Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorPérez Romero, Jesús Albertoes
dc.creatorBarcia Piedras, José Maríaes
dc.creatorRedondo Gómez, Susanaes
dc.creatorMateos Naranjo, Enriquees
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T08:04:04Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T08:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.citationPérez Romero, J.A., Barcia Piedras, J.M., Redondo Gómez, S. y Mateos Naranjo, E. (2023). Sarcocornia fruticosa recovery capacity after exposure to co-existed water and salinity stress. Plant Stress, 8, 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100162.
dc.identifier.issn2667-064Xes
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/154108
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)es
dc.description.abstractThe capacity of halophytes species to resist abiotic stress has been tested on multiple occasions. The ability of these species such as Sarcocornia fruticosa to cope with severe stress conditions has been shown, as well as their utility as a phytoremediation tool or even as potential crop species. However, there is a lack of literature on the effect that these abiotic factors have on their physiological response after a recovery period. In a greenhouse experiment, S. fruticosa plants were subjected to a combination of water regimen (water stress/field capacity) and salinity concentration (171/510 mM NaCl) grown conditions for 30 days. After these stress periods, plants were left 15 days in recovery conditions (field capacity and 171 mM NaCl). To study the effect of stress during both periods, osmotic potential, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, quantum efficiency of PS II, OJIP-derived parameters and photosynthetic pigment concentrations were measured. Our results show the already known resistance of this species to drought and salinity stress. However, the combination of both factors did affect the ability of S. fruticosa to maintain its level of carbon assimilation due to a decrease in stomatal conductance. In addition, the recovery period helped us to describe a synergic effect of both abiotic factors showing that plants subjected to both stresses received a better response during the recovery period than those only affected by salinity stress.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent8 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Stress, 8, 100162.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDroughtes
dc.subjectAbiotic stresses
dc.subjectStress recoveryes
dc.subjectHalophytees
dc.subjectPhotosynthesises
dc.titleSarcocornia fruticosa recovery capacity after exposure to co-existed water and salinity stresses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecologíaes
dc.relation.projectIDPID2021-124750NB-I00es
dc.relation.projectIDTED2021–131605B-I00es
dc.relation.projectIDFJC2020–043865-Ies
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X23000301es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.stress.2023.100162es
dc.contributor.groupUniversidad de Sevilla. RNM035: Ecología Funcional Aplicadaes
dc.journaltitlePlant Stresses
dc.publication.volumen8es
dc.publication.initialPage100162es
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). Españaes
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission (EC). Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
10.1016_j.stress.2023.100162.pdf1.906MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional