Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorAgost-González, Aidaes
dc.creatorEscobio Prieto, Isabeles
dc.creatorPareja Leal, Azahara M.es
dc.creatorCasuso-Holgado, María Jesúses
dc.creatorBlanco-Diaz, Maríaes
dc.creatorAlbornoz Cabello, Manueles
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T09:41:03Z
dc.date.available2021-09-17T09:41:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-13
dc.identifier.citationAgost-González, A., Escobio Prieto, I., Pareja Leal, A.M., Casuso-Holgado, M.J., Blanco-Diaz, M. y Albornoz Cabello, M. (2021). Percutaneous versus Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Posterior Tibial Nerve in Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Urinary Incontinence in Adults: A Systematic Review. Healthcare, 9 (7), art.n.879.
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032 (electrónico)es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/125952
dc.description.abstractBackground: Percutaneous electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (PTNS and TTNS) of the posterior tibial nerve are internationally recognized treatment methods that offer advantages in terms of treating patients with overactive bladder (OAB) who present with urinary incontinence (UI). This article aims to analyze the scientific evidence for the treatment of OAB with UI in adults using PTNS versus TTNS procedures in the posterior tibial nerve. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, between February and May 2021 in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. Results: The research identified 259 studies, 130 of which were selected and analyzed, with only 19 used according to the inclusion requirements established. The greatest effectiveness, in reducing UI and in other parameters of daily voiding and quality of life, was obtained by combining both techniques with other treatments, pharmacological treatments, or exercise. Conclusions: TTNS has advantages over PTNS as it is more comfortable for the patient even though there is equality of both therapies in the outcome variables. More research studies are necessary in order to obtain clear scientific evidencees
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent17 p.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcare, 9 (7), art.n.879.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPercutaneous electric nerve stimulationes
dc.subjectTranscutaneous electric nerve stimulationes
dc.subjectAdultes
dc.subjectUrinary bladderes
dc.subjectOveractivees
dc.subjectUrinary incontinencees
dc.subjectTibial nervees
dc.titlePercutaneous versus Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Posterior Tibial Nerve in Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Urinary Incontinence in Adults: A Systematic Reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Fisioterapiaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/7/879es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare9070879es
dc.journaltitleHealthcarees
dc.publication.volumen9es
dc.publication.issue7es
dc.publication.initialPageart.n.879es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Percutaneous versus Transcutan ...806.4KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir   Percutaneous versus Transcutaneous

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional