dc.creator | García Mejido, José Antonio | es |
dc.creator | Martín-Martínez, Alicia | es |
dc.creator | González-Díaz, Enrique | es |
dc.creator | Núñez-Matas, María José | es |
dc.creator | Fernández Palacín, Ana | es |
dc.creator | Carballo-Rastrilla, Sonia | es |
dc.creator | Fernández-Fernández, Camino | es |
dc.creator | Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-17T14:35:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-17T14:35:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | García Mejido, J.A., Martín-Martínez, A., González-Díaz, E., Núñez-Matas, M.J., Fernández Palacín, A., Carballo-Rastrilla, S.,...,Sáinz Bueno, J.A. (2023). Identification of surgical uterine prolapse in premenopausal patients with clinical or ultrasound criteria? A multicenter comparative study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16248. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0278-4297 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/158544 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives—It is unknown whether diagnosing uterine prolapse (UP) via ultrasound or surgical criteria is superior. Our objective is to determine whether the
diagnostic capacity of ultrasound with surgical criteria differs from that of surgical criteria only.
Methods—This was a multicenter prospective observational study with
54 premenopausal patients with surgical criteria for a dysfunctional pelvic floor
pathology who were consecutively recruited for 1 year. Clinical UP with surgical
criteria was defined when UP stage II–IV was identified (during pelvic floor consultation), and UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria was established
when a difference ≥15 mm was found between rest and Valsalva applied to the
pubis-uterine fundus. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were determined to evaluate clinical and ultrasound methodologies as
diagnostic tests.
Results—UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria presented better sensitivity (78.57 vs 35.71%), specificity (92.11 vs 81.58%), positive predictive value
(61.83 vs 23.99%), and negative predictive value (96.35 vs 11.37%) than UP
diagnosed by surgical criteria only.
Conclusion—Ultrasound with surgical criteria is superior to surgical criteria
alone when diagnosing UP. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Wiley | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | 3D transperineal ultrasound | es |
dc.subject | Pelvic floor | es |
dc.subject | Pelvic organ prolapse | es |
dc.subject | Uterine prolapse | es |
dc.title | Identification of surgical uterine prolapse in premenopausal patients with clinical or ultrasound criteria? A multicenter comparative study | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugía | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16248 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jum.16248 | es |
dc.journaltitle | Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine | es |