Por motivos de mantenimiento se ha deshabilitado el inicio de sesión temporalmente. Rogamos disculpen las molestias.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorAlconero-Camarero, Ana Rosaes
dc.creatorSarabia Cobo, Carmen Maríaes
dc.creatorCatalán Piris, Mª Josées
dc.creatorGonzález Gómez, Silviaes
dc.creatorGonzález López, José Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T09:44:52Z
dc.date.available2021-02-16T09:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-19
dc.identifier.citationAlconero-Camarero, A.R., Sarabia Cobo, C.M., Catalán Piris, M.J., González Gómez, S. y González López, J.R. (2021). Nursing students´ satisfaction: a comparison between medium- and high-fidelity simulation training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020804.
dc.identifier.issnISSN 1660-4601es
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/105017
dc.description.abstractTraining based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student’s level of knowledge and clinical experiencees
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent11es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (2), 1-11.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSimulation traininges
dc.subjectNursing studentses
dc.subjectPersonal satisfactiones
dc.subjectHigh-fidelity simulation traininges
dc.titleNursing students´ satisfaction: a comparison between medium- and high-fidelity simulation traininges
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Enfermeríaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020804es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph18020804es
dc.journaltitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes
dc.publication.volumen18es
dc.publication.issue2es
dc.publication.initialPage1es
dc.publication.endPage11es

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Nursing Students’ Satisfaction_ ...387.8KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional