Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorPereira, Júliaes
dc.creatorRivero Camacho, Cristinaes
dc.creatorGomes, Maria da Gloriaes
dc.creatorMoret Rodrigues, Antonioes
dc.creatorMarrero Meléndez, Madelynes
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T15:28:41Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T15:28:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPereira, J., Camacho Rivero, C., Gomes, M.d.G., Moret Rodrigues, A. y Marrero Meléndez, M. (2021). Energy, environmental and economic analysis of windows’ retrofit with solar control films: a case study in Mediterranean climate. Energy, 233, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083.
dc.identifier.issn1873-6785es
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/159454
dc.description.abstractThe incorporation or the replacement of materials in buildings may decrease the energy use during the operational stage but increase the embodied energy in a building's life cycle. In this study, three different solar control films (SCFs A, B and C) with application on the existing windows of a building are investigated through an energy, environmental and economic perspective over a defined life cycle period. The full replacement of the existing window with a new one is also analyzed as an alternative retrofitting solution. Retrofitting solutions with higher light-to-solar gain ratios showed higher energy savings during the use stage by decreasing the solar gains in a higher proportion than the decrease of the visible transmittance. The best retrofitting solution, SCF C, showed a life cycle energy (LCE) (embodied plus operational energy) and a carbon footprint of 4447 MJ/m2 /40 y and 380 kgCO2eq/m2 /40 y, respectively, whereas the least performant solution, new window, showed a LCE 1.5 times higher than the average of the three SCFs. The higher LCE value of the new window was found to be related to the higher value of the embodied energy when compared to that of the three SCFs (~9 times higher than the average of the films).es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent14 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy, 233, 1-14.
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmentes
dc.subjectBuilding retrofittinges
dc.subjectGlazing systemes
dc.subjectSolar control filmses
dc.subjectEmbodied and operational energyes
dc.subjectCarbon footprintes
dc.titleEnergy, environmental and economic analysis of windows’ retrofit with solar control films: a case study in Mediterranean climatees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas II (ETSIE)es
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2021.121083es
dc.journaltitleEnergyes
dc.publication.issue233es
dc.publication.initialPage1es
dc.publication.endPage14es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Marrero3.pdf1.998MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Este documento está protegido por los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial. Sin perjuicio de las exenciones legales existentes, queda prohibida su reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación sin la autorización del titular de los derechos, a menos que se indique lo contrario.