dc.creator | Casanova-Méndez, Amaloha | es |
dc.creator | Oliva Pascual-Vaca, Ángel | es |
dc.creator | Rodríguez Blanco, Cleofás | es |
dc.creator | Heredia Rizo, Alberto Marcos | es |
dc.creator | Gogorza-Arroitaonandia, Kristobal | es |
dc.creator | Almazán-Campos, Ginés | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-23T15:13:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-23T15:13:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Casanova-Méndez, A., Oliva Pascual-Vaca, Á., Rodríguez Blanco, C., Heredia Rizo, A.M., Gogorza-Arroitaonandia, K. y Almazán-Campos, G. (2014). Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Manual Therapy, 19 (4), 331-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.03.002. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-689X | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-2769 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/162753 | |
dc.description.abstract | Spinal Manipulation (SM) has been purported to decrease pain and improve function in subjects with
non-specific neck pain. Previous research has investigated which individuals with non-specific neck pain
will be more likely to benefit from SM. It has not yet been proven whether or not the effectiveness of
thoracic SM depends on the specific technique being used. This double-blind randomized trial has
compared the short-term effects of two thoracic SM maneuvers in subjects with chronic non-specific
neck pain. Sixty participants were distributed randomly into two groups. One group received the Dog
technique (n ¼ 30), with the subject in supine position, and the other group underwent the Toggle-Recoil
technique (n ¼ 30), with the participant lying prone, T4 being the targeted area in both cases. Evaluations
were made of self-reported neck pain (Visual Analogue Scale); neck mobility (Cervical Range of Motion);
and pressure pain threshold at the cervical and thoracic levels (C4 and T4 spinous process) and over the
site described for location of tense bands of the upper trapezius muscle. Measurements were taken
before intervention, immediately afterward, and 20 min later. Both maneuvers improved neck mobility
and mechanosensitivity and reduced pain in the short term. No major or clinical differences were found
between the groups. In the between-groups comparison slightly better results were observed in the
Toggle-Recoil group only for cervical extension (p ¼ 0.009), right lateral flexion (p ¼ 0.004) and left
rotation (p < 0.05). | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 7 p. | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Churchill Livingstone; Elsevier BV | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | Manual Therapy, 19 (4), 331-337. | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Cervical spine | es |
dc.subject | Neck pain | es |
dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | es |
dc.subject | Spinal manipulation | es |
dc.title | Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Fisioterapia | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X14000356?via=ihub | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.math.2014.03.002 | es |
dc.journaltitle | Manual Therapy | es |
dc.publication.volumen | 19 | es |
dc.publication.issue | 4 | es |
dc.publication.initialPage | 331 | es |
dc.publication.endPage | 337 | es |