Artículo
Interobserver variability of ultrasound measurements for the differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse and cervical elongation without uterine prolapse
Autor/es | García Mejido, José Antonio
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ramos Vega, Zenaida Armijo Sánchez, Alberto Fernández Palacín, Ana ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Borrero Fernández, Carlota Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Departamento | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugía Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública |
Fecha de publicación | 2021-10-07 |
Fecha de depósito | 2021-11-30 |
Publicado en |
|
Resumen | Objectives: Our study aims to determine the interobserver variability of different ultrasound measurements (pubis-cervix distance, pubis-uterine fundus distance, and pubis-Douglascul-de-sac distance) previously analyzed ... Objectives: Our study aims to determine the interobserver variability of different ultrasound measurements (pubis-cervix distance, pubis-uterine fundus distance, and pubis-Douglascul-de-sac distance) previously analyzed for the ultrasound differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse (UP) and cervical elongation CE without UP. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with 40 patients scheduled to undergo surgical correction of UP and CE without UP. All patients underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examination by an examiner (E1) who acquired ultrasound images. Using these images, E1 measured the distances for the ultrasound differential diagnosis of UP and CE without UP, and these distances were compared with those measured by the other examiner (E2). Values were analyzed by calculating ICCs with 95% CIs. Results: For UP, excellent reliability was obtained for all measurements except the pubis-Douglascul-de-sac measurement at rest, which was moderate (ICC 0.596; p = 0.028) and for the difference between the pubis-Douglascul-de-sac measurement at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, which was good (ICC 0.691; p < 0.0005). For CE without UP, interobserver reliability was excellent for all measurements analyzed except the pubis-cervix measurement during the Valsalva maneuver, which was moderate (ICC 0.535; p = 0.052) and for the pubis-Douglascul-de-sac measurement at rest, which was good (ICC 0.768; p < 0.0005). Conclusions: There is excellent interobserver reliability in measurements of the difference in the distance from the pubic symphysis to the uterine fundus at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver for both UP and CE without UP, which are used for the ultrasound differential diagnosis of UP and CE without UP. |
Cita | García Mejido, J.A., Ramos Vega, Z., Armijo Sánchez, A., Fernández Palacín, A., Borrero Fernández, C. y José Antonio Sáinz Bueno, (2021). Interobserver variability of ultrasound measurements for the differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse and cervical elongation without uterine prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver | Descripción |
---|---|---|---|---|
Interobserver variability of ... | 2.682Mb | ![]() | Ver/ | |