Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Artículo

dc.creatorFomin, Peteres
dc.creatorBeuran, Mirceaes
dc.creatorGradauskas, Audriuses
dc.creatorBarauskas, Giedriuses
dc.creatorDartois, Nathaliees
dc.creatorCapitan-Morales, Luis-Cristobales
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-15T09:51:52Z
dc.date.available2016-06-15T09:51:52Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn1743-9191es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11441/42320
dc.description.abstractBackground Empiric treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) represents a clinical challenge because of the diverse bacteriology and the emergence of bacterial resistance. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline (TGC), a first-in-class, expanded broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, were compared with imipenem/cilastatin (IMI/CIS) in patients with cIAI. Methods In this prospective, double-blind, phase 3, multinational trial, patients were randomly assigned to intravenous (IV) TGC (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg every 12 h) or IV IMI/CIS (500/500 mg every 6 h) for 5–14 days. Clinical response was assessed at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (14–35 days after therapy) for microbiologically evaluable (ME) and microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) populations (co-primary efficacy endpoint populations in which cure/failure response rates were determined). Results Of 817 mITT patients (i.e., received ≥ 1 dose of study drug), 641 (78%) comprised the m-mITT cohort (322 TGC, 319 IMI/CIS) and 523 (64%) were ME (266 TGC, 256 IMI/CIS). Patients were predominantly white (88%) and male (59%) with a mean age of 49 years. The primary diagnoses for the mITT group were complicated appendicitis (41%), cholecystitis (22%), and intra-abdominal abscess (11%). For the ME population, clinical cure rates at TOC were 91.3% (242/265) for TGC versus 89.9% (232/258) for IMI/CIS (95% CI −4.0, 6.8; P < 0.001). Corresponding clinical cure rates within the m-mITT population were 86.6% (279/322) for TGC versus 84.6% (270/319) for IMI/CIS (95% CI −3.7, 7.5; P < 0.001 for noninferiority TGC versus IMI/CIS). The most commonly reported adverse events for TGC and IMI/CIS were nausea (17.6% TGC versus 13.3% IMI/CIS; P = 0.100) and vomiting (12.6% TGC versus 9.2% IMI/CIS; P = 0.144). Conclusions TGC is efficacious in the treatment of patients with cIAIs and TGC met per the protocol-specified statistical criteria for noninferiority to the comparator, IMI/CIS.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of surgery, 3(1), 35-47es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectComplicated intra-abdominal infectionses
dc.subjectTigecyclinees
dc.subjectGlycylcyclinees
dc.subjectImipenem/cilastatines
dc.subjectEfficacyes
dc.subjectSafetyes
dc.subjectIn vitro activityes
dc.titleTigecycline is efficacious in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infectionses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugíaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.011
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.011es
idus.format.extent8es
dc.identifier.idushttps://idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/42320

FicherosTamañoFormatoVerDescripción
Tigecycline is efficacious in ...274.3KbIcon   [PDF] Ver/Abrir  

Este registro aparece en las siguientes colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional