Show simple item record

Article

dc.creatorGarcía Jiménez, Rocíoes
dc.creatorValero, Irenees
dc.creatorCorrales-Gutiérrez, Isabeles
dc.creatorGranell, Reyeses
dc.creatorBorrero González, Carlotaes
dc.creatorSáinz Bueno, José Antonioes
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T12:42:18Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T12:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGarcía Jiménez, R., Valero, I., Corrales-Gutiérrez, I., Granell, R., Borrero González, C. y Sáinz Bueno, J.A. (2022). Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?. Biomedicines, 10 (10), 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579.
dc.identifier.issn2227-9059es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/149148
dc.description.abstractCurrently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofBiomedicines, 10 (10), 2579.
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFirst trimester combined testinges
dc.subjectContingent screeninges
dc.subjectAneuploidyes
dc.subjectNon invasive prenatal testinges
dc.subjectTrisomy 21es
dc.subjectTrisomy 18es
dc.subjectTrisomy 13es
dc.subjectCell free DNAes
dc.titleDoes a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dcterms.identifierhttps://ror.org/03yxnpp24
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Cirugíaes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/10/10/2579es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomedicines10102579es
dc.journaltitleBiomedicineses
dc.publication.volumen10es
dc.publication.issue10es
dc.publication.initialPage2579es

FilesSizeFormatViewDescription
Does a High Risk.pdf246.2KbIcon   [PDF] View/Open  

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Atribución 4.0 Internacional