PT	AU	BA	BE	GP	AF	BF	CA	TI	SO	SE	BS	LA	DT	CT	CY	CL	SP	HO	DE	ID	AB	C1	C3	RP	EM	RI	OI	FU	FP	FX	CR	NR	TC	Z9	U1	U2	PU	PI	PA	SN	EI	BN	J9	JI	PD	PY	VL	IS	PN	SU	SI	MA	BP	EP	AR	DI	DL	D2	EA	PG	WC	WE	SC	GA	PM	OA	HC	HP	DA	UT
J	Bartram, T; Cooke, FL				Bartram, Timothy; Cooke, Fang Lee			Celebrating the 60(th) anniversary of the Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources: what has been achieved and what more can be done	ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES			English	Article						employee wellbeing; global pandemic; HRM; megatrends; sustainable development goals	MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; BANKING SECTOR; PERFORMANCE; WORKPLACE; FUTURE; CHINA; MODEL; HR	The Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources (APJHR) celebrates its 60(th) anniversary in 2022. In this 60(th) anniversary issue, we provide a brief overview of the APJHR and its recent developments. We outline a few thematic areas, with indicative research questions that would facilitate researchers to extend the field of HRM research with policy relevance and societal impact in the Asia Pacific, drawing on several megatrends as the context. These include demographic changes, climate change and energy transition, digital technology and the growing interest in HR analytics, and the global pandemic. We then present a collection of review articles included in this anniversary issue that provide a critical appraisal, from a historical lens, of selected research topics including those published in the APJHR; we reflect on how they have evolved and what further research efforts can be exerted to advance the field.	[Bartram, Timothy] RMIT Univ, Sch Management, HR Analyt, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Bartram, Timothy] RMIT Univ, Sch Management, Dept HRM & IR, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Cooke, Fang Lee] Monash Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Grad Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Cooke, Fang Lee] Monash Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Human Resource Management & Asia Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia		Bartram, T (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Sch Management, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.	Timothy.bartram@rmit.edu.au		Bartram, Timothy/0000-0003-4496-7048				Aguinis H, 2022, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V36, P857, DOI 10.5465/amp.2020.0093; Alang T, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P555, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12261; Australian Government, 2021, AUSTR CLIM CHANG STR; Bartram T, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P63, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12230; Bartram T, 2012, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V50, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00008.x; Biswas K, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P66, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12218; Boudreau J, 2017, J ORGAN EFF-PEOPLE P, V4, P119, DOI 10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0021; Boxall P, 2022, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V60, P41, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12305; Buckley PJ, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1045, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0102-z; Byrne L, 2016, J MENT HEALTH, V25, P217, DOI 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101428; Cavanagh J., 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P152, DOI DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12284; Cavanagh J, 2017, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V55, P6, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12111; Chen CC, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P132, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12246; Colella A, 2017, J APPL PSYCHOL, V102, P500, DOI 10.1037/apl0000084; Cooke FL, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAG J, V28, P1, DOI 10.1111/1748-8583.12163; Cooke FL., 2020, LOW CARBON EC UNPUB; Cooper B, 2019, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V58, P85, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21934; Crane A, 2019, REGUL GOV, V13, P86, DOI 10.1111/rego.12162; De Cieri H, 2022, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V60, P116, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12309; Deloitte, 2017, NOIS MEG TOM WORLD; Department of Trade and Investment, 2003, EN WHIT PAP OUR EN F; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Dundon T, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAG J, V28, P377, DOI 10.1111/1748-8583.12195; Edwards MR., 2019, PREDICTIVE HR ANALYT, V2; Evans KJ, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P204, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12262; Follmer KB, 2018, J MANAGE, V44, P325, DOI 10.1177/0149206317741194; Folque M, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P876, DOI 10.1002/sd.2181; Guest DE, 2017, HUM RESOUR MANAG J, V27, P22, DOI 10.1111/1748-8583.12139; Harney B, 2021, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100824; Holland P., 2021, HRM SMART DARK SIDE; Horwitz F., 2022, HDB LABOR HUMAN RESO; International Energy Agency, 2020, STRAT DEV HYDR FUEL; International Labour Organization, 2019, WORK BRIGHTER FUTURE; International Labour Organization, 2016, FUT LAB SUPPL DEM MI; International Labour Organization, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE FINAN; International Labour Organization and International Organization of Employers, 2019, CHANG BUS OPP EMPL B; Jackson SE, 2014, ACAD MANAG ANN, V8, P1, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2014.872335; Jenkins K., 2020, ADV GENDER EQUALITY; Jensen JM, 2013, J MANAGE, V39, P1699, DOI 10.1177/0149206311419663; Kim H, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P85, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12224; Kolk A., 2010, INT BUS REV, V19, P119, DOI [10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003]; KPMG, 2020, SUST INV FAST FORW I; Kramar R., 2021, FANG WILL ADD REF IT; Kulik CT, 2022, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V60, P97, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12312; Liu JF, 2021, FACTORY BEATERS FLED; Liu MS, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P378, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12220; Loh JMI, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P305, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12233; Marler JH, 2017, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V28, P3, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699; Michailova S., 2020, AIB INSIGHTS, P1; Min M, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P399, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12221; Nankervis A, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P3, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12245; Park R, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P247, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12208; Paulet R, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P159, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12285; PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2016, 5 MEGATRENDS THEIR I; Rogovsky N., 2021, HUMAN CTR AGENDA HUM; Sengupta S., 2021, NEW YORK TIMES 1028; Shann C, 2014, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V52, P298, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12032; Tang GY, 2018, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V56, P31, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12147; Tarique I, 2021, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION; Townsend K, 2022, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V60, P79, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12311; Ulrich D, 2016, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V54, P148, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12104; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2015, STESASERA390 UN POP; United Nations Development Programme, 2019, HUM DEV REP INC AV T; Van Damme Wim, 2020, BMJ Glob Health, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003098; Villo S, 2020, J WORLD BUS, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101068; Wang J, 2014, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V52, P132, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12026; Wang R, 2020, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V58, P427, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12222; Wood S, 2012, HUM RELAT, V65, P419, DOI 10.1177/0018726711432476; Wright PM, 2022, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V60, P22, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12308; Yang WG, 2019, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V57, P553, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12205; Zhao CH, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P357, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12295; Zhou Y, 2021, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V59, P20, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12258	72	1	1	9	10	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1038-4111	1744-7941		ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU	Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour.	JAN	2022	60	1					3	21		10.1111/1744-7941.12320	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12320		DEC 2021	19	Industrial Relations & Labor; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	YJ1YA					2022-09-08	WOS:000725930400001
J	Chen, JR; Zhou, D; Zhao, Y; Wu, BH; Wu, T				Chen, Jingrui; Zhou, Dan; Zhao, Yue; Wu, Bohong; Wu, Tian			Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions of bike sharing in China: Production, operation, and recycling	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Sharing economy; Bike sharing; Resource consumption; Carbon emission; Life cycle assessment; China	URBAN; GAS	Recent global environmental initiatives designed to achieve a more sustainable society include the United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement. While the shared economic model has long been linked to the creation of the sustainable use of resources, one problem encountered by the bike sharing is whether the current management model can maintain the focus on sustainability in China. Based on the amount of resources consumed during bike production, operation, and recycling, this paper aims to use life cycle carbon emission assessment to calculate an emission reduction threshold for bike-sharing industry. The research obtained energy consumption data from the OFO Curve bike, which is the most commonly used type of bike sharing in China. Calculating the average distance traveled and number of times each bike was used per day via the Baidu Map Application Program Interface, we found that the average number of times each bike was used per day was 4.552, and the average riding distance was 0.356 km. Additionally, the overall utilization of shared bikes averages about 50%. Further results show that the whole life cycle carbon footprint of one bike is 34.56 kg CO2. The power generation by incineration produces 1.9916 kg CO2 in less than a landfill. If a bike is deposited directly in a landfill, it will take 31 years to degrade. The final calculations show that based on the current number of bikes, each used at least 686 days to achieve a net positive reduction in emissions. This paper provides a basis for capacity management and operation management of shared bikes from the perspective of pro-environment and provides a new angle for the research on environmental impact of sharing economy.	[Chen, Jingrui; Zhou, Dan] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Chen, Jingrui; Zhou, Dan] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Yue] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Int Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Wu, Bohong] Res Inst Petr Explorat & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Wu, Tian] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China		Wu, T (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.	wutian@amss.ac.cn		Zhao, Yue/0000-0002-3185-9067; Wu, Tian/0000-0002-5557-7232	National Natural Science Foundation of China [71804181]; National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	The project was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71804181) and the National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS.	Cai SJ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.072; Chen YF, 2018, EUROMICRO WORKSHOP P, P60, DOI 10.1109/PDP2018.2018.00017; China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, 2018, REP DEV CHIN BIK SHA; Core Writing Team, 2007, SYNTHESIS REPORT CON; Data Center of China Internet DCCI, DCCI RES REP US 13 C; Delre A, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V605, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.177; DeMaio PJ, 2003, TRANSPORT Q, V57, P9; [狄向华 Di Xianghua], 2005, [中国环境科学, China Environmental Science], V25, P632; Hirano Y, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.033; iiMedia Research, 2018, SPEC STUD DEV STAT S; Jiang M., 2017, BEIJING COMMERCIAL D, P8; Jie T, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104510; Kou ZY, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104534; Li T., 2017, GREEN TECHONOL, V16, P13; Liu HS, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.005; Shaheen S., 2015, ACCESS MAG, V1, P8; Tavassoli K, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119247; YAO Y, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI DOI 10.3390/su11195425; Zhang H., 2011, ADOPTION LOW CARBON; Zhang HR, 2019, APPL ENERG, V242, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.119; Zhang L, 2007, ENERGY, V32, P1896, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.009; Zhang LL, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V142, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.019; Zheng Lihong, 2014, ECOCITY GREEN BUILDI, V03, P60	23	23	24	33	81	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	NOV	2020	162								105011	10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105011	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105011			12	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	NO6QS					2022-09-08	WOS:000569614800007
J	van der Waal, JWH; Thijssens, T; Maas, K				van der Waal, Johannes W. H.; Thijssens, Thomas; Maas, Karen			The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Goals	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						sustainability-oriented innovation; patents; multinational enterprises; SDGs; global challenges; sustainability reporting	ECO-INNOVATION; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN INNOVATION; FIRM SIZE; STRATEGY; SDGS; OPPORTUNITIES; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES	The 2030 Agenda recognizes the role of the private sector and calls on its innovative and creative capabilities to help solve sustainable development challenges. Judging by the embracement of the SDGs in sustainability reporting, this call seems to resonate. However, the extent to which companies actually make a contribution to solving SDG challenges remains unclear. This paper aims to explore this innovative contribution to the SDGs. It does so by assessing the level of SDG relevant innovation by the largest multinational enterprises in the world. We develop a method for the identification of SDG relevant patent applications, distinguishing between "green" patents, related to environmental themes, and "blue" patents, related to "improving conditions" and meeting unmet sustainable development needs. In addition, we explore whether the level of SDG relevant innovation is systematically associated with a number of company characteristics. Our results show that large MNEs have similar levels of green patents, and lower levels of blue patents, compared to smaller companies. Using regression analysis, we find that there are regional and industry-specific differences. Corporate sustainable development attributes such as Global Compact membership and sustainability reporting, are less convincingly associated. It can be concluded that MNEs play an important role in SDG relevant innovation, but that there are trade-offs between different SDGs. Some SDG relevant innovation is not commonly associated with sustainable development. This study attempts to quantify the actual effect of sustainability strategies of companies by identifying their sustainable patents and associates this to company characteristics, using a new method for sustainable patent identification. Moreover, SDG relevant innovation is taken beyond green innovation to include the whole range of technical innovation that is related to the broad range of SDGs. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[van der Waal, Johannes W. H.; Thijssens, Thomas; Maas, Karen] Open Univ Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands		van der Waal, JWH (corresponding author), Open Univ Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands.	johannes.vanderwaal@ou.nl	van der Waal, JWH/ABI-2305-2020	van der Waal, JWH/0000-0001-5394-8207				Abbas A, 2014, WORLD PAT INF, V37, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.wpi.2013.12.006; Abrahamson E., 2009, OXFORD HDB ORG DECIS, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199290468.003.0023, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199290468.003.0023]; Adams R, 2016, INT J MANAG REV, V18, P180, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12068; Albino V, 2014, APPL ENERG, V135, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.012; Amore MD, 2016, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V75, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003; Archibugi D, 1996, TECHNOVATION, V16, P451, DOI 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4; Arevalo JA, 2013, BUS ETHICS, V22, P1, DOI 10.1111/beer.12005; Ayuso S, 2011, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V111, P1399, DOI 10.1108/02635571111182764; Berliner D, 2015, POLICY STUD J, V43, P115, DOI 10.1111/psj.12085; Bos-Brouwers HEJ, 2010, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V19, P417, DOI 10.1002/bse.652; Burritt RL, 2020, J BUS ETHICS, V164, P389, DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-4066-0; Coulmont M, 2015, BUS ETHICS, V24, P144, DOI 10.1111/beer.12087; Coxe S, 2009, J PERS ASSESS, V91, P121, DOI 10.1080/00223890802634175; Criscuolo P, 2005, ISSI 2005: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P479; Dang CY, 2018, J BANK FINANC, V86, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006; Diaz-Garcia C, 2015, INNOV-ORGAN MANAG, V17, P6, DOI 10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060; Duran-Romero G, 2015, INNOV-MANAG POLICY P, V17, P115, DOI 10.1080/14479338.2015.1011062; Endl A, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101440; Fabrizi A, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P1018, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005; Fujii H, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V112, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.012; Gallego-Alvarez I, 2011, MANAGE DECIS, V49, P1709, DOI 10.1108/00251741111183843; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120194; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P2019, DOI 10.1002/bse.2485; Guo JQ, 2002, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V64, P63, DOI 10.1111/1468-0084.00004; Hahn R, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005; Hawn O, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P949, DOI 10.1002/smj.2752; Haywood LK, 2019, S AFR J SCI, V115, DOI 10.17159/sajs.2019/6452; He F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.314; Held M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.118; Ho L.J., 2007, J INT FIN MANAG ACC, V18, P123, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-646X.2007.01010.X, 10.1111/j.1467-646X.2007.01010.x]; Hogerzeil HV, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V369, P896, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp1303723; Hojnik J, 2016, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V19, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006; Ike M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117661; Khan R, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8101034; Kim J, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V92, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.009; Kim WC, 2005, CALIF MANAGE REV, V47, P105, DOI 10.2307/41166308; Klewitz J, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017; Kolk A, 2010, INT BUS REV, V19, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003; Kumar A, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P3554, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1543969; Kuo TC, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V192, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212; Li B, 2018, FINANC RES LETT, V25, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.020; Lin WL, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P974, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.214; Migotto M., 2015, OECD ENV WORKING PAP, V89, P1, DOI 10.1787/5js009kf48xw-en; Muff K, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.004; O'Hara RB, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P118, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.x; Pedersen CS, 2018, PROC CIRP, V69, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2018.01.003; Perego P, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.106; Perez-Batres LA, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003; Pinstrup-Andersen P, 2007, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V37, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00244.x; Radu C, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P893, DOI 10.1002/bse.1950; Raith M. G., 2018, J BUSINESS MODELS, V6, P71; RobecoSam, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY YB 20; Rosati F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107; Ruggie JG, 2001, GLOB GOV, V7, P371; Rugman AM, 2008, MANAGE INT REV, V48, P397, DOI 10.1007/s11575-008-0023-y; S&P Global, 2020, SAM COMPANION 2020; Salim N, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V209, P1445, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.105; Scheyvens R, 2016, SUSTAIN DEV, V24, P371, DOI 10.1002/sd.1623; Schiederig T, 2012, R&D MANAGE, V42, P180, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x; Schramade W, 2017, J APPL CORP FINANC, V29, P87, DOI 10.1111/jacf.12234; Scott L., 2019, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL, DOI [10.2307/j.ctvc77cxj.37, DOI 10.2307/J.CTVC77CXJ.37]; Slowak AP, 2017, INNOVATION-ABINGDON, V30, P455, DOI 10.1080/13511610.2016.1192990; Sullivan K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.201; United Nations, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, V25, P1, DOI [10.5363/tits.7.8_44, DOI 10.5363/TITS.7.8_44]; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017, WORKING PAPER NO ESA; van der Waal JWH, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119625; van Zanten JA, 2021, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V28, P210, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2020.1768452; van Zanten JA, 2018, J INT BUS POLICY, V1, P208, DOI 10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x; Voegtlin C, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V143, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z; Walz R., 2017, INT ECON ECON POL, V14, P449, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10368-017-0386-2, 10.1007/s10368-017-0386-2]; Williams A, 2019, ACAD MANAG DISCOV, V5, P367, DOI 10.5465/amd.2018.0154; Xie ZQ, 2013, WORLD PAT INF, V35, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.wpi.2012.10.005	72	24	24	15	35	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 20	2021	285								125319	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PY3GA		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000611934600012
J	Oluwasanya, GO; Carter, RC				Oluwasanya, Grace O.; Carter, Richard C.			Water safety planning for small water supply systems: the framework and control measures	WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY			English	Article						developing country; drinking-water supply; self-supply hand-dug wells; small systems; water safety plans		A water safety plan (WSP) is a preventive comprehensive risk assessment and management approach to ensuring the safety of a drinking water supply from source to tap for public health protection. The concept was introduced in the last decade in international guidance documents and has been applied widely across a varied range of water supply systems, particularly, the public water utilities and to a lesser extent towards small systems. Mainstreaming water safety intervention for small systems however, would ensure safe household water to a wider population, alleviate poverty and hunger through water for use in support of livelihood activities, and help towards achieving the sustainable development goals. Self-supply hand-dug wells in Abeokuta, Nigeria, were assessed using the step-by-step World Health Organization WSP model, mainly from the relevant system assessment to operational monitoring and management procedures. This paper reviewed the methodology of water safety planning and flagged the issue of 'who' conducts WSP for small systems. The paper also evaluated major control measures critical to self-supply and suggested an apt WS planning model for the systems. The WSP framework for self-supply systems incorporated an institutional aspect for WSP coordination.	[Oluwasanya, Grace O.] FUNAAB, Dept Water Resources Management & Agr Meteorol, Abeokuta, Nigeria; [Carter, Richard C.] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Water Sci Inst, Cranfield, Beds, England		Oluwasanya, GO (corresponding author), FUNAAB, Dept Water Resources Management & Agr Meteorol, Abeokuta, Nigeria.	grace.oluwasanya@gmail.com	Parween, Shama/AFQ-4232-2022; Carter, Richard C/O-9818-2015	Carter, Richard C/0000-0001-9625-7182; OLUWASANYA, Grace/0000-0003-0731-2042				Bartram J., 2009, WATER SAFETY PLAN MA; Carter R. C., 2006, RURAL WATER SUPPLY S; Davison A, 2005, WATER SAFETY PLANS M; Foster S., 2008, SESS 5 INT C GROUNDW; Gowing J, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, DOI [10.5194/hess-2015-549, DOI 10.5194/HESS-2015-549]; Maurice J, 2013, LANCET, V382, P383, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61642-6; Mekonta L., 2015, SELF SUPPLY FORMAL S; Oluwasanya G., 2013, NIGERIAN J HYDROLOGI, V2, P85; Oluwasanya G, 2011, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V11, P172, DOI 10.2166/ws.2011.026; Schmoll O., 2006, PROTECTING GROUNDWAT; Sutton S., 2004, SELF SUPPLY FRESH AP; United Nations, 2014, A68970 UN; WHO, 2011, GUID DRINK WAT QUAL, V4; WHO, 2011, GUID DRINK WAT QUAL, Vfourth	14	5	5	3	26	IWA PUBLISHING	LONDON	ALLIANCE HOUSE, 12 CAXTON ST, LONDON SW1H0QS, ENGLAND	1606-9749			WATER SCI TECH-W SUP	Water Sci. Technol.-Water Supply	DEC	2017	17	6					1524	1533		10.2166/ws.2017.057	http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.057			10	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	FP9DF		Bronze			2022-09-08	WOS:000417947000004
J	Pinto, GO; da Silva, LCS; Assad, DBN; Pereira, SH; Mello, LCBD				Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira; Soares da Silva Junior, Luis Carlos; Nagem Assad, Daniel Bouzon; Pereira, Samira Herculano; Brasil de Brito Mello, Luiz Carlos			Trends in global greywater reuse: a bibliometric analysis	WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY			English	Article						bibliometrix; developing countries; greywater reuse; sustainable development goals; water resources management; water scarcity	WATER MANAGEMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GREEN ROOFS; NETWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; EVOLUTION; QUALITY; IMPACT	The increase in water demand in recent years led to the expansion of research and public policies on the reuse of water, especially greywater (GW). Given the diversity of research in the area, this paper proposes an analysis of the evolution of the area through an objectivity metric. Metadata of 1,524 publications indexed in the Scopus database between 1974 and 2021 were analyzed using the VOSviewer tool, and showed exponential growth in publications from 2013. Six different spelling variations were found for GW in the database. Despite the highly geographical scattering of academic production, developed countries, who began researching greywater earlier, had more connections and published more papers; except for Israel, which had the highest average of citations per article. While developed countries lead the research area, developing countries are emerging in GW reuse research. These aspects reveal both the dispersion of the research structure development and a trend of intellectual production in GW from developed to developing countries. Also, we noted that countries suffering from water scarcity stood out with the highest activity in paper publishing. Thus, we expect that future research on GW reuse will take place in developing countries that face water scarcity.	[Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira; Brasil de Brito Mello, Luiz Carlos] Fluminense Fed Univ, Civil Engn Dept, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil; [Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira; Nagem Assad, Daniel Bouzon] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Ind Engn Dept, BR-20550900 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; [Soares da Silva Junior, Luis Carlos] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Civil Engn Program, Ave Athos da Silveira Ramos 149, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; [Nagem Assad, Daniel Bouzon] Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain; [Pereira, Samira Herculano] UCAMPROMINAS, BR-35170111 Coronel Fabriciano, MG, Brazil		da Silva, LCS (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Civil Engn Program, Ave Athos da Silveira Ramos 149, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.	luis.junior@coc.ufrj.br		Soares da Silva Junior, Luis Carlos/0000-0002-9379-1619; Herculano, Samira/0000-0002-4359-713X; Oliveira Pinto, Gustavo/0000-0002-1264-3228; Assad, Daniel/0000-0003-3911-4323				Abejon R, 2015, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V6, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.03.009; Acedo FJ, 2006, J MANAGE STUD, V43, P957, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x; Al-Jayyousi OR, 2003, DESALINATION, V156, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00340-0; Amnon Kartin, 2001, GeoJournal, V53, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1019590029553; Angelakis AN, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00026; [Anonymous], 2010, 852512010 BSI, P54; Aria M, 2017, J INFORMETR, V11, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007; ASTM International, 2012, F2363F2363M12 ASTM; Baideme M., 2013, Water Environment Research, V85, P1339, DOI 10.2175/106143013X13698672322264; Boyjoo Y, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P1403, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.675; Busgang A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10040413; California State Board of Health, 1918, REG GOV US SEQ IRR P; ChristovaBoal D, 1996, DESALINATION, V106, P391, DOI 10.1016/0011-9164(96)00134-8; Cobo MJ, 2011, J INFORMETR, V5, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002; de Vries T. T., 2005, IMPACTS GLOBAL CLIMA, P1, DOI [10.1061/40792(173)511, DOI 10.1061/40792(173)511]; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Duran-Sanchez A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091191; Eriksson E., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P85, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4]; Etchepare R, 2015, WATER RES, V72, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.048; Friedler E, 2006, DESALINATION, V190, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.007; Friedler E, 2004, ENVIRON TECHNOL, V25, P997, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2004.9619393; Fuller Amy C, 2010, Am J Environ Sci, V6, P249, DOI 10.3844/ajessp.2010.249.252; Gagolewski M, 2011, J INFORMETR, V5, P678, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.006; Gassie LW, 2017, WATER RES, V125, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.062; Goodwin D, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P1087, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.020; Gross A, 2007, CHEMOSPHERE, V66, P916, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.006; Haak L, 2018, WATER ENVIRON RES, V90, P748, DOI [10.2175/106143017X15131012153185, 10.2175/106143017x15131012153185]; Heim RR, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P1149, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1149; Hicks D, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007; Hirsch JE, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P16569, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507655102; Jarneving B, 2007, J INFORMETR, V1, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004; Jefferson B, 2004, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V50, P157, DOI 10.2166/wst.2004.0113; Ji L, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V134, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.005; Jin RY, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V140, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.029; Kamdem JP, 2016, AN ACAD BRAS CIENC, V88, P1735, DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201620150534; Khan Stuart J., 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, V2, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.02.002; Lazarova V, 2001, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V43, P25; Leong JYC, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P3014, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.167; Li EJ, 2015, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V51, P589, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12310; Li FY, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P3439, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004; Marginson S, 1997, HIGH EDUC, V34, P63, DOI 10.1023/A:1003082922199; Miranda R, 2018, J INFORMETR, V12, P1015, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2018.08.006; Mubako ST, 2018, J CONTEMP WAT RES ED, V165, P4, DOI 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2018.03289.x; Nolde E, 2000, URBAN WATER J, V1, P275, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00023-6; Oliveira P., 2018, CIENCIA DADOS COM R, V1; Oron G, 2014, WATER RES, V58, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.032; Oteng-Peprah M, 2018, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V229, DOI 10.1007/s11270-018-3909-8; Pellegrin Marie-Laure, 2017, Water Environ Res, V89, P1066, DOI 10.2175/106143017X15023776270241; Persson O, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V60, P421, DOI 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d; Pradhan S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.226; Queensland Government, 2008, GREYW GUID COUNC, P23; Radicchi F, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V97, P627, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1027-3; Rowe DB, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2100, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029; Schmidt CM, 2016, J MED LIBR ASSOC, V104, P138, DOI 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008; Shuval H., 1980, WATER QUALITY MANAGE; Storopoli J, 2019, REV GEST AMBIENT SUS, V8, P410, DOI 10.5585/GEAS.V8I3.15731; Taddeo R, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V653, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.412; Tal A, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P1081, DOI 10.1126/science.1126011; Tang M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051655; The Economist, 2015, THE ECONOMIST; Turkeli S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.118; United Nations, 2015, NAT SUST DEV STRAT; United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011, EPA800R11001, P68; van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3; Velasco-Munoz JF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071320; Vuppaladadiyam AK, 2019, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V18, P77, DOI 10.1007/s11157-018-9487-9; Wu B, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V656, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.347; Zhang Y, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V149, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.067; Zimmerman BD, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P7993, DOI 10.1021/es501659r; Zupic I, 2015, ORGAN RES METHODS, V18, P429, DOI 10.1177/1094428114562629	70	1	1	9	13	IWA PUBLISHING	LONDON	REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON, ENGLAND	0273-1223	1996-9732		WATER SCI TECHNOL	Water Sci. Technol.	NOV 15	2021	84	10-11			SI		3257	3276		10.2166/wst.2021.429	http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.429			20	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	XF7TG	34850726	gold			2022-09-08	WOS:000724270300046
J	Nhep, T; Schott, C; Sahli, M				Nhep, Tinat; Schott, Christian; Sahli, Mondher			Climate change adaptation in Cambodia's coastal hotel sector: An analysis of adaptation measures and hotel characteristics	TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES			English	Article						Climate change adaptation; Coastal tourism; Hotels; Cambodia; developing countries; SDGs; climate change; SDG13	ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; TOURISM; MITIGATION; VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK; RESPONSES	After decades of profound challenges Cambodia has seen twenty years of stability and a flourishing tourism industry, however, it has also been identified as highly vulnerable to climate change thus putting the country's long-desired economic development at risk. Sustainable Development Goal 13 'Climate Action' is critical for the continued economic success of Cambodia's vulnerable coastal tourism sector, but little is known about the hotel sector's adaptation responses and the differences between key hotel characteristics such as star rating, size, ownership and length of operation. This article examines the adaptation actions by 50 Cambodian coastal hotels by distinguishing between five adaptation categories. Subsequently, the analysis is deepened through a comparative analysis of key hotel characteristics. Although adaptation measures varied considerably between hotels they were more comprehensive and numerous than expected. Furthermore, patterns emerged that saw large hotels apply high levels of adaptation while budget and Khmer-owned hotels reported limited adaptation measures.	[Nhep, Tinat] CAMFIRST Sch, Phnom Penh, Cambodia; [Schott, Christian] Victoria Univ Wellington, Tourism Management, Sch Management, Wellington, New Zealand; [Sahli, Mondher] Univ Polynesie Francaise, Econ, Punaauia, France; [Sahli, Mondher] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand		Schott, C (corresponding author), Victoria Univ Wellington, Tourism Management, Sch Management, Wellington, New Zealand.	christian.schott@vuw.ac.nz	Nhep, Tinat/ABE-6398-2021	Schott, Christian/0000-0002-5865-6139				Adger WN, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596667.002; Adie BA, 2022, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V30, P2282, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1860071; Atzori R, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V69, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.005; Barnett J, 2013, NATURAL DISASTERS AND ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, P223; Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX; Becken S, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.001; Becken S, 2019, TOUR RECREAT RES, V44, P419, DOI 10.1080/02508281.2019.1598042; Becken S, 2016, WORLDW HOSP TOUR THE, V8, P578, DOI 10.1108/WHATT-06-2016-0033; Birendra KC, 2021, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100822; Bruni M., 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE DISAS, P513; Carlton JS, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V130, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.038; Casey A, 2019, COAST MANAGE, V47, P169, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2019.1564952; Chan ESW, 2011, J HOSP TOUR RES, V35, P3, DOI 10.1177/1096348010370857; Chapagain D, 2020, CLIM DEV, pNIL_1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1711698; Chong KY, 2019, TOUR REV, V74, P268, DOI 10.1108/TR-11-2017-0182; Coles R., 1986, POLITICAL LIFE CHILD; Cross MS, 2012, ENVIRON MANAGE, V50, P341, DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9893-7; Dwyer L, 2012, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V15, P303, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2011.604405; Dzoga M. N., 2014, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, V4, P288; Fatoric S, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V142, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1929-9; Forster M., 2015, J INFORM LITERACY, V9, P62; Gossling S, 2010, TOUR RECREAT RES, V35, P119, DOI 10.1080/02508281.2010.11081628; Hall C. M., 2018, Global climate change and coastal tourism: recognizing problems, managing solutions and future expectations, P48, DOI 10.1079/9781780648439.0048; Hall CM, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1044, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2018.1560456; Hall CM, 2015, ASPEC TOUR, V63, P332; Hall CM, 2010, TOUR RECREAT RES, V35, P131, DOI 10.1080/02508281.2010.11081629; Hambira WL, 2013, TOUR REV INT, V17, P19, DOI 10.3727/154427213X13649094288025; Harmeling S., 2013, GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK; Hoogendoorn G, 2018, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V21, P742, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2016.1188893; Hopkins D, 2013, THESIS U OTAGO NZ; Jarratt D, 2020, TOUR PLAN DEV, V17, P423, DOI 10.1080/21568316.2019.1667861; Jeffers J. M, 2011, THESIS STATE U NEW J; Jopp R, 2012, THESIS VICTORIA U ME; Jopp R, 2013, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V18, P144, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2012.688515; Jopp R, 2010, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V13, P591, DOI 10.1080/13683501003653379; Kaenzig R, 2016, TOURISM GEOGR, V18, P111, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2016.1144642; Kajan E, 2013, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V16, P167, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2013.774323; Kasim A, 2009, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V17, P709, DOI 10.1080/09669580902928468; Loehr J, 2020, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V28, P515, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1683185; Masten AS, 1998, AM PSYCHOL, V53, P205, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.205; McCollum D, 2017, GUIDE SDG INTERACTIO; Ministry of Tourism, 2020, TOUR STAT REP JUN 20; MOE GEF & UNEP, 2015, VULNERABILITY ASSESS; Moreno A, 2009, J COASTAL RES, P1140; Moreno A, 2009, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V17, P473, DOI 10.1080/09669580802651681; Nalau J., 2018, LIMITS CLIMATE CHANG, P1; Ngin C, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109557; Nicholls S, 2012, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V20, P953, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2011.645577; Njoroge JM, 2014, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V12, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2014.06.002; Pachauri RK, 2014, 2014 IEEE STUDENTS' CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (SCEECS); Parsons M, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P644, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1410082; Pasanchay K, 2021, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100784; Pickard A. J., 2007, RES METHODS INFORM; Ponna P, 2009, THESIS PRINCE SONGKL; Poudel S., 2013, THESIS CENTRIA U APP; Prasso S, 2007, CAMBODIAS COAST UTOP; Saarinen J, 2020, AGR EC; Saarinen J, 2012, TOURISM CLIMATE CHAN, P243; Santos-Lacueva R, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112062; Sarkodie SA, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365; Scheyvens R, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1061, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2018.1551404; Schott C, 2010, BRIDG TOUR THEOR PRA, V3, P1; Scott D., 2012, TOURISM CLIMATE CHAN; Scott D, 2016, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V24, P8, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2015.1062021; Scott D, 2019, ANN TOURISM RES, V77, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007; Scott D, 2012, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V20, P883, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2012.699063; Scott D, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P213, DOI 10.1002/wcc.165; Siakwah P, 2020, TOUR PLAN DEV, V17, P355, DOI 10.1080/21568316.2019.1600160; Simpson M., 2008, SCOTT KU; Sotharith C, 2019, EEC DEV TRANSPORT FA; Su Y. P, 2014, THESIS U CANTERBURY; Su YP, 2013, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V18, P92, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2012.688513; Theron P. M, 2015, LUCE VERBI, V49; UN, 2019, LIST LEAST DEV COUNT; United Nations, 2020, SUST DEV GOALS; United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE TOURI; Walmsley A, 2011, TR ISS GLOB TOUR, P77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17767-5_9; Warrick O.C., 2011, THESIS U WAIKATO; World Bank, 2021, TRAV TOUR DIR CONTR; Yusuf A. A., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE VULNE	80	1	1	1	4	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	2211-9736	2211-9744		TOUR MANAG PERSPECT	Tour. Manag. Perspect.	OCT	2021	40								100890	10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100890	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100890		OCT 2021	10	Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Social Sciences - Other Topics; Business & Economics	WW8RE					2022-09-08	WOS:000718175900005
J	Rankovic, M; Ilic, MP				Rankovic, Marko; Ilic, Milena P.			Mariusz Soltanifar, Mathew Hughes, Lutz Gocke - Digital Entrepreneurship, Impact on Business and Society (2021, Springer International Publishing)	ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH JOURNAL			English	Article; Early Access						entrepreneurship; digital entrepreneurship; artificial intelligence; Internet; Internet of Things; digitalized era; global challenges; business; society; SDGs		The book by Mariusz Soltanifar, Mathew Hughes, and Lutz Gocke entitled "Digital Entrepreneurship Impact on Business and Society" (Soltanifar, M., M. Hughes, and L. Gocke. 2021. Digital Entrepreneurship Impact on Business and Society. Charm: Springer International Publishing; Springer) published by Springer International Publishing demonstrates the global challenges that companies and economies face related to digital entrepreneurship. The book emphasizes the impact that digital entrepreneurial activities have on business and society in a way that shapes the world business environment in the present time, and will continue to the same in the future. The book provides the reader with an overview of the processes, means, and challenges that are transforming the business world, giving the possible opportunities to companies and citizens, but also threats as well that also shape their everyday life and society as a whole.	[Ilic, Milena P.] ITS Belgrade, Informat Technol Sch, Comtrade Technol Ctr, Savski Nasip 7, Belgrade 11070, Serbia; [Rankovic, Marko] Univ Union Nikola Tesla, Fac Informat Technol & Engn, Belgrade 11158, Serbia		Ilic, MP (corresponding author), ITS Belgrade, Informat Technol Sch, Comtrade Technol Ctr, Savski Nasip 7, Belgrade 11070, Serbia.	milena.ilic@its.edu.rs	Ilic, Milena P./W-7022-2019	Ilic, Milena P./0000-0002-9719-175X				Avlijas R., 2013, TEHNOLOSKI TRANSFER, V14, P125; Domazet I., 2018, MANAGING DIVERSITY I, P20; Domazet I., 2018, DIGITAL TRANSFORMATI, P214; Hisrich R.D., 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; Pokorni S., 2013, INFORM KOMUNIKACIONE; Soltanifar M., 2021, AMER PRINT, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6]	6	1	1	11	15	WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH	BERLIN	GENTHINER STRASSE 13, D-10785 BERLIN, GERMANY	2194-6175	2157-5665		ENTREP RES J	Entrep. Res. J.												10.1515/erj-2021-0275	http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0275		SEP 2021	6	Business	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	XZ1AR					2022-09-08	WOS:000737393800001
J	Delaire, C; Peletz, R; Haji, S; Kones, J; Samuel, E; Easthope-Frazer, A; Charreyron, E; Wang, T; Feng, A; Mustafiz, R; Faria, IJ; Antwi-Agyei, P; Donkor, E; Adjei, K; Monney, I; Kisiangani, J; MacLeod, C; Mwangi, B; Khush, R				Delaire, Caroline; Peletz, Rachel; Haji, Salim; Kones, Joan; Samuel, Edinah; Easthope-Frazer, Alicea; Charreyron, Eloise; Wang, Timothy; Feng, Andy; Mustafiz, Razin; Faria, Ismat Jabeen; Antwi-Agyei, Prince; Donkor, Emmanuel; Adjei, Kwaku; Monney, Isaac; Kisiangani, Joyce; MacLeod, Clara; Mwangi, Brian; Khush, Ranjiv			How Much Will Safe Sanitation for all Cost? Evidence from Five Cities	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY			English	Article							WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CAP HAITIEN; WATER; SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; GHANA	Global sustainable development goals call for universal access to safely managed sanitation by 2030. Here, we demonstrate methods to estimate the financial requirements for meeting this commitment in urban settings of low-income countries. Our methods considered two financial requirements: (i) the subsidies needed to bridge the gap between the willingness-to-pay of low-income households and actual market prices of toilets and emptying services and (ii) the amounts needed to expand the municipal waste management infrastructure for unserved populations. We applied our methods in five cities- Kisumu, Malindi, Nakuru in Kenya; Kumasi in Ghana; and Rangpur in Bangladesh and compared three to five sanitation approaches in each city. We collected detailed cost data on the sanitation infrastructure, products, and services from 76 key informants across the five cities, and we surveyed a total of 2381 low-income households to estimate willingness-to-pay. We found that the total financial requirements for achieving universal sanitation in the next 10 years and their breakdown between household subsidies and municipal infrastructure varied greatly between sanitation approaches. Across our study cities, sewerage was the costliest approach (total financial requirements of 16-24 USD/person/year), followed by container-based sanitation (10-17 USD/person/year), onsite sanitation (2-14 USD/person/year), and mini-sewers connecting several toilets to communal septic tanks (3-5 USD/person/year). Further applications of our methods can guide sanitation planning in other cities.	[Peletz, Rachel; Haji, Salim; Easthope-Frazer, Alicea; Khush, Ranjiv] Aquaya Inst, San Anselmo, CA 94979 USA; [Delaire, Caroline; Kones, Joan; Samuel, Edinah; Kisiangani, Joyce; MacLeod, Clara; Mwangi, Brian] Aquaya Inst, Nairobi, Kenya; [Charreyron, Eloise; Wang, Timothy] Oliver Wyman, Toronto, ON M5J 0A1, Canada; [Feng, Andy] Oliver Wyman, New York, NY 10036 USA; [Mustafiz, Razin; Faria, Ismat Jabeen] D2 Technol Ltd, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh; [Antwi-Agyei, Prince] Univ Energy & Nat Resources, Sunyani, Ghana; [Antwi-Agyei, Prince; Donkor, Emmanuel; Adjei, Kwaku; Monney, Isaac] NHance Dev Partners Ltd, Kumasi, Ghana		Delaire, C (corresponding author), Aquaya Inst, Nairobi, Kenya.	caroline@aquaya.org	; Monney, Isaac/A-7248-2014	Antwi-Agyei, Prince/0000-0001-6940-2428; Monney, Isaac/0000-0003-4990-4732	Urban Sanitation Research Initiative; UK Aid from the UK government	Urban Sanitation Research Initiative; UK Aid from the UK government(CGIAR)	This research was delivered through a research agreement between Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor (WSUP) and The Aquaya Institute. The agreement was funded under the Urban Sanitation Research Initiative managed by WSUP and supported by UK Aid from the UK government. We appreciate the contributions from the WSUP team including Guy Norman, Sam Drabble, Rosie Renouf, and Emanuel Owako. We gratefully acknowledge our enumerators, the households who answered our survey, and the key informants who provided us with location -specific cost information. We also thank Mridul Chowdhury, Adrien Couton, Peter Hawkins, Ashley Muspratt, and Fiona Zakaria for their guidance at various stages of the research process.	Acey C, 2019, WORLD DEV, V115, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.006; Amoah P, 2016, ENVIRON TECHNOL, V37, P3002, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2016.1173116; [Anonymous], 2014, WATER PEOPLE REPORT; [Anonymous], 2019, EV POT CONT BAS SAN; [Anonymous], 2016, POL GOV MIDDL INC AS; [Anonymous], 2016, COSTS M 2030 SUSTAIN; Asian Development Bank Institute, 2018, I MECH SUST SAN LEAR, V3; Balasubramanya S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171735; Burt Z, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16234738; Cairns-Smith S., 2014, URB SAN WHY PROTF SO; County Government of Kisumu, KIS COUNT INT DEV PL; Daudey L, 2018, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V8, P176, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.058; Dodane PH, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P3705, DOI 10.1021/es2045234; Fonseca C., 2011, 1A WASHCOST COST SUS; Foote AM, 2017, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V7, P252, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.112; Foreit JR, 2003, HEALTH POLICY, V63, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00039-8; Furlong C., 2015, SFD REPORT NAKURU; Furlong C, 2015, SFD REPORT KUMASI; Furlong C., 2016, SFD REPORT KISUMU; Gunatilake H., 2007, GOOD PRACTICES ESTIM; Hakspiel D., 2018, CONTAINER BASED TOIL; Hall RP, 2015, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V5, P586, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2015.053; Minh HV, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PREV, V18, P275, DOI 10.1007/s12199-012-0317-3; iDE Cambodia, 2019, REACH POOR SAN TARG; Khanna T, 2016, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, P1185, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2015.1062905; Kone D., 2012, BUSINESS ANAL FECAL; Konradsen F., 2014, J EC SUSTAIN DEV, V5, P63; Lacy R., 2019, MAKING BLENDED FINAN; Manga M, 2020, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V223, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.06.012; Mbalo D, 2017, WATER SECTOR TRUST F; Peletz R., 2017, SUPPLY DEMAND IMPROV; Peletz R., 2020, STATED WILLINGNESS T; Peletz R, 2020, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V10, P744, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2020.060; Peletz R, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0238003; Peletz R, 2019, AM J TROP MED HYG, V101, P555, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0888; Pruss-Ustun A, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P894, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12329; Robbins D., 2017, CITY WIDE FECAL SLUD; Ross I., 2016, FECAL SLUDGE MANAGEM; Russel K, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P525, DOI 10.1177/0956247815596522; Satterthwaite D, 2019, UNTREATED UNSAFE SOL; SFD Promotion Initiative, 2018, SFD MAN; The Aquaya Institute, 2019, SAN POL PRACT PREF K; The Aquaya Institute, 2019, SAN POL PRACT PREF M; The Aquaya Institute, 2019, SAN POL PRACT PREF N; The Aquaya Institute, 2019, SAN POL PRACT PREF R; The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; The World Bank Group, 2011, EN ACC PROD US URB P; Tilmans S, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247815572746; Trading Economics, GHAN INFL RAT; UN-Water Decade Programme on Advocacy and Communication and Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council, 2014, HUM RIGHT WAT SAN ME; United Nations, SUST DEV GOAL WAT SA; United Nations Children's Fund & World Health Organization, 2019, PROGR HOUS DRINK WAT; United States Agency for International Development; Concern Worldwide, 2014, IND DEV SURV URB EM; von Munch E, 2007, WATER SA, V33, P593; Water and Sanitation Program, 2012, EC IMP POOR SAN AFR; Water and Sanitation Program, 2012, EC IMP IN SAN BANGL; Water and Sanitation Program-World Bank, 2015, MISSING LINK SANITAT; Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor, 2018, HIGH QUAL SHAR SAN C; Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor, 2018, REG REF RAIS STAND P; Water Services Regulatory Board, 2018, PERF REP KEN WAT SER, V1; WHITTINGTON D, 1990, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V38, P293, DOI 10.1086/451794; WHITTINGTON D, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P1539, DOI 10.1029/93WR00184; Whittington D, 2000, J PLAN EDUC RES, V19, P297, DOI 10.1177/0739456X0001900309; Whittington D, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P1546, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.004; WHO UN, 2019, UN WAT GLOB AN ASS S; Wolf J, 2018, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V23, P508, DOI 10.1111/tmi.13051; World Health Organization, ANN 2 SAF MAN SAN SE; World Health Organization, UN CHILDR FUND JOINT	67	4	4	3	16	AMER CHEMICAL SOC	WASHINGTON	1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA	0013-936X	1520-5851		ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL	Environ. Sci. Technol.	JAN 5	2021	55	1					767	777		10.1021/acs.est.0c06348	http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06348			11	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PQ8VN	33356187	hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000606821200077
J	Patil, AB; Tarik, M; Struis, RPWJ; Ludwig, C				Patil, Ajay B.; Tarik, Mohamed; Struis, Rudolf P. W. J.; Ludwig, Christian			Exploiting end-of-life lamps fluorescent powder e-waste as a secondary resource for critical rare earth metals	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Rare earth metals; Circular economy; Resource management; Lamp fluorescent powder e-waste; Recycling; Hydrometallurgy; Liquid-liquid extraction	RECOVERY; ELEMENTS; EXTRACTION; SEPARATION; EUROPIUM; YTTRIUM; LIQUID; PRETREATMENT; CONCENTRATE; DISSOLUTION	The consensus is growing for the UN sustainable development goals regarding responsible consumption, production, and climate actions. Because of growth towards a digital society ("industry 4.0 revolution"), it is needed to have our resources and economies to be circular. The success also depends on appropriate management of critical raw materials, such as Rare Earth Elements (REEs). Here, a cost-effective recycling method for the recovery of single REEs from fluorescent powder (FP) with end-of-life lamp e-waste is presented with the additional benefit of having a much less environmental impact than mining. The recycling method involves a carefully designed sequential digestion of two phosphor components (YOX and LAP) and treating their leachates separately under specific hydrometallurgical conditions. The phosphors were targeted for Yttrium (Y), Europium (Eu), Terbium (Tb), Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), and Gadolinium (Gd). On trace REEs basis, the leaching process with the FP showed > 95% recovery for Eu, La, Ce, Y and Tb. The effective recycling was achieved to > 99% purity for Y, Eu, and Tb in 1, 25, and 55 liquid-liquid extraction stages, respectively. To our knowledge, this is one of the first methods to leach and separate Tb from FP e-waste with near quantitative leaching efficiency and > 99% purity.	[Patil, Ajay B.; Tarik, Mohamed; Struis, Rudolf P. W. J.; Ludwig, Christian] Paul Scherrer Inst PSI, Energy & Environm Res Div ENE, Lab Bioenergy & Catalysis LBK, Chem Proc & Mat CPM Res Grp, Forschungsstr 111, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland; [Patil, Ajay B.; Ludwig, Christian] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, ENAC IIE GR LUD, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland		Patil, AB; Ludwig, C (corresponding author), Paul Scherrer Inst PSI, Energy & Environm Res Div ENE, Lab Bioenergy & Catalysis LBK, Chem Proc & Mat CPM Res Grp, Forschungsstr 111, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland.; Patil, AB; Ludwig, C (corresponding author), Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, ENAC IIE GR LUD, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.	ajay.patil@psi.ch; christian.ludwig@psi.ch	Ludwig, Christian/B-8224-2008	Ludwig, Christian/0000-0002-0718-8195; Patil, Ajay B./0000-0003-0509-4926; Tarik, Mohamed/0000-0002-1631-5520	Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland (FOEN, CH) [UTF-1011-05300]; Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research in the field of Biomass for Swiss Energy Future (SCCER BIOSWEET, CH); Energy System Integration Platform (ESI, CH)	Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland (FOEN, CH); Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research in the field of Biomass for Swiss Energy Future (SCCER BIOSWEET, CH); Energy System Integration Platform (ESI, CH)	The authors thank the Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland (FOEN, CH, Project No. UTF-1011-05300), the Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research in the field of Biomass for Swiss Energy Future (SCCER BIOSWEET, CH) and the Energy System Integration Platform (ESI, CH) for their financial support of the present work. Authors also thank Mr Andreas Krebs (from BLUBOX Trading AG) and Mr Werner Larsen (from UCR AG Metals & Rare Earth Chemical Recovery AG) for providing the FP waste samples and demercurisation assembly, respectively, and BATREC AG for providing assistance and space for the demercuristation of the FP and sharing their exhaust gas cleaning infrastructure. Technical and analytical support of Mr Albert J. Schuler is greatly acknowledged.	Achzet B., 2011, MAT CRITICAL ENERGY; Alstad J., 1977, PROCESS SEPARATION L, V4, P041125; Balde C.P., 2014, E WASTE MONITOR, DOI [10.1007/s00705-012-1479-4, DOI 10.1007/S00705-012-1479-4]; Bogart JA, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P14887, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1612628113; Bringezu Stefan., 2019, REPORT INT RESOURCE; Cheisson T, 2019, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V7, P4993, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05638; Dupont D, 2015, GREEN CHEM, V17, P856, DOI 10.1039/c4gc02107j; Gschneidner K.A., HDB PHYS CHEM RARE E, DOI [10.1016/S0168-1273(04)34006-7, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1273(04)34006-7]; Innocenzi V, 2017, INT J MINER PROCESS, V168, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.minpro.2017.09.017; Innocenzi V, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V184, P552, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.026; Innocenzi V, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P2364, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.006; Ippolito NM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V153, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.195; Jha MK, 2016, HYDROMETALLURGY, V165, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.01.035; Kim D, 2016, SEP SCI TECHNOL, V51, P1716, DOI 10.1080/01496395.2016.1171782; Lima I. B. D., 2015, RARE EARTHS IND TECH, DOI [10.1016/C2014-0-01863-1, DOI 10.1016/C2014-0-01863-1, 10.1016/c2014-0-01863-1.]; Lorenz T, 2017, PHYS SCI REV, V2, DOI 10.1515/psr-2016-0067; Maat N, 2016, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V4, P6455, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01226; Machacek E, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V104, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.005; Maroufi S, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P11811, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02097; McCoy H., 1935, SEPARATION EUROPIUM, V57, DOI [10.1021/ja01312a506, DOI 10.1021/JA01312A506]; Patil A.B., 2019, PROG TOWAR RESOUR RE, P162; Patil AB, 2015, SEP PURIF TECHNOL, V145, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.02.041; Patil AR, 2019, SN APPL SCI, V1, DOI 10.1007/s42452-019-0163-7; Preston JS, 1996, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V65, P93, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199601)65:1<93::AID-JCTB393>3.0.CO;2-O; Sayed SA, 2005, SEP PURIF TECHNOL, V46, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.05.006; Sun DT, 2018, J AM CHEM SOC, V140, P16697, DOI 10.1021/jacs.8b09555; Tan QY, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep19961; Tan QY, 2015, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V45, P749, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2014.900240; Tunsu C, 2016, HYDROMETALLURGY, V166, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.012; Tunsu C, 2014, HYDROMETALLURGY, V144, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.01.019; Van Loy S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.160; Venkatesan P, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P9375, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01707; Wu YF, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V88, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.007; Yin X, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01191; Yurramendi L, 2019, HYDROMETALLURGY, V187, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.04.030; Zhou BL, 2017, MINERALS-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/min7110203	36	12	12	8	33	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	JAN	2021	164								105153	10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105153	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105153			8	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OW0CD		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000592565500039
J	Barnes, SJ; Guo, Y; Chan, JS				Barnes, Stuart J.; Guo, Yue; Chan, Jason			Big Data analytics for sustainability: Insight through technological innovation	INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Sustainability; Analytics; Health; Consumption; Environment; Methods	SMART CITY; SYSTEMS	How do information systems and big data analytics help to enable a sustainable future? This question is investigated in nine papers in this special issue that examine the issue of big data analytics for sustainability from a variety of perspectives. Broadly, these papers can be considered in four main areas: health, online behavior and consumption, safety and the environment, and methods to improve understanding of sustainability issues. Recent advances in data-driven decision-making analytics research focusing on different aspects of sustainability are discussed in these papers, including air pollution management, online health consultation services, gamification of exercise and health, sustainable urban mobility, the sustainable use of resources in hospitals, the design of anticrime information support systems, the interdependence effects among mobile social apps, networks of sustainable development goals, and the spillover effect of sustainable consumption.	[Barnes, Stuart J.] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle upon Tyne, England; [Guo, Yue] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China; [Chan, Jason] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA		Barnes, SJ (corresponding author), Newcastle Univ, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.	stuart.barnes@kcl.ac.uk						Barnes SJ, 2021, SOC SCI MED, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114057; Barnes SJ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102434; Bina O, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN C, V31, P1023, DOI 10.1068/c1310j; Crivello S, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P909, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2014.891568; Das A, 2020, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P353, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-6709-0_13; De Las Heras A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P9320, DOI 10.3390/su12229320; Fridgen G, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102916; Ismagilova E, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V47, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004; Jin J, 2014, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V1, P112, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2013.2296516; Koo C, 2017, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V54, P683, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2017.04.005; Kothari A., 2014, DEVELOPMENT, V57, P362, DOI [10.1057/dev.2015.24, DOI 10.1057/DEV.2015.24]; Kourtit K, 2017, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V58, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2016.10.001; Laufs J, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102023; Li VOK, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V125, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.001; Liu C, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P5113, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1677961; Moon YB, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN ENG, V10, P2, DOI 10.1080/19397038.2016.1220990; Popa CL, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112064; Ruggerio CA, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V786, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481; Sarkodie SA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084118; Schroeder P, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P77, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12732; Tang B, 2017, IEEE T IND INFORM, V13, P2140, DOI 10.1109/TII.2017.2679740; Ullah K, 2021, APPL ENERG, V299, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117104; United Nations, 2018, WORLD URB PROSP 2018; WCED, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE, V17, P1; Woetzel J., 2018, MCKINSEY GLOBAL I RE; Wu WQ, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100994; Yigitcanlar T, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V73, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.034; Zhou L, 2018, IEEE T IND INFORM, V14, P1626, DOI 10.1109/TII.2017.2784100; Zhu FH, 2016, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V17, P1576, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2015.2506156	29	0	0	9	9	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0378-7206	1872-7530		INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER	Inf. Manage.	JUL	2022	59	5							103627	10.1016/j.im.2022.103627	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103627			4	Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science; Management	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science; Business & Economics	2H3MR					2022-09-08	WOS:000814203000009
J	Lakshan, AMI; Low, M; de Villiers, C				Lakshan, A. M. I.; Low, Mary; de Villiers, Charl			Management of risks associated with the disclosure of future-oriented information in integrated reports	SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL			English	Article						Risk and uncertainty; Integrated reports; Future-oriented disclosure		Purpose Integrated reporting (IR) promotes the disclosure of future-oriented information to enable financial stakeholders to make better-informed decisions. However, the downside to this type of disclosure is the risk to management of disclosing such future-oriented information. This paper aims to explore how IR preparers manage the risk of disclosing future-oriented information in companies' integrated reports. Design/methodology/approach This study represents an exploratory interpretative thematic analysis of 33 semi-structured interviews with managers involved in IR in eight Sri Lankan companies representing various industries. The thematic analysis is informed by the research literature and prior studies on IR. Findings This paper provides evidence of various strategies to manage the risk associated with the disclosure of future-oriented information in integrated reports. These strategies include making non-specific predictions; increasing the accuracy of the predictions; linking performance management to disclosed targets, thus ensuring individual responsibility for target achievement; disclosing ex post explanations for not achieving previously disclosed targets; and linking disclosed targets to the company's risk management procedures. However, these strategies can cause managers to provide conservative future-oriented information, rather than "best estimate" future-oriented information. Practical implications The study describes the strategies that managers use to mitigate the risks involved in disclosing future-oriented information. These strategies can provide support or raise concerns, for managers in deciding how to deal with such risks. Regulators tasked with investor protection, as well as stock exchanges interested in the transparency and accountability of listed companies' activities should be aware of these strategies. Furthermore, the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) should be interested in the implications of this study because some of the identified strategies could undermine the usefulness of integrated reports to stakeholders. This is a significant concern given that the IIRC envisages integrated reporting and thinking as vehicles that could align capital allocation and corporate behaviour with wider sustainable development goals. Social implications The trend of future-oriented information moving from being used only in organisations' internal management systems to being externally reported in integrated reports has implications for stakeholder groups interested in the reported targets. This study reveals management strategies that could affect future-oriented information reliability and reduce their usefulness for users of integrated reports. Originality/value This study provides unique insights into the emerging area of how managers deal with the risks involved in disclosing future-oriented IR information.	[Lakshan, A. M. I.] Univ Kelaniya, Dept Accountancy, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka; [Low, Mary] Univ Waikato, Sch Accounting Finance & Econ, Hamilton, New Zealand; [de Villiers, Charl] Univ Auckland, Dept Accounting & Finance, Auckland, New Zealand; [de Villiers, Charl] Univ Pretoria, Dept Accounting, Pretoria, South Africa		de Villiers, C (corresponding author), Univ Auckland, Dept Accounting & Finance, Auckland, New Zealand.; de Villiers, C (corresponding author), Univ Pretoria, Dept Accounting, Pretoria, South Africa.	lakshan@kln.ac.lk; mary.low@waikato.ac.nz; charl.devilliers@auckland.ac.nz						Abdelrehim N, 2017, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V49, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.007; ACCA, 2011, ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIO; Adams C., 2020, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Adams CA, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V27, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001; Adams S, 2011, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V21, P292, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00143.x; Adhariani D, 2019, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V10, P183, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2018-0043; Aljifri K, 2007, MANAG AUDIT J, V22, P881, DOI 10.1108/02686900710829390; Atkins J, 2015, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V23, P197, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2014-0047; Atkins J, 2015, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V28, P651, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1485; Atkins JF, 2015, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V23, P28, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-01-2014-0002; Babbie E.R., 2015, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES; Baginski SP, 2004, J ACCOUNTING RES, V42, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00127.x; BARRIBALL KL, 1994, J ADV NURS, V19, P328; Boyatzis R.E., 1998, THEMATIC ANAL CODE D; Braun V., 2013, SUCCESSFUL QUALITATI, V1st Ed.; Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]; Bujaki M., 1999, 44 U OTT; Busco C., 2013, INTEGRATED REPORTING, P3; CASL, 2015, MESSAGE PRESIDENT CA; CASL, 2019, CA SRI LANK IRCSL HI; Celik O., 2006, INVESTMENT MANAGEMEN, V3, P197; Cheng M, 2014, J INT FIN MANAG ACC, V25, P90, DOI 10.1111/jifm.12015; Creswell JW., 2009, RES DESIGN QUALITATI, V3, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1450-5; CSE, 2014, CSE ANN REP 2014; De Villiers C., 1998, S AFR J EC MANAG SCI, V1, P145; De Villiers C., 2020, HVAC ENG HDB; De Villiers C.J., 2001, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V9, P81; de Villiers C. J., 1995, MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY, P44; de Villiers C, 2017, ACCOUNT FINANC, V57, P937, DOI 10.1111/acfi.12246; de Villiers C, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P450, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2017-0183; de Villiers C, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P1042, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736; De Zoysa, 2008, P APPL INT BUSINESS, P1086; De Zoysa A, 2010, INT J EMERG MARK, V5, P183, DOI 10.1108/17468801011031810; Del Baldo M, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P505, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2016-0094; Deloitte, 2011, INTEGRATED REPORTING; DEVILLIERS CJ, 1999, MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY, V7, P33; du Toit E, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P654, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2016-0052; Dumay J, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P574, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2016-0067; Dumay J, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P461, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-05-2017-0150; Dumay J, 2016, ACCOUNT FORUM, V40, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001; Eccles R.G., 2014, CORPORATE INTEGRATED; Eccles R. G., 2014, 14094 HARV BUS SCH; Eccles RG, 2019, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3345590, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3345590]; Ernst and Young, 2014, INTEGRATED REPORTING; EY, 2015, REP MAG; Field L, 2005, J ACCOUNT ECON, V39, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.004; Flower J, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002; Frost C.A., 1996, YSM69 YAL SCH MAN; Gibassier D., 2019, INTEGRATED REPORTING; Golafshani N., 2003, QUAL REP, V8, P597; Graham JR, 2005, J ACCOUNT ECON, V40, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002; Gunarathne N, 2017, MANAG AUDIT J, V32, P524, DOI 10.1108/MAJ-01-2016-1309; Guthrie J, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P553, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-06-2017-0155; Haji AA, 2016, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V7, P190, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2015-0106; Healy PM, 2001, J ACCOUNT ECON, V31, P405, DOI 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0; Hesse-Biber SN., 2010, PRACTICE QUALITATIVE; Hillson D., 2009, CAPTURING UPSIDE RIS; Hussainey K., 2003, ACCOUNTING BUSINESS, V33, P275, DOI DOI 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729654; IIRC, 2013, INT FRAMEWORK; *IIRC, 2013, MAT BACKGR PAP; IIRC, 2011, INTEGRATED REPORTING; IIRC, 2015, INTEGRATED REPORTING; IIRC, 2020, IIRC VIS; IIRC, 2013, BAS CONCL INT FRAM; Jensen JC, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P299, DOI 10.1002/bse.740; Johnson MF, 2001, J ACCOUNTING RES, V39, P297, DOI 10.1111/1475-679X.00014; Jones M.J., 1994, J ACCOUNT LIT, V13, P142; KASZNIK R, 1995, ACCOUNT REV, V70, P113; Lai A, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P1381, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2016-2674; Lai A, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P533, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2017-0113; Lichtman M., 2013, QUALITATIVE RES ED U, V3rd ed.; Liyanagedara K., 2012, P INT C COL, V2012; Lombard M, 2002, HUM COMMUN RES, V28, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x; Macias HA, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P605, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2016-0099; Marshall MN, 1996, FAM PRACT, V13, P522, DOI 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522; Mathuva D., 2012, INT J ACCOUNTING FIN, V2, P125; McNally MA, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P481, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-10-2016-0085; Meidell A, 2017, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V49, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.005; Menicucci E., 2013, INT BUSINESS RES, V6, P30; Menicucci E, 2018, J APPL ACCOUNT RES, V19, P102, DOI 10.1108/JAAR-01-2016-0007; Mercantile Investments and Finance PLC (, 2015, MAN DISC AN KPI PROF; Moolman J, 2016, SOUTH AFR BUS REV, V20, P600; Morros J, 2016, INTANG CAP, V12, P336, DOI 10.3926/ic.700; Nagar V, 2003, J ACCOUNT ECON, V34, P283, DOI 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00075-7; Perego P, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.106; Peterson M., 2012, DECISION THEORY ETHI; PwC, 2015, CORPORATE PERFORMANC; Riesch H., 2013, ESSENTIALS RISK THEO, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5455-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5455-3_2]; Rinaldi L, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P1294, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2018-3446; Robertson FA, 2015, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V6, P190, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2014-0044; Roulston K., 2001, QUAL RES J, V1, P279, DOI [DOI 10.1177/146879410100100302, 10.1177/146879410100100302]; Rumsfed D., 2002, DEFENSE GOV NEWS TRA; Sampath Bank PLC (, 2016, FUT OUTL; Silverman D., 2019, INTERPRETING QUALITA; Silverman D., 2011, INTERPRETING QUALITA; SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507; Stenbacka C., 2001, MANAGEMENT DECISIONS, V39, P551, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005801; Stent W, 2015, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V23, P92, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0026; Stubbs W, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P1068, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1279; Velte P, 2017, J MANAG CONTROL, V28, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00187-016-0235-4	100	2	2	6	21	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	2040-8021	2040-803X		SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA	Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J.	JAN 26	2021	12	2					241	266		10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2019-0114	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2019-0114		JAN 2021	26	Business, Finance; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PZ8AN					2022-09-08	WOS:000607811500001
J	Wang, FM; Li, ZW; Zhang, ZT; Wang, F; Tan, RR; Ren, JZ; Jia, XP				Wang, Fangming; Li, Zhiwei; Zhang, Zetian; Wang, Fang; Tan, Raymond R.; Ren, Jingzheng; Jia, Xiaoping			Integrated graphical approach for selecting industrial water conservation projects	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Water savings; Cost-effectiveness; Marginal cost curve; Pinch analysis; Subsidies	PINCH ANALYSIS; CHINA; MANAGEMENT; DEMAND; SUSTAINABILITY; RESOURCES; FOOTPRINT	Sustainable water management is key to achieving sustainable development goals. Increasing water consumption prompts industrial plants to implement water conservation projects (WCPs) and improve the utilization efficiency of water resources. In this paper, we develop an integrated graphical method for the implementation of water conservation projects by considering both water-saving targets and investment costs with or without government subsidies. First, cost-benefit analysis for different projects is carried out. The unit water saving cost diagram is employed to rank the priority of implementation of each project. Then, the project combination that meets the expected water-saving goal is determined via water-saving pinch analysis. Finally, the water conservation potential and cost-benefit of the optimal project combination are estimated using the marginal cost curve diagram. Two scenarios are considered for the proposed graphical approach: with and without government subsidies. A chlor-alkali/polyvinyl chloride complex is used as an illustrative case study. The results indicate the proposed method can be used to screen out the feasible projects under the constraints of water-saving target and financial fund. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Wang, Fangming; Zhang, Zetian; Wang, Fang; Jia, Xiaoping] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Qingdao 266042, Peoples R China; [Li, Zhiwei] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China; [Wang, Fang] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sino German Engn Coll, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China; [Tan, Raymond R.] De La Salle Univ, Chem Engn Dept, Manila 0922, Philippines; [Ren, Jingzheng] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China		Jia, XP (corresponding author), Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Qingdao 266042, Peoples R China.	1131924555@qq.com; zhiwei.li@hfut.edu.cn; 1374364737@qq.com; wangf@qust.edu.cn; Raymond.tan@dlsu.edu.ph; jingzheng.ren@polyu.edu.hk; jiaxp@qust.edu.cn		JIA, Xiaoping/0000-0002-1338-7545	National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFE0201400]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771575]	National Key R&D Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	The authors would like to thank the financial support provided by National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFE0201400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771575).	[Anonymous], 2020, HANZHOU DAILY; Aviso KB, 2010, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V88, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2009.11.003; Basupi I, 2020, WATER ENVIRON J, V34, P536, DOI 10.1111/wej.12483; Bijl DL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.005; Brooks DB, 2006, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V22, P521, DOI 10.1080/07900620600779699; Byers W., 2003, IND WATER MANAGEMENT; Cai JL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P2901, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.180; China Chlor-Alkali Industry Association, 2017, 13 5 YEAR PLAN CHIN; Dai H.Y., 2015, CHLOR ALKALI IND, V51, P30; Gumbo B, 2003, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V28, P797, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2003.08.026; Jia XP, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.034; Jia XP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P950, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.332; Jia XP, 2015, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V17, P1987, DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-0921-1; Jiang Y, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V54, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.006; Klemes JJ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V98, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.030; Liu JG, 2012, SCIENCE, V337, P649, DOI 10.1126/science.1219471; Liu JG, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P545, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000518; Lyu SD, 2016, J ENVIRON SCI, V39, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2015.11.012; Ma T, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14532-5; Manan ZA, 2004, AICHE J, V50, P3169, DOI 10.1002/aic.10235; Mao R., 2019, CHINAS CNY 10000 GDP; Marchioni A, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V268, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.007; NDRC, 2019, NAT WAT CONS ACT PLA; Oki T, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P1068, DOI 10.1126/science.1128845; Roychaudhuri PS, 2017, ENERGY, V138, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.082; Sun S, 2017, J HYDROL, V553, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.020; Sun YH, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.110; Tan RR, 2018, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V20, P1123, DOI 10.1007/s10098-018-1551-1; Tan RR, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P2107, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1101-7; Wada Y, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P175, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-175-2016; Wang C., 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V280; Wang F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V219, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.079; Wang H, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P3317, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02615-3; Wang Q, 2016, ENVIRON POLLUT, V218, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.011; Wang YS, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V101, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.092; World Bank Group, 2016, HIGH DRY CLIM CHANG, DOI DOI 10.1596/23665; Xiong W, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109766; Zhang DM, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V170, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.11.004; Zhao X, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P1031, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1404130112	39	3	3	2	16	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 10	2021	287								125503	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125503	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125503			14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PY2QN					2022-09-08	WOS:000611893500016
J	Gallien, J; Leung, NHZ; Yadav, P				Gallien, Jeremie; Leung, Ngai-Hang Z.; Yadav, Prashant			Inventory Policies for Pharmaceutical Distribution in Zambia: Improving Availability and Access Equity	PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT			English	Article						inventory management; medicine distribution; efficiency and equity; simulation; zambia	MANAGEMENT; HEALTH	In many low- and middle-income countries, including Zambia, stockouts of life-saving medicines threaten the advancement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); it is therefore vital to reduce stockouts through the use of improved inventory control policies. The associated medicine distribution problem is challenging because it involves seasonality and uncertainty in both demand and lead times, heterogeneous delivery locations, and lost demand. Besides service level and inventory costs, equity across delivery locations must also be considered. This empirical study is based on an independently validated simulation model constructed from extensive field data, and addresses the lack of rigorous recommendations of inventory policies in this context. It compares the current base-stock and other policies proposed in the practitioner's literature with an optimization-based policy adapted from research on industrial settings. Although the optimization-based policy may need more implementation efforts, it generally outperforms the other evaluated policies. Our results also suggest that the prevalent proportional inventory rationing rules may lead to substantial service level discrepancies between facilities. Finally, the performance metrics of service level and distribution equity can be at odds, prompting non-trivial design trade-offs and considerations. This work motivated the development of a digital distribution information system involving smartphones with barcode scanners deployed in 60 health centers, posts, and district hospitals in Zambia until 2018.	[Gallien, Jeremie] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England; [Leung, Ngai-Hang Z.] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Yadav, Prashant] INSEAD, Technol & Operat Management, Blvd Constance, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France; [Yadav, Prashant] Ctr Global Dev, Washington, DC 20036 USA; [Yadav, Prashant] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA		Gallien, J (corresponding author), London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England.	jgallien@london.edu; znhleung@cityu.edu.hk; prashant.yadav@insead.edu	Gallien, Jeremie/L-6428-2013	Gallien, Jeremie/0000-0001-6292-5031				Agrawal N, 2001, NAV RES LOG, V48, P409, DOI 10.1002/nav.1026; Axsater S., 2002, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V4, P75, DOI 10.1287/msom.4.1.75.291; Babaley, 2011, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM; Barrington J, 2010, MALARIA J, V9, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-298; Bertsimas D, 2011, OPER RES, V59, P17, DOI 10.1287/opre.1100.0865; Bossert TJ, 2007, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V22, P73, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czl041; Cameron A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P240, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6; Caro F, 2010, OPER RES, V58, P257, DOI 10.1287/opre.1090.0698; De Vries H, 2020, PROD OPER MANAG, V29, P55, DOI 10.1111/poms.13092; Ernst R, 1997, EUR J OPER RES, V103, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00280-9; Foreman J, 2008, THESIS MASSACHUSETTS; Foreman J, 2010, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V12, P547, DOI 10.1287/msom.1090.0288; Gallien J, 2017, PROD OPER MANAG, V26, P997, DOI 10.1111/poms.12662; Graves SC, 1996, MANAGE SCI, V42, P1, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.42.1.1; HEATH DC, 1994, IIE TRANS, V26, P17, DOI 10.1080/07408179408966604; Hwang B, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0212405; IBM, 2014, ZAMB GOV IBM PROV IM; Kraiselburd S, 2013, PROD OPER MANAG, V22, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01315.x; Leung NHZ, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156026; Management Sciences for Health, 1997, MAN DRUG SUPPL SEL P; MARSH MT, 1994, EUR J OPER RES, V74, P1, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90200-3; McCoy JH, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P965, DOI 10.1111/poms.12101; Neale JJ, 2015, PROD OPER MANAG, V24, P535, DOI 10.1111/poms.12262; Picazo OF, 2009, WORLD BANK COUNTRY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7804-5; Porteus E., 2002, FDN STOCHASTIC INVEN, DOI 10.1515/9781503619883; Printz, 2014, MALARIA SEASONALITY; Qi J, 2017, MANAGE SCI, V63, P566, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2353; Raja S, 2009, PUBLIC SECTOR HLTH S; Sieter, 2010, PRACTICAL APPROACH P; The World Bank , 2016, HLTH SERV IMPR PROJ; USAID | DELIVER PROJECT, 2011, COMP LOG HDB USAID D; USAID | DELIVER PROJECT, 2011, LOG HDB PRACT GUID S; Vledder M, 2019, HEALTH SYST REFORM, V5, P158, DOI 10.1080/23288604.2019.1596050; World Health Organization, 2016, WHO DRUG INF, V30, P180; Yadav P., 2007, ANAL PUBLIC PRIVATE; You DZ, 2015, LANCET, V386, P2275, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8; Zambia Ministry of Health , 2015, HLTH SECT SUPPL CHA; Zipkin P, 2008, OPER RES, V56, P1256, DOI 10.1287/opre.1070.0471	38	2	2	5	14	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1059-1478	1937-5956		PROD OPER MANAG	Prod. Oper. Manag.	DEC	2021	30	12					4501	4521		10.1111/poms.13541	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.13541		AUG 2021	21	Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	YH4ZU					2022-09-08	WOS:000688529700001
J	Valenzuela-Levi, N				Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolas			Factors influencing municipal recycling in the Global South: The case of Chile	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Recycling rate; Waste policy; Local authorities; Circular economy	SEPARATE WASTE COLLECTION; SOLID-WASTE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; INEQUALITY; CHALLENGES; DISPOSAL; SANTIAGO; POLITICS	One of the targets from the Sustainable Development Goals is by 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse. The indicators defined to measure progress are the recycling rate and Tons of material recycled. Paradoxically, very little is known about these indicators and the factors influencing them outside rich countries, where recycling has been long ago adopted. This study provides the first analysis of factors linked to separate collection rates and kilograms recycled per capita from actually existing municipal recycling services in a Latin American country. Thanks to primary data collection, it is possible to characterise and analyse the Chilean case. By 2018, barely above half of the 345 local governments had implemented recycling. Furthermore, even among municipalities that have been recycling for at least 5 years, separate collection is much lower than in any OECD country with available data. Econometric models are used to test nine different hypotheses about factors influencing municipal recycling. Existence of kerbside separate collection, duration of recycling programs and per capita spending on waste management are found to be positively and significantly linked to separate collection rates. Collection frequency of landfill waste is significant and negatively linked to higher separate collection rates within municipalities, but the same link is not significant between local governments. Four of the Chilean regions are found to be significantly lagging behind compared to the Santiago Metropolitan Region. Variables that are not significant are existence of organic recycling, population density, total population and poverty rate.	[Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolas] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, 19 Silver St, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England		Valenzuela-Levi, N (corresponding author), Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, 19 Silver St, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England.	nv284@cam.ac.uk	Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolás/ABA-9419-2020	Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolás/0000-0003-1174-9976	CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2016 [72170123]	CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2016	This research was possible thanks to the Becas Chile Program from the Chilean National Commission for Science and Technology (Conicyt). This work was funded by CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2016 - 72170123.	Abbott A, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P2214, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.028; Agovino M, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V98, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.003; Agovino M, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P589, DOI 10.1007/s10668-015-9754-7; Agovino M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V124, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.082; [Anonymous], 2016, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Besen GR, 2016, DISP, V52, P45, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2016.1195583; Magni AAC, 2014, SAUDE SOC-SAO PAULO, V23, P99, DOI 10.1590/S0104-12902014000100011; Callan S.J., 2006, EAST ECON J, V32, P221; Carvalho P, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.004; Challcharoenwattana A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V137, P1118, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.208; Chamizo-Gonzalez J, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V107, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.006; Chen CC, 2010, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V7, P447, DOI 10.1007/BF03326154; Chen CC, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.027; Alfaia RGDM, 2017, WASTE MANAGE RES, V35, P1195, DOI 10.1177/0734242X17735375; Chaves GDD, 2014, WASTE MANAGE RES, V32, P19, DOI 10.1177/0734242X14541987; European Environment Agency, 2016, MUN WAST MAN EUR COU; Ferronato N, 2019, ENVIRON DEV, V29, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2019.01.002; Gallardo A, 2012, WASTE MANAGE RES, V30, P859, DOI 10.1177/0734242X12443584; Garreton M, 2017, CITIES, V65, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.005; Giovannini M, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P1497, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2017.1363727; Greco G, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.011; GROSSMAN GM, 1993, MEXICO-U.S. FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, P13; Guibrunet L, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V86, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.021; Guibrunet L, 2017, GEOFORUM, V85, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.011; Intendencia Region Metropolitana de Santiago, 2019, IN NOV EST SEP REC R; Jara-Samaniego J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P1349, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.178; Jenkins RR, 2003, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V45, P294, DOI 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00054-2; Kaseva ME, 2005, HABITAT INT, V29, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.12.003; Lakhan C, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V92, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.006; Lavee D, 2010, WASTE MANAGE, V30, P2204, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.032; Lee S, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P1159, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.005; Livert F, 2018, REG STUD, V52, P403, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1309013; Matsumoto S, 2011, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V55, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.005; Mendez AP, 2008, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V12, P752, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.025; Hare P, 2019, DIALECT ANTHROPOL, V43, P31, DOI 10.1007/s10624-018-9533-6; Ordonez I, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V72, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.002; Martinez CIP, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P1067, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9782-y; Passarini F, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P785, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.021; Peretz Jean H., 2005, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V48, P627, DOI DOI 10.1080/0964056050018170; Rehren A, 1996, CRIME LAW SOCIAL CH, V25, P323, DOI 10.1007/BF00572513; Rojas CA, 2018, RESOURCES-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/resources7010018; Rosa E, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P1407, DOI 10.1177/0308518X18781083; Sidique SF, 2010, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V54, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.006; Slavik J, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V70, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.013; Sorroche S, 2017, REV ESTUD SOC, P58, DOI 10.7440/res61.2017.05; Starr J, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V99, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.009; Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Regional, 2019, SIST NAC INF MUN; Tadesse T, 2009, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V53, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.009; Thorpe N., 2013, INDEPENDENT STUDY PR, P1806; Valenzuela-Levi N, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.195; Vasconi P, 2004, RESIDUOS S LIDOS DOM; Vasquez OC, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V82, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.006; Vasquez OC, 2011, REV INT CONTAM AMBIE, V27, P347; Vergara SE, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P107, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12257; Xevgenos D, 2015, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V6, P657, DOI 10.1007/s12649-015-9389-9	55	24	24	7	42	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	NOV	2019	150								104441	10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104441	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104441			10	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	JA8ZY		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000488141000025
J	Dwivedi, A; Moktadir, MA; Jabbour, CJC; De Carvalho, DE				Dwivedi, Ashish; Moktadir, Md Abdul; Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta; de Carvalho, Daniel Estima			Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world	TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE			English	Article						Industry 4.0; Big data; Circular economy; Sustainable production; Green recovery; Sustainable Development Goals	SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; CLEANER-PRODUCTION; GREY-DEMATEL; DECISION-SUPPORT; SMART PRODUCTION; BARRIERS; TECHNOLOGIES; CHINA; CHALLENGES; MODEL	In the past few years, the implementation of a more sustainable mode of production has become necessary for manufacturing companies to thrive in the international business context. Professionals and researchers are also paying increasing attention to Industry 4.0 (14.0) and big data, as well as Circular Economy (CE) concepts, due to the many advantages they can provide for the manufacturing industry. The purpose of the CE is the effective utilization of resources, and the 14.0 concept has been established to help achieve this objective and requires further exploration in the field of sustainable production. Research gaps exist in the literature regarding challenges to 14.0 and CE in terms of Sustainable Footwear Production (SFP) in emerging economies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to deliver an original analysis of the most significant challenges regarding the interaction of 14.0 and CE for SFP. A comprehensive literature review is performed to establish the challenges to 14.0-CE for SFP in the context of emerging economies. Further, the challenges identified are prioritized based on the assessment of a real case study from the footwear industry. A mixed methodology (i.e., both qualitative and quantitative) is adopted to identify the cause-effect interactions among the identified challenges. The results of our analysis show that the five most important causal challenges obstructing the execution of SFP in the footwear industry are 'deficient legislative-industry strategies towards SFP adoption', 'lack of competence in 14.0 and CE concepts for SFP adoption', 'understanding of synchronization among suppliers for attaining SFP', 'uncertain economic benefits of 14.0 and CE application for attaining SFP' and 'inadequate support for industries towards SFP efforts'. This study may be beneficial for industry managers, practitioners and decision makers to establish an understanding of 14.0-CE initiatives and to mitigate the most significant challenges regarding the successful implementation of 14.0-CE for SFP.	[Dwivedi, Ashish] O P Jindal Global Univ, Jindal Global Business Sch, Sonipat 131001, India; [Moktadir, Md Abdul] Univ Dhaka, Inst Leather Engn & Technol, Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh; [Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta] Emlyon Business Sch, LN6 7TS, Ecully, France; [de Carvalho, Daniel Estima] FIA Business Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil		Jabbour, CJC (corresponding author), Emlyon Business Sch, LN6 7TS, Ecully, France.	cchiappettajabbour@lincoln.ac.uk	CHIAPPETTA JABBOUR, Charbel Jose/F-3505-2010	CHIAPPETTA JABBOUR, Charbel Jose/0000-0002-6143-4924; Moktadir, Md. Abdul/0000-0003-1852-7815				Ali SM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.322; Almada-Lobo Francisco., 2016, J INNOVATION MANAGEM, V3, P16, DOI 10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0003; [Anonymous], 2017, DAILY SUN REPORT; [Anonymous], ESPACIOS CARACAS, V34, P1; Baena F, 2017, PROCEDIA MANUF, V9, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022; Bai CG, 2013, INT J PROD ECON, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.011; Basappaji KM, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V54, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.255; Bhatia MS, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V136, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.021; Bilitewski B, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.004; Bovea MD, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V228, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.014; Bressanelli G, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030639; Carvalho J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.343; Cezarino LO, 2021, MANAGE DECIS, V59, P1841, DOI 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1084; Chauhan C, 2021, BENCHMARKING, V28, P1638, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0310; Corporate Finance, 2015, IND 4 0 CHALL SOL DI; Cui L, 2019, J BUS RES, V98, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.031; Dabbous A, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119775; de Jesus A, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001; De Marchi V, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11236530; Deepu T.S., 2021, DIGITAL BUSINESS, V1, DOI [10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100009, DOI 10.1016/J.DIGBUS.2021.100009]; DENG JL, 1982, SYST CONTROL LETT, V1, P288, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X; Dev NK, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583; Domenech T, 2019, ECOL ECON, V155, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001; Dwivedi A, 2020, J MODEL MANAG, V15, P933, DOI 10.1108/JM2-01-2019-0003; Dwivedi A, 2019, J SCI TECHNOL POLICY, V10, P319, DOI 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2018-0054; Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013, OPP CONS GOODS SECT; Fatimah YA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263; Frank AG, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V210, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004; Garcia-Muina F.E., 2018, SOC SCI, V7, P255, DOI [10.3390/socsci7120255, DOI 10.3390/SOCSCI7120255]; Garetti M, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P83, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.591619; Garg CP, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124035; Garrido-Hidalgo C, 2019, COMPUT IND, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103127; Geng Y, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1502, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.028; Gupta S.M., 2018, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P117, DOI [10.1201/9781315119304-10, DOI 10.1201/9781315119304-10]; Gupta S, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V144, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030; Hendershot DC, 2006, PROCESS SAF PROG, V25, P98, DOI 10.1002/prs.10121; Hilson G, 2000, MINER ENG, V13, P699, DOI 10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00055-8; Hofmann E, 2017, COMPUT IND, V89, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002; Horvath D, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021; Huang JC, 2011, COMPUT BIOL MED, V41, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.03.007; Jabbour CJC, 2020, RESOUR POLICY, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596; Jabbour CJC, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416; Jaeger B, 2020, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V33, P729, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047; Julong D, 1990, P ISUMA 1990 1 INT S, P285, DOI [10.1109/ISUMA.1990.151265, DOI 10.1109/ISUMA.1990.151265]; Kakha G, 2019, INT J ENG-IRAN, V32, P1497, DOI 10.5829/ije.2019.32.10a.20; Kang HS, 2016, INT J PR ENG MAN-GT, V3, P111, DOI 10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5; Kerin M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117805; Kiel D, 2017, INT J INNOV MANAG, V21, DOI 10.1142/S1363919617400151; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Kirkire MS, 2017, J MODEL MANAG, V12, P204, DOI 10.1108/JM2-09-2015-0062; Koch V., 2014, IND 4 0 OPPORTUNITIE, P5; Kumar R, 2021, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V32, P82, DOI 10.1108/MEQ-03-2020-0058; Kumar S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023; Lee YC, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P1745, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.034; Li JH, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P1015, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.040; Lin KY, 2018, COMPUT IND ENG, V125, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.06.023; Jabbour ABLD, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P273, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8; Lu Y, 2017, J IND INF INTEGR, V6, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005; Luthra S, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V117, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018; Madaan J., 2020, MODERN SUPPLY CHAIN, V2, P2631, DOI DOI 10.1108/MSCRA-12-2019-0023; Marques M, 2017, J AMB INTEL SMART EN, V9, P299, DOI 10.3233/AIS-170436; Martin-Gomez A, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.035; Nascimento DLM, 2019, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V30, P607, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071; Mavi NK, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V247, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.069; McPherson S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V135, P907, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.138; Moktadir MA, 2021, E M EKON MANAG, V24, P197, DOI 10.15240/tul/001/2021-1-013; Moktadir MA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119737; Moktadir MA, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V117, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.020; Moktadir MA, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.245; Molina-Azorin JF, 2009, J CLEAN PROD, V17, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.09.001; Moors EHM, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P657, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.010; Moreno M, 2016, SMART INNOV SYST TEC, V52, P563, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_48; Muller JM, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010247; Mwangi GM, 2021, ANN OPER RES, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04096-y; Nicoletti Bernardo, 2018, AGILE PROCUREMENT, P189; Okorie O, 2018, ENERGIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/en11113009; Ormazabal M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031; Ozkan-Ozen YD, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104986; Pagoropoulos A, 2017, PROC CIRP, V64, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047; Pusporini P, 2017, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P1520, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290147; Rahman T, 2019, PROD PLAN CONTROL, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2019.1674939; Raj A, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107546; Rajput S, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V49, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.002; Raut RD, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V68, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.067; Ren JZ, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V67, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.024; Rizos V, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111212; Roblek V, 2016, SAGE OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1177/2158244016653987; Rosa P, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1662, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896; Savtschenko M., 2017, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10288; Schroder C., 2017, CHALLENGES IND 4 0 S; Severo EA, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.090; Severo EA, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V96, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.027; Shamim S, 2017, ENERGIES, V10, DOI 10.3390/en10040499; Shayganmehr M., 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, P125280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125280; Shi H, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P842, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.05.002; Shrouf F, 2014, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P697, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058728; Silvestre BS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V194, P766, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.127; Sousa-Zomer TT, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P740, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.006; Staniskis J.K., 2003, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V5, P142, DOI [10.1007/ s10098-003-0182-2, DOI 10.1007/S10098-003-0182-2]; Su B, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V42, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020; Suarez-Eiroa B, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V214, P952, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271; Sun Y., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS MOBIL, V1, P1; Sun Yong-he, 2017, Control and Decision, V32, P385, DOI 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2016.0823; Tang KY, 2013, REV ADV MATER SCI, V33, P373; Theorin A, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P1297, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1201604; Tian GD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P1088, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.086; Tomic T, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110564; Tortorella GL, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P2975, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420; Tsai FM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124132; Tseng ML, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009; Tseng ML, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V131, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028; van Loon P, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P1662, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1367107; Veleva V, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V154, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.177; Vieira LC, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.034; Waibel MW, 2017, PROCEDIA MANUF, V8, P731, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.094; Wei D, 2019, ENERGY REP, V5, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.010; Weyer S, 2015, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V48, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143; Wu YN, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V189, P853, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.002; Yadav G, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120112; Zadeh MA, 2018, EURASIAN J ANAL CHEM, V13, DOI 10.29333/ejac/85007; Zeng SX, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P975, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.019; Zezulka F, 2016, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V49, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.002; Zou HX, 2008, 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, ICRMEM 2008, PROCEEDINGS, P100, DOI 10.1109/ICRMEM.2008.13	123	4	4	11	11	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0040-1625	1873-5509		TECHNOL FORECAST SOC	Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.	FEB	2022	175								121335	10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121335	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121335			19	Business; Regional & Urban Planning	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Public Administration	0D4DC					2022-09-08	WOS:000775946700027
J	Xu, XY; Zhang, ZH; Long, T; Sun, SM; Gao, J				Xu, Xueyan; Zhang, Zhonghao; Long, Tao; Sun, Shimeng; Gao, Jun			Mega-city region sustainability assessment and obstacles identi fi cation with GIS-entropy-TOPSIS model: A case in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainability assessment; Obstacles diagnosis; GIS-Entropy-TOPSIS; Strong sustainability; Weak sustainability; Mega-city region	DEVELOPMENT GOALS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; WEAK SUSTAINABILITY; DECISION-MAKING; INDICATORS; AFRICA; NEIGHBORHOODS; NORMALIZATION	Sustainability is related to support the huge population and improve the residents' well-being in the Mega-city regions. Sustainability assessment is necessary under the context of implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in 2030. Refer to SDG 11, this study constructed an index system, assessed the sustainability level based on the theory of "weak" and "strong" sustainability and screened obstacles of 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) by applying a combined method of GIS-entropy-TOPSIS. The results showed that the overall sustainable level of the YRD improved, while its spatial pattern is relatively stable from 2007 to 2016. Furthermore, the co-operation effect within regions was unstable and unbalanced, due to the lack of interaction and influence among cities. In addition, the obstacles of each city gradually shifted from strong sustainable factors to weak sustainable factors. This paper also provided corresponding solutions regarding government management practice. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Xu, Xueyan] Shanghai Business Sch, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China; [Xu, Xueyan; Zhang, Zhonghao; Sun, Shimeng; Gao, Jun] Shanghai Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Inst Urban Studies, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Zhonghao] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; [Zhang, Zhonghao] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; [Long, Tao] Shanghai Dev Pk Assoc, Listen China Think Tank Ind Pk, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China		Zhang, ZH (corresponding author), Shanghai Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Inst Urban Studies, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China.	xuxy@sbs.edu.cn; zzh87@shnu.edu.cn; longtao@sidp.org.cn; gaojun@shnu.edu.cn			Natural Science Foundation Projects of China [41730642, 41601459]; Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19040504]; Chenguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation; Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [17CG45]; Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [16YJCZH152]	Natural Science Foundation Projects of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Chinese Academy of Sciences); Chenguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation; Shanghai Municipal Education Commission(Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (SHMEC)); Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China	This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation Projects of China (NO. 41730642 & 41601459), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA19040504), Chenguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No.17CG45) and the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 16YJCZH152).	Acheampong M, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V75, P927, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.074; Agrawal Saurabh, 2016, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, V12, P15, DOI 10.1007/s40092-015-0124-8; Ali-Toudert F, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V73, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.046; Arslan TV, 2016, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V40, P180, DOI 10.1111/1477-8947.12115; Awasthi A, 2012, APPL MATH MODEL, V36, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.033; Ayres RU, 2001, ENVIRON ETHICS, V23, P155, DOI 10.5840/enviroethics200123225; Barnett C, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P87, DOI 10.1177/0956247815621473; Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419; Beskese A, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V73, P3513, DOI 10.1007/s12665-014-3635-5; Bleicher A, 2010, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V17, P57, DOI 10.1080/13504500903488263; Bond A, 2012, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V30, P53, DOI 10.1080/14615517.2012.661974; Boyle L, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041005; Cohen M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112048; Dietz S, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007; Ding XH, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.140; Djurfeldt AA, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.08.002; Dodman D, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P185, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103016; Gao L, 2017, NATURE, V544, P217, DOI 10.1038/nature21694; Geijzendorffer IR, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V74, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.017; Haider H, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.031; Huang L, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1175, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2; Jayasooria D, 2016, J HUM RIGHTS SOC WOR, V1, P19, DOI 10.1007/s41134-016-0007-y; Kates RW, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P641, DOI 10.1126/science.1059386; Kaur H, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V210, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009; Klopp JM, 2017, CITIES, V63, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019; Kowkabi L, 2013, INT J ENVIRON RES, V7, P423; KRUGMAN P, 1993, J REGIONAL SCI, V33, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1993.tb00217.x; Li F, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.022; Li PY, 2013, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V185, P2453, DOI 10.1007/s10661-012-2723-9; Liang Y, 2015, SOC INDIC RES, V123, P677, DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0755-y; Malczewski J., 2015, MULTICRITERIA DECISI, VVolume 1; Ness B., 2007, ECOL ECON, V60, P498, DOI [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023]; Ngan SL, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V111, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.001; Pollescha NL, 2016, ECOL ECON, V130, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.018; Raheem UA, 2017, AFR GEOGR REV, V36, P216, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2015.1130100; Salmeron JL, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P2443, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.094; Salvia AL, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V208, P841, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242; Sanchez-Lozano JM, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V24, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019; Schmidt-Traub G, 2017, NAT GEOSCI, V10, P547, DOI 10.1038/NGEO2985; Shen LY, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006; Shi GT, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.039; Simon D, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P49, DOI 10.1177/0956247815619865; Singh RK, 2009, ECOL INDIC, V9, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011; Starkl M, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7175, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.037; Sun LY, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V73, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.018; Talukder B, 2017, RESOURCES-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/resources6040066; Tzeng GH, 2005, ENERG POLICY, V33, P1373, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014; Valensisi G, 2016, CAN J DEV STUD, V37, P239, DOI 10.1080/02255189.2016.1131672; Verma P, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007; Wei C, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124733; Wei YG, 2015, HABITAT INT, V46, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.015; Wilson MC, 2017, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V24, P44, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2015.1136360; Wu JG, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P999, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9; Wu XM, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V104, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.033; Xu XY, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16132288; Yang TR, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11164281; Ye YQ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P930, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.031; Yigitcanlar T, 2015, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V12, P341, DOI 10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x	58	21	21	9	30	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	APR 20	2021	294								126147	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126147	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126147		FEB 2021	12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	RH3QH					2022-09-08	WOS:000636137100009
J	Musavengane, R				Musavengane, Regis			Small hotels and responsible tourism practice: Hoteliers' perspectives	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Responsible tourism; Small hotels; Participatory democracy; Sustainable development; Theory of planned behaviour	ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE TOURISM; FOOD WASTE; GREEN; BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; ATTITUDES; BARRIERS; INDUSTRY	Responsible tourism is embraced globally as one of the vectors to achieving the United Nations' 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Through the Theory of Planned Behaviour, this article attempts to establish the understanding of responsible tourism among owners of small budget hotels in the Johannesburg West Rand Region, South Africa. The conclusion it reaches is that a general appreciation of responsible tourism does not translate into being responsible in daily operations. The paper proposes a 'Best Responsible Tourism Model', which identifies four ways that small hotels can be encouraged by the public sector to participate in responsible tourism, including education, economic motivation, marketing motivation and building social networks. Combined, these feed into the Theory of Planned Behaviour variations, normative beliefs, behavioural beliefs and control beliefs, which will determine the behaviour and perceptions of hoteliers on Responsible Tourism Practice. Participatory democracy should be adopted by hoteliers and other key responsible tourism actors to augment understanding and practice of responsible tourism in small hotels. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Musavengane, Regis] Univ Johannesburg, Coll Business & Econ, Sch Tourism & Hospitality, Dept Tourism, Bunting Rd Campus,POB 524, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa		Musavengane, R (corresponding author), Univ Johannesburg, Coll Business & Econ, Sch Tourism & Hospitality, Dept Tourism, Bunting Rd Campus,POB 524, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa.	regmuss2000@yahoo.com	Musavengane, Regis/U-9197-2019	Musavengane, Regis/0000-0002-5276-7911				AJZEN I, 1991, LEISURE SCI, V13, P185, DOI 10.1080/01490409109513137; AJZEN I, 1987, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V20, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6; Ajzen I., 2005, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT, V2nd ed.; Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2; Ajzen I., 2012, HDB THEORIES SOCIAL; Alzboun N, 2016, J HOSP TOUR MANAG, V27, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.03.001; [Anonymous], 2015, UNDERSTANDING SUSTAI; [Anonymous], SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRI; [Anonymous], 2002, CAP TOWN DECL; Apotheker S., 1995, RESOURCE RECYCLING, V14, P16; Azam M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V190, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168; Banerjee SB, 2002, J BUS RES, V55, P177, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1; Bohdanowicz P., 2005, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, V46, P188, DOI 10.1177/0010880404273891; Boonyakiat K., 2012, USING BUFFET MONITOR; Brewer JF, 2017, MAR POLICY, V80, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.015; Budeanu A, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.024; Budeanu A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.027; Camilleri MA, 2018, TOUR PLAN DEV, V15, P653, DOI 10.1080/21568316.2017.1393772; Carasuk R, 2016, J HOSP TOUR RES, V40, P19, DOI 10.1177/1096348013491607; Caruana R, 2014, ANN TOURISM RES, V46, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2014.03.006; Chan ESW, 2008, INT J HOSP MANAG, V27, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.011; Chan ESW, 2014, INT J HOSP MANAG, V40, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.001; Chan ESW, 2011, J HOSP TOUR RES, V35, P3, DOI 10.1177/1096348010370857; Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), 1996, WHIT PAP TOUR DEV PR; Dewhurst H., 2003, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V11, P383, DOI DOI 10.1080/09669580308667212; Ebreo A, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P424, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973061; El Dief M, 2012, J HOSP TOUR RES, V36, P115, DOI 10.1177/1096348010388657; Erdogan N, 2007, TOURISM MANAGE, V28, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.003; Ettinger A, 2018, INT J HOSP MANAG, V68, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.09.002; FEDHASA (Federated Hospitality Association of South Africa), 2017, IM AW RESP TOUR; Font X, 2007, CRITICAL ISSUES ECOT, P386; Frey N, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.017; Garay L, 2012, INT J HOSP MANAG, V31, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.013; Gil MJA, 2001, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V29, P457; Goffi G, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V209, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.208; Goodwin H., 2011, TAKING RESPONSIBILIT; Gray DE., 2013, DOING RES REAL WORLD; Gstaettner AM, 2017, J OUTDOOR REC TOUR, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jort.2017.04.001; Hanafiah MH, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V222, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.194; Henderson J. C., 2007, International Journal of Hospitality Management, V26, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.02.001; Hoogendoorn G, 2015, S AFR GEOGR J, V97, P123, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2015.1028977; Horng JS, 2017, INT J HOSP MANAG, V63, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.02.005; Bonilla-Priego MJ, 2011, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V19, P361, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2010.530350; Kallbekken S, 2013, ECON LETT, V119, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.019; Kasim A, 2007, INT J HOSP TOUR ADM, V8, P25, DOI 10.1300/J149v08n02_02; Kernel P, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.023; Kerr B, 2004, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V19, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.004; Kim Y, 2010, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V18, P997, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2010.490300; Kirk D., 1995, INT J CONT HOSPITALI, V7, P3, DOI [10.1108/09596119510095325, DOI 10.1108/09596119510095325]; Lacher RG, 2010, TOURISM GEOGR, V12, P77, DOI 10.1080/14616680903493654; Lalasz Camille B., 2013, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, V18, P181, DOI 10.1080/10871209.2013.751637; LeanPath, 2013, LEANPATH AUT FOOD WA; Liu JY, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V41, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.016; Lockwood M, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P986, DOI 10.1080/08941920802178214; Mair J, 2010, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V18, P77, DOI 10.1080/09669580903291007; Mann M., 2002, GLOBAL ALTERNATIVE T; Mathew PV, 2017, J HOSP TOUR MANAG, V31, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.10.001; Maynard B, 2002, DEV RESPONSIBLE TOUR; McWilliams A, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P117, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987; Mensah I, 2014, INT J HOSP TOUR ADM, V15, P150, DOI 10.1080/15256480.2014.901064; Mihalic T, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.062; Milohnic I, 2006, TOUR HOSP MANAG-CROA, V12, P231; Musavengane R., 2013, INT J HOSPIT TOURISM, V6, P1; Musavengane R, 2015, REV LIT AFRICAN J HO, V4, P1; Musavengane R, 2016, DEV SO AFR, V33, P806, DOI 10.1080/0376835X.2016.1231054; Okereke Chukwumerije, 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.002; PARSONS T, 1960, STRUCTURE PROCESS MO; Pope S, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V137, P173, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2546-z; Price Waterhouse Coopers, 2018, HOT OUTL 2018 2022 P; Quinlan C., 2015, BUSINESS RES METHODS; Radwan HRI, 2012, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V20, P533, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2011.621539; Revell A., 2007, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V16, P404, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.499; Rhodes AR., 2004, DEFINING RESPONSIBLE; Ritchie J., 2003, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC, P77; Rivis A, 2003, CURR PSYCHOL, V22, P218, DOI 10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2; ROGERSON M, 2004, TOURISM DEV ISSUES C; Sampaio AR, 2012, INT J TOUR RES, V14, P235, DOI 10.1002/jtr.849; Saunders M., 2019, RES METHODS BUSINESS; Schaper M., 2002, INT SMALL BUS J, V20, P235, DOI DOI 10.1177/0266242602203001; Shanklin CW, 2001, J AM DIET ASSOC, V101, P1221, DOI 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00299-1; Simpson M., 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V13, P156, DOI [DOI 10.1002/BSE.398, 10.1002/bse.398]; Siti-Nabiha A. K., 2011, World Applied Sciences Journal, V12, P56; Smith C., 2018, e-Review of Tourism Research, V15, P480; South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), 2011, 1162 SABS SANS; Spenceley A., 2007, RESPONSIBLE TOURISM; Spenceley Anna, 2008, RESPONSIBLE TOURISM; Stanford D., 2000, REV ED TOURISTS ACHI; Statistics South Africa [Stats SA], 2016, TOUR SAT ACC 2011 20; Statistics South Africa [Stats SA], 2018, D64111 STATS SA; Swarbrooke J., 1999, SUSTAINABLE TOURISM; Tang Jigen, 2004, THESIS U COLL LONDON; Tearfund, 2001, TOUR PUTT ETH PRACT; Tosun C., 1998, Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, V4, P101, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199806)4:2<101::AID-PTH100>3.0.CO;2-Z; Tzschentke NA, 2008, INT J HOSP MANAG, V27, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.010; Van der Merwe M., 2007, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V38; Walker GJ., 2013, CONT PERSPECTIVES LE, P371; Wyngaard AT, 2013, INT J HOSP MANAG, V34, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.007; Yadava RN, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V138, P549, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1; Zein K., 2008, BEST ENV PRACTICES H; 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P205, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.07.133; 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P320, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2014.07.038	101	29	31	3	35	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 20	2019	220						786	799		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.143	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.143			14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HU8CH					2022-09-08	WOS:000465509400064
J	Moses, O; Hopper, T				Moses, Olayinka; Hopper, Trevor			Accounting articles on developing countries in ranked English language journals: a meta-review	ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL			English	Article						Developing countries; Journal ratings; Topics; Authors; Impact; Citations	AUDIT QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; REFLECTIONS; PERFORMANCE; MAINSTREAM; RANKINGS; CHINA; GAPS	Purpose The paper conducts a metadata analysis of articles on developing countries in highly ranked "international" accounting journals, the topics covered, research methods employed, their authorship and impact, across countries and continents. Design/methodology/approach A database of the publications of accounting journals ranked A*, A and B in the Australian Business Dean Council (ABDC) journal rankings from 2009 to 2018 was constructed. A structured literature review, partly using NVivo and Leximancer, analysed the 1,317 articles on developing countries. A parallel online repository contains the research data. Findings Articles on accounting in developing countries increased by 36% over the ten years but remained a small proportion of all published articles (i.e. 1,317 of 13,805 representing 9.5%). They have concentrated on quantitative market-based studies of financial reporting and auditing, especially in larger and relatively richer developing countries in Asia and Africa, with developed capital markets. Broader topics deemed important in recent reviews of the area, for instance, on achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and on smaller, poorer countries, which have been neglected, albeit less so in qualitative studies. The research identifies important jurisdictional differences. Many authors held positions in British Commonwealth universities. The most cited articles overall, all quantitative, were in highly ranked North American journals, whereas most qualitative studies came from journals located in richer British Commonwealth countries. Research limitations/implications The study only covers English language journals. Journals in other languages and lesser ranked journals, especially those based in developing countries, may be important sources too. Practical implications More research on a broader range of accounting issues, especially in smaller and poorer developing countries, is needed. Although quantitative work is valuable, more recognition of the value of qualitative studies is needed, especially given the disappointing results of market-based policies prescribed by foreign institutions and their shift to advocating good governance reforms and achieving SDGs. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the most exhaustive analysis of recent accounting research on developing countries. It traces which journals have published such research, when, on which countries, on what topics and by whom. This is of interest to journal editors, course designers and researchers in the area. The authors hope that making the raw data and detailed analyses available online, consistent with protocols adopted in science disciplines, will encourage accounting researchers to do likewise to enable further testing of results and claims and build knowledge cumulatively.	[Moses, Olayinka] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Accounting & Commercial Law, Wellington, New Zealand; [Hopper, Trevor] Univ Sussex, Brighton, E Sussex, England; [Hopper, Trevor] Univ Essex, Colchester, Essex, England; [Hopper, Trevor] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand		Moses, O (corresponding author), Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Accounting & Commercial Law, Wellington, New Zealand.	yinka.moses@vuw.ac.nz	Moses, Olayinka/L-3282-2016	Moses, Olayinka/0000-0003-3884-2222; Hopper, Trevor/0000-0002-4362-1558				Alawattage C., 2008, CRIT PERSPECT, V19, P293, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2006.08.006; Alawattage C, 2021, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.002; Amini M, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P1450, DOI 10.1002/bse.2195; Andrews, 2013, LIMITS I REFORM DEV; Annisette M, 2018, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V51, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.12.002; Annisette M, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V31, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.06.001; Ashraf J., 2019, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION, P259; Bebbington J, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P2, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929; Bebbington J, 2017, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V48, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.06.002; Bebbington J, 2014, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V39, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003; Bisman J, 2009, ASIAN REV ACCOUNT, V17, P180, DOI 10.1108/13217340910991901; Black EL, 2017, J INT ACCOUNT RES, V16, P1, DOI 10.2308/jiar-10571; Bonner SE, 2006, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V31, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2005.06.003; Bowyer D, 2012, QUAL RES ACCOUNT MAN, V9, P363, DOI 10.1108/11766091211282670; Chen HW, 2011, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V28, P892, DOI 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01088.x; Chen SM, 2010, ACCOUNT REV, V85, P127, DOI 10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.127; Chen S, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V87, P299, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0; Chua WF, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P2253, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2018-3454; Chua WF, 2019, BEHAV RES ACCOUNT, V31, P3, DOI 10.2308/bria-52377; Crofts K, 2010, QUAL RES ACCOUNT MAN, V7, P180, DOI 10.1108/11766091011050859; de Villiers C, 2018, ACCOUNT FINANC, V58, P993, DOI 10.1111/acfi.12424; Demartini MC, 2020, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V58, P288, DOI 10.1080/00472778.2019.1659680; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Dumay J, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P1257, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2014-1714; Grossmann A, 2019, J BUS RES, V95, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.035; Gul FA, 2013, ACCOUNT REV, V88, P1993, DOI 10.2308/accr-50536; Guthrie J, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P2, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-036; Guthrie J, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P2, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1504; Hopper T, 2012, HANDBOOK OF ACCOUNTING AND DEVELOPMENT, P1; Hopper T, 2019, J ACCOUNT ORGAN CHAN, V15, P87, DOI 10.1108/JAOC-12-2017-0115; Hopper T, 2017, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V43, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.003; Hopwood AG, 2007, ACCOUNT REV, V82, P1365, DOI 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1365; Kaur A, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P338, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2014-1901; Leximancer, 2018, LEX US GUID; Lin Z., 2018, ROUTLEDGE HDB ACCOUN; Lowe A., 2006, BRIT ACCOUNTING REV, V38, P321; Lukka K, 1996, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V21, P755, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(96)00020-7; Mader P, 2015, STUD POL ECON PUB, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137364210; Mader P, 2018, DEV CHANGE, V49, P461, DOI 10.1111/dech.12368; Marrone M, 2020, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P2167, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2020-4457; Martin-Sardesai A, 2020, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P1193, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4133; Martin-Sardesai A, 2017, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V27, P329, DOI 10.1111/auar.12151; Massaro M, 2016, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V29, P767, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939; McCarthy WE, 2012, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V26, P833, DOI 10.2308/acch-10313; McCredie B, 2019, PAC ACCOUNT REV, V31, P553, DOI 10.1108/PAR-11-2018-0088; Merchant KA, 2010, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V21, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.004; Merigo JM, 2017, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V27, P71, DOI 10.1111/auar.12109; Moses O., 2020, SOCIAL ENV ACCOUNTAB, V40, P1; Moses O, 2019, ADV ENVIRON ACC MAN, V8, P159, DOI 10.1108/S1479-359820190000008007; Negash M, 2019, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V51, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003; O'Connell BT, 2020, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P1277, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2019-4293; O'Higgins ERE, 2006, BUS ETHICS Q, V16, P235, DOI 10.1017/S1052150X00012823; Palea V, 2017, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V42, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2016.03.002; Parker LD, 2013, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V26, P4, DOI 10.1108/09513571311293028; Prabowo T., 2018, J PUBLIC BUDGETING A, V30, P2; Raffournier B, 2010, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V19, P161, DOI 10.1080/09638180902989368; Sullivan K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.201; Thomas S, 2014, ECOL ECON, V107, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.028; Tilt C., 2018, SOCIAL ENV ACCOUNTAB, V38, P145; Vogel R, 2017, RES POLICY, V46, P1707, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.001; Weetman P., 2019, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION; Wildavsky A., 1986, BUDGETING COMP THEOR; World Economic Forum, 2021, GLOB RISKS REP, V16th ed.	63	2	2	4	12	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0951-3574	1758-4205		ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN	Account. Audit Account.	APR 4	2022	35	4					1035	1060		10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4528	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4528		OCT 2021	26	Business, Finance	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	0E2OY		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000711609900001
J	Xu, Z; Niu, L; Zhang, ZF; Hu, QY; Zhang, D; Huang, J; Li, C				Xu, Ze; Niu, Lu; Zhang, Zhengfeng; Hu, Qiyu; Zhang, Dong; Huang, Jing; Li, Chu			The impacts of land supply on PM2.5 concentration: Evidence from 292 cities in China from 2009 to 2017	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainability; Air pollution; Land supply; Panel-data vector autoregression; Regional synergy; China	AIR-POLLUTION; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; EXPOSURE; EMISSION; QUALITY; MODEL; PM10; URBANIZATION; PARTICLES; TRENDS	The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development proposes to considerably reduce the number of deaths and diseases caused by air pollution. It pays special attention to attaining this via urban air governance and management. Although the development of China's air governance has been a lengthy process, there is no indication of instituting a plan based on land supply (LS) in the foreseeable future. This paper introduces a novel perspective of the role of LS in managing air pollution, and builds a comprehensive analysis framework that includes the quantity, structure, and price of LS for management of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mu m or less (PM2.5). The dynamic relationship between LS and PM2.5 is revealed by a panel-data vector autoregression model on a district scale. The study found that: (1) The Central District has the highest average annual PM2.5 concentration in China from the year 2009-2017. (2) The supply of the four types of land -industrial and mining storage land (IMSL), commercial and business facilities land (CBFL), residential land (RL), and other land (OL)-showed increase in the Central District, while only IMSL decreased in the Western District. The supply of IMSL decreased the most in the Northeast District, and in the Eastern District, only the supply of OL increased. (3) In the Northeast District, the quantity, structure, and price of LS have no significant effect on PM2.5 concentration. However, in China, the Eastern District, and Central District, the bidding, auction, and listing prices have a significant negative effect on the PM2.5 concentration. As for the Western District, it exhibits not only the "negative price effect," but also the "negative quantity effect." In future, the government should adopt different strategies: (1) For China, the Eastern District, and Central District, the bidding, auction, and listing prices should be further increased; (2) In the Western District, local government should also focus on expanding the area of LS.	[Xu, Ze; Niu, Lu; Zhang, Zhengfeng; Hu, Qiyu; Zhang, Dong; Huang, Jing; Li, Chu] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China		Zhang, ZF (corresponding author), Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China.	xuze_bj@126.com; niulu@ruc.edu.cn; zhangzhengfeng@ruc.edu.cn; huqiyu9@163.com; cufezhangdong@163.com; Huangjing_ruc@163.com; lichu@ruc.edu.cn		Zhang, Dong/0000-0002-5771-5969	National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [42077433]; Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities; Research Funds of Renmin University of China [21XNH030]	National Natural Science Founda-tion of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities(Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities); Research Funds of Renmin University of China	The paper was supported by the National Natural Science Founda-tion of China (42077433) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (21XNH030) . Thanks to all anonymous reviewers for their valu-able comments and timely feedback.	Abrigo MRM, 2016, STATA J, V16, P778, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1601600314; Andrade MD, 2012, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V5, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11869-010-0104-5; Andrews DWK, 2001, J ECONOMETRICS, V101, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4; Aryal RK, 2009, J HAZARD MATER, V168, P732, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.086; Borrego C, 2006, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V21, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.07.009; Briggs DJ, 1997, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V11, P699, DOI 10.1080/136588197242158; Chen J, 2018, APPL ENERG, V230, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.089; Chen S., 2009, EC RES J, V4, P41; Chen S, 2020, REV INT ECON, V28, P1020, DOI 10.1111/roie.12480; Chen YY, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P12936, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1300018110; Clougherty JE, 2009, ATMOS ENVIRON, V43, P5545, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.003; Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6]; de Sherbinin A, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/084013; Ding YT, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V211, P1480, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.159; Emerson DJ, 2022, ACCOUNT EDUC, V31, P273, DOI 10.1080/09639284.2021.1971095; Ernste H., 2009, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, P102; Fan SX, 2017, ATMOS ENVIRON, V166, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.026; Fu Q, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1791, DOI 10.1177/0042098014552760; Han YJ, 2008, ATMOS ENVIRON, V42, P4735, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.047; Hien PD, 2002, ATMOS ENVIRON, V36, P3473, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00295-9; Ho SPS, 2003, CHINA QUART, P681, DOI 10.1017/S0305741003000407; HOLTZEAKIN D, 1988, ECONOMETRICA, V56, P1371, DOI 10.2307/1913103; Huang X., 2014, ECON GEOGR, V3, P38; Jin WF, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104630; Juda-Rezler K, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P6557, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.020; Kim S, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V214, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.027; Kukkonen J, 2018, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V18, P8041, DOI 10.5194/acp-18-8041-2018; Lee C, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V246, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.146; Lee SJ, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P1727, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1205006; Li SW, 2020, CHEMOSPHERE, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127163; Li YC, 2019, ATMOS ENVIRON, V213, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.062; Lu DB, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118741; MLRC, 2016, CHINA LAND RESOURCES; Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.050; Oanh NTK, 2013, ATMOS ENVIRON, V77, P674, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.001; Ramacher MOP, 2020, ATMOS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117674; Reisen F, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P3944, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.060; Requia WJ, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V243, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.056; Rubin Z, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V65, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.002; Salata S, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V28, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.009; Sanchis E, 2014, ATMOS ENVIRON, V98, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062; Schindler M, 2014, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V45, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.01.004; SIMS CA, 1980, ECONOMETRICA, V48, P1, DOI 10.2307/1912017; Sun WZ, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102849; Tan RP, 2018, ENERGY, V149, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.041; TOLLEY GS, 1976, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V2, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0095-0696(76)80002-2; Tripathy S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V673, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.453; Vienneau D, 2010, ATMOS ENVIRON, V44, P688, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.016; Wain A., 2008, DEV ENV SCI, P535; Wan DJ, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13111119; Wang H, 2019, ATMOS ENVIRON, V197, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.001; Wang SS, 2019, ENVIRON POLLUT, V251, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.050; Wang XM, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V123, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.001; Witkowska A, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V573, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.123; Wolff H, 2010, REV ENV ECON POLICY, V4, P293, DOI 10.1093/reep/req008; Wu WJ, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.010; [徐国泉 XU Guoquan], 2006, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population·Resources and Environment], V16, P158; Xu GY, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105889; Xu J, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P890, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00892.x; Yan D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V761, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143266; Yang T, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V230, P692, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.007; Yang YC, 2019, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V49, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.09.002; Zhang F, 2014, ATMOS ENVIRON, V86, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.008; Zhou Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109274; Zhu CY, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.008	65	0	0	8	8	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 1	2022	347								131251	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131251	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131251			16	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0X1QG					2022-09-08	WOS:000789488800005
J	Ghosh, B; Kivimaa, P; Ramirez, M; Schot, J; Torrens, J				Ghosh, Bipashyee; Kivimaa, Paula; Ramirez, Matias; Schot, Johan; Torrens, Jonas			Transformative outcomes: assessing and reorienting experimentation with transformative innovation policy	SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY			English	Article						innovation policy; sustainability transitions; transformation; transformative outcomes; experimentation; policy engagements	SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITION PATHWAYS; STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; MULTI-REGIME INTERACTIONS; GRASS-ROOTS INNOVATIONS; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; TRANSNATIONAL LINKAGES; CREATIVE DESTRUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE	The impending climate emergency, the Paris agreement and Sustainable Development Goals demand significant transformations in economies and societies. Science funders, innovation agencies, and scholars have explored new rationales and processes for policymaking, such as transformative innovation policy (TIP). Here, we address the question of how to orient the efforts of science, technology, and innovation policy actors to enable transformations. We build on sustainability transitions research and a 4-year co-creation journey of the TIP Consortium to present twelve transformative outcomes that can guide public policy agencies in evaluating and reformulating their projects, programmes, and policies. We illustrate the transformative outcomes in two empirical cases: transitions towards mobility-as-a-service in the Finnish transport system and the emergence of speciality coffee in Colombia. We argue that the twelve transformative outcomes can guide public policy agents to fundamentally transform their ways of thinking and operation in advancing transformative change.	[Ghosh, Bipashyee; Kivimaa, Paula; Ramirez, Matias] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Jubilee Bldg, Brighton BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England; [Kivimaa, Paula] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Climate Change Programme, Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland; [Schot, Johan] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Global Challenges, Janskerkhof 2-3A, NL-3512 BK Utrecht, Netherlands; [Torrens, Jonas] Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Vening Meinesz Bldg A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands		Schot, J (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Ctr Global Challenges, Janskerkhof 2-3A, NL-3512 BK Utrecht, Netherlands.	j.w.schot@uu.nl	Torrens, Jonas/E-8541-2010	Torrens, Jonas/0000-0002-9991-7980				Arond E., 2017, TRANSFORMATIVE INNOV; Avelino F, 2020, EUR PLAN STUD, V28, P955, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339; Bauer F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.140; Binz C, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002; Boon W, 2018, SCI PUBL POLICY, V45, P435, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scy014; Boon WPC, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P792, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.005; Borghei BB, 2018, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V28, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.004; Borras S, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.020; Borup M, 2006, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V18, P285, DOI 10.1080/09537320600777002; Bos JJ, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003; Bosman R, 2014, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V13, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003; Brown N, 2003, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V15, P3, DOI 10.1080/0953732032000046024; Budde B, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1098, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.007; Budde B, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1072, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.012; Bush RE, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V148, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.129; Carvalho L., 2018, INNOVATING CLIMATE G, P49; Coenen L, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P367, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.651802; Coenen L, 2010, TECHNOL SOC, V32, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006; Cruz-Rodríguez Edwin, 2013, Entramado, V9, P138; Danermark B., 2002, EXPLAINING SOC CRITI; David M, 2017, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V33, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.023; Delina L, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V35, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.031; Diercks G, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P880, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028; Dignum M, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.010; Echevarria J. J., 2014, INFORME MISION ESTUD; Edler J, 2017, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V33, P2, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grx001; Elzen B, 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR; Feola G, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011; Fuenfschilling L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023; Geels F., 2006, SCI PUBL POLICY, V33, P265, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154306781778984; Geels FW, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V38, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.010; Geels FW, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P896, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015; Geels FW, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002; Geels FW, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022; Geels FW, 2005, TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSITIONS AND SYSTEM INNOVATIONS: A CO-EVOLUTIONARY AND SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, P1, DOI 10.4337/9781845424596; Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8; Genus A, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109795; Ghosh B., 2021, SOCIETIES INNOVATION; Ghosh B, 2019, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V51, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.001; Gibbs D, 2015, GEOFORUM, V59, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.004; Gosens J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.004; Grillitsch M, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1048, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004; Grin J., 2010, TRANSITIONS SUSTAINA; Hansen T, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V17, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001; Hansen UE, 2013, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V8, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2013.07.001; Holscher K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043; Jolly S, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P199, DOI 10.1007/s11625-012-0163-7; Jorgensen U, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P996, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001; Kainiemi L, 2019, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V31, P1003, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2019.1582765; Kanger L., 2017, TRANSFORMATIVE INNOV; Karltorp K, 2012, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V2, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.001; Kivimaa P., 2020, INTERPLAY POLICY EXP; Kivimaa P, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1062, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006; Kivimaa P, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008; Kivimaa P, 2014, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V24, P28, DOI 10.1002/eet.1629; Konrad K, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1190, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014; Konrad K, 2006, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V18, P429, DOI 10.1080/09537320600777192; Konrad K, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1084, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.008; Leipprand A, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V40, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004; Li FGN, 2017, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V24, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2016.08.002; Loorbach D, 2011, EUROPEAN RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, VOL 1: TRANSFORMATIVE SCIENCE APPROACHES FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19202-9_7; Matschoss K, 2018, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V30, P1455, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2018.1473853; Mauser W, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001; Mazzucato M, 2018, IND CORP CHANGE, V27, P803, DOI 10.1093/icc/dty034; Meelen T, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.002; Mercure JF, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V37, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.003; Mezirow J., 2000, LEARNING TRANSFORMAT, P3; Molas-Gallart J., 2020, TIPCWP202001 TIPC; Naber R, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V110, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.056; Pekkarinen S, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.015; Pellicer-Sifres V, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V42, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.001; Pohl C, 2017, GAIA, V26, P43, DOI 10.14512/gaia.26.1.10; Raven R, 2007, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V19, P491, DOI 10.1080/09537320701403441; Raven R, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P258, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047; Raven R, 2016, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V18, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002; Raven R, 2012, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V4, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001; Raven R, 2010, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V51, P57, DOI 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033128; Rip A, 1998, HUMAN CHOICE CLIMATE, P327; Rogge KS, 2017, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V33, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004; Safarzynska K, 2013, J EVOL ECON, V23, P271, DOI 10.1007/s00191-012-0298-9; Scholz G, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.011; Schot J., 2019, TRANSFORMING EXPERIM; Schot J, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292651; Schot J, 2007, J EVOL ECON, V17, P605, DOI 10.1007/s00191-007-0057-5; Schot J, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.005; Schot J, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P1554, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011; Sengers F, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031; Sengers F, 2016, ROUT RES SUSTAIN URB, P15; Seyfang G, 2014, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V13, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004; Seyfang G, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN C, V30, P381, DOI 10.1068/c10222; Slingerland M, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P7541, DOI 10.3390/su6117541; Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005; Smith A, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V81, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.001; Smith A, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P1025, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012; Sol J, 2018, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V24, P1383, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2017.1402171; Sovacool BK, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101490; Sovacool BK, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102028; Steward F, 2012, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V24, P331, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2012.663959; Sutherland LA, 2015, RES POLICY, V44, P1543, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.013; Swilling M., 2019, AGE SUSTAINABILITY J; Sydow J, 2009, ACAD MANAGE REV, V34, P689, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978; Thelen Kathleen, 2005, CONTINUITY I CHANGE, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2; Torrens J, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.003; Truffer B, 2008, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V75, P1360, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.001; Turnheim B, 2018, INNOVATING CLIMATE G; Turnheim B, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V50, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060; van de Kerkhof M, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.002; van Doren D, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V35, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.03.001; Van Driel H, 2005, TECHNOL CULT, V46, P51; van Lente H, 2012, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V24, P769, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2012.715478; van Mierlo B, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.001; Van Poeck K, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006; van Waes A, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V36, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.06.002; Verbong GPJ, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P1214, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008; Verbong G, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P555, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292719; Vinke-de Kruijf J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.004; Voorberg WH, 2015, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V17, P1333, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505; Voss JP, 2006, REFLEXIVE GOVERNANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, P1; Wagner A, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101674; Weber KM, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015; Wenger E, 1998, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE; Wieczorek AJ, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V17, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2015.01.001; Yang KJ, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V36, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.002	123	8	8	10	14	OXFORD UNIV PRESS	OXFORD	GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND	0302-3427	1471-5430		SCI PUBL POLICY	Sci. Public Policy	OCT	2021	48	5					739	756		10.1093/scipol/scab045	http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab045		JUL 2021	18	Environmental Studies; Management; Public Administration	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Business & Economics; Public Administration	WQ4JP		Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000713784900011
J	Xu, MY; Zhao, D; Zhu, XY; Su, YY; Angelidaki, I; Zhang, YF				Xu, Mingyi; Zhao, Dan; Zhu, Xinyu; Su, Yanyan; Angelidaki, Irini; Zhang, Yifeng			Biogas upgrading and valorization to single-cell protein in a bioinorganic electrosynthesis system	CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL			English	Article						Methane-oxidizing bacteria; Single-cell protein; Bioinorganic electrosynthesis; Biogas upgrading; Carbon capture and utilization; Renewable energy	METHANOTROPHIC BACTERIA; AMINO-ACIDS; COMMUNITY; METHANE; CULTIVATION; METABOLISM; BENEFITS; STATE; CH4	Valorization of crude biogas to value-added products is the key step toward techno-economic biogas business. Besides, the increasing world population puts heavy pressure on food supply and will double protein demand in the coming decades. In this context, we propose a bioinorganic electrosynthesis process for the integration of biogas upgrading and edible single-cell protein production, which could be an alternative solution to address these challenges. With a biogas inflow of 70%CH4/30%CO2 at 50 mL center dot d-1 and an applied voltage of 3.0 V, the protein concentration of 472.04 +/- 22.05 mg center dot L-1 was achieved with the "CO2-to-CH4" bioconversion efficiency of 92.97 +/- 5.61%. Higher CO2 content in the biogas resulted in a comparatively lower protein concentration. The system was tested resilient to the toxic H2S in biogas (up to 5000 ppm). It was possible to improve the protein yield three times by scaling up the fermenter from 100 mL to 1 L, with a "CH4-to-SCP" fermentation efficiency of 70.67 +/- 2.37%. The methanotrophic biomass produced in the system was found rich in protein with a total amino acids mass-content of over 62.8%. The outcomes of this study will offer a new solution for sustainable protein production, biogas upgrading and valorization, which are perfectly in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.	[Xu, Mingyi; Zhao, Dan; Zhu, Xinyu; Su, Yanyan; Angelidaki, Irini; Zhang, Yifeng] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark		Zhang, YF (corresponding author), Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.	yifz@env.dtu.dk	Zhu, Xinyu/AAC-5551-2022; Angelidaki, Irini/AAX-2562-2020; Xu, Mingyi/GPP-3219-2022; Zhang, Yifeng/D-9604-2011	Zhu, Xinyu/0000-0003-2589-2300; Angelidaki, Irini/0000-0002-6357-578X; Zhang, Yifeng/0000-0002-2832-2277; Xu, Mingyi/0000-0001-7649-4359; Su, Yanyan/0000-0001-9676-7668; Zhao, Dan/0000-0003-3822-1418	Novo Nordisk Foundation (Denmark) [NNF16OC0021568]; China Scholarship Council (China); Otto MOnsted Fond (Denmark); Carlsberg Foundation Distin-guished Fellowships [CF18-0084]	Novo Nordisk Foundation (Denmark)(Novo Nordisk Foundation); China Scholarship Council (China)(China Scholarship Council); Otto MOnsted Fond (Denmark); Carlsberg Foundation Distin-guished Fellowships	This research was sponsored by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0021568, Denmark) . The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the China Scholarship Council (China) , the Otto MOnsted Fond (Denmark) , and the Carlsberg Foundation Distin-guished Fellowships (CF18-0084) . The authors would like to thank Hector Gracia, Sinh Hy Nguyen, Mikael Emil Olsson for the experimental assistance.	Adegbeye MJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118319; Alexandratos N., 2009, How to feed the World in 2050. Proceedings of a technical meeting of experts, Rome, Italy, 24-26 June 2009, P1; Angelidaki I, 2018, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V36, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011; Baena-Moreno FM, 2020, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V18, P1649, DOI 10.1007/s10311-020-01036-3; Bajracharya S, 2017, J POWER SOURCES, V356, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.024; Benato A, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12060979; Bian B, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V302, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122863; Brosnan JT, 2006, J NUTR, V136, p1636S, DOI 10.1093/jn/136.6.1636S; Burgmann H., 2011, ENCY GEOBIOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9212-1_139; Bussmann I, 2006, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V56, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00076.x; Cai WC, 2018, FISH PHYSIOL BIOCHEM, V44, P1159, DOI 10.1007/s10695-018-0503-3; Calcott P.H., 2020, CONTIN CULT CELLS, P113, DOI [10.1201/9781351070874-6, DOI 10.1201/9781351070874-6]; Cheng K, 2020, OPTIMIZING METHANOTR; Courtney-Martin G, 2016, MOLEC NUTRITION, P265, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802167-5.00019-0; European Biogas Association, 2021, EBA STAT REP 2020; Foley JA, 2011, NATURE, V478, P337, DOI 10.1038/nature10452; Fu SF, 2021, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V39, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.006; Henckel T, 2000, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V2, P666, DOI 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00149.x; Holecek M, 2020, NUTRIENTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/nu12030848; Hugler M, 2005, J BACTERIOL, V187, P3020, DOI 10.1128/JB.187.9.3020-3027.2005; Hvelplund F, 2019, IN SEARCH OF GOOD ENERGY POLICY, P165; Jiang X, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V299, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122621; Jost G, 2010, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V71, P226, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00798.x; Kappler A, 2016, EHRLICHS GEOMICROBIO, V6 6th; KOH SC, 1993, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V59, P960, DOI 10.1128/AEM.59.4.960-967.1993; Korberg AD, 2020, ENERGY, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117426; Liao SFF, 2015, SPRINGERPLUS, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-0927-5; Liu CQ, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121877; Liu YD, 2020, CHEM ENG J, V389, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124510; Lu F, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI, V24, P711, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60813-9; Matassa S, 2016, MICROB BIOTECHNOL, V9, P568, DOI 10.1111/1751-7915.12369; Mishra A, 2020, JOULE, V4, P1142, DOI 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.008; Molitor B, 2019, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V12, P3515, DOI 10.1039/c9ee02381j; Nasr J, 2011, ITAL J ANIM SCI, V10, P170, DOI 10.4081/ijas.2011.e32; Nelabhotla ABT, 2019, CATALYSTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/catal9080683; Petrova B, 2020, J NUTR, V150, p2580S, DOI 10.1093/jn/nxaa132; Raven RPJM, 2007, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V11, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2004.12.002; Ritala A, 2017, FRONT MICROBIOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02009; ROSLEV P, 1995, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V61, P1563, DOI 10.1128/AEM.61.4.1563-1570.1995; Sehgal K, 2018, BIOFUEL BIOREFIN TEC, V6, P449, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77335-3_18; Shimomura A, 2014, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V25, P1954, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2013090967; Sievert SM, 2007, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V9, P271, DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01156.x; Smil V, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P126, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0126:NAFPPF]2.0.CO;2; Spallotta Francesco, 2013, Commun Integr Biol, V6, pe25466, DOI 10.4161/cib.25466; Stein LY, 2011, BIOCHEM SOC T, V39, P1826, DOI 10.1042/BST20110712; Thalacker-Mercer AE, 2020, J NUTR, V150, p2588S, DOI 10.1093/jn/nxaa229; Thrane M, 2017, SUSTAINABLE PROTEIN SOURCES, P23, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00002-0; Tsapekos P, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123646; Valverde-Perez B, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123388; Vilardi G, 2020, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113323; Xiao S, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V162, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.036; Xu MY, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.007; Xu MY, 2020, WATER RES, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116138; Yamauchi M, 2012, ESSAYS BIOCHEM, V52, P113, DOI [10.1042/bse0520113, 10.1042/BSE0520113]; Yousuf A, 2016, ENERG SOURCE PART B, V11, P841, DOI 10.1080/15567249.2016.1148084; Zakaria BS, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121738; Zha X, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124351; Zhao NN, 2020, J POWER SOURCES, V470, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228399; Zhao YP, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V687, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.491; Zhou HH, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V407, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124363; Zhou HH, 2020, APPL ENERG, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115101; Zhu XY, 2018, CHEM ENG J, V332, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.113; Zhu XY, 2017, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V101, P1313, DOI 10.1007/s00253-016-8028-0; Zou RS, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V727, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138684	64	2	2	7	21	ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA	LAUSANNE	PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND	1385-8947	1873-3212		CHEM ENG J	Chem. Eng. J.	DEC 15	2021	426								131837	10.1016/j.cej.2021.131837	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131837		AUG 2021	9	Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Chemical	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering	WQ2MC		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000713653400004
J	Islam, KMN; Sultana, A; Wadley, D; Dargusch, P; Henry, M; Naito, Y				Islam, K. M. Nazmul; Sultana, Afrin; Wadley, David; Dargusch, Paul; Henry, Matieu; Naito, Yurie			Opportunities for inclusive and efficient low carbon food system development in Bangladesh	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Food system; Circular economy; Life cycle assessment; Climate change; Developing country; Low carbon economy	GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; METHANE EMISSIONS; FOOTPRINT; LIVESTOCK; CHINA; UNCERTAINTIES; PRODUCTS; MITIGATION; INVENTORY; SOUTHEAST	The food system is a significant source of rising greenhouse gas emissions in Bangladesh due to increasing food demand, and ongoing economic growth. The country needs to develop low carbon pathways for the food system that strengthen food security, reduce vulnerability to climate change, and help to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In this paper we analyse the historical trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions of the food system in Bangladesh, and identify various strategies for reducing those emissions. Our analysis reveals that greenhouse gas emissions from Bangladesh's food system doubled from 1990 to 2017, and from the processes included in this study are projected to rise up to 250% by 2050 under a business as usual scenario. Compared with that scenario, a 'National Policy-Based Circular Economy' scenario could achieve a 75% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the same period for same level of food supply and production. Major reductions in greenhouse gas emissions could be achieved through activities such as alternative wetting and drying in rice cultivation, and the valorisation of organic waste generated by the food system.	[Islam, K. M. Nazmul] Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia; [Islam, K. M. Nazmul] Univ Queensland, Australian Ctr Water & Environm Biotechnol Former, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia; [Islam, K. M. Nazmul; Sultana, Afrin] Univ Chittagong, Inst Forestry & Environm Sci, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh; [Wadley, David; Dargusch, Paul] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia; [Henry, Matieu; Naito, Yurie] UN, FAO, I-00153 Rome, Italy		Islam, KMN (corresponding author), Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.	kmnazmul.islam@uq.net.au			University of Queensland Research Training Program (UQ RTP) scholarship; Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) [DE160101322]	University of Queensland Research Training Program (UQ RTP) scholarship; Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA)(Australian Research Council)	K M Nazmul Islam acknowledges the University of Queensland Research Training Program (UQ RTP) scholarship, and the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) project grant DE160101322.	AFIYANTI M, 2019, PROC IOP C SERIES EA; [Anonymous], 2016, STAT YB BANGL 2015; Athare TR, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V737, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139881; Audsley E., 2009, LOW CAN WE GO ASSESS, P5; Bank W., 2020, WORLD BANK OPEN DATA; BBS, 2017, STAT YB BANGL 2016; BBS, 2012, STAT YB BANGL 2011; BBS, 2013, STAT YB BANGL 2012, P32; BBS, 2013, DISTR STAT 2011 KHAG; Beauchemin KA, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008; Bodirsky BL, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75213-3; Bruno M, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V156, P489, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02508-4; Cerda A, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V248, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.133; Chen G, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.046; Cheng K, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.012; Chhabra A, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P329, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0556-8; DEWR, 2006, GEN METH APPL MULT A, DOI DOI 10.1-10.87; Dyer JA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121785; EquityBD, 2017, SDGS COUNTR PROC BAN, P12; Eriksson M, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V60, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.008; European Commission, 2015, CLOS LOOP AN EU ACT; FAO, 2011, ENS FOOD SEC CHANG C; FAO, 2017, FUT FOOD AGR TRENDS, P163; FAO, 2019, STAT FOOD SEC NUTR W, P214; FAO, 2020, FAOSTAT LIV PRIM BEE; FAO, 2014, SUSTAINABLE AGR FOOD; FAO F.a.A.O, 2019, FOOD BAL; FAOSTAT, 2019, AGR PROD EM DAT PROD; Finnveden G, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018; GED, 2013, NATL SUST DEV STRAT, P143; GED, 2015, 7 5 YEAR PLAN 2016 2, P736; Gerber P., 2013, MITIGATION GREENHOUS; Havlik P, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3709, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308044111; Herrero M, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P452, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2925, 10.1038/nclimate2925]; Hic C, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P4269, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b05088; Hong JK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V129, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.085; Hossain MF, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.197; Hristov AN, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, pE1320, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1401046111; Huynh T.L.H, 2017, VIETNAM J SCI TECHNO, V59, P91; IPCC, 2006, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES, V4; Islam KMN, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110695; Islam KMN, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V580, P755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.022; ISO, 2006, 14040 ISO, P20; Jain A, 2017, CLEAN COOKING BANGLA, V2018; Jurgilevich A, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8010069; Khan EU, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V62, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.044; Li HM, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P803, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12323; Lin JY, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V90, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.072; Liu Q, 2016, GCB BIOENERGY, V8, P148, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12248; Malley J., 2020, SPECIAL REPORT CLIMA, P437; Maraseni TN, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P2288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.182; Masud MH, 2020, INT J SUSTAIN ENERGY, V39, P132, DOI 10.1080/14786451.2019.1659270; Maxime D, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.015; Mirmohamadsadeghi S., 2019, BIORESOUR TECHNOL RE, V7, P100202, DOI [10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100202, DOI 10.1016/J.BITEB.2019.100202]; MoEF, 2009, BANGLADESH CLIMATE C, P76; MoEFCC, 2015, BANGL INT NATL DET C, P15; MoEFCC, 2017, BANGL COUNTR INV PLA, P211; MoF, 2020, BUDGET SPEECH, P126; Mujica M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V116, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.086; Munir M.M.H, 2019, SPOTLIGHT SUSTAINABL, P191; Nutter DW, 2013, INT DAIRY J, V31, pS57, DOI 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.09.011; Pathak H, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V139, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.002; Pradhan P, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P10551, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c02739; Pradhan P, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062228; Rahman S., 2014, Livestock Research for Rural Development, V26, P173; Rai R, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101866; Roibas L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P2441, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.074; Roos E, 2011, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V16, P338, DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0270-1; Roos E, 2010, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V15, P478, DOI 10.1007/s11367-010-0171-8; Rosenzweig C, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P94, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0031-z; Scarborough P, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V125, P179, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1; Scholz K, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V94, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.016; Stocker T.F., 2014, CLIM CHANG 2013 PHYS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324; Sun JC, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V690, P1190, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.093; Tanwi TS, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7221-3; Tom Michelle S., 2016, Environment Systems & Decisions, V36, P92, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9577-y; UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2019, EM GAP REP 2019, P81; Verge XPC, 2013, J DAIRY SCI, V96, P6091, DOI 10.3168/jds.2013-6563; Warchold A, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P285, DOI 10.1002/sd.2145; WasteConcern, 2015, BANGL WAST DAT 2014; Wiedmann TO, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P676, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12346; WorldBank, 2018, BANGL RED POV SHAR P; WorldBank, 2016, BANGL GROW EC ADV AG; Wynes S, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7; Xu ZY, 2015, CRIT REV FOOD SCI, V55, P1270, DOI 10.1080/10408398.2013.821593; Yagi K, 1997, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V49, P213, DOI 10.1023/A:1009743909716; Yamaji K, 2004, ATMOS ENVIRON, V38, P7111, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.045; Yan XY, 2009, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V23, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003299; Yan XY, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P237, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00564.x; Yu JS, 2018, ATMOS ENVIRON, V184, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.029; Zhu BQ, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1571, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0896-9	91	0	0	6	9	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 15	2021	319								128586	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128586	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128586		AUG 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XM9IK					2022-09-08	WOS:000729130900010
J	da Silva, L; Prietto, PDM; Korf, EP				da Silva, Luciana; Marques Prietto, Pedro Domingos; Korf, Eduardo Pavan			Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Information systems; Urban waste; Sustainability; Sustainable governance	PERFORMANCE	This work aimed to select a relevant set of sustainability indicators to analyze municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in large and medium-sized worldwide cities and to apply these findings in three municipalities located in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in southern Brazil. For this purpose, surveys were carried out, and data collected from secondary sources. A set of 18 methodologies with different MSWM indicators was initially selected, totaling 396 indicators evaluated through selection criteria. The result was the selection of a set of 49 indicators for application in a case study. It was only possible to measure 11 indicators with the information publicly available for the three Brazilian cities studied, demonstrating the fragility of information regarding sustainability issues. Also, data related to social issues and natural and energy resources were insufficient for indicators to be measured. The analysis revealed difficulties regarding the availability of information in databases such as the National Sanitation Information System, and the lack of investments in infrastructure, technical and human resources, evidencing an opportunity gap to update and include new indicators in the Brazilian waste management system. Nevertheless, the set of 49 indicators proposed would be beneficial as a strategic support tool for management in any global city, as the indicators were selected to promote sustainability and to meet the global commitment of cities to implement policies related to MSWM, the Sustainable Development Goals, and sustainable governance. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[da Silva, Luciana; Marques Prietto, Pedro Domingos] Univ Passo Fundo, Grad Program Civil & Environm Engn, PPGEng, Passo Fundo, Brazil; [Korf, Eduardo Pavan] Fed Univ Fronteira Sul, Grad Program Environm Sci & Technol, PPGCTA, UFFS, Erechim, Brazil		da Silva, L; Prietto, PDM (corresponding author), Univ Passo Fundo, Grad Program Civil & Environm Engn, PPGEng, Passo Fundo, Brazil.; Korf, EP (corresponding author), Fed Univ Fronteira Sul, Grad Program Environm Sci & Technol, PPGCTA, UFFS, Erechim, Brazil.	eduardo.korf@uffs.edu.br	Korf, Eduardo Pavan/B-4402-2013	Korf, Eduardo Pavan/0000-0003-2041-0173	CAPES [88881.068119/2014e01]; CNPq [486506/2013-4]	CAPES(Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)); CNPq(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ))	The authors would like to thank CAPES (Project no. 88881.068119/2014e01) and CNPq (Projects no. 486506/2013-4 and 312756/2017-8) federal agencies for the financial support to the authors in the development of this research.	Agol D, 2014, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V48, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.04.001; [Anonymous], 2015, OV SOL WAST BRAZ; Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2014, DEV IND MON SYST ENV; Atlas of Human Development in Brazil (ATLASBRASIL), 2013, TRACKS IDHM; Bardin L., 2004, CONTENT ANAL; Brazilian Association of Public Cleaning and Special Waste Companies (ABRELPE), 2017, OV SOL WAST BRAZ; Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 2016, PROF BRAZ MUN 2015 2, P61; Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 2010, NAT SURV BAS SAN 200; Cifrian E, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V53, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.010; Dias S. M. F, 2012, HLTH ENV ENG J, V17, P203, DOI [10.1590/S1413-41522012000200010, DOI 10.1590/S1413-41522012000200010]; Euroconsultants, 2010, LIFE07ENVRO686 EUR; Foundation of Economics and Statistics Siegfried Emanuel Heuser (FEE), 2016, GDP MUN RS 2014 PERF; Greene KL, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.020; Hotta Y, 2016, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V18, P22, DOI 10.1007/s10163-015-0442-3; International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2014, 371202014E ISO; International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), 2015, PROM SUST WAST MAN W; Latawiec A.E., 2015, SUSTAINABILITY INDIC, DOI [10.1515/9783110450507, DOI 10.1515/9783110450507]; Li H, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P1116, DOI 10.3390/su7021116; Polaz CNM, 2009, ENG SANIT AMBIENT, V14, P411, DOI 10.1590/S1413-41522009000300015; McCarney Patricia, 2015, Statistical Journal of the IAOS, V31, P103, DOI 10.3233/SJI-150874; Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD), 2010, HANDBOOK OF SERVICE; Munizaga Plaza J. A., 2016, THESIS, P270; Munizaga Plaza J. A, 2013, 5 S IB ING RES HAC S; National Foundation of Quality (FNQ), 2014, SYST IND; [National Sanitation Information System (NSIS) Ministry of Cities], 2015, HIST SER SOL WAST 20; Oliveira Castro M., 2015, ENV HLTH ENG MAGAZIN, V20, P415, DOI [10.1590/S1413, DOI 10.1590/S1413]; Parekh H, 2015, KSCE J CIV ENG, V19, P36, DOI 10.1007/s12205-014-2356-3; Princewaterhousecoopers Professional Services (PWC), 2016, URB CLEAN SUST IND; Rametsteiner E, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.009; Reichert GA, 2014, ENG SANIT AMBIENT, V19, P301, DOI 10.1590/S1413-41522014019000001145; Rodic L, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9030404; Sanjeevi V, 2015, WASTE MANAGE RES, V33, P1052, DOI 10.1177/0734242X15607428; Santiago L. S, 2011, THESIS, P129, DOI [10.17565/gesta.v2i2.12799, DOI 10.17565/GESTA.V2I2.12799]; Sustainable Cities Program (PCS), 2013, GPS GUID SUST PUBL M; United Nations, 2016, RESP CONS PROD WHY M; United Nations Human Setlements Program (Un-Habitat), 2010, SOLID WASTE MANAGEME, DOI [10.1108/meq.2010.08321fae.003, DOI 10.1108/MEQ.2010.08321FAE.003]; WCED, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE, V17, P1; Wilson DC, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V35, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006; Zhou JY, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V56, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.024	39	16	16	10	97	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	NOV 10	2019	237								117802	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IU3DX					2022-09-08	WOS:000483462700095
J	Wu, C; Lin, Y; Barnes, D				Wu, Chong; Lin, Yang; Barnes, David			An integrated decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection in the chemical industry	EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS			English	Article						Supplier selection; Sustainable supply chain; Chemical industry; Dimensional analysis	ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MULTI CRITERIA APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FUZZY DEMATEL; FAILURE MODE; DEA MODEL; CHAIN; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK	Due to an increased awareness of ecological protection and resultant stringent legislations, business organizations are highly motivated to improve the sustainable performance of their supply chain in order to achieve sustainable development goals. The chemical industry is a high-risk, high-pollution, and high-efficiency industry, that would benefit from a systematic and sustainability focused evaluation system for supplier selection. Yet, to date, few studies have conducted the necessary in-depth analysis of the characteristics of this industry from the economic, social, and environmental perspectives. Despite the many methods and models that have been proposed to resolve the sustainable supplier selection (SSS) problem, no research has yet considered the different characteristics of each triple bottom line dimension. Accordingly, this paper addresses this problem by proposing a hybrid multi-method and multi-criteria decision-making framework for SSS in the chemical industry. Based on specific characteristics of the chemical industry, this study applies Fuzzy Grey Relational Analysis (FGRA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and cloud computing-entropy weight method (EWM) to analyze the economic, social, and environmental dimensions, respectively. Finally, this study integrates the evaluation results of the three dimensions using the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL). The proposed approach and decision-making model can help managers of sustainable supply chains in the chemical industry to choose more sustainable suppliers, respond to market demands quickly, and maintain high competitiveness in the market. An illustrative application of the proposed framework and model is undertaken in one of the biggest Chinese petrochemical companies to verify its practicality and reliability.	[Wu, Chong; Lin, Yang] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China; [Barnes, David] Univ Westminster, Westminster Business Sch, London NW1 5LS, England		Barnes, D (corresponding author), Univ Westminster, Westminster Business Sch, London NW1 5LS, England.	Chong.Wu@xmu.edu.cn; linyang@stu.xmu.edu.cn; d.barnes@westminster.ac.uk		Wu, Chong/0000-0002-0818-0312; Barnes, David/0000-0001-7418-877X	National Natural Science Foundation of China [71872155]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant number 71872155. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers and Associate Editor for their valuable recom-mendations and comments.	Al-Hudhaif S., 2011, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V6, P122, DOI DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V6N9P122; Amindoust A, 2012, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V12, P1668, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023; An RY, 2018, APPL ENERG, V226, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.044; Awasthi A, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V126, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029; Azadi M, 2015, COMPUT OPER RES, V54, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.002; Azadnia Amir Hossein, 2013, Applied Mechanics and Materials, V315, P206, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.315.206; Azadnia AH, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P383, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.935827; Bai C, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V124, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023; Banaeian N, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V89, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015; Barkemeyer R, 2014, SUSTAIN DEV, V22, P15, DOI 10.1002/sd.521; Bozdag E, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P4000, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.015; Bromer J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117701; Broeren MLM, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V64, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.025; Buyukozkan G, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P3000, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162; Buyukozkan G, 2011, COMPUT IND, V62, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009; Chang B, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P1850, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114; Chen H, 2016, APPL ENERG, V183, P1333, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.097; Chen JM, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P1327, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03589-1; Chen KS, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V212, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.005; Chou W., 2020, START DOMESTIC PETRO; Christmann P, 2000, ACAD MANAGE J, V43, P663, DOI 10.2307/1556360; Costa R, 2013, EXPERT SYST APPL, V40, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028; Dickson G., 1966, J PURCHAS, V2, P5, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.1966.TB00818.X]; Diouf M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103779; Duman GM, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V81, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.070; Erol I, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1088, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001; Fallahpour A, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V105, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.005; Fick J, 2009, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V28, P2522, DOI 10.1897/09-073.1; Foroozesh N, 2018, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V95, P3609, DOI 10.1007/s00170-017-1308-8; Franceschini F, 2001, INT J PROD RES, V39, P2991, DOI 10.1080/00207540110056162; Genovese A, 2014, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V25, P1198, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.808839; Goerlandt F, 2017, SAFETY SCI, V99, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.023; Gordalla BC, 2013, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V70, P3875, DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-2672-9; Govindan K, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V98, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046; Govindan K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V47, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014; Griffin PW, 2018, APPL ENERG, V227, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.010; Guo Z, 2019, CURR OPIN CHEM ENG, V26, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.coche.2019.09.010; Hashemi SH, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V159, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.027; Ho W, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V202, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009; Hsueh CF, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V151, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.10.017; Humphreys P, 2006, INT J PROD RES, V44, P2379, DOI 10.1080/00207540500357476; Isik F, 2010, INT J PROD RES, V48, P3681, DOI 10.1080/00207540902810593; Kadoic N, 2019, CENT EUR J OPER RES, V27, P653, DOI 10.1007/s10100-018-0601-4; Kales P., 1998, RELIABILITY TECHNOLO; Kannan D, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V195, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020; Kaya R, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V134, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.053; Kumar VRS, 2019, KNOWL ENG REV, V34, DOI 10.1017/S0269888919000109; Kuo RJ, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020; Lage M, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V125, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009; Lamba K, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V128, P1052, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.028; Liao CN, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P10803, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031; Lin CH, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P2488, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.025; Lo HW, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P15733, DOI 10.1007/s00500-020-04903-x; Marston S, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006; Mishra S, 2002, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V69, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00123-8; Nematollahi M, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V184, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.017; Nikolopoulou A, 2012, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V44, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.05.006; Olszewska J., 2020, P 12 INT C AG ART IN; Olszewska J. I., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), P91, DOI 10.1109/INES.2012.6249809; Rahman K, 2017, COGENT MATH, V4, DOI 10.1080/23311835.2017.1338638; Rajeev A, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.020; Rashidi K, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V121, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.025; Rezaei J, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V66, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.009; Sallehuddin R., 2008, INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, V2008, P423; Sarkis J, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V166, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007; Selvakkumaran S, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V81, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.005; Shen LX, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V74, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006; Simeone A, 2019, PROC CIRP, V86, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.019; Singh A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.236; [唐宏祥 Tang Hongxiang], 2004, [中国管理科学, Chinese journal of management science], V12, P60; [唐振宇 Tang Zhenyu], 2019, [运筹与管理, Operations Research and Management Science], V28, P62; Tirkolaee EB, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119517; Tong LZ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122771; Tong LZ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061533; Wang Jian-qiang, 2012, Control and Decision, V27, P1185; Wang KQ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9050688; Wang TK, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020289; Williams, 2018, ORG CHANGE CORPORATE; Wu C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123165; Wu C, 2020, EXPERT SYST APPL, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113643; Wu C, 2012, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V32, P79, DOI 10.1108/01443571211195745; Wu C, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V125, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.010; Xie Hui, 2018, Computer Engineering and Applications, V54, P257, DOI 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1610-0169; Yager RR, 2014, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V22, P958, DOI 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989; Yang YF, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V263, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121433; Yildiz A, 2015, S AFR J IND ENG, V26, P158, DOI 10.7166/26-2-1010; You XY, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P1906, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.004; Yu CX, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V121, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010; Yu F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P880, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.165; Yuan JF, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V198, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.109; Zarbakhshnia N, 2018, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V97, P2933, DOI 10.1007/s00170-018-2138-z; Zhang SZ, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V65, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.037; Zhang Y, 2019, APPL ENERG, V236, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.022; Zhu B, 2010, ENERGY, V35, P4663, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.038	94	12	12	25	70	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0957-4174	1873-6793		EXPERT SYST APPL	Expert Syst. Appl.	DEC 1	2021	184								115553	10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115553	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115553		JUL 2021	16	Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Computer Science; Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	UR8ZU					2022-09-08	WOS:000697030900008
J	Mielly, M; Peticca-Harris, A				Mielly, Michelle; Peticca-Harris, Amanda			Local worker perspectives from Nicaraguan surf tourism: revisiting career anchors in non-standard work contexts	CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL			English	Article						Career anchors; Global south; Internal careers; Local workers; Non-standard contexts; Surf tourism	MANAGEMENT; IDENTITY	Purpose This qualitative study explores, through the lens of Schein's (1978) career anchor theory, the internal career perceptions (self-perceived values, challenges and capabilities) of local surf workers in the highly internationalized sector of surf tourism in Nicaragua. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 22 local surf tourism workers. Participant experiences were analyzed using thematic analysis to distinguish their career anchor orientations. Findings The results indicate the sustained value and instrumentality of Schein's original career anchor theory, specifically in terms of the interconnectedness of dominant and supporting anchors and the relevance of anchor groupings for workers in non-standard working environments. The anchors of lifestyle, entrepreneurial creativity, and security and stability were closely interrelated and complementary, as participants from this context were ultimately striving for security and stability. Research limitations/implications Future research should consider more explicitly the role of the socio-political, environmental or economic context in shaping the internal career self-concepts and experiences of workers. Practical implications This study sheds light on the internal career drivers - the unique dilemmas, challenges, passions and motives - of local workers in a resource-constrained environment. Managers, business owners and other economic actors stand to gain important insights into the realities of workers they employ, but do not intimately understand. Such insights could be generalizable to a variety of work settings in which there are high material, social or cultural constraints. Social implications Non-standard work contexts and local worker voices are both thematically underrepresented in the careers scholarship. Research on these topics can contribute to broader discussions of sustainability, sustainable development goals and decolonial perspectives in social science scholarship. Bringing local workers from the Global South into view means turning scholarly attention towards less-visible "others" working alongside those having received the lion's share of academic discussion, i.e. expatriate workers on a global assignment or self-initiated expatriates, most often from the Global North. Originality/value This is one of the first studies to explore the career anchors of local workers in the Global South in a non-standard, non-bureaucratic vocational setting. The study sheds light on local workers' career decisions, an often-neglected perspective within international human resource management.	[Mielly, Michelle; Peticca-Harris, Amanda] Grenoble Ecole Management, People Org Soc, Grenoble, France		Mielly, M (corresponding author), Grenoble Ecole Management, People Org Soc, Grenoble, France.	michelle.mielly@grenoble-em.com						Al Ariss A, 2010, CAREER DEV INT, V15, P338, DOI 10.1108/13620431011066231; Arnold J, 2019, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V30, P3190, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2017.1380058; Arthur MB, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P177, DOI 10.1002/job.290; Atherton A, 2007, QUAL RES ORGAN MANAG, V2, P62, DOI 10.1108/17465640710749117; Au WC, 2021, CAREER DEV INT, V26, P613, DOI 10.1108/CDI-02-2021-0043; Banerjee S, 2010, MANAGE LEARN, V41, P147, DOI 10.1177/1350507609357391; Baruch Y., 2016, PEOPLE STRATEGY, V39, P16; Baruch Y., 2015, HDB RES SUSTAINABLE, P364, DOI 10.4337/9781782547037.00029; Baudrillard Jean., 1976, L CHANGE SYMBOLIQUE; Bellah RobertN., 1985, HABITS HEART INDIVID; Berry, 2009, AC MAN P CHIC IL US, P1, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.2009; Broegaard RB, 2009, DEV CHANGE, V40, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01509.x; Ca?ada, 2010, TURISMO CENTROAM RIC; Croes R, 2008, J TRAVEL RES, V47, P94, DOI 10.1177/0047287507312429; Doherty N, 2013, INT J MANAG REV, V15, P447, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12005; Feldman DC, 1996, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V6, P89, DOI 10.1016/S1053-4822(96)90014-5; Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151; Hall D. T., 2002, CAREERS OUT ORG; Ituma A, 2007, PERS REV, V36, P978, DOI 10.1108/00483480710822463; Jiang JJ, 1999, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V16, P219, DOI 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518262; Kopelman S, 2012, ORGAN DYN, V41, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.010; LaVanchy GT, 2015, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V31, P765, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2014.985819; Lazarow N, 2007, J COASTAL RES, P12; Lips-Wiersma M, 2016, CAREER DEV INT, V21, P534, DOI 10.1108/CDI-04-2016-0052; Mach L, 2020, ANN LEIS RES, V23, P184, DOI 10.1080/11745398.2018.1491801; Mielly M, 2017, CRIT PERSPECT INT BU, V13, P319, DOI 10.1108/cpoib-01-2017-0003; Miles M.B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA; Mulhall S., 2014, STRATEGIC HRM RES PR, P211; Nicaragua, 2018, CIA FACTBOOK; Peticca-Harris A, 2020, ORGANIZATION, V27, P36, DOI 10.1177/1350508418757332; Peticca-Harris A, 2013, J MANAG DEV, V32, P823, DOI 10.1108/JMD-08-2011-0100; Ponting J, 2015, SPORT MANAG REV, V18, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.smr.2014.07.004; Ponting J, 2009, TOUR ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.3727/108354209789116510; Prasad A, 2016, CRIT PERSPECT INT BU, V12, P218, DOI 10.1108/cpoib-10-2015-0048; Pringle JK, 2003, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V14, P839, DOI 10.1080/0958519032000080839; Richardson J, 2019, CAREER DEV INT, V25, P1, DOI 10.1108/CDI-04-2019-0104; Richardson J, 2020, J VOCAT BEHAV, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.002; Schein E. H., 1990, CAREER ANCHORS INSTR; Schein E. H., 1985, CAREER ANCHORS DISCO; SCHEIN E. H., 1996, ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC, V10, P80, DOI DOI 10.5465/AME.1996.3145321; SCHEIN EH, 1987, HDB ORG BEHAV, P155; Schein EH, 1978, CAREER DYNAMICS MATC; Scurry T., 2013, CAREERS BORDERS CRIT; Sotomayor S, 2016, INT J TOUR RES, V18, P62, DOI 10.1002/jtr.2033; Spivak G., 1988, MARXISM INTERPRETATI, P271, DOI [10.5840/philosophin200314275, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20]; Suutari V., 2004, Journal of Management Development, V23, P833, DOI 10.1108/02621710410558440; Thomas D., 2006, CULTURAL INTELLIGENC; Usher LE, 2015, J SPORT SOC ISSUES, V39, P455, DOI 10.1177/0193723515570674; Wils T, 2014, RELAT IND-IND RELAT, V69, P813, DOI 10.7202/1028113ar; Womack B., 2015, ASYMMETRY INT RELATI, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781316459348, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316459348]; Yarnall Jane, 1998, CAREER DEV INT, V3, P56, DOI DOI 10.1108/13620439810207536	51	0	0	4	4	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	1362-0436	1758-6003		CAREER DEV INT	Career Dev. Int.	APR 5	2022	27	2					245	259		10.1108/CDI-10-2021-0253	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2021-0253		FEB 2022	15	Psychology, Applied; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Psychology; Business & Economics	0K5CI					2022-09-08	WOS:000752329400001
J	Garcia-Sanchez, IM; Aibar-Guzman, B; Aibar-Guzman, C				Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria; Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz; Aibar-Guzman, Cristina			What sustainability assurance services do institutional investors demand and what value do they give them?	SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL			English	Article						Cost of capital; Institutional investors; Forecast accuracy; Sustainability assurance; Assurance quality	CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE; INVESTMENT HORIZONS; AGENCY COSTS; INFORMATION; IMPACT; GOVERNANCE; QUALITY	Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyse the role played by institutional investors in a firm's decision to hire sustainability assurance services and to determine the benefits of sustainability assurance for the functioning of the capital market. This analysis is complemented by examining the quality of the sustainability assurance service that institutional investors demand. Design/methodology/approach The authors selected a sample of 1,564 multinational firms from 2002 to 2017. Panel data logit and generalised method of moments (GMM) regressions were estimated to consider decisions about hiring sustainability assurance services or not, and the assurance quality indexes constructed by a checklist based on the academic literature, respectively. Findings Institutional pressures associated with the environmental and social impacts of a firm's activities lead to the convergence of institutional investor attitudes towards corporate sustainability, so that, regardless of their investment horizon, they promote the hiring of sustainability assurance services by corporate boards, which favours analyst precision and a reduction in the cost of capital. Long-term (LT) institutional investors exert influence through a selection mechanism, whereas short-term (ST) institutional investors exert influence through their presence on the board. Once the company has decided to provide assurance about its sustainability report, both types of institutional investors promote a higher quality of such service, although this is not well valued by the stock market. Research limitations/implications This paper extends research on the monitoring role of institutional investors into the sustainability assurance context. Researchers may benefit from this paper's findings when they examine the factors that drive the hiring of sustainability assurance services and their characteristics. This paper also shows that sustainability assurance services are a significant weakness due to the lack of standardisation in comparison with financial auditing, which complicates the assessment of their quality by stock market participants, thereby penalising those companies that provide more complete sustainability assurance reports. Practical implications Considering this paper's findings, it seems advisable that regulators establish a normative framework to standardise sustainability assurance processes. The results can also be used as an orientation for both companies, to design their sustainability disclosure policies and regulators, to improve the running of the capital market. Social implications Sustainability assurance services have a positive effect on the running of the capital market and improve external stakeholder decision-making by providing more reliable information, which, in turn, will favour the implementation of more sustainable actions that contribute to the attainment of sustainable development goals. Originality/value This is one of the first papers to analyse the effect of institutional ownership on a firm's decision to hire sustainability assurance services and consider the effect of the institutional investors' investment horizon - LT versus ST - and the channel - selection methods and/or active engagement - used by them to exert their influence. The authors also propose several measures of sustainability assurance quality to demonstrate the relevance of the contents of the assurance statement for the capital market in general and the institutional investors in particular.	[Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria] Univ Salamanca, Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa IME, Salamanca, Spain; [Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz; Aibar-Guzman, Cristina] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Econ & Business Sci, Santiago De Compostela, Spain		Garcia-Sanchez, IM (corresponding author), Univ Salamanca, Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa IME, Salamanca, Spain.	lajefa@usal.es	ISABEL-MARIA, GARCIA-SANCHEZ/F-4271-2016; Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz/ABE-5257-2021; AIBAR-GUZMÁN, CRISTINA/ABE-5271-2021	ISABEL-MARIA, GARCIA-SANCHEZ/0000-0003-4711-8631; Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz/0000-0001-7410-5997; AIBAR-GUZMÁN, CRISTINA/0000-0002-1229-9631	Junta de Castilla y Leon y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [CLU-2019-03]; Consejeria de Educacion, Junta de Castilla y Leon [SA069G18]; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [ECO2013-43838P]; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [RTI2018-093423-B-I00]; Universidad de Salamanca [USAL2017-DISAQ]	Junta de Castilla y Leon y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional; Consejeria de Educacion, Junta de Castilla y Leon(Junta de Castilla y Leon); Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion(Instituto de Salud Carlos IIISpanish GovernmentEuropean Commission); Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades(Spanish Government); Universidad de Salamanca	Junta de Castilla y Leon y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [Grant/Award No. CLU-2019-03 Unidad de Excelencia "Gestion Economica para la Sostenibilidad" (GECOS)]. Consejeria de Educacion, Junta de Castilla y Leon [Grant/Award Number: SA069G18]; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [Grant/Award Number: ECO2013-43838P]; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [Grant/Award Number: RTI2018-093423-B-I00]; and Universidad de Salamanca [Grant/AwardNumber: USAL2017-DISAQ].	AccountAbility, 2003, AA1000 ASS STAND; Accountancy Europe, 2017, RESP ASS NEEDS NONFI; Adams C.A., 2004, J CORPORATE CITIZENS, V14, P97; Aghion P, 2013, AM ECON REV, V103, P277, DOI 10.1257/aer.103.1.277; Aguilera RV, 2006, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V14, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x; Amor-Esteban V, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P127, DOI 10.1002/csr.1665; Amor-Esteban V, 2018, SUSTAIN DEV, V26, P620, DOI 10.1002/sd.1732; Amorelli MF, 2020, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V27, P204, DOI 10.1002/csr.1793; Armitage S., 2008, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V40, P314, DOI [10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.003, DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2008.06.003]; Attig N, 2013, FINANC MANAGE, V42, P441, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01221.x; Barnea A, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V97, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z; Bilinski P, 2019, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V49, P305, DOI 10.1080/00014788.2018.1510303; BlackRock, 2020, BLACKROCK INV STEW; Boone AL, 2015, J FINANC ECON, V117, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.008; Botosan CA., 2006, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V36, P31, DOI [10.1080/00014788.2006.9730042, DOI 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730042]; BRICKLEY JA, 1988, J FINANC ECON, V20, P267, DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90047-5; Briem CR, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P1461, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2447; Brockman P, 2009, J BANK FINANC, V33, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.011; Brossard O, 2013, IND CORP CHANGE, V22, P1031, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtt018; Bushee B.J., 2004, J APPL CORPO RATE FI, V16, P28; Bushee BJ, 2000, J ACCOUNTING RES, V38, P171, DOI 10.2307/2672914; Bushee BJ, 2001, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V18, P207, DOI 10.1506/J4GU-BHWH-8HME-LE0X; Casey RJ, 2015, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V34, P97, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-50736; Chen X, 2007, J FINANC ECON, V86, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.005; Cheng MM, 2015, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V34, P131, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-50738; Cho CH, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002; Clarkson P, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P2451, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3424; Pucheta-Martinez MC, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV, V27, P388, DOI 10.1002/sd.1911; Pucheta-Martinez MC, 2018, SUSTAIN DEV, V26, P835, DOI 10.1002/sd.1853; Cox P, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V52, P27, DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033105.77051.9d; Crane AD, 2018, J FINANC QUANT ANAL, V53, P33, DOI 10.1017/S0022109017000904; Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, 2017, INT BUS REV, V26, P1141, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.009; Dhaliwal D, 2014, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V33, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006; Dhaliwal DS, 2012, ACCOUNT REV, V87, P723, DOI 10.2308/accr-10218; Dhaliwal DS, 2011, ACCOUNT REV, V86, P59, DOI 10.2308/accr.00000005; DIAMOND DW, 1991, J FINANC, V46, P1325, DOI 10.2307/2328861; Dilla W, 2019, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V10, P476, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0357; Dyck A, 2019, J FINANC ECON, V131, P693, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013; Easton PD, 2004, ACCOUNT REV, V79, P73, DOI 10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.73; Elyasiani E, 2010, J FINANC MARK, V13, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.05.001; Eng L.L., 2003, J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC, V22, P325, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P417, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3727; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P1240, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2958; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P307, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2016-2756; Farooq MB, 2017, PAC ACCOUNT REV, V29, P79, DOI 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0093; FEE, 2004, FEE CALL ACT ASS SUS; Ferreira MA, 2008, J FINANC ECON, V88, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.003; Francis JR., 2004, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V36, P345, DOI [10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003, DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2004.09.003]; Garcia-Meca E, 2018, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V25, P237, DOI 10.1002/csr.1451; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2021, REV CONTAB, V24, P241, DOI 10.6018/rcsar.409441; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P1136, DOI 10.1002/bse.2676; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V27, P2530, DOI 10.1002/csr.1974; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P2019, DOI 10.1002/bse.2485; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P832, DOI 10.1002/csr.1724; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2017, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V24, P395, DOI 10.1002/csr.1415; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2016, LONG RANGE PLANN, V49, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004; Gaspar JM, 2005, J FINANC ECON, V76, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.002; Gibson R., 2018, SUSTAINABILITY FOOTP; Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)  UN Global Compact  & World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2015, SDG COMPASS GUIDE BU; Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI), 2006, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR; GRAVES SB, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P1034, DOI 10.2307/256611; Healy PM, 2001, J ACCOUNT ECON, V31, P405, DOI 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0; Hodge K, 2009, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V19, P178, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2009.00056.x; Hsieh TY, 2019, ASIA PAC MANAG REV, V24, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.12.002; Husted BW, 2006, J INT BUS STUD, V37, P838, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227; JENSEN MC, 1976, J FINANC ECON, V3, P305, DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X; Johnson RA, 1999, ACAD MANAGE J, V42, P564, DOI 10.2307/256977; Kane GD, 2004, J BUS RES, V57, P976, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00499-X; Kim HD, 2019, J BUS RES, V95, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.019; Kolk A, 2010, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V19, P182, DOI 10.1002/bse.643; Kr?ger, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY FOOTP; Lee C, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V150, P279, DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3197-4; Lev B., 2003, I OWNERSHIP COST CAP; Lin YP, 2018, ACCOUNT REV, V93, P283, DOI 10.2308/accr-51945; Lopez-Arceiz FJ, 2020, REV CONTAB, V23, P148, DOI 10.6018/rcsar.369331; Lu R., 2013, DOES I OWNERSHIP AFF; Manetti G, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V87, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9809-x; Martinez-Ferrero J, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P1181, DOI 10.1002/bse.2061; Martinez-Ferrero J, 2017, BUS ETHICS, V26, P223, DOI 10.1111/beer.12152; Martinez-Ferrero J, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V135, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.133; McCahery JA, 2016, J FINANC, V71, P2905, DOI 10.1111/jofi.12393; McNulty T, 2016, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V24, P346, DOI 10.1111/corg.12143; Moroney R, 2012, ACCOUNT FINANC, V52, P903, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x; Muslu V, 2019, J BUS ETHICS, V154, P1119, DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3429-7; O'Dwyer B., 2005, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V37, P205, DOI [10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005, DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2005.01.005]; Oh WY, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V104, P283, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z; Ohlson JA, 2005, REV ACC STUD, V10, P349, DOI 10.1007/s11142-005-1535-3; Perego P., 2009, INT J MANAGEMENT, V26, P412; Perego P, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V110, P173, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5; Pflugrath G, 2011, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V30, P239, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-10047; Porter David P., 2009, CASE W RES L REV, V59, P627; Prado-Lorenzo JM, 2009, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V16, P94, DOI 10.1002/csr.189; Rees W., 2013, J SUSTAINABLE FINANC, V3, P238, DOI DOI 10.1080/20430795.2013.791143; Richardson AJ, 2001, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V26, P597, DOI 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00025-3; Riviere-Giordano G, 2018, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V9, P336, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2018-0054; Sethi SP, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V144, P59, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2862-3; Shen HT, 2017, INT J AUDIT, V21, P271, DOI 10.1111/ijau.12094; Shroff N, 2013, J ACCOUNT RES, V51, P1299, DOI 10.1111/1475-679X.12022; Simnett R, 2009, ACCOUNT REV, V84, P937, DOI 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937; Sparkes R, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V52, P45, DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99; Starks LT, 2009, FINANC REV, V44, P461, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6288.2009.00225.x; Steinmeier M, 2019, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V28, P177, DOI 10.1080/09638180.2017.1412337; Wang SY, 2020, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V11, P717, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2019-0031; Weber JL, 2018, J FINANC REPORT ACCO, V16, P694, DOI 10.1108/JFRA-12-2017-0112; Yan XM, 2009, REV FINANC STUD, V22, P893, DOI 10.1093/revfin/hhl046; Zorio A, 2013, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V22, P484, DOI 10.1002/bse.1764	107	8	8	6	19	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	2040-8021	2040-803X		SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA	Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J.	JAN 3	2022	13	1					152	194		10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2020-0199	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2020-0199		AUG 2021	43	Business, Finance; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XS8KJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000683733700001
J	Liu, C; Mao, CX; Bunditsakulchai, P; Sasaki, S; Hotta, Y				Liu, Chen; Mao, Caixia; Bunditsakulchai, Pongsun; Sasaki, So; Hotta, Yasuhiko			Food waste in Bangkok: Current situation, trends and key challenges	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Food waste (FW); Food supply chain; Lifestyle; 3Rs; Bangkok	MANAGEMENT; NUTRITION; HEALTH; NORMS	In the course of implementing the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, policymakers, practitioners and academics have increasingly acknowledged the urgency of addressing the food waste (FW) issue in urban areas of developing economies. This paper selected Bangkok as a case study to evaluate options for preventing and reducing FW. The current situation and tendency of FW generation was clarified based on official published data, and ways in which FW is generated by consumers were examined via a questionnaire survey, followed by a review of the relevant existing FW policies and strategies, to provide policy implications for tackling the issues raised. It found that detailed stipulations by law remain incomplete, resulting in the increasing trend of FW generation over the past decade, with most FW being mixed with municipal solid waste and landfilled. FW generation doubled from 2,860 tonnes per day in 2003 to 5,669 tonnes per day in Bangkok in 2018. The proportion of FW in MSW was 53% in 2018, a figure that has been rising since 2015. Per capita, FW was estimated to be 0.38-0.61 kg per day in 2018, which is high even when compared to developed cities. Sources of FW are distributed widely through the whole supply chain due to diverse dietary and eating habits, with a high frequency of eating out and consuming ready-made food. This paper offers recommendations for FW policies and innovative actions targeting the entire supply chain to achieve more effective FW management.	[Liu, Chen; Mao, Caixia; Hotta, Yasuhiko] Inst Global Environm Strategies, Sustainable Consumpt & Prod Area, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa 2400115, Japan; [Bunditsakulchai, Pongsun] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, 254 Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; [Sasaki, So] Chuo Univ, Fac Econ, 742-1 Higashinakano, Hachioji, Tokyo 1920393, Japan; [Sasaki, So] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Econ, 254 Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand		Liu, C (corresponding author), Inst Global Environm Strategies, Sustainable Consumpt & Prod Area, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa 2400115, Japan.	c-liu@iges.or.jp		Mao, Caixia/0000-0001-8940-3524	Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan 'Policy Design and Evaluation to Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns in Asian Region' (2016-2020) [S-16]; IGES SRF fund 2019	Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan 'Policy Design and Evaluation to Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns in Asian Region' (2016-2020); IGES SRF fund 2019	This research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-16) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan 'Policy Design and Evaluation to Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns in Asian Region' (2016-2020), and IGES SRF fund 2019. The authors would like to thank Dr Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee for her technical assistance with the policy review, Prof Orawan Siriratpiriya for her advice, Mr Desmond Allen and Ms Emma Fushimi for proofreading this paper, and would also like to express gratitude to the referees for their useful comments.	[Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2019, NATION; [Anonymous], 2013, INDONESIA RETAIL FOO; [Anonymous], 2018, PHNOM PENH WAST MAN; [Anonymous], 2017, SOLID WASTE MANAGEME; [Anonymous], 2013, SUSTAINABILITY SCI P, DOI DOI 10.1080/15487733.2013.11908111; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2016, BANGK STAT ENV 2015; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2011, BANGK STAT ENV 2010; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2019, BOOKL THAIL STAT POL; [Anonymous], 2017, APPL ENV RES J; [Anonymous], 2018, THAIL STAT POLL REP; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2019, COURT COMM 2025 ANN; Aschemann-Witzel J, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P6457, DOI 10.3390/su7066457; Banwell C, 2013, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V16, P608, DOI 10.1017/S1368980012004223; Barr S., 2001, ENV WASTE MANAGEMENT, V4, P69; Derqui B, 2018, APPETITE, V129, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.022; FAO, 2014, FOOD WASTAGE FOOTPRI; Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2013, FOOD WASTAGE FOOTPRI; Graham-Rowe E, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V84, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005; Gustavsson J., 2011, GLOBAL FOOD LOSSES F; Jitnarin N, 2011, EAT WEIGHT DISORD-ST, V16, pE242, DOI 10.1007/BF03327467; Kawai K, 2016, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V18, P517, DOI 10.1007/s10163-014-0348-5; Khalid S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P1015, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.138; Kosulwat V, 2002, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V5, P183, DOI 10.1079/PHN2001292; Lee KCL, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.085; Li XL, 2014, ACTA PHYS SIN-CH ED, V63, DOI 10.7498/aps.63.217101; Li YY, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V31, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.006; Liu C, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V133, P557, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.026; Lober DJ, 1996, WASTE MANAGE RES, V14, P125, DOI 10.1177/0734242X9601400203; Losiri C, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070686; Mak TMW, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V204, P1034, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.049; Mariani J.F., 2014, ENCY AM FOOD DRINK; Martin-Rios C, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V79, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.033; McGuire S, 2015, ADV NUTR, V6, P623, DOI 10.3945/an.115.009936; Thi NBD, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V157, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.022; O'Connor C., 2014, THE FULL REPORT; Poyatos-Racionero E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3398, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.075; Quested TE, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V79, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011; Reardon T., 2006, EUR J DEV RES, V18, P522, DOI DOI 10.1080/09578810601070613; Revilla BP, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V198, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.038; Reynolds C, 2019, FOOD POLICY, V83, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009; Richardson AJ, 1995, SURVEY METHODS TRANS; Schneider F, 2013, PROC INST CIV ENG-WA, V166, DOI 10.1680/warm.13.00016; Seto KC, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P943, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7439; Setti M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.024; Sirieix L, 2017, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V34, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.004; Soma, 2018, INDONESIA, V150, P173, DOI [10.1353/ind.2018.0007, DOI 10.1353/IND.2018.0007]; Stenmarck A., 2016, ESTIMATES EUROPEAN F; UN-Habitat, 2016, WORLD CIT REP 2016 U; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; United Nations Environment Programme, 2021, FOOD WAST IND REP 20; Wang LG, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V136, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.001; Wansink B, 2013, J EXP PSYCHOL-APPL, V19, P320, DOI 10.1037/a0035053; Yamane T., 1967, STAT INTRO ANAL, V2nd Edn	65	18	19	3	19	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29a, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	JUN	2020	157								104779	10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104779	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104779			11	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LY5ZB					2022-09-08	WOS:000540606400011
J	Sebbah, B; Alaoui, OY; Wahbi, M; Maatouk, M; Ben Achhab, N				Sebbah, Boutaina; Alaoui, Otmane Yazidi; Wahbi, Miriam; Maatouk, Mustapha; Ben Achhab, Nizar			QGIS-Landsat Indices plugin (Q-LIP): Tool for environmental indices computing using Landsat data	ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE			English	Article						Q-LIP; Landsat; QGIS; Environmental monitoring		Environmental monitoring has become of paramount importance for researchers and decision makers in order to better protect the environment and achieve sustainable development goals, especially with continuous population growth and rapid urbanization and industrialization processes that alter natural components of the environment and degrade the ecosystems. Hence, the use of Landsat data is of great significance, particularly in environmental monitoring and land management, due to their high spatial resolution and their free of cost availability since 1972. However, calculation of remotely sensed indices for environmental purpose occurs in several steps and requires minimum knowledge in imagery processing. This paper describes the development and design of Q-LIP "QGIS-Landsat Indices plugin"a simple and easy-to-use tool to download, process and automatically calculate environmental indices from Landsat imagery. Q-LIP has been built under Python and designed as a QGIS software plugin; it is available to download from QGIS Plugin Repository.	[Sebbah, Boutaina; Alaoui, Otmane Yazidi; Wahbi, Miriam; Maatouk, Mustapha] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Fac Sci & Tech Tangier, Geomat & Land Management Res Unit, Tangier, Morocco; [Ben Achhab, Nizar] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Remote Sensing & GIS Res Unit, Tetouan, Morocco		Sebbah, B (corresponding author), Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Fac Sci & Tech Tangier, Geomat & Land Management Res Unit, Tangier, Morocco.	boutainasebbah@gmail.com		MAATOUK, Mustapha/0000-0003-3125-9149; Otmane, YAZIDI ALAOUI/0000-0002-7100-2391; Sebbah, Boutaina/0000-0002-2169-238X				ARTIS DA, 1982, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V12, P313, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(82)90043-8; Barbosa CCD, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V52, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.007; Carlson TN, 1997, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V62, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1; Chander G, 2007, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V4, P490, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2007.898285; Chander G, 2009, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V113, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007; Ding HY, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V168, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.009; Ellsasser F, 2020, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104739; Feyisa GL, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V140, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029; Guo GH, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V84, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.021; He CY, 2010, REMOTE SENS LETT, V1, P213, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2010.481681; Huete A, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V83, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2; HUETE AR, 1988, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V25, P295, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X; Jimenez-Munoz JC, 2014, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V11, P1840, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2312032; Li J, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12071130; Lindberg F, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V99, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.020; Liu Y, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V743, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140589; Lopez Garcia M. J., 1991, Geocarto International, V6, P31; Maatouk M, 2017, 4 C ASS FRANC GEOGR, P101; McFeeters SK, 1996, INT J REMOTE SENS, V17, P1425, DOI 10.1080/01431169608948714; NASA, 2018, LANDS BEN SOC 50 YEA; Nielsen A, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104886; Panda SS, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.012; QI J, 1994, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V48, P119, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1; Quintano C, 2015, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.015; Rouse J., 1973, 3 ERTS S NASA, P309; Sato Y., 2001, 22 AS C REM SENS, P5; Schultz M, 2016, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V52, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2016.06.020; Sebbah B., 2017, T MACH LEARN ARTIF I, V5, DOI [10.14738/tmlai.54.3423, DOI 10.14738/TMLAI.54.3423]; Skokovic D., 2014, CALIBRATION VALIDATI; Skokovic D., 2014, PROD VALID EVOL ESAE; Sobrino JA, 2008, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V46, P316, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2007.904834; Touati N, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100692; U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, LANDSAT 8 L8 DATA US; USGS, 2011, LANDS 7 SCI DAT US H, P186; Wilson EH, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00318-2; Xie ZY, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111317; Xu HQ, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3025, DOI 10.1080/01431160600589179; Xu HQ, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11202345; Zha Y, 2003, INT J REMOTE SENS, V24, P583, DOI 10.1080/01431160304987; [张勇 Zhang Yong], 2006, [遥感学报, Journal of Remote Sensing], V10, P789	40	2	2	8	13	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	1364-8152	1873-6726		ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW	Environ. Modell. Softw.	MAR	2021	137								104972	10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104972	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104972		JAN 2021	5	Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Computer Science; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	QR7WW					2022-09-08	WOS:000625426100001
J	Siddiki, SYA; Uddin, MN; Mofijur, M; Fattah, IMR; Ong, HC; Lam, SS; Kumar, PS; Ahmed, SF				Siddiki, Sk Yasir Arafat; Uddin, M. N.; Mofijur, M.; Fattah, I. M. R.; Ong, Hwai Chyuan; Lam, Su Shiung; Kumar, P. Senthil; Ahmed, S. F.			Theoretical calculation of biogas production and greenhouse gas emission reduction potential of livestock, poultry and slaughterhouse waste in Bangladesh	JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING			English	Article						Biogas; Slaughterhouse waste; Waste management; Biofertiliser; Biomethane		The utilisation of available renewable resources and mitigating their impact on the environment boosts sustainable development and helps to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Biogas is renewable energy option produced through anaerobic digestion of wastes such as livestock excreta and slaughterhouse wastes. Biogas production is treated as one of the leading processes to combat climate change as well as a waste management strategy, especially for a developing country like Bangladesh. It is also vital in meeting future demand for energy utilising indigenous sources. Livestock farming is an important economic activity in rural areas of Bangladesh. Thus, the livestock waste production, estimated biogas generation capacity, electricity generation potential, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential, and estimated biofertiliser generation capacity of Bangladesh were determined for the financial year 2018-2019 in this study. The results show that Bangladesh had 486.77 million tons per year of animal waste products to produce 27,923.72 million m(3)/year biogas in 2018-2019. This biogas potential corresponds to a theoretical potential to produce a 512 PJ/year heating value and electric power of 50 TW h/year. Besides, about 29.232 million tons per year of organic fertiliser can be produced with the residues of the biogas plants. The findings of this study will contribute to guiding policymakers and governments who will concentrate on the use of animal waste in biogas industries and livestock farming as a potential bioenergy source to meet national energy demand.	[Siddiki, Sk Yasir Arafat] Khulna Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh; [Uddin, M. N.] Northern Univ Bangladesh, Dept Elect Engn, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh; [Mofijur, M.; Fattah, I. M. R.; Ong, Hwai Chyuan] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Informat Syst & Modelling, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia; [Mofijur, M.] Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia; [Lam, Su Shiung] Univ Malaysia Terengganu, Higher Inst, Inst Trop Aquaculture & Fisheries AKUATROP, Ctr Excellence HICoE, Terengganu 21030, Malaysia; [Kumar, P. Senthil] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India; [Ahmed, S. F.] Asian Univ Women, Sci & Math Program, Chattogram 4000, Bangladesh		Siddiki, SYA (corresponding author), Khulna Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh.; Mofijur, M (corresponding author), Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Informat Syst & Modelling, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.	yasir.arafat@che.kuet.ac.bd; MdMofijur.Rahman@uts.edu.au	Fattah, Islam Md Rizwanul/B-5715-2012; Rahman, Mofijur/E-9959-2019; Ong, Hwai Chyuan/A-9492-2013; Ahmed, Shams Forruque/AAU-1353-2021; Lam, Su Shiung/K-7436-2012; P, Senthil Kumar/D-1869-2012; College of Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar/AAP-1896-2021; Uddin/M-5058-2019	Fattah, Islam Md Rizwanul/0000-0003-4170-4074; Rahman, Mofijur/0000-0002-8605-4303; Ong, Hwai Chyuan/0000-0002-6731-4800; Ahmed, Shams Forruque/0000-0003-3360-3636; Lam, Su Shiung/0000-0002-5318-1760; P, Senthil Kumar/0000-0001-9389-5541; Uddin/0000-0001-8154-1703; Siddiki, Sk. Yasir Arafat/0000-0003-2124-0559				Abdeshahian P, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P714, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.117; Adeoti O, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V37, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.005; Afazeli H, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V34, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.016; Ahmed Y, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V42, P1260, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.073; [Anonymous], 2019, ANN REPORT 2018 19; Avcioglu AO, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P1557, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.006; Ayodele TR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V203, P718, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.282; Benito M, 2015, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V40, P14456, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.163; Bhattacharyya SC, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V75, P745, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.034; Budzianowski WM, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.161; Cai MW, 2016, FRONT MICROBIOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00778; Caliskan M, 2021, BIOENERG RES, V14, P860, DOI 10.1007/s12155-020-10193-w; Ch'ng HY, 2014, J AGR SCI TECH-IRAN, V16, P1441; Chasnyk O, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.122; Dai J, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V41, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.043; De Vries JW, 2012, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V125, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124; Department of Livestock Services (DLS), 2019, LIV EC GLANC 2018 20; Divya D, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V42, P690, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.055; Feng R, 2016, APPL THERM ENG, V96, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.003; Garcia A., 2014, THESIS; Halder PK, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V65, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.094; Hori T, 2011, MICROBIOL-SGM, V157, P1980, DOI 10.1099/mic.0.049189-0; Hosseini SE, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V40, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.204; Kaygusuz K, 2002, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V6, P339, DOI 10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00007-7; Khalil M, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V105, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.011; Li CJ, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V44, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.027; Li WW, 2018, APPL ENERG, V226, P1219, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055; Luostarinen S, BALT FOR INN TECHN S; Mahlia TMI, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109526; Mahmudul HM, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141920; Manfredi S, 2009, WASTE MANAGE RES, V27, P825, DOI 10.1177/0734242X09348529; McInerney MJ, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1125, P58, DOI 10.1196/annals.1419.005; Nasir I.M., 2013, INT J ENG TECHNOL, V10, P22; Nasir IM, 2012, ENG LIFE SCI, V12, P258, DOI 10.1002/elsc.201100150; Ngumah Chima, 2013, Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, V63, P60, DOI 10.5755/j01.erem.63.1.2912; Noorollahi Y, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V50, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.190; Ong HC, 2021, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113647; Ounnar A, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V33, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1211; Paolini V, 2018, J ENVIRON SCI HEAL A, V53, P899, DOI 10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076; Pramanik Sagor Kumar, 2019, Bioresource Technology Reports, V8, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100310; Purohit P, 2007, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V11, P1208, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2005.09.003; Rahman SMA, 2021, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113742; Rajendran K, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109746; Sadettanh K, 2004, ENERG SOURCE, V26, P9, DOI 10.1080/00908310490266994; Shah FA, 2014, SCI WORLD J, DOI 10.1155/2014/183752; Strazzera G, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V226, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.039; Szabo G, 2014, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V13, P2867, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2014.322; Tabatabaei M, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V146, P1204, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.037; Than T.M.M., 2005, SE ASIAN AFFAIRS 200, V2005, P257; Zabed HM, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109503; Zamri MFMA, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110637	51	11	11	7	36	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	2213-2929	2213-3437		J ENVIRON CHEM ENG	J. Environ. Chem. Eng.	JUN	2021	9	3							105204	10.1016/j.jece.2021.105204	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105204		FEB 2021	9	Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Chemical	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering	RC2HV					2022-09-08	WOS:000632625900004
J	Zhou, J; Leavitt, PR; Zhang, YB; Qin, BQ				Zhou, Jian; Leavitt, Peter R.; Zhang, Yibo; Qin, Boqiang			Anthropogenic eutrophication of shallow lakes: Is it occasional?	WATER RESEARCH			English	Article						Shallow lake; Eutrophication; Sustainability; Depth; Trophic state; Management	LAND-COVER DATABASE; WATER-QUALITY; AGRICULTURAL EXPANSION; UNITED-STATES; PHOSPHORUS; CLIMATE; NITROGEN; BLOOMS; DEPTH; COMPLETION	Understanding and managing the susceptibility of lakes to anthropogenic eutrophication has been a primary goal of limnological research for decades. To achieve United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, scientists have attempted to understand why shallow lakes appear to be prone to eutrophication and resistant to restoration. A rich data base of 1151 lakes (each >= 0.5 km2) located within the Europe and the United States of America offers a rare opportunity to explore potential answers. Analysis of sites showed that lake depth integrated socioecological systems and reflected potential susceptibility to anthropogenic stressors, as well as lake productivity. In this study, lakes distributed in agricultural plain and densely populated lowland areas were generally shallow and subjected to intense human activities with high external nutrient inputs. In contrast, deep lakes frequently occurred in upland regions, dominated by natural landscapes with little anthropogenic nutrient input. Lake depth appeared to not only reflect external nutrient load to the lake, but also acted as an amplifier that increased shallow lake susceptibility to anthropogenic disturbance. Our findings suggest that shallow lakes are more susceptible to human forcing and their eutrophication may be not an occasional occurrence, and that societal expectations, policy goals, and management plans should reflect this observation.	[Zhou, Jian; Zhang, Yibo; Qin, Boqiang] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, State Key Lab Lake Sci & Environm, 73 East Beijing Rd, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China; [Zhou, Jian] Loughborough Univ, Dept Geog, Loughborough LE11 3TU, England; [Leavitt, Peter R.] Univ Regina, Limnol Lab, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada		Qin, BQ (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, State Key Lab Lake Sci & Environm, 73 East Beijing Rd, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China.	jzhou@niglas.ac.cn; Peter.Leavitt@uregina.ca; ybzhang@niglas.ac.cn; qinbq@niglas.ac.cn	Leavitt, Peter/A-1048-2013	Leavitt, Peter/0000-0001-9805-9307; Qin, Boqiang/0000-0003-3977-4903; Zhou, Jian/0000-0001-8001-1268	National Natural Science Foundation of China [42177058, 41621002, 41790423]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177058, 41621002, and 41790423) .	[Anonymous], 1967, TREATISE LIMNOL; Beaver JR, 2014, HARMFUL ALGAE, V36, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.hal.2014.03.005; Birk S, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1060, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1216-4; Blenckner T, 2005, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V533, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-004-1463-4; Borics G, 2013, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V714, P93, DOI 10.1007/s10750-013-1525-6; Brooks JR, 2014, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V59, P2150, DOI 10.4319/lo.2014.59.6.2150; Buckler C., 2014, SHAP FUT WE WANT UN; Bunting L, 2016, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V61, P2090, DOI 10.1002/lno.10355; CARLSON RE, 1977, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V22, P361, DOI 10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361; Carpenter SR, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P559, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2; Carpenter SR, 2007, BIOSCIENCE, V57, P323, DOI 10.1641/B570407; Carpenter SR, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P75, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-021810-094524; Conley DJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1014, DOI 10.1126/science.1167755; DeArellano JVG, 2015, ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER: INTEGRATING AIR CHEMISTRY AND LAND INTERACTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1177/2053019615579128; Dearing JA, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE1111, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1118263109; Deblij Harm J., 1981, GEOGRAPHY REGIONS CO; Dolman AM, 2016, FRESHWATER BIOL, V61, P444, DOI 10.1111/fwb.12718; Dudgeon D, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1464793105006950; Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772; Fry JA, 2011, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V77, P859; Nobre RLG, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V716, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137044; Havens KE, 2005, LAKE RESERV MANAGE, V21, P139, DOI 10.1080/07438140509354423; Heino J, 2021, BIOL REV, V96, P89, DOI 10.1111/brv.12647; Herlihy AT, 2008, J N AM BENTHOL SOC, V27, P860, DOI 10.1899/08-081.1; Ho JC, 2019, NATURE, V574, P667, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1648-7; Ho LT, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071462; Homer C, 2007, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V73, P337; Homer C, 2015, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V81, P345, DOI 10.14358/PERS.81.5.345; Janssen ABG, 2021, FRESHWATER BIOL, V66, P1, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13582; Aranguren-Riano NJ, 2018, AQUAT SCI, V80, DOI 10.1007/s00027-018-0588-x; Laurance WF, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001; Le TT, 2021, BIOINFORMATICS, V37, P282, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa662; Leavitt PR, 2009, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V54, P2330, DOI 10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2330; Liu WZ, 2010, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V644, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10750-010-0151-9; Mantzouki E, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.226; Martin SL, 2011, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V56, P2362, DOI 10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2362; Michalak AM, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P6448, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1216006110; Moorhouse HL, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P4009, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14299; Nielsen A, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P1187, DOI 10.1890/11-1831.1; Paerl HW, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P57, DOI 10.1126/science.1155398; Qin BQ, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P3191, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b05858; Qin BQ, 2019, SCI BULL, V64, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.02.008; R Development Core Team, 2021, R LANG ENV STAT COMP; Read EK, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P943, DOI 10.1890/14-0935.1; Richardson J, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5044, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14396; Scheffer M, 2007, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V584, P455, DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-0616-7; Schindler DW, 2006, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V51, P356, DOI 10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0356; Schindler DW, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P8923, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b02204; SCHINDLER DW, 1974, SCIENCE, V184, P897, DOI 10.1126/science.184.4139.897; Schonfelder I., 2004, STUDIA QUAT, V21, P129; Solheim AL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V697, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134043; Stoddard JL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P3409, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b05950; Tammelin M, 2018, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2018.00065; Tang T, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V704, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135268; Taranu ZE, 2008, ECOSYSTEMS, V11, P715, DOI 10.1007/s10021-008-9153-0; Tilman D, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P5995, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995; Tomer MD, 2013, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V68, p113A, DOI 10.2489/jswc.68.5.113A; USEPA, 2016, COLL SURV LAK US; VOLLENWEIDER R A, 1975, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Hydrologie, V37, P53, DOI 10.1007/BF02505178; Wang JD, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V152, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.004; Watson SB, 2016, HARMFUL ALGAE, V56, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.hal.2016.04.010; Woolway RI, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P388, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0067-5; Zhang J, 2011, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V41, P548, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2010.530577	63	2	2	26	26	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0043-1354	1879-2448		WATER RES	Water Res.	AUG 1	2022	221								118728	10.1016/j.watres.2022.118728	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118728			10	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	2J6TA	35717711				2022-09-08	WOS:000815785400004
J	Amicarelli, V; Rana, R; Lombardi, M; Bux, C				Amicarelli, Vera; Rana, Roberto; Lombardi, Mariarosaria; Bux, Christian			Material flow analysis and sustainability of the Italian meat industry	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Food waste; Meat industry; Circular economy; Material flow analysis; Eco-efficiency indicators; Material cycles indicators	DESCRIBING SOCIETY METABOLISM; FOOD WASTE; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; MATERIAL CYCLES; 6 INDICATORS; QUANTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; RECOVERY	The Italian meat industry represents a core business for the national economy, accounting for over 20 billion euro (15% of the domestic agri-food value), but requires large amounts of energy and produces several types of waste, of which food loss and waste account for an always-increasing amount. The United Nations 2030 Agenda has established food waste as a global concern, contributing to social, environmental and economic losses. Nevertheless, only a few studies have addressed food waste quantification from production to consumption stage. This paper, in line with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/1597 concerning a common methodology and minimum quality requirements for the uniform measurement of levels of food waste, applies the Material Flow Analysis (MFA) methodology to the Italian meat industry, testing its reliability in sustainability assessments. With MFA it was possible first to quantify and qualify food waste streams and secondly to calculate related material cycles and ecoefficiency indicators. Results demonstrate that, in 2018, the Italian meat industry processed more than 4.9 Mt to produce approximately 2.0 Mt of fresh meat, 1.9 Mt of co-products and by-products, 0.7-0.8 Mt of meat-based products and more than 0.2-0.3 Mt of food waste at retail and final consumption. Material Use Efficiency was estimated at 0.95-0.97 (96%) at slaughtering, drastically decreasing to 0.79-0.85 (82%) when "unconscious" food waste was included, showing that it represents a significant variable mass for material cycle indicator calculation. On the other side, a sharp increase in eco-efficiency indicators was assessed, showing an average variation of approximately & thorn;20% in the last ten years in terms of material input productivity. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Amicarelli, Vera; Bux, Christian] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Econ Management & Business Law, Bari, Italy; [Rana, Roberto; Lombardi, Mariarosaria] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ, Foggia, Italy		Bux, C (corresponding author), Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Econ Management & Business Law, Bari, Italy.	vera.amicarelli@uniba.it; roberto.rana@unifg.it; mariarosaria.lombardi@unifg.it; christian.bux@uniba.it	Bux, Christian/ABA-8983-2020; Amicarelli, Vera/AAZ-3147-2020; rana, roberto/I-8901-2016	Bux, Christian/0000-0001-7360-4989; Amicarelli, Vera/0000-0003-0115-1356; rana, roberto/0000-0003-0611-2049				Abdelaal AH, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V98, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.007; Ali MM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120499; Amicarelli V., 2020, BR FOOD J AHEAD IN P; Amicarelli V, 2021, BRIT FOOD J, V123, P67, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0241; Anaborapi, 2020, CATEGORIE MERCEOLOGI; [Anonymous], 2016, ESTIMATES EUROPEAN F; [Anonymous], 2016, MARK BAS INSTR OTH S; Beretta C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V147, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.023; Beretta C, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.11.007; Bogad R., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P393; Boschini M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P1024, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.040; Bringezu S, 2015, RESOURCES-BASEL, V4, P25, DOI 10.3390/resources4010025; Brunner P.H., 2017, ENV RESOURCE WASTE E; Caldeira C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.011; Carni Sostenibili, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY MEAT; Cencic O, 2008, J ENV ENG MANAGEMENT, V18, P3; Cencic O., 2016, HDB MAT FLOW ANAL EN, Vsecond, P94; Cencic O, 2016, SUSTAIN ENVIRON RES, V26, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.serj.2016.06.002; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Corazzin M., 2014, QUADERNO SOZOOALP, V8; COWIconsult Denmark Miljostyrelsen and United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology Industry and Economics, 2000, CLEANER PRODUCTION A; De Marco O, 2009, ECO-EFFIC IND SCI, V23, P161; Desjardins RL, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3279, DOI 10.3390/su4123279; Elimelech E, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V95, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.015; Environdec, 2020, MONTANA FROZEN HAMBU; Environdec, 2020, MONTANA CANNED BEEF; Ercoli L., 2008, UTILIZZAZIONE AGRONO, P117; Ermgassen EKHJZ, 2016, FOOD POLICY, V58, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001; European Commission, 2010, PREPARATORY STUDY FO; European Commission, 2015, CLOS LOOP EU ACT PLA; Eurostat, 2020, CIRC EC MON FRAM; Eurostat, 2020, STAT EXPL GLOSS DIR; FAO, 2020, COMPOSITION MEAT ANI; FAO, 2001, REP JOINT FAO WHO ON; FAO, 2019, CCBY NC SA 30; FAO, 2019, STAT FOOD AGR MOV FO; FAO IFAD UNICEF WFP WHO., 2018, STAT FOOD SEC NUTR W; Farina, 2015, FOOD RECOVERY WASTE; Fiore Mariantonietta, 2017, International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, V9, P185; Fischer-Kowalski M, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14; Fry J., 2009, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN; Galanakis C, 2021, INTERACTION OF FOOD INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT, P341, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816449-5.00011-4; Garcia-Garcia G, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V211, P1339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.269; Gherardi E., 2013, SUINICOLTURA, V6, P26; Giordano C, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P2885, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-02-2018-0081; Gustavsson J., 2011, Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention; Haberl H, 2011, SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P1, DOI 10.1002/sd.410; Hamerschlag K., 2011, MEAT EATERS GUIDE CL; Hartikainen H, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V71, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.026; Hashimoto S, 2004, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V40, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00101-0; Hashimoto S, 2004, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V40, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00070-3; Hautzinger P., 2007, RAP PUBLICATION, V2007/20; Ilakovac B, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V102, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.042; Ingrao C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.267; IPCC, 2019, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT; Irshad A., 2015, J ANIM PROD ADV, V5, P681, DOI 10.5455/japa.20150626043918; ISMEA, 2019, CARNE SUINA SALUMI S; ISMEA, 2019, AVICOLI UOVA SCHEDA; ISMEA, 2019, ALL BOV CARN SCH SET; Isprambiente, 2005, LINEE GUIDA LIDENTIF; Istat, 2020, MAC CARN ROSS DAT AN; Istat, 2020, MACELLAZIONI CARNI B; Istat, 2019, ANNUALE BESTIAME CAR; Jacobi N, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V137, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.022; Jorissen J, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2695, DOI 10.3390/su7032695; Katajajuuri JM, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V73, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.057; Kayikci Y, 2020, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V33, P791, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-01-2019-0025; Krausmann F., 2011, FUNDAMENTALS MAT ENE, P81; Lagioia G, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V60, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.001; Leray L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V125, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.055; Lombardi M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125573; Lombardi M, 2020, ADM SCI, V10, DOI 10.3390/admsci10030045; Mc Carthy U, 2018, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V77, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.002; Moraga G, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V146, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045; Mullen AM, 2017, MEAT SCI, V132, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.243; Nebbia G., 2002, MERCI VALORI CRITICA, P1; OJEU Official Journal of European Union, 2009, REG EC NO 1069 2009; OJEU Official Journal of the European Union, 2004, ENS HYG FOOD AN OR R; OJEU Official Journal of the European Union, 2019, COMM DEL DEC EU 201D; Padalino B, 2018, ANIMALS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/ani8090155; Parfitt J, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P3065, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126; Poore J, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P987, DOI 10.1126/science.aaq0216; Quested TE, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121263; Rama D., 2014, MERCATO CARNE BOVINA, P224; Rattanapan C, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V40, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.167; Read Q.D., 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V685, P1240; Rechberger H, 2014, J IND ECOL, V18, P159, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12087; ReFED Rethink Food Waste Through Economics and Data, 2016, ROADMAP REDUCE US FO, P1; Ribeiro AP, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.029; Ritchie Hannah, 2020, FOOD WASTE IS RESPON; Roma R., 2015, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN, P251, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11940-3_5; Ronga M., 2017, MINISTERO POLITICHE; Sakaguchi L, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V180, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.136; Salvatori G., 2016, ITALIAN REV AGR EC, V71, P347, DOI DOI 10.13128/REA-18653; Scherhaufer S, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V77, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038; Septianto F, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120591; Silvennoinen K, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V46, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.010; Silvennoinen K, 2014, BRIT FOOD J, V116, P1058, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-12-2012-0311; Spang ES, 2019, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V44, P117, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033228; Strzalka R, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V72, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.091; Thamagasorn M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P845, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.312; Tricase C, 2009, RENEW ENERG, V34, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.013; United Nations, 2020, OBIETTIVO 2 PORRE FI; United Nations, 2009, STESCAP2561; Verfaillie H.A., 2000, MEASURING ECO EFFICI; Wakefield A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122803; Wang SL, 2018, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V173, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.059; Wang W, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P787, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.103; Wang YS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P1017, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.202; Weidema Bo, 2008, ENV IMPROVEMENT POTE; Weiss F, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V149, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015; Wyngaard SR, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.139	112	16	16	7	19	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 25	2021	299								126902	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126902	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126902		APR 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	RX8AR					2022-09-08	WOS:000647441800013
J	Mao, F; Zhao, XF; Ma, PM; Chi, SY; Richards, K; Clark, J; Hannah, DM; Krause, S				Mao, Feng; Zhao, Xianfu; Ma, Peiming; Chi, Shiyun; Richards, Keith; Clark, Julian; Hannah, David M.; Krause, Stefan			Developing composite indicators for ecological water quality assessment based on network interactions and expert judgment	ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE			English	Article						Analytic network process; Integrated river basin management; Ecological network; Composite indicator; Ecological water quality assessment; Multi-criteria decision-making	SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ORGANISM GROUPS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; LAND-USE; MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES; STREAM; INDEX; FRAMEWORK	Increasingly, composite indicators and multi-criteria approaches are applied in environmental assessment and decision-making, including the EU Water Framework Directive. For example, integrated evaluation of aquatic ecosystem conditions and functioning usually involves a group of criteria, such as biological organisms and communities, physicochemical and hydromorphological variables, which are measured individually and combined by a weighted linear function into an overall 'score'. We argue that the network interactions of evaluation components are useful information for expert judgments, which have not been sufficiently considered in existing multi-criteria combination strategies in environmental assessment and management. Built upon the Analytic Network Process and demonstrated with the Chishui River Basin in China, this paper introduces a network-based expert judgment approach to construct ecological water quality indicators, and to determine and adjust their variable weight settings with information of interaction networks. This approach has potential to construct composite indicators for a broad environmental context.	[Mao, Feng; Clark, Julian; Hannah, David M.; Krause, Stefan] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England; [Zhao, Xianfu; Ma, Peiming; Chi, Shiyun] Minist Water Resources, Inst Hydroecol, Key Lab Ecol Impacts Hydraul Projects & Restorat, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Xianfu; Ma, Peiming; Chi, Shiyun] Chinese Acad Sci, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China; [Richards, Keith] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England		Mao, F (corresponding author), Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England.	f.mao@bham.ac.uk	, Xianfu/AHC-4026-2022; Hannah, David M./B-9221-2015	Hannah, David M./0000-0003-1714-1240; Krause, Stefan/0000-0003-2521-2248; Mao, Feng/0000-0002-5889-1825	National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0405303]; 'River Basin Governance Research Network' project [ESRC] [RES-810-21-0071]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [51279113]; Special Funds for Public Industry Research Projects of the National Ministry of Water Resources [201501030]; ESRC [ES/H008055/1] Funding Source: UKRI	National Key Research and Development Program of China; 'River Basin Governance Research Network' project [ESRC]; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Special Funds for Public Industry Research Projects of the National Ministry of Water Resources; ESRC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC))	We would like to thank the National Key Research and Development Program of China [Nos. 2017YFC0405303] and the 'River Basin Governance Research Network' project [ESRC grant reference: RES-810-21-0071]. This research was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos. 51279113] and the Special Funds for Public Industry Research Projects of the National Ministry of Water Resources [Nos. 201501030]. We also thank Wei Chen and Sheng Chen who processed the biological samples.	Anbumozhi V, 2005, ECOL ENG, V24, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.01.007; Bandura R., 2008, SURVEY COMPOSITE IND; Bisset R., 1988, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, P47; Bona F, 2008, RIVER RES APPL, V24, P1068, DOI 10.1002/rra.1110; Borja A, 2008, MAR POLLUT BULL, V56, P1519, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.005; Bottero M, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P1211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002; Boulton AJ, 1999, FRESHWATER BIOL, V41, P469, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00443.x; Burgman MA, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022998; Casini M, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V64, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.008; CEN, 2010, WAT QUAL GUID STAND; Cummins Kenneth W., 2001, P85; Dahm V, 2013, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V704, P389, DOI 10.1007/s10750-012-1431-3; Esselman Peter C., 2011, Ecological Restoration, V29, P133, DOI 10.3368/er.29.1-2.133; European Commission (EC), 2000, OFF J EUR COMMUNIT L, V372, P1; Faustini J.M., 2009, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V90, P309, DOI DOI 10.HTTPS://D0I.0RG/10.1029/2009E0360001; Feio MJ, 2009, ECOL INDIC, V9, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.07.001; FORMAN E, 1983, EXPERT CHOICE; Garcia L, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V45, P650, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.030; Hak T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003; Halide H, 2009, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V24, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.013; Halpern BS, 2012, NATURE, V488, P615, DOI 10.1038/nature11397; Hauer F.R., 2007, METHODS STREAM ECOLO; Heatherly T, 2007, J ENVIRON QUAL, V36, P1653, DOI 10.2134/jeq2006.0521; Hering D, 2006, FRESHWATER BIOL, V51, P1757, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01610.x; Hering D, 2006, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V566, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0087-2; Hering D, 2006, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V566, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0098-z; Hermann BG, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1787, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.004; Herva M, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V39, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058; Hsu A, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V33, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.011; Huang IB, 2011, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V409, P3578, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022; Hughes SJ, 2009, FRESHWATER BIOL, V54, P2383, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02253.x; Johnson RK, 2006, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V566, P115, DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0101-8; Johnson RK, 2006, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V566, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0100-9; Jungwirth M, 2002, FRESHWATER BIOL, V47, P867, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00914.x; Kelly M, 2008, FRESHWATER BIOL, V53, P403, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01903.x; Kumar P, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P5827, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017342; Lane SN, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P927, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-927-2014; Lau SSS, 2002, WATER RES, V36, P3593, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00059-3; Lucke JD, 2009, ECOL INDIC, V9, P659, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.005; Lumb A, 2011, WATER QUAL EXPOS HEA, V3, P11, DOI 10.1007/s12403-011-0040-0; Mao F, 2019, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V123, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2018.11.007; Mao F, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3655, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017; Mao F, 2012, AREA, V44, P423, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01124.x; Martin TG, 2012, CONSERV BIOL, V26, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01806.x; McCluney KE, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P48, DOI 10.1890/120367; Mizobuchi H, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V118, P987, DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0457-x; Molinos-Senante M, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V497, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.026; Monk WA, 2008, RIVER RES APPL, V24, P988, DOI 10.1002/rra.1120; Montgomery DR, 1999, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V35, P397, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03598.x; Munda Giuseppe, 2005, Environment Development and Sustainability, V7, P117, DOI 10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0; NIEA, 2014, RIV HYDR ASS TECHN R; Norris V., 1993, Water Resources Management, V7, P257, DOI 10.1007/BF00872284; O'Connor N. A., 1996, EVALUATION NATL RIVE; OECD, 2008, HDB CONSTRUCTING COM, DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-en; Ostadtaghizadeh A., 2015, PLOS CURR, DOI [10.1371/currents.dis, DOI 10.1371/CURRENTS.DIS]; R Development Core Team, 2013, R LANG ENV STAT COMP; RBMP, 2012, EU CHIN RIV BAS MAN; RiBaGo, 2012, RIV BAS GOV RES NETW; Rickels W, 2016, EARTHS FUTURE, V4, P252, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000353; Rogge N, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V23, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.020; Saaty T., 2000, SUPER DECISIONS SOFT; Saaty T.L., 1996, DECISION MAKING DEPE; Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE; Saaty TL, 2008, EUR J PURE APPL MATH, V1, P122; Sahin O, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V46, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.004; Sandin L, 2004, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V516, P55, DOI 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025258.63416.11; Schipper E.L.F., 2015, COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2430.0882; Schmutz S, 2000, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V422, P279, DOI 10.1023/A:1017038820390; SEPA, 2002, GB38382002 SEPA; Singh RK, 2007, ECOL INDIC, V7, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004; Singh RK, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V15, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007; Singh RK, 2009, ECOL INDIC, V9, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011; Sipahi S, 2010, MANAGE DECIS, V48, P775, DOI 10.1108/00251741011043920; Sivapalan M, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P6988, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017896; Sliva L, 2001, WATER RES, V35, P3462, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00062-8; Sutherland WJ, 2015, NATURE, V526, P317, DOI 10.1038/526317a; Tong STY, 2002, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V66, P377, DOI 10.1006/jema.2002.0593; Toosi SLR, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P1999, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-9995-2; UKTAG, 2008, UKTAG RIV ASS METH, P1; UKTAG, 2009, UK TECHN ADV GROUP W; UKTAG (United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group of the Water Framework Directive), 2008, UKTAG RIV ASS METH B; Vacik H., 2007, SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; VANNOTE RL, 1980, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V37, P130, DOI 10.1139/f80-017; Wasson JG, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P1465, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02443.x; Webb BW, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P902, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6994; Wiegand J, 2010, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P1446, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.004; Wijnmalen DJD, 2007, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V46, P892, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.020; Wolfslehner B, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V207, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.025; Wolfslehner B, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.027; Zhou F., 2010, STUDY CONTENTS HEAVY	90	8	8	2	40	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	1364-8152	1873-6726		ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW	Environ. Modell. Softw.	MAY	2019	115						51	62		10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.011	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.011			12	Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Computer Science; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	HO1CW		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000460643900005
J	Espejo, R				Espejo, Raul			The enterprise complexity model: An extension of the viable system model for emerging organizational forms	SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE			English	Article						complexity management; enterprise complexity model; organizational systems; performance; viable system model; Viplan method; Viplan methodology		An enterprise complexity model (ECM) is offered as a methodological tool for the actors of an enterprise to overcome complex environmental problems. The heuristic for this purpose is the viable system model, which guides an enterprise's self-organization towards policies creating, regulating and producing sustainable development goals. Self-organization is grounded in correcting imbalanced interactions between an enterprise's actors and their environmental agents, to increase their requisite variety to achieve sustainability, that is, to overcome environmental problems. The interactions between actors and agents are facilitated by current and emergent digital technologies, which support the structuring of collaborative networks. Reflexive interactions between the enterprise's actors and agents in the problematic environment help their branching into all kinds of innovative organizational forms. The Viplan methodology is used to achieve this branching, which accounts for the enterprise's complexity with the support of the Viplan method. Respect for the environment and quality of interactions are values driving this ecology of enterprises towards a deeper and wider appreciation of the issues besetting future generations.	[Espejo, Raul] Syncho Res, Lincoln, England; [Espejo, Raul] World Org Syst & Cybernet, London, England		Espejo, R (corresponding author), Syncho Res, Lincoln, England.; Espejo, R (corresponding author), World Org Syst & Cybernet, London, England.	r.espejo@syncho.org		Espejo, Raul/0000-0001-8708-4240				[Anonymous], FUTURES; Ashby R. W., 1964, INTRO CYBERNETICS; Avril E, 2013, NEW TECHNOLOGY, ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137264237; Barile S, 2014, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V31, P683, DOI 10.1002/sres.2318; Bauman Zygmunt, 2000, LIQUID MODERNITY; Beer S., 1985, DIAGNOSING SYSTEM OR; Beer S., 1981, BRAIN FIRM; Beer S., 1979, HEART ENTERPRISE; Benkler Yochai, 2006, WEALTH NETWORKS SOCI; Bowling D., 2000, EXPLORING COMP UNPUB; Checkland P, 2000, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V17, pS11, DOI 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.3.CO;2-F; Checkland P.B., 1981, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; Christensen CM, 2009, INNOVATORS PRESCRIPT; Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E; Espejo R, 2011, ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS: MANAGING COMPLEXITY WITH THE VIABLE SYSTEM MODEL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19109-1; Espejo Raul, 2008, International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, V2, P6, DOI 10.1504/IJASS.2008.022791; Espejo R, 2001, SYST PRACT ACT RES, V14, P139, DOI 10.1023/A:1011303705113; ESPEJO R., 2015, INT J SYST SOC, V2, P1, DOI [10.4018/ijss.2015010101, DOI 10.4018/IJSS.2015010101]; Espejo R., 2003, VIABLE SYSTEM MODEL; Espejo R., 1989, VIABLE SYSTEM MODEL, P361; Espejo R., 2018, SYSTEMS RES REAL WOR; Espejo R., 2017, PROSPETTIVE ORG, V6; Espejo R., 1993, ORG FITNESS CORPORAT; Espejo R, 2021, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V38, P184, DOI 10.1002/sres.2692; Espejo R, 2018, FUTURES, V103, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.07.007; Espejo R, 2017, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V34, P24, DOI 10.1002/sres.2392; Espejo R, 2015, KYBERNETES, V44, P1020, DOI 10.1108/K-02-2015-0044; Harari Y. N., 2018, 21 LESSONS 21 CENTUR; Harari Yuval N., 2017, HOMO DEUS BRIEF HIST; Homer-Dixon T., 2001, THE INGENUITY GAP; Lassl W., 2020, VIABILITY ORG, V3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-25854-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25854-2]; Maturana H., 2002, CYBERNETICS HUMAN KN, V3, P5, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2008.00767.X; Nachira F., 2007, DIGITAL BUSINESS ECO; Pickering A., 2010, THE CYBERNETIC BRAIN, DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226667928.001.0001]; Reyes A., 2007, HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT, P134; Schwab K., 2017, CURRENCY, DOI DOI 10.1080/08961530.2020.1727164; Simon HA., 1981, SCI ARTIFICIAL; Tapscott D., 2009, GROWN UP DIGITAL; Tapscott D., 2016, BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTIO; Teece J. D., 2008, TECHNOLOGICAL KNOW O, P328, DOI [10.1142/6147, DOI 10.1142/6147]; United Nations Development Programme, 2018, SUST DEV GOALS; West J, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P805, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001; Zuboff S., 2019, AGE SURVEILLANCE CAP	43	4	4	4	13	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1092-7026	1099-1743		SYST RES BEHAV SCI	Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.	NOV	2021	38	6					721	737		10.1002/sres.2735	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2735		AUG 2020	17	Management; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Social Sciences - Other Topics	XM0AA					2022-09-08	WOS:000556139200001
J	Yew, MH; Molla, A; Cooper, V				Yew, Ming Hock; Molla, Alemayehu; Cooper, Vanessa			Behavioural and environmental sustainability determinants of residential energy management information systems use	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Information systems; Green IS; Residential energy; Energy behaviour; Sustainability	ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; MODEL; CONSERVATION; LIFE; HOUSEHOLDS; EXTENSION; INTERNET; GREEN	Notwithstanding appliance energy efficiency and advances in Smart Home Technologies (SHT), residential energy consumption is still on the rise. Residential Energy Management Information Systems (REMIS) that enable users to monitor, analyse, and benchmark energy use and consumption can contribute to energy savings and mitigate unnecessary consumption. Nevertheless, the withdrawal of Microsoft's Hohm and Google's Powermeter and the low adoption rate of smart meters in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia signposts missed opportunities in reducing energy intensity. Thus, the question of how to influence the successful adoption of REMIS and other related sustainable technologies captivates both researchers and practitioners. In this paper, based on a conceptual model developed by integrating the theory of planned behaviour and pro-environment behaviour research, we analysed survey data from 208 Singapore testbed eco-town apartment precinct households. The study found that environmental altruism and sustainability information exposure induce normative pressures towards REMIS use and a sense of volitional control over REMIS use. Furthermore, presence of children and the apartment size moderate the causal relationship between attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control concerning REMIS adoption. These findings offer theoretical and empirical insights to cleaner production, residential energy consumption research and other sustainable technologies use that can contribute to UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It also discusses the strategic, policy and design implications for energy and technology providers, and residential energy users.	[Yew, Ming Hock; Molla, Alemayehu; Cooper, Vanessa] RMIT Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Business Analyt, Melbourne, Australia		Molla, A (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Business Analyt, Melbourne, Australia.	minghock.yew@rmit.edu.au; alemayehu.molla@rmit.edu.au; vanessa.cooper@rmit.edu.au		Molla, Alemayehu/0000-0001-9320-7294				AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T; Ajzen I, 2002, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V22, P453; Ajzen I., 1985, INTENTIONS ACTIONS T, P11; Allcott H, 2011, J PUBLIC ECON, V95, P1082, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003; Bertoldi P, 2020, ENERGY AND BEHAVIOUR: TOWARDS A LOW CARBON FUTURE, P451, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818567-4.00018-1; Bhati A, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V104, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.032; Brown SA, 2005, MIS QUART, V29, P399; Brown SA, 2006, INFORM SOC, V22, P205, DOI 10.1080/01972240600791333; Butler T, 2021, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2020.103320; Chang YP, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1840, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.006; Chen BY, 2016, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V22, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.003; Chevron, 2018, CLIMATE CHANGE RESIL; Corbett J, 2013, INFORM SYST FRONT, V15, P747, DOI 10.1007/s10796-013-9414-0; Darby S., 2006, TECHNICAL REPORT; Davis F. D., 1985, TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANC; DAVIS FD, 1989, MIS QUART, V13, P319, DOI 10.2307/249008; de Groot J, 2007, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P1817, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x; Department of Statistics, 2019, POP TRENDS; DUNLAP RE, 1978, J ENVIRON EDUC, V9, P10, DOI 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875; Ellsmoor J, 2018, 2018 TIPPING POINT C; Fan XD, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V105, P2545, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.732; Fishbein M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE; Ford R, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.020; Gartner, 2017, GARTN NEWSR; Gaskin J., 2011, MULTIGROUP MODERATIO; Gholami R, 2021, J GLOB INF MANAG, V29, P166, DOI 10.4018/JGIM.2021030109; Gholami R, 2013, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V50, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2013.01.004; Hair JF., 2009, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; Hess DJ, 2014, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V23, P688, DOI 10.1177/0963662512464936; Hesselink LXW, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V99, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.031; Housing & Development Board, 2017, PUBL HOUS SING IC; Hsu J.Y., 2012, INT P COMPUT SCI INF, V45, P11; International Energy Agency, 2009, IEA EXP EN US NEW EL; Kim B, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P7033, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.015; Kim Y, 2017, TOTAL QUAL MANAG BUS, V28, P1149, DOI 10.1080/14783363.2017.1310708; Koo C, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.001; Kranz J., 2012, AMCIS 2012; LaMonica M, 2011, MICROSOFT KILLS HOHM; Lehman P.K., 2004, BEHAV SOC ISSUES, V13, P13, DOI [10.5210/bsi.v13i1.33, DOI 10.5210/BSI.V13I1.33]; MEWR, 2013, HOUS EN EFF STUD; Minton AP, 1997, J BUS RES, V40, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00209-3; National Geographic, 2019, MOST AM NOW WORR CLI; OECD/IEA, 2014, ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN; Park ES, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122351; Park E, 2018, UNIVERSAL ACCESS INF, V17, P175, DOI 10.1007/s10209-017-0533-0; Park E, 2017, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V4, P2342, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750765; Perkins HE, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004; Petchey R., 2010, END USE ENERGY INTEN; Pritoni M, 2018, DATA BRIEF, V16, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.067; Rogers E.M., 1983, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6; Schultz PW, 2005, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V36, P457, DOI 10.1177/0022022105275962; Serrenho T., 2019, SMART HOME APPLIANCE; Sherwood H., 2019, GUARDIAN; Singh M, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102147; SOCOLOW RH, 1978, ENERG BUILDINGS, V1, P207, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(78)90003-8; Stern P.C., 1999, HUM ECOL REV, V6, P81; Stern PC, 2000, J SOC ISSUES, V56, P407, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00175; Stop Smart Meters Australia (SSMA), 2014, STOP SMART MET AUSTR; Herrero ST, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.001; Tzeiranaki ST, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12061065; Urban J, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V47, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.018; VANRAAIJ WF, 1983, J ECON PSYCHOL, V3, P39, DOI 10.1016/0167-4870(83)90057-0; Vassileva I, 2016, RESOURCES-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/resources5010003; Venkatesh V, 2001, MIS QUART, V25, P71, DOI 10.2307/3250959; Wang Y, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.11.005; Wang YS, 2003, INT J SERV IND MANAG, V14, P501, DOI 10.1108/09564230310500192; Watson RT, 2010, MIS QUART, V34, P23; Wilson C, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V103, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.047; Wu IL, 2005, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V62, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003; Wunderlich P, 2012, 18 AM C INF SYST AMC; Wunderlich P, 2019, MIS QUART, V43, P673, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2019/12112; Xu P, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V75, P2694, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.679; Xu XJ, 2015, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V44, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004; Yang H, 2017, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V117, P68, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0017; Zangheri Paolo, 2019, Energies, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12193788	76	0	0	2	2	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 1	2022	356								131778	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131778	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131778			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1T4DV					2022-09-08	WOS:000804682300005
J	Matzembacher, DE; Meira, FB				Matzembacher, Daniele Eckert; Meira, Fabio Bittencourt			Sustainability as business strategy in community supported agriculture: Social, environmental and economic benefits for producers and consumers	BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL			English	Article						Education for sustainability; Healthy food; Sustainability; Community shared agriculture; Community-supported agriculture; Short supply chain	LIFE-STYLE BEHAVIORS; FOOD WASTE; ORGANIC FOOD; SUPPLY CHAIN; CSA; CONSUMPTION; FRUIT; MOTIVATIONS; VEGETABLES; MANAGEMENT	Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how sustainability integrates the business strategy of Brazilian community supported agriculture (CSA) initiatives, and to understand the social, environmental and economic benefits to producers and consumers. Design/methodology/approach A case study was carried out through participant observation, using the techniques of ethnography, in addition to in-depth interviews and access to secondary data. Follow-up was carried out over two years and six months with two CSA initiatives. Findings The results indicated that the analyzed CSA activities address, in an integrated way, the social, environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability by promoting healthy diet, sustainable agriculture and social transformation to producers and consumers. Producers have their sales guaranteed due to previous consumers' association; they also receive higher incomes, avoiding the rural exodus. In addition, their work conditions do not harm their health and the diversified production meets the consumption of their family group, increasing farmers' autonomy. Regarding consumers, there is a strong emphasis on education for sustainability. It occurs primarily through face-to-face contact among participants, at times of basket withdrawal, follow-up visits to production and interaction events at farmers' place. Exchanges of information, recipes, cooking classes, newsletters and internet interactions are also important. As these outputs, verified in a real situation, integrate the mission and the business proposal of these CSAs initiatives, it is possible to conclude that, in these analyzed situations, sustainability is incorporated into a business strategy. Sustainability is a structural component of the strategy, with practices in different levels of the business activity. Research limitations/implications As an exploratory study, the findings cannot be extrapolated to broader populations. To improve generalization, it would be beneficial to broaden the sample and pursue comparative research between countries and regions. Also, studies should examine which incentive structures and programs would relate more to better outcomes in education for sustainability and behavior chances. Practical implications From a managerial point of view, this study contributes by presenting emerging businesses in Brazil, which incorporated sustainability in their strategy, contributing with the need pointed out by Robinson (2004) to provide innovative and creative solutions toward sustainability. It also presents some alternatives to achieve objectives of the 2030 Agenda, especially objective 2 (related to food security) and 12 (improve sustainable production and consumption systems). This study also contributes by elucidating alternatives to promote education for sustainable consumption, presenting cases where consumers reported a more sustainable behavior. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by filling the gap pointed out by Arzu and Erkan (2010), Nakamba, Chan and Sharmina (2017), Rossi et al. (2017) and Searcy (2016) about addressing all three dimensions of sustainability in an integrated way, by analyzing CSA initiatives (a need indicated by Brown and Miller, 2008), especially evaluating empirical cases of sustainability insertion in the business strategy, as proposed by Claro, Claro and Amancio (2008) and Franceschelli, Santoro and Candelo (2018). This study also responded to the need pointed out by Benites Lazaro and Gremaud (2016) to further understand the insertion of sustainability in the context of Latin America.	[Matzembacher, Daniele Eckert; Meira, Fabio Bittencourt] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Business Sch, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil		Matzembacher, DE (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Business Sch, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.	daniele_eckert@yahoo.com.br	Meira, Fabio B./AAZ-2428-2021; Matzembacher, Daniele/AAT-5113-2021; Meira, Fabio B./AAG-2431-2020	Meira, Fabio B./0000-0002-4703-2398				Abson DJ, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y; Ahearn MC, 2018, AGRIC FINANCE REV, V78, P470, DOI 10.1108/AFR-08-2017-0071; Akyuz GA, 2010, INT J PROD RES, V48, P5137, DOI 10.1080/00207540903089536; Allen JE, 2017, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V15, P70, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2016.1177866; Angrosino M., 2009, ETNOGRAFIA OBSERVACA; [Anonymous], 2017, REP SEL COUNTR SUBJ; Aschemann-Witzel J, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P6457, DOI 10.3390/su7066457; Bellavia A, 2013, AM J CLIN NUTR, V98, P454, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.112.056119; Benites Lazaro L.L., 2016, REV ADM U FEDERAL SA, V9; Beretta C, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.11.007; Boeing H, 2012, EUR J NUTR, V51, P637, DOI 10.1007/s00394-012-0380-y; Brown C, 2008, AM J AGR ECON, V90, P1296, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01220.x; Cagliano R., 2016, ORG SUPPLY CHAIN PRO, P287, DOI [10.1108/S2045-060520160000005020, DOI 10.1108/S2045-060520160000005020]; Chen WP, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P1428, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-01-2011-0013; Clam R, 2008, REV ADMIN-SAO PAULO, V43, P289, DOI DOI 10.1590/S0080-21072008000400001; Cone CA, 2000, HUM ORGAN, V59, P187, DOI 10.17730/humo.59.2.715203t206g2j153; Coppola A, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P1732, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0553; Cox R, 2008, LOCAL ENVIRON, V13, P203, DOI 10.1080/13549830701669153; CSA Brazil, 2018, COMM SUPP AGR BRAZ; Dimitri C, 2016, BRIT FOOD J, V118, P603, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0200; Doernberg A, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111125; Dorward LJ, 2012, FOOD POLICY, V37, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.04.006; Eckert D., 2016, THESIS; Elkington J., 2012, SUSTENTABILIDADE CAN; Engert S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P2833, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.031; Ernst M., 2013, COMMUNITY SUPPORTED; Foley JA, 2011, NATURE, V478, P337, DOI 10.1038/nature10452; Franceschelli MV, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P2483, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0049; Giampietri E, 2016, BRIT FOOD J, V118, P618, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0168; Gobel C, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P1429, DOI 10.3390/su7021429; Goh LML, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P1052, DOI [10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0464, 10.1108/bfj-10-2016-0464]; Govindan K, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V195, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003; Graham-Rowe E, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V84, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005; Groh T., 1997, FARMS TOMORROW REVIS, P312; Hashem S, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P1600, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-08-2017-0426; Helms M., 2004, British Food Journal, V106, P380, DOI 10.1108/00070700410531606; Henderson Elizabeth, 2007, SHARING HARVEST CITI; Jones M, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14060639; Kiron D, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V53, P69; Kolodinsky JM, 1997, J SUSTAIN AGR, V10, P129, DOI 10.1300/J064v10n02_11; Krul K, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9050844; Kulikovskaja V, 2017, J INT FOOD AGRIBUS M, V29, P328, DOI 10.1080/08974438.2017.1350244; Lazell J, 2016, J CONSUM BEHAV, V15, P430, DOI 10.1002/cb.1581; Mangla SK, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.099; Mangla SK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V129, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.124; Mirosa M, 2012, BRIT FOOD J, V114, P816, DOI 10.1108/00070701211234345; Morris C., 2003, British Food Journal, V105, P559, DOI 10.1108/00070700310497318; Nakamba CC, 2017, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V22, P522, DOI 10.1108/SCM-12-2016-0436; Niemi P, 2016, BRIT FOOD J, V118, P2815, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2016-0086; Notarnicola B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080; Otero Gerardo, 2013, Antipod. Rev. Antropol. Arqueol., P49; Pole A, 2015, BRIT FOOD J, V117, P1488, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-12-2014-0405; Robinson J, 2004, ECOL ECON, V48, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017; Rodier F, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P1495, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0407; Rossi J, 2017, AGR HUM VALUES, V34, P855, DOI 10.1007/s10460-017-9779-7; Rossi JJ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9091543; Russell WS, 2008, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V23, P136, DOI 10.1017/S1742170507001962; Sacco dos Anjos Flávio, 2010, Agroalim, V16, P115; Scalvedi ML, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P749, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2017-0141; Schacht K, 2010, BRIT FOOD J, V112, P476, DOI 10.1108/00070701011043736; Searcy C, 2016, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V25, P120, DOI 10.1002/bse.1861; Sharp J., 2002, J EXT, V40, P1; Sproul TW, 2015, AGRIC FINANCE REV, V75, P313, DOI 10.1108/AFR-04-2015-0020; Van Der Ploeg JD, 2010, J AGRAR CHANGE, V10, P98, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00251.x; Vassalos M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9030478; Verain MCD, 2015, APPETITE, V91, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.055; Vitterso G, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V92, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.055; Worsley A, 2015, BRIT FOOD J, V117, P400, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2013-0175; Zsolnai L., 2002, INT J SOC ECON, V29, P652, DOI [10.1108/03068290210434198, DOI 10.1108/03068290210434198]; [No title captured]	70	26	28	8	51	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0007-070X	1758-4108		BRIT FOOD J	Br. Food J.		2019	121	2					616	632		10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0207	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0207			17	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Food Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Agriculture; Food Science & Technology	HZ5JN					2022-09-08	WOS:000468888100028
J	Aguilar, FX; Wen, YL				Aguilar, Francisco X.; Wen, Yali			Socio-economic and ecological impacts of China's forest sector policies	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Forests; China; Policy; Forest management; Institutions; Trade		This manuscript offers a synthesis of the studies compiled under the Special Issue ?Socio-economic and Ecological Impacts of China?s Forest Policies, Programs and Practices? and outlines areas where new research seems warranted. There is evidence that China?s policy interventions in its forest sector have improved national environmental and ecological conditions. Corresponding effects on localized socio-economic conditions are more nuanced pointing to partial or limited success of some restoration programs. More efficient policy design and implementation might be achieved via a mixed bottom-up/top-down approach to stakeholder engagement. For instance, better forest sector outcomes seem plausible by tailoring land practices to local socio-ecological conditions, taking into consideration additional tenure and regulatory reforms to reduce transaction costs, further engage local institutions, and attract new investments. The global clout of the Chinese forest sector creates an opportunity to extend environmentally-sound forest management and wood product manufacturing practices abroad reducing the risk of leakage of domestic conservation. Reduced barriers to trade could support transferring of knowledge and technology. Future research should generate new knowledge to better understand the prospective role of the Chinese forest sector in meeting the United Nations? Sustainable Development Goals and contributing to a carbon-neutral China by 2060. Future lines of research should consider, among others, long-term and distributional dimensions of the impacts of China?s forest sector policies.	[Aguilar, Francisco X.] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SLU Skogsekon, Dept Forest Econ, S-90183 Umea, Sweden; [Wen, Yali] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China		Aguilar, FX (corresponding author), Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SLU Skogsekon, Dept Forest Econ, S-90183 Umea, Sweden.	Francisco.aguilar@slu.se		Aguilar, Francisco/0000-0003-0226-4467				Aguilar FX, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.006; Breslow SJ, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023; Bryan BA, 2018, NATURE, V559, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2; Buongiorno J., 2003, GLOBAL FOREST PRODUC; Chen C, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P122, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7; Costanza R, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023; Di Sacco A, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P1328, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15498; Duan W, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102421; Fang L, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V124, P2379, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102379; FAOSTAT, 2020, FAOSTAT FOR DAT FOR; Hyde WF, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V98, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.008; Jiang BX, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102374; Jide X, 2019, NATL FORESTRY GRASSL; Ke SF, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102240; Ke SF, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101949; Li J, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102377; Li LY, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102353; Li XY, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102133; Li ZC, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102314; LIN JYF, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P34; Liu W, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102310; Ma B, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102313; Ma B, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109506; Mallapaty S, 2020, NATURE, V586, P482, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-02927-9; Mayer M, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V466, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127; Pan WQ, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102375; People''s Republic of China, 2019, CHINAS PROGR REPORT; People''s Republic of China, 2016, 13 5 YEAR PLAN NATL; Regie Libanaise de Tabacs et Tombacs, 2016, SUST DEV REP 2016; ROSENBAUM PR, 1983, BIOMETRIKA, V70, P41, DOI 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41; Su HY, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102256; Wang J, 2020, NATURE, V586, P720, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2849-9; WU HM, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NIMA.2009.12.050; Xu C, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102354; Xu JT, 2006, ECOL ECON, V57, P595, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.008; Yin R., 2009, INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN, P1; Yin RS, 2013, INT FOREST REV, V15, P534, DOI 10.1505/146554813809025739; Yin RS, 2016, FOREST POLICY ECON, V73, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.008; Yin RS, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P429, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9373-x; Zhang Y, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102339; Zhang YJ, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102400; Zhou T, 2020, IMPLEMENTING SDGS CH	42	2	2	9	28	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	JUN	2021	127								102454	10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102454	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102454		MAR 2021	6	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	RI9HP					2022-09-08	WOS:000637216300004
J	Fischer, B; Guerrero, M; Guimon, J; Schaeffer, PR				Fischer, Bruno; Guerrero, Maribel; Guimon, Jose; Schaeffer, Paola Rucker			Knowledge transfer for frugal innovation: where do entrepreneurial universities stand?	JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Sustainable development; Emerging economies; Brazil; Entrepreneurial university; Frugal innovation; Entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems; Social innovation approach; Strategic knowledge transfer management	OF-THE-ART; SOCIAL INNOVATION; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; ECOSYSTEMS; DETERMINANTS; GROWTH	Purpose Frugal innovation has gained prominence based on its potential contribution to sustainable development and the new opportunities that it offers to low-income customers. This paper aims to analyse the strategic knowledge transfer practices implemented by an entrepreneurial university for fostering frugal innovations within an emerging economy. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a case study methodological approach. The selected case was the University of Campinas (Unicamp), one of the leading universities in Brazil in terms of research quality and technology transfer. The study built upon 14 interviews with key informants and secondary sources of data (official and public documents). Findings The findings highlight the multidimensional dynamics of frugal innovations arising from university-industry relationships. Key dimensions considered include the internal capabilities of universities to foster frugal innovations and connect them to markets, the surrounding innovation ecosystems in which the university is embedded and the overarching institutional framework. Research limitations/implications The analysis of strategic management practices for frugal innovation requires an evolutionary perspective, but the findings lacked sufficient longitudinal information for a formal evaluation. Also, as our empirical analysis is based on an in-depth case study of one university, further validation in other contexts would be necessary. Practical implications This study offers new insights regarding the effectiveness of university-business collaboration partnerships for developing frugal innovations in emerging economies. Policymakers should promote societal programs enhancing the active participation of all agents involved in the entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystem. University managers should understand the challenges and the opportunities behind the adoption of an inclusive and societal orientation. Social implications By adopting frugal innovation practices, universities can enhance their contribution of meeting the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value The literature on frugal innovation has emphasized the importance of networking between different types of firms, NGOs and governments, but the role of universities in frugal innovation remains mostly unexplored. This study addresses this gap by exploring how entrepreneurial universities participate in frugal innovations to meet societal challenges.	[Fischer, Bruno] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Appl Sci, Limeira, Brazil; [Fischer, Bruno] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia; [Guerrero, Maribel] Univ Desarrollo, Sch Business & Econ, Santiago, Chile; [Guerrero, Maribel] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Northumbria Ctr Innovat Reg Transformat & Entrepr, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England; [Guimon, Jose] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Dev Econ, Madrid, Spain; [Schaeffer, Paola Rucker] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Sci & Technol Policy, Campinas, Brazil		Guerrero, M (corresponding author), Univ Desarrollo, Sch Business & Econ, Santiago, Chile.; Guerrero, M (corresponding author), Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Northumbria Ctr Innovat Reg Transformat & Entrepr, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England.	maribel.guerrero@northumbria.ac.uk	Fischer, Bruno B/L-7760-2016; Guerrero, Maribel/C-5978-2008; Guimon, Jose/J-7645-2017	Fischer, Bruno B/0000-0003-3878-9097; Guerrero, Maribel/0000-0001-7387-1999; Guimon, Jose/0000-0002-7391-7659	Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE); Russian Academic Excellence Project '5-100'; SAo Paulo Research Foundation (Fapesp) [2016/17801-4]	Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE); Russian Academic Excellence Project '5-100'(Ministry of Education and Science, Russian FederationProject 5-100, Ministry of Education and Science, Russian Federation); SAo Paulo Research Foundation (Fapesp)(Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP))	Bruno Fischer's contribution to this article is based on the study funded by the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project '5-100'. Bruno Fischer also acknowledges funding from the SAo Paulo Research Foundation (Fapesp Grant #2016/17801-4).	Agarwal N, 2017, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V64, P3, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2016.2620562; Altmann P, 2016, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V59, P48, DOI 10.1080/08956308.2016.1117323; Annala L., 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production, V171, pS110, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.065; Ardito L., 2018, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA, V142, P312; Arocena R., 2017, U INCLUSIVE DEV SOCI, P49; Arocena R, 2015, TECHNOL SOC, V41, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.10.004; Audretsch DB, 2014, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V39, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1; Basu R.R., 2013, J MANAG GLOB SUSTAIN, V1, P63, DOI DOI 10.13185/JM2013.01204; Bayuo BB, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120030; Benneworth P, 2016, SCI PUBL POLICY, V43, P731, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scw018; Benneworth P, 2015, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V18, P508, DOI 10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099; Benneworth P, 2010, HIGH EDUC, V59, P567, DOI 10.1007/s10734-009-9265-2; Bianchi C, 2017, TECHNOL SOC, V51, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.08.001; Blume-Kohout M.E., 2014, 424 US SMALL BUS ADM; Brem Alexander, 2017, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V45, P37, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2017.2734320; Brundenius C., 2017, U INCLUSIVE DEV SOCI; Cajaiba-Santana G, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V82, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008; Chaminade C., 2018, ADV INTRO NATL INNOV; Chataway J., 2014, INNOV DEV, V4, P33, DOI DOI 10.1080/2157930X.2013.876800; Cope AP, 2018, NAT REV RHEUMATOL, V14, P53, DOI 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.200; Cozzens S., 2010, HDB INNOVATION SYSTE, P57; Crisp N, 2014, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-10-14; Dahlmann F., 2020, EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNA, P100053; Dias AA, 2018, KNOWL MAN RES PRACT, V16, P525, DOI 10.1080/14778238.2018.1514288; Dost M, 2019, J KNOWL MANAG, V23, P1245, DOI 10.1108/JKM-01-2019-0035; Romero GD, 2017, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V6, P279, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n4p279; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557; Eun JH, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P1329, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.008; Fischer BB, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001; Fischer BB, 2018, ENTREP REGION DEV, V30, P612, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2018.1438523; Guerrero M., 2014, ADV STUDY ENTREPRENE, V24; Guerrero M, 2016, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA, V119, P294; Guerrero M., 2019, RES AGENDA ENTREPREN, P107, DOI 10.4337/9781788116015.00012; Guerrero M, 2012, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V37, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x; Guerrero M, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P3280, DOI 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1126; Guerrero M, 2018, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V56, P150, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12366; Guerrero M, 2019, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V44, P615, DOI 10.1007/s10961-017-9578-8; Guerrero M, 2016, SMALL BUS ECON, V47, P551, DOI 10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4; Guerrero M, 2016, APPL QUAL LIFE RES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32091-5_1; Guerrero M, 2015, RES POLICY, V44, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008; Guimon Jose, 2017, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, V9, P1; Guimon J., 2019, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY, V66; Hart S, 2016, ORGAN ENVIRON, V29, P401, DOI 10.1177/1086026616677170; Hartley J, 2014, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V34, P227, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2014.908034; Heaton S, 2019, IND CORP CHANGE, V28, P921, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtz038; Herrera F, 2018, APPL QUAL LIFE RES, P109, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_6; Herstatt C., 2012, SWISS J BUS RES PRAC, V66, P245, DOI DOI 10.5771/0042-059X-2012-3-245; Hertzfeld HR, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006; Hossain M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.091; Hossain M, 2016, TECHNOL SOC, V46, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.005; Kahle HN, 2013, J INDIAN BUS RES, V5, P220, DOI 10.1108/JIBR-01-2013-0008; Karnani A, 2007, CALIF MANAGE REV, V49, P90, DOI 10.2307/41166407; Klofsten M, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V141, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004; Kruss G., 2017, U INCLUSIVE DEV SOCI, P223; Leih S, 2016, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V30, P182, DOI 10.5465/amp.2015.0022; Leliveld A, 2018, EUR J DEV RES, V30, P1, DOI 10.1057/s41287-017-0121-4; Lim C, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1016, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.014; Lorentzen J., 2010, AFRICAN J SCI TECHNO, V2, P46; Lozano R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048; Martínez Nayeli, 2018, Innovar, V28, P23, DOI 10.15446/innovar.v28n70.74444; McKelvey M, 2018, IND INNOV, V25, P594, DOI 10.1080/13662716.2017.1295364; Melkas H, 2019, INNOV DEV, V9, P25, DOI 10.1080/2157930X.2018.1437687; Murray R., 2010, OPEN BOOK SOCIAL INN; Natalicchio A., 2018, R&D MANAGE, V49, P639; Niroumand M, 2020, INT J INOV SCI, V12, P1, DOI 10.1108/IJIS-10-2019-0099; OECD, 2017, KNOWL TRIANGL SYNTH; Olsen AO, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P2232, DOI 10.5465/amj.2015.0730; Pisoni A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.248; Rao B., 2019, ROYAL SOC OPEN SCI, V6, P1; Rao-Nicholson R, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013; Rasmussen E, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002; Renault T.B., 2017, U INCLUSIVE DEV SOCI, P71; Sharmelly R, 2018, J GEN MANAGE, V43, P157, DOI 10.1177/0306307018762698; Steinfield L, 2019, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V36, P764, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12510; Turker D, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V119, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.019; van der Have RP, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P1923, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010; Willyard C, 2018, NATURE, V562, P24, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-06858-4; Yin Robert K., 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; Zeschky M, 2011, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V54, P38, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5404007	79	31	32	23	105	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	1367-3270	1758-7484		J KNOWL MANAG	J. Knowl. Manag.	MAR 9	2021	25	2			SI		360	379		10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040		JUL 2020	20	Information Science & Library Science; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Information Science & Library Science; Business & Economics	QU4TI		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000547822200001
J	Agarwal, V; Mathiyazhagan, K; Malhotra, S; Saikouk, T				Agarwal, Vernika; Mathiyazhagan, Kaliyan; Malhotra, Snigdha; Saikouk, Tarik			Analysis of challenges in sustainable human resource management due to disruptions by Industry 4.0: an emerging economy perspective	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER			English	Article						Sustainable human resource management; Mixed methodology; Disruption; Challenges; Fuzzy best-worst method; Emerging economies	DECISION-MAKING; PERSONNEL-SELECTION; FRAMEWORK; IMPLEMENTATION; TOPSIS	Purpose Sustainable human resource management highlights the importance of the eighth sustainable development goal, "decent work and economic growth". Thus, the purpose of this study is to align human resource practices and policies with Industry 4.0 is imperative. Design/methodology/approach The authors aimed to identify key challenges of sustainable human resource implementation in view of Industry 4.0 and to analyse these identified challenges by prioritising them for effective Industry 4.0 implementation in an emerging economy such as India. A mixed-methods approach was utilised to prioritise identified challenges. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts, academicians and industry mangers. Transcribed interviews were run in NVivo to emerge into broad themes/challenges, which were prioritised using fuzzy best-worst methodology. Findings The performance appraisal challenge holds maximum importance, followed by learning and development. This finding signifies the need for instilling job security and continuous learning opportunities for employees amidst all disruption caused by Industry 4.0. Practical implications This work enhances the link between sustainability, disruptive technologies and Industry 4.0 to transform economic outlooks, leading to improvement under economic aspects through the adoption of sustainable human resource practices into workplaces and society. Originality/value Sustainable human resource management has mostly focused on employee welfare. However, the major challenges of disruption caused by Industry 4.0 have not been addressed in the literature. The upskilling and reskilling requirements due to disruptions by Industry 4.0 range from recruitment to performance appraisal and every facet that relates to an employee's cycle in a company. Hence, there is a need to identify critical challenges for optimum adaptation to upcoming industry demands.	[Agarwal, Vernika; Malhotra, Snigdha] Amity Univ, Amity Int Business Sch, Noida, India; [Mathiyazhagan, Kaliyan] Thiagarajar Sch Management, Operat & Quantitat Methods, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India; [Saikouk, Tarik] CERIIM, Excelia Business Sch, La Rochelle, France		Mathiyazhagan, K (corresponding author), Thiagarajar Sch Management, Operat & Quantitat Methods, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.	vernika.agarwal@gmail.com; madii1984@yahoo.com; smalhotra1@amity.edu; saikoukt@excelia-group.com	SAIKOUK, Tarik/AEL-2177-2022; Agarwal, Vernika/J-8370-2014; Malhotra, Snigdha/C-2758-2018	SAIKOUK, Tarik/0000-0001-9674-4722; Malhotra, Snigdha/0000-0001-7167-7674				Abdel-Basset M, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10041202; Adolph S., 2014, J INT SCI PUBL, V12, P1001; Ahammad MF, 2020, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100700; Bag S, 2021, IND MARKET MANAG, V92, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.001; Bag S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125233; Bag S, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420; Bag S, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502; Baldassari P., 2017, PEOPLE STRATEGY, V40, P20; Beer M, 2015, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V54, P427, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21726; Box, 2014, MANAGEMENT J, V7, P43; Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE; Collis J., 2014, BUSINESS RES PRACTIC; Coupe T, 2019, INT J MANPOWER, V40, P1288, DOI 10.1108/IJM-12-2018-0418; da Silva VL, 2019, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V31, P546, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2018.1524135; Dallasega P, 2018, COMPUT IND, V99, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.039; Deloitte, 2015, CHALLENGES SOLUTIONS, P1; Ehnert I., 2014, SUSTAINABILITY HUMAN, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_1]; Elkington J., 1997, CANNIBALS FORKS TRIP, P49; Frank AG, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V210, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004; Govindanan K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V236, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.088; Guo S, 2017, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V121, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010; Gupta S., 2018, BENCHMARKING; Gurbuz T, 2014, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V21, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.025; Hameed Z, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1061, DOI 10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0407; Hampe K., 2015, IND 4 0 ERSTMALS TOP; Ivanov D, 2021, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V32, P775, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450; Jana-Tr?ller M., 2009, CROSS WORK SKILLS OL; Kamble SS, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V117, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009; Kiron D, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V53, P69; Kramar R, 2014, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V25, P1069, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2013.816863; Leavy P., 2017, RES DESIGNQUANTITATI; Lin CY, 2021, INT J MANPOWER, V42, P409, DOI 10.1108/IJM-08-2018-0281; Lin HT, 2010, COMPUT IND ENG, V59, P937, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2010.09.004; Lincoln Y.S., 1985, NATURALISTIC INQUIRY; Liu HC, 2015, HUM FACTOR ERGON MAN, V25, P370, DOI 10.1002/hfm.20553; Longo F, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V113, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016; Maguire, 2003, CHANGING PSYCHOL CON; Malik, 2019, INT RES J ADV ENG SC, V4, P209; MORSE JM, 1991, NURS RES, V40, P120; Oztemel E, 2020, J INTELL MANUF, V31, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8; Pereira AC, 2017, PROCEDIA MANUF, V13, P1206, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032; Piccarozzi M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103821; Pillai, 2018, SMART HR 4 0 IND 4 0; Prisecaru P., 2016, KNOWL HORIZ EC, V8, P57; Puhovichova D., 2020, INDUSTRY, V5, P138; Rana Geeta, 2019, Strategic HR Review, V18, P176, DOI 10.1108/SHR-01-2019-0003; Rezaei J, 2016, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V64, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001; Rezaei J, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V53, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009; Rombaut E, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1199, DOI 10.1108/IJM-04-2019-0184; Samanlioglu F, 2018, INT J FUZZY SYST, V20, P1576, DOI 10.1007/s40815-018-0474-7; Sang XZ, 2015, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V30, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.002; Sangster K., 2006, TOWN COUNTRY PLANN, V75, P184; Schwab, 2015, FOREIGN AFF, V10, P1, DOI [10.1038/nnano.2015.286, DOI 10.1038/NNANO.2015.286]; Sehatpour MH, 2022, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V71, P1444, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2020-0231; Sheets, 2015, BUILDING TALENT PIPE; Shenton A.K., 2004, ED INF, V22, P63, DOI 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201; Staniskiene E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V188, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.269; Strohmeier S., 2014, EMPL RELAT, V36; Taylor S.J., 1998, INTRO QUALITATIVE ME; Telukdarie A, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V118, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.030; Thames L, 2016, PROC CIRP, V52, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.041; Westerman G., 2014, LEADING DIGITAL TURN; Weyer S, 2015, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V48, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143; Whysall Z, 2019, J MANAG DEV, V38, P118, DOI 10.1108/JMD-06-2018-0181; Wood, 2020, J MANPOWER; Yu DJ, 2013, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.010	68	5	5	11	33	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0143-7720	1758-6577		INT J MANPOWER	Int. J. Manpow.	MAY 24	2022	43	2			SI		513	541		10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0192	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0192		AUG 2021	29	Industrial Relations & Labor; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	1K1AY					2022-09-08	WOS:000683522500001
J	Maheshwari, A; Prasad, V; Gudi, RD; Biswas, P				Maheshwari, Abhilasha; Prasad, Vijaysai; Gudi, Ravindra D.; Biswas, Pratim			Systems engineering based advanced optimization for sustainable water management in refineries	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Refinery water network; Sustainable water management; Integrated superstructure; Distributed effluent treatment plant; Cycles of concentration; Water recycle	DESIGN	Refineries are increasingly compelled to play an imperative role in achieving sustainable management of water as mandated by sustainable development goals (SDGs). Existing optimization models lack the ability to addresses this challenge of obtaining optimal refinery water network configuration for problems of industrial scale due to difficulty in application of complex solution algorithms of mixed integer non-linear problem (MINLP) formulations to large dimensions. Therefore, the optimization formulation in this work exploits process engineering derived constraints to build an integrated superstructure, which results in a simplified non-linear problem (NLP), and thus reduces computational complexity. Further, to substantially minimize fresh water consumption, the proposed model incorporates novel features of a modern refinery complex viz. distributed effluent treatment plant based on total dissolved solids (TDS) levels in waste water, segregation of sour water treatment based on phenolics content in condensate stream, and minimizing cooling tower blowdown rates by optimizing the cycles of concentration in cooling tower operation. The formulation is demonstrated for optimal water routing and economic benefits of the proposed approach through a representative case study of a real refinery complex. Towards the goal of zero liquid discharge, an efficient new scheme of recycling treated water to the boiler feed water system and cooling tower make up water requirements in optimal ratios, has been suggested from the results of the proposed model. Sensitivity of water reallocation in optimal refinery water network with respect to crude quality and desalter performance is also presented through application of proposed optimization framework in the case studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Maheshwari, Abhilasha; Gudi, Ravindra D.] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India; [Prasad, Vijaysai] Suez Water Technol & Solut, Whitefield Rd, Bangalore 560066, Karnataka, India; [Biswas, Pratim] Washington Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA		Gudi, RD (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.	ravigudi@iitb.ac.in			Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India [501100004541]	Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India	The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India 501100004541.	Aherne V. J., 2009, BEST PRACTICE GUIDEL; [Anonymous], 2017, GEN STAND DISCH EN A, P545; [Anonymous], 2009, ENV IMP ASS PETR PET; Deng C, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P2302, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03754; Ellis M., 2001, IND WATER USE ITS EN; Faria DC, 2011, IND ENG CHEM RES, V50, P3788, DOI 10.1021/ie1014734; Foo DCY, 2009, IND ENG CHEM RES, V48, P5125, DOI 10.1021/ie801264c; Ghaffour N, 2013, DESALINATION, V309, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.015; Gunaratnam M, 2005, IND ENG CHEM RES, V44, P588, DOI 10.1021/ie040092r; Henderson R. J., 2016, WATER CONSUMPTION US; Hussain A, 2015, WATER RESOUR IND, V11, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.wri.2015.05.002; Jacob Teter K. T., 2015, WATER USE IMPACTS CA; Jezowski J, 2010, IND ENG CHEM RES, V49, P4475, DOI 10.1021/ie901632w; Karuppiah R, 2006, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V30, P650, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.11.005; Khor CS, 2012, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V42, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.02.020; Klemes JJ, 2012, CURR OPIN CHEM ENG, V1, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.010; Moel P. J. de, 2013, Drinking Water Engineering and Science, V6, P115; Ostenberg R., 2009, WAT EN SUST FOR GROU; Otts Jr L. E., 1963, WATER REQUIREMENTS P; Parkash S., 2003, REFINING PROCESSES H, P242; Quaglia A, 2014, IND ENG CHEM RES, V53, P5160, DOI 10.1021/ie401379j; Ronald F., 2009, OIL REFINERY PROCESS; Sharma S, 2016, IND ENG CHEM RES, V55, P226, DOI 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02840; Sueviriyapan N, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.101; Sun PP, 2018, FUEL, V221, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.089; Tan RR, 2009, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V87, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2009.01.001; The United Nations World Water Development Report, 2017, WAST UNT RES; Tong TZ, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P6846, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b01000; WANG YP, 1994, CHEM ENG SCI, V49, P981, DOI 10.1016/0009-2509(94)80006-5; Weiland R. H., 2013, STRIPPING PHENOLIC W; Yang LL, 2014, IND ENG CHEM RES, V53, P17680, DOI 10.1021/ie500978h	31	5	5	0	11	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 1	2019	224						661	676		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.164	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.164			16	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HZ9BX					2022-09-08	WOS:000469151900058
J	Morea, D; Fortunati, S; Martiniello, L				Morea, Donato; Fortunati, Simona; Martiniello, Laura			Circular economy and corporate social responsibility: Towards an integrated strategic approach in the multinational cosmetics industry	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Corporate social responsibility; Circular economy; Cosmetics industry; Cleaner production; Sustainability; Reports	CSR	Sustainability become, in recent years, an important part of corporate management philosophy. It is commu-nicated through mandatory and non-mandatory reports that identify specific objectives and disseminate best practices to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this context Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the Circular Economy (CE) can be integrated despite having a different theoretical focus. The paper aims to discuss "if" and "how" cosmetic luxury brands are improving their environmental sustainability through new integrated strategies, using the different theoretical concepts of CSR and CE, driver of cleaner production. The research analyses the CSR reports of eight well-known Multinationals in Cosmetics (MNCs) to verify how they pursue the typical dimensions of CSR (environmental, social, and economic) and if CE is part of their corporate strategies. We found evidence of a good level of attention by MNCs to circularity in their CSR reporting. In particular, we found companies' CSR reports communicate multiple objectives typical of a circular approach (eco-design, reuse, low energy consumption, zero emissions). The main contribution of this study is supporting the integration of CE and CSR dimensions in MNCs managerial choices. It also contributes to the understanding on the relation between CSR and CE and assesses the state of art of MNCs in this field making it possible take a step towards an increasingly integrated approach to circularity.	[Morea, Donato] Univ Cagliari, Dept Mech Chem & Mat Engn, Via Marengo 2, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy; [Fortunati, Simona] Univ Tuscia, Dept Econ Engn Soc & Business, Via Paradiso 47, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy; [Martiniello, Laura] Univ Mercatorum, Fac Econ, Piazza Mattei 10, I-00186 Rome, Italy		Morea, D (corresponding author), Univ Cagliari, Dept Mech Chem & Mat Engn, Via Marengo 2, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy.	donato.morea@unica.it	Morea, Donato/S-9544-2019	Morea, Donato/0000-0003-0995-6685				Martinez JB, 2016, EUR J MANAG BUS ECON, V25, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002; Beerling J., 2013, SUSTAINABILITY COSME, P197, DOI [10.1002/9781118676516.ch9, DOI 10.1002/9781118676516.CH9]; Bocken NMP, 2016, J IND PROD ENG, V33, P308, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124; Bonet D., 2014, REV FRANCAISE GESTIO; Born S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V225, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.255; Camilleri M.A, 2016, CORPORATE SUSTAINABI; Charter M., 2018, DESIGNING CIRCULAR E, DOI [10.4324/9781315113067, DOI 10.4324/9781315113067]; Dimitrova V, 2009, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V109, P1155, DOI 10.1108/02635570911002243; Donato C., 2019, SUSTAINABLE LUXURY, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0623-5_2; Esken B, 2018, MANAG RES REV, V41, P586, DOI 10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0054; European Communities, 2001, CORP CITIZ; Ghisellini P, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007; Grohens Y., 2013, RECYCLING REUSE MAT, DOI [10.1201/b14597, DOI 10.1201/B14597]; Homrich AS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064; Issara U., 2014, International Food Research Journal, V21, P25; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Kumar Sharma N., 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P1803, DOI [10.1002/bse.2717, DOI 10.1002/bse.2717]; Kuo LP, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V27, P986, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.014; Leandro A., 2018, P C S AVNIR LILL POR, P1750; Marco-Fondevila M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124858; Moreno M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090937; Pascu E., 2013, MANAGEMENT INTERCULT, V29, P248; Prendeyille S, 2017, PROCEDIA MANUF, V8, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.037; Prieto-Sandoval V, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224; Ramani K, 2010, J MECH DESIGN, V132, DOI 10.1115/1.4002308; Rexhepi G, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V75, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.058; Romli A, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P549, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.958593; Schreck M, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V67, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.036; Tukker A, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V97, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049; Turon K., 2017, J CORPORATE RESPONSI, V3, P83, DOI [10.12775/JCRL.2016.025, DOI 10.12775/JCRL.2016.025]; Upadhyay A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130; Varvaresou A., 2009, International Journal of Cosmetic Science, V31, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x; Wang JY, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V92, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.076; Yin R., 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG, DOI 10.1097/FCH.0b013-31822dda9e	34	18	18	17	24	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 15	2021	315								128232	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128232	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128232		JUL 2021	9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UF5AC					2022-09-08	WOS:000688585800007
J	Philippidis, G; Ferrer-Perez, H; Gracia-de-Renteria, P; M'barek, R; Lopez, AIS				Philippidis, George; Ferrer-Perez, Hugo; Gracia-de-Renteria, Pilar; M'barek, Robert; Sanjuan Lopez, Ana Isabel			Eating your greens: a global sustainability assessment	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Reference diet; Virtual commodities; Water, land and GHG footprints; CGE modelling	IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GRASSLAND; EMISSIONS; WASTE	The importance of healthy diets is woven into the fabric of the Sustainable Development Goals, although there is no clear metric to define it. Employing a simulation model (MAGNET), this study examines the sustainability implications arising from the adoption of recommended daily nutrition requirements inspired by the 'Lancet' reference diet. To measure sustainability, changes in 'virtual' requirements and associated tier footprints for irrigation (blue) water, agricultural land and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are calculated. Assuming business-as-usual food consumption trends, between 2015 and 2050 blue water, agricultural land and emissions rise 34%, 9% and 44%, respectively, whilst corresponding increases in Sub-Saharan Africa are much higher. By 2050, the switch to the reference diet decreases agricultural land use by -8% and emissions by -9%. Global blue water and cropland requirements increase by 5%, whilst significant concomitant savings in permanent pastureland (-21%) are expected. By region, the diet switch drives rising blue water consumption in Oceania and the EU and agricultural land savings in Latin America and Oceania, accompanied by cropland increases in the EU and North Africa. The reference diet generates substantial reductions in GHG emissions, particularly in Latin America. Interestingly, Sub-Saharan Africa which abstains from the reference diet due to affordability considerations, benefits from a 'rebound' effect from falling meat and dairy prices. Finally, the diet shift could result in marginal per capita food expenditure rises arising from demand driven fish price, particularly in more vulnerable world regions. This estimate does not capture, however, second-round economic growth effects arising from increased labour productivity and reduced public health expenditures.	[Philippidis, George] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Agrifood & Nat Resource Econ, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2,CITA,Aragonese Ag, Avda Montanana 930, Zaragoza 50059, Spain; [Ferrer-Perez, Hugo; Gracia-de-Renteria, Pilar; Sanjuan Lopez, Ana Isabel] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Agrifood & Nat Resource Econ, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2,CITA, Avda Montanana 930, Zaragoza 50059, Spain; [M'barek, Robert] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Edificio Expo,Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain		Lopez, AIS (corresponding author), Univ Zaragoza, Dept Agrifood & Nat Resource Econ, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2,CITA, Avda Montanana 930, Zaragoza 50059, Spain.	gphilippidis@aragon.es; hferrer@cita-aragon.es; mpgracia@cita-aragon.es; robert.nibarek@cc.curopa.eu; aisanjuan@aragon.es	Gracia-de-Rentería, Pilar/AAP-3084-2021; Pérez, Hugo Ferrer/AAY-8678-2021	Pérez, Hugo Ferrer/0000-0002-5583-3697	Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) [RTA2017-00046-00-00]; FEDER "Operational Program Smart-Growth" 2014-2020; EU Commission Joint Research Centre, project "MAGNET development and application to bioeconomy modelling" [935680.X6]	Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)(Instituto de Investigacion Agropecuaria (INIA)); FEDER "Operational Program Smart-Growth" 2014-2020; EU Commission Joint Research Centre, project "MAGNET development and application to bioeconomy modelling"	This research was funded by the Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) (RTA2017-00046-00-00), co-funded by FEDER "Operational Program Smart-Growth" 2014-2020, for the project "Bioeconomia 2030: Un analisis cuantitativo de las per-spectivas a medio plazo en Espana"; and EU Commission Joint Research Centre (935680.X6), project "MAGNET development and application to bioeconomy modelling".	Aguiar A, 2016, J GLOB ECON ANAL, V1, P181, DOI 10.21642/JGEA.010103AF; Alexandratos N., 2012, 1203 UN ESAWORK; Allen C, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008; Banse M, 2011, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V35, P2385, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.09.001; Campoy-Munoz P, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.010; Corong EL, 2017, J GLOB ECON ANAL, V2, P1; Daioglou V, 2016, GCB BIOENERGY, V8, P456, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12285; Di Cesare M, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1377, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X; European Commission, 2020, P COMM COMM EUR PARL; FAO, 2018, FUTURE FOOD AGR ALTE; FAO, 2020, FOOD BAL DAT; Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08748-210341; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019, WAT US LIV PROD SYST; Fraval S, 2019, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V3, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00104; Global Panel, 2016, FOOD SYSTEMS DIETS F; Hirvonen K, 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE59, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4; Keramidas K., 2018, GLOBAL ENERGY CLIMAT, DOI [10.2760/67475, DOI 10.2760/67475]; O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2; Philippidis G, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122147; Philippidis G, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V146, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.016; Rutten M., 2013, 1 FOODSECURE; Rutten M., 2013, REDUCING FOOD WASTE; Springmann M, 2018, NATURE, V562, P519, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0; van Meijl H, 2018, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V108, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.040; Vellinga TV, 2004, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V70, P33, DOI 10.1023/B:FRES.0000045981.56547.db; Weitzel M, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P345, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0453-5; Willems AB, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V144, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.001; Willett W, 2019, LANCET, V393, P447, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4; Woltjer G. B., 2014, MAGNET MODEL MODULE	29	3	3	5	15	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	MAY	2021	168								105460	10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105460	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105460		FEB 2021	11	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	SM0FP		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000657289000085
J	Marks, SJ; Kumpel, E; Guo, J; Bartram, J; Davis, J				Marks, Sara J.; Kumpel, Emily; Guo, Jean; Bartram, Jamie; Davis, Jennifer			Pathways to sustainability: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of rural water supply programs	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Rural water supply; Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis; Functionality; Sustainable Development Goals	DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY; COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT; DEMAND-DRIVEN; PARTICIPATION; SANITATION; PROJECTS; IMPACT; FUNCTIONALITY; EXPERIENCE	Despite recent progress extending access to drinking water supplies globally, ensuring long-term functionality of rural water infrastructure remains challenging. Past research on rural water project outcomes has used two principal approaches: large-N statistical studies estimating average effect sizes, or case studies providing causal description. Notably lacking is a rigorous comparative analysis of conditions determining sustained service delivery. We use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify causal conditions ("pathways") leading to sustained functionality of rural water supplies across diverse geographies. Twenty cases were selected through a review of the literature. We identified and coded five conditions to examine their influence on project outcomes for each case. Results reveal three distinct pathways sufficient for achieving sustained functionality: Pathway 1 features piped networks with professionalized, service-oriented management and post-construction support. Pathway 2 features a self-supply approach (e.g., private wells and small piped schemes) delivering water services on premises. Pathway 3 describes community-managed water points (e.g., deep boreholes with hand pumps) in the context of freshwater scarcity. Two conditions were common across all pathways: good financial management and user participation in project decisions. Strong management, combined with sufficient financial and technical resources, moderates the influence of physical water availability on service sustainability. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.	[Marks, Sara J.] Eawag, Dept Sanitat Water & Solid Waste Dev Sandec, Ueberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland; [Kumpel, Emily] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 130 Nat Resources Rd,224 Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003 USA; [Guo, Jean] Paris Sch Econ, Hospinn, 1 Parvis Notre Dame, F-75004 Paris, France; [Bartram, Jamie] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Water Inst, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; [Davis, Jennifer] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega,Y2E2, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Guo, Jean] Harvard Univ, Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA		Marks, SJ (corresponding author), Eawag, Sandec Dept, Ueberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland.	sara.marks@eawag.ch; ekumpel@umass.edu; jguo1991@gmail.com; jbartram@email.unc.edu; jennadavis@stanford.edu			Eawag internal funds	Eawag internal funds	This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The lead author's time was supported by Eawag internal funds. This funding source was not involved in designing the study; in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.	Alvarado J. H, 2009, WORLD ENV WAT RES C, P3877; [Anonymous], 2009, DISCOVERY GROUNDED T; Araral E, 2009, WORLD DEV, V37, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.002; Bhandari B. S., 2005, Water Policy, V7, P201; Boudet HS, 2011, J CONSTR ENG M, V137, P498, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000333; Briscoe J., 1995, Natural Resources Forum, V19, P59; Busari Ola, 2009, Environment Development and Sustainability, V11, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10668-007-9098-z; Carter RC, 1999, J CHART INST WATER E, V13, P292; Davis J, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006550; Fisher MB, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P8431, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016770; Foster T, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P12037, DOI 10.1021/es402086n; Garn H, 1997, URBAN ENV SANITATION; Gasparro KE, 2017, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V7, P546, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.053; Gross B., 2001, LINKING SUSTAINABILI; Hoque BA, 2004, PUBLIC HEALTH, V118, P70, DOI 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00135-5; Hoque BA, 1996, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V74, P431; Hoque Bilqis A., 1994, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, V25, P67; ISHAM J, 1995, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V9, P175, DOI 10.1093/wber/9.2.175; Jordan E, 2011, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V29, P1159, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2011.640339; Kaminsky J, 2017, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V7, P196, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.240; Kaminsky JA, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P10028, DOI 10.1021/es501608p; Katz T., 1998, MAKING RURAL WATER S; Kayser GL, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P460, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2014.136; Khwaja AI, 2009, J PUBLIC ECON, V93, P899, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.010; Kleemeier E, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P929, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00155-2; Kleemeier E, 2001, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V21, P245, DOI 10.1002/pad.171; Komives K., 2008, 33 WEDC INT C ACCR G; Komives K, 2006, WATER RESOURCES SUST, P267; Kunz NC, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P8287, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b01827; Levitsky S, 2009, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V12, P115, DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.091106.121756; LIVINGSTONE A, 1993, WATER INT, V18, P225, DOI 10.1080/02508069308686184; Madrigal R., 2010, ENV DEV DISCUSSION P; Madrigal R, 2011, WORLD DEV, V39, P1663, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.011; Manikutty S, 1997, Dev Policy Rev, V15, P115, DOI 10.1111/1467-7679.00029; Manlkutty S., 1998, Development Policy Review, V16, P373, DOI 10.1111/1467-7679.00070; Mann E, 2003, GREENER MANAG INT, P59; Marks SJ, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P276, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14527620; Marks SJ, 2013, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V3, P122, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2013.098; Marks SJ, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P1569, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.011; Mazango NBM, 2009, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V34, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2008.07.004; Montgomery MA, 2009, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V26, P1017, DOI 10.1089/ees.2008.0388; Narayan D, 1995, ENV SUSTAIN DEV OCCA, V1; Nauges C, 2010, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V25, P263, DOI 10.1093/wbro/lkp016; Onda K, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P880, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9030880; Opare Service, 2011, Environment Development and Sustainability, V13, P1021, DOI 10.1007/s10668-011-9303-y; Pega F, 2016, MONITORING ACTION SO; Portes A, 2010, SOCIO-ECON REV, V8, P585, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwq018; Prokopy L. S., 2004, Water Policy, V6, P103; Prokopy LS, 2008, J PLAN EDUC RES, V27, P294, DOI 10.1177/0739456X07311072; Prokopy LS, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1801, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.002; Ragin C.C, 2008, REDESIGNING SOCIAL I; Ragin C. C., 2008, FUZZY SET QUALITATIV; Ragin CC, 2007, OXFORD HDB POLITICAL, V2; Rihoux Benoit., 2008, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP, DOI [10.4135/9781452226569, DOI 10.4135/9781452226569]; Rural Water Supply Network Rural Water Supply Network, 2009, HANDP DAT SEL COUNTR; Schlager E, 2009, POLICY STUD J, V37, P367, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00319.x; SCHOUTEN T, 2003, COMMUNITY WATER COMM; SINGH B, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P1931, DOI 10.1029/92WR02996; Srinivasan V, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011087; Sullivan C, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P1195, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9; Sutton S, 2009, AN INTRODUCTION TO S; Therkildsen O, 1988, WATERING WHITE ELEPH; Walters JP, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P5035, DOI 10.1021/es505975h; Whittington D, 1998, WATER INT, V23, P134, DOI 10.1080/02508069808686760; Whittington D, 2009, WATER POLICY, V11, P696, DOI 10.2166/wp.2009.310; Wims Padraig, 2003, Tearmann, V3, P87; World Health Organisation (WHO), 2017, SAF MAN DRINK WAT TH; World Health Organization, 2015, PROGR DRINKING WATER	68	24	24	8	64	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	DEC 20	2018	205						789	798		10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.029	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.029			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GZ1MX		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000449133300062
J	Pereira, MA; Marques, RC				Pereira, Miguel Alves; Marques, Rui Cunha			Sustainable water and sanitation for all: Are we there yet?	WATER RESEARCH			English	Article						Water and sanitation services; Sustainable development; Governance; Convergence; Data envelopment analysis	TREATMENT PLANTS; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; EFFICIENCY; UTILITIES; BENCHMARKING; AUTHORITIES; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES	The lack of access to water and sanitation services (WSS) of a considerable share of the world population has been challenging the international community for decades. The proposal of the Millennium Development Goals and, later on, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations (UN) intended to act as a blueprint to achieve a more equitable future for all and, in the case of WSS, "Ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all" (SDG 6). However, the current global pandemic further emphasised the importance of WSS, given the increasing asymmetries faced by billions worldwide, and the gaps between high-income and low-and middle-income nations. For this reason, understanding whether low-and middle-income countries have been approximating towards or deviating from the SDG 6 is crucial to derive and communicate key information for the sake of improved public governance and political decision-making. In this paper, we extend a state-of-the-art methodology based on data envelopment analysis for assessing the convergence of the low-and middle-income UN Member States regarding the SDG 6 between 2016 and 2017. We find that, on average, not only did the Member States converge by decreasing the performance spread and the gap between the best and worst practice frontiers, but also the Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources was the indicator in which the majority exhibited the worst performances. In the end, we derive possible policy implications, which, as our results show, are aligned with the recent UN reports on the subject.	[Pereira, Miguel Alves] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CEG IST, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal; [Marques, Rui Cunha] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CERIS, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal		Pereira, MA (corresponding author), Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal.	miguelalvespereira@tecnico.ulisboa.pt	Pereira, Miguel/AAF-4486-2021; Cunha Marques, Rui/F-6646-2010	Pereira, Miguel/0000-0002-5315-8229; Cunha Marques, Rui/0000-0003-0344-5200				Adelodun B, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110309; Iribarnegaray MA, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P2922, DOI 10.3390/su4112922; Ballabh V., 2008, GOVERNANCE WATER I A; BARRO RJ, 1992, J POLIT ECON, V100, P223, DOI 10.1086/261816; Bartram J, 2018, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0; Berg SV, 2011, WATER POLICY, V13, P591, DOI 10.2166/wp.2011.041; Boussemart J.-P., 2003, B ECON RES, V55, P391, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00183, DOI 10.1111/1467-8586.00183]; Brettenny W, 2016, WATER SA, V42, P11, DOI 10.4314/wsa.v42i1.02; Burck J, 2012, CLIMATE CHANGE PERFO; Carvaho P, 2012, UTIL POLICY, V21, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2011.12.005; Carvalho P, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P902, DOI 10.2166/wp.2015.148; Carvalho P, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2698, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.008; Cavalcanti A, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17249244; Cetrulo TB, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110662; Cetrulo TB, 2019, WATER RES, V161, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.044; Cha S, 2017, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V10, DOI 10.1080/16549716.2017.1327170; Chambers RG, 1996, J ECON THEORY, V70, P407, DOI 10.1006/jeth.1996.0096; Cherchye L, 2007, SOC INDIC RES, V82, P111, DOI 10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7; Chung YH, 1997, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V51, P229, DOI 10.1006/jema.1997.0146; Carvalho AEC, 2015, UTIL POLICY, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2015.03.001; D'Inverno G, 2018, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V61, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.006; da Cruz NF, 2012, WATER POLICY, V14, P841, DOI 10.2166/wp.2012.103; De Witte K, 2010, CENT EUR J OPER RES, V18, P189, DOI 10.1007/s10100-009-0108-0; Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V112, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.026; Emerson JW, 2012, ENV PERFORMANCE INDE; FARE R., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P85, DOI 10.1007/BF00158770; Ferreira DC, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146279; Ferro G, 2011, WATER POLICY, V13, P607, DOI 10.2166/wp.2011.042; Grigg N.S., 2010, GOVERNANCE MANAGEMEN; Guerrant RL, 2013, NAT REV GASTRO HEPAT, V10, P220, DOI 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.239; Halkos GE, 2012, S AFR J ECON, V80, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2011.01281.x; Headey D, 2019, DEMOGRAPHY, V56, P729, DOI 10.1007/s13524-019-00760-y; Heller, 2009, WATER SANITATION SER; Herrera V, 2019, WORLD DEV, V118, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.009; Horta IM, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V246, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.015; Karagiannis G, 2017, J OPER RES SOC, V68, P456, DOI 10.1057/s41274-016-0168-1; Keeney R.L., 1992, VALUE FOCUSED THINKI; lo Storto C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123170; Longo S, 2018, WATER RES, V141, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.067; Marques RC, 2014, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V140, P562, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000366; Maziotis A, 2020, UTIL POLICY, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101087; Meadowcroft J., 2005, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007371; Molinos-Senante M, 2014, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V38, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.07.001; Mraz AL, 2021, WATER RES, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116591; Nardo M, 2008, HDB CONSTRUCTING COM; Nations U., 2020, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Oliveria R, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V278, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.042; Pereira MA, 2022, WORLD DEV, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105708; Pereira MA, 2021, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2021.102495; Pereira MA, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V294, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.045; Rogge N, 2019, SOC INDIC RES, V141, P765, DOI 10.1007/s11205-018-1854-y; ROMER PM, 1994, J ECON PERSPECT, V8, P3, DOI 10.1257/jep.8.1.3; Shephard RW, 1970, THEORY COST PRODUCTI; Silva MCA, 2020, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102119; Sinharoy SS, 2019, UTIL POLICY, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2019.100957; United Nations, 2013, HUMAN DEV REPORT; World Bank, 1992, GOVERNANCE DEV, DOI [10.1596/0-8213-2094-7, DOI 10.1596/0-8213-2094-7]; Zanella A, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V245, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.036; Zhao DD, 2021, WATER RES, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116986	59	4	4	7	14	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0043-1354	1879-2448		WATER RES	Water Res.	DEC 1	2021	207								117765	10.1016/j.watres.2021.117765	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117765		OCT 2021	11	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	WP7KS	34731660				2022-09-08	WOS:000713306300005
J	Davis, A; Javernick-Will, A; Cook, SM				Davis, Allie; Javernick-Will, Amy; Cook, Sherri M.			Analyzing Sanitation Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for Resource-Limited Communities	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY			English	Article							LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT PLANTS; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION	Diverse and numerous sanitation sustainability assessment frameworks have been created to enhance the ability of systems to provide safe sanitation services, especially in resource-limited contexts. However, many go unused while new frameworks are developed and high sanitation system failure rates persist. To better support the sustainable development goal around global sanitation, there is a need to better understand how sanitation sustainability is defined and measured and the potential advantages and disadvantages of existing assessment frameworks. A subset of existing sanitation sustainability assessment frameworks was reviewed after applying each to evaluate multiple successful and failed community sanitation systems in India. Overall, the evaluated frameworks did not share a sanitation sustainability definition or core set of essential indicators. Many indicators lacked clear definitions and guidance on data collection and analysis. When evaluating framework effectiveness, differentiations between successful and failed cases varied greatly between frameworks. Potential improvements include indicator pilot testing to verify measurement feasibility and that they provide expected results; context-specific weightings; and project-specific framework selection. Clarifying and improving sanitation sustainability assessment frameworks could increase their effectiveness and use, leading to better decision-making and improved public and environmental health, economic viability, and sanitation use and acceptance.	[Davis, Allie; Javernick-Will, Amy; Cook, Sherri M.] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA		Cook, SM (corresponding author), Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.	sherri.cook@colorado.edu	Cook, Sherri M/J-2937-2017	Cook, Sherri M/0000-0002-7648-4596	Mortenson Center in Global Engineering; CU Boulder Engineering Excellence Fund; Beverly Sears Graduate Student Research Grant	Mortenson Center in Global Engineering; CU Boulder Engineering Excellence Fund; Beverly Sears Graduate Student Research Grant	This work was completed with financial support from the Mortenson Center in Global Engineering, the CU Boulder Engineering Excellence Fund, and the Beverly Sears Graduate Student Research Grant.	Akeju T.J., 2018, ASIAN RES J SOC SCI, V5, P1, DOI [10.9734/ARJASS/2018/39282, DOI 10.9734/ARJASS/2018/39282]; Allotey P, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V57, P949, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00463-X; [Anonymous], 2012, TOOLK MON EV HOUS WA; Ashley R, 2008, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V134, P200, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:3(200); Badowski N, 2011, J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA, V2011, DOI 10.1155/2011/130467; Balkema A.J., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P153, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00014-6, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00014-6]; Barnes R, 2011, DEV PRACT, V21, P168, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2011.543269; Basiago AD., 1998, ENVIRONMENTALIST, V19, P145, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1006697118620; Billig P., 1999, WATER SANITATION IND; Blizzard JL, 2012, DESIGN STUD, V33, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.destud.2012.03.001; Brunner N, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111644; CDC, 2008, EV SUST WAT SAN INT; Central Statistical Agency ICF, 2015, UNICEF PROGR SAN DRI; Chevalier C, 2005, APPL THERM ENG, V25, P3025, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.011; Coates J., 2007, HOUSEHOLD FOOD INSEC; Davis A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V663, P507, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291; Davis A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P401, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b04761; Dillard J., 2008, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL, DOI 10.4324/9780203892978; Dourson M, 2013, CRIT REV TOXICOL, V43, P467, DOI 10.3109/10408444.2013.807223; Drabble S, 2018, TOPIC BRIEF; Fang LL, 2016, WATER RES, V88, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.016; Flores A, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P2973, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.375; Fujita Y., 2005, BICI REV, V11, P59; Gallego A, 2008, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V52, P931, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.02.001; Gaulke LS, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P93, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9398-1; Guest J. S, 2009, P WATER ENV FED, V2009, P6584; Gunther I, 2012, IS SHARED SANITATION; Heijnen M, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093300; Hermann BG, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1787, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.004; Minh HV, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH INSIG, V5, P63, DOI 10.4137/EHI.S8199; Hunkeler D, 2003, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V8, P109, DOI 10.1007/BF02978435; Iribarnegaray MA, 2012, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V2, P205, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2012.005; ISO, 1997, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS; Jacimovic R, 2017, MONITORING EVALUATIO; Kalbar PP, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V117, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.036; Kalbar PP, 2012, TECHNOL SOC, V34, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.10.001; Kalbar PP, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V113, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025; Kapiriri Lydia, 2002, Health Expect, V5, P55; Katukiza AY, 2012, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V30, P964, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.007; Kempkes M, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY MONIT; Kuhnen M, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P1547, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12663; Lennartsson M., 2009, COMP SANITATION SYST; Malekpour S, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V118, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.007; Mercy Corps, 2006, DES MON EV DM E; Molinos-Senante M, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V532, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.059; Molinos-Senante M, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V497, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.026; Molinos-Senante M, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P4396, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.014; Mosler HJ, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0197483; Muga HE, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.008; Murphy HM, 2009, TECHNOL SOC, V31, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.010; Murray A, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P3553, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.009; Murray CJL, 2012, LANCET, V380, P2197, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4; Nawab B, 2006, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V26, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.005; Noga J, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3023, DOI 10.3390/su4113023; Olschewski A., 2015, TECHNOLOGIES DEV, P185; Opher T, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V182, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.080; Palme U, 2005, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V43, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.006; Parkinson J., 2014, SANITATION 21 PLANNI; Rebitzer G, 2003, ENVIRON PROG, V22, P241, DOI 10.1002/ep.670220412; Rodriguez-Garcia G, 2011, WATER RES, V45, P5997, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.053; Sabogal RI, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P89, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2013.130; Schaider LA, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P7304, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04778; Schoen ME, 2017, WATER RES, V109, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.044; Schweitzer R, 2014, 10 IRC; Schwemlein S, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13030333; Skat Foundation, TAF TECHN APPL FRAM; Skat Foundation, 2013, EUR COMM 7 FRAM PROG; Sperling J, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V60, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.006; Stafford-Smith M, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P911, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3; Starkl Markus, 2018, International Journal of Standardization Research, V16, P39, DOI 10.4018/IJSR.2018010103; Starkl M, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P6411, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b00887; Starkl M, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7175, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.037; Starkl M, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P6102, DOI 10.1021/es3048416; Stellacci P, 2010, DESALINATION, V253, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2009.11.034; Tilley E, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P9965, DOI 10.1021/es501645d; UNICEF, 2014, MAD WASH SECT SUST C; UNICEF, 2012, SUST CHECKS UNICEF E; UNICEF, 2017, SUST CHECKS GUID DES, P44; United Nations General Assembly, 1987, REPORT WORLD COMMISS; van der Vleuten-Balkema A. J, 2003, THESIS; WaterAid, 2011, SUST FRAM; WHO UNICEF, 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER; Wongburi P, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V150, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/150/1/012013; Young SL, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023558	84	6	6	1	10	AMER CHEMICAL SOC	WASHINGTON	1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA	0013-936X	1520-5851		ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL	Environ. Sci. Technol.	NOV 19	2019	53	22					13535	13545		10.1021/acs.est.9b03134	http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03134			11	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	JP5BG	31674173	Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000498279400059
J	Mahmoudi, A; Abbasi, M; Deng, XP				Mahmoudi, Amin; Abbasi, Mehdi; Deng, Xiaopeng			Evaluating the Performance of the Suppliers Using Hybrid DEA-OPA Model: A Sustainable Development Perspective	GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION			English	Article						Multi-criteria decision analysis; Sustainable development; Data envelopment analysis; Ordinal priority approach; Supply chain management; Performance measurement	DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; FUZZY DEA; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; EFFICIENCY; NETWORK; TOPSIS	One of the most important activities in any organization is the identification and selection of the right supplier. The responsible organizations determine the performance of their potential suppliers based on the attributes that are aligned with their sustainable development goals. Data regarding these attributes can be qualitative and/or quantitative, and not every supplier selection methodology can handle them simultaneously. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an influential methodology for measuring the suppliers' performance, especially when there are more than one input and/or output. However, the original DEA model cannot consider human judgment during evaluation. In this regard, the current study proposes a novel methodology with the aid of the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) of multiple attributes decision-making and the DEA. The proposed method, the DEA-OPA model, truly enjoys the advantages of both DEA and OPA models, making it more powerful than the original DEA for performance measurement. The proposed model was compared with the original DEA and OPA then retested through incomplete data when the experts lack enough knowledge about inputs and outputs. Finally, a pilot application has been executed in the paper industry, and comprehensive sensitivity analysis has been performed to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed model. The findings are of significant importance to responsible enterprises and organizational decision-makers.	[Mahmoudi, Amin; Deng, Xiaopeng] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China; [Abbasi, Mehdi] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran		Deng, XP (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China.	pmp.mahmoudi@gmail.com; abbasi_m@iaushiraz.ac.ir; dxp@seu.edu.cn	Mahmoudi, Amin/AAW-2347-2020; Abbasi, Mehdi/AAO-4680-2021	Mahmoudi, Amin/0000-0001-7091-5044; Abbasi, Mehdi/0000-0002-9357-0699	National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771052, 72171048]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This study was supported by the [National Natural Science Foundation of China] under Grant [71771052 and 72171048].	Alikhani R, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V208, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.018; Ataei Y, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893; Azadi M, 2015, COMPUT OPER RES, V54, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.002; BANKER RD, 1984, MANAGE SCI, V30, P1078, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078; CHARNES A, 1978, EUR J OPER RES, V2, P429, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8; Cheng YJ, 2017, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V50, P12255, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2038; Cooper WW, 2000, HDB DATA ENVELOPMENT, V1st, P1; Davoudabadi R, 2020, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.101074; Deng X, 2021, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V30, P1201, DOI 10.1007/s10726-019-09647-0; Dobos I, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V209, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.022; Dobos I, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V157, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.026; FARRELL MJ, 1957, J R STAT SOC SER A-G, V120, P253, DOI 10.2307/2343100; Govindan K, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V98, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046; Gupta P, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.04.007; Hendiani S, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106456; Izadikhah M, 2019, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V28, P641, DOI 10.1007/s10726-019-09616-7; Izadikhah M, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V100, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.002; Jauhar SK, 2017, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, V21, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.02.011; Jauhar SK, 2017, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, V19, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2016.10.007; Javed, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, DOI [10.1016/j.ijpe.2020, DOI 10.1016/J.IJPE.2020]; Javed SA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123997; Ji X, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V48, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.007; Karami S, 2021, J TEXT I, V112, P578, DOI 10.1080/00405000.2020.1768771; Kuo RJ, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P2852, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.559487; Kuo RJ, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020; Mahmoudi A, 2022, EXPERT SYST APPL, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116067; Mahmoudi A, 2021, OPER MANAGE RES, DOI 10.1007/s12063-021-00178-z; Mahmoudi A, 2021, J AMB INTEL HUM COMP, V12, P9341, DOI 10.1007/s12652-020-02649-w; Mahmoudi A, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P318, DOI 10.1002/bse.2623; Markabi MS, 2014, J IND ENG MANAG-JIEM, V7, P1197, DOI 10.3926/jiem.872; Marler RT, 2005, ENG OPTIMIZ, V37, P551, DOI 10.1080/03052150500114289; Marler RT, 2004, STRUCT MULTIDISCIP O, V26, P369, DOI 10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6; Omrani H, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P3989, DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-04168-z; Rashidi K, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122001; Rashidi K, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V121, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.025; Rouyendegh BD, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P12255, DOI 10.1007/s00500-020-04669-2; Sadeghi M, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P10495, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-16376-y; Sevkli M, 2007, INT J PROD RES, V45, P1973, DOI 10.1080/00207540600957399; Seydel J, 2005, MANAG FINANC, V31, P49, DOI 10.1108/03074350510769569; Shabanpour H, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V50, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.022; Shafiee M, 2014, APPL MATH MODEL, V38, P5092, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023; Shakouri GH, 2014, ENERGY, V64, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.022; Suganthi L, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V43, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.022; Tavassoli M, 2020, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V21, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2019.11.001; Torres-Ruiz A, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V131, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.008; Vorosmarty G, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121672; Yousefi S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.054; Zeydan M, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P2741, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.064; Zhou XY, 2016, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V46, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.038; Zimmer K, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P1412, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340; Zohrehbandian M, 2010, J OPER RES SOC, V61, P604, DOI 10.1057/jors.2009.4	51	5	5	10	20	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0926-2644	1572-9907		GROUP DECIS NEGOT	Group Decis. Negot.	APR	2022	31	2					335	362		10.1007/s10726-021-09770-x	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09770-x		NOV 2021	28	Management; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Social Sciences - Other Topics	ZV6HV					2022-09-08	WOS:000723977900001
J	Soleimani, H; Chhetri, P; Fathollahi-Fard, AM; Al-E-Hashem, SMJM; Shahparvari, S				Soleimani, Hamed; Chhetri, Prem; Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.; Al-E-Hashem, S. M. J. Mirzapour; Shahparvari, Shahrooz			Sustainable closed-loop supply chain with energy efficiency: Lagrangian relaxation, reformulations and heuristics	ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH			English	Article; Early Access						Sustainability; Energy; Closed-loop supply chain; Sustainable supply chain; Heuristics; Lagrangian relaxation	REVERSE LOGISTICS NETWORK; PROGRAMMING APPROACH; DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; GREEN; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; DECISIONS; ROBUST	Research on the development of sustainable supply chain models is highly active nowadays. Merging the concept of supply chain management with sustainable development goals, leads to simultaneous consideration of all economic, environmental and social factors. This paper addresses the design of a sustainable closed-loop supply chain including suppliers, manufacturers, distribution centers, customer zones, and disposal centers considering the consumption of energy. In addition, the distribution centers play the roles of warehouse and collection centers. The problem involves three choices of remanufacturing, recycling, and disposing the returned items. The objectives are including the total profit, energy consumption and the number of created job opportunities. As far as we know, these objectives are rarely considered in a sustainable closed-loop supply chain model. The proposed model also responds to the customer demand and also addresses the real-life constraints for location, allocation and inventory decisions in a closed-loop supply chain framework. Another novelty of this research is to develop a set of efficient Lagrangian relaxation reformulations and fast heuristics for solving a real-world numerical example. The results have revealed that the obtained solution is feasible and the developed solution algorithm is highly efficient for solving supply chain models. Finally, a comprehensive discussion is provided to highlight our findings and managerial insights from our results.	[Soleimani, Hamed] Univ Melbourne, Sch Math & Stat, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia; [Soleimani, Hamed] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Ind & Mech Engn, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran; [Chhetri, Prem; Shahparvari, Shahrooz] RMIT Univ, COBL, Sch Accounting Informat Syst & Supply Chain, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.] Univ Quebec, Ecole Technol Super, Dept Elect Engn, 1100 Notre Dame St W, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Al-E-Hashem, S. M. J. Mirzapour] Rennes Sch Business, 2 Rue Robert dArbrissel, F-35065 Rennes, France		Soleimani, H (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Sch Math & Stat, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.; Soleimani, H (corresponding author), Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Ind & Mech Engn, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran.	hd_soleimani@yahoo.com	Al-e-Hashem, S.M.J. Mirzapour/Q-7218-2017; Alehashem, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirzapour/L-3023-2019	Al-e-Hashem, S.M.J. Mirzapour/0000-0002-3235-2698; Alehashem, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirzapour/0000-0002-3235-2698	CAUL and its Member Institutions	CAUL and its Member Institutions	Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.	Ahi P, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005; Akbari-Kasgari M, 2022, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V24, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s10098-021-02266-x; Ameknassi L, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V182, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.031; Asghari M, 2022, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/math10020283; Babazadeh R, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V147, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.038; Bertsimas D., 1997, INTRO LINEAR OPTIMIZ, P479; Chalmardi MK, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P1035, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.197; Cruz-Rivera R, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V196, P930, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.041; Edalatpour MA, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.019; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2021, ADV ENG INFORM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101418; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111277; FISHER ML, 1985, INTERFACES, V15, P10, DOI 10.1287/inte.15.2.10; Fleischmann M, 2001, PROD OPER MANAG, V10, P156; Fragoso R, 2021, J OPER RES SOC, V72, P1236, DOI 10.1080/01605682.2020.1718015; Gao XH, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122405; Gholizadeh H, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106653; Gholizadeh H, 2020, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V32, P3967, DOI 10.1007/s00521-018-3847-9; Golpira H, 2022, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V30, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.028; Salema MIG, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V179, P1063, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.032; Govindan K, 2021, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102279; Govindan K, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.033; Govindan K, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V240, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012; Handfield R.B., 2002, SUPPLY CHAIN REDESIG; Hasani A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123199; Hasani A, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V87, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2015.12.009; Jayaraman V, 1999, J OPER RES SOC, V50, P497, DOI 10.2307/3009998; Keyvanshokooh E, 2013, APPL MATH MODEL, V37, P10182, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2013.05.042; Keyvanshokooh E, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V249, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.028; Khan SAR, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357; La Londe, 1997, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM, V1, P6; Lee DH, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V128, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.009; Lieckens K, 2007, COMPUT OPER RES, V34, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.006; Lin CH, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P1118, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.107; Melo MT, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V196, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007; Nayeri S, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106716; Nili M, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111428; Ozceylan E, 2014, INT J PROD RES, V52, P2363, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.865852; Oliver R.K., 1982, LOGISTICS STRATEGIC, V5, P42; Ozkir V, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V41, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.013; Shabestar MP, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P67214, DOI [10.1007/s11356-021-15345-9, 10.1007/s11356-021-12980-0]; Pazhani S, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107191; Pishvaee MS, 2011, APPL MATH MODEL, V35, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.013; Pishvaee MS, 2010, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V47, P269, DOI 10.1007/s00170-009-2194-5; Rajak S, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P6481, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01713-5; Ringuest JL, 1997, EUR J OPER RES, V98, P563, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00177-4; Santoso T, 2005, EUR J OPER RES, V167, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.046; Sherafati M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095; Shih LH, 2001, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V32, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00098-7; SIMCHILEVI D, 2004, MANAGING SUPPLY CHAI; Soleimani H, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15100-0; Soleimani H, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V109, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.038; Soleimani H, 2015, APPL MATH MODEL, V39, P3990, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.016; Soleimani H, 2013, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V68, P917, DOI 10.1007/s00170-013-4953-6; Spengler T, 1997, EUR J OPER RES, V97, P308, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00200-7; Su TS, 2014, COMPUT IND ENG, V72, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2014.03.007; Tavana M, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129777; Wang F, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020; Xu ZT, 2022, ANN OPER RES, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04499-x; Zailani S, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008	59	8	8	16	16	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0254-5330	1572-9338		ANN OPER RES	Ann. Oper. Res.												10.1007/s10479-022-04661-z	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04661-z		APR 2022	26	Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Operations Research & Management Science	0Q5HM		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000784949600001
J	Yang, HB; Dietz, T; Yang, W; Zhang, JD; Liu, JG				Yang, Hongbo; Dietz, Thomas; Yang, Wu; Zhang, Jindong; Liu, Jianguo			Changes in Human Well-being and Rural Livelihoods Under Natural Disasters	ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS			English	Article						Resilience; Sustainability; Post-disaster reconstruction; Wenchuan Earthquake; Vulnerability; Wolong Nature Reserve	WOLONG NATURE-RESERVE; GIANT PANDA HABITAT; WILDLIFE HABITAT; POVERTY TRAPS; RECOVERY; DYNAMICS; CHINA; EARTHQUAKE; IMPACTS; RESTORATION	Rural areas around the world are increasingly exposed to natural disasters. To guide management intervention for sustainable development after natural disasters, scientists and policymakers need a better understanding of the linkages between livelihood changes after natural disasters and recovery outcomes. Despite the growing body of disaster research, systematic evaluation of the relationship between post-disaster changes in rural livelihoods and recovery outcomes is rare, largely due to the lack of relevant data. By taking advantage of the long-term data collection and research conducted in China's Wolong Nature Reserve (Wolong), we empirically evaluated livelihood changes after the catastrophic 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake and how those changes are linked to the recovery of human well-being. Our results show that households' livelihood portfolios in Wolong conspicuously changed after the earthquake and that human well-being had been recovering. However, we found most of these livelihood changes negatively affected, instead of facilitated, human well-being recovery. The enriched understanding of the linkages between post-disaster livelihood changes and recovery outcomes has important management implications for achieving Sustainable Development Goals amid natural disasters in Wolong and beyond.	[Yang, Hongbo; Dietz, Thomas; Liu, Jianguo] Michigan State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA; [Dietz, Thomas] Michigan State Univ, Dept Sociol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Dietz, Thomas] Michigan State Univ, Environm Sci & Policy Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Yang, Wu] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Jindong] China West Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conser, Nanchong 637009, Sichuan, Peoples R China		Liu, JG (corresponding author), Michigan State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA.	yanghon8@msu.edu; tdietz@msu.edu; wyang@zju.edu.cn; zhangjd224@163.com; liuji@msu.edu	Liu, Jianguo/G-5211-2015; Yang, Hongbo/AAL-4818-2021	Liu, Jianguo/0000-0001-6344-0087; Yang, Hongbo/0000-0001-5935-6595; Dietz, Thomas/0000-0001-9399-0784	U.S. National Science Foundation [130313]; Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC0503404]; Michigan State University; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571517]	U.S. National Science Foundation(National Science Foundation (NSF)); Ministry of Science and Technology of China(Ministry of Science and Technology, China); Michigan State University; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	We thank Sue Nichols and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an early draft of this paper. We thank Xuejia Li, Dan Li, Yan Chen, and Xuemei Li for their help in collecting some of the data, and the interviewees for their time and cooperation in participating in our household surveys. We appreciate the logistical supports from staff at Wolong Nature Reserve and Chinese Academy of Sciences during our field work, especially Hemin Zhang and Zhiyun Ouyang. We are grateful for funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (#130313), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (#2016YFC0503404), Michigan State University, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#41571517).	An L, 2001, ECOL MODEL, V140, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00267-8; [Anonymous], 2013, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES H; [Anonymous], 2005, MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM; [Anonymous], 2007, HDB DISASTER RES; Axinn WG, 1999, SOC SCI RES, V28, P243, DOI 10.1006/ssre.1998.0641; Bacci M. L., 2017, CONCISE HIST WORLD P; Barrett CB, 2001, FOOD POLICY, V26, P315, DOI 10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8; Barrett CB, 2016, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V8, P303, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095235; Barrios RE, 2017, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V46, P151, DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635; Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX; Bat W., 2018, CHINA ENV SCI POLLUT, P1, DOI [10.1007/s11356-018-1407-6, DOI 10.1007/S11356-018-1407-6]; Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039; Cao SX, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P10712, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900197106; Carter MR, 2007, WORLD DEV, V35, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.010; CCTV, 2009, WENCH EATHQ CAUS 845; Chen XD, 2012, ORGAN ENVIRON, V25, P3, DOI 10.1177/1086026611436216; Chen XD, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V229, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.007; China News, 2012, CHINA NEWS; Cutter SL, 2015, NATURE, V522, P277, DOI 10.1038/522277a; de Sherbinin A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.005; Dietz T., 2015, SOCIOLOGY DEV, V1, P123, DOI DOI 10.1525/sod.2015.1.1.123; Finch C, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8; Freedman D, 1988, Sociol Methodol, V18, P37, DOI 10.2307/271044; Fukase E, 2016, J AGR ECON, V67, P3, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12117; Guha-Sapir D, 2012, ANN DISASTER STAT RE; Haider LJ, 2018, WORLD DEV, V101, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.038; Hallegatte S, 2007, ECOL ECON, V62, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.006; Hallegatte S, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P777, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.011; He GM, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V42, P1017, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9214-3; Hull V, 2014, J NAT CONSERV, V22, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.02.003; Hull V, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P3028, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.007; Ingram JC, 2006, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V9, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.006; Kramer DB, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2897, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.026; Lawther PM, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P494, DOI 10.1111/disa.12163; Lei H, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P1021, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3064-3; Linderman MA, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V183, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.026; Liu J, 2016, PANDAS AND PEOPLE: COUPLING HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703549.001.0001; Liu J., 2013, WOLONG HOUSEHOLD STU; Liu JG, 2003, NATURE, V421, P530, DOI 10.1038/nature01359; Liu JG, 1999, POPUL ENVIRON, V21, P45, DOI 10.1007/BF02436120; Liu JG, 1999, CONSERV BIOL, V13, P1360, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98418.x; Liu JG, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P98, DOI 10.1126/science.1058104; Liu JG, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07868-200344; Liu JG, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05873-180226; Liu W, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035420; Masozera M, 2007, ECOL ECON, V63, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013; Msilimba GG, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P347, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9437-5; Muthen L. K., 2010, 1998 2010 MPLUS USER, V6th; Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501; [欧阳志云 OUYANG ZhiYun], 2008, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V28, P5801; Phillips S. D., 2015, DISASTER RECOVERY; Pour MD, 2017, ECOL ECON, V141, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.023; Priebe S, 2011, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V46, P615, DOI 10.1007/s00127-010-0227-x; Pulido-Fernandez JI., 2015, NATURE BASED TOURISM, P181; Rathfon D, 2013, DISASTERS, V37, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01305.x; Resosudarmo BP, 2012, ASIAN ECON J, V26, P233, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8381.2012.02084.x; Rudel TK, 2013, RURAL SOCIOL, V78, P167, DOI 10.1111/ruso.12009; Rush A., 2011, RESERVE BANK AUSTR B, P29; Simpson M, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P489, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090011; Smith G., 2018, HDB DISASTER RES HDB, P595, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28, 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28]; Tierney Kathleen., 2014, SOCIAL ROOTS RISK PR; Nguyen TT, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.001; Tuanmu MN, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P249, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1727, 10.1038/nclimate1727]; Tuanmu MN, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P1510, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02479.x; United Nations, 2016, SUST DEV GOALS, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02479.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2011.02479.X]; van den Berg M, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.006; Vina A, 2011, AMBIO, V40, P274, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0098-0; Wang X., 2013, GREEN TIMES; Wang Y, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1853, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1400-4; Wang Y, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0224-3; Williams JN, 2013, POPUL ENVIRON, V34, P510, DOI 10.1007/s11111-012-0175-3; Willis KJ, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC B, V362, P169, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2006.1976; Wong DFK, 2007, INT J SOC WELF, V16, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00475.x; Xu WH, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P353, DOI 10.1890/080192; Xu XW, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P3437, DOI 10.1007/s11434-013-5999-4; Yang HB, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aao6652; Yang HB, 2017, BIOL CONSERV, V213, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.010; Yang W, 2016, PANDAS AND PEOPLE: COUPLING HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P148; Yang W, 2016, PANDAS AND PEOPLE: COUPLING HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P109; Yang Wu, 2015, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V1, P19, DOI 10.1890/EHS15-0001.1; Yang W, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064582; Yang W, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P10916, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1301733110; Zhang JD, 2017, BIOL CONSERV, V209, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.014; Zhang JD, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V319, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.029; Zhang JD, 2011, ECOL RES, V26, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11284-011-0809-4; Zhang Y, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P5, DOI 10.1080/01944360903294556; Zhong BL, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0157530; Zhou Shiqiang, 2016, Acta Theriologica Sinica, V36, P138, DOI 10.16829/j.slxb.201602002	88	21	24	10	126	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-8009	1873-6106		ECOL ECON	Ecol. Econ.	SEP	2018	151						184	194		10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.008	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.008			11	Ecology; Economics; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Business & Economics	GL3XS					2022-09-08	WOS:000437078900019
J	Faubert, P; Belisle, CL; Bertrand, N; Bouchard, S; Chantigny, MH; Pare, MC; Rochette, P; Ziadi, N; Villeneuve, C				Faubert, Patrick; Belisle, Catherine Lemay; Bertrand, Normand; Bouchard, Sylvie; Chantigny, Martin H.; Pare, Maxime C.; Rochette, Philippe; Ziadi, Noura; Villeneuve, Claude			Land application of pulp and paper mill sludge may reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to landfilling	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Biosolid; Paper mill sludge; Greenhouse gases; Landfilling; Land application; Fertilization	NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; N2O EMISSIONS; DENITRIFICATION; WATER; CROP; AMENDMENTS; BIOSOLIDS; METHANE; CARBON	Land application of pulp and paper mill sludge (PPMS) may replace landfilling in certain jurisdictions. However, the consequences of this change in management on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from PPMS are unknown. Land application may also entail temporary storage by landfilling due to a timing mismatch between PPMS production and application. We quantified direct GHG emissions from landfilled PPMS (pilot scale; N-rich and N-poor types) over two snow-free seasons, and after application of previously landfilled PPMS (LPPMS; < 6-month landfilled) to a clay loam soil cropped to wheat over one snow-free season. Landfilling of N-rich PPMS induced the highest GHG emission factor (EF; 0.26 Mg CO2-equivalent Mg-1 dry PPMS) and generated substantial N2O emissions (2% of landfilled N), which are neglected by the current assessment methods. Landfilling of N-rich PPMS also resulted in the highest CH4 emissions (0.6% of landfilled C). Replacing urea with LPPMS to fulfill wheat N requirements did not change field N2O-N EFs (1.1-3.5% of applied N) and did not generate CH4. Shortterm (1-2 years) GHG (CO2-equivalent) EFs with landfilled N-rich PPMS were 0.54 to 4.48 times the EFs reported in the literature for land-applied PPMS. Long-term EF estimates suggest that landfilled PPMS may increase GHG emissions by up to three times compared to land application. Further research at the industrial scale is warranted to reduce uncertainty on GHG emissions from PPMS landfill sites, fulfill sustainable development goals and determine accurate carbon credits associated with changes in PPMS management practices.	[Faubert, Patrick; Belisle, Catherine Lemay; Bouchard, Sylvie; Pare, Maxime C.; Villeneuve, Claude] Univ Quebec Chicoutimi, Dept Sci Fondamentales, Chaire Ecoconseil, 555 Blvd Univ, Chicoutimi, PQ G7H 2B1, Canada; [Bertrand, Normand; Chantigny, Martin H.; Rochette, Philippe; Ziadi, Noura] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Quebec Res & Dev Ctr, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd, Quebec City, PQ G1V 2J3, Canada; [Pare, Maxime C.] Univ Quebec Chicoutimi, Dept Sci Fondamentales, Lab Ecol Vegetale & Anim, 555 Blvd Univ, Chicoutimi, PQ G7H 2B1, Canada		Faubert, P (corresponding author), Univ Quebec Chicoutimi, Dept Sci Fondamentales, Chaire Ecoconseil, 555 Blvd Univ, Chicoutimi, PQ G7H 2B1, Canada.	patrick1_faubert@uqac.ca		Pare, Maxime/0000-0003-3482-4828; Faubert, Patrick/0000-0003-0237-3188	Ministere du Developpement durable, de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques of Quebec; Ministere de l'Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l'Alimentation of Quebec (Program Innov'Action agroalimentaire); Fonds vert (Viridis); Fonds vert (Sanexen); Fonds vert (Serro); Mitacs Elevate program	Ministere du Developpement durable, de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques of Quebec; Ministere de l'Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l'Alimentation of Quebec (Program Innov'Action agroalimentaire); Fonds vert (Viridis); Fonds vert (Sanexen); Fonds vert (Serro); Mitacs Elevate program	This study was funded by the Ministere du Developpement durable, de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques of Quebec, Ministere de l'Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l'Alimentation of Quebec (Program Innov'Action agroalimentaire) and Fonds vert (Viridis, Sanexen and Serro) in research grants attributed to the Chaire en eco-conseil, Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi. We are also grateful for the collaborative support from the Quebec Forest Industry Council and ZIP Saguenay. A research fellowship from the Mitacs Elevate program was awarded to Patrick Faubert. We thank our operational collaborators: Resolute Forest Products - Kenogami and Alma mills, Agrinova and College d'Alma. We thank Steeve Duchesne, landlord of the site for LPPMS application. We also thank Philippe Cournoyer Farley, Pascal Dufour, Simon Durocher, Claire Fournier, Olivier Fradette, Frederic Gagnon, Jean-Guy Girard, Stephanie Girard, Sylvie Michaud, Annie Robichaud, Nicolas St-Pierre, Pascal Tremblay and Denis Walsh for their assistance in field and laboratory work.	AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), 2018, PED REG CHIC; [Anonymous], 2008, SOIL SAMPLING METHOD; Baggs EM, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V90, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00175-X; Bakken LR, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P1226, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0321; Bogner JE, 1999, J ENVIRON QUAL, V28, P278, DOI 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800010034x; Bouwman AF, 1996, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V46, P53, DOI 10.1007/BF00210224; Brown S, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P9509, DOI 10.1021/es101210k; BUSWELL AM, 1952, IND ENG CHEM, V44, P550, DOI 10.1021/ie50507a033; Camberato JJ, 2006, CAN J SOIL SCI, V86, P641, DOI 10.4141/S05-120; CANMET E.T.C., 2005, 3401734791 CANMET NA, V1, P152; Chantigny MH, 2013, J ENVIRON QUAL, V42, P30, DOI 10.2134/jeq2012.0196; Chantigny MH, 1998, CAN J SOIL SCI, V78, P589, DOI 10.4141/S98-009; Charles A, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V236, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021; CRAAQ, 2010, GUID REF FERT; Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2018, CAN SUBM UN FRAM CON, P260; Faubert P, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V250, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.040; Faubert P, 2017, J ENVIRON QUAL, V46, P950, DOI 10.2134/jeq2017.03.0119; Faubert P, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V108, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.007; Faubert P, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V352, P199, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0989-2; Gouvemement du Quebec, 2012, QUEB ACT GREEN 2020, P55; Hao X., 2008, SOIL SAMPLING METHOD, V2nd, P743; Heath LS, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P3999, DOI 10.1021/es902723x; Industrial waste, 2012, IND WASTE, P73, DOI DOI 10.5772/37043; IRDA, 2018, CART PED 22D07201; Jensen J. E, 2002, BACKGROUND PAPERS, P419; Le Mer J, 2001, EUR J SOIL BIOL, V37, P25, DOI 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01067-6; Likon M, 2012, MACROMOL SYMP, V320, P50, DOI 10.1002/masy.201251006; LINN DM, 1984, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V48, P1267, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060013x; Liu BB, 2010, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V72, P407, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00856.x; Luedeling E, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V158, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.020; MDDELCC (Ministere du Developpement durable de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques), 2016, BIL ANN CONF ENV 201, P86; MDDEP, 2011, QUEB RES MAT MAN POL, P13; MELCC (Ministere de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques), 2019, BIL ANN CONF ENV SEC; NCASI, 2013, ICFPA NCASI SPREADSH; NCASI (National Council for Air and Stream Improvement), 2005, CALC TOOLS EST GREEN, P140; Pelster DE, 2012, J ENVIRON QUAL, V41, P427, DOI 10.2134/jeq2011.0261; Petersen SO, 2008, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V40, P967, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.11.017; Rinne J, 2005, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V39, P7790, DOI 10.1021/es048416q; Rochette P, 2001, CAN J SOIL SCI, V81, P515, DOI 10.4141/S00-044; Rochette P, 2008, CAN J SOIL SCI, V88, P641, DOI 10.4141/CJSS07025; Rochette P, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V254, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.021; Serrano-Silva N, 2014, PEDOSPHERE, V24, P291, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60016-3; Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1; Thangarajan R, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V465, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.031; The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ipcc), 2006, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES; USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2018, ANN INV US GHG EM SI, P529; USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2018, INV US GREENH GAS EM, P655; WEIER KL, 1993, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V57, P66, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010013x; Wold S., 1995, CHEMOMETRIC METHODS; Zhang HH, 2008, J ENVIRON SCI, V20, P189, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60030-3	50	9	9	3	20	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	NOV	2019	150								104415	10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104415	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104415			13	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	JA8ZY					2022-09-08	WOS:000488141000014
J	Kumpel, E; Peletz, R; Bonham, M; Khush, R				Kumpel, Emily; Peletz, Rachel; Bonham, Mateyo; Khush, Ranjiv			Assessing Drinking Water Quality and Water Safety Management in Sub-Saharan Africa Using Regulated Monitoring Data	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY			English	Article							DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SETTINGS; ACCESS; HEALTH; IMPACT	Universal access to safe drinking water is prioritized in the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Collecting reliable and actionable water quality information in low-resource settings, however, is challenging, and little is known about the correspondence between water quality data collected by local monitoring agencies and global frameworks for water safety. Using 42?926 microbial water quality test results from 32 surveillance agencies and water suppliers in seven sub-Saharan African countries, we determined the degree to which water sources were monitored, how water quality varied by source type, and institutional responses to results. Sixty-four percent of the water samples were collected from piped supplies, although the majority of Africans rely on nonpiped sources. Piped supplies had the lowest levels of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) compared to any other source type: only 4% of samples of water piped to plots and 2% of samples from water piped to public taps/standpipes were positive for FIB (n = 14?948 and n = 12?278, respectively). Among other types of improved sources, samples from harvested rainwater and boreholes were less often positive for FIB (22%, n = 167 and 31%, n = 3329, respectively) than protected springs or protected dug wells (39%, n = 472 and 65%, n = 505). When data from different settings were aggregated, the FIB levels in different source types broadly reflected the source-type water safety framework used by the Joint Monitoring Programme. However, the insufficient testing of nonpiped sources relative to their use indicates important gaps in current assessments. Our results emphasize the importance of local data collection for water safety management and measurement of progress toward universal safe drinking water access.	[Kumpel, Emily; Peletz, Rachel; Bonham, Mateyo] Aquaya Inst, POB 21862, Nairobi, Kenya; [Khush, Ranjiv] Aquaya Inst, 12 E Sir Francis Drake Blvd,Suite E, Larkspur, CA 94939 USA		Kumpel, E (corresponding author), Aquaya Inst, POB 21862, Nairobi, Kenya.	ekumpel@umass.edu			Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1040691]	Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation(Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)	This work was supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to The Aquaya Institute (Global Development Grant Number OPP1040691). B. Kevin Clawson, Zarah Rahman, and Lola Aleru contributed towards data collection and collation. We thank all of the water suppliers and surveillance agencies that contributed to this study.	Bain RES, 2012, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V90, P228, DOI 10.2471/BLT.11.094284; Bain R, 2014, PLOS MED, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001644; Baum R, 2014, AM J TROP MED HYG, V90, P121, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0380; Brown JC, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0036735, 10.1371/journal.pone.0030955]; Central Statistical Agency (Ethiopia), 2013, POP PROJ ETH ALL REG; Davison A, 2005, WHOSDEWSH0506; Enger KS, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P1181, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.034; Hunter PR, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P2621, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.018; International Organization for Standardization, 2007, 3166 ISO; ISO, 2010, 31662 ISO, P3166; Khush RS, 2013, AM J TROP MED HYG, V89, P251, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0067; Kumpel E, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P10846, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120910846; LLOYD BJ, 1991, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V24, P61, DOI 10.2166/wst.1991.0031; Ministry of Water and Environment, 2010, UG WAT SUPPL ATL 201; Onda K, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P880, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9030880; Peletz R., 2013, WATER, V21, P35; Peletz R, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13030275; Pruss-Ustun A, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P894, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12329; Rahman Z, 2011, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V1, P242, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2011.002; Rutstein S., 2014, 8 DHS ICF INT; Shaheed A, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P186, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12229; Shaheed A, 2014, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V92, P283, DOI 10.2471/BLT.13.119594; UNICEF and WHO, 2011, DRINK WAT EQ SAF SUS; UNICEF and World Health Organization, 2013, UNICEF 2012 ANN REP; Unicef World Health Organization, 2015, PROGR SAN DRINK WAT; WHO, 1997, GUID DRINK WAT QUAL, V3; WHO/UNICEF, 2014, RAP ASS DRINK WAT QU; WHO/UNICEF, 2 M WHO UNICEF JMP T; WHO/UNICEF, 2014, PROGR DRINK WAT SAN; WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP), 2014, WASH POST2015 PROP T; Wiedenmann A, 2001, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V204, P245, DOI 10.1078/1438-4639-00101	31	24	25	0	29	AMER CHEMICAL SOC	WASHINGTON	1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA	0013-936X	1520-5851		ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL	Environ. Sci. Technol.	OCT 18	2016	50	20					10869	10876		10.1021/acs.est.6b02707	http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02707			8	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	DZ5MW	27559754				2022-09-08	WOS:000385907200012
J	Manu, P; Asiedu, RO; Mahamadu, AM; Olomolaiye, PO; Booth, C; Manu, E; Ajayi, S; Agyekum, K				Manu, Patrick; Asiedu, Richard Ohene; Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed; Olomolaiye, Paul Olaniyi; Booth, Colin; Manu, Emmanuel; Ajayi, Saheed; Agyekum, Kofi			Contribution of procurement capacity of public agencies to attainment of procurement objectives in infrastructure procurement	ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Organisational capacity; Procurement capacity; Procurement objectives; Public organisation; Public procurement; Infrastructure		Purpose Effective procurement of infrastructure is linked to the attainment of the sustainable development goals set by the United Nations. While the capacity of organisations is generally thought to be related to organisational performance, there is a lack of empirical insights concerning the contribution of procurement capacity of public organisations towards the attainment of procurement objectives in infrastructure procurement. Thus, it is unclear which aspects of the capacity of public procurement organisations contribute the most to the attainment of procurement objectives in the procurement of infrastructure. This research sought to address this gap. Design/methodology/approach The research used a survey of public procurement professionals which yielded 590 responses. Findings Exploratory factor analysis of 23 organisational capacity items revealed three components of organisational procurement capacity: "management of the procurement process"; "human and physical resources"; and "financial resources and management". Multiple regression modelling of the relationship between the components and the attainment of 12 procurement objectives further reveals that there is a significant positive relationship between the three components and all the objectives. However, "management of the procurement process" emerged as the greatest contributor to the attainment of seven objectives, whereas "human and physical resources", and "financial resources and management" were the greatest contributor to the attainment of one objective and four objectives, respectively. Originality/value The study provides strong empirical justification for investment in the development of procurement capacity of public agencies involved in procurement of infrastructure. Furthermore, procurement capacity development of specific capacity components can be prioritised based on the relative contribution of capacity components to the attainment of desired procurement objectives. This should be useful to government policymakers as well as multilateral organisations that fund infrastructure and procurement reforms in various countries.	[Manu, Patrick] Univ Manchester, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, Lancs, England; [Asiedu, Richard Ohene] Koforidua Polytech, Dept Bldg Technol, Koforidua, Ghana; [Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed; Olomolaiye, Paul Olaniyi; Booth, Colin] Univ West England Frenchay Campus, Fac Environm & Technol, Bristol, Avon, England; [Manu, Emmanuel] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Architecture Design & Built Environm, Nottingham, England; [Ajayi, Saheed] Leeds Beckett Univ, Sch Built Environm Engn & Comp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England; [Agyekum, Kofi] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Construct Technol & Management, Kumasi, Ghana		Manu, P (corresponding author), Univ Manchester, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, Lancs, England.	patrick.manu@manchester.ac.uk; richasiedu27@yahoo.com; Abdul.Mahamadu@uwe.ac.uk; paul.olomolaiye@uwe.ac.uk; Colin.Booth@uwe.ac.uk; emmanuel.manu@ntu.ac.uk; S.Ajayi@leedsbeckett.ac.uk; agyekum.kofi1@gmail.com	Ajayi, Saheed/AHC-7157-2022; Agyekum, Kofi/AAP-6023-2021; Agyekum, Kofi/R-1479-2018; Ajayi, Saheed/AAV-4209-2021; Manu, Patrick/N-9004-2013	Agyekum, Kofi/0000-0002-7903-5390; Manu, Patrick/0000-0001-7766-8824; Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed/0000-0001-7757-8562	United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID)	United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID)	The authors extend their appreciation to the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID) for providing funding for data collection in Nigeria as part of the Urbanisation Research Nigeria programme.	Abu-Hummour A.M., 2020, CURR CONTENTS, V20, P1; Addo-Duah P., 2014, P CONSTR RES C 2014; Adewole, 2014, INT J PUBLIC ADM MAN, V2, P25; Adjei-Bamfo P, 2019, J PUBLIC AFF, V19, DOI 10.1002/pa.1902; Agwot K.R., 2016, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V6, P20; Agyekum K., 2019, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V12, P112; Ahadzie D K, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.006; Alencastro J, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V182, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.103; Aliza A.H., 2011, PROCEDIA ENG, V14, P1929; Ambe IM, 2012, J TRANSP SUPPLY CHAI, V6, P242; Ameyaw, 2012, W AFR BUILT ENV RES; [Anonymous], 2009, CRIT ROL INFR SUST D; [Anonymous], 1994, WORLD DEV REP INFR D; [Anonymous], 2006, CHALL CAP DEV WORK G; [Anonymous], 2006, PROC CAP ASS US GUID; [Anonymous], 2004, 3 JOINT ROUND TABL S; [Anonymous], 2017, GLOB INFR OUTL INFR; [Anonymous], 2003, PUBL SECT MAN REF AF; [Anonymous], 2019, LINK STRATEGIC PLANN; [Anonymous], 2016, PROGR SUST DEV GOALS; [Anonymous], 2013, INFR ACT PLAN NIG CL; [Anonymous], 2000, NIG COUNTR PROC ASS, DOI 1121258/nigeria-countryprocurement-assessment-report-cpar; [Anonymous], 2007, SUST ACH EXC CONSTR; [Anonymous], 2014, PROC MAN REV 5; [Anonymous], 2010, PUBL PROC CAP DEV GU; [Anonymous], 2011, 8534 BS BSI; [Anonymous], 2014, EMP WOM PUBL PROC; [Anonymous], 2010, STRAT HLTH DEV PLAN; [Anonymous], 2013, GLOB CONSTR 2025 GLO; [Anonymous], 2013, STAT DEV PLAN 2014 2; [Anonymous], 2013, NIG VAL CHAIN AN STU; [Anonymous], 2003, GHAN COUNTR PROC ASS; [Anonymous], 1995, REST URB NIG STRAT R, DOI 10735837/restoring-urban-nigeria-strategy-restoring-urbaninfrastructure-services-nigeria; [Anonymous], 2007, CAP ASS PRACT NOT; Anvuur A., 2006, P 2006 CIB W107 CONS; Asare E.N., 2016, J LOGISTICS MANAGEME, V5, P22, DOI DOI 10.5923/J.LOGISTICS.20160501.04; ASCHAUER DA, 1989, J MONETARY ECON, V23, P177, DOI 10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0; Asiedu R.O., 2015, J INT REAL ESTATE CO, V3, P1; Asiedu RO, 2014, INT J SUSTAIN CONSTR, V5, P13; Awuzie BO, 2016, PROC INST CIV ENG-MA, V169, P106, DOI 10.1680/jmapl.15.00024; Basheka B.C., 2010, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT S; Bolton P, 2006, J PUBLIC PROCUR, V6, P193, DOI 10.1108/JOPP-06-03-2006-B001; Cadot O, 2006, J PUBLIC ECON, V90, P1133, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.006; Calderon C., 2008, 4712 WORLD BANK; Calderon C., 2014, INFRASTRUCTURE GROWT; Changalima IA, 2021, J PUBLIC PROCUR, V21, P37, DOI 10.1108/JOPP-05-2020-0047; de Mariz C.L., 2014, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT R; Devece C, 2017, SERV BUS, V11, P563, DOI 10.1007/s11628-016-0320-7; Evenett S.J., 2005, 3720 WORLD BANK; Field A., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI; Fourie D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P8692, DOI 10.3390/su12208692; Gebregziabher G, 2009, AGR WATER MANAGE, V96, P1837, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.004; Geng Y, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P932, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.016; Gill J., 2010, RES METHODS MANAGERS, V4th ed.; GUADAGNOLI E, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P265, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265; Guarnieri P, 2019, J PUBLIC PROCUR, V19, P295, DOI 10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-0032; Heale Roberta, 2015, Evid Based Nurs, V18, P66, DOI 10.1136/eb-2015-102129; Jensen E.R.K., 2009, ADB HIGH LEV FOR PUB; Jones D.S., 2002, J PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, V2, P29; Kakwezi P., 2019, INT J SOCIAL SCI MAN, V3, P172; Kwak YH, 2009, CALIF MANAGE REV, V51, P51, DOI 10.2307/41166480; Lakshmanan TR, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.001; Lewis-Faupel S, 2016, AM ECON J-ECON POLIC, V8, P258, DOI 10.1257/pol.20140258; Li X, 2014, DIGEST DIS SCI, V2014, P1; Loader K, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V36, P47, DOI 10.1177/2399654417692987; Locatelli G, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.010; Mahamadu AM, 2018, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V16, P2, DOI 10.1108/JEDT-09-2017-0089; Manu P, 2019, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V26, P1962, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-11-2017-0240; Manu P, 2018, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V8, P386, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-02-2018-0038; McCarthy J., 2006, CURR CONTENTS, V16, P10; Meyer J., 2014, WORLD BANK C PROC DE; Mrope N.P., 2018, DETERMINANTS PERFORM; Ndou V., 2004, Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, V18; Newell G, 2009, J PROP INVEST FINANC, V27, P180, DOI 10.1108/14635780910937863; OECD, 2002, REL REG TRAD AGR MUL; Offei Isaac, 2016, International Journal of Procurement Management, V9, P455; Ojo SO, 2011, J CIV ENG MANAG, V17, P227, DOI 10.3846/13923730.2011.574449; Osborne J., 2004, PRACT ASSESS RES EVA, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.3390/IJERPH13010139; Owusu EK, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.124; PARENTE SL, 2000, BARRIERS RICHES; Qiao Y., 2003, J PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, V3, P215; Rahmani F, 2017, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V24, P593, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-03-2016-0058; Raymond J, 2008, BENCHMARKING, V15, P782, DOI 10.1108/14635770810915940; Rioja FK, 1999, J DEV ECON, V58, P387, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00118-7; Rothery R., 2003, J PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, V3, P370, DOI DOI 10.1108/J0PP-03-03-2003-B003; Rowley J, 2014, MANAG RES REV, V37, P308, DOI 10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027; Sahoo P, 2009, J ASIA PAC ECON, V14, P351, DOI 10.1080/13547860903169340; Saunders M, 2007, RES METHODS BUSINESS; Smits W, 2017, BUILD RES INF, V45, P336, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1190579; Tassabehji Rana, 2008, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V14, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.005; van de Walle DV, 2009, J DEV EFFECT, V1, P15, DOI 10.1080/19439340902727701; Walker H, 2009, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V14, P128, DOI 10.1108/13598540910941993; Wright T, 2015, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V35, P135, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2015.1007708; Yevu SK, 2020, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V27, P411, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-03-2019-0135; Yin R., 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG, DOI 10.1097/FCH.0b013-31822dda9e	95	5	5	12	31	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0969-9988	1365-232X		ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA	Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.	NOV 4	2021	28	10					3322	3345		10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0375	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0375		JAN 2021	24	Engineering, Industrial; Engineering, Civil; Management	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Business & Economics	WU3IJ		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000612958900001
J	Das, D; Kalbar, PP; Velaga, NR				Das, Deepjyoti; Kalbar, Pradip P.; Velaga, Nagendra R.			Pathways to decarbonize passenger transportation: Implications to India's climate budget	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable development goal; Electric vehicles; Carbon emissions; Transportation; Electricity grid; Climate change mitigation	ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ROAD TRANSPORT; EMISSIONS; SECTOR; SCENARIOS; ENERGY; WELL	There is a lack of studies on assessing long-term impacts of different sectors on shrinking global carbon budget. Present study focuses on assessing contribution of electric vehicles (EVs) with improving electricity grids' efficiency (EGs) and minimizing 'transmission and distribution' (T&D) losses in reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and fulfilling emission targets for 2030 and 2050. Eleven different scenarios are articulated with estimated uncertainties for Mumbai Metropolitan Regions' (MMRs') passenger transportation using data extracted from MMR's Comprehensive Mobility Plan's transportation model. A novel methodology is developed to estimate local carbon budget targets from global targets between 2018 and 2050. The estimations indicate that carbon emissions in 'business as usual' scenario are 252%, 505%, and 55% above the targets for 2 degrees C, 1.5 degrees C, and Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC), respectively. Study also shows that introducing EVs in MMR without simultaneously improving EGs will generate more net CO2 emissions than BAU. EVs with EG and T&D improvements are not enough to meet the estimated targets. However, their combined contribution significantly reduces CO2 emission by half and reaches peak emission by 2025 from post-half-century. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Das, Deepjyoti; Kalbar, Pradip P.] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn CUSE, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India; [Kalbar, Pradip P.] Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Programme Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India; [Velaga, Nagendra R.] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Transportat Syst Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India		Kalbar, PP (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn CUSE, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.; Kalbar, PP (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Programme IDP Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.	deepjyoti.das10@iitb.ac.in; kalbar@iitb.ac.in; n.r.velaga@iitb.ac.in	Kalbar, Pradip/N-2734-2015; Das, Deepjyoti/ABF-8015-2021	Kalbar, Pradip/0000-0002-1436-3609; Das, Deepjyoti/0000-0002-6726-2094				Adhikari M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124850; Alhindawi R, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219152; [Anonymous], 2017, HINDU; ARAI Emission factor development for Indian vehicles, 2007, EM FACT DEV IND VEH; Azar D, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V130, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.022; Bhatnagar R., 2018, INT C EXH SMART GRID, P361, DOI [10.1007/978-981-32-9119-5_30, DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9119-5_30]; Bjorn A, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.001; CEA, 2020, EX SUMM POW SECT OCT; City population, 2019, INDIA STATES MAJOR A; CMP, 2016, COMPREHENSIVE MOBILI; Creutzig F, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P268, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1; Dhar S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.076; Dhar S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V146, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.111; Egbue O, 2017, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V19, P1927, DOI 10.1007/s10098-017-1375-4; Gai YJ, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114983; Garg A, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V58, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.018; GHGPlatform, 2017, STAT LEV EST; GHGProtocol, 2019, PROD LIF CYCL REP ST; Ghosh A, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13102602; Goel R, 2015, ATMOS ENVIRON, V105, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.045; GoI, 2019, FAME IND SCHEM; GOI, 2018, POW SECT MARCH 2O18; Henderson J, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1993, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1744422; ICCT, 2020, UPD GLOB TRANS EL VE; IEA,, 2019, REN 2019 MARK AN FOR; IIASA, 2014, AR5 SCEN DAT VERS 1; INDC, 2015, IND INDC UNFCC; Jones G.W., 2013, POPULATION CHANGE MI; Kalbar P.P., 2019, LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINAB, P205, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00010-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00010-5]; Kalbar PP, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V91, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.032; Manjunath A, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V102, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.003; Martin NPD, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P3093, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04746; Mittal S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V44, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.002; MMRDA, 2008, COMPREHENSIVE TRANSP; Mokariya MKashyap L, 2015, WORLD ELECTR VEHIC J, V7, P2; MOUD, 2008, URBAN TRANSPORT ENV; NANGINI P, 2019, NAT SCI DATA, P180, DOI DOI 10.1038/SDATA.2018.280; Nimesh V, 2020, ENERGY, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116976; NITI Aayog, 2017, IND LEAPS AH TRANSF; Paladugula AL, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V116, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.037; Pan J, 2003, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1021366620577; Parikh KS, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V120, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.014; Peters DR, 2020, GEOHEALTH, V4, P275, DOI 10.1029/2020GH000275; Rogelj J, 2016, NATURE, V534, P631, DOI 10.1038/nature18307; Rogelj J, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P519, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2572; Singh B, 2013, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V25, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2013.09.002; Soni AR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1579, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.216; Statista, 2019, SHAR TRANSP IND 2018; TERI, 2015, ENV STAT REP MUMB ME, P707; Teske S, 2019, ACHIEVING THE PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT GOALS: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY SCENARIOS WITH NON-ENERGY GHG PATHWAYS FOR +1.5(DEGREE)C AND +2(DEGREE)C, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2; Tran M, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P328, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1429; UN, 2016, EM GAP REP 2016; UNFCC, 2016, NAT DET CONTR NDCS; van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P95, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]; WRI, 2019, IND GREENH GAS PROGR; Xue MQ, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124402; Zhang RS, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6658	57	4	4	0	8	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 1	2021	295								126321	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126321	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126321		FEB 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	RP0WN					2022-09-08	WOS:000641457400011
J	Leon, J; Martin-Campo, FJ; Ortuno, MT; Vitoriano, B; Carrasco, LM; Narvarte, L				Leon, Javier; Martin-Campo, F. Javier; Ortuno, M. Teresa; Vitoriano, Begona; Carrasco, Luis Miguel; Narvarte, Luis			A methodology for designing electrification programs for remote areas	CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH			English	Article						Sustainable development; Photovoltaic energy; Maintenance; Integer optimization; Expert systems	RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; SOLAR; SYSTEMS; PV	One of the UN Sustainable Development Goals is the supply of sustainable energy even where no electrical grid is available. The photovoltaic rural electrification programs are the most common systems implemented in remote areas, especially in developing countries. These programs include the systems installation and their maintenance for a given period. Installation costs and even spare parts costs over time are usually well estimated. However, design and cost estimation of the maintenance systems is a difficult task, whose wrong management has often resulted in the failure of these electrification programs. In this work, a methodology for designing maintenance systems and estimating costs is presented. The methodology includes a mixed integer linear programming model and a rule based expert system. The mathematical programming model allows obtaining the optimal size and accurate cost estimation of a maintenance system, based on precise information about the installed systems. This model is calibrated and validated with real running programs and will be used to get an enlarged data set of simulated cases if needed. The rule based expert system is obtained from the data set applying classification and regression methods with general information about the region and program to be run. It can be used for designing programs or for companies making decisions about being involved in a program to be developed. The methodology has been applied to real Morocco programs.	[Leon, Javier; Martin-Campo, F. Javier; Ortuno, M. Teresa; Vitoriano, Begona] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Matemat, Inst Matemat Interdisciplinar IMI, HUM LOG Res Grp, Plaza Ciencias 3, Madrid 28040, Spain; [Carrasco, Luis Miguel; Narvarte, Luis] Univ Politecn Madrid, Inst Energia Solar IES, Carretera Valencia Km 7, Madrid 28031, Spain		Leon, J (corresponding author), Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Matemat, Inst Matemat Interdisciplinar IMI, HUM LOG Res Grp, Plaza Ciencias 3, Madrid 28040, Spain.	javileon@ucm.es; javier.martin.campo@mat.ucm.es; tortuno@mat.ucm.es; bvitoriano@mat.ucm.es; luismiguel.carrasco@ies-def.upm.es; navarte@ies-def.upm.es	Narvarte, Luis/X-6812-2019; Martín-Campo, F. Javier/D-8609-2012; Vitoriano, Begoña/S-7937-2016; Ortuno Sanchez, M. Teresa/H-1942-2015	Narvarte, Luis/0000-0002-6289-7605; Vitoriano, Begoña/0000-0002-3356-6049; Martin-Campo, F. Javier/0000-0001-7584-4062; CARRASCO MORENO, LUIS MIGUEL/0000-0002-3746-0620; Leon, Javier/0000-0002-1967-908X; Ortuno Sanchez, M. Teresa/0000-0002-5568-9496				Borah RR, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V54, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.309; Cabraal A., 1996, BEST PRACTICES PHOTO; Carrasco LM, 2016, ENERGY, V117, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.073; Carrasco LM, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V20, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.073; Chaurey A, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P2266, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.005; Division for Sustainable Development U. N., 2015, SUST DEV GOALS; Domenech B, 2022, ANN OPER RES, V312, P1375, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03195-1; Ellegard A, 2004, RENEW ENERG, V29, P1251, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.019; Garcia-Bernabeu A, 2016, ANN OPER RES, V245, P163, DOI 10.1007/s10479-015-1836-2; Gomez-Hernandez DF, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V129, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.004; Hernandez-Callejo L, 2019, SOL ENERGY, V188, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.017; International Finance Corporation, 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT; Kanagawa M, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P2016, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.041; Lemaire X, 2011, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.005; Lemaire X, 2009, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2009.01.001; Carrasco LM, 2013, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V21, P1136, DOI 10.1002/pip.2218; Sharif I, 2013, ENRGY PROCED, V33, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.075; van der Vleuten F, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P1439, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.001; Wamukonya N, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.019	19	5	5	2	4	SPRINGER	NEW YORK	ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES	1435-246X	1613-9178		CENT EUR J OPER RES	Cent. Europ. J. Oper. Res.	DEC	2020	28	4			SI		1265	1290		10.1007/s10100-019-00649-6	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-019-00649-6			26	Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Operations Research & Management Science	OC9CC		hybrid, Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000579451500005
J	Principato, L; Ruini, L; Guidi, M; Secondi, L				Principato, Ludovica; Ruini, Luca; Guidi, Matteo; Secondi, Luca			Adopting the circular economy approach on food loss and waste: The case of Italian pasta production	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Food loss and waste; Circular economy; Food supply chain; Pasta production; FLW standard; Agri-food chain	MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; CHALLENGES	Food loss and waste (FLW) is one of the most serious social, economic and environmental issues undermining our planet's sustainability, and by reducing it some UN Sustainable Development Goals may be achieved. The European Commission Circular Economy (CE) Package foresees FLW prevention, but to date few studies have adopted the CE perspective for analysing FLW. In 2017 only 20% of the world's 50 largest food companies have established FLW reduction programs. However, reducing FLW is also beneficial for company economic sustainability since it was observed that for every dollar invested in reducing FLW there is a saving of 14 dollars in operating costs. Therefore, main aim of this research is to quantify the main FLW and their causes along the FSC of the pasta production and to understand if these FLW could be reused according to the CE approach. Based on a single case study analysis, for the first time, this study quantifies FLW along the pasta supply chain, emphasizing FLW valorisation from a CE perspective using the global Food Loss and Waste Accounting and Reporting Standard. Our results show that pasta supply chain is a good example of CE as little is lost. Food losses in the field are very limited (less than 2%), while the straw obtained during the harvest is normally used as animal feed and litter. The losses generated during the grinding of the wheat and pasta production amounted to approximately 2%. In line with previous literature, most FLW occurs during the cultivation and consumption, thus demonstrating that further research is required in order to reduce FLW in these two supply chain phases.	[Principato, Ludovica] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Business Studies, Via Silvio DAmico 77, I-00145 Rome, Italy; [Ruini, Luca] Barilla G&R Flli, Supply Chain Dept, Via Mantova 166, I-43122 Parma, Italy; [Guidi, Matteo] Last Minute Market, Via Jacopo della Lana 3-A, I-40137 Bologna, Italy; [Secondi, Luca] Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forest Syst DIBAF, Via SC De Lellis Snc, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy		Principato, L (corresponding author), Roma Tre Univ, Dept Business Studies, Via Silvio DAmico 77, I-00145 Rome, Italy.	ludovica.principato@uniroma3.it; luca.ruini@barilla.com; matteo@lastminutemarket.com; secondi@unitus.it	Secondi, Luca/AAA-9715-2020	Secondi, Luca/0000-0001-8437-0444	Barilla G. & R. F.lli (Supply Chain Group)	Barilla G. & R. F.lli (Supply Chain Group)	This work was partially funded by Barilla G. & R. F.lli (Supply Chain Group). The authors thank all those employed in the Supply Chain Group of Barilla G. & R. F.lli for their enthusiasm and collaboration in this study. In particular, they are grateful to Nicola Cornini for his constant effort and availability.	Aschemann, 2017, FOOD WASTE REDUCTION, P43, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50088-1_4; Champions 12.3, 2018, ROAD MAP ACH SDG TAR; Chen R., 2015, IND BIOTECHNOL, V11, P127, DOI [10.1089/ind.2014.0029, DOI 10.1089/IND.2014.0029]; CIRAIG, 2015, CIRC EC CRIT LIT REV; Davoodi M. J. S., 2010, American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, V8, P104; Din M.U., 2015, INT J RES, V2, P20; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557; Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMAF), 2015, GROWTH CIRC EC VIS C; European Commission, 2014, HOR 2020 WORK PROGR, P1; FAO, 2013, GEOECONOMICS; Garcia-Garcia G, 2017, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V8, P2209, DOI 10.1007/s12649-016-9720-0; Gehman J., 2017, SYNTH SUMM SHOWC S H; Grizzetti B, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V33, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.013; Gustavsson J., 2011, GLOBAL FOOD LOSSES F; Halloran A, 2014, FOOD POLICY, V49, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.09.005; Ingrao C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.267; Jimenez-Rivero A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V167, P1335, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.068; Kim MH, 2013, INT J ENERGY ENVIR E, V4, DOI 10.1186/2251-6832-4-1; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Korhonen J, 2018, ECOL ECON, V143, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041; Michelini L, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.009; Mihai FC, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1631, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.163; Mohan SV, 2016, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V34, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.012; Mondejar-Jimenez JA, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V138, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.018; Monier V., 2010, PREPARATORY STUDY FO; Murray A., 2015, J BUS ETHICS; Principato L., 2018, FOOD WASTE CONSUMER; Principato L, 2018, INT J HOSP MANAG, V74, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.02.022; Principato L, 2015, BRIT FOOD J, V117, P731, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-10-2013-0314; Quested TE, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V79, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011; Redlingshofer B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.173; Reike D, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027; RUGGIERI A, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI [DOI 10.3390/su8111153, DOI 10.3390/SU8111153]; Sarti S., 2017, EC POLICY ENERGY ENV, V2017, P1; Schott ABS, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V101, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004; Secondi L, 2015, FOOD POLICY, V56, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.007; Shamabadi Z., 2012, International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS), V4, P1797; Stenmarck A., 2016, ESTIMATES EUROPEAN F; Takata M, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V432, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.049; Topi C., 2017, FOOD WASTE REDUCTION, P25, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50088-1_3; United Nations General Assembly, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, DOI [10.1007/s13398- 014-0173-7.2, DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2]; Valenti F., 2017, ITALY CHEM ENG T, V58, P529, DOI DOI 10.3303/CET1758089; Valenti F, 2017, J AGRIC ENG, V48, P196, DOI 10.4081/jae.2017.727; van Geffen E., 2016, CAUSES DETERMINANTS; Volpe R, 2016, FUEL, V183, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.044; Waste Watcher, 2013, SPRECH AL FAM IT; Xu FQ, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V247, P1047, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020; Yin R.K., 2009, CASE STUDY RES, V4; Yin R. K., 1994, CASE STUDY RES, V2	49	75	76	10	91	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV	AMSTERDAM	PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	MAY	2019	144						82	89		10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.025	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.025			8	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HP2VZ					2022-09-08	WOS:000461534800010
J	Erauskin-Tolosa, A; Bueno, G; Etxano, I; Tamayo, U; Garcia, M; de Blas, M; Perez-Iribarren, E; Zuazo, I; Torre-Pascual, E; Akizu-Gardoki, O				Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar; Bueno, Gorka; Etxano, Iker; Tamayo, Unai; Garcia, Maria; de Blas, Maite; Perez-Iribarren, Estibaliz; Zuazo, Inaki; Torre-Pascual, Eduardo; Akizu-Gardoki, Ortzi			Social organisational LCA for the academic activity of the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT			English	Article						Social organisational LCA; SO-LCA; Higher education institution; Soca; Social footprint; Social debt; SDG	INSTITUTIONS; GUIDANCE; DEBT	Purpose This article aims to estimate the social footprint of a higher education institution (HEI) and its potential contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. The social organisational life cycle assessment (SO-LCA) of the academic activity of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), in northern Spain, has been performed, in order to estimate its social impacts. Method The assessment has been run using openLCA software and supported on the PSILCA-based Soca add-on for the Ecoinvent v3.3 database, covering 53 social indicators for almost 15,000 industrial sectors and goods in 189 countries. Results and discussion The analysis undertaken reflects social impacts and associated risk levels for four stakeholders: Workers, Local Community, Society, and Value Chain Actors. Labour activity in the UPV/EHU is the sub-process with the greatest social impact, followed by processes related to transport, energy, materials, and waste management. Among the socio-economic context which supports the academic activity of the UPV/EHU (indirect impacts), the existence of traces of child labour and illiteracy outside the Basque Country stands out. Further analysis would be required in order to more accurately determine the geographical location of such impacts, and also to better tackle the concept of social debt. Conclusion SO-LCA may have great potential for HEIs, helping them to identify hotspots, reduce their social footprint, and raise awareness among the academic community, which undoubtedly contributes to the knowledge, progress, human values, and sustainability these HEIs stand for.	[Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar] Univ Basque Country, Dept Appl Econ, UPV EHU, Onati Plaza 1, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain; [Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar] Univ Basque Country, GEZKI Inst Social Econ & Cooperat Law, UPV EHU, Elhuyar Plaza, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain; [Bueno, Gorka; Perez-Iribarren, Estibaliz] Univ Basque Country, Dept Elect Engn, UPV EHU, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain; [Bueno, Gorka; Etxano, Iker] Univ Basque Country, Hegoa Inst Int Cooperat & Dev Studies, UPV EHU, Lehendakari Agirre Etorbidea 83, Bilbao 48015, Spain; [Bueno, Gorka; Etxano, Iker; Akizu-Gardoki, Ortzi] Univ Basque Country, EKOPOL Res Grp, UPV EHU, Sarriena Z-G, Leioa 48940, Spain; [Etxano, Iker] Univ Basque Country, Dept Appl Econ, UPV EHU, Sarriena Auzoa Z-G, Leioa 48940, Spain; [Tamayo, Unai] Univ Basque Country, Dept Finance Econ 2, UPV EHU, Lehendakari Agirre Etorbidea 83, Bilbao 48015, Spain; [Garcia, Maria] Univ Basque Country, Dept Appl Econ, UPV EHU, Comandante Izarduy 23, Vitoria 01006, Spain; [de Blas, Maite; Torre-Pascual, Eduardo] Univ Basque Country, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, UPV EHU, Ingeniero Torres Quevedo Plaza 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain; [Zuazo, Inaki; Akizu-Gardoki, Ortzi] Univ Basque Country, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, UPV EHU, Ingeniero Torres Quevedo Plaza 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain		Erauskin-Tolosa, A (corresponding author), Univ Basque Country, Dept Appl Econ, UPV EHU, Onati Plaza 1, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain.; Erauskin-Tolosa, A (corresponding author), Univ Basque Country, GEZKI Inst Social Econ & Cooperat Law, UPV EHU, Elhuyar Plaza, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain.	artitzar.erauskin@ehu.eus	Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar/ABI-3350-2020; DE BLAS MARTIN, MAITE/B-4429-2017; Bueno, Gorka/L-6362-2014	Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar/0000-0002-4527-7180; Garcia-Alvarez, Maria/0000-0003-1822-3264; DE BLAS MARTIN, MAITE/0000-0002-6621-1682; ZUAZO URIONABARRENETXEA, Inaki/0000-0003-2427-3946; DE LA TORRE PASCUAL, EDUARDO/0000-0002-9868-9533; Bueno, Gorka/0000-0003-3461-5567	Basque Government [IT-1365-19]; University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [GIC-18/22]	Basque Government(Basque Government); University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU	This research has been supported by "Ekopol: Iraunkortasunerako Bideak" research group, recognised by the Basque Government (IT-1365-19) and the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU (GIC-18/22).	Benoit C., 2013, METHODOLOGICAL SHEET; Ciroth A, 2016, PSILCA PRODUCT SOCIA; Ciroth A, 2007, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V12, P209, DOI 10.1065/lca2007.06.337; D'Eusanio M, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P1119, DOI 10.1007/s11367-020-01746-4; Di Noi C, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P332, DOI 10.1007/s11367-019-01678-8; Doumpos M., 2019, NEW PERSPECTIVES MUL; Eisfeldt, 2017, SOCA V 1 ADD ON ADDI; Eustat, EUST; FIGUEIRA J., 2016, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE; Forin S, 2019, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V24, P866, DOI 10.1007/s11367-018-1533-x; Franze A, 2011, LCA ECOLABELED NOTEB, P409; Gompf K, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P1883, DOI 10.1007/s11367-020-01788-8; Hauschild MZ., 2018, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3]; Almanza AMH, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P1833, DOI 10.1007/s11367-020-01789-7; Jarosch L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031259; Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, 2017, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V22, P1928, DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1289-8; Silva DAL, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V94, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.001; Lozano R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048; Martinez-Blanco J, 2015, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V20, P1586, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0960-1; Martinez-Blanco J, 2015, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V20, P1045, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0912-9; Martinez-Blanco J, 2015, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V20, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0883-x; Martnez-Blanco J, 2018, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_20, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_20]; Mazijn, 2009, UNEP SETAC LIFE CYCL; Moltesen A, 2018, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN, P401, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_16, 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_16]; Neugebauer C, 2020, GUIDELINES SOCIAL LI; Numbeo, POLL BILB NUMB; Pelletier N., 2012, ORG ENV FOOTPRINT OE; Pelletier N, 2014, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V19, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0609-x; Pengue WA., 2005, B SCI TECHNOL SOC, V25, P314, DOI [10.1177/0270467605277290, DOI 10.1177/0270467605277290]; Perez-Iribarren E, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V315, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128019; Petti L, 2018, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V23, P422, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4; de Camara ES, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010392; Sinha P, 2010, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V60, P568, DOI 10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.568; Srinivasan UT, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P1768, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0709562104; Torras M, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P2161, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.09.001; UNEP/SETAC, GUID ORG LIF CYCL AS; UPV/EHU, PAN IND DES SOST UPV; UPV/EHU, UPV EHU FIG; UPV/EHU, 2019, EHUAGENDA 2030 SUST; URA, BASQ OFF WAT UR EUSK; Werker J, 2019, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V19, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.006	41	4	4	3	19	SPRINGER HEIDELBERG	HEIDELBERG	TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY	0948-3349	1614-7502		INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS	Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.	AUG	2021	26	8					1648	1669		10.1007/s11367-021-01940-y	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01940-y		JUL 2021	22	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UC5QJ		hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000673835600001
J	Wutich, A; Jepson, WE; Stoler, J; Thomson, P; Kooy, M; Brewis, A; Staddon, C; Meehan, K				Wutich, Amber; Jepson, Wendy E.; Stoler, Justin; Thomson, Patrick; Kooy, Michelle; Brewis, Alexandra; Staddon, Chad; Meehan, Katie			A Global Agenda for Household Water Security: Measurement, Monitoring, and Management	JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION			English	Article						water security; measurement; interventions; monitoring and evaluation; governance	DAR-ES-SALAAM; DECISION-SUPPORT; ACCESS; GIS; INFRASTRUCTURE; INSECURITY; CHALLENGES; QUALITY; SERVICES; SYSTEM	Water scholarship has advanced considerably in recent decades. Despite this remarkable progress, water challenges may be growing more quickly than our capacity to solve them. While much progress has been made toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6 - water and sanitation for all - new stressors have emerged to threaten this progress. Far from being a problem of the Global South, recent research shows that water insecurity is very much a global phenomenon - and one that has been, until recently, seriously neglected in the Global North. This indicates a strong need for innovative measurement of who experiences water insecurity, new approaches for monitoring the efficacy of water interventions, and more effective management of complex, mobile, and multiple water infrastructures to achieve water security. In this paper, we introduce the Household Water Insecurity approach to addressing these concerns. First, we suggest ways to improve the measurement of water insecurity - pinpointing problems at the household and individual levels - in ways that can inform policymaking with improved precision. Second, we discuss ways that new information and communication technology can improve monitoring and indicate where water infrastructure repairs and investments are most needed. Third, we highlight the need for new approaches to managing complex water infrastructures in more inclusive and democratic ways.	[Wutich, Amber; Brewis, Alexandra] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA; [Jepson, Wendy E.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn, TX 77843 USA; [Jepson, Wendy E.] Texas A&M AgriLife Res College Stn, Texas Water Resources Inst, College Stn, TX USA; [Stoler, Justin] Univ Miami, Dept Geog & Sustainable Dev, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA; [Stoler, Justin] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33136 USA; [Thomson, Patrick] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England; [Kooy, Michelle] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Dept Human Geog Planning & Int Dev Studies, Delft, Netherlands; [Kooy, Michelle] Univ Amsterdam Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Staddon, Chad] Univ West England Bristol, Dept Geog & Environm Management, Bristol, Avon, England; [Meehan, Katie] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London, England		Wutich, A (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.	awutich@asu.edu	Stoler, Justin/AAY-8224-2021; Kooy, Michelle/C-3894-2013	Stoler, Justin/0000-0001-8435-7012; Wutich, Amber/0000-0003-4164-1632; Meehan, Katie/0000-0001-8330-4736; Jepson, Wendy/0000-0002-7693-1376; Kooy, Michelle/0000-0003-3226-9939	U.S. National Science Foundation [BCS-1759972, EEC-1449500, GCR-2021147]; Lloyd's Register Foundation [00068]	U.S. National Science Foundation(National Science Foundation (NSF)); Lloyd's Register Foundation	We thank Dr. Zhuping Sheng for the invitation to participate in this special issue. We acknowledge the U.S. National Science Foundation grants that supported our work: Household Water Insecurity Experiences Research Coordination Network (HWISE RCN) (Award BCS-1759972), Coevolution of social and physical infrastructure and improved access to clean water in informal water sharing system (Award GCR-2021147), Nanosystems Engineering Research Center on Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (EEC-1449500), and the Lloyd's Register Foundation (Grant #00068).	Allen A, 2017, URBAN RES PRACT, V10, P22, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2016.1197306; Anand N., 2017, HYDRAULIC CITY WATER; Aranda-Jan CB, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-188; Bakker K, 2012, SCIENCE, V337, P914, DOI 10.1126/science.1226337; Bhuyian MSI, 2020, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V25, P985, DOI 10.1111/tmi.13414; Bladon KD, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P8936, DOI 10.1021/es500130g; Boateng GO, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149; Brewis A, 2019, AM J HUM BIOL, V31, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23234; Choudhary N, 2020, J WATER HEALTH, V18, P579, DOI 10.2166/wh.2020.024; Deedat H., 2002, COST RECOVERY CRISIS, P81; Dugard J, 2008, S AFR J HUM RIGHTS, V24, P593, DOI 10.1080/19962126.2008.11864972; Erban Laura E, 2019, Front Built Environ, V5, P1, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00124; Fa?anha I., 2019, WH2O J GENDER WATER, V6; Franceys, 2014, LIMITS POSSIBILITIES; Furlong K, 2017, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V41, P888, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12582; Furlong K, 2014, TECHNOL SOC, V38, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.04.001; Geere JA, 2017, WATER ALTERN, V10, P513; Geere JAL, 2018, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000764; Greeff H, 2019, IEEE SENS J, V19, P1820, DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2882866; Hadley C, 2009, HUM ORGAN, V68, P451, DOI 10.17730/humo.68.4.932w421317680w5x; Hoque SF, 2020, WATER ECON POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X19500115; Hoque SF, 2018, WATER POLICY, V20, P725, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.179; Hutchings M., 2012, MWASH MOBILE PHONE A; Jayarathna L, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V32, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.012; Jepson Wendy, 2017, Water Security, V1, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.07.001; Jepson WE, 2021, BMJ OPEN, V11, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040825; Jepson WE, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1214; Juuti P, 2019, RESILIENT WATER SERV, P250; Kugler TA, 2019, POPUL ENVIRON, V41, P209, DOI 10.1007/s11111-019-00326-5; Lama, 2014, SUST WATER SAN SERV; Larson, 2020, JUST ADD WATER SOLVI; Loftus, 2019, WATER POLITICS, P189; Mahlaba B.J., 2014, THESIS; Mapulanga AM, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P8249, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1814970116; Mechael PB, 2010, BARRIERS GAPS AFFECT; Meehan K, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P28700, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007361117; Meehan K, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1486; Molden OC, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P130, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.116; Mukherjee S, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7030091; Mumbo G., 2013, P 36 WEDC INT C NAK; Nagel C, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P14292, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04077; Nganyanyuka K, 2014, HABITAT INT, V44, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.003; O'Donnell EL, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1368; Octavianti T, 2021, WIRES WATER, V8, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1516; Onda K, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P880, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9030880; Pacheco-Vega R, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040658; Patil R, 2020, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101435; Pauloo RA, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6f10; Pearson AL, 2016, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12942-016-0062-8; Pooi CK, 2018, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41545-018-0011-0; Proctor C.R., 2020, AWWA WATER SCI, V2, pe1183, DOI 10.1002/aws2.1183; Rodina L, 2016, WATER ALTERN, V9, P336; Rosinger AY, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1468; Satterthwaite D, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P181, DOI 10.1630/095624703101286628; Schuster RC, 2020, AM J HUM BIOL, V32, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23357; Sheikh, 2017, INFORMAL SECTOR INNO; Sultana F, 2018, WATER INT, V43, P483, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2018.1458272; Tait P, 2012, ECOL ECON, V75, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.009; Tellman B, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0209470; Thomas E, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V727, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138772; Thomson P., 2012, Waterlines, V31, P280, DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.2012.031; Thomson P, 2016, AQUAT PR, V6, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.06.010; Thomson P, 2012, J HYDROINFORM, V14, P829, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2012.183; Tomaz P, 2020, PROF GEOGR, V72, P481, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2020.1750439; Tsai AC, 2016, J WATER HEALTH, V14, P280, DOI 10.2166/wh.2015.165; Turman-Bryant N, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113046; Umar A., 2017, LOC ACT INT COOP IMP; Vallabh P, 2016, CONSERV BIOL, V30, P540, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12701; White G, 1972, DRAWERS WATER; Wutich A, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1461; Wutich A, 2020, AM J HUM BIOL, V32, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23350; Wutich A, 2020, AM J HUM BIOL, V32, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23345; Wutich Amber, 2017, Water Secur, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.09.001; Wutich A, 2009, FIELD METHOD, V21, P49, DOI 10.1177/1525822X08325673; Wutich A, 2008, SOC SCI MED, V67, P2116, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.042; Xie HJ, 2009, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V26, P53, DOI 10.1080/10286600802003666; Yang HY, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V14, DOI 10.1007/s11783-020-1254-9; Young SL, 2021, AM J TROP MED HYG, V104, P391, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0417; Young SL, 2019, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001750; Young SL, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023558; Zeilhofer P, 2007, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V23, P875, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2007000400015; Zhou JF, 2020, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41545-020-00089-9	82	2	2	3	7	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1093-474X	1752-1688		J AM WATER RESOUR AS	J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.	AUG	2021	57	4					530	538		10.1111/1752-1688.12926	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12926		MAY 2021	9	Engineering, Environmental; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Geology; Water Resources	UB5VJ		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000655127400001
J	Abdalla, H; Rahmat-Ullah, Z; Abdallah, M; Alsmadi, S; Elashwah, N				Abdalla, Hadeer; Rahmat-Ullah, Zakiya; Abdallah, Mohamed; Alsmadi, Sara; Elashwah, Nadeen			Eco-efficiency analysis of integrated grey and black water management systems	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Source separation; Decentralization; Wastewater management; Conventional sewer system; Grey water treatment	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREYWATER; SCALE; SUSTAINABILITY; FEASIBILITY; IMPACT; REUSE	Unconventional wastewater management systems have been developed to cope with the ever-increasing demand on the existing infrastructure. Grey water separation and treatment emerged to address the limitations of conventional sanitation systems. Towards achieving key sustainable development goals, this study aims to assess the performance of grey and black water separation alternatives with on-site treatment (SOT) or dual collection (SDC), compared to conventional collection and treatment (CCT). The on-site treated grey water in the SOT scenario was used for toilet flushing, leading to 25% reduction in domestic water demand. A novel manhole configuration was designed to suit the dual sewer collection network in the SDC scenario, where the sewercollected grey water was conveyed directly to the tertiary treatment stage due to its low solids and organic load. A comprehensive, cost-integrated life cycle analysis was carried out to quantify the environmental impacts and assess the financial feasibility of the examined wastewater management systems. An eco-efficiency analysis was conducted to aggregate the results of life cycle costing (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA). The proposed collection and treatment alternatives were applied on a residential development in Dubai based on local design guidelines. Results of the environmental assessment indicated that SOT had the highest impacts in all midpoint impact categories with a single score of 1.27, followed by CCT (0.94) and SDC (0.89) systems. Over 50-year assessment period, the LCC findings revealed close net present values of CCT and SDC systems ($30 and 25 million, respectively), compared to SOT system ($8 million). The environmental impacts and financial burdens of the SOT system were reduced by 54 and 59%, respectively, when the treated grey water was reused instead of potable water for toilet flushing. The eco-efficiency analysis indicated that the SDC is the most sustainable system. Overall, this research emphasized the potential environmental and financial benefits of grey water separation, collection and treatment systems taking into consideration the entire urban water cycle.	[Abdalla, Hadeer; Rahmat-Ullah, Zakiya; Abdallah, Mohamed; Alsmadi, Sara; Elashwah, Nadeen] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah 27272, U Arab Emirates		Abdallah, M (corresponding author), Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah 27272, U Arab Emirates.	mabdallah@sharjah.ac.ae		Elashwah, Nadeen/0000-0002-6452-0019; Abdallah, Mohamed/0000-0002-4304-7234				Abdallah M, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106378; Abdallah M, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V82, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.029; [Anonymous], 2012, 14045 ISO; [Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO; [Anonymous], 2014, WASTEWATER ENG TREAT; [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 140442006 ENV MA; [Anonymous], 2006, APP 2 DOC EXP FUNCT; Baptista A.J., 2014, ENERGY RELATED TECHN, P11, DOI [10.13140/2.1.2409.5520, DOI 10.13140/2.1.2409.5520]; Besson M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126868; Bocquier P, 2005, DEMOGR RES, V12, P197, DOI 10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9; Burn L.S., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00018-3, 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00018-3]; Central Public Health & Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO), 2013, ENG DES CONSTR SEW A; Chaosakul T, 2014, J ENVIRON SCI HEAL A, V49, P1316, DOI 10.1080/10934529.2014.910071; Cornejo PK, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P6680, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b05055; DEWA, 2016, GUID NEW DEV PROJ WA; El-Ghonemy AMK, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P6566, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.026; Environmetal Protection Agency (EPA), 2017, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS; European Commission, 2014, 10277929525 EUR COMM; Friedler E, 2006, DESALINATION, V190, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.007; Gawad M.A., 2016, WORLD C CIV STRUCT E, P16, DOI [10.11159/awspt16.111, DOI 10.11159/AWSPT16.111]; Green W, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V51, P29, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0348; Guest JS, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V61, P1637, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.880; Ibrahim R., 2017, LOWL TECHNOL INT, V19, P131; Jeong H, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.193; Jolliet O, 2003, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V8, P324, DOI 10.1007/BF02978505; Kampschreur MJ, 2009, WATER RES, V43, P4093, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.001; Kobayashi Y, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105215; Koskela M, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P546, DOI 10.1002/bse.741; Kujawa-Roeleveld Katarzyna, 2006, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, V5, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11157-005-5789-9; Kumar S., 2013, TNDS18508 DUB MUN; Leong JYC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P1211, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.046; Li FY, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P3439, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004; Liberman N, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P1219, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1112-4; Listowski A., 2011, J WATER SUSTAINABILI, V1, P113; Liu XM, 2019, WATER RES, V162, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.07.016; Loosdrecht M. van, 2012, Water 21, P17; Lundin M, 2000, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V34, P180, DOI 10.1021/es990003f; Menoufi K.A.I., 2011, OVERVIEW LIFE CYCLE; Mourad KA, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2447, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.004; Oh KS, 2015, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V3, P1146, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.022; Oldenburg M, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V56, P251, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.578; Opher T, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V182, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.080; Penn R, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P137, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2011.652132; Pradhan S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.226; Oviedo-Ocana ER, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P19200, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-8710-5; Schertenleib R, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V51, P7, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0345; Schramm E, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11122597; Shanableh A, 2020, DESALIN WATER TREAT, V179, P211, DOI 10.5004/dwt.2020.25048; Thaher RA, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061679; Thibodeau C, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V92, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.004; Thibodeau C, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V67, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.012; Va V, 2019, INT J GEOMATE, V17, P219, DOI 10.21660/2019.60.ICEE3; van Voorthuizen E, 2008, WATER RES, V42, P4334, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.012; Weidema B P, 2013, SWISS CENT LIFE CYCL, V3, P169; Weiss P, 2008, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V52, P1153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.004; World Bank, 2019, WORLD DEV IND POP GR; World Bank, 2015, WORLD DEV IND EL PRO; Yerri S, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.016; Yusuf RO, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P5059, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.008; Zhu J, 2018, J WATER REUSE DESAL, V8, P1, DOI 10.2166/wrd.2016.086	60	5	5	3	17	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	SEP	2021	172								105681	10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105681	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105681		JUN 2021	14	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	TF4PL					2022-09-08	WOS:000670700700022
J	Banson, KE; Asare, DK; Dery, FD; Boakye, K; Boniface, A; Asamoah, M; Awotwe, LE				Banson, Kwamina Ewur; Asare, Daniel Kwasi; Dery, Fidelis Doodaa; Boakye, Kwadwo; Boniface, Akudugu; Asamoah, Moses; Awotwe, Lourees Esi			Impact of Fall Armyworm on Farmer's Maize: Systemic Approach	SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH			English	Article						Systems thinking; Fall armyworm; Impact; CLDs; Maize production	SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THINKING APPROACH; SPODOPTERA-FRUGIPERDA; DECISION-MAKING; FOOD SECURITY; MANAGEMENT; MIGRATION; AFRICA; LEPIDOPTERA; UNCERTAINTY	Fall armyworm (FAW) infestation in African countries presents significant threats to maize production. Such infestation has major economic implications in terms of the cost of measures taken at individual and international levels. Today's problems cannot be solve with the same thinking which created them. Past interventions have generally resulted in policy revision from The MDGs to SDGs with little success. The complex nature of agri-business has necessitated the use of a systemic approach in solving operational problems. The study used a systemic approach to develop systems models that determine the components of current systems and its interaction with policies, social, environmental and economic dimensions of the agriculture industry. Results indicates that only by increasing our appreciation for "systemic approach" that addresses the needs of the present while safeguarding earth's life-support system, can our social institutions achieve some modicum of effective control and stability. The systems models will help governments and agricultural proponents to anticipate the long-term consequences of their decisions and actions, as well as help to avoid any unintended consequences of policies and strategies such as 'silo mentality' and 'organizational myopia'. As demonstrated in the aforementioned CLD and archetype, agriculture projects will continue to be the engine that develops and empowers the emerging and existing commercial business, and nation building across Africa. This systems thinking approach will provide more clarity in dealing with the complex management challenges and gradually replace the traditional theoretical approach of dealing with agricultural project management.	[Banson, Kwamina Ewur; Boakye, Kwadwo; Boniface, Akudugu; Asamoah, Moses] Ghana Atom Energy Commiss, Biotechnol & Nucl Agr Res Inst, Socioecon & Commercialisat Unit, Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana; [Banson, Kwamina Ewur; Asare, Daniel Kwasi] Univ Ghana, Sch Nucl & Allied Sci, Atom Campus, Kwabenya, Accra, Ghana; [Dery, Fidelis Doodaa] Univ Ghana, Sch Nucl & Allied Sci, Audit Dept, Accra, Ghana; [Awotwe, Lourees Esi] Ghana Atom Energy Commiss, Biotechnol & Nucl Agr Res Inst, Ctr Biotechnol, Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana		Banson, KE (corresponding author), Ghana Atom Energy Commiss, Biotechnol & Nucl Agr Res Inst, Socioecon & Commercialisat Unit, Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana.; Banson, KE (corresponding author), Univ Ghana, Sch Nucl & Allied Sci, Atom Campus, Kwabenya, Accra, Ghana.	asskeroo@yahoo.com; dank5000asare@gmail.com	Banson, Kwamina/O-7174-2019	Banson, Kwamina/0000-0002-3957-4437				Adeyemo O. K., 2003, Environmentalist, V23, P297, DOI 10.1023/B:ENVR.0000031357.89548.fb; ALI A, 1989, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V18, P881, DOI 10.1093/ee/18.5.881; AllAfrica, 2018, US JOINS AFRICAS FIG; Allan C, 2009, ADAPTIVE ENV MANAGEM, V351; Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9; Amoah P, 2006, ARCH ENVIRON CON TOX, V50, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00244-004-0054-8; [Anonymous], 2018, DAILY GUIDE; [Anonymous], 2017, GHANAWEB; [Anonymous], 2018, DAILY NATION; Aracil J, 1997, MATH COMPUT SIMULAT, V44, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4754(97)00060-8; Armah FA, 2010, WATER-SUI, V2, P120, DOI 10.3390/w2020120; Asante S, 2018, GHANA LOSES US64 MIL; ASHLEY TR, 1989, FLA ENTOMOL, V72, P152, DOI 10.2307/3494982; Banson KE, 2015, INT J MARKETS BUSINE, V1, P289, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJMABS.2015.074208; Banson KE, 2018, SYSTEMS, V6, DOI 10.3390/systems6040035; Banson KE, 2018, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V35, P39, DOI 10.1002/sres.2437; Banson KE, 2016, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V33, P544, DOI 10.1002/sres.2372; Banson KE, 2015, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V32, P672, DOI 10.1002/sres.2270; Banson KE, 2016, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V33, P79, DOI 10.1002/sres.2300; Bempah CK, 2012, FOOD CONTROL, V25, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.11.035; Bertalanffy L von, 1972, ACAD MANAGE J, V15, P407, DOI [10.2307/255139, DOI 10.2307/255139]; Beuchelt TD, 2012, AGR HUM VALUES, V29, P259, DOI 10.1007/s10460-012-9355-0; Bosch O, 2011, IUAES AAS ASAANZ C; Bosch O. K., 2007, IMPROVING TRIPLE BOT, P57; Bosch OJH, 2013, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V30, P116, DOI 10.1002/sres.2171; Bosch OckieJ.H., 2013, BUSINESS SYSTEMS REV, V2, P48; Boskin MJ, 1998, J ECON PERSPECT, V12, P3, DOI 10.1257/jep.12.1.3; Brandt Eva, 2006, PARTICIPATORY DESIGN, P57, DOI [10.1145/1147261.1147271, DOI 10.1145/1147261.1147271]; Braun W., 2002, SYSTEM, V27; Caldwell R, 2012, J CHANG MANAG, V12, P145, DOI 10.1080/14697017.2011.647923; Capinera J L, 2000, FALL ARMYWORM SPODOP; Chapman Jake, 2004, SYSTEM FAILURE WHY G; CHECKLAND P, 1985, J OPER RES SOC, V36, P757, DOI 10.2307/2582164; Churchman C. W., 1979, SYSTEMS APPROACH ITS; Confederation N, 2005, LEADING EDGE, V10, P1; Day R., 2017, Outlooks on Pest Management, V28, P196, DOI 10.1564/v28_oct_02; Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 2018, A Z LIST PRED PAR PA; Doss CR, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P1987, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00109-2; Dunn WN, 2018, PROBLEM STRUCTURING; Everitt BJ, 2005, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P1481, DOI 10.1038/nn1579; FAO, 2018, FOOD CHAIN CRIS; FAO, 2017, SUST MAN FALL ARM AF; FAOSTAT, 2017, CROPS; Fliess M, 1999, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, V44, P922, DOI 10.1109/9.763209; FLOOD RL, 1991, SYSTEMS THINKING IN EUROPE, P43; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019, FAO S AFR JOIN HANDS; Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, 2018, ACH ZER HUNG AFR 202; Ford S., 1999, MODELING ENV INTRO S; Freire P., 2018, PEDAGOGY OPPRESSED; Ghanaweb, 2018, GHANAWEB; Gladwin CH, 2001, FOOD POLICY, V26, P177, DOI 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00045-2; GLADWIN TN, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P874, DOI 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024; Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383; Goergen G, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0165632; Graphic Online, 2018, GRAPHIC ONLINE; Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a; Grohs JR, 2018, THINK SKILLS CREAT, V28, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003; GSS Ghs Icf International, 2014, GHANA 2014 DEMOGRAPH; Hammond D, 2005, TRIPLEC-COMMUN CAPIT, V3, P20; Haraldsson H., 2000, INTRO SYSTEMS CAUSAL; Hatanaka M, 2005, FOOD POLICY, V30, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.006; Hjorth P, 2006, FUTURES, V38, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.005; IFPRI, 2018, MAL NEW REAL FALL AR; Jabeen F, 2015, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V187, DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4273-4; Jackson M. C., 2003, SYSTEMS THINKING CRE; Jackson MC, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V128, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00067-9; Jackson MC, 2010, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V27, P133, DOI 10.1002/sres.1020; JOHNSON SJ, 1987, INSECT SCI APPL, V8, P543, DOI 10.1017/S1742758400022591; Jones NA, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16; Kahneman D, 2011, THINKING FAST SLOW, V1; Kardaras D, 1999, INFORM SOFTWARE TECH, V41, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0950-5849(98)00125-6; Kebede M, 2018, ACAD AGR J, V3; Kim D.H., 1999, INTRO SYSTEMS THINKI, V16; Kim DH, 1993, PEGASUS COMMUNICATIO; Koranteng KA, 2018, FARMERS CRYING FALL; Kunc M., 2017, SYSTEM DYNAMICS SOFT; Lambert VA, 2012, PAC RIM INT J NURS R, V16, P255; Lannon C., 2012, CAUSAL LOOP CONSTRUC; Lim MML, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10182-230322; LOVELOCK JE, 1982, NATURE, V296, P561, DOI 10.1038/296561a0; Luchen SWS, 2018, FALL ARMY WORM THREA; Maani K., 2007, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; Maani K.E., 2000, SYSTEMS THINKING MOD; Maes S, 2018, THIS INVASIVE PEST I; Masweneng K, 2017, BUSINESSLIVE; Mingers J, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V207, P1147, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.019; Mirchi A, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P2421, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0024-2; Mofa, 2017, FALL ARM EN FOOD SEC; Nagoshi RN, 2009, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V38, P1546, DOI 10.1603/022.038.0605; Nguyen NC, 2016, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V33, P360, DOI 10.1002/sres.2348; Nguyen NC, 2013, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V30, P104, DOI 10.1002/sres.2145; Nguyen NC, 2012, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V29, P14, DOI 10.1002/sres.1097; Nguyen NC, 2011, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V28, P51, DOI 10.1002/sres.1044; Noe R.A., 2017, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG; Otte M.J., 2004, TRANSBOUNDARY ANIMAL; Peschke V.M, 2018, FALL ARMYWORM AFRICA; Polasky S, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007; Quan Van Nguyen, 2013, Journal of Vietnamese Environment, V4, P20; Refsgaard JC, 2007, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V22, P1543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004; RICHMOND B, 1993, SYST DYNAM REV, V9, P113, DOI 10.1002/sdr.4260090203; Rivera-Ferre MG, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3858, DOI 10.3390/su5093858; ROSE AH, 1975, CAN ENTOMOL, V107, P567, DOI 10.4039/Ent107567-6; Rubenstein-Montano B, 2001, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V31, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00116-0; SARI, 2017, N R SAV AGR RES I EN; Senge P.M., 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA; SENGE PM, 1992, EUR J OPER RES, V59, P137, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-W; Sherwood D, 2002, SEEING FOREST TREES; Sterman J., 2002, SYSTEM DYNAMICS SYST; Sterman JD, 2006, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V96, P505, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066043; Stroh D., 2015, SYSTEMS THINKING SOC, P264; Tamakloe S, 2018, JOY ONLINE; Tanko B, 2017, FALL ARMYWORM ENEMY; Tip T, 2011, SYSTEMS THINKER, V22; Toole TM, 2005, ARCOM 21 ANN C; Von Bertalanffy L, 1968, GEN SYSTEM THEORY, P40; Walters Carl, 1997, Conservation Ecology, V1, pUnpaginated; Wanner RT, 1995, BUSINESS PROCESS REE; Williams APO, 2001, J MANAGE STUD, V38, P67, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00228; Wilson J. A, 2002, SCI UNCERTAINTY COMP; Yim NH, 2004, EXPERT SYST APPL, V27, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2003.12.019	120	6	6	0	20	SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS	NEW YORK	233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA	1094-429X	1573-9295		SYST PRACT ACT RES	Syst. Pract. Action Res.	APR	2020	33	2					237	264		10.1007/s11213-019-09489-6	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09489-6			28	Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	KT9PY					2022-09-08	WOS:000519346700007
J	Yao, LM; Tan, SQ; Hou, SH				Yao, Liming; Tan, Shiqi; Hou, Shuhua			Spatial-equilibrium-model-based optimization for inter-regional virtual water pattern within grain trade to relieve water stress	WATER SUPPLY			English	Article						food security; inter-regional grain trade; spatial equilibrium model; virtual water; water scarcity; water stress	FOOD SECURITY; SCARCE WATER; RESOURCES; SHORTAGE; NEXUS	Realizing water usability and management sustainability represents one of the Sustainable Development Goals. Since grain cultivation consumes tremendous amount of water, the inter-regional grain trade causes virtual water flow, increasing water stress in certain water-scarce regions. As the second-longest river in China, the Yellow River bears increasingly severe water stress. Considering water and food security, this study proposes a spatial equilibrium model (SEM) that combines partial equilibrium theory and transport models to maximize net social revenue and to balance grain supply and demand, thereby optimizing inter-regional grain trade to relieve water stress. According to different natural, technical and social conditions, we conceive five scenarios to predict regional water stress characterizing with different water supplies, demographic structures, food demand compositions and water-saving technologies. Our simulation results suggest that the developed SEM can realize spatial equilibrium of food and water resources within the Basin, which is capable of resolving the problem of food demands in regions with varying extents (13%-55%), optimizing inter-regional grain trade and mitigating water stress. Finally, we recommend some constructive policies for different scenarios to relieve water stress.	[Yao, Liming; Tan, Shiqi; Hou, Shuhua] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China; [Yao, Liming] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China		Hou, SH (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China.	houshuhua@scu.edu.cn			National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771157]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sichuan University [2019hhs-19, 2020CXQ22]; Funding of Sichuan University [skqx201726]; Social Science Funding of Sichuan Province [SC19TJ005, SC20EZD026]; Ministry of Ecology and Environment [2020QT017-K2020A003]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sichuan University; Funding of Sichuan University; Social Science Funding of Sichuan Province; Ministry of Ecology and Environment	This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71771157), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sichuan University (Grant No. 2019hhs-19, 2020CXQ22), Funding of Sichuan University (Grant No. skqx201726), and Social Science Funding of Sichuan Province (Grant No. SC19TJ005, SC20EZD026), Ministry of Ecology and Environment (Grant No. 2020QT017-K2020A003).	Allan JA, 2003, WATER INT, V28, P106, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2003.9724812; Allan T., 1993, Proceedings of the conference on priorities for water resources allocation and management. Natural Resources and Engineering Advisers Conference, Southampton, July 1992., P13; Chen Qian-yun, 2019, Water Resources and Power, V37, P30; Dalin C, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P4588, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504345112; Feng KS, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P7704, DOI 10.1021/es500502q; Gohari A, 2013, J HYDROL, V491, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.021; Hoekstra AY, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.06.004; Huang HP, 2019, WATER SUPPLY, V19, P635, DOI 10.2166/ws.2018.112; Jiang YK, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V87, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.074; Krylatov AY, 2020, VESTN ST PET U-P MAT, V16, P447, DOI 10.21638/11701/spbu10.2020.409; Liu Z, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V51, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.006; Namany S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120296; Omer A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V704, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135428; Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364; Ren DD, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.071; Rodell M, 2018, NATURE, V557, P650, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1; Samireddypalle A, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107634; Samuelson PA, 1952, AM ECON REV, V42, P283; Sun SK, 2013, J SCI FOOD AGR, V93, P1427, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.5911; Wang LP, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119936; Wang Y, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38511-z; Wang ZZ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.151; Yang CW, 2002, ENERG ECON, V24, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00092-5; Yang H, 2007, FOOD POLICY, V32, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.004; [苑颖 Yuan Ying], 2017, [中国农业资源与区划, Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning], V38, P119; Zakharov V, 2015, ADV INTELL SYST, V360, P449, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18167-7_39; Zhang C, 2017, APPL ENERG, V187, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.052; Zhang C, 2014, ECOL ECON, V100, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.006; Zhao X, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaba49	29	0	0	20	20	IWA PUBLISHING	LONDON	REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON, ENGLAND	1606-9749	1607-0798		WATER SUPPLY	Water Supply	MAY	2022	22	5					5393	5409		10.2166/ws.2022.139	http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.139		MAR 2022	17	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	1S1XA		gold			2022-09-08	WOS:000770353000001
J	Pourmousavi, M; Nasrollahi, H; Najafabadi, AA; Kalhor, A				Pourmousavi, Marziyeh; Nasrollahi, Hossein; Najafabadi, Abdolhamid Amirkaveh; Kalhor, Ahmad			Evaluating the performance of feature selection techniques and machine learning algorithms on future residential water demand	WATER SUPPLY			English	Article; Early Access						feature selection; machine learning; mutual information; regression model; water demand forecasting	REGRESSION; MODEL	The provision of potable water as a severe challenge has engaged many people worldwide. So, identifying influential factors in water demand forecasting (WDF) for the residential sector performs a vital role in water crisis management. Nowadays, long-term macro planning for vast geographic areas helps policymakers to achieve sustainable development goals. This study uses the same perspective to present a pattern for water consumption behavior and prediction. For this purpose, yearly residential water consumption data, along with climatic characteristics, and socioeconomic factors of rural areas of Isfahan, Iran are aggregated. The feature selection task is conducted on the collected data using various machine learning (ML) methods along with a novel approach, forward selection based on smoothness index (FSSmI). Posterior to selecting features influencing residential water demand (WD), the raw data are analyzed using regression techniques, including multiple linear regression, support vector regression, and random forest regression. The employed methods show an improvement in the feature selection procedure and coefficient of determination as a result of implementing the FSSmI method. Based on the results, the multiple linear regression and support vector regression gain 96 and 95% accuracy and less than 11 and 13% error respectively; it demonstrates the validity of forecasting methods.	[Pourmousavi, Marziyeh] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran; [Nasrollahi, Hossein] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Mech Engn Fac, Dept Energy Syst, Tehran 158754416, Iran; [Najafabadi, Abdolhamid Amirkaveh] Univ Tehran, Dept Engn Sci, Coll Engn, Tehran 1417935840, Iran; [Kalhor, Ahmad] Univ Tehran, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran 1417935840, Iran		Kalhor, A (corresponding author), Univ Tehran, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran 1417935840, Iran.	akalhor@ut.ac.ir						[Anonymous], 2016, IRAN METEOROLOGICAL; [Anonymous], 2016, ISFAHAN PROVINCE RUR; [Anonymous], 2010, ADV ENG MATH; Antunes A, 2018, J HYDROINFORM, V20, P1343, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2018.163; Billings R. B., 2011, FORECASTING URBAN WA; Bishop C., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, P4; Brown G, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P27; Buitinck Lars, 2013, LANGUAGES DATA MININ, P108; Cano JR, 2013, EXPERT SYST APPL, V40, P4820, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.025; CLEVELAND WS, 1988, J ECONOMETRICS, V37, P87, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(88)90077-2; Donkor EA, 2014, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V140, P146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000314; Eslamian SA, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.003; Fullerton TM, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008450; Glantz M., 2011, CREDIT ENG BANKERS, V2nd, P185, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-378585-5.10008-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-378585-5.10008-9]; Jang D, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030750; Jang D, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9111933; Kalhor A., 2019, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV; Kindler J., 1984, MODELING WATER DEMAN; Lee SJ, 2010, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V24, P283, DOI 10.1007/s00477-009-0317-z; Levin ER, 2006, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V98, P102; Makki AA, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V95, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.009; Nasseri M, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P7387, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.087; Schleich J, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P1756, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.012; Statistical Center of Iran, 2016, STAT CTR IR MET; STONE M, 1974, J R STAT SOC B, V36, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x; Villarin MC, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001067; Weaver K. F., 2017, INTRO STAT ANAL RES, P435	27	0	0	2	2	IWA PUBLISHING	LONDON	REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON, ENGLAND	1606-9749	1607-0798		WATER SUPPLY	Water Supply												10.2166/ws.2022.243	http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.243		JUN 2022	22	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	2L3WU		gold			2022-09-08	WOS:000816949900001
J	Koppa, A; Gebremichael, M; Hopson, TM; Riddle, E; Boehnert, J; Broman, DP				Koppa, Akash; Gebremichael, Mekonnen; Hopson, Thomas M.; Riddle, Emily; Boehnert, Jennifer; Broman, Daniel P.			A Scalable Earth Observations-Based Decision Support System for Hydropower Planning in Africa	JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION			English	Article						hydropower; decision support system; remote sensing; water resources	GLOBAL TERRESTRIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; STREAMFLOW FORECASTS; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; WATER; ASSIMILATION; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; BASINS; TRENDS	Hydropower is a key part of the increasing shift in power production from nonrenewables to renewable energy. In regions such as Africa, hydropower reservoirs are vital for achieving several sustainable development goals, including clean water, energy, and poverty elimination. However, the operations of hydropower reservoirs are often suboptimal due to the lack of hydrologic data for generating reliable inflow forecasts. Here, we present a decision support system (DSS) framework for hydropower planning at daily to seasonal time scales by combining data from earth observation satellites (EOS) with ensemble climate forecasts from dynamical models and hydrologic modeling. The large uncertainty inherent in satellite-based datasets is overcome by using a data validation framework which does not require ground-based measurements. In addition, an EOS evapotranspiration product is used as a proxy for streamflow in calibrating hydrologic models. Compared to a DSS forced with a climatological forecast (zero-skill), the hydropower production with the new DSS increased by 20%. The study highlights the advantage of using data from EOS in overcoming the issue of data scarcity in water resources applications, particularly in developing regions of the world such as Africa.	[Koppa, Akash; Gebremichael, Mekonnen] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; [Koppa, Akash] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Hydroclimate Extremes Lab H CEL, Ghent, Belgium; [Hopson, Thomas M.; Riddle, Emily; Boehnert, Jennifer] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Res Applicat Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA; [Broman, Daniel P.] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; [Broman, Daniel P.] US Bur Reclamat, Water & Environm Resources Div, Lakewood, CO USA		Koppa, A (corresponding author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.; Koppa, A (corresponding author), Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Hydroclimate Extremes Lab H CEL, Ghent, Belgium.	akashkoppa@ucla.edu	Koppa, Akash/O-2122-2019	Koppa, Akash/0000-0001-5671-0878; Hopson, Thomas/0000-0002-4595-7274	NASA Applied Sciences Water Resources Application Grant [NNX15AC33G]	NASA Applied Sciences Water Resources Application Grant	We acknowledge funding support from the NASA Applied Sciences Water Resources Application Grant # NNX15AC33G. All hydrologic model configuration files and postprocess scripts are available at .	Alemu ET, 2011, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V137, P72, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000088; Alfieri L, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P1161, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013; Ashouri H, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P69, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00068.1; Ball J.T., 1987, PROGR PHOTOSYNTHESIS, P221, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48; Barros MTL, 2003, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V129, P178, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(178); Benninga HJF, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P5273, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-5273-2017; Beven K, 2006, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V10, P609, DOI 10.5194/hess-10-609-2006; Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROLOG SCI J, V24, P43, DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834; Bitew MM, 2012, J HYDROMETEOROL, V13, P338, DOI 10.1175/2011JHM1292.1; Borovikov A, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P7335, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3835-2; Braman D, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P1241, DOI 10.1002/joc.6268; Budyko M.I, 1974, CLIMATE LIFE TRANSLA; Chen F, 1997, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V85, P391, DOI 10.1023/A:1000531001463; Condon LE, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P1117, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-1117-2017; Conway D, 2017, NAT ENERGY, V2, P946, DOI 10.1038/s41560-017-0037-4; Cox S.J., 2006, 12 C ATM RAD; Crow WT, 2009, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V13, P1, DOI 10.5194/hess-13-1-2009; Cuntz M, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P10676, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025097; Cuo L, 2011, J HYDROMETEOROL, V12, P713, DOI 10.1175/2011JHM1347.1; David CH, 2011, J HYDROMETEOROL, V12, P913, DOI 10.1175/2011JHM1345.1; Didan, 2015, EOSDIS LAND PROCESSE, DOI [10.5067/MODIS, DOI 10.5067/MODIS]; Donohue R.G., 2014, CARTOGR PERSPECT, V76, P43, DOI [10.14714/CP76.1248, DOI 10.14714/CP76.1248]; Etkin D, 2015, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000396; Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016; Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086; Fletcher S, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09677-x; Fu B., 1981, SCI ATMOSPHERICA SIN, V5, P23; Funk C, 2015, SCI DATA, V2, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2015.50; Greve P, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR026280; Greve P, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P716, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2247, 10.1038/NGEO2247]; Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a; Hoeting JA, 1999, STAT SCI, V14, P382, DOI 10.1214/ss/1009212519; Hong Y, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P469, DOI 10.1175/JHM574.1; Hopson TM, 2014, MON WEATHER REV, V142, P1125, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00111.1; Hopson TM, 2010, J HYDROMETEOROL, V11, P618, DOI 10.1175/2009JHM1006.1; Huffman GJ, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P38, DOI 10.1175/JHM560.1; Immerzeel WW, 2008, J HYDROL, V349, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.017; Jiang C, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V186, P528, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2016.08.030; Johnson SJ, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1087, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019; Jordan R., 1991, TECH REP; Joyce RJ, 2004, J HYDROMETEOROL, V5, P487, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2; Kirtman BP, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P585, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00050.1; Knievel JC, 2017, WEATHER FORECAST, V32, P2195, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-17-0049.1; KOENKER R, 1978, ECONOMETRICA, V46, P33, DOI 10.2307/1913643; Koppa A., 2017, Water Resources Research, V53, P8487, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020593; Koppa A, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12040599; Koppa A, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P8583, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025228; Koppa A, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V130, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.06.005; Kumar SV, 2006, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V21, P1402, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.004; Leaflet, 2016, LEAFL JAVASCRIPT LIB; Lettenmaier DP, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P7309, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017616; Li D, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P969, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20107; Li WT, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1246; Lopez PL, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3125, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3125-2017; Martens B, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P1903, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017; Mazrooei A, 2019, J HYDROL, V575, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.071; Merryfield WJ, 2013, MON WEATHER REV, V141, P2910, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00216.1; Mianabadi A, 2020, J HYDROL, V588, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089; Mu QZ, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019; Ning TT, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-31036-x; Niu GY, 2006, J HYDROMETEOROL, V7, P937, DOI 10.1175/JHM538.1; Niu GY, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015139; Niu GY, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2007JD008674; Raftery AE, 2005, MON WEATHER REV, V133, P1155, DOI 10.1175/MWR2906.1; Rakovec O, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P7779, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019430; Sachs JD, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2206, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0; Seguin S, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000854; Senay GB, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.014; Sheffield J, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P9724, DOI 10.1029/2017WR022437; Sloughter JM, 2007, MON WEATHER REV, V135, P3209, DOI 10.1175/MWR3441.1; Snow AD, 2016, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V52, P950, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12434; Sorooshian S, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P2035, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2035:EOPSSE>2.3.CO;2; Sridharan V, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-08275-7; Stellingwerf S, 2021, EARTH SPACE SCI, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EA000933; Taylor KE, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P7183, DOI 10.1029/2000JD900719; Tramontana G, 2016, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V13, P4291, DOI 10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016; Unger DA, 2009, MON WEATHER REV, V137, P2365, DOI 10.1175/2008MWR2605.1; VERSEGHY DL, 1991, INT J CLIMATOL, V11, P111; VRUGT JA, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI DOI 10.1029/2007WR006720; Vrugt JA, 2009, INT J NONLIN SCI NUM, V10, P273, DOI 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273; Wang FX, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011366; Westphal KS, 2003, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V129, P165, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(165); Wielicki BA, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P853, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2; Xu XL, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P6123, DOI 10.1002/2013GL058324; Yamazaki D, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P5844, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072874; Yang RQ, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2002JD003109; YEH WWG, 1985, WATER RESOUR RES, V21, P1797, DOI 10.1029/WR021i012p01797; Zhang K, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008800; Zhang YQ, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep19124; Zhou GY, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms6918; Zink M, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P2976, DOI 10.1002/2017WR021346	91	1	1	1	18	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1093-474X	1752-1688		J AM WATER RESOUR AS	J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.	OCT	2021	57	5					711	736		10.1111/1752-1688.12914	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12914		APR 2021	26	Engineering, Environmental; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Geology; Water Resources	WW0UM					2022-09-08	WOS:000641668600001
J	Adams, CA				Adams, Carol A.			Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process	ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL			English	Article						Value creation; Integrated reporting; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; ESG risk; Integrated thinking	CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; ORGANIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; STRATEGY; UK	Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine and explain the complex interrelationships which influence the ability of firms to create value for their providers of finance and other stakeholders (loosely referred to in practice as "integrated thinking"). In doing so it examines the interrelationships between: environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk; delivering on corporate strategy; non-financial corporate reporting; and, board oversight. Design/methodology/approach - Interviews were conducted with board chairs and non-executive directors of large listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (where Boards are required to have a social and ethics sub-committee and approve integrated reports which have been mandatory since 2010) and the Australian Stock Exchange (where Board directors' liability legislation results in Boards being reluctant to adopt integrated reporting which is voluntary). Findings - The research finds that contemporary reporting processes, and in particular those set out in the King III Code and the International Integrated Reporting Framework, influence cognitive frames enhancing board oversight and assisting organisations in managing complexity. This results in increased awareness of the impact of ESG issues together with a broader view of value creation despite investor disinterest. Research limitations/implications - A number of avenues of research are suggested to further examine the interrelationships identified. Practical implications - The research assists the development of practice and policy by articulating and enhancing the understanding of linkages, which loosely fall under the vague practitioner term "integrated thinking". Social implications - The conceptualisation can inform national and global discussions on the appropriateness of corporate reporting and governance models to achieve sustainable development and contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value - The paper conceptualises emerging and complex interrelationships. The cross-country comparison allows an assessment of the extent to which different national social contexts with differing governance and reporting frameworks lead to different perspectives on, and approaches to, value creation.	[Adams, Carol A.] Univ Durham, Durham, England		Adams, CA (corresponding author), Univ Durham, Durham, England.	carol.adams@durham.ac.uk	Bui, Binh/AAX-2439-2020; Zou, Joy/AAL-5850-2020; Adams, Carol A/X-7287-2019	Bui, Binh/0000-0001-5215-8879; Adams, Carol A/0000-0001-7894-0471	CPA Australia; University of Pretoria	CPA Australia; University of Pretoria	The author would like to thank the interviewees for their generosity with their time to allow this research to be undertaken. The author is grateful to those who helped in establishing contact with potential interviewees, but have not disclosed their names in order to maintain anonymity of the interviewees. The author would like to thank CPA Australia and the University of Pretoria for providing funding to support this research and Rene Swart for making sure the author got to the interviews in South Africa. The author is grateful for feedback from Mark Learmonth, Venkat Narayanan, Brad Potter, Sandra Waddock, Chris Van Staden and participants in seminars at the University of Queensland and Swinburne University and at the EMAN conference at Leuphana Universitat and the CSR conference at Humboldt Universitat in 2016. The guidance provided by Lee Parker and anonymous referees has been valuable in revising the paper.	ACCA, 2013, WHAT DO INV EXP NONF; ACCA and Net Balance Foundation, 2011, AD INT REP ASX 50; Adams, 2013, UNDERSTANDING INTEGR; Adams C. A., 2004, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V17, P731, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570410567791; Adams C. A., 2009, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V22, P118; Adams C.A., 2013, CAPITALS BACKGROUND; Adams C.A., 2002, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V15, P223, DOI [10.1108/09513570210418905, DOI 10.1108/09513570210418905]; Adams C. A., 2007, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V20, P382, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570710748553; Adams C.A., 2014, SUSTAINABILITY CO FU; Adams CA, 2016, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V48, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2016.05.002; Adams CA, 2013, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V4, P384, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2012-0044; Adams CA, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V27, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001; Archel P, 2011, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V36, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.003; Atkins J, 2014, S AFRICAN I INVESTOR; Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI), 2014, CORP REP AUSTR; Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI), 2015, CORP REP AUSTR; Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), 2013, ASIC REG GUID 247; Black Sun and IIRC, 2014, REAL BEN IMP INT REP; Bundy J, 2015, ACAD MANAGE REV, V40, P345, DOI 10.5465/amr.2013.0027; BURCHELL S, 1985, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V10, P381, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9; Cheng M, 2014, J INT FIN MANAG ACC, V25, P90, DOI 10.1111/jifm.12015; Cho CH, 2015, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V40, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003; Cho CH, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002; Christensen LT, 2013, ORGANIZATION, V20, P372, DOI 10.1177/1350508413478310; Contrafatto M, 2014, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V39, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.002; Cooper C, 2016, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V7, P494, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0049; Correa C, 2015, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V6, P5, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2014-0058; Coulson AB, 2016, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V7, P517, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2016-0027; Coulson AB, 2015, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V6, P290, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2015-0032; CPA Australia KPMG, 2014, TACT STRAT AUSTR BUS; Deegan C., 2002, ACC AUDIT ACCOUNT J, V15, P312, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570210435861; DENT JF, 1990, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V15, P3, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(90)90010-R; Eccles R.G., 2011, COMMUNICATION    NOV; Eccles R.G., 2014, ACCOUNTANCY FUTURES, V17, P20; Eisenbeiss SA, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V128, P635, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2124-9; Ernst & Young LLP (EY), 2013, VAL CREAT BACKGR PAP; EY, 2014, EXC INT REP AW; Flower J, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002; Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)  UN Global Compact  & World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2015, SDG COMPASS GUIDE BU; Gray R., 2006, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V19, P793, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570610709872; Gray R., 2014, ACCOUNTABILITY SOCIA; GRI, 2014, G4 REP PRINC STAND D; Hahn T, 2014, ACAD MANAGE REV, V39, P463, DOI 10.5465/amr.2012.0341; Hall M, 2015, J MANAGE STUD, V52, P907, DOI 10.1111/joms.12146; Harjoto M, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V132, P641, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0; Henri JF, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.001; Huggins A, 2015, CO SECUR LAW J, V33, P176; International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), 2013, INT IR FRAM INT INT; Ioannou I, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P1053, DOI 10.1002/smj.2268; Isidro H, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V132, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9; KPMG, 2011, EXP UN; LAUGHLIN RC, 1991, ORGAN STUD, V12, P209, DOI 10.1177/017084069101200203; Lewin K, 1947, HUM RELAT, V1, P143, DOI 10.1177/001872674700100201; Llewelyn S., 2003, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V16, P662, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570310492344; Lodhia S, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V129, P585, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8; McNicholas P., 2007, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V20, P382, DOI [10.1108/09513570710748535, DOI 10.1108/09513570710748535]; Michelon G, 2016, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V7, P2, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0121; Miles M.B., 1994, EXPANDED RESOURCE BO, V2nd; Miles MB, 2020, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA, V4; Miller P, 2013, ACAD MANAG ANN, V7, P557, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2013.783668; Miller P, 1991, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V16, P733, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(91)90022-7; Milne M. J., 2009, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V22, P1211; Milne MJ, 2013, J BUS ETHICS, V118, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8; Mitchell RK, 2015, J MANAGE STUD, V52, P851, DOI 10.1111/joms.12151; O'Sullivan N, 2015, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V43, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.008; Parker L.D., 2005, AUDITING ACCOUNTING, V18, P842, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510627739, DOI 10.1108/09513570510627739]; PATTEN DM, 1992, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V17, P471, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90042-Q; Queen PE, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V127, P683, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2070-6; ROBERTS J, 1990, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V15, P107, DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(90)90017-O; Simnett R, 2015, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V6, P29, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2014-0053; Skaerbaek P, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.003; Solomon JF, 2013, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V38, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2013.01.001; Steyn M, 2014, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V5, P476, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2013-0052; Stubbs W, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P1068, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1279; Unerman J, 2014, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V39, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.003; UNGC, 2010, UN GLOB COMP MAN MOD; United Nations (UN), 2014, A68970 UN; van der Vegt GS, 2015, ACAD MANAGE J, V58, P971, DOI 10.5465/amj.2015.4004	78	87	89	15	84	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0951-3574	1758-4205		ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN	Account . Audit Account.		2017	30	4					906	931		10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529			26	Business, Finance	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	EW9XA		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000402871500007
J	Zhou, JG; Li, LL; Tseng, ML; Lin, GQ				Zhou, Jun-Gang; Li, Ling-Ling; Tseng, Ming-Lang; Lin, Guo-Qian			Green system reliability assessment method based on life cycle: Resources and economical view	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						System reliability; Life cycle; Green assessment method; Resource management	POWER-SYSTEM; ASSESSMENT LCA; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; MODEL	The traditional assessment method of system reliability is based on unit reliability and probability theory, but the rationale behind this method of assessment does not consider resources and economy. Unit reliability tests tend to consume resources and economy, and consequently, reliability assessment of large systems tends to consume a large amount of resources and economy. Taking the series system and parallel system as examples, this study proves that the traditional assessment method of system reliability is unreasonable, especially from the perspective of resources and economy, as it does not meet green economy and sustainable development goals. The system life cycle diagram model is established on the unit life cycle. A green assessment method of system reliability is proposed from the resources and economy perspectives. This proposed method does not depend on the number of units and does not require the consumption of a large amount of resources and economy. This study promotes sustainable and cleaner production. The green assessment method of system reliability is applied to the series system and parallel system to assess system reliability. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Zhou, Jun-Gang; Li, Ling-Ling; Lin, Guo-Qian] Hebei Univ Technol, State Key Lab Reliabil & Intelligence Elect Equip, Tianjin 300130, Peoples R China; [Zhou, Jun-Gang] Shandong Inst Prod Qual Inspect, Jinan 250102, Peoples R China; [Li, Ling-Ling] Hebei Univ Technol, Key Lab Electromagnet Field & Elect Apparat Relia, Tianjin 300130, Peoples R China; [Tseng, Ming-Lang] Asia Univ, Inst Innovat & Circular Econ, Taichung, Taiwan; [Tseng, Ming-Lang] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan		Tseng, ML (corresponding author), Asia Univ, Inst Innovat & Circular Econ, Taichung, Taiwan.	jungang1983@126.com; lilinglinglaoshi@126.com; tsengminglang@gmail.com; lin_guoqian@126.com	Tseng, Ming Lang/M-9051-2014	Tseng, Ming Lang/0000-0002-2702-3590	Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Key) Project [E2017202284]; Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project [19JCZDJC32100];  [MOST 109-2918-I-468 -001 -]	Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Key) Project; Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project; 	The financial support of Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Key) Project (No. E2017202284) and Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 19JCZDJC32100). The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers. This study is also partially support from MOST 109-2918-I-468 -001 -.	Adefarati T, 2017, APPL ENERG, V185, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.087; Awad ASA, 2014, IEEE T SMART GRID, V5, P2339, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2014.2316197; Awadallah SKE, 2015, IEEE T POWER SYST, V30, P970, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2331103; Barone G, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V123, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.013; Nieto PJG, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V138, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.001; Guo J, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V170, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.020; He B, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.097; Jackson C, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.09.006; Lee D, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V171, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.009; Lei HT, 2017, IEEE T POWER SYST, V32, P1064, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2572159; Li XY, 2018, APPL MATH MODEL, V61, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2018.04.008; Li ZG, 2017, INT J FUZZY SYST, V19, P1759, DOI 10.1007/s40815-017-0363-5; Lopes VS, 2015, IEEE T SUSTAIN ENERG, V6, P1169, DOI 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2335895; Mi JH, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V174, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.021; Nguyen N, 2018, IEEE T POWER SYST, V33, P985, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2707475; O'Connell, 2019, APPL ENERG, V247, P745, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.156; Pomponi F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V176, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.119; Ren Y, 2019, APPL ENERG, V249, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.119; Wang JJ, 2015, APPL ENERG, V146, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.056; Wong JH, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.241; Wu D, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V189, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.05.007; Xiao RS, 2018, IEEE T POWER SYST, V33, P6000, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2829079; Xu BB, 2019, APPL ENERG, V248, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.125; Xu NZ, 2016, IEEE T POWER SYST, V31, P759, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2396524; Yang XF, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V169, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.016; Zanghelini GM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.230; Zhan YZ, 2018, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V31, P523, DOI 10.1080/0951192X.2016.1268721; Zhang YC, 2017, IEEE T SMART GRID, V8, P2343, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2016.2523515; Zhou D, 2018, IEEE T POWER ELECTR, V33, P8030, DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2769161; Zhou P, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.344; Zhou ZZ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V210, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.074	31	4	4	3	19	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	APR 1	2020	251								119786	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119786	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119786			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	KH7IL					2022-09-08	WOS:000510823700066
J	De Boeck, K; Decouttere, C; Jonasson, JO; Vandaele, N				De Boeck, Kim; Decouttere, Catherine; Jonasson, Jonas Oddur; Vandaele, Nico			Vaccine supply chains in resource-limited settings: Mitigating the impact of rainy season disruptions	EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH			English	Article						OR in developing countries; Global health; Vaccine supply chain design; Spatial modeling; Discrete-event simulation	INFORMATION-SYSTEM; INTEGRATING GIS; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; LOCATION; ALLOCATION; SIMULATION; COVERAGE; IMPROVE; ORGANIZATIONS	Immunization is widely recognized as one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions, preventing two to three million deaths from vaccine-preventable diseases each year. Although progress has been made in recent years, substantial operational challenges persist in resource-limited settings with frequent stock-outs contributing to sub-optimal immunization coverage and inequality in vaccine access. In this paper, we investigate the role of rainy season induced supply chain disruptions on vacci-nation coverage and inequalities. We develop a modeling framework combining spatial modeling-to pre-dict flood disruptions in road networks-and a discrete-event simulation of a multi-tiered vaccine supply chain (VSC). Our models are fitted using data from the Malagasy VSC network and validated to the best extent possible with scarce data. Our baseline simulation predicts the national vaccination coverage with good accuracy and suggests that 67% of regions with low reported immunization coverage are affected by rainy season disruptions or operational inefficiencies, causing significant geographical inequalities in vac-cine access. We investigate various mitigation strategies to increase the resiliency of VSCs and find that, by strategically placing buffer inventory at targeted facilities prior to the rainy season, the proportion of children receiving all basic vaccines in these areas is increased by 8% and the geographical inequality in vaccination coverage between areas affected and not affected by the rainy season is reduced by 11%. By also increasing the replenishment frequency from every third month to every month, the national vac-cination coverage improves by 41%. Our results contribute to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by providing actionable insights for improving vaccination coverage (SDG 3) and investigat-ing the resiliency of the VSC to increased flooding due to climate change (SDG 13). (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.	[De Boeck, Kim; Decouttere, Catherine; Vandaele, Nico] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Operat Management, Res Ctr Access to Med, Leuven, Belgium; [Jonasson, Jonas Oddur] MIT, MIT Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA		De Boeck, K (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Operat Management, Res Ctr Access to Med, Leuven, Belgium.	kim.deboeck@kuleuven.be; atherine.decouttere@kuleuven.be; joj@mit.edu; nico.vandaele@kuleuven.be		vandaele, nico/0000-0001-7687-7376	Research Foundation - Flanders [1113720N]	Research Foundation - Flanders(FWO)	Acknowledgments The authors thank UNICEF Madagascar, and in particular Andry Fidele Ravalitera, for providing data, information and clarifications regarding the problem setting. The authors are also grateful for the exploratory work done by two master students, Van Hout (2019) and Dewilde (2018) . The authors thank the anonymous re-viewers for the thorough reading and the detailed and useful feed-back provided.	Aina M, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P2175, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.100; Ajin R. S., 2013, Advances in Applied Science Research, V4, P263; Aktas E, 2013, INTERFACES, V43, P240, DOI 10.1287/inte.1120.0671; Alegana VA, 2012, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V11, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-11-6; [Anonymous], 2019, DEMOGRAPHIC HLTH SUR; Ares JN, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V254, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.031; Aringhieri R, 2017, COMPUT OPER RES, V78, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2016.09.016; Ashok A, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P2217, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.045; Assi TM, 2013, VACCINE, V31, P2828, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.011; Berenguer G, 2016, J OPER MANAG, V45, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.005; Besiou M, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P1950, DOI 10.1111/poms.12215; Brooks A, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P2110, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.072; Brown ST, 2014, VACCINE, V32, P4097, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.090; Brownwright TK, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4961-9; Hoyos MC, 2015, COMPUT IND ENG, V82, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2014.11.025; Camm JD, 1997, INTERFACES, V27, P128, DOI 10.1287/inte.27.1.128; Carland C, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V269, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.010; Chen L., 2020, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE, DOI [10.1287/msom.2020.0901, DOI 10.1287/MSOM.2020.0901]; Chen YW, 2008, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V36, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2006.04.018; Cherkesly M, 2019, PROD OPER MANAG, V28, P1716, DOI 10.1111/poms.13008; Church RL, 2002, COMPUT OPER RES, V29, P541, DOI 10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00104-5; Climate-ADAPT, 2017, OAS; De Boeck K, 2020, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2019.08.004; de Treville S, 2006, J OPER MANAG, V24, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2005.03.004; de Vries H, 2020, PROD OPER MANAG, V29, P1165, DOI 10.1111/poms.13152; Decouttere C., 2020, IMMUNIZATION OPERATI; Delen D, 2011, ANN OPER RES, V185, P181, DOI 10.1007/s10479-009-0616-2; Deo S, 2015, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V17, P191, DOI 10.1287/msom.2014.0512; Dewilde S., 2018, THESIS KU LEUVEN; Doerner K, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V179, P1078, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.067; Earth Engine Data Catalog, 2019, GLOB FRICT SURF 2015; Eftekhar M, 2016, J OPER MANAG, V44, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.008; Eftekhar M, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P951, DOI 10.1111/poms.12108; Epstein R, 2006, OPER RES, V54, P1017, DOI 10.1287/opre.1060.0331; Fard MK, 2019, PROD OPER MANAG, V28, P2132, DOI 10.1111/poms.13028; Gallien J, 2017, PROD OPER MANAG, V26, P997, DOI 10.1111/poms.12662; Gu LY, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V293, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.019; Haidari LA, 2016, VACCINE, V34, P4062, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.022; Harper PR, 2005, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V33, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.011; Harper PR, 2005, J OPER RES SOC, V56, P134, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601898; Herlin H, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V139, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.003; James WHM, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.90; Jeong H, 2019, BIOENERG RES, V12, P229, DOI 10.1007/s12155-018-9943-y; Jonasson JO, 2017, OPER RES, V65, P1479, DOI 10.1287/opre.2017.1646; Karp CL, 2015, VACCINE, V33, P3471, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.071; Kim S, 2018, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V86, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.05.006; Kin B, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030653; Kourgialas NN, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P212, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.555836; Kraiselburd S, 2013, PROD OPER MANAG, V22, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01315.x; Lasry A, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V180, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.043; LCA, 2019, MAD ROAD NETW; LCA, 2019, LCA HOM; Lemmens S, 2016, CHEM ENG RES DES, V109, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.015; Lennon P, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P2198, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.068; Leung NHZ, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156026; Madagascar Decision Support System, 2019, MAD DEC SUPP SYST IN; Martinez AJP, 2011, J OPER MANAG, V29, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.013; McCoy JH, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P965, DOI 10.1111/poms.12101; Mccoy JH, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P1, DOI 10.1111/poms.12036; Mehrotra M, 2020, PROD OPER MANAG, V29, P571, DOI 10.1111/poms.13129; Mensah K, 2019, VACCINE, V37, P2511, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.069; Min H, 2002, COMPUT IND ENG, V43, P231, DOI 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00066-9; Murray AT, 2021, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102176; Natarajan KV, 2017, PROD OPER MANAG, V26, P1015, DOI 10.1111/poms.12634; Natarajan KV, 2014, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V16, P595, DOI 10.1287/msom.2014.0497; OasisHub, 2019, CAT FLOOD HAZ MAP MA; Ozdamar L, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V244, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.030; Ozkan SP, 2016, PROC TECH, V22, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.026; Pamuk S, 2004, J OPER RES SOC, V55, P1137, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601774; Parvin H, 2018, PROD OPER MANAG, V27, P774, DOI 10.1111/poms.12826; Pedraza-Martinez AJ, 2020, OPER RES, V68, P984, DOI 10.1287/opre.2019.1941; Pedraza-Martinez AJ, 2013, PROD OPER MANAG, V22, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01316.x; Rabta B, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.020; Raghu KC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12051964; Rajgopal J, 2011, VACCINE, V29, P5512, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.044; Ren HT, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1705, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1693656; Restrepo-Mendez MC, 2016, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V94, P794, DOI 10.2471/BLT.15.162172; Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V204, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.023; Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V264, P978, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.021; Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2016, GEOSCIENCES, V6, DOI 10.3390/geosciences6020018; Sahinyazan FG, 2021, PROD OPER MANAG, V30, P1082, DOI 10.1111/poms.13293; Shaban A., 2001, B ENGGEOL ENV, V60, P93, DOI 10.1007/s100640000092; Smith HK, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V193, P768, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.031; Tarantilis CD, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V152, P437, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00035-3; Tatem AJ, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-2; Taylor TA, 2014, MANAGE SCI, V60, P2461, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1910; UN, 2021, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; USAID, 2017, MAD US AG INT DEV; Utazi CE, 2018, VACCINE, V36, P1583, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.020; van den Ent MMVX, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P2148, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.099; Van Hout D., 2019, THESIS KU LEUVEN; Wallace AS, 2017, VACCINE, V35, P6751, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.082; Weigel D, 1999, INTERFACES, V29, P112, DOI 10.1287/inte.29.1.112; Weiss DJ, 2018, NATURE, V553, P333, DOI 10.1038/nature25181; WHO, 2017, IMM COV FACT SHEET; WHO, 2014, WHO POL STAT MULT VI; WHO/UNICEF, 2020, MAD WHO UNICEF EST I; WHO/UNICEF, 2017, PROGR GLOB IMM GOALS; World Bank, 2019, WORLD BANK SUPP MAD; World Bank, 2019, WORLD BANK MAD OV; World Bank, 2015, MAD SYST COUNTR DIAG; World Economic Forum, 2017, GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE; World Health Organization (WHO), 2013, CLIM CHANG HLTH; Worldpop, 2019, MAD 1KM BIRTHS; Zhang FL, 2017, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V98, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.004; Zhang FL, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V85, P740, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.041	106	2	2	14	14	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0377-2217	1872-6860		EUR J OPER RES	Eur. J. Oper. Res.	AUG 16	2022	301	1					300	317		10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.040	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.040			18	Management; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science	0X7MU					2022-09-08	WOS:000789886400020
J	Wahlen, CB				Wahlen, Catherine Benson			Opportunities for making the invisible visible: Towards an improved understanding of the economic contributions of NTFPs	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						NTFPs; Forests; Forest valuation; Non-cash value; SDGs; NWFPs	TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS; RURAL LIVELIHOODS; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; NATURAL-PRODUCTS; CASH INCOME; TRADE; CONSERVATION; XISHUANGBANNA; HOUSEHOLDS; WEALTH	Forests around the world remain under-valued because governments, policymakers, and other key actors do not consider the global or national contributions of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) when estimating the value of forests. Where available, existing estimates suggest the non-cash benefits of forests are substantial, in many cases three to ten times higher than those for which systematic national and global data are collected. Part of this under-valuation stems from a general focus by governments on forest resources that are commercially valued as well as from government failure to include estimates of NTFP contributions in their national accounts. Beyond these reasons, however, lay methodological challenges in measurement techniques and comparability across studies, countries, and regions, both of which result in limited data on NTFPs. This article reviews NTFP studies at the global and national levels to provide estimates of the non-cash contributions of NTFPs and to shed light on challenges related to the absence of systematic, reliable data on the economic contributions of forests. The article then considers the implications for forest governance, management, and policy, arguing that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer an opportunity to increase attention on the non-cash contributions of forests and turn this invisible contribution into a visible one.				catherinebenson@gmail.com			UN Forum on Forests (UNFF)	UN Forum on Forests (UNFF)	Initial background research for this paper was supported through a consultancy with the UN Forum on Forests (UNFF) as part of background research for Agrawal et al. (2013).	Agrawal A, 2013, EC CONTRIBUTIONS FOR; Ambrose-Oji B, 2003, INT FOREST REV, V5, P106, DOI 10.1505/IFOR.5.2.106.17420; Angelsen A., 2003, CIFOR Occasional Paper; Angelsen A, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006; APPASAMY PP, 1993, ECON BOT, V47, P258, DOI 10.1007/BF02862292; Babulo B, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.007; Bakkegaard R. K., 2016, 179 FAO; Bark SK, 2008, INT FOREST REV, V10, P349, DOI 10.1505/ifor.10.2.349; Belcher B, 2005, GLOBAL PATTERNS TREN; BELCHER B., 2004, FOREST PRODUCTS LIVE, V1; Byron N., 1997, 19 CIFOR; Cavendish W, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P1979, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8; Delang CO, 2006, ECOL ECON, V59, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.006; Dlamini C, 2011, J GEOGR REG PLANN, V4, P715; Dlamini CS, 2009, SOUTH FORESTS, V71, P311, DOI 10.2989/SF.2009.71.4.9.1036; Dovie DBK, 2003, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V10, P247, DOI 10.1080/13504500309469803; Falconer J., 1990, MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE M; FAO, 2014, CONTR FOR SECT NAT E; FAO, 2014, SOFO ENH SOC BEN FOR; FAO, 2010, GLOB FOR RES 2010; FAO, 2015, GLOBAL FOREST RESOUR; FAO, 2012, STAT WORLDS FOR 2012; Foli S, 2014, ENVIRON EVID, V3, DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-15; Fu YN, 2009, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V16, P332, DOI 10.1080/13504500903198805; Fu YN, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.003; Government of Uganda (GoU) and UN Development Programme (UNDP) 2013Government of Uganda (GoU) and UN Development Programme (UN., MILL DEV GOALS REP U; Guariguata MR, 2011, NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT, P171, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_8; GUNATILAKE HM, 1993, ECON BOT, V47, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF02862294; Hogarth NJ, 2013, WORLD DEV, V43, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.010; Huber FK, 2010, ECON BOT, V64, P189, DOI 10.1007/s12231-010-9126-z; Hussain SA, 2010, WETL ECOL MANAG, V18, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11273-009-9173-3; Ickowitz A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.001; Jagger P, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P1810, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.030; Jamnadass R., 2015, WORLD SERIES, V33, P172; Kar SP, 2012, FOREST POLICY ECON, V14, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.003; Karayilmazlar S, 2005, FOREST PROD J, V55, P78; LAIRD SA, 2010, WILD PRODUCT GOVERNA; Liebenberg L., 2003, NEW ENV MONITORING M; Lund J. F., 2011, MEASURING LIVELIHOOD; Lybbert TJ, 2002, ECOL ECON, V41, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00020-4; Mahapatra AK, 2012, INT FOREST REV, V14, P62, DOI 10.1505/146554812799973217; Mahapatra AK, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V35, P258, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-8203-9; Ndoye Ousseynou, 2004, FOREST PRODUCTS LIVE, V2; Newton P, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.032; NFA, 2015, 20152019 NFA; Paumgarten F, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2950, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.013; Powell B, 2011, INT FOREST REV, V13, P305, DOI 10.1505/146554811798293944; PROFOR, 2008, POV FOR LINK SYNTH 6; Rowland D., 2016, ENVIRON CONSERV, P1; Shackleton C, 2004, S AFR J SCI, V100, P658; Shackleton CM, 2007, FOREST POLICY ECON, V9, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.004; Shackleton CM, 2014, FOREST POLICY ECON, V38, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.004; Shackleton S, 2011, INT FOREST REV, V13, P136, DOI 10.1505/146554811797406642; Shackleton S, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.003; Shanley P., 2005, CASE STUDIES NONTIMB, V3; Shepherd G., 2013, FORESTS LIVELIHOODS; Sisak L, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006; Sunderland TCH, 2011, NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT, P209, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_10; The Program on Forests (PROFOR) at the World Bank, 2015, GLOB ASS NONW FOR EC; Thondhlana G, 2012, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V19, P460, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2012.708908; UN, 2016, THE SDGS REP; Vira B, 2015, FORESTS AND FOOD: ADDRESSING HUNGER AND NUTRITION ACROSS SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPES, P1, DOI 10.11647/OBP.0085; Vira B., 2015, IUFRO WORLD SERIES, V33, P172; Wahlen C. B., 2015, US FOR SERV USFS US; Whiteman A, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V352, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.011; World Bank, 2008, AGRIC RURAL DEV, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7163- 3; Wunder S, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.007	67	22	23	0	16	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV	AMSTERDAM	PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	NOV	2017	84				SI		11	19		10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.006	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.006			9	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	FM3DQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000414884900003
J	Batista, M; Caiado, RGG; Quelhas, OLG; Lima, GBA; Leal, W; Yparraguirre, ITR				Batista, Marcio; Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes; Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo Luiz; Alves Lima, Gilson Brito; Leal Filho, Walter; Rocha Yparraguirre, Ivany Terezinha			A framework for sustainable and integrated municipal solid waste management: Barriers and critical factors to developing countries	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Integrated solid waste management; sustainable development; barriers; critical; factors; systematic literature review; municipalities	PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; INCINERATION; ENERGY; BRAZIL; COLLECTION; GENERATION; CHALLENGES; RECOVERY; SYSTEMS; GREEN	Developing countries adopt policies to reduce the negative impacts of large amount of waste generated by accelerated industrialization and rapid urbanization, but these actions are far from establishing procedures that meet society's needs, especially regarding the management of municipal solid waste (MSW), which requires the cooperation of numerous stakeholders, and a broad plan of action, in terms of sustainability cities' targets and policies. In this sense, sustainable and integrated solid waste management (S-ISWM) emerges as a solution to address the growing challenges of disposing of MSW in developing countries municipalities. However, to guide SISWM implementation there still a need of a framework with a multi-stakeholder and holistic perspective of the MSW management, considering the barriers and critical success factors (CSFs) to achieve it. To this end, a systematic literature review using the PRISMA diagram on the Scopus and Web of Science databases, and then, a content analysis of 75 articles, which met the eligibility criteria, were carried out. As a result, were identified eight barriers, 11 CSFs, which were grouped according to five pillars - public policies, disposal techniques, legal aspects, public-private partnership (PPP) and energy recovery - that affect the municipal S-ISWM and were pointed out ways of implementing these factors in practice. Finally, it was proposed a management artifact - a framework towards S-ISWM - based on state-of-the-art CSFs and barriers, mainly oriented to waste to energy, to the developing countries municipalities. This study offers theoretical, practical, and political implications, serving as a stimulus for the development of public policies with a multidisciplinary approach, providing environmental, economic, and societal contributions, and, thus, encouraging the achievement of the eleventh and the twelfth sustainable development goals.	[Batista, Marcio; Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes; Alves Lima, Gilson Brito; Rocha Yparraguirre, Ivany Terezinha] Fed Fluminense Univ UFF, Management Syst Dept, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil; [Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes] Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio de Janeiro PUC Rio, Tecgraf Inst, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; [Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes; Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo Luiz; Alves Lima, Gilson Brito] Fed Fluminense Univ UFF, Dept Prod Engn, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil; [Leal Filho, Walter] Hamburg Univ Appl Sci, European Sch Sustainabil Sci & Res, Fac Life Sci, Hamburg, Germany		Caiado, RGG (corresponding author), Fed Fluminense Univ UFF, Management Syst Dept, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.; Caiado, RGG (corresponding author), Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio de Janeiro PUC Rio, Tecgraf Inst, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.; Caiado, RGG (corresponding author), Fed Fluminense Univ UFF, Dept Prod Engn, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.	marciobatista@terra.com.br; rodrigocaiado@tecgraf.puc-rio.br; osvaldoquelhas@id.uff.br; glima@id.uff.br; walter.leal@haw-hamburg.de; ivanytry@tjrj.jus.br	Leal, Walter/ACX-9082-2022; Caiado, Rodrigo/S-9342-2019; Leal, Walter/AAU-6997-2021	Leal, Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225; Caiado, Rodrigo/0000-0002-3290-8385; Leal, Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225; Batista Pereira, Marcio/0000-0001-6645-7087	Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]; Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [300007/2019-1]	Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)(Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)); Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ))	This work was supported by the Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) Finance Code 001, and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) - 300007/2019-1.	Abbasi SA, 2018, ENERGY SUSTAIN SOC, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13705-018-0175-y; Allegrini E, 2014, J HAZARD MATER, V270, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.048; Amorim S., 2013, ORG SUSTENTABILIDADE, V2, P59; ANTMAN EM, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V268, P240, DOI 10.1001/jama.268.2.240; Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]; Asefi H, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P2287, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1714562; Azevedo BD, 2021, WASTE MANAGE, V120, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.001; Azevedo BD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1377, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.162; Bagatini A, 2017, REV UFPR; Marotti ACB, 2017, DESENVOLV MEIO AMBIE, V41, P191, DOI 10.5380/dma.v41i0.46020; Bartholomeu D., 2011, LOGISTICA AMBIENTAL; Beigl P, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.011; Berezin A., 2015, INT MULTIDISCIPLINAR, V2, DOI [10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B22/S6.020, DOI 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B22/S6.020]; Besen G., 2010, RESIDUOS SOLIDOS VUL; Beylot A., 2017, JORNAL ECOLOGIA IND, V22, P1, DOI [10.1111/jiec.12701, DOI 10.1111/JIEC.12701]; Briner R.B., 2012, OXFORD HDB EVIDENCE, P112; Burke R, 2017, ACCOUNT FORUM, V41, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.004; Buso M, 2017, INT J IND ORGAN, V51, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.12.002; Caiado R, 2018, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V24, P1659, DOI 10.3846/tede.2018.3119; Chalhoub MS, 2018, COGENT ENVIRON SCI, V4, DOI 10.1080/23311843.2018.1529853; Chen XD, 2010, WASTE MANAGE, V30, P716, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.011; Chin W. W., 2000, P 21 INT C INF SYST, P553; Corvellec H, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P1722, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.005; Cui CY, 2018, INT J PROJ MANAG, V36, P773, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004; Cunha L, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P1101, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.183; Cunha S., 2013, QUESTAO AMBIENTAL DI; da Silva CL, 2017, URBE-CURITIBA, V9, P276, DOI [10.1590/2175-3369.009.002.AO09, 10.1590/2175-3369.009.002.ao09]; Alfaia RGDM, 2017, WASTE MANAGE RES, V35, P1195, DOI 10.1177/0734242X17735375; Denyer D., 2009, SAGE HDB ORG RES MET, P671, DOI DOI 10.1080/03634528709378635; Diaz GR, 2017, UTIL POLICY, V48, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2016.04.011; Elsaid S, 2015, MANAG RES REV, V38, P1086, DOI 10.1108/MRR-11-2014-0264; Filho WL, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P4377, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.065; Fleury A., 2000, MODELO ORG NEGOCIOS; Freitas J., 2015, REV DIREITO ADM; Fuss M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.051; Gonçalves Andriani Tavares Tenório, 2018, Rev. Ambient. Água, V13, pe2157, DOI 10.4136/ambi-agua.2157; Gouveia N, 2012, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V17, P1503, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232012000600014; Grau E.R., 2018, ORDEM EC CONSTITUICA, V19th; Guimar  aes F., 2013, PPP PARCERIA PUBLICO; Guo Y., 2019, REV LIVROS AVALIACAO, P1; Caiado RGG, 2021, INT J PROD ECON, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107883; Caiado RGG, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P890, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166; Hueskes M, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1184, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.020; Iqbal A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138622; Jacobsen R, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.015; Jin JJ, 2006, WASTE MANAGE, V26, P1045, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.08.006; Julianelli V, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104784; Keers BBM, 2018, INT J PROJ MANAG, V36, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.001; Kosuke T, 2014, SCI DIRECT; Kruger C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V191, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.180; Leite W., 2012, 7 C MEIO AMB; Li XM, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V104, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.084; Li Y, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V46, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.008; Limanto A, 2017, 2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER AND IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT (CITSM 2017), P122; Lins MG, 2021, TOTAL QUAL MANAG BUS, V32, P606, DOI 10.1080/14783363.2019.1624518; Lira W., 2013, GESTAO SUSTENTAVEL R, P326; Liu TT, 2016, INT J PROJ MANAG, V34, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.004; Loosemore M, 2015, INT J PROJ MANAG, V33, P1325, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.005; Lopes AI, 2015, J ECON BUS, V79, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2015.01.001; Jabbour ABLDS, 2014, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V16, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10098-013-0600-z; Ma J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082804; Ma J, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V56, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.041; Macedo A., 2015, POLITICA SEGURANCA P, DOI [10.1590/1679-395117188, DOI 10.1590/1679-395117188]; Machado P.A.L., 2013, DIREITO AMBIENTAL BR; Malav LC, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123227; Margallo M, 2015, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V17, P1333, DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-0961-6; Marques RC, 2018, UTIL POLICY, V50, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2017.10.004; Marshall RE, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P988, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.023; Martins I., 2011, COMENTARIOS LEI RESP; Mayring P, 2004, COMPANION QUALITATIV, V1, P159; Mbuligwe SE, 2006, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V47, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.11.002; McCormick K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003; Melnik AN, 2016, INT MULTIDDISCIP SCI, P213; Mikic M, 2013, WASTE MANAGE RES, V31, P1102, DOI 10.1177/0734242X13487582; Milare E., 2016, REV SAO PAULO; Milare E., 2013, REVISTAS, P8; Mittal VK, 2014, PROC CIRP, V17, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.075; Moher D, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]; Mongeon P, 2016, SCIENTOMETRICS, V106, P213, DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5; Moore MA, 2017, UTIL POLICY, V48, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2017.08.008; Moya D, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V134, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.618; Munn Z, 2018, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4; Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V148, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.172; Nanda S, 2021, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V19, P1433, DOI 10.1007/s10311-020-01100-y; Neto P.N., 2013, RESIDUOS SOLIDOS URB; Parasuraman A, 2005, J SERV RES-US, V7, P213, DOI 10.1177/1094670504271156; Peerapong P, 2016, ENG J-THAIL, V20, P171, DOI 10.4186/ej.2016.20.4.171; Pietzsch N, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V67, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004; PIOVESAN Flavia, 2013, DIREITOS HUMANOS DIR; Pitkanen K, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V139, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.071; Quintero O., 2018, COLOMBIA INVESTIGACI, DOI [10.14350/rig.59559, DOI 10.14350/RIG.59559]; Rada EC, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P785, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.002; Rafailovich A., 2017, PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTE, P928; Ramos N.F, 2017, ENG SANIT AMBIENT; Ravi V, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.07.002; Romeiro A.R., 2011, AVALIACAO CUSTOS BEN; Saieg P, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.030; Sanches AC, 2017, REV GEST AMBIENT SUS, V6, P124, DOI 10.5585/geas.v6i2.739; Schalch V., 2009, ESTRATEGIA GESTAO RE; Schalch V., 2012, POLITICA NACL RESIDU; Schalch V., 2019, RESIDUOS SOLIDOS CON; Selau C.C, 2018, GESTAO GERENCIAMENTO, P159; Seuring S, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V56, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.033; Shah PJ, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V78, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.019; Silva F., 2017, CADERNOS GRADUACAO C, V4, P37; SILVA J. A., 2019, DIREITO AMBIENTAL CO, V11; Soltani A., 2015, WASTE MANAG; Sun XF, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V31, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.079; Tan ST, 2015, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V102, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.010; Thome AMT, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P408, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464; Themelis N.J., 2013, EARTH ENG CTR; Themelis N.J., 2013, GUIA RECUPERACAO ENE; Ti'ebauth K., 2017, ELLE SEFFECTUE MAJOR; Un Environment, 2018, PERSP GEST RES AM LA; Vaitkus A, 2019, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V212, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.014; Vasconcelos A., 2017, DIREITO AMBIENTAL EM; Whitmore A, 2015, INFORM SYST FRONT, V17, P261, DOI 10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2; Wilson DC, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V35, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006; Zotos G, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P1686, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.11.016	119	12	12	5	5	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2021	312								127516	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127516	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127516		JUN 2021	14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UD4WA		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000687207100008
J	Meran, G; Siehlow, M; von Hirschhausen, C				Meran, Georg; Siehlow, Markus; von Hirschhausen, Christian			Pipes, Taps, and Vendors: An Integrated Water Management Approach	WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY			English	Article						C31 (Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Spatial Models); R12 (Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity); O17 (Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy); Q25 (Water)	URBAN WATER; DEMAND; PRICE	This paper applies a microeconomics-based stylized model to identify the optimal modal split of water supply infrastructure in regions of the Global South against the background of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 6. Based on an assumed linear city, we calculate the optimal modal split of water supply. Not all water users need to be connected to a centralized, pipeline-based water supply network from an economic perspective. We calculate the optimal tap density and the optimal spatial range of households served by non-mobile or mobile water vendors for the area with unconnected households. The analysis is made for the case of water requirement (totally inelastic water demand), and afterward, the research will be extended to the case of an elastic water demand based on a Stone-Geary utility function to incorporate price and income effects. The result, an "optimal modal split" between network-based water supply and other supply options, has main implications on water tariffication. While the volumetric elements of the tariff are based on the marginal costs, the level of the access fee mainly depends on the subsistence level of water.	[Meran, Georg; Siehlow, Markus; von Hirschhausen, Christian] Berlin Univ Technol, Meran, Germany; [Meran, Georg; von Hirschhausen, Christian] DIW Berlin, Berlin, Germany		von Hirschhausen, C (corresponding author), Berlin Univ Technol, Meran, Germany.; von Hirschhausen, C (corresponding author), DIW Berlin, Berlin, Germany.	g.meran@tu-berlin.de; markus.siehlow@tu-berlin.de; cvh@wip.tu-berlin.de						Adewumi I.J., 2012, MEDITERRANEAN J SOCI, V3, P229; Ahmad MT, 2017, APPL WATER SCI, V7, P1191, DOI 10.1007/s13201-016-0507-z; Alaerts, 2000, BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, P1, DOI DOI 10.1061/40517(2000)241; Chaudhury A., 2013, CAN WATER VENDORS HE; Collignon, 1999, POTENTIAL LIMITS PRI; Collignon Bernard., 2000, INDEPENDENT WATER SA; Cook J, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P841, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017468; Dalhuisen JM, 2003, LAND ECON, V79, P292, DOI 10.2307/3146872; Deaton A., 1980, EC CONSUMER BEHAV; Gaudin S, 2001, LAND ECON, V77, P399, DOI 10.2307/3147133; Hotelling H, 1929, ECON J, V39, P41, DOI 10.2307/2224214; Kjellen M., 2006, INFORMAL WATER VENDO; LOVEI L, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P1965, DOI 10.1029/92WR02998; Luengo M., 2010, PROVISION WATER POOR; Mitlin, 2006, SMALL WATER ENTERPRI; Njiru C., 2004, Water Policy, V6, P443; OECD, 2005, RUR COST FUNCT WAT S; Okun DA., 1984, AQUA, V5, P289; Olmstead SM, 2007, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V54, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.03.002; Opryszko MC, 2009, J WATER HEALTH, V7, P609, DOI 10.2166/wh.2009.213; Pauliuk S, 2014, URBAN WATER J, V11, P274, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.795234; Portes A, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY, SECOND EDITION, P403; Proost S, 2019, J ECON LIT, V57, P575, DOI 10.1257/jel.20181414; Rahaman MM, 2016, J WATER RESOUR ENG M, V3, P15; SALOP SC, 1979, BELL J ECON, V10, P141, DOI 10.2307/3003323; Sansom K., 2008, International Journal of Water, V4, P290, DOI 10.1504/IJW.2008.019499; Schwartz J, 2005, WORLD BANK POLICY RE; SNELL S, 1998, WATER SANITATION SER; Solo TM, 1999, ENVIRON URBAN, V11, P117, DOI 10.1177/095624789901100120; Tirole J., 1988, THEORY IND ORG JEAN; Tsukada, 2011, SMALL SCALE WATER PR; UN, 2019, MILLENNIUM DEV GOALS; UNDP, 2015, WORLD LEAD AD SUST D; von Hirschhausen, 2020, EC WATER RULES I; WHITTINGTON D, 1991, WORLD DEV, V19, P179, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90254-F; Whittington D., 1989, International Journal of Water Resources Development, V5, P158, DOI 10.1080/07900628908722429; WHITTINGTON D, 1990, WORLD DEV, V18, P269, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(90)90052-Y; Wutich A, 2016, WORLD DEV, V79, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.043; Wutich A, 2014, CURR ANTHROPOL, V55, P444, DOI 10.1086/677311	39	0	0	1	1	WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD	SINGAPORE	5 TOH TUCK LINK, SINGAPORE 596224, SINGAPORE	2382-624X	2382-6258		WATER ECON POLICY	Water Econ. Policy	OCT	2021	07	04							2150018	10.1142/S2382624X21500181	http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X21500181		DEC 2021	29	Economics; Environmental Studies; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	ZW2AQ		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000735241000002
J	Cho, CH; Kim, A; Rodrigue, M; Schneider, T				Cho, Charles H.; Kim, Anna; Rodrigue, Michelle; Schneider, Thomas			Towards a better understanding of sustainability accounting and management research and teaching in North America: a look at the community	SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL			English	Article						Academic life; North America; Education; Research; Sustainability accounting; Sustainability management	ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; CORPORATE; REFLECTIONS; EXPLORATION; CSR	Purpose The purpose of this paper is two-fold. The first is to provide insight into the academic life, teaching and research activities of active participants in the sustainability accounting and management academic community in North America. The second is to provide readers with an overview of the papers in this special issue. Design/methodology/approach To meet the first objective, we specifically sought out those who self-identify as sustainability accounting and management academics, based in North American universities and who actively engage in the sustainability academic community in North America. Using an anonymous online survey, this group was asked to respond to various questions about their academic life, research and teaching activities. Findings Survey respondents report that they choose to focus on sustainability accounting and management because they want to make a difference (change the world). To that end, the respondents identify carbon emissions and climate change, social issues such as inequalities, as well as grand challenges and sustainable development goals, as important research topics to pursue in the future. While passionate about their research topics, respondents generally note that research outlets that will serve to significantly move their careers forward are difficult to find. A relatively small number of respondents teach sustainability accounting or management, however, most courses taught are dedicated to the topic and teaching sustainability was identified as amongst the most enjoyable aspects of their academic lives. Practical implications With study respondents feeling closed out of a number of mainstream journals, career paths at North American institutions could appear somewhat limited for those choosing sustainability accounting and management research as a focus, interest and even passion. This is perhaps even more profound on the teaching side where from a practical perspective, we need to be teaching accountants and managers the significance of sustainability in and for the profession, yes - but even more so for society broadly. Social implications As we move into the digital age, it is important that professionals bend their minds to sustainability as much as they do to keep up with the "pace of change" on other fronts. A potential risk is that "high-tech" subsumes equally important social aspects that need to be embedded in the process of generating accounting and management professionals. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a survey on the work experiences of a sample of scholars teaching and doing research in the area of sustainability accounting and management has been presented for publication. It is meant to provide some descriptive insights into what drives some active participants in this group of academics and reflect on where the future might lead as sustainability becomes an urgent necessity rather than a choice. These descriptive insights and reflections provide a starting point for future inquiries.	[Cho, Charles H.] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON, Canada; [Kim, Anna] McGill Univ, Desautels Fac Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Rodrigue, Michelle] Univ Laval, Sch Accounting, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; [Schneider, Thomas] Ryerson Univ, Sch Accounting & Finance, Toronto, ON, Canada		Cho, CH (corresponding author), York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON, Canada.	ccho@schulich.yorku.ca	Kim, Anna/AAF-7421-2020; Rodrigue, Michelle/E-5238-2016	Rodrigue, Michelle/0000-0003-4083-8505	Erivan K. Haub Chair in Business & Sustainability at the Schulich School of Business	Erivan K. Haub Chair in Business & Sustainability at the Schulich School of Business	We would like to thank Editor Carol Adams who gave us the opportunity to put together this Special Issue. We are also grateful to all the great reviewers who took time out of their busy schedules to provide constructive feedback to all the papers submitted to the Special Issue. We would also like to thank the Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers who provided valuable guidance for the development of this paper through the revision process. Last but not least, we wish to thank Oumayma Ouzane, Patrick Vipond and Emily Nield for their outstanding research assistance. Charles Cho acknowledges the financial support provided by the Erivan K. Haub Chair in Business & Sustainability at the Schulich School of Business. We would also like to pay a tribute to the memory of Professor Rob Gray who recently, and very sadly, passed away. Rob is the pioneer of the Sustainability Accounting field, and the founder of the Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR). As a brilliant and groundbreaking scholar, dear friend, colleague and mentor, Rob has always been incredibly supportive of the development of sustainability accounting research and the CSEAR community in North America, and was the inaugural plenary speaker of the first-ever CSEAR North America Conference in 2008 (organized by two of the four authors of this paper). He paved the way for so many scholars and is part of the reasons why the four of us ended up working together on this Special Issue that we wish to dedicate to him. Thank you Rob for your support, inspiration and passion.	Adams CA, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P2367, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3399; Bebbington J, 2017, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V48, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.06.002; Bell A., 2012, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V3, P68; Boncori I, 2019, MANAGE LEARN, V50, P74, DOI 10.1177/1350507618784555; Boulianne E., 2018, ADV ENV ACCOUNTING M, V7, P71; Bryman A., 2015, BUSINESS RES METHODS, V4th; Bujaki M.L., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY ACCOU, V11; Bunderson JS, 2009, ADMIN SCI QUART, V54, P32, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32; Burrell G, 1979, SOCIOLOGICAL PARADIG; Camilleri MA, 2017, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V8, P77, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2016-0023; Camors C, 2020, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V11, P1095, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0330; Chartered Professional Accountants (CPA) Canada, 2019, WAY FORW TRANSF INS; Chen J., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY ACCOU, V11; Cho C. H., 2019, CAN ACCOUNTANTS SAVE; Cho CH, 2014, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V5, P130, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2014-0003; Cho CH, 2013, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V24, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.04.003; Cho CH, 2010, ADV ENVIRON ACC MAN, V4, P161, DOI 10.1108/S1479-3598(2010)0000004010; Conklin TA, 2012, J MANAGE INQUIRY, V21, P298, DOI 10.1177/1056492611414426; Easterby-Smith M., 2015, MANAGEMENT BUSINESS; Efthimiou O, 2017, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V8, P489, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2015-0074; Everett J, 2007, ACCOUNT FORUM, V31, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2006.12.002; Ferguson J, 2007, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V20, P912, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570710830290; Fogarty TJ, 2019, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V60, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2018.09.001; Gendron Y, 2021, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.003; Gibassier D, 2018, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V9, P202, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2018-151; Gray R, 2010, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V1, P11, DOI 10.1108/20408021011059205; Gray R, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006; Kurpierz JR, 2020, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V11, P1075, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0272; Laine M., 2009, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V22, P1029, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570910987367; Lawson RA, 2014, ISS ACCOUNT EDUC, V29, P295, DOI 10.2308/iace-50673; Malsch B, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V26, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.006; McDonald-Kerr L, 2017, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V8, P43, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0116; McElroy MW, 2015, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V6, P425, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2015-0025; Merchant KA, 2010, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V21, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.004; Messner M, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V26, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.013; Meyer M, 2018, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V51, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.07.001; Michaelson C, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V121, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5; Milne MJ, 2013, J BUS ETHICS, V118, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8; Mitra R, 2017, HUM RELAT, V70, P594, DOI 10.1177/0018726716663288; Murray A, 2010, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V1, P161, DOI 10.1108/20408021011089220; Patten D. M., 2013, FINANCIAL REPORTING, V2, P9; Patten RK, 2020, FRONT PHYSIOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00606; Ramsden C, 2014, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V5, P224, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2012-0033; Roberts RW, 2018, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V51, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.10.006; Rodrigue M, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P119, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1305; Smith C, 2020, ORGANIZATION, V27, P840, DOI 10.1177/1350508419867201; SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788; Van der Stede WA, 2018, ISS ACCOUNT EDUC, V33, P85, DOI 10.2308/iace-52050; Wright C, 2012, HUM RELAT, V65, P1561, DOI 10.1177/0018726712457698	49	7	7	10	33	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	2040-8021	2040-803X		SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA	Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J.	OCT 21	2020	11	6			SI		985	1007		10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2019-0311	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2019-0311		JUL 2020	23	Business, Finance; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PB2LN					2022-09-08	WOS:000557587300001
J	Wang, C; Zhan, JY; Zhang, F; Liu, W; Twumasi-Ankrah, MJ				Wang, Chao; Zhan, Jinyan; Zhang, Fan; Liu, Wei; Twumasi-Ankrah, Micheal Jordan			Analysis of urban carbon balance based on land use dynamics in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Carbon balance; LUCC; Carbon emissions; Urban management; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei	ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COVER CHANGE; SOIL CARBON; SEQUESTRATION; EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION; URBANIZATION; CONSUMPTION; BIOMASS	Faced with climate change, rapid urbanization, and ecosystem degradation, comprehensive analysis of carbon balance are urgently required to achieve the envisioned sustainable development goals. This study proposed an integrated framework incorporating land use dynamics and carbon balance into the urban management system, according to the logic of "Background & Objectives-Carbon balance-(Natural system + Land use and land cover change + Socio-economic system)-Policy & Strategy". This is followed by the case study and specific policy implications of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, a typical urban agglomeration in China. Results show that the land use structure of the BTH region remained relatively steady from 2000 to 2015. Cultivated land is primarily distributed in the southeast, with a slight decrease from 50.72% in 2000 to 47.63% in 2015. Carbon emissions from built up land have the highest proportion and increased from 82.58% in 2000 to 92.43% in 2015. Carbon sinks are mainly found in the northwest, and carbon sources are mainly found in the southeast. The carbon balance is increasingly unsettled, with a sharply decreasing rate from 2.73% in 2000 to 0.66% in 2015. Comprehensive policies are proposed from four specific aspects, i.e., strengthening land governance, land use planning, optimizing industrial structure, and regulating residential behavior. The results and conclusions provide scientific evidences for the regional spatial management to achieve sustainable development. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Wang, Chao; Zhan, Jinyan; Liu, Wei; Twumasi-Ankrah, Micheal Jordan] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Fan] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China		Zhan, JY (corresponding author), Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.	wangchao@mail.bnu.edu.cn; zhanjy@bnu.edu.cn; zhangf.ccap@igsnrr.ac.cn; liuw@mail.bnu.edu.cn; 201929180016@mail.bnu.edu.cn	Liu, Wei/AAA-2253-2020; Wang, Chao/AAZ-6399-2021; Fan, Zhang/AAZ-3509-2021	Liu, Wei/0000-0002-9199-9678; Wang, Chao/0000-0002-8764-5543	State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71533004, 72033005]; National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602500]	State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); National Key Research and Development Program of China	This work was supported by research funds from the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71533004 and 72033005) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0602500).	[Anonymous], PHYS CHEM EARTH; [Anonymous], PHYS CHEM EARTH; [Anonymous], 2007, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-909493-38-4_2; Canu DM, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.008; Chen YJ, 2013, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V66, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.022; Chu X, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.296; Chuai XW, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V84, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.003; Chuai XW, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P13021, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b01732; Deng XZ, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V144, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.027; Deng XZ, 2016, J LAND USE SCI, V11, P709, DOI 10.1080/1747423X.2016.1241312; Deng XZ, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P985, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.174; Deng XZ, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V45, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.007; Duffy C, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110523; Fang J., 1996, CARBON CYCLE TERREST; Fang JY, 2007, SCI CHINA SER D, V50, P92, DOI 10.1007/s11430-007-2031-3; Huang L, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119908; Johansson TB, 1996, ENERG POLICY, V24, P985, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(96)80362-4; Kuang Y. Q, 2010, CHINA POPULATION RES, V20, P56; [李璐 Li Lu], 2019, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V34, P1003; Li YN, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V210, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.249; Liu WG, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V91, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.087; Mi ZF, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.034; Neupane PR, 2017, INT FOREST REV, V19, P120; Ngara T., 2006, IPCC GUIDELINES NATL; Ohashi H, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-13241-y; Pei J, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-31733-7; Piao SL, 2009, NATURE, V458, P1009, DOI 10.1038/nature07944; Piao SL, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2004GB002274; Prada M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V718, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137446; Prasad M, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V100, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.060; Runst P, 2020, ENERG ECON, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104898; Sahle M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V624, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.033; SCC, 2015, JING JIN JI COORD DE; Shan YL, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0393-y; Shan YL, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.201; Shan YL, 2016, APPL ENERG, V184, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.073; Shi H, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137001; Tao J, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105880; Tiwari S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123270; Viglizzo EF, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.130; Wang C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V685, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.064; Wang C, 2019, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V110, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.09.001; Wang C, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V208, P1357, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.257; Wang CD, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1529, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.294; Wang JL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V662, P824, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.260; Wang L, 2019, POSTHARVEST BIOL TEC, V154, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.04.013; Wang Q, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838; Wang Q, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126506; Wang SP, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.002; Wang S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V721, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137814; Wang YT, 2016, APPL ENERG, V184, P779, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.026; Wang ZH, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.330; Wang ZH, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V61, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.015; West TO, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V91, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00233-X; Wu JS, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V645, P692, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.086; Xia CY, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V104, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.031; Xu LX, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.014; Xuan D, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122383; Zeng L, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106347; Zhang WT, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V122, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.014; Zhang X, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V44, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.003; Zhang XH, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119961; Zhu EY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P930, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.317; Zhu M.C., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENV, V714, P17	64	9	10	36	124	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 25	2021	281								125138	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125138	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125138			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PU0SC					2022-09-08	WOS:000609019000004
J	Qorri, A; Gashi, S; Kraslawski, A				Qorri, Ardian; Gashi, Saranda; Kraslawski, Andrzej			A practical method to measure sustainability performance of supply chains with incomplete information	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Performance measurement; Pharmaceutical industry; SSCM; Sustainable environmental performance; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy entropy	DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; FUZZY TOPSIS; GREEN; SYSTEMS; INITIATIVES; PRESSURES; COMPANIES; CRITERIA	Measuring and managing supply chain sustainability is essential for achieving sustainable development goals. Existing methods fail to assess all three sustainability aspects across supply chain partners when measuring sustainability performance. Hence, this paper aims to develop a new method that evaluates environmental, social, and economic sustainability aspects across the entire supply chain, from raw material providers to consumers to reverse logistics providers. By combining content analysis, expert's evaluation, fuzzy Shannon's Entropy, and fuzzy TOPSIS, we develop a novel approach to measure the end-to-end supply chain sustainability performance. Utilizing data from six sustainability reports published by large pharmaceutical companies we demonstrate the practicality and ease of application of the proposed solution. Results show that the developed method can be used by managers and policymakers to benchmark supply chains and evaluate the effectiveness of adopted sustainable supply chain initiatives. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis indicates that the results obtained from the proposed method are promising and robust. Researchers and practitioners can use the proposed approach to measure sustainability, increase their value chain transparency, and identify potential environmental and social issues across their supply chains, leading to more informed decision-making about the implementation of sustainability practices across inter-organizational processes.	[Qorri, Ardian; Gashi, Saranda; Kraslawski, Andrzej] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Ind Engn & Management, POB 20, FI-53581 Lappeenranta, Finland		Qorri, A (corresponding author), Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Sch Engn Sci Ind Engn & Management, POB 20, FI-53581 Lappeenranta, Finland.	ardian.qorri@lut.fi; saranda.gashi@lut.fi; andrzej.kraslawski@lut.fi						Abdul-Rashid SH, 2017, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V37, P182, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223; Agrawal S, 2016, COMPET REV, V26, P289, DOI 10.1108/CR-04-2015-0029; Ahi P, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005; Ahi P, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V52, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018; Allen C., 2012, GUIDEBOOK GREEN EC; Aras G, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.175; Arcese G, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P1027, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.137; Awasthi A, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P12270, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.005; Azam Saiful., 2013, CORP OWNERSH CONTROL, V11, P754, DOI DOI 10.22495/COCV11I1C8ART6; Beske-Janssen P, 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V20, P664, DOI 10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0216; Buyukozkan G, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.064; Calabrese A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V121, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005; Cankaya SY, 2019, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V30, P98, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099; Chan F. T. S., 2003, Management Decision, V41, P635, DOI 10.1108/00251740310495568; Chaturvedi U, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P1358, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.184; Das D, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P1344, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006; De Giovanni P, 2012, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V32, P265, DOI 10.1108/01443571211212574; Demir M, 2019, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V10, P333, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2018-0094; Diaz-Balteiro L, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V258, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075; Ding BY, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V119, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.031; Docekalova MP, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V78, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.038; dos Santos BM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.235; Eltayeb TK, 2011, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V55, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003; Erol I, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1088, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001; Esfahbodi A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V155, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098; Gardas BB, 2019, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V68, P958, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2018-0154; Gernaey KV, 2012, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.02.022; Govindan K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V47, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014; Halabi S.F., 2015, FOOD DRUG REGULATION, P51, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-802311-2.00005-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802311-2.00005-9]; Hassini E, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042; Hervani AA, 2005, BENCHMARKING, V12, P330, DOI 10.1108/14635770510609015; Hwang C.-L., 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, P58, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101873]; Joshi R, 2018, COMPUT APPL MATH, V37, P5624, DOI 10.1007/s40314-018-0656-9; Kannan D, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V233, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023; Koenig SG, 2017, CURR OPIN GREEN SUST, V7, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.07.004; Kumar A, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P3554, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1543969; Kumar S, 2008, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V38, P601, DOI 10.1108/09600030810915134; Laosirihongthong T, 2013, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V113, P1088, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0164; Li J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V222, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.070; Li N, 2019, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/math7121150; Li XH, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.066; Linton JD, 2007, J OPER MANAG, V25, P1075, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012; Lotfi FH, 2010, ENTROPY-SWITZ, V12, P53, DOI 10.3390/e12010053; Low YS, 2016, J PHARM INNOV, V11, P250, DOI 10.1007/s12247-016-9255-8; Mani V., 2016, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, V24, P18; Meherishi L, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057; Milanesi M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121204; Min M, 2017, J MANAG DEV, V36, P58, DOI 10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0103; Mujkic Z., 2019, INT J MANAG SUSTAIN, V8, P98, DOI [10.18488/ journal.11.2019.82.98.110, DOI 10.18488/JOURNAL.11.2019.82.98.110]; Nematollahi M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P2876, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.126; Olugu EU, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026; Papoutsi A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121049; Phillis YA, 2010, IEEE SYST J, V4, P15, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2039734; Piotrowicz W, 2015, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V64, P1068, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2014-0064; Qorri A, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P194, DOI 10.1002/sd.2140; Qorri A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V189, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.073; Rani P, 2020, INT J FUZZY SYST, V22, P735, DOI 10.1007/s40815-019-00689-9; Rao P, 2005, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V25, P898, DOI 10.1108/01443570510613956; Roschangar F, 2017, GREEN CHEM, V19, P281, DOI 10.1039/c6gc02901a; Schneider JL, 2010, BENCHMARKING, V17, P421, DOI 10.1108/14635771011049371; Schoggl JP, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.035; Sengul U, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V75, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045; Shafiee M, 2014, APPL MATH MODEL, V38, P5092, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023; SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x; Singh RK, 2016, INT J PHARM HEALTHC, V10, P234, DOI 10.1108/IJPHM-10-2015-0050; Sloan T., 2010, J GLOBAL BUSINESS MA, V6, P92; Srivastava SK, 2007, INT J MANAG REV, V9, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x; Sroufe R, 2003, PROD OPER MANAG, V12, P416; Tachizawa EM, 2015, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V35, P1546, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2015-0023; Tajbakhsh A, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V105, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.054; Uygun O, 2016, COMPUT IND ENG, V102, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2016.02.020; Vanalle RM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.066; Veleva V., 2003, BENCHMARKING, V10, P107, DOI DOI 10.1108/14635770310469644; Veleva VR, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P2, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02277; Viegas CV, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117719; Wang L, 2021, SOFT COMPUT, V25, P973, DOI 10.1007/s00500-020-05193-z; Wicher P, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118132; Xie Y, 2014, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V19, P455, DOI 10.1108/SCM-07-2013-0255; Xie Y, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P40, DOI 10.1108/13598541211212195; Yakovleva N, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P1297, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.571926; Yazdani M, 2021, MANAGE DECIS, V59, P1801, DOI 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1088; ZADEH LA, 1965, INFORM CONTROL, V8, P338, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X; Zahiri B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V103, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.009; Zhu QH, 2004, J OPER MANAG, V22, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005; Zhu Q, 2007, INT J PROD RES, V45, P4333, DOI 10.1080/00207540701440345	85	1	1	13	13	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 20	2022	341								130707	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130707	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130707			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ZW9VZ					2022-09-08	WOS:000771553100001
J	Bleischwitz, R				Bleischwitz, Raimund			Mineral resources in the age of climate adaptation and resilience	JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY			English	Article						circular economy; climate change; economic analysis; materials efficiency; methods; resource management	SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; NEXUS; EUROPE	This article discusses issues on resources availability to achieve climate adaptation and resilience for cities and infrastructures. In the age of climate change, there could be cascading failures through a range of infrastructure breakdowns. Direct and indirect damage costs could exceed what had been estimated in traditional risk assessments. This could be exacerbated through abrupt price peaks in international supply chains of minerals, and through events happening in remote parts of the world that affect extraction and vulnerable industries. The core argument made here is one of feedbacks: climate adaptation has significant resource implications, and how resources are being used will have implications on climate strategies. Industrial Ecology has a role to play assessing those interactions and providing a better grasp of the spatial dimension of material flows, partly to track those flows and align them to specific actors, and partly to address interlinkages across different flows and their stocks ('the resource nexus'). Methodological novelties are needed to better understand the resource base and the socio-economic dimension, especially on innovations and transitions that can help to cope with the challenges ahead. Altogether this would enable research to establish an evidence base on sustainable materials to deliver parts of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to reassess infrastructure assets and the mineral resources in the age of climate adaptation and resilience.	[Bleischwitz, Raimund] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, BSEER, London, England		Bleischwitz, R (corresponding author), UCL, UCL Inst Sustainable Resources, ISR BSEER, Cent House,14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England.	r.bleischwitz@ucl.ac.uk		Bleischwitz, Raimund/0000-0001-8164-733X				Adger WN, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P755; Ali SH, 2017, NATURE, V543, P367, DOI 10.1038/nature21359; [Anonymous], 2017, RES EFF POT EC IMPL; [Anonymous], 2004, J IND ECOL; Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z; Beiser V., 2018, WORLD GRAIN STORY SA; Biggs EM, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V54, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002; Bleischwitz R., 2018, ROUTLEDGE HDB RESOUR; Bleischwitz R, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P737, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0173-2; Bleischwitz R, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V48, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.008; Bleischwitz R, 2014, EUR J FUTURES RES, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40309-013-0034-1; Bleishwitz R., 2007, MINER ENERGY, V22, P159, DOI DOI 10.1080/14041040701683664; CBI (Confederation of British Industry), 2018, UK MIN STRAT M DEM M; Christmann P, 2018, NAT RESOUR RES, V27, P159, DOI 10.1007/s11053-017-9343-6; Dawson RJ, 2018, PHILOS T R SOC A, V376, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2017.0298; Flachenecker F., 2018, INVESTING RESOURCE E; Font Vivanco D., 2017, J IND ECOLOGY, V22, P12704, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12704; Geng Y, 2019, NATURE, V565, P153, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-00017-z; Hatfield-Dodds S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V144, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.170; Kemp R., 2017, IEEP, V14, P409, DOI [10.1007/s10368-017-0384-4, DOI 10.1007/S10368-017-0384-4]; Lehne J., 2018, MAKING CONCRETE CHAN; Li FGN, 2019, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V51, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.010; Matthews, 2000, WEIGHT NATIONS; Meinert LD, 2016, RESOURCES-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/resources5010014; Murguia DI, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V180, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.040; Northey SA, 2018, NAT RESOUR RES, V27, P241, DOI 10.1007/s11053-017-9352-5; OECD, 2018, GLOB MAT RES OUTL 20; Schiller G., 2018, P 12 WORLD C RSAI; Steffen W, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P8252, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1810141115; Tangtinthai N, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V236, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.141; Tilton J. E., 2016, MINERAL EC POLICY; Tokimatsu K, 2017, APPL ENERG, V207, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.151; Torres A, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P970, DOI 10.1126/science.aao0503; Tukker A, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.002; UNEP, 2010, ASS ENV IMP CONS PRO; UNEP, 2016, ECO EFFICIENT CEMENT; Van der Voet E., 2018, ROUTLEDGE HDB RESOUR; Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110; Winning M., 2017, INT EC EC POLICY, V14, P383, DOI [10.1007/s10368-017-0385-3, DOI 10.1007/S10368-017-0385-3]	39	5	5	0	29	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1088-1980	1530-9290		J IND ECOL	J. Ind. Ecol.	APR	2020	24	2			SI		291	299		10.1111/jiec.12951	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12951		OCT 2019	9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LD6LK		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000489524600001
J	Gider, D; Hamm, U				Gider, Denise; Hamm, Ulrich			How do consumers search for and process corporate social responsibility information on food companies' websites?	INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW			English	Article						Corporate social responsibility; CSR communication; consumer; information search behavior; think-aloud protocols	SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES; CSR; PREFERENCES; BEHAVIOR; USABILITY; MARKET; CHOICE; CREDIBILITY; PERCEPTIONS; AQUACULTURE	The importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication for food companies has grown substantially ever since global action plans such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals have begun targeting topics which arc highly relevant to food companies. Furthermore, various food scandals have caused consumers to question current food production methods, leading to a search for more information on ethical production methods. However, it is not known how consumers search for and process information on websites as one relevant CSR communication channel. The objective of this study is to develop requirements for consumer-aligned CSR communication on corporate websites. Information search and processing was examined through consumers' navigation behavior on websites and by conducting think-aloud protocols. The findings of this study suggest companies provide comprehensive information that can easily be filtered. Furthermore, companies should present specific information to credibly distance themselves from greenwashing accusations, c.g. by referring to external evidence.	[Gider, Denise; Hamm, Ulrich] Kassel Univ, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Dept Agr & Food Mkt, Steinstr 19, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany		Hamm, U (corresponding author), Kassel Univ, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Dept Agr & Food Mkt, Steinstr 19, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany.	hamm@uni-kassel.de	Hamm, Ulrich/F-7886-2013; Hamm, Ulrich/AAI-6552-2020	Hamm, Ulrich/0000-0001-7444-3451				[Anonymous], 1987, REPORT WORLD COMMISS; [Anonymous], 2018, 9241112018 ISO; Aschemann-Witzel J, 2011, METHODOLOGY-EUR, V7, P1, DOI 10.1027/1614-2241/a000018; Barnett J, 2016, FOOD CONTROL, V59, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.06.021; Benbunan-Fich R, 2001, INFORM MANAGE, V39, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00085-4; Alcaniz EB, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V96, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x; BMEL (Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft Federal Ministry for Food and Agriculture), 2017, STAT BER BMEL TAB LA; Bradley OJ, 2018, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V9, P139, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2017-0015; Branch JL, 2000, LIBR INFORM SCI RES, V22, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00051-7; Bronnmann J, 2017, ECOL ECON, V142, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.005; Bryman A, 2012, SOCIAL RES METHODS, V4th; Bucklin RE, 2003, J MARKETING RES, V40, P249, DOI 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.249.19241; Carrero I, 2012, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V40, P629, DOI 10.1108/09590551211245425; Castaldo S, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V84, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9669-4; Chen YS, 2014, QUAL QUANT, V48, P2411, DOI 10.1007/s11135-013-9898-1; Cheung MY, 2009, INT J ELECTRON COMM, V13, P9, DOI 10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402; Cho C.H., 2009, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V22, P933, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570910980481; Cooke L, 2010, IEEE T PROF COMMUN, V53, P202, DOI 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859; Del Giudice T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P526, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.276; Du SL, 2010, INT J MANAG REV, V12, P8, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x; EC, 2011, REN EU STRAT 2011 14; European Commission, 2013, FLASH EUR 363 CO INF; Fatma M, 2015, MANAG RES REV, V38, P195, DOI 10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0223; Flick U., 2009, INTRO QUALITATIVE RE, V4th; Forsman-Hugg S, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P30, DOI 10.1108/00070701311289867; Gassler B, 2016, J GLOB MARK, V29, P71; Global Reporting Initiative, 2016, CONSOLIDATED SET GRI; Glover JL, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.027; Gomez M, 2018, J CONSUM BEHAV, V17, P64, DOI 10.1002/cb.1692; Grunert KG, 2018, MEAT SCI, V137, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022; Hartmann M, 2015, FOOD POLICY, V52, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.012; Hartmann M, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P124, DOI 10.1108/00070701311289911; Hartmann M, 2011, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V38, P297, DOI 10.1093/erae/jbr031; Hesse-Biber S. N., 2006, PRACTICE QUALITATIVE; Hinchliffe A, 2008, HEALTH PROMOT J AUST, V19, P29, DOI 10.1071/HE08029; Hodkinson C, 2000, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V52, P805, DOI 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0357; Holmqvist K., 2011, EYE TRACKING COMPREH; Hoppmann TK, 2009, QUAL QUANT, V43, P211, DOI 10.1007/s11135-007-9116-0; Janssen M, 2014, FOOD POLICY, V49, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.011; Jones P, 2007, MARK INTELL PLAN, V25, P17, DOI 10.1108/02634500710722371; Ju S, 2016, NUTR RES PRACT, V10, P108, DOI 10.4162/nrp.2016.10.1.108; Karstens B, 2006, INT J ADVERT, V25, P189, DOI 10.1080/02650487.2006.11072962; Klink J., 2014, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V5, P144; Klink J, 2015, NEUERE THEORIEN METH, V50, P355; Kuckartz U., 2014, QUALITATIVE TEXT ANA; Kuhl S, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P1999, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0412; Lazar J., 2003, IT SOC, V1, P18; Lee MY, 2009, CORP REPUT REV, V12, P140, DOI 10.1057/crr.2009.10; Lee Y, 2012, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V52, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004; Lerro M, 2018, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V25, P1050, DOI 10.1002/csr.1519; Lerro M, 2018, J CONSUM AFF, V52, P689, DOI 10.1111/joca.12182; Levene Mark, 2010, INTRO SEARCH ENGINES; Lombart C, 2014, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V21, P630, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.009; Loose SM, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P142, DOI 10.1108/00070701311289920; Loussalief L, 2014, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V21, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.09.005; Luhmann H., 2016, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V7, P243; Luhmann H, 2016, J AGR ENVIRON ETHIC, V29, P673, DOI 10.1007/s10806-016-9620-0; Lynch PJ, 2009, WEB STYLE GUIDE BASI; Lyon TP, 2015, ORGAN ENVIRON, V28, P223, DOI 10.1177/1086026615575332; Malhotra N. K., 2012, MARKETING RES APPL A; Maloni MJ, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V68, P35, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9038-0; Max Rubner-Institut, 2008, NAT VERZ 1; Mayring P., 2000, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO, V1; MB-Research, 2017, KAUFKR 2017 DEUTSCHL; Montiel I, 2008, ORGAN ENVIRON, V21, P245, DOI 10.1177/1086026608321329; Mozas A., 2013, Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, V11, P617; Muller H, 2014, IT STANDARDS AGRAR E, P101; Nielsen A. E, 2013, ENCY CORPORATE SOCIA, P692; Oberseder M, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V124, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1787-y; Oberseder M, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P1839, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.005; Parguel B, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V102, P15, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2; Park J, 2009, SERV IND J, V29, P1451, DOI 10.1080/02642060903026254; Poetz K, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P47, DOI 10.1108/00070701311289876; Pollach I, 2003, BUSINESS SOC, V42, P277, DOI DOI 10.1177/0007650303042002006; Pollach I, 2005, CORP COMMUN, V10, P285, DOI 10.1108/13563280510630098; Pomering A, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V85, P285, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9729-9; Rayner M, 2001, J NUTR EDUC, V33, P24, DOI 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60006-7; Risius A, 2017, APPETITE, V113, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.021; Risius A, 2017, MEAT SCI, V124, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.10.008; Ross RB, 2015, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V18, P17; Sasaki Tomomi, 2003, 2 LANGUAGE STUDIES, V22, P1; Schlegelmilch BB, 2005, J MARKET MANAG-UK, V21, P267, DOI 10.1362/0267257053779154; Senecal S, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.06.003; Singh J, 2008, J BUS ETHICS, V80, P597, DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9457-6; Solomon M. R., 2015, CONSUMER BEHAV BUYIN; Spence C, 2009, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V18, P254, DOI 10.1002/bse.600; UN, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Valor C, 2008, J CONSUM POLICY, V31, P315, DOI 10.1007/s10603-008-9070-9; van de Ven B, 2008, J BUS ETHICS, V82, P339, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9890-1; Van den Haak M. J, 2003, 49 INT PROF COMM C I; Wiese A, 2013, BRIT FOOD J, V115, P92, DOI 10.1108/00070701311289894; Zander K., 2018, METHODS CONSUMER RES, P557, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-08-102089-0.00021-2, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-102089-0.00021-2]; Zander K, 2018, J AQUAT FOOD PROD T, V27, P5, DOI 10.1080/10498850.2017.1390028; Zander K, 2010, FOOD QUAL PREFER, V21, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006; Ziek P, 2009, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V16, P137, DOI 10.1002/csr.183	95	3	3	3	33	WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS	WAGENINGEN	PO BOX 220, WAGENINGEN, 6700 AE, NETHERLANDS	1559-2448			INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN	Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev.		2019	22	2					229	246		10.22434/IFAMR2018.0062	http://dx.doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.0062			18	Agricultural Economics & Policy	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Agriculture	HO4HV		Green Published, gold			2022-09-08	WOS:000460884500005
J	Hult, GTM; Mena, JA; Gonzalez-Perez, MA; Lagerstrom, K; Hult, DT				Hult, G. Tomas M.; Mena, Jeannette A.; Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez, Maria; Lagerstrom, Katarina; Hult, Daniel T.			A Ten Country-Company Study of Sustainability and Product-Market Performance: Influences of Doing Good, Warm Glow, and Price Fairness	JOURNAL OF MACROMARKETING			English	Article						sustainability; international marketing; sustainable development; sustainable marketing; sustainable consumption	RESOURCE-BASED THEORY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; OF-ORIGIN; MODEL; SUBSIDIARIES; INSTITUTIONS; SATISFACTION; ISOMORPHISM; INDICATORS; DECISIONS	Countries, companies, and customers are becoming increasingly concerned with sustainability. However, it is unclear how much increased cost, if any, companies are willing to tolerate for sustainability efforts at the rate of potentially lower profits. Plus, what are the customers' sensitivities to the prices of products/services that are developed within the realm of sustainability initiatives (e.g., how much more can the products/services cost and still be viable)? Additionally, with 193 countries of the United Nations ratifying the Sustainable Development Goals, we know that countries are focused on sustainability, but can companies achieve positive sustainability effects on performance above what countries are doing? Consequently, what are the macro-micro dynamics in play for sustainability efforts? In a 10-country study involving 4,051 companies, we examine these macro-micro (country-company) dynamics, company costs, customer costs, and price sensitivities on the effects of sustainability on companies' performance. The results indicate that positive effects on companies' performance can be achieved (1) from the companies' sustainability efforts in all 10 countries studied, (2) even if the costs and/or prices increased by 27 to 72 percent (depending on the dynamic and scenario), and (3) by companies implementing sustainability efforts that are 5 to 30 percent above the efforts of the country. Increased sustainability effects can also be gained from lowering customer and company costs, but no such effects were found when lowering product prices.	[Hult, G. Tomas M.] Michigan State Univ, Broad Coll Business, 645 N Shaw Ln,Room 7, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Mena, Jeannette A.] Univ S Florida, Muma Coll Business, Mkt, Tampa, FL USA; [Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez, Maria] Univ EAFIT, Escuela Adm, Medellin, Colombia; [Lagerstrom, Katarina] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Uppsala, Sweden; [Hult, Daniel T.] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Business Adm Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA		Hult, GTM (corresponding author), Michigan State Univ, Broad Coll Business, 645 N Shaw Ln,Room 7, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA.	hult@msu.edu	Gonzalez-Perez, Maria Alejandra/B-1863-2012; Hult, G. Tomas M./F-5055-2012	Gonzalez-Perez, Maria Alejandra/0000-0001-6338-4281; Hult, G. Tomas M./0000-0003-1728-7856				Agrawal J, 1999, INT J RES MARK, V16, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8116(99)00017-8; ANDERSON JC, 1987, MANAGE SCI, V33, P525, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.33.4.525; Andrews M, 2014, J MARKETING, V78, P120, DOI 10.1509/jm.14.0003; BAGOZZI RP, 1982, ADMIN SCI QUART, V27, P459, DOI 10.2307/2392322; Bamiatzi V., 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P1448, DOI DOI 10.1002/smj.2422; BARNEY J, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P99, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108; BELIVEAU B, 1994, J BUS ETHICS, V13, P731, DOI 10.1007/BF00881333; Buckley PJ, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P492, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0243-0; Burroughs JE, 2010, J MACROMARKETING, V30, P127, DOI 10.1177/0276146710362872; Campbell Margaret C., 2007, J MARKETING RES, V36, P187; Chabowski BR, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P55, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0212-7; CLARK T, 1990, J MARKETING, V54, P66, DOI 10.2307/1251760; CLOGG CC, 1995, AM J SOCIOL, V100, P1261, DOI 10.1086/230638; Closs DJ, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0207-4; Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, V3rd ed.; Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL SOCI, V2nd Edn; CONNER KR, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P121, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700109; Crittenden VL, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P71, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0217-2; Cronin JJ, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P158, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0227-0; Dacin MT, 1997, ACAD MANAGE J, V40, P46, DOI 10.2307/257020; DAY GS, 1994, J MARKETING, V58, P37, DOI 10.2307/1251915; DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P147, DOI 10.2307/2095101; DOTY DH, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P1196, DOI 10.2307/256810; Enax L, 2015, FRONT BEHAV NEUROSCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00247; Fenton Amy, 2014, THE NIELSEN CO; Fluckiger Y, 2016, NATURE, V531, P448, DOI 10.1038/531448c; FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312; Fornell C, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P92, DOI 10.1509/jm.15.0229; GALASKIEWICZ J, 1989, ADMIN SCI QUART, V34, P454, DOI 10.2307/2393153; Giebelhausen M, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P56, DOI 10.1509/jm.14.0497; GRANT RM, 1991, CALIF MANAGE REV, V33, P114, DOI 10.2307/41166664; Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a; Grocery Manufacturers Association, 2009, MOR HALF SHOPP CONS; Guler I, 2002, ADMIN SCI QUART, V47, P207, DOI 10.2307/3094804; Gurhan-Canli Z, 2000, J MARKETING RES, V37, P309, DOI 10.1509/jmkr.37.3.309.18778; Habel J, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P84, DOI 10.1509/jm.14.0389; Hillebrand B, 2015, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V43, P411, DOI 10.1007/s11747-015-0424-y; Hillman AJ, 2005, J INT BUS STUD, V36, P322, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400137; Hollensbe E, 2014, ACAD MANAGE J, V57, P1227, DOI 10.5465/amj.2014.4005; Holm M, 2012, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V40, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11747-011-0263-4; Huang MH, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P40, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0193-6; Hult GTM, 2008, J INT BUS STUD, V39, P1027, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400396; Hult GTM, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P509, DOI 10.1007/s11747-011-0253-6; Hunt SD, 1996, J MARKETING, V60, P107, DOI 10.2307/1251905; Hunt SD, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P7, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0196-3; Husted BW, 2016, J INT BUS STUD, V47, P382, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2016.3; Iyer G, 2016, MARKET SCI, V35, P727, DOI 10.1287/mksc.2015.0975; Jarvis CB, 2003, J CONSUM RES, V30, P199, DOI 10.1086/376806; JORESKOG KG, 2000, LISREL 8 NEW STAT FE; Katsikeas CS, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P1, DOI 10.1509/jm.15.0287; Kilbourne WE, 2010, J MACROMARKETING, V30, P109, DOI 10.1177/0276146710363726; KIRMANI A, 1990, J CONSUM RES, V17, P160, DOI 10.1086/208546; Kotler P., 2005, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, V11th; Kotler P, 2011, J MARKETING, V75, P132, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.132; Kozlenkova IV, 2014, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V42, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11747-013-0336-7; Kumar V, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P36, DOI 10.1509/jm.15.0414; Kumar V, 2009, J MARKETING, V73, P119, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.119; Laczniak GR, 2012, J PUBLIC POLICY MARK, V31, P284, DOI 10.1509/jppm.10.106; Leonidou CN, 2013, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V41, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11747-012-0317-2; Lieberman MB, 2006, ACAD MANAGE REV, V31, P366; Luchs MG, 2010, J MARKETING, V74, P18, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18; Luo XM, 2009, J MARKETING, V73, P198, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198; McFarland RG, 2008, J MARKETING, V72, P63, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.72.2.63; MCFARLIN DB, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P626, DOI 10.2307/256489; Mitchell RW, 2010, J MACROMARKETING, V30, P160, DOI 10.1177/0276146710361928; Mizruchi MS, 1999, ADMIN SCI QUART, V44, P653, DOI 10.2307/2667051; Moorman C, 2016, J MARKETING, V80, P6, DOI 10.1509/jm.15.0423; Morgan NA, 2012, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V40, P102, DOI 10.1007/s11747-011-0279-9; Nilsson M, 2016, NATURE, V534, P320, DOI 10.1038/534320a; O'Sullivan D, 2007, J MARKETING, V71, P79, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.71.2.79; PARASURAMAN A, 1988, J RETAILING, V64, P12; Peloza J, 2013, J MARKETING, V77, P104, DOI 10.1509/jm.11.0454; PETERAF MA, 1993, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V14, P179, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140303; Pfeffer J., 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG; Porter M.E., 1980, PORTER COMPETITIVE S; Prescott K., 1988, J MARKETING MANAGEME, V4, P175, DOI [10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964068, DOI 10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964068]; Rumelt R. P., 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG, P11; Rumelt Richard P., 1984, COMPETITIVE STRATEGI, P11; Sanchez JI, 1996, ACAD MANAGE J, V39, P704, DOI 10.2307/256660; Sheth JN, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3; Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TEST; Steenkamp JBEM, 1998, J CONSUM RES, V25, P78, DOI 10.1086/209528; Strahilevitz M., 1999, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V8, P215, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327663JCP0803_02; Trudel R, 2016, J CONSUM RES, V43, P246, DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucw014; Udry C, 2003, AM ECON REV, V93, P107, DOI 10.1257/000282803321946895; UN, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Van de Ven A. H., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, P333; Varadarajan R, 2014, J INT MARKETING, V22, P1, DOI 10.1509/jim.13.0158; Varey RJ, 2010, J MACROMARKETING, V30, P112, DOI 10.1177/0276146710361931; Venkatesan R, 2004, J MARKETING, V68, P106, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.68.4.106.42728; Wernerfelt B, 2005, J MARKETING, V69, P15, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.15.60763; WERNERFELT B, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050207; WERTS CE, 1974, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V34, P25, DOI 10.1177/001316447403400104; White K, 2013, J MARKETING, V77, P78, DOI 10.1509/jm.11.0278; Woodruff RB, 1997, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V25, P139, DOI 10.1007/BF02894350	95	24	24	1	31	SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC	THOUSAND OAKS	2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA	0276-1467	1552-6534		J MACROMARKETING	J. Macromarketing	SEP	2018	38	3					242	261		10.1177/0276146718787017	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0276146718787017			20	Business	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	GP2TB		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000440688000001
J	Wang, YH; Chen, SC; Araral, E				Wang, Yahua; Chen, Sicheng; Araral, Eduardo			The mediated effects of urban proximity on collective action in the commons: Theory and evidence from China	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Urban proximity; Rural revitalization; Irrigation commons; Collective action; China	MARKET ACCESS; CITIES; GOVERNANCE; IRRIGATION; TRANSFORMATION; HETEROGENEITY; INSTITUTIONS; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; LIVELIHOODS	Villages closer to urban centers often have higher economic growth, better agricultural conditions and better welfare outcomes. However, few studies have linked villages' proximity to urban centers with governance of the commons. In this paper, we explore the effects of urban proximity on the irrigation commons using ordered probit models, stepwise regression and the Sobel-Goodman mediation test, with survey data from 1257 villages in 306 counties and 27 provinces across China. We find that villages' proximity to provincial economic centers has a direct and positive effect on collective action in the irrigation commons, which could be attributed to farmers' incentives for agricultural intensification. Agriculture in villages closer to market centers is more commercially oriented, which gives farmers incentives to participate in collective action to reap the benefits of maintaining the irrigation commons. We also find that proximity between the village and the provincial economic center increases irrigation collective action through the mediated effects of village topography, population and collective income. The results enrich the literature of commons study and imply that distance to the economic center should be considered in policy making for rural revitalization and implementation of the New Urban Agenda as well as the Sustainable Development Goals. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Wang, Yahua; Chen, Sicheng] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China; [Wang, Yahua; Chen, Sicheng] Tsinghua Univ, China Inst Rural Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Araral, Eduardo] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore, Singapore		Chen, SC (corresponding author), Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.	scchen@tsinghua.edu.cn	Chen, Sicheng/AAN-1004-2020	Chen, Sicheng/0000-0002-1026-7951	Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences [15ZDB164, 18CZZ019]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [71573151, 71721002]; National Key Research Program [2016YFC0401408]; Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2019THZWLJ08]	Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); National Key Research Program; Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program	This work was supported by the Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences [grant number 15ZDB164, 18CZZ019], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 71573151, 71721002], the National Key Research Program [grant number 2016YFC0401408] and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [grant number 2019THZWLJ08]. Any errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.	Abate GT, 2020, WORLD DEV, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105133; Agrawal A, 1997, DEV CHANGE, V28, P435, DOI 10.1111/1467-7660.00050; Agrawal A, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P1649, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8; Araral E. K. Jr., 2011, Water Alternatives, V4, P110; Araral E, 2009, WORLD DEV, V37, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.002; Baland J., 1996, HALTING DEGRADATION; Bardhan P, 2000, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V48, P847, DOI 10.1086/452480; BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173; Berdegue JA, 2015, WORLD DEV, V73, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.013; Bosker M, 2017, J URBAN ECON, V98, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2015.09.003; CAPOZZA DR, 1989, J URBAN ECON, V26, P295, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(89)90003-X; Chamberlin J, 2013, WORLD DEV, V41, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.004; Chen SC, 2019, GOVERNANCE, V32, P761, DOI 10.1111/gove.12405; Chen SC, 2020, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V36, P697, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2019.1656602; Chen SC, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P547, DOI 10.3390/w6030547; Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016; Damania R, 2017, AM J AGR ECON, V99, P265, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aav073; Deichmann U, 2009, WORLD DEV, V37, P645, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.008; Diao XS, 2019, WORLD DEV, V121, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.001; Fafchamps M, 2006, J DEV ECON, V79, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.01.005; Fafchamps M, 2005, ECON J, V115, P477, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.00997.x; Fafchamps M, 2003, J DEV STUD, V39, P23, DOI 10.1080/00220380312331293577; Fujiie M, 2005, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V33, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00351.x; Guiling P, 2009, LAND ECON, V85, P252, DOI 10.3368/le.85.2.252; He AJ, 2021, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V44, P471, DOI 10.1080/15309576.2020.1780138; HEPNER GF, 1985, J RURAL STUD, V1, P359, DOI 10.1016/0743-0167(85)90047-6; Hess C., 2008, INT ASS STUDY COMMON; Hess C., 2000, INT ASS STUDY COMMON; Hu D, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V161, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.152; Imai K, 2011, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V46, P861, DOI 10.1080/00273171.2011.606743; Kasraian D, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1000, DOI 10.1177/2399808317740355; Konishi H, 2000, J URBAN ECON, V48, P1, DOI 10.1006/juec.1999.2150; Korah PI, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.039; KRUGMAN P, 1993, J REGIONAL SCI, V33, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1993.tb00217.x; Ling, 2019, I EC, V11, P103; Ling GHT, 2019, ECONOMIES, V7, DOI 10.3390/economies7020061; MacKinnon DP, 2004, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V39, P99, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4; Meinzen-Dick R, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P649, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00130-9; Mersha AA, 2018, WORLD DEV, V107, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.001; Naidu SC, 2009, WORLD DEV, V37, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.001; Nunn N, 2011, Q J ECON, V126, P593, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjr009; Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15176, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701886104; Partridge M, 2007, CAN J ECON, V40, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00399.x; Plantinga AJ, 2002, J URBAN ECON, V52, P561, DOI 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00503-X; Poteete AR, 2004, DEV CHANGE, V35, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x; Preacher KJ, 2004, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V36, P717, DOI 10.3758/BF03206553; Preacher KJ, 2008, BEHAV RES METHODS, V40, P879, DOI 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879; Ruttan LM, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P969, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.005; Sharma A, 2016, J DEV STUD, V52, P1593, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2016.1166207; Spencer SJ, 2005, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V89, P845, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845; Steinhubel L, 2021, J DEV STUD, V57, P669, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2020.1806244; Stifel D, 2017, WORLD DEV, V90, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.09.009; Su YQ, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104378; Tione SE, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104509; Tofighi D, 2011, BEHAV RES METHODS, V43, P692, DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x; van Laerhoven F, 2014, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V24, P77, DOI 10.1002/eet.1646; Van Laerhoven F, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.005; Vandercasteelen J, 2018, WORLD DEV, V106, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.006; Vandercasteelen J, 2018, WORLD DEV, V105, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.032; Wang HR, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125881; Wang YH, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P9791, DOI 10.1029/2017WR021837; Wang YH, 2016, WORLD DEV, V88, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.014; Wang YH, 2014, WATER POLICY, V16, P773, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.073; Wu J, 2008, AM J AGR ECON, V90, P392, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01126.x; Zang LZ, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P518, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.042; Zhang XB, 2004, J PUBLIC ECON, V88, P2857, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.004; Zhao XS, 2010, J CONSUM RES, V37, P197, DOI 10.1086/651257	67	4	4	18	44	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	JUN	2021	142								105444	10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105444	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105444		FEB 2021	10	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	RP4KH					2022-09-08	WOS:000641697900025
J	Seydanlou, P; Jolai, F; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R; Fathollahi-Fard, AM				Seydanlou, Pourya; Jolai, Fariborz; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza; Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.			A multi-objective optimization framework for a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network in the olive industry: Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms	EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS			English	Article						Sustainable closed-loop supply chain; Multi-objective; Perishable products; Olive industry; Hybrid optimization algorithms	DESIGN; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTS; GREEN	A closed-loop option for reusing, remanufacturing, and recycling waste products in the olive industry creates a high added value for this business network. This fact motivates the implementation of closed-loop supply chains for adopting an efficient and sustainable strategy in the olive industry in Iran. As one of the developing countries, Iran must redesign their supply chain networks to meet the standards of sustainable development goals. In this regard, the triple bottom line approach focuses on a sustainable design considering all economic, environmental, and social factors in supply chain networks. The main novelty of this paper is to merge the sustainable ClosedLoop Supply Chain Network (CLSCN) design and the olive industry. Hence, a multi-objective optimization framework is proposed to make location, allocation, and inventory decisions for the considered problem. Based on the triple bottom line approach, the objectives of the optimization model are to minimize the total cost and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and maximize job opportunities. In small instances, the model is solved by an epsilon-constraint method. To address the high complexity of large-scale networks, this study innovates new hybrid optimization algorithms. In this regard, a hybrid of Virus Colony Search Algorithm (VCS) and Simulated Annealing (SA) and a combination of Electromagnetism-like Algorithm (EMA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) are proposed for the first time. To confirm their efficiency, an extensive comparison with individual algorithms is carried out by different multi-objective optimization metrics. Finally, some sensitivity analyses are performed to discuss some practical insights for the supply chain managers working in the olive industry in Iran.	[Seydanlou, Pourya] Univ Tehran, Dept Ind Engn, Alborz Campus, Tehran, Iran; [Jolai, Fariborz; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran; [Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.] Univ Quebec, Ecole Technol Super, Dept Elect Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada		Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R (corresponding author), Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran.; Fathollahi-Fard, AM (corresponding author), Univ Quebec, Ecole Technol Super, Dept Elect Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada.	pourya.seydanlou@ut.ac.ir; f.jolai@ut.ac.ir; tavakoli@ut.ac.ir; amirmohammad.fathollahifard.1@ens.etsmtl.ca						Ahi P, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005; Ahumada O, 2011, INT J PROD ECON, V133, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.015; Allen S. J., 2004, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V6, P225, DOI 10.1287/msom.1040.0035; Amin SH, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V73, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.024; Ansari ZN, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P2524, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023; Banasik A, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.012; Birbil SI, 2003, J GLOBAL OPTIM, V25, P263, DOI 10.1023/A:1022452626305; Blackburn J, 2009, PROD OPER MANAG, V18, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01016.x; Chalmardi MK, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P1035, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.197; Cheraghalipour A, 2019, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V162, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.041; Cheraghalipour A, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V69, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.022; Crainic TG, 2002, J HEURISTICS, V8, P601, DOI 10.1023/A:1020325926188; Deb K., 2000, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. 6th International Conference. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.1917), P849; Dehghanian F, 2009, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V53, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.007; Devika K, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V235, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.032; Eskandarpour M, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V54, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.006; Farahani RZ, 2014, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V45, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2013.08.006; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2021, ADV ENG INFORM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101418; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111277; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2020, INFORM SCIENCES, V512, P1335, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.062; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118200; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V71, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.07.025; Fathollahi-Fard AM, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V69, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.055; Fragoso R, 2021, J OPER RES SOC, V72, P1236, DOI 10.1080/01605682.2020.1718015; Gao XH, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122405; Gholizadeh H, 2022, EXPERT SYST APPL, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116419; Gholizadeh H, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106653; Govindan K, 2021, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102279; Govindan K, 2015, COMPUT OPER RES, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.12.014; Govindan K, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V240, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012; HAIMES YY, 1971, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC1, P296; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, 2019, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V31, P5343, DOI 10.1007/s00521-018-3369-5; Hasani A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123199; Khuri AI, 2010, WIRES COMPUT STAT, V2, P128, DOI 10.1002/wics.73; KIRKPATRICK S, 1983, SCIENCE, V220, P671, DOI 10.1126/science.220.4598.671; Li MD, 2016, ADV ENG SOFTW, V92, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.11.004; Liu WL, 2020, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V21, P5094, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2948596; Mojtahedi M, 2021, J IND INF INTEGR, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100220; Mota B, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V105, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.052; Nadal-Roig E., 2015, HDB OPERATIONS RES A, V224, P163; Nayeri S, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106716; Ozkir V, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V41, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.013; Shabestar MP, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P67214, DOI [10.1007/s11356-021-15345-9, 10.1007/s11356-021-12980-0]; Pazhani S, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107191; Pishvaee MS, 2012, FUZZY SET SYST, V206, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010; Roghanian E, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118081; Sahebjamnia N, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.245; Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6; Salehi-Amiri A, 2022, APPL MATH MODEL, V101, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.035; Salehi-Amiri A, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110821; Sharma R, 2020, COMPUT OPER RES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926; Shekarian E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119823; Sherafati M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095; Shukla M, 2013, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V33, P114, DOI 10.1108/01443571311295608; Soleimani H, 2022, ANN OPER RES, DOI 10.1007/s10479-022-04661-z; Soleimani H, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V109, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.038; Soleimani H, 2015, APPL MATH MODEL, V39, P3990, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.016; Taguchi G., 1986, INTRO QUALITY ENG DE; Talaei M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.074; van der Vorst JGAJ, 2009, INT J PROD RES, V47, P6611, DOI 10.1080/00207540802356747; VANBERLO JM, 1993, AGR SYST, V43, P91, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(93)90094-I; Verdouw CN, 2010, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V73, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2010.05.005; Wang F, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020; Wang HF, 2010, COMPUT OPER RES, V37, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2009.06.001; WHITLEY D, 1994, STAT COMPUT, V4, P65; Zailani S, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008; Zhalechian M, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V89, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.011; Zhang QF, 2007, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V11, P712, DOI 10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759; Zhang WB, 2011, ANN OPER RES, V190, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10479-009-0626-0; Zhao FQ, 2021, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, DOI [10.1109/TCYB.2021.3086181, 10.1109/TMAG.2021.3078464]; Zhao FQ, 2021, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V51, P5291, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3025662; Zhao FQ, 2020, EXPERT SYST APPL, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113678; Zhou SC, 2021, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V51, P1430, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2939219; Zitzler E, 2003, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V7, P117, DOI 10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758; Zitzler E, 2000, EVOL COMPUT, V8, P173, DOI 10.1162/106365600568202	75	6	6	14	14	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0957-4174	1873-6793		EXPERT SYST APPL	Expert Syst. Appl.	OCT 1	2022	203								117566	10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117566	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117566			18	Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Computer Science; Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	1R7UM					2022-09-08	WOS:000803570800005
J	Jiang, M; Jiang, C; Huang, WM; Chen, WL; Gong, QH; Yang, J; Zhao, Y; Zhuang, CW; Wang, JG; Yang, ZY				Jiang, Min; Jiang, Chong; Huang, Wumeng; Chen, Weilian; Gong, Qinghua; Yang, Ji; Zhao, Ying; Zhuang, Changwei; Wang, Junguang; Yang, Zhiyuan			Quantifying the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services and identifying its spatial determinants: A case study of ecosystem restoration hotspot in Southwest China	ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING			English	Article						Supply and demand; Spatial determinants; Spillover effect; Landscape metrics	RIVER DELTA; LAND-USE; LOESS PLATEAU; KARST; BASIN; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; REGIONS; MODEL	Ecosystem conservation and restoration are the primary practices for enhancing ecosystem services (ESs) and achieving sustainable development goals. However, inappropriate land use interventions and revegetation projects may lead to an imbalance between the supply and demand of ESs. This study applied the ES matrix approach and spatial panel models to quantify the supply-demand balance of ESs in the southwest karst region and to identify their spatial determinants and spillover effects. The overall patterns for landscape metrics between 1980 and 2015 remained relatively stable, while landscape fragmentation and population growth weakened the ES supply capacity but increased the demand, which caused an imbalance (i.e. the demand exceeded the supply), particularly in the surrounding areas of the urban agglomerations. Population density and individual landscape metrics were significantly associated with ES balance (p < 0.01) and were identified as the dominant spatial determinants. Additionally, the spillover effects of determinants also influenced ES balance patterns, which should be considered in integrated landscape planning and ecosystem management to coordinate collaborations from local and adjacent regions to mitigate ES imbalance. Excessive reclamation and urbanisation temporarily improved grain provision and economic profits, respectively, but caused an imbalance in ESs and threatened ecological security. Additionally, excessive conservation practices ignored economic costs and the livelihood of residents, which threatened food security and exacerbated poverty. Therefore, a balance between the contrasting targets should be maintained through the lens of ES balance to reconcile ecosystem conservation and socioeconomic development. This study provides a complete and feasible perspective to examine and optimise human interventions, with the aim of achieving win-win goals.	[Jiang, Min; Wang, Junguang] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China; [Jiang, Min] Changjiang Water Resources Commiss, Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Wuhan 431000, Peoples R China; [Jiang, Chong; Huang, Wumeng; Chen, Weilian; Gong, Qinghua; Yang, Ji] Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangzhou 510070, Peoples R China; [Jiang, Chong; Huang, Wumeng; Gong, Qinghua; Yang, Ji] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzho, Guangzhou 511458, Peoples R China; [Jiang, Chong; Zhao, Ying] Ludong Univ, Dongying Base Integrat Ind & Educ High Qual Dev M, Dongying 257509, Peoples R China; [Zhuang, Changwei] Guangdong Prov Acad Environm Sci, Guangzhou 510045, Peoples R China; [Yang, Zhiyuan] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia		Wang, JG (corresponding author), Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China.; Jiang, C (corresponding author), Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangzhou 510070, Peoples R China.	jiangchong1987@gmail.com; jgwang@mail.hzau.edu.cn			National Natural Science Foundation of China [41901258, 42006170, 41630858, 41301201]; Guangdong Academy of Sciences (GDAS) Project of Science and Technology Development [2020GDASYL-20200103010, 2020GDASYL-20200301003, 2020GDASYL20200103001]; Marine Economy Development Foundation of Guangdong Province [[2020]051]; Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), China [GML2019ZD0301]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Guangdong Academy of Sciences (GDAS) Project of Science and Technology Development; Marine Economy Development Foundation of Guangdong Province; Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), China	National Natural Science Foundation of China (41901258, 42006170, 41630858, 41301201), the Guangdong Academy of Sciences (GDAS) Project of Science and Technology Development (2020GDASYL-20200103010, 2020GDASYL-20200301003, 2020GDASYL20200103001), the Marine Economy Development Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. GDNRC[2020]051), and the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), China (GML2019ZD0301).	ANSELIN L, 1988, ECON LETT, V28, P335, DOI 10.1016/0165-1765(88)90009-2; ANSELIN L, 1988, GEOGR ANAL, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x; Bryan BA, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V32, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.002; Burkhard B., 2014, Landscape Online; Burkhard B., 2009, Landscape Online; Burkhard B, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V14, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.005; Burkhard B, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019; Cai WB, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V191, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.003; Cao SX, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1117, DOI 10.1007/s13280-020-01448-z; Cao SX, 2021, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V32, P430, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3739; Cao SX, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa650c; Chen D, 2017, EARTH-SCI REV, V173, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.08.007; Chen WX, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104263; [陈万旭 Chen Wanxu], 2019, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V34, P325; Chen WX, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V669, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139; Chi GQ, 2013, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V50, P861, DOI 10.1007/s00168-012-0524-2; Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0; Elhorst JP, 2012, J GEOGR SYST, V14, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10109-011-0158-4; Elvidge C., 2013, NATL TRENDS SATELLIT; Feng Q, 2019, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V30, P910, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3277; Feng Q, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P1250, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.079; Frank S, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027; Hu XS, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V512, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.035; Huang JL, 2013, ENVIRON MANAGE, V51, P32, DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9793-2; Huang Y., 2014, ACTA GEOGRAPH SIN, V69, P41; Jacobs S, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V295, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024; Jiang C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V793, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148472; Jiang C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145140; Jiang C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V754, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142139; Jiang C, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P14720, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11703-1; [江东 Jiang Dong], 2002, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V17, P734; Kandziora M, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V4, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001; Kroll F, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V29, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008; LeSage J.P., 2010, HDB APPL SPATIAL ANA, P355, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_18; LeSage JP, 2014, ECONOMETRICS, V2, P217, DOI 10.3390/econometrics2040217; Li JH, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.002; [李双成 Li Shuangcheng], 2014, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V69, P1628; Liu Hui-min, 2016, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V27, P2161, DOI 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005; Liu JY, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6; Liu JY, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V98, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012; McGarigal K, 2012, FRAGSTATS SPATIAL PA; MEA: Millennium ecosystem assessment, 2005, MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM, P1; Mitchell MGE, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.011; Nedkov S, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022; Ouyang Z, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P1455, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf2295; Palacios-Agundez I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.012; Palomo I, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V4, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001; Pena L, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V13, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008; Peng J, 2020, ECOSYST SERV, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101139; Redhead JW, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092; Schirpke U, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V651, P928, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235; Schroter M, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V36, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018; Serna-Chavez HM, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V39, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024; Sietz D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.005; Stoll S, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V295, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019; Sturck J, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V38, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010; Tao Y, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V72, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.051; Tong XW, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P44, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0004-x; Tong XW, 2017, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V54, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2016.09.013; Wang J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V657, P781, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.080; [王克林 Wang Kelin], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P7432; Wang KL, 2019, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V34, P2743, DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00912-w; Wei W, 2016, EARTH-SCI REV, V159, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.010; Wilkerson ML, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V31, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.017; Wu WB, 2011, J GEOGR SCI, V21, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11442-011-0825-x; Wu X, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P1375, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.329; [肖玉 Xiao Yu], 2016, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V36, P3096; Yushanjiang A, 2018, ECOL ENG, V113, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.005; Zhang HY, 2015, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V234, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.014; Zhang JZ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P1020, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.110; Zhang LQ, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P701, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0629-y; [张立伟 Zhang Liwei], 2014, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V34, P316; Zhang ZM, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V72, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.035; Zhang ZM, 2021, ECOSYST SERV, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101274	74	6	6	71	136	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0925-8574	1872-6992		ECOL ENG	Ecol. Eng.	JAN	2022	174								106472	10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106472	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106472		NOV 2021	14	Ecology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Engineering	WX1OZ					2022-09-08	WOS:000718374700001
J	Jutting, M				Juetting, Malte			Crafting Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems Strategic Levers for Directing Collaborative Innovation Toward the Grand Challenges	IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT			English	Article; Early Access						Ecosystems; Technological innovation; Collaboration; Business; Interviews; Biological system modeling; Sustainable development; Collaborative innovation; ecosystem strategy; grand challenges; innovation ecosystems; mission-oriented innovation; SDGs	QUADRUPLE HELIX; VALUE CREATION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; CAPTURE; SUSTAINABILITY; EVOLUTIONARY; PERFORMANCE; NETWORK	In recent years, cross-sectoral, collaborative innovation within so-called mission-oriented innovation ecosystems has emerged as a key strategy to address the grand challenges of our time, ranging from climate change to global health and fostering sustainable, inclusive growth. By adopting an explorative research approach, this article investigates and systematizes the strategic levers employed to translate (politically-defined) missions into concrete ecosystem practices based on a case study of 15 technology-based innovation ecosystems in Germany. Ultimately, this article argues that mission integration into broader ecosystem strategy may happen at the level of an ecosystem's value proposition, architecture, or reward model. Identifying key levers for designing mission-oriented innovation ecosystems whilst also pointing to the importance of the broader socio-technical environment and organizational dynamics, the study lays out a number of options for practitioners to adjust ecosystem strategies according to their unique objectives and challenges.	[Juetting, Malte] Fraunhofer Inst Ind Engn IAO, Ctr Responsible Res & Innovat CeRRI, Stuttgart, Germany; [Juetting, Malte] Tech Univ Berlin, D-10587 Berlin, Germany		Jutting, M (corresponding author), Fraunhofer Inst Ind Engn IAO, Ctr Responsible Res & Innovat CeRRI, Stuttgart, Germany.	malte.juetting@gmail.com			German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)] [01IO1915]	German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)](Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF))	This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)] under Grant 01IO1915.	Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98; Adner R, 2010, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V31, P306, DOI 10.1002/smj.821; Almpanopoulou A, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, P6357; Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]; Bacon E, 2020, J BUS RES, V115, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.005; Brown P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030635; Bryson JM, 2015, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V75, P647, DOI 10.1111/puar.12432; Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), 2018, FORSCH INN MENSCH DI; Carayannis Elias G, 2010, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, V1, P41, DOI 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105; Carayannis E.G., 2014, J INNOV ENTREPRENEUR, V3, P12, DOI 10.1186/s13731-014-0012-2; Carayannis E.G., 2019, SMART QUINTUPLE HELI, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01517-6_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-01517-6_6]; Carayannis EG, 2021, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V68, P235, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2019.2914408; Carayannis EG, 2009, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V46, P201, DOI 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374; Corazza L, 2021, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V68, P1173, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2020.3020736; Creswell J.W., 2014, RES DESIGN QUALITATI; Gomes LAD, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009; Dedehayir O, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028; Durst S., 2013, COCREATE, P27; Durst S., 2013, INT J BUS RES MANAG, V4, P111; Eisenhardt KM, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1113, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4004; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557; Esterberg K.G., 2002, QUALITATIVE METHOD S; European Commission, HOR 2020; European Commission, IMPLEMENTATION STRAT; Flick U., 2004, COMPANION QUALITATIV, P3; Flick U., 2004, COMPANION QUALITATIV, P146; Fusch PI, 2015, QUAL REP, V20, P1408; Geels FW, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015; Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8; George G, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1880, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4007; Glasbergen P., 2007, PARTNERSHIPS GOVERNA; Granstrand O, 2020, TECHNOVATION, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098; Hakala H, 2020, INT J MANAG REV, V22, P10, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12212; Hossain M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257; Jacobides MG, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2255, DOI 10.1002/smj.2904; Jutting M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166677; Khademi B, 2020, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V10, P16, DOI 10.22215/timreview/1311; Klimas P, 2022, REV MANAG SCI, V16, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11846-020-00439-4; Kuckartz U., 2014, QUALITATIVE TEXT ANA; Laplane Andrea, 2020, Research Policy: X, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.repolx.2020.100008; Linde L, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614; Marie H, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V101, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.009; Mayring P., 1983, QUALITATIVE INHALTSA; Mazzucato M, 2018, IND CORP CHANGE, V27, P803, DOI 10.1093/icc/dty034; Mazzucato M, 2016, IND INNOV, V23, P140, DOI 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124; McGahan AM, 2021, CALIF MANAGE REV, V63, P49, DOI 10.1177/0008125620973713; MOORE JF, 1993, HARVARD BUS REV, V71, P75; Morioka SN, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104; Nylund PA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125329; O'Connor C, 2020, INT J QUAL METH, V19, DOI 10.1177/1609406919899220; O'Reilly CA, 2013, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V27, P324, DOI 10.5465/amp.2013.0025; Oh DS, 2016, TECHNOVATION, V54, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004; Oliveira-Duarte L, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P1018, DOI 10.1002/sd.2191; Oskam I, 2021, BUS SOC, V60, P1059, DOI 10.1177/0007650320907145; Parida V, 2019, J BUS RES, V101, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006; Pattberg P, 2012, PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: EMERGENCE, INFLUENCE AND LEGITIMACY, P1; Patton M. Q, 2015, QUALITATIVE RES EVAL, V4th; Pellikka J, 2016, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V6, P17; Popa EO, 2020, SCI PUBL POLICY, V47, P876, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scaa054; Provan KG, 2008, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V18, P229, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum015; Ragin CC, 2014, COMPARATIVE METHOD: MOVING BEYOND QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES, P1; Ritala P, 2013, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V63, P244, DOI 10.1504/IJTM.2013.056900; Ruhrmann H, 2022, REG STUD, V56, P1468, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2021.1872780; Russo-Spena T., IN PRESS, DOI [10.1109/TEM.2020.3040746, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2020.3040746]; Russo-Spena T, 2017, J SERV THEOR PRACT, V27, P977, DOI 10.1108/JSTP-10-2015-0224; Scaringella L, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023; Schneidewind U, 2013, GAIA, V22, P82, DOI 10.14512/gaia.22.2.5; Schot J, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292651; Schot J, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P1554, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011; Schroth F., 2020, INT J INNOV REGIONAL, V9, P121; Schroth F, 2018, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V8, P4, DOI 10.22215/timreview/1195; Schutz F, 2019, SHE JI, V5, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002; Schutz F., 2020, THESIS; Schutz F., INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM; Schütz Florian, 2018, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, V13, P47; Schuurman Dimitri, 2016, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, V10, P322; Selsky JW, 2005, J MANAGE, V31, P849, DOI 10.1177/0149206305279601; SPD/Gruene/FDP Mehr Fortschritt wagen, BUNDN FREIH GER NACH; Suominen A, 2019, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V22, P335, DOI 10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188; Talmar M, 2020, LONG RANGE PLANN, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002; Tracy SJ, 2010, QUAL INQ, V16, P837, DOI 10.1177/1077800410383121; Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375; Tsujimoto M, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032; Tushman ML, 1996, CALIF MANAGE REV, V38, P8, DOI 10.2307/41165852; van Marrewijk M, 2003, J BUS ETHICS, V44, P107, DOI 10.1023/A:1023383229086; van Zanten JA, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P3703, DOI 10.1002/bse.2835; Walrave B, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011; Wanzenbock I, 2020, SCI PUBL POLICY, V47, P474, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scaa027; Wiek A, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6; Wittmann F., 2020, FRAUNHOFER ISI DISCU, V64; Witzel A., 2000, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO, V1; Yin R., 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG, DOI 10.1097/FCH.0b013-31822dda9e	92	0	0	1	1	IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC	PISCATAWAY	445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA	0018-9391	1558-0040		IEEE T ENG MANAGE	IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.												10.1109/TEM.2022.3171735	http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3171735		AUG 2022	15	Business; Engineering, Industrial; Management	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Engineering	3T7XY					2022-09-08	WOS:000840485800001
J	Patnaik, J; Tarei, PK				Patnaik, Jayshree; Tarei, Pradeep Kumar			Analysing appropriateness in appropriate technology for achieving sustainability: A multi-sectorial examination in a developing economy	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Appropriateness; Appropriate technology; Developing country; Exploratory factor analysis; Decision-making trial and evaluation; laboratory	RESOURCE MOBILIZATION; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INNOVATION; DESIGN; ENERGY; COMMUNITIES; EMPOWERMENT; BUSINESS; LESSONS; POLICY	Appropriate technology has emerged as a critical driver for sustainable development in developing countries where a massive population depends on small and medium-sized businesses. Appropriate technologies are energy-efficient, which corresponds to environmental sustainability. The benefits of appropriate technology may range from providing economic sustainability for availing affordable solutions in a resource-constrained environment to promoting social sustainability by fostering inclusivity of marginalized sections of the society. However, the appropriateness, which is the perceived quality of appropriate technology, largely remains unaddressed in prior research. Therefore, the current study proposes a framework to explore determinants of appropriateness and examine the interplay among them anchored on resource mobilization theory. Four case organizations of a developing country are empirically analyzed to obtain appropriateness factors from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders, namely, enterprises, developers, and users. Next, a decision-making technique is applied to derive the cause-effect relationship between the identified factors. The results contribute five factors of appropriateness: technological, socio-economic, organizational, market, and environment to the literature on appropriate technology. The former three factors induce the latter two factors of appropriateness. Understanding the interplay among the indicators from a multi-stakeholder perspective assists the policymakers in facilitating the adoption of appropriate technologies at the grassroots level to achieve sustainable development goals in developing economies.	[Patnaik, Jayshree] OP Jindal Global Univ, Jindal Global Business Sch, Dept Strategy, Sonepat, India; [Tarei, Pradeep Kumar] ICFAI Fdn Higher Educ IFHE, ICFAI Business Sch IBS, Dept Operat & IT, Hyderabad, India		Tarei, PK (corresponding author), ICFAI Fdn Higher Educ IFHE, ICFAI Business Sch IBS, Dept Operat & IT, Hyderabad, India.	shreepattnaik@gmail.com; pradeep.tarei@gmail.com	Tarei, Pradeep Kumar/P-5189-2017	Tarei, Pradeep Kumar/0000-0001-7301-4647				Reda AA, 2021, SOCIOL METHOD RES, DOI 10.1177/0049124120986197; Ackermann L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126327; Akubue A., 2000, J TECHNOL STUD, V26, P33, DOI [DOI 10.21061/jots.v26i1.a.6, DOI 10.21061/JOTS.V26I1.A.6]; Auerswald M, 2015, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V80, P920, DOI 10.1007/s11336-015-9468-7; Bandara YM, 2016, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V43, P830, DOI 10.1080/03088839.2016.1173735; Bank W., 2021, WORLD DEV REPORT 202; Bardhan AK, 2021, BENCHMARKING, V28, P2711, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0470; Bauer AM, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V78, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.076; Beltrami M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127733; Lopez-Sosa LB, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11205620; Bhattacharjya BR, 2019, TECHNOL SOC, V57, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.008; Bishop CP, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V49, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.011; Botchie D, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V131, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.010; Braga IFB, 2021, TECHNOL SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101687; Carazo D.R., 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, P132; Castro GD, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204; CATTELL RB, 1966, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V1, P245, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10; Chand P, 2021, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100722; Chang TY, 2016, MEDICINE, V95, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000005396; Clot N., 2014, TECHNOLOGIES SUSTAIN, P245; Costello A.B., 2005, RES EVALUAT, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868; Del-Rio-Carazo L, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010132; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Du HS, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125290; Edwards B., 2013, RESOURCE MOBILIZATIO; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557; Eltantawy N, 2011, INT J COMMUN-US, V5, P1207; Franco W., 2020, DEV ENG, V5, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.DEVENG.2020.100050; Fressoli M., 2011, 9 GLOB INT C GLOBELI; Fuchs V. J., 2011, Waterlines, V30, P122, DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.2011.014; Garniati L, 2014, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V12, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.10.003; Gupta S, 2020, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V48, P941, DOI 10.1007/s11747-019-00639-9; Hanington Bruce, 2015, [Archives of Design Research, 디자인학연구], V28, P41, DOI 10.15187/adr.2015.02.113.1.41; Hazeltine B, 2015, WHAT MAKES TECHNOLOG; Henson R.K., 2006, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V66; Joshi C.A., 2016, J SUSTAIN DEV, V9, P133, DOI DOI 10.5539/JSD.V9N4P133; Jue D, 2015, CURR SCI INDIA, V109, P1630, DOI 10.18520/v109/i9/1630-1638; Khalid RU, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122415; Khurana S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.022; Lange A, 2021, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, DOI 10.1080/00472778.2021.1924380; Lee HK, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12125165; Lee J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072255; Linton JD, 2017, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V55, P196, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12311; Lissenden J., 2015, J HUMANIT ENG, V3; Marti-Herrero J, 2014, RENEW ENERG, V71, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.036; Maskey R, 2018, ASIAN J SHIPPING LOG, V34, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006; Mikoajczak P., 2021, ENTERPREN EMERG EC; Molina-Maturano J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119001; Moon Y, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051456; Murphy HM, 2009, TECHNOL SOC, V31, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.010; Nath A., 2015, 10 ANN C KNOWL FOR; Naughton CC, 2015, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V5, P279, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2015.135; Nimawat D, 2021, BENCHMARKING, V28, P2407, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0429; Nwalusi Dickson M., 2021, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V730, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/730/1/012013; OECD, 2001, AD TECHN SUST FARM S, P149; Palinkas L.A., 2015, RESEARCH-CHINA, V42, P533; Park E, 2015, SUSTAIN DEV, V23, P74, DOI 10.1002/sd.1574; Patel S, 2014, IEEE TECHNOL SOC MAG, V33, P19, DOI 10.1109/MTS.2014.2301855; Patnaik J., 2020, INT J INNOVAT MANAGE, V11; Patnaik J, 2022, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V34, P125, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2021.1890013; Patnaik J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121124; Patnaik J, 2019, TECHNOL SOC, V57, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.11.004; Pattnaik BK, 2015, TECHNOL SOC, V40, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.09.002; Pearce Joshua M., 2012, Environment Development and Sustainability, V14, P425, DOI 10.1007/s10668-012-9337-9; Pin LA, 2021, TECHNOL SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101658; Rebehy PCPW, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V154, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.173; Prasetyo Y.E., 2016, ADV INCL RURAL DEV T, V420; Ramesh KT, 2019, BENCHMARKING, V27, P1261, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-03-2019-0119; Rao-Nicholson R, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013; Rosca E, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, pS133, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050; Salesforce, 2019, ANN REPORT; Sapnas Kathryn G, 2002, J Nurs Meas, V10, P135; Schrder M, 2021, SUSTAINABLE USE NATU; Shayganmehr M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V317, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128302; Shin H, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P1167, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.336; Si SL, 2018, MATH PROBL ENG, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/3696457; Sianipar C.P.M., 2014, J SUSTAIN SCI MANAG, V9, P1; Sianipar CPM, 2013, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V17, P1007, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.120; Singh A, 2021, BENCHMARKING, V28, P3040, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0419; Singh S, 2018, SADHANA-ACAD P ENG S, V43, DOI 10.1007/s12046-018-0909-8; Smith A, 2017, 201710 SCI POL RES U; Smith Adrian, 2016, GRASSROOTS INNOVATIO; Spearman C, 1904, AM J PSYCHOL, V15, P201, DOI 10.2307/1412107; Sugathan M, 2016, RES J TEXT APPAR, V20, P136, DOI 10.1108/RJTA-03-2016-0005; Surana K, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.001; Tabachnick BG., 2013, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V6th ed; Tarei P.K., 2018, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA; Tarei PK, 2022, BENCHMARKING, V29, P2231, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-04-2021-0215; Tharakan J, 2017, INDIG PEOLE, V123; Tharakan J, 2015, AFR J SCI TECHNOL IN, V7, P364, DOI 10.1080/20421338.2015.1085176; Thomas J., 2013, STORIES SOCIAL ENTER; Uddin SMN, 2014, TECHNOL SOC, V38, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.02.002; United Nations, 2017, ROL TECHN IMPL MON S; Varela J.R.F., 2017, STRENGTHENING DOMEST; Vitali F., 2014, TECHNOLOGIES SUSTAIN, P129; Walsh P. R., 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V338, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130537, DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.130537]; Watkins MW, 2018, J BLACK PSYCHOL, V44, P219, DOI 10.1177/0095798418771807; WCED, 1987, REPORT; WHO, 2012, GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS REPORT 2012, P1; Wijayanti F., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V374, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/374/1/012026; Williams B., 2010, J EMERG PRIM HEAL CA, V8, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93, DOI 10.33151/AJP.8.3.93]; Yavuz RI, 2021, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, DOI 10.1080/00472778.2021.1913596; Yin RK., 1984, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; Yong AG, 2013, TUTOR QUANT METHODS, V9, P79, DOI 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079; Zelenika I., 2011, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V4; Zhou JH, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020178	106	2	2	1	1	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 15	2022	349								131204	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131204	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131204			17	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1C5TS					2022-09-08	WOS:000793181900004
J	Retamal, M				Retamal, Monique			Collaborative consumption practices in Southeast Asian cities: Prospects for growth and sustainability	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sharing economy; Social practice theory; Product-service systems; Emerging economies	PATTERNS; ECONOMY; FUTURE	Collaborative consumption and its alter ego "the sharing economy" have attracted significant attention in recent years due to the emergence of new business models, industry disruption, regulatory issues and the potential social, economic and environmental impacts of these consumption practices. Academic literature on collaborative consumption (CC) to date has focused on high-income countries, and there has been little examination of CC practices in emerging or developing economies. With the potential for CC to offer more sustainable consumption options, understanding its applications and impact is relevant to the sustainable development goals. This study examines the prospects for broader uptake of CC practices in Southeast Asia, using a social practice theory framework, and then considers these prospects with regard to their potential to offer more sustainable consumption options. The analysis draws on qualitative field data and the results from four studies examining the current use of CC in three cities Bangkok, Metro Manila and Hanoi. CC services were found to be established and normalised, with strong prospects for further uptake due to alignment with existing practice configurations. However, shared-access CC practices currently face significant resistance in all three cities. In the future, growth in the middle classes and the development of a supportive institutional environment may help to normalise shared-access CC and create a shift in consumer perceptions. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Retamal, Monique] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia; [Retamal, Monique] Univ Technol, Inst Sustainable Futures, Level 10,UTS Bldg 10,235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia		Retamal, M (corresponding author), Univ Technol, Inst Sustainable Futures, Level 10,UTS Bldg 10,235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.	monique.retamal@uts.edu.au		Retamal, Monique/0000-0002-3128-8807	Australian Government Endeavour Fellowship; CSIRO; Australian Government Research Training Program	Australian Government Endeavour Fellowship(Australian GovernmentDepartment of Industry, Innovation and Science); CSIRO(Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)); Australian Government Research Training Program(Australian Government)	Thanks to Prof. (Anthony) Shun Fung Chiu, Dr Tran Van Nhan, Dr Somporn Kamolsiripichaiporn, Jem Baldisimo, Emee Tan, Thu Bui Minh and Piyanuch Sueb for their in-country assistance and translation. Thanks to Karen Hussey and Heinz Schandl for their support, reviews and advice; and to Tim Brennan for reviewing. The Australian Government Endeavour Fellowship, CSIRO and the Australian Government Research Training Program provided financial support. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive advice.	Akenji L., 2016, DTI1717PA UN ENV PRO; [Anonymous], 2014, STUDIES; [Anonymous], THESIS; Bardhi F, 2012, J CONSUM RES, V39, P881, DOI 10.1086/666376; Belk R, 2014, J BUS RES, V67, P1595, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001; Bocken NMP, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039; Botsman R., 2010, WHATS MINE IS YOURS; Botsman R., 2015, DEFINING SHARING EC; CCAP, 2015, CRED CARDS PAWN SHOP; Chakraborty LB, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P559, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12402; Codagnone C., 2016, SSRN ELECT, V1, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2783662; Cohen B, 2014, ORGAN ENVIRON, V27, P279, DOI 10.1177/1086026614546199; Do A.-M., 2014, GRABTAXI ENTERS VIET; Frenken K, 2017, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V23, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; Habito CF., 2015, PHILIPPINE DAILY INQ; Hargreaves T, 2011, J CONSUM CULT, V11, P79, DOI 10.1177/1469540510390500; Havas Worldwide, 2014, PROS REP NEW CONS SH, V18; Heiskanen E, 2003, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V10, P186, DOI DOI 10.1002/CSR.46; Hira A, 2017, J DEV SOC, V33, P244, DOI 10.1177/0169796X17710074; Hira A, 2017, J DEV SOC, V33, P175, DOI 10.1177/0169796X17710071; Hoballah A., 2014, 11 AS PAC ROUNDT SUS; Huber A, 2017, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V23, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2016.12.001; Jaeger-Erben M, 2014, GAIA, V23, P166, DOI 10.14512/gaia.23.S1.4; Laukkanen M., 2014, 25 ISPIM C INN SUST; Le D., 2017, VIETNAM EC TIMES; Martin E, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, P150, DOI 10.3141/2143-19; McMeekin A, 2012, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V24, P345, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2012.663960; Ministry of Transport Vietnam, 2014, 632014MBGTVT; Mont O, 2004, ECOL ECON, V50, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.030; Mont O, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.009; Mont O, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V63, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.007; Mylan J, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V97, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.065; Nguyen Q, 2017, VIETNAM EC TIMES; Owyang J., 2014, SHARING IS NEW BUYIN; Retamal M., TRANSITIONS SH UNPUB; Retamal M., CHARACTERIZING UNPUB; Retamal M, 2018, J IND ECOL, V22, P1389, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12696; Retamal M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.032; Ritchie JLJ., 2003, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC; Ropke I, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2490, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015; Sahakian M, 2016, ROUTL STUD FOOD SOC, P1; Sahakian M., 2014, KEEPING COOL SE ASIA; Sahakian M, 2014, J CONSUM CULT, V14, P25, DOI 10.1177/1469540513505607; Sahakian MD, 2011, J IND ECOL, V15, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00305.x; Schandl H, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003; Shove E, 2003, J CONSUM POLICY, V26, P395, DOI 10.1023/A:1026362829781; Shove E., 2003, COMFORT CLEANLINESS; Shove E, 2014, CONTEMP SOC SCI, V9, P415, DOI 10.1080/21582041.2012.692484; Spaargaren G, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P813, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010; Tanakasempipat P., 2017, THAI TRANSPORT AUTHO; Tukker A, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P1552, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.022; Tukker A, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V97, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049; Vezzoli C, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V97, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.061; Warde A., 2005, J CONSUM CULT, V5, P131, DOI [10.1177/1469540505053090, DOI 10.1177/1469540505053090]; Wong M., 2004, THESIS CAMBRIDGE U; 2016, ECOL ECON, V121, P149, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2015.11.027; 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V45, P74, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.05.034	58	23	26	2	36	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUN 10	2019	222						143	152		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.267	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.267			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HV8RA		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000466249500013
J	Duane, S; Domegan, C; Bunting, B				Duane, Sinead; Domegan, Christine; Bunting, Brendan			Partnering for UN SDG #17: a social marketing partnership model to scale up and accelerate change	JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MARKETING			English	Article						Structural equation modelling; Social marketing theory	TRUST; COMMUNICATION; UPSTREAM; SUCCESS; SECTOR	Purpose The United Nations (UN) 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) places partnerships as a vital mechanism, which strengthens the implementation of change strategies. The SDG targets are ambitious; acknowledging the interconnected multifaceted issues that are currently facing society. Similarly, social marketing thought is transitioning to embrace systemic change strategies, realising no one organisation can have an impact on the emerging grand challenges. Partnerships are the 5th P in the social marketing mix, however, partnerships is also a nebulous term which has been criticised for lacking theoretical development. This study aims to answer the call from both the UN and social marketing community for further research to guide the development and implementation of impactful transformative partnerships. Design/methodology/approach A robust mixed method approach to develop and test a social marketing partnership model is presented. Trust and relationship commitment are at the forefront of successful partnership exchanges. Morgan and Hunt's (1994) trust and relationship commitment model is extended into the social marketing domain. Findings The findings validate Hasting's (2003) call for social marketers to listen to their commercial marketing counterparts, positioning trust and commitment as essential to change strategies. As the degree of complexities in the multifaceted world continues to accelerate, partnerships for change (UN SDG #17) will pay off, driving more effective and smarter collaborations amongst a diverse range of stakeholders at different levels in different networks. Partnerships will elevate social marketing to deliver systemic transformation for complex problems with far reaching collective and sustainable consequences. Research limitations/implications With trust/mistrust critical to successful exchanges and exchange central to social marketing, quantitative measurement of the antecedents to and outcomes of partnerships can inform the evaluation, impact and management of social marketing interventions. Practical implications Three contributions are made, which support the selection, implementation and evaluation of social marketing partnerships. Key social marketing partnership characteristics are operationalised supporting the partnership selection process. Measurement scales are developed to assist in evaluating partnership relationships over time. The model is empirically tested to investigate the relationships between key mediating variables of social marketing partnerships. Originality/value This paper presents a validated 5th P Partnership model for social marketers, accelerating social marketing's capacities to deliver systemic transformation for complex problems with far reaching collective and sustainable consequences and UN SDG #17.	[Duane, Sinead] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Dept Mkt, Galway, Ireland; [Duane, Sinead] NUI Galway, Ryan Inst, Galway, Ireland; [Domegan, Christine] Natl Univ Ireland, Dept Mkt, Galway, Ireland; [Bunting, Brendan] Univ Ulster, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Dept Psychol, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland		Duane, S (corresponding author), Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Dept Mkt, Galway, Ireland.; Duane, S (corresponding author), NUI Galway, Ryan Inst, Galway, Ireland.	sinead.duane@nuigalway.ie						ANDERSON JC, 1990, J MARKETING, V54, P42, DOI 10.2307/1252172; ANDERSON JC, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P411, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411; [Anonymous], 2011, HDB MARKETING SCALES; [Anonymous], 2016, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Arshad, 2020, J ED HUMANITIES RES, P13; Aulakh PS, 1996, J INT BUS STUD, V27, P1005, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490161; BAGOZZI RP, 1975, J MARKETING, V39, P32, DOI 10.2307/1250593; Bagozzi RP, 1996, INT J RES MARK, V13, P201, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(96)00010-9; Baumgartner H., 1996, INT J RES, V13, P139, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0, 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0]; Bell, 1999, SOCIAL MARKETING Q, V5, P10; Bentler PM, 1999, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V34, P181, DOI 10.1207/S15327906Mb340203; Biroscak BJ, 2014, SOC MARK Q, V20, P247, DOI 10.1177/1524500414556649; Brennan L, 2016, J SOC MARKET, V6, P219, DOI 10.1108/JSOCM-12-2015-0079; Byrne B.M., 2010, STRUCTURAL EQUATION; Byrne B.M., 2001, INT J TEST, V1, P55, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4, DOI 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4, 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4]; Choi CJ, 2007, J BUS ETHICS, V74, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9128-z; CHURCHILL GA, 1979, J MARKETING RES, V16, P64, DOI 10.2307/3150876; Crutchfield L.R., 2008, FORCES GOOD 6 PRACTI; Dillman D.A., 2000, MAIL INTERNET SURVEY, V2nd; Domegan C, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100275; Domegan C, 2019, J MACROMARKETING, V39, P136, DOI 10.1177/0276146719835287; Domegan C, 2016, J MARKET MANAG-UK, V32, P1123, DOI 10.1080/0267257X.2016.1183697; Donovan R., 2010, PRINCIPLES; Duane S, 2019, MARKETING THEOR, V19, P169, DOI 10.1177/1470593118799810; Duane S, 2016, J MARKET MANAG-UK, V32, P856, DOI 10.1080/0267257X.2016.1189449; Farr M., 2016, HARNESSING SCI SOCIA; Flaherty T, 2020, SOC MARK Q, V26, P146, DOI 10.1177/1524500420925188; FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312; Ghauri P., 2020, RES METHODS BUSINESS; Gordon R, 2013, EUR J MARKETING, V47, P1525, DOI 10.1108/EJM-09-2011-0523; GUMMESSON E, 1994, INT J SERV IND MANAG, V5, P5, DOI 10.1108/09564239410074349; Gundlach G., 2001, HDB MARKETING SOC; Hair JR., 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; Hastings G., 2003, J MACROMARKETING, V23, P6, DOI DOI 10.1177/0276146703023001006; Himmelman AT, 2001, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V29, P277, DOI 10.1023/A:1010334831330; Hooper D., 2010, ELECT J BUSINESS RES, V6, P53; Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118; Hunt, 2010, MORPHOLOGY THEORY MA; Hunt, 2010, THEORY ISSUES ASPECT; Jarvis CB, 2003, J CONSUM RES, V30, P199, DOI 10.1086/376806; Johansson C, 2018, J SOC MARKET, V8, P159, DOI 10.1108/JSOCM-03-2016-0009; Kennedy AM, 2016, J MACROMARKETING, V36, P354, DOI 10.1177/0276146715617509; Lagarde F, 2005, SOC MARK Q, V11, P38, DOI 10.1080/15245000500308930; Lambe CJ, 2002, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V30, P141, DOI 10.1177/03079459994399; Lee N, 2005, SOC MARK Q, V11, P51, DOI 10.1080/15245000500308963; Lee NR, 2020, SOC MARK Q, V26, P3, DOI 10.1177/1524500419889141; Lefebvre RC, 2012, J SOC MARKET, V2, P118, DOI 10.1108/20426761211243955; MacMillan K, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.008; MOHR J, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P135, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150205; Mohr JJ, 1996, J MARKETING, V60, P103, DOI 10.2307/1251844; MORGAN RM, 1994, J MARKETING, V58, P20, DOI 10.2307/1252308; Muthen LK, 2002, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V9, P599, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8; Niblett GR, 2005, SOC MARK Q, V11, P9, DOI 10.1080/15245000500308898; NREL, 2020, LOW IMP SOL DEV STRA; Ping RA, 2004, J BUS RES, V57, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00297-1; Platt, 2006, WHAT CAN CASE STUDIE; Saren M., 2003, MARK THEORY, V3, P305, DOI DOI 10.1177/147059310333005; Selnes F., 1998, EUR J MARKETING, V32, P305, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090569810204580; Shook CL, 2004, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V25, P397, DOI 10.1002/smj.385; SINGER B, 2004, SOCIAL MARKETING Q, V10, P67, DOI DOI 10.1080/15245000490484617; SUTTON RI, 1995, ADMIN SCI QUART, V40, P371, DOI 10.2307/2393788; Tapp A, 2013, ISMA ESMA AASM CONSE; Tapp A, 2013, CONSENSUS DEFINITION; Thomas J, 2008, SOC MARK Q, V14, P72, DOI 10.1080/15245000701849195; Truong VD, 2019, J SOC MARKET, V9, P180, DOI 10.1108/JSOCM-06-2018-0062; Truong VD, 2018, J SOC MARKET, V8, P58, DOI 10.1108/JSOCM-11-2016-0072; Truong VD, 2017, J MACROMARKETING, V37, P409, DOI 10.1177/0276146716660833; UN Sustainable Development Goals, 2021, REV GLOB PARTN SUST; WEINREICH N, 2011, HANDS SOCIAL MARKETI, P63281; Weinreich N. K., 1999, HANDS ON SOCIAL MARK; WYMER W, 2021, INT REV PUBLIC NONPR, V18, P1; Zurcher C, 2018, CONFL SECUR DEV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1080/14678802.2018.1483559	72	1	1	2	4	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	2042-6763	2042-6771		J SOC MARKET	J. Soc. Market.	JAN 3	2022	12	1			SI		49	75		10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0200	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0200		SEP 2021	27	Business	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	XX0YK		Green Submitted, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000703456300001
J	Shan, S; Umar, M; Mirza, N				Shan, Shan; Umar, Muhammad; Mirza, Nawazish			Can robo advisors expedite carbon transitions? Evidence from automated funds	TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE			English	Article						Carbon transitions; Robo advisors; Technological Investments	MUTUAL FUNDS; PERFORMANCE; RISK	When it comes to making comparisons with traditional funds, it has been observed that Robo advisers have emerged as a viable alternative that imposes a substantially lesser load on the investors. As a result, they are capable of playing a crucial role in supporting low-carbon transitions - a phenomenon that has never been investigated prior to this. In this study, we assess the performance of automated funds, after categorizing them into different groups, based on their investment exposure to carbon-emitting enterprises. Our findings reveal that automated funds that invest in low-carbon funds tend to outperform their competitors. Moreover, when we compare the absolute returns, the return to value at risk, the adjusted Sharpe ratio, and Jensen's alpha, these results remain consistent. In addition to this, we also found that Robo funds with less exposure to polluting companies have better market timing. Therefore, we conclude that these technology-enabled investment vehicles can help with low-carbon transitions and are instrumental in achieving sustainable development goals.	[Shan, Shan] Coventry Univ, Sch Strategy & Leadership, Coventry, England; [Umar, Muhammad] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China; [Mirza, Nawazish] Excelia Business Sch, La Rochelle, France		Umar, M (corresponding author), Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China.	umar@qdu.edu.cn	Mirza, Nawazish/AAS-8266-2021	Mirza, Nawazish/0000-0003-4265-9519				Amaral C, 2020, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102014; Assaf A, 2015, J MULTINATL FINANC M, V29, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.mulfin.2014.11.002; Bhatia A, 2020, J BEHAV EXP FINANC, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100281; Brammertz W, 2018, J RISK FINANC, V19, P76, DOI 10.1108/JRF-02-2017-0025; Brenner L, 2020, J BEHAV EXP FINANC, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100275; Brunen AC, 2022, J BANK FINANC, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106314; Carhart MM, 1997, J FINANC, V52, P57, DOI 10.2307/2329556; Dorfleitner G, 2022, J RISK FINANC, V23, P85, DOI 10.1108/JRF-07-2020-0162; Dorfleitner G, 2022, J RISK FINANC, V23, P32, DOI 10.1108/JRF-11-2020-0230; Ferrat Y, 2022, J RISK FINANC, V23, P1, DOI 10.1108/JRF-07-2021-0107; Guo XZ, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121429; Hasnaoui JA, 2021, J ASSET MANAG, V22, P360, DOI 10.1057/s41260-021-00228-y; Ielasi F, 2018, J RISK FINANC, V19, P247, DOI 10.1108/JRF-12-2016-0159; JENSEN MC, 1968, J FINANC, V23, P389, DOI 10.2307/2325404; Ji XF, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113228; Jiao ZL, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120442; Karim S, 2022, J RISK FINANC, V23, P191, DOI 10.1108/JRF-09-2021-0158; Koutsokostas D, 2019, J RISK FINANC, V20, P352, DOI 10.1108/JRF-07-2018-0108; Lobato M, 2021, J RISK FINANC, V22, P34, DOI 10.1108/JRF-04-2020-0066; Mirza N, 2020, FINANC RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101657; Mirza N, 2013, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V26, P177, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517615; Naqvi B, 2021, GLOB FINANC J, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100656; Naqvi B, 2018, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V52, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.02.003; Reboredo JC, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V73, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.158; Reddy K, 2017, ECON MODEL, V66, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.007; Rizvi SKA, 2020, J ASSET MANAG, V21, P281, DOI 10.1057/s41260-020-00172-3; Schellinger B, 2020, J RISK FINANC, V21, P127, DOI 10.1108/JRF-11-2019-0221; Shanmuganathan M, 2020, J BEHAV EXP FINANC, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100297; SHARPE WF, 1966, J BUS, V39, P119, DOI 10.1086/294846; SHARPE WF, 1994, J PORTFOLIO MANAGE, V21, P49, DOI 10.3905/jpm.1994.409501; Tao R, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120421; Tsai WT, 2020, J RISK FINANC, V21, P469, DOI 10.1108/JRF-02-2017-0022; Umar M., Q REV EC FINANCE, DOI [10.1016/j.qref.2021.04.016, DOI 10.1016/J.QREF.2021.04.016]; Umar M, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113156; Yan L, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121326; Yarovaya L, 2021, INT REV ECON FINANC, V71, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2020.09.017	36	1	1	4	4	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0040-1625	1873-5509		TECHNOL FORECAST SOC	Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.	JUL	2022	180								121694	10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121694	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121694			6	Business; Regional & Urban Planning	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Public Administration	1N4FF					2022-09-08	WOS:000800612300019
J	Chen, CD; Su, CH; Chen, MH				Chen, Chun-Da; Su, Ching-Hui (Joan); Chen, Ming-Hsiang			Are ESG-committed hotels financially resilient to the COVID-19 pandemic? An autoregressive jump intensity trend model	TOURISM MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Hotel industry; Environmental-social-governance; ESG; Risk management; Autoregressive jump intensity trend model; COVID-19	CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; VOLATILITY; COMPONENTS; DYNAMICS; PRICE; VALUATION; SHOCKS; RISK	Given that the United Nations views environmental, social, and governance (ESG) as a practical framework for anchoring responsible corporate behavior to achieve its sustainable development goals, this study constructs an autoregressive jump intensity trend (ARJI-trend) model to determine if ESG can improve future resilience and create crisis-resilient value for chained-brand hotel corporations from the effects of COVID-19. The findings indicate that the ARJI-trend model indeed captures both the permanent and transitory components of the hotel corporation's ESG performance related to stock return dynamics. When ESG rating is taken into account, the following conclusions emerge: 1) the transitory component of time-varying return variance decreases but the permanent component does not; 2) the hotel corporation portfolios with a lower transitory component experiences a higher return, implying that the hotel corporations with a higher ESG rating appear to be more defensiveness; and 3) with proper asset reallocation, a portfolio centered on strong ESG-conscious hotel corporations is a safe-haven asset during market turmoil.	[Su, Ching-Hui (Joan)] Lamar Univ, Coll Business, Dept Business, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA; [Chen, Ming-Hsiang] Iowa State Univ, Dept Apparel, Events, Hospitality Management, Ames, IA 50011 USA; [Chen, Ming-Hsiang] Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Tourism & Social Adm Coll, Nanjing 211171, Peoples R China; [Chen, Ming-Hsiang] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Sch Hospitality Business Management, Pullman, WA 99164 USA		Chen, MH (corresponding author), Iowa State Univ, Dept Apparel, Events, Hospitality Management, Ames, IA 50011 USA.; Chen, MH (corresponding author), Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Tourism & Social Adm Coll, Nanjing 211171, Peoples R China.; Chen, MH (corresponding author), Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Sch Hospitality Business Management, Pullman, WA 99164 USA.	chunda.chen@lamar.edu; joansu@iastate.edu; ming-hsiang.chen@wsu.edu		Chen, Ming-Hsiang/0000-0001-6048-018X				Adrian T, 2008, J FINANC, V63, P2997, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01419.x; Andersen TG, 2007, REV ECON STAT, V89, P701, DOI 10.1162/rest.89.4.701; Bai J, 2003, J APPL ECONOMET, V18, P1, DOI 10.1002/jae.659; Bai JS, 1998, ECONOMETRICA, V66, P47, DOI 10.2307/2998540; Begin JF, 2020, REV FINANC STUD, V33, P155, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhz043; Broadstock DC, 2021, FINANC RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716; Cantele S, 2020, INT J HOSP MANAG, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102510; Caporale GM, 2017, J INT MONEY FINANC, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.03.002; Carnevale C, 2014, BUS ETHICS, V23, P69, DOI 10.1111/beer.12038; Cek K, 2020, J BUS ECON MANAG, V21, P1165, DOI 10.3846/jbem.2020.12725; Chan WH, 2002, J BUS ECON STAT, V20, P377, DOI 10.1198/073500102288618513; Chen C. D., 2020, N AM J ECON FINANC; Chen JJ, 2021, TOURISM MANAGE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104304; Chiang SM, 2019, J INT MONEY FINANC, V96, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.04.007; CHOW GC, 1960, ECONOMETRICA, V28, P591, DOI 10.2307/1910133; Claypole A, 2021, IDEAGEN; Cro S, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V63, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.05.009; Daal E, 2007, J BANK FINANC, V31, P2751, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.12.012; Dutta A, 2021, INT J FINANC ECON, V26, P889, DOI 10.1002/ijfe.1826; Engle R. F., 1999, COINTEGRATION CAUSAL, P475; Fatemi A, 2018, GLOB FINANC J, V38, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001; Fong WM, 2002, ENERG ECON, V24, P71, DOI 10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00087-1; Franco S, 2020, INT J HOSP MANAG, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102395; Freeman R.E., 1984, STRATEG MANAG; Freudenreich B, 2020, J BUS ETHICS, V166, P3, DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z; Giese G, 2019, J PORTFOLIO MANAGE, V45, P69, DOI 10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069; Gupta P., 2021, MICROBIAL NATURAL MA; Haase M, 2019, EMPIR ECON, V56, P1359, DOI 10.1007/s00181-017-1387-2; Jamali D, 2019, SOC RESPONSIB J, V16, P309, DOI 10.1108/SRJ-05-2018-0108; Jensen ST, 2004, ECONOMETRICA, V72, P641, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00504.x; Kho BC, 1996, J FINANC ECON, V41, P249, DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00861-8; Kim B, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.103999; Kim CH, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P2581, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.015; Kim M, 2014, INT J HOSP MANAG, V40, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.006; Kimpel S. H., 2021, NATL LAW REV, V61, P47; Koekebakker S, 2004, AM J AGR ECON, V86, P1018, DOI 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00650.x; Koseoglu MA, 2021, INT J HOSP MANAG, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102819; Kuttu S, 2017, GLOB FINANC J, V32, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.gfj.2016.06.004; Liu YT, 2022, MANAGE SCI, V68, P1573, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3884; Lochhead C, 2022, LAS VEGAS REV J; Maheu JM, 2004, J FINANC, V59, P755, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00648.x; Nicolau JL, 2008, ANN TOURISM RES, V35, P990, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2008.09.003; Normandin M, 2004, J MONETARY ECON, V51, P1217, DOI 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.11.002; OECD, 2020, IMP COVID 19 ED INS; Park SY, 2009, CORNELL HOSP Q, V50, P168, DOI 10.1177/1938965509331814; Park S, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V59, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.016; Polbennikov S., 2016, J FIXED INCOME, V26, P21, DOI DOI 10.3905/JFI.2016.26.1.021; Porter M. E, 2021, WORKING PAPERS; Qiu S, 2021, INT J HOSP MANAG, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102759; S&P Global, 2020, AL PORTF S P GLOB ES; Serafeim G, 2020, HARVARD BUS REV; Su CH, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104158; Theodoulidis B, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V62, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.018; Urdangarin J., 2015, 6 REASONS RESPOND DO; Wang YS, 2013, SERV IND J, V33, P1206, DOI 10.1080/02642069.2011.629295	55	0	0	16	16	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0261-5177	1879-3193		TOURISM MANAGE	Tourism Manage.	DEC	2022	93								104581	10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104581	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104581			14	Environmental Studies; Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Social Sciences - Other Topics; Business & Economics	2F5JJ	35693760	Green Published, Bronze			2022-09-08	WOS:000812945200005
J	Amirshenava, S; Osanloo, M				Amirshenava, Sina; Osanloo, Morteza			Mine closure risk management: An integration of 3D risk model and MCDM techniques	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Mine closure; Sustainable development; Risk management; 3D risk model; Mine reclamation; Multi-criteria decision making	DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; OPEN-PIT MINE; LAND-USE; RECLAMATION; METHODOLOGY; PROMETHEE; FRAMEWORK; RANKING; SITES	Mine life is limited to mineable reserve, but economic, social and environmental factors can make mine life shorter than what is expected. Mine closure is associated with adverse on-site and off-site impacts such as unemployment, the loss of community services and pollution which threaten achieving the sustainable development goals. Therefore, mine closure risk management is necessary for reducing the negative effects. The present study aimed to develop a generic procedure for mine closure risk management. To this end, a three dimensional (3D) risk model was developed for assessing mine closure risks. The 3D risk model can fix the deficiency of 2D risk model by considering the time value of risk. Mine reclamation is a risk treatment option which requires the selection of optimal Post-Mining Land Use (PMLU). The optimal PMLU depends on the risks identified by the 3D risk model. In addition, a hybrid approach involving three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods was developed for optimal PMLU selection. Twenty six different criteria including six economic, four technical, three landscape and environmental, seven social and six mine site factors were proposed. Finally, the proposed risk management approach was implemented in Choghart iron ore mine of Iran. The results indicated that the identified events had a 51.4% low, 22.9% medium, 143% high and 11.4% extreme risk levels and accordingly revegetation with native species was recommended as the optimal PMLU. Compared with the 2D risk model, the assessment results are more effective and practical by adding the time value of risk which can help budget planning for risk treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Amirshenava, Sina; Osanloo, Morteza] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Min & Met Engn, POB 15875-4413,424 Hafez Ave, Tehran, Iran		Osanloo, M (corresponding author), Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Min & Met Engn, POB 15875-4413,424 Hafez Ave, Tehran, Iran.	sina.amirshanava@gmail.com; morteza.osanloo@gmail.com	Osanloo, Morteza/CAE-9412-2022					[Anonymous], 2018, 310002018 ISO; Aven T, 2007, RISK MANAGEMENT APPL; Bascetin A, 2007, ENVIRON GEOL, V52, P663, DOI 10.1007/s00254-006-0495-7; Behzadian M, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V200, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021; Betrie GD, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V119, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.024; BRANS JP, 1986, EUR J OPER RES, V24, P228, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5; Delgado-Martin J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V20, P7520, DOI 10.1007/s11356-013-1618-9; Dimitrijevic B, 2014, J MIN SCI+, V50, P319, DOI 10.1134/S106273911402015X; Du HZ, 2016, IEEE CONF COMPUT; Eggart M. J, 2015, RESPONSIBLE MINING C, P1; Espinoza RD, 2017, RESOUR POLICY, V52, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.010; FINE WT, 1971, J SAFETY RES, V3, P157; Fourie A, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P1085, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.05.008; Ghanbari M., 2010, 12 INT S ENV ISS WAS, P24; Gheisari N., 2014, MINE PLANNING EQUIPM, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_77]; Griffith J. J., 2001, UNASYLVA, V52, P9; Hartman HL., 2002, INTRO MINING ENG; Hasheela I, 2014, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V144, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.05.009; Hwang C.-L., 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, VVolume 186, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]; Jonek Kowalska I, 2014, RESOUR POLICY, V41, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.05.002; Kinney GF., 1976, PRACTICAL RISK ANAL; Kodir A., 2017, SUS ENV RES IN PRESS, DOI [10.1016/j.serj.2017.03, DOI 10.1016/J.SERJ.2017.03]; Krzemien A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V139, P1044, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.149; Kuka K, 2013, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V132, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.05.001; Kuo FE, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P343, DOI 10.1177/0013916501333002; Kuo T, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V260, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.052; Laurence D, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.04.011; Laurence D, 2001, MINER RESOUR ENG, V10, P315, DOI 10.1016/S0950-6098(01)00068-3; Laurence D, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.019; LeClerc E, 2015, EXTR IND SOC, V2, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.exis.2014.09.001; LPSDP, 2016, RISK MAN LEAD PRACT; Maczkowiack RI, 2012, AGR SYST, V109, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.002; Marhavilas PK, 2008, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V21, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.009; Mborah C., 2016, Environment and Pollution, V5, P14, DOI 10.5539/ep.v5n1p14; Minaei Mobtaker M., 2013, 6 INT C SUST DEV MIN; Musingwini C., 2010, P 19 INT S MIN PLANN; Narrei S., 2011, OIDA INT J SUSTAIN D, V11, P65; Noras P., 2008, MINE CLOSURE HDB; Osanloo M., 2017, MINE RECLAMATION, P222; Paricheh M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V167, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.202; Rahmanpour M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P1249, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.205; Ristic D., 2013, SAFETY ENG J, V3, P121, DOI 10.7562/SE2013.3.03.03; RMO (Risk Management Office), 2004, RISK ASS 3D MOD ENV; ROY B, 1968, REV FR INFORM RECH O, V2, P57; Ruiz Chaparro M., 2014, THESIS; Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE; Saaty TL, 1990, INT J CONFL MANAGE, V1, P47, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB022672; Shenavar M., 2016, 16 INT S ENV ISS WAS; Skousen J., 2014, INT J COAL SCI TECHN, V1, P135; Sloss L., 2013, CCC216 IEA; Soltanmohammadi H, 2008, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V5, P535, DOI 10.1007/BF03326051; SOLTANMOHAMMADI H, 2009, ENVIRON GEOL, V58, P877, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00254-008-1563-y; Soltanmohammadi H., 2008, P POSTM S NANC FRANC; Stacey J, 2010, J S AFR I MIN METALL, V110, P395; Steward M., 1996, HDB W RECLAMATION TE; Taveira A.L.S., 2016, 24 WORLD MINING C MI; Unger CJ, 2015, RESOUR POLICY, V43, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.008; Valenzuela L, 2014, MIN CLOS SOL C OUROP; Venkateswarlu K, 2016, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V15, P327, DOI 10.1007/s11157-016-9398-6; Vickers H, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V163, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.024; Wei XC, 2011, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V409, P941, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.030; Winde F, 2010, WATER SA, V36, P75; Yan DM, 2013, ENVIRON MANAGE, V52, P748, DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0092-y; Yavuz M, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V73, P6167, DOI 10.1007/s12665-014-3842-0; Zimmerman M., 2016, DEV DECISION SUPPORT, P87	65	39	40	2	27	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 20	2018	184						389	401		10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.186	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.186			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GD8RK					2022-09-08	WOS:000430779600035
J	Castro, L; Sganzerla, WG; Ziero, HDD; Mudhoo, A; Martins, G; Forster-Carneiro, T				Castro Ampese, Larissa; Sganzerla, William Gustavo; Ziero, Henrique Di Domenico; Mudhoo, Ackmez; Martins, Gilberto; Forster-Carneiro, Tania			Research progress, trends, and updates on anaerobic digestion technology: A bibliometric analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Renewable energy; Biogas; Bibliometrics; Pretreatment; Circular economy; Biorefinery	MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; METHANE PRODUCTION; WASTE-WATER; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CO-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; PRETREATMENT STRATEGIES; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION	Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a consolidated waste management technology with numerous publications on this topic. Consequently, using Scientometric tools can be insightful to depict and analyze research gaps and trends towards updating scientific datasets and upgrading knowledge in this research area. Therefore, this bibliometric review examined the research progress, trends, and updates on AD technology. The Web of Science(C) database was used to select the documents, and the softwares VOSviewer(C) and Bibliometrix were used to carry out the bibliometric investigation. The results obtained in this bibliometric study highlight that the hot topics in the field over the last five years of publications are associated with environmental studies for biogas production to avoid greenhouse gas emissions, focusing on the microbiological and engineering parameters involved. There is a lack of information regarding the recovery of bioenergy from organic waste. The main opportunities and trends can be associated with the integration of feedstock pretreatment prior to the core processing of substrates by AD with a view to improve biogas production and quality. The production of bioenergy and biofuels from AD processes can be an alternative to meet the relevant Sustainable Development Goals. Finally, the knowledge on feedstock pre-treatment with process modeling, optimization, and operation, is crucial to establish AD as a profitable management system reaping alongside significant economic and environmental benefits.	[Castro Ampese, Larissa; Sganzerla, William Gustavo; Ziero, Henrique Di Domenico; Forster-Carneiro, Tania] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Food Engn, Rua Monteiro Lobato,N 80, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil; [Mudhoo, Ackmez] Univ Mauritius, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Fac Engn, Reduit 80837, Mauritius; [Martins, Gilberto] Univ Fed Abc, Modeling & Appl Social Sci, Brazilian Ctr Engn, Ave Estados 5001, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil		Forster-Carneiro, T (corresponding author), Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Food Engn, Rua Monteiro Lobato,N 80, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil.	taniafc@unicamp.br	Martins, Gilberto/D-5229-2012	Martins, Gilberto/0000-0003-0565-2289; Castro Ampese, Larissa/0000-0001-8418-5855; Sganzerla, William Gustavo/0000-0002-1780-2160; FORSTER-CARNEIRO, TANIA/0000-0002-0514-3460	Brazilian Science and Research Foundation (CNPq) [302473/2019-0]; Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]; Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) [2018/05999-0, 2018/14938-4, 2019/ 26925-7]	Brazilian Science and Research Foundation (CNPq)(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ)Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF)); Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)(Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)); Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil)(Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP))	This study was supported by the Brazilian Science and Research Foundation (CNPq) (productivity grant 302473/2019-0); Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) (Finance code 001); and Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) (grant numbers 2018/05999-0, 2018/14938-4, and 2019/ 26925-7). The contents of this article were crosschecked for similarity in the Turnitin platform.	Arzate JA, 2017, CHEM-ING-TECH, V89, P686, DOI 10.1002/cite.201600176; Atelge MR, 2020, FUEL, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117494; Bacaksiz AM, 2021, CHEM ENG J, V410, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127535; Brauer HB, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127738; Carrere H, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V199, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.007; Chandra R, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P1462, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.035; Chen C, 2021, WATER RES, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116552; Chen G, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V329, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124864; Chen JL, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V642, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.373; Chen YC, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V192, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.260; Cheng H, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V267, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.045; Choerudin C, 2021, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105276; Lizama AC, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V275, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.086; Cremonez PA, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111854; Deschamps L, 2021, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102061; Dhillon GS, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V27, P789, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.046; Diez V, 2021, CHEM ENG J, V408, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127288; Van DP, 2020, ENVIRON ENG RES, V25, P1, DOI 10.4491/eer.2018.334; EIA, 2020, GLOB EN REV CO2 EM 2; Eriksen M., 2015, TOBACCO ATLAS REVISE; European Environment Agency, 2020, IS EUR RED ITS GREEN; Feng Y, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115755; Ferrari G, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13143714; Gannoun H, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V201, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.050; Ghobakhloo M., 2021, J CLEAN PROD; Gielen D, 2019, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006; Giwa AS, 2019, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103067; Hakawati R, 2017, APPL ENERG, V206, P1076, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.068; Holliger C, 2016, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V74, P2515, DOI 10.2166/wst.2016.336; Hu C, 2018, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V6, P2095, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.018; Jain S, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091; Ji JY, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V336, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125306; Jimenez-Castro MP, 2020, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104035; Khan MA, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V219, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.073; Nguyen VK, 2021, FUEL, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119105; Klenert D, 2020, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V76, P751, DOI 10.1007/s10640-020-00453-w; Kong Z, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124123; Kotay SM, 2007, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V98, P1183, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.009; Kothari R, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V39, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.011; Kumar A, 2020, ENERGY, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117253; Kwon D., MEMBRANES, V11, P365; Tan LC, 2021, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101482; Lei Z, 2021, J MEMBRANE SCI, V632, DOI 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119383; Lei Z, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V330, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124966; Li Y, 2019, APPL ENERG, V240, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243; Liew WH, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V71, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.006; Liu Y, 2015, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V189, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.003; Liu YW, 2012, CHEM ENG J, V192, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.044; Liu Y, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121339; Lo HM, 2010, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V101, P6329, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.048; Luo JY, 2020, J HAZARD MATER, V383, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121176; Mahon AM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P810, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04048; Mao CL, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V45, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032; Mayer F, 2021, WASTE MANAGE, V130, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.019; Meegoda J.N., 2018, INT J ENV RES PUBL H, V15; Meng AH, 2015, J ENERGY INST, V88, P480, DOI 10.1016/j.joei.2014.10.003; Morales-Polo C., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P23; Neumann P, 2016, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V15, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11157-016-9396-8; Nie YQ, 2007, PROCESS BIOCHEM, V42, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.11.007; Nilusha RT, 2021, MEMBRANES-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/membranes11020108; Nunes LJR, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109658; Obileke K, 2022, BIOMASS CONVERS BIOR, V12, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s13399-020-00832-9; Panigrahi S, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V143, P779, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.040; Phayungphan K, 2020, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V15, P1068, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2020.081; Phuttaro C, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V284, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.114; Ramachandran A, 2019, PROCESSES, V7, DOI 10.3390/pr7120953; Ritchie H., 2020, ENERGY MIX; Romero-Guiza MS, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P1486, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.094; Roser M, CO2 EMISSIONS FUEL; Sawatdeenarunat C, 2015, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V178, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.103; Schieb P-A, 2015, BIOREFINERY 2030 FUT; Serrano A, 2021, BIOFUEL BIOPROD BIOR, V15, P150, DOI 10.1002/bbb.2159; Sharma B, 2021, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101201; Shen YW, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123212; Shen YW, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V50, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129; Shin C, 2021, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V7, P739, DOI [10.1039/d0ew01112f, 10.1039/D0EW01112F]; Sohn W., 2021, BIORESOUR TECHNOL RE; Tou FY, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P4831, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b05931; Tua C, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111605; United Nations U.N, 2020, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Unsar EK, 2018, CHEMOSPHERE, V211, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.014; Veluchamy C, 2019, FUEL, V253, P1097, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.104; Veluchamy C, 2017, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V245, P1206, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.179; Vinardell S, 2021, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124170; Vinardell S, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141625; Wainaina S, 2019, BIOENGINEERED, V10, P437, DOI 10.1080/21655979.2019.1673937; Wang PX, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123368; Wang XM, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V249, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.038; Xiao BY, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V249, P826, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.084; Xu FQ, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V247, P1047, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020; Xu R, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V247, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.095; Xu YY, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V28, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.027; Xu Y, 2020, J HAZARD MATER, V389, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121847; Yaashikaa PR, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V748, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141312; Yang G, 2015, WATER RES, V78, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.002; Ye N, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122679; Zaidi AA, 2019, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V44, P14661, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.245; Zamri MFMA, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110637; Zhang N, 2021, CURR POLLUT REP, V7, P277, DOI 10.1007/s40726-021-00192-6; Zhang YJ, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P26427, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-12448-1; Zhen GY, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V69, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187; Zhu KY, 2020, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122382	102	9	9	26	26	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 10	2022	331								130004	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130004	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130004			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0Z8WD					2022-09-08	WOS:000791351000006
J	Karamshetty, V; De Vries, H; Van Wassenhove, LN; Dewilde, S; Minnaard, W; Ongarora, D; Abuga, K; Yadav, P				Karamshetty, Varun; De Vries, Harwin; Van Wassenhove, Luk N.; Dewilde, Sarah; Minnaard, Warnyta; Ongarora, Dennis; Abuga, Kennedy; Yadav, Prashant			Inventory Management Practices in Private Healthcare Facilities in Nairobi County	PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT			English	Article						inventory control; low- and middle-income countries; urban neighborhoods; private healthcare; semi-structured interviews	ESSENTIAL MEDICINES; STOCK-OUTS; LOW-INCOME; AVAILABILITY; ACCESS; MEDICATIONS; CHILDREN; DISEASES; COSTS	Universal health coverage (UHC) is an integral part of the United Nations sustainable development goals. The private sector plays a prominent role in achieving UHC, being the primary source of essential medicines for many people. However, many private healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have insufficient stocks of essential medicines. Simultaneously, these same facilities carry excessive quantities of other drugs, leading to obsolescence. This suggests poor inventory control. To propose potential remedies it is vital to fully understand the underlying causes. In semi-structured interviews with managers of private healthcare facilities in Nairobi, we asked them about their (1) inventory control systems, (2) inventory control skills, (3) time/human resource constraints, (4) budget constraints, (5) motivations for inventory control, and (6) suppliers. Our results suggest that the problems are driven by resource limitations (budget and time/human resources), managerial issues (relating to skills and systems), and market mechanisms that limit overage and underage costs. Unavailability at the supplier level and motivations for inventory control are relatively minor issues. We posit that the key causes are interlinked and stem from wider issues in the market and regulatory environment. Our results challenge prevalent beliefs about medicine supply chains in LMICs and lead to novel hypotheses. Testing these hypotheses could improve our understanding of inventory management in private healthcare facilities and aid progress in achieving UHC.	[Karamshetty, Varun] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore; [De Vries, Harwin] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands; [Van Wassenhove, Luk N.; Dewilde, Sarah; Yadav, Prashant] INSEAD, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France; [Minnaard, Warnyta] PharmAccess Fdn, NL-1105 BP Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Ongarora, Dennis; Abuga, Kennedy] Univ Nairobi, Nairobi 1967600202, Kenya		Karamshetty, V (corresponding author), Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.	varun.karamshetty@nus.edu.sg; harwin.devries@rsm.nl; luk.van-wassenhove@insead.edu; sarah.dewilde@insead.edu; w.minnaard@pharmaccess.org; dennis.bagwasi@uonbi.ac.ke; koabuga@uonbi.ac.ke; prashant.yadav@insead.edu		Karamshetty, Varun/0000-0002-0531-3212				Alphs, 2012, ENHANCING ACCESS MED; Anderson ET, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P1751, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0577; Anupindi R, 1999, MANAGE SCI, V45, P178, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.45.2.178; Axsater S, 2015, INVENTORY CONTROL, V225; Azzi A, 2014, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V25, P109, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-01-2012-0004; Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544; Bissell K, 2016, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V20, P717, DOI 10.5588/ijtld.15.0734; Cachon G., 1997, Production and Operations Management, V6, P266; Cameron A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P240, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6; Cetinkaya S, 2000, MANAGE SCI, V46, P217, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.217.11923; Chalker JC, 2015, ANTIMICROB RESIST IN, V4, DOI 10.1186/s13756-015-0075-2; Chan M., 2018, 10 YEARS PUBLIC HLTH; Chuang HHC, 2016, PROD OPER MANAG, V25, P935, DOI 10.1111/poms.12519; Creswell J.W., 2014, RES DESIGN QUALITATI; De Meyer A., 1990, J OPER MANAG, V9, P168, DOI [10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-T., DOI 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-T]; DiCicco-Bloom B, 2006, MED EDUC, V40, P314, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x; Elbireer S, 2011, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V16, P981, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02800.x; Escamilla R, 2021, PROD OPER MANAG, V30, P676, DOI 10.1111/poms.13309; Ewen M, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171284; Fisher M., 2001, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V3, P230, DOI 10.1287/msom.3.3.230.9889; Frohlicher P., 2019, BRING UNIVERSAL HEAL; Gardner JW, 2020, PROD OPER MANAG, V29, P2182, DOI 10.1111/poms.13221; Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151; Glassman A., 2019, HARNESSING POWER PRI; Goudge J, 2009, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-9-75; Guest G, 2006, FIELD METHOD, V18, P59, DOI 10.1177/1525822X05279903; HACKETT SC, 1993, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V20, P247, DOI 10.1016/0167-2681(93)90093-5; Harding R, 2014, PALLIATIVE MED, V28, P293, DOI 10.1177/0269216313498637; Harrison A, 1998, AIDS, V12, P2329, DOI 10.1097/00002030-199817000-00015; Health Access International, 2018, PRIC AV LOC PROD IMP; Kallio H, 2016, J ADV NURS, V72, P2954, DOI 10.1111/jan.13031; Kesavan S, 2020, MANAGE SCI, V66, P5182, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3743; Kibirige D, 2017, BMC PULM MED, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12890-017-0527-y; Kibirige D, 2017, INT J EQUITY HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12939-017-0651-6; Kibwage I.O., 2019, SUBSTANDARD PHARM SE; Kvale S., 2009, INTERVIEWS LEARNING; Lauffenburger Julie C, 2011, Int J Pharm Pract, V19, P201, DOI 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00114.x; Leung NHZ, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156026; Lewis S, 2015, HEALTH PROMOT PRACT, V16, P473, DOI 10.1177/1524839915580941; Magadzire BP, 2017, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2640-2; Magadzire BP, 2014, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0520-6; Management Sciences for Health, 2014, MDS 3 MAN ACC MED HL; Matchaba, 2019, START DIGITAL HEALTH; Mendis S, 2007, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V85, P279, DOI 10.2471/BLT.06.033647; Ministry of Health, 2016, KEN ESS MED LIST; Ministry of Medical Services, 2009, ACC ESS MED KEN HLTH; Muiruri C, 2017, FACTORS INFLUENCING; Musinguzi G, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0142312; Netessine S., 2006, RETAIL STORE EXECUTI; Ngcobo NJ, 2017, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V107, P535, DOI [10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i6.12149, 10.7196/samj.2017.v107i6.12149]; Nilseng J, 2014, BMC MED INFORM DECIS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-14-78; Noble MA, 1995, DECISION SCI, V26, P693, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01446.x; Ohno T., 1988, TOYOTA PRODUCTION SY; Ongarora D, 2019, PHARMACY-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/pharmacy7020040; Pasquet A, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013414; Penfold S, 2013, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V13, DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-61; Poku RA, 2017, AJAR-AFR J AIDS RES, V16, P231, DOI 10.2989/16085906.2017.1364275; Poyer S, 2015, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V20, P744, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12491; Raman A, 2001, CALIF MANAGE REV, V43, P136, DOI 10.2307/41166093; Robertson J, 2009, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V87, P231, DOI 10.2471/BLT.08.053645; Songole R, 2017, MED CLIN REV, V3, P20; Symon G., 2012, QUALITATIVE ORG RES; Ton Z, 2010, PROD OPER MANAG, V19, P546, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01120.x; Tosun J, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, DOI 10.1002/gch2.201700036; TUKEY JW, 1980, AM STAT, V34, P23, DOI 10.2307/2682991; United Nations, 2019, WORLD POPULATION PRO; USAID, 2019, USAID GLOB HLTH SUPP; USAID-Deliver Project, 2011, LOG HDB PRACT GUID S; Valentini G, 2003, INT J PROD ECON, V81-2, P215, DOI 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00300-6; van Donselaar KH, 2010, MANAGE SCI, V56, P766, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1141; Wagenaar BH, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P791, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12314; Wangu M. M., 2014, African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, V8, P438; Wiernikowski JT, 2014, PEDIATR BLOOD CANCER, V61, P1513, DOI 10.1002/pbc.25049; Wirtz VJ, 2016, CIRCULATION, V133, P2076, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.008722; World Health Organization, 2013, MULT NAT ACT PLAN PR; World Health Organization/Health Action International, 2008, MED PRICES AVAILABIL, V2nd; Xue WL, 2017, PROD OPER MANAG, V26, P1685, DOI 10.1111/poms.12713; Yadav P, 2015, HEALTH SYST REFORM, V1, P142, DOI 10.4161/23288604.2014.968005; Yao YL, 2007, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V43, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.021; Yin R. K, 2003, QUALITATIVE RES METH, P359; Zomerdijk LG, 2003, INT J PROD ECON, V81-2, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00276-1	81	1	1	6	15	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1059-1478	1937-5956		PROD OPER MANAG	Prod. Oper. Manag.	FEB	2022	31	2					828	846		10.1111/poms.13445	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.13445		JUL 2021	19	Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	ZI7SI		hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000672449000001
J	Mogale, DG; Kumar, SK; Tiwari, MK				Mogale, D. G.; Kumar, Sri Krishna; Tiwari, Manoj Kumar			Green food supply chain design considering risk and post-harvest losses: a case study	ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH			English	Article						Food grain supply chain; Food security; Transportation; Inventory; Particle swarm optimization	LOCATION-ALLOCATION PROBLEM; NETWORK DESIGN; FACILITY LOCATION; GRAIN TRANSPORTATION; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; STORAGE; SYSTEM; TIME	The global food insecurity, malnourishment and rising world hunger are the major hindrances in accomplishing the zero hunger sustainable development goal by 2030. Due to the continuous increment of wheat production in the past few decades, India received the second rank in the global wheat production after China. However, storage capacity has not been expanded with similar extent. The administrative bodies in India are constructing several capacitated silos in major geographically widespread producing and consuming states to curtail this gap. This paper presents a multi-period single objective mathematical model to support their decision-making process. The model minimizes the silo establishment, transportation, food grain loss, inventory holding, carbon emission, and risk penalty costs. The proposed model is solved using the variant of the particle swarm optimization combined with global, local and near neighbor social structures along with traditional PSO. The solutions obtained through two metaheuristic algorithms are compared with the optimal solutions. The impact of supply, demand and capacity of silos on the model solution is investigated through sensitivity analysis. Finally, some actionable theoretical and managerial implications are discussed after analysing the obtained results.	[Mogale, D. G.] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Logist & Operat Management, Cardiff, Wales; [Kumar, Sri Krishna; Tiwari, Manoj Kumar] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India; [Tiwari, Manoj Kumar] Natl Inst Ind Engn NITIE, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India		Tiwari, MK (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India.; Tiwari, MK (corresponding author), Natl Inst Ind Engn NITIE, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.	mogaled@cardiff.ac.uk; srikrishna@iem.iitkgp.ac.in; mktiwari9@iem.iitkgp.ac.in	Tiwari, Manoj K./B-3592-2012	Tiwari, M.K/0000-0001-8564-1402; Mogale, Dnyaneshwar/0000-0002-7977-0360				Akkerman R, 2010, OR SPECTRUM, V32, P863, DOI 10.1007/s00291-010-0223-2; Alagusundaram K., 2016, P 10 INT C CONTROLLE, P431; Aliano A, 2022, ANN OPER RES, V314, P347, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03468-9; Allaoui H, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V89, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.012; An K, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V88, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.009; [Anonymous], 2013, STOR MAN MOV FOOD GR; Arabani AB, 2012, COMPUT IND ENG, V62, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2011.09.018; Ardjmand E, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V51, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.12.036; Asgari N, 2013, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V13, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.002; Banasik A, 2017, ANN OPER RES, V250, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10479-016-2199-z; Bilgen B, 2007, INT J PROD ECON, V107, P555, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.008; Boonmee A, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V250, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.020; Chan FTS, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P5155, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1701209; Chauhan A, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V290, P621, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03190-6; De A, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V225, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107566; Department of Food & Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food & Public Distribution., 2017, PUBL DISTR NFSA COMP; Department of Food & Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer affairs Food & Public Distribution., PDS PORT IND; Diabat A, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P3039, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.588619; Dora M, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V290, P47, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03134-0; Eberhart R, 1995, INT S MICROMACH HUM, P39, DOI DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215; Eskandarpour M, 2017, COMPUT OPER RES, V80, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.012; Eskandarpour M, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V54, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.006; Esteso A, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P4418, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1447706; Etemadnia H, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V244, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.044; Farahani RZ, 2010, APPL MATH MODEL, V34, P1689, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.005; Florentino HD, 2022, ANN OPER RES, V314, P451, DOI 10.1007/s10479-020-03610-y; Food and Agriculture Organization, 2020, The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets, DOI 10.4060/ca9692en; Ge HT, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V197, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.007; Ge HT, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V159, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.023; Gholamian MR, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V140, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.038; Gobel C, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P1429, DOI 10.3390/su7021429; Govindan K, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.028; Gustavsson J., 2011, Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention; Hamadani AZ, 2013, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2013.03.001; Hosseini-Motlagh SM, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105095; Kaur H, 2019, MODELLING INTERNET T; Ketzenberg M, 2015, PROD OPER MANAG, V24, P54, DOI 10.1111/poms.12209; Khalifehzadeh S, 2015, J MANUF SYST, V35, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.12.002; Khamjan W, 2013, COMPUT IND ENG, V66, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.006; Kiil K, 2018, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V29, P106, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1384077; Krishnan R, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118374; Leat P, 2013, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V18, P219, DOI 10.1108/13598541311318845; Liotta G, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V164, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.016; Maiyar LM, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V217, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.021; Maiyar LM, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V110, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.023; Melo MT, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V196, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007; Milman O., 2015, EARTH HAS LOST 3 AR; Mishra N, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P337, DOI 10.1007/s10479-016-2303-4; Mogale DG, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P6493, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1682707; Mogale DG, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P5521, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1669840; Mogale DG, 2018, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V111, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.004; Mogale DG, 2018, CONTROL ENG PRACT, V70, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.09.017; Mogale DG, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V104, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.027; Mohammed A, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V184, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.016; Naderi B, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V291, P685, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03137-x; Nicholson CF, 2011, FOOD POLICY, V36, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.028; Nourbakhsh SM, 2016, BIOSYST ENG, V151, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.08.011; Orgut IS, 2017, IISE TRANS, V49, P567, DOI 10.1080/24725854.2017.1300358; Orjuela-Castro JA, 2017, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V24, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.08.002; Paksoy T, 2012, APPL MATH MODEL, V36, P2762, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.060; Parwez S., 2014, AFRICAN J BUSINESS M, V8, P572; Pongchairerks Pisut, 2009, International Journal of Operational Research, V6, P176, DOI 10.1504/IJOR.2009.026534; Ramanathan V., 2014, INDIA CALIFORNIA AIR; Rancourt ME, 2015, COMPUT OPER RES, V56, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.10.018; Raut RD, 2018, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V154, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.035; ReVelle CS, 2005, EUR J OPER RES, V165, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.032; Rohmer SUK, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V273, P1149, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.006; Sachan A, 2005, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V54, P187, DOI 10.1108/17410400510584901; Sharon E. M., 2014, J POSTHARVEST TECHNO, V2, P12; Sheane R., 2018, REPORT FOOD SYSTEM F; Shukla M, 2013, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V33, P114, DOI 10.1108/01443571311295608; Soleimani H, 2015, APPL MATH MODEL, V39, P3990, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.016; Song ML, 2014, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V32, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2014.08.005; Soto-Silva WE, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V251, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.046; Soysal M, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.012; Timperley J., 2019, CARB BRIEF PROF IND; Validi S, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V290, P191, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2887-y; Validi S, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.003; Veeramachaneni K, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2723, P110; Vlajic JV, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V137, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.026; Wang F, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020; Wang XJ, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P377, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.561812; Wisittipanich W, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V113, P793, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.004; Xia Zhao, 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI), P162, DOI 10.1109/SOLI.2011.5986548; Xu JP, 2011, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V47, P1075, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2011.04.002; Yakavenka V, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V294, P593, DOI 10.1007/s10479-019-03434-5; Yamada T, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.001; Zhu YH, 2009, 2009 THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, P364, DOI 10.1109/IITA.2009.396; Zhu ZG, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P5700, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1425014	89	22	22	5	22	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0254-5330	1572-9338		ANN OPER RES	Ann. Oper. Res.	DEC	2020	295	1					257	284		10.1007/s10479-020-03664-y	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03664-y			28	Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Operations Research & Management Science	PM3BR		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000603679700001
J	Tong, YD; Qi, M; Sun, PZ; Qin, WX; Zhu, Y; Wang, XJ; Xu, YX; Zhang, W; Yang, JJ				Tong, Yindong; Qi, Miao; Sun, Peizhe; Qin, Wanxiao; Zhu, Ying; Wang, Xuejun; Xu, Yanxue; Zhang, Wei; Yang, Jingjing			Estimation of Unintended Treated Wastewater Contributions toStreams in the Yangtze River Basin and the Potential Human Healthand Ecological Risk Analysis	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY			English	Article						WWTP effluent discharge; water supply source; spatial relationship; human health risk; a python-based ArcGIS model; the Yangtze River Basin	PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; THE-DRAIN CHEMICALS; DRINKING-WATER; NUTRIENT DYNAMICS; SURFACE-WATER; PHARMACEUTICALS; CHINA; MODEL; POLLUTANTS; DISCHARGE	"Clean water and sanitation"is one of the UnitedNations Sustainable Development Goals. One primary objective ofwastewater treatment is to remove contaminants such aspathogens, nutrient, and organic matter from wastewater, whilenot all contaminants could be removed effectively. Wastewatertreatment plants would inevitably represent concentrated pointsources of residual contaminant loadings into surface waters. Thisstudy focuses on the populated Yangtze River Basin whereemerging contaminants are frequently detected in the rivers in therecent years. A python-based ArcGIS model is developed toestimate the contributions of effluent discharges in water supplysources and quantify fate and environmental risks of human-derived contaminants in the river network. Wefind that one-third of theriver networks are potentially influenced by the effluents through local or upstream inputs. Average fraction of unintendedwastewater reuse in water supply intakes is estimated to be lower than 3% under the averageflow scenario with an average travelingtime of 0.05 day from the nearest effluent input site to water supply intakes. However, under lowflow scenario, the percentage ofeffluent discharge would increase largely, leading to substantial increases in human health and ecological risks. This study provides asystematic investigation to understand extents of impacts of effluent inputs in river networks as well as identify the opportunities toimprove the water management in the densely populated regions	[Tong, Yindong; Qi, Miao; Sun, Peizhe; Qin, Wanxiao] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China; [Zhu, Ying] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China; [Wang, Xuejun] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China; [Xu, Yanxue; Yang, Jingjing] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Wei] Renmin Univ China, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China		Tong, YD (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China.; Yang, JJ (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China.	yindongtong@tju.edu.cn; yangjj@caep.org.cn	Zhu, Ying/K-2797-2012; Sun, Peizhe/G-6461-2014	Zhu, Ying/0000-0002-2534-290X; Sun, Peizhe/0000-0001-7538-5345; tong, yindong/0000-0002-0503-6585	National Natural Science Foundation, China [42122059, 41977324]; Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [20JCYBJC01080]	National Natural Science Foundation, China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin(Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin)	The study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation, China (nos. 42122059 and 41977324) and Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (no. 20JCYBJC01080).	ALLEN PM, 1994, WATER RESOUR BULL, V30, P663; Anderson PD, 2004, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V38, P838, DOI 10.1021/es034430b; Bruce GM, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P5619, DOI 10.1021/es1004895; Bu QW, 2020, CHEMOSPHERE, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125818; California Department of Health Services, 2018, CAL COD REG REG SURF; Cao SS, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V721, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137624; Carey RO, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5; Chaudhry RM, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14060635; Chen BY, 2021, WATER RES, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117265; Comber S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V676, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.113; Ferrer DL, 2017, WATER QUAL RES J CAN, V52, P258, DOI 10.2166/wqrj.2017.019; Font C, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P5213, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-5213-2019; Fu Q, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V24, P1739, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)61011-5; Gaffney VD, 2015, WATER RES, V72, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.027; Grill G, 2018, WATER RES, V145, P707, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.053; Grill G, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V541, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.100; Huang C., 2021, J HAZARD MAT LETT, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.hazl.2021.100026, DOI 10.1016/J.HAZL.2021.100026]; Hughes SR, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P661, DOI 10.1021/es3030148; HydroSHEDS, 2008, SEAML HYDR DAT GLOB; Jiang L, 2011, CHEMOSPHERE, V82, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.028; Karakurt S, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P6154, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b07216; Kehrein N, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.018; Larsen TA, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P928, DOI 10.1126/science.aad8641; Lei K, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104919; Li J., 2019, THESIS TIANJIN U; Li L, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109396; Li WW, 2015, NATURE, V528, P29, DOI 10.1038/528029a; Lin T, 2016, CHEMOSPHERE, V152, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.109; Liu MD, 2019, WATER RES, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115042; Liu M, 2019, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109497; Liu N, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105454; Ma T, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aau3798; Macedo H. E., EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V2021, DOI [10.5194/essd-2021-214, DOI 10.5194/ESSD-2021-214]; Marce R, 2018, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V32, P376, DOI 10.1002/2017GB005677; Marti E, 2010, HANDB ENVIRON CHEM, V8, P173, DOI 10.1007/698_2009_33; Messager ML, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13603; Ministry of Environmental Protection China, 2013, EXPOSURE FACTORS HDB; Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2019, URB CONSTR STAT YB; Ministry of Water Resources China, HYDR DAT YB CHIN; MORRIS MD, 1991, TECHNOMETRICS, V33, P161, DOI 10.2307/1269043; National Research Council, 2012, WAT REUS EXP NAT WAT; Oldenkamp R, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P12494, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b03862; Overington JP, 2006, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V5, P993, DOI 10.1038/nrd2199; Peng Y, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V241, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.061; Postigo C, 2010, ENVIRON INT, V36, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.004; Qi M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120003; Qu JH, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11783-019-1172-x; Resource and Environment Science and Data Center China, DAT CHIN GRIDD POP S; Rice J, 2017, NAT GEOSCI, V10, P587, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2984, 10.1038/NGEO2984]; Rice J, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P982, DOI 10.1021/es5048057; Rosario-Ortiz F, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P912, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf0953; Sedlak David., 2014, WATER 4 0 PRESENT FU; Sengar A, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V807, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150677; Sharma BM, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P1459, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.235; Soller JA, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P13382, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b02002; Sun J, 2015, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V117, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.03.032; Tong L, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V497, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.068; Tong YD, 2021, WATER RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116570; Tong YD, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P11566, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1920759117; Tong YD, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V321, P728, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.011; Trussell R., 2013, POTABLE REUSE STATE; UN, 2015, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; US EPA Potable Reuse Compendium, 2017, 810R17002 US EPA; Wang ZM, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V599, P1399, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.078; Wu CX, 2014, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V106, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.029; [吴蕾 Wu Lei], 2021, [安全与环境工程, Saffty and Environmental Engineering], V28, P179; Yang S, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P6138, DOI 10.1029/2018WR024614; Yang Y, 2022, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V56, P13, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c04250; Yao B, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V236, P889, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.032; Yu CQ, 2019, NATURE, V567, P516, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1001-1; Zhang RS, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106244; Zhao X, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V411, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125047; Zhu Y, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P2559, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b07054; Zhu Y, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V115, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.013	74	1	1	30	30	AMER CHEMICAL SOC	WASHINGTON	1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA	0013-936X	1520-5851		ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL	Environ. Sci. Technol.	MAY 3	2022	56	9					5590	5601		10.1021/acs.est.1c02131	http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02131			12	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1K6LG	35427135				2022-09-08	WOS:000798709200029
J	Hussain, MM; Bibi, I; Niazi, NK; Nawaz, MF; Rinklebe, J				Hussain, Muhammad Mahroz; Bibi, Irshad; Niazi, Nabeel Khan; Nawaz, Muhammad Farrakh; Rinklebe, Jorg			Impact of organic and inorganic amendments on arsenic accumulation by rice genotypes under paddy soil conditions: A pilot-scale investigation to assess health risk	JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS			English	Article						Arsenic contamination; Bioavailability; Health risk; Remediation; Eco-friendly amendments; UN Sustainable Development Goals 2030	ORYZA-SATIVA L.; MANAGEMENT; VEGETABLES; EXPOSURE; GRAIN; TRANSFORMATION; GROUNDWATER; SPECIATION; TOXICITY; BACTERIA	In this study, we investigated the distinct effects of organic (farmyard manure (FYM), cow dung (CD), biogas slurry (BGS), sugarcane bagasse (SCB)) and inorganic (gypsum and lignite) amendments on arsenic (As) accumulation by two rice genotypes, Kainat (fine) and Basmati-385 (coarse), under As stress. Results showed that shoot As concentration was similar to 2-time greater in Kainat compared to Basmati-385 (3.1-28 vs. 1.7-16 mg kg(-1) DW, respectively), with the minimum shoot As content observed with CD and SCB. In contrast to gypsum and lignite, grain As concentration was significantly reduced with CD and SCB for Kainat (0.29 and 0.24 mg kg(-1) DW) and Basmati-385 (0.04 and 0.09 mg kg(-1) DW). Data indicated that the CD and SCB also improved chlorophyll a and b contents, reduced lipid peroxidation and hydrogen peroxide production in both rice genotypes. Significantly, the CD and SCB decreased grain As concentration below the FAO safe As limit in rice grain (0.2 mg kg(-1) DW), especially in coarse rice genotype (Basmati-385), resulting in negligible As-induced human health risk. This study highlights the significance of amendments and rice genotypes controlling As accumulation in rice grain, which should be considered prior to As remediation program of paddy soils for limiting exposure of humans to As via rice grain.	[Hussain, Muhammad Mahroz; Bibi, Irshad; Niazi, Nabeel Khan] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan; [Nawaz, Muhammad Farrakh] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Fac Agr, Dept Forestry & Range Management, Faisalabad, Pakistan; [Rinklebe, Jorg] Univ Wuppertal, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Inst Fdn Engn Water & Waste Management, Lab Soil & Groundwater Management, Pauluskirchstr 7, D-42285 Wuppertal, Germany; [Rinklebe, Jorg] Sejong Univ, Dept Environm Energy & Geoinformat, Seoul 05006, South Korea; [Rinklebe, Jorg] Shoolini Univ, Int Res Ctr Nanotechnol Himalayan Sustainabil IRC, Solan 173212, Himachal Prades, India		Niazi, NK (corresponding author), Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.	nabeelkniazi@gmail.com	Hussain, Muhammad Mahroz/AAA-6416-2021; Niazi, Nabeel Khan/D-9548-2017; Rinklebe, Joerg/Y-2398-2019; Bibi, Irshad/GNP-1903-2022	Hussain, Muhammad Mahroz/0000-0002-3358-0393; Niazi, Nabeel Khan/0000-0003-4459-1124; Rinklebe, Joerg/0000-0001-7404-1639; Bibi, Irshad/0000-0001-6223-2841	Higher Education Commission Pakistan [6425/Punjab/NRPU/RD/HEC/2016, 6396/Punjab/NRPU/RD/HEC/2016]; COMSTEQ-TWAS Italy [18-268 RG/EAS/AS_C]	Higher Education Commission Pakistan(Higher Education Commission of Pakistan); COMSTEQ-TWAS Italy	The authors are thankful to Higher Education Commission (Project Nos. 6425/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2016 and 6396/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2016), Pakistan for providing financial support. Drs Nabeel Khan Niazi and Irshad Bibi are thankful to the University of Agriculture Faisalabad. Dr Irshad Bibi acknowledges the support form COMSTEQ-TWAS research grant 2018, Italy (18-268 RG/EAS/AS_C).	Alam MZ, 2020, RHIZOSPHERE-NETH, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100268; Bakhat HF, 2022, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V41, P558, DOI 10.1007/s00344-021-10321-6; Banik P, 2006, J AGRON CROP SCI, V192, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00219.x; Beesley L., 2018, EXPOS HEALTH, P1; Bhattacharya P, 2013, J HAZARD MATER, V262, P1091, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.004; Bhowmick S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.216; Carrijo DR, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V649, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.216; Chen Y, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00268; Codex Alimentarius Commission Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Organization W.H., 2016, JOINT FAO WHO FOOD S; Confalonieri M, 2003, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V72, P109, DOI 10.1023/A:1022265504775; Dixit G, 2015, J HAZARD MATER, V298, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.008; Dwivedi S, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P9542, DOI 10.1021/es101716h; Fang Y, 2014, FOOD CHEM, V147, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.116; FAO, 2010, SUMM REP 73 M JECFA, P12; Farnese Fernanda S, 2014, Idesia, V32, P99, DOI 10.4067/S0718-34292014000100012; Hafez E. M., 2015, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V7, P208, DOI 10.5539/jas.v7n12p208; He HD, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P40001, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10028-3; Hilbe JM, 2005, AM STAT, V59, P111, DOI 10.1198/000313005X24651; Hodges DM, 1999, PLANTA, V207, P604, DOI 10.1007/s004250050524; Hussain MM, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145040; Hussain MM, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V403, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124027; Hussain MM, 2019, COMP ANAL C, V85, P15, DOI 10.1016/bs.coac.2019.03.007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2012, IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, V100, P11; Irem S, 2019, CHEMOSPHERE, V225, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.202; Islam E, 2008, J HAZARD MATER, V154, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.121; Islam S, 2019, CHEMOSPHERE, V214, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.158; Islam S, 2017, FOOD CONTROL, V82, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.030; Islam SMA, 2005, BIOTECHNOL LETT, V27, P1885, DOI 10.1007/s10529-005-3898-8; Jia Y, 2013, PLANT SOIL, V365, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11104-012-1391-4; Junglee S, 2014, AM J ANAL CHEM, V5, P720, DOI [10.4236/ajac.2014.511081, DOI 10.4236/AJAC.2014.511081]; Kang D.-W., 2018, EFFECT SOIL AMENDMEN, V51, P101; Khaleda Khatun, 2018, Azarian Journal of Agriculture, V5, P151; Khalid S, 2017, ENHANCING CLEANUP OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS, VOL 2: NON-BIOLOGICAL APPROACHES, P97, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-55423-5_4; Kumarathilaka P, 2018, WATER RES, V140, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.034; Lei L, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00003; LICHTENTHALER HK, 1987, METHOD ENZYMOL, V148, P350; Majumder S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V233, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.034; Miller RO, 1998, HANDBOOK OF REFERENCE METHODS FOR PLANT ANALYSIS, P57; Natasha, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V402, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124074; Nath S, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V80, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.013; Nawab J, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V214, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.093; Niazi NK, 2017, INT J PHYTOREMEDIAT, V19, P670, DOI 10.1080/15226514.2016.1278427; Norton GJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V177, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.049; Norton GJ, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P8381, DOI 10.1021/es901844q; OLSEN STERLING R., 1954, U S DEPT AGRIC CIRC, V939, P1; Qiao JT, 2018, J HAZARD MATER, V344, P958, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.025; Rafiq M, 2017, INT J PHYTOREMEDIAT, V19, P662, DOI 10.1080/15226514.2016.1278426; Rahman MA, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.005; Rahman MA, 2014, WHEAT AND RICE IN DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH: BENEFITS, RISKS AND MECHANISMS OF WHOLE GRAINS IN HEALTH PROMOTION, P365, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-401716-0.00028-3; Rahman MM, 2009, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V31, P179, DOI 10.1007/s10653-008-9238-x; Rasheed H, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V634, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.339; Rayment GE., 2011, SOIL CHEM METHODS AU; Rehman ZU, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V550, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.094; Ryan J., 2001, SOIL PLANT ANAL LAB; Sarker TC, 2017, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V19, P2343, DOI 10.1007/s10098-017-1429-7; Shahid M, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P16097, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9230-z; Shakoor MB, 2019, ADVANCES IN RICE RESEARCH FOR ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE, P385, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814332-2.00018-6; Talebi B., 2019, Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, V50, P155, DOI 10.2478/sab-2019-0021; Tripathi P, 2013, ECOL ENG, V52, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.057; Upadhyay MK, 2019, FOOD CHEM, V276, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.069; Walkley A, 1934, SOIL SCI, V37, P29, DOI 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003; Zhai WW, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113790	62	5	5	10	31	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0304-3894	1873-3336		J HAZARD MATER	J. Hazard. Mater.	OCT 15	2021	420								126620	10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126620	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126620		JUL 2021	10	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UR7MW	34329086				2022-09-08	WOS:000696929700005
J	Sinha, A; Schneider, N; Song, ML; Shahzad, U				Sinha, Avik; Schneider, Nicolas; Song, Malin; Shahzad, Umer			The determinants of solid waste generation in the OECD: Evidence from cross-elasticity changes in a common correlated effects framework	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Municipal solid waste; Eco-innovation; OECD; Sustainable development goals; Elasticity	ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CARBON EMISSIONS; ERROR-CORRECTION	Following the COP26 summit, the management of solid waste has been identified as a major policy issue that can only be tackled if nations reorient their innovational endeavors. However, the present academic and policy discourse cannot provide a consensus on how to address this issue at the policy level. The absence of a comprehensive policy framework for achieving this reorientation and addressing the issue has motivated the present study. This paper conducts a comparative investigation of the long-run determinants of municipal solid waste (MSW) generation for the 10 best and least recycling economies in the OECD. We consider a set of technological, regulatory, and institutional regressors such as eco-innovation, environmental tax revenue, governance quality, an index of the structural transformation of the economy, and the capital-to-labor ratio. Based on data with the highest availability and spanning the longest time period (2000-2018), our study adopts a common correlated effects framework accounting for heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence within the sample. Results of individual impacts show that eco-innovation, environmental tax, governance quality, and capital-to-labor ratio decrease the generation of solid waste with a larger size effect in the top-10 recycling sample of countries. However, findings derived from the dynamic elasticity-based interactive effects stress that environmental tax and governance quality enhance the environmental impact of eco-innovation, whereas structural transformation of the economy and capital-to-labor ratio lower the size of this effect, with a much lower magnitude in the bottom-10 recycling OECD economies. Associated policy recommendations are aimed at aiding the design of adequate waste management policies in the OECD, with inclusive knowledge on this topic.	[Sinha, Avik] Goa Inst Management, Ctr Excellence Sustainable Dev, Panaji, Goa, India; [Schneider, Nicolas] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci LSE, Dept Geog & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England; [Song, Malin; Shahzad, Umer] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China		Song, ML (corresponding author), Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China.	f11aviks@iimidr.ac.in; N.Schneider2@lse.ac.uk; songml@aufe.edu.cn; umer@aufe.edu.cn	Sinha, Avik/J-3905-2019	Sinha, Avik/0000-0001-7795-1259				Adams S, 2017, J POLICY MODEL, V39, P1035, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.04.006; Al-mulali U, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V48, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029; Alam MJ, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P3243, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.029; Aldieri L, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V95, P612, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.045; Ali Syeda Maria, 2014, Journal of King Saud University Science, V26, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.08.003; AlQattan N, 2018, RENEW ENERGY FOCUS, V27, P97, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.REF.2018.09.005, 10.1016/j.ref.2018.09.005]; Andretta A, 2018, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V17, P2307; Arbulu I, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V46, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.014; Asongu SA, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V712, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136376; Aw BY, 2011, AM ECON REV, V101, P1312, DOI 10.1257/aer.101.4.1312; Baalbaki R, 2020, ECON BULL, V40, P1049; Babiker MH, 2005, J INT ECON, V65, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.003; Bauer N, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P130, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0053-1; Bekhet HA, 2018, ENERG ECON, V72, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.028; Blackburne EF, 2007, STATA J, V7, P197, DOI 10.1177/1536867X0700700204; Bogner J, 2008, WASTE MANAGE RES, V26, P11, DOI 10.1177/0734242X07088433; Bui TD, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105968; Chen JD, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V130, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.003; Chen Y, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, P1; Chen YC, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V79, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.017; Cheng SL, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105217; Chudik A, 2015, J ECONOMETRICS, V188, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007; Clarke C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P465, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.003; Cottrell J., 2017, ENV TAX REFORMS ASIA; D'Adamo I, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V95, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.005; Daniels EJ, 1999, POLYM-PLAST TECHNOL, V38, P569, DOI 10.1080/03602559909351600; Das S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P658, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323; Dechezlepretre A, 2011, REV ENV ECON POLICY, V5, P109, DOI 10.1093/reep/req023; Destek MA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126612; Dietz S, 2019, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V96, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.04.003; EA, 2012, WORLD OIL MARK REP 2; Eberhardt M, 2012, STATA J, V12, P61, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1201200105; Edjabou ME, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V46, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.013; Fullerton D., 2008, ENV TAXES REFORMING; Gardiner R, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V114, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.038; GRANGER CWJ, 1988, J ECON DYN CONTROL, V12, P551, DOI 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90055-3; GRANGER CWJ, 1969, ECONOMETRICA, V37, P424, DOI 10.2307/1912791; Grazhdani D, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V48, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.028; GROSSMAN GM, 1993, MEXICO-U.S. FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, P13; Hoornweg D., 1999, WHAT WASTE SOLID WAS, P1; *IPCC, 2007, CLIM CHANG 2007 CONT; Jaligot R, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V130, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.014; Jia C, 2018, ENV TAX HELP CHINA F; Johnstone N, 2004, LAND ECON, V80, P529, DOI 10.2307/3655808; Karak T, 2012, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V42, P1509, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2011.569871; Karousakis K., 2006, APPL ENV EC C; Kaza S., 2018, WHAT WASTE 2 0 GLOBA; Kuznets S, 1955, AM ECON REV, V45, P1; Lee M., 2014, ASIAS ENERGY ADEQUAC; Lee S, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V56, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.022; Li RR, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V740, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140053; LILIEN DM, 1982, J POLIT ECON, V90, P777, DOI 10.1086/261088; Ludwig C., 2003, MUNICIPAL SOLID WAST; Luttenberger LR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120495; Magazzino C, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112293; Magazzino C, 2020, INT REV ENVIRON RESO, V14, P417, DOI 10.1561/101.00000121; Magazzino C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142510; Magazzino C, 2020, APPL ENERG, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115835; Magazzino C, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V113, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.033; Malinauskaite J, 2017, ENERGY, V141, P2013, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.128; Martinez-Zarzoso I, 2004, ECON LETT, V82, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.008; Matheson M.T., 2019, DISPOSAL IS NOT FREE; Mazzanti M, 2005, ENV SCI, V2, P409, DOI DOI 10.1080/15693430500364707; Mazzanti M, 2008, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V52, P1221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.003; Mazzanti M, 2008, APPL ECON LETT, V15, P287, DOI 10.1080/13504850500407640; Namlis KG, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V89, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.012; Norberg-Bohm V, 1999, POLICY SCI, V32, P13, DOI 10.1023/A:1004384913598; OECD, 2002, IND MEAS DEC ENV PRE; OECD, 2020, MAK GREEN REC WORK J; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2021, REG IND TRANS POL PE; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020, ENV GLANC IND CIRC E; Organisation pour la Cooperation et le Developpement Economique, 2017, ENV FISCAL REFORM PR; Pan SY, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.124; Panayotou T., 1993, PAC ASIAN J ENERGY; Persyn D, 2008, STATA J, V8, P232, DOI 10.1177/1536867X0800800205; Pesaran MH, 2007, J APPL ECONOMET, V22, P265, DOI 10.1002/jae.951; Pesaran MH, 2006, ECONOMETRICA, V74, P967, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x; PESARAN MH, 1995, J ECONOMETRICS, V68, P79, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F; PORTER ME, 1991, SCI AM, V264, P168, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168; Prades M, 2015, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V187, DOI 10.1007/s10661-014-4098-6; Prats G.M., 2020, J ENV MANAG TOUR, V11, P43; Razzaq A, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105372; Ahangar SS, 2021, J IND PROD ENG, V38, P323, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2021.1891146; Schneider N., 2020, SSRN ELECT J, P1; Shahzad U, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P24848, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4; Sharma E., 2021, STATECRAFT; Song ML, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104777; Song ML, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.001; Szarowska I., 2017, J INT STUD, V10, P90, DOI [10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/6, DOI 10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/6]; Tayeh RA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123753; TODA HY, 1995, J ECONOMETRICS, V66, P225, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8; Tseng M.L., 2021, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL; Tseng ML, 2021, J IND PROD ENG, V38, P581, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2021.1950227; Van Fan Y, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V701, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134652; Wang Q, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119853; Wang Q, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P702, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.174; Wang YC, 2013, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V35, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.01.003; Westerlund J, 2006, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V68, P101, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00154.x; Westerlund J, 2007, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V69, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x; World Bank, 2021, WORLD DEV IND; World Bank, 2021, WORLDWIDE GOVERNANCE; World Resources Institute, 2009, WORLD GREENH GAS EM; Yilmaz F, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P40331, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-09109-0; Zhao X, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105959	104	2	2	6	6	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	JUL	2022	182								106322	10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106322	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106322			13	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1W6QX					2022-09-08	WOS:000806898600007
J	Mihelcic, JR; Naughton, CC; Verbyla, ME; Zhang, Q; Schweitzer, RW; Oakley, SM; Wells, EC; Whiteford, LM				Mihelcic, James R.; Naughton, Colleen C.; Verbyla, Matthew E.; Zhang, Qiong; Schweitzer, Ryan W.; Oakley, Stewart M.; Wells, E. Christian; Whiteford, Linda M.			The Grandest Challenge of All: The Role of Environmental Engineering to Achieve Sustainability in the World's Developing Regions	ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE			English	Article						environment; global competency; greenhouse gas; hygiene; sanitation; sustainable development; water	WATER-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WASTE-WATER; DRINKING-WATER; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HEALTH IMPROVEMENTS; SMALL CITIES; SOLID-WASTE; SANITATION; RECOVERY	The environmental engineering discipline has focused much of its historical efforts in developing regions of the world on advancing environmental sustainability through improving provision of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services. However, the skills and expertise that reside within the discipline of environmental engineering are fundamental to achieve a much broader range of sustainable development goals, including those related to health, climate, water, energy, and food security; economic development; and reduction of social inequalities. Accordingly, this article critically reviews several focus areas where environmental engineering should assume a more active presence in the global community that seeks to achieve sustainability in developing regions of the world. The 10 environmental engineering Grand Challenges for the developing world covered are: (1) understand the historical perspective of the discipline's connection with public health as the field transitions forward; (2) integrate the differences encountered when operating over rural to urban locations; (3) address emissions of greenhouse gases and other important carbon-containing pollutants; (4) understand the link between development and health to better connect health outcomes and reduction in risk with ecosystem management and other development interventions; (5) address the complex interactions of water energy systems; (6) integrate the synergy inherent in development/sustainability goals of WASH, food security, and resource recovery; (7) transition to a green economy; (8) advance monitoring, evaluation, and assessment activities that include life cycle assessment, (9) integrate culture, perception, and behavior with advances in science and technology, and (10) educate globally competent engineers. Our hope is that this discussion leads to a better world through monumental improvements in the environment and human well-being and drives new innovations and opportunities in research, education, practice, and service.	[Mihelcic, James R.; Naughton, Colleen C.; Verbyla, Matthew E.; Zhang, Qiong] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENB 118, Tampa, FL 33620 USA; [Schweitzer, Ryan W.] Aguaconsult Ltd, Wivenhoe, Essex, England; [Oakley, Stewart M.] Calif State Univ Chico, Dept Civil Engn, Chico, CA 95929 USA; [Wells, E. Christian; Whiteford, Linda M.] Univ S Florida, Dept Anthropol, Tampa, FL USA		Mihelcic, JR (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENB 118, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.	jm41@usf.edu		Schweitzer, Ryan/0000-0003-4547-6988; Verbyla, Matthew/0000-0001-8143-6954	National Science Foundation [1243510]; Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1144244]; American Association of University Women (AAUW); Office Of The Director [1243510] Funding Source: National Science Foundation	National Science Foundation(National Science Foundation (NSF)); Graduate Research Fellowship Program; American Association of University Women (AAUW); Office Of The Director(National Science Foundation (NSF)NSF - Office of the Director (OD))	This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1243510 and the Graduate Research Fellowship Program awarded to Dr. Verbyla under Grant No. 1144244. During this time period, Dr. Naughton held an American Fellowship from the American Association of University Women (AAUW).	AAEES, 2009, ENV ENG BOD KNOWL; Acharya T, 2007, Glob Public Health, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/17441690600673833; Adams E. L., 2015, THESIS; Adams WM, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P1146, DOI 10.1126/science.1097920; AfDB, 2012, GREEN GROWTH AFR; African Life Cycle Assessment Network (ALCANET), 2011, ALCANET CHART; Ahmed K, 2012, GETTING GREEN SOURCE; Ahrens B.T., 2006, J ENG SUSTAINABLE DE, V1, P13; Aiello AE, 2008, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V36, pS128, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.008; Akers DB, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P2685, DOI 10.1021/es504517r; Alwi SRW, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V71, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.013; Anastas P. T., 1998, GREEN CHEM THEORY PR; Anastas Paul, 2010, ORD PATH FORWARD; Anastas PT, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P580, DOI 10.1021/es203881e; Andreasen A.R., 1995, MARKETING SOCIAL CHA; Andreasen A.R., 2006, SOCIAL MARKETING 21; Andrei A.L., 2013, PRACT ANTHR, V35, P29; Anenberg SC, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P3944, DOI 10.1021/es304942e; [Anonymous], 2012, WORLD EN OUTL 2012; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2010, WAT FOR EN; [Anonymous], 2021, UN WAT AN BRIEF WAT; [Anonymous], 2014, UN WORLD WAT DEV REP; Ardakanian R., 2015, REP ACH INT DEC ACT; Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX; Baum R, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P1994, DOI 10.1021/es304284f; Baumert K., 2005, NAVIGATING NUMBERS; Bell S, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V164, P177, DOI 10.1680/ensu.900014; Billgren C, 2008, LAND USE POLICY, V25, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.004; Bjorn A, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P812, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0524-6; Bond T, 2011, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.003; Bowles FJ, 2012, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V19, P484, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00813.x; Brown C., 1997, PRACT ANTHR, V19, P27; Bruce N., 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P1079; Bruun E, 2015, NATURE, V523, P29, DOI 10.1038/523029a; Bruun S, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V33, P736, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.033; CAIRNCROSS S, 1993, ENV HLTH ENG TROPICS; Cairns M.R., 2015, 75 ANN M SOC APPL AN; Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11; Chen Y, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.019; Clasen TF, 2004, AM J TROP MED HYG, V70, P651, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.651; Cohen B, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005; COHEN JM, 1975, J DEV AREAS, V9, P335; Conning J, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P375, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00119-X; Cornejo PK, 2014, J WATER REUSE DESAL, V4, P238, DOI 10.2166/wrd.2014.058; Cornejo PK, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V131, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.043; Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708; Cutler D, 2005, DEMOGRAPHY, V42, P1, DOI 10.1353/dem.2005.0002; Davies WJ, 2011, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V149, P123, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610001115; Dolnicar S, 2011, J PUBLIC AFF, V11, P49, DOI 10.1002/pa.378; Dolnicar S, 2010, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P1288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.003; Doria MD, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P5455, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.031; Downey GL, 2006, J ENG EDUC, V95, P107, DOI 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x; EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 2002, WAT SUST; Eshun JF, 2011, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V16, P625, DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0307-5; Exley JLR, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P1086, DOI 10.1021/es503945x; Faber Daniel, 2008, CAPITALIZING ENV JUS; Fair G. M, 1966, WATER WASTEWATER ENG, V1; FAO IFAD WFP, 2014, STATE FOOD INWORLD; Feachem R.G., 1983, WORLD BANK STUDIES W; Ferriman A, 2007, BRIT MED J, V334, P111, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39097.611806.DB; FLEURET P, 1985, AM ETHNOL, V12, P103, DOI 10.1525/ae.1985.12.1.02a00060; Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2002, CROPS DROPS MAK BEST; Fry L.M., 2013, COMPREHENSIVE WATER, V4, P299; Fry LM, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P4298, DOI 10.1021/es7025856; Fry LM, 2012, J HYDROL, V468, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.023; Fry LM, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P9535, DOI 10.1021/es100798j; Galvin C. M., 2013, THESIS; GERHARD WP, 1909, SANITATION SANITARY; Gloyna EF., 1971, WASTE STABILIZATION; Gotass H.B., 1956, COMPOSTING SANITARY; Graham JP, 2008, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V123, P282, DOI 10.1177/003335490812300309; Grant SB, 2012, SCIENCE, V337, P681, DOI 10.1126/science.1216852; Griffin SM, 2011, J IMMUNOL METHODS, V364, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jim.2010.11.005; Guang T., 2012, INT J BUSINESS ANTHR, V3, P102; Guest JS, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P6126, DOI 10.1021/es9010515; Haarstad H, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P87, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12111; Hales S., 2014, QUANTITATIVE RISK AS; Harris AR, 2013, J WATER HEALTH, V11, P543, DOI 10.2166/wh.2013.023; Hasan A, 2005, ENVIRON URBAN, V17, P3, DOI 10.1177/095624780501700109; Held RB, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V60, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.018; Humphrey JH, 2009, LANCET, V374, P1032, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60950-8; Hussey K, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04641-170131; Hutton G., 2008, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V86, P1; IEA, 2006, WORLD EN OUTL 2006; Institute of International Education, 2014, OP DOORS REP INT ED; Israel BA, 1998, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V19, P173, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173; Jackson S, 2006, AUST GEOGR, V37, P19, DOI 10.1080/00049180500511947; Jesiek BK, 2012, INT J ENG EDUC, V28, P144; Jesiek B. K., 2014, ADV ENG EDUC, V4, P1; Jetter JJ, 2009, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V33, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.014; Johnson BB, 2003, RISK ANAL, V23, P985, DOI 10.1111/1539-6924.00375; Kemp B, 2012, J PUBLIC AFF, V12, P337, DOI 10.1002/pa.1429; Kenny J. F., 2009, ESTIMATED USE WATER; Kinyua MN, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P896, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.324; KOTLER P, 1971, J MARKETING, V35, P3, DOI 10.2307/1249783; Krolikowski A, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P235; Kudinova G.E., 2012, UN ENV PROGR UNEP GR, P738, DOI 10.15393/j1.art.2012.1602; Kumar G., 2007, P 2007 IEEE CAN EL P, P97; LANSING JS, 1987, AM ANTHROPOL, V89, P326, DOI 10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00030; Lazarova V, 2012, WATER-ENERGY INTERACTIONS IN WATER REUSE, P1; Lee K, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V291, P2636, DOI 10.1001/jama.291.21.2636; Lee NR, 2011, SOCIAL MARKETING INF; Life Cycle Initiative, 2015, 2012 2016 FLAGSH ACT; Linton J, 2014, GEOFORUM, V57, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008; Linton J, 2014, WIRES WATER, V1, P111, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1009; Lowe P, 2013, CONTEMP SOC SCI, V8, P207, DOI 10.1080/21582041.2013.769617; MacCarthy MF, 2013, WATER ALTERN, V6, P424; MacKinnon D, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P21, DOI 10.1177/0309132510367841; Mausezahl D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000125; Mankad A, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V44, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2012.01.002; Manser ND, 2015, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V190, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.111; Manser ND, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P3128, DOI 10.1021/es505807a; Mansuri G, 2004, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V19, P1, DOI 10.1093/wbro/lkh012; Mara D., 1996, LOW COST URBAN SANIT; Mara D., 2010, DISCUSSION PAPER OPT; Mara D.D, 2004, DOMESTIC WASTEWATER; Marks SJ, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P276, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14527620; Marston SA, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P219, DOI 10.1191/030913200674086272; McConville JR, 2007, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V24, P937, DOI 10.1089/ees.2006.0225; McDonnell RA, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P131, DOI 10.1080/07900620701723240; Mcgranahan G, 2001, CITIZENS RISK URBAN; Medina M, 2000, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V31, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00071-9; Mehl J, 2011, J WATER HEALTH, V9, P187, DOI 10.2166/wh.2010.138; Michie B.H, 1973, EC POLIT WKLY, V8, pA67; Mihelcic J.R., 2014, ENV ENG FUNDAMENTALS; Mihelcic J.R., 2010, WHAT IS GLOBAL ENG E, P235; Mihelcic JR, 2008, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V25, P255, DOI 10.1080/10286600802002981; Mihelcic JR, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P3414, DOI 10.1021/es060303e; Mihelcic JR, 2006, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V23, P426, DOI 10.1089/ees.2006.23.426; Mihelcic JR, 2011, CHEMOSPHERE, V84, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.046; Mihelcic JR, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P5314, DOI 10.1021/es034605h; MIHELCIC JR, 2004, WATER ENV TECHNOL, V16, P86; MIHELCIC JR, 2009, FIELD GUIDE ENV ENG; Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL; Mirchi A, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P2421, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0024-2; Mo WW, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V127, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.007; Moe Christine L., 2006, Journal of Water and Health, V4, P41; Mongi H. J., 2015, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, V9, P438; Muga HE, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.008; MUNRO NB, 1986, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V20, P768, DOI 10.1021/es00150a002; Murray CJL, 2012, LANCET, V380, P2197, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4; Murray CJ, 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS CO; Nancarrow BE, 2008, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V57, P485, DOI 10.2166/wst.2008.160; National Academy of Engineering. (NAE), 2004, ENG 2020 VIS ENG NEW; National Research Council (NRC), 1999, ENG TASKS NEW CENT J; Naughton C, 2016, THESIS; Naughton CC, 2015, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V5, P279, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2015.135; Naughton CC, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V58, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.007; NDC, 2007, MED LONG TERM DEV PL; Ngure FM, 2014, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1308, P118, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12330; Norman E., 2012, Water Alternatives, V5, P52; NRC, 1983, RISK ASS FED GOV MAN; Oakley SM, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P2535, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.030; Okun D. A., 1975, COMMUNITY WASTEWATER; Olmstead SM, 2014, ENERG ECON, V46, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.005; Orlove B, 2010, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V39, P401, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105045; Owens EL, 2011, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V137, P937, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000399; Patz J. A., 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL, P391; Pettorelli N, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC B, V369, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0190; Phelps E., 1948, PUBLIC HLTH ENG; Pingali PL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P12302, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0912953109; Po M., 2005, PREDICTING COMMUNITY, DOI [10.4225/08/5866a174964d6, DOI 10.4225/08/5866A174964D6]; Population Reference Bureau, 2014, 2014 WORLD POP DAT S; Post Jennifer L, 2010, International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, V6, P4, DOI 10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033980; Pruss-Ustun A, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P894, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12329; Pruss-Ustun A., 2006, PREVENTING DIS HLTH; Rao PV, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P2086, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.031; Rehfuess E, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, P373, DOI 10.1289/ehp.8603; Rodriguez C, 2009, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V6, P1174, DOI 10.3390/ijerph6031174; Rodriguez D.J., 2013, WATER PAPERS WORLD B; Rosas R., 2011, EFICIENCIA ENERGETIC; Russell S, 2009, WATER POLICY, V11, P21, DOI 10.2166/wp.2009.007; Salamanca-Buentello F, 2005, PLOS MED, V2, P383, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097; Salvato J. A., 1958, ENV SANITATION; Sato T, 2013, AGR WATER MANAGE, V130, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.08.007; Schafer CA, 2012, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V104, P49, DOI 10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0125; Schweitzer RW, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P429, DOI 10.1021/es302956f; Schweitzer RW, 2012, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V2, P20, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2012.056; Seto KC, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P923; Sharawat I., 2014, INT J ENV RES DEV, V4, P297; Shen Y., 2011, P ANN C AM SOC ENG E; SMITH KR, 1993, ANNU REV ENERG ENV, V18, P529, DOI 10.1146/annurev.eg.18.110193.002525; Soto AM, 2010, NAT REV ENDOCRINOL, V6, P364, DOI 10.1038/nrendo.2010.87; Stauffer JR, 2006, ECOHEALTH, V3, P22, DOI 10.1007/s10393-005-0007-3; Steinmann P, 2006, LANCET INFECT DIS, V6, P411, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7; Stillwell AS, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/es-03781-160102; Surendra KC, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V31, P846, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015; Sutton S., 2004, SELF SUPPLY FRESH AP; Tan JJL, 2014, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003043; TARR JA, 1980, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V70, P427, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.70.4.427; Tidwell VC, 2009, DECISION SUPPORT INT; Trimmer JT, 2016, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V6, P276, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2016.045; Troschinetz AM, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P915, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.016; Trotz M.A., 2009, P 2009 WORLD ENV WAT; Tucker B., 2014, APPL EVOLUTIONARY AN; U. S. Agency for International Development (USAID), 1966, COUNTR ASS PROGR BOO; U.S. Department of Energy, 2006, EN DEM WAT RES C INT; U.S. Department of Energy, 2014, WAT EN NEX CHALL OPP; UN, 2015, MILL DEV GOALS REP 2; UN Water, 2016, GEMI BACKGR OBJ; UN-Habitat, 2015, URB PROSP; UN-Habitat, 2006, M DEV GOALS SMALL UR; UNEP, 2012, UN WAT STAT REP APPL; UNEP, 2014, EM GAP REP 2014; UNEP, 2014, GEO SMALL ISL DEV ST; UNEP, 2015, DISTR EN CIT UNL POT; United Nations, 2011, POP DISTR URB INT MI; United Nations, 2016, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2014, UNEP YEAR BOOK EM IS; United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), 2010, TIONS GLOBAL CLIMATE; United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2003, TRENDS URB RES, DOI 10.4324/9781849772907; Van Houweling E, 2015, GENDER PLACE CULT, V22, P1391, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2014.970140; Verbyla M.A., 2014, P 3 ANN AM SOC ENG E; Verbyla ME, 2015, WATER RES, V71, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.031; Verbyla ME, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P2698, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.556; Verbyla ME, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P3598, DOI 10.1021/es3050955; Vergara W., 2011, ASSESSMENT IMPACTS C; Vernaza-Hernadez V., 2016, SCI ED RES ENGAGI 12, P1871; Walburger A., 2007, ENERGY INDEX DEV BEN; Water Resources Group, 2009, CHART OUR WAT FUT EC, DOI 10.4324/9780203132937-13; Weinzierl T, 2013, LAND, V2, P60, DOI 10.3390/land2010060; Welker M, 2012, AM ETHNOL, V39, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01371.x; Wells E. C., 2014, J ECOL ANTHR, V17, P1; Wells EC, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.050; Wende HEW, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003; Wendel HEW, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P6728, DOI 10.1021/es103949f; Whiteford L., 2016, COMPANION ENV HLTH A, P219; Whiteford L.M, 2015, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA; Whiteford Linda M., 2005, GLOBALIZATION WATER; Whiteford LM, 2015, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATORY INVOLVEMENT: A SUSTAINABLE MODEL FOR GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, P1; WHO/UNICEF, 2014, PROGR DRINK WAT SAN; Widmann J., 2008, P 38 ASEE IEEE FRONT, P11; Wigginton KR, 2015, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V1, P735, DOI [10.1039/c5ew00125k, 10.1039/C5EW00125K]; Wilbur P, 2014, THESIS; Winz I, 2009, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V23, P1301, DOI 10.1007/s11269-008-9328-7; World Bank Group, 2012, INCL GREEN GROWTH PA; World Economic Forum, 2011, WAT SEC WAT EN FOOD; World Health Organization, 2020, GLOB REP EP BURD SEP; World Health Organization (WHO), 2015, HLTH TOP AIR POLL; World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), 2003, WAT PEOPL WAT LIF; WRI, 2005, CAM FOR EST; WWAP, 2012, 4 WWAP UNESCO, V1; Zhuang Y, 2014, THESIS; Zhuang Y. L., 2015, 33 INT C SYST DYN SO; [No title captured]	246	39	39	3	76	MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC	NEW ROCHELLE	140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA	1092-8758	1557-9018		ENVIRON ENG SCI	Environ. Eng. Sci.	JAN	2017	34	1			SI		16	41		10.1089/ees.2015.0334	http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ees.2015.0334			26	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	EH5ZH		Bronze			2022-09-08	WOS:000391851300003
J	Babla, M; Katwal, U; Yong, MT; Jahandari, S; Rahme, M; Chen, ZH; Tao, Z				Babla, Mohammad; Katwal, Utsab; Yong, Miing-Tiem; Jahandari, Soheil; Rahme, Maroun; Chen, Zhong-Hua; Tao, Zhong			Value-added products as soil conditioners for sustainable agriculture	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Waste management; Agricultural wastes; Coal tailings; Soil conditioners; Co-pelletisation; Sustainable food production	SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE; COAL FLY-ASH; MOISTURE-CONTENT; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BY-PRODUCTS; SANDY SOIL; COMPOST; PELLET; BIOCHAR; SUPERABSORBENT	Due to the intensive use of fertilisers, soil degradation has become a global problem, leading to the depletion of organic matter and soil fertility. Meanwhile, the intensification of agriculture accompanied by urbanisation and industrialisation has drastically accelerated the waste generation rate. For instance, coal mining produces wastes in a large quantity globally, the majority of which end up in landfills or dump into storage dams. Accordingly, sustainable food production is driving global innovations to better utilise various waste materials to make valueadded products, such as soil conditioners. Nowadays, soil conditioners are of great importance to improve plant growth and soil health and reduce chemical fertiliser use. This paper comprehensively reviews the soil conditioners derived from various agro-wastes and coal by-products. The process of producing soil conditioners and their sustainable applications in agriculture are also reviewed. Furthermore, sustainable approaches to recycle coal wastes are gaining increasing interest, and co-pelletisation of coal waste with agro-waste as a value-added soil conditioner to supplement soil nutrients in the agro-ecosystem has been proposed to improve the productivity of lands towards sustainable agricultural applications. This review highlights the possibility of turning coal wastes and organic wastes into revenue-earning products of environmental and economic values in the form of pellets for soil conditioning. But a multidisciplinary approach should be adopted to utilise the natural resources eco-friendly and cost-effectively, contributing to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.	[Babla, Mohammad; Yong, Miing-Tiem; Chen, Zhong-Hua] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Sci, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; [Katwal, Utsab; Jahandari, Soheil; Tao, Zhong] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Infrastruct Engn, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; [Rahme, Maroun] Nu Rock Technol Pty Ltd, Breakfast Point, NSW 2137, Australia; [Chen, Zhong-Hua] Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia		Chen, ZH (corresponding author), Western Sydney Univ, Sch Sci, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.; Tao, Z (corresponding author), Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Infrastruct Engn, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.; Chen, ZH (corresponding author), Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.	z.chen@westernsydney.edu.au; z.tao@westernsydney.edu.au	Tao, Zhong/K-7172-2019; Yong, Miing Tiem/GNP-5773-2022	Tao, Zhong/0000-0003-2117-2162; Yong, Miing Tiem/0000-0001-5655-8992; Chen, Zhong-Hua/0000-0002-7531-320X	Australian Coal Association Research Program [C29057]	Australian Coal Association Research Program	The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Australian Coal Association Research Program (No: C29057) . The au-thors are also grateful to Dr David Osborne from Somerset International Australia Pty Ltd, who reviewed the manuscript and provided constructive comments.	AbdAllah AM, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106946; Abobatta W., 2018, ADV AGR ENV SCI, V1, P59, DOI [DOI 10.30881/AAEOA.00011, 10.30881/aaeoa.00011]; Adejumo IO, 2020, STRATEGIES SUSTAINAB, P8; Agusta H., 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV; Ahmad A, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132112; Ahmad G, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P17068, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-12029-8; Ajmal M, 2020, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V140, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.001; Miranda MFA, 2018, ARCH AGRON SOIL SCI, V64, P1207, DOI 10.1080/03650340.2017.1419195; Amoah-Antwi C, 2021, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V232, DOI 10.1007/s11270-021-05044-z; Amoah-Antwi C, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V722, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137852; Andrenelli MC, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V163, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.017; [Anonymous], 2016, ENVIRON SCI-TOKYO, DOI DOI 10.5829/IDOSI.AEJAES.2016.16.7.12961; Arslan H, 2006, ENVIRON GEOL, V50, P761, DOI 10.1007/s00254-006-0248-7; Awais M, 2021, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101465; Azar D, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V130, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.022; Ben-Hur M, 2006, AUST J SOIL RES, V44, P191, DOI 10.1071/SR05175; Bisoi SS, 2017, INT J PHYTOREMEDIAT, V19, P446, DOI 10.1080/15226514.2016.1244164; Bougnom BP, 2011, RECYCLING OF BIOMASS ASHES, P87, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19354-5_7; Bowden-Green B, 2016, POWDER TECHNOL, V288, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.046; Bray AW, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P152, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b03568; Brown B, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V19, P149, DOI 10.1162/glep_a_00501; Chang RX, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.076; Chaudhari S., 2021, SUSTAIN AGR REV, V52, P147, DOI [10.1007/s00248-009-9489-9, 10.1007/978-3-030-73245-5_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-73245-5_5]; Chaudhary J, 2020, BIOMOLECULES, V10, DOI 10.3390/biom10060939; Chew KW, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V116, P780, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.016; Chia WY, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115662; Daniyan I.A., 2017, AM J MECH MAT ENG, V1, P44; Das S., 2021, SOIL EROSION CURR CH, P121; De Corato U, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V738, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139840; Demeyer A, 2001, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V77, P287, DOI 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00043-2; Ebrahimi E, 2019, INT J RECYCLING ORG, V8, P59, DOI 10.1007/s40093-018-0228-4; El-Dolify M. M., 2016, Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V24, P195; El-Saied H, 2004, POLYM-PLAST TECHNOL, V43, P779, DOI 10.1081/PPT-120038064; Elshafie HS, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063253; FAO, 2011, FOOD LOSS FOOD WAST; FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2019, BACKGR NOT SUST PROD; Firpo B.A., 2021, ENERGY GEOSCIENCE, V2, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.09.006; Food and Agriculture Organization, 2020, The state of food and agriculture 2020: overcoming water challenges in agriculture, DOI 10.4060/cb1447en; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2006, LIV LONG SHAD ENV IS; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2017, STRAT WORK FAO SUST; Gabhane JW, 2020, SN APPL SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s42452-020-3121-5; Gasparotto J., 2021, ENERGY GEOSCIENCE, V2, P113, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENGEOS.2020.07.003; Ghosh D, 2020, SOIL USE MANAGE, V36, P726, DOI 10.1111/sum.12626; Guilherme MR, 2015, EUR POLYM J, V72, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.017; Gustafsson J., 2013, METHODOLOGY FAO STUD; Hadke P.B., 2019, J EXP AGR INT, P1, DOI 10.9734/jeai/2019/v34i230171; Hamedani SR, 2019, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105334; Harris WG, 2010, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V20, P10, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.20.1.10; Haynes RJ, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.003; Heise K, 2019, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V7, P8604, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00378; Helyar K. R., 1989, Soil acidity and plant growth., P61; Hendryx M, 2020, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V41, P397, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094104; Hettiarachchi L, 2019, INT J AGR BIOL ENG, V12, P184, DOI 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191204.4354; Holanda RB, 2020, MINERAL MET MAT SER, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_15; Hossain N, 2020, BIOENERG RES, V13, P618, DOI 10.1007/s12155-019-10061-2; Hower J.C., 2021, ENERGY GEOSCI, P90; Huttermann A, 2009, CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, V37, P517, DOI 10.1002/clen.200900048; Hussein K., 2017, IFAD FOSTERING INCLU; Iftime MM, 2019, CARBOHYD POLYM, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115040; Jankowski K., 2018, ACTA AGROPHYS, V25, P45, DOI [10.31545/aagr0004, DOI 10.31545/AAGR0004]; Jaramillo Nieves L.J., 2020, ENERGY GEOSCI, P167, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENGEOS.2020.09.004; Jonathan S.G., 2013, ACAD ARENA, V5, P55; Kadyampakeni DM, 2015, J PLANT NUTR, V38, P568, DOI 10.1080/01904167.2014.934470; Khoshnevisan B, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110033; Khushbu, 2019, POLYMER, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121823; Kiwietniak P, 1985, MECHANIZACJA ROLNICT, V34, P5; Klauber C, 2011, HYDROMETALLURGY, V108, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.007; Kohli S.J., 2010, ACTA AGROPHYS, V16, P327; Kolade MO., 2018, LAUTECH J ENG TECHNO, V12, P10; Kopittke PM, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105078; Kumar K, 2021, BIOMASS CONVERS BIOR, DOI 10.1007/s13399-021-01459-0; Kumari R, 2013, J APPL PHYCOL, V25, P1225, DOI 10.1007/s10811-012-9933-y; Kuokkanen M, 2019, BIORESOURCES, V14, P7299, DOI 10.15376/biores.14.3.7299-7315; Lebrun M., 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, P1; Li MX, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128549; Liu Z, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030811; Lou ZM, 2017, CHEMOSPHERE, V169, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.044; Ma B, 2020, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V31, P1176, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3482; Mangwandi C, 2014, POWDER TECHNOL, V252, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.10.039; Marousek J, 2020, ENERG SOURCE PART A, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2020.1776796; Mehnaz KR, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V671, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.422; Mieldazys R, 2017, ENG RUR DEVELOP, P575, DOI 10.22616/ERDev2017.16.N113; Miller BG, 2011, CLEAN COAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-1-85617-710-8.00001-7; Mingorance MD, 2017, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V174, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.02.010; Mohd Hadi-akbar Basri, 2013, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V8, P4020; Mounissamy VC, 2021, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V106, P536, DOI 10.1007/s00128-020-03096-1; Nassaj-Bokharaei S, 2021, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112576; Nikiema J., 2013, Environment and Pollution, V2, P70; Nkebiwe PM, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V196, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.018; Omojola M. O., 2013, African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, V13, P7972; Ondrasek G., 2018, Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Professional Conference, "Water For All", Osijek, Croatia, 9 - 10 March 2017, P229; Ondrasek G, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141902; Orava H., 2006, CHOPS 05 2006 C P SO; Ou YJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187281; Panda D, 2021, INT J PHYTOREMEDIAT, V23, P72, DOI 10.1080/15226514.2020.1791052; Panda L, 2020, EMERG MATER RES, V9, P921, DOI 10.1680/jemmr.18.00097; PANDA RB, 2018, INT J AGR ENV BIOTEC, V11, P275, DOI DOI 10.30954/0974-1712.04.2018.8; Granado MPP, 2021, RENEW ENERG, V167, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.087; Pescatore A, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131986; Petrova IP, 2021, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V12, P2433, DOI 10.1007/s12649-020-01190-3; Pomeranz K, 2021, GREAT DIVERGENCE; Alves BSQ, 2021, PEDOSPHERE, V31, P572, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60003-6; Rafiq H.S., 2014, J SCI DEV, V63; Rajakumar R., 2016, INT J APPL PURE SCI, V2, P163; Rauner S, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P308, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0728-x; Rehman I, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052652; Riding MJ, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V75, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.025; Roberts DA, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V161, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.002; Ronga D, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10050661; Roulia M, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11061114; Sarlaki E, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117412; Shakeel A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13095116; Shakeel A, 2020, SN APPL SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s42452-020-3191-4; Shakeel A, 2019, SN APPL SCI, V1, DOI 10.1007/s42452-019-0404-9; Shamsaei E, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084350; Sharma B., 2019, WASTE VALORISATION R, P539; Shen Y., 2020, J CLEAN PROD; Shin J, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13082070; Shinde R., 2019, AGR FOOD E NEWSL, V1, P1; Standards Australia, 2012, 4454 AS; Sumbane-Prinsloo L., 2021, ENERG GEOSCI, V2, P148, DOI [10.1016/j.engeos.2020.08.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENGEOS.2020.08.001]; Sun LY, 2017, FUEL, V199, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.073; Sun MX, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120702; Takahashi S, 2016, SOIL SCI PLANT NUTR, V62, P399, DOI 10.1080/00380768.2016.1198680; Talon M, 2020, GENUS CITRUS, P9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812163-4.00002-4; Tripathi D. M., 2020, Current World Environment, V15, P127, DOI 10.12944/CWE.15.1.16; Tripathi RC, 2010, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V32, P576, DOI 10.1080/15567030903058584; Ujaczki E, 2016, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V91, P1596, DOI 10.1002/jctb.4898; Upadhyay SK, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129216; Usmani Z, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-46821-5; Nascimento CDV, 2021, J ARID ENVIRON, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104496; Walker GM, 2005, CHEM ENG SCI, V60, P3867, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2005.02.007; Wang B, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V31, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.002; Wang HY, 2015, J INTEGR AGR, V14, P158, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60760-7; White PJ, 2010, ANN BOT-LONDON, V105, P1073, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcq085; Widowati, 2020, AIMS AGRIC FOOD, V5, P150, DOI 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.150; Wilske B, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V21, P9453, DOI 10.1007/s11356-013-2103-1; Woods J, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2991, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0172; Yadav V.K., 2019, AMELIORATION TECHNOL; Yang K, AGRIC, V11, P47; Yang XH, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-61633-8; Yangyuoru M., 2006, WEST AFR J APPL ECOL, V9; Yao ZT, 2015, EARTH-SCI REV, V141, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.016; Yusuf R, 2021, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V681, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/681/1/012019; Zafari A, 2014, ENVIRON TECHNOL, V35, P478, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2013.833639; Zhang, 2021, BIOMASS CONVERS BIOR, P1; Zhang RH, 2012, PEDOSPHERE, V22, P333, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60020-4; Zhou HX, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.017	148	5	5	25	25	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	MAR	2022	178								106079	10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106079	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106079			13	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ZR1AL					2022-09-08	WOS:000767524900003
J	Zhang, LL; Long, RY; Chen, H; Huang, XR				Zhang, Linling; Long, Ruyin; Chen, Hong; Huang, Xinru			Performance changes analysis of industrial enterprises under energy constraints	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Energy constraint; Industrial enterprise; Performance change; Super-efficient data envelopment analysis; Corporate attribute	GREEN TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS; CLIMATE POLICY; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; GROWTH; EXPENDITURES; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION	The rapid development of industry has made great progress in economy and society. However, the problems of resource shortage and environmental pollution are becoming more and more serious. The coordinated development of economy, energy and environment in industrial sector is an important guarantee for achieving global sustainable development goals. This study took 11,909 micro industrial enterprises in Anhui Province, China as the research objects, used super-efficient data envelope analysis models to measure corporate performances before and after considering energy constraints, analyzed performance changes and explored corporate attributes corresponding to these changes. The results show that although energy constraints reduced the corporate performance of the enterprise sample as a whole, the effects vary among enterprises. Performance may increase, decrease or remain constant, and the increasing degree of corporate performance is significantly lower than the corresponding reduction. Corporate performances mostly change by a small amount, and the closer an enterprise's performance is to the market average, the less it is influenced by energy constraints, and vice versa. Enterprises that increase performance are mainly low energy-consuming enterprises, small-scale enterprises and private enterprises. In contrast, enterprises that experience performance reduction are mostly high energy-consuming enterprises, large-scale enterprises and state-owned enterprises. In the future, enterprise development should differentiate energy saving and emission reduction policies, provide more financial support for technological innovation, guide a reasonable size distribution among enterprises, encourage stock diversification and establish strict market access systems.	[Zhang, Linling; Long, Ruyin; Chen, Hong; Huang, Xinru] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China		Long, RY; Chen, H (corresponding author), China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.	longruyin@163.com; hongchenxz@163.com		Gong, Likun/0000-0001-8821-641X; Chen, Hong/0000-0002-2035-6851	Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XKZD12]	Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities)	This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017XKZD12).The authors would like to extend special thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions for improving the quality of this study.	ANDERSEN P, 1993, MANAGE SCI, V39, P1261, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261; [Anonymous], 2016, CHINA ENERGY DATABOO; Arouri MEH, 2012, ECOL ECON, V81, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.001; Auburger S, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V89, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.042; Becker RA, 2013, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V66, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.08.001; Brannlund R, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V67, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.012; Broberg T, 2013, J PROD ANAL, V40, P43, DOI 10.1007/s11123-012-0335-6; Cai BF, 2016, APPL ENERG, V166, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.006; Chatzistamoulou N., 2017, ENERGY, P1; Chen L, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V133, P351, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2370-x; Cobuloglu HI, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P6065, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.006; Duro JA, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P2468, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.022; Earnhart D, 2016, J REGUL ECON, V50, P111, DOI 10.1007/s11149-016-9304-8; Fan JPH, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V134, P509, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2382-6; Fang GC, 2013, APPL ENERG, V110, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.041; Granderson G, 2013, J PROD ANAL, V39, P243, DOI 10.1007/s11123-012-0301-3; Guo LL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.210; Kang JS, 2015, INT J HOSP MANAG, V48, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.05.001; Li N, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V89, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.028; Lund H, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3578, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.007; Lundgren T, 2015, J PROD ANAL, V44, P225, DOI 10.1007/s11123-014-0396-9; Mare DS, 2015, J INT FINANC MARK I, V39, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.intfin.2015.05.005; Misra A., 2007, J VIROL, V88, P4319; Moser N, 2016, POST-COMMUNIST ECON, V28, P72, DOI 10.1080/14631377.2015.1124555; O'Neill JW, 2008, CORNELL HOSP Q, V49, P355, DOI 10.1177/1938965508324634; Papaefthymiou G, 2012, IEEE T SUSTAIN ENERG, V3, P636, DOI 10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202132; Podgorski D, 2015, SAFETY SCI, V73, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018; PORTER ME, 1995, J ECON PERSPECT, V9, P97, DOI 10.1257/jep.9.4.97; PORTER ME, 1991, SCI AM, V264, P168, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168; Qiu Y, 2016, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V48, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007; Ramanathan R, 2010, MANAGE DECIS, V48, P1493, DOI 10.1108/00251741011090298; Rammer C., 2016, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V57, P145; Rassier DG, 2010, LAND ECON, V86, P329, DOI 10.3368/le.86.2.329; Schauble M., 2006, IEEE, V16, P166; Shadbegian RJ, 2005, ECOL ECON, V54, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.029; Shao YM, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V117, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.015; Shaverdi M, 2016, INT J FUZZY SYST, V18, P248, DOI 10.1007/s40815-016-0142-8; Song ML, 2017, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V28, P976, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1336801; Song ML, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.001; Song ML, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P1648, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7925-1; Sun LC, 2017, ECOL ECON, V132, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.005; Tavana M, 2015, ANN OPER RES, V226, P589, DOI 10.1007/s10479-014-1738-8; Toussaint ND, 2015, NEPHROLOGY, V20, P184, DOI 10.1111/nep.12366; Tseng FM, 2009, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V37, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2007.07.004; Tseng M.L., 2016, INT J PROD ECON, P1; Tseng M.L., 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V3450, P1; Wang CH, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P5169, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1156780; Wang Q., 2017, ENERGY POLICY, V109; Xuan Zhang, 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC 2011), P5588, DOI 10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6009840; Yang CH, 2012, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V34, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.05.001; Zhang K, 2015, J PROCESS CONTR, V33, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.06.007; Zhao K, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090764; Zhao ZY, 2012, RENEW ENERG, V39, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2011.07.044; Zhou DQ, 2016, APPL ENERG, V166, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.081; Zhu Xianyou, 2010, 2010 2nd Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (ESIAT 2010), P691, DOI 10.1109/ESIAT.2010.5568444; Zohdi M., 2012, AFR J BUS MANAGE, V6, P5573	56	24	25	3	51	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV	AMSTERDAM	PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	SEP	2018	136						248	256		10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.032	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.032			9	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GL3XW					2022-09-08	WOS:000437079300025
J	Espasandin-Bustelo, F; Ganaza-Vargas, J; Diaz-Carrion, R				Espasandin-Bustelo, Francisco; Ganaza-Vargas, Juan; Diaz-Carrion, Rosalia			Employee happiness and corporate social responsibility: the role of organizational culture	EMPLOYEE RELATIONS			English	Article						Internal CSR; Organizational culture; Employee happiness; Institutional theory; PLS		Purpose This research explores how does the organizational culture influence internal corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions and the effect of these actions on the level of happiness of employees. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts an employee perspective since the perception of employees is the unit of analysis. By relying on a sample of 921 workers of firms from different sectors and sizes headquartered in Spain, the empirical analysis is performed using partial least squares. Findings The findings evidence that clan and adhocracy cultures highly foster internal CSR practices and that internal CSR activities enhance employees' happiness. The mediating role of internal CSR in the relationship between organizational culture and employee happiness is also found. These results suggest that managers could play a proactive role in fostering internal CSR by designing the organizational culture according to features of clan and adhocracy cultures such as flexibility, innovation, creativity, autonomy, communication, training and support of supervisors. Research limitations/implications The research focuses on a single country, which makes it difficult to generalize the results and guides future research into cross-cultural analysis. Including countries that present differences in their cultural and institutional context would allow to explore the influence of the national context on the business culture, on internal CSR and on employee happiness. This work is also limited in time, as the data used are of a cross-cultural nature. Practical implications A greater effort in internal CSR by companies translates into a higher level of happiness for their workers. Specifically, occupational health and safety practices have the greatest influence on employee happiness. Hence, organizations must develop cultures that contribute to promote internal CSR-adhocracy and clan-since this would enhance employees' happiness if the values and beliefs that characterize these cultural configurations are translated into internal CSR practices such as occupational health and safety, work-life balance and equal opportunities. Social implications The improvement of employee happiness creates social value and can be enhanced through an organizational culture that promotes CSR. The research findings might be useful when defining institutional policies to promote job quality, as encouraged by the social policy agenda of the United Nations embodied in the Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value Promoting internal CSR through organizational culture will have positive effects for companies internally by enhancing employees' happiness. Therefore, the article contributes to overcome the lack of evidence about the antecedents of internal CSR and its relationship with employees' happiness, an emerging variable in the management literature.	[Espasandin-Bustelo, Francisco; Ganaza-Vargas, Juan; Diaz-Carrion, Rosalia] Univ Seville, Seville, Spain		Diaz-Carrion, R (corresponding author), Univ Seville, Seville, Spain.	bustelo@us.es; ganaza@us.es; rosaliadiaz@us.es						Al-bdour A. A., 2010, INT J HUMAN SOCIAL S, V5, P932, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1054799; Alves AA, 2019, HEYTHROP J, V60, P600, DOI 10.1111/heyj.12331; Angus-Leppan T, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V93, P189, DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0221-y; Bartram D, 2012, SOCIOL COMPASS, V6, P644, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00483.x; Boesso G., 2010, INT J MANAG, V27, P470, DOI DOI 10.2308/ACCR.00000005; Brammer S, 2007, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V18, P1701, DOI 10.1080/09585190701570866; Branco MC, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V69, P111, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z; Buciuniene I, 2012, BALT J MANAG, V7, P5, DOI 10.1108/17465261211195856; Cameron K.S., 1999, DIAGNOSING CHANGING; Carmines E.G., 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412985642; Carraminana E.N., 2014, ATLANTIC REV EC REV, V2, P11; Carrasco I, 2007, INT ADV ECON RES, V13, P454, DOI 10.1007/s11294-007-9110-2; Castejon P. J. M., 2016, EUROPEAN J FAMILY BU, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJFB.2016.05.002; Cepeda, 2016, MODELOS ECUACIONES E; Chen ZF, 2019, CORP COMMUN, V24, P63, DOI 10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0078; Cornelius N, 2008, J BUS ETHICS, V81, P355, DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9500-7; DAILEY RC, 1992, HUM RELAT, V45, P305, DOI 10.1177/001872679204500306; de Bussy NM, 2012, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V38, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.006; DECI EL, 1989, J APPL PSYCHOL, V74, P580, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580; Del Junco J.G., 2013, ATINERS C PAPER SERI, VSME2013-0855; Diamantopoulos A, 2006, BRIT J MANAGE, V17, P263, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x; Diaz-Carrion R, 2019, BUS ETHICS, V28, P1, DOI 10.1111/beer.12203; DIENER E, 1984, PSYCHOL BULL, V95, P542, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542; Drummond S, 2017, HUM RELAT, V70, P544, DOI 10.1177/0018726716662696; Dupont C., 2013, INT BUSINESS RES, V6, P145, DOI [10.5539/ibr.v6n12p145, DOI 10.5539/IBR.V6N12P145]; Dutschke G, 2019, J ORGAN CHANGE MANAG, V32, P709, DOI 10.1108/JOCM-01-2018-0035; Espasand?n Bustelo F., 2014, MANUAL PR CTICO RESP; European Commission, 2001, PROMOTING EUROPEAN F; FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312; Freeman R.E., 2004, Z WIRTSCHAFTSUND UNT, V5, P228, DOI DOI 10.5771/1439-880X-2004-3-228; Frey B.S., 2014, INT REV EC, V61, P115; Frey B.S., 2019, INT REV EC, V1, P1; Galbreath J, 2010, BRIT J MANAGE, V21, P511, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00633.x; Ganescu C., 2017, STUD U VASILE GOLDIS, V27, P45, DOI [10.1515/sues-2017-0008, DOI 10.1515/SUES-2017-0008]; Gerstner CR, 1997, J APPL PSYCHOL, V82, P827, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827; Gorondutse AH, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P1638, DOI 10.1108/MD-05-2018-0557; Gupta N., 2016, IUP J ORG BEHAV, V15, P59; Hair J.F., 2016, PRIMER PARTIAL LEAST; Hair JF, 2017, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V45, P616, DOI 10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x; Halkos G, 2017, MANAGE DECIS, V55, P595, DOI 10.1108/MD-12-2016-0868; Halme M, 2020, BUS SOC, V59, P1181, DOI 10.1177/0007650318755648; Hawn O, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P2569, DOI 10.1002/smj.2464; Hernández Sampieri Roberto, 2014, Contad. Adm, V59, P229; Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118; Hu LT, 1998, PSYCHOL METHODS, V3, P424, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424; Jaakson K, 2009, SOC RESPONSIB J, V5, P6, DOI 10.1108/17471110910939962; Jaakson K, 2012, BALT J MANAG, V7, P202, DOI 10.1108/17465261211219813; Jamali DR, 2015, BUS ETHICS, V24, P125, DOI 10.1111/beer.12085; Kapoor S, 2010, GLOB BUS REV, V11, P185, DOI 10.1177/097215091001100205; Koh H. C., 2004, Management Decision, V42, P677, DOI 10.1108/00251740410538514; Kucharska W, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P453, DOI 10.1002/csr.1696; Leal S., 2015, OIDA INT J SUSTAINAB, V8, P113; Lee M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101883; Leite A, 2020, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V27, P396, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2019.1708509; MacKenzie SB, 2005, J APPL PSYCHOL, V90, P710, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710; Makikangas A, 2016, J HAPPINESS STUD, V17, P2325, DOI 10.1007/s10902-015-9696-7; Maon F, 2010, INT J MANAG REV, V12, P20, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00278.x; Miller R, 2015, TIZARD LEARN DISABIL, V20, P69, DOI 10.1108/TLDR-08-2014-0026; Nitzl C, 2016, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V116, P1849, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302; Noonan, 2017, PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE; Nunnally J.C., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V2nd ed.; Pasquali L., 2012, ANALISE FATORIAL PES; Pasricha P, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V151, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3568-5; Perko K, 2016, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V25, P105, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1011136; Porter ME, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P78; Raab R, 2020, J HAPPINESS STUD, V21, P943, DOI 10.1007/s10902-019-00109-7; Real JC, 2006, IND MARKET MANAG, V35, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.004; Ringle, 2015, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P419; Rooney S, 2007, ECOS, V138, P27; Saenghiran N., 2013, SOCIAL RES REPORTS, V25, P21; Santos M, 2011, SOC RESPONSIB J, V7, P490, DOI 10.1108/17471111111154581; Sarstedt M, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P3998, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007; Swanson R.N., 1999, 12 CENTURY RENAISSAN; Tatarkiewicz W, 1976, ANAL HAPPINESS; Thanetsunthorn N, 2018, MANAG RES REV, V41, P1137, DOI 10.1108/MRR-08-2017-0254; Thanetsunthorn N, 2015, ASIAN J BUS ETHICS, V4, P35, DOI 10.1007/s13520-015-0042-2; Thornton CH, 2008, J HIGH EDUC-UK, V79, P160, DOI 10.1353/jhe.2008.0011; Tu YD, 2017, J HAPPINESS STUD, V18, P229, DOI 10.1007/s10902-016-9725-1; Turker, 2018, MANAGING SOCIAL RESP; Ubius U, 2009, INZ EKON, P90; Upadhaya B, 2018, J BUS RES, V91, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.042; VEENHOVEN Ruut, 1993, HAPPINESS NATIONS SU; Virakul B, 2009, SOC RESPONSIB J, V5, P178, DOI 10.1108/17471110910964478; Wang Q, 2016, BUS SOC, V55, P1083, DOI 10.1177/0007650315584317; WERTS CE, 1974, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V34, P25, DOI 10.1177/001316447403400104; Wieland J., 2005, BUSINESS SOC, V44, P74, DOI DOI 10.1177/0007650305274852; Wong IA, 2014, INT J CONTEMP HOSP M, V26, P500, DOI 10.1108/IJCHM-05-2013-0225; Xanthopoulou D, 2012, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V21, P489, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2011.584386	88	11	11	20	109	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0142-5455	1758-7069		EMPL RELAT	Empl. Relat.	APR 2	2021	43	3					609	629		10.1108/ER-07-2020-0343	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2020-0343		DEC 2020	21	Industrial Relations & Labor; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	RI2LN					2022-09-08	WOS:000600836400001
J	Truslove, JP; Coulson, AB; Mbalame, E; Kalin, RM				Truslove, Jonathan P.; Coulson, Andrea B.; Mbalame, Emma; Kalin, Robert M.			Barriers to handpump serviceability in Malawi: life-cycle costing for sustainable service delivery	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY			English	Article							COMMUNITY-BASED MANAGEMENT; WATER; FUNCTIONALITY; SYSTEMS; SUPPLIES; TANZANIA; LIBERIA; NIGERIA; ACCESS; MODEL	The implementation of handpumps has contributed to increased improved water access. However, 'universal access' as the metric for success within Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6, potentially conceals fundamental barriers for sustainable services and hinders SDG 6 target success. Tariffs, in the form of household contributions, are the most common form of financial provision for the maintenance of rural water supplies. However, the annualised financial resources significantly vary across local contexts. Four tariff scenarios (collected per month, when required for repairs, per year and no tariff) were investigated across the life-cycle of 21 997 Afridev handpumps in Malawi. Known local costs for Afridev components from suppliers in Malawi were used to determine the potential shortfall in financial resources over the handpumps' 15 year design life. Domains that influence functionality, such as the operations, maintenance and quality of infrastructure, were also investigated to identify significant factors impacting the sustainability of the handpumps. Logistic regression indicates sub-standard installations (i.e.seasonality and poor water quality), structural damage to civil works, no preventative maintenance, lack of spare parts on site and a shortfall in potential financial resources were significantly associated with the poor status of infrastructure (broken or worn components) over the life-cycle of the Afridev. The findings highlight the burden placed on rural communities of maintaining inherently unsustainable assets that inevitably hinders lasting service delivery and benefits for rural communities in the SDG period and beyond.	[Truslove, Jonathan P.; Kalin, Robert M.] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Lanark, Scotland; [Coulson, Andrea B.] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Accounting & Finance, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland; [Mbalame, Emma] Govt Malawi, Minist Agr Irrigat & Water Dev, Tikwere House, Lilongwe, Malawi		Truslove, JP (corresponding author), Univ Strathclyde, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Lanark, Scotland.	jonathan.truslove@strath.ac.uk; a.b.coulson@strath.ac.uk; emmambalame@gmail.com; robert.kalin@strath.ac.uk	Coulson, Andrea/AAV-3168-2021; Kalin, Robert M/E-8620-2011	Coulson, Andrea/0000-0002-9534-1371; Truslove, Jonathan/0000-0001-5671-0616; Kalin, Robert M/0000-0003-3768-3848	Scottish Government under the Scottish Government Climate Justice Fund Water Futures Programme research grant [HN-CJF-03]; Government of Malawi Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development (MoAIWD); United Purpose; World Vision; CADECOM; CARE; BAWI; Water for People	Scottish Government under the Scottish Government Climate Justice Fund Water Futures Programme research grant; Government of Malawi Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development (MoAIWD); United Purpose; World Vision; CADECOM; CARE; BAWI; Water for People	We gratefully acknowledge the funding of this research by the Scottish Government under the Scottish Government Climate Justice Fund Water Futures Programme research grant HN-CJF-03 awarded to the University of Strathclyde. We thank continued direct collaboration with our partner the Government of Malawi Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development (MoAIWD), and implementation partners United Purpose, World Vision, CADECOM, CARE, BAWI and Water for People for their support. In particular, the authors would like to thank BASEFlow for their ongoing technical and logistical support.	Adank M, 2016, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V6, P435, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2016.034; Baraki YA, 2013, TECHNOL SOC, V35, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.10.001; Baumann E., 2006, Waterlines, V25, P10, DOI 10.3362/0262-8104.2006.033; Baumann E., 2013, 3 HANDPUMPS REVOUTIO; Baumann E., 2008, OPERATION MAINTENANC, P1; Blaikie P, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P1942, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.023; Bonsor H.C., 2015, HIDDEN CRISIS STRENG; Bonsor H, 2018, HYDROGEOL J, V26, P367, DOI 10.1007/s10040-017-1711-0; Briscoe J., 1988, WATER RURAL COMMUNIT; Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management, 2019, DIABETES CARE, V2, pS103, DOI 10.2337/dc19-S010; Carter R. C., 2016, Waterlines, V35, P94, DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.2016.008; Carter R. C., 2010, IRC S; Chowns E, 2015, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V35, P263, DOI 10.1002/pad.1737; Cronk R, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P11336, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b03287; Dickinson N., 2017, HARNESSING WATER POI; Driscoll F. G., 1986, GROUNDWATER WELLS; Ellis F, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P1407, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.005; Etongo D, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091271; Evans B., 1993, COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT; Fisher MB, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P8431, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016770; Fonseca C., 2013, FINANCING CAPITAL MA; Fonseca C., 2011, LIFE CYCLE COSTS APP; Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2015, REV FOOD AGR POL MAL; Foster T, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P1473, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019634; Foster T, 2019, HYDROGEOL J, V27, P535, DOI 10.1007/s10040-018-1865-4; Foster T, 2018, INT J ENVIRON HEAL R, V28, P579, DOI 10.1080/09603123.2018.1491953; Foster T, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.302; Foster T, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P12037, DOI 10.1021/es402086n; Foster T, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V47, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.026; Grey D., 1987, COMMUNITY WATER SUPP; Harvey P. A., 2007, Community Development Journal, V42, P365, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsl001; Harvey PA., 2006, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V159, P31, DOI [10.1680/ensu.2006.159.1.31, DOI 10.1680/ENSU.2006.159.1.31]; Hunter PR, 2010, PLOS MED, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000361; Hutchings P, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P963, DOI 10.2166/wp.2015.128; K. ERPF, 2007, AFRIDEV INSTALLATION, V2; KALIN RM, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI DOI 10.3390/W11040702; Kativhu T, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V106, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.05.003; Kativhu T, 2017, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V100, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2017.04.009; Kelly E, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V628-629, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.045; Klug T, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V619, P1126, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.183; Kroll C, 2019, PALGR COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1057/s41599-019-0335-5; Lapworth DJ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8031; Lockwood H, 2011, SUPPORTING RURAL WAT; MacAllister DJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14839-3; MacArthur J., 2015, HANDPUMP STANDARDISA; Mainali B, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030815; Martinez-Santos P, 2017, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V33, P514, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1298517; McNicholl D., 2019, PERFORMANCE BASED FU; MoAIWD, 2015, RUR WAT SUPPL OP MAI; MoAIWD, 2005, NAT WAT POL; Montgomery MA, 2009, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V26, P1017, DOI 10.1089/ees.2008.0388; Morgan P., 1993, WATERLINES, V11, P2, DOI [10.3362/0262-8104.1993.011, DOI 10.3362/0262-8104.1993.011]; Moriarty P, 2013, WATER ALTERN, V6, P329; Nussbaumer D, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8040135; Olaerts L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133726; Pezon C., 2010, SERVICES ARE FOREVER; RWSN Executive Steering Committee, 2010, MYTHS RUR WAT SUPPL; Thomson P, 2016, AQUAT PR, V6, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.06.010; Truslove JP, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020744; Truslove JP, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, P494, DOI 10.3390/w11030494; Tucker J., 2014, WATER RESOURCES RURA, V3, P27, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.WRR.2014.04.001; UN Water, 2018, BALL PRINC VAL WAT; van den Broek M, 2015, GEOFORUM, V67, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.009; Vedachalam S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0176272; Whaley L., 2017, WATER RESOURCES RURA, V9, P56, DOI [10.1016/j.wrr.2017.04.001, DOI 10.1016/J.WRR.2017.04.001]; Whaley L, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab35be; Whittington D, 2009, WATER POLICY, V11, P696, DOI 10.2166/wp.2009.310; WHO/ UNICEF, 2015, PROGR SAN DRINK WAT, P90; Woodward D. G., 1997, International Journal of Project Management, V15, P335, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00089-0	69	2	2	1	2	ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY	CAMBRIDGE	THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE CB4 0WF, CAMBS, ENGLAND	2053-1400	2053-1419		ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES	Environ. Sci.-Wat. Res. Technol.	AUG 1	2020	6	8					2138	2152		10.1039/d0ew00283f	http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ew00283f			15	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	MS1LU		Green Accepted, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000554046900012
J	Mazhar, R; Ghafoor, A; Xuehao, B; Wei, Z				Mazhar, Rabia; Ghafoor, Abdul; Xuehao, Bi; Wei, Zou			Fostering sustainable agriculture: Do institutional factors impact the adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices among new entry organic farmers in Pakistan?	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Climate-smart agriculture; Integrated planning; Sustainable development; Market orientation; Entrepreneurial support	INTEGRATED PEST-MANAGEMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; FOOD SECURITY; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; CROP-ROTATION; ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; COVER CROPS; SOIL; AGROFORESTRY; TECHNOLOGY	Amidst recent environmental challenges, Climate-Smart Agricultural (CSA) practices have been widely acknowledged as a prospective and effective alternative to sustainable food production. Despite the serious global concerns and appeal to implement Agenda 2030, the task for the widespread adoption of CSA-practices seems challenging in developing countries. To this end, this study examines the impact of two institutional characteristics - market structure, and interaction - on the uptake of six CSA practices in Pakistan, namely: integrated pest management, agroforestry, cover cropping, integrated crop-animal farming, traditional organic composting, and crop rotation and diversification. The data set for this work consisted of 600 new entry organic farmers collected from 12 districts of Punjab province, Pakistan. Results of the binary logistic regression models show that, inter alia, the institutional factors, contractual agreements, entrepreneurial support, and market orientation are related to the adoption of multiple CSA practices (>= 3). The findings of the study suggest promoting the integrated role of entrepreneurial support, public and private partnership, and supportive institutional landscape for implementing CSA practices in Pakistan. Further, the study also proposes the implementation of revised contractual agreements by tracking CSA practices with lower uptake and introducing such practices as a package in the contractual agreements. The findings of the study provide several theoretical and practical implications for sustainability along with extending the existing literature on CSA, sustainable agriculture, organic farming, and institutional characteristics. Lastly, the study also shows some limitations each of which provides avenues for future research. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Mazhar, Rabia; Xuehao, Bi; Wei, Zou] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China; [Ghafoor, Abdul] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Business Management Sci, Faisalabad, Pakistan		Wei, Z (corresponding author), Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.	Ghafooruaf@hot.com; njauzw@163.com			National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [18AGL014]	National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (Project ID: 18AGL014).	Abid M, 2015, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V6, P225, DOI 10.5194/esd-6-225-2015; Adebiyi J, 2016, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V31, P101, DOI 10.1017/S1742170515000150; Adnan N, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V63, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.022; Aker JC, 2011, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V42, P631, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x; Allahyari MS, 2017, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/agriculture7120101; Alonso AM, 2010, J SUSTAIN AGR, V34, P312, DOI 10.1080/10440041003613362; Altieri MA, 2003, SOIL TILL RES, V72, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00089-8; [Anonymous], 2017, PAKISTAN J AGR SCI, DOI DOI 10.21162/PAKJAS/17.5132; Aryal J.P., 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR; Asrat P, 2017, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49520-0_4; Bais-Moleman AL, 2019, GEODERMA, V338, P555, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042; Barrett CB, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.006; Beaudoin N, 2005, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V111, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.06.006; Bello-Bravo J., 2018, OUTLOOKS PEST MANAGE, V29, P58, DOI [10.1564/v29_apr_02, DOI 10.1564/V29_APR_02]; Benson D, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.016; Berman R, 2012, ENVIRON DEV, V2, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.017; Birkhofer K, 2008, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V40, P2297, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.007; Blasi E, 2016, AGR SYST, V145, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.013; Branca G., 2011, MITIGATION CLIMATE C, V3, P1; Bruinsma J., 2017, WORLD AGR 2015 2030, P444; Buthelezi N.N., 2013, AFR J AGR RES, V8, P507; Camacho Leni D., 2016, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V12, P5, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2015.1124453; Carlisle L, 2016, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V40, P583, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2016.1156596; Chadwick D. R., 2002, P57, DOI 10.1079/9780851995458.0057; Chaudhury A.S., 2019, CLIMATE SMART AGR PU, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.25544.78083., DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.25544.78083]; Chichongue O., 2019, International Journal of Agricultural Extension, V7, P277, DOI 10.33687/ijae.007.03.3049; Clark A., 2008, MANAGING COVER CROP, Vthird; Congreves KA, 2015, SOIL TILL RES, V152, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2015.03.012; Coulibaly JY, 2017, AGR SYST, V155, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.017; Dhakal A, 2015, AGROFOREST SYST, V89, P645, DOI 10.1007/s10457-015-9802-1; Dlodlo N, 2015, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN NETWORKS AND COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS (ETNCC), P13, DOI 10.1109/ETNCC.2015.7184801; Douxchamps S, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1305, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0838-6; Egodawatta WCP, 2012, FIELD CROP RES, V129, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.010; Ehler LE, 2006, PEST MANAG SCI, V62, P787, DOI 10.1002/ps.1247; Eyhorn F, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P253, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0266-6; Faling M, 2018, GLOB POLICY, V9, P408, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12547; FAO, 2019, AGR ZON PUNJ; FAO, 2017, WORLD AGR 2015 2030; FERNANDEZBALDOR A, 2012, CAPABILITY APPROACH, P00135; Fernihough A, 2011, SIMPLE LOGIT PROBIT; FLORA CB, 1992, J SUSTAIN AGR, V2, P37, DOI 10.1300/J064v02n03_04; Florentin M.A., 2010, INTEGR CROP MANAG, V12; Folk E., 2018, ECOL J POSTINDUSTRIL; Forsyth T, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P683, DOI 10.1002/wcc.68; Gelgo B., 2016, ETHIOPIA INT J AGR E, V4, P117; Gibbs D., 2009, GREENER MANAG INT; Goglio R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P4010, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.133; Gold MA, 2009, N AM AGROFORESTRY IN, V2nd, P45; Gorgievski MJ, 2018, J CAREER ASSESSMENT, V26, P457, DOI 10.1177/1069072717714541; Government of Pakistan, 2020, EC SURVEY PAKISTAN; Haghjou M, 2014, J AGR SCI TECH-IRAN, V16, P957; Haque MM., 2016, J EXP AGR INT, V14, P1; Hartwig NL, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P688, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0688:AIACCA]2.0.CO;2; Harvey CA, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P77, DOI 10.1111/conl.12066; Hess C, 2006, INT SOC SCI J, V58, P335, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2006.00622.x; Hoorman J.J, 2009, USING COVER CROPS IM, P1; Hosmer Jr D.W., 2004, APPL LOGISTIC APPL L, Vfirst; Hosseini P, 2014, CROP PROT, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.022; Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104; IPCC, 2011, INT PAN CLIM CHANG; Ipcc C.C., 2007, PHYS SCI BASIS CONTR, V996; Iqbal M. A., 2018, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, V34, P233, DOI 10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.2.233.239; Jaleta M, 2013, AGR SYST, V121, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.05.006; Jose S, 2012, AGROFOREST SYST, V85, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10457-012-9517-5; Kalaba KF, 2010, ENVIRON SCI ENG, P461, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00493-3_22; Kassie M, 2010, J AGR ECON, V61, P605, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00263.x; Kpadonou RAB, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.050; Kumar M., 2019, INDIAN J EXT ED, V55, P160; Kurniawan R, 2019, SOC INDIC RES, V141, P443, DOI 10.1007/s11205-017-1833-8; Leakey R., 1996, Agroforestry Today, V8, P5; Lebel L, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P1057, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9407-1; Lee DR, 2005, AM J AGR ECON, V87, P1325, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00826.x; LIEBMAN M, 1993, ECOL APPL, V3, P92, DOI 10.2307/1941795; Lipper L, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1068, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2437, 10.1038/nclimate2437]; Litskas VD, 2011, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V35, P1302, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.023; Liu T, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V232, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.015; Liu Y, 2017, SUSTAIN DEV, V25, P414, DOI 10.1002/sd.1671; Long P, 2013, J SCI FOOD AGR, V93, P2881, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.6223; Long TB, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044; Lucchi A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P13439, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-1919-0; Luedeling E, 2014, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V6, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.013; Mahmood F, 2017, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V17, P22; Martin G, 2016, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V36, DOI 10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x; Matta NF, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P109; Mullins J., 2018, Climate smart agriculture: building resilience to climate change, P353; Murage AW, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P709, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0454-9; Mutuo PK, 2005, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V71, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10705-004-5285-6; Negi VS, 2010, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V17, P431, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2010.505076; Nkomoki W, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V78, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.021; Ostrom E., 1994, RULES GAMES COMMON P; Pacheco DF, 2010, J BUS VENTURING, V25, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006; Park JH, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V84, P761, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.049; Peng CYJ, 2002, J EDUC RES, V96, P3, DOI 10.1080/00220670209598786; Person S. W., 2004, GEO INT ENV L REV, V17, P307; Pilarova T, 2018, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V16, P367, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2018.1499244; Pryor SW, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.069; Rajaram T, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P1734, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.035; Reganold JP, 2016, NAT PLANTS, V2, DOI [10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221, 10.1038/nplants.2015.221]; Rigal C., 2018, PLOS ONE, V13; Risam KS., 2012, INDIAN RES J EXTENSI, V2, P49; Rodriguez JM, 2009, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V24, P60, DOI 10.1017/S1742170508002421; Rudd MA, 2004, ECOL ECON, V48, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.002; Ryschawy J, 2017, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V108, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10705-016-9815-9; Sabastian G, 2014, AGROFOREST SYST, V88, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10457-014-9673-x; Sabatier PaulA., 2007, THEORIES POLICY PROC; Sanchez II, 2019, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V83, P1356, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2019.02.0051; Scherr S.J., 2012, AGR FOOD SECUR, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-1-12; SDR, 2019, SUT DEV REP RANF ACH; Seidel R., 2017, Organic Agriculture, V7, P53, DOI 10.1007/s13165-015-0145-z; Sharma A.R., 2012, INDIAN J AGRON, V57, P131; Sher A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121269; Sher A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071838; Sher A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P1131, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.198; Silajdzic I, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V88, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.004; Singh S, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P1621, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00059-1; Sukhpal S., 2011, INNOVATIVE POLICIES, P41; Teklewold H, 2013, J AGR ECON, V64, P597, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12011; Tey YS, 2017, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V16, P337, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2017.034; Thierfelder C, 2017, FOOD SECUR, V9, P537, DOI 10.1007/s12571-017-0665-3; Thierfelder C, 2012, FIELD CROP RES, V137, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.017; Timprasert S, 2014, CROP PROT, V62, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.04.008; Tittonell P, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.10.001; Totin E, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061990; UN, 2015, UST DEV GOALS UN 203; van Mierlo B, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.004; Verchot L. V., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P901, DOI 10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6; Willer H., 2019, WORLD ORGANIC AGR ST; Wollni M, 2010, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V41, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00445.x; Woolthuis RK, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002; Zhang B, 2014, BIOL FERT SOILS, V50, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s00374-014-0929-4	130	8	8	4	28	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 10	2021	283								124620	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124620	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124620		JAN 2021	17	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PT9FE					2022-09-08	WOS:000608914800013
J	Kurniawan, TA; Maiurova, A; Kustikova, M; Bykovskaia, E; Othman, MHD; Goh, HH				Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono; Maiurova, Aleksandra; Kustikova, Marina; Bykovskaia, Elena; Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan; Goh, Hui Hwang			Accelerating sustainability transition in St. Petersburg (Russia) through digitalization-based circular economy in waste recycling industry: A strategy to promote carbon neutrality in era of Industry 4.0	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Carbon neutrality; Circular economy; Industry 4.0; Smart city; Waste recycling; Zero-waste	SOLID-WASTE; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; TAIWAN; SMART; IMPLEMENTATION; DESIGN; SECTOR; POLICY	Due to industrialization and economic development, urban expansion in St. Petersburg (Russia) has swelled its solid waste generation. The current waste management system does not meet the city's needs. Fundamental changes are required to accelerate its sustainability transition to achieve the 2030 UN's Sustainable Development Goals. This article critically evaluates and analyzes the existing situation of waste management in St. Petersburg and its role in promoting digitalization-based circular economy. Challenges in waste recycling that prevent it from reforming its waste management are identified. Lessons drawn from Taiwan's prowess in resources recovery are presented to inspire a transformation of its waste sector towards a digitalization. The implications of digitalization on the city's waste recycling industry are elaborated. Before applying digitalization, St. Petersburg encountered challenges such as a lack of proper infrastructure in waste management, low public participation and environmental awareness, technological gaps, and insufficient coordination among its institutions. As one of the world's leaders in waste recycling (65%), Taiwan was selected as a role model for St. Petersburg in improving its waste management. The Island's daily per capita rate decreased by 96% to 0.4 kg in 2015. Taiwan also minimized the amount of waste disposal into landfills to less than 2%, while 80% of its industrial waste was recycled. About 33% of annual waste generation in Taiwan was reduced through "Pay-as-you-throw" policy. The average volume of municipal solid waste generation per capita decreased by 20% to 0.91 kg/day. This suggests that moving towards digitalization has minimized the extraction of raw materials through resource recovery. As implications of digitalization in waste management, the consumption of virgin materials could be lowered by 25% in 2030, while a half of greenhouse gas emissions could be avoided. The World Economic Forum estimated that the circular economy could potentially add USD 700 billion in material savings to global economy.	[Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono] Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, Peoples R China; [Maiurova, Aleksandra; Kustikova, Marina; Bykovskaia, Elena] ITMO Univ, Fac Energy & Ecotechnol, St Petersburg 197101, Russia; [Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan] Univ Teknol Malaysia UTM, Adv Membrane Technol Res Ctr AMTEC, Sch Chem & Energy Engn, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia; [Goh, Hui Hwang] Guangxi Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China		Kurniawan, TA (corresponding author), Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, Peoples R China.	tonni@xmu.edu.cn	Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono/B-8172-2008; Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono/GMW-4660-2022	Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono/0000-0003-1362-6339; 	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Q.J130000.21A6.00P14]; ITMO Fellowship and Professorship Program; World Academy of Sciences [FR 3240322700]	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; ITMO Fellowship and Professorship Program; World Academy of Sciences	The grant supports from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia No. Q. J130000.21A6.00P14, the ITMO Fellowship and Professorship Program, and a Fellowship for Visiting Experts from the World Academy of Sciences (FR 3240322700) are also gratefully acknowledged.	Abdallah M, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V109, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.057; Abdel-Shafy H.I., 2018, EGYPT J PET, V27, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003; Abramova Nadezhda, 2021, E3S Web of Conferences, V258, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202125808014; Hoang AT, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132285; Hoang AT, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V305, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127161; Hoang AT, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112322; Arya S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122707; Atabani AE, 2022, BIOMASS CONVERS BIOR, V12, P565, DOI 10.1007/s13399-021-02017-4; Badgett A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V314, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128057; Bartl A, 2014, WASTE MANAGE RES, V32, P3, DOI 10.1177/0734242X14541986; Berg H., 2020, DIGITAL WASTE MANAGE; Chang YM, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P2443, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.014; Chao CW, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P2414, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.020; Chen HW, 2004, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT II, P509; Chen WY, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V218, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.028; Chen Y.C., 2017, J TAIWAN ENERGY, V4, P93; Chusov Alexander, 2018, MATEC Web of Conferences, V193, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/201819302037; Clark JH, 2016, GREEN CHEM, V18, P3914, DOI 10.1039/c6gc00501b; Danilina Marina, 2020, E3S Web of Conferences, V217, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202021704011; Drozhzhin SI, 2019, COMM COM INF SC, V947, P14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_2; Esmaeilian B, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V81, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.047; Fan KS, 2005, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V55, P574, DOI 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464647; Fedorov GM, 2020, DATA BRIEF, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106551; Fedotkina O, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11205837; Ferrari F, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119618; Ferronato N, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16061060; Fu D, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118062; Fu D, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129861; Fu D, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V286, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112246; Fu D, 2019, CHEM ENG J, V355, P650, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.188; Fu D, 2017, J MOL LIQ, V248, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.020; Fujikura R, 2011, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V21, P303, DOI 10.1002/eet.579; Gaeta GL, 2021, WASTE MANAGE, V120, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.009; Geraskina Inna, 2021, E3S Web of Conferences, V281, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202128108006; Gong XM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120725; Grigor'eva LS, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V153, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.104; Gupta H, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253; Hammed T., 2017, INT J SCI ENG INVEST, V6, P1; Hoang AT, 2021, J ENERG RESOUR-ASME, V143, DOI 10.1115/1.4050779; Nguyen HP, 2021, ENERG SOURCE PART A, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2021.1954110; Honma S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125274; Houng H., 2013, MUNICIPAL SOLID WAST, P317, DOI [10.1007/978-981-4451-73-4_16, DOI 10.1007/978-981-4451-73-4_16]; Huang W.L, 2013, OPEN ENV SCI, V7, P21; Hunsicker MD, 1996, J HAZARD MATER, V47, P31, DOI 10.1016/0304-3894(95)00112-3; Iqbal A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138622; Kamolov S., 2019, ADV SOC SCI ED HUMAN, V392, P256; Kang KD, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119801; Kaza S., 2018, WASH TIMES, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0; Nguyen KLP, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104931; Kunkel S, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V112, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.022; Kurniawan T.A., 2014, COLLABORATION SUSTAI, P177, DOI [10.1007/ 978-94-007-7633-3_9, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7633-3_9]; Kurniawan TA, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V357, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131911; Kurniawan TA, 2022, CHEM PAP, V76, P5001, DOI 10.1007/s11696-022-02226-9; Kurniawan TA, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14042374; Kurniawan TA, 2022, ANN NUCL ENERGY, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108736; Kurniawan TA, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113882; Kurniawan TA, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129986; Kurniawan TA, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112265; Kurniawan TA, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116741; Kurniawan TA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124775; Kurniawan TA, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V58, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.002; Kurniawan TA, 2011, SEP SCI TECHNOL, V46, P460, DOI 10.1080/01496395.2010.512030; Lee CH, 2000, J HAZARD MATER, V73, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00191-0; Li N, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V130, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.008; Lin HT, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V89, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.026; Lu LT, 2006, WASTE MANAGE, V26, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.005; Maiurova Aleksandra, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production, V354, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131604; Malchenko YA, 2019, ROSS ZH MENEDZH, V17, P387, DOI 10.21638/spbu18.2019.305; Mao WL, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105132; Mengting Z, 2022, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V21, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11157-022-09617-0; Mengting Z, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V405, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123999; Mingaleva Z, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010094; Chau MQ, 2021, ENERG SOURCE PART A, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2021.1994057; Moh Y, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V116, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.012; Nizetic S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122877; Okorie O, 2018, ENERGIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/en11113009; Ordieres-Mere J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041460; Owojori O, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12125111; Page MJ, 2021, SYST REV-LONDON, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4; Pardini K, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20082380; Passarini F., 2018, 29220 EUR, DOI [10.2760/1079.JRC111643, DOI 10.2760/1079.JRC111643]; Premakumara DGJ, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P971, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.040; Putinceva Natalia, 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V940, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/940/1/012024; Ragin C. C, 1992, WHAT IS CASE; Rajput S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123853; Ranta V, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105155; Rodionov M, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P1486, DOI 10.3390/su3091486; Ruohomaa H, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V337, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/337/1/012032; Russo I, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V218, P966, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.044; Santti U, 2020, AIP CONF PROC, V2233, DOI 10.1063/5.0001547; Sarc R, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V95, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.035; Schwanholz J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122327; Shahbaz M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009; Sharma M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122047; Sung HC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12083425; Suthar S, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V22, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.013; Tan ST, 2014, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V18, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012159; The Penn State Methodology Center, 2020, WHY US SMART DES BUI; Tsai CH, 2021, MATERIALS, V14, DOI 10.3390/ma14133730; Tsai WT, 2007, RESOUR POLICY, V32, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.06.004; Tsai WT, 2004, WASTE MANAGE, V24, P1061, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.016; Tsai WT, 2004, J CLEAN PROD, V12, P725, DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00053-2; Un-Habitat, 2010, SOLID WASTE MANAGEME, V105; Valenzuela-Levi N, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104441; van Schalkwyk RF, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V186, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.111; Vasileva E., 2020, THESIS MASARIK U; Verzilin D, 2019, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V52, P2261, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.542; Vidiasova D., 2019, DIGITAL TRANSFORMATI, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030- 37858-5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5]; Vidiasova L, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102158; Vilve M, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V17, P875, DOI 10.1007/s11356-009-0291-5; Vogt R., 2015, 002099E UBAFB; Wang B, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126773; Wang HD, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V134, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.006; Wang Z, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V188, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.075; Wilson DC, 2012, WASTE MANAGE RES, V30, P237, DOI 10.1177/0734242X12437569; Wilts H, 2021, RESOURCES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/resources10040028; Wu CY, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V26, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009; Xue WC, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131549; YANG GCC, 1995, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V13, P15, DOI 10.1016/0921-3449(94)00009-T; Yang HC, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V102, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.016; Zhang B, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V144, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.001; Zhao L, 2020, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V133, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.014; Zhu MT, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110839; Zhu MT, 2020, MAT SCI ENG C-MATER, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110420	124	0	0	3	3	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2022	363								132452	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132452	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132452			16	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	3J6QB					2022-09-08	WOS:000833517200004
J	Mroz, A; Ocetkiewicz, I; Tomaszewska, B				Mroz, Anna; Ocetkiewicz, Iwona; Tomaszewska, Barbara			What should be included in education programmes - The socio-education analysis for sustainable management of natural resources	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Education; Teachers; Renewable resources; Sustainable development	ENVIRONMENTAL-EDUCATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; KEY COMPETENCES; CURRICULUM; IMPLEMENTATION	Education is an important element in enhancing students' awareness of the environment. This is because education plays an important role in shaping and transforming society. According to the assumptions of the most important documents regarding sustainable development (Agenda 21, 1992; Agenda, 2030, 2015; UNESCO, 2018a) the condition for achieving the desired development model is properly planned and effectively implemented education. Therefore, teachers should make every effort to expand students knowledge, skills and attitudes (and thus competences) in this area. This should be implemented, inter alia, by actively incorporating key issues for sustainable development into educational programmes. The purpose of the study presented here was to explore and describe the inclusion of the issue of the sustainable management of natural resources (SMNR) in education programmes (curricula) by Polish teachers. The authors were looking for the answer to the research question: how do Polish teachers of general subjects working in lower secondary schools (gimnazjums) and upper secondary schools (lyceums) integrate the SMNR issue into educational programmes? The aim of the research was descriptive-exploratory. In order to answer the research question, we used the survey method (quantitative paradigm). The authors have developed our own questionnaire, which served as a research tool. A total of 337 Polish teachers of general subjects took part in the research. The results show that in their daily work they try to incorporate the SMNR issue into educational programmes, but they do not always know how to actively involve students. However, many teachers, especially Polish language teachers, still do not implement this issue in their curriculum. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Mroz, Anna] Pedag Univ Kracow, Fac Pedag, Ingardena 4, PL-30084 Krakow, Poland; [Ocetkiewicz, Iwona] Pedag Univ Kracow, Fac Pedag, Podchorazych 2, PL-30084 Krakow, Poland; [Tomaszewska, Barbara] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Geol Geophys & Environm Protect, Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland		Tomaszewska, B (corresponding author), AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Geol Geophys & Environm Protect, Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland.	annamroz@up.krakow.pl; iwona.ocetkiewicz@up.krakow.pl; barbara.tomaszewska@agh.edu.pl		Tomaszewska, Barbara/0000-0002-4780-1580	Pedagogical University of Krakow [BS-440/P/2016]; AGH-UST [11.11.140.031]	Pedagogical University of Krakow; AGH-UST	The work was prepared under the statutory research grant no. BS-440/P/2016 of the Pedagogical University of Krakow and partly under the statutory research grant no. 11.11.140.031 of AGH-UST.	Acikgoz C, 2011, RENEW ENERG, V36, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.015; Paredes-Chi AA, 2018, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V24, P564, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2017.1333576; Babbie Earl, 2013, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES; Barth M., 2007, INT J SUSTAIN HIGH E, V8; BASTOS REMO MOREIRA BRITO, 2017, Rev. Bras. Educ., V22, P802, DOI 10.1590/s1413-24782017227040; Bentham H., 2015, INT J HIGH ED, V4, P158; Buissink-Smith N., 2011, J ED SUSTAINABLE DEV, V5, P101, DOI DOI 10.1177/097340821000500113; Capelo A., 2012, CONTRIBUTIONS UN DEC, P95; Celikler D, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V75, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.036; Celikler D, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V60, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2013.05.034; Christensen B., 2011, ED RES QUANTITATIVE; De Haan G., 2007, GUIDE ED SUSTAINABLE; De Haan G., 2006, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V12, P19, DOI [10.1080/13504620500526362, DOI 10.1080/13504620500526362]; de Haan G, 2010, INT REV EDUC, V56, P315, DOI 10.1007/s11159-010-9157-9; Diemont SAW, 2010, ECOL ENG, V36, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.004; Duran J., 2013, PROBLEM YEKOROZWOJU, V8, P106; Elias D., 2006, AUST J ENV ED, V22, P273; ESD, 2012, LEARN TRAIN TOOLS N; EUROSTAT, 2016, DAN STAT PORT EUR; EURYDICE, 2014, SYSTEM ED POLAND; EURYDICE, 2018, SYSTEM ED POLAND; Finnish National Agency For Education, 2017, FINN ED NUTSH ED FIN, P1; Hidayah Liew Abdullah N., 2018, J PHYS C SER, V1049, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012098; Indrawan M, 2014, ECOL ENG, V64, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.038; Jukic R., 2014, SOC EKOL, V22, P221; Kandpal T.C., 2015, ACTA ACAD STROMSTADI; Kandpal TC, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V34, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.039; Kinyanjui N. M., 2014, ED SUSTAINABLE DEV T; Kobierska H, 2007, J BIOL EDUC, V42, P12, DOI 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656101; Leal W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309; Molapo L., 2012, ACTA ACAD, V44, P202; Moser A, 1996, ECOL ENG, V7, P117, DOI 10.1016/0925-8574(96)00005-5; Mroz A. M., 2018, NAUCZYCIEL WOBEC KON; Mula I, 2009, ED SUST DEV, V3, P87, DOI DOI 10.1177/097340820900300116; Musialik M., 2013, P EC OPOLE, V7, P017; Niemi H, 2016, MIRACLE ED PRINCIPLE; Ocetkiewicz I, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V80, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.144; ODUM HOWARD T., 1963, PUBL INST MAR SCI, V9, P373; Paden M., 2007, J ED SUSTAIN DEV, V1, P115; Reed Johnson J.A., 2014, ED SUSTAINABLE DEV E; Rieckmann M, 2011, GAIA, V20, P48, DOI 10.14512/gaia.20.1.10; Robinson K., 2015, CREATIVE SCH GRASSRO; Salmani B, 2015, INT J ENVIRON RES, V9, P151; Sherman R., 2003, RENEWABLES ARE READY; Sorgo A, 2012, ENER EDUC SCI TECH-B, V4, P1067; Stanisic J, 2014, J ENVIRON EDUC, V45, P118, DOI 10.1080/00958964.2013.829019; Szymanski M.J., 2013, SOCJOLOGIA EDUKACJI; Tilbury D., 2004, ENGAGING PEOPLE SUST; Udo V, 2011, PROBL EKOROZW, V6, P33; Uitto A, 2017, EDUC SCI, V7, DOI 10.3390/educsci7010008; UNESCO, 2014, GLOB CIT ED PREP LEA; UNESCO, 2012, ED SUST DEV SOURC LE; UNESCO, 2018, GLOB ACT PROGR ED SU; UNESCO, 2012, 2012 FULL LENGTH REP; UNESCO, 2018, TEACHING LEARNING SU; W?jcik, 2004, INT RES GEOGR ENVIRO, V13, P291, DOI [10.1080/10382040408668525, DOI 10.1080/10382040408668525]; Wals A.E.J., 2013, J CLEAN PROD, VXxx, P1; Wiek A, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6; World Conservation Union (WCU), 1991, CAR EARTH STRAT SUST	59	5	5	2	21	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 20	2020	250								119556	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119556	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119556			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	KE8WO					2022-09-08	WOS:000508829800109
J	Kumar, R				Kumar, Rajesh			Effects of high volume dolomite sludge on the properties of eco-efficient lightweight concrete: Microstructure, statistical modeling, multi-attribute optimization through Derringer's desirability function, and life cycle assessment	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Lightweight cellular concrete; Waste management; Response surface methodology; Thermal analysis; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable development goals	WASTE MARBLE POWDER; SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE; FLY-ASH; FOAMED CONCRETE; CEMENT; PERFORMANCE; STABILITY; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; MIXTURE	Micro fines stone sludge (mu SS) as dolomite, is a hazardous waste and creates many health problems along with air, water and land pollution. The research paper presents the statistical models with the help of response surface methodology, aiming to develop mu SS incorporated structural grade lightweight cellular concrete (SG- LCC) using novel mix design (with 15 design steps). The three level-three factorial (3(3)) Box Behnken Design was employed to investigate the effects of three input parameters i.e. temperature of water to be diluted with surfactant (T-w), flowability value (FV) and percentage replacement of mu SS (%R(mu)ss) on all the dependent responses i.e. oven dry density (rho(OD)), uniaxial compressive strength (f(c.28d)), performance factor for uniaxial compressive strength (PFc.28d) and thermal conductivity (lambda-value). The regression analysis and Derringer's desired function methodology was applied to find out an optimum condition for developing SG-LCC (as replacement of masonry brick) containing maximum volume of wet mu SS. It was finally concluded that by optimizing above sensitive input parameters, eco-efficient SG-LCC can be produced at T-w of 31 degrees C, %R(mu)ss of 51.50% and FV of 135.50%.The developed SG-LCC have rho(OD) of 1243 kg/m(3), f(c.28d) of 8.23 MPa, PFc.28 of 6621 Pa/(kg/m(3)) and lambda-value of 0.456 W/mK. Microstructure studies indicated that mu SS filers does not participate chemically in cement hydration reactions. However, these filers imparted physical effect by acting as nucleation sites for the cement hydration products. The economic index was 18.42% higher for the final optimized mix, than that of the control mix. Use of wet mu SS (up to 51%) to produce optimized SG-LCC mix, will not only reduce the production cost up to 17.54%, but also it will conserve natural RS and tap water by 26.28% and 100%, respectively. Life cycle assessment also showed that production of SG-LCC containing higher amount of mu SS; consumes lower energy, and emits lesser amount of greenhouse gases that are the key parameters requirements for sustainable development goals. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Kumar, Rajesh] Cent Bldg Res Inst, CSIR, Organ Bldg Mat OBM Grp, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India; [Kumar, Rajesh] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India; [Kumar, Rajesh] Cent Bldg Res Inst, CSIR, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India		Kumar, R (corresponding author), Cent Bldg Res Inst, CSIR, Organ Bldg Mat OBM Grp, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India.; Kumar, R (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India.; Kumar, R (corresponding author), Cent Bldg Res Inst, CSIR, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India.	rajeshkumar@cbri.res.in		Kumar, Rajesh/0000-0002-2512-2659	Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, Government of India [19e45/2018/RE, GAP0090]	Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, Government of India	The author is grateful to the Director, CSIR-CBRI, Roorkee for his kind permission to publish this work. The author is also grateful to 'Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, Government of India' for the sustained financial support to the project (File Number: 19e45/2018/RE; Project No.: GAP0090). Last but not the least; the author sincerely thanks the anonymous reviewers for their insightful observations and valuable suggestions.	Alyamac KE, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V144, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.156; American Society of Testing Materials, 2012, C796796M12 ASTM INT; Amiri A, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P2528, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.010; Amran YHM, 2015, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V101, P990, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.112; Anderson M.J., 2017, RSM SIMPLIFIED OPTIM; [Anonymous], 1988, 4031VI IS BUR UND ST; [Anonymous], 1970, IS 383; [Anonymous], 1996, IS 4031 I; [Anonymous], 1985, 4032 IS BUE IND STAN; [Anonymous], 1992, IS 1077; [Anonymous], 2003, HDB THERMAL ANAL CON; [Anonymous], 1993, 5233R ACI; [Anonymous], 1980, IS 3346; [Anonymous], 1983, 5512 IS BUE IND STAN; [Anonymous], 1963, IS 2386 I; [Anonymous], 1963, IS 2386 2; [Anonymous], 2000, 456 IS; [Anonymous], 2013, 8112 IS BUR IND STAN; [Anonymous], 1988, IS 4031 3; [Anonymous], 1988, IS 4031 V; [Anonymous], 1999, 9103 IS BUR IND STAN; [Anonymous], 1963, IS 2386 3; [Anonymous], 2014, 5233R ACI; [Anonymous], 1972, 6598 IS BUR IND STAN; [Anonymous], 1988, IS 4031 4; [Anonymous], 2008, IS 2185 4; [Anonymous], 1988, 4031X1; [Anonymous], 1999, IS 4031 2; Asadzadeh S, 2018, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V170, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.189; Ashish DK, 2016, ADV CONCR CONSTR, V4, P145, DOI 10.12989/acc.2016.4.2.145; British Cement Association, 1994, FOAMED CONCRETE COMP; Chandra S, 2013, J MATER CIVIL ENG, V25, P1666, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000730; Cinar M, 2019, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V5, P777, DOI 10.28991/cej-2019-03091287; CLCD, 2010, HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TR; CPM LCA, 2016, FLEXIBLE PUR FOAM; ELCD, 2013, LANDFILL GLASSINERT; Elyamany HE, 2014, ALEX ENG J, V53, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2014.03.010; Ferdosian I, 2017, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V84, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.019; Gabrovsek R, 2006, ACTA CHIM SLOV, V53, P159; Gonzalez RC., 2009, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES; Hadzima B, 2007, MAT SCI ENG A-STRUCT, V462, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.081; Hassan WNFW, 2020, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118251; Hossain MU, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V109, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.009; Hossain MU, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P70, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0988-2; International Organization for Standardization, 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS; Jain J, 2009, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V31, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.01.003; Jones M.R., 2000, ONE DAY AWARENESS SE, P54; Jones M.R., 2005, WRAP RES REPORT WAST; Jones MR, 2016, MAG CONCRETE RES, V68, P542, DOI 10.1680/macr.15.00097; Jones MR, 2005, FUEL, V84, P1398, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.030; Karasahin M, 2007, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V21, P616, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.001; Kearsley EP, 2002, CEMENT CONCRETE RES, V32, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00665-2; Kearsley EP, 2001, CEMENT CONCRETE RES, V31, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00430-0; Kirgiz MS, 2016, MECH MATER, V92, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.09.013; Kliestik T, 2020, EC MANAGE FIN MARKET, V15, P23, DOI [10.22381/EMFM15320203, DOI 10.22381/EMFM15320203]; Kliestik T, 2018, SCI ENG ETHICS, V24, P791, DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9912-4; Kockal NU, 2011, MATER DESIGN, V32, P3586, DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.028; Kore SD, 2020, INT J SUSTAIN ENG, V13, P264, DOI 10.1080/19397038.2019.1703151; Kovacova M, 2019, OECON COPERNIC, V10, P743, DOI 10.24136/oc.2019.034; Krumbein WC., 1963, STRATIGRAPHY SEDIMEN, P660; Kumar R, 2020, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103706; Kumar R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P1650, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.073; Lakhani R, 2015, RILEM P INT C SUST S; Lakhani R., 2014, J ENG SCI TECHNOL RE, V7, DOI DOI 10.25103/jestr.073.29; Lei XS, 2019, INT J HEAT MASS TRAN, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118453; Lenhard R, 2019, HEAT TRANSFER ENG, V40, P215, DOI 10.1080/01457632.2018.1426225; Lim SK, 2017, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V151, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.091; Marou sek J, 2020, ENERG SOURCE PART A, P1, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2020.1825560; Marousek J, 2019, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V21, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7; Marousek J, 2014, IND CROP PROD, V53, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.048; Marousek J, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P1695, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.041; Mashaly AO, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P731, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.023; Mehta P. K., 2013, CONCRETE MICROSTRUCT; Mohammed BS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P1605, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.102; Montgomery D., 2013, DESIGN ANAL EXPT; Muszynski MR, 2012, J MATER CIVIL ENG, V24, P194, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000351; Nambiar EKK, 2007, CEMENT CONCRETE RES, V37, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.009; Nambiar EKK, 2006, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V28, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.12.001; Narayanan N, 2000, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V22, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00016-0; Neville A.M, 1995, PROPERTIES CONCRETE, V4; Powers MC., 1953, J SEDIMENT RES, V23, P117, DOI 10.1306/D4269567-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D; Prins A., 2006, ENCY COLLOID SURFACE, V8, P5926; Punetha P, 2017, GEOTEXT GEOMEMBRANES, V45, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.02.001; Rana A, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V94, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.053; Sahu Sritam Swapnadarshi, 2018, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A (Civil, Architectural, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering), V99, P391, DOI 10.1007/s40030-018-0288-5; Shah SN, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105103; Shandilya P, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V38, P2371, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.283; Skapa S, 2019, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V41, P1041, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2018.1539137; Song Y, 2019, APPL SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/app9050876; Stevenson P, 2012, FOAM ENG FUNDAMENTAL, P75; Sutcu M, 2015, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V82, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.055; Tawfik ME, 2006, J ELASTOM PLAST, V38, P65, DOI 10.1177/0095244306055569; Thakur AK, 2018, CURR OPIN GREEN SUST, V13, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.06.005; VALORE RC, 1954, J AM CONCR I, V25, P773, DOI DOI 10.14359/11794; VALORE RC, 1954, J AM CONCR I, V25, P817, DOI DOI 10.14359/11795; Wang HT, 2017, J SURFACTANTS DETERG, V20, P615, DOI 10.1007/s11743-017-1953-9	96	7	7	5	14	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 20	2021	307								127107	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127107	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127107		MAY 2021	23	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	SV3TZ					2022-09-08	WOS:000663746100002
J	Lee, K; Jung, H				Lee, Keeheon; Jung, Hosang			Dynamic semantic network analysis for identifying the concept and scope of social sustainability	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Social sustainability; Diffusion; Change point detection; Bass model; Co-keyword network; Network analysis	SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; MODELS; PERFORMANCE; DIMENSIONS; CENTRALITY; SOCIETY; GROWTH; GREEN	Social sustainability is important across disciplines in the era of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, many scholars note that its concept and scope are ambiguous regardless of public attention and importance. It limits the development of social sustainability research. Therefore, in this study, we introduce a data-driven approach for identifying the concept and scope of social sustainability. We apply dynamic semantic network analysis to the current social sustainability literature over time. This analysis partitions the diffusion of social sustainability in academia into several periods by detecting change points. It also builds semantic networks periodically to discover the concept and scope in the network analysis perspective. Our result shows that social sustainability penetrated into disciplines with minimal innovation and high imitation rates. The concept of social sustainability has been changed several times by including the humanity of community and individuals during its diffusion. The scope of social sustainability has been enlarged but is densely intertwined. That is, social sustainability more concerns quality of life in a society, which is independent from economic and environmental sustainability. And thus, it considers human factors and social effects in a supply chain of products and services. This statement means that social sustainability developed to include the various values of humanity in our society that we should retain. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Lee, Keeheon] Yonsei Univ, Underwood Int Coll, Seoul, South Korea; [Jung, Hosang] Inha Univ, Asia Pacific Sch Logist, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 22212, South Korea		Jung, H (corresponding author), Inha Univ, Asia Pacific Sch Logist, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 22212, South Korea.	keeheon@yonsei.ac.kr; hjung@inha.ac.kr			Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2017R1C1B1010094]; Ministry of Education, Sejong City, Korea; Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2017 [2017-22-0067]	Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)(National Research Foundation of Korea); Ministry of Education, Sejong City, Korea(Ministry of Education (MOE), Republic of Korea); Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2017	This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2017R1C1B1010094]; by the Ministry of Education, Sejong City, Korea. This work was supported (in part) by the Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2017(2017-22-0067).	Agyeman J, 2004, GEOGR J, V170, P155, DOI 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00117.x; Ahi P, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005; Ahman H, 2013, LOCAL ENVIRON, V18, P1153, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.788480; Ashby A, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P497, DOI 10.1108/13598541211258573; Awan U, 2018, COGENT BUS MANAG, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311975.2018.1429346; Baker S, 2006, SUSTAINABLE DEV; Barnett GA., 1988, READINGS GALILEO SYS; BARNEY J, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P99, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108; BASS FM, 1969, MANAGE SCI, V15, P215, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215; Bebbington J, 2009, ROUTL STUD DEV SOC, V17, P157; BECKLEY TM, 1995, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V8, P261, DOI 10.1080/08941929509380919; Beckley TM., 2000, SUSTAINABLE FOREST M; Bonacich P, 2007, SOC NETWORKS, V29, P555, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002; Bostrom M., 2012, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, V8, P1; Brindley T., 2003, URBAN DES INT, V8, P53, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000093, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000093]; Campbell MO, 2004, ENVIRON CONSERV, V31, P225, DOI 10.1017/S0376892904001389; Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696; Carter C.R., 2004, J BUS LOGIST, V25, P145, DOI [10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00173.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2158-1592.2004.TB00173.X]; Chambers R., 1992, IDS DISCUSSION PAPER; Chiu R.L.H., 2004, HOUS THEORY SOC, V21, P65, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14036090410014999, 10.1080/14036090410014999]; COHEN B, 1984, COGNITIVE SCI, V8, P27, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog0801_2; Colantonio A., 2009, SUSTAINABLE DE UNPUB; Collins Allan M., 1972, EXPT SEMANTIC MEMORY; COLLINS AM, 1969, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V8, P240, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1; Cuthill M, 2010, SUSTAIN DEV, V18, P362, DOI 10.1002/sd.397; Davidson M, 2009, LOCAL ENVIRON, V14, P607, DOI 10.1080/13549830903089291; Dempsey N, 2011, SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P289, DOI 10.1002/sd.417; Denyer D., 2009, SAGE HDB ORG RES MET, P671, DOI DOI 10.1080/03634528709378635; Dillard J, 2009, ROUTL STUD DEV SOC, V17, P1; Doak S.C., 1996, SIERRA NEVADA ECOSYS, P375; Doerfel ML, 1999, HUM COMMUN RES, V25, P589, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00463.x; EKINS P, 1993, ECOL ECON, V8, P269, DOI 10.1016/0921-8009(93)90062-B; ELKINGTON J, 1994, CALIF MANAGE REV, V36, P90, DOI 10.2307/41165746; Elkington J, 1998, ENV QUALITY MANAGEME, DOI [10.1002/tqem.3310080106, DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106]; FREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35, DOI 10.2307/3033543; Gallego-Alvarez I, 2015, SOC INDIC RES, V120, P29, DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0579-9; Gimenez C, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035; Glavic P, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1875, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006; GRANGER CWJ, 1969, ECONOMETRICA, V37, P424, DOI 10.2307/1912791; GRILICHES Z, 1960, SCIENCE, V132, P275, DOI 10.1126/science.132.3422.275; Guo L, 2012, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V56, P616, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2012.732148; Harris CC, 2000, RURAL COMMUNITIES IN; Hutchins MJ, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1688, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001; JENNINGS SF, 2000, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V2, P177, DOI DOI 10.1080/714038553; JUNG H, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI DOI 10.3390/su9050777; Khodakarami M, 2015, MEASUREMENT, V70, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.024; Kozlowski A, 2015, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V64, P377, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2014-0152; Kunz J., 2006, SOCIAL SUSTAINABILIT, V118; LAFFERTY W. M., 1999, SUSTAINABLE DEV, P1; Lakoff G., 1988, MEANING MENTAL REPRE, P119; Larsen G. L., 2008, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL, P61; Lee K, 2017, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V68, P1295, DOI 10.1002/asi.23752; Lehtonen M, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019; LEVANDOWSKY M, 1971, NATURE, V234, P34, DOI 10.1038/234034a0; Magee L, 2012, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V7, P239, DOI 10.1007/s11482-012-9166-x; Magis K, 2009, ROUTL STUD DEV SOC, V17, P15; Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674; Mani V, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V71, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.007; McCarthy IP, 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P604, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.53503029; McKenzie S, 2004, HAWKE RES I WORKING, V27; Miller D., 1999, FAIRNESS FUTURITY ES; Missimer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170; Missimer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059; Missimer M, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.024; Missimer Merlina, 2013, THESIS; MURPHY GL, 1988, COGNITIVE SCI, V12, P529, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1204_2; PAGE ES, 1954, BIOMETRIKA, V41, P100, DOI 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100; Pagell M, 2009, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V45, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x; Pawlowski A, 2008, SUSTAIN DEV, V16, P81, DOI 10.1002/sd.339; Rajak S, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P1184, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.070; Redclift M, 2005, SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P212, DOI 10.1002/sd.281; Rogers EverettM., 2003, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; Scott K, 2000, J RURAL STUD, V16, P433, DOI 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00018-8; Seghezzo L, 2009, ENVIRON POLIT, V18, P539, DOI 10.1080/09644010903063669; Seuring S, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1545, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.002; Sharma S., 2003, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V12, P205, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.366; STEPHENSON K, 1989, SOC NETWORKS, V11, P1, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(89)90016-6; Steyvers M, 2005, COGNITIVE SCI, V29, P41, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3; Tate WL, 2010, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V46, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03184.x; Valiance S, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002; Vifell AC, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P18, DOI 10.1002/sd.461; Wasserman S., 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL, V8; WCED, 1987, REPORT; WOOD DJ, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P383, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700206; Wustenhagen R., 2003, Greener Management International, P105; YIFTACHEL O, 1994, CITIES, V11, P139, DOI 10.1016/0264-2751(94)90120-1; Yusuf YY, 2013, INT J PROD ECON, V146, P501, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.021	87	17	17	2	42	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 1	2019	233						1510	1524		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.390	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.390			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IN9VC					2022-09-08	WOS:000479025500124
J	Wu, F; Li, L; Crandon, L; Cao, YY; Cheng, F; Hicks, A; Zeng, EY; You, J				Wu, Fan; Li, Liang; Crandon, Lauren; Cao, Yuanyu; Cheng, Fei; Hicks, Andrea; Zeng, Eddy Y.; You, Jing			Environmental hotspots and greenhouse gas reduction potential for different lithium-ion battery recovery strategies	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; LIB recycle; Environmental impacts; Cathode-healing; Hydrometallurgy; Pyrometallurgy	VALUABLE METALS; COBALT; SEPARATION; FUTURE; LI; TECHNOLOGY; PYROLYSIS; CARBONATE; GRAPHITE; CATHODES	The ever-growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the shortage of metal minerals have led to urgent needs in battery recycling. Current recycling technologies cannot keep up with the exaltation of the LIB market and meet UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A holistic assessment of environmental tradeoffs is critical for recycling technological innovation. We divided traditional hydrometallurgy and pyrometallurgy recycling into three generalized phases and identified stepwise environmental "hotspots " among different LIB recycling techniques using life cycle assessment (LCA). Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and cumulative energy demand (CED) vary among recycling approaches from 67 to 286 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO(2)eq) and 1164-4349 MJ, respectively, for reproducing 1 kg LCO cathode from recovered cobalt. Comparatively, a direct "cathode healing " process emits 21-154 kg CO(2)eq and utilizes 267-2251 MJ to regenerate 1 kg LCO. When substituting the stepwise recycling with the direct approach, 127 of 162 modeled scenarios show GHG reduction. Up to 36.5 million metric tons of CO(2)eq may be reduced if 100% stepwise recycling is replaced by the green direct approach by 2025. Our study provides insights into optimizing LIB recovery technologies to minimize environmental impacts and offer quantitative evidence for sustainable management and technological innovation for spent LIB recovery.	[Wu, Fan; Li, Liang; Cao, Yuanyu; Cheng, Fei; Zeng, Eddy Y.; You, Jing] Jinan Univ, Sch Environm, Guangdong Key Lab Environm Pollut & Hlth, Guangzhou 511443, Peoples R China; [Wu, Fan; Zeng, Eddy Y.; You, Jing] Jinan Univ, Inst Low Carbon & Sustainable Dev, Guangzhou 511443, Peoples R China; [Crandon, Lauren] OnTo Technol LLC, Bend, OR 97703 USA; [Hicks, Andrea] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA		You, J (corresponding author), Jinan Univ, Sch Environm, Guangdong Key Lab Environm Pollut & Hlth, Guangzhou 511443, Peoples R China.	youjing@jnu.edu.cn	Wu, Fan/Q-2346-2019; You, Jing/A-6201-2009	Wu, Fan/0000-0001-8621-9449; You, Jing/0000-0002-4006-8339; Cheng, Fei/0000-0002-6158-0745; Hicks, Andrea/0000-0002-6426-9717	National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1901220, 42107286]; National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1805501]; Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515110788]; Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [202102020681]; Innovative Research Team of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2020KCXTD005]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); National Key Research and Development Program of China; Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation; Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau; Innovative Research Team of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province	Acknowledgement This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1901220 and 42107286) , the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1805501) , the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515110788) , Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (202102020681) , and the Innovative Research Team of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2020KCXTD005) .	Ang P, 2021, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V9, P669, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06247; [Anonymous], 2021, LONDON METAL EXCHANG; Bae H, 2021, MATER ADV, V2, P3234, DOI 10.1039/d1ma00216c; Banza CLN, 2009, ENVIRON RES, V109, P745, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2009.04.012; Bare J, 2011, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V13, P687, DOI 10.1007/s10098-010-0338-9; Beaudet A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145837; Biswal BK, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P12343, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02810; Boyden A, 2016, PROC CIRP, V48, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.100; Chen JP, 2016, GREEN CHEM, V18, P2500, DOI 10.1039/c5gc02650d; Chen XP, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V326, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.021; Chen YM, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V75, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.024; Ciez RE, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P148, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5; Dunn JB, 2015, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V8, P158, DOI 10.1039/c4ee03029j; Dunn JB, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P12704, DOI 10.1021/es302420z; Faria R, 2014, J POWER SOURCES, V262, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.092; Ferreira DA, 2009, J POWER SOURCES, V187, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.077; Gaines L, 2018, MRS ENERGY SUSTAIN, V5, DOI 10.1557/mre.2018.13; Gaines L, 2014, SUSTAIN MATER TECHNO, V1-2, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2014.10.001; Gaines L, 2012, MRS BULL, V37, P333, DOI 10.1557/mrs.2012.40; Ghamkhar R, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118767; Gratz E, 2014, J POWER SOURCES, V262, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.126; Hua Y, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105249; Jiang S., 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON; Kallitsis E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120067; Kushnir D, 2015, CURR STATE FUTURE PR, P1; Lambert R, 2020, OCEANS-IEEE, DOI 10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389236; Larouche F, 2020, MATERIALS, V13, DOI 10.3390/ma13030801; Li J, 2016, J HAZARD MATER, V302, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.050; Li L, 2013, J POWER SOURCES, V233, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.089; Li L, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V176, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.026; Li YK, 2021, GREEN CHEM, V23, P6139, DOI 10.1039/d1gc01639c; Lv WG, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P1504, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811; Melin H.E, 2018, LITHIUM ION BATTERY, P1; Meng XQ, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P5797, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03880; Mohr M, 2020, J IND ECOL, V24, P1310, DOI 10.1111/jiec.13021; Mossali E, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500; Nuruzzaman M, 2016, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V64, P1447, DOI 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05214; Oliveira L, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.021; Piccinno F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.226; Pinna EG, 2017, HYDROMETALLURGY, V167, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.024; Porzio J, 2021, ADV ENERGY MATER, V11, DOI 10.1002/aenm.202100771; Propulsion Quebec, 2019, LITHIUM ION BATTERY; Rajaram M, 2022, J CHILD LANG, V49, P197, DOI 10.1017/S0305000920000811; Raugei M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.237; Richa K, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P715, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12607; Rinne M, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105586; Shi Y, 2018, GREEN CHEM, V20, P851, DOI 10.1039/c7gc02831h; Sloop S, 2020, SUSTAIN MATER TECHNO, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00152; Tao YQ, 2021, SCI ADV, V7, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abi7633; Tarascon JM, 2001, NATURE, V414, P359, DOI 10.1038/35104644; Thompson DL, 2020, GREEN CHEM, V22, P7585, DOI 10.1039/d0gc02745f; Tian XY, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P821, DOI 10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z; Wang X, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V83, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.009; Wu F, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122465; Wu F, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P4078, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b06800; Xiao JF, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P9, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b03725; Xiao JF, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P11960, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b02561; Xiao JF, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V338, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.024; Xu PP, 2020, JOULE, V4, P2609, DOI 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.008; Zeng LL, 2016, DESALIN WATER TREAT, V57, P11184, DOI 10.1080/19443994.2015.1043951; Zeng XL, 2015, J HAZARD MATER, V295, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.064; Zhang GW, 2020, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V8, P2205, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05896; Zhang GW, 2018, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V6, P10896, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02186; Zhao JM, 2011, SEP PURIF TECHNOL, V78, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.12.024	64	1	1	33	33	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 10	2022	339								130697	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130697	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130697			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ZZ0BJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000772942100007
J	Hussain, FS; Memon, N; Khatri, Z; Memon, S				Hussain, Fayyaz Salih; Memon, Najma; Khatri, Zeeshan; Memon, Saima			Solid waste-derived biodegradable keratin sponges for removal of chromium: A circular approach for waste management in leather industry	ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION			English	Article						Keratin-glutaraldehyde sponge; Wastewater treatment; Chromium removal; Adsorption; Biomolecules; Tannery wastewater; Cleaner production	RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGY; WOOL; BINDING; FIBERS; CELLS; HARD	Sustainable consumption and production falls under UN sustainable development goal 12, which require environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes; and to reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse. Leather industry produce huge solid keratinous waste and chromium contaminated wastewater. In this study, a sponge is obtained from keratinous waste that is tested to remove chromium from wastewater. Removal experiments are carried out at simulated leather industry discharge conditions. Characteristics features of sponge are; its multimodal pore structure with mesopores of 3.83 nm (BET surface area 5.52 m(2)/g) and 66.5% of macropores as obtained by nitrogen adsorption porosimetry and volume displacement methods, respectively. Removal of chromium was optimized by multivariate method and procedure was applied for removal of chromium from synthetic and real tanning industry wastewater that showed 91% and 87.13% removal efficiency. Langmuir adsorption capacity of 270 mg/g was obtained. Desorption study showed that at pH 10 or above, sponge can be reused, and recovery of chromium is feasible. Sorption mechanism and continuous flow removal experiments were also carried out to understand the interaction and industrial viability of method. Overall finings support 'utilization of solid waste for treatment of liquid waste' which would add into environmentally sustainable production in leather industry. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.	[Hussain, Fayyaz Salih; Memon, Najma] Univ Sindh, Natl Ctr Excellence Analyt Chem, Jamshoro, Pakistan; [Khatri, Zeeshan] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Text Engn, Jamshoro, Pakistan; [Memon, Saima] Univ Sindh, MA Kazi Inst Chem, Jamshoro, Pakistan		Memon, N (corresponding author), Univ Sindh, Natl Ctr Excellence Analyt Chem, Jamshoro, Pakistan.	najma.memon@usindh.edu.pk			National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan	National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan	This project was carried through institutional funds of National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.	Ahmad AA, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V173, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.111; Aktas N, 2005, ENZYME MICROB TECH, V37, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.010; Aluigi A, 2017, MATER DESIGN, V127, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.045; Azargohar R, 2005, MICROPOR MESOPOR MAT, V85, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.018; Canizares-Villanueva R. O., 2000, Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia, V42, P131; Cao JN, 1997, J APPL POLYM SCI, V63, P411, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970124)63:4<411::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-U; Cheung KH, 2007, INT BIODETER BIODEGR, V59, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.05.002; CODERCH L, 1992, TEXT RES J, V62, P302, DOI 10.1177/004051759206200508; Coulombe PA, 2002, CURR OPIN CELL BIOL, V14, P110, DOI 10.1016/S0955-0674(01)00301-5; de Guzman RC, 2011, BIOMATERIALS, V32, P8205, DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.054; Dou Y, 2015, RSC ADV, V5, P27168, DOI 10.1039/c4ra15469j; Fraser RDB, 2011, J STRUCT BIOL, V173, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.09.020; FRASER RDB, 1986, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V83, P1179, DOI 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1179; Fraser RDB, 1996, INT J BIOL MACROMOL, V19, P207, DOI 10.1016/0141-8130(96)01129-4; GADD GM, 1993, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V11, P353, DOI 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90158-6; Goormaghtigh E, 2006, BIOPHYS J, V90, P2946, DOI 10.1529/biophysj.105.072017; GUTHRIE RE, 1968, AUST J CHEM, V21, P2437, DOI 10.1071/CH9682437; Hamrajani S., 1967, J INDIAN CHEM SOC, V44, P704; HARTLEY FR, 1968, AUST J CHEM, V21, P2723, DOI 10.1071/CH9682723; HARTLEY FR, 1968, AUST J CHEM, V21, P1013, DOI 10.1071/CH9681013; Hojo N., 1958, SEN I GAKKAISHI, V14, DOI [10.2115/fiber.14.953, DOI 10.2115/FIBER.14.953]; ISHIKAWA S, 1998, BIOTECHNOLOGY FUELS, V70, P719; Janssen LJJ, 2002, CHEM ENG J, V85, P137, DOI 10.1016/S1385-8947(01)00218-2; Katoh K, 2004, BIOMATERIALS, V25, P4255, DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.018; Kong J, 2007, ACTA BIOCH BIOPH SIN, V39, P549, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00320.x; Lyman DJ, 2001, APPL SPECTROSC, V55, P552, DOI 10.1366/0003702011952343; Maclaren J., 1981, WOOL SCI; Manich AM, 2005, J THERM ANAL CALORIM, V82, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10973-005-0851-y; Marti M, 2007, J APPL POLYM SCI, V104, P545, DOI 10.1002/app.25586; Martinez-Hernandez AL, 2005, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V23, P162; Mazotto AM, 2017, LWT-FOOD SCI TECHNOL, V84, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.077; MENEFEE E, 1965, TEXT RES J, V35, P801, DOI 10.1177/004051756503500904; NEUHOFF V, 1985, ELECTROPHORESIS, V6, P427, DOI 10.1002/elps.1150060905; Panesar PS, 2008, BIOCHEM ENG J, V39, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.017; Parbhu AN, 1999, BIOCHEMISTRY-US, V38, P11755, DOI 10.1021/bi990746d; PHILLIPS DG, 1985, TEXT RES J, V55, P171, DOI 10.1177/004051758505500306; Posati T, 2016, MATER DESIGN, V110, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.017; Rad ZP, 2012, J AEROSOL SCI, V51, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.04.007; Rajasimman M, 2010, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V41, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2009.04.010; SPEI M, 1989, COLLOID POLYM SCI, V267, P549, DOI 10.1007/BF01416064; Suyama K, 1996, APPL BIOCHEM BIOTECH, V57-8, P67, DOI 10.1007/BF02941689; Tao SSH, 1999, FOOD ADDIT CONTAM A, V16, P465, DOI 10.1080/026520399283759; Wang B, 2016, PROG MATER SCI, V76, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.001; Wang JL, 2009, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V27, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002; Wang K, 2016, GREEN CHEM, V18, P476, DOI 10.1039/c5gc01254f; Wojciechowska E, 2000, J MOL STRUCT, V555, P397, DOI 10.1016/S0022-2860(00)00626-8; WORTMANN FJ, 1993, J APPL POLYM SCI, V48, P137, DOI 10.1002/app.1993.070480114; WU YJ, 1982, CELL, V31, P693, DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90324-5; Zhang YQ, 2014, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V62, P2745, DOI 10.1021/jf405498k	49	11	11	2	17	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	2352-1864			ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO	Environ. Technol. Innov.	NOV	2020	20								101120	10.1016/j.eti.2020.101120	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101120			13	Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PC6WP					2022-09-08	WOS:000597139100007
J	Naderi, M				Naderi, Mostafa			Assessing level of water resources management based on water supply and availability concepts	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Level of water resources management; Water availability and supply; Land-use and climate changes; Indicator 6.5.1; United Nations 2030 agenda; Gilan province of Northern Iran	CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACT; GROUNDWATER FOOTPRINT; AQUIFER SYSTEMS; RIVER FLOWS; ADAPTATION; BLUE; HIMALAYAN; WETLAND; MODELS; REGION	Water balance as a common approach has been used so far to qualitatively judge the water resources management in which unsustainability is referred for depleted groundwater storage and reduced river flow. Lack of a clearly defined path, universal methodology and specificity of a concept in literature to quantify the level of water resources management, applicable for different spatio-temporal scales, under supported environmental flow requirement are main criticisms for sustainable water resources management. Thus, this study aims to present a physical metric, based on water availability and supply concepts, to overcome mentioned challenges. It quantifies the level of management (either for surface or ground water) using the ratio of residual volume of available water (available water minus water supply) to initial available water in a given area. Management of nine rivers and Fumanat aquifer in Gilan Province of northern Iran (adopting as a case study) is quantified for the baseline period (1989-2012) and two future (2020-2050) scenarios, S1 (climate change) and S2 (simultaneous land-use and climate changes), under alternatives of available and improved water use efficiencies. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool is used to simulate river flow under two scenarios S1 and S2. Climate change study under three Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP1-1.9, SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5) indicates that temperature (precipitation) will increase (decrease) by 1.4-2.1 degrees C (2.9%-12.31%). Quantified management of rivers and groundwater is minimum in spring (-4.43 to 0.66) and summer (-0.613), respectively, and is maximum in autumn-winter (1) and winter (0.491), respectively. Quantified annual management in rivers (groundwater) is -1.278 to 1 (-0.07) and -0.772 to 1 (0.104) under available and improved water use efficiencies, respectively. Climate and land-use changes will reduce the level of management over the study area in which the reduction is higher for a greater level of warming and scenario S2. Quantified annual management of rivers (groundwater) in scenario S2 under available water use efficiency is -1.34 to 1 (-0.379), -1.45 to 1 (-0.654) and -1.55 to 1 (-0.947) for the SSP1-1.9, SSP2-4.5 and SSP8.5, respectively. Efficiency improvement increases management level under scenario S2; however, three rivers and groundwater will still suffer from mismanagement in the future. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Naderi, Mostafa] Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Dept Earth Sci, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran; [Naderi, Mostafa] Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Res Ctr Basic Sci & Modern Technol RBST, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran		Naderi, M (corresponding author), Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Dept Earth Sci, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran.; Naderi, M (corresponding author), Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Res Ctr Basic Sci & Modern Technol RBST, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran.	m.naderi@iasbs.ac.ir	Naderi, Mostafa/AAA-1610-2022		Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences of Zanjan in Iran	Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences of Zanjan in Iran	The author is thankful for the support of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences of Zanjan in Iran. Help of the Iranian Water Resources Management Company in providing the data is greatly appreciated. The author acknowledges the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP6, and the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output.	Abbasi F., 2015, IRRIGATION EFFICIENC, P1; Abbaspour KC, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007615; Aghsaei H, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V712, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136449; Akbari S., 2016, REPORT STAT EC SOCIA, P1; Al-Kalbani MS, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1345, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0864-4; Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x; Arora H., 2017, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, P969, DOI [10.1061/9780784414767.ch33, DOI 10.1061/9780784414767.CH33]; Ashofteh PS, 2015, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000540; Azadi F, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P401, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-2109-z; Bertule M, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10121744; Buytaert W, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P841, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-9994-3; Charkhabi AH, 2006, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V15, P395; Charlton MB, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.012; Charnay B, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V48, P189, DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9683-7; Chen XC, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V586, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.197; Chen Y, 2016, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V60, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.048; Esnault L, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P4953, DOI 10.1002/2013WR014792; Falkenmark M, 2010, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V136, P606, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000118; Farinosi F, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P993, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001198; Ghafouri M, 2010, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V84, P240, DOI 10.1007/s00128-009-9897-z; Gharbia SS, 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0210-y; Gleeson T, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044010; Golfam P, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P3401, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02307-7; Golfam P, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P2867, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02274-z; Hadinia H, 2017, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V8, P177, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2016.025; Hoekstra A. Y., 2011, WATER FOOTPRINT ASSE; Hoekstra AY, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V129, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.012; Huang JP, 2016, CLIM DYNAM, V46, P1131, DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2636-8; Iizumi T, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC A, V370, P1121, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2011.0305; Kallioras A, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V74, P83, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4582-5; Kourgialas NN, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.308; Loaiciga H.A., 2017, J IRRIGAT DRAIN ENG, V143, P1; Lutz AF, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P3988, DOI 10.1002/joc.4608; Marino M.A., 2015, J HYDROL ENG, V20, P1; Mayer A, 2009, GEOGR COMPASS, V3, P1176, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00239.x; Merabtene T, 2002, HYDROL PROCESS, V16, P2189, DOI 10.1002/hyp.1150; Modaberi H., 2020, IRAN J SOIL WATER RE, V51, P2501; Modaberi H., 2019, IRAN WATER RESOUR RE, V15, P91; Moghadam SH, 2019, J HYDROL ENG, V24, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001801; Mohammed R, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P3557, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1685-7; N_aschen K., 2019, SUSTAIN BASEL, V11, P1; Naderi M, 2020, HYDROGEOL J, V28, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s10040-020-02159-1; Naderi M, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P552, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1704761; Naderi M, 2018, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V4, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s40899-018-0245-5; Naderi M, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-016-5525-5; Nath B, 2020, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9020134; Nematollahi MJ, 2018, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V190, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-6543-4; O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016; Oeurng C, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030618; Pascual-Ferrer J, 2014, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V30, P572, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2013.843410; Pires A, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V578, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217; Ragettli S, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P9222, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606526113; Ratnayaka D.D., 2009, WATER SUPPLY; Raziei T, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P1226, DOI 10.1002/joc.2347; Richter BD, 2012, RIVER RES APPL, V28, P1312, DOI 10.1002/rra.1511; Rodrigues DBB, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P7187, DOI 10.1002/2013WR014274; Salamat A., 2005, IRAN J AGR SCI NAT R, V12, P71; Sharda VN, 2009, HYDROLOG SCI J, V54, P1018, DOI 10.1623/hysj.54.6.1018; Simha P, 2017, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V3, P283, DOI 10.1007/s40899-017-0095-6; United Nations, 2018, WATER SUSTAINABLE DE, P10017; van Vliet MTH, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.002; Vanham D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056; Vatandoost M, 2018, DATA BRIEF, V18, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.058; Veettil AV, 2016, J HYDROL, V542, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.032; Xianglian Li, 2009, Frontiers of Earth Science in China, V3, P198, DOI 10.1007/s11707-009-0029-1; Xue YK, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P2173, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<2173:TIODIT>2.0.CO;2; Zeng N, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1537, DOI 10.1126/science.286.5444.1537	67	3	3	3	13	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 10	2021	305								127086	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127086	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127086		APR 2021	20	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	SJ6YY					2022-09-08	WOS:000655679200009
J	Koehler, J; Thomson, P; Goodall, S; Katuva, J; Hope, R				Koehler, Johanna; Thomson, Patrick; Goodall, Susanna; Katuva, Jacob; Hope, Rob			Institutional pluralism and water user behavior in rural Africa	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Risk; Water user behavior; Cultural theory; Professionalization; Rural water sustainability; Kenya		The Sustainable Development Goal of providing everyone with safe and reliable drinking water services combines a moral imperative with an entrepreneurial opportunity. We examine water user behavior in the face of institutional change brought about by a professional service provider maintaining rural water infrastructure in Kenya. We ask (1) which factors are associated with households and waterpoint user groups contracting a service provider that guarantees rapid repairs; (2) how do factors vary between different management cultures defined by cultural theory of risk; and (3) can the professional service provider address the risk factors? By applying the cultural theory of risk framework, we capture the institutional diversity of community, public, private and failed management on the ground in dealing with operational, financial, institutional and environmental risks. To identify the factors associated with institutional change towards a pluralist arrangement - enabled by the professional maintenance service provider incubated in rural Kenya - we model data from 1215 households at actively managed handpumps with sensor data from daily handpump usage and community responses to this entrepreneurial approach. The predictors of behavior change of rural water users to commit to the new service provider include organizational factors of managing payments, affordability, and operational factors such as distance and water quality, which vary in importance across the management cultures. This learning can be harnessed to reduce risk and inform future policy and practice. As professional maintenance services for rural water infrastructure are emerging across Africa, which promise to increase value for rural water users, government, and investors through performance-based contracts, it is important for policymakers and implementers to understand which factors predict shifts in institutional behavior by water users. This research recommends seeking cooperative solutions across systems, where current policy effectively separates communities from the state or markets. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.y	[Koehler, Johanna] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, De Boelelaan 1111, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Koehler, Johanna; Thomson, Patrick; Katuva, Jacob; Hope, Rob] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England; [Koehler, Johanna; Thomson, Patrick; Goodall, Susanna; Katuva, Jacob; Hope, Rob] Univ Oxford, Smith Sch Enterprise & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England; [Goodall, Susanna] Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Ashby Rd, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England		Koehler, J (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, De Boelelaan 1111, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.	johanna.koehler@vu.nl; patrick.thomson@ouce.ox.ac.uk; s.goodall@lboro.ac.uk; jacob.katuva@spc.ox.ac.uk; robert.hope@ouce.ox.ac.uk		Koehler, Johanna/0000-0002-9045-4844	Rural Focus Ltd (Kenya); UPGro programme on 'Groundwater Risk Management for Growth and Development' - UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M008894/1]; UK Economic and Social Research Council; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; 'Mobile payment systems to reduce rural water risks in Africa' project - UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N000137/1]; University of Oxford Global Challenges Research Fund QR funding; UK Aid from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) [201880]; ESRC [ES/N000137/1, ES/S008179/1] Funding Source: UKRI; NERC [NE/M008894/1] Funding Source: UKRI	Rural Focus Ltd (Kenya); UPGro programme on 'Groundwater Risk Management for Growth and Development' - UK Natural Environment Research Council; UK Economic and Social Research Council(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)); UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; 'Mobile payment systems to reduce rural water risks in Africa' project - UK Economic and Social Research Council; University of Oxford Global Challenges Research Fund QR funding; UK Aid from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO); ESRC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)); NERC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC))	The authors are grateful to Government of Kenya staff in the National Ministry of Water, Sanitation and Irrigation, the Water Sector Trust Fund, the Water Services Regulatory Board, Kwale County Government, as well as the team of 25 enumerators for their support for the study. Rural Focus Ltd (Kenya) supported the study logistics. The authors are deeply grateful to Professor Steve Rayner, who supported this work for several years. We are also grateful to Dr Paola Ballon, Dr Janina Steinert, Dr Stefania Innocenti, Dr Alexander Fischer, Dr Tim Foster, Dr Nina Doering, Dr Maximilian Zott, Patrick Moran, and Nancy Gladstone, who provided valuable comments for this article. The corresponding author is also extremely grateful for the valuable feedback received for this paper by the participants of the 9th Mary Douglas Seminar at University College London and the 2nd Sustainability and Development Conference at the University of Michigan.; We also acknowledge financial support from the UPGro programme on 'Groundwater Risk Management for Growth and Development' (NE/M008894/1) funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council, the UK Economic and Social Research Council and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, the 'Mobile payment systems to reduce rural water risks in Africa' project (ES/N000137/1) funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, as well as the University of Oxford Global Challenges Research Fund QR funding. This document is also an output from the REACH programme funded by UK Aid from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) for the benefit of developing countries (Programme Code 201880). However, the views expressed and information contained in it are not necessarily those of or endorsed by FCDO, which can accept no responsibility for such views or information or for any reliance placed on them.	Aggarwal RM, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P1481, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00030-9; Agrawal A, 1999, CAPRI WORKSH DEV PRO; Banerjee SG, 2011, DIR DEV, P1, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8457-2, 10.1007/978-3-642-22371-6_1]; Baumann E., 2013, 3 HANDPUMPS REVOLUTI, P12; Biggs S, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P1743, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00143-8; Black M., 1998, LEARNING WHAT WORKS; Brinkerhoff DW, 2018, GOVERNANCE, V31, P103, DOI 10.1111/gove.12271; BRISCOE J, 1993, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V8, P47, DOI 10.1093/wbro/8.1.47; Carter R., 2008, APPL GROUNDWATER STU, P25; Castilla-Rho JC, 2017, NAT HUM BEHAV, V1, P640, DOI 10.1038/s41562-017-0181-7; Chuang F, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P4034, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1916936117; Dercon S, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.09.009; Dercon S, 2014, J DEV ECON, V106, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.09.006; Doe S. R., 2004, Community Development Journal, V39, P360, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsh032; Douglas M., 1994, RISK BLAME ESSAYS CU; Douglas Mary., 1996, THOUGHT STYLES; Falkingham J, 2002, MEASURING HLTH POVER, V44; Ferrer N, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V694, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133634; Foster T, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P1473, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019634; Foster T, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.302; Foster T, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P12037, DOI 10.1021/es402086n; Foster T, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V47, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.026; Grimen H, 1999, ROUTLEDGE/ECPR STUD, V11, P103; Gyawali D, 2016, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V47, P179, DOI 10.19088/1968-2016.192; Hanchett S, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P43, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500219; Harvey P, 2004, RURAL WATER SUPPLY A; Hood C., 2001, GOVT RISK UNDERSTAND; Hope R, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P664, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.170; Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators, 2017, REVISED LIST GLOBAL; Katuva J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176943; Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2019, KEN POP HOUS CENS; Koehler J., 2019, 1 UPT CONS; Koehler J., 2016, 7 FOR RUR WAT SUPP; Koehler J, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.006; Koehler J, 2018, GEOFORUM, V92, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.018; Koehler J, 2015, WORLD DEV, V74, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.020; Kosec K, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017; Lach D, 2006, GLOB ISS SER, P226; Langenegger O., 1989, DEV WATER SCI, V39, P531; Luoto J, 2014, J DEV ECON, V110, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.02.010; MacAllister DJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14839-3; Marris C, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x; McCommon C., 1990, COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT; Mwihaki N. J, 2018, WATER POLICY; Nagel C, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P14292, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04077; Narayan-Parker D., 1988, PEOPLE PUMPS AGENCIE; Ney S, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN C, V33, P1679, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614450; Nowicki S, 2020, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41545-020-0062-x; O'Riordan T, 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V9, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00030-2; Oluoko-Odingo AA, 2011, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V101, P1, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.532739; Peters I, 2012, 12 DIIS; RAYNER S, 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES OF RISK, P83; Rayner S., 1984, RISK ANAL, P150; RAYNER S, 1988, RULES DECISIONS INEQ, P20; REACH, 2016, FUNDIFIX MODEL MAINT; Republic of Kenya, 2016, WATER ACT; Smith S, 1978, NOMADIC ALTERNATIVE, P75; Sorenson SB, 2011, SOC SCI MED, V72, P1522, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.010; SSEE, 2015, 3 SSEE; Tansey J., 1999, HEALTH RISK SOC, V1, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13698579908407008, 10.1080/13698579908407008]; Thomas EA, 2016, BROKEN PUMPS AND PROMISES: INCENTIVIZING IMPACT IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28643-3_1; Thompson M., 1990, CULTURAL THEORY; Thomson P, 2016, AQUAT PR, V6, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.06.010; Thomson P, 2012, J HYDROINFORM, V14, P829, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2012.183; Tole M, 1997, P RAB S; Verweij M, 2006, PUBLIC ADMIN, V84, P817, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1; Vyas S, 2006, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V21, P459, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czl029; WASREB, 2015, IMPACT PERFORMANCE R; WaterAid, 2013, HANDPUMPS TECHNICAL; Weber EU, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P332, DOI 10.1002/wcc.41; Welle K, 2016, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V47, P41, DOI 10.19088/1968-2016.105; Whaley L., 2017, WATER RESOURCES RURA, V9, P56, DOI [10.1016/j.wrr.2017.04.001, DOI 10.1016/J.WRR.2017.04.001]; Whaley L, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab35be; WHITTINGTON D, 1990, WORLD DEV, V18, P269, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(90)90052-Y; WHO/UNICEF, 2020, INT GUID 19 MAR 2010; WHO/UNICEF, 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER; WILDAVSKY A, 1987, AM POLIT SCI REV, V81, P3, DOI 10.2307/1960776; Wold, 2013, CHANGING ENV HUMAN S, P424	78	5	5	2	9	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	APR	2021	140								105231	10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105231	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105231		FEB 2021	14	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	QK8SQ		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000620650300039
J	Jan, AA; Lai, FW; Tahir, M				Jan, Ahmad Ali; Lai, Fong-Woon; Tahir, Muhammad			Developing an Islamic Corporate Governance framework to examine sustainability performance in Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Shariah governance; Institutional ownership; Financial performance; Content analysis	SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; BOARD COMPOSITION; COMMERCIAL-BANKS; LISTED COMPANIES; CSR DISCLOSURES; AGENCY COSTS; QUALITY; FIRM; DETERMINANTS	Academic and industry interest in sustainable development has increased significantly, which is evident from the number of publications in recent years. To develop the field further, this study conceptualizes a framework to establish the nexus of Islamic Corporate Governance (ICG) and Sustainability Performance (SP) in Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions (IBFIs). Although strong corporate governance practices are crucial for maintaining financial stability and development. Nevertheless, scant practical guidance is available on how multidimensional functions of Islamic CG affect the IBFIs' sustainability performance. A conscientious examination of the extant ICG literature facilitates the development of a research framework consisting of several research propositions. This study has derived the most influential Islamic CG mechanisms from the theoretical perspective of Agency Theory, Institutional Theory, and Legitimacy Theory and established their relationship with sustainability performance. Explicitly, this research focuses primarily on the key elements of Islamic corporate governance namely Shariah board attributes and ownership structure and aims to examine its impact on economic, social, and environmental SP. This study posits the ordinary least square (OLS) for the anticipated analysis. This study offers a rationale way for future research. In theory, Islamic CG's impact on sustainability performance has been elusive and needs more academic consideration. In this study, a total number of six propositions were developed to provide responsible decision-making opportunities to enhance sustainability performance. The research framework and propositions were developed to address the need for Islamic corporate governance procedures to encourage sustainable banking for maintaining financial stability and sustainable growth. This research is likely to add to the existing developmental plans of the Islamic development bank and other concerned authorities in addressing sustainability-related issues. This study provides policy insights to policymakers, practitioners, and corporate boards of the IBFIs to promote sustainable and cleaner operations through Islamic corporate governance. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that extends the current literature by establishing the nexus of Islamic corporate governance and triple bottom line performance in IBFIs.	[Jan, Ahmad Ali; Lai, Fong-Woon] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Management & Human, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia; [Tahir, Muhammad] Comsats Univ Islamabad, Dept Management Sci, Abbottabad Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan		Jan, AA (corresponding author), Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Management & Human, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.	ahmad.alijan91@gmail.com	Tahir, Muhammad/AAC-6226-2021; JAN, AHMAD ALI/AAX-8067-2021	JAN, AHMAD ALI/0000-0003-0127-1024	Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS	Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS	The authors are immensely grateful to Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for providing financial support. The authors would also like to thank the four anonymous reviewers, Associate Editor Dr Chew Tin Lee, and Executive Editor Dr Zhifu Mi for their helpful guidance throughout the review process.	Abd Rahman NHW, 2011, SOC RESPONSIB J, V7, P181, DOI 10.1108/17471111111141486; Abd Razak A, 2018, ISRA INT J ISLAMIC F, V10, P36, DOI 10.1108/IJIF-08-2017-0020; Abu-Tapanjeh A. M., 2009, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V20, P556, DOI [10.1016/j.cpa.2007.12.004, DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2007.12.004]; Adel C, 2019, INT J ACCOUNT INF MA, V27, P301, DOI 10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118; Ajili H, 2018, INT J ISLAMIC MIDDLE, V11, P470, DOI 10.1108/IMEFM-05-2017-0131; Aktas R., 2013, INT J EC FINANCE, V5, P113, DOI [DOI 10.5539/IJEF.V5N3P113, 10.5539/ijef.v5n3p113]; ALFOUL BA, 2006, DIGEST MIDDLE E STUD, V15, P1; Allegrini M, 2013, J MANAG GOV, V17, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3; Alnasser SAS, 2012, HUMANOMICS, V28, P220, DOI 10.1108/08288661211258110; Ameer R, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V108, P61, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y; Aras G, 2008, MANAGE DECIS, V46, P433, DOI 10.1108/00251740810863870; Arena C, 2015, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V22, P346, DOI 10.1002/csr.1350; Baah C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119125; Arcay MRB, 2005, ADV ACCOUNT, V21, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21013-1; BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173; Bastas A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.110; Ben Zeineb G, 2018, MANAG FINANC, V44, P551, DOI 10.1108/MF-05-2017-0186; Bose S, 2018, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V35, P501, DOI 10.1007/s10490-017-9528-x; Buallay A, 2019, INT J ISLAMIC MIDDLE, V12, P216, DOI 10.1108/IMEFM-07-2017-0172; Bukhari KS, 2013, MANAG RES REV, V36, P400, DOI 10.1108/01409171311315003; Campbell D, 2011, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V43, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2010.11.002; Cheng ECM, 2006, INT J ACCOUNT, V41, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001; Denis DK, 2003, J FINANC QUANT ANAL, V38, P1, DOI 10.2307/4126762; DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P147, DOI 10.2307/2095101; Dissanayake D, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V129, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.086; Dusuki A.W., 2007, AM J ISLAMIC SOCIAL, V24, P25; Elgattani T, 2020, J FINANC REPORT ACCO, V18, P1, DOI 10.1108/JFRA-03-2019-0040; Elkington, 1997, TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE E, P2; Eng L.L., 2003, J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC, V22, P325, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1; Ricart JE, 2005, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V5, P24, DOI 10.1108/14720700510604670; FAMA EF, 1983, J LAW ECON, V26, P327, DOI 10.1086/467038; Farag H, 2018, J INT FINANC MARK I, V54, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002; Ganapathy E., 2017, INDIAN J CORPORATE G, V10, P24; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2014, MANAGE DECIS, V52, P1014, DOI 10.1108/MD-09-2013-0446; GEDAJLOVIC E, 1993, ORGAN STUD, V14, P731, DOI 10.1177/017084069301400507; Ghazali N. A. M., 2006, J INT ACCOUNTING AUD, V15, P226, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INTACCAUDTAX.2006.08.001; Giannarakis G, 2014, INT J LAW MANAG, V56, P393, DOI 10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021; Giannarakis G, 2014, SOC RESPONSIB J, V10, P569, DOI 10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008; Grassa R, 2016, J MANAG GOV, V20, P875, DOI 10.1007/s10997-015-9322-4; Grassa Rihab., 2016, INT J ACCOUNTING AUD, V12, P360, DOI [10.1504/IJAAPE.2016.079862, DOI 10.1504/IJAAPE.2016.079862]; Guthrie J., 1989, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V19, P343, DOI [10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863, DOI 10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863]; Hamad S, BUS MANAG STRAT, V10, P265; Hamad S, 2020, SAGE OPEN, V10, DOI 10.1177/2158244020927431; Haniffa R.M., 2005, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V24, P391, DOI [10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2005.06.001, DOI 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001]; Hashim F, 2015, PROC ECON FINANC, V31, P36, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01129-6; Hassan M.K., 2013, SUSTAINABLE SOCIALLY; Hassan MK, 2018, BUS ETHICS, V27, P248, DOI 10.1111/beer.12185; Htay S.N.N., 2012, ASIAN J FINANCE ACCO, V4, P1, DOI [10.5296/ajfa.v4i1.810, DOI 10.5296/AJFA.V4I1.810]; Hussain N, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V149, P411, DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5; Islam MS, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V217, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.259; Jan A, 2019, INT J ASIAN BUS INF, V10, P73, DOI 10.4018/IJABIM.2019040104; Jan A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.208; Jan A, 2019, ECON CHANG RESTRUCT, V52, P67, DOI 10.1007/s10644-017-9220-7; Jan Amin., 2018, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V13, DOI [10.5539/ijbm.v13n11p61, DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V13N11P61]; Janggu T, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V145, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020; JENSEN MC, 1976, J FINANC ECON, V3, P305, DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X; Jizi MI, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V125, P601, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2; Kamardin H, 2014, DEV CORP GOV RESPONS, V6, P47, DOI 10.1108/S2043-052320140000006002; Khan H.Z., 2014, CORPORATE OWNERSHIP, V11, P507, DOI [10.22495/cocv11i4c6p1, DOI 10.22495/COCV11I4C6P1]; Khan MHUZ, 2011, SOC RESPONSIB J, V7, P347, DOI 10.1108/17471111111154509; Khan MHUZ, 2010, INT J LAW MANAG, V52, P82, DOI 10.1108/17542431011029406; Kolsi MC, 2017, INT J ISLAMIC MIDDLE, V10, P2, DOI 10.1108/IMEFM-07-2015-0076; Kor YY, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P489, DOI 10.1002/smj.459; Kumar S, 2015, SMALL ENTERP RES, V22, P99, DOI 10.1080/13215906.2015.1036504; Lai F.W, 2015, CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; Lai F. W., 2017, GLOBAL BUSINESS MANA, V9; Lewis M. K., 2005, REV ISLAMIC EC, V9, P5; Lindblom C.K, 1994, IMPLICATIONS ORG LEG, V120; LIPTON M, 1992, BUS LAWYER, V48, P59; Loayza, 1999, FINANCIAL INTERMEDIA; Matoussi H., 2012, EC RES FORUM, V734, P2; Merino E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010158; Michelon G, 2012, J MANAG GOV, V16, P477, DOI 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3; Miglietta F, 2011, COMP SOCIALLY RESPON; Milne M. J., 2002, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V15, P372, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570210435889; Moerman L, 2005, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V18, P374, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570510600747; Mollah S, 2017, J FINANC SERV RES, V51, P195, DOI 10.1007/s10693-016-0245-2; Morioka SN, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104; Muthuri JN, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V98, P467, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0588-9; Naciti V, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727; Naser K., 2006, ADV INT ACCOUNTING, V19, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0897-3660(06)19001-7, 10.1016/S0897-3660(06)19001-7]; Odenius Jurgen., 2008, 08179 IMF; Pellegrini M., 2006, CORP GOV-OXFORD; Post C, 2011, BUS SOC, V50, P189, DOI 10.1177/0007650310394642; Prior M, 2001, POLIT COMMUN, V18, P335, DOI 10.1080/10584600152400374; Rao KK, 2012, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V12, P143, DOI 10.1108/14720701211214052; Rebai S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.129; Rosati F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107; Rupley KH, 2012, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V31, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002; Saha A. K., 2013, J APPL MANAGEMENT AC, V11, P45, DOI DOI 10.1108/17471110910964496; Said R, 2009, SOC RESPONSIB J, V5, P212, DOI 10.1108/17471110910964496; Saleh M, 2010, MANAG AUDIT J, V25, P591, DOI 10.1108/02686901011054881; Schucking H., 2011, BANKROLLING CLIMATE; Shad MK, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P22511, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08398-9; Singh M, 2003, J BANK FINANC, V27, P793, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00260-6; Sobhani F. A., 2011, WORLD J SOCIAL SCI, V1, P69; Song J, 2015, INT J RES MARK, V32, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.03.005; Tahir M, 2020, J CHIN ECON FOREIGN, V13, P97, DOI 10.1108/JCEFTS-01-2020-0005; Tahir M, 2020, APPL ECON LETT, V27, P633, DOI 10.1080/13504851.2020.1728223; Tahir M, 2019, ECON SYST, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ecosys.2019.100702; Thomsen S, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P689, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200006)21:6<689::AID-SMJ115>3.0.CO;2-Y; Ullah S, 2014, BUS ETHICS, V23, P218, DOI 10.1111/beer.12045; Vafeas N, 1999, J FINANC ECON, V53, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5; Walls JL, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P885, DOI 10.1002/smj.1952; Wu MW, 2013, J BANK FINANC, V37, P3529, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023; Zahid M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118683; ZAHRA SA, 1989, J MANAGE, V15, P291, DOI 10.1177/014920638901500208; Zaid MAA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652	108	14	14	6	10	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 15	2021	315								128099	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099		JUN 2021	14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XN0AX					2022-09-08	WOS:000729179000002
