2025-04-212025-04-212024Gavala González, J., Real Pérez, M., Benítez García, L. y Fernández García, J.C. (2024). Fixed-seat rowing versus sliding-seat rowing: Effects on physical fitness in breast cancer survivors. Cancers, 16 (12), 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122207.https://hdl.handle.net/11441/171868This study aimed to analyze the effects of a team rowing-based training program on physical fitness and anthropometric parameters in female breast cancer survivors (n = 40; 56.78 ± 6.38 years). The participants were divided into two groups: one rowed in fixed-seat rowing (FSR) boats (n = 20; 56.35 ± 4.89 years), and the other rowed in sliding-seat rowing (SSR) boats (n = 20; 57.20 ± 7.7 years). Both groups engaged in two 75 min sessions per week for 24 weeks. Significant improvements were observed in both groups in terms of weight (FSR: −1.93 kg, SSR: −1.75 kg), body mass index (FSR: −0.73 kg/m2, SSR: −0.67 kg/m2), waist circumference (FSR: −2.83 cm, SSR: −3.66 cm), and hip circumference (FSR: −2.02 cm, SSR: −2.88 cm). Muscle strength improved in the lower extremities (jump test: FSR: 2.99 cm, SSR: 3.11 cm) and upper extremities (dominant: FSR: 4.13 kgf, SSR: 4.34 kgf; non-dominant: FSR: 3.67 kgf, SSR: 3.32 kgf). Aerobic capacity also improved, with the SSR group showing a greater increase (FSR: 63.05 m, SSR: 93.65 m). Flexibility tests revealed better results in the SSR group for both dominant (SSR: 1.75 cm vs. FSR: −5.55 cm) and non-dominant limbs (SSR: 1.72 cm vs. FSR: −3.81 cm). These findings suggest that the type of rowing modality can influence physical fitness outcomes, with the SSR group showing superior improvements compared to the FSR group Rowing; Breast cancer; Physical activity; Anthropometry; Exerciseapplication/pdfengAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/RowingBreast cancerPhysical activityAnthropometryExerciseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess10.3390/cancers16122207