Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorPersonal Vázquez, Enriquees
dc.creatorGarcía Delgado, Antonioes
dc.creatorParejo Matos, Antonioes
dc.creatorLarios Marín, Diego Franciscoes
dc.creatorBiscarri Triviño, Félixes
dc.creatorLeón de Mora, Carloses
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T12:14:19Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T12:14:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPersonal Vázquez, E., García Delgado, A., Parejo Matos, A., Larios Marín, D.F., Biscarri Triviño, F. y León, C. (2016). A Comparison of Impedance-Based Fault Location Methods for Power Underground Distribution Systems. Energies, 9 (1022), 1-30.
dc.identifier.issn1996-107es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11441/50608
dc.description.abstractIn the last few decades, the Smart Grid paradigm presence has increased within power systems. These new kinds of networks demand new Operations and Planning approaches, following improvements in the quality of service. In this sense, the role of the Distribution Management System, through its Outage Management System, is essential to guarantee the network reliability. This system is responsible for minimizing the consequences arising from a fault event (or network failure). Obviously, knowing where the fault appears is critical for a good reaction of this system. Therefore, several fault location techniques have been proposed. However, most of them provide individual results, associated with specific testbeds, which make the comparison between them difficult. Due to this, a review of fault location methods has been done in this paper, analyzing them for their use on underground distribution lines. Specifically, this study is focused on an impedance-based method because their requirements are in line with the typical instrumentation deployed in distribution networks. This work is completed with an exhaustive analysis of these methods over a PSCADTM X4 implementation of the standard IEEE Node Test Feeder, which truly allows us to consistently compare the results of these location methods and to determine the advantages and drawbacks of each of them.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)es
dc.relation.ispartofEnergies, 9 (1022), 1-30.es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPower distribution networkes
dc.subjectPower deliveryes
dc.subjectUnderground distribution systemes
dc.subjectFault locationes
dc.titleA Comparison of Impedance-Based Fault Location Methods for Power Underground Distribution Systemses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Tecnología Electrónicaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en9121022es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en9121022es
idus.format.extent30es
dc.journaltitleEnergieses
dc.publication.volumen9es
dc.publication.issue1022es
dc.publication.initialPage1es
dc.publication.endPage30es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
energies_biscarri_2016_acompar ...2.202MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional