dc.creator | Montero Miralles, Paloma | es |
dc.creator | Estévez-Luaña, Roberto | es |
dc.creator | Gregorio González, César de | es |
dc.creator | Valencia de Pablo, Oliver | es |
dc.creator | Jaramillo, David E. | es |
dc.creator | Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-05T15:52:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-05T15:52:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Montero Miralles, P., Estévez-Luaña, R., Gregorio González, C.d., Valencia de Pablo, O., Jaramillo, D.E. y Cisneros-Cabello, R. (2018). Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10 (1), e70-e74. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1989-5488 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/161148 | |
dc.description.abstract | root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser.
Material and Methods: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation
protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix®
- Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact
test and McNemar test.
Results: Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser
and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed sta tistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in
combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser.
Conclusions: 17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective
removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 5 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Medicina Oral S.L | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10 (1), e70-e74. | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Laser | es |
dc.subject | Endodontics | es |
dc.subject | Smear layer | es |
dc.title | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Estomatología | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/aop/54395.pdf | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4317/jced.54395 | es |
dc.journaltitle | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry | es |
dc.publication.volumen | 10 | es |
dc.publication.issue | 1 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | e70 | es |
dc.publication.endPage | e74 | es |