Show simple item record

Article

dc.creatorMejías Padilla, Carmenes
dc.creatorArenas Molina, Marinaes
dc.creatorMartín Bueno, Juliaes
dc.creatorSantos Morcillo, Juan Luises
dc.creatorAparicio Gómez, Irenees
dc.creatorAlonso Álvarez, Estebanes
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T11:36:22Z
dc.date.available2024-04-23T11:36:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.identifier.issn1040-8347es
dc.identifier.issn1547-6510es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/157028
dc.description.abstractThe main difficulties when analyzing pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in solid environmental samples is the complexity of the samples and the low concentration levels of such pollutants. Most efforts are focused in achieving good analytical performance parameters such as high recoveries or low detection limits without considering if the methods are environmentally friendly. In this work, the main tools proposed for assessing the greenness of analytical methodologies (Analytical Eco-scale, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), and Analytical GREEnness metric (AGREE)) have been applied to nine analytical procedures that include recent important analytical tendencies. The three metrics identified the paper spray ionization method as the greenest procedure since it used untreated samples for direct mass spectrometry analysis. Using Analytical Eco-scale, most of the evaluated procedures were rated as “acceptable green”. However, the use of internal standards resulted key in the environmental impact of the method which provided contradictory results versus other metrics. GAPI found greenness similarities between most of selected methods, hindering a greenness classification. AGREE allowed the weighting of each evaluation criterion providing a greenness ranking. The application of each metric detecting their weaknesses and strengths was discussed. The incorporation of validation analytical features in greenness metrics was a gap revealed.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent15 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherTaylor and Francises
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAnalytical methodes
dc.subjectGreenness assessmentes
dc.subjectGAPI tooles
dc.subjectAGREE metrices
dc.subjectAnalytical eco-scalees
dc.titleGreen Assessment of Analytical Procedures for the Determination of Pharmaceuticals in Sewage Sludge and Soiles
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Química Analíticaes
dc.relation.projectIDPID2020-117641RB-I00es
dc.relation.projectIDVIPPIT-US2021II.2Aes
dc.relation.projectIDFPU20/00540es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408347.2023.2276294es
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10408347.2023.2276294es
dc.contributor.groupUniversidad de Sevilla. FQM344: Análisis Químico Industrial y Medioambientales
dc.journaltitleCritical Reviews in Analytical Chemistryes
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). Españaes
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad de Sevillaes

FilesSizeFormatViewDescription
CRaC_mejias-padilla_2023_green.pdf1.429MbIcon   [PDF] View/Open  

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional