Article
Author response to: Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles
Author/s | Valencia Chulián, Rafael
Heredia Rizo, Alberto Marcos Moral Muñoz, José A. Lucena Antón, David Luque Moreno, Carlos |
Department | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Fisioterapia |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Deposit Date | 2023-05-05 |
Published in |
|
Abstract | Conducting a systematic review. Should we based our scientific
analysis on personal impressions?
The present letter is in response to a letter to the editor entitled
“Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles”,1 ... Conducting a systematic review. Should we based our scientific analysis on personal impressions? The present letter is in response to a letter to the editor entitled “Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles”,1 recently pub- lished in Complementary Therapies in Medicine. In this letter, co-authors Olaf R. van Loon and A.J. van Loon discussed some allegedly pitfalls in our 2020 systematic review investigating the effects of dry needling in people after stroke,2 review that the authors identified as the RVC study. |
Citation | Valencia Chulián, R., Heredia Rizo, A.M., Moral Muñoz, J.A., Lucena Antón, D. y Luque Moreno, C. (2022). Author response to: Hardly traceable pitfalls in medical review articles. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 68, 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102844. |
Files | Size | Format | View | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Author response to Hardly.pdf | 290.2Kb | [PDF] | View/ | |