dc.creator | Durán Toro, Amador | es |
dc.creator | Fernández Montes, Pablo | es |
dc.creator | Bernárdez Jiménez, Beatriz | es |
dc.creator | Weinman, Nathaniel | es |
dc.creator | Akahn, Ash | es |
dc.creator | Fox, Armando | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-07T12:30:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-07T12:30:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Durán Toro, A., Fernández Montes, P., Bernárdez Jiménez, B., Weinman, N., Akahn, A. y Fox, A. (2021). Gender Bias in Remote Pair Programming among Software Engineering Students: The twincode Exploratory Study. ArXiv.org, arXiv:2110.01962 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/128058 | |
dc.description.abstract | Context. Pair programming has been found to increase student interest
in Computer Science, particularly so for women, and would
therefore appear to be a way to help remedy the under–representation
of women in the field. However, one reason for this under–
representation is the unwelcoming climate created by gender stereotypes
applied to engineers in general, and to software engineers
in particular, assuming that men perform better than their women
peers. If this same bias is present in pair programming, it could
work against the goal of improving gender balance in computing.
Objective. In a remote setting in which students cannot directly observe
the gender of their peers, we aim to explore whether Software
Engineering students behave differently when the perceived gender
of their remote pair programming partners changes, searching
for differences in (i) the perceived productivity compared to solo
programming; (ii) the partner’s perceived technical competency
compared to their own; (iii) the partner’s perceived skill level; (iv)
the interaction behavior, such as the frequency of source code additions,
deletions, validations, etc.; and (v) the type and relative
frequencies of dialog messages used for collaborative behavior in
a chat window. Although there are some studies on pair programming
performance and gender pair combination, to the best of our
knowledge there are no studies on the impact of gender stereotypes
and bias within the pairs themselves. Method. We have developed
an online platform (twincode) that randomly classifies students
into gender–balanced groups, arranges them in pairs for remote
pair programming (sharing an editor window and a chat window),
and can selectively deceive one or both partners regarding the gender
of the other via the use of a clearly gendered avatar. Several behaviors are automatically measured during the pair programming
process, together with two questionnaires and a semantic
tagging of the pairs’ conversations. We will perform a series of
experiments to identify the effect, if any, of possible gender bias
in remote pair programming interactions. Students in the control
group will have no information about their partner’s gender; students
in the treatment group will receive such information but
will be selectively deceived about their partner’s true gender. To
analyze the data, apart from checking reliability of questionnaire
data using Cronbach’s alpha and Kaiser criterion, for each response
variable we will (i) compare control and experimental groups for
the score distance between two in–pair tasks; then, using the data
from the experimental group only, we will (ii) compare scores using
the partner’s perceived gender as a within–subjects variable; and
(iii) analyze the interaction between the partner’s perceived gender
(within–subjects) and the subject’s gender (between–subjects). For
the (i) and (ii) analyses we will use t–tests, whereas for the (iii)
analyses we will use mixed–model ANOVAs. | es |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación OPHELIA (RTI2018–101204–B–C22) | es |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación HORATIO (RTI2018-101204–B–C21) | es |
dc.description.sponsorship | Junta de Andalucía EKIPMENTPLUS (P18–FR–2895) | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 7 | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Cornell University | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | ArXiv.org, arXiv:2110.01962 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Gender Bias | es |
dc.subject | Pair Programming | es |
dc.subject | Remote Pair Programming | es |
dc.subject | Distributed Pair Programming | es |
dc.subject | Software Engineering Education | es |
dc.title | Gender Bias in Remote Pair Programming among Software Engineering Students: The twincode Exploratory Study | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dcterms.identifier | https://ror.org/03yxnpp24 | |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos | es |
dc.relation.projectID | RTI2018–101204–B–C22 | es |
dc.relation.projectID | RTI2018-101204–B–C21 | es |
dc.relation.projectID | P18–FR–2895 | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01962 | es |
dc.journaltitle | ArXiv.org | es |
dc.publication.issue | arXiv:2110.01962 | es |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España | es |
dc.contributor.funder | Junta de Andalucía | es |