Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorAlbornoz Cabello, Manueles
dc.creatorPérez Mármol, José Manueles
dc.creatorBarrios Quinta, Cristo Jesúses
dc.creatorMatarán-Peñarrocha, Guillermo A.es
dc.creatorCastro-Sánchez, Adelaida Maríaes
dc.creatorCruz Torres, Blanca de laes
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T11:49:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-19T11:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAlbornoz Cabello, M., Pérez Mármol, J.M., Barrios Quinta, C.J., Matarán-Peñarrocha, G.A., Castro-Sánchez, A.M. y Cruz Torres, B.d.l. (2019). Effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on outcomes in primary care patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation, 33 (9), 1458-1467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519844554.
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155es
dc.identifier.issn1477-0873es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/153650
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on pain, disability, psychological status and range of motion in patients with neck pain. Design: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: Primary care physiotherapy units. Subjects: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with non-specific mechanical neck pain. This sample was divided into two groups randomly: experimental (n = 42) versus control group (n = 42). Interventions: Patients in both groups had a supervised therapeutic exercise programme, with the experimental group having additional interferential current stimulation treatment. Main measures: The main measures used were intensity of neck pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale; the degree of disability according to the Neck Disability Index and the CORE Outcome Measure; anxiety and depression levels according to the Goldberg scale; apprehension as measured by the Personal Psychological Apprehension scale; and the range of motion of the cervical spine. The sample was evaluated at baseline and posttreatment (10 sessions/two weeks). Results: Statistically significant differences between groups at posttreatment were observed for Visual Analogue Scale (2.73 ± 1.24 vs 4.99 ± 1.56), Neck Disability Index scores (10.60 ± 4.77 vs 18.45 ± 9.04), CORE Outcome Measure scores (19.18 ± 9.99 vs 35.12 ± 13.36), Goldberg total score (6.17 ± 4.27 vs 7.90 ± 4.87), Goldberg Anxiety subscale, Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale scores (28.17 ± 9.61 vs 26.29 ± 11.14) and active and passive right rotation. Conclusions: Adding interferential current stimulation to exercise resulted in better immediate outcome across a range of measures.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent27 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationses
dc.relation.ispartofClinical rehabilitation, 33 (9), 1458-1467.
dc.subjectRange of movementes
dc.subjectNeck paines
dc.subjectExercisees
dc.subjectInterferential currentses
dc.titleEffect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on outcomes in primary care patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled triales
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Fisioterapiaes
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269215519844554es
dc.journaltitleClinical rehabilitationes
dc.publication.volumen33es
dc.publication.issue9es
dc.publication.initialPage1458es
dc.publication.endPage1467es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Effect of adding interferential ...396.0KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Este documento está protegido por los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial. Sin perjuicio de las exenciones legales existentes, queda prohibida su reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación sin la autorización del titular de los derechos, a menos que se indique lo contrario.