Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorRizo-Gorrita, Maríaes
dc.creatorFernández Asián, Ignacio Rafaeles
dc.creatorGarcia-de-Frenza, Andreinaes
dc.creatorVazquez-Pachon, Celiaes
dc.creatorSerrera Figallo, María de los Ángeleses
dc.creatorTorres-Lagares, Danieles
dc.creatorGutiérrez Pérez, José Luises
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T13:52:12Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T13:52:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-13
dc.identifier.citationRizo-Gorrita, M., Fernandez-Asian, I., Garcia-de-Frenza, A., Vazquez-Pachon, C., Serrera Figallo, M.d.l.Á., Torres-Lagares, D. y Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L. (2020). Influence of Three Dental Implant Surfaces on Cell Viability and Bone Behavior. An In Vitro and a Histometric Study in a Rabbit Model. Applied Sciences, 10 (4790), 1-18.
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/101987
dc.description.abstractThe chemical composition and the surface characteristics of dental implants are factors that have a decisive effect on the osseointegration process. The surface characterization at the compositional and topographic level of three dental implants available in the market was performed with different surface treatments: (1) sandblasted and acid etched surface (SLA), (2) hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) blasted surface (HA/TCP), and (3) HA-blasted and non-etching acid washed surface (HA + AW). In addition, an in vitro viability study of MG-63 osteoblast cells was performed with a JC-1 test. To complete the study, an in vivo study was conducted in New Zealand rabbits. The study analyzed the histometric characteristics of the bone formed around the implants at the level of area, volume, bone density, accumulated bone density, and bone–implant contact (BIC). The rabbits were sacrificed at 6 weeks after implants were placed in the tibial metaphysis. No statistically significant differences were observed at the level of cell viability or histometric parameters between the different study groups (p > 0.05). SLA and HA/TCP surfaces were the ones that obtained a higher BIC value. Taking into account the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the different implant surfaces analyzed favor a good bone response.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent18 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDental implant surfaceses
dc.subjectSurface roughnesses
dc.subjectTitaniumes
dc.subjectOsseointegrationes
dc.subjectBone–implant interfacees
dc.titleInfluence of Three Dental Implant Surfaces on Cell Viability and Bone Behavior. An In Vitro and a Histometric Study in a Rabbit Modeles
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app10144790es
dc.journaltitleApplied Scienceses
dc.publication.volumen10es
dc.publication.issue4790es
dc.publication.initialPage1es
dc.publication.endPage18es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Influence.pdf9.358MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional