dc.contributor.editor | Rodríguez Álvarez, Jorge | es |
dc.contributor.editor | Gonçalves, Joana Carla Soares | es |
dc.creator | López Cabeza, Victoria Patricia | es |
dc.creator | Galán-Marín, Carmen | es |
dc.creator | Rivera Gómez, Carlos Alberto | es |
dc.creator | Samuelson, Holly | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-10T18:03:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-10T18:03:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | López Cabeza, V.P., Galán-Marín, C., Rivera Gómez, C.A. y Samuelson, H. (2020). Comparison and Validation of Two Simulation Workflows for Courtyard Microclimates. En 35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (1018-1022), La Coruña: Universidad de La Coruña. | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-84-9749-794-7 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/145810 | |
dc.description.abstract | The simulation of urban microclimates in a way that is flexible enough to be included in the early design
stages is still a problem to be solved. Furthermore, the necessity to find a balance between accuracy, provided by the
use of CFD software requiring high computational power, operational speed and integration with the modelling tool,
is an even more complex challenge. Accordingly, this research investigates t he u se o f t he L adybug T ools, a s et o f
plugins for Grasshopper that links analysis and design, in a hybrid workflow, to simulate the thermodynamic
performance of courtyards, a transitional space of buildings that is proven to be a passive design strategy to reduce
energy consumption. The results show that the hybrid workflow has a similar accuracy to the integrated CFD tool
analyzed, but having the advantage of using the same design interface. It also provides the transparency of an opensource
software and the possibility of improving the result in further research. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 5 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Universidad de La Coruña | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | 35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (2020), pp. 1018-1022. | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Courtyards | es |
dc.subject | Outdoor Simulation | es |
dc.subject | ENVI-met | es |
dc.subject | Ladybug tools | es |
dc.subject | Validation | es |
dc.title | Comparison and Validation of Two Simulation Workflows for Courtyard Microclimates | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject | es |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas I (ETSA) | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497497947 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17979/spudc.9788497497947 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | 1018 | es |
dc.publication.endPage | 1022 | es |
dc.eventtitle | 35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture | es |
dc.eventinstitution | La Coruña | es |
dc.relation.publicationplace | La Coruña | es |