Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorGinel Ramos, Josées
dc.creatorBurguera, Noemies
dc.creatorRocha de Lossada, Carloses
dc.creatorPiñero, Davides
dc.creatorSáez-Martin, Alejandroes
dc.creatorFernández, Joaquínes
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T14:35:41Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T14:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGinel Ramos, J., Burguera, N., Rocha de Lossada, C., Piñero, D., Sáez-Martin, A. y Fernández, J. (2023). Economic Evaluation of Cataract: A Systematic Mapping Review. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00678-0.
dc.identifier.issn2193-8245es
dc.identifier.issn2193-6528es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/143523
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this article was to ascertain the existing literature and find the gaps in economic evaluations of cataracts. Methods: Systematic methods were used to search and collect the published literature on economic evaluations of cataracts. A mapping review of studies published in the following bibliographical databases was performed: the National Library of Medicine (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), and the Central of Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) database. A descriptive analysis was conducted and relevant studies were classified into different groups. Results: Among 984 studies screened, 56 studies were included in the mapping review. Four research questions were answered. There has been a progressive increase of publications during the last decade. The majority of the included studies werepublished byauthors frominstitutionsinthe USA and UK. The most commonly investigated area was cataract surgery followed by intraocular lenses (IOLs). The studies were classified into dif ferent categories according to the main outcome evaluated, such as comparisons between different surgical techniques, costs of the cataract surgery, second eye cataract surgery costs, quality of life gainaftercataractsurgery, waitingtimeofcataract surgery and costs, and cataract evaluation, follow-up, and costs. In the IOL classification, the most frequently studied area was the comparison between monofocal and multifocal IOLs, fol lowed by the comparison between toric and monofocal IOLs. Conclusions: Cataract surgery is a cost-effective procedure compared with other non-oph thalmic and ophthalmic interventions and sur gery waiting time is an important factor to consider because vision loss has a huge and broad-ranging impact on society. Numerous gaps and inconsistencies are found among the studies included. For this reason, there is a need for further studies according to the classification described in the mapping review.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent19 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCes
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmology and Therapy, 789-807.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCataractes
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness analysises
dc.subjectAnd cost–utility analysises
dc.titleEconomic Evaluation of Cataract: A Systematic Mapping Reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugíaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40123-023-00678-0es
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40123-023-00678-0es
dc.journaltitleOphthalmology and Therapyes
dc.publication.initialPage789es
dc.publication.endPage807es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Economic Evaluation.pdf718.6KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional