Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorGonzález-Diaz, Enriquees
dc.creatorGarcía Mejido, José Antonioes
dc.creatorMartín-Martínez, Aliciaes
dc.creatorFernández-Fernández, Caminoes
dc.creatorOrtega, Ismaeles
dc.creatorMedina, Margaritaes
dc.creatorFernández-Corona, Alfonsoes
dc.creatorFernández Palacín, Anaes
dc.creatorSáinz Bueno, José Antonioes
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T11:21:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-19T11:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Diaz, E., García Mejido, J.A., Martín-Martínez, A., Fernández-Fernández, C., Ortega, I., Medina, M.,...,Sáinz Bueno, J.A. (2020). Are there differences in the damage to the pelvic floor between malmstrom's and kiwi omnicup vacuums? A multicenter study. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 39 (1), 190-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24167.
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467es
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/161562
dc.description.abstractObjectives The objective of this study is to investigate a multicenter study to establish if differences exist in the levator ani muscle avulsion (LAM) rates between deliveries performed with Malmstrom's vacuum and the Kiwi vacuum. Study design A prospective, multicenter observational study with 199 primiparous subjects was performed. All patients had undergone vaginal delivery by vacuum (Malmstrom's or Kiwi). Avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch in the multiplanar mode, as identified in the three central sections by transperineal 3/4D echography 6 months after delivery. The area of ​​the levator hiatus was measured in the plane of minimum dimensions at rest, during the Valsalva maneuver and during contraction. Results LAM avulsion occurred in 33.1% of cases in which Malmstrom's vacuum was used and in 29.4% of cases in which the Kiwi vacuum was used (the difference was not statistically significant), which resulted in a crude odds ratio (OR) of 0.977 (0.426, 2.241; P = .957) and an adjusted OR of 2.90 (0.691; 12.20; P = .146). Women in the Malmstrom's vacuum group had a larger LHA at rest 14.77 vs 12.64 cm2; P = .001) and at maximum contraction (13.41 vs 10.83 cm2; P < 0.001) in comparison with the Kiwi group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance under Valsalva maneuver (18.71 vs 17.21 cm2; P = .051).Differences between both groups were detected in the measurements of the hiatus area levator at rest (14.77 vs 12.64 cm2), during the Valsalva maneuver (18.71 vs 17.21 cm2) and during maximum contraction (13.41 vs 10.83 cm2). Conclusions In the present study, Malmstrom's vacuum was not associated with a higher risk of LAM in comparison with Kiwi's Omnicup.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent15 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherWileyes
dc.relation.ispartofNeurourology and Urodynamics, 39 (1), 190-196.
dc.subjectkiwi omnicup vacuumes
dc.subjectlevator ani musclees
dc.subjectmalmstrom's vacuumes
dc.subjectpelvic floores
dc.subjectultrasoundes
dc.titleAre there differences in the damage to the pelvic floor between malmstrom's and kiwi omnicup vacuums? A multicenter studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugíaes
dc.relation.projectIDPI16/01387es
dc.date.embargoEndDate2021
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.24167es
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.24167es
dc.journaltitleNeurourology and Urodynamicses
dc.publication.volumen39es
dc.publication.issue1es
dc.publication.initialPage190es
dc.publication.endPage196es
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union. ERDF/ESFes
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIes

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN THE ...901.4KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir   Versión aceptada - Accepted Version

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Este documento está protegido por los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial. Sin perjuicio de las exenciones legales existentes, queda prohibida su reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación sin la autorización del titular de los derechos, a menos que se indique lo contrario.