Repositorio de producción científica de la Universidad de Sevilla

Development of a work climate scale in emergency health services


Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.creator Sanduvete Chaves, Susana es
dc.creator Lozano Lozano, José Antonio es
dc.creator Chacón Moscoso, Salvador es
dc.creator Holgado Tello, Francisco Pablo es 2018-02-07T14:42:28Z 2018-02-07T14:42:28Z 2018
dc.identifier.citation Sanduvete Chaves, S., Lozano Lozano, J.A., Chacón Moscoso, S. y Holgado Tello, F.P. (2018). Development of a work climate scale in emergency health services. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-14.
dc.identifier.issn 1664-1078 es
dc.description.abstract An adequate work climate fosters productivity in organizations and increases employee satisfaction. Workers in emergency health services (EHS) have an extremely high degree of responsibility and consequent stress. Therefore, it is essential to foster a good work climate in this context. Despite this, scales with a full study of their psychometric properties (i.e., validity evidence based on test content, internal structure and relations to other variables, and reliability) are not available to measure work climate in EHS specifically. For this reason, our objective was to develop a scale tomeasure the quality of work climates in EHS.We carried out three studies. In Study 1, we used a mixed-method approach to identify the latent conceptual structure of the construct work climate. Thus, we integrated the results found in (a) a previous study, where a content analysis of seven in-depth interviews obtained from EHS professionals in two hospitals in Gibraltar Countryside County was carried out; and (b) the factor analysis of the responses given by 113 EHS professionals from these same centers to 18 items that measured the work climate in health organizations. As a result, we obtained 56 items grouped into four factors (work satisfaction, productivity/achievement of aims, interpersonal relationships, and performance at work). In Study 2, we presented validity evidence based on test content through experts’ judgment. Fourteen experts from the methodology and health fields evaluated the representativeness, utility, and feasibility of each of the 56 items with respect to their factor (theoretical dimension). Forty items met the inclusion criterion, which was to obtain an Osterlind index value greater than or equal to 0.5 in the three aspects assessed. In Study 3, 201 EHS professionals from the same centers completed the resulting 40-item scale. This new instrument produced validity evidence based on the internal structure in a second-order factormodel with four components (RMSEA=0.079, GFI = 0.97, AGFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.97; NFI = 0.95, and NNFI = 0.97); absence of differential Item Functioning (DIF) in 80% of the items; reliability (a = 0.96); and validity evidence based on relations to other variables, specifically the test-criterion relationship (r = 0.680). Finally, we discuss further developments of the instrument and its possible implications for EHS workers. es
dc.description.sponsorship Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PSI2011-29587 es
dc.description.sponsorship Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PSI2015-71947-REDT es
dc.format application/pdf es
dc.language.iso eng es
dc.publisher Frontiers Media es
dc.relation.ispartof Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-14.
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional *
dc.rights.uri *
dc.subject Work climate es
dc.subject Emergency health services es
dc.subject Mixed methods es
dc.subject Content validity es
dc.subject Reliability es
dc.subject Construct Validity es
dc.title Development of a work climate scale in emergency health services es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es
dc.contributor.affiliation Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Psicología Experimental es
dc.relation.projectID PSI2011-29587 es
dc.relation.projectID PSI2015-71947-REDT es
dc.relation.publisherversion es
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00010 es
idus.format.extent 14 p. es
dc.journaltitle Frontiers in Psychology es
dc.publication.volumen 9 es
dc.publication.initialPage 1 es
dc.publication.endPage 14 es
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO). España
Size: 302.8Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record