dc.creator | Fernández, Joaquín | es |
dc.creator | Rocha de Lossada, Carlos | es |
dc.creator | Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-28T13:27:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-28T13:27:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fernández, J., Rocha de Lossada, C. y Rodríguez-Vallejo, M. (2022). Recommendations for Writing Clinical Research Manuscripts: From Monofocal to Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (1661-7827 / 1660-4601), 19 (24), 17036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417036. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1661-7827 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 1660-4601 (online) | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/143646 | |
dc.description.abstract | Writing a manuscript is not an easy task, and publishing in peer-reviewed journals
might prove difficult if the methodology is not appropriately described and results are
not clearly presented. Fortunately, researchers have tools that can assist in creating a wellwritten
manuscript. For example, reporting guidelines are used by researchers to write
a manuscript. These specify the minimum amount of information necessary for a clear
account of research methods and findings to prevent the common pitfalls that investigators
may experience during manuscript writing. The EQUATOR network manages an important
database (https://www.equator-network.org/ (accessed on 15 December 2022) containing
universal guidelines depending on study design and regardless of study topic [1].
However, for specific topics, such as for intraocular lens (IOL) clinical studies, merely
following reporting guidelines may not be enough to produce a well-written manuscript.
For example, although researchers can follow the CONSORT checklist for reporting the
results of a randomized clinical trial, this checklist is focused on general characteristics;
therefore, important points for a specific topic may go unnoticed by the researcher during
the writing process. To complement these general guidelines, exploring specialized standards
for a particular topic can improve manuscript writing. Regarding IOL clinical studies,
standards for reporting clinical results with monofocal IOLs were coined in 2017 [2], and
recently these have been updated for presbyopia-correcting IOLs, namely enhanced monofocal,
extended depth-of-focus (EDOF), and multifocal IOLs [3]. Furthermore, standards
have been defined for assessing prediction errors in spherical and toric IOL power calculation
methods [4,5]. All these standards should be reviewed together with the universal
reporting guidelines to create a well-written manuscript. In this editorial, we also provide
a checklist (Table 1) that extends and complements the previously described guidelines
and standards. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 3 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (1661-7827 / 1660-4601), 19 (24), 17036. | |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Recommendations for Writing Clinical Research Manuscripts: From Monofocal to Multifocal Intraocular Lenses | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dcterms.identifier | https://ror.org/03yxnpp24 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugía | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/17036 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph192417036 | es |
dc.journaltitle | NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (1661-7827 / 1660-4601) | es |
dc.publication.volumen | 19 | es |
dc.publication.issue | 24 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | 17036 | es |