Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Artículo
Energy, environmental and economic analysis of windows’ retrofit with solar control films: a case study in Mediterranean climate
dc.creator | Pereira, Júlia | es |
dc.creator | Rivero Camacho, Cristina | es |
dc.creator | Gomes, Maria da Gloria | es |
dc.creator | Moret Rodrigues, Antonio | es |
dc.creator | Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-29T15:28:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-29T15:28:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pereira, J., Camacho Rivero, C., Gomes, M.d.G., Moret Rodrigues, A. y Marrero Meléndez, M. (2021). Energy, environmental and economic analysis of windows’ retrofit with solar control films: a case study in Mediterranean climate. Energy, 233, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-6785 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-5442 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/159454 | |
dc.description.abstract | The incorporation or the replacement of materials in buildings may decrease the energy use during the operational stage but increase the embodied energy in a building's life cycle. In this study, three different solar control films (SCFs A, B and C) with application on the existing windows of a building are investigated through an energy, environmental and economic perspective over a defined life cycle period. The full replacement of the existing window with a new one is also analyzed as an alternative retrofitting solution. Retrofitting solutions with higher light-to-solar gain ratios showed higher energy savings during the use stage by decreasing the solar gains in a higher proportion than the decrease of the visible transmittance. The best retrofitting solution, SCF C, showed a life cycle energy (LCE) (embodied plus operational energy) and a carbon footprint of 4447 MJ/m2 /40 y and 380 kgCO2eq/m2 /40 y, respectively, whereas the least performant solution, new window, showed a LCE 1.5 times higher than the average of the three SCFs. The higher LCE value of the new window was found to be related to the higher value of the embodied energy when compared to that of the three SCFs (~9 times higher than the average of the films). | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 14 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | Energy, 233, 1-14. | |
dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | es |
dc.subject | Building retrofitting | es |
dc.subject | Glazing system | es |
dc.subject | Solar control films | es |
dc.subject | Embodied and operational energy | es |
dc.subject | Carbon footprint | es |
dc.title | Energy, environmental and economic analysis of windows’ retrofit with solar control films: a case study in Mediterranean climate | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas II (ETSIE) | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño | |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083 | es |
dc.journaltitle | Energy | es |
dc.publication.issue | 233 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | 1 | es |
dc.publication.endPage | 14 | es |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver | Descripción |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marrero3.pdf | 1.998Mb | [PDF] | Ver/ | |
Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones
Este documento está protegido por los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial. Sin perjuicio de las exenciones legales existentes, queda prohibida su reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación sin la autorización del titular de los derechos, a menos que se indique lo contrario.