Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorLópez Cabeza, Victoria Patriciaes
dc.creatorDiz Mellado, Eduardo Maríaes
dc.creatorRivera-Gómez, Carloses
dc.creatorGalán-Marín, Carmenes
dc.creatores
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-10T05:28:13Z
dc.date.available2023-05-10T05:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-11
dc.identifier.citationLópez Cabeza, V.P., Diz Mellado, E.M., Rivera-Gómez, C., Galán-Marín, C. y Galán-Marín, C. (2022). Shade and thermal comfort in courtyards: experimental versus simulation results. Buildings, 12 (1961). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111961.
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/145731
dc.description.abstractOutdoor comfort is gaining attention in the design of our cities to face the current context of rising temperatures. Although simulation is required to inform the early design stage of projects considering outdoor space and strategies to improve their thermal performance, different tool options must be compared through monitoring to determine the accuracy of their modeling. This study analyses the thermal comfort benefits of the installation of a shading device in a courtyard in the Mediterranean climate. In the study, two simulation workflows were analyzed, one using ENVI-met software and the other using the Ladybug Tools, to evaluate their performance. Air temperature monitoring data were used to validate and calibrate the simulations. Then, both were used to compute the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) to evaluate comfort. The results show that the simulation reproduced an air temperature reduction when the shading was installed, but this was not as high as the monitoring results (up to 13.7 °C). In the UTCI, in contrast, the two simulation workflows provided contradictory results. These differences were explained by analyzing the different parameters affecting comfort and the mean radiant temperature, and the air temperature was found to be the parameter most affecting the UTCI in this context. Thus, future research should focus on improving the accuracy of the simulations of these two parameters.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent18 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofBuildings, 12 (1961).
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCourtyardes
dc.subjectMicroclimatees
dc.subjectUTCIes
dc.subjectPassive strategieses
dc.subjectBuilding simulationes
dc.subjectOutdoor thermal comfortes
dc.titleShade and thermal comfort in courtyards: experimental versus simulation resultses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas I (ETSA)es
dc.relation.projectIDRTI2018-093521-B-C33es
dc.relation.projectIDPID2021-124539OBI00es
dc.relation.projectIDFPU17/05036es
dc.relation.projectIDFPU18/04783es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/11/1961es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings12111961es
dc.contributor.groupUniversidad de Sevilla. TEP206: Sath Sostenibilidad en Arquitectura, Tecnología y Patrimonio: Materialidad y Sistemas Constructivoses
dc.journaltitleBuildingses
dc.publication.volumen12es
dc.publication.issue1961es
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD). Españaes

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Shade and thermal comfort in ...4.902MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional