Opened Access The defeasibility of knowledge‐how
Cites

Show item statistics
Icon
Export to
Author: Adam Carter, J.
Navarro Reyes, Jesús
Department: Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Metafísica y Corrientes Actuales de la Filosofía, Ética y Filosofía Política
Date: 2017
Published in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95 (3), 662-685.
Document type: Article
Abstract: Reductive intellectualists (e.g., Stanley & Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011a; 2011b; Brogaard 2008; 2009; 2011) hold that knowledge‐how is a kind of knowledge‐that. If this thesis is correct, then we should expect the defeasibility conditions for knowledge‐how and knowledge‐that to be uniform—viz., that the mechanisms of epistemic defeat which undermine propositional knowledge will be equally capable of imperilling knowledge‐how. The goal of this paper is twofold: first, against intellectualism, we will show that knowledge‐how is in fact resilient to being undermined by the very kinds of traditional (propositional) epistemic defeaters which clearly defeat the items of propositional knowledge which intellectualists identify with knowledge‐how. Second, we aim to fill an important lacuna in the contemporary debate, which is to develop an alternative way in which epistemic defeat for knowledge‐how could be modelled within an anti‐intellectualist framework.
Cite: Adam Carter, J. y Navarro Reyes, J. (2017). The defeasibility of knowledge‐how. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95 (3), 662-685.
Size: 283.5Kb
Format: PDF

URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11441/75716

DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12441

See editor´s version

This work is under a Creative Commons License: 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)