Este archivo ha sido creado el 17-12-2024 por Alfonso Moriana Elvira GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------ 1. Dataset title: Dataset of the article Evaluation of growers’ efforts to improve the sustainability of olive orchards: Development of the hydroSOStainable index 2. Authorship: Name:Corell, Mireia Institution:Universidad de Sevilla Email:mcorell@us.es ORCID:0000-0001-5955-0048 Name: Martín-Palomo, María José Institution: Universidad de Sevilla Email:mjpalomo@us.es ORCID:0000-0002-0314-4363 Name:Sánchez-Bravo, P Institution:Universidad Miguel hernández Email:paola.sanchezb@umh.es ORCID:0000-0002-9855-1999 Name:Carillo, T Institution:BALAM Email: ORCID: Name:Collado, J Institution:Universidad Miguel Hernández Email:jacintacollado@gmail.com ORCID:0000-0002-9373-2192 Name:Hernández-Garcia, F Institution:Universidad Miguel Hernández Email:francisca.hernandez@umh.es ORCID: Name:Girón, I Institution:CSIC Email:iggi@irnase.csic.es ORCID:0000-0003-0546-7147 Name: Andreu, Luis Institution: Universidad de Sevilla Email:landreu@us.es ORCID:0000-0002-8741-127X Name: Galindo, A Institution: IMIDA Email:alejandro.galindo@carm.es ORCID:0000-0002-3724-2586 Name: López-Moreno, YE Institution: Email:yestivenlm@outlook.com ORCID: Name: Centeno, A Institution: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Email:ana.centeno@upm.es ORCID:0000-0001-5592-5447 Name: Pérez-López, D Institution: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Email:david.perezl@upm.es ORCID:0000-0002-9293-4892 Name: Carboinell, A.A. Institution: Universidad Miguel Hernández Email:angel.carbonell@umh.es ORCID:0000-0002-7163-2975 Name: Moriana, Alfonso Institution:Universidad de Sevilla Email:amoriana@us.es ORCID:0000-0002-5237-6937 DESCRIPTION ---------- 1. Dataset language: English 2. Abstract: El artículo describe un índice que permita evaluar el manejo del agua en fincas de olivar. El índice está compuestos por 16 indicadores que incluyen cuestiones de diseño hidraúlico del riego, del manejo de la finca y de la programación del riego. El uso del indicador se ejemplifica con datos de dos fincas diferentes. 3. Keywords: Riego deficitario, olivar, programación de riego 4. Date of data collection (fecha única o rango de fechas): Datos de 2017 5. Publication Date: 12-07-2019 6. Grant information: Agencia Española de Investigación (AEI) y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo (FEDER) proyectos AGL2013-45922-C2-1-R and AGL2016-75794-C4-4-R. 7. Geographical location/s of data collection: Ecija (Seville, Spain, 37.66 °N;-5.10 °W). ACCESS INFORMATION ------------------------ 1. Creative Commons License of the dataset: cc-BY 2. Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/11441/166729 3. Related publication: Corell, M, Martín-Palomo, MJ, Sánchez-Bravo, P, Carrillo, T, Collado, J, Hernandez-Garciz, F, Girón, I, Andreu, L, Galindo, A, López-Moreno, YE, Centeno, A, Perez-Lopez, D. Carbonell-Barrachina, AA, Moriana, A. (2019) Evaluation of growers’ efforts to improve the sustainability of olive orchards:Development of the hydroSOStainable index. Scientia Horticulturae 257: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108661 METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION ----------------------- 1. Description of the methods used to collect and generate the data: Indicatiors were defined and apply in two different orchards. Two irrigation sectors of 23.5 ha (A) and 15.4 ha (B) were selected. In both sectors, irrigation maintenance was very unsuccessful and irrigation uniformity was considered lower than 90%. Sector A was irrigated following a regulated deficit irrigation strategy (RDI) from the beginning of pit hardening (16th June). Sector B was irrigated following the decision of the growers. The second commercial orchard, “Orchard-2”, is located in Marchena (Seville,Spain, 37.41 °N, -5.47 °W). This is also a super-high-density olive orchard (cv Arbequina) with 3 years-old trees. Two irrigation sectors of 12 ha (A) and 29.91 ha (B) were used. In both sectors, irrigation uniformity was estimated at around 95%. Sector A was irrigated following a regulated deficit irrigation strategy (RDI) from the beginning of pit hardening (16th June). Sector B was irrigated following the decision of the growers. In both orchards, the RDI sectors used the same irrigation scheduling approach with the pressure bomb technique as irrigation tool, according to the Moriana et al. (2012) and Girón et al. (2015a) recommendations. The midday shade water potential was measured weekly, from pit hardening until the last week of August, and every 10–15 days thereafter until yield. Mature, healthy, shaded leaves were used for measuring the water potential using the pressure bomb technique. The target for the midday shade water potential was −3 MPa during the pit hardening period (from 16th June until 24th August) and -1.4 MPa thereafter until harvest. Pit hardening was estimated according to Raporpot et al., (2013). On the other hand, the growers’ management was different between orchards: in Orchard-1, the water applied was almost constant during the season, while in Orchard-2, the midday shaded water potential and canopy temperature was used, with drones checking the growers’ decisions. The water stress level in both orchards was checked at the end of August using measurements of midday stem water potential. The water budget was calculated with the 10-year average rainfall and ETo obtained from the Andalusian network of agroclimatic stations (SIAR, 2018): Ecija for “Orchard-1” and Los Molares for “Orchard-2” (Tables 6 and 7). The crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was calculated according to Steduto et al. (2012) as ETc=EToxKcxKr. The reduction coefficient (Kr) was estimated according to Steduto et al. (2012) at around 1 for both orchards. The crop coefficient (Kc) was estimated also according to this latter work, considering that there was no tillage management in both orchards, with values from 0.65 during winter to 0.5 during midsummer. In order to calculate the soil water stored in both orchards, the root depth was estimated at around 0.8 m, the soil texture was sandy loam (θFC=0.21 and θPWP=0.1; Villalobos et al., 2016) and the percentage of allowable depletion was fixed at 0.75 according to Orgaz and Fereres (1997). Then, the allowed depletion was estimated at 72mm and the period of irrigation from June to September, with a total irrigation needs of 354mm (Table 6) and 325mm (Table 7). Both locations are under Mediterranean conditions, with warm winters and hot and dry summer (Tables 6 and 7). The differences between ETc and rainfall data were used to determine the period of leaching, when rainfall exceeded ETc, from October to February/ March. The amount of rain that could be considered as leaching was calculated as the difference between total rain in this period and the sum of ETc and soil water stored. The results were 97.77 and 111.42 mm, respectively. 3. Software or instruments needed to interpret the data: Excel program 4. Information about instruments, calibration and standards: No instrument were used 5. Environmental or experimental conditions: Climatic conditions are presneted in methodology FILE OVERVIEW ---------------------- 1. Explain the file naming conversion, si es aplicable: There is a unique file with all data. Each sheet is data of each table at the reference publication 2. File list: File name:Dataset Corell et al 2019 Description: Excel file 4. File format: Excel