2025-01-162025-01-162014-09Díaz Moreno, A. (2014). Comentario a la Sentencia de 13 de febrero de 2014: mandato aparente y protección de los terceros de buena fe. Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil, 96, 307-322.0212-6206https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166818Comentario a la Sentencia del 13 de febrero del 2014Mandato. Extinción por muerte del mandante: nulidad de la venta realizada por el mandatario con conocimiento del fallecimiento: la validez requiere la buena fe del tercero con el que se celebra el contrato y además que el mandatario, en el momento de hacer uso del poder, ignorara la muerte del mandante.Article 1738 CC: “The actions performed by the attorney being unaware of the death of the principal or any other causes which involve termination of the mandate shall be valid and fully effective against third parties who have transacted with him in good faith”.In order to apply the doctrine established in this article and to extend the protection to bona fide third parties, it is necessary that the two conditions referred to in the article are met: first, the third party that contracts with the agent has to act in good faith; this is, he were unaware of the previous extinction of the mandate; and second, that this agent, when making use of the powers granted, does not know the death of the principal or the concurrence of any of the other causes that end the mandate.application/pdf8spaMandatoExtinciónSeguridad jurídicaAparienciaTercerosBuena feMandateTerminateLegal certaintyPrinciple of the protection of legitimate expectationsThirdsGood faithinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess