Aproximaciones lingüísticas a la hipótesis de la modularidad de la mente

Abstract

In this article we argue that linguistic evidence, particularly coming from language pathologies, point out that Fodor’s Modularity of Mind Hypothesis is too strong. In its place we defend a weaker version of it, meaning that the language faculty is not conditioned by any specific sensorial modality, as signed languages show, and where modular systems can interact among them.