Show simple item record

Article

dc.creatorGómez Risquet, Maríaes
dc.creatorHochsprung, Anjaes
dc.creatorMagni, Eleonoraes
dc.creatorLuque Moreno, Carloses
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T09:28:21Z
dc.date.available2024-07-09T09:28:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationGómez Risquet, M., Hochsprung, A., Magni, E. y Luque Moreno, C. (2024). Feedback Interventions in Motor Recovery of Lateropulsion after Stroke: A Literature Review and Case Series. Brain Sciences, 14 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070682.
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/161207
dc.description.abstractLateropulsion is a post-stroke phenomenon marked by an active push of the body across the midline towards the more affected side and/or a resistance of the weight shift towards the less affected side. Within the mechanisms of treatment, feedback systems have been shown to be effective. The aim of the present study was to create a body of knowledge by performing a literature review on the use of feedback mechanisms in the treatment of lateropulsion and to report two cases of lateropulsion patients who had undergone feedback-based treatment. Methods: The review was performed across five different databases (Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro) up to February 2024, and haptic feedback intervention was incorporated into the case series (with lateropulsion and ambulation capacity as the main variables). Results: In total, 211 records were identified and 6 studies were included after the review of the literature. The most used feedback modality was visual feedback. In the case series, positive results were observed from the intervention, particularly in the recovery of lateropulsion and balance, as well as in the improvement of gait for one patient. Patients demonstrated good adherence to the intervention protocol without adverse effects. Conclusions: Visual feedback is the most commonly used feedback modality in lateropulsion patients but other mechanisms such as haptic feedback also are feasible and should be taken into account. Larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and the isolation of feedback mechanisms must be established to clarify evidence.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent19 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofBrain Sciences, 14 (7).
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectStroke rehabilitationes
dc.subjectPostural balancees
dc.subjectGait disorderses
dc.subjectNeurologices
dc.subjectFeedbackes
dc.subjectHaptic technologyes
dc.subjectLateropulsiones
dc.subjectPusher syndromees
dc.subjectContraversive pushinges
dc.subjectPusher behaviores
dc.titleFeedback Interventions in Motor Recovery of Lateropulsion after Stroke: A Literature Review and Case Serieses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Enfermeríaes
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Fisioterapiaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/7/682es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci14070682es
dc.journaltitleBrain Scienceses
dc.publication.volumen14es
dc.publication.issue7es

FilesSizeFormatViewDescription
Feedback Interventions in Motor ...610.1KbIcon   [PDF] View/Open  

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Atribución 4.0 Internacional