J	Ibn-Mohammed, T; Mustapha, KB; Godsell, J; Adamu, Z; Babatunde, KA; Akintade, DD; Acquaye, A; Fujii, H; Ndiaye, MM; Yamoah, FA; Koh, SCL				Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Mustapha, K. B.; Godsell, J.; Adamu, Z.; Babatunde, K. A.; Akintade, D. D.; Acquaye, A.; Fujii, H.; Ndiaye, M. M.; Yamoah, F. A.; Koh, S. C. L.			A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						COVID-19; Circular economy; Sustainability; Sustainable development; Supply chain resilience; Climate change	HEALTH-CARE WASTE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; PERIURBAN AGRICULTURE; EMBODIED EMISSIONS; MANAGEMENT; URBAN; SUSTAINABILITY; DESIGN	The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on the 11th of March 2020, but the world is still reeling from its aftermath. Originating from China, cases quickly spread across the globe, prompting the implementation of stringent measures by world governments in efforts to isolate cases and limit the transmission rate of the virus. These measures have however shattered the core sustaining pillars of the modern world economies as global trade and cooperation succumbed to nationalist focus and competition for scarce supplies. Against this backdrop, this paper presents a critical review of the catalogue of negative and positive impacts of the pandemic and proffers perspectives on how it can be leveraged to steer towards a better, more resilient low-carbon economy. The paper diagnosed the danger of relying on pandemic-driven benefits to achieving sustainable development goals and emphasizes a need for a decisive, fundamental structural change to the dynamics of how we live. It argues for a rethink of the present global economic growth model, shaped by a linear economy system and sustained by profiteering and energy-gulping manufacturing processes, in favour of a more sustainable model recalibrated on circular economy (CE) framework. Building on evidence in support of CE as a vehicle for balancing the complex equation of accomplishing profit with minimal environmental harms, the paper outlines concrete sector-specific recommendations on CE-related solutions as a catalyst for the global economic growth and development in a resilient post-COVID-19 world.	[Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Godsell, J.] Univ Warwick, Warwick Mfg Grp WMG, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England; [Mustapha, K. B.] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn & Sci, Malaysia Campus, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia; [Adamu, Z.] London South Bank Univ, Sch Built Environm & Architecture, London SE1 0AA, England; [Babatunde, K. A.] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Econ & Management, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia; [Babatunde, K. A.] Al Hikmah Univ, Fac Management Sci, Dept Econ, Ilorin, Nigeria; [Akintade, D. D.] Univ Nottingham, Sch Life Sci, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England; [Acquaye, A.] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7PE, Kent, England; [Fujii, H.] Kyushu Univ, Fac Econ, Nishi Ku, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan; [Ndiaye, M. M.] Amer Univ Sharjah, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates; [Yamoah, F. A.] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Management, London WC1E 7JL, England; [Koh, S. C. L.] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Univ Management Sch SUMS, Sheffield S10 1FL, S Yorkshire, England		Ibn-Mohammed, T (corresponding author), Univ Warwick, Warwick Mfg Grp WMG, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.	t.ibn-mohammed@warwick.ac.uk	Akintade, Damilare/AAW-4753-2020; Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq/AAE-3181-2021; Mustapha, Khameel B./AAU-8335-2020; Fujii, Hidemichi/E-8261-2014	Akintade, Damilare/0000-0002-1383-2522; Mustapha, Khameel B./0000-0002-9905-9162; Fujii, Hidemichi/0000-0002-3043-1122; Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq/0000-0003-2454-0303; Yamoah, Fred/0000-0001-6368-7952; Ndiaye, Malick/0000-0003-4181-074X; Acquaye, Adolf/0000-0003-0430-2498				Abbas Elmualim S.M., 2018, UNMAK WASTE PRODUCT; Abiose A., 2022, COVID 19 TOURISM IND, P7; ACI, 2020, POL BRIEF COVID 19 R; Acquaye A, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V187, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.059; Ahmed F, 2020, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, pE240, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30085-2; Air Transport Bureau, 2020, EFF NOV COR COVID 19; Akgun EZ, 2019, TRANSPORT POLICY, V75, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.009; Allan J., 2020, 2001 OXF SMITH SCH E; Allison A.L., 2020, ENV DANGERS EMPLOYIN; American Geriatrics Society, 2020, J AM GERIATRICS SOC; Anderson RM, 2020, LANCET, V395, P931, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5; Andrew A., 2020, CHALLENGES ADOPTING; Ang BW, 2005, ENERG POLICY, V33, P867, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010; Antikainen M, 2018, PROC CIRP, V73, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.027; Arafat S.Y., 2020, PSYCHIAT RES; Galvao GDA, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105060; Ardente F, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.022; Artola I., 2016, STUDY ITRE COMMITTEE, P72; ARUP, 2020, TRANSF REUS LOW CARB; Atelge MR, 2020, FUEL, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117494; Aubrecht P., 2020, CENTRALIZED DECENTRA; Auffhammer M., 2020, COVID 19 REDUCES ECO; Ayambire RA, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V84, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.004; Bachman D., 2020, COVID 19 COULD AFFEC; Baldwin R., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC, P111; Baseler L, 2017, ANNU REV PATHOL-MECH, V12, P387, DOI 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100506; Basilaia G., 2020, GEORGIA PEDAG RES; Bauwens T, 2020, ECOL ECON, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703; Bayram M., 2020, OMICS J INTEGRAT BIO; Becque R., 2016, POLITICAL EC CIRCULA, P1; Beretta C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V147, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.023; Bloom DE, 2019, FRONT IMMUNOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00549; Bloom David E, 2004, SCRIPTA VARIA, V106, P304; Bocken NMP, 2016, J IND PROD ENG, V33, P308, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124; Bown C.P., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC, P31; Bradsher K, 2020, ROOM IT HAPPENED; Bramanti B, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2429; Braungart M, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1337, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003; Bretscher L., 2020, SUPPLY CHANNEL UNCER; Browne M., 2005, URBAN FREIGHT CONSOL; Rubio-Romero JC, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104830; Carra G., 2017, ARUP BAM, P1; Carrillo-Hermosilla J, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1073, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014; Castane S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V167, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.121; Chandra S., 2020, SPEED SPACE SUSTAINA; Chang H.-H., 2020, COVID 19 DEMAND ONLI; Chen C, 2020, J HOSP INFECT, V105, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.008; Chen Y, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P1996, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.11.031; Chi MM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120962; Cimprich A, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P1344, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12921; Clair A., 2020, HOMES HLTH COVID 19; Company M., 2020, GLOBAL VIEW CONSUMER; Da Silva CE, 2005, WASTE MANAGE, V25, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.03.002; Danieli A., 2020, SECTOR SPECIFIC SHOC; Dannenberg P, 2020, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V111, P543, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12453; Dargaville T, 2020, POLYM DEGRAD STABIL, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109162; Daszak P, 2012, LANCET, V380, P1883, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61887-X; De Cock KM, 2012, AIDS, V26, P1205, DOI 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328354622a; De Gioannis G, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V68, P595, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.013; de Jesus A, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001; De Soete W, 2017, GREEN CHEM, V19, P3493, DOI 10.1039/c7gc00833c; Deloitte, 2020, UND SECT IMP COVID 1, P2; Devakumar D, 2020, LANCET, V395, P1194, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30792-3; Diaz LF, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P1219, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.010; Dilkes-Hoffman LS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V180, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.169; Duflou JR, 2012, CIRP ANN-MANUF TECHN, V61, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002; Duncan-Jones R. P., 1996, JRA, V9, P108, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1047759400016524; Eberhardt L.C.M., 2019, IOP C SERIES MAT SCI; EEA, 2020, ENV NOIS EUR 2020, P1; Ekins P., 2016, RESOURCE EFFICIENCY, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.18978.43204; Eleyan D, 2013, WASTE MANAGE RES, V31, P986, DOI 10.1177/0734242X13490981; EMF, 2019, PLANN EFF TRANSP PEO, P6; EMF, 2020, 10 CIRC INV OPP BUIL, P13; EMF, 2016, CIRC EC IND RETH GRO, P86; EMF, 2020, 10 CIRC INV OPP BUIL, P10; Enkvist P.-A., 2018, CIRCULAR EC POWERFUL; EPRS, 2014, URB PER URB AGR; ESA, 2020, AIR POLL REM LOW EUR; European Commission, 2011, ROADM RES EFF EUR, P26; European Commission (EU-COM), 2020, EUROPEAN ASS ENV RES; Evenett S.J., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC; Fast Company, 2019, IS IT POSS RAIS CARB; Feber D., 2020, SHAPING NEXT NORMAL, P6; Feng KS, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms8714; Fernandes N., 2020, WP1240E IESE BUS SCH, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3557504; Fischer R., 2020, ASSESSMENT N95 RESPI; Ford TE, 2009, EMERG INFECT DIS, V15, P1341, DOI 10.3201/eid1509.081334; Friant MC, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917; Fujii Hidemichi, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P22; Gates B., 2020, CLIM CORONAVIRUS GAT; Gates B, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1677, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2003762; Gatta V, 2019, RES TRANSP ECON, V73, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.12.004; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; Gibbs MJ, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P1842, DOI 10.1126/science.1061662; Girling R., 2011, RUBBISH DIRT OUR HAN; Gondi S, 2020, LANCET; Gopinath G., 2020, LIMITING EC FALLOUT; Govindan K, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P278, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141; Grant MJ, 2009, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V26, P91, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x; Greenhalgh T., 2018, EUR J CLIN INVEST, V48; Guan D., 2020, CBC 0802; Guan D., 2020, CONTAINMENT DIVIDE C; Guerrieri V., 2020, 26918 NBER, DOI 10.3386/w26918; Gungor A, 1999, COMPUT IND ENG, V36, P811, DOI 10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00167-9; Haigh L., 2020, COVID 19 CIRCULAR EC; Hasanat M.W., 2020, ASIAN J MULTIDISCIP, V3, P85; Herrmann C, 2014, INT J PR ENG MAN-GT, V1, P283, DOI 10.1007/s40684-014-0034-z; Hobbs J.E., 2020, CAN J AGR EC REV CAN; Hockley L., 2020, INT AIRPORT REV ONLI; Hoornweg D., 2012, WHAT WASTE GLOBAL RE, DOI 10.1111/febs.13058; Horrox R., 2013, BLACK DEATH; Hotez P.J., 2014, PLOS NEGLECT TROPIC, V8; Hu M.R., 2020, COVID 19 RISK LOCKDO; Huang WW, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V70, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.011; Hussey LK, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P170, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1610350; IATA, 2020, AIR TRANSP COVID 19; Ibn-Mohammed T, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V35, P692, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.027; Ibn-Mohammed T, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V72, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.018; Ibn-Mohammed T, 2013, ENERG BUILDINGS, V66, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.026; Ibn-Mohammed T., 2018, J EUR CER SOC; IEA, 2020, GLOB EN REV 2020 IMP, P1; Ijomah WL, 2010, PROC INST CIV ENG-WA, V163, P157, DOI 10.1680/warm.2010.163.4.157; IMF, 2020, WORLD EC OUTL GREAT, p37 ; Insa E, 2010, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V54, P1048, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.005; Iyengar K., 2020, DIAB METABOL SYNDR C; Jaeger B, 2020, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V33, P729, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047; Janne M., 2019, CONSTR INNOV; Javorcik B., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC; JHU, 2020, MAPS TRENDS NEW CAS; Johansson H., 2017, INT J PHYS DISTRIB L; Kaiser B, 2001, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V109, P205, DOI 10.2307/3434685; Kanda W, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101666; Kane GM, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.030; Kiba-Janiak M, 2019, TRANSP RES PROC, V39, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.017; Kirchherr J, 2018, ECOL ECON, V150, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Klemes JJ, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109883; Koh SCL, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep39514; Korhonen J, 2018, ECOL ECON, V143, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041; Kraemer MUG, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P493, DOI 10.1126/science.abb4218; Laing T., 2020, EC IMPACT CORONAVIRU; Le Quere C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P647, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x; LEE CC, 1991, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V25, P360, DOI 10.1021/es00015a607; Lee GG, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V140, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.012; Lee JW, 2004, LEARNING FROM SARS, P91; Liao L, 2020, ECS J SOLID STATE SC, V9, DOI 10.1149/2162-8777/aba854; Lieder M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V115, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042; Littman R J, 1973, Am J Philol, V94, P243, DOI 10.2307/293979; Liu X., 2020, INFLUEN OTHER RESP V; Livingston E., 2020, SOURCING PERSONAL PR; Lucrezi S, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V121, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.12.003; Lwasa S, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.10.007; Lyche H., 2020, MIGHT DISASTER TRIGG; Mabahwi NAB, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V153, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.056; MacArthur E., 2013, EC; Mahler D.G., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 CORO; Manninen K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003; Marcucci E, 2017, 2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (MT-ITS), P839, DOI 10.1109/MTITS.2017.8005629; Marques G, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15040821; Masiero G, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V80, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.148; McDonough W., 2010, CRADLE CRADLE REMAKI; Mckee M, 2020, NAT MED, V26, P640, DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-0863-y; McKenzie B, 2020, COVID 19 SUPPLY CHAI, V24, P20; McKibbin W, 2021, ASIAN ECON PAP, V20, P1, DOI 10.1162/asep_a_00796; Minunno R, 2018, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/buildings8090125; Moazzami B, 2020, J CLIN VIROL, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104345; Monlau F, 2015, APPL ENERG, V148, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.024; Morlet A., 2016, INTELLIGENT ASSETS U, P1; Morrison A, 2012, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V28, P138, DOI 10.1017/S0266462312000086; Muhammad S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138820; Murray Natasha Evelyn Anne, 2013, Clin Epidemiol, V5, P299, DOI 10.2147/CLEP.S34440; Naidoo R., 2020, RESET SUSTAINABLE DE; NASA, 2020, AIRB NITR DIOX PLUMM; NASUWT, 2022, ADV OUR DISC NOV COR; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 2020, AIRB PART LEV PLUMM, DOI DOI 10.1021/es405348h; National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020, COVID INDUCED ECONOM; Neiman B, 2020, MANY JOBS; OECD, 2018, FIN CLIM FUT RETH IN; Omary MB, 2020, J CLIN INVEST, V130, P2745, DOI 10.1172/JCI138646; Opitz I, 2016, AGR HUM VALUES, V33, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10460-015-9610-2; Oweis R, 2005, WASTE MANAGE, V25, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.03.011; Ozkan A, 2013, WASTE MANAGE RES, V31, P141, DOI 10.1177/0734242X12471578; Paez Arsenio, 2017, J Evid Based Med, DOI [10.1111/jebm.12266, 10.1111/jebm.12265]; Pagoropoulos A, 2017, PROC CIRP, V64, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047; Partelow S, 2015, MAR POLLUT BULL, V100, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.08.026; Paxton NC., 2020, N95 RESP MASKS COVID; PEARCE JM, 2020, F1000RESEARCH, V8, DOI DOI 10.3390/TECHNOLOGIES8020018; Peng J., 2020, AM J INFECT CONTROL, VS0196-6553, P30351; Penn E, 2012, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V147, P615, DOI 10.1177/0194599812450681; PHE, 2020, REV INT IMPR OUTD AI, P1; Piguillem F., 2020, EIEF WORKING PAPERS, P40; Pinheiro MD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145863; Pinner D., 2020, MCKINSEY Q ADDRESSIN, P1; Pitarma R, 2017, J MED SYST, V41, DOI 10.1007/s10916-016-0667-2; Pomponi F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055; Prata JC, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P7760, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c02178; Preston F., 2019, INCLUSIVE CIRCULAR E, P1; Pruss-Ustun A., 1999, SAFE MANAGEMENT WAST; Rai HB, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.210; Rai HB, 2017, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V9, DOI 10.1007/s12544-017-0256-6; Ranganatha J., 2020, REGENERATIVE AGR GOO; Ranney ML, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2006141; Rashid A, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V57, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.012; Rees WE, 2002, NATURE, V420, P267, DOI 10.1038/420267b; Rhodes CJ, 2017, SCI PROGRESS-UK, V100, P80, DOI 10.3184/003685017X14876775256165; Rios FC, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V118, P1296, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485; San Juan DM, 2020, RESPONDING COVID 19; Sarkis J., 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECYC; Sauerwein M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V226, P1138, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.108; Saunders-Hastings PR, 2016, PATHOGENS, V5, DOI 10.3390/pathogens5040066; Schluep M., 2009, RECYCLING FROM E WAS; Sen J., 2013, SUSTAINABLE URBAN PL; Shaheen S, 2020, DEMAND FOR EMERGING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: MODELING ADOPTION, SATISFACTION, AND MOBILITY PATTERNS, P37, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-815018-4.00003-6; Sherwood S, 2000, APPL SOIL ECOL, V15, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00074-3; Shogren J.F., 2020, BENEFITS COSTS FLATT; Sim K, 2020, PSYCHIAT RES, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113015; Siow W.T., 2020, MANAGING COVID 19 RE; Snider-Mcgrath B., 2020, EXERCISE RATES RISE; Snyder H, 2019, J BUS RES, V104, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039; Sohrabi C., 2020, INT J SURG; Solomon MZ, 2020, HASTINGS CENT REP, V50, P3, DOI 10.1002/hast.1093; Spash CL, 2021, GLOBALIZATIONS, V18, P1087, DOI 10.1080/14747731.2020.1761612; Stahel W.R., 2019, CIRCULAR EC USERS GU; Stahel WR, 2016, NATURE, V531, P435, DOI 10.1038/531435a; Stellinger A., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC; Stockholm Resilience Centre, 2016, RESV STOCKH LAN 2015, P1; Sundararajan A., 2020, NYU STERN SCH BUSINE, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3625638, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3625638]; SYSTEMIQ, 2017, ACHIEVING GROWTH 320, P149; Tan Jian'an, 2002, Huan Jing Ke Xue, V23, P1; Temmerman S, 2013, NATURE, V504, P79, DOI 10.1038/nature12859; Thebo AL, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114002; Timmer M., 2012, WORLD INPUT OUTPUT D, P40; Toquero C., 2020, PEDAG RES, V5; Trilla A, 2008, CLIN INFECT DIS, V47, P668, DOI 10.1086/590567; Tudor TL, 2005, WASTE MANAGE, V25, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.10.004; UN DESA, 2020, EV INCL SOC IMP COVI; Van Bavel JJ, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P460, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z; van Buren N, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070647; Voudrias E.A., 2018, HEALTHCARE WASTE MAN; Vousdoukas MI, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P260, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0697-0; Wagner DM, 2014, LANCET INFECT DIS, V14, P319, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70323-2; Wang PF, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814; Watts N, 2018, LANCET, V392, P2479, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32594-7; Watts N, 2018, LANCET, V391, P581, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9; Webster Robert G., 1997, Journal of Infectious Diseases, V176, pS14, DOI 10.1086/514168; White DB, 2020, JAMA; WHO, 2014, SAFE MANAGEMENT WAST, V2nd ed; WHO, 2020, 107 WHO, P1; WHO, 2021, WHO TIMELINE COVID 1; Williamson J., 2020, EVERY UK MANUFACTURE; Windapo AO, 2020, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V10, P585, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-04-2019-0041; Windfeld ES, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V163, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.013; Wong HJY, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P5294; WONG KFV, 1994, J ENVIRON HEALTH, V57, P19; World Economic Forum, 2019, VISION SUSTAINABLE B, P1; World Economic Forum, 2020, 2 WORLD EC FOR; Wormer BA, 2013, AM SURGEON, V79, P666; Wosik J, 2020, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, V27, P957, DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067; Xiao YH, 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, V20, P523, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30152-3; Zambrano-Monserrate MA, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813; Zambrano-Monserrate MA, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V157, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.020; Zhou M, 2021, PEDIATR RES, V89, P1192, DOI 10.1038/s41390-020-1023-2	262	188	191	97	368	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	JAN	2021	164								105169	10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169			22	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OW0CD	32982059	Bronze, Green Accepted, Green Published	Y	Y	2022-09-08	WOS:000592565500055
J	Soonsawad, N; Martinez, RM; Schandl, H				Soonsawad, Natthanij; Martinez, Raymundo Marcos; Schandl, Heinz			Material demand, and environmental and climate implications of Australia's building stock: Current status and outlook to 2060	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Material footprint; Sustainable resource management; Spatially explicit analysis; Circular economy; Embodied Greenhouse gas emissions	CONSTRUCTION; FLOWS; FOOTPRINT; SOCIETY	The construction and maintenance of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings are associated with a significant environmental footprint. Resource efficiency and innovation in the built infrastructure sector are essential for achieving sustainable development goals, and timely information is required to support sustain ability policies in cities and towns. Therefore, we estimated the material and environmental footprint of Australian residential, commercial, and industrial buildings in 2016. Our analysis combines spatially explicit gross floor area (GFA) data, building materials per GFA for eleven building types in two construction periods, and estimates of key building materials' emissions, energy, and water footprint. We estimated the material footprint of 8.8 million buildings at 3.8 billion tonnes with associated emissions of 1,804 million tonnes of CO(2)e and consumption of 24,218 terajoules (TJ) of energy and 31.5 billion litres of water. Concrete accounts for 59% of the material footprint, followed by sand and stone, ceramics, and timber with 23%, 8%, and 4%, respectively. Most materials, 70.7%, are in residential buildings, while commercial and industrial buildings account for 24.7% and 4.6%, respectively. By 2060, the projected material demand for new buildings and replacing ageing buildings ranges from 4.3 to 7.5 billion tonnes for alternative population growth scenarios. The upper range of the demand signals a two-fold increase in building materials and associated environmental impacts by 2060. Considering this, if Australia does not change the way construction materials are produced and buildings are designed towards sustainable outcomes, the country may not be able to achieve its net-zero emissions target by 2050.	[Soonsawad, Natthanij; Martinez, Raymundo Marcos; Schandl, Heinz] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia		Soonsawad, N (corresponding author), Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.	natthanij.soonsawad@csiro.au						Augiseau V, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V123, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.002; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, POPULATION PROJECTIO; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2000, AUSTR NAT ACC CONC S; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, AV WEEKL EARN AUSTR; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016, 1270055001 ASGS AUST, V1; Bach V, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051562; Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z; Chen D., 2010, DEV EMBODIED CO2 EMI, V61, P10; Climate Watch, 2021, HIST COUNTR GREENH G; Commonwealth of Australia, 2018, TRAJ LOW EN BUILD; Crawford R.H., 2019, ENV PERFORMANCE CONS, DOI [10.26188/5dc228-f98c5a, DOI 10.26188/5DC228-F98C5A, 10.26188/ 5dc228-f98c5a]; Deetman S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118658; Fishman T, 2014, J IND ECOL, V18, P407, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12114; Fuller RJ, 2011, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V26, P165, DOI 10.1007/s10901-011-9212-2; Geoscience Australia, 2020, NAT EXP INF SYST NEX; Giesekam J, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P423, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872; Haberl H, 2021, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V55, P3368, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c05642; Hammond G., 2008, INVENTORY CARBON ENE, DOI [10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87, DOI 10.1680/ENER.2008.161.2.87]; Kleemann F, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P368, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12446; Krausmann F, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P1880, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1613773114; Lederer J, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125566; Leising E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V176, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010; Mao RC, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P5345, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b07229; Miatto A, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.015; Milios L, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI, V13, P861, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9; Muller E, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P2102, DOI 10.1021/es403506a; Myers RJ, 2019, SCI DATA, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41597-019-0085-7; NDC, 2020, AUSTR NAT DET CONTR; Oborn P., 2020, SURVEY BUILT ENV PRO; OECD, 2021, MAT CONS IND, DOI [10.1787/84971620-en, DOI 10.1787/84971620-EN]; Rock M, 2020, APPL ENERG, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107; Ruuska A, 2013, CARBON FOOTPRINT BUI; Schandl H, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121770; Shi F, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P493, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00523.x; Stephan A, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V129, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.022; Stephan A, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V114, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.043; Tanikawa H, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P778, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12284; Treloar G., 2004, JSTOR, V1, P1; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2020, NEW REPORT BUILDING; United Nations Population Division, 2018, URB POP TOT POP AUST; Walker-Morison A., 2007, ENV DES GUID, V1, P1; Waterfield T., 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 1 5 C; Wiedenhofer D, 2019, ECOL ECON, V156, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.010; Wiedenhofer D, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P538, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12216; Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110; Yu M, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.180	46	0	0	2	2	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	MAY	2022	180								106143	10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106143	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106143			12	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0L5BI					2022-09-08	WOS:000781488300004
J	Swain, B; Lee, J; Gu, BW; Lee, CG; Yoon, JH				Swain, Basudev; Lee, Jieun; Gu, Bon Woo; Lee, Chan-Gi; Yoon, Jin-Ho			Sustainable valorization of semiconductor industry tantalum scrap using non-hazardous HF substitute lixiviant	WASTE MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Tantalum scrap valorization; Tantalum recovery; Waste management; Recycling	RECYCLING PROCESS; RECOVERY; WASTE; GAN	Global tantalum production from mines averages 1800 tons per year and hardly increases, but demand for tantalum in the electronics industry consistently increasing. Globally, 50% of total tantalum produced is being used for tantalum capacitors manufacturing, almost all demand from various industries is mainly met by primary resources only. Tantalum production and supply predominantly dominated by Congo and Rwanda which accounts for > 50%, add disadvantages for the strategic and economic competitiveness of other nations. To address the monopoly dominated by Congo and Rwanda, and the disparity of tantalum primary reserve, exploitation of secondary resources can alternatively address the drawbacks of primary resource distribution. Currently, hardly < 1% of tantalum getting recycled, and the poor recycling rate of tantalum is mainly contributed by the lack of efficient and sustainable valorization technology for recycling tantalum-bearing scraps like electronic capacitors and semiconductor industry tantalum scrap. In the current investigation, a sustainable tantalum extraction process from scrap dominated by hydrometallurgical route has been developed. Tantalum scrap which is passive to leach for tantalum recovery was calcinated for oxidation of TaN content and followed by tantalum has been leached using a mixture of NaF and HCl, a specially developed novel lixiviant for the purpose as an HF substituent. Calcination process parameter like temperature and time requirement for oxidation was optimized varying one parameter at a time. Then, the efficient leaching condition was optimized for quantitative leaching of tantalum. The process can achieve 99.99% efficient leaching, the process can successfully be applied for feasible industrial-scale tantalum scrap recycling. The HF substituent lixiviant can add advantages to overcome occupational and industrial operation safety challenges associated with HF lixiviant. The reported valorization process can be a sustainable tantalum recycling process that simultaneously can address UNO sustainable development goal, WEEE directive, and UNEP E-Waste Management goal.	[Swain, Basudev; Lee, Jieun; Lee, Chan-Gi; Yoon, Jin-Ho] Inst Adv Engn IAE, Mat Sci & Chem Engn Ctr, Yongin 449863, South Korea; [Gu, Bon Woo] ECO Recycling Co Ltd, Incheon, South Korea		Swain, B (corresponding author), Inst Adv Engn IAE, Mat Sci & Chem Engn Ctr, Yongin 449863, South Korea.	Swain@iae.re.kr	Swain, Basudev/F-1230-2014	Swain, Basudev/0000-0003-2771-8058	Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP); Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20195210100070]	Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP); Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea	This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20195210100070) .	Agrawal M, 2021, SUSTAIN MATER TECHNO, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00323; [Anonymous], 2019, MINERAL COMMODITY SU; [Anonymous], 2020, TANTALUM MARKET GROW; Brookes K, 2005, MET POWDER REP, V60, P18; Callaghan R.M., 2021, MINERAL COMMODITY SU; Chen WS, 2019, MATERIALS, V12, DOI 10.3390/ma12081220; Commission E The European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, 2020, COMMUNICATION COMMIS; Deblonde GJP, 2019, SEP PURIF TECHNOL, V215, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.052; Dutta S, 2021, HYDROMETALLURGY, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105522; Forti V., 2020, GLOBAL E WASTE MONIT; GIGUERE PA, 1980, J AM CHEM SOC, V102, P5473, DOI 10.1021/ja00537a008; Graedel TE, 2011, J IND ECOL, V15, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00342.x; HOLL MMB, 1990, J AM CHEM SOC, V112, P7989, DOI 10.1021/ja00178a022; Hollerweger R, 2015, ACTA MATER, V83, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.006; Joutsuka T, 2011, J PHYS CHEM A, V115, P671, DOI 10.1021/jp108147e; Katano S, 2014, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V10, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.10.022; Lee J., 2021, INT J REFRACT METAL; Lessard JD, 2015, INT J REFRACT MET H, V48, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.09.027; Micheau C, 2019, HYDROMETALLURGY, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105107; Mineta K, 2005, J PHYS CHEM SOLIDS, V66, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.06.060; Mineta K., 2005, SHIGEN TO SOZAI, V121, P284, DOI 10.2473/shigentosozai.121.284; Niu B, 2017, ACS SUSTAIN CHEM ENG, V5, P1376, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01839; Padilla A.J., 2021, MINERAL COMMODITY SU; Petrucci R.H., 2007, GEN CHEM PRINCIPLES, V9th; Roskill Information Services Ltd, 2020, TANT OUTL 2029, V15th; Shi JY, 2012, J MATER CHEM, V22, P18808, DOI 10.1039/c2jm33470d; Survey U.S.G, 2018, INTERIOR RELEASES 20; Swain B, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V140, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.003; Swain B, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V138, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.027; Vutova K, 2016, METALS-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/met6110287	30	0	0	1	1	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0956-053X	1879-2456		WASTE MANAGE	Waste Manage.	MAY 1	2022	144						294	302		10.1016/j.wasman.2022.04.005	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.04.005			9	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1K8ES	35427901				2022-09-08	WOS:000798829800006
J	Zhang, Q; Liu, SM; Wang, T; Dai, XH; Baninla, Y; Nakatani, J; Moriguchi, Y				Zhang, Qian; Liu, Shuming; Wang, Tao; Dai, Xiaohu; Baninla, Yvette; Nakatani, Jun; Moriguchi, Yuichi			Urbanization impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the water infrastructure in China: Trade-offs among sustainable development goals (SDGs)	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						SDG 6; GHG emissions; Urban water systems; Sustainable urban water management; Urban policy; Material flow analysis (MFA)	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WASTE-WATER; URBAN WATER; MATERIAL STOCK; CO2 EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; TREATMENT PLANTS; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; TIME	The lasting urbanization in China has moved to the 'new-normal' stage, in which rural-to-urban migration, inefficiency in land use, and insufficient public services are the key challenges. To prevent urban sprawl, the compact city design intensively focuses on the improvement of housing and transport services to increase urban accessibility, vitality and diversity. Clean water and sanitation is also an essential function of cities, but the impacts from China's future urbanization on unheeded water infrastructure were sparsely estimated, especially from a perspective of urban metabolism. This study examines the complex response in the water sector to Chinese urban policies taking resource efficiency into account GI-IG emissions. A hypothetical grid-city model was developed to connect technical parameters in urban water infrastructure systems to the socio-economic changes, such as population growth, housing blocks, and water end-use. The results show that the pipeline construction dominates material use and locks in significant GHG emissions in the water sector. The most efficient urbanization scenario can reduce 60% of GHG emissions from the water infrastructure, compared to the case of urban sprawl with residency restriction in large cities. A trade-off in scenarios was observed between the optimization for mega-cities and the optimization for the whole of China regarding the additional energy consumption for pumping in the water sector. As empirical evidence of China, this study shows the conflict between SDG 6 (Clean water and sanitation) and SDG 13 (Climate action) in the urban water sector can be largely alleviated by an efficiency-focused urban policy complying with SDG 11 (Sustainable cities and communities). A loosen migration regulation and compact urban planning in the medium- and large sized cities are recommended, along with advanced water technologies to promote sustainable urban water management in China. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Zhang, Qian; Nakatani, Jun; Moriguchi, Yuichi] Univ Tokyo, Dept Urban Engn, Tokyo 1138656, Japan; [Zhang, Qian] Univ Victoria, Dept Civil Engn, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; [Liu, Shuming] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China; [Wang, Tao] Tongji Univ, Inst Adv Study, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China; [Wang, Tao] Tongji Univ, UNEP Tonji Inst Environm Sustainable Dev, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China; [Dai, Xiaohu] Tongji Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China; [Baninla, Yvette] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China; [Baninla, Yvette] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China		Zhang, Q (corresponding author), Univ Victoria, Dept Civil Engn, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.	zhangqian@uvic.ca	Zhang, Qian/K-2298-2019; liu, shuming/F-3081-2018	Zhang, Qian/0000-0002-0544-6744; Nakatani, Jun/0000-0002-8085-5089; liu, shuming/0000-0002-4949-4318	Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H01750, 18H03417]; Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of Japan [3K163001]	Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT)Japan Society for the Promotion of Science); Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of Japan	This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 15H01750 and No. 18H03417) and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (3K163001) of Japan. The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions from anonymous reviewers.	Acuto M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P2, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0013-9; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2017, WORLD POPULATION PRO; Bao C, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P531, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9930-y; Barido DPD, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P3632, DOI 10.1021/es405117n; Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, 2004, WAT SUPPL DRAIN DES; Bhattacharya A., 2012, INFRASTRUCTURE DEV M; Bleischwitz R, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P737, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0173-2; BP, 2015, BP EN OUTL 2035 CONT; Browder G., 2007, STEPPING IMPROVING P; Brown G.O., 2002, AM SOC CIVIL ENG, V38, P34; Canning D, 1998, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V12, P529, DOI 10.1093/wber/12.3.529; Chen G, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.046; Chen P, 2009, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V15, P200, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:3(200); Cheng CL, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00097-4; CUWA, 2013, URB WAT SUPPL STAT Y, V2013; Daelman MRJ, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P3657, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.024; Dombi M, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V138, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.015; Furumai H, 2008, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V33, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.029; Goldstein B, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035024; Haimes YY, 2005, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V11, P67, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(67); Hall MR, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P5434, DOI 10.1021/es103939a; Hancock NT, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P1145, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.004; He Y, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.320; Heeren N, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P253, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12739; Hellstrom D, 2000, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V20, P311, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3; Hong JL, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.026; Hou WX, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P129, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12186; [黄烨勍 Huang Yeqing], 2012, [华南理工大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of South China University of Technology. Natural Science Edition], V40, P131; Imura H, 1995, ENVRION SYST RES, V23, P142, DOI [10.2208/proer1988.23.142, DOI 10.2208/PROER1988.23.142]; Kennedy CA, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P343, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2160; Kennedy CA, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P5985, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504315112; Kennedy F, 2012, CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS 2012, P275; Khalkhali M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P1257, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.408; Larsen HN, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P1975, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.014; Liu YH, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V157, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.138; Long Y, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V177, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.008; Makropoulos CK, 2008, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V23, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.010; Marlow DR, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7150, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046; Maurer M, 2013, URBAN WATER J, V10, P268, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.731072; MCPRC, 2001, URB SEW TREATM PROJ; Mo WW, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V112, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.014; MoEP, 2002, DISCH STAND POLL MUN; MOHURD, 2012, B URB WAT SUPPL CHIN; Muller DB, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P11739, DOI 10.1021/es402618m; NBS (National Bureau of Statistics), 2018, CHIN STAT YB 2018; Pauliuk S, 2014, URBAN WATER J, V11, P274, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.795234; Peng W, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P693, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0174-1; Poff NL, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P25, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2765, 10.1038/nclimate2765]; Porse E, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P289, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0068-2; Poumanyvong P, 2010, ECOL ECON, V70, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029; Pradhan P, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P1169, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000632; Rothausen SGSA, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P210, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1147; Sepehri A, 2018, CHEM ENG PROCESS, V128, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.cep.2018.04.006; Seto KC, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934; Shan YL, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0390; Shan YL, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.201; Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Insitute, 2004, WAT SUPPL DRAIN DES; Shen YW, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V50, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129; Shi F, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P493, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00523.x; Smith K, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V91, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.051; Smith K, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V135, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.033; Smith K, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P792, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12290; Soda S, 2013, J SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, V4, P33; Tanikawa H, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P778, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12284; Tanikawa H, 2009, BUILD RES INF, V37, P483, DOI 10.1080/09613210903169394; UN, 2014, DEMOGR RES; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Venkatesh G, 2014, ENERGY, V75, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.111; Venkatesh G, 2009, J IND ECOL, V13, P532, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00143.x; Venkatesh G, 2011, VATTEN, V67, P157; Wang T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.253; Wang XR, 2015, HABITAT INT, V47, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.02.001; Xu CQ, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V67, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.002; Yokota T, 2012, RES APPL STOCK MANAG; Yoshida H, 2013, WASTE MANAGE RES, V31, P1083, DOI 10.1177/0734242X13504446; Zhang B, 2014, BRIDGES, V10; Zhang KH, 2003, CHINA ECON REV, V14, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2003.09.018; Zhang QH, 2010, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V101, P1421, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.071; Zhang Q, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.042; Zhang Y, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.052; Zhao X, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P480, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001113; Zhu HM, 2012, ECON LETT, V117, P848, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.001	83	29	29	26	173	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 20	2019	232						474	486		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.333	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.333			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IM1XB					2022-09-08	WOS:000477784000044
J	Nichiforel, L; Deuffic, P; Thorsen, BJ; Weiss, G; Hujala, T; Keary, K; Lawrence, A; Avdibegovic, M; Dobsinska, Z; Feliciano, D; Gorriz-Mifsud, E; Hoogstra-Klein, M; Hrib, M; Jarsky, V; Jodlowski, K; Lukmine, D; Malovrh, SP; Nedeljkovic, J; Nonic, D; Ostoic, SK; Pukall, K; Rondeux, J; Samara, T; Sarvasova, Z; Scriban, RE; Silingiene, R; Sinko, M; Stojanovska, M; Stojanovski, V; Stoyanov, T; Teder, M; Vennesland, B; Wilhelmsson, E; Wilkes-Allemann, J; Zivojinovic, I; Bouriaud, L				Nichiforel, Liviu; Deuffic, Philippe; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark; Weiss, Gerhard; Hujala, Teppo; Keary, Kevin; Lawrence, Anna; Avdibegovic, Mersudin; Dobsinska, Zuzana; Feliciano, Diana; Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena; Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke; Hrib, Michal; Jarsky, Vilem; Jodlowski, Krzysztof; Lukmine, Diana; Malovrh, Spela Pezdevsek; Nedeljkovic, Jelena; Nonic, Dragan; Ostoic, Silvija Krajter; Pukall, Klaus; Rondeux, Jacques; Samara, Theano; Sarvasova, Zuzana; Scriban, Ramona Elena; Silingiene, Rita; Sinko, Milan; Stojanovska, Makedonka; Stojanovski, Vladimir; Stoyanov, Todor; Teder, Meelis; Vennesland, Birger; Wilhelmsson, Erik; Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee; Zivojinovic, Ivana; Bouriaud, Laura			Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Forest governance; Institutional changes; Property rights; PRIF; Private ownership	NATURAL-RESOURCES; PRIVATE FORESTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; MANAGEMENT; OWNERS; REGIMES; GOVERNANCE; BIOECONOMY; LITHUANIA	In the last two decades, attention on forests and ownership rights has increased in different domains of international policy, particularly in relation to achieving the global sustainable development goals. This paper looks at the changes in forest-specific legislation applicable to regular productive forests, across 28 European countries. We compare the legal framework applicable in the mid-1990s with that applicable in 2015, using the Property Rights Index in Forestry (PRIF) to measure changes across time and space. The paper shows that forest owners in most western European countries already had high decision-making power in the mid-1990s, following deregulation trends from the 1980s; and for the next two decades, distribution of rights remained largely stable. For these countries, the content and direction of changes indicate that the main pressure on forest-focused legislation comes from environmental discourses (e.g. biodiversity and climate change policies). In contrast, former socialist countries in the mid-1990s gave lower decision-making powers to forest owners than in any of the Western Europe countries; over the next 20 years these show remarkable changes in management, exclusion and withdrawal rights. As a result of these changes, there is no longer a clear line between western and former socialist countries with respect to the national governance systems used to address private forest ownership. Nevertheless, with the exception of Baltic countries which have moved towards the western forest governance system, most of the former socialist countries still maintain a state-centred approach in private forest management. Overall, most of the changes we identified in the last two decades across Europe were recorded in the categories of management rights and exclusion rights. These changes reflect the general trend in European forest policies to expand and reinforce the landowners' individual rights, while preserving minimal rights for other categories of forest users; and to promote the use of financial instruments when targeting policy goals related to the environmental discourse.	[Nichiforel, Liviu; Scriban, Ramona Elena; Bouriaud, Laura] Univ Stefan Cel Mare Suceava, Fac Forestry, Suceava 720225, Romania; [Deuffic, Philippe] Natl Res Inst Agr Food & Environm INRAE, F-33612 Cestas, France; [Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, DK-1958 Copenhagen C, Denmark; [Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, DK-1958 Copenhagen C, Denmark; [Weiss, Gerhard; Zivojinovic, Ivana] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna BOKU, Inst Forest Environm & Nat Resource Policy, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [Weiss, Gerhard; Zivojinovic, Ivana] Forest Policy Res Network, European Forest Inst, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [Hujala, Teppo] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki 00790, Finland; [Hujala, Teppo] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Forest Sci, Joensuu 80100, Finland; [Keary, Kevin] Forest Serv, Dept Agr Food & Marine, Dublin D02 WK12, Ireland; [Lawrence, Anna] Univ Highlands & Isl, Perth PH1 2NX, Scotland; [Avdibegovic, Mersudin] Univ Sarajevo, Fac Forestry, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia & Herceg; [Dobsinska, Zuzana] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Forestry, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia; [Feliciano, Diana] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Biol Sci, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, Scotland; [Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena] European Forest Inst EFIMED, Solsona 25280, Spain; [Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena] Forest Sci & Technol Ctr Catalonia CTFC, Solsona 25280, Spain; [Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke] Wageningen Univ & Res, Forest & Nat Conservat Policy Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands; [Hrib, Michal; Jarsky, Vilem] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Prague 16521, Czech Republic; [Jodlowski, Krzysztof] Forest Res Inst, PL-05090 Sekocin Stary, Poland; [Lukmine, Diana; Silingiene, Rita] Inst Forestry, Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, LT-53101 Girionys, Lithuania; [Malovrh, Spela Pezdevsek; Sinko, Milan] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Forestry & Renewable Forest Resources, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; [Nedeljkovic, Jelena; Nonic, Dragan] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade 11030, Serbia; [Ostoic, Silvija Krajter] Croatian Forest Res Inst, Dept Int Sci Cooperat Southeast Europe EFISEE, Jastrebarsko 10450, Croatia; [Pukall, Klaus] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest & Environm Policy, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany; [Rondeux, Jacques] Univ Liege, Dept Biose, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium; [Samara, Theano] Forest Res Inst Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 57006, Greece; [Sarvasova, Zuzana] Forestry Res Inst Zvolen, Natl Forest Ctr, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia; [Stojanovska, Makedonka; Stojanovski, Vladimir] Ss Cyril & Methodius Univ Skopje, Forest Fac Skopje, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia; [Stoyanov, Todor] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Forest Res Inst, Sofia 1756, Bulgaria; [Teder, Meelis] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Forestry & Rural Engn, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia; [Vennesland, Birger] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res, N-1431 As, Norway; [Wilhelmsson, Erik] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management, S-90183 Umea, Sweden; [Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Nat Resource Policy Grp, Inst Environm Decis, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; [Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee] Bern Univ Appl Sci BFH, Sch Agr Forest & Food Sci HAFL, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland		Nichiforel, L (corresponding author), Univ Stefan Cel Mare Suceava, Univ 13, Suceava 720225, Romania.	nichiforel@usv.ro	Jarský, Vilém/G-6438-2016; Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena/ABE-3171-2021; Teder, Meelis/E-4269-2017; Zivojinovic, Ivana/C-6830-2019; Stojanovski, Vladimir/CAJ-5117-2022; Górriz Mifsud, Elena/AAH-5669-2019; Dobsinska, Zuzana/AAE-1399-2020; Stoyanov, Todor/AAY-6281-2020; Nedeljkovic, Jelena/A-5992-2015	Jarský, Vilém/0000-0003-2964-6406; Teder, Meelis/0000-0003-1151-267X; Zivojinovic, Ivana/0000-0001-9900-7066; Stojanovski, Vladimir/0000-0002-7893-7261; Górriz Mifsud, Elena/0000-0002-2112-5780; Dobsinska, Zuzana/0000-0001-7080-8249; Stoyanov, Todor/0000-0002-1276-6527; Nedeljkovic, Jelena/0000-0002-2957-5620; Deuffic, Philippe/0000-0001-8721-3735; Scriban, Ramona-Elena/0000-0002-6414-8253; Hujala, Teppo/0000-0002-7905-7602; Lukmine, Diana/0000-0001-8899-3606; Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela/0000-0003-2005-6194; Nonic, Dragan/0000-0001-8848-5943	EU; Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF96]; NAZV [QK1820041]; Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-15-0715]; Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia; Slovenian Research Agency [P4 - 0059]; grant EVA4.0 - OPRDE [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803]	EU(European Commission); Danish National Research Foundation(Danmarks Grundforskningsfond); NAZV; Slovak Research and Development Agency(Slovak Research and Development Agency); Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia(Ministry of Education, Science & Technological Development, Serbia); Slovenian Research Agency(Slovenian Research Agency - Slovenia); grant EVA4.0 - OPRDE	The study was conducted in the framework of the FP1201 FACESMAP COST Action (Forest Land Ownership Change in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy) which is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. BJT acknowledges the support of the Danish National Research Foundation for the Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate (DNRF96). MH and VJ were supported by NAZV (QK1820041) and grant EVA4.0, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803 financed by OPRDE. ZS and ZD have been supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-15-0715. JN and DN were supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. SPM was financed by the Research Programs P4 - 0059 of the Slovenian Research Agency. DF acknowledges to Rosario Alves (FORESTIS). SKO acknowledges the Croatian Union of Private Forest Owners' Associations. TS acknowledges Mr. Oikonomou, president of the Greek Private Owners' Association. Open Access for this article was provided by the Estonian University of Life Sciences; Forest Research Institute (IBL, Poland); Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; University of Copenhagen; University of Eastern Finland; University of Ljubljana; and University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU).	Alphandery P, 2001, SOCIOL RURALIS, V41, P311, DOI 10.1111/1467-9523.00185; [Anonymous], COLLECTIVE I ENTREPR; [Anonymous], NATURA 2000 FORESTS; [Anonymous], THESIS; [Anonymous], WHAT SCI CAN TELL US; [Anonymous], 2006, YALE U FACULTY ENV S; [Anonymous], 2020, OUR GOAL; [Anonymous], 2015, OPEN J FOR, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJF.2015.55046; [Anonymous], 2008, PRIVATE COMMON PROPE; [Anonymous], 2005, IUFRO WORLD SERIES; [Anonymous], 25 EFI; [Anonymous], WHO OWNS OUR FORESTS; [Anonymous], ECETIMSP43 UNECEFAO; [Anonymous], UNASYLVA; [Anonymous], DOUGLAS FIR OPTION E; [Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABLE EUROPEAN; [Anonymous], EFI SERIES WHAT SCI; [Anonymous], 2017, NATURA 2000 FORESTS; [Anonymous], EV STUD FOR MEAS RUR; [Anonymous], RAPP ACT; Arts B. J. M., 2010, IUFRO World Series, V28, P57; Avdibegovic M, 2010, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V38, P257; Bouriaud L., 2005, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V156, P297, DOI 10.3188/szf.2005.0297; Bouriaud L, 2013, ANN FOR RES, V56, P199; Bouriaud L, 2011, INNOVATION IN FORESTRY: TERRITORIAL AND VALUE CHAIN RELATIONSHIPS, P276, DOI 10.1079/9781845936891.0276; Brukas V, 2001, FOREST POLICY ECON, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8; Brukas V, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.034; Buliga B, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.021; Coleman EA, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.012; Deuffic P, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P1024, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.021; Dobsinska Z, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102090; Dragoi M, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8060099; Feliciano D, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016; Gluck P, 2002, FOREST POLICY ECON, V4, P125, DOI 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00012-6; Gorriz-Mifsud E, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V63, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.003; Humphreys D, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.008; Jacobsen JB, 2013, FORESTRY, V86, P575, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpt023; Jarsky V, 2018, CENT EURO FOR J, V64, P195, DOI 10.1515/forj-2017-0045; Klapwijk MJ, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.012; Kleinschmit D, 2014, SCAND J FOREST RES, V29, P402, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2014.921722; Larson AM, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P678, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.014; Lawrence A, 2018, FORESTRY, V91, P401, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpy017; Lawrence A, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.003; Leipold S, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P445, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462; McCauley Darren, 2008, European Environment, V18, P152, DOI 10.1002/eet.478; Nichiforel L, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034; Nichiforel L, 2011, EUR J FOREST RES, V130, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10342-009-0337-8; Nonic D, 2011, SMALL-SCALE FOR, V10, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11842-011-9160-4; NORTH DC, 1991, J ECON PERSPECT, V5, P97, DOI 10.1257/jep.5.1.97; Orazio C, 2017, HDB WOOD MOBILISATIO; Ostoic SK, 2016, SUMAR LIST, V140, P215; Primmer E, 2014, ECOL ECON, V103, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.008; Pulzl H, 2014, SCAND J FOREST RES, V29, P386, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2014.920044; Sarvasova Z, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019; SCHLAGER E, 1992, LAND ECON, V68, P249, DOI 10.2307/3146375; Schmithuasen F., 2010, PRIVATE FOREST OWNER; Scriban RE, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.018; Sergent A, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.036; Sikor T, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032; Stupak I, 2011, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V35, P3287, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.032; Teder M, 2015, BALT FOR, V21, P326; Toppinen A, 2012, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V19, P191, DOI 10.1002/csr.256; Vatn A, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN C, V19, P665, DOI 10.1068/c17s; Weiland S, 2010, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V20, P397, DOI 10.1002/eet.558; Weiss G, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006; Weiss G, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003; Winkel G, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P496, DOI 10.1068/c1356j; Winkel G, 2011, CRIT POLICY STUD, V5, P361, DOI 10.1080/19460171.2011.628002	68	20	21	3	25	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	JUN	2020	115								102146	10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146			16	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	LO4BY		hybrid, Green Submitted, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000533575500006
J	Tajvidi, R; Tajvidi, M				Tajvidi, Rana; Tajvidi, Mina			The growth of cyber entrepreneurship in the food industry: virtual community engagement in the COVID-19 era	BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL			English	Article						Cyber entrepreneurship; COVID-19; Food; Sustainable entrepreneurship; Technological entrepreneurship; Online entrepreneurship; Virtual community		Purpose The sustainable development goals are the plans to accomplish a recovering and more sustainable future for all. However, with the COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges are more for achieving these goals by entrepreneurship. With the pandemic challenges, new technological advancements have become the foundation of an emerging form of entrepreneurship known as cyber entrepreneurship. Although a small segment of burgeoning literature on this topic has been recently tended to study cyber entrepreneurship, it offers only a partial understanding of those concepts, especially for community engagement in the food industry during the pandemic. This paper aims to explore cyber entrepreneurship in the food industry and its opportunities for entrepreneurs in epidemics such as COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach This study using a case study approach identifies and explores the fundamental aspects of cyber entrepreneurship. This study employs empirical research with a holistic overview of the existing literature to define the different forms of entrepreneurship in the current digital age, focusing on COVID-19 implications for cyber entrepreneurship. Findings The result of this paper provides a better understanding of a new form of entrepreneurship in cyberspace as innovative practice for firms. This study reveals that cyber entrepreneurship can develop community engagement during pandemic circumstances, such as COVID-19 in the food industry. Originality/value This research demonstrates entrepreneurial processes around sustainable business behaviours by focusing on community engagement. It opens a window into the exploration of cyber entrepreneurship in the food industry.	[Tajvidi, Rana] London South Bank Univ, Business Sch, London, England; [Tajvidi, Mina] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England		Tajvidi, M (corresponding author), Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England.	mina.tajvidi@newcastle.ac.uk		Tajvidi, Mina/0000-0002-6259-505X				Alavi SA, 2016, INT REV RETAIL DISTR, V26, P272, DOI 10.1080/09593969.2015.1096808; Almeida Costa Ana Isabel, 2016, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, V15, P191; Antoncic B, 2008, TECHNOVATION, V28, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.005; Badaruddin M.N., 2015, INT C INF TECHN SOC; Berg B.L., 2012, QUALITATIVE RES METH; BIRCH DL, 1981, PUBLIC INTEREST, P3; Bouwman H., 2002, Telematics and Informatics, V19, P291, DOI 10.1016/S0736-5853(01)00018-1; Bresciani S., 2016, J PROMOTION MANAGEME, V22, P251, DOI DOI 10.1080/10496491.2016.1121753; Brodie RJ, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029; Bula H.O., 2012, EUROPEAN J BUSINESS, V4, P85; Cantillon Richard, 1959, ESSAY NATURE TRADE G; Carley KM, 2000, UNDERSTANDING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY, P325; Carrier C., 2004, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V10, P349, DOI 10.1108/13552550410554320; Champeaux J., 2000, CYBERENTREPRISE 10 C; Chang H.-H., 2020, COVID 19 DEMAND ONLI; Chen SC, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014; Cohen S.S., 2000, 138 BRIE; Colombo MG, 2001, SMALL BUS ECON, V16, P177, DOI 10.1023/A:1011127205758; Constant D, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P119, DOI 10.1287/orsc.7.2.119; Constantinides E., 2008, EUROPEAN RETAIL RES, V22, P1; Dahlstrand AL, 2007, EUR BUS REV, V19, P373, DOI 10.1108/09555340710818969; Costa AID, 2007, FOOD QUAL PREFER, V18, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.08.003; Deans KR, 2003, SERV IND J, V23, P82, DOI 10.1080/714005119; Dorf R., 2005, TECHNOLOGY VENTURES; Dutta S, 2010, HARVARD BUS REV, V88, P127; Fait M, 2020, BRIT FOOD J, V122, P2513, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0481; Ferto I., 2007, MANAGING GLOBAL TRAN, V5, P5; Fillis I., 2004, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V10, P178, DOI [10.1108/13552550410536762, DOI 10.1108/13552550410536762]; Finkelstein S., 2001, J BUS STRAT, V22, P16; Fischer E, 2014, J BUS VENTURING, V29, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.02.004; Franceschelli MV, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P2483, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0049; Gartner W., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P27, DOI [10.1177/104225870102500403, DOI 10.1177/104225870102500403, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_11]; Ghose S, 1998, J ADVERTISING RES, V38, P29; Goss D, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00077.x; Hajli N, 2017, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V64, P594, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2017.2711042; Harris ML, 2008, EDUC TRAIN, V50, P568, DOI 10.1108/00400910810909036; Harrison H., 2017, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO, DOI 10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655; Holeton R., 1998, COMPOSING CYBERSPACE; Hull Clyde Eirikur, 2007, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, V4, P290, DOI 10.1504/IJNVO.2007.015166; Jeng SP, 2016, J AIR TRANSP MANAG, V55, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.04.005; Kadam A., 2014, SIES J MANAGEMENT, V10, P3; Keeble D, 1999, REG STUD, V33, P319, DOI 10.1080/713693557; Kimes S.E., 2011, CORNELL HOSP REP, V11, P6; Kisfalvi V, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P489, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00075-1; Kleis L, 2012, INFORM SYST RES, V23, P42, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0338; Kollmann T., 2008, SELECTED READINGS IN, DOI [10.4018/978-1-60566-086-8.ch001, DOI 10.4018/978-1-60566-086-8.CH001]; Lee B., 2017, CONDUCTING CASE STUD, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781529716702; Lin HF, 2007, J INF SCI, V33, P135, DOI 10.1177/0165551506068174; Lounsbury M, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P545, DOI 10.1002/smj.188; Malone T.W., 1999, ELECT BUSINESS ENG, P13; Martin LM, 2005, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V11, P162, DOI 10.1108/13552550510590563; Matlay H., 2004, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V11, P408, DOI DOI 10.1108/14626000410551663; Merriam S.B., 2009, QUALITATIVE RES GUID; Mohammed, 2020, HARVARD BUS REV; Nakara Walid A., 2012, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, V16, P386, DOI 10.1504/IJESB.2012.047608; Newman AF, 2007, J ECON THEORY, V137, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jet.2007.03.004; OECD, 2001, SCI TECHNOLOGY IND O; Olofsson C., 1994, DYNAMIKEN SVENSKT N; Ozcelik E, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.011; Padilla A., 2006, HDB RES TECHNOENTREP; Pohjola M, 2002, INF ECON POLICY, V14, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6245(01)00063-4; Rietveld R, 2020, J INTERACT MARK, V49, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.06.003; ROURE JB, 1990, J BUS VENTURING, V5, P201, DOI 10.1016/0883-9026(90)90017-N; Saarijarvi H, 2014, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V21, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.06.009; Santoro G, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P2373, DOI [10.1108/BFJ-02-2017-0120, 10.1108/bfj-02-2017-0120]; Say J.-B., 1855, TREATISE POLITICAL E, V6th; Sebastiani R, 2013, J BUS ETHICS, V114, P473, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1343-1; Serarols C, 2008, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V43, P142, DOI 10.1504/IJTM.2008.019412; Shane S, 2003, RES POLICY, V32, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00104-X; Shane S, 2000, ACAD MANAGE REV, V25, P217, DOI 10.5465/amr.2000.2791611; Shane S.A., 2008, ILLUSIONS ENTREPRENE; Shareena, 2020, J INTERDISCIPL CYCLE, V12, P1327; Siu WS, 2002, IND MARKET MANAG, V31, P177, DOI 10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00176-6; Stake R., 2008, STRATEGIES QUALITATI, P119; Statista, 2020, STAT NEWS; Storey D.J., 1994, UNDERSTANDING SMALL; Tajudeen FP, 2018, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V55, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2017.08.004; Tajvidi M, 2020, J BUS RES, V121, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008; Tajvidi R, 2021, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.026; Tapscott D., 2006, WIKINOMICS MASS COLL; The Canadian Academy of Engineering, 1998, WEALTH TECHN ENTR; Toulouse, 1992, ENTREPRENEURSHIP TEC; Tovstiga G, 2000, INTERNET RES, V10, P459, DOI 10.1108/10662240010349471; Tsimonis G, 2014, MARK INTELL PLAN, V32, P328, DOI 10.1108/MIP-04-2013-0056; VANMAANEN J, 1979, ADMIN SCI QUART, V24, P520; VANPRAAG CM, 1995, KYKLOS, V48, P513; Walker H., 2006, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, V3, P25, DOI 10.1504/IJNVO.2006.008783; Yeo VCS, 2017, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V35, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.013; Yu CH, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.021; ZAHRA SA, 1993, J BUS VENTURING, V8, P319, DOI 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N; Zahra SA, 2008, STRATEG ENTREP J, V2, P243, DOI 10.1002/sej.47	91	13	13	7	27	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0007-070X	1758-4108		BRIT FOOD J	Br. Food J.	OCT 21	2021	123	10			SI		3309	3325		10.1108/BFJ-06-2020-0559	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2020-0559		DEC 2020	17	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Food Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Agriculture; Food Science & Technology	WM1VH		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000603477200001
J	Hall, S; Illian, J; Makuta, I; McNabb, K; Murray, S; O'Hare, BAM; Python, A; Zaidi, SHA; Bar-Zeev, N				Hall, Stephen; Illian, Janine; Makuta, Innocent; McNabb, Kyle; Murray, Stuart; O'Hare, Bernadette A. M.; Python, Andre; Zaidi, Syed Haider Ali; Bar-Zeev, Naor			Government Revenue and Child and Maternal Mortality	OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW			English	Article						Government revenue; Public services; Under-five mortality; Maternal mortality; Human rights	MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOAL; MIDDLE-INCOME; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; COUNTRIES; DETERMINANTS; OUTCOMES; AFRICA; INFANT; RATES; TIME	Most maternal and child deaths result from inadequate access to the critical determinants of health: clean water, sanitation, education and healthcare, which are also among the Sustainable Development Goals. Reasons for poor access include insufficient government revenue for essential public services. In this paper, we predict the reductions in mortality rates - both child and maternal - that could result from increases in government revenue, using panel data from 191 countries and a two-way fixed-effect linear regression model. The relationship between government revenue per capita and mortality rates is highly non-linear, and the best form of non-linearity we have found is a version of an inverse function. This implies that countries with small per-capita government revenues have a better scope for reducing mortality rates. However, as per-capita revenue rises, the possible gains decline rapidly in a non-linear way. We present the results which show the potential decrease in mortality and lives saved for each of the 191 countries if government revenue increases. For example, a 10% increase in per-capita government revenue in Afghanistan in 2002 ($24.49 million) is associated with a reduction in the under-5 mortality rate by 12.35 deaths per 1000 births and 13,094 lives saved. This increase is associated with a decrease in the maternal mortality ratio of 9.3 deaths per 100,000 live births and 99 maternal deaths averted. Increasing government revenue can directly impact mortality, especially in countries with low per- capita government revenues. The results presented in this study could be used for economic, social and governance reporting by multinational companies and for evidence-based policymaking and advocacy.	[Hall, Stephen; Zaidi, Syed Haider Ali] Univ Leicester, Sch Business, Leicester, Leics, England; [Illian, Janine] Univ Glasgow, Sch Math & Stat, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland; [Makuta, Innocent] Univ Malawi, Dept Econ, Chancellor Coll, Zomba, Malawi; [McNabb, Kyle] Overseas Dev Inst, London, England; [Murray, Stuart] Univ St Andrews, Sch Med, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland; [O'Hare, Bernadette A. M.] Univ St Andrews, Sch Med, Div Infect & Global Hlth, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland; [O'Hare, Bernadette A. M.] Univ Malawi, Coll Med, Blantyre, Malawi; [Python, Andre] Univ Oxford, Oxford Big Data Inst, Li Ka Shing Ctr Hlth Informat & Discovery, Oxford, England; [Python, Andre] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Data Sci, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; [Bar-Zeev, Naor] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Int Vaccine Access Ctr, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA		O'Hare, BAM (corresponding author), Univ St Andrews, Sch Med, Div Infect & Global Hlth, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.; O'Hare, BAM (corresponding author), Univ Malawi, Coll Med, Blantyre, Malawi.	bamo@st-andrews.ac.uk	Bar-Zeev, Naor/ABF-8648-2021; hall, stephen George/AAR-7607-2021	Bar-Zeev, Naor/0000-0003-0570-4624; O'Hare, Bernadette/0000-0003-1730-7941; Murray, Stuart/0000-0003-2871-8375	Global Challenges Research Fund; Scottish Funding Council	Global Challenges Research Fund; Scottish Funding Council	(The Global Challenges Research Fund, the Scottish Funding Council and the Professor Sonia Buist Global Health Research Fund)	Access Now Policy Team, 2018, TOR DECL PROT RIGHT; Alonso J., 2018, J GLOBALIZATION DEV, V9, DOI [10.1515/jgd-2018-0016, DOI 10.1515/JGD-2018-0016]; Amouzou A., 2004, African Population Studies, V19, P1; Anyamele OD, 2017, SOC INDIC RES, V130, P1125, DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1225-x; Anyanwu JC, 2009, AFR DEV REV, V21, P400, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2009.00215.x; Baldacci E, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P1317, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.08.003; Bantekas I., 2019, SOVEREIGN DEBT HUMAN; Bantekas I, 2018, SOVEREIGN DEBT HUMAN; Beer S, 2018, WP18227 IMF; Bhalotra S, 2006, UN WIDER RES PAP; Bishai DM, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0144908; Bokhari FAS, 2007, HEALTH ECON, V16, P257, DOI 10.1002/hec.1157; Brinda EM, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1449-3; Carter P, 2016, 2016171 UNUWIDER, DOI [10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2016/215-1, DOI 10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2016/215-1]; Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), 2017, EC12GC24 CESCR, V24; DerSarkissian M, 2013, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V67, P992, DOI 10.1136/jech-2013-202565; Fewtrell L, 2005, LANCET INFECT DIS, V5, P42, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01253-8; Filmer D, 1999, SOC SCI MED, V49, P1309, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00150-1; French D, 2016, HEALTH ECON, V25, P1312, DOI 10.1002/hec.3218; Gakidou E, 2010, LANCET, V376, P959, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61257-3; GUPTA S, 2002, EUROPEAN J POLITICAL, V0018; Haile F, 2018, J INT DEV, V30, P367, DOI 10.1002/jid.3326; ICTD/UNU-WIDER, 2018, GOV REV DAT; ICTD/UNU-WIDER, 2018, ICTD GOV REV DAT US; Jamison DT, 2016, J HEALTH ECON, V48, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.03.002; Jeuland MA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074804; London Stock Exchange Group, 2018, YOUR GUID ESG REP; Long C., 2017, TAXATION SUSTAINABLE; Makuta I, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2287-z; Maruthappu M, 2015, PEDIATRICS, V135, pE887, DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-1600; Moore M., 2018, TAXING AFRICA COERCI; O'Hare B, 2015, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/s12992-015-0092-1; O'Hare B, 2014, J ROY SOC MED, V107, P148, DOI 10.1177/0141076813514575; O'Hare B, 2013, J ROY SOC MED, V106, P408, DOI 10.1177/0141076813489680; PRESTON SH, 1975, POP STUD-J DEMOG, V29, P231, DOI 10.2307/2173509; Prichard W, 2016, WORLD DEV, V80, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.017; Rajkumar AS, 2008, J DEV ECON, V86, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.003; Reeves A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P274, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60574-8; Schell CO, 2007, SCAND J PUBLIC HEALT, V35, P288, DOI 10.1080/14034940600979171; Tamarappoo R, 2016, ANAL LINKAGE DOMESTI; United Nations, 2018, GOAL 11 MAK CIT INCL; Wang LM, 2003, HEALTH POLICY, V65, P277, DOI 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00039-3; Waris A, 2017, KENYA HAS IMPLEMENTE; Welander A, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V136, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.006; WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008, CLOS GAP GEN; Wigley S, 2017, SOC SCI MED, V176, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.038; Woessmann L, 2016, EDUC ECON, V24, P3, DOI 10.1080/09645292.2015.1059801; World Bank, 2018, DAT WORLD DEV IND; Zash R, 2016, BMC PEDIATR, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12887-016-0635-5	49	2	2	3	11	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0923-7992	1573-708X		OPEN ECON REV	Open Econ. Rev.	FEB	2021	32	1					213	229		10.1007/s11079-020-09597-0	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11079-020-09597-0		SEP 2020	17	Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	QI3LY		hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000568659200001
J	Mangla, SK; Kazancoglu, Y; Ekinci, E; Liu, MQ; Ozbiltekin, M; Sezer, MD				Mangla, Sachin Kumar; Kazancoglu, Yigit; Ekinci, Esra; Liu, Mengqi; Ozbiltekin, Melisa; Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz			Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer	TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW			English	Article						Food waste; Milk supply chain and distribution; Societal impacts; Blockchain; Sustainability; Transparency and traceability; System Dynamics	CHAIN MANAGEMENT; FOOD LOSS; TRACEABILITY; LOGISTICS; CHALLENGES; QUALITY; HEALTH; SUSTAINABILITY; AGRICULTURE; PERFORMANCE	The integration of blockchain technologies in the food sector has significant social impacts. The objectives of this research are firstly, to map the milk supply chains to explore information flow among different members for higher traceability; secondly, to investigate the societal impacts of blockchain technology in a milk supply chain to build social sustainability. The systems theory in integration with system dynamics (SD) provides the necessary theoretical underpinning to this research. We collect data from an agricultural development cooperative founded to support dairy farmers in Turkey. This work evaluates the societal impacts of blockchain technology on farmers, the community and animals using parameters such as local embedding, rural development, decreasing food fraud, animal health and welfare, proximity to food markets, food security, educating and promoting people towards healthy eating, assisting food access and social acceptability for transparency. In the last 18 years, the cooperative has encouraged dairy farmers in the district to become partners with a resultant increase in milk production from 30 thousand tons in 2002 to 330 thousand tons in 2019. According to our findings, population growth of the country and adult population increases in the district, it is expected that by 2025 the number of partners will rise to approximately 2800. The increase in number of partners proves the network expansion. Furthermore, blockchain technology can be incorporated into the existing system so that transparent and end-to-end accurate tracking of the supply chain is made possible, while creating decentralized recording of transactions. Moreover, the critical traceability points of a milk supply chain are evaluated with the blockchain adoption. This will help achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of providing safe food, promoting good health and better well-being for everyone.	[Mangla, Sachin Kumar] OP Jindal Global Univ, Jindal Global Business Sch, Sonipat, Haryana, India; [Mangla, Sachin Kumar] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth Business Sch, Plymouth, Devon, England; [Kazancoglu, Yigit; Ekinci, Esra] Yasar Univ, Int Logist Management Dept, Izmir, Turkey; [Liu, Mengqi] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha, Peoples R China; [Ozbiltekin, Melisa] Yasar Univ, Int Logist Management Dept, Izmir, Turkey; [Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz] Yasar Univ, Business Adm Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey		Liu, MQ (corresponding author), Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha, Peoples R China.	sachin.kumar@plymouth.ac.uk; yigit.kazancoglu@yasar.edu.tr; esra.ekinci@yasar.edu.tr; liumengqi76@163.com; melisa.ozbiltekin@yasar.edu.tr; deniz.sezer@yasar.edu.tr	ekinci, esra/E-1285-2018; Kazancoglu, Yigit/AAT-5676-2021; Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa/AAA-2580-2019; Kazancoglu, Yigit/E-7705-2015	ekinci, esra/0000-0003-2609-7763; Kazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X; Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa/0000-0002-1356-3203; Kazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X	British Council, UK under "Newton Fund Research Environment Links UK and Turkey Grant" [RR205157, 527884800]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871091]	British Council, UK under "Newton Fund Research Environment Links UK and Turkey Grant"; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	The authors (Prof. Sachin Kumar Mangla and Prof. Yigit Kazancoglu) would like to thank the project "Developing capacity and research network on circular and Industry 4.0 driven sustainable solutions for reducing food waste in supply chains in Turkey" (Ref no: RR205157 & Application ID:527884800) funded by British Council, UK under "Newton Fund Research Environment Links UK and Turkey Grant", for supporting this research. Mengqi Liu's research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 71871091.	Ala-Harja H, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V74, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.005; Alexandre A, 2018, WALMART IS READY USE; Azzi R, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V135, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.042; Balaman SY, 2019, DECISION-MAKING FOR BIOMASS-BASED PRODUCTION CHAINS: THE BASIC CONCEPTS AND METHODOLOGIES, P77, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814278-3.00004-2; Bayramoglu, 2013, FOOD LOSSES WASTE TU; Behnke K, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025; Biswal AK, 2018, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V109, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2017.11.010; Borchers MR, 2016, J DAIRY SCI, V99, P7458, DOI 10.3168/jds.2015-10843; Broom DM, 2010, J VET MED EDUC, V37, P83, DOI 10.3138/jvme.37.1.83; Bumblauskas D, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.004; Cai YJ, 2021, DECISION SCI, V52, P866, DOI 10.1111/deci.12475; Casino F, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P5758, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1789238; Chang YL, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P2082, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1651946; Charlebois S, 2015, J DAIRY SCI, V98, P3514, DOI 10.3168/jds.2014-9247; Choi TM, 2021, J OPER RES SOC, V72, P2580, DOI 10.1080/01605682.2020.1800419; Choi TM, 2020, EUR J OPER RES, V284, P1031, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.049; Choi TM, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101860; Choi TM, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.008; Choi TM, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V131, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.019; Choi TM, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V127, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.007; Cole R, 2019, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V24, P469, DOI 10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309; Connolly A, 2018, WHAT ARE IMPLICATION; Costa C, 2013, FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH, V6, P353, DOI 10.1007/s11947-012-0958-7; Crosby M., 2016, APPL INNOVATION, V2, P71; Crossey S., 2018, NEW FOOD MAGAZINE; Daud A. R., 2015, Livestock Research for Rural Development, V27, P137; de las Morenas J, 2014, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V101, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.011; Deloitte, 2017, GLOB DAIR SECT TREND; Demestichas K, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10124113; Duan J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17051784; Dutta P, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067; Ekinci E, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136948; European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2019, FOOD LOSS WAST SECT; Fahim A, 2017, INDIAN J ANIM SCI, V87, P1396; Fan ZP, 2022, ANN OPER RES, V309, P837, DOI 10.1007/s10479-020-03729-y; FAO, FOOD LOSS WAST TURK; FAO, 2013, STAT FOOD INS WORLD; FAO, 2012, BAL FEED IMPR LIV PR; Feng Tian, 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), P1, DOI 10.1109/ICSSSM.2016.7538424; Fernando A.L., 2018, PERENNIAL GRASSES BI, P245, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-812900-5.00008-4; FORRESTER JW, 1994, SYST DYNAM REV, V10, P245, DOI 10.1002/sdr.4260100211; Francisco K, 2018, LOGISTICS-BASEL, V2, DOI 10.3390/logistics2010002; Frohling A, 2010, FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH, V3, P892, DOI 10.1007/s11947-010-0366-9; Galvez JF, 2018, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V107, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011; Georgiadis P, 2005, J FOOD ENG, V70, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.06.030; Ghadge A, 2021, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V32, P1191, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2020.1796140; Gnansounou E, 2015, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V196, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.072; Hao ZH, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17072300; Hastig GM, 2020, PROD OPER MANAG, V29, P935, DOI 10.1111/poms.13147; Hingley M., 2011, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V2, P340; Hosseini S, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V125, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001; Huang KC, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V129, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.018; Hume DA, 2011, J AGR SCI, V149, P9, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610001188; IBM, 2017, IBM WATS INT THINGS; Ingalls W, 2011, PROCEDURES PRODUCTS; Irani Z, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V98, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.007; Ivanov D, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P829, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086; Jagtap S, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V87, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.017; Kaiyue Ling Eric, 2020, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, V29, P216; Kamble SS, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022; Kamilaris A, 2019, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V91, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034; Kayikci Y, 2022, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V33, P301, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2020.1810757; Koh L, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P2054, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1736428; Leat P, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P605, DOI 10.3390/su3040605; Lemma DH, 2018, FOOD QUAL SAF-OXFORD, V2, P135, DOI 10.1093/fqsafe/fyy009; Li G, 2020, DECISION SCI, V51, P1521, DOI 10.1111/deci.12437; Li G, 2020, J OPER MANAG, V66, P958, DOI 10.1002/joom.1061; Li G, 2020, DECISION SCI, V51, P691, DOI 10.1111/deci.12340; Li G, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V126, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.019; Liu HA, 2012, BRIT FOOD J, V114, P372, DOI 10.1108/00070701211213474; Lotta F., 2015, European Food and Feed Law Review, P114; Millogo V, 2010, FOOD CONTROL, V21, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.029; Minegishi S, 2000, SIMULAT PRACT THEORY, V8, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0928-4869(00)00026-4; MIRANDA MG, 2014, INDIAN J SCI TECHN S, V7, P16, DOI DOI 10.17485/ijst/2014/v7i3S/48521; Monasterolo I, 2016, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/agriculture6030044; Morkunas VJ, 2019, BUS HORIZONS, V62, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.009; Navarro E.F., 2014, THESIS U COLL CORK I; Nielsen NI, 2005, J DAIRY SCI, V88, P3186, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73002-2; Orji IJ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102025; Pant RR, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V189, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.235; Simoes ARP, 2020, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V23, P71, DOI 10.22434/IFAMR2019.0033; Pohlmann CR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118798; Pournader M, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P2063, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1650976; Rabbani H, 2015, LAB MANUAL QUALITY C; Rebs T, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V208, P1265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.100; Redlingshofer B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.173; Resende MA, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V139, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.034; Rogerson M, 2020, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V25, P601, DOI 10.1108/SCM-08-2019-0300; Saberi S, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P2117, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261; Saetta Stefano, 2020, Procedia Manufacturing, V42, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.083; SafeFood, 2008, REV MILK SUPPL CHAIN; Salihoglu G, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V248, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.083; Sanchez-Flores RB, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176972; Shankar R, 2018, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V119, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.006; Shen B, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102066; SNV, 2017, HYG QUAL MILK PROD T; Statista, 2020, MILK PROD PER COW US; Stewart M, 2017, J DAIRY SCI, V100, P3893, DOI 10.3168/jds.2016-12055; Tan A., 2020, SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, V2, P100034, DOI [10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100034, DOI 10.1016/J.SFTR.2020.100034]; Tang CS, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V129, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.06.004; Tarnanidis T, 2020, SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTI, P108; Tian ZG, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P2229, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1809733; Tipmontian J, 2020, MULTIDISCIP DIGIT PU, V39, P14, DOI [10.3390/proceedings2019039014, DOI 10.3390/PROCEEDINGS2019039014]; Toni F, 2011, J DAIRY SCI, V94, P1772, DOI 10.3168/jds.2010-3389; Tsang YP, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P129000, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940227; Wang YL, 2019, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V24, P62, DOI 10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0148; World Health Organization, 2015, WHOS 1 EV GLOB EST F; Wu X, 2018, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V111, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.002; Yang CS, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V131, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.020; Zelbst PJ, 2020, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V31, P441, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0118; Zhao GQ, 2019, COMPUT IND, V109, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002	111	21	21	21	71	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	1366-5545	1878-5794		TRANSPORT RES E-LOG	Transp. Res. Pt. e-Logist. Transp. Rev.	MAY	2021	149								102289	10.1016/j.tre.2021.102289	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102289		MAR 2021	21	Economics; Engineering, Civil; Operations Research & Management Science; Transportation; Transportation Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science; Transportation	TE9DK					2022-09-08	WOS:000670306600013
J	Hosseini, K; Stefaniec, A; Hosseini, SP				Hosseini, Keyvan; Stefaniec, Agnieszka; Hosseini, Seyedeh Parisa			World Heritage Sites in developing countries: Assessing impacts and handling complexities toward sustainable tourism	JOURNAL OF DESTINATION MARKETING & MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Sustainable tourism; World heritage site; In danger world heritage list; Developing countries; COVID-19 pandemic; Degrowth; Nonhegemonic partnership; Data envelopment analysis	SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; SOCIETAL PROBLEMS; DESTINATION; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; LIST; INSCRIPTION; PERFORMANCE; COMPRAM; DEA	The current study addresses several concerns regarding World Heritage Sites (WHSs) in developing countries. Using a novel super-efficiency parallel framework, this research firstly elucidates how WHS designation impacts the tourism sector in the 21 developing nations with the greatest number of WHSs from 2000 through 2016. The proposed parallel model assesses the tourism industry at both the macro level in the context of resource-oriented efficiency and the micro level in facility-oriented efficiency. The results demonstrate that the WHS brand positively impacts the tourism demand in developing countries and can be used as a promotional tool. Secondly, this work draws attention to the socio-ecological concerns related to WHSs in developing countries. It sets out a critical and factual discussion based on the current designation and conservation status of WHSs. The analysis highlights an unfair distribution of WHSs between developing and advanced economies and reveals negligence in their preservation, since around 94% of sites labeled In Danger are located in developing nations. The study concludes that the conservation of WHSs is a complex societal problem and offers policy implications for handling heritage inscription and preservation issues in developing countries. Finally, it explores pathways toward sustainable conservation of WHSs, based on United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) for safeguarding heritage and sustainable communities (SDG 11), for more effective institutions (SDG 16), and for fair and nonhegemonic partnership between advanced economies and developing countries (SDG 17). The outcomes may be of practical value to policymakers aiming to improve tourism and heritage management.	[Hosseini, Keyvan; Stefaniec, Agnieszka] Sodertorn Univ, Sch Social Sci, SE-14189 Stockholm, Sweden; [Hosseini, Seyedeh Parisa] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China		Hosseini, K (corresponding author), Sodertorn Univ, Sch Social Sci, SE-14189 Stockholm, Sweden.	keyvan.hosseini@sh.se; agnieszka.stefaniec@sh.se; parisa@mail.ustc.edu.cn	Hosseini, Keyvan/ABG-3711-2020; Hosseini, Keyvan/GQP-4803-2022	Hosseini, Keyvan/0000-0002-8299-1957; Stefaniec, Agnieszka/0000-0003-2366-7740				Adie BA, 2018, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V26, P399, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2017.1359277; Amideo AE, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V279, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.009; Andrades L, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V62, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.05.008; [Anonymous], 2020, CORONAVIRUS WHAT CAN; Assaf AG, 2012, J TRAVEL RES, V51, P388, DOI 10.1177/0047287511426337; Assaf AG, 2012, TOURISM MANAGE, V33, P1122, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.021; Assani S, 2018, COMPUT IND ENG, V120, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.043; Brouder P, 2020, TOURISM GEOGR, V22, P484, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2020.1760928; Brown NE, 2019, J FIELD ARCHAEOL, V44, P287, DOI 10.1080/00934690.2019.1600929; Buscher B., 2021, PLANNING WORLD COVID, V140, DOI [10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105357,105357, DOI 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105357,105357]; Buscher B, 2017, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V25, P651, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2016.1159214; Carrier JG, 2005, J ROY ANTHROPOL INST, V11, P315, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00238.x; Chaabouni S, 2019, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V11, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.09.002; Charnes A., 1962, NAVAL RES LOGS, V9, P181, DOI [10.1002/nav.3800090303, DOI 10.1002/NAV.3800090303]; Cheung KS, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1197, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1606815; Cuccia T, 2017, TOURISM ECON, V23, P316, DOI 10.1177/1354816616656266; Cuccia T, 2016, ECON MODEL, V53, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.049; Denstadli JM, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104150; DeTombe DJ, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V128, P266, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00070-9; DeTombe DJ, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V140, P232, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00066-8; DeTombe D, 2017, J SYST SCI SYST ENG, V26, P303, DOI 10.1007/s11518-017-5334-8; Dobers P, 2009, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V16, P237, DOI 10.1002/csr.212; Durbarry R., 2004, Tourism Economics, V10, P389; Emrouznejad A, 2018, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V61, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008; Franceschini I, 2020, CRIT ASIAN STUD, V52, P512, DOI 10.1080/14672715.2020.1804961; Higgins-Desbiolles F, 2020, TOURISM GEOGR, V22, P610, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2020.1757748; Higgins-Desbiolles F, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1926, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1601732; Hjalager AM, 2007, ANN TOURISM RES, V34, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2006.10.006; Hosseini K, 2019, ENERGY, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116112; International Monetary Fund, 2019, WORLD EC OUTLOOK; Ivanov S, 2013, ANN TOURISM RES, V41, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.008; Jeyacheya J, 2020, WORLD DEV, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960; Kallis G, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P873, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007; Kim H, 2018, INT J TOUR RES, V20, P126, DOI 10.1002/jtr.2169; Kim SS, 2007, TOURISM MANAGE, V28, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.024; King LM, 2014, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V22, P768, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2013.864660; Ko TG, 2005, TOURISM MANAGE, V26, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.12.003; Li YJ, 2017, ANN OPER RES, V253, P453, DOI 10.1007/s10479-016-2382-2; Ma XL, 2009, TOURISM MANAGE, V30, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.006; Mamun S., 2020, DHAKA TRIBUNE; Mariani MM, 2020, J TRAVEL RES, V59, P22, DOI 10.1177/0047287518821737; Milano C, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1857, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1650054; Perry J, 2011, INT J HERIT STUD, V17, P426, DOI 10.1080/13527258.2011.568064; Pestana BC, 2011, TOURISM MANAGE, V32, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.015; Poria Y, 2013, TOURISM MANAGE, V35, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.02.011; Rasoolimanesh SM, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V58, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.016; Rather RA, 2021, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V20, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100564; Reyes V, 2014, POETICS, V44, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2014.04.003; Rossolatos G, 2020, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100484; Seraphin H, 2018, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V9, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.011; Sesana E, 2020, J CULT HERIT, V41, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.013; Sharifi A, 2015, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V123, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.006; Stefaniec A, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102258; The World Bank, DEBT SERV SUSP COV 1; Tignor R., 2017, WORLDS TOGETHER WORL, V3; Tone K, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V143, P32, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1; Tone K, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V130, P498, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5; UNESCO, 2020, MON WORLD HER SIT CL; UNESCO, 2019, WORLD HER LIST; UNESCO, 2017, SEE CONVENTION PROTE; United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2019, TOURISM STAT; UNODC, 2020, VICT INT HOM; Valdivielso J, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1876, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1660670; Wang ZG, 2015, J NAT CONSERV, V23, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.11.001; Wijesinghe SNR, 2018, PERSPECT ASIAN TOUR, P97, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_5; World Bank, 2019, WORLD BANK OPEN DATA; World Economic Forum, 2019, TRAVEL TOURISM COMPE; Xiao HG, 2013, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.02.004; Yang CH, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.008; Yang Y, 2019, ANN TOURISM RES, V75, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2018.12.007; Yazdi SK, 2017, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V20, P787, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2016.1170772; Yin PZ, 2020, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2019.02.004	72	10	10	12	29	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	2212-571X	2212-5752		J DESTIN MARK MANAGE	J. Destin. Mark. Manag.	JUN	2021	20								100616	10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100616	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100616		MAY 2021	12	Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Social Sciences - Other Topics; Business & Economics	SP2OL					2022-09-08	WOS:000659513900006
J	Ozdemir, S; Ozdemir, S; Ozer, H; Yetilmezsoy, K				Ozdemir, Saim; Ozdemir, Serkan; Ozer, Hasan; Yetilmezsoy, Kaan			A techno-sustainable bio-waste management strategy for closing chickpea yield gap	WASTE MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Bio-waste recycling; Chickpea cultivation; Chlorophyll content; Nodule image analysis; Poultry abattoir sludge	NITROGEN-FIXATION; POULTRY SLAUGHTERHOUSE; ORGANIC WASTES; FLY-ASH; SLUDGE; GROWTH; WATER; SOIL; NODULATION; RESPONSES	Sustainable development goals imply environmentally sound management of all wastes to minimize the waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse. In particular, the poultry industry produces nutrient-rich waste that requires proper management. Additionally, the recycling of bio-wastes in agricultural lands is still a key technology for the sustainable use of nutrients as a renewable fertilizer. Currently, there are very few studies on the utilization of agro-industrial bio-wastes, such as poultry abattoir sludge (PAS), for crop cultivation in soils containing low organic matter and high pH. In this context, it is necessary to make a more particular assessment of poultry industry-oriented and locally available nutrient-rich organic wastes for nodulation, physiological adaptation, and crop yield. Considering the scarcity of the literature in this field, the present study aimed to fulfill the apparent gap by focusing on the applicability of recycled PAS to low fertility soil in the growth of chickpea selected as a model legume, thereby contributing to the development of an agricultural and sustainable industrial management strategy for the relevant sectors. In this study, leaf chlorophyll content and nodule color were also investigated by the image analysis methodology to describe the effects of bio-waste on closing chickpea yield gap in a marginal land with high soil pH and low organic matter. Two-year consecutive field experiments were carried out to explore the effect of the PAS with the application rates of 25 kg N ha(-1) (T-2), 50 kg N ha(-1) (T-3), and 100 kg N ha(-1) (T-4) along with unamended (T-0) and fertilized control (T-1). The results indicated that the PAS treatments significantly differed in chlorophyll content, nodulation parameters, and biomass and grain yields. The chlorophyll content was correlated (r = 0.910) with the red color value (RGB color model) of nodule image analysis in the response to bio-waste. Based on the two-year average, it was concluded that chickpea yield could be increased 45% by amending with the PAS (T3). The present study clearly demonstrated that the image analysis could be a useful digital tool for the evaluation of chlorophyll content, nitrogen fixation efficiency, and forecasting biomass and grain yields of chickpea. The results also confirmed that the PAS application to low fertility soil could prominently contribute to establish sustainable waste management and crop production alternatives for closing chickpea yield gap. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Ozdemir, Saim; Ozer, Hasan] Sakarya Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, TR-54187 Esentepe, Sakarya, Turkey; [Ozdemir, Serkan] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Informat Syst, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey; [Yetilmezsoy, Kaan] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Environm Engn, TR-34220 Istanbul, Turkey		Ozdemir, S (corresponding author), Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Informat Syst, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey.	saimo@sakarya.edu.tr; serkano@metu.edu.tr; hasanozer@sakarya.edu.tr; yetilmez@yildiz.edu.tr	Ozdemir, Saim/N-4860-2019	Ozdemir, Saim/0000-0002-0549-0577				AHMED M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI [DOI 10.3390/SU11184938, DOI 10.3390/su11184938]; Alvarenga P, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V61, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.004; Alvarenga P, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V686, P1152, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.038; Amiri H, 2017, COMPOST SCI UTIL, V25, P152, DOI 10.1080/1065657X.2016.1249313; Araujo ASF, 2007, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V98, P1028, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.028; Berek AK, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agronomy8100203; Boudjabi S, 2019, J KING SAUD UNIV SCI, V31, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.jksus.2017.12.012; Brannvall E, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V159, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.032; Antolin MC, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V182, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.017; Ciria CS, 2020, IND CROP PROD, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112184; Dede G, 2017, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V14, P1451, DOI 10.1007/s13762-017-1252-z; Elrys AS, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110488; Ferreira A, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P3081, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.078; Gwata ET, 2004, J HERED, V95, P154, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esh017; Hosseinzadeh SR, 2018, J INTEGR AGR, V17, P2426, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61874-4; Israr D, 2016, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V108, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.023; Karimi B, 2017, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V15, P265, DOI 10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6; Kraiser T, 2011, J EXP BOT, V62, P1455, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erq425; Lodwig EM, 2003, NATURE, V422, P722, DOI 10.1038/nature01527; Lohri CR, 2017, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V16, P81, DOI 10.1007/s11157-017-9422-5; Lotocka B, 2012, SYMBIOSIS, V58, P63, DOI 10.1007/s13199-013-0225-3; Manirakiza E, 2022, CAN J SOIL SCI, V102, P27, DOI 10.1139/cjss-2019-0138; Marousek J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123015; Marousek J, 2020, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V22, P937, DOI 10.1007/s10098-020-01835-w; Marousek J, 2019, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V21, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7; Marousek J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V218, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.037; Mekki A, 2019, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V69, P867, DOI 10.1080/10962247.2017.1374311; Merga B, 2019, COGENT FOOD AGR, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2019.1615718; Mittal GS, 2006, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V97, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.11.021; Nel A. A., 2009, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, V26, P164; Ogleni N, 2010, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V34, P509, DOI 10.3906/tar-0908-300; Ozdemir S, 2005, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V14, P599; Ozdemir S, 2019, ENVIRON PROG SUSTAIN, V38, DOI 10.1002/ep.13225; Ozdemir S, 2020, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V22, P11, DOI 10.1007/s10163-019-00934-1; Paliya S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109523; Ribeiro JP, 2018, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V18, P2023, DOI 10.1007/s11368-018-1949-8; Lozada JAR, 2017, SEMIN-CIENC AGRAR, V38, P1209, DOI 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1209; Ryan J., 2001, SOIL PLANT ANAL LAB, P5; Salminen E, 2001, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V78, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00160-7; Schulze J, 2004, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V167, P125, DOI 10.1002/jpln.200320358; Shahzad SM, 2014, BIOL FERT SOILS, V50, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00374-013-0826-2; Sharma B, 2019, INT J ENVIRON RES, V13, P409, DOI 10.1007/s41742-019-00175-y; Sinclair T. R., 2004, SOYBEANS IMPROVEMENT, P537, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR16.3ED.FRONTMATTER; Singh RP, 2007, CHEMOSPHERE, V67, P2229, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.019; Singh RP, 2010, ECOL ENG, V36, P969, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.008; Soltani A, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V185, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.015; Srivastava AK, 2017, OUTLOOK AGR, V46, P230, DOI 10.1177/0030727017726208; Stal L.J., 2017, SCI REP, V7, P1; Taibi K, 2016, S AFR J BOT, V105, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.011; TAN CT, 1962, J FOOD SCI, V27, P232, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1962.tb00086.x; UZUN P, 2011, ULUDAG U ZIRAAT FAKU, V25, P135; Whish JPM, 2007, EXP AGR, V43, P505, DOI 10.1017/S0014479707005297; Xiao TT, 2014, DEVELOPMENT, V141, P3517, DOI 10.1242/dev.110775; Yetilmezsoy K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V152, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.106; Yilmaz G, 2008, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V100, P529, DOI 10.1002/bit.21774; Zaheer A, 2019, SAUDI J BIOL SCI, V26, P1061, DOI 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.04.004	56	6	6	5	21	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0956-053X	1879-2456		WASTE MANAGE	Waste Manage.	JAN 1	2021	119						356	364		10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.030	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.030			9	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PG5HR	33186829				2022-09-08	WOS:000599766200034
J	Abdelwahed, A; van den Berg, PL; Brandt, T; Ketter, W; Mulder, J				Abdelwahed, Ayman; van den Berg, Pieter L.; Brandt, Tobias; Ketter, Wolfgang; Mulder, Judith			A Boost for Urban Sustainability: Optimizing Electric Transit Bus Networks in Rotterdam	INFORMS JOURNAL ON APPLIED ANALYTICS			English	Article						sustainability; public transport; electric transit networks; charging scheduling; optimization; simulation	CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE	In 2016, the Dutch government, in pursuit of the UN's sustainable development goals, set a target that all its diesel transit bus networks should be fully electrified between 2025 and 2030. A research team from Rotterdam School of Management has since worked in close collaboration with Rotterdamse Elektrische Tram, the public transport operator in the city of Rotterdam, to accomplish this complex transition. This paper presents essential lessons learned and key practical implications derived from the project. As part of the transition process, we developed a discrete-event simulation model that can simulate the network using different settings and under uncertainty. We also formulated a mixed-integer linear programming problem to optimize the charging schedule. To mitigate the critical impact of uncertainty regarding traffic delays and energy consumption on the electrified transit bus network operation, we developed a real-time decision support system that adjusts and reoptimizes the charging schedule during the day according to the realizations of this uncertainty. We use this system to achieve better coordination between the charging schedule of the electric buses and electricity generation from renewable energy sources with the latter involving high levels of uncertainty. Our study shows the benefits of real-time optimization compared with off-line planning and other greedy strategies. We also show that even highly conservative off-line planning might not be sufficient to maintain reliability levels under extreme operational uncertainty conditions. Additionally, our results and insights have substantially contributed to the success of the first phase of the project, which involved electrifying seven essential bus lines in the city, in realizing a robust and reliable operational plan. Finally, our study shows the potential substantial positive impact of installing renewable energy generators and coordinating the electric buses' charging schedule with their output power profile. Based on our recommendations, RET developed a real-time monitoring system and is working on incorporating our charging schedule optimizer into its planning process.	[Abdelwahed, Ayman; van den Berg, Pieter L.; Brandt, Tobias; Ketter, Wolfgang] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Technol & Operat Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands; [Brandt, Tobias] Univ Munster, European Res Ctr Informat Syst, D-48149 Munster, Germany; [Ketter, Wolfgang] Univ Cologne, Cologne Inst Informat Syst, Fac Management Econ & Social Sci, D-50969 Cologne, Germany; [Ketter, Wolfgang] Univ Cologne, Inst Energy Econ, D-50969 Cologne, Germany; [Mulder, Judith] Rotterdamse Elekt Tram, Dept Business Operat, NL-3071 AA Rotterdam, Netherlands		Abdelwahed, A (corresponding author), Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Technol & Operat Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.	abdelwahed@rsm.nl; vandenberg@rsm.nl; tobias.brandt@wwu.de; ketter@wiso.uni-koeln.de; jmulder@ret.nl	Ketter, Wolfgang/W-4931-2017; van den Berg, Pieter L/R-1252-2017	Ketter, Wolfgang/0000-0001-9008-142X; van den Berg, Pieter L/0000-0002-8550-6769; Abdelwahed, Ayman/0000-0003-2473-102X; Brandt, Tobias/0000-0002-2127-1921	EU; European Union [731198]	EU(European Commission); European Union(European Commission)	This research was conducted as part of the EU Horizon 2020 project RUGGEDISED and received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [Grant 731198].	Abdelwahed A, ONLINE OPTIMIZATION; Abdelwahed A, 2020, TRANSPORT SCI, V54, P1601, DOI 10.1287/trsc.2020.0982; Chen ZB, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V93, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.006; Elia Group, 2019, SUCC EN TRANS SUST W; European Commission, 2010, STRATEGY SMART SUSTA; Kammen DM, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P922, DOI 10.1126/science.aad9302; Ke BR, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.152; Kunith A, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V11, P707, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2017.1310962; Li JQ, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P157, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.872737; Mohamed M, 2017, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V142, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.09.032; Paul T, 2014, 2014 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), P2780, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2014.6958135; Pelletier S, 2018, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V115, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2018.07.010; Qin N, 2016, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V94, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.014; van Ede W, 2020, RET VERIFICATION LET; Xylia M, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V78, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.005	15	1	1	1	5	INFORMS	CATONSVILLE	5521 RESEARCH PARK DR, SUITE 200, CATONSVILLE, MD 21228 USA	2644-0865	2644-0873		INFORMS J APPL ANAL	INFORMS J. Appl. Anal.	SEP-OCT	2021	51	5					391	407		10.1287/inte.2021.1092	http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2021.1092			17	Management; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science	UZ2AI		Green Published, Bronze			2022-09-08	WOS:000702012300006
J	Cooke, SJ; Allison, EH; Beard, TD; Arlinghaus, R; Arthington, AH; Bartley, DM; Cowx, IG; Fuentevilla, C; Leonard, NJ; Lorenzen, K; Lynch, AJ; Nguyen, VM; Youn, SJ; Taylor, WW; Welcomme, RL				Cooke, Steven J.; Allison, Edward H.; Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.; Arlinghaus, Robert; Arthington, Angela H.; Bartley, Devin M.; Cowx, Ian G.; Fuentevilla, Carlos; Leonard, Nancy J.; Lorenzen, Kai; Lynch, Abigail J.; Nguyen, Vivian M.; Youn, So-Jung; Taylor, William W.; Welcomme, Robin L.			On the sustainability of inland fisheries: Finding a future for the forgotten	AMBIO			English	Article						Inland fisheries; Sustainability; Governance; Integrated water resources management; Food-water-energy nexus	FRESH-WATER FISH; SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES; FOOD SECURITY; CAPTURE FISHERIES; BIODIVERSITY; MARINE; MANAGEMENT; THREATS; COMANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES	At present, inland fisheries are not often a national or regional governance priority and as a result, inland capture fisheries are undervalued and largely overlooked. As such they are threatened in both developing and developed countries. Indeed, due to lack of reliable data, inland fisheries have never been part of any high profile global fisheries assessment and are notably absent from the Sustainable Development Goals. The general public and policy makers are largely ignorant of the plight of freshwater ecosystems and the fish they support, as well as the ecosystem services generated by inland fisheries. This ignorance is particularly salient given that the current emphasis on the food-water-energy nexus often fails to include the important role that inland fish and fisheries play in food security and supporting livelihoods in low-income food deficit countries. Developing countries in Africa and Asia produce about 11 million tonnes of inland fish annually, 90 % of the global total. The role of inland fisheries goes beyond just kilocalories; fish provide important micronutrients and essentially fatty acids. In some regions, inland recreational fisheries are important, generating much wealth and supporting livelihoods. The following three key recommendations are necessary for action if inland fisheries are to become a part of the food-water-energy discussion: invest in improved valuation and assessment methods, build better methods to effectively govern inland fisheries (requires capacity building and incentives), and develop approaches to managing waters across sectors and scales. Moreover, if inland fisheries are recognized as important to food security, livelihoods, and human well-being, they can be more easily incorporated in regional, national, and global policies and agreements on water issues. Through these approaches, inland fisheries can be better evaluated and be more fully recognized in broader water resource and aquatic ecosystem planning and decision-making frameworks, enhancing their value and sustainability for the future.	[Cooke, Steven J.] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol & Inst Environm Sci, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, Ottawa, ON, Canada; [Allison, Edward H.] Univ Washington, Sch Marine & Environm Affairs, Seattle, WA USA; [Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.] United States Geol Survey, Natl Climate Change & Wildlife Sci Ctr, Reston, VA USA; [Arlinghaus, Robert] Humboldt Univ, Dept Biol & Ecol Fishes, Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany; [Arlinghaus, Robert] Humboldt Univ, Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, Berlin, Germany; [Arthington, Angela H.] Australian Rivers Inst, Griffith Univ, Logan, Qld, Australia; [Bartley, Devin M.; Fuentevilla, Carlos] United Nations, Dept Fisheries & Aquaculture, Food & Agr Org, Rome, Italy; [Cowx, Ian G.] Univ Hull, Hull Int Fisheries Inst, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England; [Leonard, Nancy J.] Northwest Power & Conservat Council, Portland, OR USA; [Lorenzen, Kai] Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Fisheries & Aquat Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA; [Lynch, Abigail J.] United States Geol Survey, Natl Climate Change & Wildlife Sci Ctr, Reston, VA USA; [Nguyen, Vivian M.] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, Ottawa, ON, Canada; [Nguyen, Vivian M.] Carleton Univ, Inst Environm Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada; [Youn, So-Jung; Taylor, William W.] Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA; [Welcomme, Robin L.] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk, Ascot, Berks, England		Cooke, SJ (corresponding author), Carleton Univ, Dept Biol & Inst Environm Sci, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, Ottawa, ON, Canada.	steven_cooke@carleton.ca	Arthington, Angela H./I-1689-2019; Arlinghaus, Robert/J-6171-2019; Arlinghaus, Robert/E-3340-2010; Nguyen, Vivian/AAO-8682-2020; Cooke, Steven J/F-4193-2010; Cowx, Ian G/A-5540-2009; Lorenzen, Kai/A-3032-2015; Lynch, Abigail J./H-5059-2019; Allison, Edward H/B-8615-2009	Arlinghaus, Robert/0000-0003-2861-527X; Cooke, Steven J/0000-0002-5407-0659; Lynch, Abigail J./0000-0001-8449-8392; Lorenzen, Kai/0000-0002-9691-3693; Nguyen, Vivian/0000-0002-8666-8137; Allison, Edward/0000-0003-4663-1396	Canada Research Chairs Program; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Too Big To Ignore Network of the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada	Canada Research Chairs Program(Canada Research Chairs); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada(Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)CGIAR); Too Big To Ignore Network of the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada	The Global Conference was convened as part of a partnership agreement between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Michigan State University (MSU); the contributions of FAO, MSU, the American Fisheries Society, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research in support of the Global Conference is gratefully acknowledged. Cooke is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Too Big To Ignore Network of the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We thank several anonymous referees for providing valuable input on the manuscript. Kathryn Dufour assisted with formatting the manuscript. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. Photo credits: Karen Murchie, Ian Cowx, and Vivian Nguyen.	Ahmed M., 2006, WORLDFISH CTR DISCUS, V2; Allan JD, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P1041, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1041:OOIW]2.0.CO;2; Allison EH, 2006, MAR POLICY, V30, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.001; Allison EH, 2012, FISH FISH, V13, P14, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00405.x; Allison EH, 2011, SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT: FRAMEWORKS AND APPROACHES FOR THE DEVELOPING WORLD, P216, DOI 10.1079/9781845936075.0216; Andrew NL, 2007, FISH FISH, V8, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00252.x; Arlinghaus R, 2009, RECREATIONAL HUNTING, P39, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444303179.CH3; Asche F, 2015, WORLD DEV, V67, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.013; Balirwa JS, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P703, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0703:BAFSIT]2.0.CO;2; Barnett A, 2016, FISH FISH, V17, P696, DOI 10.1111/faf.12140; Bartley DM, 2015, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V22, P71, DOI 10.1111/fme.12104; Beard TD, 2011, BIOL LETTERS, V7, P481, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0046; Belton B, 2011, FOOD POLICY, V36, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.027; Bene C, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.010; Bene C, 2009, J DEV STUD, V45, P911, DOI 10.1080/00220380902807395; Biggs EM, 2014, CISC VIS NETW IND GL; Bonar SA, 2002, FISHERIES, V27, P10, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(2002)027&lt;0010:SSOIF&gt;2.0.CO;2; Bower S. D., 2014, ENHANCING STEWARDSHI; Brown L.R., 2002, ECOECONOMY BUILDING, P145; BRUTON MN, 1995, ENVIRON BIOL FISH, V43, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00001812; Chuenpagdee R., 2006, 148 U BRIT COL, V14; Cisneros-Montemayor A.M., 2010, J BIOECONOMICS, V12, P245, DOI [10.1007/s10818-010-9092-7, DOI 10.1007/S10818-010-9092-7]; Clausen R, 2008, SOC SCI RES, V37, P1310, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.10.002; Collares-Pereira MJ, 2004, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V11, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00392.x; Cooke SJ, 2014, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V71, P1593, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0176; Cooke SJ, 2013, J FISH BIOL, V83, P997, DOI 10.1111/jfb.12222; Cooke S. J., CONSERVATION FRESHWA; Cooke S. J., FRESHWATER FISH FUTU; Cooke SJ, 2016, FRESHWATER FISHERIES ECOLOGY, P449; Cowx IG, 2011, J FISH BIOL, V79, P1663, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03144.x; Cowx IG., 1998, RECREATIONAL FISHERI; de Graaf G, 2015, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V22, P64, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00844.x; Deines AM, 2015, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V25, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11160-015-9384-z; Dudgeon D, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1464793105006950; Dugan P., 2010, BLUE HARVEST INLAND; Eggert H, 2015, FISH RES, V167, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.02.015; Evans L, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P1938, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.010; FAO, 1995, COD COND RESP FISH; FAO, 2015, VOL GUID SEC SUST SM; FAO, 2022, STATE WORLD FISHERIE, DOI DOI 10.4060/CC0461EN; FAO, 1999, 382 FAO; FERNANDO CH, 1993, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V259, P91, DOI 10.1007/BF00008375; Garcia SM, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2869, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0171; Gawler M., 2002, STRATEGIES WISE USE, P1; Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383; Grafton RQ, 2006, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V63, P699, DOI 10.1139/f05-247; Gutierrez NL, 2011, NATURE, V470, P386, DOI 10.1038/nature09689; Hall SJ, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8393, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1208067110; Hilborn R, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P9187, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308962110; Holmlund CM, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P253, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00015-4; Hortle KG, 2009, AQUAT ECOL-SAN DIEGO, P197, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374026-7.00009-7; Humphries P, 2009, BIOSCIENCE, V59, P673, DOI 10.1525/bio.2009.59.8.9; Karkkainen Bradley, 2006, PACIFIC MCGEORGE GLO, V19, P209; Kew M., 1992, COMPLEX CULTURE BRIT, P177; Krueger CC, 1999, INLAND FISHERIES MAN, P31; Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization, 2016, E AFR COMM BEN LAK V; Lapointe NWR, 2014, ENVIRON REV, V22, P1, DOI [10.1139/er-2013-0013, DOI 10.1139/ER-2013-0013]; Limburg KE, 2011, FISHERIES, V36, P27, DOI 10.1577/03632415.2011.10389053; Liu JG, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1258832; Lorenzen K, 2014, J FISH BIOL, V85, P1807, DOI 10.1111/jfb.12573; Lorenzen K, 2012, BIOL REV, V87, P639, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00215.x; Loucks DP, 2000, WATER INT, V25, P3, DOI 10.1080/02508060008686793; Lynch AJ, 2016, ENVIRON REV, V24, P115, DOI 10.1139/er-2015-0064; Mills D, 2011, J INT DEV, V23, P308, DOI 10.1002/jid.1638; Navy H., 1998, SOCIOECONOMIC ASSESS; Newson M., 2004, Hydrology: science and practice for the 21st century, Volume II. Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society International Conference, Imperial College, London, July 2004, P439; Njaya, 2007, INT J COMMONS, V1, P137, DOI [DOI 10.18352/IJC.21, 10.18352/ijc.21]; Nunan F, 2015, WORLD DEV, V70, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.01.009; Orr S, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P925, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.06.002; Ostrom E, 2011, POLICY STUD J, V39, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x; Pauly D, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10244; Pollnac RB, 2001, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V44, P531, DOI 10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00064-3; Post JR, 2002, FISHERIES, V27, P6, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(2002)027&lt;0006:CRF&gt;2.0.CO;2; Reid W.V.C, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL; Ricciardi A, 1999, CONSERV BIOL, V13, P1220, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98380.x; Rodriguez M., 2014, STATE WORLD FISHERIE; Roos N, 2007, J NUTR, V137, P1106, DOI 10.1093/jn/137.4.1106; Sachs JD, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2206, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0; Sala OE, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1770, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770; Sarch MT, 2000, GEOGR J, V166, P156, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2000.tb00015.x; Schindler DE, 2010, NATURE, V465, P609, DOI 10.1038/nature09060; SISK TD, 1994, BIOSCIENCE, V44, P592, DOI 10.2307/1312459; Smith L. E. D., 2005, Water Policy, V7, P359; Suhardiman D, 2012, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V25, P572, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2011.604398; The World Bank, 2012, HIDDEN HARVEST GLOBA; Thorpe A., 2004, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V7, P40; Troell M, 2004, ENCY ENERGY, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00205-9; Tufts B. L., 2015, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V72, P850, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2015.1022987; Turton A.R., 2007, GOVERNANCE TRIALOGUE; United Nations, 2016, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; US Department of the Interior US Fish and Wildlife Service and US Department of Commerce US Census Bureau, 2011, NAT SURV FISH HUNT W; van der Knaap M., 2002, Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, V5, P245, DOI 10.1080/14634980290031947; Vorosmarty CJ, 2010, NATURE, V467, P555, DOI 10.1038/nature09440; Wahab M.A., 2014, EC INCENTIVES MARINE, P170; Watson R, 2001, NATURE, V414, P534, DOI 10.1038/35107050; Weeratunge N, 2014, FISH FISH, V15, P255, DOI 10.1111/faf.12016; Welcomme R., 2001, INLAND FISHERIES CON; Welcomme RL, 2011, ICES J MAR SCI, V68, P1751, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsr035; Welcomme RL, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2881, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0168; Winemiller KO, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P128, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7082; Youn SJ, 2014, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V3, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.09.005	101	94	103	5	76	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0044-7447	1654-7209		AMBIO	Ambio	NOV	2016	45	7					753	764		10.1007/s13280-016-0787-4	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0787-4			12	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	DY5OY	27312662	Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000385151100001
J	Wood, T; Morais, DOCD				Wood, Thomaz; Morais, Dafne Oliveira Carlos de			Organizing for sustainable development: A multi-stakeholder project in the Amazon	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainability; Sustainable development goals; Stakeholder engagement; Territorial governance; Large-scale projects; Amazon	TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; GRAND CHALLENGES; DISCOURSE; FRAMEWORK; ECONOMY	Sustainable development has become a major topic as the impacts of human actions on the environment have increasingly dramatic consequences. This article describes and analyses a case of organizing for sustainable development that involved multiple social actors working in a participatory way. The research focuses on a project that aimed to define guidelines for carrying out large-scale engineering and construction ventures in the Amazon. It was conducted by a Brazilian research center and an international development agency. The field research included interviews with project leaders, extensive document analysis and nonparticipant observation. As a theoretical lens, we used the concept of territorial governance, from which we created propositions on how interventions should work. Based on these propositions and additional literature on social-ecological systems, an evaluation of the project is presented. We found the elements that were vital to the short-term success of the project, i.e., the skills of the change agents, the reputation of their organizations, and the social technology employed. We also found that less attention to public policies might weaken its long-term prospects. This work advances the knowledge on alternative modes of organizing for sustainability. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the concept of territorial governance, which offers opportunities for engaged scholars interested in tackling grand challenges.	[Wood, Thomaz] FGV EAESP, Ave Nove Julho 2029, BR-01313902 Sa Paulo, SP, Brazil; [Morais, Dafne Oliveira Carlos de] Ctr Univ FEI, Rua Tamandare 688, BR-01525000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil		Morais, DOCD (corresponding author), Ctr Univ FEI, Rua Tamandare 688, BR-01525000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.	thomaz.wood@fgv.br; dafne.morais@fei.edu.br	Morais, Dafne/E-8838-2019	Morais, Dafne/0000-0001-9188-7900	FGV EAESP Pesquisa [2018/03]	FGV EAESP Pesquisa	This work was supported by FGV EAESP Pesquisa (grant number 2018/03) . The sponsor was not involved in the study.	Akhmouch A, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8050204; Alvesson M., 2017, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG, V3rd; Annesi N, 2021, UTIL POLICY, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101270; Atkinson P., 2000, QUALITATIVE RES TEXT; Balz VE, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P871, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2014.889662; Bennett L, 2017, DEFORESTATION CLIMAT; Bocken NMP, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127828; Bratman E.Z., 2019, GOVERNING RAINFOREST; Broman GI, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.121; Brown J, 2015, J MANAGE STUD, V52, P961, DOI 10.1111/joms.12153; BRUNDTLAND GH, 1987, ENVIRON CONSERV, V14, P291, DOI 10.1017/S0376892900016805; Cammelli F., 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V332; Carino G, 2019, LANCET, V394, P2241, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32620-0; Carley M., 2017, MANAGING SUSTAINABLE; *CEC, 2008, GREEN PAP TERR COH T; CEMAT (European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning), 2006, RES 2 TERR GOV EMP E; CEPEA (Centros de Estudos Avanadas em Economia Aplicada), 2019, PIB AGR BRAS; Chan M., 2020, ATLANTIC; Dagnino R., 2014, TECNOLOGIA SOCIAL CO, DOI [10.7476/9788578793272, DOI 10.7476/9788578793272]; Davoudi S, 2008, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, P33; Delbridge R, 2013, ACAD MANAGE REV, V38, P325, DOI 10.5465/amr.2013.0085; deSouza M. A, 2019, REV GEOGRAFIA ATOS G, V3, P50; Dick M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V311, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127750; dos Reis JC, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124580; Du Y, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117682; Eisenhardt KM, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1113, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4004; Esparcia J, 2020, SPRING GEOGR, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_3; European Commission, 2009, CONS GREEN PAP TERR; Fairclough N., 1992, DISCOURSE SOCIAL CHA; Fearnside PM, 2018, SUSTAIN DEV, V26, P141, DOI 10.1002/sd.1725; FGVces & I.F.C., 2017, LARG SCAL PROJ AM LE; FGVces & I.F.C., 2018, GRAND OBR AM APR DIR; FISHER RJ, 1993, J CONSUM RES, V20, P303, DOI 10.1086/209351; Furmankiewicz M, 2014, GEOGR ANN B, V96, P345, DOI 10.1111/geob.12056; Maues LMF, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121779; Furumo PR, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102055; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; George G, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1880, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4007; George G, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1869, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4006; Greenwood M, 2007, J BUS ETHICS, V74, P315, DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y; Guerreiro I, 2017, CAPITAIS AMAZONIA LE; Hajjar R, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.102; Hardy C, 2010, ACAD MANAGE J, V53, P1365, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318384; HOUAISS Antonio, 2001, DICIONARIO ELETRONIC; Ivanaj S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126586; Kohler-Koch B., 1999, TRANSFORMATION GOVER; Lathuilliere MJ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V219, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.021; Lazarus RJ, 2009, CORNELL LAW REV, V94, P1153; Leal A, 2016, SADUE LANA CAMPANHA; Levin K, 2012, POLICY SCI, V45, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0; Lidstrom A, 2007, REG FED STUD, V17, P499, DOI 10.1080/13597560701691896; Loiseau E, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V139, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024; Mitev N, 2009, J MANAGE STUD, V46, P733, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00846.x; Ribeiro AMM, 2019, DIREITO PRAX, V10, P1046, DOI 10.1590/2179-8966/2018/32202; Myers MD, 2013, QUALITATIVE RES BUSI; NOWOTNY H., 2001, RE THINKING SCI KNOW; OECD, 2001, OECD TERR OUTL; Ostrom E, 2010, AM ECON REV, V100, P641, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.3.641; Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133; PAINTER J, 1995, ECON SOC, V24, P334; Paredes M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121605; Peixoto F.A, 2009, BBC BRAZIL; Phillips D., 2019, GUARDIAN; Phillips N, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P635; Phillips N., 2002, DISCOURSE ANAL INVES; Polanyi Karl, 2012, GRANDE TRANSFORMACAO, P70; Polge E, 2018, PAP REG SCI, V97, P909, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12308; Ribas JR, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.043; Skidmore Thomas E., 1988, POLITICS MILITARY RU; Stahel WR, 2016, NATURE, V531, P435, DOI 10.1038/531435a; Stead D, 2014, EUR PLAN STUD, V22, P680, DOI [10.1080/09654313.2013.772731, 10.1080/09654313.2013.786684]; Torres-Salcido G, 2018, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agriculture8020018; Toto R., 2021, GOVERNING TERRITORIA, P195; UN, 2019, SUST DEV GOALS REP 2; Union European, 2013, ESPON TANGO TERRITOR; van Zanten JA, 2018, J INT BUS POLICY, V1, P208, DOI 10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x; Wassenhoven L, 2008, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, P53; Wright C., 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE CAPIT, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139939676; Yin R.K., 2005, INTRO WORLD ED CASE; Zanon B, 2011, PLAN PRACT RES, V26, P325, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2011.580114	80	0	0	5	5	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 15	2022	362								132193	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132193	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132193			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1X9TE					2022-09-08	WOS:000807790200004
J	Pan, HY; Zheng, XY; Tian, X; Geng, Y; Zhang, XH; Xiao, SJ; Gao, ZY; Yang, YX; Liu, XC; Li, L; Huang, CY; Deng, SH; Liu, Q				Pan, Hengyu; Zheng, Xiangyu; Tian, Xu; Geng, Yong; Zhang, Xiaohong; Xiao, Shijiang; Gao, Ziyan; Yang, Yuanxiang; Liu, Xincong; Li, Li; Huang, Chengyi; Deng, Shihuai; Liu, Qiang			Toward sustainable crop production in China: A co-benefits evaluation	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Crop productions; Sustainable development; Climate change; Emergy analysis; Driving factors	GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; EMERGY EVALUATION; FOOTPRINT; FERTILIZER; TEMPERATURE; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; NITROGEN	Crop production is critical in achieving Sustainable Development Goals, but it may lead to various environmental concerns, such as soil and water contamination, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study aims to account the overall sustainability of crop production by applying emergy analysis and evaluate corresponding GHG emissions by applying carbon footprint analysis. Key factors affecting both the overall sustainability and GHG emissions of crop production were uncovered by using Kaya identify and Logarithmic Mean Divisa Index (LMDI) methods. China is selected as the case study country due to its large scaled crop production. The study period is from 2000 to 2015, a period of rapid crop development. The results show that the overall sustainability of China's crop production decreased due to increasing non-renewable resource inputs, especially in Tibet and Inner Mongolia, while the total carbon footprint increased by 10.92% due to straw burning and fertilizer application. Driving factors analysis results show that crop productivity, land use intensity and agricultural population were key positive factors influencing the overall sustainability and carbon footprints of Cina's crop production, while crop productivity was one negative factor. Policy recommendations were raised to facilitate sustainable crop production and respond to climate change challenges.	[Pan, Hengyu; Zheng, Xiangyu; Zhang, Xiaohong; Yang, Yuanxiang; Liu, Xincong; Li, Li; Huang, Chengyi; Deng, Shihuai] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Environm Sci, Chengdu Campus, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China; [Tian, Xu; Geng, Yong; Xiao, Shijiang; Gao, Ziyan] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, SJTU UNIDO Joint Inst Inclus & Sustainable Ind Dev, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China; [Geng, Yong] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China; [Liu, Qiang] Ecol Environm Monitoring Stn Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 610091, Sichuan, Peoples R China		Zhang, XH (corresponding author), Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Environm Sci, Chengdu Campus, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China.; Geng, Y (corresponding author), Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, SJTU UNIDO Joint Inst Inclus & Sustainable Ind Dev, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China.	ygeng@sjtu.edu.cn	Geng, Yong/B-6310-2018	Geng, Yong/0000-0002-2284-1375; Gao, Ziyan/0000-0001-7855-4941	Natural Science Foundation of China [72088101, 71810107001, 71690241]; Shanghai Pujiang Program [2020PJC078]	Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Shanghai Pujiang Program(Shanghai Pujiang Program)	Acknowledgement This work is supported by This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (72088101; 71810107001; 71690241) , Shanghai Pujiang Program (2020PJC078) .	Ali M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.236; Audsley E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V73, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.066; Bai YY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V752, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141963; Berardy A, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5e6d; Brown MT, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V339, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.017; Brown MT, 1997, ECOL ENG, V9, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00033-5; Bryan BA, 2018, NATURE, V559, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2; Carlson KM, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P63, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3158, 10.1038/nclimate3158]; Chen GQ, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V115, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.01.005; Chen X., NATURE, V514; Cheng K, 2015, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V153, P422, DOI 10.1017/S0021859614000665; Cheng K, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.012; Dalin C, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P9774, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1404749111; de Barros I, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.015; Ding D, 2018, GEOFORUM, V90, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.010; Dong G, 2013, ECOL ECON, V91, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.003; DP-NDRC Department of Price in National Develpment and Reform Commission of China, 2000, COMP NAT AGR COSTS R; Fan X, 2020, APPL ENERG, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114796; FAOSTAT, 2019, FAOSTAT STAT DAT; Feng XL, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V770, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144838; Geng Y, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1526, DOI 10.1126/science.1227059; Geng Y, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P5273, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.081; Ghisellini P, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V271, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.014; Goglio R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P4010, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.133; He P, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P122, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0035-y; He R, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114607; Hong CP, 2021, NATURE, V589, P554, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-03138-y; Houshyar E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P2246, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.187; Hu MP, 2020, WATER RES, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115779; Huang L, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147935; Ju XT, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P3041, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0813417106; Lam WY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V315, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128121; Laurent A, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P4100, DOI 10.1021/es204163f; Li BW, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105124; Li MQ, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123963; Li M, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111147; Liu WW, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V645, P1296, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.104; Liu WJ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V210, P1229, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.121; Liu ZX, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107023; Liu ZX, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.183; Lou B, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V55, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.009; Lu F, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x; Lu F, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1195, pE107, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05408.x; Lu HF, 2010, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P2727, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.025; Ma L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P1385, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b04375; Maraseni T, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V282, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124555; McDougall R, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P129, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1809707115; Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2015, CHINA WATER RESOURCE; Mohammadzadeh A, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P16971, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9253-5; Moonilall NI, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120761; National Bureau of Statistics, 2019, CHINA ANIMAL HUSBAND; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016, CHIN RUR STAT YB 200; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016, CHIN STAT YB 2000 20; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016, 2015 DAL NAT EC SOC, P1; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016, CHIN AGR STAT YB 200; National Earth System Science Data Center, 2019, CHIN 30M DEM ASTER D, DOI [10.12041/geodata.78789.ver1.db/, DOI 10.12041/GEODATA.78789.VER1.DB]; National Energy Administration, 2016, GUID OP COMP IMPL PL; National Environmental Accounting Database, 2015, CHIN EM MON RAT EMR; Odum H.T., 1996, CHOICE REV ONLINE, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.34-0412; Pan HY, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P14598, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04793-z; Pan HY, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V140, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.012; Pan HY, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P1498, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.019; Peng SZ, 2019, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V11, P1931, DOI 10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019; Pittelkow CM, 2015, NATURE, V517, P365, DOI 10.1038/nature13809; Qian YY, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P5877, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b00093; Rao ND, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P841, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.073; Ren DD, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.071; Ren JQ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061762; Shah SM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118019; Shao S, 2021, ENERG ECON, V102, P5515, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105515; Springmann M, 2018, NATURE, V562, P519, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0; Sun WY, 2016, ATMOS RES, V168, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.09.001; Tao J, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V29, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.014; Tian PP, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123347; Wang CD, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110337; Wang C, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V68, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.018; Wang XL, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V117, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.009; Wang X, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V716, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137119; Wu F, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119006; Wu JJ, 2022, ENERGY, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122374; Xu MY, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105239; Xu ZP, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126638; Xu ZC, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19520-3; Yang J, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P3907, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021; Yang Q, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V34, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.006; Yang XL, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109588; Yin HJ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2695, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.076; Yuan MH, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V752, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141954; Yuan S, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.264; Zabel F, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z; Zhang D, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04182-x; Zhang J, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V627, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.090; Zhang M, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V227, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.010; Zhang T, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105301; Zhang XH, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.004; Zhang XH, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V43, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.034; Zhang X, 2015, NATURE, V528, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature15743; Zhao H, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P1042, DOI 10.1038/s41893-021-00784-6; Zhao YC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P4045, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700292114; Zheng H, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P16681, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312324110; Zhou Y, 2017, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V17, P2839, DOI 10.5194/acp-17-2839-2017; Zhuang MH, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122125; Zuo LJ, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P304, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0076-2	103	1	1	21	21	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 10	2022	361								132285	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132285	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132285			18	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1X9NO					2022-09-08	WOS:000807775600005
J	Jeyacheya, J; Hampton, MP				Jeyacheya, Julia; Hampton, Mark P.			Wishful thinking or wise policy? Theorising tourism-led inclusive growth: Supply chains and host communities	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article; Proceedings Paper	Sustainability and Development Conference (SDC)	NOV 09-11, 2018	Ann Arbor, MI			Inclusive growth; Tourism development; Poverty alleviation; Economic linkages; South-East Asia	INNOVATION; POOR	Tourism is perceived as driving economic growth for developing countries by generating employment, income and government revenue. In debates over the relationship between economic growth and poverty alleviation, the inclusive growth paradigm emerged in World Bank, OECD and other development publications, becoming a UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 8). However, inclusive growth remains highly contested, and specifically, tourisms role in economic growth has been little discussed. This paper contributes to the debate by interrogating tourism-led inclusive growth using evidence from developing economies in South-East Asia, a region with booming international tourism. It raises the fundamental question whether tourism-led growth can be inclusive in the short- to medium-term, drawing on evidence from fieldwork in Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia and Myanmar. Fieldwork utilised a rapid rural appraisal approach using qualitative methods, mainly semi-structured interviews. Although tourism can generate employment overall, this can be precarious and poorly paid, limiting opportunities for poverty alleviation. Tourism-led growth may widen inequalities in host communities and weaken backward linkages to the local economy, despite its potential for strengthening such linkages to food and non-food sectors. Remoteness and transportation also weaken such linkages. Low-income households and locally owned businesses are most affected by the construction of large-scale tourism projects - which although increasing overall tourist arrivals and expenditure - can result in the loss of land, business premises and livelihoods. In addition, privileging large capital, foreign firms and crony conglomerates is a regional trend and a major obstacle for tourism-led inclusive growth policy. Ownership patterns and destination governance also play critical roles in defining a destinations direction/pace of development, steering it towards or away from tourism-led inclusive growth. Given tourisms significance for many developing countries, the paper contributes to wider debates over inclusive growth both for theorising, and in its policy relevance for national development strategies and poverty alleviation. Crown Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Jeyacheya, Julia] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Business & Law, Manchester, Lancs, England; [Hampton, Mark P.] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, Kent, England; [Hampton, Mark P.] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Canterbury, Kent, England		Jeyacheya, J (corresponding author), Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Business & Law, Manchester, Lancs, England.	J.Jeyacheya@kent.ac.uk; m.hampton@kent.ac.uk	Jeyacheya, Julia/ABG-6647-2020	Jeyacheya, Julia/0000-0003-4245-9453	British Council (UKASEAN Knowledge Partnership Fund); British Academy (PMi2); University of Kent's Business School; Faculty of Social Sciences Research Fund, University of Kent	British Council (UKASEAN Knowledge Partnership Fund); British Academy (PMi2); University of Kent's Business School; Faculty of Social Sciences Research Fund, University of Kent	This paper has contributions from several research projects in South-East Asia funded variously by the British Council (UKASEAN Knowledge Partnership Fund); the British Academy (PMi2); the University of Kent's Business School, and the Faculty of Social Sciences Research Fund, University of Kent, but the views expressed are not necessarily those of any previous funder nor institution. The authors would also like to thank Lngesh Bhaskaran, Bilge Daldeniz, JD, Joern Fricke, Thao Hien Nguyen, Shima, Caroline Walsh and Che Wan for their assistance with fieldwork in the various projects, as well as our colleagues Amran Hamzah, Pham Hong Long and Ghazali Musa. Finally, we thank the interview respondents across South-East Asia who generously gave up their time. The usual disclaimers apply.	Acemoglu D., 2010, REV EC I, V1, DOI [10.5202/rei.v1i2.14, DOI 10.5202/REI.V1I2.14, 10.5202/rei.v1i2.1]; African Development Bank, 2016, AFR TOUR MON, V4; Ali I., 2007, ELECTRON J PROBAB; [Anonymous], SUN SEA TOURISM FANT; APEC, 2016, 11 APEC; APEC, 2018, APEC TOUR MIN STAT H; ASEAN, 2018, 21 M ASEAN TOUR MIN; Asian Development Bank, 2008, STRAT 2020 LONG TERM; Asian Development Bank, 2018, REG GREAT MEK SUBR T; Aung H.T., 2018, MYANMAR TIMES   0427; Bakker M, 2019, TOUR PLAN DEV, V16, P575, DOI 10.1080/21568316.2018.1541817; Bakker M, 2017, TOUR HOSP RES, V17, P384, DOI 10.1177/1467358416638919; Bianchi R, 2018, ANN TOURISM RES, V70, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2017.08.005; Blake A, 2008, ANN TOURISM RES, V35, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2007.06.013; Bowman K., 2013, PEDDLING PARADISE PO; Brand U, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V24, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.007; Bunnell T, 2006, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V30, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00647.x; Butler G, 2016, LOCAL ECON, V31, P264, DOI 10.1177/0269094215623732; Chambers R, 1983, RURAL DEV PUTTING LA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315835815-3; Clifton J, 2018, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V59, P323, DOI 10.1111/apv.12200; Cupples J., 2017, JAKARTA POST; Edralin D. M, 2014, DLSU BUSINESS EC REV, V24, P13; Ellis S, 2014, TOUR PLAN DEV, V11, P467, DOI 10.1080/21568316.2014.894558; Felipe J, 2012, INCLUSIVE GROWTH, FULL EMPLOYMENT, AND STRUCTURAL CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS AND POLICIES FOR DEVELOPING ASIA, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.7135/UPO9781843313557; George G, 2012, J MANAGE STUD, V49, P661, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x; Gupta J, 2015, ENCY GLOBAL ENV POLI, P35; Hakimian Hassan, 2013, EC BRIEF; Hall J, 2012, J MANAGE STUD, V49, P785, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01044.x; Hampton MP, 2018, J DEV STUD, V54, P359, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2017.1296572; Hampton MP, 2015, WORLD DEV, V70, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.007; Hamzah A, 2013, TOURISM GEOGR, V15, P43, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2012.675582; Holden A, 2013, TOURISM, POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT, P1; Jeyacheya, 2013, TOURISM INCLUSIVE GR; Jones H., 2013, ENTRY POINTS DEV TOU; Kireyev A., 2017, WP17127 IMF; KLASEN S., 2010, ADB SUSTAINABLE DEV, V12; Lee D, 2015, REV INT POLIT ECON, V22, P194, DOI 10.1080/09692290.2014.887590; Lin Y.J., 2004, ASIAN DEV REV, V21, P1; Loeprick J., 2010, INVESTMENT CLIMATE P; Mawdsley E, 2017, PROG HUM GEOG, V41, P108, DOI 10.1177/0309132515601776; McEwen D., 2010, SEYCHELLES TOURISM V; McKinley T., 2010, ADB SUSTAINABLE DEV; Meyer DW, 2006, PHYS FLUIDS, V18, DOI 10.1063/1.2182005; Ministry of Hotels and Tourism (MoHT), 2015, MYANM TOUR STAT; Newing H, 2011, CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN CONSERVATION: SOCIAL SCIENCE METHODS AND PRACTICE, P1; Pattullo P., 1996, LAST RESORTS COST TO; Paus E, 1995, WORLD DEV, V23, P2173, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00106-M; RANIERI R, 2013, 104 INT POL CTR INCL; Saad-Filho A., 2010, 100 UNDESA; Scheyvens R, 2002, ANN TOURISM RES, V29, P144, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00030-5; Scheyvens R., 2011, TOURISM AND POVERTY; Scheyvens R, 2018, TOURISM GEOGR, V20, P589, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2017.1381985; Sen K, 2014, ASIAN DEV REV, V31, P136; Singh S., 2009, DOMESTIC TOURISM ASI; Stiglitz JE, 2016, J POLICY MODEL, V38, P693, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.05.012; Suntikul W, 2013, CONTEMP GEOGR LEIS T, P92; Surana S., 2018, NY TIMES; UNCTAD, 2017, EC DEV AFRICA REPORT; UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), 2010, CONTR TOUR TRAD DEV; United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2019, TOURISM HIGHLIGHTS, DOI [10.18111/9789284421152, DOI 10.18111/9789284421152]; UNWTO, 2018, TOURISM HIGHLIGHTS, DOI 10.18111/9789284419876; Wall-Reinius S., 2017, TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, V21, P766, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2017.1375975.; Wattanakuljarus A, 2008, J POLICY MODEL, V30, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.02.006; Wong PP, 1998, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V38, P89, DOI 10.1016/S0964-5691(97)00066-5; World Bank, 2018, RID WAV E AS MIR 21; World Bank, 2009, WHAT IS INCL GROWTH; WTTC, 2018, REG EC IMP REP; WTTC, 2019, COUNTR EC IMP REP	68	12	12	3	51	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X			WORLD DEV	World Dev.	JUL	2020	131								104960	10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960			12	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	LF0GG		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000527104600007
J	Fu, YT; Dong, N; Ge, Q; Xiong, F; Gong, C				Fu, Yanting; Dong, Na; Ge, Qi; Xiong, Feng; Gong, Cheng			Driving-paths of green buildings industry (GBI) from stakeholders' green behavior based on the network analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Green behavior; Green buildings; Stakeholders; Whole-network analysis; Ego-network analysis	WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; TECHNOLOGIES ADOPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; IMPACT ANALYSIS; BARRIERS; CONSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE	The development of green buildings industry is significant to achieve global sustainable development goals. In China, the level of green buildings industry has great development space. However, the adoption of green buildings is often hindered by complicated behavior of different stakeholders to some extent. This research aims at analyzing the complex relationships among stakeholders' green behavior and exploring the driving-paths for green buildings industry based on the network analysis. The green behavior system of six major stakeholders was constructed based on the previous literatures. Then, whole-network analysis explores the visual relationships through questionnaires data, while ego-network analysis presenting by upwards and downwards structure mines the vital driving-paths for green buildings industry. Finally the study reveals, (i) the end-users are critical to the development direction of green buildings industry; (ii) when issuing the incentive policies for green buildings, government should consider creating trade-offs between the incremental cost and profit; (iii) as the main body of green innovation, designers and suppliers are overdependent on governmental incentives. Strategically, these findings provide a visual analysis model for stakeholders to carry out green strategies and transformation upgrading. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Fu, Yanting; Dong, Na; Ge, Qi; Xiong, Feng; Gong, Cheng] Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China		Dong, N (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China.	fuyanting@stu.scu.edu.cn; dongna@scu.edu.cn; geqi@scu.edu.cn; fxiong@scu.edu.cn; gongcheng@stu.scu.edu.cn			Science and Technology Institute of Sichuan Province [19H0469]	Science and Technology Institute of Sichuan Province	This research for this paper was funded by the Science and Technology Institute of Sichuan Province (No. 19H0469). Special thanks also go to the green buildings professionals who participated in the questionnaire survey. Finally, we are very grateful to all the editors and anonymous reviewers, whose invaluable comments and suggestions substantially helped in improving the quality of this paper.	Aaltonen K, 2010, SCAND J MANAG, V26, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.001; Ade R, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V186, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.040; Afshari H, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V127, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.140; Ahmad T, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V155, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.034; Ahn YH, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V145, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.065; Akadiri PO, 2015, J BUILD ENG, V4, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.08.006; Alqadami AT, 2018, ADV SCI LETT, V24, P4496, DOI 10.1166/asl.2018.11633; Alwisy A, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V178, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.043; Ametepey O, 2015, PROCEDIA MANUF, V3, P1682, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.988; [Anonymous], 2011, GREEN IND IN SUST IN; Ansah MK, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101576; Arnaboldi V, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF 2012 ASE/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIVACY, SECURITY, RISK AND TRUST AND 2012 ASE/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL COMPUTING (SOCIALCOM/PASSAT 2012), P31, DOI 10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.41; Badi S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.132; Bansal Sunita, 2017, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V6, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.005; Berardi U, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V60, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.074; Berawi MA, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328; Chan APC, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1067, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.235; Chan APC, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9060969; Chen CS, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V135, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.033; Chun SH, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V186, P507, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.192; Cohen C, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106227; Darko A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.318; Deng YH, 2014, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V47, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.015; Devine A, 2019, CITIES, V92, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.005; Ding RX, 2019, INFORM FUSION, V50, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.02.004; Dong N, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11205731; Fan K, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V119, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.054; Feng C, 2017, ENERGY, V141, P1869, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.114; Freeman R.E., 1984, STRATEG MANAG; Gao XY, 2019, PHYSICA A, V514, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.067; Geng Y, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V183, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017; Geng Y, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P932, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.016; Guo L, 2019, PHYSICA A, V523, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2019.02.005; Hasan M, 2017, CLEAN ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: COMPARISONS AND CONTRASTS OF NEW APPROACHES, P143, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805423-9.00005-3; Hollberg A, 2020, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102972; Hong SH, 2019, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V102, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.015; Hull A, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V158, P3982, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.843; Hwang BG, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P335, DOI 10.1002/sd.492; Illankoon IMCS, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106247; Khan SAR, 2018, 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS (ICDSBA 2018), P457, DOI 10.1109/ICDSBA.2018.00091; Khoshbakht M, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.176; Kong XF, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V41, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.024; Kuo CFJ, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V95, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.046; Leon RD, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V114, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.032; Li HY, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V128, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.014; Li YA, 2014, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V11, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.10.002; Liang J, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.021; Liu YM, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V82, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.008; Mathew PA, 2015, APPL ENERG, V140, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.042; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD), 2019, ASS STAND GREEN BUIL; Morarescu IC, 2011, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, V56, P1862, DOI 10.1109/TAC.2010.2095315; Nageli C, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106212; Ofek S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119575; Olander S, 2007, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V25, P277, DOI 10.1080/01446190600879125; Olubunmi OA, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V59, P1611, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.028; Onuoha IJ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V90, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.012; Oyedokun Tunbosun B., 2017, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V6, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.12.007; Pan SL, 2019, ADV ENG INFORM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2019.100996; Pan SY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.134; Portnov BA, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V137, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.014; Potbhare V, 2009, J GREEN BUILD, V4, P158, DOI 10.3992/jgb.4.2.158; Rowley TJ, 1997, ACAD MANAGE REV, V22, P887, DOI 10.2307/259248; Sparrevik M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V188, P879, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.048; Stankovic B, 2014, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2013.12.001; State Council, 2008, REG EN CONS CIV BUIL; van der Grijp N, 2019, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V49, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.006; Wang G., 2019, TECHNOL EC, V38, P21; Wang J., 2016, SCI TECHNOL MANAGE R, V36, P87, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2016.18.017, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-7695.2016.18.017.]; WorldGBC, 2017, GREEN GUILD WHAT IS; Xiao Y, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V26, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.007; Xue F, 2019, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V76, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004; Yang RJ, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V73, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014; Yang XD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P1076, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.014; Ye L, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V53, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.022; Yin S, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101555; Yu XN, 2021, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102116; Yuan QQ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119457; Zhang L, 2016, ECOL ECON, V129, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.010	78	15	15	20	113	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	NOV 10	2020	273								122883	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122883	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122883			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	NT4QQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000572927800004
J	Aggarwal, S; Larson, A; McDermott, C; Katila, P; Giessen, L				Aggarwal, Safia; Larson, Anne; McDermott, Constance; Katila, Pia; Giessen, Lukas			Tenure reform for better forestry: An unfinished policy agenda	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Collective forests; Community forestry; Legal reform; Tenure rights; Policy; VGGT	MANAGEMENT	The global community is currently grappling with multiple and overlapping social and environmental threats. These include the climate emergency, COVID-19 and the threat of widespread hunger, and the accelerating loss of biodiversity. All of these threats point to an urgent need to restore and sustainably manage land and forests. Studies are pointing to the critical role of tenure reform, and in particular strengthening collective forest tenure, as an effective means to reduce deforestation, mitigate climate change, restore ecosystem services and maintain biodiversity. Since the 1970s, countries worldwide have attempted to better recognize the customary rights of local communities. Yet despite over 40 years of effort, collective forest tenure reforms have yielded only moderate results. This article draws on recent assessments conducted in 23 countries by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) on community-based forestry and associated forest tenure regimes based on the internationally endorsed Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (the VGGT). The findings suggest that governments are increasingly giving legal recognition to community rights to use both timber and non-timber forest products for commercial purposes. Yet, the tenure provided to collective forestry is less robust than that held by companies and smallholders in a number of ways. These include fewer legal protections, more barriers to the use of these rights, inadequate access to justice, and less administrative support in documenting rights. Furthermore, in many cases the existing community forestry legal provisions are not implemented. The relatively successful cases suggest that with robust tenure, communities and smallholders can be potent vehicles for moving towards sustainable forest management and mitigating climate change, improving local livelihoods, contributing to timber and non-timber product economies, and achieving several of the Sustainable Development Goals. But for this, governments will need to strengthen community and local rights within their legal frameworks and mainstream implementation in government policies and practices. Nongovernmental organizations, civil society organizations, donors, research institutions and academia can provide important support through policy implementation, research, and ensuring inclusive policy formulation processes.	[Aggarwal, Safia] Food & Agr Org United Nations FAO, Rome, Italy; [Larson, Anne] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor, Indonesia; [McDermott, Constance] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England; [Katila, Pia] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki, Finland; [Giessen, Lukas] Tech Univ Dresden, Trop & Int Forestry, Dresden, Germany		Aggarwal, S (corresponding author), FAO, Forestry Dept, Viale Terme Caracalla, I-00153 Rome, Italy.	safia.aggarwal@fao.org		McDermott, Constance/0000-0002-5238-0936				Adams WM, 2004, EXTINCTION STORY CON; Arts B, 2017, WORLD DEV, V96, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.014; Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD) Community Forest Rights Learning Group (CFRLA), 2020, IMP COVID 19 OUTBR L; Cary K.L, 2019, PHYSL COMMUNITY ASSE; Charnley S, 2007, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V36, P301, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143; Fa JE, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P135, DOI 10.1002/fee.2148; FAO, 2019, ASS GOV TEN IMPR FOR; FAO, 2012, SUCC CAS GOOD PRACT; FAO, 2019, FRAM ASS EXT EFF COM; FAO, FOR TENS TRAD CTR PR; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012, IMPROVING GOVERNANCE; Garnett ST, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P369, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6; Gilmour D., 2016, FAO Forestry Paper; Global Landscapes Forum (GLF), 2019, RIGHTS LANDSC; Katila P., 2014, IUFRO WORLD SERIES; Larson A.M., 2008, TENURE RIGHTS COMMUN, P50, DOI [10.17528/cifor/002631, DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/002631]; Larson A. M., 2016, RECOGNITION RESPECT; Larson AM, 2007, SUSTAIN SCI, V2, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11625-007-0030-0; Larson AM, 2012, CONSERV SOC, V10, P103, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.97482; Larson I., 2017, COMP PROPERTY LAW GL; Le, 2016, FOREST TENURE ASSESS; Lele, 2010, RIGHTS RESOURCES INI; Liu, 2016, FOREST TENURE ASSESS; McFarland W, 2015, SUBSIDIES KEY COMMOD; Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE), 2016, STATE UGANDAS FOREST; Mollins J., 2020, CIFOR FOREST NEWS; Mwangi, 2019, 253 CIFOR; Pagdee A, 2006, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V19, P33, DOI 10.1080/08941920500323260; Pelletier J, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7080170; RRI, 2020, FOR TEN DAT; RRI, 2018, RIGHTS RESOURCES INI; Skulska I, 2020, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V33, P101, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2019.1660934; Williams A., 2020, LAND USE POLICY; WRI, 2016, CLIM BEN TEN COSTS E	34	8	8	2	24	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	FEB	2021	123								102376	10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102376	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102376			5	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	PR1WK		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000607033300011
J	Tiba, S; van Rijnsoever, FJ; Hekkert, MP				Tiba, Sarah; van Rijnsoever, Frank J.; Hekkert, Marko P.			Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Entrepreneurial ecosystems; Sustainable entrepreneurship; Sustainable development; Topic model; Startup	SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; BUSINESS; DETERMINANTS; PREVALENCE; SUPPORT; POLICY; GREEN	While it is well known where the best entrepreneurial ecosystems can be found in general, such information is missing in the case of sustainability entrepreneurial ecosystems. These are entrepreneurial ecosystems with high shares of startups that are active in industries which address the Sustainable Development Goals through innovation. Not knowing what the best sustainability entrepreneurial ecosystems are, inhibits sustainability startups to locate to regions with the most favourable supportive conditions. This paper addresses the above-mentioned gap by establishing a ranking of entrepreneurial ecosystems according to their share of sustainability enterprises. For this purpose, we have analysed the websites of 19,997 startups in the 28 largest entrepreneurial ecosystems according to the Startup Genome project using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. We find that the highest proportion of sustainability startups among these entrepreneurial ecosystems is located in Boston, followed by Houston, Seattle and Lagos, respectively. A qualitative comparative analysis of the causal patterns underlying our results reveals that high GDP in combination with either (1) high shares of female founders of startups or (2) high shares of non-religious people in the population induce entrepreneurial ecosystems with relatively high levels of sustainability enterprises. Our work aims to stimulate further scholarly interest in sustainabilityoriented entrepreneurial ecosystems. Policy makers can use the causal drivers to increase the share of sustainability startups in their region. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).	[Tiba, Sarah; van Rijnsoever, Frank J.; Hekkert, Marko P.] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands		van Rijnsoever, FJ (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands.	f.j.vanrijnsoever@uu.nl						A Deeper Dive, 2017, SOCIAL ENTERPRISE EC; Acs ZJ, 2017, SPRINGERBRIEF ECON, P81, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65903-9_5; Alvedalen J, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P887, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694; Bacq S, 2011, ENTREP REGION DEV, V23, P373, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2011.577242; Bank N, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V157, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123; Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8; Berger A., 2016, GLOBAL BUSINESS ORG, V35, P58, DOI DOI 10.1002/JOE.21698; Bertazzi P., 2015, SDG COMPASS GUIDE BU; Blei DM, 2007, ANN APPL STAT, V1, P17, DOI 10.1214/07-AOAS114; Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993; Bosma N., 2015, GEM SPECIAL TOPIC RE; Brock DC, 2012, HIST TECHNOL, V28, P375, DOI 10.1080/07341512.2012.756236; Chang J., 2009, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, P288; Cohen Boyd., 2006, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V15, P1, DOI [10.1002/bse.428, DOI 10.1002/BSE.428]; Coren M. J., 2018, QUARTZ; CrunchBase, 2016, EYEFLUENCE; Dacin PA, 2010, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V24, P37, DOI 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950; Davidsson P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P81, DOI [10.1177/104225870, DOI 10.1177/104225870102500406]; Dean TJ, 2007, J BUS VENTURING, V22, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003; Dees J.G., 2018, ENV PERFORMANCE INDE; Eveleens CP, 2017, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V42, P676, DOI 10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7; Gast J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V147, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065; Geels FW, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P1242, DOI 10.1126/science.aao3760; Gelissen J, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P392, DOI 10.1177/0013916506292014; Gerhards J, 2008, COMP SOCIOL, V7, P215, DOI 10.1163/156913308X289050; GLAESER EL, 2008, J HUMAN CAPITAL, V0002; Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2017, GEM 2016 2017 EGLOBA; Griffiths MD, 2013, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V20, P341, DOI 10.1108/14626001311326761; Griffiths TL, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307752101; Grimmer J, 2013, POLIT ANAL, V21, P267, DOI 10.1093/pan/mps028; Grun B., 2017, TOPICMODELS; Guerreiro J, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V139, P111, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2622-4; Hansen EG, 2013, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V13, P583, DOI 10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074; Harris JD, 2009, J BUS VENTURING, V24, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.001; Hechavarria DM, 2017, SMALL BUS ECON, V48, P225, DOI 10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4; Hechavarria DM, 2016, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V12, P1025, DOI 10.1007/s11365-015-0376-1; Hechavarria DM, 2016, INT J GEND ENTREP, V8, P242, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-09-2014-0029; Henry Z, 2018, WOMEN ENTREPRENEURSH; Hockerts K, 2018, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V24, P322, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-427; Hoogendoorn B, 2016, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V54, P278, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12301; Horne J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118052; Ide T, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V33, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.008; Johnson MP, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P1141, DOI 10.1177/1042258719885368; Krestel R., 2009, P 3 ACM C REC SYST S, P61, DOI [10.1145/1639714.1639726, DOI 10.1145/1639714.1639726]; Leendertse J, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P1019, DOI 10.1002/bse.2667; Legewie N, 2013, QUALITATIVE SOCIAL R, V14, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-14.3.1961; Li W., 2006, P 23 INT C MACH LEAR, P577, DOI DOI 10.1145/1143844.1143917; Longenecker JG, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V55, P373; Lyon TP, 2015, ORGAN ENVIRON, V28, P223, DOI 10.1177/1086026615575332; Mair J, 2006, J WORLD BUS, V41, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002; Matsunaga Y, 2010, VOLUNTAS, V21, P180, DOI 10.1007/s11266-010-9125-9; McAdam M., 2013, FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS; Munoz P., 2017, J BUS VENTUR INSIGHT, V7, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.12.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JBVI.2016.12.001]; Munoz P, 2015, J BUS VENTURING, V30, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012; Nerini FF, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P674, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0334-y; Neumeyer X, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P4565, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216; Nilsson M, 2016, NATURE, V534, P320, DOI 10.1038/534320a; Ooms J., 2017, GOOGLES COMPACT LANG; Pew Research Center, 2016, RELIG ED WORLD; Piepenbrink A, 2015, SCIENTOMETRICS, V102, P2107, DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1513-2; Pitelis C, 2012, IND CORP CHANGE, V21, P1359, DOI 10.1093/icc/dts008; Piwowar-Sulej K., 2021, J CLEAN PROD; R Core Team, 2022, R LANG ENV STAT COMP; Ragin C.C, 2008, REDESIGNING SOCIAL I; Saebi T, 2019, J MANAGE, V45, P70, DOI 10.1177/0149206318793196; Salton G., 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; Schmid H., 1995, TREETAGGER; Schneider Carsten., 2012, CAMB CORE; Shnayder L, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119036; Stam E, 2014, DUTCH ENTREPRENEURIA, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2473475; Stam E, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P1759, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484; Startup Genome Project, 2017, GLOB START EC REP 20; Sugimoto CR, 2011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V62, P185, DOI 10.1002/asi.21435; Sullivan K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.201; Teran-Yepez E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742; TERPSTRA DE, 1993, J PSYCHOL, V127, P375, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1993.9915573; Theodoraki C, 2018, SMALL BUS ECON, V51, P153, DOI 10.1007/s11187-017-9924-0; Thiem A, 2016, POLIT ANAL, V24, P104, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpv028; Tiba S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121616; Tiba S, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P265, DOI 10.1002/csr.1682; Titov Ivan, 2008, P 17 INT C WORLD WID; Toman M, 2006, P INSCIT, P354; UN, 2017, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Uys J., 2011, P 41 INT C COMP IND; van der Linden S, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P28, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0001-0; van Rijnsoever FJ, 2020, RES POLICY, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103884; Volkmann C, 2021, SMALL BUS ECON, V56, P1047, DOI 10.1007/s11187-019-00253-7; Walley E. E., 2002, Greener Management International, P31; Weaver GR, 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P77, DOI 10.2307/4134370; York JG, 2010, J BUS VENTURING, V25, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.007; Zahra SA, 2009, J BUS VENTURING, V24, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007; Zheng B, 2006, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V7, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-7-58	92	9	9	11	27	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 15	2021	306								127054	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054		MAY 2021	15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	SQ3HX		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000660247500018
J	Clarke-Sather, A; Cobb, K				Clarke-Sather, Abigail; Cobb, Kelly			Onshoring fashion: Worker sustainability impacts of global and local apparel production	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable sourcing; Life cycle assessment; Apparel product development; Sustainability assessment; Apparel industry	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; INDUSTRY; BUSINESS; STAKEHOLDER	Recently "onshoring," manufacturing products for local markets from regional suppliers and producers, has gained traction in the U.S. "Onshoring" is contrasted with "offshoring" or moving production to countries with lower wages and fewer environmental and safety regulations. Moving manufacturing operations effects people, communities, economies, and the environment worldwide. Offshoring steadily eroded U.S. apparel manufacturing capabilities while U.S. apparel demand skyrocketed according to American Association of Footwear and Apparel statistics. This research developed a simplified prospective sustainability life cycle assessment (LCA) method to compare global sustainability impacts of onshoring and offshoring legging production in the fast-growing athleisure apparel market segment. A proof-of-concept legging design demonstrated that technical capability exists regionally in the Eastern U.S. for supply and production. Sustainability LCA impacts were measured globally to compare effects to workers from onshoring to the U.S. with offshoring to Sri Lanka to produce garments for U.S. consumers. Results suggest greater worker environmental impacts exist when producing leggings in Sri Lanka than the U.S. largely due to electricity generation differences. Worker safety concerns for garment workers in Sri Lanka were found to be greater than in the U.S. However, economic benefits for workers were better in Sri Lanka than the U.S. because Sri Lankan apparel workers receive middle-class wages, whereas U.S. counterparts do not. Whether onshoring or offshoring apparel production, sustainability tradeoffs exist. U.N. sustainable development goals encourage strategies to improve sustainability for apparel workers worldwide instead of specifying where production occurs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Clarke-Sather, Abigail] Univ Minnesota Duluth, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, 1305 Ordean Court, Duluth, MN 55816 USA; [Cobb, Kelly] Univ Delaware, Fash & Apparel Studies Dept, Newark, DE 19716 USA		Clarke-Sather, A (corresponding author), Univ Minnesota Duluth, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, 1305 Ordean Court, Duluth, MN 55816 USA.	abbie@d.umn.edu						Adrian Chapman, 2010, MISTR FUT FASH REV L; American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAfA, 2015, APPARELSTATS 2014; [Anonymous], 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS; [Anonymous], 2015, RISE NEW CULTURAL DI; [Anonymous], 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001; Arvidsson R, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P4529, DOI 10.1021/es405338k; Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), 2015, US FED POV GUID US D; Bamunusinghe R, 2014, SUNDAY TIMES SRI LAN; Bras B., 1997, IND ENV, V20, P7; Brezet H., 1997, ECODESIGN PROMISING; Brooks Andrew, 2015, CLOTHING POVERTY HID; BSR, 2015, COLL PROGR CLEAN CAR; Chen H.L., 2006, RES J, V24, P248, DOI 10.1177/0887302x06293065; Chen T, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V74, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.026; Clark Garrette, 2009, Sustainability, V1, P409, DOI 10.3390/su1030409; Claudio L, 2007, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V115, pA448; Cline E. L., 2012, OVERDRESSED SHOCKING; Coates S, 2016, TREND 2017 18 WOMENS; DeSilva PV, 2013, GALLE MED J, V18, P1, DOI [10.4038/gmj.v18i1.5510., DOI 10.4038/GMJ.V18I1.5510]; Elkington J., 1997, CANNIBALS FORKS TRIP, P49; EPA, 2015, EM FACT GREENH GAS I; Esbenshade Jill Louise, 2009, MONITORING SWEATSHOP; Fair Labor Association, 2016, FAIR COMP GLOB SUPPL; Fletcher Kate, 2010, FASHION PRACTICE, V2, DOI DOI 10.2752/175693810X12774625387594; Fornasiero R, 2013, INT J PROD RES, V51, P2110, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2012.706718; Franco MA, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P833, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056; Freeman R.E., 1984, STRATEG MANAG; Georgia State University, 2012, SO TEXT IND WORK N P; Global Reporting Initiative, 2016, CONSOLIDATED SET GRI; Guo ZX, 2014, INT J PROD RES, V52, P1100, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.838650; Haigh N, 2009, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V18, P347, DOI 10.1002/bse.602; Khmara Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V177, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.182; Kochhar Rakesh, 2015, AM COMP GLOBAL MIDDL; Kozlowski A, 2016, ENV FOOTPRINTS ECODE, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0245-8_5; LaBat Karen L., 1999, CLOTH TEXT RES J, V17, P11, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887302X9901700102; Lamb Jane M., 1992, CLOTH TEXT RES J, V10, P42, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887302X9201000207; Moran R., 2015, GROWTH ATLEISURE US; Muthukumarana TT, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1346, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.261; Niinimaki K, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P1876, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020; Pal R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.001; Park H., 2006, CLOTH TEXT RES J, V24, P229; Pathirana S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.274; Perez-Batres LA, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003; Perrini F., 2006, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V15, P296, DOI [10.1002/bse.538, DOI 10.1002/BSE.538]; Phillips RA, 2000, J BUS ETHICS, V23, P185, DOI 10.1023/A:1006041929249; Renwick T., 2014, ASS PUBL POL AN MAN; Robertson, 2016, STITCHES RICHES APPA; Rome A, 2015, FASHION FORWARD ENV; Roos S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V133, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.146; Samarasinghe N, 2015, J ENG TECHNOL OPEN U, V3, P1; Sandin G, 2015, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V20, P1684, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0984-6; Schmitt E, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.039; Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 2006, WAT WAST EN BEST PRA; Sri Lankan Department of Census and Statistics, 2017, OFF POV LIN DISTR MA; Sri Lankan Department of Census and Statistics, 2017, ANN SURV IND FIN REP; Swarr T.E., 2011, ENV LIFE CYCLE COSTI; Tobiasson T. S., 2010, FRESH LOOK WOOL; Trejo H., 2014, TEXT SOC AM S P; Turker D, 2014, EUR MANAG J, V32, P837, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.001; U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017, 315 NAICS US BUR LAB; U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017, HOUS DAT ANN AV 18B; U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017, 516031 US BUR LAB ST; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, 2011, DTI1412PA UNEP SETAC; USAID, 2015, GREENH GAS EM SRI LA; Valdivia S, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P1673, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1; Waddock S, 2011, ORGAN ENVIRON, V24, P192, DOI 10.1177/1086026611413933; Walser T, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P4570, DOI 10.1021/es2001248; Williams A, 2017, ENCY NEW GA; Wyatt N, 2016, REVOLUTIONIZING MADE; Zamani B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P1368, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.128; [No title captured]	71	17	17	8	64	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 20	2019	208						1206	1218		10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.073	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.073			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HB8SY					2022-09-08	WOS:000451362200109
J	Kouloumpis, V; Yan, XY				Kouloumpis, Victor; Yan, Xiaoyu			Sustainable energy planning for remote islands and the waste legacy from renewable energy infrastructure deployment	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; Sustainable energy; Circular economy; Remote islands; Waste; Renewable energy	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CHALLENGES; SYSTEMS	The transition towards a sustainable energy mix is required to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 7 for affordable and clean energy. Remote islands not connected to grid which depend on diesel generators may appear ideal because they can benefit from a variety of renewable energy sources. However, renewable energy deployment requires a lifetime perspective to not inherit waste and other problems to future generations. The aim of this paper is to present a life cycle sustainability framework developed and applied for the case of the island of Ushant off North West France. Seven renewable energy generation scenarios were examined and assessed using technoeconomic, social and environmental indicators utilising life cycle costing and life cycle assessment modelling. The results show that only three out of the seven examined renewable energy scenarios manage to cover the 6807 MWh per annum demand. These scenarios can improve all the indicators against the business-as-usual diesel generation scenario except the ones related to toxicity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 92%. The easy-to-use framework allows the users to adjust their scenarios and receive useful insight about the nature of the trade-offs between the various indicators. It can also be adapted and updated to include more technologies and support the investigation of more sustainable energy scenarios of other remote island cases in the future. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Kouloumpis, Victor; Yan, Xiaoyu] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9FE, England; [Kouloumpis, Victor; Yan, Xiaoyu] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Penryn TR10 9FE, England		Kouloumpis, V (corresponding author), Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9FE, England.	v.kouloumpis@exeter.ac.uk	; Yan, Xiaoyu/C-4178-2008	Kouloumpis, Victor/0000-0003-3699-7335; Yan, Xiaoyu/0000-0003-3165-5870	France (Channel) England INTERREG VA programme [5025]	France (Channel) England INTERREG VA programme	This research was undertaken as part of the Intelligent Community Energy (ICE) research project, financially supported by the France (Channel) England INTERREG VA programme, award 5025. The funder had no involvement in study design, data collection and analysis, or writing up this paper.	Atilgan B, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V93, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.055; Bauer L., WIND TURBINE MODEL; BEIS, 2016, EL GEN COST REP; Bretagne Developpement ~ Innovation, 2018, USH ISL IC INT; Brizmohun R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.033; Burchart-Korol D, 2018, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V23, P2165, DOI 10.1007/s11367-018-1450-z; Costa D, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V686, P774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435; ENERCON GmbH, 2016, E 53; Fitch-Roy O., 2018, T112 ICE; Gaete-Morales C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P1155, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.346; Garcia R, 2014, APPL ENERG, V134, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.067; GreenDelta GmbH 2021, OPENLCA MOD SUIT; Guinee J.B, 2002, HDB LIFE CYCLE ASSES; Hall CAS, 2012, ENERGY AND THE WEALTH OF NATIONS: UNDERSTANDING THE BIOPHYSICAL ECONOMY, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4; Hardwick J., 2018, T111 ICE; Hardwick J., 2018, T14 ICE; Howell R.J., 2013, P I MECH ENG M-J ENG, V229, P124, DOI [10.1177/1475090213506184, DOI 10.1177/1475090213506184]; International Energy Agency, 2020, WORLD EN MOD DOC; International Organization for Standardization, 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS; Kouloumpis V, 2018, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V15, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2018.03.002; Kouloumpis V, 2015, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2015.04.001; Mahmood H., 2019, T12 ICE; Messagie M, 2014, APPL ENERG, V134, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.071; Michalena E, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V114, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.022; Myhr A, 2014, RENEW ENERG, V66, P714, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.017; Natacha Haas Guego, 2018, EUROPES 1 MARINE TUR; Paboeuf S., 2016, P 35 INT C OC OFFSH; Roinioti A, 2019, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V32, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2019.01.003; Santoyo-Castelazo E, 2011, ENERGY, V36, P1488, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.018; SDEF, 2018, FUT SOL POW PLANTS U; Stenzel P, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V135, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.487; Sustainability B.V., 2021, SIMAPRO WORLDS LEADI; Thinkstep A.G, 2019, GABI; Turconi R, 2014, APPL ENERG, V132, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.078; Wernet G, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P1218, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8; Yan X., 2020, LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINAB; Zweifel, 2017, ENERGY EC THEORY APP, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1	37	2	2	1	7	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 20	2021	307								127198	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127198	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127198		MAY 2021	10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	SQ3IB		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000660247900008
J	Subramanian, K; Chopra, SS; Wharton, CM; Yonge, W; Allen, J; Stevens, R; Fahy, S; Milindi, PS				Subramanian, Karpagam; Chopra, Shauhrat S.; Wharton, Christopher M.; Yonge, William; Allen, Julie; Stevens, Rozanne; Fahy, Sam; Milindi, Paschal Simon			Mapping the food waste-energy-water-emissions nexus at commercial kitchens: A systems approach for a more sustainable food service sector	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; Food; Nexus index; Commercial kitchens; Menu; Environmental impacts	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIES; GOVERNANCE	A 'nexus' approach, comprising interrelated systems components of energy, water, and food, has been suggested to accelerate progress towards achieving sustainable development goals on food waste and related issues, like climate change. The current body of literature usually focuses on food security, especially in relation to production and waste management in the supply chain. The food service sector (FSS), a major consumer-facing component of the food system, has often been overlooked or neglected. There exists, then, an opportunity to better understand the interlinkages between food waste, energy, water, and emissions -the FEWE Nexus -to assist this sector in developing more sustainable operations, such as kitchen equipment management and menu development. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel FEWE Nexus Framework, to understand the flow of nexus components associated with receiving, storing, preparing, cooking, cleaning, and serving menu items. A key aspect of the methodological approach for FEWE evaluation is life cycle assessment (LCA). This is embodied in a comprehensive nexus audit tool comprising several indicators to monitor and quantify energy and water consumption, emissions from cooking, food waste generated, and type and efficiency of equipment used. Further, a stakeholder engagement survey is integrated, allowing for stakeholder feedback on applications of the audit tool, and to assess the impacts and acceptance of potential interventions. Finally, we describe how an iterative nexus approach can enable decision makers in the FSS to robustly estimate nexus components and establish a baseline to track their progress towards minimizing wastages and maximize efficiency. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Subramanian, Karpagam; Chopra, Shauhrat S.; Milindi, Paschal Simon] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Wharton, Christopher M.] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Phoenix, AZ USA; [Yonge, William] Earth Ocean Ltd, Southampton, Hants, England; [Yonge, William; Allen, Julie] Kings Coll London, Estates & Facil, London, England; [Stevens, Rozanne] Dublin State Univ, Noosphere Inst, Dublin, Ireland; [Fahy, Sam] Dublin City Univ, Sustainabil DCU, Dublin, Ireland		Chopra, SS (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.	sschopra@cityu.edu.hk		Milindi, Paschal/0000-0001-6561-9435; Fahy, Samantha/0000-0002-8966-7244; Chopra, Shauhrat S./0000-0001-9067-4321; Wharton, Christopher/0000-0003-3622-3225	Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO)	Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO)	Results reported in this publication were developed with funding support provided by the Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO) .	Al-Ansari T, 2015, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V2, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2015.07.005; Boas I, 2016, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V16, P449, DOI 10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1; Brouwer F, 2018, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2017.10.005; De Laurentiis V, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8010095; Endo A, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V11, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.11.010; Flammini A., 2013, WALKING NEXUS TALK A; Foden M., 2017, INTERVENTIONS HOUSEH, DOI [10.1111/geoj.12257, DOI 10.1111/GEOJ.12257]; Garcia DJ, 2016, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V91, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.003; Gokhale, 2019, BUILD EVID HLTH, P1; Hoff H, 2011, UNDERSTANDING NEXUS; Hussien WA, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V93, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.034; Jeswani HK, 2015, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V2, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2015.08.001; Karabulut AA, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3874, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.092; Kibler KM, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V74, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.014; Laso J, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V80, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.009; Liu TY, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECH LET, V5, P32, DOI 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00530; Liu TY, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V599, P1614, DOI [10.1016/j.sdtotenv2017.05.147, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.147]; Melikoglu M, 2013, OPEN ENG, V3, P157, DOI 10.2478/s13531-012-0058-5; Mudie S, 2016, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V11, P66, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/ctt068; Pacetti T, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V101, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.084; Plukis C, 2019, INTEGRATING PROTEIN, P1; Slorach PC, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V113, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.012; Smajgl A, 2016, J HYDROL, V533, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.033; Subramanian K, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104989; Wang XN, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P3257, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b04659; Weitz N, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V45, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.006; Yan X, 2019, CALING NEXUS INTEGRA, P419, DOI [10.1111/ geoj.12256, DOI 10.1111/GEOJ.12256]; Zhang C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.194	28	3	3	2	18	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUN 10	2021	301								126856	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126856	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126856		APR 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	RW5ZJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000646601400002
J	Singh, R; Sharma, R; Akram, SV; Gehlot, A; Buddhi, D; Malik, PK; Arya, R				Singh, Rajesh; Sharma, Rohit; Akram, Shaik Vaseem; Gehlot, Anita; Buddhi, Dharam; Malik, Praveen Kumar; Arya, Rajeev			Highway 4.0: Digitalization of highways for vulnerable road safety development with intelligent IoT sensors and machine learning	SAFETY SCIENCE			English	Article						Highway; DL; Vulnerable Road Safety; Smart city; IoT; Renewable energy; And vision node	SMART CITY; TRAFFIC INJURIES; SYSTEM; INTERNET; THINGS; TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN; CITIES; MODEL	According to United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda, the transportation system needs to be enhanced for the establishment of access to safe, affordable, accessible, and sustainable transport systems along with enhanced road safety. The highway road transport system is one of the transport systems that enables to transits goods and humans from one location to another location. The agenda of UN 2030 for the transport system will be accomplished with the assistance of digital technologies like the internet of things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI). The implementation of these digital technologies on highways empowers to provide reliable, smarter, intelligent, and renewable energy sources experience to the users travelling along the highways. This study discusses the significance of the digitalization of highways that supporting and realizing a sustainable environment on the highways. To discuss the significance of digitalization, the study has categorized digitalization into five subcomponents namely smart highway lighting system, smart traffic and emergency management system, renewable energy sources on highways, smart display and AI in highways. An architecture-for smart highway lighting, smart traffic, and emergency management are proposed and discussed in the study. The significance of implementing smart display boards and renewable sources with real-time applications is also addressed in this study. Moreover, the integration of AI in highways is addressed with the perspective of enhancing road safety. The integration of deep learning (DL) in the edge-based vision node for predicting the patterns of traffic flow, highway road safety, and maintenance of quality roads have been addressed in the discussion section. Embedding the deep learning techniques in the vison node at the traffic junction and the highway lighting controller is able to deliver an intelligent system that provides sustained experience and management of the highways. Smart reflectors, adoption of renewable energy, developing vehicle-to-vehicle communication in vehicles, and smart lamppost are the few recommendations for the implementation of digitalizing highways.	[Singh, Rajesh; Akram, Shaik Vaseem; Gehlot, Anita; Buddhi, Dharam; Malik, Praveen Kumar] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Phagwara, Punjab, India; [Sharma, Rohit] SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Elect & Commun, NCR Campus, Ghaziabad, India; [Arya, Rajeev] Natl Inst Technol, Patna 800005, Bihar, India		Buddhi, D (corresponding author), Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Phagwara, Punjab, India.; Sharma, R (corresponding author), SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Elect & Commun, NCR Campus, Ghaziabad, India.	rohitapece@gmail.com; dharam.24816@lpu.co.in	Singh, Rajesh/AAV-3309-2020; Malik, Praveen/ABF-9511-2021; sharma, rohit/AAM-7855-2020; Malik, Praveen/AAM-6085-2020; Gehlot, Anita/AIF-4090-2022; Malik, Praveen/AAE-5886-2022; Shaik, Vaseem Akram/ADP-6850-2022; sharma, rohit/N-7419-2017	Singh, Rajesh/0000-0002-3164-8905; Gehlot, Anita/0000-0001-6463-9581; Arya, Dr. Rajeev/0000-0002-0346-2150; sharma, rohit/0000-0002-1600-5039; Buddhi, Dharam/0000-0001-7305-0795; Shaik, Vaseem Akram/0000-0001-8438-4387				Abbas N, 2018, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V5, P450, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750180; Afework A, 2020, 2020 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI 2020), P47, DOI 10.1109/SACI49304.2020.9118819; Afrin T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114660; Ahn S, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19061275; Al-Fuqaha A, 2015, IEEE COMMUN SURV TUT, V17, P2347, DOI 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095; [Anonymous], BBC NEWS; [Anonymous], BHARATMALA PARIYOJAN; [Anonymous], TRANSPORT SUSTAINABL; [Anonymous], 2017, INT J PAVEMENT RES T, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJPRT.2017.08.006; Avila AM, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15582-5; Bani-Hani Ehab Hussein, 2018, Energy Engineering, V115, P61, DOI 10.1080/01998595.2018.11969276; Barba-Guaman L, 2020, ELECTRONICS-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3390/electronics9040589; Battiato S, 2018, COMPUT IND, V98, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.014; Beg A, 2021, PERS UBIQUIT COMPUT, V25, P33, DOI 10.1007/s00779-019-01297-y; Behbahani H, 2020, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V12, P501, DOI 10.1080/19439962.2018.1501785; Bibri SE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.034; Biswal Anil Kumar, 2021, Green Technology for Smart City and Society. Proceedings of GTSCS 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS 151), P43, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-8218-9_4; Boukerche A, 2020, COMPUT NETW, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107484; Broccardo L, 2019, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V32, P367, DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-0126; Camero A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014; Casado-Sanz N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062237; Chimata R., 2018, INTERNET THINGS AUTO; De Paz JF, 2016, INFORM SCIENCES, V372, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.045; de Souza AM, 2017, INT J DISTRIB SENS N, V13, DOI 10.1177/1550147716683612; Deng SG, 2020, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V7, P7457, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2984887; Dhingra S, 2021, INTERNET THINGS-NETH, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.iot.2020.100175; Duan W, 2020, IEEE NETWORK, V34, P283, DOI 10.1109/MNET.001.1900659; Ekott E., 2020, 2020 INT C MATH COMP, P1; El Mokaddem Y., 2019, 2019 INT C LOG SUPPL, P1; Garg S., 2020, P 2 INT C ADV COMP I, V1192, P223; Gohar M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.008; Gomez C, 2019, J AMB INTEL SMART EN, V11, P23, DOI 10.3233/AIS-180509; Goniewicz M, 2012, CENT EUR J PUBL HEAL, V20, P116, DOI 10.21101/cejph.a3686; GSMA, IOT CONN FOR RIS ENT; Hickson K, 2013, RACE SUSTAINABILITY, DOI [10.1142/8998, DOI 10.1142/8998]; Horrey WJ, 2012, J SAFETY RES, V43, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.11.004; Huang TT, 2020, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105392; HUSSAIN LM, 1994, BRIT MED J, V308, P1077, DOI 10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1077; Inkoom S, 2019, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V15, P940, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2019.1581230; Javaid S, 2018, INT CONF ADV COMMUN, P393, DOI 10.23919/ICACT.2018.8323770; Jeon DH, 2021, ENERGY, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119540; Khalil HB, 2017, INT CONF COMPUT; Khan R, 2012, 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (FIT 2012), P257, DOI 10.1109/FIT.2012.53; Koo S., 2011, ADV INTERNET THINGS, V1, P27, DOI [10.4236/ait.2011.12004, DOI 10.4236/AIT.2011.12004]; Kumar RR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911; Lee WH, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20020508; Lee WH, 2018, J ADV TRANSPORT, DOI 10.1155/2018/5060481; Li ZY, 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, V10, P691, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2750542; Liu SS, 2019, P IEEE, V107, P1697, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2915983; Liu ZH, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P113950, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2934979; Liu ZY, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.262; Lu Y., 2020, INT J DISTRIB SENS N, V16; Maghsoudi R., 2017, J ADV COMPUT RES, V8, P87; Malik P. K., 2020, COMPUT COMMUN; Mao YY, 2017, IEEE COMMUN SURV TUT, V19, P2322, DOI 10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201; Maurice P, 2004, INJURY PREV, V10, P255, DOI 10.1136/ip.2004.006080; Miao Wu, 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2010), P484, DOI 10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579493; Mukta MY, 2020, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102575; Mustafa AM, 2017, L N INST COMP SCI SO, V179, P22, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49622-1_4; Nizetic S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122877; Nord JH, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V133, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.014; Parsa AB, 2020, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405; de Oliveira LFP, 2021, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V8, P3384, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3022392; Puvanachandra P, 2012, TRAFFIC INJ PREV, V13, P44, DOI 10.1080/15389588.2011.639417; Qian Y, 2019, IEEE NETWORK, V33, P4, DOI 10.1109/MNET.2019.8675165; Rahman MA, 2021, IEEE SYST J, V15, P46, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2020.2975592; Rahman MA, 2019, COMPUTERS, V8, DOI 10.3390/computers8020040; Santhosh Reddy A., 2019, INT J SCI TECHNOL RE, V8, P1968; Sarrab M., 2020, GLOBAL TRANSITIONS, V2, P230, DOI [10.1016/j.glt.2020.09.004, DOI 10.1016/J.GLT.2020.09.004]; Satyanarayanan M, 2017, COMPUTER, V50, P30, DOI 10.1109/MC.2017.9; Schneider J, 2011, W3C PROPOSED RECOMME, V20, P32; Sharif Mirza Ahammad, 2011, REAL TIME CRASH PRED; Singh R., 2019, INT J SCI TECHNOLOGY, V8, P3702; Singh R, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V82, P3263, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.018; Soleimani S, 2019, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V128, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.002; Subbaramaiah R, 2020, IEEE SENS J, V20, P13940, DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3000489; Sumi L., 2018, IOT VANET BASED TRAF, DOI [10.1007/ 978-981-10-8636-6_3, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_3]; Tian L., 2018, CLUSTER COMPUT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10586-017-1340-3; Varghese B, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CLOUD (SMARTCLOUD), P20, DOI 10.1109/SmartCloud.2016.18; Wadi M, 2018, 2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL ISTANBUL SMART GRIDS AND CITIES CONGRESS AND FAIR (ICSG ISTANBUL 2018), P71, DOI 10.1109/SGCF.2018.8408945; Wang Y., 2020, SUSTAIN, V12; WHO, 2014, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT ON VIOLENCE PREVENTION 2014, P1; Zhao ZQ, 2019, IEEE T NEUR NET LEAR, V30, P3212, DOI 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876865; Zheng CJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689; GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE	85	8	8	6	37	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0925-7535	1879-1042		SAFETY SCI	Saf. Sci.	NOV	2021	143								105407	10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105407	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105407		JUL 2021	15	Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	UI1HO					2022-09-08	WOS:000690367600006
J	Onah, I; Nyong, A; Ayuba, KH				Onah, Innocent; Nyong, Anthony; Ayuba, Kuje Haruna			A case study of improved cookstoves and clean fuel use by selected Nigerian Households	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Food security; Improved cook stove use; Clean cooking fuel; SDGs 1-2-4-7-13-15 nexus; Pentagonal framework for SDGs	ENERGY	The implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Nigeria and many African countries seek evidence-based approaches to make business, health and socio-economic justification for increased public and private sector investments to achieve the goals. Yet, access to resources to engender food, energy, social, economic, and environmental security by over 62% of Nigerians living below the poverty line of $1.90 per day, remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to use the SDG framework to analyze the inter-linkages between food security, social, economic, climate and environmental outcomes of a national clean cookstoves project that was effectively implemented in Nigeria between 2014 and 2018. The project distributed improved cookstoves and clean fuels to 1000 households with the aim of using it as a pilot to stimulate demand, contribute to the expansion of energy access for cooking, improve the livelihood of women and girls, reduce forest degradation and fuelwood-induced carbon emissions. Structured questionnaires were used to collect primary data from 161 households drawn from a randomly stratified experimental layout in Kwara state. Project variables were classified into economic security (SDG1), food security (SDG2), social security (SDG4), energy security (SDG7), climate variable (SDG13), and environmental sustainability (SDG15). Regression estimates reveal that all the representative SDG variables significantly impacted the food security of beneficiaries in the following order: SDG1 > SDG4 > SDG15 > SDG13 > SDG7. A conceptual framework consisting of pentagonal linkages was developed from Pearson correlation estimates. The study established a pentagonal nexus for SDG1,2,4,7,13,15 hinged on food security, social, economic, energy, climate, and environmental factors. We suggest strengthening of climatic and environmental frameworks such as the integration of SDGs into Nationally Determined Contributions and long-term national development plans to drive food security. The study calls on the private sector to make use of SDG policy analysis to direct investments to help build back better from the COVID-19 pandemic. A matrix of food security-based policy, research, project, and knowledge activities were recommended to better understand SDG synergies. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Onah, Innocent] African Dev Bank, Nigeria Country Dept, 1521 Cadastral Zone A0, Abuja, Nigeria; [Nyong, Anthony] African Dev Bank Grp, Climate Change & Green Growth Dept, CCIA Bldg,Ave Joen Paul II 01 BP 1387, Abidjan 01, Cote Ivoire; [Ayuba, Kuje Haruna] Nasarawa State Univ, Fac Environm Sci, Dept Geog, Keffi, Nigeria		Onah, I (corresponding author), African Dev Bank, Nigeria Country Dept, 1521 Cadastral Zone A0, Abuja, Nigeria.	innocentonah@gmail.com; t.nyong@afdb.org						Albrecht TR, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6; AllAfrica, 2013, NIG FIR SMOK 3 LARG; Ekouevi K., 2013, HOUSEHOLD ENERGY COO; Fader M, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00112; Federal Government of Nigeria, 2013, APPR ACT 2013; Federal Ministry of Environment of Nigeria, 2016, CLEAN EN IN NAT CLEA; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, 2018, FOOD SEC NUTR CHALL; Global Alliance for Clean Cook Stoves United Nations Foundation, 2011, IGN CHANG STRAT UN A; Goozee H., 2017, 156 IPCIG; Guardian, 2020, THE GUARDIAN U GUIDE; Idris N. M, 2019, ESTIMATION FUELWOOD; International Center for Energy Environment and Development ICEED, 2012, LOW CARB AFR NIG REP; Jan I, 2017, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V103, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.014; Jeuland MA, 2015, ENERG ECON, V52, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.010; Juan U.-T., 2019, ENERGIES; Keenan R., 2016, PARIS CLIMATE AGREEM; KREJCIE RV, 1970, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V30, P607, DOI 10.1177/001316447003000308; Louise Aukland P. M., 2002, CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; Masera OR, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P2083, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0; Miyamoto M, 2020, WORLD DEV, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104746; Nigeria Investment Promotion Commission-NIPC, 2017, NIG EC REC GROWTH PL; Olopade C., 2018, ENVIRON INT; United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, 2020, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, 2017, NIG 2020 VOL NAT REV; Waters A., 2010, 94 EC RES SERV; World Bank, 1987, 64487 ESM WORLD BANK	26	1	1	2	9	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	JUN	2021	142								105416	10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105416	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105416		FEB 2021	11	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	RP4KH					2022-09-08	WOS:000641697900007
J	Zheng, YQ; Du, SH; Zhang, XY; Bai, LB; Wang, HY				Zheng, Yunqiang; Du, Shihong; Zhang, Xiuyuan; Bai, Lubin; Wang, Haoyu			Estimating carbon emissions in urban functional zones using multi-source data: A case study in Beijing	BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT			English	Article						Carbon emission; Multi-source data; Urban functional zone; Energy consumption; Beijing	ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS	Carbon emissions have been increasing for decades, resulting in serious environmental problems. To achieve sustainable development goals, it is necessary to estimate carbon emissions related to urban energy consumption. As previous studies have addressed carbon emissions from the building-, community-, and district-levels, urban functional zones (a basic unit serving for urban planning) remain unexplored. In this study, carbon emissions derived from energy consumption in Beijing were explored using multi-source data, and a novel framework was developed to calculate the residential and urban facility carbon emissions. The methods were based on the mapped relationship between geographic entity locations and multi-source data, adopting the coefficient method of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to calculate emissions. The results showed large spatial auto-correlation, where peak emissions were represented by aggregation patterns, and outliers mostly occurred in the forested and farmland zones. Carbon emissions distributions per unit area also showed a mode of high value clusters in centre of Beijing while using Moran's I test (p < 0.0001). Suburban carbon emissions are also of interest owing to their similar aggregation centres surrounding urban areas. This study revealed that the institutional, residential, and industrial zones held the highest levels of carbon emissions. Accordingly, this work will aid low-carbon city management efforts and energy allocation optimization.	[Zheng, Yunqiang; Du, Shihong; Zhang, Xiuyuan; Bai, Lubin; Wang, Haoyu] Peking Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & GIS, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China		Du, SH (corresponding author), Peking Univ Beijing, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.	dshgis@hotmail.com			National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China [2021YFE0117100]; Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [42001327]; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660003, 2020T130005]	National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China; Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(China Postdoctoral Science Foundation)	Funding This work was supported by the National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China [grant number 2021YFE0117100] ; the Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 42001327] ; and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [grant numbers 2019M660003, 2020T130005] .	[Anonymous], 2017, BEIJING BUREAU STAT; [Anonymous], 2018, BEIJING REGIONAL STA; Cai M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128792; Chen L, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V109, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.010; Chen X, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V709, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135768; Contosta AR, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103724; Cui XL, 2019, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V110, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2019.01.007; Du SH, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112480; Feng YN, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11151802; Flerlage H, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131208; Gurney KR, 2015, NATURE, V525, P179, DOI 10.1038/525179a; Hiraishi T, 2014, 2013 SUPPLEMENT 2006; Huo TF, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102068; IPCC, 2019, 2019 REFINEMENT 2006; Kavgic M, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1683, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.021; Li PY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107243; Liu K, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120313; Liu R, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V169, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.002; Mitchell MGE, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.255; National Bureau of Statistics, 2018, NATL BUREAU STAT; Reinhart CF, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V97, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001; Shang SS, 2021, CITIES, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103002; Shao L, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118774; Sharifi E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120035; Song JC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117881; Su YX, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V35, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.015; Swan LG, 2009, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V13, P1819, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.033; Wang SH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V169, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.001; Xia CY, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120797; Zhang PF, 2020, APPL ENERG, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115425; Zhang Y, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V645, P1630, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.033; Zuo SD, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118659	32	3	3	32	32	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0360-1323	1873-684X		BUILD ENVIRON	Build. Environ.	MAR 15	2022	212								108804	10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108804	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108804			11	Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Civil	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Construction & Building Technology; Engineering	0J6DU					2022-09-08	WOS:000780194000004
