dc.creator | Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio | es |
dc.creator | Ortiz García, Iván | es |
dc.creator | Jiménez Guerra, Álvaro | es |
dc.creator | Núñez Márquez, Enrique | es |
dc.creator | Moreno Muñoz, Jesús | es |
dc.creator | Rondón Romero, José Luis | es |
dc.creator | Cabanillas Balsera, Daniel | es |
dc.creator | Gil, Javier | es |
dc.creator | Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando | es |
dc.creator | Monsalve Guil, Loreto | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-09T14:57:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-09T14:57:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-08-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Velasco-Ortega, E., Ortiz García, I., Jiménez Guerra, Á., Núñez Márquez, E., Moreno Muñoz, J., Rondón-Romero, J.L.,...,Monsalve Guil, L. (2021). Osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched implant surfaces. A histological and histomorphometric study in the rabbit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22 (6), 8507. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1422-0067 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/140277 | |
dc.description.abstract | Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early
wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate
sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we
used two different types of sandblasted-etched surface implants, an SLA™ surface and a Nanoblast
Plus™ surface. Roughness and chemical composition were evaluated by a white light interferometer
microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The SLA™ surface exhibited the
higher values (Ra 3.05 µm) of rugosity compared to the Nanoblast Plus™ surface (Ra 1.78 µm).
Both types of implants were inserted in the femoral condyles of ten New Zealand white rabbits.
After 12 weeks, histological and histomorphometric analysis was performed. All the implants were
osseointegrated and no signs of infection were observed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that
the bone–implant contact % (BIC) ratio was similar around the SLA™ implants (63.74 ± 13.61) than
around the Nanoblast Plus™ implants (62.83 ± 9.91). Both implant surfaces demonstrated a favorable
bone response, confirming the relevance of the sandblasted-etched surface on implant osseointegration. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 12 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22 (6), 8507. | |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Osseointegration | es |
dc.subject | Implant surface | es |
dc.subject | Sandblasted and acid-etched surface | es |
dc.title | Osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched implant surfaces. A histological and histomorphometric study in the rabbit | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dcterms.identifier | https://ror.org/03yxnpp24 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Estomatología | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/16/8507 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijms22168507 | |
dc.journaltitle | International Journal of Molecular Sciences | es |
dc.publication.volumen | 22 | es |
dc.publication.issue | 6 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | 8507 | es |