Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorRocha de Lossada, Carloses
dc.creatorColmenero Reina, Elviraes
dc.creatorFlikier, Davides
dc.creatorCastro-Alonso, Francisco Javieres
dc.creatorRodríguez-Ratón, Álvaroes
dc.creatorGarcía-Madrona, José Luises
dc.creatorPeraza-Nieves, Jorgees
dc.creatorSánchez González, José Maríaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T07:53:52Z
dc.date.available2024-06-11T07:53:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationRocha de Lossada, C., Colmenero Reina, E., Flikier, D., Castro-Alonso, F.J., Rodríguez-Ratón, Á., García-Madrona, J.L.,...,Sánchez González, J.M. (2021). Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 31 (6), 2981-2988. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120980690.
dc.identifier.issn1724-6016 (electrónico)es
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721 (impreso)es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/160299
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the accuracy of 12 intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas; Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF), Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Kane, Ladas Super Formula, Olsen Lenstar, Panacea, Pearl-DGS, Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff / theoretical (SRK/T). In addition, an analysis of the efficacy as a function of the axial length was performed. Methods: 171 from 93 patients. 68 male eyes and 103 females eyes. Twelve IOL power formula calculations were studied with one IOL platform (trifocal hydrophilic IOL, FineVision Micro F), one biometer (Lenstar LS 900), one topographer (CSO Sirius Topographer), one surgeon and one optometrist. Optimization were determined to be zeroed mean refractive prediction error. Mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE) and refractive accuracy within ± 1.00D was calculated. Axial length was split in short and medium eyes. Results: One hundred and seventy eyes were included. Formulas were ranked by percentage within ± 0.50 diopters and MAE (D). Among all eyes, Olsen 86.55% (0.273D) and Barrett Universal II 86.55% (0.285D). For short eyes (<22.5 mm), Olsen 90.70% (0.273D) and Kane 90.70% (0.225D). For medium eyes, Barrett 89.34% (0.237D) and Pearl 86.89% (0.263). Conclusion: Olsen and Barrett formula obtained excellent accuracy for overall eyes. Kane and Olsen formula obtained the best results in short eyes. For medium axial length Barret formula achieved the best accuracy results.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent8 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherWichtig Publishing; SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTDes
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology, 31 (6), 2981-2988.
dc.subjectIntraocular lens poweres
dc.subjectCalculation formuales
dc.subjectPrediction error accuracyes
dc.subjectRefractive accuracyes
dc.titleIntraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lenses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Física de la Materia Condensadaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120980690es
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1120672120980690es
dc.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Ophthalmologyes
dc.publication.volumen31es
dc.publication.issue6es
dc.publication.initialPage2981es
dc.publication.endPage2988es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Intraocular lens_Sánchez Gonzá ...1.135MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir   Versión aceptada

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Este documento está protegido por los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial. Sin perjuicio de las exenciones legales existentes, queda prohibida su reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación sin la autorización del titular de los derechos, a menos que se indique lo contrario.