J	Tambo, JA; Matimelo, M; Ndhlovu, M; Mbugua, F; Phiri, N				Tambo, Justice A.; Matimelo, Mathews; Ndhlovu, Mathias; Mbugua, Fredrick; Phiri, Noah			Gender-differentiated impacts of plant clinics on maize productivity and food security: Evidence from Zambia	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Agricultural extension; Plant clinics; Gender; Agricultural productivity; Food security; Zambia	FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS; AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; ADOPTION; POVERTY; RWANDA; ACCESS; WOMEN	The United Nation's declaration of 2020 as the International Year of Plant Health underscores the crucial role of crop protection in achieving the sustainable development goals. In this article, we analyse the gendered impacts of plant clinics-an innovative extension approach that aims to help smallholder farmers to lose less of their crops to pests through the provision of plant health diagnostic and advisory services. In particular, we investigate whether male and female farmers accrue similar benefits, in terms of technology adoption, maize productivity and food security, from participating in plant clinics. We use genderdisaggregated plot-level data from maize producers in Zambia. Applying doubly robust estimators, we find that participation in plant clinics stimulates the adoption of multiple pest management strategies, which boost maize yield and income by 14% and 27% respectively, and ultimately help to stave off food insecurity. A disaggregated analysis shows that both male and female farmers achieve positive outcomes from using plant clinic services, but the effects are disproportionately greater for male farmers. We also observe heterogeneous impacts for female household heads and female spouses, reflecting differences in decision-making power within the household. The findings suggest that plant clinics can play a significant role in helping male and female farmers address crop health problems and reduce transitory food insecurity, but female participants (particularly female spouses) will need additional support if the goal is to bridge the gender gap in agricultural productivity. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).	[Tambo, Justice A.] Ctr Agr & Biosci Int CABI, Rue Grillons 1, CH-2800 Delemont, Switzerland; [Matimelo, Mathews; Ndhlovu, Mathias] Zambia Agr Res Inst ZARI Mt Makulu, Chilanga, Zambia; [Mbugua, Fredrick] Ctr Agr & Biosci Int CABI, 673 Canary Bird,Limuru Rd, Nairobi, Kenya; [Phiri, Noah] Ctr Agr & Biosci Int CABI, POB 37589, Lusaka, Zambia		Tambo, JA (corresponding author), Ctr Agr & Biosci Int CABI, Rue Grillons 1, CH-2800 Delemont, Switzerland.	j.tambo@cabi.org; F.Mbugua@cabi.org; n.phiri@cabi.org			Foreign, Commonwealth AMP; Development Office (FCDO) , UK; DirectorateGeneral for International Cooperation (DGIS) , Netherlands; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); European Commission (DG DEVCO); Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR); Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China; International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) through the CABIled Plantwise programme; Irish Aid	Foreign, Commonwealth AMP; Development Office (FCDO) , UK; DirectorateGeneral for International Cooperation (DGIS) , Netherlands(Netherlands Government); Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); European Commission (DG DEVCO)(European CommissionEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre); Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)(Australian Ctr Intl Agr Res); Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China(Ministry of Agriculture, China); International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) through the CABIled Plantwise programme; Irish Aid(CGIAR)	This research was financially supported by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) , UK; the DirectorateGeneral for International Cooperation (DGIS) , Netherlands; the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) ; the European Commission (DG DEVCO) ; the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) ; the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China; Irish Aid; and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) through the CABIled Plantwise programme. We gratefully acknowledge Judith Chowa for logistical support, and Tim Beale for generating the map of the study area. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.	AIR, 2019, EV PLANTW KEN 36 MON; Aker JC, 2011, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V42, P631, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x; Akter S, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P449, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01007-0; Anderson J., 2007, HDB AGR EC, P2343; Bellemare MF, 2017, AM J AGR ECON, V99, P357, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aaw053; Bentley J, 2011, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V9, P393, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2011.583482; Bilinsky P., 2007, MONTHS ADEQUATE HOUS; Bindlish V, 1997, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V12, P183, DOI 10.1093/wbro/12.2.183; CABI, 2019, PLANTW ANN REP 2018; Corning S., 1990, J EXTENSION, V28, P24; Davis K, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.019; Day R., 2017, Outlooks on Pest Management, V28, P196, DOI 10.1564/v28_oct_02; Dinar A, 2001, AM J AGR ECON, V83, P769, DOI 10.1111/0002-9092.00206; Dohmen T, 2011, J EUR ECON ASSOC, V9, P522, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x; Early R, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12485; Eckel C.C., 2008, HDB EXPT EC RESULTS, V1, P1061; FAO, 2015, GUID PREP VOIC HUNG; FAO, 2016, METH EST COMP RAT FO; FAO, 2016, GLOB FOOD INS EXP SC; FAO, 2020, GIEWS COUNTR BRIEF Z; FAO, 2011, WOM AGR CLOS GEND GA; FAO and ECOWAS Commission, 2018, COUNTR GEND ASS SER; FAOSTAT, 2018, FAOSTAT; Filmer D, 2001, DEMOGRAPHY, V38, P115, DOI 10.2307/3088292; Gates MF, 2014, SCIENCE, V345, P1273, DOI 10.1126/science.1258882; Imai K, 2014, J R STAT SOC B, V76, P243, DOI 10.1111/rssb.12027; Imbens GW, 2009, J ECON LIT, V47, P5, DOI 10.1257/jel.47.1.5; Imbens GW, 2004, REV ECON STAT, V86, P4, DOI 10.1162/003465304323023651; Kabisa M, 2016, 114 IAPRI; Kansiime MK, 2019, PEST MANAG SCI, V75, P2840, DOI 10.1002/ps.5504; Karubanga G, 2017, DEV PRACT, V27, P1091, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2017.1359236; Lapple D, 2013, J AGR ECON, V64, P467, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12000; Lambrecht I, 2016, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V43, P841, DOI 10.1093/erae/jbv039; Lamontagne-Godwin J, 2017, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V23, P7, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1230069; Larsen AF, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.003; Meinzen-Dick R., 2012, Reshaping agriculture for nutrition and health: an IFPRI 2020 book, P135; MoA, 2019, CROP FOR SURV 2018 2; Musebe R. O., 2018, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V13, P2862, DOI 10.5897/AJAR2018.13090; Njuki J, 2019, RESAKSS 2019 ANN TRE; Onwujekwe O, 2002, SOC SCI MED, V55, P2121, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00355-0; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development / Food and Agriculture Organisation (OECD/ FAO), 2012, OECD FAO AGR OUTLOOK, DOI [DOI 10.1787/AGR_OUTLOOK-2012-EN, 10.1787/agr_outlook-2012-en]; OSullivan M., 2014, LEVELLING FIELD IMPR; Pan Y, 2018, AM J AGR ECON, V100, P1012, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aay012; POMS, 2020, PLANTW ONL MAN SYST; Pryck JennieDeyde., 2014, GENDER AGR CLOSING K, P343, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_7; Quisumbing AR, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P581, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.006; Ragasa C, 2019, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V20, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.12.007; Ragasa C, 2013, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V19, P437, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2013.817343; Rutamu N.G, 2017, EXTENSION ADVISORY S; Rwomushana I, 2020, INV SPEC COMP; Silvestri S, 2019, FOOD SECUR, V11, P301, DOI 10.1007/s12571-019-00910-5; Smale M, 2015, FOOD POLICY, V52, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.001; Tambo JA, 2021, J AGR ECON, V72, P97, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12391; Tambo JA, 2020, WORLD DEV, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104881; Tambo JA, 2020, INT J PEST MANAGE, V66, P298, DOI 10.1080/09670874.2019.1646942; Tambo JA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220844; Terefe B, 2020, GENDER ASSESSMENT PL; Verhofstadt E, 2014, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V45, P39, DOI 10.1111/agec.12128; Whittington D, 1998, WORLD DEV, V26, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00125-3; Williams F, 2012, PLANTWISE GENDER STR; Williams FE, 2020, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V26, P383, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1726778; Woetzel J., 2015, POWER PARITY ADV WOM; World Bank, 2011, WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2011: CONFLICT, SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8439-8; World Economic Forum, 2015, GLOBAL GENDER GAP RE; World Economic Forum, 2020, GLOBAL GENDER GAP RE	65	5	5	1	9	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	SEP	2021	145								105519	10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105519	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105519		MAY 2021	15	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	SM6YZ		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000657749600021
J	Chakraborty, S; Sahoo, S; Majumdar, D; Saha, S; Roy, S				Chakraborty, Subha; Sahoo, Satiprasad; Majumdar, Debaleena; Saha, Swati; Roy, Souvanic			Future Mangrove Suitability Assessment of Andaman to strengthen sustainable development	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Future mangrove suitability index; AHP; Sensitivity analysis; Statistical correlation; MCDM	ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CORAL-REEF; FORESTS; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES; ISLANDS; INDEX; INDIA	Islands are threatened by various natural and anthropogenic factors including climate change, overpopulation, unsustainable use of natural resources and increasing trend in seismic events. Therefore, studies on island in specific aspect (ecological, social and economic) is very essential for sustainable resource management and future development. Mangroves are highly important natural resources of coastal regions in respect to coastal livelihood and natural defense. Although, around 46% of the mangrove forest area has vanished worldwide in the last few decades. In this present research, Future Mangrove Suitability Index (FMSI) using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has been performed for sustainable forest management under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal no 15. It is a new framework applied on North and Middle Andaman Island to determine the future distribution of mangrove forest. Land-use and land-covers (LULC) are prepared in supervised classification (maximum likelihood algorithm) techniques with 3000 signatures. A total number of fourteen parameters has been used in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) platform to generate future scenarios. Among them, Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) projected climatic data (RCP 6.0 scenario shows the best result comparing to 4.5 and 8.5) and projected population data has been used for the first time in the investigated area. The final results are validated using 556 field sample point. Seven major sensitive parameters have been selected from sensitivity analysis and three statistical correlation analysis has been performed using 300 field points to generate the actual correlation between the parameters. The final outcome shows that major unsuitable zones are located in Diglipur tehsil whereas; highest suitable zones are located in Rangat tehsil region which are the result of the continuous increase of sea surface height (1.5 mm observed during 1980-2009), seismic events with frequent storm surges, anthropogenic influences and impact of climate change. Thus a planned sustainable development practice is essential to control the biodiversity loss and future livelihood management. Moreover, this study will strengthen future planning projects and researches in mangrove ecosystem management of Andaman. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Chakraborty, Subha; Saha, Swati; Roy, Souvanic] IIEST, Dept Architecture Town & Reg Planning, PO Bot Garden, Howrah 711103, W Bengal, India; [Sahoo, Satiprasad] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Sch Water Resources, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India; [Majumdar, Debaleena] Jadavpur Univ, DST Women Scientist WOS A, Dept Geog, Kolkata 700032, India		Chakraborty, S (corresponding author), IIEST, Dept Architecture Town & Reg Planning, PO Bot Garden, Howrah 711103, W Bengal, India.	subha.gis@gmail.com	Sahoo, Dr. Satiprasad/AAG-2660-2021					Abdel-Basset M, 2018, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/sym10040116; Akay AO, 2018, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V190, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-6948-0; Alongi DM, 2008, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024; Alongi DM, 2002, ENVIRON CONSERV, V29, P331, DOI 10.1017/S0376892902000231; Alonso JA, 2006, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ, V14, P445, DOI 10.1142/S0218488506004114; Asner GP, 2009, J APPL REMOTE SENS, V3, DOI 10.1117/1.3223675; Beh Boon Chun, 2011, 2011 Proceedings of the International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace 2011), P147, DOI 10.1109/IConSpace.2011.6015871; Chaturvedi RK, 2012, CURR SCI INDIA, V103, P791; Chow J, 2018, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V37, P139, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2017.1339615; Chowdhury A, 2018, CARBON MANAG, V9, P575, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2018.1518105; De Andreis S, 2005, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V42, P1421, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.037; Dhar A, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V74, P5663, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4580-7; Estoque RC, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5391, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14409; Etongo D, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V90, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.008; Garcia Lopez T., 2018, Open Journal of Ecology, V8, P147, DOI 10.4236/oje.2018.83010; George R, 2018, REMOTE SENS LETT, V9, P1099, DOI 10.1080/2150704X.2018.1508910; Ghelichkhan M, 2018, J ANIM SCI, V96, P3993, DOI 10.1093/jas/sky259; Giri C, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P154, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x; Goutham-Bharathi MP, 2014, BOT MAR, V57, P421, DOI 10.1515/bot-2014-0033; Gupta K, 2018, METHODSX, V5, P1129, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.011; HAMBY DM, 1994, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V32, P135, DOI 10.1007/BF00547132; Hamurcu M., 2018, INT ADV RESEARCHES E, V02, P92; Hilmi E, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V165, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.002; Hussain SA, 2010, WETL ECOL MANAG, V18, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11273-009-9173-3; Kahsay A, 2018, COGENT FOOD AGR, V4, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2018.1507184; Kayet N, 2016, SPAT INF RES, V24, P515, DOI 10.1007/s41324-016-0049-3; Kiruba-Sankar R, 2018, J COAST CONSERV, V22, P217, DOI 10.1007/s11852-017-0588-3; Kuenzer C, 2011, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V3, P878, DOI 10.3390/rs3050878; Laegdsgaard P, 2001, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V257, P229, DOI 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00331-2; Majumdar SD, 2018, REG STUD MAR SCI, V24, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2018.08.011; Mandal U, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4293, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1421-8; Mehvar S, 2018, J MAR SCI ENG, V6, DOI 10.3390/jmse6010005; Misra A, 2015, ARAB J GEOSCI, V8, P267, DOI 10.1007/s12517-013-1220-y; Mukhopadhyay A, 2015, ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP, V17, P1111, DOI [10.1039/c4em00611a, 10.1039/C4EM00611A]; Nagelkerken I, 2000, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V51, P31, DOI 10.1006/ecss.2000.0617; Ojo O. I., 2018, MULTIPURPOSEFUL APPL, P65, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.73314, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.73314]; Parry JA, 2018, J URBAN MANAG, V7, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2018.05.002; Pelegri SP, 1998, MAR BIOL, V131, P53, DOI 10.1007/s002270050296; Putranto S., 2018, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V176, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/176/1/012043; Ragavan P, 2018, MAR BIODIVERS, V48, P1291, DOI 10.1007/s12526-016-0581-3; Ragavan P, 2014, FLORAL COMPOSITION T; Romanach SS, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V154, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.01.009; Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE; Sahoo M., 2014, NAT RESOUR RES, V23, P409, DOI [10.1007/s11053-014-9251-y, DOI 10.1007/s11053-014-9251-y]; Sahoo S, 2016, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V56, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.002; Sari M. P., 2018, SCI J PLATAX, V6, P24; Singh LK, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V91, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.070; Pham TD, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7373-y; Zhang RQ, 2013, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V57, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2012.06.014; Zulfa AW, 2018, PERTANIKA J SCI TECH, V26, P899	50	11	11	3	56	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 10	2019	234						597	614		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.257	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.257			18	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IU2JK					2022-09-08	WOS:000483406000053
J	Beceiro, P; Brito, RS; Galvao, A				Beceiro, Paula; Brito, Rita Salgado; Galvao, Ana			Assessment of the contribution of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to urban resilience: application to the case study of Porto	ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING			English	Article						Nature-Based Solutions (NBS); Resilience assessment framework (RAF); Stormwater management and control; Urban resilience; 1D-2D modelling	GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; CARBON STORAGE; PERFORMANCE; BARRIERS; SWALES	Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) provide a systemic approach to promote the maintenance, enhancement, and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) in urban areas, helping to enhance urban resilience in the water sector. Within the sustainable development goals proposed by UNHABITAT, resilience in cities was established as a critical issue. The assessment of the NBS contribution to urban resilience and the development of tools to determine the long-term value of these solutions comprise a most needed step forward. A comprehensive Resilience Assessment Framework to assess the NBS contribution to urban resilience (RAF), focused on NBS for stormwater management and control, was proposed and developed (Beceiro et al., 2020). This assessment framework aims to support the diagnosis, decision-making, implementation, planning, and management of the NBS and to identify the solutions with greater potential to contribute to city resilience drawbacks. This paper aims to demonstrate the purpose and relevance of the RAF, by presenting its application to a case study, highlighting both data demands (given different complexity requirements for metric's determination) and specific considerations regarding the level of assessment (either to the overall city area or to specific NBS). The application to the case study allows assessing the contribution to urban resilience of the main NBS in the urban area of Porto and, specifically, the contribution of an infiltration basin, which will be implemented in the Asprela catchment. Main resilience shortcomings in the city that may be upgraded by NBS are also identified, as recommendations for future urban planning in Porto. This application also intends to deliver a thorough example for other cities aiming to assess NBS contribution to urban resilience using the proposed RAF. At the city level, the main opportunities to improve the NBS contribution identified corresponded to the Governance and stakeholders' involvement, Environmental resilience and Resilience engaged service. On the other hand, the Social involvement and co-benefits and the Service management (obj.6) are identified as consolidated aspects across the urban area. At the NBS level, it was possible to conclude that the infiltration basin, considering the design characteristics, will enhance significantly the contribution to urban resilience in the Asprela catchment, based on the results for the model based metrics and the defined scenarios. Furthermore, it was possible to conclude that the NBS will operate in overall good hydraulic condition, even for the most severe rainfall conditions.	[Beceiro, Paula; Brito, Rita Salgado] Lab Nacl Engn Civil LNEC, Av Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal; [Beceiro, Paula; Galvao, Ana] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CERIS, Av Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal		Beceiro, P (corresponding author), Lab Nacl Engn Civil LNEC, Av Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal.	pbeceiro@lnec.pt	Galvao, Ana/M-6997-2013	Galvao, Ana/0000-0003-1513-4522	Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PD/BD/135216/2017]	Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)(Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology)	The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) , through the PhD fellowship PD/BD/135216/2017. The authors would like to thanks the Aguas do Porto and the Camara Municipal do Porto, especially to the Drainage of Stormwater, Watercourses, and Beaches Unit and the Municipal Environmental Management Unit, respectively, for the pro-vided information, the collaboration, and all constructive comments during this work.	Alves A, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V239, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.036; [Anonymous], 2017, DISASTER RESILIENCE; [Anonymous], 2017, IMPACT EVALUATION FR; Balian E., 2014, OUTPUT STRATEGIC FOR; Beceiro P., 2018, P 18 ENC ENG SAN AMB; Beceiro P, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062537; Calliari E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V656, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.341; Cardoso M.A., 2020, RESCCUE RESILIENCE A; Cardoso M.A., 2019, P 16 SEM IB AM SIST; Carmo J.M., 2013, THESIS U LISBOA LISB; CIWEM, 2017, COD PRACT HYDR MOD U; Clar M.L, 2004, STORMWATER BEST MANA; Collier M., 2011, ETICA EU PROJECT; Davies ZG, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P1125, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02021.x; Davis AP, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P6775, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.017; Dhakal KP, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V203, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065; Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9; EMAC, 2016, ESTR MUN AD ALT CLIM; EWA, 2020, EUR WAT ASS WAT MAN; FEUP, 2018, PARQ CENTR ASPR PROJ; Flynn KM, 2013, ECOL ENG, V55, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.004; Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002; Hansen R., 2008, GREEN SURGE DELIVERA, V65, DOI [10.1017/cbo9781139924672.006, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139924672.006]; IPMA, 2020, I PORT MAR ATM CLIM; Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239; Lafortezza R, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V172, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063; Leroy MC, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V566, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.027; Matos R., 1987, THESIS, V1; NATURE4CITIES, 2019, NATURE4CITIES D2 1 S; Nawaz R, 2015, ECOL ENG, V82, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.061; Nowak D.J., 1994, CHICAGOS URBAN FORES, P83; Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019; O'Sullivan F, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V2, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2020.572527; Potschin M., 2016, OPENNESS ECOSYSTEM S; Rizvi A.R., 2015, IUCN, P1; Sayaas S., 2016, OCDE RESILIENT CITIE; Staddon Chad, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P330, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9; Thorslund J, 2017, ECOL ENG, V108, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.012; UNESCO, 2018, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO; USEPA, 2017, EPA600R16365F USEPA, V10; van den Bosch M, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040; Vojinovic Z, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147725; Wihlborg M, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V233, P706, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.018	45	1	1	8	22	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0925-8574	1872-6992		ECOL ENG	Ecol. Eng.	FEB	2022	175								106489	10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106489	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106489		NOV 2021	17	Ecology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Engineering	XO3VM					2022-09-08	WOS:000730116200003
J	Taleizadeh, AA; Soleymanfar, VR; Govindan, K				Taleizadeh, Ata Allah; Soleymanfar, Vahid Reza; Govindan, Kannan			Sustainable economic production quantity models for inventory systems with shortage	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable economic production quantity models; Shortage; Partial-backordering; Inventory control; Sustainable development; Environmental considerations	SUPPLY CHAIN; EOQ MODEL; FORMULATION; MANAGEMENT; EPQ	Recently, new economic order/production quantity models have shifted away from focusing only on economic issues and towards combined economic-environmental concerns because of sustainable development goals. Despite this shift, only a few works have addressed sustainable Economic Production Quantity (EPQ). The theoretical sustainable EOQand EPQ models are basic models that ignore many real life conditions such as the possibility of stock-out in inventory systems. In this paper, we develop four new sustainable economic production quantity models that consider different shortage situations. To find optimal values of inventory system variables, we solve four independent profit maximization problems for four different situations. These proposed models include a basic model in which shortages are not allowed, and when shortages are allowed, the lost sale, full backordering and partial backordering models can be selected by operations managers depending on the manufacturer's motivation to improve service levels. We have also proposed an algorithm for determining optimum values of the decision variables for these sustainable economic production quantity models. Finally, the formulated models are explained with some different examples and the obtained results have been analyzed and discussed. These results show that the sustainable economic production quantity with partial backordering model is a general and more realistic model that can be used in many real cases with a reasonable profit amount, compared with the three other proposed models. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Taleizadeh, Ata Allah] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran; [Soleymanfar, Vahid Reza] Islamic Azad Univ, Sch Ind Engn, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran; [Govindan, Kannan] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, Ctr Sustainable Supply Chain Engn, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark		Govindan, K (corresponding author), Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, Ctr Sustainable Supply Chain Engn, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.	kgov@iti.sdu.dk	Govindan, Kannan/M-5996-2017	Govindan, Kannan/0000-0002-6204-1196				Abdallah T, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P120, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.591622; Absi N., 2012, SINGLE ITEM GREEN LO; Andriolo A., 2013, IFAC P, P1708, DOI DOI 10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00371; Andriolo A, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V155, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.013; Barbosa-Povoa AP, 2009, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V27, P127; Battini D, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V149, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.06.026; Bonney M, 2011, INT J PROD ECON, V133, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.033; Bouchery Y, 2012, EUR J OPER RES, V222, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.004; Chen X, 2013, OPER RES LETT, V41, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.003; Csutora M., 2012, 17 INT S INV; Dallery, 2010, RES REPORT; Digiesi S, 2015, IMA J MANAG MATH, V26, P185, DOI 10.1093/imaman/dpu004; Digiesi S., 2013, MANUFACTURING MODELL, V46, P664, DOI [DOI 10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00444, 10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00444]; Glock CH, 2012, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V23, P340, DOI 10.1108/09574091211289219; Gunasekaran A, 2014, J OPER RES SOC, V65, P806, DOI 10.1057/jors.2013.171; Gurtu A., 2014, APPL MATH MODEL; Hammami R, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V164, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.017; Harris F. W., 1915, LIB FACTORY MANAGEME, VV, P47; Hovelaque V, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V164, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.022; Inman RA, 2002, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V13, P47, DOI 10.1080/09537280110061575; Jawad H, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V105, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.079; Kannan D., 2017, INT J PROD IN PRESS; Kazemi N., 2016, INT J SYST SCI OPER; Khan M., 2012, 17 INT S INV; Massaro V, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V104, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.021; Ozlu H., 2013, THESIS; Pentico DW, 2009, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V37, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2008.03.002; Romero Morales D., 2012, 3 INT WORKSH LOT SIZ; San-Jose LA, 2009, INT J SYST SCI, V40, P59, DOI 10.1080/00207720802142475; Scheel C, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.018; Taleizadeh AA, 2014, APPL MATH MODEL, V38, P5357, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.02.014; Taleizadeh AA, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V155, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.023; Turkay M., 2008, ENV CONSCIOUS SUPPL, P45; Wahab MIM, 2011, INT J PROD ECON, V134, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.008	34	63	63	1	25	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 10	2018	174						1011	1020		10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.222	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.222			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	FV6YD					2022-09-08	WOS:000424727100093
J	Sharif, A; Godil, DI; Xu, BJ; Sinha, A; Khan, SAR; Jermsittiparsert, K				Sharif, Arshian; Godil, Danish Iqbal; Xu, Bingjie; Sinha, Avik; Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman; Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak			Revisiting the role of tourism and globalization in environmental degradation in China: Fresh insights from the quantile ARDL approach	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Tourism; Globalization; EKC; China; QARDL	GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; CO2 EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION	Ascertaining sustainable development is a major issue across the globe, and the economic growth pattern achieved is a predominant reason behind this. The globalization-led economic growth achieved by the emerging economies might not be ecologically sustainable, as globalization might not have been utilized as a policy tool. Moreover, a sound policy calls for considering the entire data spectrum for the analysis, which is largely ignored in the literature. This research contributes to the literature by proffering a policy framework for the emerging economies by analyzing the impact of globalization and tourism on environmental degradation, by considering the Chinese context as a sample. Following the quantile autoregressive distributed lag model, the impact of economic growth, globalization, and tourism on greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide emissions, and the ecological footprint in China over 1978Q1-2017Q4 are analyzed. The results demonstrate that economic growth stimulates environmental degradation, while the presence of Environmental Kuznets Curve is also validated. Moreover, tourism has been found to exert positive environmental externalities, while globalization exerts negative environmental externalities. Based on the outcomes of the research, a comprehensive policy framework has been suggested, following which the Chinese economy might be able to attain the objectives of Sustainable Development Goals 7, 8, and 13. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Sharif, Arshian] Univ Utara Malaysia, Eman Inst Management & Sci, Othman Yeop Abdullah Grad Sch Business, Dept Business Adm, Karachi, Pakistan; [Godil, Danish Iqbal] Bahria Univ, Karachi Campus, Karachi, Pakistan; [Xu, Bingjie] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Ctr Special Econ Zone Res, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [Xu, Bingjie] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA; [Sinha, Avik] Goa Inst Management, Ctr Sustainable Dev, Sattari, India; [Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; [Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam		Jermsittiparsert, K (corresponding author), Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.	arshian.aslam@gmail.com; danishiqbal.bukc@bahria.edu.pk; f11aviks@iimidr.ac.in; f11aviks@iimidr.ac.in; sarehman_cscp@yahoo.com; kittisak.jermsittiparsert@tdtu.edu.vn	Sinha, Avik/J-3905-2019; Godil, Danish Iqbal/AAA-3777-2022; Sharif, Arshian/I-4221-2016; Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak/O-5786-2019	Sinha, Avik/0000-0001-7795-1259; Godil, Danish Iqbal/0000-0003-1602-3744; Sharif, Arshian/0000-0002-1155-4151; Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak/0000-0003-3245-8705; khan, syed abdul rehman/0000-0001-5197-2318				Acheampong AO, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V677, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.353; Ahmad M, 2018, CARBON MANAG, V9, P631, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2018.1529998; Ahmed Z., 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, P1; Allena M., 2017, GLOBAL EUROPEAN ITAL; [Anonymous], 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-1072-1; [Anonymous], 2018, NAT HAZARDS, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3031-z; [Anonymous], 2019, COMMUNITY WORK FAMIL; Appiah MO, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V112, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.017; Arain H, 2020, TOURISM ECON, V26, P682, DOI 10.1177/1354816619859695; ARROW KJ, 1961, REV ECON STAT, V43, P225, DOI 10.2307/1927286; Atil A., 2018, J ENERGY DEV, V44, P95; Balli E, 2019, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V24, P219, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2018.1557717; Balsalobre-Lorente D, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P7130, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-07372-4; Balsalobre-Lorente D, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V113, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050; Becken S, 2001, ECOL ECON, V39, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00229-4; Bekun FV, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V655, P759, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.271; Ben Mbarek M, 2018, QUAL QUANT, V52, P1105, DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0506-7; Bianco V, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119286; Boniface P., 2017, TASTING TOURISM TRAV; Borhan H, 2018, J ASIAN BEHAV STUD, V3, P55, DOI [10.21834/jabs.v3i6.237, DOI 10.21834/JABS.V3I6.237]; Cai WJ, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V39, P1155, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.136; Chen LL, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072118; Chen YL, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V131, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047; Cho JS, 2015, J ECONOMETRICS, V188, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.05.003; Destek MA, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537; Dong HW, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V104, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.031; Dong KY, 2018, ENERG ECON, V75, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017; Dreher A, 2006, APPL ECON, V38, P1091, DOI 10.1080/00036840500392078; Dwyer L, 2010, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V18, P355, DOI 10.1080/09669580903513061; Eyuboglu K, 2020, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V23, P1631, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2019.1636006; Fletcher R, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P522, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2018.1471084; Friedlingstein P, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P709, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2248, 10.1038/ngeo2248]; Galli A, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V17, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.022; Geary A., 2018, MARKETING MODERN WOR; Godil DI, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P24190, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08619-1; Gossling S, 2002, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V12, P283, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00044-4; Gossling S, 2011, TOURISM MANAGE, V32, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.006; Hafeez M, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P25026, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05757-z; Hall CM, 2008, FOOD WINE FESTIVALS; Hamit-Haggar M, 2012, ENERG ECON, V34, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005; Hassan ST, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P2929, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3; HOLTZEAKIN D, 1995, J PUBLIC ECON, V57, P85, DOI 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X; JORGENSON AK, 2006, GLOBALIZATION ENV; Kahouli B, 2018, ENERGY, V145, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.136; Kalayci C, 2018, IJEEP, V9, P356; Katircioglu S, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P33611, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3324-0; Katircioglu ST, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V29, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.004; Khan D, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P15194, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04913-9; Khan SAR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.226; Kim TH, 2003, ADV ECONOMETRICS, V17, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0731-9053(03)17005-3; Lahiani A, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P7901, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-07467-y; Lenzen M, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P522, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x; LEVITT T, 1983, HARVARD BUS REV, V61, P92; Li Z, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120635; Liu XY, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.156; Lv ZQ, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1036; Ma XW, 2016, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V7, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2016.09.004; Malik MAS, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V23, P24178, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7609-x; Mikayilov JI, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P19389, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05269-w; Mikayilov JI, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1558, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269; Mishra S, 2020, CRIT REV FOOD SCI, V60, P1346, DOI 10.1080/10408398.2019.1571479; Mishra S, 2019, RESOUR POLICY, V62, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.04.005; Olale E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P859, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.178; Paramati SR, 2017, J TRAVEL RES, V56, P712, DOI 10.1177/0047287516667848; Perch-Nielsen S, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.002; Rico A, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V70, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.012; Roy V, 2018, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V38, P1091, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-05-2017-0260; Roy V, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V150, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.040; Sabir S, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P33387, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3; Sajjad F, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V21, P12403, DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-3146-7; Salahuddin M, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P2699, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3790-4; Salahuddin M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2002, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009; Schafer A, 1999, ENERGY, V24, P657, DOI 10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00019-5; Shahbaz M, 2019, INT EC, V158, P25, DOI [10.1016/j.inteco.2019.02.002, DOI 10.1016/J.INTECO.2019.02.002]; Shahbaz M, 2019, J ECON STUD, V46, P106, DOI 10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249; Shahbaz M, 2018, ENVIRON MODEL ASSESS, V23, P557, DOI 10.1007/s10666-017-9584-0; Shahbaz M, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V52, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025; Shaheen K, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P31273, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06252-1; Sharif A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138; Sharif A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V121, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.011; Sharif A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P11191, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7; Sinha A, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110602; Sinha A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549; Sinha A, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V119, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058; Sinha A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P1217, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071; Song JN, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P688, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.062; Tang Z, 2018, ADV METEOROL, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/1473184; Troster V, 2018, ENERG ECON, V70, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.029; UN, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2019, TOURISM STAT; United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2018, WORKING PAPER; Wang SJ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025; Wang SX, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P845, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.120; Wang Y, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102752; World Bank, 2019, EC GROWTH; Wu S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119764; Xu ZF, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P28378, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2876-3; Yang JM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118273; Yang L, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V662, P581, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.225; Zafar MW, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P13246, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7; Zafar MW, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P1166, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.081; Zaidi SAH, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210; Zhu KF, 2019, ENERG ECON, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104483; ZIVOT E, 1992, J BUS ECON STAT, V10, P251, DOI 10.2307/1391541	104	48	48	5	27	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	NOV 1	2020	272								122906	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122906	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122906			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	NP5TI		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000570238100001
J	Bogers, M; Chesbrough, H; Strand, R				Bogers, Marcel; Chesbrough, Henry; Strand, Robert			Sustainable open innovation to address a grand challenge Lessons from Carlsberg and the Green Fiber Bottle	BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL			English	Article						Open innovation; Sustainable development; Management; Food and beverage industry; SDGs; Grand challenges	BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION; HUMAN SIDE; FOOD; MANAGEMENT	Purpose This paper describes the case of how the Danish beer manufacturer, Carlsberg, developed the Green Fiber Bottle as part of its sustainability program through an open innovation approach in collaboration with complementary partners. It thereby illustrates how a grand challenge associated with sustainability can be effectively addressed through open innovation and reveals the opportunities and challenges that emerge in that context. Design/methodology/approach The paper summarizes some key elements of the case and, in particular, discusses some of the lessons learned, which can be further explored in future research, practice, and policy. Findings The case suggests a number of key issues that are relevant when attempting to address grand challenges, in general, and sustainability in the food and beverage (F&B) industry, in particular, namely: leveraging open innovation in the face of sustainability as a grand challenge; sustainability beyond a solid business case; opportunities and challenges in the face of new business models; the importance of early wins for addressing societal challenges for signals and scaling; and the importance of the Nordic context and long-term vision. Originality/value The case describes a recent (and to some extent still ongoing) initiative of how a particular F&B company has explored new approaches to developing its sustainability program. Therefore, it highlights some of the unique characteristics of this case. This paper also lays the groundwork for the establishment of "Sustainable Open Innovation" as a domain in its own right.	[Bogers, Marcel] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Copenhagen, Denmark; [Bogers, Marcel; Chesbrough, Henry; Strand, Robert] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA; [Chesbrough, Henry] Luiss Univ, Open Innovat, Rome, Italy; [Strand, Robert] Copenhagen Business Sch, Frederiksberg, Denmark		Bogers, M (corresponding author), Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Bogers, M (corresponding author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.	marcel@ifro.ku.dk; chesbrou@berkeley.edu; rstrand@berkeley.edu	Bogers, Marcel/D-5523-2011	Bogers, Marcel/0000-0002-7942-3561				Ahn JM, 2017, R&D MANAGE, V47, P727, DOI 10.1111/radm.12264; Bjerager A.L., 2011, PEOPLES BREWER; Bjerke B., 1999, BUSINESS LEADERSHIP; Blank S, 2013, HARVARD BUS REV, V91, P64; Bocken NMP, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039; Bogers M, 2018, CALIF MANAGE REV, V60, P5, DOI 10.1177/0008125617745086; Bogers M, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.012; Bogers M, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P2325, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2017-0394; Bogers M, 2017, IND INNOV, V24, P8, DOI 10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068; Bondeson Ulla V, 2003, NORDIC MORAL CLIMATE; Borsting C, 2017, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V33, P317, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grx023; Bouncken R, 2015, REV MANAG SCI, V9, P577, DOI 10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6; Bresciani S., 2016, J PROMOTION MANAGEME, V22, P251, DOI DOI 10.1080/10496491.2016.1121753; Bresciani S, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P2290, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-08-2017-0458; Brundtland G., 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE; Cantino V, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P259, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-06-2018-0351; Carlsberg Foundation, 2014, PURS PERF; Cheng N.L., 2008, SOLVENT HDB, V4th; Chesbrough H., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW; Chesbrough H., 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES; Chesbrough H., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I, P3; Chesbrough H.W., 2018, BERKELEY HAAS CASE S, P1; Chesbrough H, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010; Cillo V, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P242, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0472; Civera C, 2019, BUS ETHICS, V28, P156, DOI 10.1111/beer.12208; Dahan NM, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003; Dahlander L, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013; Dainelli F, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P2322, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-01-2019-0059; Didone M., 2017, 16 FUND RES S ADV PU; Du JS, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008; Dyer J. H., 2011, INNOVATORS DNA MASTE; Elkington J, 1998, ENV QUALITY MANAGEME, DOI [10.1002/tqem.3310080106, DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106]; Elkington J., 2013, TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE, P23; Enkel E, 2009, R&D MANAGE, V39, P311, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x; Fauchart E, 2011, ACAD MANAGE J, V54, P935, DOI 10.5465/amj.2009.0211; Franceschelli MV, 2018, BRIT FOOD J, V120, P2483, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0049; Francioni B, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P2277, DOI [10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0181, 10.1108/bfj-03-2019-0181]; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; George G, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1880, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4007; Giacosa E, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P2309, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2017-0124; Holgersson M, 2018, LONG RANGE PLANN, V51, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.007; House R.J., 2004, CULTURE LEADERSHIP O; Kastelli I, 2018, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V43, P882, DOI 10.1007/s10961-016-9530-3; Keltner D, 2009, BORN BE GOOD SCI MEA; Martinez M. G., 2013, OPEN INNOVATION FOOD; Mascher M, 2017, NATURE, V544, P426, DOI 10.1038/nature22043; Monteiro CA, 2012, PLOS MED, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001252; Munoz P, 2018, J BUS VENTURING, V33, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005; Oliveira CAO, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P2901, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-10-2018-0647; Osterwalder A, 2011, RESPONSIBLE MANAGEME, P61; Popkin BM, 2014, FOOD POLICY, V47, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.001; Randhawa K, 2016, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V33, P750, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12312; Rangus K, 2019, R&D MANAGE, V49, P168, DOI 10.1111/radm.12298; Rexhepi G, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V75, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.058; Riley M., 2005, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, V17, P88, DOI 10.1108/09596110510577707; Sachs J., 2019, SUSTAINABLE DEV REPO; Sorensen SPL, 1909, BIOCHEM Z, V21, P131; Stanko MA, 2017, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V34, P543, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12392; Strand R, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V127, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6; Sund KJ, 2016, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V57, P8; TEECE DJ, 1986, RES POLICY, V15, P285, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2; Thomsen S, 2018, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V26, P180, DOI 10.1111/corg.12236; Truant E, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V121, P2067, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0158; Tucci CL, 2016, IND CORP CHANGE, V25, P283, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtw002; Vanhaverbeke W., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I, V281, P287; Vanhaverbeke W., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I; Vrontis D, 2016, BRIT FOOD J, V118, P1863, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-05-2016-0192; West J, 2017, INNOV-ORGAN MANAG, V19, P43, DOI 10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995; West J, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P805, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001; West J, 2014, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V31, P814, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12125	70	34	35	2	21	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0007-070X	1758-4108		BRIT FOOD J	Br. Food J.	MAY 4	2020	122	5			SI		1505	1517		10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0534	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0534			13	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Food Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Agriculture; Food Science & Technology	LI0IN					2022-09-08	WOS:000529168800010
J	Gwandu, T; Blake, LI; Nezomba, H; Rurinda, J; Chivasa, S; Mtambanengwe, F; Johnson, KL				Gwandu, T.; Blake, L., I; Nezomba, H.; Rurinda, J.; Chivasa, S.; Mtambanengwe, F.; Johnson, K. L.			Waste to resource: use of water treatment residual for increased maize productivity and micronutrient content	ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH			English	Article; Early Access						Aluminium-based water treatment residual; Organic nutrient resources; Mineral fertilizer; Soil chemical properties; Maize dry matter yield; Nutrient uptake	SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT; PHOSPHORUS ADSORPTION; SMALLHOLDER FARMS; LAND APPLICATION; HEAVY-METALS; SANDY SOILS; GROWTH; RATIO; CORN; AVAILABILITY	Soil degradation, which is linked to poor nutrient management, remains a major constraint to sustained crop production in smallholder urban agriculture (UA) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). While organic nutrient resources are often used in UA to complement mineral fertilizers in soil fertility management, they are usually scarce and of poor quality to provide optimum nutrients for crop uptake. Alternative soil nutrient management options are required. This study, therefore, evaluates the short-term benefits of applying an aluminium-based water treatment residual (Al-WTR), in combination with compost and inorganic P fertilizer, on soil chemical properties, and maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and nutrient uptake. An eight-week greenhouse experiment was established with 12 treatments consisting of soil, Al-WTR and compost (with or without P fertilizer). The co-amendment (10% Al-WTR + 10% compost) produced maize shoot biomass of 3.92 +/- 0.16 g at 5 weeks after emergence, significantly (p < 0.05) out-yielding the unamended control which yielded 1.33 +/- 0.17 g. The addition of P fertilizer to the co-amendment further increased maize shoot yield by about twofold (7.23 +/- 0.07 g). The co-amendment (10% Al-WTR + 10% C) with P increased maize uptake of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn), compared with 10% C + P. Overall, the results demonstrate that combining Al-WTR, compost and P fertilizer increases maize productivity and micronutrient uptake in comparison with single amendments of compost and fertilizer. The enhanced micronutrient uptake can potentially improve maize grain quality, and subsequently human nutrition for the urban population of SSA, partly addressing the UN's Sustainable Development Goal number 3 of improving diets.	[Gwandu, T.; Johnson, K. L.] Univ Durham, Dept Engn, Durham DH1 3LE, England; [Gwandu, T.; Nezomba, H.; Rurinda, J.; Mtambanengwe, F.] Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Soil Sci & Environm, Soil Fertil Consortium Southern Africa SOFECSA Re, POB MP167, Harare, Zimbabwe; [Blake, L., I; Chivasa, S.] Univ Durham, Dept Biol Sci, Durham DH1 3LE, England		Gwandu, T (corresponding author), Univ Durham, Dept Engn, Durham DH1 3LE, England.	tariro.gwandu@durham.ac.uk; lynsay.i.blake@durham.ac.uk; hnezomba@agric.uz.ac.zw; jairos.rurinda@gmail.com; stephen.chivasa@durham.ac.uk; fmtambanengwe@admin.uz.ac.zw; karen.johnson@durham.ac.uk		Gwandu, Tariro/0000-0002-1949-1482	Durham University's Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF)	Durham University's Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF)	We acknowledge funding from Durham University's Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) for the project 'Soil health improvement technologies to enhance drought and nutrient resilience in Zimbabwean soils' and the Geography Department, Durham University, for laboratory analysis and David Brookes for the help in sourcing WTR. We also acknowledge the University of Zimbabwe for providing technical support.	Ahmad T, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V124, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.073; American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association and the USEPA, 1996, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; Anderson J.M., 1993, TROPICAL SOIL BIOL F; [Anonymous], 1993, METHODS ANAL SOILS P; Awad A, 2019, INT ECON J, V33, P252, DOI 10.1080/10168737.2019.1604787; Babatunde AO, 2008, CHEM ENG J, V136, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.013; Babatunde AO, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V184, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.102; Bai LL, 2014, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V26, P2397, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2014.04.002; Basta N. T., 2000, Land application of agricultural, industrial, and municipal by-products, P481; Bonifas KD, 2005, WEED SCI, V53, P670, DOI 10.1614/WS-05-002R.1; Clarke CE, 2019, J ENVIRON QUAL, V48, P1781, DOI 10.2134/jeq2019.03.0147; Clemente R, 2006, CHEMOSPHERE, V64, P1264, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.058; Cockx L, 2018, WORLD DEV, V110, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.018; Cox AE, 1997, J ENVIRON QUAL, V26, P1393, DOI 10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600050028x; Dassanayake KB, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V38, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.025; Dawson J. J. C, 2012, CREW PUBLICATION; Dayton EA, 2001, WATER ENVIRON RES, V73, P52, DOI 10.2175/106143001X138688; Elliott H. A., 1990, LAND APPL WATER TREA; ELLIOTT HA, 1991, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V83, P126; ERICSSON T, 1995, PLANT SOIL, V168, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00029330; Eskilsson CS, 2000, J CHROMATOGR A, V902, P227; FAO I., 1998, WORLD REF BAS SOIL R; FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2001, ALINORM 0112A, P1; Fitton G, 1997, MODERN ANAL GEOCHEMI; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2019, STAT DAT; GEERTSEMA WS, 1994, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V86, P64; Gibbons MK, 2011, J HAZARD MATER, V186, P1916, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.085; GRABAREK RJ, 1987, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V79, P84; Havlin J.L., 2005, ACTIVITIES PLANT GRO; HEIL DM, 1989, J ENVIRON QUAL, V18, P292, DOI 10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800030008x; Hovsepyan A, 2009, J HAZARD MATER, V164, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.121; Hsu WM, 2011, SOIL SCI, V176, P691, DOI 10.1097/SS.0b013e318235dd99; Hyde JE, 2004, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V35, P1033, DOI 10.1081/CSS-120030579; Ippolito JA, 2015, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V226, DOI 10.1007/s11270-015-2604-2; Jonasson B, 1996, SWED J AGR RES, V26, P69; Jones JB., 1997, HDB TRACE ELEMENTS; Kamanga BCG, 2014, EXP AGR, V50, P229, DOI 10.1017/S0014479713000513; Keesstra SD, 2016, SOIL-GERMANY, V2, P111, DOI 10.5194/soil-2-111-2016; Kihara J, 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V42, P3015, DOI 10.1007/s10653-019-00499-w; Kogel-Knabner I, 2008, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V171, P61, DOI 10.1002/jpln.200700048; Kutiwa Susan, 2010, Journal of Human Ecology, V32, P85; Lal R, 2019, SOIL TILL RES, V188, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2017.12.015; LUCAS JB, 1994, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V86, P75; Mahdy AM, 2007, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V4, P489, DOI 10.1007/BF03325985; Malhotra H., 2018, PLANT NUTR ABIOTIC S, P171, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-9044-8_7; Manzeke GM, 2014, FIELD CROP RES, V166, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.019; Manzeke GM, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V361, P57, DOI 10.1007/s11104-012-1332-2; Mapfumo P., 2001, SOIL FERTILITY MANAG; Matilainen A, 2010, ADV COLLOID INTERFAC, V159, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007; Mtambanengwe F, 2006, PLANT SOIL, V281, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11104-005-4182-3; Mtambanengwe F, 2005, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V73, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10705-005-2652-x; Mtambanengwe F, 2009, SYMBIOSIS, V48, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF03179982; Mtangadura TJ, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0182840; Nezomba H, 2015, GEODERMA, V239, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.10.006; Norris M, 2012, WATER SA, V38, P715, DOI 10.4314/wsa.v38i5.9; Novak JM, 2004, SOIL SCI, V169, P206, DOI 10.1097/01.ss.0000122522.03492.30; Nyamangara J., 1996, JASSA, Journal of Applied Science in Southern Africa, V2, P77; Nyamangara J, 2000, J SUSTAIN AGR, V16, P15, DOI 10.1300/J064v16n02_04; Nyamapfene K. W, 1991, SOILS ZIMBABWE, V1; Nyamasoka B., 2015, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V10, P100; OLSEN STERLING R., 1954, U S DEPT AGRIC CIRC, V939, P1; RENGASAMY P, 1980, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V11, P533, DOI 10.1080/00103628009367061; Republic of The Gambia and World Food Programme, 2021, STAT FOOD SEC GAMB C; Rurinda J, 2020, AGR SYST, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102790; Rurinda J, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P4588, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13061; TAGWIRA F, 1993, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V24, P841, DOI 10.1080/00103629309368844; Takavarasha T, 2003, MIN C URB PER AGR E; TILMAN D, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P827, DOI 10.1086/284382; Titshall LW, 2005, WATER SA, V31, P299; Toth G, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V88, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.017; Vanlauwe B, 2010, OUTLOOK AGR, V39, P17, DOI 10.5367/000000010791169998; WHO, 1996, TRAC EL HUM NUTR HLT; World Reference Base, 2006, WORLD SOIL RESOURCES, V103; Yang XE, 2007, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V29, P413, DOI 10.1007/s10653-007-9086-0; Zingore S., 2015, Better Crops with Plant Food, V99, P24	75	2	2	5	10	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0269-4042	1573-2983		ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH	Environ. Geochem. Health												10.1007/s10653-021-01100-z	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01100-z		SEP 2021	18	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Water Resources	UX7MX	34570292	Green Accepted, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000701025800001
J	Ouoba, N; Phung, LD; Sasaki, A; Pham, DV; Watanabe, T				Ouoba, Nindia; Luc Duc Phung; Sasaki, Atsushi; Pham, Dung Viet; Watanabe, Toru			Drip fertigation with treated municipal wastewater and soil amendment with composted sewage sludge for sustainable protein-rich rice cultivation	ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION			English	Article						Drip fertigation; Wastewater reuse; Nutrient recycling; Sustainable crop production; Protein-rich rice	ORYZA-SATIVA L.; IRRIGATION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY	Rice paddy farming is threatened by global water scarcity, necessitating the adoption of novel water-saving cultivation practices. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of drip fertigation with treated municipal wastewater (TWW) on a rice- soil system that is amended with composted sewage sludge (CSS). The treatments included flood irrigation with tap water (Control; T1), flood irrigation with TWW (T2), drip irrigation (DI) with TWW at 86% water consumption (T3), DI with TWW at 75% water consumption (T4), DI with TWW at 69% water consumption (T5), and DI with tap water at 86% water consumption (T6). The control was administered mineral fertilizers, and all other treatments received the same N amount (260 kg ha(-1)) from CSS. The results indicated that TWW drip fertigation had a significant beneficial effect on rice production by increasing (59.7 g pot(-1), T3) or maintaining (51.4 g pot(-1), T4) grain yield while conserving up to 25% of water when compared to conventional flood irrigation and mineral fertilizer application (52.9 g pot(-1)). In comparison to conventional farming, TWW drip fertigation in conjunction with CSS amendment significantly increased grain protein and Cu content while reducing As accumulation by 50%. Both CSS and TWW are effective at retaining soil fertility while avoiding unfavorable accumulation of As, Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn. The novel cultivation techniques described herein have the potential to significantly improve the sustainability of rice farming in water-stressed areas, as well as integrated wastewater management strategies aimed at achieving sustainable development goals.& nbsp;(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).	[Ouoba, Nindia; Luc Duc Phung; Pham, Dung Viet; Watanabe, Toru] Yamagata Univ, Fac Agr, 1-23 Wakaba Machi, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 9978555, Japan; [Luc Duc Phung] Vietnam Natl Univ Agr, Ctr Foreign Languages & Int Educ, Hanoi 12406, Vietnam; [Sasaki, Atsushi] Yamagata Univ, Fac Engn, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yonezawa, Yamagata 9928510, Japan		Phung, LD; Watanabe, T (corresponding author), Yamagata Univ, Fac Agr, 1-23 Wakaba Machi, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 9978555, Japan.	phungducluc0305@gmail.com; to-ru@tds1.tr.yamagata-u.ac.jp		Phung, Luc/0000-0001-6720-8365	Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)	Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)	We would like to express our gratitude to the Tsuruoka City Government's Bureau of Sewerage System for providing treated municipal wastewater and composted sewage sludge for our experiment. We are grateful to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for providing a scholarship to the first author to pursue a Master's degree at Yamagata University in Japan through the African Business Education (ABE) Initiative.	Adegoke AA, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00337; Arao T., 2010, EFFECTS WATER MANAGE; Awasthi S, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01007; Bosch A, 2018, INT J FOOD MICROBIOL, V285, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.06.001; Bouman BAM, 2007, ADV AGRON, V92, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92004-4; Chung BY, 2011, PEDOSPHERE, V21, P621, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60164-1; Colak YB, 2021, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V159, P544, DOI 10.1017/S0021859621000824; Davatgar N, 2009, INT J PLANT PROD, V3, P19; Pham DD, 2017, CURRENT PERSPECTIVE ON IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, P37, DOI 10.5772/66956; Fageria NK, 2007, J PLANT NUTR, V30, P843, DOI 10.1080/15226510701374831; FAO/WHO, 2019, 1931995 FAOWHO COD S; Farhadkhani M, 2018, WATER RES, V144, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.047; Ferdous Z., 2017, RICE PRODUCTION WORL, P255, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47516-5_11; Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (FAMIC), 2020, STAND VAL HARMF SUBS; Ghosh AK, 2004, ENVIRON GEOL, V45, P1010, DOI 10.1007/s00254-004-0961-z; Gonalves J.M., 2021, P 1 INT C WAT EN FOO, P93, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-75315-3_11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-75315-3_11]; Hansch R, 2009, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V12, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006; Halim MA, 2015, ARAB J GEOSCI, V8, P3391, DOI 10.1007/s12517-014-1480-1; Hu PJ, 2013, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V13, P916, DOI 10.1007/s11368-013-0658-6; Huang XY, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12138; Ibekwe AM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P1603, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.039; International Rice Research Institute, 2022, RIC KNOWL BANK; JONES D. B., 1931, U.S. Dept. Agric., Circular; Ju CX, 2015, FIELD CROP RES, V175, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.007; Kalavrouziotis IK, 2012, AGR WATER MANAGE, V103, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.002; Kang MS, 2007, J ENVIRON SCI HEAL A, V42, P439, DOI 10.1080/10934520601187633; Kato Y, 2014, PLANT PROD SCI, V17, P1, DOI 10.1626/pps.17.1; Tran LD, 2019, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V17, P507, DOI 10.1007/s10333-019-00746-x; Lopez-Lopez R, 2018, IRRIG DRAIN, V67, P508, DOI 10.1002/ird.2250; Phung LD, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-67233-w; Ma J, 2000, J NUTR, V130, P2838, DOI 10.1093/jn/130.11.2838; MOE, 2012, METH SED SURV, P417; Mondal D, 2008, APPL GEOCHEM, V23, P2987, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.06.025; Park S., 2021, UNIVERS J AGR RES, V9, P101, DOI [10.13189/UJAR.2021.090401, DOI 10.13189/UJAR.2021.090401]; Parthasarathi T., 2013, Environment and Ecology, V31, P1826; Parthasarathi T, 2018, AGRON J, V110, P2378, DOI 10.2134/agronj2018.01.0002; Phung LD, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-62247-w; Rosemarin A., 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST; Sharda R, 2017, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V15, P93, DOI 10.1007/s10333-016-0531-5; Takahashi Y, 2004, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V38, P1038, DOI 10.1021/es034383n; Terio V, 2015, FOOD ENVIRON VIROL, V7, P305, DOI 10.1007/s12560-015-9199-z; Tortajada C, 2020, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41545-020-0069-3; Tuong TP, 2005, PLANT PROD SCI, V8, P231, DOI 10.1626/pps.8.231; Tuong TP, 2003, COMP ASSESS WAT MAN, V1, P53, DOI 10.1079/9780851996691.0053; White PJ, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V182, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x; Xu XY, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P5574, DOI 10.1021/es800324u; Yoshida S., 1981, Fundamentals of rice crop science.; Yuan ZF, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00719; Zhao FJ, 2020, PLANT SOIL, V446, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11104-019-04374-6	49	0	0	15	15	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	2352-1864			ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO	Environ. Technol. Innov.	NOV	2022	28								102569	10.1016/j.eti.2022.102569	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102569			11	Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1C4XR		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000793124500002
J	Rehak, D				Rehak, David			Assessing and strengthening organisational resilience in a critical infrastructure system: Case study of the Slovak Republic	SAFETY SCIENCE			English	Article						Critical infrastructure; ASOR Method; Organisational resilience; Risk management; Innovation processes; Educational and development processes		Critical infrastructure is a system that consists of civil infrastructures in which disruption or failure would have a serious impact on the lives and health of the population. It includes, for example, electricity, oil and gas, water supplies, communications and emergency or healthcare services. It is therefore important that technical resilience and organisational resilience is provided continuously and at a high level by the owners and operators of these civil infrastructures. Organisational resilience management mainly consists of continuously assessing determinants in order to identify weak points early so that adequate security measures can be taken to strengthen them. In the context of the above, the article presents a method for Assessing and Strengthening Organisational Resilience (ASOR Method) in a critical infrastructure system. The essence of this method lies in defining the factors that determine organisational resilience and the process of assessing and strengthening organisational resilience. The method thus allows weaknesses to be identified and the subsequent quantification of positive impacts that strengthen individual factors in organisational resilience. A benefit from applying this method is minimizing the risk and subsequent adverse impact on society of critical infrastructure system disruption or failure. The article also contributes to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goal 9, namely Building Resilient Infrastructure. The ASOR method namely contributes to the development of quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and trans-border infrastructure. Finally, the article presents the results of this method's practical application on a selected electricity critical infrastructure entity in the Slovak Republic.	[Rehak, David] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Safety Engn, Ostrava, Czech Republic		Rehak, D (corresponding author), Lumirova 13, Ostrava 70030, Czech Republic.	david.rehak@vsb.cz	Rehak, David/H-9495-2014	Rehak, David/0000-0002-4617-0553	Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic [VI20152019049]; Dynamic Resilience Evaluation of Interrelated Critical Infrastructure	Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic; Dynamic Resilience Evaluation of Interrelated Critical Infrastructure	This work was supported by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, [Grant No. VI20152019049: Dynamic Resilience Evaluation of Interrelated Critical Infrastructure Subsystems].	[Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2017, SAFETY RELIABILITY T; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2016, GUIDELINES CRITICAL; [Anonymous], 2017, ORG RESILIENCE SUMMA; [Anonymous], 2018, NAT CROSS SECT FOR 2; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497; Bryson J.M., 2004, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V6, P21, DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722; BS ISO:, 2018, 31000 ISO; de la Canal MD, 2013, CHEM ENGINEER TRANS, V33, P193, DOI 10.3303/CET1333033; Djapan M, 2013, CHEM ENGINEER TRANS, V33, P463, DOI 10.3303/CET1333078; Goncalves L, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V111, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.015; IEC, 1990, 610251990 IEC; IEC, 2010, 62502 IEC; IEC 60812, 2006, 60812 IEC 2; Labaka L., 2015, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V6, P409, DOI [10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2014-0048, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2014-0048]; McManus S., 2008, NAT HAZARDS REV, V9, P81, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:2(81); Nan C, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V157, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013; Nasibova RA, 2010, AUTOM CONTROL COMPUT, V44, P96, DOI 10.3103/S0146411610020057; National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC), 2009, CRIT INFR RES FIN RE; OECD, 2005, PROPOSED GUIDELINES, V3rd, P162, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264013100-EN, 10.1787/9789264013100-en]; Petit F., 2013, RESILIENCE MEASUREME; Rehak D, 2019, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V25, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.03.003; Rehak D, 2018, SYSTEMS, V6, DOI 10.3390/systems6020021; Rehak D, 2014, CHEM ENGINEER TRANS, V36, P469, DOI 10.3303/CET1436079; Saaty Thomas L, 2008, International Journal of Services Science, V1, P83, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590; Saaty T. L., 2004, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, V13, P348, DOI 10.1007/s11518-006-0171-1; Seville Erica, 2008, J Bus Contin Emer Plan, V2, P258; Tasic J, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P713, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2019.1617340; Taylor S, 2014, AMSTRONGS HDB HUMAN; Turner K., 2017, J LEADERSHIP ED, V16, P183, DOI DOI 10.12806/V16/I2/T2; Weil R, 2001, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V74, P23, DOI 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00064-3	37	19	19	5	27	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29a, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0925-7535	1879-1042		SAFETY SCI	Saf. Sci.	MAR	2020	123								104573	10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104573	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104573			9	Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	KG0EW		hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000509615500029
J	Schandl, H; Lu, YY; Che, N; Newth, D; West, J; Frank, S; Obersteiner, M; Rendall, A; Hatfield-Dodds, S				Schandl, Heinz; Lu, Yingying; Che, Nhu; Newth, David; West, James; Frank, Stefan; Obersteiner, Michael; Rendall, Andrew; Hatfield-Dodds, Steve			Shared socio-economic pathways and their implications for global materials use	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs); Integrated modelling; Global material use; Resource efficiency; Sustainable development goals (SDGs)	INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; STOCK DYNAMICS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY; MITIGATION; SCENARIOS; EMISSIONS; METALS	The global economy relies on a continuous and ever-growing throughput of biomass, fossil fuels, metal ores and non-metallic minerals to build, maintain and fuel the infrastructure of cities and industrial systems. The amount of materials required year by year depends on population levels, the use of technologies in production systems, investment into public infrastructure, and the lifestyle choices and consumption behaviours of households. The level of global material use has important consequences for environmental pressures and impacts of socioeconomic activities. Using materials more efficiently has positive implications for the economy and allows for reduced pressure on climate change, biodiversity loss, resource supply systems and waste management. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) structure assumptions of future population growth, economic activity and urbanisation into five core narratives and allow for greater comparability of scenario assumptions and assessments of future natural resource requirements and pollution levels. In this study we explore the future of global material use across the five SSPs using economic modelling with industry sector, country detail and technology extensions and provide a summary of global material demand scenarios. The challenge faced to reduce global material flows is determined by the material requirements of different levels of population, global economic growth, the potential to improve material intensity of production systems, and consumer behaviour. Under the scenarios, global material flows vary between 134 billion tonnes for SSP1 and 282 billion tonnes for SSP5 by 2060. A middle of the road SSP2 scenario projects material demand of 176 billion tonnes by 2060, which is twice the level of 2017's global material use. Despite yearly average improvements in material efficiency of 0.8% between 2015 and 2060, our results demonstrate the level of ambition that is required to curb the increasing pressures on natural resource supply systems and their environmentally detrimental consequences. This study presents five alternative baseline scenarios which assume a continuation of historical trends in the way in which production, consumption and material use are interacting. Efforts to reduce global demand of primary materials need be stepped up to manage the global economy within planetary boundaries. This can be modelled by introducing ambitious policy settings which was, however, not the purpose of this study.	[Schandl, Heinz; Lu, Yingying; Che, Nhu; Newth, David; West, James; Rendall, Andrew] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia; [Frank, Stefan; Obersteiner, Michael] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria; [Hatfield-Dodds, Steve] Australian Bur Agr & Resource Econ & Sci ABARES, Canberra, ACT, Australia		Schandl, H (corresponding author), Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.		Schandl, Heinz/C-5055-2008; Frank, Stefan/AAE-8070-2019; West, James/B-5487-2011; Lu, Yingying/M-8460-2019	Schandl, Heinz/0000-0001-6399-4231; Frank, Stefan/0000-0001-5702-8547; West, James/0000-0002-1444-1080; Lu, Yingying/0000-0002-0199-0662; Obersteiner, Michael/0000-0001-6981-2769	United Nations Environment Program International Resource Panel; Federal government of Germany; Foundation for Environmental Economics and Sustainability (SUN)	United Nations Environment Program International Resource Panel; Federal government of Germany; Foundation for Environmental Economics and Sustainability (SUN)	This study has been supported by the United Nations Environment Program International Resource Panel, the Federal government of Germany and the Foundation for Environmental Economics and Sustainability (SUN).	Akenji L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V132, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.071; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2017, RES EFF POT EC IMPL; [Anonymous], 2018, WORLD EN STAT; [Anonymous], 2019, GLOBAL WARMING 1 5 C; [Anonymous], 2007, GLOBAL TRADE ENV MOD; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; Duro JA, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.029; Arora V, 2016, ENERG ECON, V60, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.026; Bauer N, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006; Bongaarts J, 2019, POPUL DEV REV, V45, P680, DOI 10.1111/padr.12283; Bringezu S, 2015, RESOURCES-BASEL, V4, P25, DOI 10.3390/resources4010025; Cai YY, 2015, APPL ENERG, V154, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.041; Cai YY, 2015, APPL ENERG, V148, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.106; de Koning A, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V129, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.040; Deetman S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118658; Deetman S, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P4950, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b05549; Dellink R, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004; Elshkaki A, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.003; Ermolieva TY, 2015, CYBERN SYST ANAL+, V51, P125, DOI 10.1007/s10559-015-9704-2; Fischer-Kowalski M, 2011, J IND ECOL, V15, P855, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x; Garnaut R, 2011, GARNAUT REVIEW 2011: AUSTRALIA IN THE GLOBAL RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139107280; Graedel TE, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P4257, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1500415112; Harman I., 2008, ASSESSMENT FUTURE GL; Hatfield-Dodds S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V144, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.170; Hertwich EG, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6277, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312753111; Jackson T., 2016, PROSPERITY GROWTH FD; Jiang LW, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008; Kleijn R, 2011, ENERGY, V36, P5640, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.003; Krausmann F, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102034; Liu G, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P338, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1698, 10.1038/nclimate1698]; McCarthy A., 2018, MACROECONOMICS CIRCU; Miatto A, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P924, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12471; Mogollon JM, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.007; Muller DB, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P11739, DOI 10.1021/es402618m; O'Neill BC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004; Pauliuk S, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P13, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3148; Pauliuk S, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P3448, DOI 10.1021/es303149z; Raupach MR, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P10288, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0700609104; Riahi K, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009; Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6; Samir KC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004; Schandl H, 2018, J IND ECOL, V22, P827, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12626; Schandl H, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V132, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100; Schandl H, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003; Spangenberg JH, 2002, ECOL ECON, V43, P127, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00212-4; Swilling M., 2013, CITY LEVEL DECOUPLIN; Van der Voet E, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P141, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12722; Watari T, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V148, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.015; Wiedenhofer D, 2019, ECOL ECON, V156, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.010; Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110	53	18	18	3	40	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29a, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	SEP	2020	160								104866	10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104866	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104866			12	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LY6BP					2022-09-08	WOS:000540613000030
J	Kumar, SS; Banerjee, B; Duarte, FD; Dadich, A				Sree Kumar, Sheela; Banerjee, Bobby; Duarte, Fernanda de Paiva; Dadich, Ann			The business - government nexus: Impact of government actions and legislation on business responses to climate change	JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION			English	Article						Australia; business strategy; carbon tax; climate change; government legislation; wicked problems	STRATEGIES	Australia has committed to reducing emissions under the Paris Agreement by 2030, in alignment with the United Nations' (UN) Sustainability Development Goal (SDG) climate action. This article investigates the responses of Australian high-emission businesses to Australian government action and legislation in relation to climate change, specifically the carbon tax, and how this knowledge can assist in delineating future carbon legislation. A qualitative study of the responses of 17 high-emission businesses and three industry associations to carbon legislation during the implementation of the carbon tax in Australia identified the use of resistive, reactive or cooperative strategies by the businesses. Issues related to carbon legislation identified by businesses included differences in time orientation, multiple regulations, political uncertainty, international positioning and the need for long-term and consolidated policies. Given these findings, this article argues that well-designed top-down legislative measures are necessary to steer businesses towards a carbon-neutral regime.	[Sree Kumar, Sheela; Duarte, Fernanda de Paiva; Dadich, Ann] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia; [Banerjee, Bobby] City Univ London, Business Sch, London, England		Kumar, SS (corresponding author), Western Sydney Univ, Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia.	s.sreekumar@westernsydney.edu.au		Dadich, Ann/0000-0001-5767-1794; SREE KUMAR, SHEELA/0000-0001-5947-5607				[Anonymous], 2008, IARC PUBL, VIX, P1; [Anonymous], 2015, AUSTR 2030 CLIM CHAN; [Anonymous], 2016, IEEE ASME T MECHATRO, VPP, P1; [Anonymous], 2011, AUSTR TAX FORUM; ASX, 2011, ASX EN ENV MARK; Banerjee S.B., 2001, MANAGE DECIS, V39, P36, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005405; Bank W, 2021, STATE TRENDS CARBON, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8; Baxter T., 2019, GUARDIAN; Bebbington J, 2008, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V17, P697, DOI 10.1080/09638180802489162; Bog M, 2019, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V3, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00117; Bradford J, 2008, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V15, P156, DOI 10.1002/csr.151; Brouhle K, 2009, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V18, P360, DOI 10.1002/bse.604; Clean Energy Regulator, 2013, NGER SCHEM; Clean Energy Regulator, 2016, CARB PRIC MECH MECH; Delmas M., 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V13, P209, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.409; Department of Climate Change, 2012, AUSTR ACT CLIM CHANG; Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, 2011, AUSTR EM; Department of the Environment and Energy, 2017, NAT INV REP 2017; Directorate of Climate Change Adaptation, 2015, SIDIK SISTEM INFORMA; Duarte FD, 2015, SUSTAIN DEV, V23, P425, DOI 10.1002/sd.1603; Engau C, 2011, LONG RANGE PLANN, V44, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.11.003; Etzion D, 2007, J MANAGE, V33, P637, DOI 10.1177/0149206307302553; Fremeth AR, 2011, CALIF MANAGE REV, V54, P145, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.145; Griffiths Andrew, 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.001; Hannam P., 2017, SYDNEY MORNING HERAL; Hoffman A.J., 2012, BUSINESS ENV CRITICA, V1, P1; Jones Charles A., 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.001; Kavalski E, 2011, POLIT STUD REV, V9, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00221.x; Kolk A, 2007, BUS SOC, V46, P201, DOI DOI 10.1177/0007650307301383; Kvale S., 1996, INTERVIEWS; Lazarus R.J., 2010, ENV LAW POLICY ANN R, V40, P10749; Levy D.L., 2002, ORG POLICY NATURAL E, P173; Levy DL, 2003, J MANAGE STUD, V40, P803, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00361; LEVY DL, 2000, HDB STRATEGIC MANAGE, P67; Lewis S, 2015, HEALTH PROMOT PRACT, V16, P473, DOI 10.1177/1524839915580941; MacKay B, 2012, ORGAN STUD, V33, P1507, DOI 10.1177/0170840612463318; MacKenzie I. A., 2018, AUSTR EMISSIONS REDU; Millan N., 2010, BUILDING OPERATING M, V57, P23; Ministry for the Environment, 2020, TRANS LOW EM CLIM RE; Nachmany M., 2017, GLOBAL TRENDS CLIMAT; Northrop M., 2004, WIDENER LAW J, V14, P21; Nyberg D, 2013, ORGANIZATION, V20, P433, DOI 10.1177/1350508413478585; Okereke Chukwumerije, 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.002; Pearse R., 2017, PRICING CARBON AUSTR; Pinkse J, 2010, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V19, P261, DOI 10.1002/bse.677; Power S., 2018, AUSTR CLIMATE SAFEGU; Rice J, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P44, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2014.983220; Sangle S, 2011, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V20, P365, DOI 10.1002/bse.692; Sullivan R, 2009, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V16, P301, DOI 10.1002/csr.187; Teece D, 2016, CALIF MANAGE REV, V58, P13, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13; UNFCCC, 2015, FCCCCP201510ADD1; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Webb J, 2012, SOCIOLOGY, V46, P109, DOI 10.1177/0038038511419196; Wittneben BBF, 2012, ORGAN STUD, V33, P1431, DOI 10.1177/0170840612464612; Wittneben BBF, 2009, MANAGE DECIS, V47, P1122, DOI 10.1108/00251740910978331	55	1	1	1	12	CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS	CAMBRIDGE	EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND	1833-3672	1839-3527		J MANAGE ORGAN	J. Manag. Organ.	NOV	2020	26	6			SI		952	974		10.1017/jmo.2020.21	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.21			23	Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	PT2KR		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000608448200003
J	Amadu, FO; Miller, DC; McNamara, PE				Amadu, Festus O.; Miller, Daniel C.; McNamara, Paul E.			Agroforestry as a pathway to agricultural yield impacts in climate-smart agriculture investments: Evidence from southern Malawi	ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS			English	Article						Agroforestry; Climate-smart agriculture; Double hurdle; Maize yield; Malawi	SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; RICE INTENSIFICATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; EASTERN; TREES; ADAPTATION; FARMERS; MODELS; SYSTEM	Agroforestry is widely promoted for delivering not only the main food security objective of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) but also increasing resilience and mitigating climate change. Yet rigorous estimates of the impact of this pathway on agricultural yields in CSA interventions remain limited. Here we analyze maize yield effects of agroforestry within a large CSA project, funded by the US Agency for International Development and implemented from 2009 to 2014 in southern Malawi. Using original survey data from 808 households across five districts, we apply a double hurdle specification with a control function approach to account for the endogeneity of CSA program participation and the intensity of agroforestry fertilizer trees (as a proxy for agroforestry adoption) in the study area. We find a positive and statistically significant yield effect of CSA program participation and the intensity of agroforestry fertilizer trees: maize yields increased, on average, by 20% for participation, and 2% for the intensity of fertilizer trees - a modest but useful result with implications for increasing agricultural productivity among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere. More broadly, our results show that incorporating agroforestry into CSA interventions could enhance agricultural yields among smallholder farmers in the face of climate change - a crucial aspect of sustainable development goals on hunger and climate adaptation.	[Amadu, Festus O.; Miller, Daniel C.] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, S-406 Turner Hall,1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA; [McNamara, Paul E.] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, 341 Mumford Hall,1301 W Gregory Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA		Amadu, FO (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, S-406 Turner Hall,1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.; Amadu, FO (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, 62 Mumford Hall,1301 W Gregory Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.	amadu2@illinois.edu; dcmiller@illinois.edu; mcnamar1@illinois.edu		Miller, Daniel/0000-0001-6812-0314; McNamara, Paul/0000-0001-7692-4494	United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Borlaug Leadership Enhancement in Agriculture Program [016258-128]; United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Strengthening Agriculture & Nutrition Extension (SANE) project [AID-612-LA-15-00003]; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), through National Institute of Food & Agriculture Hatch project [1009327]; Association for International Agriculture & Rural Development through a Future Leaders' Fellowship	United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Borlaug Leadership Enhancement in Agriculture Program(United States Agency for International Development (USAID)); United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Strengthening Agriculture & Nutrition Extension (SANE) project(United States Agency for International Development (USAID)); United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), through National Institute of Food & Agriculture Hatch project; Association for International Agriculture & Rural Development through a Future Leaders' Fellowship	The authors acknowledge funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Borlaug Leadership Enhancement in Agriculture Program (Grant # 016258-128) and Strengthening Agriculture & Nutrition Extension (SANE) project (Grant # AID-612-LA-15-00003), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), through National Institute of Food & Agriculture Hatch project # 1009327. We also acknowledge supplemental funding from the Association for International Agriculture & Rural Development through a Future Leaders' Fellowship.	Adegbola P, 2007, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V37, P55, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00222.x; Ajayi OC, 2003, AGROFOREST SYST, V59, P317, DOI 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000005232.87048.03; Ajayi OC, 2011, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V9, P129, DOI 10.3763/ijas.2010.0554; Alemayehu F, 2009, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V53, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.007; Amankwah A, 2016, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V47, P633, DOI 10.1111/agec.12261; AMEMIYA T, 1984, J ECONOMETRICS, V24, P3, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2018, ASSESSMENT WELLNESS; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2014, WATERSHED DEV MALAWI; Asfaw S, 2016, FOOD SECUR, V8, P643, DOI 10.1007/s12571-016-0571-0; Blaser WJ, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P234, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0062-8; Branca G, 2011, J ENVIRON DEV, V20, P278, DOI 10.1177/1070496511415645; Chandra A, 2018, CLIM POLICY, V18, P526, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2017.1316968; Chen WQ, 2018, 2018 IEEE ASIA PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (APCCAS 2018), P329, DOI 10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605638; Climate Bonds Initiative and HSBC, 2016, BOND CLIM CHANG STAT; Coulibaly JY, 2017, AGR SYST, V155, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.017; CRAGG JG, 1971, ECONOMETRICA, V39, P829, DOI 10.2307/1909582; Dhanush Dinesh, 2017, Agriculture for Development, P4; Di Falco S, 2011, AM J AGR ECON, V93, P825, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aar006; Dillon B, 2017, FOOD POLICY, V67, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.015; Dittrich R, 2016, ECOL ECON, V122, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.12.006; Fasse A, 2013, ECOL ECON, V94, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008; Felix GF, 2018, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V38, DOI 10.1007/s13593-018-0533-3; Ferraro PJ, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0267; Garrity DP, 2010, FOOD SECUR, V2, P197, DOI 10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7; Hope RA, 2007, WORLD DEV, V35, P1436, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.006; Ickowitz A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.001; IPCC, 2018, SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS; Issahaku G, 2020, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V42, P559, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppz002; Jerneck A, 2013, J RURAL STUD, V32, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.004; Kahsay GA, 2016, ECOL ECON, V121, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.016; Kassie M, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.016; Katengeza SP, 2019, ECOL ECON, V156, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.018; Khonje MG, 2018, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V49, P599, DOI 10.1111/agec.12445; Lambrecht I, 2014, WORLD DEV, V59, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.024; Lipper L, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1068, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2437, 10.1038/nclimate2437]; Liverpool-Tasie LSO, 2014, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V45, P663, DOI 10.1111/agec.12114; Ma WL, 2018, AM J AGR ECON, V100, P502, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aax079; Makate C, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P858, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.069; Mercer DE, 2004, AGROFOREST SYST, V61-2, P311, DOI 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029007.85754.70; Miller DC, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V84, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.005; Mohebalian PM, 2018, ECOL ECON, V143, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.038; Muller C, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P4313, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1015078108; Munsell JF, 2018, AGROFOREST SYST, V92, P1387, DOI 10.1007/s10457-017-0084-7; Ng'ombe JN, 2017, AGREKON, V56, P205, DOI 10.1080/03031853.2017.1312467; Noltze M, 2013, ECOL ECON, V85, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.009; Noltze M, 2012, AGR SYST, V108, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.003; Oldekop JA, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P421, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3; Pattanayak SK, 2003, AGROFOREST SYST, V57, P137; Reed J, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V84, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.012; Sida TS, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.013; Sileshi GW, 2016, J ARID ENVIRON, V132, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.002; SINGH I, 1986, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V1, P149, DOI 10.1093/wber/1.1.149; Tesfamariam BY, 2018, FOOD SECUR, V10, P95, DOI 10.1007/s12571-017-0756-1; TOBIN J, 1958, ECONOMETRICA, V26, P24, DOI 10.2307/1907382; Ubilava D, 2018, AM J AGR ECON, V100, P239, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aax060; van Noordwijk M, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V34, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.003; Verkaart S, 2019, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V17, P34, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2018.1559007; Weiler F, 2018, WORLD DEV, V104, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001; Wooldridge JM, 2015, J HUM RESOUR, V50, P420, DOI 10.3368/jhr.50.2.420; World Bank,, 2017, WORLD DEV IND 2017; Yengwe J, 2018, EUR J AGRON, V99, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.004	63	28	28	12	40	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29a, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-8009	1873-6106		ECOL ECON	Ecol. Econ.	JAN	2020	167								106443	10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106443	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106443			17	Ecology; Economics; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Business & Economics	KB8DI					2022-09-08	WOS:000506719100009
J	Rodriguez-Espindola, O; Cuevas-Romo, A; Chowdhury, S; Diaz-Acevedo, N; Albores, P; Despoudi, S; Malesios, C; Dey, P				Rodriguez-Espindola, Oscar; Cuevas-Romo, Ana; Chowdhury, Soumyadeb; Diaz-Acevedo, Natalie; Albores, Pavel; Despoudi, Stella; Malesios, Chrisovalantis; Dey, Prasanta			The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS			English	Article						Small and medium sized enterprises; Structural equation modelling; Circular economy; Sustainability-oriented innovation	SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; INSTITUTION-BASED VIEW; INDUSTRY 4.0; BIG DATA; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT	The UN's sustainable development goals underscore engaging supply-chain stakeholders with environmentally friendly practices. Small-and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) are key participants in several supply chains, but their operations often produce a significant environmental impact. Their transition to sustainable practices is challenging because they operate with constrained resources, which are mostly invested in pressing activities. Therefore, evidence is needed that shows the benefits of investing limited resources in sustainable activities to support decision-making in SMEs. Research has neglected to connect circular economy and sustainable-oriented innovation whilst accounting for external factors affecting the implementation of sustainable processes and technology within SMEs in developing countries. This paper fills that gap by analyzing the impact of external factors on the implementation of circular economy and technology, and their influence on sustainable-oriented innovation and sustainable performance. Responses from 165 Mexican SMEs have been collected and analyzed using structural equation modeling to test direct and indirect effects between constructs. Findings reveal that while both governmental support and customer pressure facilitate the adoption of circular economy, only governmental support contributes directly to technology implementation. They also highlight the value of circular economy to support the adoption of sustainable-oriented innovation and to mediate the relationship between technology implementation and sustainable-oriented innovation. The overarching finding is that circular economy promoting sustainability-oriented innovation has a positive impact on financial, environmental, and social performance. This is a key implication to inform managers in SMEs on the potential benefits of investing in sustainable solutions.	[Rodriguez-Espindola, Oscar; Albores, Pavel; Despoudi, Stella; Dey, Prasanta] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England; [Cuevas-Romo, Ana] Univ Celaya, Coordinac Invest, Celaya, Mexico; [Chowdhury, Soumyadeb] TBS Business Sch, Informat Operat & Management Sci Dept, Toulouse, France; [Diaz-Acevedo, Natalie] Univ Celaya, Fac Adm & Negocios, Celaya, Mexico; [Malesios, Chrisovalantis] Univ Western Macedonia, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Athens, Greece		Rodriguez-Espindola, O (corresponding author), Aston Business Sch, Aston Triangle B4 7ET, W Midlands, England.	o.rodriguez-espindola@aston.ac.uk	Malesios, Chrisovalantis/C-6659-2018	Malesios, Chrisovalantis/0000-0003-0378-3939; Albores, Pavel/0000-0001-7509-9381; Rodriguez-Espindola, Oscar/0000-0002-4889-1565; Diaz Acevedo, Natalie Berenice/0000-0002-0116-0095; DESPOUDI, STYLIANI/0000-0002-8377-6407				Abdel-Maksoud A, 2021, ACCOUNT FORUM, V45, P30, DOI 10.1080/01559982.2020.1827697; Abdul-Rashid SH, 2017, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V37, P182, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223; Adams R, 2016, INT J MANAG REV, V18, P180, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12068; Adebanjo D, 2016, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V36, P995, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-11-2014-0543; Agamuthu P, 2009, WASTE MANAGE RES, V27, P625, DOI 10.1177/0734242X09103191; Ageron B, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.007; Aghelie A, 2017, INT J BUS EC DEV, V5, P41; Aguilar F.X., 2007, US POL EC, V9, P1100; Aktin T, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P767, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.057; Anderson B, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f80; [Anonymous], 2007, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.2007.00033.X, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2007.00033.x]; Araya U, 2003, ANALISIS COMPARATIVO; Arbuckle JL., 2006, AMOS 7 0 USERS GUIDE; Arena C, 2018, BRIT J MANAGE, V29, P316, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12250; Asgary A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P59, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00247-0; Bag S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125233; Bag S, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420; Balyer A., 2019, ROLES INTEREST PRESS, V11, P7052; Bastein A.G.T.M., 2013, OPPORTUNITIES CIRCUL, P1; Batista L, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P7248, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1558295; Baumeister R. F., 1997, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V1, P311; Beske P, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026; Bocken NMP, 2016, J IND PROD ENG, V33, P308, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124; Boiral O, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V123, P363, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1845-5; Bollen K.A., 1989, ARCHAEOL OCEAN, DOI [10.1002/9781118619179, DOI 10.1002/ARCO.5207]; Bollen KA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P15639, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1010661108; BOOMSMA A, 1985, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V50, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF02294248; Braganza A, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.006; British_Chamber_of_Commerce, 2021, CARB FOOTPR MYST 9 O; Brklin N, 2020, TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN SU, P219; Brown P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030635; Bryman A., 2011, 18 19 ELECT RESOURCE; Burstein P, 2003, POLIT RES QUART, V56, P29, DOI 10.1177/106591290305600103; Cainelli G, 2020, RES POLICY, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827; Carbons_Majors_Database, 2017, CDP CARB MAJ REP, P15; Cayzer S, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN ENG, V10, P289, DOI 10.1080/19397038.2017.1333543; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Chan TY, 2012, J FASH MARK MANAG, V16, P193, DOI 10.1108/13612021211222824; Charonis G, 2012, WORLD EC ASS SUST C; Chavez R, 2016, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V25, P205, DOI 10.1002/bse.1868; Chen CW, 2020, JOHNSON MATTHEY TECH, V64, P48, DOI 10.1595/205651320X15710564137538; Chu ZF, 2019, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V30, P57, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-11-2017-0294; CHURCHILL GA, 1979, J MARKETING RES, V16, P64, DOI 10.2307/3150876; De D, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.003; de Jesus A, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001; Demirel P, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P847, DOI 10.1002/bse.2286; Dey P.K., BR J MANAG, V31, P141; Dey PK, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P2145, DOI 10.1002/bse.2492; Dieguez-Santana K, 2021, ACAD-REV LATINOAM AD, V34, P316, DOI 10.1108/ARLA-08-2020-0188; do Paco A, 2013, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V56, P1532, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2012.733310; Druckman A, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P3572, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058; Dubey R, 2019, BRIT J MANAGE, V30, P341, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12355; EC, 2019, EX SUMM SME ANN REP; EMF, 2013, GROWTH CIRC EC VIS C; Epstein M. J., 2003, J CORP CITIZSH, P79; Lopez-Perez ME, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P985, DOI 10.1002/bse.1961; European Union, 2020, DIRECTIVE 200898EC E, VL312, P3; Figge F, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V69, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.031; Fonseka MM, 2014, CHIN MANAG STUD, V8, P593, DOI 10.1108/CMS-09-2011-0066; Gadenne D, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V84, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9672-9; Games D, 2019, J GLOB ENTREP RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40497-019-0167-1; Garcia-Quevedo J, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P2450, DOI 10.1002/bse.2513; Garetti M, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P83, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.591619; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; Geng Y, 2008, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V15, P231, DOI 10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6; Geradts T.H.J, 2019, DRIVING SUSTAINABILI, V78; Ghisellini P, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007; Gong MF, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V217, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.033; Govindan K, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P278, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141; Govindan K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V47, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014; Goyal S, 2018, THUNDERBIRD INT BUS, V60, P729, DOI 10.1002/tie.21883; GRANT RM, 1991, CALIF MANAGE REV, V33, P114, DOI 10.2307/41166664; Gunasekaran A, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004; Gupta M, 2016, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V53, P1049, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004; Hallam C, 2016, MANAGE DECIS, V54, P2157, DOI 10.1108/MD-04-2016-0259; Healy B, 2018, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V25, P129, DOI 10.1108/JSBED-06-2017-0206; Hernandez AA, 2018, J CASES INF TECHNOL, V20, P49, DOI 10.4018/JCIT.2018040104; Hofmann E, 2017, COMPUT IND, V89, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002; Hong JT, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3508, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093; Hong P, 2006, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V19, P292, DOI 10.1108/17410390610658478; Horvath D, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021; Hutner P, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P837, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.156; Ibn-Mohammed T., 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY; Ilic M, 2016, HABITAT INT, V56, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.003; INEGI, 2016, SE DIF EST DET MICR; Inman RA, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P4802, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1447705; Jabbour CJC, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416; Jain NK, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P3509, DOI 10.1002/bse.2593; Jakhar SK, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P904, DOI 10.1108/MD-09-2018-0990; Jambulingam T, 2005, J OPER MANAG, V23, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.003; Johnson MP, 2016, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V54, P481, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12154; Joreskog K.G., 1994, PRELIS 2 USERS GUIDE; Kagermann H.W., 2013, FINAL REPORT INDUSTR; Kalmykova Y, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034; Kannan D, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V233, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023; Katz-Gerro T, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P485, DOI 10.1002/bse.2259; Kava H, 2021, ANN OPER RES, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04263-1; Kazancoglu I, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P590, DOI 10.1002/bse.2641; Khurana S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125377; Khurana S, 2020, LECT N MECH ENG, P95, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-1071-7_9; Kim ST, 2012, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V15, P147, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2012.709228; Kirchherr J, 2018, ECOL ECON, V150, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Kiron D, 2013, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V54, P69; Klewitz J, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017; KOHLI AK, 1990, J MARKETING, V54, P1, DOI 10.2307/1251866; Kumar P, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215; Kumar R, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124063; Kumar S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023; Lawrence S. R., 2006, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V15, P242, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.533; Li YN, 2019, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V39, P550, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-12-2017-0753; Liang HG, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P59; Lii P, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V174, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.018; Lin CY, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V98, P67, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0535-9; Lin KY, 2018, COMPUT IND ENG, V125, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.06.023; Liu HF, 2010, J OPER MANAG, V28, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010; Liu Y, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V87, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002; Jabbour ABLD, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P273, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8; Lu JT, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122456; Ludeke-Freund F, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P36, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12763; Luthra S, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1505, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828; Machado CG, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1462, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777; Macrotrends, 2020, CEL MEX POP 1950 202; Mahpour A, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V134, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026; Mangla SK, 2018, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V29, P551, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449265; Martinez-Conesa I, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P553, DOI 10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403; Matjaz M, 2016, TOTAL QUAL MANAG BUS, V27, P1171, DOI 10.1080/14783363.2015.1064767; Meehan J, 2011, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V20, P94, DOI 10.1002/bse.678; Metz P, 2016, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V59, P50, DOI 10.1080/08956308.2016.1161409; Meyer John W., 1983, ORG ENV RITUAL RATIO, P199; MEYER JW, 1977, AM J SOCIOL, V83, P340, DOI 10.1086/226550; Miller K., 2011, 1 ASSESSMENT ENV COM; Moore SB, 2009, J CLEAN PROD, V17, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.004; Mostaghel R, 2021, J BUS RES, V127, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.053; Munaro MR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121134; Mwangi GM, 2021, ANN OPER RES, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04096-y; Neutzling DM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.091; Noci G, 1999, R&D MANAGE, V29, P3, DOI 10.1111/1467-9310.00112; Noy C, 2008, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V11, P327, DOI 10.1080/13645570701401305; Ntsonde J, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127303; Nunnally J.C., 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V3, P248; O'Connor GC, 2008, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V25, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x; OECD, 2016, ENV POL TOOLK GREEN; OECD, 2018, SMES KEY DRIV GREEN; OECD, 2020, FIN SMES ENTR 2020 O; OECD, 2018, ENV POL TOOLK SME GR; Oliver C, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P697, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C; Ormazabal M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V185, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031; Panwar R., 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P2890, DOI [10.1002/bse.2602, DOI 10.1002/BSE.2602]; Parker CM, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN C, V27, P279, DOI 10.1068/c0859b; Patwa N, 2021, J BUS RES, V122, P725, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.015; Peltier JW, 2012, INT SMALL BUS J, V30, P406, DOI 10.1177/0266242610365512; Peng H, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120032; Peng MW, 2008, J INT BUS STUD, V39, P920, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377; Peng MW, 2009, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V23, P63, DOI 10.5465/AMP.2009.43479264; Perry P, 2012, J FASH MARK MANAG, V16, P141, DOI 10.1108/13612021211222806; Petersen C, 2018, VOLATILITY UNCERTAIN; Pinto L, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P1832, DOI 10.1002/bse.2471; Porter M.E., 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; Prause M., 2019, CASE JPN, V11, P5807; Preacher KJ, 2004, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V36, P717, DOI 10.3758/BF03206553; Preston F., 2017, CHATHAM HOUSE BRIEFI; Priem RL, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P22, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.27879279; Prieto-Sandoval V, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P1525, DOI 10.1002/bse.2210; Prieto-Sandoval V, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224; Pymnts, 2019, FINTECH PRESS FI GIA; Ranta V, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017; Rattalino F, 2018, THUNDERBIRD INT BUS, V60, P747, DOI 10.1002/tie.21917; Reh L, 2013, PARTICUOLOGY, V11, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.partic.2012.11.001; Revell A, 2010, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V19, P273, DOI 10.1002/bse.628; Rizos V., 2016, BARRIERS ENABLERS, V8, P1212; Rodriguez-Espindola O., 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V178, P121562, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562; Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106676; Roh T, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V317, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422; Rojko Andreja, 2017, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, V11, P77, DOI 10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072; Ruth Del Castillo R, 2019, REV ARCHEOL NARBONNA, V5, P69; Samouel P., 2003, ESSENTIALS BUSINESS; Sarkar S, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V114, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.029; Sarkis J, 2010, J OPER MANAG, V28, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001; Schaltegger S, 2011, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V20, P222, DOI 10.1002/bse.682; Schroder C, 2016, CHALLENGES IND 40 SM; Shao J, 2020, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V31, P542, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-02-2019-0076; Shao J, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P3185, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.113; Sideridis G, 2014, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V74, P733, DOI 10.1177/0013164414525397; SLATER SF, 1994, J MARKETING, V58, P46, DOI 10.2307/1252250; Soh KL, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128858; Song L, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V218, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.283; Srinivasan R, 2018, PROD OPER MANAG, V27, P1849, DOI 10.1111/poms.12746; Su B, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V42, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020; Sullivan-Taylor B, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5565, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563837; Tatoglu E, 2016, J WORLD BUS, V51, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.11.001; Tellis G.J., 2009, PREEMINENCE CORPOR C, V73, P3; Thanki S, 2018, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V67, P366, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0215; Tseng ML, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V131, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028; van Griethuijsen RALF, 2015, RES SCI EDUC, V45, P581, DOI 10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6; Van Holt T, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P3399, DOI 10.1002/bse.2584; Vanalle RM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.066; Wallace R. S., 1988, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V20, P131, DOI DOI 10.1016/0890-8389(88)90036-4; Wang B, 2016, 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (ICEM 2016), P442; Wang LX, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031172; Waters J, 2015, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V18, P367, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2014.953316; Waugh Rob, 2019, TELEGRAPH; WEF (World Economic Forum), 2017, INCLUSIVE GROWTH DEV; WERNERFELT B, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050207; Wognum PM, 2011, ADV ENG INFORM, V25, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.001; Wolf EJ, 2013, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V73, P913, DOI 10.1177/0013164413495237; Wu GC, 2017, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V24, P661, DOI 10.1002/csr.1435; Yong R, 2007, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V9, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10163-007-0183-z; Zeng BX, 2020, ECON MODEL, V87, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.07.012; Zeng HX, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V155, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.093; Zhang C, 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V120, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.023; Zhang SL, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V116, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.025; Zheng DQ, 2013, EUR J INFORM SYST, V22, P221, DOI 10.1057/ejis.2012.28; Zhou YF, 2013, J CONSUM MARK, V30, P335, DOI 10.1108/JCM-02-2013-0482; Zhu QH, 2008, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V15, P322, DOI 10.1002/csr.173	215	3	3	18	18	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0925-5273	1873-7579		INT J PROD ECON	Int. J. Prod. Econ.	JUN	2022	248								108495	10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495			18	Engineering, Industrial; Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	0Z0VX		Green Accepted, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000790799900004
J	Khalikova, VR; Jin, MS; Chopra, SS				Khalikova, Venera R.; Jin, Mushan; Chopra, Shauhrat S.			Gender in sustainability research: Inclusion, intersectionality, and patterns of knowledge production	JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY			English	Article						diversity; gender; industrial ecology; intersectionality; sustainability; sustainable development goal 5 (SDG 5)	CLIMATE-CHANGE; SCIENCE; WOMEN; PERCEPTIONS; MEN; CONSERVATION; PREFERENCES; DIVERSITY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACTS	This cross-disciplinary study examines gender inclusion and intersectionality in the knowledge production of sustainability research. Building on studies of gender inclusion as essential for quality research, we develop a three-step framework that analyzes the socio-demographic profile of researchers (sustainability by whom?), key research trajectories (sustainability of what?), and beneficiaries of sustainability research (sustainability for whom?). Our methods include a survey and a bibliometric analysis. The survey was administered at the joint conference of the International Society for Industrial Ecology and the International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology in 2017. The survey results show gendered differences in collaboration patterns. The survey results also indicated a good level of gender inclusion among the experts in this field, but the bibliometric analysis showed that gender issues remain marginal in the studies of industrial ecology. In contrast to industrial ecology, we found increasing attention to gender in other areas of sustainability research (climate change, corporate social responsibility, food production, resource management, energy policy, and environmental behavior and education), but even there, "gender" tends to be equated with "women" in traditional gender roles, ignoring the role of intersectionality-the intersection of gender with income, age, and other demographic characteristics. Therefore, this study makes recommendations to approach gender critically, by using theoretical lenses from gender studies scholarship (i.e., gender as a constructed, intersectional, dynamic category). We show how these lenses enable better assessments of the environmental impacts of industrial processes on people of diverse backgrounds in the context of changing patterns of work and consumption.	[Khalikova, Venera R.] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anthropol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Jin, Mushan; Chopra, Shauhrat S.] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China		Khalikova, VR (corresponding author), Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anthropol, New Asia Coll, Room 407 Humanities Bldg, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.; Chopra, SS (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon, Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.	venera.khalikova@cuhk.edu.hk; sschopra@cityu.edu.hk	Khalikova, Venera/GNM-9912-2022	Khalikova, Venera/0000-0002-6530-6866; Chopra, Shauhrat S./0000-0001-9067-4321; JIN, Mushan/0000-0002-1406-617X				Agyeman J, 2003, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V590, P35, DOI 10.1177/0002716203256565; Albert K., 2015, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2015, DOI [10.5465/ambpp.2015.14800abstract, DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.14800ABSTRACT]; Alriksson S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P645, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12212; Amneklev J, 2016, J IND ECOL, V20, P99, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12251; [Anonymous], 1993, BODIES MATTER DISCUR; Araujo EB, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0176791; Barke RP, 1997, SOC SCI QUART, V78, P167; Batagelj V, 1998, CONNECTIONS, V21, P47, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511996368; Beal CD, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V60, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.007; Below TB, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.012; Blaney L, 2018, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V35, P568, DOI 10.1089/ees.2017.0337; Bose D, 2011, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V101, P2368, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300275; Bozeman B, 2011, RES POLICY, V40, P1393, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002; Bullard Robert D., 1994, UNEQUAL PROTECTION E; Chiu MS, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V55, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.022; Collins P.H., 2000, BLACK FEMINIST THOUG, DOI 10.4324/9780203900055; Corona B, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P1566, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12541; Crenshaw K., 1989, DEMARGINALIZING INTE, V1989, P139, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429500480-5; Daily GC, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P991, DOI 10.2307/2269582; Denton F., 2009, IDS B, V35, P42; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Du L., 2019, BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWE; Farrington J., 2005, J TRANSPORT GEOGR, V13, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2004.10.002; Fausto-Sterling Anne, 1997, GENDER SEXUALITY REA, P244; FLYNN J, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P1101, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x; Fortnam M, 2019, ECOL ECON, V159, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.018; Foster T, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P12037, DOI 10.1021/es402086n; Freeman RB, 2015, J LABOR ECON, V33, pS289, DOI 10.1086/678973; Garcia-Cuerva L, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V113, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006; Godfrey P, 2016, ROUT ADV CLIMATE, P1; Hamann M, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V34, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008; HARAWAY D, 1988, FEMINIST STUD, V14, P575, DOI 10.2307/3178066; Kaijser A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P417, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.835203; Kassinis G, 2016, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V23, P399, DOI 10.1002/csr.1386; Kohlstedt SG, 1997, OSIRIS, V12, P3, DOI 10.1086/649263; Kongsted H. C., 2017, U RES ENGAGEMENT IND; Laurance WF, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V151, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.037; Li XW, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.084; Mascia-Lees F. E., 2016, GENDER ANTHR; McBain D, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P340, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12260; Meinzen-Dick R, 2014, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V39, P29, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013240; Meyer A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P3451, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133; Naughton CC, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V576, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.059; Nielsen MW, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P1740, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700616114; Norstrom AV, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P182, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2; O'Meara K, 2011, INNOV HIGH EDUC, V36, P83, DOI 10.1007/s10755-010-9159-3; Persson I, 2009, TLS-TIMES LIT SUPPL, P9; Pichler, 2019, 13 ISIE SEM C STATS; Quinn CH, 2003, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V68, P111, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00013-6; Rhoten D, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001; Rogers RA, 2008, ENVIRON COMMUN, V2, P281, DOI 10.1080/17524030802390250; Rothgerber H, 2013, PSYCHOL MEN MASCULIN, V14, P363, DOI 10.1037/a0030379; Rubin Gayle, 1975, TRAFFIC WOMEN NOTES, P157, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00249482; Scambor E, 2014, MEN MASC, V17, P552, DOI 10.1177/1097184X14558239; Segnestam L., 2018, INTEGRATING GENDER S; Smith D. M., 1977, HUMAN GEOGRAPHY WELF; Tannenbaum C, 2019, NATURE, V575, P137, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6; Taylor DE, 2000, AM BEHAV SCI, V43, P508, DOI 10.1177/0002764200043004003; Tilahun M, 2015, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V26, P642, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2207; Tilt B, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, pS249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.030; van Eck N.J., 2014, MEASURING SCHOLARLY, P285, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13(InEng.); van Kerkhoff L, 2006, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V31, P445, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850; Warner K., 2002, LOCAL ENVIRON, V7, P35, DOI DOI 10.1080/13549830220115402; Wilson J, 2013, J IND ECOL, V17, P880, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12057; Zelezny LC, 2000, J SOC ISSUES, V56, P443, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00177; Zhang XL, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V103, P873, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.024	66	4	4	13	39	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1088-1980	1530-9290		J IND ECOL	J. Ind. Ecol.	AUG	2021	25	4					900	912		10.1111/jiec.13095	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13095		JAN 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	TZ2LL					2022-09-08	WOS:000604535600001
J	Mangla, SK; Bhattacharya, A; Yadav, AK; Sharma, YK; Ishizaka, A; Luthra, S; Chakraborty, R				Mangla, Sachin Kumar; Bhattacharya, Arijit; Yadav, Alok Kumar; Sharma, Yogesh Kumar; Ishizaka, Alessio; Luthra, Sunil; Chakraborty, Ratula			A framework to assess the challenges to food safety initiatives in an emerging economy	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Food safety; Supply chain management; Best worst method; DEMATEL; Emerging economy; Sustainability	SUPPLY CHAIN; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; SECURITY CHALLENGE; REVERSE LOGISTICS; SYSTEM; INDIA; LAND; GOVERNANCE; INDICATORS; COUNTRIES	Emerging economies, e.g. India, China and Brazil etc., face challenges to adopt food safety (FS) practices in their food supply chains. Considering food industry's operations and processes, this study identifies 25 challenges to the FS initiatives involving the opinions of practitioners from six major Indian food producers and academic experts. The challenges are grouped into five categories, viz. organisational, government and policy, global, knowledge and financial. We identify the best and worst challenges to the FS initiatives along with causality among them using combined Best Worst Method (BWM) and 'Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory' (DEMATEL) approaches. BWM prioritises these challenges, while DEMATEL identifies causal relationship maps for the prioritised challenges. The BWM results demonstrate that the government and policy related challenges are the key challenges followed by the organisational, global, knowledge and financial related challenges. The DEMATEL results exhibit the organisational, government and policy, and global related challenges as the cause group challenges. The knowledge and financial related challenges represent the effect group challenges. Mitigation of these challenges inherently necessitates stakeholders' involvement in the food supply chains. We identify constructs for food safety initiatives policy in the emerging economies to raise public awareness while encouraging greater collaboration and efficiency in food supply chains to help achieve the second Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for securing food for everyone. The results of the study offer guidance and deeper insights to supply chain managers about synergy requirements between the government policymakers and key players of the industry in the emerging economies. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Mangla, Sachin Kumar] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth Business Sch, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England; [Bhattacharya, Arijit; Chakraborty, Ratula] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England; [Yadav, Alok Kumar; Sharma, Yogesh Kumar] Shobhit Univ, Saharanpur, UttarPradesh, India; [Ishizaka, Alessio] NEOMA Business Sch, Mont St Aignan, France; [Luthra, Sunil] Ch Ranbir Singh State Inst Engn & Technol, Jhajjar, Haryana, India		Mangla, SK (corresponding author), Univ Plymouth, Plymouth Business Sch, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England.	sachin.kumar@plymouth.ac.uk; A.Bhattacharya@uea.ac.uk; alokwhy@gmail.com; yogeshsharmame355@gmail.com; Alessio.ISHIZAKA@neoma-bs.fr; sunilluthra1977@gmail.com; R.Chakraborty@uea.ac.uk	Bhattacharya, Arijit/C-7029-2009	Bhattacharya, Arijit/0000-0001-5698-297X; Luthra, Sunil/0000-0001-7571-1331; Ishizaka, Alessio/0000-0002-2531-292X				Adams MR., 1999, BASIC FOOD SAFETY HL; Ahmadi HB, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V126, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020; Ahumada O, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V196, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014; Ali I, 2017, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V28, P1236, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1362487; Ali SM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.322; [Anonymous], 2008, BBC NEWS; [Anonymous], 2018, FINANCIAL EXPRESS; [Anonymous], 2017, GOV LAW REP WORLD BA; Anser MK, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119662; Balaji M, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V114, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.016; Basha MB, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.098; BBC News, 2008, BBC NEWS; Bhattacharya A, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107558; Bosona T, 2013, FOOD CONTROL, V33, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.004; Bustos CA, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P1020, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.187; Cui L, 2019, J BUS RES, V98, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.031; Dania WAP, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V186, P851, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.148; Devkota KP, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118835; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P57, DOI 10.2307/258191; Gabus A., 1972, WORLD PROBLEMS INVIT; Gandhi S, 2016, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V19, P537, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2016.1164126; Gandhi VP, 2014, FOOD RES INT, V63, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.015; Gardas BB, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.153; Gautam RK, 2011, J COMPETITIVENESS, P27; Ghobadian A, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001; Glock CH, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.015; Govindan K, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V195, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003; Govindan K, 2017, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V28, P552, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1309716; Graham-Rowe E, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V84, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005; He GH, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P739, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.053; Hodge I, 2007, J AGR ECON, V58, P409, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00124.x; Jeng DJF, 2015, J BUS RES, V68, P2305, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.016; Kaferstein F K, 1993, J Public Health Policy, V14, P149, DOI 10.2307/3342961; Khandal RK, 2008, J BIOTECHNOL, V136, pS9, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.07.1799; Kickbusch I, 1997, J PUBLIC HEALTH MED, V19, P171, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024605; King T, 2017, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V68, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.014; Krishnan R, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118374; Kumar S, 2011, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V19, P2151, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2011.06.006; Liu H.C., 2017, MATEC WEB C, V119; Liu X, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118939; Lopez C, 2019, J BUS RES, V103, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.050; Lund C, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V71, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027; Mangla SK, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117620; Mangla SK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V129, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.124; Marik CM, 2020, J FOOD PROTECT, V83, P108, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-283; Marousek J., 2020, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, P1; Marousek J, 2019, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V21, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7; Marucheck A, 2011, J OPER MANAG, V29, P707, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.007; Masiero S, 2015, WORLD DEV, V67, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.014; Namany S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120296; Pavleen S, 2013, J COMPETITIVENESS, V5, P134, DOI 10.7441/joc.2013.04.08; Poulsen MN, 2015, FOOD POLICY, V55, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.002; Pulak M, 2012, J COMPETITIVENESS, V4, P3, DOI 10.7441/joc.2012.01.01; Ralph O., 2018, FINANCIAL TIMES; Rao N, 2006, FOOD POLICY, V31, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.10.006; Rezaei J, 2016, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V64, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001; Rezaei J, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P9152, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073; Rezaei J, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V53, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009; Sazvar Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V194, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.118; Sener A, 2019, J BUS RES, V99, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.070; Smith G., 2017, FOOD DRINK IND 2 MOS; Stanikis JK, 2012, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V14, P1015, DOI 10.1007/s10098-012-0535-9; Subramanian N, 2014, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V21, P223, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2014.907216; Turi A, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V124, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.469; Umali-Deininger DL, 2001, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V25, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00212.x; Unnevehr L, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V4, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.12.001; Unnevehr LJ, 2000, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V23, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00275.x; van de Kaa G, 2020, SCI ENG ETHICS, V26, P475, DOI 10.1007/s11948-019-00105-3; Vaque L.G., 2017, EUROPEAN FOOD FEED L, V12, P294; Vellema S, 2006, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V17, P624, DOI 10.1080/09537280600866884; Verbeke W, 2005, BRIT FOOD J, V107, P823, DOI 10.1108/00070700510629779; Verdouw CN, 2016, J FOOD ENG, V176, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.009; Vlachos I, 2015, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V26, P1351, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1049238; Vlajic JV, 2018, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V29, P522, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449264; Wang XJ, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P377, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.561812; WHO, 1999, WHO TECHN REP SER, V883; World Bank, 2017, WORLD DEV REP GOV LA; World Health Organization, 2016, RUB MULT RES ANN REP; Wu CW, 2015, J BUS RES, V68, P2242, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.005; Yadav G., 2018, INT J PROD RES, P1; Yin R.K.., 2011, CASE STUDY RES APPL; Young W, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V117, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.016; Zhang Z, 2018, FOOD CONTROL, V93, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.05.047	83	10	10	3	21	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 15	2021	284								124709	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124709	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124709		JAN 2021	12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PT8ZE		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000608899000007
J	Arnould, M; Morel, L; Fournier, M				Arnould, Maxence; Morel, Laure; Fournier, Meriem			Embedding non-industrial private forest owners in forest policy and bioeconomy issues using a Living Lab concept	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Living Lab; Action research; French forest policy; Wood mobilization	REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS; WOOD MOBILIZATION; SMART CITY; COLLABORATION; FRAMEWORK; PATTERNS; TOOLS; HELIX	International policies have set sustainable development goals that put emphasis on bioeconomy strategies based on renewable resources. The forestry sector, by providing bio-based products, is expected to take part in this bioeconomy with, among other things, the reduction of society's dependence on fossil fuels. Nevertheless, in Europe, the forestry sector is facing an increase in the number of small private forest ownerships, called nonindustrial private forests (NIPF), where wood mobilization is difficult due to both ownership fragmentation and the lack of interest of non-industrial forest owners in existing forest-wood chains. Although many policy instruments have been put in place to address this situation, the problem persists for two main reasons. First, a lack of use of policy instruments by forest owners and second, a lack of collaboration between stakeholders. To provide solutions, we propose a methodology to design territorial projects with non-industrial forest owners in the framework of a Living Lab innovation process. This paper presents both the general method developed and analyzed through open and user-centered innovation concepts and its practical implementation in the Vosges department in France. Our results show how the Living Lab approach can improve the acceptance, adoption and use of policy instruments by NIPF owners and how it promotes multi-stakeholder collaborations to design and deploy innovative solutions. The main interest of our study is to provide a methodology to pilot a forestry Living Lab for policy makers and practitioners, based on rigorous concepts of innovation management. Finally, future developments and limitations of our study are discussed in a global research perspective.	[Arnould, Maxence; Morel, Laure] Univ Lorraine, Equipe Rech Proc Innovat ERPI, 8 rue Bastien Lepage, F-54000 Nancy, France; [Arnould, Maxence; Fournier, Meriem] Univ Lorraine, UMR Silva, INRAE, AgroParisTech, 14 Rue Girardet, F-54000 Nancy, France; [Arnould, Maxence] Agence Transit Ecol ADEME, 20 Ave Gresille, F-49004 Angers, France; [Arnould, Maxence] 14 rue Girardet, F-54000 Nancy, France		Arnould, M (corresponding author), 14 rue Girardet, F-54000 Nancy, France.	maxence.arnould@agroparistech.fr; laure.morel@univ-lorraine.fr; meriem.fournier@inrae.fr			UMR Silva (University of Lor-raine, INRAE and AgroParisTech); Research team on innovation process (ERPI, University of Lorraine)	UMR Silva (University of Lor-raine, INRAE and AgroParisTech); Research team on innovation process (ERPI, University of Lorraine)	We would like to thank all the actors who participated in the study and who are already presented in the article. We would particularly like to thank the ADEME, which has placed its trust in us and is funding this multidisciplinary research between the UMR Silva (University of Lor-raine, INRAE and AgroParisTech) and the Research team on innovation process (ERPI, University of Lorraine) .	ADEME, 2011, ET INT POL PUBL MOB; Agnew J, 2011, HDB GEOGRAPHICAL KNO, P316, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446201091.N24; Agreste, 2015, FOR PRIV FRANC FRANC, V30, P1; Alexandre S., 2017, RAPPORT MISSION GUE; Almirall E, 2012, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P12; Almirall E, 2011, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V23, P87, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2011.537110; Arnkil R., 2010, EXPLORING QUADRUPLE; Arnould M, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102425; Ballon P., 2007, DESIGNING NETWORKED, P137; Ballon P., 2005, SSRN, P1, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1331557, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1331557]; BASKERVILLE R., 1999, ACCOUNTING MANAGEMEN, V9, P1, DOI [10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00017-4, DOI 10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00017-4]; Bergvall-Kareborn B., 2009, INT J INNOVATION REG, V1, P356, DOI [10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727, DOI 10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727]; Boly V., 2016, INGENIERIE LINNOVATI; Boujut J. F. O., 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, V12, P205, DOI 10.1023/A:1023980212097; Broring S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121939; Centre National de la Propriete Forestere Forestiers prives de France, 2015, CHIFFR FOR PRIV; Centre National de la Propriete Forestiere, 2018, RAPP ACT 2018; Centre Regional de la Propriete Forestiere Lorraine-Alsace, 2006, SCHEM REG GEST SYLV; Cerreta M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su122410561; Chesbrough H., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW; Chesbrough HW., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I, P3; Chiasson M, 2009, INFORM SYST J, V19, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00297.x; Coenen T, 2015, P ANN HICSS, P4029, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2015.484; Colin A., 2016, DISPONIBILITES FORES, V1; Compagnucci L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125721; DAmecourt A., 2016, PLAN RECHERCHE INNOV; Danley B, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V105, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.018; DeFillippi Robert, 2014, Strategy & Leadership, V42, P30, DOI 10.1108/SL-10-2013-0075; Dell'Era C, 2014, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V23, P137, DOI 10.1111/caim.12061; Deuffic P, 2015, FOREST LAND OWNERSHI; Dobrynin D, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102142; Donnelly R, 2013, INT J EPORTFOLIO, V3; Doyon M., 2015, ARTICULO J URBAN RES; DRAAF ADEME MAAF, 2015, PROJ PIL MOB BOIS AU, P14; DRAAF Grand-Est Fibois, 2019, PROGR REG FOR BOIS R, P2018; Dube P., 2014, LIVRE BLANC LIVING L, V132; Dupont L., 2014, 2014 INT C ENG TECHN, P1, DOI [10.1109/ICE.2014.6871550, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2014.6871550]; Dupont L, 2019, J INNOV ECON MANAG, P53, DOI 10.3917/jie.028.0053; Dupont L, 2015, J STRATEGY MANAG, V8, P245, DOI 10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027; Dutilleul B., 2010, J PUBLIC POLICY, V4, P60; Dvarioniene J, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V75, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.017; Edwards P, 2013, FOREST POLICY ECON, V33, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.002; Elyakime B., 2015, REV FOR FR; ENoLL, 2007, HARM METH TOOLS; ENoLL, 2016, ACT REP 2016 REV ACT; Eriksson M., 2005, STATE ART UTILIZING; Etzkowitz H, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4; European Commission, 2016, COM20160110 EUR COM; European Commission, 2009, LIVING LABS USER DRI; European Commission, 2012, OFF J EUR UNION, DOI DOI 10.2777/6462; Evans P., 2017, LIVING LAB METHODOLO; Feurstein K., 2008, EUROPEAN LIVING LABS, P1; Ficko A, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010; Folstad A., 2008, ELECT J VIRTUAL ORG, V10, P99; Forest Europe, 2015, STAT EUR FOR 2015 FO; Francois, 2019, 18127 CGAAER, P69; Geng AX, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V85, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.007; Glon E., 2016, COEUR TERRITOIRES CR; Grundel I, 2016, J KNOWL ECON, V7, P963, DOI 10.1007/s13132-016-0411-7; Guitton J.L, 2014, REV FOR FR; Hakkarainen L, 2013, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P16; Hansen E, 2014, FORESTS, V5, P1341, DOI 10.3390/f5061341; Hansen L, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9030341; Harrison S., 2002, SMALL SCALE EC MANAG, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11842-002-0001-3; Henttonen K, 2017, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V20, P329, DOI 10.1108/EJIM-06-2015-0047; Hossain M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257; Hujala T, 2008, SCAND J FOREST RES, V23, P466, DOI 10.1080/02827580802334209; IGN, 2013, RES INV FOR PART VOS; Imbert E, 2017, OPEN AGRIC, V2, P195, DOI 10.1515/opag-2017-0020; IRSTEA, 2012, EV CONTR PLANS DEV M; Janin C, 2017, CANADIAN J REGIONAL, V40, P5; Kallai T., 2018, DELIVERABLE 3 1 REPO; Kilcline K, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102461; Klein J.L., 2017, CAN J REG SCI, V40, P1; Kleinschmit D, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V89, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.011; Krott M., 2005, FOREST POLICY ANAL; Kubeczko K, 2006, FOREST POLICY ECON, V8, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.011; Ladu L, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.023; Lallemand C., 2016, METHODES DESIGN UX 3; Lawrence A, 2018, FORESTRY, V91, P401, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpy017; Lehmann V, 2015, J KNOWL MANAG, V19, P1087, DOI 10.1108/JKM-02-2015-0058; Leminen Seppo, 2016, International Journal of Technology Marketing, V11, P399; Leminen S, 2015, P 26 ISPIM C JUN 14; Leminen S, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P15; Leminen S, 2015, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P29; Leminen S, 2012, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P6; Lenglet J, 2020, DEV DURABLE TERRIT, V11, DOI 10.4000/developpementdurable.16645; Lenne L., 2015, LIVING LABS NOUVEAU; Levers C, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V315, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030; Logghe S, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P35; Lovric N, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102079; Lupp G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010188; Mallein P., 2010, REV PLURIELS, V7; Malovrh SP, 2017, CROAT J FOR ENG, V38, P127; Mastelic Joelle, 2015, Info, V17, P12, DOI 10.1108/info-01-2015-0012; Mastelic J., 2019, THESIS U LAUSANNE; Moffat K, 2016, FORESTRY, V89, P477, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpv044; Moine A., 2006, ESPACE GEOGRAPHIQUE, V35, P115, DOI 10.3917/eg.352.0115; Moulaert F, 2013, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK ON SOCIAL INNOVATION: COLLECTIVE ACTION, SOCIAL LEARNING AND TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, P1, DOI 10.4337/9781849809993; Mulder I., 2008, ELECT J VIRTUAL ORG, V10, P1; Nabuurs GJ, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P792, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1853, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1853]; Nesterova N, 2016, TRANSP RES PROC, V16, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.038; Nystrom AG, 2014, IND MARKET MANAG, V43, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016; Orazio C., 2017, HDB WOOD MOBILISATIO, DOI [10.13140/rg.2.2.30261.78568, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.30261.78568]; Pallot M., 2009, SEMINAIRE SRI PACA; Pallot M., 2012, 2012 18 INT C ENG TE, DOI [10.1109/ice.2012.6297648, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2012.6297648]; Pallot M, 2011, LIVING LAB RES LANDS; Pascu Corina, 2009, Info, V11, P82, DOI 10.1108/14636690910996731; Paskaleva K, 2015, PUB ADMIN INF TECH, V8, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03167-5_7; Petucco C, 2015, J FOREST ECON, V21, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.07.001; Pierson Jo, 2005, ETHNOGRAPHIC PRAXIS, V2005, P114, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-8918.2005.TB00012.X; Ponce de Leon M, 2006, 2 INT C TESTB RES IN; Ponsard C., 2020, ERCIM NEWS 121; Poss Y., 2017, REV FOR FR; Priday G., 2018, LAB PROJECT TECHNOL, V7, P7, DOI [10.22215/timreview1053, DOI 10.22215/TIMREVIEW1053]; Rametsteiner E, 2006, FOREST POLICY ECON, V8, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.009; Rauch P., 2005, SMALL SCALE EC MANAG, V4, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11842-005-0004-Y; Rauch P, 2015, FOREST POLICY ECON, V61, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.09.003; Reed MS, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P2417, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014; Reed MS, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1933, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001; Roux E., 2017, REV CAN SCI REG, V40, P33; Russo-Spena T, 2012, J SERV MANAGE, V23, P527, DOI 10.1108/09564231211260404; Schaffers Hans, 2009, 2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), P1, DOI 10.1109/ITMC.2009.7461428; Schmithuasen F., 2010, GENEVA TIMBER FOREST, V26, P1, DOI DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-A-006311424; Schuurman D, 2015, COMMUNICATION SCI; Schuurman D, 2014, INT J BUSI INNOVAT R; Schuurman D, 2011, TELEMAT INFORM, V28, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2010.11.004; Schwerdtner W, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2301, DOI 10.3390/su7032301; Sergent A., 2014, INNOVATIONS AGRONOMI, V41, P91; Sergent A., 2017, REV FORESTI RE FRAN, V69, P99, DOI [10.4267/2042/64089, DOI 10.4267/2042/64089]; Serre O., 2015, NANCY, V4; Skiba N, 2012, 2012 18 INT C ENG TE, DOI [10.1109/ICE.2012.6297646, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2012.6297646]; Stahlbrost Anna, 2011, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, V14, P298; Stahlbrost A., 2012, LIVING LAB METHODOLO, P76; Stahlbrost A., 2008, THESIS LULEAA U TECH; Stahlbrost A., 2008, P 31 INF SYST RES SE; Stahlbrost A, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P27; Stahlbrost A, 2013, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P37; Steen K, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P21; Stern T., 2013, JB OSTERREICHISCHEN, V22, P19; Stoettner EM, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.008; Tang T, 2012, 18 INT C ENG TECHN I, P1, DOI [10.1109/ ICE.2012.6297644, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2012.6297644]; Teder M, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V89, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.05.007; Toivonen M, 2019, WORLD FORESTS, V24, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-28999-7_1; Turk Mehes K., 2019, COMMUNICATION; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2020, WHO OWNS OUR FOR FOR; Valkeapaa A, 2013, FOREST POLICY ECON, V28, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.004; Valkokari K, 2015, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P17; Van der Jagt A., 2017, CITIES RES LEARNING, P63; Vargo SL, 2004, J MARKETING, V68, P1, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036; Veeckman C, 2013, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P6; Vinck D, 2011, ENG STUD, V3, P25, DOI 10.1080/19378629.2010.547989; von Hippel E, 2001, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V18, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00090-X; Von Hippel Eric, 2005, DEMOCRATIZING INNOVA; von Willert M, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V104, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.011; Voytenko Y, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V123, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053; Weiss G, 2012, FOREST POL I WORKING; Weiss G, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102506; Weiss G, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102288; Wippel B., 2008, HOLZMOBILIZIERUNG KL; Zivojinovic I., 2015, COST ACTION FP1201 F, P693	161	1	1	3	3	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	JUN	2022	139								102716	10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102716	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102716			19	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	0X3MD					2022-09-08	WOS:000789614000002
J	Naderi, N; Monavvarifard, F; Salehi, L				Naderi, Nader; Monavvarifard, Feyzallah; Salehi, Laleh			Fostering sustainability-oriented knowledge-sharing in academic environment: A key strategic process to achieving SDGs through development of students' sustainable entrepreneurship competences	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION			English	Article						Green entrepreneurship; Sustainable entrepreneurship competencies; Sustainability-oriented knowledge-sharing; University culture; Systems-thinking	MODERATING ROLE; SELF-EFFICACY; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES; QUALITY KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN THINKING; CAREER SUCCESS; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION	The development of sustainable entrepreneurship competencies (SEC) among students as future business owners be a key factor in reducing the destructive effects of unsustainable production. Accordingly, the Knowledge-Sharing Process (KSP) related to sustainable entrepreneurship was recognized as an important mediating variable in providing SEC. This process has been affected by an interrelated set of contextual factors and student inputs. Using a Mix-Methods approaches in the study, we depict the way these factors influence the KSP and their relationships with each other and improve the level of SEC among students. For this purpose, PRISMA flowchart in qualitative part and Structural Equation Model (SEM) in quantitative part were used. Fifteen articles were analyzed in qualitative part using NVivo11 software and a total of seven factors affecting the KSP were identified. The findings from SME revealed that university culture and education, respectively, have the highest impact on KSP and SEC among students. The experimental research model help university administrators to plan effectively in order to strengthen SEC among students. Moreover, a process-oriented structure of the factors affecting KSP and SEC is provided, which can be a basis for future research in this field.	[Naderi, Nader] Razi Univ, Fac Social Sci, Kermanshah, Iran; [Monavvarifard, Feyzallah] Razi Univ, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Kermanshah, Iran; [Salehi, Laleh] Razi Univ, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Kermanshah, Iran		Monavvarifard, F (corresponding author), Razi Univ, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Kermanshah, Iran.	N.naderi@razi.ac.ir; Monavvarifard@ut.ac.ir; Lsalehi@razi.ac.ir		Monavvarifard, Feyzallah/0000-0002-4788-9199				Al Saifi SA, 2015, J KNOWL MANAG, V19, P164, DOI 10.1108/JKM-07-2014-0287; Annan-Diab F, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006; Aquino K, 2005, J MANAG EDUC, V29, P17, DOI 10.1177/1052562903262482; Audretsch DB, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V41, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6; Ballout HI, 2009, CAREER DEV INT, V14, P655, DOI 10.1108/13620430911005708; Bandura A, 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI; Baradaran M., 2016, EFFECT STUDENTS SOCI; Bavik YL, 2018, LEADERSHIP QUART, V29, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006; Berchicci L., 2005, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V14, P272, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.488; Bircham-Connolly H., 2005, ELECT J KNOWLEDGE MA, V32, P1; Bocken N, 2013, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V13, P482, DOI 10.1108/CG-06-2013-0078; Braungart M, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1337, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003; Breuer H, 2018, INT J ENTREP VENTUR, V10, P256, DOI 10.1504/IJEV.2018.092715; Brooke J, 2017, EUR J TRAIN DEV, V41, P144, DOI 10.1108/EJTD-04-2016-0021; Buhl A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V231, P1248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259; Calvo N, 2019, INFORM SYST, V85, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2019.06.002; Carlgren L, 2016, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V25, P344, DOI 10.1111/caim.12176; Chang D.L., 2018, J OPEN INNOV TECHNOL, V4, P5, DOI [10.1186/s40852-018-0087-2, DOI 10.1186/S40852-018-0087-2]; Chang HH, 2011, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V48, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001; Chatterjee S, 2021, J BUS RES, V128, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.033; Checkland P.B., 1981, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; Chen CJ, 2010, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V47, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001; Chen J, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V177, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.217; Chen MH, 2015, J BUS RES, V68, P906, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.050; Chen ZJ, 2018, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V55, P840, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2018.03.011; Chion SJ, 2020, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V26, P1443, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2018-0279; Chiu CM, 2006, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V42, P1872, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001; Crals E, 2005, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V12, P173, DOI 10.1080/13504500509469628; Davenport TH., 1998, WORKING KNOWLEDGE OR; Davis L, 2008, J BUS RES, V61, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.08.005; De Haan G., 2006, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V12, P19, DOI [10.1080/13504620500526362, DOI 10.1080/13504620500526362]; Dentoni D, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.050; Dokhtesmati M, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V73, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.065; Edwards S, 1998, ECON J, V108, P383, DOI 10.1111/1468-0297.00293; Eggens L, 2008, HIGH EDUC, V55, P553, DOI 10.1007/s10734-007-9074-4; Ellis G, 2008, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V14, P482, DOI 10.1080/13504620802308287; Federici RA, 2011, SOC PSYCHOL EDUC, V14, P575, DOI 10.1007/s11218-011-9160-4; de Guimaraes JCF, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1653, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.074; Fichter K., 2016, SHIFTING SUPPORT ENT; Fichter K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.031; Fischer M, 2015, GAIA, V24, P174, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.3.9; Fullwood R, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P1254, DOI 10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0274; Fullwood R, 2013, J KNOWL MANAG, V17, P123, DOI 10.1108/13673271311300831; Gast J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V147, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065; Grootaert C., 2002, SOCIAL CAPITAL EC DE; Gupta B., 2000, STUDY KNOWLEDGE MANA; Caiado RGG, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V198, P1276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102; Hair JF, 2011, J MARKET THEORY PRAC, V19, P139, DOI 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202; Handl G, 2012, DECL UN C HUM ENV ST, V11; Hermann RR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119038; Hitt MA, 2011, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V25, P57, DOI 10.5465/AMP.2011.61020802; Hubeau M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061027; Hussinki H, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P1596, DOI 10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0394; Kang YJ, 2008, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V31, P1548, DOI 10.1080/01900690802243607; Kankanhalli A, 2005, MIS QUART, V29, P113, DOI 10.2307/25148670; Katsikis I.N., 2007, P AC MAN ANN M PHIL, V1, P1, DOI 10.5465/ambpp.2007.26530537; Klewitz J, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017; Kline R.B., 1998, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE; Koe WL, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V172, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404; Koppi A., 1998, FLEXIBILITY NEXT WAV, P425; Koufteros X, 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V120, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.010; Lambrechts W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V208, P1631, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.084; Lambrechts W, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V48, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034; LAMM H, 1973, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V3, P361, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2420030402; Landau S., 2019, HDB STAT ANAL USING; Landeiro F, 2017, BMJ OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013778; Lans T, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V62, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.036; LAVE J, 1991, PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIALLY SHARED COGNITION, P63, DOI 10.1037/10096-003; Lee W, 2012, INT J HOSP MANAG, V31, P819, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.018; Lee Y, 2021, J KNOWL MANAG, V25, P1526, DOI 10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0483; Lee YLA, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P1987, DOI 10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0309; Liang CY, 2017, THINK SKILLS CREAT, V23, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.007; Liao CC, 2013, ONLINE INFORM REV, V37, P891, DOI 10.1108/OIR-11-2012-0196; Liedtka J, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P925, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12163; Lim S, 2021, INT J HOSP MANAG, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102940; Lin F. R., 2013, WHY PEOPLE SHARE KNO; Lin TC, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P751, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.068; Linnanen L., 2005, MAKING ECOPRENEURS D; Lo MF, 2021, J KNOWL MANAG, V25, P2161, DOI 10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0800; Lou J, 2013, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V64, P356, DOI 10.1002/asi.22750; Lozano R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048; Martins VWB, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.354; Maruyama GM, 1997, BASICS STRUCTURAL EQ; Matoskova J, 2022, VINE J INF KNOWL MAN, V52, P486, DOI 10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2020-0092; Moffett S, 2007, J TECHNOLOGY MANAGEM; Monavvarifard F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.175; Montano D.E., 2015, HLTH BEHAV THEORY RE, P95; Moran P, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P1129, DOI 10.1002/smj.486; Muhammed S, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P2455, DOI 10.1108/JKM-03-2020-0227; Nahapiet J, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P242, DOI 10.2307/259373; Naim MF, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P885, DOI 10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0334; Ng KYN, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P1221, DOI 10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0071; Nguyen Nga H., 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P490, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9570-5; Nikolaou IE, 2018, J ENTREP, V27, P111, DOI 10.1177/0971355717738601; Noy S, 2017, AUST J ENVIRON EDUC, V33, P97, DOI 10.1017/aee.2017.22; Omotayo Funmilola Olubunmi, 2016, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, V18, P148, DOI 10.1108/JSIT-02-2016-0009; Osupile K, 2021, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V34, P118, DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0149; Oyefolahan I.O., 2013, VINE, V43, P482, DOI DOI 10.1108/VINE-07-2012-0023; Pacheco DF, 2010, J BUS VENTURING, V25, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006; Pemsel S, 2013, INT J PROJ MANAG, V31, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.004; Pittino D, 2018, J BUS RES, V84, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.014; Presbitero A, 2018, INT J INTERCULT REL, V67, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.08.004; Prusak R, 2014, MANAG-POL, V18, P199, DOI 10.2478/manment-2014-0015; Rahman MS, 2018, INT J EDUC MANAG, V32, P761, DOI 10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0193; Ramayah T, 2013, MINERVA, V51, P131, DOI 10.1007/s11024-013-9229-7; Rashid L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195343; Rodgers C, 2010, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V17, P125, DOI 10.1002/csr.223; Rodman L, 2018, TECHTRENDS, V62, P602, DOI 10.1007/s11528-018-0291-8; Rohim A, 2019, J MANAG DEV, V38, P538, DOI 10.1108/JMD-07-2018-0190; Rosati F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107; Safdar M, 2021, GLOB KNOWL MEM COMMU, V70, P254, DOI 10.1108/GKMC-11-2019-0139; Sallis J. F, 2015, HLTH BEHAV THEORY RE, V5th; Sanchez LE, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V62, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.001; Savari M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102284; Schaefer K, 2015, ORGAN ENVIRON, V28, P394, DOI 10.1177/1086026615621111; Schaltegger S., 2016, MAKING ECOPRENEURS, P95; Schaltegger S, 2011, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V20, P222, DOI 10.1002/bse.682; Scheffold K, 2018, PALLIAT SUPPORT CARE, V16, P308, DOI 10.1017/S1478951517000281; Senge P.M., 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA; Shahid SM, 2021, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100533; Shang SSC, 2017, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V54, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2016.06.008; Shepherd D. A., 2017, TRAILBLAZING ENTREPR; Shepherd DA, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x; Sidiropoulos E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V85, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.040; Singh K., 2018, P 2 ADV BUS RES INT, P349; Siverns K, 2019, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104186; Spence M, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V99, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0656-1; Suppiah V, 2011, J KNOWL MANAG, V15, P462, DOI 10.1108/13673271111137439; Swanson J, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P472, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336; Tansley C., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P350, DOI DOI 10.1108/02683940710745932; Thompson N, 2011, ADV ENTREP FIRM EMER, V13, P201, DOI 10.1108/S1074-7540(2011)0000013012; Tittel A., 2020, ENTREPRENEURSHIP ED, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S41959-019-00021-4; Tiwana A, 2005, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V22, P13, DOI 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045836; Tsai MT, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P8479, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.029; United Nations, 2016, SUST DEV AG; Utz S, 2017, PSYCHOL DIGITAL LEAR, P171; Van Acker F., 2018, WHY TEACHERS SHARE E; van Reijsen J, 2015, KNOWL MAN RES PRACT, V13, P401, DOI 10.1057/kmrp.2013.59; Wiek A, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6; Wingfield M. E., 2000, SCI TEACHING SELF EF; Wu HP, 2017, J SOC SERV RES, V43, P527, DOI 10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775; Wu WW, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.021; Wu WL, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P474, DOI 10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0318; Yang TM, 2011, GOV INFORM Q, V28, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008; Yassin F, 2013, PROC TECH, V11, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.191; Zahra SA, 2009, J BUS VENTURING, V24, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007; Zampetakis Leonidas A., 2006, INT ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V2, P413, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11365-006-0006-Z; Zeng JY, 2018, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V14, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11365-017-0466-3; Zhang Y, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V48, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.022; Zhou JJ, 2014, INTERNET RES, V24, P566, DOI 10.1108/IntR-07-2013-0143	150	1	1	16	29	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	1472-8117	2352-3565		INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF	Int. J. Manag. Educ.	MAR	2022	20	1								10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100603	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100603			20	Business; Education & Educational Research; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Education & Educational Research	YK2PK					2022-09-08	WOS:000745061400005
J	Sulis, F; Agostinho, F; Almeida, CMVB; Giannetti, BF				Sulis, Federico; Agostinho, Feni; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.; Giannetti, Biagio F.			Recognizing the wealth of non-marketable food in distribution centres: The environmental benefits of donation	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; Food donation; Waste management hierarchy; Waste prevention	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT; HOUSEHOLD WASTE; SAO-PAULO; ENERGY; OPTIONS; LCA; VALORISATION; CONSUMPTION; PREVENTION	About one-third of annual global food production for human consumption is wasted, increasing the pressure on the environment in providing resources to support food supply-chains. Food waste reduction is of fundamental importance towards a more sustainable world, as recognized by the United Nations in the twelfth of its seventeen sustainable development goals for 2030. Among other practices, food donation appears as an alternative to overcome the existing social and environmental issues related to food waste, however, donation also causes environmental pressure by requiring additional energy investment on infrastructure and operational goods, while releasing gases to atmosphere, due to its processes. This work applies the life cycle assessment (LCA) method to evaluate the environmental impacts of plausible food donation scenarios in the 'CEAGESP' food distribution center in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, the third largest in the world regarding marketable food (about 3 million tons/yr). Under the concept of waste hierarchy management options, six scenarios for the CEAGESP's non-marketable food (37,652 tons/yr) were established, from landfilling as a baseline to a donation alternative. Results show that donation scenarios have the least environmental burdens for all nine LCA impact categories. Worst-case scenarios were obtained by landfilling the non-marketable food, considering electricity generation or otherwise. Differences over tenfold in comparative bases among the best and worst-case scenarios were obtained by fossil depletion, global warming, human toxicity, water and metal depletion LCA's impact categories. Results highlight the environmental advantages of donating the non-marketable food of distribution centres, which is aligned with the concepts of circular and regenerative economy towards a sustainable development that should be promoted by public policies. Regional variables as the Brazilian electricity grid based on hydropower plants have considerable influence in some LCA impact categories, especially when accounting for the avoided emissions, emphasizing the importance of carrying out this study for Brazilian conditions.	[Sulis, Federico; Agostinho, Feni; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.; Giannetti, Biagio F.] Paulista Univ UNIP, Postgrad Program Prod Engn, Sao Paulo, Brazil		Agostinho, F (corresponding author), Univ Paulista UNIP, Programa Posgrad Engn Prod, Rua Dr Bacelar 1212,4 Andar, BR-04002600 Sao Paulo, Brazil.	feni@unip.br	Sulis, Federico/ABC-6501-2020; Agostinho, Feni/GQB-4411-2022; Agostinho, Feni/C-9351-2018	Sulis, Federico/0000-0002-7182-1282; Agostinho, Feni/0000-0002-6445-2175	Universidade Paulista (UNIP); FAPESP Brazil [2018/14739-1]; CNPq Brazil [302592/2019-9]	Universidade Paulista (UNIP); FAPESP Brazil(Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)); CNPq Brazil(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ))	The authors are grateful for the financial support received from Vice-Reitoria de Pos-Graduacao da Universidade Paulista (UNIP) . FS is grateful to the scholarship provided by FAPESP Brazil (2018/14739-1) . FA is grateful to the financial support provided by CNPq Brazil (302592/2019-9) . The work of Jose Hugo de Oliveira for the English language review is also acknowledged.	Albizzati PF, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V90, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.034; Almeida CMVB, 2012, INT J ENVIRON SUSTAI, V11, P258, DOI 10.1504/IJESD.2012.050462; Andersen JK, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.014; [Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO; Bartocci P, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V709, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136187; Beretta C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V147, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.023; Bergstrom P, 2020, RESOURCES-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/resources9030027; Boldrin A, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P1560, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.010; Bovea MD, 2006, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V79, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.005; Brancoli P, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V117, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.043; Bueno G, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V51, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.021; Buratti C, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V89, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.012; CEAGESP, 2019, REL GEST 2018; CETESB Emissoes, 2019, VEIC EST SAO PAUL 20; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Cherubini F, 2009, ENERGY, V34, P2116, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023; Coimbra E.A., 2009, TOTAL FLOW MANAGEMEN, P277; Costa AM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.006; Da Silva, 2011, THESIS; Damiani M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125813; Dekker E, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P2315, DOI 10.1007/s11367-019-01653-3; Deviatkin I, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11205750; Eggleston HS, 2006, NATL GREENHOUSE GAS, V5; EPE, 2020, EMPR PESQ EN BRAZ MI; Eriksson M, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V60, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.008; Eriksson M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V93, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.026; Evangelisti S, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V100, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.062; Evans JA, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V74, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.075; Fagundes P. R. S., 2014, Informacoes Economicas - Instituto de Economia Agricola, V44, P33; Fath B. D., 2019, GLOBAL TRANSITIONS, V1, P15, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.GLT.2019.02.002; Fernandez-Nava Y, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V81, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.008; Foley JA, 2011, NATURE, V478, P337, DOI 10.1038/nature10452; Gerdau, 2012, MAN GALP PORT COM PE; Giannetti BF, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V431, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109162; Goedkoop M., 2009, RECIPE 2008 LIFE CYC; Gustavsson J., 2011, Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention; Henz GP, 2017, HORTIC BRAS, V35, P472, DOI [10.1590/s0102-053620170402, 10.1590/S0102-053620170402]; Hoveidi H., 2019, ENV ENERGY EC RES, V3, P37; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Larsen AW, 2009, WASTE MANAGE RES, V27, P652, DOI 10.1177/0734242X08097636; Liberti F, 2018, ENRGY PROCED, V148, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.118; Liikanen M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.005; Mendes MR, 2004, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V41, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.08.003; Miloradovic N., 2017, 6 INT C TRANSP LOG T, P73; Moult JA, 2018, FOOD POLICY, V77, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.003; Ohara, 2021, AGORA ENERGIEWENDE I; Oliveira B., 2018, INT J OCCUP ENV SAF, V2, P1, DOI [10.24840/2184-0954_002.002_0001, DOI 10.24840/2184-0954_002.002_0001]; Oliveira LSBL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V155, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.093; Reich MC, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.015; Ribeiro, 2006, GESTAO RESIDUOS AGR; RICARDO AEA, 2015, LIGHT WEIGHT MEANS I; Ripa M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149; Rossi V, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.049; Salhofer S, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.026; Schneider F, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P755, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.10.025; Slagstad H, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P1482, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.018; Torres, 2015, REV IBEROAM CIENC TE, V6, P285, DOI [10.6008/SPC2179-6858.2015.001.0022, DOI 10.6008/SPC2179-6858.2015.001.0022]; Tunesi S, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.08.023; van der Mei, 2021, GTB1262; Van Ewijk S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V132, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.051; WHO, 2003, WHO TECH REP SER, V916, P1; Yang N, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.017; Ziegler-Rodriguez K, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P989, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.015	63	1	1	8	12	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 10	2021	318								128482	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128482	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128482		AUG 2021	14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XH2JV					2022-09-08	WOS:000725268100006
J	Alola, AA				Alola, Andrew Adewale			Risk to investment and renewables production in the United States: An inference for environmental sustainability	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Cleaner production and environment; Risk to investment; United States; Renewable energy; economic development	ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2 EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TRADE-POLICY; TRILEMMA	With the increasing drive toward cleaner environment, accessing lower risk investment with financing opportunities has remained a pertinent hurdle to achieving a paradigm shift from the business-as-usual approaches to a responsible climate actions and environmental awareness. On this note, the current study examined for the first time the impact of the risk to investment on environmental quality over the period of 1984-2017 for the case of the United States. Considering that the burning of fuels constitutes the largest source of Greenhouse gas in the United States, this study employed energy carbon emissions both as a proxy for environmental quality and dependent variable. The real Gross Domestic Product and renewable energy production were both incorporated in the carbon function model as an additional explanatory variable that was examined by a handful of empirical tools. Importantly, the study found that an associated lower risk to investment is a suitable and significant approach toward improving the quality of the environment in both the short and long run. Similarly, the production and utilization of renewable energy exhibits a statistically significant and desirable impact on environmental quality i.e renewable energy production and utilization improves environmental quality. However, the study found that economic expansion significantly spur hindrance to environmental sustainability. This study justifies that risk associated with all investment aspects is fundamental to environmental quality, and thus posing an indirect health and socioeconomic concerns. Additionally, the result proved that the circumstance of renewable energy waste and energy loss to transmission arising production-consumption disparity is negligible. Moreover, the robustness and diagnostic test affirms the validity of the investigation. Thus, this study proffers a relevant policy mechanism toward the attainment of the country's sustainable development goals via cleaner productivity, especially from the perspective of associated risks in public and private low-carbon and clean technologies financing.	[Alola, Andrew Adewale] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Istanbul, Turkey; [Alola, Andrew Adewale] South Ural State Univ, Dept Financial Technol, Chelyabinsk, Russia		Alola, AA (corresponding author), Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Dept Econ, Istanbul, Turkey.	aadewale@gelisim.edu.tr	alola, andrew/AAO-6120-2020	alola, andrew/0000-0001-5355-3707				Ahmad F, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121714; Ahmed K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V154, P530, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.008; Alola AA, 2019, CARBON MANAG, V10, P209, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2019.1577180; Alola AA, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V658, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212; Alola AA, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P34448, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06576-y; [Anonymous], 2020, INT COUNTR RISK GUID; Benitez PC, 2007, ECOL ECON, V60, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015; Blyth W, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P5766, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.030; Britannica, 2020, PUBL INV PUBL INV; Chen L, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V741, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138722; Competition Consumer Protection Commission, 2020, UNDERSTANDING INVEST; Corporate Finance Institute, 2020, RISK RET RISK RET; DICKEY DA, 1979, J AM STAT ASSOC, V74, P427, DOI 10.2307/2286348; Dietz T., 1994, HUM ECOL REV, V1, P277; Energy Information Administration (US EIA, 2019, U S EN CONS SOURC 20 U S EN CONS SOURC 20; Fred, 2019, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK; Fuss S, 2008, APPL ENERG, V85, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.01.005; Golub A, 2019, CLIM POLICY, V19, P716, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2019.1570064; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chang, 2019, AR5 SYNTH REP CLIM C AR5 SYNTH REP CLIM C; Islam S., 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE; JOHANSEN S, 1990, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V52, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x; Lee J, 2003, REV ECON STAT, V85, P1082, DOI 10.1162/003465303772815961; Li CB, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V50, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.007; Ma MD, 2020, APPL ENERG, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115247; Ma MD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V222, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.314; Nathaniel SP, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V679, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011; Ozturk I, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P17277, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05016-1; Ozturk I, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P3220, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005; Pesaran MH, 2001, J APPL ECONOMET, V16, P289, DOI 10.1002/jae.616; Political Risk Services (PRS, 2020, INT COUNTR RISK GUID INT COUNTR RISK GUID; Rosa EA, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P509, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2004)033[0509:TTADOE]2.0.CO;2; Sachse K, 2012, J ECON PSYCHOL, V33, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.006; Schmidt TS, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P237, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2112; Senapati AK, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101351; Shahbaz M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V217, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282; Shahbaz M, 2018, ENVIRON MODEL ASSESS, V23, P557, DOI 10.1007/s10666-017-9584-0; Shahbaz M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009; Udemba EN, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P24819, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05542-y; Udi J, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P10553, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-07691-x; Umar M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124863; Usman O, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V150, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.151; Vajjarapu H, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101528; York R, 2003, ECOL ECON, V46, P351, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5	43	2	2	0	2	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2021	312								127652	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127652	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127652		JUN 2021	9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	TY5CH					2022-09-08	WOS:000683801600008
J	Zozmann, H; Klassert, C; Klauer, B; Gawel, E				Zozmann, Heinrich; Klassert, Christian; Klauer, Bernd; Gawel, Erik			Heterogeneity, Household Co-Production, and Risks of Water Services - Water Demand of Private Households with Multiple Water Sources	WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY			English	Article						Multiple water sources; residential water demand; Sustainable Development Goal 6; right to water; new consumer theory; household allocation of time	DAR-ES-SALAAM; DRINKING-WATER; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; TIME; ACCESS; CONSUMPTION; ALLOCATION; COSTS; POOR; QUALITY	Private households around the world use and combine multiple water sources, including diverse forms of market services and self-supply. The reasons for this have so far not been explained in a coherent framework, nor have the implications for water management and policy been sufficiently analyzed. Here, we examine how heterogeneity of water services, household co-production, and risks of provision influence household demand patterns. We apply an economic household production model that incorporates two water quality levels for different household activities to exemplary situations. We derive a number of explanations why households use and combine water services that expand the current state of research. Relevant findings include: (i) The diverse characteristics of available water services result in different time requirements for water procurement and varying degrees of suitability for household activities. (ii) Differences in the value placed on time can induce households to demand heterogeneous water services because these enable them to find a balance between using time and money to access water. (iii) Certain water services may be demanded because they function as insurance against both uncertain and unreliable supply. Our insights are relevant for water policy, in particular for developing and managing demand-responsive systems, and for the implementation and monitoring of normative goals for access to water.	[Zozmann, Heinrich; Klassert, Christian; Klauer, Bernd; Gawel, Erik] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Econ, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany; [Gawel, Erik] Univ Leipzig, Inst Infrastruct & Resources Management, Fac Econ & Business Management, Grimmaische Str 12, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany		Zozmann, H (corresponding author), UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Econ, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany.	heinrich.zozmann@ufz.de	Klassert, Christian Joachim Anton/AAR-5144-2021; Gawel, Erik/G-8130-2015	Klassert, Christian Joachim Anton/0000-0003-0676-2455; Gawel, Erik/0000-0003-3634-9717; Zozmann, Heinrich/0000-0002-5642-7826	US National Science Foundation [ICER/EAR1829999]; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [033WU002]; Belmont Forum	US National Science Foundation(National Science Foundation (NSF)); German Federal Ministry of Education and Research(Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF)); Belmont Forum	This work was conducted as part of the Belmont Forum Sustainable Urbanisation Global Initiative (SUGI)/Food-Water-Energy Nexus theme for which coordination was supported by the US National Science Foundation under grant ICER/EAR1829999 to Stanford University. Also as a part of the Belmont Forum, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research provided funding to the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) (033WU002). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations.	Abubakar IR, 2018, WATER INT, V43, P570, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2018.1490862; Acharya G, 2002, AM J AGR ECON, V84, P415, DOI 10.1111/1467-8276.00307; Aini MS, 2007, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V14, P503, DOI 10.1080/13504500709469749; AKERLOF GA, 1970, Q J ECON, V84, P488, DOI 10.2307/1879431; Albuquerque CD., 2014, REALIZING HUMAN RIGH; Allen A, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P333, DOI 10.1177/0956247806069608; Amit RK, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.003; [Anonymous], 2005, SMALL SCALE PRIVATE; Arbues F., 2003, J SOCIO-ECON, V32, P81, DOI [10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00005-2., DOI 10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00005-2, 10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00005-2]; Asensio J, 2008, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V44, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2007.12.002; Baisa B, 2010, J DEV ECON, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.09.010; Bakker K, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P1891, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.015; BARZEL Y, 1974, J LAW ECON, V17, P73, DOI 10.1086/466785; Basani M, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P953, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.021; Baumgartner S., 2006, JOINT PRODUCTION RES; BECKER GS, 1965, ECON J, V75, P493, DOI 10.2307/2228949; Becker GS., 2008, EC APPROACH HUMAN BE; Bretschneider W, 2016, DISSERTATION; Brocklehurst C, 2015, PLOS MED, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001894; Cain A., 2009, WATER SERVICE PROVIS; Cheesman J, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006265; Cook J, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P841, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017468; Deal P, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12030693; Elliott M, 2019, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V2, DOI 10.1038/s41545-019-0031-4; Elliott M, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P9106, DOI 10.1002/2017WR021047; Evans B., 2013, PUBLIC HLTH SOCIAL B, P1; Baquero OF, 2016, SOC INDIC RES, V127, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-0976-8; Garrote L, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P2951, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1714-6; Gawel E, 2016, CONTENT IMPLEMENTATI; Gawel E, 2017, WATER INT, V42, P505, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2017.1342062; Graham S, 2013, PUBLIC CULTURE, V25, P115, DOI 10.1215/08992363-1890486; Grupper MA, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8010049; Guppy L, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P501, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0649-z; Gurung Y, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P7078, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019529; Hamermesh DS, 2008, ECON LETT, V98, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.008; Hindman Persson T., 2002, ASIAN ECON J, V16, P303, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8381.T01-1-00154; HOLT CA, 1982, J POLIT ECON, V90, P280, DOI 10.1086/261056; Hoque SF, 2020, WATER ECON POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X19500115; Hoyer W., 1983, GRUNDLAGEN MIKROOKON; Hutton G, 2012, MONITORING AFF UNPUB; Ilahi N, 2000, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V49, P45, DOI 10.1086/452490; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Klassert C, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P3643, DOI 10.3390/w7073643; Koolwal G, 2013, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V61, P369, DOI 10.1086/668280; Kostyla C, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V514, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.018; LANCASTER KJ, 1966, J POLIT ECON, V74, P132, DOI 10.1086/259131; LAUGHLAND AS, 1993, WATER RESOUR BULL, V29, P291; MacDonald MC, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8120574; Majuru B, 2018, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V8, P142, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2018.174; Majuru B, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13121222; Massarutto A, 2020, UTIL POLICY, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101018; Moriarty P., 2011, LADDERS ASSESSING CO; Moriarty P, 2013, WATER ALTERN, V6, P329; Nauges C, 2007, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V29, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.05.002; Nauges C, 2010, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V25, P263, DOI 10.1093/wbro/lkp016; Nauges C, 2009, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V42, P535, DOI 10.1007/s10640-008-9222-z; Neumann LJvon., 1947, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA; Nganyanyuka K, 2014, HABITAT INT, V44, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.003; Niehof A., 2002, CHANGES OTHER END CH, P179; O'Donnell EL, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1368; Onjala J, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P268, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2014.131; Pattanayak SK, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/200WR002443; Pattanayak SK, 2010, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V88, P535, DOI 10.2471/BLT.09.066050; POLLAK RA, 1975, J POLIT ECON, V83, P255, DOI 10.1086/260322; Rachmadyanto Herry, 2016, International Journal of Water, V10, P246, DOI 10.1504/IJW.2016.075571; Raina A, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P189, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.138; Rawas F, 2020, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41545-020-0053-y; Roaf V., 2005, MONITORING IMPLEMENT; ROSEN S, 1974, J POLIT ECON, V82, P34, DOI 10.1086/260169; Rosenberg DE, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005340; Sappa G, 2015, J AFR EARTH SCI, V105, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.02.007; Schiff J, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1321; Srinivasan V, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008698; Subbaraman R, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-173; SUEN W, 1989, J POLIT ECON, V97, P1384, DOI 10.1086/261659; Sultana F, 2009, GENDER PLACE CULT, V16, P427, DOI 10.1080/09663690903003942; Thompson J, 2000, ENVIRON URBAN, V12, P37, DOI 10.1177/095624780001200204; United Nations Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, 2003, GEN COMM NO 15 RIGHT; Uwera C, 2015, WATER ECON POLICY, V1, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X14500027; Velarde M, 2014, J ECON AGEING, V3, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jeoa.2013.12.003; Verbooy K, 2018, VALUE HEALTH, V21, P1428, DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1828; Water UN., 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Water UN., 2006, GEND WAT SAN POL BRI; Whittington D., 2000, DESIGNING HOUSEHOLD, V2, P5; Whittington D, 2009, WATER POLICY, V11, P696, DOI 10.2166/wp.2009.310; WHO and UNICEF, 2015, PROGR SAN DRINK WAT, P9; WHO UNICEF, 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER; World Bank, 1994, WORLD DEV REPORT 199; World Health Organisation (WHO), 2017, SAF MAN DRINK WAT TH; Wutich A, 2016, WORLD DEV, V79, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.043; Wutich A, 2009, FIELD METHOD, V21, P49, DOI 10.1177/1525822X08325673; Wutich A, 2008, SOC SCI MED, V67, P2116, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.042; Zhang X.-j, 2011, EMERGENCY DRINKING W EMERGENCY DRINKING W; Zozmann H, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, P1009, DOI 10.3390/w14071009; Zozmann H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020254	95	0	0	1	1	WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD	SINGAPORE	5 TOH TUCK LINK, SINGAPORE 596224, SINGAPORE	2382-624X	2382-6258		WATER ECON POLICY	Water Econ. Policy	JAN	2022	08	01							2250006	10.1142/S2382624X22500060	http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X22500060			38	Economics; Environmental Studies; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	1J5KM		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000797957700008
J	Nicholes, MJ; Quested, TE; Reynolds, C; Gillick, S; Parry, AD				Nicholes, Miranda J.; Quested, Tom E.; Reynolds, Christian; Gillick, Sam; Parry, Andrew D.			Surely you don't eat parsnip skins? Categorising the edibility of food waste	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Food waste; Edibility; Food behaviour; Questionnaire study; Behaviour and perception survey; Household behaviour	INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT; DRIVERS; DESIGN	Food that is either wasted or lost, rather than being eaten, accounts for around a third of global food production and is linked to several environmental, economic and social issues. The reliable quantification of this wasted food is essential to monitor progress towards the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, which covers food loss and waste. Currently quantification of food waste is made difficult by many differing definitions, some of which require categorisation of food items into those parts considered edible and those considered inedible. Edibility is difficult to define as it is affected by cultural and social influences. This study presents a novel, easily-replicable, questionnaire-based methodology to categorise 'borderline' food items thrown away from households, e.g. parsnip skin, apple cores. The methodology captures self-reported information on what people eat (self-reported consumption) and their perceptions of edibility. Our results for the United Kingdom indicate that, for a given food 'part', there is divergence between individuals' responses to the survey questions: e.g. many people would 'never' eat carrot skins, whilst many others would 'always' eat them. Furthermore, there is a systematic difference between people's self-reported consumption and their perceptions of edibility. We suggest that both need to be considered to create a balanced categorisation of edible and inedible parts; we propose a method for incorporating both elements. Within this method, a threshold needs to be applied and the resultant classification, especially of those items close to this threshold, will inevitably be contentious. Despite this, the categorisation of what is considered edible using this methodology reflects the views of the majority of the population, facilitating the quantification of food waste. In addition, we envisage this methodology can be used to compare geographical differences and track changes over time with regard to edibility.	[Nicholes, Miranda J.; Quested, Tom E.; Reynolds, Christian; Gillick, Sam; Parry, Andrew D.] Blenhe Court, Wrap, 19 George St, Banbury OX16 5BH, England; [Reynolds, Christian] Univ Sheffield, Sch Geog, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England		Quested, TE (corresponding author), Blenhe Court, Wrap, 19 George St, Banbury OX16 5BH, England.	tom.quested@wrap.org.uk	Reynolds, Christian/AAJ-6897-2021	Reynolds, Christian/0000-0002-1073-7394; Gillick-Daniels, Sam/0000-0002-0602-8317	UK Government's Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); NERC [NE/R007160/1]	UK Government's Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)(Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)); NERC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC))	This research was conducted as part of WRAP's wider work quantifying food waste, supported by funding from the UK Government's Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Christian Reynolds has funding from NERC to support an Innovation Placement at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP) (Grant Ref: NE/R007160/1).	[Anonymous], 2016, ESTIMATES EUROPEAN F; [Anonymous], 2017, GUIDANCE INTERPRETIN; Camovale E., 2000, TABELLE COMPOSIZIONE; Chaboud G, 2017, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.11.004; De Laurentiis V, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V77, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.001; Ericsson K. A., 1998, MIND CULT ACT, V5, P178, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327884MCA0503_3; Evans D.M., 2014, FOOD EVERYDAY LIFE; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011, GLOBAL FOOD LOSSES F; FUSIONS, 2016, FUS RED FOOD WAST SO; Hebrok M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.069; Koivupuro HK, 2012, INT J CONSUM STUD, V36, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01080.x; Mariani J.F., 2014, ENCY AM FOOD DRINK; Papargyropoulou E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V76, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020; Porpino G., 2016, J ASSOC CONSUM RES, V1, P41, DOI 10.1086/684528; Public Health England, 2015, MCCANCE WIDD COMP FO; R Core Team, 2017, LANG ENV STAT COMP; ReFED, 2018, FOODS FOOD WAST ACT; Reynolds C, 2019, FOOD POLICY, V83, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009; Rimestad A. H, 2017, NORWEGIAN FOOD COMPO; Romani S, 2018, APPETITE, V121, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.093; Schanes K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P978, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030; Stancu V., 2018, CONSUMER FOOD WASTE; Stockli S, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V136, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.029; Thyberg KL, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V106, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.016; UN, 2017, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Us Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service., 2016, NUTR DAT LAB USDA NA; Waste and Resource Action Programme, 2013, HOUSEHOLD FOOD DRINK; WRAP, 2008, THE FOOD WE WAST; WRAP, 2009, HOUSEHOLD FOOD DRINK; Wrap, 2015, HOUS FOOD WAST UK 20	30	18	18	0	31	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV	AMSTERDAM	PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	AUG	2019	147						179	188		10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.004	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.004			10	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IC8DO		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000471206700018
J	Yazdani, M; Torkayesh, AE; Chatterjee, P				Yazdani, Morteza; Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi; Chatterjee, Prasenjit			An integrated decision-making model for supplier evaluation in public healthcare system: the case study of a Spanish hospital	JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Supplier selection; Public procurement; DEMATEL; BWM; Weight aggregation; Modified EDAS	CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE PROCUREMENT; ORDER ALLOCATION; FUZZY TOPSIS; SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; DEMATEL; CHALLENGES	Purpose In this study, an integrated decision-making model consisting of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), best worst method (BWM) and a modified version of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) methods is proposed for supplier selection problem in a public procurement system considering sustainable development goals. Design/methodology/approach DEMATEL and BWM methods are used to determine weights of the criteria that are defined for the supplier selection problem. Weight aggregation method is applied to combine the weights obtained from these two methods. A modified version of EDAS method is then used in order to rank the alternative suppliers. Findings The proposed decision-making model is investigated for a supplier selection problem for a hospital in Spain. The validity of the results is checked using comparison with other decision-making methods and several performance analysis tests. Practical implications The proposed multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model contributes to the healthcare supply chain management (SCM) and aims to lead the policy makers in selecting the best supplier. Originality/value There is no such study that combines DEMATEL and BWM together for weight generation. The application of the modified EDAS method is also new. In real time situations, the decision experts may confront to the difficulty of using BWM while identifying the best and the worst criteria choices. The idea of using DEMATEL is to aid the experts to make them enable in distinguishing between the best/worst criteria and handle BWM easily.	[Yazdani, Morteza] Univ Loyola Andalucia, Dept Management, Seville, Spain; [Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi] Sabanci Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Istanbul, Turkey; [Chatterjee, Prasenjit] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah, India		Chatterjee, P (corresponding author), MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah, India.	morteza_yazdani21@yahoo.com; ebaditorkayesh@sabanciuniv.edu; prasenjit2007@gmail.com	Chatterjee, Prasenjit/D-4254-2011; Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi/ABI-8024-2020	Chatterjee, Prasenjit/0000-0002-7994-4252; Ebadi Torkayesh, Ali/0000-0002-1012-4213				Abdel-Baset M, 2019, COMPUT IND, V106, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017; Abdel-Basset M, 2018, DES AUTOM EMBED SYST, V22, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6; Ahmadi A, 2018, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V262, P569, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65455-3_22; Ahsan K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V152, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.055; Alikhani R, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V208, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.018; Amann M, 2014, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V19, P351, DOI 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0447; Arabsheybani A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V190, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.167; Awasthi A, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V195, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013; Azadi M, 2015, COMPUT OPER RES, V54, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.002; Azimifard A, 2018, RESOUR POLICY, V57, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.002; Baier C, 2008, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V44, P36, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00071.x; Ball A., 2014, INT J DIGIT CURATION, V9, P142, DOI DOI 10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.308; Bolturk E, 2018, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V31, P550, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-01-2018-0020; Brammer S, 2011, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V31, P452, DOI 10.1108/01443571111119551; CARR A, 1997, EUR J PURCH SUPPLY M, V3, P199, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(97)00014-2; Chai JY, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V166, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.035; Chan RYK, 2012, IND MARKET MANAG, V41, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.009; Chatterjee K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.186; Chatterjee P., 2018, ENG T, V66, P187; Chen IJ, 2004, J OPER MANAG, V22, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002; Chiarini A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.027; Coggburn J. D., 2004, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V28, P236; DEFRA-Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2012, SUST PROC GOV BUY ST; Delmonico D, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V134, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033; Edler J, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P949, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003; Erceg Z, 2019, OPERATIONAL RES ENG, V2, P37, DOI [10.31181/oresta1901015e, DOI 10.31181/ORESTA1901015E]; Erridge A, 2012, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V32, P363, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2012.703422; European Commission, 2010, EUR 2020 FLAGSH IN, V1161; Faisal MN, 2017, BENCHMARKING, V24, P1956, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-03-2016-0042; Garg CP, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P1529, DOI 10.1007/s10668-018-0261-5; Gelderman CJ, 2006, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V19, P702, DOI 10.1108/09513550610704716; Genovese A, 2017, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V66, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015; Genovese A, 2014, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V25, P1198, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.808839; Govindan K, 2019, COMPUT OPER RES, V110, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2018.11.013; Gunther E., 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, V13, P61, DOI 10.1002/csr.092; Hoejmose SU, 2012, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V18, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2012.06.002; IISD, 2015, GREEN PUBL PROC CONT, P7; Ijadi Maghsoodi Abteen, 2019, Computers & Industrial Engineering, V127, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018; Kannan D, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V233, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023; Kannan D, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V47, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010; Kaur J, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P312, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522; Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, 2017, COMPUT IND ENG, V112, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017; Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, 2015, INFORMATICA-LITHUAN, V26, P435, DOI 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57; Ketikidis PH, 2010, INT J SYST SCI, V41, P281, DOI 10.1080/00207720903326878; Khan SA, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V205, P964, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.144; Kirsch G., 2002, INT J MED MARKETING, V2, P106; Klein R, 2012, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V49, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2012.02.001; Knight AK, 2017, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V23, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2017.01.002; Liang YY, 2019, INT J FUZZY SYST, V21, P129, DOI 10.1007/s40815-018-0546-8; Liao CN, 2016, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V22, P651, DOI 10.3846/20294913.2015.1072750; Lin KP, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V128, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.017; Liu TY, 2018, INT J FUZZY SYST, V20, P1321, DOI 10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4; Liu Y, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V127, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.022; Luthra S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P1686, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078; Memari A, 2019, J MANUF SYST, V50, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002; Mohammed A., 2019, INT J PRODUCTION EC; Moheb-Alizadeh H, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V129, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.011; Oruezabala G, 2012, IND MARKET MANAG, V41, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.004; Pacheco-Blanco B, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V133, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.056; Pamuar D., 2018, OPER RES ENG SCI THE, V1, P108, DOI DOI 10.31181/ORESTA190120101108P; Pang QH, 2017, MATH PROBL ENG, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/9653261; Parikka-Alhola K, 2008, ECOL ECON, V68, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.004; Pohl M, 2011, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V17, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.001; Quan MY, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P50372, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2868374; Rainville A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V167, P1029, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.088; Ranjan R, 2015, OPSEARCH, V52, P307, DOI 10.1007/s12597-014-0186-1; Rao R., 2006, PROCUREMENT STRATEGI; Rashidi K, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V121, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.025; Rechel B., 2009, INVESTING HOSPITALS; Rezaei J, 2019, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V22, P419, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2018.1535649; Rezaei J, 2018, EXPERT SYST APPL, V98, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.004; Rezaei J, 2016, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V64, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001; Rezaei J, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V53, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009; Rezaei J, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P8165, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005; Rostamzadeh R, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V49, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045; Shen LX, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V74, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006; Sinha AK, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1587, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.234; Song WY, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V79, P1461, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.081; Stojic G, 2018, INFORMATION, V9, DOI 10.3390/info9050121; Su CM, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V134, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.080; Tavana M, 2017, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V28, P3683, DOI 10.1007/s00521-016-2274-z; Testa F, 2016, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V23, P373, DOI 10.1002/csr.1382; Testa F, 2012, ECOL ECON, V82, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.011; Uttam K, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.031; Uyarra E, 2014, TECHNOVATION, V34, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003; van de Kaa G, 2019, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V31, P40, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2018.1484441; Walker H, 2009, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V14, P128, DOI 10.1108/13598540910941993; Wang G, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V176, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014; Wesseling JH, 2018, SCI PUBL POLICY, V45, P493, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scy013; Witjes S, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V112, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015; Yadav G, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P6259, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1472406; Yazdani M, 2018, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V20, P403, DOI 10.1007/s10098-018-1488-4; Yazdani M, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V88, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.014; Yazdani M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P3728, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095; Yazdani M, 2016, J BUS ECON MANAG, V17, P1097, DOI 10.3846/16111699.2016.1165282; Yousefi S, 2016, MEASUREMENT, V83, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.032; Zaidi SAH, 2019, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.008; Zhang WQ, 2019, SOFT COMPUT, V23, P8207, DOI 10.1007/s00500-018-3455-8; ZHANG XL, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9071231; Zhou XY, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V271, P1045, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2769-3; Zhu QH, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P18, DOI 10.1002/bse.1888	101	32	32	8	48	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	1741-0398	1758-7409		J ENTERP INF MANAG	J. Enterp. Inf. Manag.	SEP 14	2020	33	5			SI		965	989		10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0294	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0294		JUL 2020	25	Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science; Business & Economics	PD9LQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000547978600001
J	Lubango, LM				Lubango, Louis Mitondo			Effects of international co-inventor networks on green inventions in Brazil, India and South Africa	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Co-inventor networks; Green inventions; PCT; International; Dissemination of green inventions; Developed economies; Developing economies; Clearer production	FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; KNOWLEDGE; ENERGY; INNOVATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; POLICY; FIRMS; TIES	This paper presents international co-inventor networks as both a predictor variable of countries' ability to produce and disseminate internationally green inventions, and an alternative mechanism to support development of relevant programmes and policies in that regard. It includes cases from three developing countries with limited resources for clean technology development, Brazil, India and South Africa, which have shown successes owing to the potentials of co-inventor networks. It contributes the extent literature on this topic, which predominantly emphasizes firms' responses to conventional governments' interventions (subsidies, market price, standards, and interagency cooperation) to achieve cleaner production plans and particularly the Targets 17.6; 17.7 and 17.8 of the sustainable development goals. Broadly, such targets aim at enhancing countries' technological capabilities through partnership. The paper finds various correlations between co-inventor networks and growth of patents in solar energy, air pollution management and biofuels in the sample countries. Correlations are linear in India, followed by Brazil owing to the larger sizes of co-inventor networks but nonlinear in South Africa, which has smaller networks. The paper argues that co-inventor networks accelerate transnational exchanges of core human capital, and are fitting predictors of production and flows of green inventions. They are worth adopting in national and transnational industrial and innovation cluster policies globally to support sustainable production plans. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Lubango, Louis Mitondo] UN, Econ Commiss Africa, Technol Climate Change & Nat Resources Management, POB 3001, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia		Lubango, LM (corresponding author), UN, Econ Commiss Africa, Technol Climate Change & Nat Resources Management, POB 3001, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.	lubango@un.org						[Anonymous], POLICY INSTRUMENTS D; [Anonymous], GLOB INN IND; [Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV; [Anonymous], HDB EC INNOVATION; [Anonymous], TECHNOVATION 2014; Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609, DOI DOI 10.1521/IJGP.2006.56.2.191; Arrow K.J, 1951, P 2 BERK S MATH STAT, P507; Bechtsis D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.173; Coletti M, 2010, SCI PUBL POLICY, V37, P679, DOI 10.3152/030234210X12778118264413; Dangelico RM, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P1608, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.007; Dong J, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V203, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.139; GREENWALD BC, 1986, Q J ECON, V101, P229, DOI 10.2307/1891114; Hansen MT, 1999, ADMIN SCI QUART, V44, P82, DOI 10.2307/2667032; Hargadon A, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P716, DOI 10.2307/2393655; JAFFE AB, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P984; Jaffe AB, 2002, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V22, P41, DOI 10.1023/A:1015519401088; Jasinski D, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V135, P1034, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.027; Keeley AR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.154; KOGUT B, 1992, ORGAN SCI, V3, P383, DOI 10.1287/orsc.3.3.383; Li W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V219, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.025; Lubango LM, 2015, TECHNOL SOC, V42, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.001; Lubango LM, 2007, TECHNOVATION, V27, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.013; Lubango LM, 2015, WORLD PAT INF, V43, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.wpi.2015.10.002; Melane-Lavado A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3578, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.131; Murray F, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013; NELSON RR, 1982, Q J ECON, V97, P453, DOI 10.2307/1885872; PAVITT K, 1984, RES POLICY, V13, P343, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0; Samuelson PA, 1954, REV ECON STAT, V36, P387, DOI 10.2307/1925895; Weiss M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P1478, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.019; World Bank, 2019, EC GROWTH; Yabar H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V44, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.045	31	9	10	1	25	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 20	2020	244								118791	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118791	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118791			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	JW6PX					2022-09-08	WOS:000503172600094
J	Akram, H; Butt, TE				Akram, H.; Butt, T. E.			WET nexus between the three sectors - 'waste to energy for transport'	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Waste to energy (WtE); Energy from waste (EfW); Maritime transport; Waste management; Climate action; Climate emergency; Environmental sustainability	SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; SOLAR; POWER	Waste, Energy and Transport are three of the main sectors of the human society. The three sectors have substantially been studied in their individual right and there is a plethora of literature available on them individually and also collectively in varying combinations. For instance, Waste to Energy is a well-established field, and so is the energy usage by the transport sector. However, there is an extreme knowledge gap in connection to energy being generated by incinerating waste in order to propel the means of the transport be it in air/aviation, terrestrial/automobile and locomotives or water/marine vessels. The paper focuses on this knowledge gap, thereby, aiming to create theoretical models of this concept. Therefore, the core nature of this study is conceptual. Relevant secondary data is drawn from the existing literature in the form of numbers and graphs to quantitatively establish the state of each of the three sectors before being joined together into a new nexus called Waste to Energy for Transport and abbreviated as WET Nexus. An account of challenges as well as benefits is outlined regarding the possibility of replacing the consumption of fossil fuel by waste-to-energy i.e. a kind of 'onboard' waste incineration to propel maritime vessels and also supply energy to 'on-board' built environments. Thus, killing two birds (transport and waste) with one stone (energy). The paper also touches upon innovative insights and future research potentials in terms of how maritime transport being driven by energy-from-waste instead of fossil fuels, can improve environmental sustainability; help climate emergency agendas and; also contribute to the Climate Action, which is one of the seventeen SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) introduced by the UN (United Nations).	[Akram, H.] Univ Punjab, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Canal Bank Rd, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [Akram, H.] Univ Punjab, Dept Life Sci, Canal Bank Rd, Lahore 54590, Pakistan; [Akram, H.] Minhaj Univ, Dept Math & Appl Sci, Civic Ctr, Lahore 54770, Pakistan; [Butt, T. E.] Northumbria Univ, Fac Engn & Environm, City Campus, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England		Butt, TE (corresponding author), Northumbria Univ, Fac Engn & Environm, City Campus, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England.	t.e.butt@northumbria.ac.uk						Agriculturist Musa, 2018, BEST 4 MODES TRANSPO; Alberti M, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00083-2; [Anonymous], 2019, CURRENT DEV BIOTECHN; [Anonymous], 2017, WAM WASTE ADVAN 0615; [Anonymous], 2021, GLOBENEWSWIRE 0219; [Anonymous], 2018, ECONOMIST-LONDON; Asariotis R., 2018, REV MARITIME TRANSPO; Ashrafi M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.098; Bertram C, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-00987-x; Bovea MD, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V50, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.036; BP (British petroleum), 2017, BP STAT REV WORLD EN, P9; Burruss Ellis, 2013, WTE INCINERATOR WAST; Butt TE, 2012, ENVIRON PROG SUSTAIN, V31, P642, DOI 10.1002/ep.10590; Butt TE, 2011, ENVIRON PROG SUSTAIN, V30, P696, DOI 10.1002/ep.10526; Butt Talib E, 2008, International Journal of Risk Assessment & Management, V10, P88, DOI 10.1504/IJRAM.2008.021056; Butt TE, 2003, ENVIRON INT, V28, P597, DOI 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00100-9; Chung S.S., 2002, J ENV ASSESS POL MAN, V4, P241; Cohen-Rosenthal E., 2017, ECOINDUSTRIAL STRATE; Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V34; Dufour F., 2018, COSTS IMPLICATIONS O; EIA (Energy Information Administration), 2016, TRANSP SECT EN COMS, P127; EIA (Energy Information Administration), 2009, EN INT INT EN STAT; Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2019, INT EN OUTL; Garcia-Olivares A, 2018, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V158, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.053; Getvoldsen K.S., 2018, HDB SUSTAINABILITY S, P445; Heinberg Richard, 2010, PEAK EVERYTHING WAKI; Hoornweg D., 2012, WHAT WASTE GLOBAL RE, DOI 10.1111/febs.13058; Hoornweg D, 2013, NATURE, V502, P615, DOI 10.1038/502615a; Huaman RNE, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V31, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.002; Hussain A, 2019, ADV ENV ENG GREEN TE, P62, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-5754-8.ch005; International Energy Agency, 2021, KEY WORLD EN STAT; Kaza S., 2018, WASH TIMES, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0; Khafallah M., 2021, EMERGING SCI J, V5, P111, DOI [10.28991/esj-2021-01262, DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2021-01262]; Khan MA, 2020, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V6, P431, DOI 10.28991/cej-2020-03091481; Le Quere C, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01001-0; Liu J, 2021, APPL ENERG, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117254; Lupa CJ, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P1759, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.002; Moriarty P, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V93, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.051; Pan HZ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102561; Pan HZ, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P1313, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01290-y; Piotrowski Jan, 2018, ECONOMIST 0927; Qerimi D, 2020, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V6, P1349, DOI 10.28991/cej-2020-03091553; Rashid K, 2019, DESIGN EC REAL TIME; Rashid K, 2019, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V179, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.054; Ritzkowski M, 2007, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V1, P281, DOI 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00029-1; Rodrigue J.P., 2020, GEOGRAPHY TRANSPORT, V5th; Rogers Heather, 2006, GONE TOMORROW HIDDEN; Saloodo, 2020, MOD TRANSP WHAT IS M; Scheyvens R, 2016, SUSTAIN DEV, V24, P371, DOI 10.1002/sd.1623; Schnurr Riley E.J., 2019, MARINE TRANSPORTATIO; Taskin A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102339; UN, 2021, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2021, METH MAN CHALL; United Nations, 2014, ROAD DIGN 2030 END P; WEC (World Energy Council), 2016, WAST FUEL WAST EN, P10; WEC (World Energy Council), 2016, WAST FUEL, P8; Williams D.E., 2007, SUSTAINABLE DESIGN E; WorldAtlas, 2021, LONG DOES IT TAK GAR	58	0	0	4	4	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 10	2022	339								130545	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130545	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130545			9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ZZ0BJ		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000772942100006
J	Kumar, A; Zavadskas, EK; Mangla, SK; Agrawal, V; Sharma, K; Gupta, D				Kumar, Anil; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras; Mangla, Sachin Kumar; Agrawal, Varun; Sharma, Kartik; Gupta, Divyanshu			When risks need attention: adoption of green supply chain initiatives in the pharmaceutical industry	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH			English	Article						risk; green supply chain; sustainable production; pharmaceutical industry; fuzzy Delphi; fuzzy AHP; India	FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; REVERSE LOGISTICS; AHP; SELECTION; BARRIERS; DRIVERS; MODEL; CAPABILITIES; INFORMATION	The pharmaceutical industry is very important in delivering life-saving products/services to society. There are many ways for materials/products/services concerned with pharmaceuticals to influence the environment; these include improper disposal of pills/tablets by patients, expired and unused medications, improper release of drugs by pharmacies or household sewage mixed with surplus drugs. In view of this, the present work seeks to integrate green supply chain (GSC) concepts in the pharmaceutical sector in a developing economy Indian context. In so doing, managers need to determine the potential risks in adopting GSC initiatives to achieve sustainability in operational perspectives. In this sense, this work seeks to distinguish the potential risks in adopting GSC initiatives within the pharmaceutical industry. This work uses a literature review and fuzzy Delphi approach in finalising the risks. This research also uses fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for prioritisation of the risks under vague and unclear surroundings. According to the findings, cold chain technology and supply risks categories are highly prioritised. This work can assist practising managers and government authorities in effectively developing and managing GSC initiatives in line with sustainable development goals in the context of the pharmaceutical industry. Finally, a sensitivity test is applied to evaluate the stability of ranking of risks.	[Kumar, Anil] Univ Derby, Ctr Supply Chain Improvement, Kedleston Rd Campus, Derby, England; [Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Vilnius, Lithuania; [Mangla, Sachin Kumar] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth Business Sch, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England; [Agrawal, Varun; Sharma, Kartik; Gupta, Divyanshu] BML Munjal Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Gurgaon, India		Zavadskas, EK (corresponding author), Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Vilnius, Lithuania.	edmundas.zavadskas@vgtu.lt	; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras/Q-6048-2018	Kumar, Anil/0000-0002-1691-0098; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras/0000-0002-3201-949X				Abdullah L, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN ENERGY, V35, P360, DOI 10.1080/14786451.2014.907292; Avikal S, 2014, INT J PROD RES, V52, P1306, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.831999; Awasthi A, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V195, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013; Bag S., 2016, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V5, P37; Bai CG, 2014, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V19, P275, DOI 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0441; Baryannis G., 2018, INT J PROD RES, P1; Bhadoria V., 2012, INDIA PHARM 2020 PRO; Bhattacharya A, 2014, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V25, P698, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.798088; Bouzon M, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V108, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.021; Bower DJ, 2007, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V19, P611, DOI 10.1080/09537320701521358; Brusset X, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V184, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.008; Chang DY, 1996, EUR J OPER RES, V95, P649, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2; Chen CT, 2006, INT J PROD ECON, V102, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009; Chittoor R, 2008, J INT MANAG, V14, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2008.05.001; Chopra S., 2001, SUPPLIER CHAIN MANAG; Dolgui A, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P902, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1407500; Dubey R, 2017, BENCHMARKING, V24, P184, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-01-2016-0011; Dubois D., 1979, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V2, P327, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90005-8; Ertugrul I, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P702, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014; Ertugrul I, 2008, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V39, P783, DOI 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8; Faisal M., 2016, REV PUBLIC ADM MANAG, V3, P176; Ferri M, 2017, CRIT REV FOOD SCI, V57, P2857, DOI 10.1080/10408398.2015.1077192; Finch P, 2004, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V9, P183, DOI 10.1108/13598540410527079; Govindan K., 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V233, P293; Gupta H, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V152, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125; Ho W, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P5031, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467; Hsu YL, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.068; ISHIKAWA A, 1993, FUZZY SET SYST, V55, P241, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C; Jabbarzadeh A., 2018, INT J PROD RES, P1; Jha R., 2007, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V42, P3958; Kadam A., 2016, INDIAN J PHAR PRACT, V9, P2, DOI [10.5530/ijopp.9.1.2, DOI 10.5530/IJOPP.9.1.2]; Kapse CP, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P4709, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1443523; Kaur J, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P312, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522; Kelle P, 2012, OPER RES HEALTH CARE, V1, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.orhc.2012.07.001; Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, 2017, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V30, P1073, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314828; Kumar Anil, 2014, International Journal of Business Excellence, V7, P213, DOI 10.1504/IJBEX.2014.059549; Kumar A, 2017, INT J STRATEG PROP M, V21, P401, DOI 10.3846/1648715X.2017.1409291; Kumar M, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V265, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.019; Kumar V, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P6372, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.917215; Kuo YF, 2008, EXPERT SYST APPL, V35, P1930, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068; Lan SL, 2016, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V116, P1024, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0389; Li Qianlei, 2012, 2012 International Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN), P250, DOI 10.1109/BCGIN.2012.71; Lintukangas K, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P1901, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.089; Jabbour ABLD, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V104, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.017; Lucker F., 2018, INT J PROD RES, P1; Luthra S, 2018, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V17, P311, DOI 10.1142/S0219622017500419; Luthra S, 2011, J IND ENG MANAG-JIEM, V4, P231, DOI 10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n2.p231-257; Ma R.M., 2012, ADV MAT RES, V573-574, P734, DOI DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.573-574.734; Macdonald JR, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P4337, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787; Mandal S, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P2666, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1381349; Mangla Sachin Kumar, 2016, International Journal of Operational Research, V25, P77; Mangla S. K., 2014, GLOBAL J FLEXIBLE SY, V15, P203; Mangla S, 2013, INT J PROD RES, V51, P3428, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.774493; Mangla SK, 2015, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V1, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2015.05.002; Mangla SK, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.099; Mangla SK, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V104, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001; Mishra N, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P2396, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.581003; Modgil S, 2017, GLOB BUS REV, V18, P652, DOI 10.1177/0972150917692177; Mohanty RP, 2014, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V25, P1322, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.832822; Moktadir A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V201, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.326; Moktadir MA, 2018, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V118, P1388, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-10-2017-0465; Narayana SA, 2014, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V25, P379, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-08-2012-0073; Nazam M., 2015, INT J SUPPLY OPERATI, V2, P548, DOI DOI 10.22034/2015.1.02; Olson DL, 2011, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V16, P401, DOI 10.1108/13598541111171110; Prasad S, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P6774, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1414329; Rostamzadeh R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071; Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE; Saberi S, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P2117, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261; Samvedi A, 2013, INT J PROD RES, V51, P2433, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2012.741330; Saranga H, 2009, INT T OPER RES, V16, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00668.x; Seker S, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112083; Settanni E, 2017, OPER RES PERSPECT, V4, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.orp.2017.05.002; Shen YC, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001; Sreedevi R, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V193, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024; Tahriri F., 2014, J IND ENG INT, V10, P2; Thakur V, 2018, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V20, P877, DOI 10.1007/s10163-017-0648-7; Tseng ML, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V40, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.007; Wang XJ, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V135, P595, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.021; Wee SY, 2017, ENVIRON INT, V106, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.004; Weraikat D, 2016, COMPUT IND ENG, V93, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.026; Wiengarten F, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V171, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.020; Xie Y, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P40, DOI 10.1108/13598541211212195; Yadav G., 2018, INT J PROD RES, P1; ZADEH LA, 1965, INFORM CONTROL, V8, P338, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X; Zavadskas EK, 2010, J CIV ENG MANAG, V16, P33, DOI 10.3846/jcem.2010.03; Zimmermann HJ, 1996, FUZZY SET THEORY ITS	86	61	61	9	91	TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD	ABINGDON	2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND	0020-7543	1366-588X		INT J PROD RES	Int. J. Prod. Res.	JUN 3	2019	57	11					3554	3576		10.1080/00207543.2018.1543969	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1543969			23	Engineering, Industrial; Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science	IF3IJ		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000472973800011
J	Quiroga, S; Suarez, C; Solis, JD; Martinez-Juarez, P				Quiroga, Sonia; Suarez, Cristina; Diego Solis, Juan; Martinez-Juarez, Pablo			Framing vulnerability and coffee farmers' behaviour in the context of climate change adaptation in Nicaragua	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Climate change adaptive capacity; Vulnerability indicators; Mesoamerica; Coffee production; Heckman selection model; Behavioral economics	PUBLIC PREFERENCES; WATER CONSERVATION; DETERMINANTS; SMALLHOLDERS; PERCEPTIONS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; LEVEL; SOIL	This paper analyses coffee producer's vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change in Nicaragua. By its geographical position, Nicaragua is one of the countries most affected by climate change, and coffee production is expected to vastly shrink in some critical areas, suitability being reduced by up to 40% in the country. This paper analyses farmer's perceptions and vulnerability indicators to find which indicators are linked to farmers' perceived capacity to adapt to climate change, paying special attention to the issue of whether farmers perceive they have any capacity at all to adapt. The analysis was conducted through a survey to 212 representative farmers jointly with an analysis of vulnerability indicators. A Heckman selection model was estimated to jointly analyse the probability of being able to cope with climate change and the level of adaptive capacity that farmers perceive. We have simulated different policy scenarios considering the sustainable development goals of United Nations in terms of poverty reduction and education concerns. We also analysed the effects of specific programs on education about climate change awareness. Finally, we extend our analysis to a geographical evaluation of the farmer's perceived vulnerability. The analysis shows that aspects such as farm size or education levels are relevant for modulating farmers' perceptions on their own adaptive capacity. Large farm managers find themselves more often able to cope with climate change impacts though they find their capacity to be limited. Farmers that could not rely on rainfall water for their plantations also reported being less able to cope with climate change impacts. Poverty was also found to be correlated to perceptions, as regions lower proportions of inhabitants under poverty levels showed higher levels of confidence in adaptive capacity. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Quiroga, Sonia; Suarez, Cristina] Univ Alcala, Dept Econ, Madrid, Spain; [Diego Solis, Juan] Univ Natl Autonoma Nicaragua, Dept Econ, Leon, Nicaragua; [Martinez-Juarez, Pablo] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Hlth Econ Grp, Exeter, Devon, England		Quiroga, S (corresponding author), Plaza Victoria 2, Madrid 28802, Spain.	sonia.quiroga@uah.es; cristina.suarez@uah.es; jdsa@ac.unanleon.edu.ni; P.Martinez-Juarez@exeter.ac	Suarez, Cristina/AAG-1283-2019; Alvarez, Juan Diego Solis/AAW-3320-2020; Quiroga, Sonia/ABH-6577-2020	Suarez, Cristina/0000-0003-2579-0734; Alvarez, Juan Diego Solis/0000-0003-0251-0701; 	Fundacion Carolina; AECID (Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation) as part of a local development programme for Leon, Nicaragua, UNAN (Rectorado de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua); SOPPEXCCA R.L (Union de Cooperativas Agropecuarias y Servicios)	Fundacion Carolina; AECID (Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation) as part of a local development programme for Leon, Nicaragua, UNAN (Rectorado de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua); SOPPEXCCA R.L (Union de Cooperativas Agropecuarias y Servicios)	This research work was supported by Fundacion Carolina, the AECID (Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation) as part of a local development programme for Leon, Nicaragua, UNAN (Rectorado de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua), Esteli (MAGFOR) and SOPPEXCCA R.L (Union de Cooperativas Agropecuarias y Servicios, Jinotega).	Abid M, 2015, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V6, P225, DOI 10.5194/esd-6-225-2015; Alfaro W., 2008, 778 CEN; Anley Y, 2007, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V18, P289, DOI 10.1002/ldr.775; Anwar MR, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V113, P225, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0780-1; Avelino J, 2013, ROYA ANARANJADA CAFE; Avelino J, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P303, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0446-9; Baca M, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088463; Bacon CM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.005; Basso E, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P693; Blundo G., 2015, CIAT RES IMPROVING L; Bosselmann AS, 2012, ECOL ECON, V80, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.007; Brooks N, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006; Bukowski R, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0033047, 10.1371/journal.pone.0047149]; CEPAL (Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe), 2010, NIC EF CAMB CLIM AGR; Chowdhury SR, 2018, WORLD DEV, V102, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.009; DaMatta FM, 2004, FIELD CROP RES, V86, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.001; De Luca G, 2011, STATA J, V11, P213, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1101100204; DEFRA, 2010, DEF TERMS US FARM BU; Deressa TT, 2011, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V149, P23, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610000687; Dolisca F, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V236, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.017; Drake B, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P649, DOI 10.1007/s10113-011-0252-7; Eckstein David, 2018, GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK; Ekeland I, 2004, J POLIT ECON, V112, pS60, DOI 10.1086/379947; Ericksen P., 2011, 5 CCAFS; Eriksen SH, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P337, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685660; Ewbank R, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, pS345, DOI 10.1111/disa.12340; Fernandez-Manjarres JF, 2018, RESTOR ECOL, V26, P404, DOI 10.1111/rec.12685; Field C.B., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014; Fussel HM, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V75, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3; de Jalon SG, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.010; Glendinning A, 2001, HUM ECOL, V29, P283, DOI 10.1023/A:1010954631611; Glenn DM, 2013, HORTICUL RE, V41, P47, DOI 10.1002/9781118707418.ch02; Global Humanitarian Forum, 2010, AN SIL CRIS HUM IMP; Greene W.H., 2010, MODELING ORDERED CHO; Hannah L, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1867-y; Hassan R, 2008, AFR J AGRIC RESOUR E, V2, P83; IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development), 2012, REP NIC; Iglesias A, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V112, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0344-x; INIDE (Instituto Nacional de Informacifin de Desarrollo), 2008, JIN CIFR; IXMATI & CIRAD, 2014, CLASS AGR HOLD NIC P; Jaramillo J, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006487; Kelly PM, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P325, DOI 10.1023/A:1005627828199; Keogh C., 2019, AGRICULTURAL FOOD EC, V7, P1; Kreft S., 2015, BRIEFING PAPER GLOBA; Laderach P, 2011, FIELD CROP RES, V120, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.006; MacDonald K, 2014, POLITICS GLOBAL SUPP; Maddison D, 2007, PERCEPTION ADAPTATIO; MAGFOR (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Nicaragua), 2013, PLAN AD VAR CAMB CLI; Ministerio del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturaies (MARENA), 2010, ESTR NAC AMB CAMB CL; Myers Steven Lee, 2013, NY TIMES; NIDE (Instituto Nacional de Informacion de Desarrollo), 2008, EST CIFR; Noblet CL, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V87, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.003; Novo P, 2014, WATER POLICY, V16, P1009, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.188; Nyangena Wilfred, 2008, Environment Development and Sustainability, V10, P745, DOI 10.1007/s10668-007-9083-6; Quirog S, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V45, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.007; R K Pachauri., 2014, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, p151 P; Rahn E, 2014, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V19, P1119, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9467-x; Rostamkalaei A, 2016, SMALL BUS ECON, V46, P255, DOI 10.1007/s11187-015-9681-x; Scheaffer R. L., 1986, ELEMENTARY SURVEY SA; Schroth G, 2009, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V14, P605, DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9186-5; The World Bank, 2020, WORLD DEV IND; UN, 2013, MILLENNIUM DEV GOALS; UN (United Nations), DRAFT OUTC DOC UN SU; USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2016, NIC COFF ANN REP; Warner K, 2013, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V5, P367, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2013.057289; Wiggins S., 2007, POVERTY REDUCTION ST; World Bank, 2008, NIC POV ASS, V1; World Bank, 2017, NIC PAV WAY FAST GRO; Yohe G., 2006, SYNTHETIC ASSESSMENT; Ziska LH, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agronomy8080152	70	14	14	4	58	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	FEB	2020	126								104733	10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104733	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104733			13	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	JU4KU					2022-09-08	WOS:000501647300019
J	Sullivan-Wiley, KA; Gianotti, AGS				Sullivan-Wiley, Kira A.; Gianotti, Anne G. Short			Risk Perception in a Multi-Hazard Environment	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						risk perception; development organizations; DRR; multi-hazard; Africa; Uganda	NATURAL HAZARDS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLOOD RISK; TRUST; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; DISASTER; MODEL; COMMUNICATION; PREPAREDNESS	Environmental disasters cause enormous losses of life and property every year, a threat that is recognized and addressed in both the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Organizations from both the risk reduction and development fields are working to design programs that build risk understanding and risk perception to encourage protective action in communities that are often at risk from multiple, overlapping threats. We know little, however, about how individuals perceive and prioritize multiple hazards at once and how this relates to their adoption of protective action strategies in the developing world. Our work addresses environmental hazard risk perception in a multi-hazard context in eastern Uganda, with particular attention paid to the role that risk reduction and development organizations (RDOs) play in shaping risk perceptions, as well as their potential to influence protective action. To better understand risk prioritization, we used survey data from farming households to generate four indices reflecting several components of risk perception and to predict holistic risk perception through multivariate regression analysis. Our study finds that the factors shaping smallholder risk perception vary among hazards within the study population and that characteristics of both hazards and individuals are important. The regression analysis also reveals a surprising relationship between risk perception, self-efficacy, and protective action. Our findings suggest that risk reduction and development programs can play an important role in affecting both risk perception and the capacity of smallholders to respond to environmental threats. Our work adds to the growing body of literature on how people perceive and respond to risk in a multi-hazard environment, a context increasingly common in a changing world. Improved understanding of how RDO programs in the developing world are engaging with and influencing risk mitigation in the multi-hazard environments is fundamental for reducing vulnerability. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Sullivan-Wiley, Kira A.] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA; [Sullivan-Wiley, Kira A.] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; [Gianotti, Anne G. Short] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA		Sullivan-Wiley, KA (corresponding author), Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA.; Sullivan-Wiley, KA (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.		Short, Anne G/C-9713-2013		Boston University	Boston University	This research would not have been possible without the people who shared their time and experiences. We are grateful to the interview and survey respondents who informed this research. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Boston University Moorman-Simon Civic Fellowship and Graduate Research Abroad Fellowship for providing financial support for this research. They would also like to acknowledge the logistical assistance of the field and translation teams in both the Bududa and Manafwa districts of Uganda.	Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122; Baan PJ, 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P113, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226]; BANDURA A, 1995, SELF EFFICACY CHANGI, P355; Barros V.R., 2014, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, P151; Bickerstaff K, 2004, ENVIRON INT, V30, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001; Boholm A., 1998, J RISK RES, V1, P135; Brewer NT, 2004, ANN BEHAV MED, V27, P125, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7; Bronfman NC, 2009, SAFETY SCI, V47, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.006; Burningham K, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P216, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x; Claessens L, 2007, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V90, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.007; CUTTER SC, 1981, ENVIRON BEHAV, V13, P105, DOI 10.1177/0013916581131006; Cutter SL, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P713, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00219; Cutter SL, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P2301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710375105; Cvetkovich G., 2013, SOCIAL TRUST MANAGEM; Doss C, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P1453, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.023; Earle TC, 2006, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V36, P383, DOI 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x; Earle TC, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P541, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x; FISCHHOFF B, 1978, POLICY SCI, V9, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF00143739; FISCHHOFF B, 1995, RISK ANAL, V15, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x; Fisher R, 2013, J RURAL STUD, V31, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.006; FLYNN J, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P1101, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x; Gaillard JC, 2008, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V172, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.036; Gallina V, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011; Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR), 2015, MAK DEV SUST FUT DIS; Grothmann T, 2006, NAT HAZARDS, V38, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6; Gyekye SA, 2009, SAFETY SCI, V47, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.12.007; Heitz C, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.008; Huppert HE, 2006, PHILOS T R SOC A, V364, P1875, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2006.1803; International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), 2014, WORLD DIS REP IFRC; KASPERSON RE, 1988, RISK ANAL, V8, P177, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x; KASPERSON RE, 1986, RISK ANAL, V6, P275, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x; Leiserowitz A, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V77, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9; LICHTENSTEIN S, 1978, J EXP PSYCHOL-HUM L, V4, P551, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551; Lin SY, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V44, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z; Lindell MK, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x; Lindell MK, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P616, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x; Lindell MK, 2000, ENVIRON BEHAV, V32, P461, DOI 10.1177/00139160021972621; Lopez-Marrero T, 2010, GEOGR J, V176, P150, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00353.x; Lopez-Marrero T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P277, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9370-7; Martin IM, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P887, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00930.x; Mayhorn C. B., 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, V6, P165, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(165), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(165)]; Miceli R, 2008, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V28, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006; MILETI DS, 1992, SOC PROBL, V39, P40, DOI 10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0062j; Mugagga F, 2012, CATENA, V90, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.004; Nakagawa Y., 2004, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V22, P5; Nathan F, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P337, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01043.x; National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), 2010, STAT ENV REP UG 2010; Nyland L. G., 1993, 15 CTR RISK RES SCH; O'Brien K, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P437; O'Brien KL, 2000, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V10, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2; Paton Douglas, 2008, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V8, P2, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017256; Perry RW, 2008, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V172, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.006; Peters RG, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.x; Pirson M, 2008, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V49, P43; Plapp T, 2006, PROC MONOGR ENG WATE, P101; Renn O, 1999, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V33, P3049, DOI 10.1021/es981283m; Renn O., 1991, COMMUNICATING RISKS, V4th ed., P175, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10; Renn O, 2009, HDB RISK CRISIS COMM, P80; ROHRMANN B, 1994, AUST J PSYCHOL, V46, P150, DOI 10.1080/00049539408259490; Shaw R, 2014, CIVIL SOC ORG DISAST; Shi P., 2015, WORLD ATLAS NATURAL; Siegrist M, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P195, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.202020; Siegrist M, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P713, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.205064; Siegrist M, 2006, RISK ANAL, V26, P971, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x; Sjoberg L, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00001; Sjoberg L., 1996, RISK PERCEPTION MEDI; SLOVIC P, 1979, ENVIRONMENT, V21, P14, DOI 10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091; SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507; Slovic P., 1980, SOC RISK ASSESSMENT, V39, P181, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9; Smith K, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P1945, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00053-X; Terpstra T, 2013, ENVIRON BEHAV, V45, P993, DOI 10.1177/0013916512452427; Terpstra T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1658, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x; Thomalla F, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x; Tschakert P, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.008; Tukey J.W., 1977, EXPLORATORY DATA ANA; Turner R. H., 1986, WAITING DISASTER EAR; TVERSKY A, 1974, SCIENCE, V185, P1124, DOI 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124; Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), 2016, NAT POP HOUS CENS 20; UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2013, HUM DEV; URCS (Uganda Red Cross Society), 2010, 2010 ANN REP DIS MAN; Wachinger G, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1049, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x; Wossen T, 2015, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V46, P81, DOI 10.1111/agec.12142; Yazdanpanah M., 2013, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V31	83	62	66	4	105	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	SEP	2017	97						138	152		10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.002	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.002			15	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	EY4YS					2022-09-08	WOS:000403984800009
J	Baum, D; Yague-Blanco, JL; Escobar, J				Baum, Dorothee; Luis Yague-Blanco, Jose; Escobar, Julio			Capacity development strategy empowering the decentralized governments of Ecuador towards local climate action	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Local climate action; Institutional capacity development; Street level bureaucracy; Design-thinking; Ecuador	ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING; STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS; DESIGN THINKING; CHANGE ADAPTATION; INTERVENTIONS; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION	The impacts of climate change are predicted to negatively impair the improvements made towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), especially in developing countries. Uncertainty on specific actions and strategies remains, leading to a research-implementation gap. For Ecuador, one of the key challenges to local adaptation are the institutional capacities of the decentralized autonomous governments (GAD, Spanish acronym). Therefore, the objective of this study is firstly to apply a capacity development strategy developed by GIZ (2013a) in the context of limited knowledge and resources and secondly gain a deeper understanding of climate action in Ecuador on a provincial level. The case study is based on an experimental participatory workshop in the coastal province of Santa Elena, Ecuador. The applied methodology has three components: firstly, semi-structured expert interviews on climate action in Ecuador; secondly, the participatory workshops with technicians and employees of the provincial government, its analysis together with a pre-, post- and two-months-after the workshop follow-up survey; thirdly, the analysis of the workshop is complemented by a peer validation of the co-facilitators. The analysis of the workshop suggests that in a context of limited institutional capacity, an understanding of climate change terminology, vulnerability and adaptive capacity is crucial to interpret predictions and to motivate action. Additionally, results indicate that pairing the content of the seminar with elements of project management might also strengthen local planning and longevity of rural development measures. Overall, the methodology of GIZ might therefore not be suitable in the local context due to its fast pace and difficult terminology. A more promising approach to foster local climate action is the Design-Thinking (DT) methodology due to its easier accessibility. Based on the insights of the case study a capacity development strategy incorporating DT offers lessons learnt for practitioners aiming to promote local climate action in comparable institutional contexts of limited knowledge and resources. As limited knowledge and resources are often main barriers to climate action, developing capacity building strategies will in turn foster climate action. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Baum, Dorothee; Luis Yague-Blanco, Jose] Univ Politecn Madrid, Av Puerta Hierro 2, Madrid 28040, Spain; [Escobar, Julio] IICA Ecuador, Interamer Inst Cooperat Agr, Av 12 Octubre N24-584 & Fco Salazar, Quito, Ecuador		Baum, D (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Madrid, Av Puerta Hierro 2, Madrid 28040, Spain.	dorotheebaum@alumnos.upm.es	Yagüe, Jose Luis/AAR-3392-2020	Yagüe, Jose Luis/0000-0002-7751-8436	Universidad Politecnica de Madrid; programme Climate Change, Natural Resources and Risk Management by the InterAmerican Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA)	Universidad Politecnica de Madrid; programme Climate Change, Natural Resources and Risk Management by the InterAmerican Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA)	The work was supported by the Universidad Politecnica de Madrid and additional financing through the programme Climate Change, Natural Resources and Risk Management by the InterAmerican Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) for data collection and travel cost within Ecuador.	Andersen J., 2013, GUIA INTEGRAR ADAPTA; Artur L, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.013; Bassett E, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P435, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.509703; Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214; Beverland MB, 2015, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V43, P589, DOI 10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8; Bharwani S., 2011, SHORT COURSE ADAPTAT; Bhave AG, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V14, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.09.004; Binswanger J, 2011, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V78, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.006; Boland R., 2010, CREATING DESIRED FUT; Booth Sweeney L., 2011, SYSTEMS THINKING PLA; Bowen A, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V113, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0346-8; Brown D, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.009; Buhl A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V231, P1248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259; Campbell BM, 2016, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V11, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.06.002; CARDESA, 2017, CCARDESA OFFERS NEW; Carlgren L, 2016, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V25, P38, DOI 10.1111/caim.12153; Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001; CONGOPE, 2018, CONSTITUCION REPUBLI, V7, P413; Creswell J., 2009, RES DESIGN QUALITATI, V3rd; Danielsen F, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P1166, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01874.x; DEAN JW, 1993, DECISION SCI, V24, P1069, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00504.x; Doorley S., 2018, BOOTLEG 2018; Eriksen SH, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014; Espinosa P., 2019, UNFCCC 25TH ANNIVERS; Farau A., 2001, GELEBTE GESCH PSYCHO; Flick U., 1998, INTRO QUALITATIVE RE; Funder M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V55, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.007; GADPSE, 2015, PLAN DESARROLLO ORDE; Garcia KC, 2015, 21 BRAZILIAN S WATER; Geurts JLA, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V128, P300, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00073-4; GIZ, 2013, INTEGRANDO ADAPTACIO; GIZ, 2015, IPACC II PUBLIC INVE; GIZ, 2010, CLIMATE PROOFING DEV; GIZ, 2013, ADAPTATE III SUPPORT; Hallegatte S., 2016, SHOCK WAVES MANAGING, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5; IEE, 2012, VISOR MAPAS IEE; IICA Office Ecuador, 2020, EMAIL INQUIRY FURTHE; INEC, 2017, CENSO INFORMACION AM; INEC, 2018, PROYECCIONES POBLACI; INEC, 2010, POBL TAS CREC INT 20; Kirchhoff CJ, 2013, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V38, P393, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828; Klay A, 2015, FUTURES, V65, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.012; Knight AT, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P610, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x; Kolko J, 2015, HARVARD BUS REV, V93, P66; Leviston Z, 2014, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P441, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2050; Liedtka J, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P925, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12163; Lipsky M, 2010, STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY: DILEMMAS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN PUBLIC SERVICES, 30TH EDITION, P1; Loster T., 2012, CLIMATE CHANGE JUSTI, P239, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_23, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_23]; MAE, 2014, COMO INCORPORAR CAMB; MAE, 2012, ESTRATEGIA NACL CAMB; Magrin GO, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1499; May PJ, 2009, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V19, P453, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum030; McEvoy S, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V207, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041; McLaughlin JE, 2019, BMC MED EDUC, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8; Michels A, 2011, INT REV ADM SCI, V77, P275, DOI 10.1177/0020852311399851; Miles MB, 2020, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA, V4; Miller J., 2004, QUALITATIVE RES THEO; Millner A, 2015, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V20, P380, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X14000692; Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, 2017, TERCERA COMUNICACION; Mintrom M, 2016, AUST J PUBL ADMIN, V75, P391, DOI 10.1111/1467-8500.12211; Nagoda S, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.014; Newell P, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P365, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659; Oberlack C, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P805, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z; Ocasio W, 2020, IND CORP CHANGE, V29, P225, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtz068; OECD, 2018, OECD WORK SUPPORT CL; OECD, 2018, INTEGRIDAD BUEN GOBI; OECD, 2009, INT CLIM CHANG AD DE; Ormston R., 2014, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC; Ostrom E, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004; Rabiee F, 2004, P NUTR SOC, V63, P655, DOI 10.1079/PNS2004399; Reckien D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V191, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220; Regie Libanaise de Tabacs et Tombacs, 2016, SUST DEV REP 2016; Republica del Ecuador, 2019, PRIMERA CONTRIBUCION; Reyer CPO, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1187-4; Richardson K., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE GLOBA, P415; Roberts JP, 2016, HEALTHCARE-J DEL SCI, V4, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002; Scholes R., 2018, SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS, P5; Scoville-Simonds M., 2019, HAZARDS MAINSTREAMIN, V125, P104683, DOI [10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104683, DOI 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2019.104683]; Selten R, 2012, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V25, P443, DOI 10.1002/bdm.738; Senplades, 2017, PLAN NACL DESARROLLO; Seva M, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V128, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.038; Sherman MH, 2014, CLIM POLICY, V14, P417, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.859501; Shukla P.R, 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE LAND, DOI 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0538; Sietz D, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.01.001; SMHI, 2012, CLIMATE CHANGE MITIG; Stage J, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1185, P150, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05168.x; Stollberg D., 2008, TZI HIERARCHIE, V22; The World Bank, 2018, HUMAN CAPITAL PROJEC; The World Bank Group, 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE KNOWL; Thissen WAH, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V129, P627, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00470-1; Thomas G., 2011, DO YOUR CASE STUDY; Toomey AH, 2017, CONSERV LETT, V10, P619, DOI 10.1111/conl.12315; Tosun J, 2017, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V8, DOI 10.1002/wcc.440; Trusty T, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V107, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.021; UNCC:e-Learn, 2019, ONE CLIMATE CHANGE L; United nations common coding system (UNCCS), 2017, OPPORTUNITIES OPTION; van den Oever K, 2019, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V40, P580, DOI 10.1002/smj.2975; van Kerkhoff L, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V73, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.011; Witkowski K., 2017, PLANIFICANDO ADAPTAC; Yin RK., 2009, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; Zhou QL, 2017, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00015	101	0	0	1	8	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 20	2021	285								125320	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125320	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125320			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PY3GA					2022-09-08	WOS:000611934600006
J	Cronk, R; Bartram, J				Cronk, Ryan; Bartram, Jamie			Identifying opportunities to improve piped water continuity and water system monitoring in Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama: Evidence from Bayesian networks and regression analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Functionality; Intermittent water supply (IWS); Safely managed drinking water; Systems approach; Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Sustainability	RURAL WATER; DRINKING-WATER; QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE; COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT; FECAL CONTAMINATION; BELIEF NETWORKS; SUSTAINABILITY; INTERMITTENT; KENYA; GHANA	Many piped water systems in rural areas of Latin America and the Caribbean provide discontinuous service. In response to service delivery challenges, governments developed the Rural Water and Sanitation Information System to monitor water service levels, infrastructure conditions, water committees, and technical assistance providers. Collected data are combined into metrics to represent water service sustainability. There is little analysis of these data to identify service delivery and system improvement opportunities and the sustainability metrics are unvalidated. Multivariable regression and Bayesian networks were used to analyze variables associated with the availability of 24-h water services using data from 5560 community-based piped water systems in Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. The regression models were compared to the sustainability metric. In Honduras and Nicaragua, the proportion of systems providing 24-h service spanned 71 percentage points between sub-national regions. Good condition infrastructure and year-round water source availability were associated with the availability of 24-h service. The availability of support for system rehabilitation in Honduras and for preventative maintenance in Nicaragua were associated with the availability of 24-h services. The Bayesian networks predicted that good condition infrastructure and year-round water source availability were more influential on the availability of 24-h service than management variables such as the availability of external technical support and funds to rehabilitate the system. In each country, insufficient household water tariffs were collected for 90% or more of systems to cover infrastructure, operations, and maintenance costs. The r-squared values for the regression models ranged from 0.22 (Nicaragua) to 0.49 (Honduras) as compared to 0.05 (Nicaragua) to 0.03 (Honduras) for the sustainability metric - suggesting that regression models are better at predicting higher service levels. Rural water service operators, technical assistance providers, local and national governments, and external support agencies could make better use of monitoring data by using interdisciplinary systems approaches to identify improvement opportunities to allocate technical and financial resources to systems with low service levels. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Cronk, Ryan; Bartram, Jamie] Univ N Carolina, Water Inst, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA		Cronk, R (corresponding author), 148 Rosenau Hall,CB 7431-135Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.	rcronk@live.unc.edu			Wallace Genetic Foundation; NIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [T32ES007018]	Wallace Genetic Foundation; NIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences(United States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS))	This article was supported in part by the Wallace Genetic Foundation. Ryan Cronk was supported by a training grant from the NIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grant Number: T32ES007018).	Amjad UQ, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P1497, DOI 10.3390/w7041497; Bain RES, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V490, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.007; Bain R, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P917, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12334; Bartram J, 2010, PLOS MED, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000367; Behnke NL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.016; Bivins AW, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P7542, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b01014; Borja-Vega C., 2017, Waterlines, V36, P40, DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.2017.003; Boulenouar J., 2013, MAPPING SUSTAINABILI; Cain J, 2001, PLANNING IMPROVEMENT; Carriger JF, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P13195, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b03220; Chen SH, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V37, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012; Contraloria General de la Reptiblica, 2014, ENC IND MULT CONG PA; Cronk R, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P11336, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b03287; Ercumen A, 2015, PLOS MED, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001892; Fisher MB, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13090840; Fisher MB, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P8431, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016770; Foster T, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P12037, DOI 10.1021/es402086n; GALAITSI SE, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI DOI 10.3390/W8070274; Greiner M, 2000, PREV VET MED, V45, P23, DOI 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X; Hunter PR, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P2621, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.018; HUTTON G., 2016, COSTS M 2030 SUST DE; Institute Nacional de Information de Desarrollo (INIDE) Ministerio de Salud (MINSA), 2013, INF PREL ENC NIC DEM; Jeandron A, 2015, PLOS MED, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001893; Kayser GL, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P460, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2014.136; Kelly E, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V628-629, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.045; Kelly E, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V56, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.021; Kevany K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V60, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.041; Klingel P, 2012, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V12, P504, DOI 10.2166/ws.2012.023; Klug T, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V619, P1126, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.183; Klug T, 2017, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V220, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.02.009; Kumpel E, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P542, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b03973; Kumpel E, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P5176, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.058; Liddle E. S., 2017, Waterlines, V36, P140, DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.16-00022; LLOYD BJ, 1991, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V24, P61, DOI 10.2166/wst.1991.0031; MacDonald MC, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8120574; Marcot BG, 2006, CAN J FOREST RES, V36, P3063, DOI 10.1139/X06-135; Marks SJ, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P276, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14527620; Marks SJ, 2013, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V3, P122, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2013.098; Morgan M. G., 1992, UNCERTAINTY GUIDE DE; Norsys Software Corp, 2014, NET 5 18; Pearl J., 2014, PROBABILISTIC REASON; Phan TD, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V85, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.006; Prokopy L. S., 2004, Water Policy, V6, P103; Pruss-Ustun A, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P894, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12329; Requejo-Castro D, 2017, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V12, P372, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2017.041; Rodriguez A, 2016, 7 RWSN FORUM WATER E; Schweitzer RW, 2012, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V2, P20, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2012.056; Schwemlein S, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13030333; Secretaria de Salud-SS/Honduras Institute Nacional tie Estadistica-INE/Honduras ICF International, 2013, HOND ENC NAC SAL DEM; Shields KF, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, P1222, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409002; SIASAR, 2016, BANC DAD; Sobsey MD, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P4261, DOI 10.1021/es702746n; WHO, 2011, GUID DRINK WAT QUAL, Vfourth; WHO/UNICEF, 2017, SAF MAN DRINK; World Health Organization, 2015, PROGR DRINKING WATER	55	11	11	1	11	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 20	2018	196						1	10		10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.017	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.017			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GT2XU					2022-09-08	WOS:000444364400001
J	Ortiz, D; Huber-Heim, K				Ortiz, Daniela; Huber-Heim, Karin			From information to empowerment: Teaching sustainable business development by enabling an experiential and participatory problem-solving process in the classroom	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION			English	Article						SDGs; Participative teaching concept; Experiential learning; Case study	PERSPECTIVE; CURRICULUM; ETHICS	The aim of this paper is to present a teaching concept by which students develop a solution to one concrete challenge posed by the SDGs via a structured participatory process. The aim of the concept is twofold. First, to create an active learning process in which students move from being informed about the pressing challenges described by the SDGs, i.e., from a mere passive-learning setting to developing possible solutions on their own. Second, it aims to provide students with a concrete tool by which they can implement a participatory process in their future professional endeavours. For this, a five-level teaching concept - the Public Participation Spectrum (PPS) developed by the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) - was used as structural framework. Our proposed concept is based on a thorough literature review on teaching sustainability to business students, and on a case study about a pilot course implemented with undergraduate students. In the pilot course, the content-related objectives could be achieved satisfactorily. However, after evaluating the extended feedback given by the students and the experience of the teacher, it seemed obvious that the applied collaborative learning experience among peers and the cooperation with external stakeholders needs to be specifically addressed and enhanced. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Ortiz, Daniela; Huber-Heim, Karin] FHWien Univ Appl Sci Management & Commun, Vienna, Austria		Ortiz, D (corresponding author), FHWien Univ Appl Sci Management & Commun, Vienna, Austria.	daniela.ortiz@fh-wien.ac.at			City of Vienna	City of Vienna	The present research is part of the project with the name "City of Vienna Competence Team for sustainable, strategic and opportunity oriented management of SMEs", which is funded by the City of Vienna. The funding source had no involvement in the study design, collection of data or preparation of the present manuscript.	Audebrand L. K., 2010, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V9, P488; Bacon CM, 2011, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V12, P193, DOI 10.1108/14676371111118237; Banerjee Abhijit, 2011, POOR EC RADICAL RETH; Barron BJS, 1998, J LEARN SCI, V7, P271, DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls0703&4_2; Barth M., 2007, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V8, P416, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14676370710823582, 10.1108/1467637071082358]; BLUMENFELD PC, 1991, EDUC PSYCHOL, V26, P369, DOI 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8; Brundiers K, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P1725, DOI 10.3390/su5041725; Brundiers K, 2010, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V11, P308, DOI 10.1108/14676371011077540; Dale A., 2005, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V6, P351, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14676370510623847, 10.1108/1467637051, DOI 10.1108/1467637051]; De Haan G., 2006, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V12, P19, DOI [10.1080/13504620500526362, DOI 10.1080/13504620500526362]; Dollar D, 2002, J ECON GROWTH, V7, P195, DOI 10.1023/A:1020139631000; Dollar D., 2013, GROWTH STILL IS GOOD; Du XY, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V61, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.012; Erskine L, 2012, J EDUC BUS, V87, P198, DOI 10.1080/08832323.2011.590162; Ferreira F., 2009, OXFORD HDB EC INEQUA, P599; Figueiro PS, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118; Fox C, 2012, ENVIRON PRAC, V14, P212, DOI 10.1017/S1466046612000166; Ghoshal S, 2005, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V4, P75, DOI 10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558; IAP2 International Association for Public Participation, 2016, COR VAL AW SHOWC; Inglis J., 2007, INT J PUBLIC PARTICI, V1, P2; Kolk A, 2014, BUS SOC, V53, P338, DOI 10.1177/0007650312474928; Longworthy A., 2007, ED PUBLIC GOOD IS SE; Maddison A, 2003, WORLD EC HIST STAT D; Marcangelo C, 2009, PROBLEM BASED LEARNI; McKinsey, 2014, SUSTAINABILITYS STRA; Mercado J. A., 2016, BUSINESS GOOD PERSPE; Nahi T, 2016, ORGAN ENVIRON, V29, P416, DOI 10.1177/1086026616652666; Painter-Morland M, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V139, P737, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2896-6; Peer V, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V44, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.003; Pellicano M., 2014, 13 EBES C IST TURK; Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879; Prahalad C.K., 2006, FORTUNE BOTTOM PYRAM; Seto-Pamies D, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V136, P523, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2535-7; Shipley R, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P22, DOI 10.1177/0885412211413133; Shrivastava P, 2010, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V9, P443, DOI 10.5465/AMLE.2010.53791826; Sipos Y., 2008, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V9, P68, DOI DOI 10.1108/14676370810842193; Stakeholder Research Associates, 2005, WORDS ACT STAK ENG M; UN Women, 2016, WOM SUST DEV GOALS; UNDP, 2008, CREAT VAL ALL STRAT; United Nations, 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD; Werhane PH, 2008, J BUS ETHICS, V78, P463, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9338-4; Wilson KL, 1997, STUD HIGH EDUC, V22, P33, DOI 10.1080/03075079712331381121; Yusuf S, 2011, FRONTIERS IN DEVELOPMENT POLICY: A PRIMER ON EMERGING ISSUES, P45	43	18	18	0	11	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	1472-8117	2352-3565		INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF	Int. J. Manag. Educ.	JUL	2017	15	2	B				318	331		10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.008	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.008			14	Business; Education & Educational Research; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Education & Educational Research	FW0ZP					2022-09-08	WOS:000425025300023
J	Sanchez-Garrido, AJ; Navarro, IJ; Yepes, V				Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J.; Navarro, Ignacio J.; Yepes, Victor			Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainability; Construction; Structural design; Life cycle cost; Life cycle assessment; Social life cycle; Multi-criteria decision-making; Modern methods of construction	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ROAD BRIDGES; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; COST; ALTERNATIVES; SITE; AHP	Since the establishment of the Sustainable Development Goals, great concern has arisen on how to diminish the impacts that result from construction activities. In such context, Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) rise as a powerful way to reduce life cycle impacts through optimizing the consumption of materials. This paper focuses on the sustainability assessment of different modern construction techniques applied to concrete structures of single-family houses. The life cycle performance in terms of sustainability is compared between a conventional reference design, a precast design, a lightweight slab design with pressurized hollow discs, and a design based on double-wall structural elements. The sustainability is assessed through a set of 38 indicators that address not only the economic and environmental response of the designs, but also their social impacts as well. Five of the best known Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques (SAW, COPRAS, TOPSIS, VIKOR and MIVES) are applied to derive the life-cycle performance of each design into a single sustainability score. Since there is no consensus on which MCDM method works best in sustainability assessments, a Global Structural Sustainability Index (GSSI) combining and weighting the above is proposed here to aid the analysis of the results obtained. The results show that consideration of the three dimensions of sustainability leads to balanced designs whose preference need not coincide with those derived from each one-dimensional life cycle approach.	[Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J.; Navarro, Ignacio J.] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Construct Engn, Valencia 46022, Spain; [Yepes, Victor] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Concrete Sci & Technol ICITECH, Valencia 46022, Spain		Sanchez-Garrido, AJ (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Construct Engn, Valencia 46022, Spain.	ajsangar@doctor.upv.es; ignamar1@cam.upv.es; vyepesp@cst.upv.es	Yepes, Víctor/K-9763-2014	Yepes, Víctor/0000-0001-5488-6001; Navarro, Ignacio/0000-0002-6539-1626; Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J./0000-0003-4797-9474	MCIN/AEI [PID2020-117056RB-I00]; ERDF A way of making Europe	MCIN/AEI; ERDF A way of making Europe	Grant PID2020-117056RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by "ERDF A way of making Europe".	Aguado A., 2006, MEDIDA SOSTENIBILIDA, P113; Allacker K, 2012, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V17, P813, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0402-2; [Anonymous], 2004, CONARQUITECTURA ARQU; [Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO; Borghi G, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P815, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.287; Daim TU, 2012, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V24, P28, DOI 10.1108/17410381311287472; de Brito MM, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P1019, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016; ECKENRODE RT, 1965, MANAGE SCI, V12, P180, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.12.3.180; Erdogan SA, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V172, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.111; Garcia-Segura T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P904, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.177; Garcia-Segura T, 2016, ENG STRUCT, V125, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.012; Habibi A, 2021, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121431; Hagerty MR, 2007, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V35, P455, DOI 10.1177/0049124106292354; Hajkowicz S, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5; Hwang CL, 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D; Ighravwe DE, 2019, J BUILD ENG, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100753; International Organization for Standardization, 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS; Jato-Espino D, 2014, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V45, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013; Jorgensen A, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P296, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0517-5; Kendall M.G., 1970, RANK CORRELATION MET, V4th ed.; Kersuliene V, 2010, J BUS ECON MANAG, V11, P243, DOI 10.3846/jbem.2010.12; Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, 2016, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V50, P25; Lopes GC, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P688, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.027; MacCrimmon, 1968, DECISION MAKING MULT; Marinkovic S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125610; Martinez-Blanco J, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V69, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044; Medineckiene M, 2010, J ENVIRON ENG LANDSC, V18, P118, DOI 10.3846/jeelm.2010.14; Mellado F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102355; Navarro IJ, 2019, ADV CIV ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/6134803; Navarro IJ, 2020, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V16, P949, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2019.1676791; Navarro IJ, 2018, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V72, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.003; Opricovic S., 1998, MULTICRITERIA SYSTEM, P302; Peldschus F, 2010, INZ EKON, V21, P223; Pellicer E, 2014, J CONSTR ENG M, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000700; Penades-Pla V, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101864; Rahman MM, 2014, J MANAGE ENG, V30, P69, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000173; Rashid K, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124316; Rebitzer, 2008, KERSTIN LICHTENVORT; Robalo K, 2021, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121680; Ruzgys A, 2014, J CIV ENG MANAG, V20, P103, DOI 10.3846/13923730.2013.843585; Saaty T.L., 1996, DECISION MAKING DEPE; SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5; Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6; Salas J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17030962; Sanchez-Garrido AJ, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106572; Sanchez-Garrido AJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120556; Sarka V., 1994, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V1, P131; Sierra LA, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V65, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.02.004; Sivilevicius H, 2008, BALT J ROAD BRIDGE E, V3, P161, DOI 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.161-166; Stanujkic D, 2017, ROM J ECON FORECAST, V20, P116; Torres-Machi C, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P56, DOI 10.3141/2523-07; Turskis Z, 2019, INT J COMPUT COMMUN, V14, P90, DOI 10.15837/ijccc.2019.1.3364; Turskis Z, 2015, INT J COMPUT COMMUN, V10, P873; Turskis Z, 2008, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V14, P224, DOI 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.224-239; Turskis Z, 2016, J CIV ENG MANAG, V22, P1078, DOI 10.3846/13923730.2016.1259179; Turskis Z, 2012, J ENVIRON ENG LANDSC, V20, P110, DOI 10.3846/16486897.2011.645827; UNEP/SETAC, 2009, GUID SOC LIF CYCL AS; UNEP/SETAC, 2013, THESIS CHALMERS U TE; van Eldik MA, 2020, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103379; Yazdani M, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P2501, DOI 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458; Yepes V, 2015, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V49, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.013; Yepes V, 2012, J PROF ISS ENG ED PR, V138, P48, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000075; Younis A, 2018, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V175, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.183; Zastrow P, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.085; Zavadskas E.K., 2016, ENG STRUCT TECHNOL, V7, P151, DOI 10.3846/2029882X.2016.1139664; Zavadskas EK, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V82, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.072; Zavadskas EK, 2016, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V29, P857, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1237302; Zavadskas EK, 2016, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V15, P645, DOI 10.1142/S0219622016300019; Zavadskas EK, 2013, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V57, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.016; Zhu XY, 2021, J CIV ENG MANAG, V27, P372, DOI 10.3846/jcem.2021.15260	70	5	5	9	9	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 1	2022	330								129724	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724			18	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0G0VG					2022-09-08	WOS:000777772000004
J	Li, ZH; Deng, XZ; Zhang, Y				Li, Zhihui; Deng, Xiangzheng; Zhang, Yue			Evaluation and convergence analysis of socio-economic vulnerability to natural hazards of Belt and Road Initiative countries	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Socio-economic vulnerability; Convergence analysis; Data envelopment analysis; Theil index; BRI countries	CHINA BELT; COMMUNITIES; IMPACT; FLOOD; RIVER; RISK	Reducing vulnerability and strengthening resilience are vital to achieve the sustainable development goals. Identification of socio-economic vulnerability has been a key step for problem identification and solution framing. Using the official data of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries from year 2000 to year 2015, the Data Envelopment Analysis model was applied to evaluate the socio-economic vulnerability of the countries. Subsequently the convergence characteristics of socio-economic vulnerability between the countries were examined using Theil index method. The results showed that the average socio-economic vulnerability of the BRI countries had a decreasing trend, from 0.319 to 0.141, with fluctuations between 2000 and 2015. The South Asia and East Asia-Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) were high vulnerability zones as they experienced frequent natural hazards with high population densities. The Theil indices indicated that overall disparities in the BRI countries' vulnerability were high with values around 0.575-0.757and did not show obvious convergence trend, even though the disparities in vulnerability scores of the South Asia and East Asia-ASEAN zones were relatively lower. In addition, intra-group disparities constituted about 71.34% of the total disparities, which were the primary cause of the overall disparity in the BRI region, indicating that different levels of socio-economic vulnerability between countries in the same zone was a concern. Proper management and decision making are proposed, especially in the South Asia and East Asia-ASEAN zones, to reduce socioeconomic vulnerability in order to better resist natural hazards. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Li, Zhihui; Deng, Xiangzheng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China; [Li, Zhihui; Deng, Xiangzheng] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China; [Li, Zhihui; Deng, Xiangzheng] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Yue] Capital Normal Univ, Coll Resource Environm & Tourism, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Yue] Capital Normal Univ, State Key Lab Incubat Base Urban Environm Proc, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China		Deng, XZ (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.	dengxz@igsnrr.ac.cn		Li, Zhihui/0000-0002-3051-6580; Deng, Xiangzheng/0000-0002-7993-5540	Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20010302]	Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [grant number XDA20010302].	Ahsan MN, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V8, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.009; Amirruddin AD, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105221; Butkus M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051552; Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 2019, NAT DIS 2018; CHARNES A, 1978, EUR J OPER RES, V2, P429, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8; Chen JX, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8100431; Chen Mengni, 2018, China Popul Dev Stud, V2, P158, DOI 10.1007/s42379-018-0007-y; Choi HI, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11216051; Choirunnisa AK, 2018, QUAEST GEOGR, V37, P115, DOI 10.2478/quageo-2018-0029; De Silva MMGT, 2018, ECOL ECON, V152, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.010; Bui DT, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V237, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.108; Eakin H, 2006, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V31, P365, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352; Eidsvig UMK, 2014, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V73, P307, DOI 10.1007/s10064-014-0571-2; Galea S, 2005, SOC SCI MED, V60, P2417, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.028; Ge Y., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY, V11; Gonslaves J., 2011, STRENGTHENING RESILI, P245; Hou JD, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, pS97, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1931-3; Huang JY, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0348-5; Huang PH, 2010, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V168, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-1098-z; Huang X, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101091; Imai KS, 2015, J ASIAN ECON, V36, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.asieco.2015.01.001; Islam MR, 2018, J ASIA PAC ECON, V23, P297, DOI 10.1080/13547860.2018.1442153; Jin L, 2018, ECON POLIT STUD-EPS, V6, P278, DOI 10.1080/20954816.2018.1498990; Kienberger S, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-29; Liu WD, 2016, AREA DEV POLICY, V1, P323, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2016.1232598; Liu Y., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENV, V142, P142; Malakar K, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P841, DOI 10.1007/s10668-017-9913-0; Pelanda C., 1981, DISASTER SOCIOSYSTEM; Ren CQ, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041261; Sahana M., 2021, GEOLOGY ECOLOGY LAND, V5, P40; Saharizan N.S., 2018, J TECHNOL MANAG BUS, V5; Seele P., 2019, ASIAN J SUSTAIN SOC, V4, P1, DOI [10.1186/s41180-018-0021-3, DOI 10.1186/S41180-018-0021-3]; Sharma J, 2019, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ab24ed; Sorg L, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V92, P257, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3207-1; Stefanidis S, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V68, P569, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5; UN/ISDR, 2004, LIV RISK GLOB REV DI; Vommaro F, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V706, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134629; Xia J, 2014, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V24, P525, DOI 10.1007/s11769-014-0720-3; Yadav DK, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.003; Yaduvanshi A, 2015, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V83-84, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2015.01.006; Yang GF, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1145, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1762-2; Yang YJ, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6568-y; Zhai F, 2018, J ASIAN ECON, V55, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006; Zhang C, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V222, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.026; Zhang JH, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V291, P1153, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-3102-x; Zhang N, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P1107, DOI 10.1126/science.aao6621; Zhang YJ, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1671, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0319-x; Zhou N, 2020, RESOUR POLICY, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101668	48	13	14	7	40	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 1	2021	282								125406	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125406	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125406			9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PS7QB					2022-09-08	WOS:000608119700011
J	Hosseini, SM; Paydar, MM; Triki, C				Hosseini, Seyyed Mehdi; Paydar, Mohammad Mahdi; Triki, Chefi			Implementing sustainable ecotourism in Lafour region, Iran: Applying a clustering method based on SWOT analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable ecotourism; SWOT analysis; Clustering method; TOPSIS; Lafour region	NATIONAL-PARK DJERDAP; RURAL TOURISM; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; MODEL; STRATEGIES; PRIORITIZATION; PROVINCE; ANP; PERSPECTIVE; EXTENSION	Nowadays, one of the growing and remarkable branches of tourism is ecotourism. Ecotourism has a great impact on the development of a region from different perspectives. Hence, by improving and developing sustainable ecotourism in a region, it will be possible to develop and improve its economic, social, and environmental situation. The Lafour region is one of the potential hubs for ecotourism activities in Iran. Despite the high potential of this region for ecotourism activities, it has not yet achieved its suitable position in this domain. Hence, the main goal of this study is to develop sustainable goals for ecotourism in the region. To meet the target, first, the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT factors) are identified through interviews with tourists, local residents, and the experts, filed observation, and considering similar works in the literature review. Then, some practical and useful strategies are determined based on SWOT analysis and consulting with the experts. The important point of the study is proposing an applicable heuristic clustering method based on SWOT analysis to classify the strategies into different clusters. To prioritize the strategies in each cluster, the commonly used Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method called the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is applied. This paper concludes and reveals that the three strategies including ST6 "Encouraging investors and entrepreneurs to establish ecotourism centers in the region", ST5 "Establishing and improving the hygiene units and the medical clinics in the region", and ST3 "Improving and diversifying tourism services and products to attract tourists and increase their satisfaction" have the greatest impact on accomplishing sustainable development goals in the region.	[Hosseini, Seyyed Mehdi; Paydar, Mohammad Mahdi] Babol Noshirvani Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Babol, Iran; [Triki, Chefi] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, Kent, England; [Triki, Chefi] Univ Salento, Dept Engn Innovat, Via Monteroni, I-73047 Lecce, Italy		Triki, C (corresponding author), Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, Kent, England.	sm.hosseini33@yahoo.com; paydar@nit.ac.ir; C.Triki@kent.ac.uk	Hosseini, Seyyed Mehdi/ABG-6525-2021	Triki, Chefi/0000-0002-8750-2470; Hosseini, seyyed mehdi/0000-0003-1302-7141				Ahmadi M, 2018, J QUAL ASSUR HOSP TO, V19, P243, DOI 10.1080/1528008X.2017.1394956; Akbulak C, 2014, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V21, P380, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2014.903383; Amaro S, 2016, ANN TOURISM RES, V59, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2016.03.007; Arsic S, 2018, ECOL ECON, V146, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.006; Arsic S, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V80, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.02.003; Asadpourian Z, 2020, SOC INDIC RES, V152, P289, DOI 10.1007/s11205-020-02438-0; Basset MA, 2018, BENCHMARKING, V25, P2546, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-08-2017-0232; Bhutia P.W., 2012, J ENG, V2, P43, DOI [10.9790/3021-021034350, DOI 10.9790/3021-021034350]; Bianco S., 2018, INT S NEW METR PERSP, P327; Blancas FJ, 2011, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V412, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.066; Botha E, 2016, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V47, P75, DOI 10.4102/sajbm.v47i2.62; Ceballos-Lascurain H, 1996, TOURISM; Chen CF, 2012, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V26, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.09.002; Claveria O, 2017, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V6, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.01.008; Cucari N, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.050; D'Urso P, 2015, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V73, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.10.015; D'Urso P, 2013, EXPERT SYST APPL, V40, P4944, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.005; Demir S, 2019, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V26, P329, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2019.1596990; Demir S, 2016, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V23, P456, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2015.1136709; Dias-Sardinha I, 2018, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V61, P635, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1327846; Dimitrovski D, 2015, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V16, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.004; Duarte-Duarte JB, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06655; Dymova L, 2015, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V83, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.014; Dymova L, 2013, EXPERT SYST APPL, V40, P4841, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.022; Ehigiamusoe KU, 2020, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V28, P1174, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1729164; Formann A. K., 1984, LATENT CLASS ANAL EI; Gao CY, 2011, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V24, P796, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.03.001; George B, 2019, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V79, P810, DOI 10.1111/puar.13104; Ghaderi Z, 2012, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V2-3, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.03.001; Ghorbani A, 2015, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V16, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.005; Gigovic LJ, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V58, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2616.07.030; Grogelj P, 2016, FOREST POLICY ECON, V71, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.006; Gu XP, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P199, DOI 10.3390/su13010199; Hashemi A, 2020, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106365; Hermon D., 2016, J ENV EARTH SCIENDE, V6, P40; Hosseinalizadeh S, 2018, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V7, P163, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p163; Hosseini SM, 2021, EXPERT SYST APPL, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115594; Hosseini SM, 2021, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V26, P668, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2021.1887306; Ioppolo G, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V31, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.010; Jackson J, 2006, ANN TOURISM RES, V33, P1018, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2006.04.005; Jamali AA, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P17077, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01334-y; Kang Q, 2016, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V104, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.021; Karimi M, 2019, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V163, P581, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.020; Kaymaz CK, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P2986, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01584-w; Laing C, 2017, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V6, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.03.006; Lin W.A., 2021, DATA SCI MANAG, V2, P12, DOI [10.1016/j.dsm.2021.05.001, DOI 10.1016/J.DSM.2021.05.001]; Majewska J, 2019, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V22, P2365, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2018.1467883; Mazloum Vajari S., 2019, IRAN J OPTIM, V11, P161; Moons I, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122866; Mosammam HM, 2016, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V18, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2016.03.004; Motlagh EY, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104549; Omarzadeh D, 2022, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V65, P490, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1887827; Pai MY, 2013, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V50, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.009; Pan SY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.134; Paydar MM., 2021, J OPTIM IND ENG, V45, P4566; Thong PH, 2016, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V109, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.06.023; Phelan A, 2020, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V28, P1665, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1747475; Qiu W., 2009, CLUSTERGENERATION RA; Rahmani Seryasat M., 2013, LIFE SCI J, V10, P395; Rezagama A., 2021, IOP Conference Series : Earth and Environmental Science, V750, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/750/1/012059; Riasi A., 2015, MANAG SCI LETT, V5, P915, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2015.8.005; Rodriguez J, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18092972; Santarem F, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V67, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.001; Sgroi F, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V736, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139539; Srinivas R, 2018, J HYDROL, V563, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.059; Swangjang K, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P15960, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01313-3; Tang XZ, 2019, GREY SYST, V9, P295, DOI 10.1108/GS-12-2018-0065; Tavassoli K., 2002, LINKING GREEN PRODUC; Toivonen A, 2022, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V30, P2223, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1783276; Tseng ML, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V231, P1319, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.305; Weidenfeld A, 2011, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V14, P595, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2010.517312; Yin Y, 2006, INT J PROD ECON, V101, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.014; Zhang JK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V127, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.131	73	3	3	9	19	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	DEC 20	2021	329								129716	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129716	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129716		NOV 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XN4NL					2022-09-08	WOS:000729483400005
J	Paulikas, D; Katona, S; Ilves, E; Ali, SH				Paulikas, Daina; Katona, Steven; Ilves, Erika; Ali, Saleem H.			Deep-sea nodules versus land ores: A comparative systems analysis of mining and processing wastes for battery-metal supply chains	JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY			English	Article; Early Access						battery metals; industrial ecology; metal production waste; nodules; sustainable supply chain; systems analysis	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POLYMETALLIC NODULES; COPPER SLAG; TAILINGS; RESOURCE; SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS	To meet UN Sustainable Development goals, a clean-energy transition with minimal ecological impact from its raw-material supply chain is essential. Polymetallic nodules lying unattached on the abyssal seafloor of the Pacific Ocean's Clarion Clipperton Zone contain four critical metals (nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper) in large quantities, and the International Seabed Authority may soon enact regulations to allow their commercial exploitation. There are complex global ecological implications of doing so. Nodule exploitation would damage abyssal habitats and may impact midwater-column organisms; but in the absence of nodule exploitation, terrestrial mining's environmental and social impacts would intensify. This paper adds to the growing systems-based literature on nodule collection by contributing a preliminary material flow analysis of global-average cradle-to-gate waste streams using either nodules or terrestrial sources as part of a preliminary life cycle assessment, as well as integrated risk assessments of those waste streams. System endpoints are battery precursors (nickel sulfate, cobalt sulfate, manganese sulfate), copper cathode, and a 40% or 75% manganese product. Overburden, tailings, and processing and refining wastes from terrestrial mining are compared to the nodule industry's anticipated offshore and onshore wastes, including sediment disrupted by nodule-collection machines. Robustness to offshore technology assumptions is tested using Monte Carlo simulation, while onshore mass-flow scenarios incorporate a "negligible-waste" flowsheet and high-waste flowsheets where manganese is not recovered. A billion-EV scenario incorporates the effects of declining terrestrial copper and nickel ore grades. Results imply that metal production from nodules may produce less waste of lower severities, caveated by uncertain impacts of disrupted sediment.	[Paulikas, Daina; Ali, Saleem H.] Univ Delaware, Dept Geog & Spatial Sci, Minerals Mat & Soc Program, Pearson Hall, Newark, DE 19711 USA; [Katona, Steven] Coll Atlantic, Bar Harbor, ME USA; [Ilves, Erika] Metals Co, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Ali, Saleem H.] Univ Queensland, Sustainable Minerals Inst, St Lucia, Qld, Australia		Paulikas, D (corresponding author), Univ Delaware, Dept Geog & Spatial Sci, Minerals Mat & Soc Program, Pearson Hall, Newark, DE 19711 USA.	daina.paulikas@gmail.com	; Ali, Saleem/I-1545-2013	Paulikas, Daina/0000-0002-4766-2381; Ali, Saleem/0000-0002-2943-9557	TheMetalsCompany (formerlyDeepGreen Metals, Inc.), Vancouver, Canada	TheMetalsCompany (formerlyDeepGreen Metals, Inc.), Vancouver, Canada	This research was funded by TheMetalsCompany (formerlyDeepGreen Metals, Inc.), Vancouver, Canada, of which one coauthor (E. Ilves) isVPof Strategy and BusinessDevelopment, and which also provided access to data and expertise in both terrestrial and deep-sea extraction and processing techniques.	Agboola O, 2020, RESULTS ENG, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100181; Aleynik D, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-16912-2; Ali SH, 2017, NATURE, V543, P367, DOI 10.1038/nature21359; Allseas, 2020, ALLS ENG EQ 916AA 00; Allseas, 2020, ALLS DES REV PRES 15; AMC, 2019, 43101 AMC NI; [Anonymous], 2021, 5302556 GLOB IND AN; [Anonymous], 2015, 3 INT FUT MIN C P; Armstrong CW, 2012, ECOSYST SERV, V2, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.001; Arrobas, 2017, GROWING ROLE MINERAL; Atwood TB, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.00165; Ayres R.U., 2002, LIFE CYCLE COPPER IT, P27; Azevado M., 2020, CLEAN CAN NICKEL IND; Beaudoin Y., 2013, MANGANESE NODULES PH; Benzaazoua M., 2020, SUSTAINABLE MANAGEME; Black Z.J., 2018, 43101F1 NI POLYMET M; Block PR, 2020, APPL SOIL ECOL, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.08.009; Bluefield Technology Group , 2019, GEOT REP MAERSK DEEP; Bradley, 2020, MININGS IMPACTS FORE; Bringezu S, 2002, HANDBOOK OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, P79; Brunner P.H., 2004, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V9, P337; Campagnol N., 2017, MCKINSEY CO; Cassan L., 2019, DEEP WATER EMERGING; Chambers D.M, 2019, INCREASING NUMBER TA; Chigumira D., 2019, COPPER MINERS GROWIN; Chin A., 2020, PREDICTING IMPACTS M; Christiansen B, 2020, MAR POLICY, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.014; Classen M., 2009, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORI; Codelco, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR; Cornwall W, 2020, SCIENCE, V369, P907, DOI 10.1126/science.369.6506.906; Credit Suisse, 2015, S 32 INV REP; CRU International , 2019, MARK OV DEEPGREEN PR; Curran MA, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P853, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001; Cuvelier D, 2018, FRONT MAR SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2018.00467; Deneen P.J, 2020, NICKEL COBALT ARE WE; Desai P, 2019, NEW PROJECTS BATTERY; Drazen J., 2019, REPORT WORKSHOP EVAL, DOI [10.3897/rio.5.e33527, DOI 10.3897/RIO.5.E33527]; Drazen JC, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P17455, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2011914117; Earthworks, 2019, TAIL; EC-JRC-IES (European Commission-Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability), 2010, INT REFERENCE LIFE C, V1st; Entwistle JA, 2019, CURR POLLUT REP, V5, P67, DOI 10.1007/s40726-019-00108-5; EPA, 2020, TENORM COPP MIN PROD; Farjana Shahjadi Hisan, 2019, Journal of Sustainable Mining, V18, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jsm.2019.03.002; Fauna and Flora International , 2020, SSESSM RISKS IMP SEA; Finnveden G, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018; Fluor , 2020, UT INT ISL COPP COMP; Ghose MK, 2001, ENVIRON GEOL, V40, P1405; Gillard B, 2019, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V7, DOI 10.1525/elementa.343; Gollner S, 2017, MAR ENVIRON RES, V129, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.04.010; Gorai B, 2003, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V39, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-4; Habib K, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104603; Halkyard J., 2015, DRT1412RP01R01; Hamilton JL, 2020, ECON GEOL, V115, P303, DOI 10.5382/econgeo.4710; Hein J. R., 2012, TREATISE GEOCHEMISTR, P273, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01111-6, 10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01111-6]; Hein JR, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P158, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0027-0; Heinrich L, 2020, MAR POLICY, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103678; Highlands Pacific , 2018, RAM MIN RES OR RES; Hughes DJ, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep09985; Hund K, 2020, MINERALS CLIMATE ACT; International Seabed Authority, 2020, REC GUID CONTR ASS P; ISA, 2021, ISA; ISA, 2021, MIN POL NOD; Jones DOB, 2020, MAR POLICY, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.025; Jones DOB, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171750; Kim MG, 2021, MINERALS-BASEL, V11, P205, DOI 10.3390/min11020205; Kinnunen P, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123237; Kinnunen PHM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.171; Komnitsas K, 2020, RESOURCES-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/resources9060079; Koschinsky A, 2018, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V14, P672, DOI 10.1002/ieam.4071; Kuipers KJJ, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V49, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.008; Kulkarni C. S, 2018, OCEANS 18, P1, DOI [10.1109/OCEANS.2018.8653642, DOI 10.1109/OCEANS.2018.8653642]; Le JT, 2017, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V137, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.08.007; Levin LA, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P784, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0558-x; Levin LA, 2016, MAR POLICY, V74, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.032; Liebsch D, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P1717, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.013; Lyu ZJ, 2019, ADV CIV ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/4159306; Manberger A, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V119, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.056; Miller KA, 2018, FRONT MAR SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2017.00418; Morello EB, 2016, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V54, P315; Moriguchi Y., 2016, TAKING STOCK IND ECO, P247, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_12; Mudd GM, 2010, ORE GEOL REV, V38, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.05.003; Munoz-Royo C, 2021, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V2, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00213-8; Nakajima K, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V586, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.049; Nkulu CBL, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P495, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0139-4; Norgate T., 2010, LINKAGES SUSTAINABIL, P131; Nornickel , 2019, PROD WAST; Northey S, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V83, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.005; NS Energy, 2020, GOR NICK COB MIN; Nuss P, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0101298; Palmer J, 2019, ENGINEERING-PRC, V5, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.009; Parsons MB, 2001, APPL GEOCHEM, V16, P1567, DOI 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00032-4; Paulikas D., 2020, SHOULD METALS GREEN, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.21346.66242, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.21346.66242]; Paulikas D, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123822; Peng XH, 2011, REV METALL-PARIS, V108, P437, DOI 10.1051/metal/2011073; Petersen S, 2016, MAR POLICY, V70, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.012; Plevin RJ, 2014, J IND ECOL, V18, P73, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12074; Potysz A, 2016, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V46, P438, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2015.1131560; Pozo-Antonio Santiago, 2014, Dyna rev.fac.nac.minas, V81, P73, DOI 10.15446/dyna.v81n186.38436; Ramu , 2020, OVERVIEW; Reuter M., 2004, P 7 INT C MOLT SLAGS, P349; Robison BH, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P847, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01219.x; Sadof, 2018, WASH POST; Sala E, 2021, NATURE, V592, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z; Sanchez M, 2013, J MIN METALL B, V49, P161, DOI 10.2298/JMMB120814011S; Schriever G., 2013, 10 ISOPE OC MIN GAS; SEC, 2021, SUST OPP ACQ CORP FO; SEC, 2019, VALE S FORM 20 F 201; Sergeant C., 2020, CONVERSATION 0224; Service R, 2020, SCI AAAS, DOI [10.1126/science.abe6031, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.ABE6031]; Simon-Lledo E, 2019, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V64, P1883, DOI 10.1002/lno.11157; Simon-Lledo E, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-44492-w; Skei J., 2019, MINING IND TAILINGS; Skousen J., 1998, HDB TECHNOLOGIES AVO; SNL, 2019, MET MIN; Sommerfeld M, 2018, MINERALS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/min8120544; Sonter LJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, P4174, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17928-5; Sonter LJ, 2018, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V285, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.1926; Spearman J, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-61837-y; Stanley M, 2017, RACE BATTERY ELECT V; Stottrup JG, 2019, J COAST CONSERV, V23, P881, DOI 10.1007/s11852-018-00677-5; Stratmann T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-91703-4; Sudol S, 2006, EVERYTHING YOU WANTE; Sumi L., 2013, POLLUTING FUTURE MIN; Thiel H., 1989, BER ZENTRUM MEERESU, V3, P1, DOI [10.2312/cr_so61, DOI 10.2312/CR_SO61]; Thurber AR, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P3941, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-3941-2014; Trethewey W, 1977, UTILIZATION COPPER N; USGS, 2020, OK TED; USGS , 2020, AMB; USGS, 2020, DOES MIN DRAIN OCC; Vale , 2021, TAIL STOR FAC DISCL; Van der Voet E, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P141, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12722; Vanreusel A, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep26808; Vare LL, 2018, FRONT MAR SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2018.00017; Verboon M., 2016, ENV IMPACTS NICKEL P; von Schroeter H., 2020, P 59 ANN C MET COM 2; Westfall LA, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P1573, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0995-3; [WISE] World Information Service on Energy, 2020, CHRON MAJ TAIL DAM F; Witten ML, 2019, TOXICOL APPL PHARM, V365, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.taap.2019.01.009; World Bank , 2020, AGR LAND SQ KM; World Resource Institute (WRI), 2003, MIN CRIT EC MAPP RIS; World Resources Institute, 2003, WORLD RES 2002 2004, P188; WWF , 2021, BRANDS BACK CALL MOR; WWF , 2020, BELCH OUT COPP GOLD; Xu CJ, 2020, COMMUN MATER, V1, DOI 10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x; Yang Y, 2017, BIOFUEL RES J, V4, P637, DOI 10.18331/BRJ2017.4.3.2; Zamagni A, 2012, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V17, P904, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x; Zhang GZ, 2020, ISIJ INT, V60, P602, DOI 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-173; Zhang RR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119951	148	3	3	6	12	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1088-1980	1530-9290		J IND ECOL	J. Ind. Ecol.												10.1111/jiec.13225	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13225		JAN 2022	24	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	YG0RJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000742205000001
J	Tomic, T; Slatina, I; Schneider, DR				Tomic, Tihomir; Slatina, Iva; Schneider, Daniel Rolph			Thermochemical recovery from the sustainable economy development point of view-LCA-based reasoning for EU legislation changes	CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY			English	Article; Early Access						Sustainable development; Legislation changes; Mixed plastic waste; Thermochemical conversion technologies; Environmental and resource sustainability; Life cycle inventory modelling	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMAND; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; PLASTIC WASTE; RECYCLING OPTIONS; SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY; FUELS; END	The EU legislation put the focus on the material recovery of waste while energy recovery is not elaborate enough and all thermochemical conversion technologies are classified in the same category regardless of the final products, which can hamper overall sustainability. Therefore, this research analyses technologies for recovery of plastic waste to review the existing EU legislation and technology classifications. Most important LCA impact categories from the legislation point of view were identified and used in the analysis. As alternative thermochemical recovery technologies are not widely used, their inventories were modelled based on an extensive literature review. Results show that pyrolysis of plastic waste has 46%, 90%, and 55%, while gasification up to 24%, 8%, and 91%, lower global warming, abiotic depletion, and cumulative energy demand-related impacts, respectively, compared to incineration with CHP generation. Incineration-based scenarios show lower impacts only in the acidification potential category which is dependent on energy mixes of substituted energy vectors which are quickly changing due to the energy transition. Thus, alternative thermochemical recovery technologies can help in reaching sustainable development goals by lowering environmental impacts and import dependence. But, before considering new investments, the substitution of less environmentally sustainable fuels in facilities like cement kilns needs to be looked upon. Results of this analysis provide levelized results for environmental and resource sustainability based on which current legislative views on individual thermochemical recovery technologies may be re-examined. [GRAPHICS] .	[Tomic, Tihomir; Slatina, Iva; Schneider, Daniel Rolph] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Dept Energy Power & Environm Engn, Zagreb, Croatia		Tomic, T (corresponding author), Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Dept Energy Power & Environm Engn, Zagreb, Croatia.				Croatian Science Foundation [IP-01-2018-3200]	Croatian Science Foundation	This work has been fully supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project NEOPLAST (IP-01-2018-3200)-Smart energy carriers in the recovery of plastic waste.	ACC, 2017, COMP PLAST TO FUEL P; Ahamed A, 2020, J HAZARD MATER, V390, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121449; Alizadeh R, 2014, 13 INT C CLEAN EN, P399; Antelava A, 2019, ENVIRON MANAGE, V64, P230, DOI 10.1007/s00267-019-01178-3; Ardolino F, 2018, ENERGY, V165, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.158; Arena U, 2003, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V8, P92, DOI 10.1007/BF02978432; Arvidsson R, 2012, J CLEAN PROD, V31, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.001; Aryan Y, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V211, P1268, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.236; Asamany EA, 2017, FUEL, V193, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.054; Aydin G, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V159, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.173; Beigbeder J, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V83, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.012; Benavides PT, 2017, FUEL, V203, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.070; BIPM, 2008, EVALUATION MEASUREME; Bueno G, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V51, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.021; Business Europe, 2019, BASFS CHEM REC PLAST; Cascone S, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109796; Chai Hongxiang, 2013, Information Technology Journal, V12, P2593, DOI 10.3923/itj.2013.2593.2598; Cossu R, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V69, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.007; Ducharme C, 2010, TECHNICAL EC ANAL PL; EC, 2008, PRES CONCL BRUSS EUR; EC, COM2011C0885 EC; EcoMondis, 2018, WAST DER ALT FUELS; ENOLL (EUROPEAN NETWORK OF LIVING LABS), 2019, DMG PROC APPL INTR B; EP, 2018, BRIEF EU LEG PROGR J; European Commission, 2011, P COMM COMM EUR PARL; European Commission, 2020, TRANSP REG EU; European Commission, 2008, RAW MAT IN M OUR CRI; European Commission, 2011, WHITE PAPER ROADMAP; European Commission, 2011, COM2021390 EUR COMM; European Commission, 2006, INT POLL PREV CONTR; European Council, 2014, 16914 EUCO; Fivga A, 2018, ENERGY, V149, P865, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.094; Gear M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V180, P735, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.015; Giugliano M, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P2092, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.029; Haig S, 2013, PLASTICS OIL PRODUCT; Heijungs R, 2007, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V12, P211, DOI 10.1065/lca2006.07.260; Helton JC, 2006, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V91, P1175, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017; Horodytska O, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122138; Hou P, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V201, P1052, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.278; Huang JJ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111866; Huijbregts MAJ, 2006, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V40, P641, DOI 10.1021/es051689g; Huijbregts MAJ, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P2189, DOI 10.1021/es902870s; Hung ML, 2009, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V14, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11367-008-0034-8; Istrate IR, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104778; ISWA, 2017, INT SOL WAST ASS; Jadhao SB, 2017, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V19, P1403, DOI 10.1007/s10098-017-1338-9; Jeswani H, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V769, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144483; Kaufman SM, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P5949, DOI 10.1021/es100505u; Khoo HH, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V145, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.010; Kremer I, 2022, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V24, P677, DOI 10.1007/s10098-021-02196-8; Kremer I, 2021, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V23, P811, DOI 10.1007/s10098-020-01930-y; La Rosa AD, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V304, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127158; Lima PD, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V78, P857, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.007; Lin G, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106078; Lloyd SM, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P161, DOI 10.1162/jiec.2007.1136; Luttenberger LR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120495; Maga D, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.018; Mastellone M.L., 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECYC, V4, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.RCRX.2019.100017, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.011, DOI 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2016.09.011]; Matak N, 2021, SMART ENERGY, V4, DOI [10.1016/j.segy.2021.100043, DOI 10.1016/J.SEGY.2021.100043]; Mert G, 2017, PROC CIRP, V59, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.018; Nakem S, 2016, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V38B, P1689, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50286-1; Ocean Recovery Alliance, 2015, PLAST FUEL PROJ DEV; Ongen A, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P915, DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-1071-1; Penny T, 2013, SMART INNOVATION SYS, P555, DOI [10.1007/978-3- 642-36645-1_52, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36645-1_52]; Persson U, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V74, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.015; Perugini F, 2005, ENVIRON PROG, V24, P137, DOI 10.1002/ep.10078; Petrov RL., 2007, 2007 WORLD C, DOI [10.4271/2007-01-1607, DOI 10.4271/2007-01-1607]; PLASTICS EUROPE, 2019, PLASTICS FACTS 2021; Ragaert K, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104646; Rahman A, 2013, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V56, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.138; Reap J, 2008, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V13, P374, DOI 10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9; Rodriguez IG, 2018, TRANSFORMING NONRECY; Rohrlich M, 2000, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V5, P369, DOI 10.1065/lca2000.11.034; RTI, 2012, ENV EC AN EM PLAST C; S.C. Inc, 2018, PYR PLANT PROJ ENV A; Schneider DR, 2021, J SUSTAIN DEV ENERGY, V9, DOI 10.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0386; Scipioni A, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P673, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0484-x; Simoes CL, 2014, WASTE MANAGE RES, V32, P414, DOI 10.1177/0734242X14527334; Siwal SS, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111483; Spielmann M, 2007, 14 EC; Suh S, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P1290, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0592-2; SUSCHEM, 2018, PLAST STRAT RES INN; Tomic T., 2022, CIRCULAR EC SUSTAINA, P433, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-819817-9.00021-1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819817-9.00021-1]; Tomic T, 2022, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V24, P543, DOI 10.1007/s10098-021-02165-1; Tomic T, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110564; Tomic T, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V98, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.029; Tomic T, 2017, ENERGY, V137, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.080; Tomic T, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V203, P973, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.070; Tomic T, 2016, THERM SCI, V20, P1105, DOI 10.2298/TSCI160212114T; Torkayesh AE, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101198; Tsiamis DA, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE-TO-ENERGY CONFERENCE - NAWTEC21; Tukker A., 1999, CHEM RECYCLING PLAST; Vadenbo C.O., 2013, 1 EC SWISS CTR LIF C; Waste Management World, 2021, EUCERTPLAST REP EUR; WHO, 2018, CIRC EC HLTH OPP RIS; Xin L, 2006, UNCERTAINTY SENSITIV, P64; Yu G., 2018, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, V9, P95, DOI 10.18178/ijesd.2018.9.4.1080; Bribian IZ, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2510, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001; Zhang RR, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110062	99	0	0	1	1	SPRINGER	NEW YORK	ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES	1618-954X	1618-9558		CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR	Clean Technol. Environ. Policy												10.1007/s10098-022-02346-6	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02346-6		JUL 2022	52	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	2Y4YK		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000825904400001
J	Damiani, M; Pastorello, T; Carlesso, A; Tesser, S; Semenzin, E				Damiani, Mattia; Pastorello, Tiziana; Carlesso, Anna; Tesser, Stefania; Semenzin, Elena			Quantifying environmental implications of surplus food redistribution to reduce food waste	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Food waste; Environmental impact; Life cycle assessment; Food redistribution; Zero hunger	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; MANAGEMENT; CONSUMPTION; OPTIONS; QUANTIFICATION; PREVENTION; FEED	Ensuring access to food for the most vulnerable is one of the objectives of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Rethinking food production and distribution systems in light of this need makes it imperative to limit the environmental burden of food supply chains to meet the increasing demand of a rapidly growing world population. One of the most important problems of food supply chains is food waste, which leads to a huge waste of resources for the production of foodstuffs that end up not fulfilling the function for which they were produced. A powerful strategy to address this problem is the recovery and redistribution of food that is still edible to socially and economically disadvantaged people. In this article Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is applied to the study of environmental burdens and benefits of food redistribution following attributional and consequential LCA approaches. Data on surplus food recovered is collected from local charities and the impact of their activities is compared with that of the treatment of food waste by incineration, anaerobic digestion and composting. All midpoint impact categories of ReCiPe (hierarchist) are considered in life cycle impact assessment of 1 kg of food wasted or donated. The study highlights the great variability of recovered food locally, with respect to quantity and type. The life cycle of surplus animal-based food has the greatest impact (e.g. up to 70% kg CO2 eq/kg in waste treatment scenario). Food donation reduces the average impact of the studied systems (e.g. 1.9 kg CO2 eq/kg net environmental benefit). However, efficient mechanisms of recovery and redistribution are required, in terms of sizing, consumptions and logistics, to ensure a significant environmental improvement over food waste treatment. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Damiani, Mattia; Pastorello, Tiziana; Carlesso, Anna; Semenzin, Elena] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Torino 155, I-30170 Mestre Venezia, Italy; [Carlesso, Anna] GreenDecision Srl, Via Ind 21-8, I-30175 Venice, Italy; [Tesser, Stefania] ARPA Veneto Reg Observ Waste, Treviso, Italy		Damiani, M (corresponding author), Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Torino 155, I-30170 Mestre Venezia, Italy.	mattia.damiani@unive.it		Semenzin, Elena/0000-0001-8032-8687				Ahamed A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.127; Al-Tabbaa A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289; Albizzati PF, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V90, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.034; [Anonymous], J CLEAN PROD, V140, P766, DOI [10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082, DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.04.082]; [Anonymous], INT J RECYCL ORG WAS, V7, P217, DOI [10.1007/s40093-018-0208-8, DOI 10.1007/S40093-018-0208-8]; [Anonymous], 2011, COMM REG EU NO 10 20; [Anonymous], 2015, CLOS LOOP EU ACT PLA, P1, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]; AUC, 2014, MAL DECL ACC AGR GRO; Banco Alimentare, 2022, DAT DISTR CIB DUR PA; Beretta C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V147, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.023; Bernstad A, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P2439, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023; Brancoli P, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V118, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.024; Caldeira C., 2019, 29901 EUR EN; Caldeira C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.011; Ciccarese L, 2018, 2792018 ISPRA I ENV; Clune S., 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289; Crenna E, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.054; Dicks LV, 2016, SCIENCE, V354, P975, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9226; Directive E C., 2008, DIR 2008 98 EC EUR P, V312, P3; Durlinger B., 2014, PAPER PRESENTED AT T, P8; Eberle U, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P759, DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0983-7; Eriksson M, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V60, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.008; Eriksson M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V93, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.026; European Commission, 2019, EU AGR OUTL MARK INC, DOI [10.2762/715, DOI 10.2762/715]; European Commission, 2014, REG EU NO 517 2014 E, P195; European Commission, 2017, OFF J EUR UNION C, V361, P1; fao, 2019, US; FAO, 2020, STAT DAT; FAO ECLAC Aladi, 2014, CELAC PLAN FOOD NUTR; Franz L., 2018, RAPPORTO RIFIUTI URB, P1; Gunders D., 2017, NATURAL RESOURCES DE, V1e58; Gustavsson J., 2011, Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention; Heller MC, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P480, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12743; Huijbregts MAJ, 2017, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V22, P138, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y; Ingram J, 2011, FOOD SECUR, V3, P417, DOI 10.1007/s12571-011-0149-9; International Organization for Standardization Iso/Tc 207/Sc 5, 2006, **DROPPED REF**, V13, P10; Italian Ministry of Agricultural Food and Forestry Policies, 2020, REP SERV I AGR FOOD; Lipinski B., 2013, STALLMENT 2 CREATING; Molina-Besch K, 2019, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V24, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11367-018-1500-6; Moult JA, 2018, FOOD POLICY, V77, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.003; Mourad M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V126, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.084; Nielsen P. H., 2003, LCA FOOD DATA BASE; Notarnicola B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080; O'Connor C., 2014, THE FULL REPORT; O'Rourke D, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P233, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224; OECD/FAO, 2020, OECD FAO AGR OUTLOOK, DOI [10.1787/1112c23b-en, DOI 10.1787/1112C23B-EN]; Oldfield TL, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P826, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.035; Papargyropoulou E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V76, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020; Parfitt J, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P3065, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126; Poore J, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P987, DOI 10.1126/science.aaq0216; Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007; Priefer C, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V109, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.004; Republic of The Gambia, 2019, GAMB 2 GEN NAT AGR I; Reynolds CJ, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P4707, DOI 10.3390/su7044707; Salemdeeb R, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049; Schott ABS, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V119, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079; Scherhaufer S, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V77, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038; Schott ABS, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V147, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.048; Searchinger T., 2019, PATHWAY CARBON NEUTR; Sinkko T., 2019, FOOD CONSUMPTION WAS, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-12-815357- 4.00011-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-815357-4.00011-0]; Tonini D, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V76, P744, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.032; Tua C., 2017, Rivista di Economia Agraria, V72, P289; United Nations General Assembly, 2015, FUT NOW SCI SUST DEV; Vandermeersch T, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V87, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.008; Veneto Region, 2011, LEGG REG 26 MAGG 201; Vittuari M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101817; Wernet G, 2016, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V21, P1218, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8	67	10	10	10	35	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 20	2021	289								125813	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125813	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125813		JAN 2021	12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	QK3IJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000620273900005
J	Goel, A; Ganesh, LS; Kaur, A				Goel, Ashish; Ganesh, L. S.; Kaur, Arshinder			Deductive content analysis of research on sustainable construction in India: current progress and future directions	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable construction; Construction industry; India; Triple Bottom Line; Deductive content analysis; Developing countries	BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; HYDROPOWER PROJECTS; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE; GREEN CONSTRUCTION; PROCUREMENT; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; IMPACT	The rising construction output in India and its future potential, fuelled by rapid economic growth and socio-economic transitions, has necessitated sustainability integration into lifecycles of construction projects. The imperatives and implications of this integration transcend India's boundaries by influencing the global efforts in mitigating climate change and realizing the sustainable development goals. Yet, there is lack of studies that synthesize and critically evaluate the available literature to provide an overview of the current state of sustainable construction (SC) research in India and provide directions for future research. To this end, a systematic literature review (SLR) has been undertaken here using deductive content analysis. It reveals that the current SC research endeavours are predominantly oriented towards the macro-industry level, the environmental dimension and the internal stakeholders. Additionally, more emphasis has been provided on the final project deliverable compared to the project processes. Overall, this study makes three specific contributions: i) the current thrust areas of SC research in India have been identified while pointing out the imbalance in this academic pursuit; ii) a deductive content analysis framework has been developed that provides a generic template for conducting similar SLRs in the context of other countries; and iii) multiple research gaps have been identified and suggestions to design future studies are proposed based on extant SC literature, especially from similar developing economies. Therefore, despite its Indian focus, this review allows implications for other developing economies set for a similar socio-economic transition and growth in construction output. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Goel, Ashish] Natl Inst Construct Management & Res, Sch Construct Management, Pune, Maharashtra, India; [Goel, Ashish; Ganesh, L. S.; Kaur, Arshinder] IIT M, Dept Management Studies, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India		Goel, A (corresponding author), Natl Inst Construct Management & Res, Sch Construct Management, Pune, Maharashtra, India.	agoel@nicmar.ac.in; lsg@iitm.ac.in; arshinder@iitm.ac.in	; Kaur, Arshinder/B-1056-2012	goel, ashish/0000-0002-3840-1673; Kaur, Arshinder/0000-0001-6151-0547				Aarseth W, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1071, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006; Abidin NZ, 2010, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P385, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1017-2_24; Abidin NZ, 2010, HABITAT INT, V34, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.011; Adams WM., 2006, FUTURE SUSTAINABILIT, P1; Adetunji I., 2003, P ICE ENG SUSTAIN, V156, P185, DOI DOI 10.1680/ENSU.2003.156.4.185; Agarchand N, 2017, INT J MANAG PROJ BUS, V10, P642, DOI 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2016-0078; Agyekum-Mensah George, 2012, Structural Survey, V30, P426, DOI 10.1108/02630801211288206; Albino V, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P387, DOI 10.1002/bse.1728; Alencar MH, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.221; Ambekar Suhas, 2017, TQM Journal, V29, P744, DOI 10.1108/TQM-02-2017-0021; [Anonymous], NICMAR J CONSTR MANA; Antony J, 2016, PROC TECH, V25, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.097; Arif Mohammed, 2012, Construction Innovation, V12, P133, DOI 10.1108/14714171211215912; Arif M, 2009, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V7, P223, DOI 10.1108/17260530910975005; Anaman KA, 2007, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V25, P951, DOI 10.1080/01446190701411208; Bagdi N., 2013, GLOB J MANAG BUS STU, V3, P361; Baloi D., 2003, 19 ANN ARCOM C 3 5 S, P289; Bamgbade JA, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V154, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.187; Banihashemi S, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1103, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.014; Bansal VK, 2011, INT J PROJ MANAG, V29, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.007; Bardhan S, 2011, SEARCH I SER DEV ATT, P93, DOI 10.2495/ECO110081; Bardhan S., 2016, IND J SCI TECHNOL, V9, P1; Bardhan S., 2015, INT J EMERG TECHNOL, V5, P171; Barnabas A., 2009, J INT WOMENS STUD, V11, P121; Baruah Bipasha., 2010, LABOR STUDIES J, V35, P198, DOI [10.1177/0160449X08326187, DOI 10.1177/0160449X08326187]; Berardi U, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V8, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008; Beriha GS, 2012, J MODEL MANAG, V7, P180, DOI 10.1108/17465661211242804; Bhatt R, 2012, J ARCHIT ENG, V18, P233, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000069; Bhattacharjee B., 2010, INDIAN CONCRETE J, V84, P45; Bohari AAM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V148, P690, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.141; Bryman A, 2012, SOCIAL RES METHODS, V4th; Carvalho MM, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1120, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.018; Casier L, 2015, WHY INFRASTRUCTURE I; Chatha KA, 2015, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V35, P487, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2012-0285; Cheng B, 2015, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V26, P324, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2210; Choudhury N, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P297, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2012.743879; Cotton AP, 2005, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V12, P617, DOI 10.1108/09699980510634164; Cronin Patricia, 2008, Br J Nurs, V17, P38; Dair CM, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN A, V38, P1345, DOI 10.1068/a37370; Dakwale VA, 2014, INDIAN J ENG MATER S, V21, P451; Delhi V. S. K., 2010, P ENG PROJ ORG C S L; Dempsey N, 2011, SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P289, DOI 10.1002/sd.417; Derakhshan R, 2019, INT J PROJ MANAG, V37, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.007; DETR, 2000, BUILD BETT QUAL LIF; Dewlaney KS, 2012, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V30, P165, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2011.654232; Dey J, 2018, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V190, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-6535-4; Diduck A., 2007, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V25, P219, DOI 10.3152/146155107X217299; Diduck AP, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V33, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.001; Doloi HK, 2016, CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, P1465; du Plessis C, 2005, BUILD RES INF, V33, P405, DOI 10.1080/09613210500218974; Du Plessis C., 2002, AGENDA 21 SUSTAINABL; Du Plessis C, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.098; Du Plessis C, 2007, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V25, P67, DOI 10.1080/01446190600601313; Edmondson AC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1155; EPF, 2016, PROM SUST INCL GROWT; Erlewein A, 2013, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V43, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.07.002; Flyvbjerg B, 2014, PROJ MANAG J, V45, P6, DOI 10.1002/pmj.21409; Fry M, 2013, GEOFORUM, V49, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.003; Gan XL, 2015, HABITAT INT, V47, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.005; Gareis R., 2013, PROJECT MANAGEMENT S; Ghisellini P, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P618, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207; Ghosh SK, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V35, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.008; Giang DTH, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.003; Giannetti BF, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V127, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.033; Goel A, 2016, NICMAR J CONSTR MANA, V31, P31; Goh C. S., 2015, P 4 WORLD C ONSTR S, P224; Gokarakonda S, 2019, BUILD RES INF, V47, P91, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2018.1490054; Gomes V., 2008, SUSTAINABLE BUILDING; Graham P, 2019, BUILD RES INF, V47, P108, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2018.1495803; Guarnieri P, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V96, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.040; Gupta A, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V115, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.007; Hill R.C., 1997, CONSTRUCT MANAG EC, V15, P223, DOI DOI 10.1080/014461997372971; Hill R. C., 2002, ENV TOXICOLOGY MANAG, V2, P200; Hsieh HF, 2005, QUAL HEALTH RES, V15, P1277, DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687; Huemann M, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1066, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014; Hwang BG, 2013, INT J PROJ MANAG, V31, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.05.004; Hwang BG, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P335, DOI 10.1002/sd.492; ILO, 2009, CRIS CONSTR IND; International Labour Organization (ILO), 2001, CONSTR IND 21 CENT I; Jones T, 2010, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V28, P971, DOI 10.1080/01446191003789465; Jumani S, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P500, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0855-9; Kaatz E, 2006, BUILD RES INF, V34, P308, DOI 10.1080/09613210600724608; Kakad K., 2002, GENDER TECHNOLOGY DE, V6, P355; Khosla R, 2019, BUILD RES INF, V47, P1, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2019.1522482; Kibert C.J., 2016, SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUC; Kini P, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V111, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.029; KiranKumar G, 2017, MATER TODAY-PROC, V4, P8052, DOI 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.144; Klewitz J, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017; Komurlu R, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V84, P690, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.095; Krippendorf K., 2004, CONTENT ANAL INTRO I; Kumar Ajay, 2016, Engineering Project Organization Journal, V6, P155, DOI 10.1080/21573727.2016.1155445; Kumar D, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V93, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.032; Langford DA, 1999, PROFITABLE PARTNERING IN CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT, P373; Leiras A, 2014, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V4, P95, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-04-2012-0008; Li HY, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V173, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.151; Li HY, 2017, ICCREM 2017: INDUSTRY REGULATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, P120; Liu ZZ, 2016, INT J PROJ MANAG, V34, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.003; Loganathan S, 2016, CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, P1793; Lopes J, 2012, NEW PERSPECTIVES CON, P40; Ma HY, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1365, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.012; Mani Monto, 2012, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, V92, P145; Marasco A, 2008, INT J PROD ECON, V113, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.017; Mastrucci A, 2019, BUILD RES INF, V47, P8, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2018.1483634; Meng JN, 2015, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V22, P692, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-01-2014-0013; Mills FT, 2009, ARCHIT ENG DES MANAG, V5, P75, DOI 10.3763/aedm.2009.0908; Mousa A, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V101, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.007; Myers D, 2005, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V23, P781, DOI 10.1080/01446190500184360; Nakata C, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.001; Nawre A., 2013, P ICSDEC 2012 DEV FR, P569; Ofori G., 2000, EUR J PURCH SUPPLY M, V6, P195, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00015-0; Ofori G., 2015, J CONSTR DEV COUNTR, V20, P115; Ofori G, 2000, CHALLENGES FACING CO, P1; Ogungbile AJ, 2019, ENERGY ENV SUSTAIN, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-3284-5_1; Olander S., 2006, THESIS; Oxford Economics, 2018, GLOB CIT FUT WORLDS; Padhi SS, 2011, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V17, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2011.03.001; Pappu A, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P2311, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.015; Parashar M., 2017, J CLIN PREV CARDIOL, V6, P99; Patil NA, 2016, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V6, P491, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-09-2015-0043; Pearce D, 2006, BUILD RES INF, V34, P201, DOI 10.1080/09613210600589910; Pearce D., 2003, SOCIAL EC VALUE CONS; Plank R., 2008, IES J A, V1, P301, DOI [10.1080/19373260802404482, DOI 10.1080/19373260802404482]; Potbhare V, 2009, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V7, P99, DOI 10.1108/17260530910947286; Praseeda KI, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V86, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.042; Raghuram G., 2011, ENG EARTH, P601; Rajagopalan J, 2018, J ORGAN CHANGE MANAG, V31, P385, DOI 10.1108/JOCM-12-2016-0301; Rajaram T, 2006, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V24, P115; Ramaswamy KR, 2009, P 17 ANN C INT GROUP, P15; Rathi AKA, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V67, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.08.004; RatriParida, 2015, PROCEDIA MANUF, V3, P6587, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.284; Ray PK, 2015, PROCEDIA MANUF, V3, P6579, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.279; Reddy BVV, 2004, CURR SCI INDIA, V87, P899; Routledge P, 2003, POLIT GEOGR, V22, P243, DOI 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00095-1; Rydin Y, 2007, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V8, P363, DOI 10.1080/14649350701514686; Sanga NP, 2014, WORLD J SCI TECHNOL, V11, P117, DOI 10.1108/WJSTSD-10-2013-0040; Sarkis J, 2012, J CLEAN PROD, V31, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.029; Serpell A, 2013, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V19, P272, DOI 10.3846/20294913.2013.798597; Sertyesilisik B, 2017, INT J CONSTR MANAG, V17, P293, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2016.1222665; Seuring S., 2005, RES METHODOLOGIES SU, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_7; Seuring S, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P544, DOI 10.1108/13598541211258609; Sev A, 2009, SUSTAIN DEV, V17, P161, DOI 10.1002/sd.373; Sfakianaki E, 2019, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V30, P176, DOI 10.1108/MEQ-02-2018-0043; Sha KX, 2000, BUILD RES INF, V28, P59, DOI 10.1080/096132100369109; Shen LY, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014; Sierra LA, 2016, J CONSTR ENG M, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001099; Silvius A.J.G., 2012, SUSTAINABILITY PROJE; Silvius G, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1479, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121; Smith RM, 2015, ASIAN GEOGR, V32, P73, DOI 10.1080/10225706.2015.1020065; Sreedhar S, 2016, TRANSP RES PROC, V17, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.095; Surya M, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V104, P1158, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.212; Tabassi AA, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V124, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.076; Tabish SZS, 2012, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V30, P21, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2011.654128; Tabish SZS, 2011, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V29, P261, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2010.549138; Tiwari P, 2001, BUILD ENVIRON, V36, P1127, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00056-1; Tiwari P, 2000, BUILD ENVIRON, V35, P59, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00059-6; Tiwary Guddi, 2011, Indian J Occup Environ Med, V15, P18, DOI 10.4103/0019-5278.83003; Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375; United Nations, 2021, NAT DET CONTR REG; Valdes-Vasquez R, 2013, J CONSTR ENG M, V139, P80, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000566; Varun, 2012, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V4, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2012.03.002; Vyas GS, 2016, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V33, P313, DOI 10.1080/10286608.2016.1247832; Webster J, 2002, MIS QUART, V26, pXIII; Wells J., 2003, IND ENV, V26, P72; Windapo AO, 2015, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V4, P67, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-01-2014-0002; Wong KKW, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P222, DOI 10.1002/sd.1538; World Bank, 1984, CONSTR IND ISS STRAT; Wuttke M, 2014, J MANAG DEV, V33, P119, DOI 10.1108/JMD-11-2013-0150; Xia B, 2014, J CONSTR ENG M, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000879; Yao S., 1999, GEOJOURNAL, V49, P269, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1007190305381; Yilmaz M, 2015, WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, P2253, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.312; Yusof N, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V121, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.090; Zhang F, 2013, INT J PROJ MANAG, V31, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.011; Zhang M, 2013, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V24, P1080, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-02-2012-0023; Zhang XL, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.037; Zhang YB, 2003, SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, P113; Zhou ZP, 2017, INT J PROJ MANAG, V35, P1378, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.017; Zuo J, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P3910, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.011	177	17	17	0	26	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 20	2019	226						142	158		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.314	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.314			17	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IA9UA					2022-09-08	WOS:000469901200015
J	Qi, M; Yang, YK; Zhang, XY; Zhang, XQ; Wang, MZ; Zhang, W; Lu, XB; Tong, YD				Qi, Miao; Yang, Yongkui; Zhang, Xiaoyan; Zhang, Xiaoqian; Wang, Mengzhu; Zhang, Wei; Lu, Xuebin; Tong, Yindong			Pollution reduction and operating cost analysis of municipal wastewater treatment in China and implication for future wastewater management	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Municipal wastewater; Pollutant reduction; Removal efficiency; Effluent discharge standard; Wastewater treatment plants	PHOSPHORUS; NITROGEN; RATIOS; RIVER; EUTROPHICATION; LIMITATION; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; SEWAGE; LAKES	"Clean water and sanitation" is one of the 17 sustainable development goals recommended by the United Nations. To improve water quality, China had experienced a dramatic improvement in municipal wastewater treatment during 2006-2016; yet the effects on pollutant reductions have not been fully discussed. This study analyzed pollutant reductions and operating costs of municipal wastewater treatment according to an investigation including 1822 active wastewater treatment plants in operation in China. The results showed that, in 2016, a total of 505 Gg of total nitrogen, 140 Gg of ammonia, 29 Gg of total phosphorus, 1296 Gg of chemical oxygen demand and 357 Gg of five-day biochemical oxygen demand were discharged after treatment. The highest pollutant removal efficiency from municipal wastewater was observed in five-day biochemical oxygen demand, with an efficiency of 91.2 +/- 6.7% (average and standard deviation), while the lowest removal efficiency was observed in total nitrogen, only with an efficiency of 65.5 +/- 13.9%. The higher total phosphorus removal efficiency (80.8 +/- 11.8%) by wastewater treatment could increase the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus by about twice in the effluent. Water managers should focus on the potential impacts of effluents to nutrient dynamics and ecology in receiving waters. Modern perspectives on nutrient limitation in aquatic ecosystems will require more N removal from municipal wastewater to achieve the desired water quality outcomes, such as by refining operation of existing facilities, developing efficient N-removal technology and introducing standards for nutrient ratio target in the effluent discharge. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Qi, Miao; Yang, Yongkui; Zhang, Xiaoyan; Wang, Mengzhu; Tong, Yindong] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Xiaoqian] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Rural Environm Protect, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Wei] Renmin Univ China, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China; [Lu, Xuebin] Tibet Univ, Sch Sci, Lhasa 850012, Peoples R China		Tong, YD (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.	yindongtong@tju.edu.cn	Yang, Yongkui/R-9216-2017	Yang, Yongkui/0000-0003-2453-0973	National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFA0903000]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977324, 41630748, 41671492]; Tibet University 2018 Central Financial Support Special Funds for Local Colleges and Universities ([2018]) [54]	National Key Research and Development Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Tibet University 2018 Central Financial Support Special Funds for Local Colleges and Universities ([2018])	This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (no. 2018YFA0903000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41977324, 41630748, 41671492) and Tibet University 2018 Central Financial Support Special Funds for Local Colleges and Universities ([2018] No. 54).	[Anonymous], 2006, M MDG DRINK WAT SAN; Bashar R, 2018, CHEMOSPHERE, V197, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.169; Bergstrom AK, 2005, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V50, P987, DOI 10.4319/lo.2005.50.3.0987; Burson A, 2016, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V61, P869, DOI 10.1002/lno.10257; Carey RO, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5; Codd GA, 2005, AQUAT ECOL SER, V3, P1; Davidson K, 2012, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V115, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.09.019; Dennehy K.F., 1998, WATER QUALITY S PLAT, P1167; Diaz RJ, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P926, DOI 10.1126/science.1156401; Elser JJ, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P1256, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01519.x; Elser JJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P835, DOI 10.1126/science.1176199; European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2018, WAT LAK; Fischer G, 2016, WATER FUTURES SOLUTI; Guildford SJ, 2000, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V45, P1213, DOI 10.4319/lo.2000.45.6.1213; Gujer W, 2010, WATER RES, V44, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.038; Hao RZ, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P1100, DOI 10.1126/science.348.6239.1100-d; Hendriks ATWM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P4735, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b01186; Hernandez-Sancho F, 2011, DESALINATION, V268, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.042; Huisman J, 2018, NAT REV MICROBIOL, V16, P471, DOI 10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1; Jeppesen E, 2005, FRESHWATER BIOL, V50, P1747, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01415.x; Jin LY, 2014, WATER RES, V66, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.014; Liu X, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P2609, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1519554113; Ma B, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V200, P981, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.074; Marti E., 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V33, P698; Meybeck M, 2003, PHILOS T R SOC B, V358, P1935, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1379; Ministry of Environmental Protection P. R. China (MEP China), 2017, TECHN GUID DER NUTR; Ministry of Environmental Protection P. R. China (MEP China), 2016, LIST NAT OP WAST TRE; Ministry of Environmental Protection P. R. China (MEP China), 2015, CHIN ENV STAT B; MOHURD, 2016, CHIN URB RUR CONSTR; Murdock J, 2004, ECOL ENG, V22, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.05.005; [牛坤玉 NIU Kunyu], 2011, [环境科学学报, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae], V31, P1562; Nriagu JO, 1996, SCIENCE, V272, P223, DOI 10.1126/science.272.5259.223; Paerl HW, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P10805, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b02575; Penuelas J, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms3934; REDFIELD A C, 1960, Sci Prog, V11, P150; Schindler DW, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P11254, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0805108105; Schindler DW, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P8923, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b02204; Sistla SA, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V196, P68, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x; SMITH VH, 1983, SCIENCE, V221, P669, DOI 10.1126/science.221.4611.669; Stoddard JL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P3409, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b05950; Stone R, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1210, DOI 10.1126/science.333.6047.1210; Stumm W., 1996, AQUATIC CHEM CHEM EQ, V3rd; Sun Y, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.jcle, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.068]; Tan Xue, 2015, China Environmental Science, V35, P3833; Tong YD, 2018, CHEMOSPHERE, V210, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.108; Tong YD, 2017, NAT GEOSCI, V10, P507, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2967, 10.1038/NGEO2967]; Tong YD, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V321, P728, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.011; U. S. Environment Protection Agency, 1998, NAT STRAT DEV REG NU; UNIDO, 2008, SUST DEV GOALS; United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, 2021, UN WORLD WATER DEV R; Van de Waal DB, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P736, DOI 10.1111/ele.12280; Vorosmarty CJ, 2010, NATURE, V467, P555, DOI 10.1038/nature09440; Vrede T, 2009, FRESHWATER BIOL, V54, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02118.x; Wang HJ, 2009, PROG NAT SCI, V19, P1445, DOI 10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.03.009; Wang MZ, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P13675, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b04266; Wang X, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10445-0; Wang X, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P1630, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1410715112; Wen YR, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43289; Yu CQ, 2019, NATURE, V567, P516, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1001-1; Zhou YQ, 2017, WATER RES, V118, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.035	60	32	33	22	102	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	APR 20	2020	253								120003	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120003	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120003			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	KQ2WG					2022-09-08	WOS:000516788400090
J	Sandoval-Cobo, JJ; Casallas-Ojeda, MR; Carabali-Orejuela, L; Munoz-Chavez, A; Caicedo-Concha, DM; Marmolejo-Rebellon, LF; Torres-Lozada, P				Sandoval-Cobo, John J.; Casallas-Ojeda, Miguel R.; Carabali-Orejuela, Lina; Munoz-Chavez, Anyi; Caicedo-Concha, Diana M.; Marmolejo-Rebellon, Luis F.; Torres-Lozada, Patricia			Methane potential and degradation kinetics of fresh and excavated municipal solid waste from a tropical landfill in Colombia	SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH			English	Article						Biochemical methane potential; Municipal solid waste; Biogas; Tropical landfill; Sustainable development goals	POST-CLOSURE CARE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; BMP; INOCULUM; STABILIZATION; GENERATION	The optimization of degradation processes and the management of leachate and biogas produced in landfills are key aspects for the establishment of more sustainable municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal in developing countries. In this study, biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests were used to evaluate CH4 production potential and degradation kinetics of fresh waste (FW) and five-year aged excavated waste (EW) samples from a tropical controlled landfill with compositional characteristics of developing countries. BMP tests with reconstituted samples of the biodegradable fraction of both MSW types were performed at three substrate/inoculum (S/I) ratios (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 g VS substrate g(- 1) VS inoculum), and CH4 generation parameters were determined using the first-order and modified Gompertz kinetic models. After 30-d, the best BMP results were reached at S/I ratios of 0.5 and 1.0, with cumulative CH4 productions of 528 and 433 mL CH4 g(- 1) VS for FW, respectively; and 151 and 135 mL CH4 g(- 1) VS for EW, respectively. The first-order kinetic model provided a good fit to BMP results for FW, whereas the modified Gompertz model showed a better adjustment to the BMP data for EW. Calculated first-order CH4 generation rates for FW and EW were in the range 0.19-0.36 and 0.23-0.25 d(- 1), respectively. These results evidence the high biodegradability and CH4 potential of FW disposed of in a tropical landfill in Colombia and the reduced BMP of EW despite a relatively short period after disposal under conventional landfill operation conditions.	[Sandoval-Cobo, John J.; Casallas-Ojeda, Miguel R.; Carabali-Orejuela, Lina; Munoz-Chavez, Anyi; Marmolejo-Rebellon, Luis F.; Torres-Lozada, Patricia] Univ Valle, ECCA Res Grp, Cali 760032, Colombia; [Caicedo-Concha, Diana M.] Univ Cooperat Colombia, Fac Engn, Cali 760035, Colombia		Sandoval-Cobo, JJ (corresponding author), Univ Valle, ECCA Res Grp, Cali 760032, Colombia.	sandoval.john@correounivalle.edu.co		Casallas Ojeda, Miguel Reinaldo/0000-0003-0498-0993	Universidad del Valle; Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia	Universidad del Valle; Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia	This work was supported by Universidad del Valle and Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.	Parra-Orobio BA, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V71, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.040; American Public Health Association, 2012, STANDARD METHODS EXA; Angelidaki I, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P927, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.040; [Anonymous], 2012, INT BEST PRACT GUID; [Anonymous], 2010, SOLID WASTE MANAGEME; Berthe C, 2008, J HAZARD MATER, V154, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.022; Bilgili MS, 2009, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V100, P4976, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.012; Bolyard SC, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V55, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.024; Boulanger A, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P2258, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.024; Buendia L, 2006, IPCC GUIDELINES NATL; Caicedo-Concha DM, 2016, SUSTAIN ENVIRON RES, V26, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.serj.2016.08.001; Campuzano R, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V54, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.016; Cardenas-Cleves LM, 2018, INT J CHEM ENG, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/9351848; Cossu R, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.014; DNP, 2016, 3874 DNP CONPES; Dong J, 2009, J HAZARD MATER, V163, P717, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.066; Ehrig H.-J., 1989, LANDFILL, P83; Francois V, 2006, J HAZARD MATER, V137, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.026; Holliger C, 2016, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V74, P2515, DOI 10.2166/wst.2016.336; Kaza S., 2018, WHAT WASTE 2 0 GLOBA; Kelly RJ, 2006, WASTE MANAGE, V26, P1349, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019; Kim H, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P1427, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.017; Knox K, 2005, 10 INT WAST MAN LAND, P3; Lay J.J., 1996, J ENV SYST ENG, V552, P101, DOI DOI 10.2208/JSCEJ.1996.552_101; Machado SL, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.017; Oviedo-Ocaña Ricardo, 2012, Rev. ing. univ. Medellín, V11, P67; P?rez, 2010, ING RECUR NAT AMBIEN, V9, P5; Park JK, 2018, WASTE MANAGE RES, V36, P200, DOI 10.1177/0734242X17753532; Parra-Orobio BA, 2018, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V6, P1529, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.048; Parra-Orobio Brayan Alexis, 2015, Ing. invest. y tecnol., V16, P515; Pearse LF, 2018, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V254, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.069; Orozco OLP, 2011, DYNA-COLOMBIA, V78, P112; Raposo F, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.008; Raposo F, 2011, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V86, P1088, DOI 10.1002/jctb.2622; Ritzkowski M, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P2074, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.004; Schirmer WN, 2014, BRAZ J CHEM ENG, V31, P373, DOI 10.1590/0104-6632.20140312s00002468; SSPD, 2018, INF DISP FIN RES SOL; Stromberg S, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P1939, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.018; Swati M, 2011, J HAZARD TOXIC RADIO, V15, P321, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.1944-8376.0000081; Themelis N.J., 2013, GUIDEBOOK APPL WASTE; Wagland ST, 2010, WASTE MANAGE, V30, P934, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.016; Yang N, 2018, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V74, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2018.02.010; Zheng W, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V36, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.031; Zheng W, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P2632, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.015	44	2	2	0	5	BMC	LONDON	CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND	2468-2039			SUSTAIN ENVIRON RES	Sustain. Environ. Res.	APR 22	2020	30	1							7	10.1186/s42834-020-00048-6	http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-00048-6			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LJ1RO		gold			2022-09-08	WOS:000529949600001
J	Yarram, SR; Adapa, S				Yarram, Subba Reddy; Adapa, Sujana			Does family ownership matter in executive pay design?	PERSONNEL REVIEW			English	Article						Executive compensation; Family businesses; Corporate governance; G3; G32; J3; C33	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS; CEO COMPENSATION; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TOP; CONSEQUENCES; DETERMINANTS; CONTRACTS; SAY	Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyse the level and structure of executive compensation of family and non-family businesses and if minority shareholders are expropriated by family businesses in the Australian context using excessive pay. Studies on compensation practices of family businesses are limited to the European and North American contexts. This study, for the first time, considers the Australian context, which is unique with its transparent compensation disclosures, and a principle-based corporate governance framework to examine the level of compensation as well as the association between pay and performance. Design/methodology/approach A set of family and matched non-family firms for the period 2004-2014 are examined in a panel data setting. Robust models are estimated to examine the association between compensation and a set of economic, governance and ownership factors. Findings This study finds evidence that family businesses in general pay lower levels of compensation than non-family businesses. An investigation of the role of economic factors on compensation of family and non-family businesses shows evidence that supports the optimal contracting theory. Further examination of governance factors on compensation levels and pay-performance sensitivities shows there is a limited role for managerial power approach in explaining the executive compensation practices of family businesses in Australia. These findings infer that family businesses, given their interest in non-financial goals, do not pay excessive compensation to their executives to expropriate minority shareholders. Research limitations/implications These findings have implications for theory relating to executive compensation and human resource management in all types of businesses, including family firms. These findings offer support for the theory of optimal contracting. Empirical analysis shows no evidence of entrenchment effect or managerial power in family businesses in Australia. In terms of theory-building, there is role for socioemotional wealth model in addition to optimal contracting theory and managerial power approach. Practical implications The findings of this study also have implications for practice. Compensation practices may be designed in such a way that executives and firms pursue broader social goals such as the sustainable development goals or more generally non-financial objectives. Businesses may not necessarily use only financial outcomes when assessing appropriate level of pay of executives. Often, the financial outcomes may involve wealth transfers between different stakeholders and may not necessarily lead to improving the societal well-being. In terms of human resource management, the findings of this study emphasise the need for explicit consideration of socioemotional wealth of all family-related and non-related employees when designing recruitment, training, reward and recognition policies. Originality/value This study highlights the role non-financial factors play in executive pay setting processes in family businesses in a highly transparent and principle-based governance framework. Family businesses in Australia are not motivated by monetary considerations, and that their interest in non-financial objectives leads to less emphasis on the link between compensation and performance.	[Yarram, Subba Reddy; Adapa, Sujana] Univ New England, UNE Business Sch, Armidale, NSW, Australia		Yarram, SR (corresponding author), Univ New England, UNE Business Sch, Armidale, NSW, Australia.	syarram@une.edu.au; sadapa2@une.edu.au	Yarram, Subba/B-6219-2013	Yarram, Subba/0000-0002-9209-3499; Adapa, Sujana/0000-0002-4385-1783				Ali A, 2007, J ACCOUNT ECON, V44, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.01.006; Anderson RC, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P1301, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00567; Anderson RC, 2004, ADMIN SCI QUART, V49, P209; Anderson RC, 2012, J BANK FINANC, V36, P1744, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.018; Andres C, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003; Bebchuk LA, 2003, J ECON PERSPECT, V17, P71, DOI 10.1257/089533003769204362; Berrone P, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P258, DOI 10.1177/0894486511435355; Berrone P, 2010, ADMIN SCI QUART, V55, P82, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82; Blair MM, 1999, VA LAW REV, V85, P247, DOI 10.2307/1073662; Block JH, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P183, DOI 10.1111/etap.12035; Block JH, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P9, DOI 10.1177/0894486510394359; Boyd T., 2017, AUSTR FINANCIAL REV; Burkart M, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P2167, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00601; Caprio L, 2011, J CORP FINANC, V17, P1636, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.008; Carney M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P513, DOI 10.1111/etap.12054; Casillas JC, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P58, DOI 10.1177/0894486518794605; Cennamo C, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P1153, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00543.x; Chalmers Kerryn, 2006, BR ACCOUNT REV, V38, P259, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2006.01.003; Cheng MY, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V32, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.014; Chrisman JJ, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x; CONYON MJ, 1994, PERS REV, V23, P25, DOI 10.1108/00483489410067772; Core JE, 1999, J FINANC ECON, V51, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0; Core JE, 2002, J FINANC ECON, V64, P317, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00127-7; Croci E, 2012, J BANK FINANC, V36, P3318, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.017; Croci E, 2011, EUR FINANC MANAG, V17, P860, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00631.x; Cruz CC, 2010, ACAD MANAGE J, V53, P69, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48036975; DEMSETZ H, 1985, J POLIT ECON, V93, P1155, DOI 10.1086/261354; Faccio M, 2002, J FINANC ECON, V65, P365, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0; Gilson RJ, 2003, U PENN LAW REV, V152, P785, DOI 10.2307/3313035; Gomez-Mejia LR, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P226, DOI 10.2307/30040616; Hambrick D. C., 2007, UPPER ECHELONS THEOR; HAMBRICK DC, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P193, DOI 10.2307/258434; HAMBRICK DC, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P175, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250160304; Huang W, 2017, APPL ECON, V49, P1459, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2016.1218432; Izan HY, 1998, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, V6, P39, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8683.00078; JENSEN MC, 1990, J POLIT ECON, V98, P225, DOI 10.1086/261677; KPMG, 2017, AUSTR FAM BUS SECT S; La Porta R, 1999, J FINANC, V54, P471, DOI 10.1111/0022-1082.00115; Laux C, 2009, ACCOUNT REV, V84, P869, DOI 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.869; Li L, 2017, FINANC RES LETT, V20, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2016.10.013; Merhebi R, 2006, ACCOUNT FINANC, V46, P481, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2006.00178.x; Michiels A, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P140, DOI 10.1177/0894486512454731; Murphy K.J., 2013, HDB EC FINANCE; Ntim CG, 2015, MANAG DECIS ECON, V36, P67, DOI 10.1002/mde.2653; Obermann J, 2018, J ACCOUNT LIT, V40, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.acclit.2018.02.001; Ozkan N, 2007, J MULTINATL FINANC M, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.mulfin.2006.08.002; Prencipe A, 2014, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V23, P361, DOI 10.1080/09638180.2014.895621; Sanchez-Marin G, 2017, BRQ-BUS RES Q, V20, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.brq.2017.07.001; Schultz E, 2013, INT REV FINANC, V13, P447, DOI 10.1111/irfi.12012; Shin TJ, 2016, J MANAGE, V42, P419, DOI 10.1177/0149206313478186; Smith, 2014, IUP J CORPORATE GOVE, V13, P40; Speckbacher G, 2012, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V23, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.mar.2011.06.002; Tzioumis K, 2013, APPL ECON, V45, P2527, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2012.669463; van Essen M, 2015, J MANAGE, V41, P164, DOI 10.1177/0149206311429378; Verbeke A, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P1183, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x; Welsh ET, 2012, PERS REV, V41, P260, DOI 10.1108/00483481211212742; Winter S., 2018, J APPL ECOL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/1365-2664; Zellweger T, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1281, DOI 10.1111/etap.12182	58	3	3	0	8	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0048-3486	1758-6933		PERS REV	Pers. Rev.	MAR 11	2021	50	3					880	899		10.1108/PR-04-2019-0164	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0164		JUL 2020	20	Industrial Relations & Labor; Psychology, Applied; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Psychology	QX0DJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000552104400001
J	Kucukgul, E; Cerin, P; Liu, Y				Kucukgul, Egemen; Cerin, Pontus; Liu, Yang			Enhancing the value of corporate sustainability: An approach for aligning multiple SDGs guides on reporting	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Corporate sustainability; Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Global reporting initiative (GRI); International integrated reporting council (IIIRC); Alignment		In the past two decades, there has been ongoing development of corporate sustainability reporting frameworks to increase awareness of sustainability-related issues from various company stakeholders. At the same time, major reporting frameworks dealing with sustainability issues increasingly publish guides to support corporations' Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) commitments. For corporations, it is challenging to use these guides to obtain the highest benefits for fulfilling corporate sustainability targets and provide valuable reporting on these for its stakeholders. This paper aims to provide a structural alignment approach and a robust alignment methodology that corporations can repeatedly use to harmonize the SDGs guides of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) to satisfy their evolving SDGs reporting challenges. The corporate sustainability assessment and reporting performance of four telecommunication companies on their SDGs commitment and their SDGs reporting challenges are examined to support them with tailor-made guidance established by aligning various SDGs guides of GRI and IIRC. The alignment process is carried out by utilizing the alignment framework and the alignment approach established by the paper. By applying the proposed alignment approach and alignment framework, the paper concludes that corporations can increase their SDGs reporting performance by satisfying their SDGs challenges with the deliverables of the SDGs guides. It adds value to strategic corporate sustainability literature by analyzing the relationship among companies' SDGs approaches in the same sector and supporting the various SDGs guides of GRI and IIRC by applying the alignment approach established in this paper.	[Kucukgul, Egemen; Cerin, Pontus; Liu, Yang] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden; [Liu, Yang] Univ Vaasa, Dept Prod, Vaasa 65200, Finland		Liu, Y (corresponding author), Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden.	yang.liu@liu.se	LIU, Yang/C-8320-2013	LIU, Yang/0000-0001-8006-3236				Accenture United Nations Global Compact., 2016, AGEND 2030 WIND OPP; Adams B.C.A, 2020, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Adams C. A., 2017, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Adams C. A., 2009, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V22, P118; Adams C. A, 1995, BR ACCOUNT REV, V27, P87; Adams CA, 2017, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V30, P906, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529; Amini M, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V76, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.016; Bansal P, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P197, DOI 10.1002/smj.441; Berning SC, 2019, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V8, P194, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n3p194; Cerin P., 2002, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, V9, P46, DOI [10.1002/csr.6, DOI 10.1002/CSR.6]; Christen M, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P400, DOI 10.1002/sd.518; Connelly BL, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P39, DOI 10.1177/0149206310388419; Corporate Reporting Dialogue, 2019, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Dyllick T., 2002, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V11, P130, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.323; Elkington J, 1998, ENV QUALITY MANAGEME, DOI [10.1002/tqem.3310080106, DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106]; Fink Arlene., 2014, CONDUCTING RES LIT R, DOI [10.1002/nha3.10270, DOI 10.1002/NHA3.10270]; Freeman R.E., 2015, STRATEG MANAG, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139192675, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675]; Funk K, 2003, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V44, P65; Garcia-Sanchez IM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120194; Grainger-Brown J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051381; Gray R., 2006, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V19, P319, DOI 10.1108/09513570610670325; GRI, 2016, GRI101129; Caiado RGG, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V198, P1276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102; Guthrie J., 1989, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V19, P343, DOI [10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863, DOI 10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863]; Guthrie J., 2006, J HUMAN RESOURCE COS, V10, P114, DOI [10.1108/14013380610703120, DOI 10.1108/14013380610703120]; Hahn R, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005; Hu A.H, 2017, ELECT GOES GREEN 201, DOI [10.1109/EGG.2016.7829866, DOI 10.1109/EGG.2016.7829866]; Izzo M.F., 2020, LEARNING BEST NEW CH; Kantabutra S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122292; Kolk A., 2017, TRANSNATIONAL CORPOR, V24, P9, DOI DOI 10.18356/6F5FAB5E-EN; KPMG, 2017, ROAD AHEAD KPMG SURV; Kramer M., 2019, HARVARD BUSINES 0612; Lindblom C.K, 1994, IMPLICATIONS ORG LEG, V120; Lo SF, 2010, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V17, P311, DOI 10.1002/csr.214; Longhurst R., 2010, KEY METHODS GEOGRAPH; Lozano R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.007; Maas K, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.008; MEYER JW, 1977, AM J SOCIOL, V83, P340, DOI 10.1086/226550; Michalczuk G, 2018, SOCIAL REPORTING TOO, DOI [10.22630/esare.2018.1.17, DOI 10.22630/ESARE.2018.1.17]; Salzmann O., 2005, European Management Journal, V23, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007; Scheyvens R, 2016, SUSTAIN DEV, V24, P371, DOI 10.1002/sd.1623; Scott Louise, 2019, SDG CHALLENGE 2019; SCOTT WR, 1987, ADMIN SCI QUART, V32, P493, DOI 10.2307/2392880; SPENCE M, 1973, Q J ECON, V87, P355, DOI 10.2307/1882010; SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788; Sullivan K, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.201; Swarnapali N, 2017, J ACCOUNTING RES ED, V1; Szekely F., 2005, European Management Journal, V23, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.009; Thijssens T, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V136, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.098; Tsalis TA, 2020, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V27, P1617, DOI 10.1002/csr.1910; United Nations General Assembly, 2015, RES ADOPT GEN ASS 25; United Nations News Service, 2015, UN FOR HIGHL FUND RO; Valente M, 2012, ORGAN STUD, V33, P563, DOI 10.1177/0170840612443455; van Tulder R., 2022, PRINCIPLES SUSTAINAB; Vartanian T. P., 2011, SECONDARY DATA ANAL, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388817.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195388817.001.0001]; WBCSD, 2015, REP MATT 2015; WBCSD, 2018, BUS SDGS SURV WBCSD; White P, 2009, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V9, P386, DOI 10.1108/14720700910984936; WOOD DJ, 1991, ACAD MANAGE REV, V16, P691, DOI 10.2307/258977; Yin R. K., 1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG, P1, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]	60	1	1	7	7	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 20	2022	333								130005	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130005	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130005			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ZW9MJ		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000771528100002
J	Liu, B; Zhang, FL; Qin, XS; Wu, Z; Wang, XL; He, YY				Liu, Bin; Zhang, Feilian; Qin, Xiaosheng; Wu, Zhe; Wang, Xiaolan; He, Yuanyuan			Spatiotemporal assessment of water security in China: An integrated supply-demand coupling model	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Water security assessment; Supply-demand coupling mechanism; Nature-society water cycle; Water security demand; Fuzzy evaluation	SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; RESOURCES; CHALLENGES; LAKE; INTELLIGENCE; DECISION; RIVERS; INDEX	Water security is especially important for China who owns a huge population and has uneven temporal and spatial water resources distribution. Previous studies towards a comprehensive evaluation of water security issues at national or provincial level are still limited. In this study, a new supply-demand coupling model was proposed to evaluate water security situation more directly and comprehensively over China. The integrated supply-demand coupling model combines analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method and fuzzy evaluation method and is particularly advantageous in handling complexity and uncertainty of water security measurement. The study result indicated that, from temporal dimension, China's overall water security situation has continuously improved, mainly because of the remarkable improvement of flood control capacity and water supply capacity. This is important to ensure China's own sustainable development goal. However, the ecological protection capacity was still highly insufficient, staying at an unsafe level for a long time; the security level of water resources and water ecology was still not optimistic and that of hydrological cycle was getting worse under the influence of human activities. From spatial distribution, the water security situation in the south part of China was generally better than that in the north. This study also highlighted the prominent water security problems in various regions, which provided a valuable reference for relevant authorities in their long-term water resources planning and management.	[Liu, Bin; Zhang, Feilian; Wu, Zhe; Wang, Xiaolan; He, Yuanyuan] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China; [Liu, Bin; Qin, Xiaosheng] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore		Zhang, FL (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China.; Qin, XS (corresponding author), Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore.	zfl701028@outlook.com; xsqin@ntu.edu.sg	Liu, Bin/AHB-7182-2022; Qin, Xiaosheng/A-3803-2011	Liu, Bin/0000-0003-2185-1624; Qin, Xiaosheng/0000-0003-3187-7561	Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2021zzts0239]; 2019 water conservancy science and technology project of Hunan Province [XSKJ2019081-57]; China Scholarship Council [202006370108]	Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University; 2019 water conservancy science and technology project of Hunan Province; China Scholarship Council(China Scholarship Council)	This research work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (No. 2021zzts0239) and 2019 water conservancy science and technology project of Hunan Province (No. XSKJ2019081-57). The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from China Scholarship Council (No. 202006370108), and appreciate all editors' careful service and reviewers' valuable comments that improved the manuscript.	Aboelnga HT, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8040178; Angulo JC, 2008, PHYS LETT A, V372, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.077; [Anonymous], 2011, GEN HYDROGEOLOGY; Bakker K, 2012, SCIENCE, V337, P914, DOI 10.1126/science.1226337; Brown L R, 1998, World Watch, V11, P10; Cai JP, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118485; Chang YJ, 2020, J HYDROL, V587, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125023; Chapi K, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V95, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012; Cheng HF, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P240, DOI 10.1021/es801934a; Coudene Y, 2016, ERGODIC THEORY AND DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-7287-1_11; Dehghani M, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12020289; Dickson SE, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P1567, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1254-5; FALKENMARK M, 1992, POPUL BULL, V47, P2; Fotovatikhah F, 2018, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V12, P411, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2018.1448896; Giri S, 2018, J HYDROL, V563, P1025, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.046; Gonzalez-Ferez R, 2003, PHYS REV LETT, V91, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.113001; Grey D, 2007, WATER POLICY, V9, P545, DOI 10.2166/wp.2007.021; Gross M, 2018, CURR BIOL, V28, pR135, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.001; Hammid AT, 2018, ALEX ENG J, V57, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2016.12.011; Hofstedt T., 2010, ASIAN AFFAIRS AM REV, V37, P71; Hosseini HM, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.10.007; Jia XL, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P2213, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-1012-2; Jiang Y, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V54, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.006; [李金柱 Li Jin-zhu], 2009, [水文地质工程地质, Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology], V36, P29; Li XS, 2016, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V39, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/39/1/012045; Li XG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P732, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.033; Liu B, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P3949, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02349-x; Liu H, 2018, WATER POLICY, V20, P510, DOI 10.2166/wp.2017.062; Ma HQ, 2010, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V163, P539, DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-0856-2; Nie S, 2021, J ENVIRON INFORM, V38, P41, DOI 10.3808/jei.202100459; Norman ES, 2013, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V27, P535, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0200-4; Palmer MA, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P584, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7778; Riahi-Madvar H, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P60314, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979927; SAATY TL, 1990, EUR J OPER RES, V48, P9, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I; Salih SQ, 2019, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V13, P878, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2019.1647879; Sarhadi A, 2016, J HYDROL, V536, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.040; Seifi A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P867, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3613-7; Shamshirband S, 2020, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V14, P339, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2020.1715844; SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x; Singh RK, 2007, ECOL INDIC, V7, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004; Skoulikidis NT, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P2501, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.026; Sun J, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V182, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.025; Sun SK, 2016, J HYDROL, V532, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.028; Veettil AV, 2016, J HYDROL, V542, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.032; Vorosmarty CJ, 2010, NATURE, V467, P555, DOI 10.1038/nature09440; Wei SK, 2010, WATER RES, V44, P2499, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.021; Yao YY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V658, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.185; Zeitoun M, 2011, GLOB POLICY, V2, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00097.x; Zhang HQ, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-00899-x; Zhang SH, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V101, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.048; Zhang SH, 2017, J HYDROL, V551, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.013; Zhang ZF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030607; Zhou XY, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P1462, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.246; Zhou YY, 2021, J ENVIRON INFORM, V37, P16, DOI 10.3808/jei.201500327	54	3	3	25	32	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 25	2021	321								128955	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128955	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128955		SEP 2021	16	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	WE7BW					2022-09-08	WOS:000705777200051
J	Chi, B; Lu, WS; Ye, M; Bao, ZK; Zhang, XL				Chi, Bin; Lu, Weisheng; Ye, Meng; Bao, Zhikang; Zhang, Xiaoling			Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Green building; Green building rating system; Leadership in energy and environmental design; Construction waste minimization	RATING SYSTEMS; BIG DATA; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATIONS; REDUCTION	Construction waste minimization is a key sustainability goal in green building rating systems. Although these rating systems traverse countries boundaries, no research so far has compared construction waste minimization performance in such systems across countries. This research aims to investigate and compare the construction waste minimization performance of green building projects in the US and China by focusing on the widely adopted LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification system. Data on 599 and 297 LEED-New Construction (NC) 2009 certified projects in the US and China, respectively, were sourced from the US Green Building Council project directory. Their construction waste minimization-related points were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and effect size test, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify the possible causes behind statistical analysis results. We found no significant difference in construction waste minimization performance of LEED platinum-level projects in the US and China, but the magnitude of the difference between two countries increased as the certification level went lower. The enforcement on regulations, recycling market development, public consciousness and advanced technologies lead to the differences while the influence of the political, economic, social, and technological context increased when the projects were certified with lower LEED levels. An amenable context should be fostered to achieve a better construction waste minimization performance in green building and a sustainable development goal. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Chi, Bin; Lu, Weisheng; Bao, Zhikang] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Pokfulam, Knowles Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Ye, Meng] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China; [Zhang, Xiaoling] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China		Ye, M (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China.	meganye.w@outlook.com	Zhang, Xiaoling/AAT-4795-2020; Zhang, Xiaoling/AAT-4748-2020; /E-2899-2010	Ye, Meng/0000-0002-7281-0411; Chi, Bin (Simon)/0000-0001-5894-4387; /0000-0003-4674-0357	Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) [17201917]; Public Policy Research (PPR) Funding Scheme from the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [2018.A8.078.18D]; Strategic PPR Funding Scheme from the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [S2018.A8.010]	Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC)(Hong Kong Research Grants Council); Public Policy Research (PPR) Funding Scheme from the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Strategic PPR Funding Scheme from the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region	This research is jointly supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC), General Research Fund (GRF) (Project No.: 17201917) and Public Policy Research (PPR) (Project No.: 2018.A8.078.18D) and Strategic PPR (Project Number: S2018.A8.010) Funding Schemes from the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.	Abbaszadeh S., 2006, HLTH BUILD, V3, P365; Adler A., 2006, GREEN BUILDING PROJE, V2nd ed.; Albino V, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P387, DOI 10.1002/bse.1728; Allen JG, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P805, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1510037; Berardi U., 2015, ASSESSING MEASURING, P497, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-799968-5.00015-4, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-13586-6]; Berardi U, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P411, DOI 10.1002/sd.532; Castleton HF, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P1582, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.004; Chen X, 2018, J GREEN BUILD, V13, P61, DOI 10.3992/1943-4618.13.4.61; CLIFF N, 1993, PSYCHOL BULL, V114, P494, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.494; Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL SOCI, V2nd Edn; Colton MD, 2015, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V105, P2482, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302793; Couto A., 2010, PROCESS MANAGEMENT; Doan DT, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007; Fowler K.M., 2006, SUSTAINABLE BUILDING; Global ABC (Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction), 2018, ZER EM EFF RES BUILD; Gou ZH, 2014, HABITAT INT, V44, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.008; Gowri K, 2004, ASHRAE J, V46, P56; Hillebrandt P.M., 1984, ANAL BRIT CONSTRUCTI; HKEPD, 1998, MON SOL WAST HONG KO; Howard J.L., 2003, FEDERAL COMMITMENT G; Ismaeel WSE, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.115; Ismaeel WSE, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P783, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217; Kibert C.J., 2016, SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUC; Liu YT, 2010, HABITAT INT, V34, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.08.003; Lu WS, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V155, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.050; Lu WS, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V79, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.030; Lu WS, 2017, INT J CONSTR MANAG, V17, P13, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2016.1166548; Lu WS, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V105, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.013; Lu WS, 2016, J CONSTR ENG M, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001034; Lu WS, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V23, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.007; Lu WS, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P1252, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018; Lu WS, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.004; MacNaughton P, 2018, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V28, P307, DOI 10.1038/s41370-017-0014-9; Mattoni B, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V82, P950, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105; NRC (National Research Council), 2009, ADV COMP EFF US CONS; Orova M., 2013, PLEA2013 29 C SUST A; Osmani M, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V40, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.158; Oztuna D., 2006, TURK J MED SCI, V36, P171; Poon C.S., 2004, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V22, P461, DOI [10.1080/0144619042000202816, DOI 10.1080/0144619042000202816]; Pushkar S, 2019, J GREEN BUILD, V14, P83, DOI 10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.83; Qiu B., 2010, P 6 INT C GREEN BUIL; Roderick Y., 2009, P 11 INT IBPSA C, P27; Romano J., 2006, ANN M SO ASS INSTITU, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004; Sakai S, 2011, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V13, P86, DOI 10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x; Shan M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.034; Shen L. -Y., 2007, J CIV ENG MANAG, V13, P273, DOI DOI 10.1080/13923730.2007.9636447; Shen LY, 2004, J CONSTR ENG M ASCE, V130, P472, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:4(472); Shuai CY, 2017, APPL ENERG, V187, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.029; Song WM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117819; Tam VW, 2008, BUILD RES INF, V36, P37, DOI 10.1080/09613210701417003; USEPA, 2016, GREEN BUILD; USGBC (The U.S. Green Buiding Council), 2019, US GREEN BUILD COUNC; USGBC (The U.S. Green Buiding Council), 2019, LEAD EN ENV DES; Valentine J.C., 2003, EFFECT SIZE SUBSTANT, P1; Wang JY, 2008, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V6, P227, DOI 10.1108/17260530810918252; Wang JY, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V221, P526, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.253; Wu ZZ, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P895, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.073; Yuan HP, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V39, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.016; Zhang B, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V76, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.003; Zhang YF, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.001; Zuo J, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V30, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021	61	45	45	5	37	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 20	2020	256								120749	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LB9WE					2022-09-08	WOS:000524981300046
J	Das, SD; Srikanth, R				Das, Soumya Deep; Srikanth, R.			Viability of power distribution in India - Challenges and Way Forward	ENERGY POLICY			English	Article						Affordability; DISCOMs; Electricity regulation; Power sector reforms; Sustainable development goals	SECTOR REFORM	Energy is a key component for economic growth as well as for human development. India is the third-ranking electricity generator in the world but ranks 106th in terms of per capita consumption. Specifically, the distribution of power is the most important link in the value chain of the power sector since it is the cash register for the entire sector. In India, electricity is a concurrent subject shared between the Central and State Governments. While the generation of power has been deregulated since 2003, the supply of power to the consumers is generally carried out by Government-owned power Distribution Companies (DISCOMs). In this paper, the authors analyze the financial distress of DISCOMs in India, and explain how the supply-demand mismatch due to over-ambitious demand projections, the fixed and energy charges of thermal power plants, and the excess procurement of "must-run" renewable sources together contribute to the high cost of power procurement that drives the financial stress faced by DISCOMs. The authors support their assertion with a study of nine DISCOMs supplying electricity to 155 million people in three States and propose policy recommendations for a turnaround of such DISCOMs which can be rolled out with suitable modifications across India.	[Das, Soumya Deep; Srikanth, R.] Indian Inst Sci Campus, Natl Inst Adv Studies NIAS, Energy & Environm Program, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; [Das, Soumya Deep] Manipal Acad Higher Educ MAHE, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India		Srikanth, R (corresponding author), Indian Inst Sci Campus, Natl Inst Adv Studies NIAS, Energy & Environm Program, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India.	rsrikanth@nias.res.in		Srikanth, Raman/0000-0003-0083-3355	NIAS under a Ministry of Earth Sciences [MoES/16/15/2011-RDEAS]	NIAS under a Ministry of Earth Sciences	The ongoing research work is part of a larger research project being implemented by NIAS under a Ministry of Earth Sciences Grant (MoES/16/15/2011-RDEAS (NIAS) dated May 22, 2018) on the theme "to understand the Interaction between components of Earth and Human Systems at various Spatial and Temporal Scales". However, the Ministry has not played any role in the design or execution of this study.	[Anonymous], 2017, EC TIMES; [Anonymous], 2020, OV AM MARCH 2020; [Anonymous], 2017, STAT EL ACC REP; [Anonymous], 2020, FINANCIAL EXPRESS; APEPDCL (Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd), 2019, 19 APEPDCL; APERC, 2018, TAR RET SAL EL FY 20; APERC, 2019, RET SUPPL TAR 2019 2; APERC, 2020, TAR RET SAL EL FY 20; APSPDCL (Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd, 2019, 19 ANN REP FY 2018 1; BESCOM (Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd, 2019, 17 BESCOM; British Petroleum, 2020, BP STAT REV WORLD EN; CEA, 2013, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2011, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2015, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2012, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2018, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2019, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2017, REP 19 EL POW SURV I; CEA, 2014, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2019, EN POW SUPPL POS REP; CEA, 2020, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2016, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2016, EN POW SUPPL POS REP; CEA, 2017, PEAK POW SUPPL POS R; CEA, 2020, EN POW SUPPL POS REP; CEA, 2020, REN EN GEN MARCH 202; CEA (Central Electricity Authority), 2011, 18 EL POW SURV; CEEW, 2019, IND EN TRANS COST M; CEEW (Council on Energy Environment and Water), 2018, RETH REN EN POW PURC; CERC, 2017, APPR TAR VALL THERM; CERC, 2016, ET TAR RAM SUP THERM; CERC, 2016, TAR POL 2016; CERC, 2016, APPR TAR SIMH SUP TH; CERC, 2017, APPR TAR RAM SUP THE; CERC, 2016, DET TAR SIMH SUP THE; CERC (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission), 2010, IND EL GRID COD IEGC; CESC (Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corp Ltd), 2019, 14 ANN ACC YEAR 2018, P1; Controller Coal, 2019, LAST; CPCB (Central Board for the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution), 1985, METH DET MIN STACK H; EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration), 2020, EL POW MONTHL DAT JA; Energy Commission Ghana, 2020, NAT EN STAT 2000 201; Fragkos P, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V118, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.002; GESCOM (Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Ltd), 2019, 17 GESCOM; Grahl J., 2020, INVESTING SURG CAPAC; HESCOM (Hubli Electricity Supply Company Ltd), 2019, 17 HESCOM; Kanitkar T., 2020, NIAS MOES WORKSH 17; KERC, 2020, TAR FIL CESC FY 19; KERC, 2020, TAR FIL GESCOM FY 19; KERC, 2020, TAR FIL MESCOM FY 19; KERC, 2018, PROP APPR REV REAL F; KERC, 2020, TAR FIL BESCOM FY 19; KERC, 2020, TAR FIL HESCOM FY 19; KERC (Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission), 2018, ESCOMS TOT APPR POW; Krishnan A.V., 2019, NITI AAYOG DST NIAS; Kundu GK, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P3537, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.053; Lok Sabha, 2017, COMMITMENTS PARIS CL; Lok Sabha, 2017, NATL ELECT POLICY RE; Lok Sabha, 2020, DEMANDS GRANTS 2020; Lok Sabha, 2019, DEMANDS GRANTS 2019; MESCOM (Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd), 2019, 17 MESCOM; Ministry of Power, 2018, FLEX GEN SCHED THERM; MoEF, 2014, NOT RESP US WASH BLE; MoEF, 2009, NAT AMB AIR QUAL STA; MoEF&CC (Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change), 2015, ENV PROT AM RUL; MoF (Ministry of Finance), 2017, SUST DEV EN CLIM CHA; MoH&FW (Ministry of Health & Family Welfare- National Commission on Population), 2019, POP PROJ IND STAT 20; MoP, 2018, MECH IMPL NEW ENV NO; MoP, 2019, STAT DISTR UT 7 ANN; MoP (Ministry of Power), 2018, DRAFT CONC NOT MER O; MoSPI (Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation), 2020, EN STAT 2020; Mukherjee S, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V102, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.001; NTPC, 2019, PET APPR TAR PER 01; NTPC, 2019, HALF YEARL COMPL REP; NTPC, 2019, 43 NTPC; Oswald Y, 2020, NAT ENERGY, V5, P231, DOI 10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8; Parikh KS, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V120, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.014; PFC (Power Finance Corporation Ltd.), 2020, REP PERF STAT POW UT; RBI, 2020, LIQ ADJ FAC REP REV; RBI (Reserve Bank of India), 2015, 1 BI MONTHL MON POL; RPCL (Raichur Power Corporation Ltd), 2019, APPL FIL RPCL DET TA; Saletti-cuesta L., 2020, SUSTAIN, V4, P1, DOI [10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9, DOI 10.1038/S41562-020-0887-9]; Saubhagya (Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana: Saubhagya), 2020, HOUSEHOLD ELECTRIFIC; Sharma DP, 2005, ENERG POLICY, V33, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.09.006; Shidore S, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V129, P1179, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.032; Singh A, 2006, ENERG POLICY, V34, P2480, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.013; Sokolowski MM, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V130, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.051; Srikanth R, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V123, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.050; Srikanth R., 2020, RANSITION PATH PROMO; SRPC (Southern Region Power Committee) of CEA, 2019, 35 M SRPC HELD 02 02; Subramanian A., 2017, PUBLIC UTILITIES POW; TSERC (Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission), 2018, RET SUPPL TAR FY 201; TSNPDCL, 2019, 19 TSNPDCL; TSSPDCL, 2019, 19 TSSPDCL; United Nations, 2021, NAT DET CONTR REG; United Nations, 2020, SUST DEV GOAL 7	95	8	8	1	18	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0301-4215	1873-6777		ENERG POLICY	Energy Policy	DEC	2020	147								111882	10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111882	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111882			11	Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OZ6ZJ	33100473	Green Published, Bronze			2022-09-08	WOS:000595071500008
J	Chandel, R; Chandel, SS; Malik, P				Chandel, Rahul; Chandel, Shyam Singh; Malik, Prashant			Perspective of new distributed grid connected roof top solar photovoltaic power generation policy interventions in India	ENERGY POLICY			English	Article						Solar energy; Photovoltaics; Solar power generation; Roof top solar policy; Sustainable development goals	WATER PUMPING SYSTEM; NET METERING MODEL; DEGRADATION ANALYSIS; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; MIDDLE-EAST; ELECTRICITY; IMPACT; PV; INSTALLATIONS	The building integrated rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, contribute significantly to the decentralised power generation. In this study a detailed analysis of the new distributed power generation policy from roof top PV systems, in India, is carried out along with identifying policy interventions required for its successful implementation. A contrasting perspective of decentralised power generation analysis is presented for roof top power generation enhancement and solar industry growth in India. As a case study, the implementation of roof top PV power generation in India is presented which faces a number of challenges including resistance from energy distribution companies (DISCOMs). The electricity tariff analysis is also carried out, to suggest corrective measures. The novelty of the study is that it identifies solar tariff, benchmark cost, energy subsidy pattern, release methodology and lack of incentives to DISCOMs as crucial parameters to be addressed for roof top PV promotion. The study is of importance and of interest for the effective implementation of distributed renewable power generation in the residential sector for solar industry and DISCOM growth in India and other countries worldwide.	[Chandel, Rahul; Chandel, Shyam Singh; Malik, Prashant] Shoolini Univ, Ctr Excellence Energy Sci & Technol, Solar Photovolta Res Grp, Solan 173212, Himachal Prades, India		Chandel, SS (corresponding author), Shoolini Univ, Ctr Excellence Energy Sci & Technol, Solar Photovolta Res Grp, Solan 173212, Himachal Prades, India.	sschandel2013@gmail.com	Chandel, Shyam Singh/D-2919-2018	Chandel, Shyam Singh/0000-0003-2005-0155				Abdullah WSW, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12122437; Abu Hamed T, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V135, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.036; Aghahosseini A, 2020, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100466; Ahmed R, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109792; Al Zou'bi M, 2010, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V4, P45; Ali M.I.., 2018, SAMVAD, V16, P1; Alnaser WE., 2020, RENEWABLE ENERGY SUS, P167, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_13]; Alrashoud K.A., 2020, MANAGING TECHNOLOGY; [Anonymous], PRESS RELEASE; [Anonymous], 2019, 318332019 GOV IND; [Anonymous], SOLAR GIS; [Anonymous], GOV NOT; Baulch B, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V118, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.106; Bevrani H, 2010, IET RENEW POWER GEN, V4, P438, DOI 10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0049; Bhuyan S.., 2017, ADBU J ELECT ELECT E, V1, P28; Bibek S.., 2018, KATHMANDU POST; Chandel R, 2013, ENERGY TECHNOL-GER, V1, P763, DOI 10.1002/ente.201300112; Chandel SS, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V76, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.019; Chandel SS, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V49, P1084, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.083; Chandel SS, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V78, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.015; Chandel S.S., 2017, DETAILED FEASIBILITY; civicsolar, ARTICLENEM 20 WHY SO; Dagher L., 2020, GULF C SUST BUILT EN, P309; Darghouth NR, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P5243, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.040; .de Industria Ministerio, 2015, RDL9002015 MIN IND E; Demiroren A., 2001, 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502), DOI 10.1109/PTC.2001.964793; eia, ELECTRICITYSTATE; El Tous Y., 2013, J ENERGY TECHNOLOGIE, V3, P2224; Elshurafa AM, 2019, J BUILD ENG, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100809; Erdiwansyah, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V670, P1095, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.273; Farias-Rocha AP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.085; Fathimath R., 2016, ADV INCLUSIVE RURAL, P443; Federal Government of Pakistan, 2019, ALT REN EN POL 2019; Federal Ministry of Justice and consumer protection (Federal Republic of Germany), 2017, LAW DEV REN EN SOURC; Fraunhofer I.S.E.., RECENT FACTS PHOTOVO; German Federal Law Gazette, GESETZF VORR ERN EN; Ghenai C, 2020, ENERG EFFIC, V13, P291, DOI 10.1007/s12053-019-09773-3; globalpetrolprices, ELECTRICITY PRICES; Greacen C.., 2003, REFOCUS, V4, P34; Griffiths S., 2017, ENERGY TRANSITIONS, V1, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S41825-017-0003-6, 10.1007/s41825-017-0003-6]; Griffiths S, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V102, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.023; Griffiths S, 2016, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2015.11.001; Hadjipanayi M, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V92, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.096; Hartono D, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13092281; Hille E, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110293; Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2019, HPECH1112017 HIM PRA; Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, HPERCH1112017 HIM PR; Himachal Pradesh electricity regulatory commission, HIM PRAD EL REG COMM; Holler R., 2019, PREPRINT; Holm D., 2008, RENEW ENERG FOCUS, V9, P56, DOI 10.1016/S1471-0846(08)70027-1; iesco, SCHEDULE ELECTRICITY; Ike GN, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V702, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134711; Imam AA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010262; International Energy Agency, 2014, SUSTAINABLE ENERGY A; International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011, HARN VAR REN S GUID; Irfan M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11041206; japantimes, BUSINESSJAPAN HALVE; Jefatura del Estado (Department Head of State Kingdom of Spain), RDL1520182018BOE A 2; Jensterle M.., 2019, SMART POWER GRIDS IN; Kabalo H ..., 2014, ISRAELI NET METERING, V29; Kiwan S, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V147, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.004; Liu H., 2010, P INT C POW SYST TEC, P24; Mateo C, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V176, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.015; mercomindia, CHINA FEED IN TARIFF; mercomindia, HIMACHAL PRADESH SOL; Ministry of New & Renewable Energy, 2014, 3011201213NSM GOVT; Ministry of new & renewable energy government of India, GOV NOT; Mohazzam S, 2020, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P227, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15164-5_12; Murdock H.E., 2019, RENEWABLES 2019 GLOB; Myrsalieva N., 2015, ARAB FUTURE ENERGY I; Nidal T., 2018, SUPPORT EVALUATION N; Pacudan R, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V132, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.033; Pacudan R, 2018, INT ENERGY J, V18, P283; Quek A, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V122, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.055; Rafique SF, 2018, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V12, P519, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0354; Ramadan A., 2019, Applied Solar Energy, V55, P174, DOI 10.3103/S0003701X1903006X; Razali A, 2019, ELEKTRIKA J ELECT EN, V18, P36, DOI 10.11113/elektrika.v18n1.141; REN21, 2018, RENEWABLES 2018 GLOB; Rosales-Asensio E, 2019, SOL ENERGY, V180, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.031; Saadeh O, 2020, DATA BRIEF, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105391; Sanseverino ER, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13102529; Sastry O. S., 2011, Proceedings of the 26th European International Conference on Photovoltaic Solar Energy, P3495; Sastry O.S.., 2011, 26 EUROPEAN PHOTOVOL, P3590; Shabbir N, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V153, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.114; Shah AL, 2017, 2017 SAUDI ARABIA SMART GRID CONFERENCE (SASG); Sharma V, 2016, SOL ENERGY, V134, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.023; Sharma V, 2014, ENERGY, V72, P536, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.078; Sharma V, 2013, ENERGY, V58, P511, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.068; Shumais M.., 2019, 1049 AS DEV BANK TOK; Sohag Md Aktar Zahid, 2020, Proceedings of International Conference in Mechanical and Energy Technology. ICMET 2019, India. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (174), P353, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-2647-3_32; solarrooftop, GOV NOT; Rocha LCS, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.018; State government of Himachal Pradesh India., 2016, SOLAR POWER POLICY; Tarai Rakesh Kumar, 2018, Renewable Energy Focus, V26, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.ref.2018.07.001; Thakur J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V218, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.286; Thakur J, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V88, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.139; Lan TT, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219209; Trends in Photovoltaic Applications International Energy Agency (IEA) Photovoltaics Power Systems (PVPS) Programme., 2019, T136 IEA PVPS; Watts D, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V41, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.201; Wehbe N., 2020, ELECT J, V33, DOI [10.1016/j.tej.2020.106764, DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2020.106764]; Westphal M.I.., 2015, EC CLIMATE CHANGE E; Wijayatunga PDC, 2009, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V50, P1595, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.02.005; World Bank, 2020, EUR CENTR AS EC UPD; Yadav AK, 2018, SADHANA-ACAD P ENG S, V43, DOI 10.1007/s12046-018-0858-2; Yadav AK, 2015, RENEW ENERG, V75, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.046; Yamamoto Y, 2012, SOL ENERGY, V86, P2678, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.001; Youngho C., 2019, 915 AS DEV BANK	107	0	0	2	2	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0301-4215	1873-6777		ENERG POLICY	Energy Policy	SEP	2022	168								113122	10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113122	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113122			16	Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	3B8SF					2022-09-08	WOS:000828204900006
J	Favre, M				Favre, Marine			Are Households Willing to Finance the Cost of Individual Water Supply? Case Study in Central Tunisia	WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY			English	Article						Contingent valuation; household survey; Tunisia; water universal access; willingness-to-pay	TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; URBAN WATER; SERVICES; DEMAND; DETERMINANTS; IMPROVEMENTS; CONSUMPTION; MUNICIPAL	In developing countries, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) set by the United Nations and the expectations expressed by modern local populations call for universal water access through individual connections (IC), to be achieved by 2030. An ambitious target such as this presents the challenge of how best to achieve the goal of funding high-quality but expensive water supply systems, to serve populations with low incomes. This raises the question of the assessment of the relevant households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improved water service in rural areas, in particular in the context of developing countries. This paper examines this issue using a case study in Tunisia. As with other developing countries, Tunisia faces difficult challenges: the increasing demand for water and the inherent cost that is involved must be met whilst climate change is likely to increase the pressure on already stressed resources. The approach applied in this paper is to assess the households' WTP using a contingent valuation (CV) method in a dedicated field household survey in Central Tunisia. The particular governorate in which the survey was conducted was facing at the time of this study high social expectations, in particular, coming under increasing demand from inhabitants of rural communities to be individually connected to water supplies in the same way as their urban counterparts who were served by SONEDE, the national utility company. The results of the survey reveal that non-SONEDE-piped households were not willing to pay the amount required in order to have an individual connection (the average bid was USD 443 whereas the expected contribution is above USD 800). It was found that a household's WTP for an individual connection had a direct relationship with its trust in the current water management model, alternative modes of supply, and its socio-economic characteristics. However, if already connected, households would be willing to pay more than their current water expenses, although the amount they were willing to pay was still lower than the sustainable water cost enabling long-term maintenance of the system. SONEDE-piped households stated a clear WTP the amount required to keep water services for the future (average bid of USD 14 to add to their current quarterly water bill of USD 14). Based on these results, this paper concludes by highlighting several policy implications.	[Favre, Marine] Univ Montpellier, G EAU, INRAE, Montpellier, France		Favre, M (corresponding author), Univ Montpellier, G EAU, INRAE, Montpellier, France.	marine.favre2014@gmail.com			ANR through IRSTEA French research institute [ANR-11-CEPL-0011, ANR-12-TMED-0006-01]; ANR through CIRED French research institute [ANR-11-CEPL-0011, ANR-12-TMED-0006-01]	ANR through IRSTEA French research institute; ANR through CIRED French research institute(French National Research Agency (ANR))	This study was carried out within two research projects financed by ANR programs: Arena (ANR-11-CEPL-0011) and Amethyst (ANR-12-TMED-0006-01) through IRSTEA and CIRED French research institutes and benefited from the logistic support from the Tunisian institutions SONEDE, Ministry of Agriculture, CRDA of Kairouan and INAT. The author is especially grateful toMarielle Montginoul for her overall implication; to Mr Ben Mansour, Mr. Kaabi, Mr. Mnajja and Mr. Jemli for their support in the data collection and in the survey implementation; to Jean-Daniel Rinaudo, Bernard Barraque and Anne Briand for their helpful advice for the writing of this article. The author also expresses sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers, to the editor-in-chief and the associate editor for their precious comments and their dedication throughout the review process. Finally, the author records her deepest gratitude to Sally Jean McAuley, who was fully involved in the English edition, and dedicates this work to her memory.	Acey C, 2019, WORLD DEV, V115, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.006; Adams EA, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V247, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.113; Alaerts GJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030821; Arnell NW, 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V9, pS31, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00017-5; Basani M, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P953, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.021; Ben Mansour M., 2016, SEM GEST TAR EAU POT, P1; Bilgic A, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR009010; BISHOP RC, 1990, AM J AGR ECON, V72, P249, DOI 10.2307/1243175; Bontemps C, 2008, STATA PRATIQUE STAT; Bontemps C, 2016, AM J AGR ECON, V98, P297, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aav046; Briand A., 2009, REV EC DEV, V17, P83, DOI [10.3917/edd.233.0083, DOI 10.3917/EDD.233.0083]; Briand A, 2017, REV ECON REG URBAINE, P33; BRISCOE J, 1993, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V8, P47, DOI 10.1093/wbro/8.1.47; Butterworth J, 2013, WATER ALTERN, V6, P405; Casey JF, 2006, ECOL ECON, V58, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.016; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Dasgupta P, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002461; Devoto F, 2012, AM ECON J-ECON POLIC, V4, P68, DOI 10.1257/pol.4.4.68; Dong HJ, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V56, P2181, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00234-4; FAO, 2016, AQUASTAT COR DAT; Favre M, 2018, UTIL POLICY, V55, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.004; Filmer D, 2001, DEMOGRAPHY, V38, P115, DOI 10.2307/3088292; Fouillen B, 2013, CONCURRENCES CONFLIC, V12; Freeman A.M., 2014, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO, V3rd; Frenoux C, 2016, THESIS U FEDERALE TO; Gana A., 2012, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V19, P201; Gleeson T, 2012, NATURE, V488, P197, DOI 10.1038/nature11295; Harvey P. A., 2007, Community Development Journal, V42, P365, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsl001; Hassan R, 2006, WATER GOVERNANCE SUS, P550, DOI [10.4324/9781849773768, DOI 10.4324/9781849773768]; Hjort M., 2020, OECD ENV WORKING PAP; ICEA, 2013, DES NAT WAT PRIC STR; INS, 2010, ENQ NAT BUDG CONS NI; INS, 2016, STAT TUN FLASH CONS, V1; INS, 2016, RES REC 2014; INS and UNFPA, 2015, PROJ POP TUN 2014 20; Karagiannis IC, 2008, DESALINATION, V223, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.071; Kulinkina AV, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V559, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.148; Ministry of Agriculture SONEDE and ONAS, 2021, NOT AL EAU POT ASS T; Moriarty P, 2013, WATER ALTERN, V6, P329; Mukheibir P, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P1027, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9474-6; Perez-Pineda F, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P1750, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.014; Raje DV, 2002, ECOL ECON, V42, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00054-X; Ray I., 2005, 224 STANF CTR INT DE; Rojat D., 2003, AFRIQUE CONT, V205, P151; Rouse M, 2014, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V30, P20, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2014.882203; Sauer J, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004127; Sebri M, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P26, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.142; Smets H, 2009, EAU POT PRIX AB; SONEDE, 2016, RAPP STAT DIR STAT P; SONEDE and SCET-Tunisie, 2015, RAPP MISS 3 REORG AC; Touzi S, 2009, THESIS U PASCAL PAOL; UN Water, 2021, UN WORLD WAT DEV REP; United Nations, 2014, HUM UN 2014; United Nations, 2015, OBJ MILL DEV RAPP 20; Van Houtven GL, 2017, ECOL ECON, V136, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.023; Vasquez WF, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P8002, DOI 10.1002/2014WR015913; Wang H, 2010, CHINA ECON REV, V21, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.12.001; Whitehead JC, 2006, SOUTH ECON J, V73, P100, DOI 10.2307/20111876; WHITTINGTON D, 1990, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V38, P293, DOI 10.1086/451794; WHITTINGTON D, 1991, WORLD DEV, V19, P179, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90254-F; Whittington D, 2002, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V22, P323, DOI 10.1023/A:1015575517927; Whittington D, 2010, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V2, P209, DOI 10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103908; WHO, 2017, UN WAT GLOB AN ASS S; WHO and UNICEF, 2015, PROGR SAN DRINK WAT, P9; WHO/UNICEF JMP, 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER; Williams R, 2006, STATA J, V6, P58, DOI 10.1177/1536867X0600600104; Zekri S, 2003, AGR ECON, V28, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00130.x	67	0	0	1	4	WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD	SINGAPORE	5 TOH TUCK LINK, SINGAPORE 596224, SINGAPORE	2382-624X	2382-6258		WATER ECON POLICY	Water Econ. Policy	OCT	2021	07	04							2150016	10.1142/S2382624X21500168	http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X21500168		DEC 2021	44	Economics; Environmental Studies; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	ZW2AQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000732426000001
J	Nayal, K; Raut, R; Jabbour, ABLD; Narkhede, BE; Gedam, VV				Nayal, Kirti; Raut, Rakesh; Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa; Narkhede, Balkrishna Eknath; Gedam, Vidyadhar V.			Integrated technologies toward sustainable agriculture supply chains: missing links	JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT			English	Article; Early Access						Big data; Supply chain performance; Sustainable agriculture supply chains; Sustainability; Circular economy	INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES; OF-THE-ART; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; BIG DATA; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; PERISHABLE PRODUCTS; LEAN PRODUCTION; FOOD-INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE	Purpose This article sheds light on the missing links concerning the study of using integrated enabling technologies toward sustainable and circular agriculture supply chains by examining the available literature and proposing future research possibilities. Design/methodology/approach The relevant literature was researched through online databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, Emerald, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, World Scientific Net and Springer-Link Journals, covering a period from 1999 to 2020. A systematic literature review based on 75 papers analyzed the integration of the concepts of enabling technologies, sustainability, circular economy and supply chain performance in agriculture supply chains. Findings It was identified that enabling technologies and agriculture supply chains alone have been explored further than integrated enabling technologies, sustainability, circular economy, supply chain performance and agriculture supply chains. Enabling technologies and agriculture supply chains' main findings are: enabling technologies have been studied to improve food safety, food quality and traceability in agriculture supply chains. The main results regarding integrated enabling technologies, sustainability, circular economy, supply chain performance and agriculture supply chains are: Internet of Things and information communication technology play an important role in addressing food security, traceability and food quality, which help achieve sustainable development goals. Originality/value This review study provides 13 research questions to underpin future trends regarding integrated technologies' application in agriculture supply chains for circular and sustainable growth.	[Nayal, Kirti; Raut, Rakesh; Narkhede, Balkrishna Eknath; Gedam, Vidyadhar V.] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; [Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa] Metis Lab, Normandie Business Sch, Paris, France		Jabbour, ABLD (corresponding author), Metis Lab, Normandie Business Sch, Paris, France.	bsousajabbour@em-normandie.fr	Nayal, Kirti/AAB-4674-2022; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz/B-8966-2012; GEDAM, VIDYADHAR/AAP-1049-2020; Narkhede, Balkrishna Eknath/AAL-2918-2020	Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz/0000-0001-6423-8868; GEDAM, VIDYADHAR/0000-0002-8083-1263; Narkhede, Balkrishna Eknath/0000-0002-9277-3005; nayal, kirti/0000-0003-1477-0500; Raut, Rakesh/0000-0002-0469-1326				Abeyratne S.A., 2016, INT J RES ENG TECHNO, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.15623/IJRET.2016.0509001; Accorsi R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V203, P1039, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.275; Ahamed A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P607, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.127; Akande A, 2019, INFORM SYST FRONT, V21, P581, DOI 10.1007/s10796-019-09903-3; Ala-Harja H, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V74, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.005; Alcayaga A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V221, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.085; Allaoui H, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P761, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.367; Aramyan LH, 2007, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V12, P304, DOI 10.1108/13598540710759826; Aschemann-Witzel J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V155, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.173; Astill J, 2019, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V91, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.024; Bag S, 2021, INT J PROD ECON, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844; Bag S, 2022, INT J ORGAN ANAL, V30, P864, DOI 10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120; Bag S, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P863, DOI 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724; Baryannis G, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P2179, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476; Batista L, 2018, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V29, P438, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502; Beelmann A, 2006, EUR PSYCHOL, V11, P244, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040.11.3.244; Behnke K, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025; Ben-Daya M, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P4719, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140; Beske P, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V152, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026; Bloemhof J.M., 2017, SUSTAINABLE FOOD SUP, P395; Blunck E., 2017, DIEM DUBROVNIK INT E, V3, P644; Bogataj D, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V193, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.028; Bottani E, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V135, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2019.05.011; Boulding K.E., 1966, ENV QUALITY GROWING; Brennan G., 2015, SUSTAINABILITY KEY I; Buchi G, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119790; Cai YF, 2016, FINANC INNOV, V2, DOI 10.1186/s40854-016-0039-4; Campbell R, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V56, P671, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3; Castro GD, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204; Castro NR, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P1398, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.239; Centobelli P, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119920; Centobelli P, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V53, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.032; Chauhan C, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124809; Chen RY, 2015, FOOD CONTROL, V51, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.11.004; Chen S, 2021, INF SYST E-BUS MANAG, V19, P909, DOI 10.1007/s10257-020-00467-3; Cook DJ, 1997, ANN INTERN MED, V126, P376, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006; Demestichas K, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10124113; Denyer D., 2009, SAGE HDB ORG RES MET, P671, DOI DOI 10.1080/03634528709378635; Di Vaio A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124851; Drobetz W, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V71, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.08.006; Duan J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17051784; El Bilali Hamid, 2018, Information Processing in Agriculture, V5, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.inpa.2018.06.006; Esfahbodi A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V155, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098; European Commission, 2020, CIRC EC ACT PLAN; European Commission, 2020, NEW IND STRAT EUR; Fan HL, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P71686, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919582; Farooque M, 2019, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V24, P677, DOI 10.1108/SCM-10-2018-0345; Fatorachian H, 2021, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V32, P63, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487; Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, 2017, MON REP DIGITAL EC; Feng HH, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121031; Flores H, 2020, EUR J OPER RES, V280, P707, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.053; Galvez JF, 2018, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V107, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011; Gandino F, 2009, IEEE T IND ELECTRON, V56, P2357, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2009.2019569; Garcia-Arca Jesus, 2009, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, V16, P250, DOI 10.1504/IJMTM.2009.022435; Geissdoerfer M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048; Geyi DG, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.022; Ghisellini P, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007; Ghobakhloo M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869; Ghobakhloo M, 2018, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V29, P910, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057; Giagnocavo C, 2017, INT J AGR BIOL ENG, V10, P115, DOI 10.25165/j.ijabe.20171005.3089; Gruzauskas V, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118225; Gruzauskas V, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V184, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.302; Ha OK, 2014, PERS UBIQUIT COMPUT, V18, P553, DOI 10.1007/s00779-013-0675-x; Han J, 2009, BRIT FOOD J, V111, P9, DOI 10.1108/00070700910924209; Hugos M., 2006, ESSENTIALS SUPPLY CH, V2nd ed.; Irani Z, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V98, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.007; Irani Z, 2018, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V31, P2, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-03-2017-0045; Isensee C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944; Jabbour CJC, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V144, P546, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.010; Jaeger B, 2020, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V33, P729, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047; Jagtap S, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V87, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.017; Jasti NVK, 2015, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V26, P1051, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1004563; Ji GJ, 2017, J SYST SCI SYST ENG, V26, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11518-016-5320-6; Kamble SS, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.023; Kamble SS, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022; Kamble SS, 2019, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V48, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.020; Kaur H, 2021, BENCHMARKING, V28, P1740, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0431; Kenyon GN, 2010, INT J INF SYST SUPPL, V3, P42, DOI 10.4018/jisscm.2010100103; King AM, 2006, SUSTAIN DEV, V14, P257, DOI 10.1002/sd.271; Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005; Koh L, 2019, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V39, P817, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2019-788; Kohler S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122193; Kristoffersen E, 2020, J BUS RES, V120, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044; Kshetri N, 2017, THIRD WORLD Q, V38, P1710, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2017.1298438; Kumar A, 2020, DECISION SCI, V51, P8, DOI 10.1111/deci.12396; Kumar A, 2020, BENCHMARKING, V27, P1003, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0500; Lezoche M, 2020, COMPUT IND, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187; Li D, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P5127, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1047976; Li Z, 2017, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V117, P1906, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-11-2016-0489; Amui LBL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103; Lin QJ, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P20698, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897792; Liu P, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123646; Jabbour ABLD, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P273, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8; Lusk JL, 2018, FOOD POLICY, V78, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007; Maksimovic M., 2015, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, V1, P333, DOI 10.1504/IJSAMI.2015.075053; Mangla SK, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117620; Markman G, 2014, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V50, P1, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12057; Nascimento DLM, 2019, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V30, P607, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071; Mededjel M, 2017, MULTIAGENT GRID SYST, V13, P47, DOI 10.3233/MGS-170261; Mengfeng Gong, 2015, International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, V7, P233; Mirkovski K, 2019, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V30, P892, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0155; Mishra N, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P337, DOI 10.1007/s10479-016-2303-4; Mishra N, 2017, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V28, P945, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1336789; Viet NQ, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1302, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1629673; Pagell M, 2014, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V50, P44, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12037; Panda S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V67, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.04.002; Pazil N.H.A., 2018, INT J ASIAN SOCIAL S, V8, P938; Perboli G, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P62018, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875782; Prakash G, 2018, J ADV MANAG RES, V15, P457, DOI 10.1108/JAMR-12-2017-0116; Prater E, 2005, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V10, P134, DOI 10.1108/13598540510589205; Puska A, 2020, INT J MANAG SCI ENG, V15, P9, DOI 10.1080/17509653.2019.1582367; Rajala R, 2018, CALIF MANAGE REV, V60, P20, DOI 10.1177/0008125618759685; Raut Rakesh D., 2020, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V48, P83, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2020.2987884; Rosa P, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1662, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896; Rossini M, 2019, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V102, P3963, DOI 10.1007/s00170-019-03441-7; Saberi S, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V57, P2117, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261; Salah K, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P73295, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918000; Satake Y, 2011, FUJITSU SCI TECH J, V47, P378; Saurabh S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124731; Schroeder P, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P77, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12732; Sgarbossa F, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.022; Shahi SK, 2021, QUAL RES ORGAN MANAG, V16, P614, DOI 10.1108/QROM-03-2020-1904; Sharma R, 2020, COMPUT OPER RES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926; Singh A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.236; Singh A, 2018, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V114, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2017.05.008; Singh A, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V164, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.019; Singh RK, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V147, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.014; Smith GC, 2005, MEAT SCI, V71, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.002; Sousa-Zomer TT, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V135, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033; Srinivasan R, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V128, P911, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.048; Srivastava SK, 2007, INT J MANAG REV, V9, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x; Stenmarck A., 2016, ESTIMATES EUROPEAN F; Stranieri S, 2021, FOOD CONTROL, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107495; Su B, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V42, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020; The Circle Economy, 2020, CIRCULARITY GAP REPO; Theien S, 2014, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V50, P44, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12048; Oesterreich TD, 2016, COMPUT IND, V83, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006; Todorovic V, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103481; Torky M, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105476; Tortorella GL, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P2975, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420; Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375; Tsang YP, 2018, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V118, P1432, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0384; Tsolakis N, 2021, J BUS RES, V131, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.003; Tzounis A, 2017, BIOSYST ENG, V164, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.007; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2020, WHAT AR SUST DEV GOA; Van der Vorst J., 2000, EFFECTIVE FOOD SUPPL; van der Vorst JGAJ, 2006, ACCREDIT QUAL ASSUR, V11, P33, DOI 10.1007/s00769-005-0028-1; van Donselaar KH, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V140, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.023; Van Huijstee M. M., 2007, ENV SCI, V4, P75, DOI DOI 10.1080/15693430701526336; Verdouw CN, 2018, ENTERP INF SYST-UK, V12, P755, DOI 10.1080/17517575.2015.1072643; Villalobos JR, 2019, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105092; Vlachos AP, 2004, J INT FOOD AGRIBUS M, V16, P19, DOI 10.1300/J047v16n01_03; Vlachos IP, 2013, INT J RF TECHNOL-RES, V4, P127, DOI 10.3233/RFT-120041; Wolfert S, 2017, AGR SYST, V153, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023; Wu MY, 2011, INT J MANAG SCI ENG, V6, P210, DOI 10.1080/17509653.2011.10671165; Xu JP, 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V122, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.026; Yadav Sanjeev, 2020, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, V35, P204; Yadav S., 2020, INT J IND SYSTEMS EN, V36, P73, DOI [10.1504/IJISE.2020.109121, DOI 10.1504/IJISE.2020.109121]; Yadav S, 2020, OPER MANAGE RES, DOI 10.1007/s12063-020-00164-x; Yadav S, 2021, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V34, P292, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-11-2019-0369; Yadav VS, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104877; Yan B, 2016, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V116, P1397, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-12-2015-0512; Yan ZM, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072568; Yazdani M, 2021, MANAGE DECIS, V59, P1801, DOI 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1088; Zadeh AH, 2018, J CASES INF TECHNOL, V20, P53, DOI 10.4018/JCIT.2018100104; Zhang YF, 2017, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V117, P1890, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0456; Zhong R, 2017, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V117, P2085, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0391	167	2	2	22	70	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	1741-0398	1758-7409		J ENTERP INF MANAG	J. Enterp. Inf. Manag.												10.1108/JEIM-09-2020-0381	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2020-0381		JUL 2021	51	Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science; Business & Economics	TF0JA					2022-09-08	WOS:000670392400001
J	Yu, XY; Dong, ZJ; Zhou, DQ; Sang, XZ; Chang, CT; Huang, XH				Yu, Xianyu; Dong, Zhuojia; Zhou, Dequn; Sang, Xiuzhi; Chang, Ching-Ter; Huang, Xinhuan			Integration of tradable green certificates trading and carbon emissions trading: How will Chinese power industry do?	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Carbon emissions trading; Tradable green certificate; Renewable portfolio standard; Electric power industry; System dynamics	DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; MARKET; IMPACT; MODEL; TGC	To promote energy conservation and emission reduction, China recently implemented a tradable green certificate market on the basis of the carbon emissions trading market. As an energy-intensive industry, the power industry is one of the leading contributors to carbon emissions in China. It is also the main participant in both the tradable green certificate market and the carbon emissions trading market. How to deal with the integration impact of the green certificate market and the carbon emissions trading market becomes a great challenge for the Chinese power industry. To improve sustainable development of Chinese power industry considering the integration impact of the green certificate market and the carbon emissions trading market, we established a simulation model based on system dynamics theory and scenario design method. The results of the study show that: (1) the implementation of tradable green certificate and carbon emissions trading mechanisms helps to control carbon emissions of the power industry, and to promote national targets of carbon emission reduction in China, (2) the optimization of electric power structure is positively related with renewable portfolio standard, and (3) the increase in the investment of renewable energy power generation technology not only brings large profit margins to power companies but also promote the achievement of sustainable development goals at the national level. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Yu, Xianyu; Dong, Zhuojia; Zhou, Dequn; Sang, Xiuzhi] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China; [Yu, Xianyu; Zhou, Dequn] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China; [Chang, Ching-Ter] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Informat Management, 259 Wen Hwa 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; [Chang, Ching-Ter] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Clin Trial Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan; [Chang, Ching-Ter] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, New Taipei, Taiwan; [Huang, Xinhuan] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Fuzhou 350117, Peoples R China		Chang, CT (corresponding author), Chang Gung Univ, Dept Informat Management, 259 Wen Hwa 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.; Huang, XH (corresponding author), Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Fuzhou 350117, Peoples R China.	xyyu@nuaa.edu.cn; zjdong@nuaa.edu.cn; dqzhou@nuaa.edu.cn; sangxz@nuaa.edu.cn; chingter@mail.cgu.edu.tw; huangxinhuan@fjnu.edu.cn	Yu, Xianyu/AAG-2938-2020	Yu, Xianyu/0000-0002-7878-6563; Dong, Zhuojia/0000-0002-1613-0171	National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [71774080, 71501098, 71834003, 71602035]; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590453, 2018T110501]; Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC630205]; Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 106-2410-H-182-004]; Chang Gung Medical Foundation [BMRPA79]	National Natural Science Foundation of China, China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(China Postdoctoral Science Foundation); Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China(Ministry of Education, China); Ministry of Science and Technology(Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea); Chang Gung Medical Foundation	This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (71774080, 71501098, 71834003 and 71602035), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Projects (2016M590453 and 2018T110501), the Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (17YJC630205). This work was also support by the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant MOST 106-2410-H-182-004 and Chang Gung Medical Foundation under Grant BMRPA79.	Ali R, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195176; Amundsen ES, 2009, J POLICY MODEL, V31, P903, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.09.002; Bergek A, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P1255, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.001; Bird L, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P2573, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.025; Chen C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V630, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.103; Deng HM, 2013, I C SERV SYST SERV M, P686, DOI 10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602584; Duan L., 2018, CHINA ENERG ENV, V40, P131, DOI [10.19389/j.cnki.1003-0506.2018.12.029, DOI 10.19389/J.CNKI.1003-0506.2018.12.029]; Fang GC, 2018, APPL ENERG, V211, P1039, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.001; Feng TT, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V92, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.079; Ganda F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V217, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235; Ghaffari Meysam, 2019, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, V15, P513, DOI 10.1007/s40092-018-0272-8; Hirbodi K, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109642; Hustveit M, 2017, ENERGY, V141, P1717, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.013; Ju LW, 2016, INT J ELEC POWER, V78, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.080; Kildegaard A, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3413, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.017; Kosnik LR, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V151, P605, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2330-z; Kuriqi A, 2019, APPL ENERG, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113980; Kuriqi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P1028, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.358; Kyoto Protocol, 1997, COUNTR PART UN FRAM; Li H, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119192; Liu LW, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V49, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.076; Liu W., 2010, CHINAS LOW CARBON EC; Liu ZQ, 2018, APPL ENERG, V230, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.117; Ma Z., 2017, AUTOM ELECT POWER SY, V24, P96, DOI 10.7500/AEPS20170409004.; Mo JL, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V89, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.002; Morthorst PE, 2001, ENERG POLICY, V29, P345, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00133-6; National Development and Reform Commission, 2016, NAT KEY EN SAV LOW C; National Energy Administration, 2018, CIRC IMPL REN PORTF; Nilsson M., 2007, Utilities Policy, V15, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2006.05.002; People's Republic of China the United States, 2014, CHIN US JOINT ANN CL; Schusser S, 2018, ENERG ECON, V71, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.012; Sherwood D, 2002, SEEING FOREST TREES; Shi J.R., 2015, CHINESE J MANAG SCI, V11, P801; Sim J, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V189, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.074; Su K, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106138; Tang L, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V81, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.032; Weng QQ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V91, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.026; Xu Guangqing, 2006, J HARBIN I TECHNOLOG, V8, P72, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-1971.2006.04.016; Yi BW, 2019, APPL ENERG, V237, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.015; Yu FF, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V89, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009; Yu SW, 2018, ENERG ECON, V74, P693, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.017; Zhang JR, 2016, CHIN J MANAG SCI, V24, P1, DOI [10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.03.001, DOI 10.16381/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-207X.2016.03.001]; Zhang YJ, 2020, APPL ENERG, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114290; Zhao Y, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V675, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.132	44	24	25	46	115	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 10	2021	279								123485	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123485	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123485			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PB6ZN					2022-09-08	WOS:000596467100008
