Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorFernández, Joaquínes
dc.creatorRocha de Lossada, Carloses
dc.creatorZamorano Martín, Franciscoes
dc.creatorRodríguez Calvo de Mora, Marinaes
dc.creatorRodríguez Vallejo, Manueles
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T14:17:31Z
dc.date.available2023-03-24T14:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationFernández, J., Rocha de Lossada, C., Zamorano Martín, F., Rodríguez Calvo de Mora, M. y Rodríguez Vallejo, M. (2023). Positioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping review. BMC ophthalmology, 23 (1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2415es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/143562
dc.description.abstractBackground New intraocular lenses (IOLs) have emerged since the originally coined monofocal and multifocal IOLs. The extended depth of focus (EDoF) and enhanced monofocal IOLs (mono‑EDoF) that have appeared in the last decade have caused some confusion in their classification. The aim of this review was to summarize the outcomes provided by mono‑EDOF IOLs and to determine which of the endpoints, described by the American National Stand‑ ard (ANSI) for EDoF IOLs, are fulfilled. Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases were searched. Two independent reviewers screened the studies for inclusion and data extraction. The search strategy was limited to studies published between 2020 and 2022, but not by language. The results are presented as a narrative summary accompanied by tables, in alignment with the objectives of this scoping review. Compliance with the endpoints for clinical outcomes described in the American National Standard Z80.35–2018 (ANSI) for EDoF lenses was checked and additional endpoints were defined. Results Two systematic reviews, 13 laboratory, 21 clinical, and two mixed studies were included. Tecnis Eyhance was the mono‑EDOF with the highest volume of evidence to date. Although laboratory studies included other IOLs, clini‑ cal evidence for them is still scarce, with only one study of IsoPure compared to a standard monofocal IOL. Evidence in comparison to EDoF lenses is also scarce, even for Tecnis Eyhance, with only three studies including this lens in comparison to an EDoF lens. After evaluation of the ANSI criteria, agreement was found in the failure for the increase in depth of field equal to or greater than 0.5 D for a visual acuity (VA) level of 0.2 logMAR and none of the studies sup‑ ported that the median monocular VA at intermediate distance was at least 0.2 logMAR. Conclusions Additional clinical evidence is required for other mono‑EDOF IOLs beyond Tecnis Eyhance. Until the arrival of a standard classification, mono‑EDOF should be better still classified as monofocal because the ANSI stand‑ ards were not fully met.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent11 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBMC ophthalmologyes
dc.relation.ispartofBMC ophthalmology, 23 (1), 101.
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectIntraocular lenses
dc.subjectCataractes
dc.subjectMonofocales
dc.subjectEnhancedes
dc.subjectPluses
dc.subjectIntermediatees
dc.titlePositioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugíaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1es
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1es
dc.journaltitleBMC ophthalmologyes
dc.publication.volumen23es
dc.publication.issue1es
dc.publication.initialPage101es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Positioning of enhanced.pdf1.428MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Atribución 4.0 Internacional