Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorLópez Serrano, Pablito M.es
dc.creatorLópez Sánchez, Carlos A.es
dc.creatorÁlvarez González, Juan G.es
dc.creatorGarcía Gutiérrez, Jorgees
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T08:12:02Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T08:12:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLópez Serrano, P.M., López Sánchez, C.A., Álvarez González, J.G. y García Gutiérrez, J. (2016). A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Landsat-5 TM Spectral Data for Biomass Estimation. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42 (6), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1217485.
dc.identifier.issn1712-7971es
dc.identifier.issn0703-8992es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/140295
dc.description.abstractMachine learning combines inductive and automated techniques for recognizing patterns. These techniques can be used with remote sensing datasets to map aboveground biomass (AGB) with an acceptable degree of accuracy for evaluation and management of forest ecosystems. Unfortunately, statistically rigorous comparisons of machine learning algorithms are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the 3 most common nonparametric machine learning techniques reported in the literature, vis., Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and Random Forest (RF), with that of the parametric multiple linear regression (MLR) for estimating AGB from Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) spectral reflectance data, texture features derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and topographical features derived from a digital elevation model (DEM). The results obtained for 99 permanent sites (for calibration/validation of the models) established during the winter of 2011 by systematic sampling in the state of Durango (Mexico), showed that SVM performed best once the parameterization had been optimized. Otherwise, SVM could be outperformed by RF. However, the kNN yielded the best overall results in relation to the goodness-of-fit measures. The findings confirm that nonparametric machine learning algorithms are powerful tools for estimating AGB with datasets derived from sensors with medium spatial resolution.es
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia y Tecnología TIN2011-28956-C02es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent16es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherTaylor and Francises
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42 (6), 690-705.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleA Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Landsat-5 TM Spectral Data for Biomass Estimationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticoses
dc.relation.projectIDTIN2011-28956-C02es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07038992.2016.1217485es
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07038992.2016.1217485es
dc.contributor.groupUniversidad de Sevilla. TIC-134: Sistemas Informáticoses
dc.journaltitleCanadian Journal of Remote Sensinges
dc.publication.volumen42es
dc.publication.issue6es
dc.publication.initialPage690es
dc.publication.endPage705es
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia Y Tecnología (MCYT). Españaes

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
A comparison of machine learning ...1.020MbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional