Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorMoreira Ribeiro Gonçalves, José Robertoes
dc.creatorAraújo e Silva Ferraz, Gabrieles
dc.creatorReynaldo, Étore Franciscoes
dc.creatorBendin Marin, Diegoes
dc.creatorFerreira Ponciano Ferraz, Patriciaes
dc.creatorPérez Ruiz, Manueles
dc.creatorRossi, Giuseppees
dc.creatorVieri, Marcoes
dc.creatorSarri, Danielees
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T11:43:52Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T11:43:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMoreira Ribeiro Gonçalves, J.R., Araújo e Silva Ferraz, G., Reynaldo, É.F., Bendin Marin, D., Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz, P., Pérez Ruiz, M.,...,Sarri, D. (2021). Comparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2021 (52) (2021 (1)), 1 p.-12 p..
dc.identifier.issn1974-7071es
dc.identifier.issne 2239-6268es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/135759
dc.descriptionNº Artículo: 1117es
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare three different soil-sampling methods used in Precision Agriculture and their environmental impact on agricultural production. The sampling methods used were: zone management by elevation, grid sampling (GS) and sampling oriented by apparent soil electrical conductivity (OS). Three different fields were tested. When the recommendations were compared, a significant difference among the suggested doses was observed. This indicated the need to improve the soil-sampling techniques, since there were doubts about input deficits or overdoses, regardless of the technology studied. The GS method was the most environmentally viable alternative for phosphorus (P) compared to other methods and the OS presented as the better option for potassium (K) and nitrogen (N). However, the use of soil sensors appeared to be a viable technology that needs further improvement in order to improve productivity and, hence, economic and environmental benefits.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent12 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherPAGEPRESSes
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agricultural Engineering, 2021 (52) (2021 (1)), 1 p.-12 p..
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectManagement zoneses
dc.subjectGrid samplinges
dc.subjectEnvironmental impactes
dc.subjectElectrical conductivityes
dc.subjectSoil proximity sensor.es
dc.titleComparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculturees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Ingeniería Aeroespacial y Mecánica de Fluidoses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.agroengineering.org/index.php/jae/article/view/1117es
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/jae.2021.1117es
dc.contributor.groupUniversidad de Sevilla. AGR278: Smart Biosystems Laboratory .es
dc.journaltitleJournal of Agricultural Engineeringes
dc.publication.volumen2021 (52)es
dc.publication.issue2021 (1)es
dc.publication.initialPage1 p.es
dc.publication.endPage12 p.es
dc.identifier.sisius13382es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Comparative.pdf900.5KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional