Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorSargas, C.es
dc.creatorAyala, R.es
dc.creatorLarráyoz, M. J.es
dc.creatorChillón, M. C.es
dc.creatorRodríguez-Arboli, E.es
dc.creatorBilbao, C.es
dc.creatorPérez Simón, José Antonioes
dc.creatorMontesinos, P.es
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-26T13:27:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-26T13:27:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSargas, C., Ayala, R., Larráyoz, M.J., Chillón, M.C., Rodríguez-Arboli, E., Bilbao, C.,...,Montesinos, P. (2023). Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group. Blood Cancer Journal, 13 (1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5.
dc.identifier.issn2044-5385es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/157218
dc.description.abstractNext-Generation Sequencing is needed for the accurate genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. We validated and compared the 2022 ELN risk classification in a real-life cohort of 546 intensively and 379 non-intensively treated patients. Among fit patients, those aged ≥65 years old showed worse OS than younger regardless risk classification. Compared with the 2017 classification, 14.5% of fit patients changed the risk with the 2022 classification, increasing the high-risk group from 44.3% to 51.8%. 3.7% and 0.9% FLT3-ITD mutated patients were removed from the favorable and adverse 2017 categories respectively to 2022 intermediate risk group. We suggest that midostaurin therapy could be a predictor for 3 years OS (85.2% with vs. 54.8% without midostaurin, P = 0.04). Forty-seven (8.6%) patients from the 2017 intermediate group were assigned to the 2022 adverse-risk group as they harbored myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations. Patients with one MDS-related mutation did not reach median OS, while patients with ≥2 mutations had 13.6 months median OS (P = 0.002). Patients with TP53 ± complex karyotype or inv(3) had a dismal prognosis (7.1 months median OS). We validate the prognostic utility of the 2022 ELN classification in a real-life setting providing supportive evidences to improve risk stratification guidelines.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees
dc.relation.ispartofBlood Cancer Journal, 13 (1), 77.
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA groupes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Medicinaes
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41408-023-00835-5es
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5es
dc.journaltitleBlood Cancer Journales
dc.publication.volumen13es
dc.publication.issue1es
dc.publication.initialPage77es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Comparison of...pdf1.923MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Atribución 4.0 Internacional