J	Libey, A; Adank, M; Thomas, E				Libey, Anna; Adank, Marieke; Thomas, Evan			Who pays for water? Comparing life cycle costs of water services among several low, medium and high-income utilities	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Life cycle cost; Service delivery; Foreign aid; Cost recovery; Utility business models; Global	SANITATION UTILITIES	Universal access to safe drinking water will require an investment of over $140 billion in capital expenditures to meet the targets set by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The World Bank estimates that recurring operations and maintenance costs for basic water and sanitation (WASH) services will rise from about $4 billion to over $30 billion per year by 2030, significantly outweighing capital costs for basic WASH services. Yet, available funding from regional, national and international sources regularly prioritizes capital investment in new water infrastructure, leading to significant unfunded operation and maintenance mandates for service providers operating in low-income settings where consumer payments cannot practically cover operating costs. Capital maintenance is deferred, leading to poor utility financial performance and decreased service for water customers. In this paper, we present indicative funding models, valuation of existing assets, and expenditures of four medium-sized urban water utilities in low, middle, and high-income communities representing a broad range of operating contexts. Yet we find common operating challenges. None of the four utilities are spending enough on capital maintenance to sustain service levels, and we find that the gap between the life cycle costs of water service delivery and associated revenues of water services ranges from $1 to $17 per customer each year. Discounting life cycle costs by service and coverage levels further widens the funding gap. All utilities would need additional funding to reach universal access with full coverage of life cycle costs, ranging from 6% of budgets to nearly 8 times current funding levels. This would not be economically or politically feasible through tariffs alone, which are already currently subsidized in all contexts. The contribution of progressive tax monies to subsidize services is taken for granted in high-income contexts and unavailable in poorer ones that must rely on insufficient and irregular foreign aid or national budget allocations in strained economies. These findings contrast with a commonly shared view in the global development sector that local or at minimum regional financial sustainability of water supplies is achievable. Consequently, our findings suggest that national governments and international donors should acknowledge that long term support of local water service delivery is both necessary, appropriate, and likely more cost-effective than current funding models. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Adank, Marieke] IRC WASH, Bezuidenhoutseweg 2, NL-2594 AV The Hague, Netherlands; [Libey, Anna; Thomas, Evan] Univ Colorado, Mortenson Ctr Global Engn, 4001 Discovery Dr,UCB 608, Boulder, CO 80303 USA		Thomas, E (corresponding author), Univ Colorado, Mortenson Ctr Global Engn, 4001 Discovery Dr,UCB 608, Boulder, CO 80303 USA.	anna.libey@colorado.edu; adank@ircwash.org; ethomas@colorado.edu		Libey, Anna/0000-0002-6100-2216; Thomas, Evan/0000-0003-3095-8407	Millennium Water Alliance; Catholic Relief Services; World Vision; AECOM; mWater; IRC; CARE; IRC Wash; SweetSense Inc.; Afar Regional Water Bureau; county government of Turkana in Kenya	Millennium Water Alliance; Catholic Relief Services; World Vision; AECOM; mWater; IRC; CARE; IRC Wash; SweetSense Inc.; Afar Regional Water Bureau; county government of Turkana in Kenya	We appreciate the support of the Millennium Water Alliance, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision, AECOM, mWater, IRC, CARE, IRC Wash, SweetSense Inc., the Afar Regional Water Bureau and the county government of Turkana in Kenya. The authors especially thank James Harper, Lauren Stover, Bernadin Sang, and Styvers Kathuni for their contributions.	Adank M, 2018, WATER POLICY, V20, P52, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.004; Andres L., 2019, DOING MORE LESS SMAR; Berg SV, 2011, WATER POLICY, V13, P591, DOI 10.2166/wp.2011.041; Board of Directors' Discussion Report, 2019, UNPUB; Borja-Vega C, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102078; Burr P., 2013, APPL LIFE CYCLE COST, P94; Byrne DM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V3, P1002, DOI 10.1039/c7ew00175d; Cambodian Water Supply Association, 2018, UNPUB; Cashman S., 2014, 600R14376 US EPA; Cetrulo TB, 2019, WATER RES, V161, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.044; City of Boulder Colorado, 2018, 2018 ANN BUDGET, V2, P268; City of Boulder Public Works Utilities Division, 2018, 2018 CAP IMPR PLAN; Climate-data.org, 2019, CLIM DAT CIT WORLDW; Cook J, 2020, WATER ECON POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X19500139; Danert K, 2020, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V10, P1, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2020.139; Eberhard R., 2018, KEY FINDINGS INFORM, P88; England M., 2012, SMALL MEDIUM SIZED E, P210; Fonseca C., 2011, BRIEFING NOTE 1A LIF, P40; GEDAG Consultancy Service PLC, 2017, DRAFT FEAS DES REV S, P127; GEDAG Consultancy Service PLC, 2018, DET DES REV REP FIN, P135; Geleta T., 2018, J GLOBAL EC, V6, P8, DOI [10.4172/2375-4389.1000304., DOI 10.4172/2375-4389.1000304.]; Gonzalez-Gomez F, 2018, URBAN WATER J, V15, P259, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2018.1436187; Grooters S., 2019, 2019 ASSET INVENTORY, P4; GWI, 2018, GLOB WAT TAR SURV; Hukka JJ, 2015, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V107, pE37, DOI 10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0007; Hutton G., 2016, COSTS M 2030 SUSTAIN, DOI [10.1596/K8543, DOI 10.1596/K8543.]; International Benchmarking Network, 2018, IBNET TAR DAT; International Benchmarking Network, 2017, IBNET BENCHM DAT; Jaglin S, 2002, ENVIRON URBAN, V14, P231, DOI 10.1177/095624780201400119; Kenya RAPID, 2017, 2017001 MWABFA; Kingdom B., 2018, BETTER USE CAPITAL D, P49; Kirk S.J., 1995, LIFE CYCLE COSTING D; Leigland J., 2016, ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL, P20; Lodwar Water and Sanitation Company Ltd, 2017, LODW WAT SAN CO LTD, P34; Lodwar Water and Sanitation Company Ltd, 2018, REV ANN REP FIN STAT; Lustgarten A., 2015, SCI AM; Mayer P, 2008, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V100, P117; National Institute of Statistics & Ministry of Planning, 2018, CAMB SOC SURV 2017, P106; OECD, 2009, MAN WAT ALL OECD PER, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264060548-EN; Pories L, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112425; Rahill-Marier B., 2013, AM WATER EXPLORATORY, P45; SHERIF YS, 1981, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V9, P287, DOI 10.1016/0305-0483(81)90035-9; Stoler J, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V716, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135881; The World Bank Group, 2017, WATER SUPPLY; Turman-Bryant N, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113046; US Environmental Protection Agency, 2018, EFF FUND FRAM WAT IN; US EPA, 2019, SDWIS FED REP SEARCH; USAID, 2018, ACT CALL FOC JOURN S, P75; van den Berg C, 2015, UTIL POLICY, V36, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2015.07.005; WASREB, 2018, IMP REP ISS 10 PERF; WHO, 2017, UN WAT GLAAS TRACKFI; WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2005, 9 WHOSEARO, P4; WHO  UNICEF, 2017, SAF MAN DRINK WAT TH; World Health Organization & UN-Water, 2019, NAT SYST SUPP DRINK, P144	54	9	9	3	12	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X	1873-5991		WORLD DEV	World Dev.	DEC	2020	136								105155	10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105155	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105155			13	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	NS7MR		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000572442200030
J	Yin, HL; Islam, MS; Ju, MD				Yin, Hailong; Islam, Md Sahidul; Ju, Mengdie			Urban river pollution in the densely populated city of Dhaka, Bangladesh: Big picture and rehabilitation experience from other developing countries	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Urban river; Water pollution; Dhaka; Environmental sustainability; Sewer system	WATER-QUALITY; AREA; EFFLUENTS	Rapid urbanization and economic development caused urban river pollution globally. In the developing countries' megapolis, the situation is especially critical in response to the United Nation's sustainable development goal for 2030. Dhaka, Bangladesh, is one of the most densely populated cities in the world. Around 21 million people are living in this city of 1464 km(2). Currently, 98% of untreated domestic sewage as well as significant amounts of industrial wastewater discharge from over 7000 industries are contributing to the presence of black and foul water in the urban rivers. In this study, a driving force-impact-challenge-response (DICR) framework is formed to create a big picture of urban river pollution situation, which incorporates nine factors of social, environmental, and governmental aspects. Using this framework, a comparative study was performed between Dhaka rivers and other rivers in developing countries with successful rehabilitation experiences. Accordingly, a strategy for Dhaka's urban river pollution control was developed, which included improvement of sewerage systems, appropriate planning of industrial enterprises, construction of hydraulic structures to modify and improve the water flow, and an efficient management framework and finance investments for river rehabilitation. The key actions necessary to further improve the river water quality in the far future are also suggested, under the condition that dry-weather black and foul occurrence in the Dhaka rivers could be eliminated. The river assessment framework and associated strategies may also help policymakers, the government, and researchers to develop a plan for the rehabilitation of seriously polluted rivers in other developing countries.	[Yin, Hailong; Islam, Md Sahidul] UNEP, Tongji Inst Environm Sustainable Dev, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China; [Yin, Hailong; Islam, Md Sahidul; Ju, Mengdie] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Yangtze River Water Environm, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China		Yin, HL (corresponding author), UNEP, Tongji Inst Environm Sustainable Dev, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.	yinhailong@tongji.edu.cn		yin, hailong/0000-0002-4112-3731	National Natural Science Foundation of China [51979195]; China Three Gorges Corporation [202003065]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); China Three Gorges Corporation	We would like to thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51979195), and China Three Gorges Corporation (Grant No. 202003065), for their funding of this research. The authors would also like to acknowledge Md. Ziaul Haque, Director of Department of Environment under Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change in Dhaka, Bangladesh, for his kind support for data collection.	Akash M., P RAIS C TAMP FL US, P45, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3152116, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3152116]; Alam MU, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17197201; Bashar T, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, P2124, DOI 10.3390/w12082124; Bernhardt ES, 2005, SCIENCE, V308, P636, DOI 10.1126/science.1109769; Cattaneo O, 2010, GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS IN A POSTCRISIS WORLD: A DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8499-2; Chapra S.C., 2008, SURFACE WATER QUALIT; [程曦 CHENG Xi], 2009, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V29, P3278; China's State Council, 2019, UN HAB HAILS CHIN SU; Chowdhury M. A. H., 2020, Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, V18, P332, DOI 10.5455/JBAU.81603; Dewan AM, 2012, INT J ENVIRON SUSTAI, V11, P118, DOI 10.1504/IJESD.2012.049178; Feio MJ, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13030371; Halder J., 2015, J ENV HUM, V2, P36, DOI [10.15764/EH.2015.01005, DOI 10.15764/EH.2015.01005]; Hasan MK, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02145; Hossain A., 2018, INT J CURRENT RES, V10, P75049, DOI [10.24941/ijcr.32890.11.2018, DOI 10.24941/IJCR.32890.11.2018]; Hossen MZ, 2017, ASIAN J WATER ENVIRO, V14, P59, DOI 10.3233/AJW-170007; Kamal AKI, 2016, POLLUTION, V2, P153, DOI 10.7508/pj.2016.02.005; Landrigan PJ, 2018, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V126, DOI 10.1289/EHP3141; Liao ZL, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-016-5881-1; Moniruzzaman M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13010083; Rampley CPN, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V703, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134760; Rouf M. A., 2013, Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, V48, P155, DOI 10.3329/bjsir.v48i3.17324; Roy R, 2010, Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, V45, P79; Sakamoto M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071951; Uddin MJ, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06107; United Nations, 2016, POP VIT STAT REP S A, VLXVIII; United Nations, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Water Resources Planning Organization (WRPO), 2001, NAT WAT MAN PLAN; Whitehead P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V631-632, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.038; Xu H., 2021, URBAN GREEN SPACE SY; Xu Z, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V52, P69, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0290; Xu ZX, 2008, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V25, P1463, DOI 10.1089/ees.2007.0219; Xu ZX, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P158, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0249-7; Xu ZX., 2003, J HYDRODYN, V15, P64	33	4	4	11	13	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 25	2021	321								129040	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129040	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129040		SEP 2021	11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	WE7BW					2022-09-08	WOS:000705777200100
J	Nyeche, EN; Diemuodeke, EO				Nyeche, E. N.; Diemuodeke, E. O.			Modelling and optimisation of a hybrid PV-wind turbine-pumped hydro storage energy system for mini-grid application in coastline communities	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Renewables energy resources; Hybrid photovoltaic-wind turbine system; Pumped hydro energy storage; Genetic algorithm; Techno-economic modelling and optimisation	RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CONFIGURATION; GENERATION; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; LEVEL; UNIT	This study proposes a clean, reliable and affordable hybrid energy conversion technology that is based on sunlight and wind, with a hydro based energy storage system. The proposed system comprises Photovoltaic arrays, wind turbine (WT) and Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES). The study was focused on satisfying energy demand of a typical coastline community, Patani (Lat. 5.23 degrees N and Long. 6.17 degrees E) - a Local Government Area (LGA). Genetic algorithm was adopted to optimise the PHES of the proposed hybrid plant to minimise the difference between energy demand and energy generated. Economic models were developed to ascertain the economic feasibility of the hybrid plant. High fidelity software (HOMER (R), MATLAB (R) and MS Excel (R) spreadsheet) were utilised for the analysis and optimisation. The peak rated power of PV and WT required to satisfy the energy demand of the LGA are 217 kW(p) and 226050 kW, respectively. The minimum storage capacity of the PHES was estimated at about 3,930,615 kWh, with the upper reservoir volume of 43170.06 m(3). The value of 0.27 $/kWh was obtained for the Levelised Cost of Energy (LCOE); while the loss of load probability of the proposed energy system was estimated at 0.1086. The proposed energy system supports the Sustainable Development Goal 7 - affordable and clean energy, with climate change mitigation potential. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Nyeche, E. N.; Diemuodeke, E. O.] Univ Port Harcourt, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Energy & Thermofluids Res Grp, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria		Diemuodeke, EO (corresponding author), Univ Port Harcourt, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Energy & Thermofluids Res Grp, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.	ogheneruona.diemuodeke@uniport.edu.ng	Diemuodeke, Ogheneruona Endurance/AAJ-4746-2020	Diemuodeke, Ogheneruona Endurance/0000-0002-0133-485X				[Anonymous], NIGER J TECHNOL; [Anonymous], ENERGY ENV; [Anonymous], 2017, ENERGY POLICY RES, DOI DOI 10.1080/23815639.2017.1280431; [Anonymous], MODEL SIMUL ENG; [Anonymous], REN EN STAT; [Anonymous], J RENEW SUSTAIN ENER; [Anonymous], MIN NIG CAS STUD PRO; [Anonymous], TRANSM LOSS; [Anonymous], SUSTAINABLE CLOUD EN; [Anonymous], 2017, MATH PROBL ENG; Barbour E, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V61, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.019; Boukhezzar B, 2009, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V50, P885, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.01.011; Bukar AL, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V221, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.228; Cao YJ, 1999, INT J ELEC ENG EDUC, V36, P139, DOI 10.7227/IJEEE.36.2.4; Comello SD, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.029; Diemuodeke EO, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V134, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.055; Diemuodeke EO, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN SOC, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13705-016-0092-x; Diemuodeke EO, 2016, INT J AMBIENT ENERGY, V37, P2, DOI 10.1080/01430750.2013.866906; Engin M, 2013, INT J PHOTOENERGY, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/217526; Farrell K., 2018, URBAN FORUM, V29, P277, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S12132-018-9335-6, 10.1007/s12132-018-9335-6]; Ghasemi A, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V123, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.072; Ghasemi A, 2018, ENERGY, V142, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.146; Ghorbani N, 2019, ENERGY, V169, P854, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.073; Gielen D, 2019, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006; Gonzalez A, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P12787, DOI 10.3390/su70912787; Hansen K, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V102, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.038; Haupt R.L., 2004, PRACTICAL GENETIC AL, V2nd ed., DOI 10.1002/047167174; Herington MJ, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V67, P1412, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.103; IRENA, 2018, RENEWABLE POWER GENE; Islam T, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V65, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.004; Kumar A, 2017, INT J RENEW ENERGY R, V7, P844; Ma T, 2014, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V79, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.047; Nazari-Heris M, 2017, ENERGY, V128, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.007; Nazari-Heris M, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V74, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.043; Oko COC, 2012, INT J RENEW ENERGY D, V1, P65, DOI 10.14710/ijred.1.3.65-73; Olatomiwa L, 2016, ENERGY REP, V2, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2016.06.001; Padron S, 2011, ENERGY, V36, P6753, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.029; Rehman S, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V44, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.040; Ren JZ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P1387, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.229; Shaaban M, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V29, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.078; Shoaib M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128; Tao JY, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V98, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.021	42	55	55	4	37	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 20	2020	250								119578	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119578	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119578			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	KE8WO					2022-09-08	WOS:000508829800066
J	Weerakkody, V; Sivarajah, U; Mahroof, K; Maruyama, T; Lu, S				Weerakkody, Vishanth; Sivarajah, Uthayasankar; Mahroof, Kamran; Maruyama, Takao; Lu, Shan			Influencing subjective well-being for business and sustainable development using big data and predictive regression analysis	JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH			English	Article						Big data; Regression; Well-being; UN SDG goals; Public sector	MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; MENTAL-HEALTH; DATA ANALYTICS; CARE; RELIGION; INCOME; SATISFACTION; MODEL; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE	Business leaders and policymakers within service economies are placing greater emphasis on well-being, given the role of workers in such settings. Whilst people's well-being can lead to economic growth, it can also have the opposite effect if overlooked. Therefore, enhancing subjective well-being (SWB) is pertinent for all organisations for the sustainable development of an economy. While health conditions were previously deemed the most reliable predictors, the availability of data on people's personal lifestyles now offers a new dimension into wellbeing for organisations. Using open data available from the national Annual Population Survey in the UK, which measures SWB, this research uncovered that among several independent variables to predict varying levels of people's perceived well-being, long-term health conditions, one's marital status, and age played a key role in SWB. The proposed model provides the key indicators of measuring SWB for organisations using big data.	[Weerakkody, Vishanth; Sivarajah, Uthayasankar; Mahroof, Kamran; Maruyama, Takao; Lu, Shan] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England		Weerakkody, V (corresponding author), Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England.	v.weerakkody@bradford.ac.uk	Lu, Shan/AAV-4268-2021	Lu, Shan/0000-0002-7588-8599; Mahroof, Kamran/0000-0003-4978-4443				Ai AL, 2007, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V33, P867, DOI 10.1177/0146167207301008; Algan Y, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0209562; [Anonymous], 2005, WELLNESS WORK PROTEC; Anshari M., 2018, APPL COMPUTING INFOR, V15, DOI [10.1016/j, DOI 10.1016/J]; Ardelt M, 2016, J HAPPINESS STUD, V17, P1963, DOI 10.1007/s10902-015-9680-2; Bakker LJ, 2016, VALUE HEALTH, V19, pA705, DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2058; Baptiste NR, 2008, MANAGE DECIS, V46, P284, DOI [10.1108/00251740810854168, 10.1108/002517408108'A]6854168]; Barber L., 1999, PEOPLE PROFITS, V355; Bassi M, 2014, J NEUROL SCI, V337, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2013.11.018; Bates DW, 2018, HEALTH POLICY TECHN, V7, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.04.006; Berry M.J.A., 1997, DATA MINING TECHNIQU; Blau DM, 1999, REV ECON STAT, V81, P261, DOI 10.1162/003465399558067; Bookwalter JT, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.07.001; Bowcock S., 2016, YOU SALE PROTECTING, P46; BrooksGunn J, 1997, FUTURE CHILD, V7, P55, DOI 10.2307/1602387; Brown SL, 2004, J MARRIAGE FAM, V66, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00025.x; Byerly K., 2019, AM J MED RES, V6, P67; Caicedo MH, 2010, J ACCOUNT ORGAN CHAN, V6, P436, DOI 10.1108/18325911011091819; Campbell A., 1976, QUALITY AM LIFE; Capuano N, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V101, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.001; Capuano N, 2018, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V26, P1704, DOI 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2744605; Carmeli A, 2009, J MANAGE PSYCHOL, V24, P66, DOI 10.1108/02683940910922546; Chen HC, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P1165; Collins Susan, 2015, Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. 8th International Conference, SBP 2015. Proceedings: LNCS 9021, P24, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_3; COSTA PT, 1987, J GERONTOL, V42, P50, DOI 10.1093/geronj/42.1.50; Deaton A, 2008, J ECON PERSPECT, V22, P53, DOI 10.1257/jep.22.2.53; Deaton A, 2013, AM ECON REV, V103, P591, DOI 10.1257/aer.103.3.591; Department for Work and Pensions, 2005, 257 DEP WORK PENS; Diener E, 1999, PSYCHOL BULL, V125, P276, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276; Diener E, 2002, SOC INDIC RES, V57, P119, DOI 10.1023/A:1014411319119; DIENER E, 1984, PSYCHOL BULL, V95, P542, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542; Diener E, 2013, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V104, P267, DOI 10.1037/a0030487; Diener E, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V101, P1278, DOI 10.1037/a0024402; DIMSON E, 1990, J BANK FINANC, V14, P399, DOI 10.1016/0378-4266(90)90056-8; Druss BG, 2001, AM J PSYCHIAT, V158, P731, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.731; Dunifon RE, 2014, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V654, DOI 10.1177/0002716214526530; Easterlin R.A., 1974, NATIONS HOUSEHOLDS E, P89; Ellison CG, 2008, SOC INDIC RES, V88, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11205-007-9187-2; Erevelles S, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.001; Evans MDR, 2019, J HAPPINESS STUD, V20, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10902-017-9917-3; Fang W, 2017, IETE TECH REV, V34, P544, DOI 10.1080/02564602.2016.1215269; Frank E., 2001, MACHINE LEARNING ECM, V2167; Friedman HS, 2014, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V65, P719, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123; Frijters P, 2006, SCAND J ECON, V108, P433, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00459.x; Fujita H, 2020, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V28, P831, DOI 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2955047; Paez DG, 2018, HEALTH INFORM J, V24, P125, DOI 10.1177/1460458216660754; GLENN ND, 1979, SOC FORCES, V57, P960, DOI 10.2307/2577364; Goetzel RZ, 2002, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V44, P320, DOI 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012; Goldberg JS, 2014, J MARRIAGE FAM, V76, P762, DOI 10.1111/jomf.12120; GOVE WR, 1990, J FAM ISSUES, V11, P4, DOI 10.1177/019251390011001002; GRAHAM C, 2014, INT J WELLBEING, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.5502/IJW.V4I1.1; Green M, 2010, J RELIG HEALTH, V49, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10943-009-9242-1; Hackney CH, 2003, J SCI STUD RELIG, V42, P43, DOI 10.1111/1468-5906.t01-1-00160; Hamid T. A., 2018, MEDITERRANEAN J SOCI, V9, P107; Harbi Y, 2019, WIRELESS PERS COMMUN, V108, P325, DOI 10.1007/s11277-019-06405-y; HORLEY J, 1995, SOC INDIC RES, V34, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF01079200; Hossain M, 2002, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V55, P400, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00505-4; Huang C.-Y. M.-C. H., 2012, J CLIN NURS, P18; Huang XB, 2019, SOCIOLOGY, V53, P401, DOI 10.1177/0038038518760211; Jain P, 2019, J BIG DATA-GER, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40537-019-0193-4; Jee SH, 2001, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V15, P244, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-15.4.244; Jeste DV, 2010, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V304, P1602, DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.1458; Johnson AD, 2018, J PEDIATR-US, V196, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.026; Kahneman D, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P3, DOI 10.1257/089533006776526030; Kapteyn A, 2015, SOC INDIC RES, V123, P625, DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0753-0; Kingdon GG, 2007, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V64, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.03.004; Kitsaras G, 2018, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5290-3; Koenig Harold G, 2012, ISRN Psychiatry, V2012, P278730, DOI 10.5402/2012/278730; Koenig HaroldG., 2012, HDB RELIG HLTH, V2; KOENIG HG, 1988, GERONTOLOGIST, V28, P18, DOI 10.1093/geront/28.1.18; Koenig HG, 2001, INT REV PSYCHIATR, V13, P67; Kosinski M, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P5802, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1218772110; Krech S., 2019, AM J MED RES, V6, P31; Kron M, 2019, INT J SOC PSYCHIATR, V65, P92, DOI 10.1177/0020764018819631; Lai HM, 2019, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V38, P533, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1543452; Li BY, 2016, COMPUT IND ENG, V101, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.009; Lim C, 2010, AM SOCIOL REV, V75, P914, DOI 10.1177/0003122410386686; Luhmann M, 2011, J RES PERS, V45, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.004; Mandall NA, 2005, BRIT DENT J, V199, P659, DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812930; Manning WD, 2015, FUTURE CHILD, V25, P51, DOI 10.1353/foc.2015.0012; MASTEKAASA A, 1994, J COMP FAM STUD, V25, P183, DOI 10.3138/jcfs.25.2.183; Mayer-Schonberger V., 2013, BIG DATA REVOLUTION; Mazumder B, 2013, ECON INQ, V51, P1795, DOI 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00490.x; McFadden SH, 1995, J SOC ISSUES, V51, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01329.x; Menard S. W, 1995, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES; Michael ST, 2003, J WOMEN AGING, V15, P145, DOI 10.1300/J074v15n02_09; Michalos A. C., 2017, ED HAPPINESS WELL BE; MICHALOS AC, 1980, SOC INDIC RES, V8, P385, DOI 10.1007/BF00461152; Monroe BL, 2015, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V48, P71, DOI 10.1017/S1049096514001760; Murata A, 2015, PROCEDIA MANUF, V3, P2426, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.502; Nazarko L., 2015, NURSING RESIDENTIAL, V17, P307; Ngamaba KH, 2017, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V27, P879, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckx081; Ohlin LE, 1949, AM J SOCIOL, V54, P441, DOI 10.1086/220398; Othman AR, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V170, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.042; Palei SK, 2009, SAFETY SCI, V47, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.01.002; Pan Y., 2007, J MACROMARKETING, V27, P360, DOI DOI 10.1177/0276146707307211; Pargament K. I., 2019, PSYCHOL RELIG, P43, DOI [10.4324/9780429495915-4, DOI 10.4324/9780429495915-4]; Pattani S, 2001, BRIT MED J, V322, P208, DOI 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.208; Piper AT, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V143, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.042; Popenoe D, 2009, SOCIETY, V46, P429, DOI 10.1007/s12115-009-9242-5; Quan-Haase A., 2018, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V38, P3; Ravallion M, 2002, EUR ECON REV, V46, P1453, DOI 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00151-9; Rhoades L, 2001, J APPL PSYCHOL, V86, P825, DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.825; Rowe JW, 1997, GERONTOLOGIST, V37, P433, DOI 10.1093/geront/37.4.433; Ruengtam P, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P966, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.256; Ryff CD, 2014, PSYCHOTHER PSYCHOSOM, V83, P10, DOI 10.1159/000353263; Saroglou V., 2008, J POSIT PSYCHOL, V3, P165, DOI DOI 10.1080/17439760801998737; Sgroi D., 2017, HIST ANAL NATL SWB U; Shields M., 2003, 8 AUSTR I FAM STUD C; Sivarajah U, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001; Slade T, 2009, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V43, P594, DOI 10.1080/00048670902970882; Soons JPM, 2009, J MARRIAGE FAM, V71, P1254, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00667.x; Spilka B., 2003, PSYCHOL RELIG EMPIRI; Steptoe A, 2015, LANCET, V385, P640, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0; Stevenson B, 2008, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1; Stratton LS, 2008, ECON EDUC REV, V27, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.003; Tay L, 2012, SCI REV REMARKABLE B; The United Nations, 2013, INT DAY HAPP PURS HA; Thiyagarajan A, 2019, BMC PEDIATR, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12887-019-1466-y; Tibesigwa B, 2016, SOC INDIC RES, V128, P361, DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1035-1; TRUETT J, 1967, J CHRON DIS, V20, P511, DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90082-3; Veenhoven R., 1984, CONDITIONS HAPPINESS; Waite LJ, 2003, POPUL DEV REV, V29, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00255.x; Waldfogel J, 2010, FUTURE CHILD, V20, P87; Watts-Schacter E., 2019, AM J MED RES, V6, P19; Weaver MT, 1998, AM J PREV MED, V15, P250, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7; Westra D, 2016, HEALTH POLICY, V120, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.014; White H, 2000, ECONOMETRICA, V68, P1097, DOI 10.1111/1468-0262.00152; Whittington BL, 2010, INT J PSYCHOL RELIG, V20, P59, DOI 10.1080/10508610903146316; Willoughby BJ, 2016, J FAM PSYCHOL, V30, P181, DOI 10.1037/fam0000150; WILSON W, 1967, PSYCHOL BULL, V67, P294, DOI 10.1037/h0024431; WIMBERLEY DW, 1984, SOCIOL QUART, V25, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1984.tb00184.x; Wiseman E., 2018, WORLDS MOST VALUABLE; Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P1; World Health Organisation (WHO), 2017, SUIC FACT SHEET; Zhou ZH, 2014, IEEE COMPUT INTELL M, V9, P62, DOI 10.1109/MCI.2014.2350953	136	7	7	4	18	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0148-2963	1873-7978		J BUS RES	J. Bus. Res.	JUL	2021	131						520	538		10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.038	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.038		MAY 2021	19	Business	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	SE4CD	32839631	hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000652020000015
J	Islam, T; Khan, MM; Ahmed, I; Mahmood, K				Islam, Talat; Khan, Mubbsher Munawar; Ahmed, Ishfaq; Mahmood, Khalid			Promoting in-role and extra-role green behavior through ethical leadership: mediating role of green HRM and moderating role of individual green values	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER			English	Article						Green HRM; In-role green behaviors; Extra-role green behaviors; Individual green values; Ethical leadership; Sustainability		Purpose Human misbehaviors are responsible for climate change as they waste resources and pollute water and air that dilapidate the environment. Considering the fact and contributing to the United Nations sustainable development goals of 2019, organizations started focusing their green HRM practices to develop employees' green attitudes and behaviors. This study is an attempt in this direction. It examines the impact of ethical leadership on individuals' green in-role and extra-role behaviors with the mediating role of green HRM practices and the moderating role of individual green values. Design/methodology/approach The study collected data from 645 MBA executive students working in various manufacturing industries with at least one year of experience. The data were collected using a questionnaire-based survey in two-time lags. Findings Hypothesized relationships are tested through structural equation modeling. Findings reflected a significant impact of ethical leadership on green HRM practices, in-role, and extra-role green behaviors. Besides, green HRM practices mediated the relationship between ethical leadership and both types of green behaviors. Furthermore, it was observed that the individual green values strengthened the association between green HRM practices and both types of green behaviors. Research limitations/implications A cross-sectional design with time lags was used to avoid common method bias. The findings of the study contribute to supply-value-fit theory and validate the scale of individual green value. Practical implications This study guides management that employees only perceive their organizational practices as green when they find their leaders are ethical. Further, considering individual green values in the recruitment process can help organizations accomplishing their green goals. Originality/value This study is novel in examining the mediating role of green HRM practices between ethical leadership and green behaviors. Further, the analysis not only validates the scale of individual green values but also noted its moderating role between green HRM and green behaviors.	[Islam, Talat] Univ Punjab, Inst Business Adm, Lahore, Pakistan; [Khan, Mubbsher Munawar] Univ Punjab, Hailey Coll Banking & Finance, Lahore, Pakistan; [Ahmed, Ishfaq] Univ Punjab, Hailey Coll Commerce, Lahore, Pakistan; [Mahmood, Khalid] Univ Punjab, Dept Informat Management, Lahore, Pakistan		Islam, T (corresponding author), Univ Punjab, Inst Business Adm, Lahore, Pakistan.	talatislam@yahoo.com	Islam, Talat/A-7857-2017; Ahmed, Ishfaq/C-5805-2012	Islam, Talat/0000-0002-3968-4513; Khan, Prof. Dr. Mubbsher Munawar/0000-0002-7633-3296; Ahmed, Ishfaq/0000-0003-1980-5872				Abrahamse W, 2009, J ECON PSYCHOL, V30, P711, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006; Adjei-Bamfo P, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1081, DOI 10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0480; Afsar B, 2016, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V45, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011; Ahmad I, 2019, LEADERSHIP ORG DEV J, V40, P534, DOI 10.1108/LODJ-12-2018-0461; Ahmad I, 2019, ETHICS BEHAV, V29, P490, DOI 10.1080/10508422.2018.1501566; Ahmad S, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1323, DOI 10.1108/IJM-02-2019-0079; ANDERSON JC, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P411, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411; [Anonymous], 2018, WHO SPEC IN; Anwar N, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401; Aselage J, 2003, J ORGAN BEHAV, V24, P491, DOI 10.1002/job.211; Avey JB, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V107, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1298-2; Barnett C., 2005, CONSUMER POLICY REV, V15, P45; Bavik YL, 2018, LEADERSHIP QUART, V29, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006; Becker BE, 2006, J MANAGE, V32, P898, DOI 10.1177/0149206306293668; Bin Saeed B, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P424, DOI 10.1002/csr.1694; Bissing-Olson MJ, 2013, J ORGAN BEHAV, V34, P156, DOI 10.1002/job.1788; Blok V, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.063; Boiral O, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V149, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3098-6; Boudreau JW, 2005, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V44, P129, DOI 10.1002/hrm.20054; Brown ME, 2005, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V97, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002; Byrne B.M., 2010, STRUCTURAL EQUATION; Chaudhary R, 2019, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V10, P161; Cheema S, 2020, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V27, P9, DOI 10.1002/csr.1769; Cherian J., 2012, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V7, P25, DOI [DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V7N21P25, 10.5539/ijbm.v7n21p25]; Jabbour CJC, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V96, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.039; Chughtai A, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V128, P653, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2126-7; Clair J., 2017, GREENING PEOPLE, P49, DOI [10.4324/9781351283045, DOI 10.4324/9781351283045]; Cohen A, 2011, INT J PSYCHOL, V46, P271, DOI 10.1080/00207594.2010.539613; Davis MC, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P335, DOI 10.1002/bse.2367; Dumont J, 2017, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V56, P613, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21792; Edwards JR, 1996, ACAD MANAGE J, V39, P292, DOI 10.2307/256782; Elci M, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V58, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1003; Elrehail H, 2020, EUR J MANAG BUS ECON, V29, P125, DOI 10.1108/EJMBE-01-2019-0001; Eubanks DL, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V107, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1295-5; Farooq O, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V125, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3; Fatoki O, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11154135; Fawehinmi O, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P879, DOI 10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0347; Gao YQ, 2017, MANAGE DECIS, V55, P294, DOI 10.1108/MD-05-2016-0284; Gilal FG, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P1579, DOI 10.1002/csr.1835; Hair JF, 2010, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, V2; Hameed Z, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1061, DOI 10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0407; Harvey G, 2013, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V24, P152, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2012.669783; Hu XW, 2018, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V29, P746, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2016.1255986; IPCC, 2018, IPCC CLIM REP 2018; Islam T, 2021, MANAGE DECIS, V59, P205, DOI 10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069; Islam T, 2020, POLICING, V43, P403, DOI 10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2019-0087; Islam T, 2019, POLICING, V42, P739, DOI 10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2018-0138; Islam T, 2019, MANAG RES REV, V42, P332, DOI 10.1108/MRR-12-2017-0408; Islam T, 2019, LEADERSH HEALTH SERV, V32, P2, DOI 10.1108/LHS-02-2017-0006; Islam T, 2018, J MANAG DEV, V37, P258, DOI 10.1108/JMD-01-2017-0039; Islam T, 2018, MANAG RES REV, V41, P296, DOI 10.1108/MRR-02-2017-0052; Jackson SE, 2011, Z PERSONALFORSCH, V25, P99, DOI 10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2011_02_Jackson; Jiang KF, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P1264, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0088; Kalshoven K, 2013, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V22, P165, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2011.640773; Khan AS, 2015, INT J PROJ MANAG, V33, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.006; Khan MAS, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01977; Khan N, 2018, ETHICS BEHAV, V28, P628, DOI 10.1080/10508422.2018.1427097; Kim YJ, 2019, INT J HOSP MANAG, V76, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007; Lee D, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V141, P47, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2689-y; Lehman P.K., 2004, BEHAV SOC ISSUES, V13, P13, DOI [10.5210/bsi.v13i1.33, DOI 10.5210/BSI.V13I1.33]; Low K. C. P., 2013, ED RES, V4, P330; Luu TT, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1167, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1601731; Moktadir MA, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1135, DOI 10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0354; Moore C, 2019, J APPL PSYCHOL, V104, P123, DOI 10.1037/apl0000341; MUCHINSKY PM, 1987, J VOCAT BEHAV, V31, P268, DOI 10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1; Muster V, 2011, Z PERSONALFORSCH, V25, P140, DOI 10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2011_02_Muster; Pham NT, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V72, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.008; Nishii LH, 2008, PERS PSYCHOL, V61, P503, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x; Norton TA, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V38, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.008; Ostroff C, 2016, ACAD MANAGE REV, V41, P196, DOI 10.5465/amr.2015.0323; Paille P, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V36, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.014; Pinzone M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V122, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.031; Pless NM, 2012, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V26, P51, DOI 10.5465/amp.2012.0028; Podsakoff PM, 2012, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V63, P539, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452; Priyankara HPR, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010271; Raja U, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P350, DOI 10.2307/20159586; Ramus C., 2007, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V16, P554, DOI [DOI 10.1002/BSE.504, 10.1002/bse.504]; Ramus CA, 2000, ACAD MANAGE J, V43, P605, DOI 10.2307/1556357; Raut RD, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P925, DOI 10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0435; Ren S, 2021, INT J MANPOWER, V42, P961, DOI 10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0414; Renwick DWS, 2016, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V27, P114, DOI 10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844; Renwick DWS, 2013, INT J MANAG REV, V15, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x; Robertson JL, 2017, LEADERSHIP ORG DEV J, V38, P22, DOI 10.1108/LODJ-05-2015-0100; Robertson JL, 2013, J ORGAN BEHAV, V34, P176, DOI 10.1002/job.1820; Roscoe S, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P737, DOI 10.1002/bse.2277; Rupp DE, 2006, J ORGAN BEHAV, V27, P537, DOI 10.1002/job.380; Saleem M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12083314; Sekaran U., 2003, RES METHODS BUSINESS, V4th; Shafaei A, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1041, DOI 10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0406; Shareef RA, 2019, MANAGE DECIS, V57, P583, DOI 10.1108/MD-08-2017-0721; Shen J, 2018, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V43, P594, DOI 10.1177/1059601116664610; Steg L, 2005, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V25, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003; Steg L, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004; Sugianingrat IAPW, 2019, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V68, P319, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0124; Tabachnick B.G., 2019, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V7th; Tang GY, 2018, ASIA PAC J HUM RESOU, V56, P31, DOI 10.1111/1744-7941.12147; Tian HR, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P7341, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-07393-z; Luu TT, 2018, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V26, P1308, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2018.1443113; Wagner M, 2011, Z PERSONALFORSCH, V25, P157, DOI 10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2011_02_Wagner; Walumbwa FO, 2017, J BUS RES, V72, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.013; Walumbwa FO, 2011, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V115, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002; Williams LJ, 2009, ACAD MANAG ANN, V3, P543, DOI 10.1080/19416520903065683; Wu LZ, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V130, P819, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2108-9; Xu AJ, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V134, P493, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2457-4; Yong JY, 2020, BENCHMARKING, V27, P2005, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0438; Yukl G, 2013, J LEADERSH ORG STUD, V20, P38, DOI 10.1177/1548051811429352; Yuriev A, 2020, INT J MANPOWER, V41, P1005, DOI 10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0387; Zhao HD, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11040944	108	34	34	21	79	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0143-7720	1758-6577		INT J MANPOWER	Int. J. Manpow.	JUL 27	2021	42	6					1102	1123		10.1108/IJM-01-2020-0036	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2020-0036		DEC 2020	22	Industrial Relations & Labor; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	TS0QA					2022-09-08	WOS:000604761900001
J	Farooq, MB; Zaman, R; Sarraj, D; Khalid, F				Farooq, Muhammad Bilal; Zaman, Rashid; Sarraj, Dania; Khalid, Fahad			Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports	SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL			English	Article						Sustainability reporting; Corporate governance; Gulf cooperation council (GCC); Managerial capture; Materiality assessment	CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; MIDDLE-EAST; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS; OWNERSHIP; ADOPTION; TRANSPARENCY; RELIABILITY	Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the extent of materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports and their determinants. The study examines the disclosure practices of listed companies based in the member states of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, colloquially referred to as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Design/methodology/approach First, the materiality assessment disclosures were scored through a content analysis of sustainability reports published by listed GCC companies during a five-year period from 2013 to 2017. Second, a fixed effect ordered logic regression was used to examine the determinants of materiality assessment disclosures. Findings While sustainability reporting rates improved across the sample period, a significant majority of listed GCC companies do not engage in sustainability reporting. The use of internationally recognised standards has also declined. While reporters provide more information on their materiality assessment, the number of sustainability reports that offer information on how the reporter identifies material issues has declined. These trends potentially indicate the existence of managerial capture. Materiality assessment disclosure scores are positively influenced by higher financial performance (Return on Assets), lower leverage and better corporate governance. However, company size and market-to-book ratio do not influence materiality assessment disclosures. Practical implications The findings may prove useful to managers responsible for preparing sustainability reports who can benefit from the examples of materiality assessment disclosures. An evaluation of the materiality assessment should be included in the scope of assurance engagements and practitioners can use the examples of best practice when evaluating sustainability reports. Stock exchanges may consider developing improved corporate governance guidelines as these will lead to materiality assessment disclosures. Social implications The findings may assist in improving sustainability reporting quality, through better materiality assessment disclosures. This will allow corporate stakeholders to evaluate the reporting entities underlying processes, which leads to transparency and corporate accountability. Improved corporate sustainability reporting supports the GCC commitment to implement the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and transition to sustainable development. Originality/value This study addresses the call for greater research examining materiality within a sustainability reporting context. This is the first paper to examine sustainability reporting quality in the GCC region, focussing particularly on materiality assessment disclosures.	[Farooq, Muhammad Bilal; Sarraj, Dania] Auckland Univ Technol, Dept Accounting, Auckland, New Zealand; [Zaman, Rashid] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup, Australia; [Khalid, Fahad] Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Sch Business, Guilin, Peoples R China		Zaman, R (corresponding author), Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup, Australia.	r.zaman@ecu.edu.au	Zaman, Rashid/H-1941-2019; Farooq, Muhammad Bilal/H-6163-2016	Zaman, Rashid/0000-0003-3111-9437; Farooq, Muhammad Bilal/0000-0003-0141-4523				AccountAbility, 2011, AA1000 STAK ENG STAN; AccountAbility, 2018, AA1000AP ACC PRINC 2; AccountAbility, 2013, RED MAT 2 WHY IT MAT; AccountAbility, 2008, AA1000 ACCOUNTABILIT; Adams C. A., 2004, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V17, P731, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570410567791; Adams CA, 2006, J ACCOUNT ORGAN CHAN, V2, P281, DOI 10.1108/18325910610690090; Adams CA, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V27, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001; Amran A, 2011, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V20, P141, DOI 10.1002/bse.672; Azizul Islam M., 2008, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V21, P850, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513570810893272, 10.1108/09513570810893272]; Baetschmann G, 2015, J R STAT SOC A STAT, V178, P685, DOI 10.1111/rssa.12090; Baker M, 2010, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V23, P847, DOI 10.1108/09513571011080153; Bananuka Juma, 2019, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, V24, P266, DOI 10.1108/JEFAS-11-2018-0120; Bananuka J, 2019, J ACCOUNT EMERG ECON, V9, P502, DOI 10.1108/JAEE-08-2018-0084; Bananuka J, 2019, AFR J ECON MANAG STU, V10, P336, DOI 10.1108/AJEMS-08-2018-0236; Bananuka J, 2018, J FINANC REPORT ACCO, V16, P138, DOI 10.1108/JFRA-07-2016-0062; Barako DG, 2006, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V14, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x; Barbuscia D., 2019, REUTERS; Bebbington J., 2001, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V12, P557, DOI DOI 10.1006/CPAC.2000.0450; Bebbington J, 2001, ACCOUNT FORUM, V25, P128, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-6303.00059; Belal A., 2002, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, V9, P8, DOI DOI 10.1002/CSR.5; Bellantuono N, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040379; Beske F, 2020, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V11, P162, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343; Bradley OJ, 2018, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V9, P139, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2017-0015; Brammer S, 2006, J BUS FINAN ACCOUNT, V33, P1168, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x; Calabrese A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V121, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005; Calabrese A, 2015, ACCOUNT FORUM, V39, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.002; Cho CH, 2015, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V40, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003; Clarkson PM, 2008, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V33, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003; Clarkson PM, 2011, ABACUS, V47, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00330.x; Cormier D., 2003, J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC, V22, P43, DOI [10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00085-6, DOI 10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00085-6]; De Beelde I, 2015, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V24, P190, DOI 10.1002/bse.1814; de Villiers C, 2014, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V46, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001; de Villiers C, 2006, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V31, P763, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.001; de Villiers C, 2016, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V46, P167, DOI 10.1080/00014788.2015.1039476; Deegan C., 1996, ACCOUNT BUS RES, V26, P187, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510, 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510]; Deegan C., 1996, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V9, P50, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513579610116358; Deegan C., 2002, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V15, P282, DOI [10.1108/09513570210435852, DOI 10.1108/09513570210435852]; Deegan C, 2013, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V24, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.04.004; Eccles R.G., 2014, INTEGRATED REPORTING; Eccles RG, 2012, J APPL CORP FINANC, V24, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x; Edgley C, 2014, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V25, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.06.001; Ettredge M, 2011, REV ACCOUNT STUD, V16, P866, DOI 10.1007/s11142-011-9153-8; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P417, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3727; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P1240, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2958; Farooq MB, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V32, P307, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2016-2756; Farooq MB, 2017, PAC ACCOUNT REV, V29, P79, DOI 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0093; Fasan M., 2013, 19 U CA FOSC VEN DEP; Fasan M, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P288, DOI 10.1002/bse.1917; Fortanier F, 2011, MANAGE INT REV, V51, P665, DOI 10.1007/s11575-011-0089-9; Fuente JA, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155; Gallo PJ, 2011, BUS SOC, V50, P315, DOI 10.1177/0007650311398784; Gerged AM, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P572, DOI 10.1002/bse.2021; Gerwanski J, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P750, DOI 10.1002/bse.2278; Global Reporting Initiative, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR; Global Reporting Initiative, 2016, GRI 101 FDN 2016; Global Reporting Initiative, 2013, GRI G4 SUST REP GUID; Gray R., 1996, SOCIAL REPORTING SUS; Gray R., 2006, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V19, P793, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570610709872; Gray R, 2010, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V35, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006; GRI, 2016, GRI 102 GEN DISCL 20; Guthrie James., 2004, J INTELLECT CAP, V5, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14691930410533704, 10.1108/14691930410533704]; Hackson D., 1996, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V9, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513579610109987, 10.1108/09513579610109987]; Hahn R, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005; Haniffa R.M., 2005, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V24, P391, DOI [10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2005.06.001, DOI 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001]; Haque S, 2010, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V20, P317, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00107.x; Haufler V, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V10, P53, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00014; Hayes AF, 2007, COMMUN METHODS MEAS, V1, P77, DOI 10.1080/19312450709336664; Hopwood A., 2010, ACCOUNTING SUSTAINAB, P25; Hopwood AG, 2009, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V34, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002; Howard M, 2019, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V27, P125, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-12-2017-0247; Hsu CW, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V57, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.040; IAASB, 2009, INT STAND AUD ISA 32; IBRAHIM NA, 1995, J BUS ETHICS, V14, P405, DOI 10.1007/BF00872102; International Accounting Standards Board, 2018, CONC FRAM FIN REP; Jain T, 2020, BRIT J MANAGE, V31, P365, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12376; Jain T, 2016, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V24, P253, DOI 10.1111/corg.12154; Jamali D, 2020, J WORLD BUS, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101127; JENSEN MC, 1976, J FINANC ECON, V3, P305, DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X; Jones P, 2016, J PUBLIC AFF, V16, P81, DOI 10.1002/pa.1570; Kamal Y, 2013, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V23, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00205.x; Kaur A, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P338, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2014-1901; Kaur A, 2014, PAC ACCOUNT REV, V26, P54, DOI 10.1108/PAR-07-2013-0064; Kent P, 2008, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V18, P297, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2008.0036.x; Khan M, 2016, ACCOUNT REV, V91, P1697, DOI 10.2308/accr-51383; KPMG, 2017, KPMG SURV CORP RESP; KPMG, 2014, SUST INS ESS MAT ASS; KPMG, 2020, TIM HAS COM KPMG SUR; Krippendorff K, 2004, HUM COMMUN RES, V30, P411, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x; Leigh L, 2011, EUR BUS REV, V23, P154, DOI 10.1108/09555341111111183; Lim J, 2020, J CORP FINANC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101628; Lydenberg S., 2012, MAT SUSTAINABILITY V; Maroun W., 2018, SOCIAL ENV ACCOUNTAB, V38, P167; McNicholas P., 2007, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V20, P382, DOI [10.1108/09513570710748535, DOI 10.1108/09513570710748535]; Michelon G, 2015, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V33, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003; Mirza M., 2001, ACCOUNT FINANC, V41, P63, DOI [10.1111/1467-629X.00054, DOI 10.1111/1467-629X.00054]; Moneva JM, 2006, ACCOUNT FORUM, V30, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001; Nalukenge I, 2020, INT J LAW MANAG, V62, P47, DOI 10.1108/IJLMA-08-2017-0195; Nalukenge I, 2018, J FINANC REPORT ACCO, V16, P764, DOI 10.1108/JFRA-08-2017-0064; ODwyer B., 2003, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V16, P523, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570310492290; Ong T, 2016, ACCOUNT RES J, V29, P198, DOI 10.1108/ARJ-03-2015-0030; Owen D., 2000, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V9, P81, DOI DOI 10.1080/096381800407950; Owen D. L., 1997, ASIA-PAC J ACCOUNT E, V4, P175; Owen DL, 2001, ACCOUNT FORUM, V25, P264, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-6303.00066; Prado-Lorenzo JM, 2009, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V16, P94, DOI 10.1002/csr.189; Raouf, 2008, CLIM CHANG THREATS O; SHELLEY M, 1984, J AM STAT ASSOC, V79, P240, DOI 10.2307/2288384; Stanny E, 2008, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V15, P338, DOI 10.1002/csr.175; UNERMAN J, 2014, SOCIAL ENV ACCOUNTAB, V34, P172, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969160X.2014.965262; Unerman J., 2008, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V21, P362, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570810863941; Unerman J, 2014, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V39, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.003; Unerman J, 2007, SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY, P86, DOI 10.4324/NOE0415384889.ch5; Vormedal I, 2009, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V18, P207, DOI 10.1002/bse.560; Zaman R., 2020, INT REV FINANC; Zaman R, 2021, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V29, P135, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0649; Zaman R, 2018, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V18, P858, DOI 10.1108/CG-01-2018-0042	115	4	4	15	34	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	2040-8021	2040-803X		SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA	Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J.	AUG 26	2021	12	5					965	1002		10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113		MAR 2021	38	Business, Finance; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UF4SQ		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000626746400001
J	Makarova, AS; Jia, XX; Kruchina, EB; Kudryavtseva, EI; Kukushkin, IG				Makarova, Anna S.; Jia, Xuexiu; Kruchina, Elena B.; Kudryavtseva, Evgenia I.; Kukushkin, Igor G.			Environmental performance assessment of the chemical industries involved in the Responsible Care Program: Case study of the Russian Federation	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article							BIG DATA; SUSTAINABILITY; ANALYTICS; EMISSIONS; FOOTPRINT	The chemical industry is one of the typical sources of harmful pollutants and some of which are difficult to tackle. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are of great concern to the performance of chemical industries regarding environmental impacts, and one of the core programs is the global voluntary Responsible Care Program (RCP), aiming to encourage the industries to voluntarily report environmental performance data. Due to the voluntary reporting system, the collected datasets are huge while often heterogeneous, which makes it difficult to analyse the performance and evaluate the difference before and after the launch of the program. Direct comparison of actual indicators may fail to provide an accurate estimation of the implementing efficiency of the RCP. In this study, an original algorithm is developed to analyse the environmental KPIs of chemical companies involved in the RCP, in order to investigate the efficiency of the program and provide insightful suggestions for further development of the data reporting, as well as to provide advice for the further application of the program. The results showed that most of the environmental impacts of the chemical industries in the RF, e.g. soil pollution and water pollution, has been decreasing after the launching of the program. However, for both the companies involved in the RCP and the entire chemical industrial sector of the RF chemical industry, the GHG emissions maintained an increase. A major insightful conclusion is more energy has been used for improving more direct environmental impact, while the attention for impacts with longer harm potential, e.g. GHG emissions, has been shifted. Further policies and regulations should be targeted at the impact of the chemical industry on climate change, and new technologies should be encouraged to improve the efficiency of energy use and thus decrease GHG emissions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Makarova, Anna S.; Kruchina, Elena B.] Mendeleyev Univ Chem Technol Russia, UNESCO Chair Green Chem Sustainable Dev, Miusskaya Sqr 9, Moscow 125047, Russia; [Jia, Xuexiu] Brno Univ Technol VUT Bmo, Fac Mech Engn, NETME Ctr, SPIL,Tech 2896 2, Brno 61669, Czech Republic; [Kudryavtseva, Evgenia I.] Koltech EcoChem LLC, Volokolamsk Highway 97, Moscow 125371, Russia; [Kukushkin, Igor G.] Mendeleyev Univ Chem Technol Russia, Dept Econ Theory, Miusskaya Sqr 9, Moscow 125047, Russia		Makarova, AS (corresponding author), Mendeleyev Univ Chem Technol Russia, UNESCO Chair Green Chem Sustainable Dev, Miusskaya Sqr 9, Moscow 125047, Russia.	annmakarova@mail.su	Makarova, Anna S/G-6354-2012; Jia, Xuexiu/J-4213-2017	Makarova, Anna S/0000-0001-8097-4515; Jia, Xuexiu/0000-0002-8644-5136; Kudravceva, Evgenia/0000-0002-3179-7687	Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia [042-2018]; EU [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000456]; Czech Republic Operational Programme Research and Development, Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research	Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia; EU(European Commission); Czech Republic Operational Programme Research and Development, Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research	The work was supported by the Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, Project Number 042-2018 and the EU supported project Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL funded as project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000456, by Czech Republic Operational Programme Research and Development, Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research.	APEC, 2011, 2011SOM3CD018 APEC; Arias AM, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V115, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.056; Barbosa LC, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V55, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.027; BASF, 2015, PROM RESP CAR CHIN; Belanger J., 2014, A CASE STUDY; Belanger J., 2009, RESPONSIBLE CARE HIS; Cucek L, 2012, J CLEAN PROD, V34, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.036; Despeisse M, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P354, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.555425; EBRD, 2010, DEV EL CARB EM FACT; Federal State Statistics Services, 2018, ENVIRONMENT; Finger S. R., 2011, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1990372, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1990372]; Finkbeiner M, 2009, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V14, P91, DOI 10.1007/s11367-009-0064-x; Fransen L, 2015, REGUL GOV, V9, P259, DOI 10.1111/rego.12055; Gamper-Rabindran S, 2013, J REGUL ECON, V43, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11149-012-9197-0; Gao T, 2014, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V9, P237, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/ctt041; Giest S, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P941, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1294149; Gombiner J., 2011, CONSILIENCE J SUSTAI, V5, P119; Hassan Abeer, 2013, International Journal of Sustainable Economy, V5, P36; Hickmann T, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V169, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.183; ICCA, 2015, RESP CAR STAT REP; ICCA, 2018, RESP CAR QUEST PERF; ICCA, 2012, GLOB SUST RIO 20 VIS; ICCA, 2018, SAICM JOURN 20 MIL 2; ICCA, 2017, GLOB CHEM IND CONTR; ICCA, 2015, CO SIGN 2014 RESP CA; Indian Chemical Council, 2018, RESP CAR; International Organization for Standardization, 2012, 140472012 ISOTR; IPCC, 2006, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES; Khair NKM, 2018, J CHEM HEALTH SAF, V25, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jchas.2018.02.003; King AA, 2000, ACAD MANAGE J, V43, P698, DOI 10.2307/1556362; Klemes J.J., 2015, ASSESSING MEASURING; Klemes JJ, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V148, P1199, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.630; Krantzberg G., 2011, CHEM CHEM INT, V33, P8; Krantzberg G., 2017, INT J SCI, V6, P55, DOI DOI 10.18483/IJSCI.1324; Lee K. E., 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V86, P417, DOI [10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.010/, DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.08.010/]; Makarova A., 2017, CHEM ENG T, V61, P1477, DOI DOI 10.3303/CET1761244; Makarova A, 2018, INT J QUAL RES, V12, P43, DOI 10.18421/IJQR12.01-03; Minx J, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035039; Moffet J., 2004, VOLUNTARY CODES PRIV, P177; Nakhutin A. l., 2016, NATL REPORT CADAST 1; Nash, 2003, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V12, P343, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.380; Penman J., 2000, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA; Ranganathan J., 2004, GREENH GAS PROT CORP; Rathore MM, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.022; Rockstrom J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a; Rustemoglu H, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V58, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.012; Saj S, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V250, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.003; Sandman P. M., 2002, RESPONSIBLE CARE BEE; Schreiber Dusan, 2016, BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev., V13, P56, DOI 10.1590/1807-7692bar2016150120; Scipioni A, 2012, J CLEAN PROD, V36, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.021; Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1; UN, 2014, GEN ASS WG REP SUST; West B., 2007, RESPONSIBLE APPL CHE; World Resources Institute, 2001, GREENH GAS PROT CORP; Yang XC, 2017, APPL ENERG, V193, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.034; Yung WKC, 2016, CARBON FOOTPRINT HANDBOOK, P503; 2013, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V15, P417, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10098-013-0641-3	57	6	6	6	26	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUN 10	2019	222						971	985		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.218	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.218			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	HV8RA					2022-09-08	WOS:000466249500084
J	Migliorini, M; Hagen, JS; Mihaljevic, J; Mysiak, J; Rossi, JL; Siegmund, A; Meliksetian, K; Sapir, DG				Migliorini, Massimo; Hagen, Jenny Sjastad; Mihaljevic, Jadranka; Mysiak, Jaroslav; Rossi, Jean-Louis; Siegmund, Alexander; Meliksetian, Khachatur; Sapir, Debarati Guha			Data interoperability for disaster risk reduction in Europe	DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Disaster risk management; Interoperability; Digital revolution; Data; Regional platforms; Science-policy interface	SYSTEM	Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how, despite increasing data availability from a wide range of sources unlocks unprecedented opportunities for disaster risk reduction, data interoperability remains a challenge due to a number of barriers. As a first step to enhancing data interoperability for disaster risk reduction is to identify major barriers, this paper presents a case study on data interoperability in disaster risk reduction in Europe, linking current barriers to the regional initiative of the European Science and Technology Advisory Group. Design/methodology/approach In support of Priority 2 ("Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk") of the Sendai Framework and SDG17 ("Partnerships for the goals"), this paper presents a case study on barriers to data interoperability in Europe based on a series of reviews, surveys and interviews with National Sendai Focal Points and stakeholders in science and research, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations and industry. Findings For a number of European countries, there remains a clear imbalance between long-term disaster risk reduction and short-term preparation and the dominant role of emergency relief, response and recovery, pointing to the potential of investments in ex ante measures with better inclusion and exploitation of data. Originality/value Modern society is facing a digital revolution. As highlighted by the International Council of Science and the Committee on Data for Science and Technology, digital technology offers profound opportunities for science to discover unsuspected patterns and relationships in nature and society, on scales from the molecular to the cosmic, from local health systems to global sustainability. It has created the potential for disciplines of science to synergize into a holistic understanding of the complex challenges currently confronting humanity; the Sustainable Development Goals are a direct reflectance of this. Interdisciplinary is obtained with integration of data across relevant disciplines. However, a barrier to realization and exploitation of this potential arises from the incompatible data standards and nomenclatures used in different disciplines. Although the problem has been addressed by several initiatives, the following challenge still remains: to make online data integration a routine.	[Migliorini, Massimo] LINKS, Turin, Italy; [Hagen, Jenny Sjastad] Univ Bergen, Bergen, Norway; [Hagen, Jenny Sjastad] Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway; [Mihaljevic, Jadranka] Inst Hydrometeorol & Seismol Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro; [Mysiak, Jaroslav] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, CCMC CaFoscari Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti C, RAAS, Venice, Italy; [Rossi, Jean-Louis] Univ Corse, Corte, France; [Siegmund, Alexander] Heidelberg Univ Educ, Dept Geog, Heidelberg, Germany; [Meliksetian, Khachatur] Armenian Natl Acad Sci, Inst Geol Sci, Yerevan, Armenia; [Sapir, Debarati Guha] Catholic Univ Louvain, Sch Publ Hlth, CRED, Brussels, Belgium		Migliorini, M (corresponding author), LINKS, Turin, Italy.	massimo.migliorini@linksfoundation.com	Mysiak, Jaroslav/A-8683-2019	Mysiak, Jaroslav/0000-0001-9341-7048; Sjastad Hagen, Jenny/0000-0003-1766-5861				Bardossy A, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P703, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-703-2007; Crawford K., 2013, CISC VIS NETW IND GL; Cutter S.L., 2003, T GIS, V7, P439, DOI [10.1111/1467-9671.00157, DOI 10.1111/1467-9671.00157]; Data-Pop Alliance, 2015, DAT POP ALL SYNTH RE; Giuliani G, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P53, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-53-2011; LANEY D, 2001, APPL DELIVERY STRATE, V949, P1; Li Y, 2018, J HYDROL, V557, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.013; Mansourian A, 2006, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V32, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.017; Migliorini M., 2015, USE INSPIRE DATA MOD; Moriyama K, 2018, J DISASTER RES, V13, P1007, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1007; Nash J.E., 1970, J CLIM, V10, P282, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6; Sathiaseelan A., 2016, BIG DATA ANAL, V1, P1, DOI [10.1186/s41044-016-0002-4, DOI 10.1186/S41044-016-0002-4]; Sjastad Hagen J., 2018, THESIS; Thielen J, 2009, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V13, P125, DOI 10.5194/hess-13-125-2009; UN Global Pulse, 2017, UN GLOB PULS ANN REP; UN GLOBAL PULSE, 2012, BIG DATA DEV CHALLEN; [ UN-DESA] United Nations-Department of Economics and Social Affairs, 2018, SUST DEV GOALS REP 2; UNDRR, 2019, GLOB ASS REP GAR DIS; United Nations, 2018, DIS REL DAT SUST DEV; United Nations General Assembly, 2016, OP END INT EXP WORK; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R; Wilkinson E., 2018, FORECASTING HAZARDS; Zaidi RZ, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.022	23	9	9	0	18	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0965-3562	1758-6100		DISASTER PREV MANAG	Disaster Prev. Manag.	NOV 4	2019	28	6			SI		796	808		10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0291	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0291			13	Environmental Studies; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Business & Economics	JL4OU					2022-09-08	WOS:000495510600007
J	Mirabella, N; Allacker, K				Mirabella, Nadia; Allacker, Karen			The population equivalent as a novel approach for life cycle assessment of cities and inter-city comparisons	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT			English	Article						LCA; Urban sustainability; Urban indicators; Functional unit; City-user; City environmental footprint; City LCA	ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT LCA; FRAMEWORK; METABOLISM; PROPOSAL; IMPACTS; EUROPE	Purpose Since the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development was set, cities are gaining momentum in the sustainability debate as favorable hubs of interventions to implement environmentally friendly policies. What makes a city sustainable is still object of debate though, as standards, frameworks, and methodologies with different goals and scope proliferate. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is promising in supporting cities to achieve this ambitious task, but methodological constraints still exist to make it applicable at city scale. This study offers proposals to solve current bottlenecks in the goal and scope phase for the application of LCA to urban systems and allowing for a meaningful inter-city comparison and benchmarking. Methods In order to define cities along with their function(s) and functional unit, a systematic desk study combined with authors' knowledge is performed and tested on the city of Leuven (Belgium). The final outcome includes the following: (i) categorization of cities based on their (prevalent) function(s); (ii) sets of indicators able to support both urban policies and LCA studies; and (iii) accounting and use of the population equivalent concept, as innovative and enhanced functional unit able to summarize and normalize different entities (i.e., residents and other city-users) to one single metric. Results and discussion Despite the fervent debate about cities and their sustainability, few studies address the topic of categorization and benchmarking of cities in an exhaustive way. The proposals were successfully applied to the city of Leuven, as first case study, with different degrees of extent and quality. A shortlist of five biophysical and economic criteria combined with ten urban categories represents a first straightforward tier of categorization. The population equivalent has the triple function of being descriptive, quantitative, and analytical for performing thorough urban sustainability studies and define targeted policies, but requires high computational and data collection efforts. The quality and granularity of collected information proved to be directly proportional to the access of local data sources, and inversely to its complexity, i.e., sufficient for policy support, but improvable when the goal is to perform LCA studies. Conclusions The functional categorization of cities and the calculation of the population equivalent provide a new approach for meaningful and helpful inter-city comparisons, as well as an enhanced detection and interpretation of urban environmental burdens. Due to the relevance of the topic in the scientific debate, the authors envisage complementary and multidisciplinary studies to make cities more and more part of the solution to the sustainability challenge, especially to improve the concept of population equivalent and the data management.	[Mirabella, Nadia; Allacker, Karen] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Engn Sci, Dept Architecture, Kasteelpk Arenberg 1, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium		Mirabella, N (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Engn Sci, Dept Architecture, Kasteelpk Arenberg 1, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.	nadia.mirabella@kuleuven.be		Allacker, Karen/0000-0002-1064-0795; Mirabella, Nadia/0000-0002-2155-0138				Aksoy E, 2016, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V204, P199, DOI 10.2495/SC160171; Alberti J, 2019, HABITAT INT, V83, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.003; Alberti J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P1516, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.377; Alberti J, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V609, P1049, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.179; [Anonymous], 2019, LEUVEN 2030; [Anonymous], 2019, URBAN DATA PLATFORM; [Anonymous], 2015, CITY PROSPERITY INIT; [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 140442006 ENV MA; [Anonymous], 2020, REG FOCUS; Athanassiadis, 2016, THESIS U LIBRE BRUXE; Cremer A, 2020, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V25, P2204, DOI 10.1007/s11367-020-01822-9; European Commission, 2019, FACTS FIG URB WAST W; European Commission, 2018, SCI ENV POLICY, V12, P24, DOI [10.2779/121865, DOI 10.2779/121865]; European Commission, 2020, EURR GREEN CAP; European Commission Directorate General for Regional Policy, 2011, CIT TOM CHALL VIS WA, DOI [10.2776/41803, DOI 10.2776/41803]; Ferrao P, 2013, SUSTAINABLE URBAN METABOLISM, P1; Folberth GA, 2015, ENVIRON POLLUT, V203, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.004; Goldstein B, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035024; Gottdiener M, 2016, KEY CONCEPTS URBAN S; Guinee JB, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P90, DOI 10.1021/es101316v; Haghshenas H, 2015, CITIES, V45, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.003; Harris CD, 1943, GEOGR REV, V33, P86, DOI 10.2307/210620; Henle K, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V124, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005; Kennedy C, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V47, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.039; Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107; Kennedy CA, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P5985, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504315112; KPMG, 2010, CIT TYP BAS POL TAIL; Lavagna M, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V145, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008; Loiseau E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V176, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.169; Loiseau E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V80, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.059; Loiseau E, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P1533, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0588-y; Lotteau M, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V93, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.029; Martinotti, 1996, MANAG SOC TRANSFORM, P10; Mirabella N, 2019, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V24, P1174, DOI 10.1007/s11367-018-1467-3; Mirabella N, 2018, PROC CIRP, V69, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.063; National Bank of Belgium, 2019, NAT BANK BELG ONL ST; Patko, 2010, RELATIONSHIP ENV IMP; Petit-Boix A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.030; Provincie Vlaams-Brabant, 2019, FACTS FIG FLEM BRAB; Randolph, 2006, 0348770 ARC; Rosenblum J, 2000, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V34, P4669, DOI 10.1021/es9914083; Simpson M., 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V13, P156, DOI [DOI 10.1002/BSE.398, 10.1002/bse.398]; Statistiek Vlaanderen, 2018, STADSM LEUV; Strezov V, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V51, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.016; The European Union Open Data Portal (EU ODP), 2018, EUROVOC EUS MULT THE; The World Bank, 2020, POP DENS MET GLOSS; Toerisme Vlaanderen, 2018, TOUR KEY FIG; UN. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, 2012, WORLD URB PROSP 2011; United Nations, 2015, 3 CHALLENGES FACING; United Nations Development Programme, 2012, INT HUM DEV IND; Vandecasteele I., 2019, FUTURE CITIES OPPORT; Venetoulis J., 2001, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V2, P180, DOI [10.1108/14676370110388381, DOI 10.1108/14676370110388381]; Walker TR, 2006, ECOL INDIC, V6, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.015; Williamson D, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V67, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1; Zoeteman K, 2016, ENVIRON DEV, V17, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.08.003	55	2	2	1	3	SPRINGER HEIDELBERG	HEIDELBERG	TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY	0948-3349	1614-7502		INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS	Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.	AUG	2021	26	8					1623	1647		10.1007/s11367-021-01944-8	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01944-8		JUL 2021	25	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UC5QJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000672272300001
J	Shao, WB; Li, FY; Cao, X; Tang, ZP; Bai, Y; Yang, SL				Shao, Wenbin; Li, Fangyi; Cao, Xin; Tang, Zhipeng; Bai, Yu; Yang, Shanlin			Reducing export-driven CO2 and PM emissions in China's provinces: A structural decomposition and coordinated effects analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Multi-regional input-output model; Structural decomposition analysis; Export-driven emissions; Regional disparities; Co-benefits; Trade-offs	GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION ABATEMENT; TRADE-OFFS; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BENEFITS; REDUCTION; IMPACTS	Reductions of export-driven CO2 and air pollutants emissions are crucial to promote green transition of exports and realize sustainable development goals for developing countries and regions. This study aims to explore the coordinated effects (co-effects) on export-driven emissions (EEs) and the hidden driving forces in China's individual provinces. Based on the multi-regional input-output (MRIO) tables and structural decomposition analysis (SDA) method, seven socioeconomic factors of the changes in CO2 and particulate matter (PM) EEs during 2007-2012 are estimated by province. The co-effects on provincial EEs, categorized as co-benefits, trade-offs and co-detriments, are assessed to reveal regional disparities. The results show that the changes in energy efficiency have led to the greatest co-benefits in all factors, while changes in emission coefficients, industrial structure, and regional distribution of exports have led to limited co-benefits in a few of provinces. The other factors, variations of population and export per capita, have resulted in co-detriments. The co-effects and their factors varied greatly across provinces. Some provinces were more likely to obtain co-benefits because of their first mover advantages or special actions for green development, such as Hebei, Henan, Hunan, Shandong, Tianjin, Yunnan and Guizhou, dispersedly distributed in coastal and inland regions. On the other hand, as trade-offs and co-detriments existed extensively in some provinces, related factors should be monitored and adjusted. Identifying coeffects and corresponding key factors at the regional level provides valuable insights into green transition of China's exports, and raises the importance of policy integration and regional cooperation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Shao, Wenbin; Li, Fangyi; Cao, Xin; Bai, Yu; Yang, Shanlin] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China; [Shao, Wenbin; Li, Fangyi; Cao, Xin; Bai, Yu; Yang, Shanlin] Hefei Univ Technol, Res Ctr Ind Transfer & Innovat Dev, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China; [Tang, Zhipeng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 10010, Peoples R China		Li, FY (corresponding author), Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.; Tang, ZP (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 10010, Peoples R China.	fly-ustc@163.com; tangzp@igsnrr.ac.cn		Li, Fangyi/0000-0002-8753-9652	National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401126, 71902051]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401126 and 71902051).	Anenberg SC, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48057-9; Ang BW, 2015, ENERG ECON, V51, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.004; Bai HT, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P754, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.029; Burtraw D, 2003, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V45, P650, DOI 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00022-0; Bustamante M, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3270, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12591; Cai JL, 2016, APPL ENERG, V183, P1112, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.069; CEADs, 2018, PROV LEV CO2 EM INV; Chae Y, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.003; Chen SQ, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P197, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000811; Chen SQ, 2019, APPL ENERG, V235, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.018; Chinese State Council (CSC), 2016, WORK PLAN CONTR GREE; Cremades R, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007; Deng HM, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa98d2; Dietzenbacher E., 1998, ECON SYST RES, V10, P307, DOI [10.1080/09535319800000023, DOI 10.1080/09535319800000023, https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000023]; Dong HJ, 2015, APPL ENERG, V144, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.020; Feng CY, 2019, APPL ENERG, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113422; Feng KS, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P600, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00494.x; Gibon T, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V76, P1283, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.078; Giordano R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V713, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136552; He K, 2010, ENERGY, V35, P4265, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.021; Jiang P, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V58, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.042; Kander A, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P431, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2555, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2555]; Kim SE, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105507; Klausbruckner C, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V57, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.001; Lee T, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V58, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.047; Lenzen M, 2000, J IND ECOL, V4, P127, DOI DOI 10.1162/10881980052541981; Leontief W, 1986, INPUT OUTPUT EC; Li AJ, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P1428, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.206; Li Y, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P1907, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.005; Liu HG, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V103, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.077; Liu JY, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab59c4; Liu QL, 2015, ECOL ECON, V113, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.026; Liu W., 2012, THEORY PRACTICE 2007; Liu W., 2018, 2012 CHINA MULTI REG; Liu YF, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121255; Liu ZY, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0176089; Liu Z, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P201, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2800, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2800]; Mao XQ, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.010; Mayrhofer JP, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V57, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005; Mi ZF, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01820-w; Miller R.E., 2009, INPUT OUTPUT ANAL FD, V2; Mittal S, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085006; National Statistics Bureau of China (NSBC), 2013, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB; National Statistics Bureau of China (NSBC) Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEPC), 2013, CHINA STAT YB ENV; Newell R., 2018, INT J CLIMATE CHANGE, V10, P1; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2019, CARBON DIOXIDE EMISS; Palomo I, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P22645, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1908683116; Qin Y, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P505, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0136-7; Rypdal K, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P6309, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.022; Shan YL, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.201; Shao WB, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133622; Shrestha RM, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P2586, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.003; Singh B, 2012, ENERGY, V45, P762, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.014; Stoeckl N, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V191, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.032; Su B, 2016, ENERG ECON, V59, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.006; Su B, 2015, APPL ENERG, V154, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.101; Su B, 2014, APPL ENERG, V114, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.036; Su B, 2012, ENERG ECON, V34, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009; Takeshita T, 2012, APPL ENERG, V97, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.029; Verspecht A, 2012, J INTEGR ENVIRON SCI, V9, P147, DOI 10.1080/1943815X.2012.698989; Wang HM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1096, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.070; Wang J, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V132, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.008; Wang Q, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V54, P1563, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.090; Wang SX, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI, V24, P2, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60724-9; Wang YQ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118507; Weber CL, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3572, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.009; Wu R, 2019, APPL ENERG, V248, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.024; Wu SM, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P867, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000913; Xu Y, 2014, ECOL ECON, V101, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.015; Xu ZC, 2020, NATURE, V577, P74, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1846-3; Yang X, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V129, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.011; Yang X, 2013, APPL ENERG, V112, P1446, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.040; Zeng A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P1226, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.037; Zhang Q, 2017, NATURE, V543, P705, DOI 10.1038/nature21712; Zhang SH, 2015, APPL ENERG, V147, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.081; Zhang SH, 2014, ENERGY, V78, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.018; Zhang S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120365; Zhang YG, 2015, ENERG ECON, V51, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.002; Zhao HY, 2016, APPL ENERG, V184, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.038; Zheng JL, 2019, ENERG ECON, V81, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003	80	7	7	19	71	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	NOV 20	2020	274								123101	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123101	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123101			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OC9QV					2022-09-08	WOS:000579490900008
J	Hu, WJ; Dong, JJ; Xu, N				Hu, Wanjie; Dong, Jianjun; Xu, Na			Multi-period planning of integrated underground logistics system network for automated construction-demolition-municipal waste collection and parcel delivery: A case study	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Underground logistics system; Construction and demolition waste; Sustainable transport; Network planning; Model and algorithm; Case study	LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; REVERSE LOGISTICS; MEMETIC ALGORITHM; ROUTING PROBLEM; HUB LOCATION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; DESIGN; COST	Sustainable development goals of cities have long been threatening by the low efficiency and negative externalities of the truck-dominant forward and reverse physical distribution activities. Aiming at conquering the dilemma, this paper offers a novel integrated underground logistics system (IULS) solution that has good applicability to incorporate the wholesale automated operations of construction and demolition waste (CDW) collection, municipal solid waste (MSW) collection, and parcel deliveries. In line with a Chinese on-going new urban district development project, the prototypes of IULS including network topology, facility operations, handling workflows, and transport technical parameters are designed. An empirical-based method is proposed to estimate the demand flows of heterogeneous CDW and parcels for IULS planning. Based on a well-designed multiperiod network expansion mechanism, a bi-objective dynamic programming model is established to characterize the optimal location-allocation-routing decisions of IULS network at minimal construction and operating costs. Given the computational complexity, a hybrid optimization approach combining variable neighborhood search based memetic algorithm, Kruskal's minimum spanning tree algorithm, and A-star algorithm is developed to obtain high-quality model solutions. Simulation based on real-world case is conducted to validate our planning techniques. Results show that the dual-use and multi-period expansion of IULS network can save millions of dollars of annual environmental governance expenditures for a satellite city with substantial rebuilding and distribution needs. By analyzing the facility configurations and cost-benefit performance of the optimized network solutions, a set of insights related to the best layout, economic feasibility, and long-term development for the prospective IULS network initiatives are disclosed.	[Hu, Wanjie] Beijing Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China; [Dong, Jianjun] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 211800, Peoples R China; [Xu, Na] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China		Dong, JJ (corresponding author), Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 211800, Peoples R China.	steve_hu@emails.njtech.edu.cn; dongjj@njtech.edu.cn; xuna@cumt.edu.cn		Hu, Wanjie/0000-0001-6969-1012; Xu, Na/0000-0002-4680-8027	National Natural Science Foundation of China [71631007, 71971214, 71901206]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants no. 71631007, 71971214 and 71901206) . The editors and anonymous reviewers of this paper are acknowledged for their constructive comments and suggestions.	[Anonymous], 2016, INTERGATING UNDERGRO; ASCE Task Comm Freight Pipelines Pipeline Div, 1998, J TRANSP ENG, V124, P300; Asefi H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101606; Chen ZL, 2017, UNDERGR SPACE, V2, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2017.08.002; Coulombel N, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V63, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.002; CST, 2020, CARG TERR; Decerle J, 2019, SWARM EVOL COMPUT, V46, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.02.009; Di Foggia G, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V114, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.012; Ding ZK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V133, P1136, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.054; Dong JJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051223; Egbunike ON, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.05.004; Fernandez C, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V67, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.013; Fotuhi F, 2018, COMPUT IND ENG, V115, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.007; Govindan K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126; Govindan K, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V240, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012; Hai DJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121019; HART PE, 1968, IEEE T SYST SCI CYB, VSSC4, P100, DOI 10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136; Hu W., 2020, INT J PROD RES, DOI DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1844333; Hu WJ, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106452; Hu WJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101923; Inghels D, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V254, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.036; Jin RY, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V140, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.029; KASHIMA S, 1993, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V8, P53, DOI 10.1016/0886-7798(93)90137-K; Liu H., 2004, P PIP DIV SPEC C 200, P1; Lu YL, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V268, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.019; Magway, 2019, MAILONLINE; Mandziuk J, 2016, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V48, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.032; Miller B, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P1957, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.008; Moscato P., 1989, CALTECH CONCURRENT C; Nagy G, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V177, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.004; Nakou D, 2014, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V41, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2013.12.005; Nanjing Municipal Postal Administration, 2020, NANJ POST IND DEV B, V2014; National Academy of Development Strategy at Renmin University of China, 2015, STAT EV MUN SOL WAST; Perez J, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104988; Qing LH, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V81, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.008; Rahimi M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1567, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.240; Rahman HF, 2020, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103052; Shang XT, 2021, APPL MATH MODEL, V91, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.057; Shi QW, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.252; Soni AR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1579, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.216; Trochu J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118818; Visser JGSN, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V80, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.006; Wang R, 2018, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V72, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.04.022; Wu HY, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104407; Wu ZZ, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P1683, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010; Yadegari E, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V128, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.054; Yang CX, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122909; Yang X, 2019, COMPUT IND ENG, V135, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2019.05.038; Yuan HP, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V237, P988, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.034; Zandi I., 1976, TRANSPORT SOLID COMM	50	1	1	20	43	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JAN 1	2022	330								129760	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129760	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129760		NOV 2021	22	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	XN4DY					2022-09-08	WOS:000729458500001
J	Iqbal, A; Ekama, GA; Zan, FX; Liu, XM; Chui, HK; Chen, GH				Iqbal, Asad; Ekama, George A.; Zan, Feixiang; Liu, Xiaoming; Chui, Ho-Kwong; Chen, Guang-Hao			Potential for co-disposal and treatment of food waste with sewage: A plant-wide steady-state model evaluation	WATER RESEARCH			English	Article						Wastewater treatment; Food waste disposer; Co-digestion; Resource recovery; Carbon footprint; Plant-wide modelling	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; RESOURCE RECOVERY; SOLID-WASTE; HONG-KONG; WATER; MANAGEMENT; ENERGY; BIODEGRADABILITY; DISPOSERS	The water, food and energy nexus is a vital subject to achieve sustainable development goals worldwide. Wastewater (WW) and food waste (FW) from municipal sources are the primary contributors of organic waste from cities. Along with the loss of these valuable natural resources, their treatment systems also consume a considerable amount of abiotic energy and resource input and make a perceptible contribution to global warming. Hence, the global paradigm has evolved from simple pollution mitigation to resource recovery systems. In this study, the prospects of FW co-disposal into the sewer system and treatment with municipal sewage were quantitatively investigated for Hong Kong's largest biological WW treatment plant (WWTP) by integrated plant-wide steady-state modelling (PWSSM) and lifecycle assessment (LCA) approaches. The investigation assessed the impacts on the design and operational capacity of the WWTP, effluent quality, sludge output, and its net energy and carbon footprint. The results revealed that even at a higher than normal FW to sewage ratio, the WW TP's organic load capacity and performance in terms of organics and nitrogen removal was not significantly degraded, in fact the denitrification efficiency was improved by the FW organics with low N/C ratio. The net energy balance was improved by 80-400%, the net carbon footprint was lowered by 37-63% (without biogenic emissions), while the sludge production was increased by similar to 33%. The results are very sensitive and improved with greater influent FW concentration and solids capture in the primary settling unit of the WWTP. The differences in the results have to be seen in relation to uncontrolled methane emission and a faster filling rate if the FW were disposed to landfill. The study provides valuable insights and policy guidelines for the decision makers locally and a generic methodological template. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Iqbal, Asad; Zan, Feixiang; Liu, Xiaoming; Chui, Ho-Kwong; Chen, Guang-Hao] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Chinese Natl Engn Res Ctr Control & Treatment Hea, Hong Kong Branch, Water Technol Ctr,Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Chen, Guang-Hao] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Fok Ying Tung Res Inst, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Ekama, George A.] Univ Cape Town, Dept Civil Engn, Water Res Grp, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa		Chen, GH (corresponding author), Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Chinese Natl Engn Res Ctr Control & Treatment Hea, Hong Kong Branch, Water Technol Ctr,Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.; Chen, GH (corresponding author), Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Fok Ying Tung Res Inst, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.	ceghchen@ust.hk	Iqbal, Asad/AAS-9910-2021; Liu, Xiaoming/GPW-7497-2022	Liu, Xiaoming/0000-0002-0499-3084; Iqbal, Asad/0000-0002-2286-7102; Zan, Feixiang/0000-0001-8737-968X	Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission [ITCCNERC14EG03]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [51638005]; Research Grant Council, China [C6033-14G, T21-604/19-R]	Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission; National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); Research Grant Council, China	The authors would like to thank the support from the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (grant number: ITCCNERC14EG03), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51638005). The work was also partially supported by grants from the Research Grant Council, China (project nos. [C6033-14G] and [T21-604/19-R]).	Americas P.E., 2011, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN; Battistoni P, 2007, WATER RES, V41, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.023; Bernstad A, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.022; Bolzonella D, 2003, ENVIRON TECHNOL, V24, P349, DOI 10.1080/09593330309385567; Chen YC, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V113, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.058; CHO JK, 1995, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V52, P245, DOI 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00031-9; Corominas L, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P5480, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.049; Curry N, 2012, RENEW ENERG, V41, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2011.10.019; Damgaard A, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P1532, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.027; de Faria ABB, 2015, WATER RES, V84, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.048; Ekama GA, 2011, TREATISE ON WATER SCIENCE, VOL 4: WATER-QUALITY ENGINEERING, P409; Ekama GA, 2009, WATER RES, V43, P2101, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.036; Ekama G.A., 2017, IWA C SUST WAST TREA, P1; Ekama G.A., 1997, LONDON INT ASS WATER; Evans TD, 2010, WATER ENVIRON J, V24, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00238.x; Fang LL, 2016, WATER RES, V88, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.016; Fernandez-Arevalo T, 2017, WATER RES, V118, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.001; Fitamo T, 2016, WATER RES, V106, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.043; Foley J., 2015, TECHNICAL REPORT; Foley J, 2010, WATER RES, V44, P831, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.033; Guest JS, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P6126, DOI 10.1021/es9010515; Henze M, 2008, BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES, MODELLING AND DESIGN, P1; Hiraishi T, 2014, 2013 SUPPLEMENT 2006; HKCSD, 2018, STAT SLUDG DISP TREA; HKEMSD, 2002, STUD POT APPL REN EN; HKEPD, 2018, MON SOL WAST HONG KO; HKEPD, 2006, PROJECT PROFILE SLUD; Iacovidou E, 2012, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V42, P1485, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2011.556897; Ikumi DS, 2014, WATER RES, V56, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.008; IPCC, 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007, DOI [10.1256/004316502320517344, DOI 10.1256/004316502320517344.]; Iqbal A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V225, P1079, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.034; Koch K, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V47, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.022; Liu GQ, 2009, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V100, P5103, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.081; Liu XM, 2016, ENGINEERING-PRC, V2, P460, DOI 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.013; Lizarralde I, 2015, WATER RES, V74, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.031; Lu H, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.031; Maalouf A, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.008; Mata-Alvarez J, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V36, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039; Metcalf S, 2004, NY TIMES BK REV, P4; Perry R., 2007, PERRYS CHEM ENG HDB, V8th; Song QB, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V57, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.042; Sotemann SW, 2005, WATER SA, V31, P511; Thomsen M., 2018, SUSTAINABILITY, V10, DOI [10.3390/su10103742, DOI 10.3390/SU10103742.]; Tsang Y., 2013, FEASIBILITY FOOD WAS; Wan JF, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep25054; Wentzel MC, 2006, WATER SA, V32, P269; Woon KS, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V75, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.066; Wu D, 2016, WATER RES, V100, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.052; Zan F., 2020, WARER RES, DOI [10.1016/j.watres.2020.116155, DOI 10.1016/J.WATRES.2020.116155.]; Zan FX, 2019, WATER RES, V157, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.061; Zan FX, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V74, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.051	51	10	10	12	64	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0043-1354			WATER RES	Water Res.	OCT 1	2020	184								116175	10.1016/j.watres.2020.116175	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116175			13	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	OS2BD	32717494				2022-09-08	WOS:000589969100017
J	Wang, YC; Lu, YL				Wang, Yichao; Lu, Yonglong			Evaluating the potential health and economic effects of nitrogen fertilizer application in grain production systems of China	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Nitrogen fertilizer; Grain production; Human health risk; Human capital loss; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable development goals	GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; AMBIENT PM2.5 POLLUTION; LONG-TERM EXPOSURE; AIR-POLLUTION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ATMOSPHERIC AMMONIA; GLOBAL BURDEN; MORTALITY; DISEASE; FOOD	In past decades, large amounts of N fertilizers have been applied in agricultural production of China. N fertilizer has not only underpinned food production but also led to great concerns about negative environmental impacts. We used a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to assess nitrogen fertilizer induced potential human health risk (HHR) and human capital loss (HCL) of rice, wheat and maize production systems. We found that the HHR of rice, wheat and maize was 633004, 264105 and 418644 DALY/yr, respectively. The rice production system caused the highest potential risk while the wheat production system the lowest. Fine particulate matter formation (FPMF) was the most serious health risk index, and accounted for nearly 87% of HHR. Sown area and crop type both play an important role in HHR. The potential loss of human capital caused by rice, wheat and maize production are 37.5, 15.6 and 24.8 billion RMB/yr, respectively. The total HCL accounted for about 5.9% of the Chinese grain yield value in 2017. We constructed 3 scenarios to evaluate the potential for reduction of human health risk. In scenario A, reducing N fertilizer rates to an appropriate level, the HHR decreased by about 23%, while in scenario B, enhancing nitrogen use efficiency and production technology, decreased HHR by about 22%. Furthermore, when we combined both scenario A and B, the HHR was reduced by as much as 37%. Improving fertilizer management practices in grain production in China has a great potential to reduce adverse impacts on human health, and more attention should also be paid to the impacts of air pollutant emissions from agricultural production on human health. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Wang, Yichao; Lu, Yonglong] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China; [Lu, Yonglong] Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Minist Educ Coastal Wetland Ecosyst, Key Lab, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, Peoples R China; [Wang, Yichao; Lu, Yonglong] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China		Lu, YL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China.	yllu@rcees.ac.cn			National Natural Science Foundation of China [71761147001]; National Key R & D Program of China [2019YFC0507505, 2017YFC0505704]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)); National Key R & D Program of China	This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71761147001, and the National Key R & D Program of China under Grant No. (2019YFC0507505, 2017YFC0505704).	Alexander LV, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P3; [Anonymous], 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS CO; [Anonymous], 2014, FERTILIZER RECOMMEND; Bachmann TM, 2017, ENVIRON INT, V103, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.020; Bravo MA, 2016, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V26, P150, DOI 10.1038/jes.2014.90; Cao JJ, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P373, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1103671; Chen XP, 2014, NATURE, V514, P486, DOI 10.1038/nature13609; Cheng K, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P948, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12368; Cheng Z, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V89-90, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.003; Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6]; Cui ZL, 2018, NATURE, V555, P363, DOI 10.1038/nature25785; Cui ZL, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P5780, DOI 10.1021/es5007127; Cui ZL, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2467, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12213; Frischknecht R, 2000, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V20, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00042-6; Gan YD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V221, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.157; Gao M, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V121, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.015; Goedkoop M., 1999, METHODOLOGY REPORT A; Heijungs R, 2014, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V19, P1445, DOI 10.1007/s11367-014-0751-0; Hong JM, 2017, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V22, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1209-3; Huang J, 2018, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V2, pE313, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30141-4; Huang S, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V192, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.023; Huijbregts MAJ, 2017, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V22, P138, DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y; Khoshnava SM, 2018, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V70, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.02.002; Lelieveld J, 2015, NATURE, V525, P367, DOI 10.1038/nature15371; Lian ZM, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V265, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.025; Liang L, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.017; Liang L, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V88, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.053; Lim SS, 2012, LANCET, V380, P2224, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8; Liu MC, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V204, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.004; Lu YL, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aau9413; Lu YL, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400039; Lu YL, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V77, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.12.010; Mahmud MAP, 2019, APPL ENERG, V250, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.007; Miller KA, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P447, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa054409; Nilsson M., 2016, DRAFT FRAMEWORK UNDE; Norse D, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V209, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.014; Sachs J., 2018, SDG INDEX DASHBOARDS; Stieb DM, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P243, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1408995; Thurston GD, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P785, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1509777; Troeger C, 2017, LANCET INFECT DIS, V17, P1133, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30396-1; Wang G., 2014, THESIS; Wang HY, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V235, P482, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.103; Wang LT, 2014, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V14, P3151, DOI 10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014; Wang SS, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep15842; Wang YC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118141; Wang ZB, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V141, P1267, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.120; Wei LF, 2015, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V58, P345, DOI 10.1007/s11430-014-4986-1; Xie WX, 2015, HEART, V101, P257, DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306165; Yang SY, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V128, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.044; Ye LP, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V189, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.112; Yue Q, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P10246, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b01285; Yue Q, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V268, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.003; Zeng SY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V687, P642, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.291; Zhang WF, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8375, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1210447110; Zhang X, 2015, NATURE, V528, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature15743; Zheng H, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P16681, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312324110	56	24	25	11	63	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 10	2020	264								121635	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121635	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121635			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	LV4EP					2022-09-08	WOS:000538390900016
J	Umar, T				Umar, Tariq			Challenges of BIM implementation in GCC construction industry	ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT			English	Article						Building information modelling; International construction; Organization; Knowledge management; Project management; International practice	INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ENERGY RESOURCES; ADOPTION; SAFETY; PROJECTS; DELAY; MANAGEMENT; BARRIERS; TYPOLOGY; REVIEWS	Purpose In some regions including the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region where construction is one of the main industries, the implementation of BIM is still at a slow rate. This article attempts to know the current situation of BIM and explore the challenges in the BIM implementation in the GCC construction industry. Design/methodology/approach A mixed research approach that includes a systematic literature review and a survey questionnaire was adopted to achieve the aim of this research. For the systematic review, four main databases were search considering a period of 2010-2019 to identify the main challenges in the BIM implementation. A total of 39 different challenges from 47 documents were classified into four main categories. A structured questionnaire developed on these challenges was sent to 206 selected from the top construction organizations from all over the GCC region. Findings A total of 39 different challenges from 47 documents were classified into four main categories. The respondents for the questionnaire were selected from the top construction organization from all over the GCC region. A large number of the respondents (69.79%) reported that their organizations are planning for BIM implementation in their future projects. The results show that top challenges fall under the main categories of "Organization", "Technical", "Government and Legal" and "Environment". Research limitations/implications While the paper provides an overview of BIM in a global context, however, the dynamics and maturity of the construction industry in different regions are quite different from each other. Since the data collected in this research is from the GCC region, the results are more relevant to the GCC region. Practical implications The finding of this research identifies the main challenges which GCC construction is facing in the implementation of BIM. The finding will, therefore, be useful for the key stakeholders to develop strategies to overcome these challenges and pave the road to take the advantages of BIM implementation in construction. Social implications The BIM implementation in the GCC construction industry will not only improve the performance of the industry but will also open the doors for new opportunities and employment. The BIM implementation in construction will help the region to achieve Goal 9 (industrial innovation and improved infrastructure) of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value The results of this study help to understand the overall situation including the challenges in the BIM implementation in the GCC construction industry. This study will be helpful for all the stakeholders to develop strategies for the effective implementation of BIM in the GCC construction industry.	[Umar, Tariq] Kingston Univ, Sch Engn & Environm, Dept Civil Engn Surveying & Construct Management, London, England		Umar, T (corresponding author), Kingston Univ, Sch Engn & Environm, Dept Civil Engn Surveying & Construct Management, London, England.	tariqumar1984@gmail.com	Tariq Umar PhD, CEng IntPE(UK), MICE, FHEA, EUR ING/AAJ-9631-2020	Tariq Umar PhD, CEng IntPE(UK), MICE, FHEA, EUR ING/0000-0002-1197-8181				Abdelaal M., 2015, P 31 ANN ARCOM C 7 9, P773; Akinade OO, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V180, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.022; Al-Hazim N, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V182, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.105; Al-Momani A.H., 2000, INT J PROJECT MANAG, V18, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00060-X; Al-Werikat G., 2017, INT J ENG RES SCI TE, V6, P22; ALEXANDER JC, 1983, THEORETICAL LOGIC SO, V1; Alzaydi A., 2014, RECYCLING POTENTIAL; Arayici Y., 2011, Structural Survey, V29, P7, DOI 10.1108/02630801111118377; Arayici Y, 2011, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V20, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.016; Arunkumar S., 2018, ASIAN J CIV ENG, V19, P239, DOI 10.1007/s42107-018-0020-9; Ayoub N, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V84, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.050; Azhar S., 2011, LEADERSH MANAG ENG, V11, P241, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127]; Banawi A, 2018, ADV INTELL SYST, V600, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60450-3_12; Barlish K, 2012, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V24, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008; BMI Business Monitor International Ltd, 2018, OM INFR REP; Boote D. N., 2005, EDUC RESEARCHER, V34, P3, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X034006003; Brooks G., 2014, INT J MANAGE INFORM, V18, P271, DOI [DOI 10.19030/ijmis.v18i4.8819, DOI 10.19030/IJMIS.V18I4.8819]; Bryman A, 2012, SOCIAL RES METHODS, V4th; Btoush M, 2017, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V271, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/271/1/012041; CBO (Central Bank of Oman), 2015, CBO ANN REP 2014; Charef R, 2018, J BUILD ENG, V19, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.028; Chong AYL, 2009, INTERNET RES, V19, P313, DOI 10.1108/10662240910965379; Coates P, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE URBANIZATION (ICSU 2010), P92; Dawson V., 2012, TEACHING SCI, V58, P8; Doumbouya L., 2016, AM J CIVIL ENG ARCHI, V4, P74, DOI [10.12691/ajcea-4-3-1, DOI 10.12691/AJCEA-4-3-1]; Eadie R, 2013, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V36, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001; EIA (Energy Information Administration), 2016, SHAR TOT EN CONS END; EIA (Energy Information Administration), 2012, WORLD EN CONS SECT; Elawi GSA, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V145, P1402, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.176; Eskew EA, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE215, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30123-6; Fellows R.F., 2015, RES METHODS CONSTRUC; Fischer M., 1998, P 6 ANN C INT GROUP; Formoso C.T, P 23 ANN C INT GROUP, P361; Gamil Y, 2019, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V17, P1077, DOI 10.1108/JEDT-03-2019-0063; Gerrish T, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V144, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.032; Graneheim UH, 2004, NURS EDUC TODAY, V24, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001; Grant MJ, 2009, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V26, P91, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x; Gu N, 2010, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V19, P988, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002; Guetterman TC, 2019, J MIX METHOD RES, V13, P179, DOI 10.1177/1558689817710877; Hall J., 2018, TOP 10 BENEFITS BIM; Hanafi MH, 2016, J TEKNOL, V78, P121; Hsiao SJ, 2009, J MED SYST, V33, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10916-008-9199-8; Jeyaraj A, 2006, J INF TECHNOL, V21, P1, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056; Jung W., 2015, INT J CIV ENV STRUCT, V9, P444; Kassem M, 2017, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V81, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.005; Kenny TC, 2005, J INF TECHNOL CONSTR, V10, P85; Keskin B., 2019, ADV INFORM COMPUTING, P881; Khodeir LM, 2018, AIN SHAMS ENG J, V9, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2017.01.004; Khosrowshahi F, 2012, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V19, P610, DOI 10.1108/09699981211277531; Kouider T, 2007, CAADRIA 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RESEARCH IN ASIA, P57; Langar S, P 53 ASS SCH CONSTR, P5; Leal  W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117728; Lee J., 2012, BUSINESS VALUE BIM S; Levy Y., 2006, Informing Science, V9, P181; Li HY, 2017, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V170, P105, DOI 10.1680/jmuen.16.00059; Liao LH, 2018, J MANAGE ENG, V34, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000604; Love PED, 2016, ADV ENG SOFTW, V102, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.10.007; MagiCAD, 2020, BIM AD EUR CURR STAT; Malsane S.M., 2015, IIER INT C, P10; Martinez-Aires MD, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V101, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.015; Masood R, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V77, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.021; Maxwell JA, 2019, J MIX METHOD RES, V13, P132, DOI 10.1177/1558689819828255; Mckiernan EC, 2019, ELIFE, V8, DOI 10.7554/eLife.47338; MEED (Middle East Economic Digest), 2019, GCC PROJ MARK SLUMPS; Mehran D, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V145, P1110, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.144; Melville N, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P283; Mesaros P, 2017, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V245, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062056; Migilinskas D, 2017, J CIV ENG MANAG, V23, P1082, DOI 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374304; Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097; Mohsin M.A.A., 2013, CAUS DEL COMPL CONST, P267; Motamedi A, 2009, J INF TECHNOL CONSTR, V14, P238; Mullins G, 2002, STUD HIGH EDUC, V27, P369, DOI 10.1080/0307507022000011507; NBS, 2014, TOP 5 BARR BIM IMPL; NCSI (National Center for Statistic and Information), 2015, STAT YB; OSC (Oman Society of Contractors), 2016, ANN GEN M DISTR EXP; Ouda OKM, 2018, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V9, P2541, DOI 10.1007/s12649-017-0174-9; Pacheco R, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P3559, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.045; Papamichael K, 1999, BUILD RES INF, V27, P20, DOI 10.1080/096132199369624; Pare G, 2015, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V52, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008; Peng CH, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.078; Randolph J. J., 2009, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V14, P1, DOI [DOI 10.7275/B0AZ-8T74, 10.7275/b0az-8t74]; Redling A., 2018, CONSTRUCTION DEMOLIT; RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects), 2016, NAT BIM REP 2016; Sacks R., 2018, BIM HDB GUIDE BUILDI; Shi Y, 2017, REV FACULTAD INGENIE, V32; Shih TH, 2008, FIELD METHOD, V20, P249, DOI 10.1177/1525822X08317085; Singh I., 2017, BIM ADOPTION IMPLEME, V4; Succar B, 2015, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V57, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.04.018; Succar B, 2012, ARCHIT ENG DES MANAG, V8, P120, DOI 10.1080/17452007.2012.659506; Sullivan G, 2011, MANAGING CONSTRUCTIO; Sweis G, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.009; Tahir MM, 2018, PERTANIKA J SCI TECH, V26, P21; Tan T, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V219, P949, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.141; TBO (Tender Board of Oman), 2018, INT REG CO; Terreno S., 2015, Computing in Civil Engineering 2015. International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering. Proceedings, P675; Umar T., 2016, P 5 WORLD CONSTR S 2, P14; Umar T., 2019, INT J APPL MANAGEMEN, P1, DOI [10.1504/IJAMS.2019.253274, DOI 10.1504/IJAMS.2019.253274]; Umar T., 2017, P JOINT CIB W099 TG5, P99; Umar T, 2020, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V173, P344, DOI 10.1680/jensu.19.00014; Umar T, 2020, P I CIVIL ENG-ENERGY, V173, P68, DOI 10.1680/jener.19.00034; Umar T, 2020, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V173, P125, DOI 10.1680/jmuen.18.00019; Umar T, 2019, PROC INST CIV ENG-MA, V172, P137, DOI 10.1680/jmapl.18.00053; Umar T, 2018, PROC INST CIV ENG-MA, V171, P251, DOI 10.1680/jmapl.18.00001; Umar T, 2018, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V171, P329, DOI 10.1680/jensu.17.00001; Umar T, 2018, PROC INST CIV ENG-MA, V171, P93, DOI 10.1680/jmapl.18.00007; Umar T, 2018, MIDDLE EAST J MANAG, V5, P121; Umar T, 2018, P I CIVIL ENG-ENERGY, V171, P37, DOI 10.1680/jener.17.00001; Umar T, 2017, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V170, P65, DOI 10.1680/jmuen.16.00020; Umar T, 2016, P I CIVIL ENG-ENERGY, V169, P143, DOI 10.1680/jener.16.00011; United Nations, 2015, UN SUSTAINABLE DEV S; Valenzuela M., 2015, WORKSHOPS 20 9 AAAI; Vass S, 2017, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V35, P597, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2017.1314519; Wang XQ, 2019, BMC COMPLEM ALTERN M, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3; Wang YM, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P803, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006; WB (World Bank), 2016, EL POW CONS KWH PER; Welch V, 2016, J DEV EFFECT, V8, P287, DOI 10.1080/19439342.2015.1113196; Whitlock K., 2018, J ENG PROJECT PRODUC, V8, P47; Woetzel J., 2017, CONSTRUCTION IND HAS; Won J, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V49, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.026; Wong KD, 2013, FACILITIES, V31, P138, DOI 10.1108/02632771311299412; Xiao Y, 2019, J PLAN EDUC RES, V39, P93, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17723971; Yeh CC, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V132, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.003; Yi W, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14091055; Yi W, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13121232; Yoders J., 2009, BUILDING DESIGN CONS; Zafar S., 2018, PALGRAVE HDB SUSTAIN, P159, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71389-2_9; Zhang JP, 2001, FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION VISUALISATION, PROCEEDINGS, P382, DOI 10.1109/IV.2001.942086; Zhang SJ, 2015, SAFETY SCI, V72, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.001; Zhu K, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P1557, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487	129	3	3	9	36	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0969-9988	1365-232X		ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA	Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.	MAR 24	2022	29	3					1139	1168		10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0608	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0608		APR 2021	30	Engineering, Industrial; Engineering, Civil; Management	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering; Business & Economics	0B8ED		Green Submitted			2022-09-08	WOS:000636442000001
J	Joshi, L; Choudhary, D; Kumar, P; Venkateswaran, J; Solanki, CS				Joshi, Lalita; Choudhary, Deepak; Kumar, Praveen; Venkateswaran, Jayendran; Solanki, Chetan S.			Does involvement of local community ensure sustained energy access? A critical review of a solar PV technology intervention in rural India	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Off-grid solar; Sustained use; Solar lamps; Solar energy eco-system; India	HOME SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; LIGHTING SYSTEMS; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; BUSINESS MODEL; ELECTRIFICATION; POWER; ELECTRICITY; ADOPTION; MARKETS	The solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies offer a sustainable solution to energy-poor communities. Adoption and sustained use of solar PV merit participation of local communities in planning and implementation. The literature on off-grid solar PV interventions that do not take the approach of involving communities point towards the difficulties experienced in reaching the bottom of the pyramid (BoP) communities as wells as in supply chain and after-sales service. Similarly, there is a gap in scientific literature that explores community inclusive initiatives to foster sustained uptake of solar PV technologies. Our study fills this gap, and discusses: 1) pathways to engage with rural poor communities to promote solar off-grid access, and 2) the impact of engaging with these communities particularly women, on their energy security and livelihood opportunities. We study a two-phased intervention in rural poor setting in Dungarpur district of Rajasthan state in India. The intervention can be broadly classified into two phases: (i) the distribution of solar study lamps to rural school students and mothers, wherein the lamps were assembled and maintained by the local community (self-help group networks), (ii) the entrepreneurship development of local community members towards continued livelihood through solar. We adopted mixed methods approach to collect and analyze the quantitative data from beneficiary households, while qualitative data were collected from SHG members. Our findings demonstrate the utility of localized intervention and the significance and challenges of engaging local communities. The consumers used these solar lamps for multiple activities and prefer solar over grid electricity for basic lighting. The voltage fluctuations or poor quality of electricity supply influences the preference to solar over the conventional grid. Local services enabled continued functioning of lamps, thereby increasing consumer confidence. The intervention built capacity of and created continued livelihood opportunities for local women in these communities, resulting in their economic and social growth. Appropriate capacity building and support to the SHG federations can channelize clean energy interventions at required speed, quality, and coverage. In the context of energy poor BoP communities of the Global South, our research provides key determinants impacting development of community-centered renewable energy interventions, crucial for the realization of Sustainable Development Goal 7. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Joshi, Lalita; Solanki, Chetan S.] Indian Inst Technol, Energy Sci & Engn, Bombay, Maharashtra, India; [Choudhary, Deepak; Venkateswaran, Jayendran] Indian Inst Technol, Ind Engn Ea Operat Res, Bombay, Maharashtra, India; [Kumar, Praveen] Boston Coll, Sch Social Work, Boston, MA USA		Venkateswaran, J (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Ind Engn Ea Operat Res, Bombay, Maharashtra, India.	lalita@soulsiitb.in; deepak.c@soulsiitb.in; praveenpf@bc.edu; jayendran@iitb.ac.in; chetanss@iitb.ac.in	C, Praveen Kumar/AAA-8227-2019	, Deepak Choudhary/0000-0001-6848-6850	Idea Cellular CSR; Government of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE); Cluster Federations in Dungarpur Rajasthan; IITB's Solar Urja through Localisation for Sustainability (SoULS); Rajeevika	Idea Cellular CSR; Government of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE); Cluster Federations in Dungarpur Rajasthan; IITB's Solar Urja through Localisation for Sustainability (SoULS); Rajeevika	The authors wish to acknowledge the funding support provided for the program and for this study by Idea Cellular CSR and the Government of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE). We acknowledge the support of Rajeevika, the Cluster Federations in Dungarpur Rajasthan, and IITB's Solar Urja through Localisation for Sustainability (SoULS) team in helping conduct this study. We also thank Sophia Hadingham, of Boston College School of Social Work for editorial assistance.	Aklin M, 2018, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V42, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.010; Azimoh CL, 2015, APPL ENERG, V155, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.120; Baky MAH, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V73, P1184, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.047; Barman M, 2017, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V38, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2017.02.004; Berthaud A, 2004, INTEGRATING GENDER E; Brunet C, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V96, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.004; Chakrabarti S, 2002, ENERG POLICY, V30, P33, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00057-X; Chaurey A, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P2266, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.005; Choragudi S, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V28, P890, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.028; Cieslik K, 2016, WORLD DEV, V83, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.009; Comello SD, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.029; Diouf B, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V90, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.050; Emili S, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V32, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2016.03.004; Friebe CA, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V52, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.038; Gabriel CA, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V64, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.025; Glemarec Y, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V47, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.032; Haanyika CM, 2006, ENERG POLICY, V34, P2977, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.008; Heuer A, 2017, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V22, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2017.02.020; Hiremath RB, 2009, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2008.12.001; Hirmer S, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V34, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.005; Holtorf H, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V50, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.015; Jacobson A, 2007, WORLD DEV, V35, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.001; Jolly S, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P199, DOI 10.1007/s11625-012-0163-7; Kapoor K, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V40, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.118; Karakaya E, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V49, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.058; Katre A, 2019, ENERGY SUSTAIN SOC, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13705-018-0185-9; Kebede KY, 2014, PORTL INT CONF MANAG, P3124; Laufer D, 2011, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.002; Lemaire X, 2018, WIRES ENERGY ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1002/wene.301; Lemaire X, 2011, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.005; Lemaire X, 2009, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2009.01.001; Mandelli S, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P1621, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.338; Moharil RM, 2009, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V13, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.016; Mondal MAH, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P4626, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.018; Naah J. B., 2015, J ENERGY NATURAL RES, V2, P24; Newcombe A, 2017, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V38, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2017.03.002; Numminen S, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P9, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1012; Pascale A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V57, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.077; Pode R, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.004; Reinders AHME, 1999, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V3, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00004-0; Scott I, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.179; Sharma DC, 2007, FUTURES, V39, P583, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.008; Singh A, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V46, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.021; Singh K, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2015.10.011; Sovacool BK, 2011, ENERGY, V36, P4445, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.077; Steel WF, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2016.02.003; Ulsrud K, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V44, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.027; Urpelainen J, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V109, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.036; Urpelainen J, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V85, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.001; Winkler H, 2011, WORLD DEV, V39, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.021; Winther T, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V44, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.017; Yaqoot M, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.224	52	23	23	2	38	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X			WORLD DEV	World Dev.	OCT	2019	122						272	281		10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.028	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.028			10	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	IS6ER					2022-09-08	WOS:000482245600020
J	Congio, GFD; Bannink, A; Mogollon, OLM; Hristov, AN				Congio, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza; Bannink, Andre; Mogollon, Olga Lucia Mayorga; Hristov, Alexander Nikolov		Latin Amer Methane Project	Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: A meta-analysis	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Enteric methane; Mitigation; Cattle; Sheep; Greenhouse gas emissions; Global warming	DRY-MATTER INTAKE; CONTROLLED-RELEASE CAPSULES; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; MAXIMUM CV-MOMBACA; RUMEN FERMENTATION; LEUCAENA-LEUCOCEPHALA; MILK-PRODUCTION; HERBAGE ACCUMULATION; ROTATIONAL STOCKING; CONDENSED TANNINS	Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region's ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier's removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein x Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement.	[Congio, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza; Mogollon, Olga Lucia Mayorga] AGROSAVIA, Colombian Corp Agr Res, Bogota 250047, DC, Colombia; [Congio, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Anim Sci, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; [Bannink, Andre] Wageningesn Univ & Res, Wageningen Livestock Res, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands; [Hristov, Alexander Nikolov] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 335 Agr Sci & Ind Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA		Congio, GFD (corresponding author), AGROSAVIA, Colombian Corp Agr Res, Bogota 250047, DC, Colombia.; Hristov, AN (corresponding author), Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 335 Agr Sci & Ind Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA.	gcongio@gmail.com; anh13@psu.edu	Filho, Adibe Luiz Abdalla/C-4499-2013; Congio, Guilhermo F. S./D-8307-2015; Cardoso, Abmael S/B-6978-2017; Berndt, Alexandre/E-8606-2014; Rodrigues, Paulo/O-2689-2017; Ortiz Chura, Abimael/S-2117-2018; Mercadante, Maria Eugenia/C-9536-2012	Filho, Adibe Luiz Abdalla/0000-0001-5968-5380; Congio, Guilhermo F. S./0000-0002-7659-594X; Cardoso, Abmael S/0000-0002-6051-9635; Sierra Alarcon, Andrea Milena/0000-0001-6725-2526; Savian, Jean V./0000-0003-3171-2572; Gomez, Carlos/0000-0001-9021-5838; Lombardi, Banira/0000-0001-5284-3382; Arango, Jacobo/0000-0002-4828-9398; Molina Botero, Isabel Cristina/0000-0003-1108-6359; Berndt, Alexandre/0000-0002-8976-2399; DIAZ CESPEDES, MEDARDO ANTONIO/0000-0003-0134-8239; Gonda, Horacio/0000-0002-0452-8289; Hernandez, Olegario/0000-0001-6975-0254; Gere, Jose Ignacio/0000-0002-2663-8761; Jaurena, Gustavo/0000-0002-3687-5648; Ilha Borges, Luiza/0000-0001-8779-3856; Ricci, Patricia/0000-0003-2463-3833; gaviria, xiomara/0000-0001-9890-1402; Monteiro, Alda/0000-0001-5002-7832; Juliarena, Maria Paula/0000-0003-2923-1163; Rodrigues, Paulo/0000-0002-4646-6805; Silvestre, Taina/0000-0002-2117-6684; Ortiz Chura, Abimael/0000-0003-3020-9502; Perondi Anchao Oliveira, Patricia/0000-0003-4665-3755; Mercadante, Maria Eugenia/0000-0002-1218-5378	AgResearch (S7SOW21Feed/Methane) - New Zealand Government	AgResearch (S7SOW21Feed/Methane) - New Zealand Government	The LAMP was supported by AgResearch (S7SOW21Feed/Methane) which was funded by the New Zealand Government to support the objectives of the Livestock Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases. The funding sources that allowed the collaborators to carry out their projects are listed in Appendix A.	Abdalla M, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V253, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.023; ALABOUDI AR, 1985, CAN J ANIM SCI, V65, P841, DOI 10.4141/cjas85-099; Albores-Moreno S, 2017, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V49, P857, DOI 10.1007/s11250-017-1275-y; Alexandratos N., 2012, 1203 ESA FAO, DOI 10.22004/ag.econ.288998; Allen VG, 2011, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V66, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00780.x; Alves F.V., 2017, CARBON NATURAL BRAZI; Appuhamy JADRN, 2013, J DAIRY SCI, V96, P5161, DOI 10.3168/jds.2012-5923; Arango J, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00065; aterson J.A., 1994, FORAGE QUALITY EVALU, P59, DOI [10.2134/1994.foragequality.c2, DOI 10.2134/1994.FORAGEQUALITY.C2]; Costa DFA, 2021, ANIM PROD SCI, V61, P480, DOI 10.1071/AN20005; Barbero RP, 2015, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V209, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.010; Beauchemin KA, 2008, AUST J EXP AGR, V48, P21, DOI 10.1071/EA07199; Beauchemin KA, 2020, ANIMAL, V14, pS2, DOI 10.1017/S1751731119003100; Benvenutti MA, 2009, LIVEST SCI, V126, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.006; BLAXTER KL, 1965, BRIT J NUTR, V19, P511, DOI 10.1079/BJN19650046; Borenstein M., 2014, COMPREHENSIVE META A; Canul-Solis J, 2020, ANIMALS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/ani10050843; Capper JL, 2013, ANNU REV ANIM BIOSCI, V1, P469, DOI 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103727; Carnevalli RA, 2006, TROP GRASSLANDS, V40, P165; Carulla JE, 2005, AUST J AGR RES, V56, P961, DOI 10.1071/AR05022; Chizzotti ML, 2015, J DAIRY SCI, V98, P3438, DOI 10.3168/jds.2014-8925; Conforti P. F, 2011, LOOKING AHEAD WORLD; Congio GFS, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V676, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.186; Congio GFS, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P872, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.301; Cottle DJ, 2011, ANIM PROD SCI, V51, P491, DOI 10.1071/AN10163; Molina-Botero IC, 2019, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V251, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.011; Molina-Botero IC, 2019, J ANIM SCI, V97, P1619, DOI 10.1093/jas/skz067; Da Silva SC, 2019, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V157, P592, DOI 10.1017/S0021859620000052; Da Silva SC, 2013, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V151, P727, DOI 10.1017/S0021859612000858; da Silva SC, 2015, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V5, P598, DOI 10.3390/agriculture5030598; da Silva SC, 2009, SCI AGR, V66, P8, DOI 10.1590/S0103-90162009000100002; da Trindade JK, 2007, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V42, P883, DOI 10.1590/S0100-204X2007000600016; Dalzell SA, 2012, ANIM PROD SCI, V52, P365, DOI 10.1071/AN11236; Gimenes FMD, 2011, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V46, P751, DOI 10.1590/S0100-204X2011000700011; Carvalho PHD, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0202088; Carvalho PCD, 2013, TROP GRASSL-FORRAJES, V1, P137, DOI 10.17138/TGFT(1)137-155; de Souza W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.245; de Souza J, 2015, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V47, P265, DOI 10.1007/s11250-014-0674-6; Eckard RJ, 2020, ANIM PROD SCI, V60, P10, DOI 10.1071/AN18574; erreira A.L., 2018, ANIM PROD SCI, V59, P1253; European Commission, 2020, EU STRAT RED METH EM, P663; FAO, 2020, LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; FAOSTAT, 2020, LIV AN; Feng XY, 2020, J DAIRY SCI, V103, P11375, DOI 10.3168/jds.2020-18541; Fonseca L, 2012, LIVEST SCI, V145, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.003; Gaviria-Uribe X, 2020, FRONT VET SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.579189; Goel G, 2012, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V44, P729, DOI 10.1007/s11250-011-9966-2; Grainger C, 2008, J DAIRY SCI, V91, P1159, DOI 10.3168/jds.2007-0319; Hammond K, 2016, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V219, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018; Herrero M, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P452, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2925, 10.1038/nclimate2925]; Hristov AN, 2018, J DAIRY SCI, V101, P6655, DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-13536; Hristov AN, 2013, J ANIM SCI, V91, P5045, DOI 10.2527/jas.2013-6583; Hristov A.N., 2021, 20210085288 CABI; Hynes DN, 2016, J DAIRY SCI, V99, P8858, DOI 10.3168/jds.2016-11509; IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5 C IPCC; JOHNSON KA, 1995, J ANIM SCI, V73, P2483; Kennedy PM, 2012, ANIM PROD SCI, V52, P225, DOI 10.1071/AN11103; Ku-Vera JC, 2020, ANIMAL, V14, pS453, DOI 10.1017/S1751731120001780; Ku-Vera JC, 2020, FRONT VET SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.00584; Kunrath TR, 2020, AGR SYST, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102716; Lee C, 2017, J ANIM SCI, V95, P3700, DOI [10.2527/jas.2017.1460, 10.2527/jas2017.1460]; Lee C, 2015, J ANIM SCI, V93, P2391, DOI 10.2527/jas.2014-8845; Lee C, 2014, CAN J ANIM SCI, V94, P557, DOI [10.4141/CJAS-2014-069, 10.4141/cjas-2014-069]; Leng R, 2008, POTENTIAL FEEDING NI; McGuffey R. K., 2001, Journal of Dairy Science, V84, pE194, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70218-4; Mehrabi Z, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P160, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0042-9; Molina IC, 2016, LIVEST SCI, V185, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.009; Montoya-Flores MD, 2020, ANIMALS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/ani10020300; Moore J.E., 1980, CROP QUALITY STORAGE; Munoz C, 2016, J DAIRY SCI, V99, P7945, DOI 10.3168/jds.2016-10919; N General Assembly, 2015, ARES701 N GEN ASS; Naumann HD, 2017, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V46, P929, DOI [10.1590/s1806-92902017001200009, 10.1590/S1806-92902017001200009]; nited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015, AD PAR AGR; Niu M, 2016, ANIM PROD SCI, V56, P312, DOI 10.1071/AN15498; Niu M, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3368, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14094; Olijhoek DW, 2016, J DAIRY SCI, V99, P6191, DOI 10.3168/jds.2015-10691; Oliveira PPA, 2020, ANIMAL, V14, pS427, DOI 10.1017/S1751731120001822; Patra AK, 2009, NUTR RES REV, V22, P204, DOI 10.1017/S0954422409990163; Pereira LET, 2014, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V152, P954, DOI 10.1017/S0021859613000695; Petersen SO, 2015, J ENVIRON QUAL, V44, P1063, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0107; Pineiro-Vazquez AT, 2018, ASIAN AUSTRAL J ANIM, V31, P1738, DOI 10.5713/ajas.17.0192; Poppi D., 1997, INT GRASSL C 18 1997, V307, P322; Rabiee AR, 2012, J DAIRY SCI, V95, P3225, DOI 10.3168/jds.2011-4895; Ramos-Morales E, 2018, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V94, DOI 10.1093/femsec/fiy009; ristov A.N., 2013, FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTIO; RUSSELL JB, 1987, J ANIM SCI, V64, P1519, DOI 10.2527/jas1987.6451519x; Sauvant D, 2014, ANIM PROD SCI, V54, P1423, DOI 10.1071/AN14616; Sauvant D, 2011, INRA PROD ANIM, V24, P433; Savian JV, 2020, ANIMAL, V14, P2503, DOI 10.1017/S1751731120001251; Savian JV, 2019, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V178, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.08.011; Savian JV, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V186, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.162; Savian JV, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V190, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.008; Segnini A, 2019, SCI AGR, V76, P33, DOI [10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0131, 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0131]; Silva S.C., 2003, ANN 20 S PAST MAN FE, P155; Smit HJ, 2005, J DAIRY SCI, V88, P1827, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72857-5; Soltan YA, 2017, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V223, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.11.003; Soltan YA, 2013, ARCH ANIM NUTR, V67, P169, DOI 10.1080/1745039X.2013.801139; St-Pierre NR, 2001, J DAIRY SCI, V84, P741, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74530-4; da Silveira MCT, 2013, SCI AGR, V70, P242, DOI 10.1590/S0103-90162013000400004; Pineiro-Vazquez AT, 2013, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V45, P577, DOI 10.1007/s11250-012-0262-6; van Lingen HJ, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106575; van Zijderveld SM, 2011, J DAIRY SCI, V94, P4028, DOI 10.3168/jds.2011-4236; Vasta V, 2019, J DAIRY SCI, V102, P3781, DOI 10.3168/jds.2018-14985; Voltolini TV, 2010, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V39, P121, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982010000100016; Waghorn GC, 2008, AUST J EXP AGR, V48, P65, DOI 10.1071/EA07299; Watts N, 2021, LANCET, V397, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X; willinger D., 2000, CRC STANDARD PROBABI	107	9	9	8	23	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2021	312								127693	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693		JUN 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UF2TQ		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000688431700004
J	Sheikhahmadi, P; Bahramara, S				Sheikhahmadi, P.; Bahramara, S.			The participation of a renewable energy-based aggregator in real-time market: A Bi-level approach	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Distributed energy resources; Real-time energy market; Two-stage stochastic problem; Uncertainties	DISTRIBUTION COMPANY; DECISION; FRAMEWORK	Increasing the share of the renewable energy sources (RESs) in supplying the electrical demand of the energy systems facilitates achieving the sustainable development goals. The main challenge in this regard is the uncertain behavior of the RESs in the real-time (RT) operation. To address this issue, the RESs can participate in the RT energy market through the distributed energy resource aggregator (DERA). The participation of the DERA as a price-maker player in the RT market is addressed in this paper. For this purpose, a bi-level optimization approach is employed in which the problem of the DERA and the RT market are modeled as the upper-level and the lower-level problems, respectively. Moreover, the uncertainties of the RESs are modeled in the DERA's problem using a risk-based two-stage stochastic model. In this model, the risk level of the DERA is managed using the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). The proposed non-linear bi-level model is transformed into a linear single-level one using the Karush-KuhnTucker conditions and the dual theory. The proposed model is applied on the IEEE 6-bus and 24-bus test systems. The results show that the social welfare of the RT market increases in the presence of the DERA through supplying the demand of the market with RESs. Moreover, the effect of the RESs' uncertainties on the DERA's decisions and the RT energy market results is managed using the risk-level of the DERA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.				s_bahramara@yahoo.com	Bahramara, Salah/C-2151-2017					Abapour S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118393; Alipour M, 2017, ENERGY, V118, P1168, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.141; Bahramara S, 2020, IEEE T IND INFORM, V16, P764, DOI 10.1109/TII.2019.2921790; Bahramara S, 2018, IEEE T SMART GRID, V9, P3857, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2768486; Bahramara S, 2015, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V9, P2555, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0327; Barhagh SS, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118076; Beraldi P, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V96, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.12.018; Bruke R.B., 2011, OVERVIEW NEW ENGLAND; CAISO, 2016, DISTR EN RES PROV PA; Chamandoust H, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.059; Conejo AJ, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V153, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1; Jafari A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119100; Kazempour SJ, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P940, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2069573; Khalili T, 2019, COMPUT ELECTR ENG, V74, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.01.027; Khalili T, 2019, ENERGY, V169, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.024; Lipari G, 2018, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V15, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2017.07.002; Mafakheri R, 2020, INT J ELEC POWER, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105977; Mi ZQ, 2018, ENERGIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/en11051242; Rashidizadeh-Kermani H, 2019, INT J ELEC POWER, V113, P528, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.072; Smart M.T., 2017, COORDINATION TRANSMI; Wang MQ, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P1164, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2100414; Zhang CY, 2016, APPL ENERG, V181, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.058; Zhang CY, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.143	23	17	17	0	3	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	DEC 10	2020	276								123149	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123149	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123149			19	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OC9UG					2022-09-08	WOS:000579500800051
J	Giron, A; Kazemikhasragh, A; Cicchiello, AF; Monferra, S				Giron, Alicia; Kazemikhasragh, Amirreza; Cicchiello, Antonella Francesca; Monferra, Stefano			The Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Sustainability Reporting and External Assurance: Evidence from Lower-Middle-Income Countries in Asia and Africa	JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES			English	Article						sustainability reporting; board gender diversity; female directors; external assurance	CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FIRM VALUE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; COMMERCIAL-BANKS; CSR; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS; CREDIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY	Based on the notion that a diverse board will pay greater attention to social responsibility and stakeholder concerns, this article examines the effect of board gender diversity on the adoption of new sustainability reporting practices (i.e., SDG reporting) and on the use of external assurance. After controlling for corporate governance as well as companies' performances, sustainability commitment, industries, and regions, we find that gender-diverse boards are positively associated with sustainability reporting and the involvement of an external assurance provider. This article consolidates and provides information on the relationship between women participation on corporate boards and sustainability reporting activities of 366 large Asian and African companies. Additionally, it addresses the understudied question of how the gender diversity of board resources affects the adoption of the external assurance of sustainability reporting and the types of assurance providers.	[Giron, Alicia; Kazemikhasragh, Amirreza] Natl Autonomous Univ Mexico UNAM, Univ Program Studies Asia & Africa PUEAA, Mexico City, DF, Mexico; [Cicchiello, Antonella Francesca; Monferra, Stefano] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Sci Econ & Sociali, Piacenza, Italy		Giron, A (corresponding author), Natl Autonomous Univ Mexico UNAM, Univ Program Studies Asia & Africa PUEAA, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.		Kazemikhasragh, Amirreza/AAD-9634-2021	Kazemikhasragh, Amirreza/0000-0001-9257-2505; Cicchiello, Antonella Francesca/0000-0003-3367-1620				Adams RB, 2009, J FINANC ECON, V94, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007; Afolabi AdeoyeAmuda, 2015, EUROPEAN J ACCOUNTIN, V3, P1; Aguinis H, 2012, J MANAGE, V38, P932, DOI 10.1177/0149206311436079; Ahmed K, 2006, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V14, P418, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00515.x; Al Hammadi Fatema., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY CORPO; Al-Shaer H, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P973, DOI 10.1002/bse.2046; Al-Shaer H, 2016, J CONTEMP ACCOUNT EC, V12, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001; Ali W, 2017, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V24, P273, DOI 10.1002/csr.1410; Aman Zainab, 2015, P 2 INT C MAN MUAM S; Ameer R, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V108, P61, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y; Amran A, 2013, KAJI MALAYS, V31, P57; Anazonwu HO, 2018, INDONES J SUSTAIN AC, V2, P65, DOI 10.28992/ijsam.v2i1.52; Aras G, 2008, MANAGE DECIS, V46, P433, DOI 10.1108/00251740810863870; Arayssi M, 2016, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V7, P376, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2015-0055; Bachoo K, 2013, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V23, P67, DOI 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00187.x; Barako DG, 2008, J MANAG GOV, V12, P309, DOI 10.1007/s10997-008-9053-x; Martinez JB, 2016, EUR J MANAG BUS ECON, V25, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002; Bassey S.A., 2019, COGITO, V11, P21; Bear S, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V97, P207, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2; Belal A., 2002, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, V9, P8, DOI DOI 10.1002/CSR.5; Ben-Amar W, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V142, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1; Bernardi R.A., 2010, ELECT J BUSINESS ETH, V15, P15, DOI 10.1002/csr.1349; Brown HS, 2009, J CLEAN PROD, V17, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009; Calabrese A, 2015, ACCOUNT FORUM, V39, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.002; Calabrese A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V116, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.100; Carter D. A., 2010, J APPL FINANCE, V20, P27; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Chijoke-Mgbame AM, 2020, ACCOUNT FORUM, V44, P262, DOI 10.1080/01559982.2020.1766280; Cohen JR, 2012, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V26, P65, DOI 10.2308/acch-50073; E-Vahdati S, 2019, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V19, P255, DOI 10.1108/CG-03-2018-0111; Freeman R.E., 1994, BUS ETHICS Q, V4, P409, DOI [DOI 10.2307/3857340, 10.2307/3857340]; Galbreath J, 2011, J MANAGE ORGAN, V17, P17; Ganesan Yuvaraj., 2017, GLOBAL BUSINESS MANA, V9, P159; Glass C, 2016, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V25, P495, DOI 10.1002/bse.1879; Global Reporting Initiative, 2018, BUS REP SDGS; Gul FA, 2013, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V27, P511, DOI 10.2308/acch-50486; Gul S., 2017, PAK J COMMER SOC SCI, V11, P1; Hahn R, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V59, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005; Hamann R, 2004, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V28, P278, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00101.x; Herzig C, 2006, ECO-EFFIC IND SCI, V21, P301, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_13; Idemudia U, 2011, PROG DEV STUD, V11, P1, DOI 10.1177/146499341001100101; Issa A, 2019, GEND MANAG, V34, P577, DOI 10.1108/GM-07-2018-0087; Jamali D, 2018, INT J MANAG REV, V20, P32, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12112; Jizi M, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P640, DOI 10.1002/bse.1943; Julizaerma MK, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V65, P1077, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.374; Khan MHUZ, 2010, INT J LAW MANAG, V52, P82, DOI 10.1108/17542431011029406; Kilic M, 2015, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V15, P357, DOI 10.1108/CG-02-2014-0022; Kolk A, 2010, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V19, P182, DOI 10.1002/bse.643; Kuzey C, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.153; Lee JK, 2011, ASIAN J WOMEN STUD, V17, P7; Liao L, 2015, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V47, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002; Lo SF, 2007, CORP GOV, V15, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00565.x; Mahmood Z, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010207; Mitra Sarbani., 2008, S ASIAN J MANAGEMENT, V15, P101; Mori R, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V120, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y; Moroney R, 2012, ACCOUNT FINANC, V52, P903, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x; Nilsson J, 2009, INT J BANK MARK, V27, P5, DOI 10.1108/02652320910928218; Park J, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P1095, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.006; Perrault E, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V128, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2092-0; Peters GF, 2015, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V34, P163, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-50849; Pflugrath G, 2011, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V30, P239, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-10047; Post C, 2011, BUS SOC, V50, P189, DOI 10.1177/0007650310394642; Rao KK, 2012, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V12, P143, DOI 10.1108/14720701211214052; Reverte C, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V88, P351, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9; Rosati F, 2019, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V26, P588, DOI 10.1002/csr.1705; Schadewitz H, 2010, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V17, P96, DOI 10.1002/csr.234; Scherer AG, 2013, J MANAGE STUD, V50, P259, DOI 10.1111/joms.12014; Schueth S, 2003, J BUS ETHICS, V43, P189, DOI 10.1023/A:1022981828869; Seto-Pamies D, 2015, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V22, P334, DOI 10.1002/csr.1349; Sharif M, 2014, QUAL QUANT, V48, P2501, DOI 10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8; Viviers Suzette, 2017, Acta Commer., V17, P1, DOI 10.4102/ac.v17i1.489; Walls JL, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P885, DOI 10.1002/smj.1952; World Economic Forum, 2019, GLOBAL GENDER GAP RE; Yasser QR, 2017, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V24, P210, DOI 10.1002/csr.1400	74	0	0	6	6	ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD	ABINGDON	2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND	0021-3624	1946-326X		J ECON ISSUES	J. Econ. Issues	JAN 2	2022	56	1					209	224		10.1080/00213624.2022.2020586	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2020586			16	Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	0J8IC					2022-09-08	WOS:000780343100011
J	Hassan, A; Roberts, L; Rodger, K				Hassan, Abeer; Roberts, Lee; Rodger, Kimberly			Corporate accountability for biodiversity and species extinction: Evidence from organisations reporting on their impacts on nature	BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT			English	Article						biodiversity accounting; reporting; corporate accountability; extinction accounting; reporting; SDGs; threatened species	CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; DISCLOSURE; ACCOUNTS	The aim of this paper is to investigate to what extent organisations disclose on accountability for biodiversity and species extinction (B/E). We present some examples of what disclosure looks like from forward-thinking companies that have been engaging in tremendous efforts to protect and preserve nature. Our justification for this paper is to provide guidance and encourage other companies to disclose transparently. We believe that B/E accountability is essential in post Covid-19 reporting as the lack of valuing, promoting and investing in biodiversity is considered to be one of the main drivers of the Covid-19 pandemic. The study's sample is the Top 200 companies from the Fortune Global with the years 2012, 2014 and 2016 and companies' websites in 2019. We believe that our paper is providing some guidance on how to repair nature and eliminate biodiversity loss. This is because organisations are reliant on natural capital resources for survival. Also, biodiversity loss and extinction can significantly affect social, economic and financial viability for survival. Our results have some implications for practitioners, policymakers and academics.	[Hassan, Abeer] Univ West Scotland, Sch Business & Creat Ind, G226,Gardner Bldg, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland; [Roberts, Lee] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Business Sch, Uxbridge, Middx, England; [Rodger, Kimberly] Univ West Scotland, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland		Hassan, A (corresponding author), Univ West Scotland, Sch Business & Creat Ind, G226,Gardner Bldg, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland.	abeer.hassan@uws.ac.uk	Hassan, Abeer/O-7814-2018	Hassan, Abeer/0000-0003-1765-7888; Roberts, Lee/0000-0002-0684-8251				Addison PFE, 2019, CONSERV BIOL, V33, P307, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13190; Adler R, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P787, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2490; Adler R, 2017, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V30, P1711, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2028; Atkins B., 2018, WORLD 80 SPECIES, P175; Atkins B.C., 2018, WORLD 80 SPECIES; Atkins J, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P750, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2957; Atkins J, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P674, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2320; Atkins J, 2014, ACCOUNTING FOR BIODIVERSITY, P215; Bebbington J, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P2, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929; Bhattacharyya A, 2019, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V26, P347, DOI 10.1080/14486563.2019.1629544; Boiral O, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V140, P403, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2668-3; Boiral O, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V135, P751, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2497-9; Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]; Brondizio E.S., 2019, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE, P1148, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3831673, 10.5281/zenodo.3831673]; Carrington, 2020, HALT DESTRUCTION NAT; Ceballos G, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P13596, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1922686117; Ceballos G, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE6089, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1704949114; Dupeyras A., 2020, COVID 19 CRISIS TOUR; Everard M, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V111, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.017; Fauna and Flora International, 2020, US; Gaia S, 2019, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V33, P1, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3472; Gaia S, 2017, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V30, P1614, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2367; Global Reporting Initiative, 2016, CONSOLIDATED SET GRI; Gray R, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P826, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483; Haque F, 2020, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2020.100893; Hassan AM, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P1419, DOI 10.1002/bse.2442; Hill R, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V34, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.005; International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), 2013, INTEGRATED REPORTING; International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 2020, IUCN RED LIST THREAT; Johnson CK, 2020, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V287, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2736; Jones MJ, 2013, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V26, P668, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1255; Kiger ME, 2020, MED TEACH, V42, P846, DOI 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030; Kim D, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V105, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0980-0; King M., 2016, CHIEF VALUE OFFICER; Kolbert Elizabeth., 2014, 6 EXTINCTION UNNATUR, V1st; Makower, 2020, BIODIVERSITY PANDEMI; Maroun W, 2018, ACCOUNT FORUM, V42, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.accfor.2017.12.001; Pievani T, 2014, REND LINCEI-SCI FIS, V25, P85, DOI 10.1007/s12210-013-0258-9; Price, 2020, CONSERVATION INT; Rimmel G, 2013, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V26, P746, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1228; Roberts L., 2020, NURSING BOTH COVID 1; Roberts L, 2020, DOES LOSS BIODIVERSI; Roberts L, 2022, J BUS ETHICS, V178, P571, DOI 10.1007/s10551-021-04800-9; Roberts L, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P705, DOI 10.1002/bse.2649; Russell S, 2017, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V30, P1426, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010; Samkin G, 2014, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V27, P527, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1496; Skouloudis A, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V98, P888, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.060; Smith T, 2019, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V29, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.1839; Sobhani FA, 2012, J CLEAN PROD, V23, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.023; Sobkowiak M., 2021, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN; Solomon JF, 2013, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V38, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2013.01.001; SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788; Talbot D, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P2571, DOI 10.1002/bse.2764; van Liempd D, 2013, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V26, P833, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ:02-2013-1232; Weir K, 2018, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V31, P875, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2494; Weston, 2020, WE DID IT OURSELVESS; WHO (World Health Organization), 2020, ENCULTURATION; World Economic Forum, 2020, GLOB RISK REP; WWF, 2020, NAT IS TOO BIG FAIL	59	2	2	5	11	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	0964-4733	1099-0836		BUS STRATEG ENVIRON	Bus. Strateg. Environ.	JAN	2022	31	1					326	352		10.1002/bse.2890	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2890		OCT 2021	27	Business; Environmental Studies; Management	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	YK3AC					2022-09-08	WOS:000704210200001
J	Aberilla, JM; Gallego-Schmid, A; Stamford, L; Azapagic, A				Mikhail Aberilla, Jhud; Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro; Stamford, Laurence; Azapagic, Adisa			Environmental assessment of domestic water supply options for remote communities	WATER RESEARCH			English	Article						Bottled water; Desalination; Groundwater; Life cycle assessment; Water-energy nexus	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DESALINATION TECHNOLOGIES; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; MIX WSMIX; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT	Access to clean water is one of the targets in the UN Sustainable Development Goals. However, millions of people are still without basic water services, predominantly in rural areas in developing nations. Previous studies have investigated the environmental impacts of water provision, but they mostly focused on large-scale urban systems. This paper considers for the first time the life cycle environmental impacts of different water supply options applicable to remote communities in developing countries. Focusing on the Southeast Asia-Pacific (SEAP) context, a cradle-to-grave approach is followed to estimate the impacts of locally-sourced groundwater, surface water and desalinated seawater as well as externally-sourced bottled water. The results reveal that surface water is environmentally the most sustainable alternative. Locally desalinated water, powered by diesel electricity, has two orders of magnitude higher impacts than surface water. However, externally-sourced water in plastic bottles is the worst option with 4-155 times higher impacts than desalinated water and up to three orders of magnitude higher impacts than surface water. This is largely due to the impacts related to the production of bottles. Doubling their recycling would reduce the impacts by 7-23% but bottled water would still be environmentally the least sustainable option. Although water in single-use bottles currently provides only 3% of the water supply of a representative remote community in the SEAP region considered in this study, it accounts on average for more than 50% of the total impacts from water consumption. By 2030, population increase could lead to greater reliance of remote communities on bottled water and 60-73% higher impacts of water consumption per household. Relying solely on local surface, ground and water desalinated using solar power and avoiding bottled water would reduce the impacts by 33-99% relative to the current situation. This would also improve considerably water availability and security in remote communities. The findings of this study will be of interest to national and local governments developing future policies aimed at increasing access of remote communities to clean water. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Mikhail Aberilla, Jhud; Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro; Stamford, Laurence; Azapagic, Adisa] Univ Manchester, Dept Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sustainable Ind Syst, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England; [Mikhail Aberilla, Jhud] Univ Philippines, Dept Chem Engn, CP Garcia Ave, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; [Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Pariser Bldg,Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England		Azapagic, A (corresponding author), Univ Manchester, Dept Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sustainable Ind Syst, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England.	adisa.azapagic@manchester.ac.uk	Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail Mikhail/AAW-9686-2021; Gallego Schmid, Alejandro/B-2332-2016	Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail/0000-0001-8558-1606; Gallego Schmid, Alejandro/0000-0002-0583-2143; Stamford, Laurence/0000-0002-0973-7338	Republic of the Philippines Commission on Higher Education; British Council through the CHED-Newton PhD Scholarship programme [261718262]; UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/K011820/1]; EPSRC [EP/K011820/1] Funding Source: UKRI	Republic of the Philippines Commission on Higher Education; British Council through the CHED-Newton PhD Scholarship programme; UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)); EPSRC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC))	This work is funded by the Republic of the Philippines Commission on Higher Education and the British Council through the CHED-Newton PhD Scholarship programme (ID 261718262), as well as by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, Gr. no. EP/K011820/1). This funding is gratefully acknowledged. Icons used in the graphical abstract are attributed to Freepik from www.flaticon.com.	Abdelkareem MA, 2018, DESALINATION, V435, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.018; Aberilla JM, 2020, APPL ENERG, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114004; Andoh P.Y., 2013, INT J SCI TECHNOL RE, V2; [Anonymous], 2017, 2017 PHIL STAT YB; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], [No title captured]; [Anonymous], 2013, RECIPE 2008 VERSION; [Anonymous], STUD REC IND DEV REP; [Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO; Arendorf J., 2014, PRELIMINARY REPORT R; Bhakar P, 2018, PROC CIRP, V69, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.050; Boulay AM, 2018, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V23, P368, DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8; Byrne P, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V47, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.083; Chenoweth J, 2008, DESALINATION, V229, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.011; Cherif H, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V59, P1504, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.094; Del Borghi A, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P1158, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0549-5; Dow Chemical Company, 2017, WAT APPL VAL ENG; Ecoinvent Association, 2014, EC 3 1; Garcia-Sanchez M, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V693, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.270; Garfi M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V137, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.218; Gassert F., 2014, AQUEDUCT GLOBAL MAPS; Ghaffour N, 2015, DESALINATION, V356, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.024; Gloser S, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P6564, DOI 10.1021/es400069b; Godskesen B, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P2363, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.005; Godskesen B, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V63, P565, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.258; Godskesen B., 2017, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_33., 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_33]; Hsien C, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104476; Hu A.H., 2013, TECHN P 2013 NSTI NA, P686; International Organization for Standardization, 2006, 14040 ISO; International Water Association, 2016, DES PAST PRES FUT; Jungbluth N., 2006, COMP ENV IMPACT DRIN; Lagioia G, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V60, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.001; Lawler W, 2015, DESALINATION, V357, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.013; Leao S, 2019, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V24, P2255, DOI 10.1007/s11367-019-01630-w; Leao S, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P1374, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b04071; Leao S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.135; Li Y, 2016, WATER RES, V89, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.030; Loubet P, 2014, WATER RES, V67, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.048; Lyons E., 2009, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, V9, P439, DOI 10.2166/ws.2009.534; Santos HCM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P3470, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-8084-0; McFarlane N., 2016, MOTIV MEDIA GR; Nitsch C., 2003, ULLMANNS ENCY IND CH, DOI [10.1002/14356007.a07_137, DOI 10.1002/14356007.A07_137]; Pfister S., 2013, LC IMPACT SPATIALLY; Philippine Department of Energy, 2017, 2016 POW STAT; Philippine Department of Energy, 2016, 2016 2020 MISS EL DE; Philippine Primer, 2015, DRINK WAT PHIL; Pradeleix L, 2015, IRRIG DRAIN, V64, P124, DOI 10.1002/ird.1865; Raluy RG, 2005, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V10, P285, DOI 10.1065/lca2004.09.179.1; Shahabi MP, 2015, DESALINATION, V357, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.003; Shen L, 2011, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V16, P522, DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0296-4; Slagstad H, 2014, URBAN WATER J, V11, P323, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.795232; Sterling Containers LLC, 2018, SPEC STERL CONT; *THIN, 2016, GABI SOFTW SYST DAT; Tse P.-K., 2015, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY; Uche J, 2014, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V19, P688, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0677-y; UN DESA Population Division, 2017, WORKING PAPER; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2017, SUST DEV GOALS; Vadenbo C.O., 2013, 1 EC SWISS CTR LIF C; WHO, 2017, FIN DEV GOALS AN TAN; WHO/UNICEF, 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER; Wilson DC, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.016; Zah R., 2007, 12 EC	63	6	6	2	15	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0043-1354	1879-2448		WATER RES	Water Res.	MAY 15	2020	175								115687	10.1016/j.watres.2020.115687	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115687			14	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources	LD3QT	32193029	Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000525947900032
J	Hischier, R; Reale, F; Castellani, V; Sala, S				Hischier, Roland; Reale, Francesca; Castellani, Valentina; Sala, Serenella			Environmental impacts of household appliances in Europe and scenarios for their impact reduction	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Life cycle assessment; Consumer footprint; Household appliances; Ecoinnovation; Scenarios; Policy impact	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT; CONSUMPTION; FOOTPRINT; LCA	Assessing the environmental impact due to consumption of goods and services is a pivotal step towards achieving the sustainable development goal related to responsible production and consumption (i.e. SDG 12). Household appliances plays a crucial role and should be assessed in a systemic manner, namely considering all life cycle stages, technological efficiency, and affluence aspects. The present study assess the impact of such household appliances used in Europe, and tests scenarios of potential impact reduction at various scales. Life cycle assessment is applied to 14 different household appliances (ranging from dishwashers to television devices) selected to build a set of representative products, based on their economic value and diffusion in households in Europe. Related impacts are calculated with the Environmental Footprint method for calculating a Consumer Footprint "appliances" for the baseline year 2010. A number of scenarios encompassing eco-solutions on a technical level, changes in consumption pattern, behavioral changes, as well as the combination of all these aspects are run to estimate the Consumer Footprint related to household appliances for the year 2030, compared against this baseline scenario. The baseline Consumer Footprint is confirming the importance of the use phase in leading the impacts in almost all impact categories. Testing different scenarios concludes that there is a reduction of the impact for most of the categories (with up to 67% for the ozone depletion potential, and still around 35% for the global warming potential), while two of the here examined impact categories (i.e. land-use and mineral resource depletion) show an overall potential that is even negative - i.e. the results of all scenarios are higher than the ones of the 2010 baseline scenario. The increase in purchase and use of such appliances may offset energy efficiency benefits in some of the examined categories. Hence, the assessment of sustainability of appliances consumption should always include several scales, from the efficiency of the products (micro scale), to the improvement of the energy mix (meso scale), up to accounting for socio-economic drivers and patterns of consumption affecting the overall appliances stock (macro scale).	[Hischier, Roland] Empa, Technol & Soc Lab, Lerchenfeldstr 5, CH-9014 St Gallen, Switzerland; [Reale, Francesca; Castellani, Valentina; Sala, Serenella] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, Ispra, VA, Italy; [Reale, Francesca] Ecoinnovazione Srl, Spin ENEA, Via Ferrarese 3, Bologna, Italy		Sala, S (corresponding author), European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, Ispra, VA, Italy.	serenella.sala@ec.europa.eu	Sala, Serenella/AAA-9133-2022; Castellani, Valentina/K-1832-2014; Hischier, Roland/J-3996-2019	Sala, Serenella/0000-0003-1919-9948; Castellani, Valentina/0000-0002-9832-6943; Hischier, Roland/0000-0002-1084-7665	Directorate General for the Environment (DG ENV) of the European Commission [070201/20157SI2.719458/ENV.A.1, 070201/2015/SI2.705230/SER/ENV.A1]	Directorate General for the Environment (DG ENV) of the European Commission	The present work is based on the research performed by the authors within the JRC and/or for the JRC, and was financially supported by the Directorate General for the Environment (DG ENV) of the European Commission in the context of two Administrative Arrangement "Ecodesign 4 Circularity" (No 070201/20157SI2.719458/ENV.A.1) and "Indicators and assessment of the environmental impact of EU consumption" (No 070201/2015/SI2.705230/SER/ENV.A1).	Amienyo D, 2016, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V6, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2015.12.004; [Anonymous], 2006, 140442006EN ISO; Ardente F, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V74, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.049; Barba-Gutierrez Y, 2008, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V52, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.002; Biganzoli L, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V524, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.041; Boldoczki S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119736; Boyano A, 2017, JRC TECHNICAL REPORT; Castellani V., 2017, 28763 EUR EN, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2016.07.002; Castellani V., 2017, EUR28764EN; CASTELLANI V, 2019, TECHNICAL REPORT; Castellani V., 2019, P DES SOC INT C ENG; Castellani V, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117966; Dekoninck E., 2019, 29600 EUR EN, V1, P3721; EC, 2018, PRODUCT ENV FOOTPRIN; *EC CTR, 2015, EC DAT V3 2 REC CONT; ecoinvent Centre, 2015, STAT PROD MAN GOODS; Elduque D, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V76, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.009; Europaische Kommission, 2021, EU REFERENCE SCENARI; European Commission, 2016, REC BAS EX ENV IMP A; European Commission, 2018, ENV FOOTPR PACK 3; Eurostat, 2017, EN EFF IND EUR IEE P; Favi C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V186, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.140; Fiore S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V659, P928, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.417; GOTZ T, 2015, OVERALL WORLDWIDE SA; Hauschild MZ, 2015, PROC CIRP, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.126; Heinrich C., 2015, SUSTAINABLE COOLING; Hertwich EG, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P6414, DOI 10.1021/es803496a; Hischier R, 2010, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V15, P428, DOI 10.1007/s11367-010-0169-2; Huppes G, 2006, J IND ECOL, V10, P129, DOI 10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.129; ISO, 2006, FOR GLOB MARK DEM EL; ISO, 2006, ISO ISO 140402006 EN; ISO, 2006, EC IMP ACC OV REP 20; JAVANI N, 2013, COMP ENV IMPACT ASSE; KEMNA R, 2011, METHODOLOGY ECODES 1; Landi D, 2019, INT J INTERACT DES M, V13, P851, DOI 10.1007/s12008-019-00533-2; Lavagna M, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V145, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008; Lee MS, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V101, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.010; Notarnicola B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080; Perez-Belis V, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V159, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.032; REALE F, 2019, 29758 EUR EN JOINT R; Ross SA, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P1103, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12505; Ryen EG, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P2549, DOI 10.1021/es505121p; SALA S, 2019, EUR29441EN; Sala S., 2019, ENCY UN SUSTAINABLE, P2523; Sala S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118050; Seyring N., 2015, STUDY WEEE RECOVERY; Subramanian K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.089; Subramanian K, 2016, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V46, P1441, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2016.1245550; Tao F, 2014, IEEE T IND INFORM, V10, P1252, DOI 10.1109/TII.2014.2306771; Tekawa M, 1997, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT - ISEE-1997, P125, DOI 10.1109/ISEE.1997.605287; VITO, 2015, 28765 EUR EN; VITO, 2015, PREP STUD LIGHT SOUR; Wager PA, 2011, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V409, P1746, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.050; Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110; Xiao RF, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V95, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.031; Zhang WJ, 2019, J IND ECOL, V23, P1381, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12928; 1998, LCA STUD PROD GROUP	57	11	11	1	22	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 10	2020	267								121952	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121952	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121952			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	MB6IN	32921932	Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000542705400008
J	Li, RC; Wei, Y; Yi, M; Zhang, LL; Cheng, BD; Yu, C				Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang			Timber carbon stocks and influencing factors in the ?Belt and Road Initiative? region	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Belt and road initiative (BRI); Timber carbon stock; Multi -regional input -output (MRIO); Structural decomposition analysis (SDA)	INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; EMISSIONS; ENERGY	Most "Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI) countries are developing countries in the early and middle stages of economic development and industrialization. The ecological environment in the BRI region is relatively fragile. Therefore, ensuring the green development of the BRI is of great significance for realizing global sustainable development goals. As the largest terrestrial ecosystem, forests can offset carbon dioxide emissions and maintain biodiversity. This paper aims to study the BRI region's timber carbon stock flow pattern and the influencing factors. A multi-regional input-output model and carbon stock-accounting methods are used to analyze the embodied timber carbon stock flows. We also reveal the spatiotemporal characteristics of embodied timber carbon stocks in critical countries. Furthermore, a structural decomposition analysis (SDA) is used to examine the factors that influence timber carbon stock changes. The results show that the timber carbon stocks imported to the BRI region account for an increasing percentage of the global imported volume, while the exported percentage has decreased. Although the BRI region has been a net export, the net export volume has shown a declining trend. China and India are the largest timber carbon stock consumers in the BRI region. The United States, Japan, and Germany are the main export destination countries of timber carbon stocks outside the BRI region. The major source countries of timber export have transferred to developed countries outside the BRI region due to the requirement of forest certification systems for combating illegal logging. The changes in the import and export of embodied timber carbon stocks are mainly affected by the negative effect of timber carbon stock intensity and the positive effect of per-capita final demand. The analyses indicate that the developing countries in BRI region with abundant forest resources no longer rely on deforestation to export raw materials in exchange for low profits. Instead, they are gradually enacting sustainable forest management, and exporting wood products with higher added value.	[Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China; [Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang] Beijing Forestry Univ, Natl Acad Econ & Trade Forestry & Grassland, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China		Yu, C (corresponding author), Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.	liruichao@bjfu.edu.cn; yingwei@bjfu.edu.cn; yimeng@bjfu.edu.cn; luluzhang1995@bjfu.edu.cn; baodong@bjfu.edu.cn; changyu@bjfu.edu.cn		Yu, Chang/0000-0002-9795-3443	 [71804012]		Acknowledgements This research was supported by grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71804012) . We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers and editors.	Aguiar A., GTAP DATA BASE VERSI; Ascensao F, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P206, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3; Chan A., 2010, ILLEGAL LOGGING INDO; Chen XP, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106315; Zaninovich SC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V747, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141085; Coenen J, 2021, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V31, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.1901; de Araujo IF, 2020, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V55, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.06.006; Duan CC, 2017, APPL ENERG, V194, P725, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.139; Dumitrascu M, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11090914; Ezici B, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119630; Fang K, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105068; Gibbs HK, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023; Hiltner U, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V492, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119166; Hiltner U, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V320, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.021; Hoang NT, 2021, NAT ECOL EVOL, V5, P845, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z; Hou J, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1761888; Johnston CMT, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P14526, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1904231116; Kulionis V, 2020, ENERGY, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116909; Lenzen M, 2013, ECOL ECON, V94, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.018; Liang S, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002076; Long A, 2013, TROP CONSERV SCI, V6, P384, DOI 10.1177/194008291300600306; Piponiot C, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e; Putz FE, 2012, CONSERV LETT, V5, P296, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00242.x; Roopsind A, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P2862, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14155; Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6; Shrestha P, 2019, FOREST SCI, V65, P439, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxz003; Su B, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.020; Su B, 2012, ENERG ECON, V34, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009; Wang LP, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119936; Wang XZ, 2020, ENERGY, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118249; Wei YG, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P521, DOI 10.1002/sd.2006; Wen W, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.036; Wiedmann T, 2018, NAT GEOSCI, V11, P314, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0113-9; Zhang DW, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108237; Zhang LL, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104966; Zhang LL, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109996; Zhang Q, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119503; Zheng Z, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145065	38	0	0	0	0	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 20	2022	359								132026	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132026	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132026			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1N0GE					2022-09-08	WOS:000800341500001
J	Li, RC; Wei, Y; Yi, M; Zhang, LL; Cheng, BD; Yu, C				Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang			Timber carbon stocks and influencing factors in the "Belt and Road Initiative" region	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Belt and road initiative (BRI); Timber carbon stock; Multi-regional input-output (MRIO); Structural decomposition analysis (SDA)	INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; EMISSIONS; ENERGY	Most "Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI) countries are developing countries in the early and middle stages of economic development and industrialization. The ecological environment in the BRI region is relatively fragile. Therefore, ensuring the green development of the BRI is of great significance for realizing global sustainable development goals. As the largest terrestrial ecosystem, forests can offset carbon dioxide emissions and maintain biodiversity. This paper aims to study the BRI region's timber carbon stock flow pattern and the influencing factors. A multi-regional input-output model and carbon stock-accounting methods are used to analyze the embodied timber carbon stock flows. We also reveal the spatiotemporal characteristics of embodied timber carbon stocks in critical countries. Furthermore, a structural decomposition analysis (SDA) is used to examine the factors that influence timber carbon stock changes. The results show that the timber carbon stocks imported to the BRI region account for an increasing percentage of the global imported volume, while the exported percentage has decreased. Although the BRI region has been a net export, the net export volume has shown a declining trend. China and India are the largest timber carbon stock consumers in the BRI region. The United States, Japan, and Germany are the main export destination countries of timber carbon stocks outside the BRI region. The major source countries of timber export have transferred to developed countries outside the BRI region due to the requirement of forest certification systems for combating illegal logging. The changes in the import and export of embodied timber carbon stocks are mainly affected by the negative effect of timber carbon stock intensity and the positive effect of per-capita final demand. The analyses indicate that the developing countries in BRI region with abundant forest resources no longer rely on deforestation to export raw materials in exchange for low profits. Instead, they are gradually enacting sustainable forest management, and exporting wood products with higher added value.	[Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China; [Li, Ruichao; Wei, Ying; Yi, Meng; Zhang, Lulu; Cheng, Baodong; Yu, Chang] Beijing Forestry Univ, Natl Acad Econ & Trade Forestry & Grassland, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China		Yu, C (corresponding author), Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.	liruichao@bjfu.edu.cn; yingwei@bjfu.edu.cn; yimeng@bjfu.edu.cn; luluzhang1995@bjfu.edu.cn; baodong@bjfu.edu.cn; changyu@bjfu.edu.cn			National Natural Science Foundation of China [71804012]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	This research was supported by grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71804012) . We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers and editors.	Aguiar A., GTAP DATA BASE VERSI; Ascensao F, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P206, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3; Chan A., 2010, ILLEGAL LOGGING INDO; Chen XP, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106315; Zaninovich SC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V747, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141085; Coenen J, 2021, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V31, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.1901; de Araujo IF, 2020, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V55, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.06.006; Duan CC, 2017, APPL ENERG, V194, P725, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.139; Dumitrascu M, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11090914; Ezici B, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119630; Fang K, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105068; Forster EJ, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24084-x; Gibbs HK, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023; Hiltner U, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V492, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119166; Hiltner U, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V320, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.021; Hoang NT, 2021, NAT ECOL EVOL, V5, P845, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z; Hou J, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1761888; Johnston CMT, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P14526, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1904231116; Kulionis V, 2020, ENERGY, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116909; Lenzen M, 2013, ECOL ECON, V94, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.018; Liang S, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002076; Long A, 2013, TROP CONSERV SCI, V6, P384, DOI 10.1177/194008291300600306; Piponiot C, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e; Putz FE, 2012, CONSERV LETT, V5, P296, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00242.x; Roopsind A, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P2862, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14155; Shrestha P, 2019, FOREST SCI, V65, P439, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxz003; Su B, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.020; Su B, 2012, ENERG ECON, V34, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009; Wang LP, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119936; Wang XZ, 2020, ENERGY, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118249; Wei YG, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P521, DOI 10.1002/sd.2006; Wen W, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.036; Wiedmann T, 2018, NAT GEOSCI, V11, P314, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0113-9; Zhang DW, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108237; Zhang LL, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104966; Zhang LL, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109996; Zhang Q, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119503; Zheng Z, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145065	38	0	0	1	1	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	JUL 20	2022	359								132026	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132026	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132026			13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	3G3RX					2022-09-08	WOS:000831274200003
J	Del Valle, TM; Wu, J; Xu, CB; Chen, Q; Wu, Y; Yang, W				Del Valle, Tomas Marin; Wu, Jing; Xu, Chongbin; Chen, Qian; Wu, Yu; Yang, Wu			Spatiotemporal dynamics and resource use efficiency in mariculture production: A case study in Southeastern China	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable development goals; Land use and land cover change; Coupled human and ocean systems; Sustainable intensification; Aquaculture; Marine farming	NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; FERTILIZER USE; AQUACULTURE; FARMERS; FOOD; IMPACT; LABOR; HOUSEHOLD; SECURITY	The rapid expansion of marine aquaculture poses a big challenge for sustainable development. More efficient production strategies are necessary to ensure a sustainable mariculture sector, yet the potential of feasible production gains without further environmental impacts is largely unknown. This work took one of the biggest mariculture centers in China to analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics of mariculture products in 2003, 2010, and 2016, explore potential factors associated with resource use efficiency, and quantify the potential of these factors to increase regional production. The mariculture sector had a rapid expansion in 2003-2010 and accelerated product diversification in 2010-2016, with overall annual growth rates of 4.6%, 24.9%, 14.6%, 20.4%, 24.7%, and 8.7% in finfish (Larimichthys crocea and others), sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus), abalone (Haliotis spp.), laminaria (Laminaria japonica), gracilaria (Gracilaria spp.), and porphyra (Porphyra spp.) production, respectively. Resource use impacts were dominated by finfish production (over 90% of the total), but recent increases were mostly due to the farming of other products. Our study also identified several demographic (household size), socioeconomic (income per capita), technical (farming density, feed usage, and energy usage), and environmental (distance between farms and total nitrogen concentration) variables that were correlated with resource use efficiency. Simulations based on regression models suggested that changes in these factors could increase fish and seaweed production by at least 3%-18% and 2%-23%, respectively, without increasing resource use levels. Sustainable intensification of local mariculture systems could be achieved by enhancing the access to more efficient technology and financial capital, increasing the willingness of engagement in the sector, facilitating the transaction of sea use rights, reducing the amount of nutrient released in coastal areas, and including the heterogeneous effects of farm distances and water quality in marine spatial planning. Our results highlight the existing opportunities in policymaking for more sustainable food production systems and the management of coastal ecosystems in mariculture-dominated seascapes.	[Del Valle, Tomas Marin; Wu, Jing; Yang, Wu] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Ctr Intelligent Ecol & Sustainabil, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China; [Xu, Chongbin; Chen, Qian] Beijing Inst Space Mech & Elect, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China; [Xu, Chongbin; Chen, Qian] Beijing Aerosp Innovat Intelligence Sci & Technol, Beijing 100076, Peoples R China; [Wu, Yu] Tianjin Univ, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Inst Surface Earth Syst Sci, Tianjin Key Lab Earth Crit Zone Sci & Sustainable, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China; [Del Valle, Tomas Marin] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, 2005 Songhu Rd, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China		Yang, W (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Ctr Intelligent Ecol & Sustainabil, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China.	wyang@zju.edu.cn			National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974171]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974171) .	Aguilar-Manjarrez J., 2010, FAO FISH AQUAC PROC, V17; Ahmed N, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P851, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.163; Beilin R, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V36, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.003; Belton B, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P677, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0540-7; Bishop MJ, 2017, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V492, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.021; Bosch ME, 2007, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V12, P181, DOI 10.1065/lca2006.11.282; Bostock J, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2897, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0170; Burkhard B, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019; Cao YM, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104736; Cassman KG, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P262, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0507-8; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Costello C, 2020, NATURE, V588, P95, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y; Cui ZL, 2018, NATURE, V555, P363, DOI 10.1038/nature25785; Edwards P, 2015, AQUACULTURE, V447, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.001; Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005; FAO, 2020, FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, DOI 10.4060/cb1213t; FAO, 2016, REG STRAT ACT PLAN S; FAO, 2020, STATE WORLD FISHERIE, DOI [10.4060/ca9229-n, 10.4060/ca9229en]; Fortin JA, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111266; Gentry RR, 2017, NAT ECOL EVOL, V1, P1317, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0257-9; Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383; Guo Q, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12083276; Haase D, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04853-170322; Henriksson PJG, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4b79; Henriksson PJG, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P2958, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716530115; Herrero M, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P20888, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308149110; Hunter MC, 2017, BIOSCIENCE, V67, P385, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix010; Joffre OM, 2017, FOOD SECUR, V9, P39, DOI 10.1007/s12571-016-0633-3; Joffre OM, 2019, AGR SYST, V173, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.011; Ju XT, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V41, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.005; Kang JM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11247186; Khanal U, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V147, P507, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2168-4; Lausch A, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V295, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.018; Li HW, 2016, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V14, P377, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2016.1170330; Li XG, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105233; [李怡静 Li Yijing], 2020, [航天返回与遥感, Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing], V41, P90; Little DC, 2016, P NUTR SOC, V75, P274, DOI 10.1017/S0029665116000665; Liu JY, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6; Lu H, 2019, HABITAT INT, V83, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.004; Lu H, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V207, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.033; Lu SS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V204, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.013; Luo LG, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V74, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.045; Margono BA, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P730, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2277, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2277]; Marin T, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051396; Meng WQ, 2017, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V191, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.008; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 2017, NOT MIN AGR ISS CONS; Molden D, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P528, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.023; Neumann K, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.02.004; Pan D, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V197, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.069; Pan YX, 2021, FOOD CONTROL, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107788; R Core Team, 2021, R LANG ENV STAT COMP; Rahman MT, 2019, AQUACULTURE, V509, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.05.002; Ren CC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.151; Ren CY, 2018, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V28, P430, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0926-2; Rockstrom J, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P4, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6; Rudel TK, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01720-8; Sanchez-Escobar F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V201, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.294; Soto D., 2008, FAO FISH AQUAC PROC, V14; Spiegal S, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa779; Tscharntke T, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V151, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068; Turner MG, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P2833, DOI 10.1890/10-0097.1; van Ittersum MK, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009; Wang FT, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V145, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.017; Wang JY, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V74, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.037; Wang JJ, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P1464, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b03340; Wang YJ, 2014, J INTEGR AGR, V13, P687, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60697-8; White C, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P4696, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114215109; Wooldridge J.M., 2016, INTRO ECONOMETRICS M, V6th; Wu J, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104190; Wu JX, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.11.008; Wu YY, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P7010, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1806645115; Xie FT, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V101, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.010; Xu DD, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.136; Yang Q, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123980; Yin Yan, 2017, Aquaculture and Fisheries, V2, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.aaf.2017.04.002; Ying ZM, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1851145; Zhang J, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9765-z; Zhang T, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.194; Zhang WF, 2016, NATURE, V537, P671, DOI 10.1038/nature19368; Zhou XL, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.013; Zulfiqar F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.155	81	0	0	13	13	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 15	2022	340								130743	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130743	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130743			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0B0FQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000774320300003
J	Lin, Z; Rui, ZP; Liu, ML; Bian, RJ; Liu, XY; Lu, HF; Cheng, K; Zhang, XH; Zheng, JF; Li, LQ; Marios, D; Stephen, J; Natarjan, I; Pan, GX				Lin Zhi; Rui Zhipeng; Liu Minglong; Bian Rongjun; Liu Xiaoyu; Lu Haifei; Cheng Kun; Zhang Xuhui; Zheng Jufeng; Li Lianqing; Marios, Drosos; Stephen, Joseph; Natarjan, Ishwaran; Pan Genxing			Pyrolyzed biowastes deactivated potentially toxic metals and eliminated antibiotic resistant genes for healthy vegetable production	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Bio-waste; Biochar; Potentially toxic metals; Antibiotic resistant genes; Vegetable production; Soil amendment; Clean production	HEAVY-METALS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PATHOGENIC BACTERIA; MICROBIAL PROCESSES; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; BIOCHAR AMENDMENT; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; RISK-ASSESSMENT	Potentially toxic metals (PTEs) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) present in bio-wastes were the major environmental and health risks for soil use. If pyrolyzing bio-wastes into biochar could minimize such risks had not been elucidated. This study evaluated PTE pools, microbial and ARGs abundances of wheat straw (WS), swine manure (SM) and sewage sludge (SS) before and after pyrolysis, which were again tested for soil amendment at a 2% dosage in a pot experiment with a vegetable crop of pak choi (Brassica campestris L.). Pyrolysis led to PTEs concentration in biochars but reduced greatly their mobility, availability and migration potential, as revealed respectively by leaching, CaCl2 extraction and risk assessment coding. In SM and SS after pyrolysis, gene abundance was removed by 4-5 orders for bacterial, by 2-3 orders for fungi and by 3-5 orders for total ARGs. With these material amended, PTEs available pool decreased by 25%-85% while all ARGs eliminated to background in the pot soil. Unlike a >50% yield decrease and a >30% quality decline with unpyrolyzed SM and SS, their biochars significantly increased biomass production and overall quality of pak choi grown in the amended soil. Comparatively, amendment of the biochars decreased plant PTEs content by 23-57% and greatly reduced health risk of pak choi, with total target hazard quotient values well below the guideline limit for subsistence diet by adult. Furthermore, biochar soil amendment enabled a synergic improvement on soil fertility, product quality, and biomass production as well as metal stabilization in the soil-plant system. Thus, biowastes pyrolysis and reuse in vegetable production could help build up a closed loop of production-wastebiochar-production, addressing not only circular economy but healthy food and climate nexus also and contributing to achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Lin Zhi; Rui Zhipeng; Liu Minglong; Bian Rongjun; Liu Xiaoyu; Lu Haifei; Cheng Kun; Zhang Xuhui; Zheng Jufeng; Li Lianqing; Marios, Drosos; Stephen, Joseph; Natarjan, Ishwaran; Pan Genxing] Nanjing Agr Univ, Inst Resource Ecosyst & Environm Agr, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China; [Lin Zhi; Rui Zhipeng; Liu Minglong; Bian Rongjun; Liu Xiaoyu; Lu Haifei; Cheng Kun; Zhang Xuhui; Zheng Jufeng; Li Lianqing; Marios, Drosos; Stephen, Joseph; Natarjan, Ishwaran; Pan Genxing] Nanjing Agr Univ, Dept Soil Sci, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China; [Lin Zhi; Rui Zhipeng; Liu Minglong; Bian Rongjun; Liu Xiaoyu; Lu Haifei; Cheng Kun; Zhang Xuhui; Zheng Jufeng; Li Lianqing; Marios, Drosos; Stephen, Joseph; Natarjan, Ishwaran; Pan Genxing] Nanjing Agr Univ, Ctr Biomass Green Technol, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China; [Bian Rongjun; Liu Xiaoyu; Cheng Kun; Zhang Xuhui; Zheng Jufeng; Li Lianqing] Nanjing Agr Univ, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Solid Organ Waste, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China; [Pan Genxing] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Recycling & Ecotreatment Waste Biomass Zh, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China		Pan, GX (corresponding author), Nanjing Agr Univ, Inst Resource Ecosyst & Environm Agr, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China.; Pan, GX (corresponding author), Nanjing Agr Univ, Dept Soil Sci, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China.	gxpan@njau.edu.cn	Liu, Minglong/AAU-5150-2021; Pan, Genxing/AAH-8501-2019	Liu, Minglong/0000-0002-9012-5960; Drosos, Marios/0000-0003-0403-7014	Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFD0200802]; Ministry of Education of China; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid OrganicWaste Resource Utilization, China	Ministry of Science and Technology of China(Ministry of Science and Technology, China); Ministry of Education of China(Ministry of Education, China); Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid OrganicWaste Resource Utilization, China	This study was partially supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of China under a grant number of 2017YFD0200802. Funding for advanced soil and environment research was also provided with the project "Two First-Class Discipline Construction Plan" by the Ministry of Education of China. Additional in-kind financial support was provided also with the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid OrganicWaste Resource Utilization, China. Assistance by Jinhua Institute of Bio-economy, Zhejiang, China for biochar preparation of swine manure and sewage sludge is acknowledged. The authors are grateful for the anonymous referees for their very kind but constructive comments for improving the significance of the study and the MS quality.	Agerso Y, 2005, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V71, P7941, DOI 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7941-7947.2005; Agrafioti E, 2013, J ANAL APPL PYROL, V101, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.02.010; Ahmad M, 2014, CHEMOSPHERE, V99, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071; ALLOWAY BJ, 1990, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V91, P223, DOI 10.1016/0048-9697(90)90300-J; Andreae MO, 2001, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V15, P955, DOI 10.1029/2000GB001382; BAATH E, 1989, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V47, P335, DOI 10.1007/BF00279331; Bashir S, 2018, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V100, P727, DOI 10.1007/s00128-018-2310-z; Basta NT, 2005, J ENVIRON QUAL, V34, P49, DOI 10.2134/jeq2005.0049dup; Berti WR, 1996, J ENVIRON QUAL, V25, P1025, DOI 10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500050014x; Paes LAB, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118086; Bian RJ, 2018, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V118, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.003; Bian RJ, 2016, J ANAL APPL PYROL, V119, P52, DOI [10.1016/j.jaap.2016., 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.018]; Bian RJ, 2014, J HAZARD MATER, V272, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.017; Bloem E, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.274; Bolan NS, 2004, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V34, P291, DOI 10.1080/10643380490434128; Bouwman L, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P20882, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1012878108; Cantrell KB, 2008, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V99, P7941, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.061; Cantrell KB, 2012, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V107, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084; Cayuela ML, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V191, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009; Chen JH, 2015, APPL SOIL ECOL, V91, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.02.012; Chen QL, 2018, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V119, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.015; Chen QL, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V92-93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.026; Cherubin MR, 2018, SCI AGR, V75, P255, DOI [10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0459, 10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0459]; China Urban Water Association (Cuwa), 2013, URB DRAIN STAT YB CH; Chowdhury MA, 2014, CHEMOSPHERE, V97, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.030; Clare A, 2015, GCB BIOENERGY, V7, P1272, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12220; Commission of the European Communities (EC), 2006, 18812006 COMM EUR CO; Cui LQ, 2016, ECOL ENG, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.007; [崔亚男 Cui Yanan], 2017, [南京农业大学学报, Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University], V40, P281; Dahal RK, 2021, BIOFUELS-UK, V12, P237, DOI 10.1080/17597269.2018.1468978; de Kraker MEA, 2016, PLOS MED, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002184; de Oliveira UR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.083; Directorate-General for Research and Innovation,European Commission (DGRI-EU), 2020, CAR SOIL IS CAR LIF; Fagnano M, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V141, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.019; Fischer D, 2011, MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIC WASTE, P167; Fristak V, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1772, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.015; Fuentes A, 2004, CHEMOSPHERE, V54, P1039, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.029; Gaskin JW, 2008, T ASABE, V51, P2061, DOI 10.13031/2013.25409; Gaze WH, 2011, ISME J, V5, P1253, DOI 10.1038/ismej.2011.15; Giller KE, 1998, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V30, P1389, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00270-8; Girotto F, 2017, SUSTAIN AGR REV, V25, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48006-0_1; Gu CH, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P31031, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3089-5; Gue IHV, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123204; Gul S, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V206, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.015; Guo T, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P995, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.194; Halim CE, 2003, J HAZARD MATER, V103, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00245-0; He YD, 2010, ENVIRON TECHNOL, V31, P567, DOI 10.1080/09593330903514466; Inyang MI, 2016, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V46, P406, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2015.1096880; Janssen RPT, 1997, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V16, P2479, DOI [10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016&lt;2479:EPOHMI&gt;2.3.CO;2, 10.1002/etc.5620161207]; Jeffery S, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V144, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015; Jin ZhenJiang, 2012, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V45, P3773; Joseph S, 2013, CARBON MANAG, V4, P323, DOI [10.4155/CMT.13.23, 10.4155/cmt.13.23]; Khan K. Y., 2016, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V8, P23, DOI 10.5539/jas.v8n9p23; Khan KY, 2017, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V141, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.020; Kim S, 2004, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V26, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.002; Kimbell LK, 2018, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V4, P1807, DOI 10.1039/c8ew00141c; Kistemann T, 2002, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V68, P2188, DOI 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2188-2197.2002; KISTLER RC, 1987, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V21, P704, DOI 10.1021/es00161a012; Korhonen J, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111; Koten H., 2017, USAGE BIOGAS DIESEL, V13; Koten H, 2014, ADV MECH ENG, DOI 10.1155/2014/571063; Kumar K, 2005, J ENVIRON QUAL, V34, P2082, DOI 10.2134/jeq2005.0026; Kwapinski W, 2010, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V1, P177, DOI 10.1007/s12649-010-9024-8; Lal R, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1623, DOI 10.1126/science.1097396; Lal R, 2005, ENVIRON INT, V31, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005; Lam SS, 2012, ENERGIES, V5, P4209, DOI 10.3390/en5104209; Lehman RM, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P988, DOI 10.3390/su7010988; Lehmann J., 2015, BIOCHAR ENV MANAGEME; Liu XiaoYu, 2018, Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, V41, P1070; Liu XY, 2013, PLANT SOIL, V373, P583, DOI 10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x; Lohri CR, 2017, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, V16, P81, DOI 10.1007/s11157-017-9422-5; Lu HF, 2020, GEODERMA, V376, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114567; Lu R, 2000, SOIL ANALYTICAL METH; Lu T, 2016, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V18, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10163-015-0366-y; Maharjan B, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01116; Marschner P, 2003, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V35, P453, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00297-3; MEEC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China), 2018, GB156182018 MEEC; Ministry of Agriculture the People's Republic of China (MOAC), 2012, NY5252012 MOAC; Ministry of Environmental Protection the People's Republic of China (MEPC), 2014, HUTTERITE J HJ; Ministry of Health the People's Republic of China (MOHC), 1992, 1310691 MOHC GB; Ministry of Health the People's Republic of China (MOHC), 1994, GB151991994 MOHC; Mohan D, 2014, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V160, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120; National Development and Reform Commission the People's Republic of China (NDRC), 2012, CHIN ANN REP RES COM; National Development and Reform Commission the People's Republic of China (NDRC), 2013, CHIN ANN REP RES COM; National Development and Reform Commission the People's Republic of China (NDRC), 2013, 930 NDRC; National Health Commission the People's Republic of China (NHFPC), 2017, 27622017 NHFPC GB; Navia R, 2010, WASTE MANAGE RES, V28, P479, DOI 10.1177/0734242X10370928; PAHLSSON AMB, 1989, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V47, P287, DOI 10.1007/BF00279329; Pan Genxing, 2017, Science & Technology Review, V35, P82, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.23.013; [潘根兴 Pan Genxing], 2015, [中国农业科学, Scientia Agricultura Sinica], V48, P4607; Pan JW, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V737, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140283; Panda AC, 2017, BIO-PROTOCOL, V7, DOI 10.21769/BioProtoc.2126; Park JH, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V348, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0948-y; Partridge SR, 2009, FEMS MICROBIOL REV, V33, P757, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00175.x; Pham TH, 2006, ENG LIFE SCI, V6, P285, DOI 10.1002/elsc.200620121; Qambrani NA, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V79, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.057; Rahube TO, 2014, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V80, P6898, DOI 10.1128/AEM.02389-14; Rodic L, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9030404; Rodriguez-Eugenio N., 2018, SOIL POLLUTION HIDDE, P1; Rumpel C, 2018, NATURE, V553, P27, DOI 10.1038/d41586-017-09010-w; Sahlstrom L, 2003, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V87, P161, DOI 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00168-2; Sauve S, 2000, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V34, P1125, DOI 10.1021/es9907764; Shao QQ, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P9244, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04417-6; Sharma B, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V64, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.002; Singh KP, 2005, J HYDROL, V312, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.021; Standardization Administration the People's Republic of China (SAC), 2017, 329512016 SAC BGT; Standardization Administration ,the People's Republic of China (SAC), 2018, 42842018 SAC GB; Su JQ, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P7356, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b01012; Sweeten J., 2008, COMPOSTING MANURE SL; Tandi NK, 2004, J ENVIRON SCI HEAL B, V39, P461, DOI 10.1081/PFC-120035930; Tirado MC, 2010, FOOD RES INT, V43, P1729, DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.010; Tsai WT, 2012, CHEMOSPHERE, V89, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.085; Uchimiya M, 2011, J HAZARD MATER, V190, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.063; URE AM, 1993, INT J ENVIRON AN CH, V51, P135, DOI 10.1080/03067319308027619; US EPA, 2007, US EPA INT RISK INF; US EPA, 2002, USEPA REG 9 PREL REM; Wang HY, 2003, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V147, P79, DOI 10.1023/A:1024522111341; Wang XD, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V221, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.069; Wang XL, 2005, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V350, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.044; Wellington EMH, 2013, LANCET INFECT DIS, V13, P155, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70317-1; WHO/FAO, 2015, 10 FACTS ROAD SAF, P1; Xu J., 2005, CHINA VEG, V6, P39, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2005.05.019, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-6346.2005.05.019]; Yachigo M., 2013, SOIL PROCESSES CURRE, DOI [10.5772/55123, DOI 10.5772/55123]; Yu R, 2016, FOOD CONTROL, V60, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.08.013; Zaman AU, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V91, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.013; Zeng XY, 2018, J ANAL APPL PYROL, V132, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.03.012; Zhang YJ, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104912; Zhou HM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V640, P1287, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.009; Zhou HM, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V239, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.006; Zhou X, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V649, P902, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.368; Zhu YG, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P3435, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222743110; Zilberman D, 2018, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V40, P22, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppx051	132	11	12	12	75	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	DEC 10	2020	276								124208	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124208	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124208			19	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	OC9UG	32982076	Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000579500800180
J	Krasodomska, J; Simnett, R; Street, DL				Krasodomska, Joanna; Simnett, Roger; Street, Donna L.			Extended external reporting assurance: Current practices and challenges	JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTING			English	Article						CSR; Directive 2014; 95; EU; EER Assurance; ISAE 3000; non&#8208; financial information; SDGs; sustainability	SUSTAINABILITY REPORTS	This paper summarizes the UNCTAD ISAR WBCSD Webinar-Assurance on Sustainability Reports: Current Practices and Challenges, which explored views and practices on assurance of extended external reporting (EER) and identified challenges and potential ways forward. Stakeholders are demanding more accountability, as reflected in increased publication of EER and regulatory developments. EER can play an important role in rebuilding trust by catalyzing corporate focus and disclosure of business-centric matters material to stakeholders including strategy, business model, governance, and greater transparency on other material non-financial matters. Relatedly, EER cannot rebuild trust unless disclosures are credible and viewed as credible. Therefore, it is important that assurance, and other credibility enhancing techniques, is developed alongside EER frameworks and takes account of regulatory initiatives. We expand on lessons outlined during the Webinar by highlighting questions posed by participants, providing a historical overview of European regulatory developments (e.g., Directive 2014/95/EU and a forthcoming revision), providing a historical overview of the IAASB's development of ISAE 3000 and forthcoming guidance on addressing major challenges aimed at supporting EER assurance, and providing an overview of practice-focused publications addressing EER assurance. We conclude with an assessment of the way forward in regard to possible changes in the EER institutional setting, potential harmonization of EER standards, and the ability to provide reasonable versus limited assurance. Along with our companion paper (Venter and van Eck, 2021, 32), we contribute to the current discussion on EER assurance by providing a comprehensive assessment of the EER assurance landscape.	[Krasodomska, Joanna] Cracow Univ Econ, Krakow, Poland; [Simnett, Roger] UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; [Street, Donna L.] Univ Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469 USA		Street, DL (corresponding author), Univ Dayton, Dept Accounting, Dayton, OH 45469 USA.	dstreet1@udayton.edu	Krasodomska, Joanna/E-2704-2018	Krasodomska, Joanna/0000-0001-8423-678X; Simnett, Roger/0000-0001-9881-8553				ACCA, 2018, INS INT REP 2 0 WALK; ACCA, 2017, INS INT REP CHALL BE; ACCA, 2019, HTS INT REP 3 0 DRIV; ACCA, 2020, SIGHTS INT REP 4 0 S; Accountancy Europe, 2019, IAASBS CONS EXT EXT; Accountancy Europe, 2017, DISC PAP RESP ASS NE; Accountancy Europe, 2019, 7 WAYS ACC CAN HELP; Accountancy Europe, 2020, IAASBS CONS PROP GUI; Accountancy Europe, 2020, REL NONF INF EUR FAC; Accountancy Europe, 2020, ECS CONS NONF REP DI; Accountancy Europe, 2020, SETT HIGH QUAL NONF; Accountancy Europe, 2019, SUST FIN CALL ACT AC; Accountancy Europe, 2020, BETT BUS DET ASS NON; Accountancy Europe & WBCSD, 2018, RESP ASS NEEDS NONF; Adams C., 2020, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; AICPA & GRI, 2020, FREQ ASK QUEST EXT A; Beis U. K., 2019, STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTI; Braam G, 2018, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V25, P164, DOI 10.1002/csr.1447; Casey RJ, 2015, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V34, P97, DOI 10.2308/ajpt-50736; CERES, 2018, DISCL WHAT MATT BRID; CII, 2020, STAT CORP DISCL SUST; CIIA, 2015, RES REP ROL INT AUD; Cingolani R, 2013, NAT NANOTECHNOL, V8, P792, DOI 10.1038/nnano.2013.238; de Cambourg P., 2019, ENSURING THE RELEVAN; Deloitte, 2015, DIR GUID INT REP; Deloitte, 2016, THINK ALL FUT CORP R; EC, 2020, NONF REP LARG COMP U; EFRAG, 2020, PROGR REP PROJ TASK; EIOPA, 2020, EIOPA CALLS NONF INF; EY, 2017, IS YOUR NONF PERF RE; FEE, 2004, FEE CALL ACT ASS SUS; FEE, 1999, DISC PAP ASS ENV REP; FEE, 2016, POSITION PAPER; FEE, 2015, ROL PRACT DISCL; FEE, 2006, DISC PAP KEY ISS SUS; FEE, 2011, FEE COMM LETT IAASB; FEE, 2002, DISC PAP ASS SUST RE; GA Institute, 2020, TRENDS SUST REP PRAC; IAASB, 2017, IRWG DISC PAP DP DIS; IAASB, 2018, SUPP CRED TRUST EM F; IAASB, 2016, DISC PAP SUPP CRED T; IAASB, 2018, IAASB PROJ PROP EM F; IAASB, 2019, CONS PAP EXT EXT REP; IAASB, 2015, EXPL ASS INT REP OTH; IAASB, 2011, ISAE 3000 REV ASS EN; IAASB, 2013, INT STAND ASS ENG IS; IAASB, 2020, PUBL CONS PROP GUID; IAASB IRWG, 2014, BRIEF PAP MARK DEV I; IFAC, 2020, CIS PR NEWSW; IFRS Foundation, 2020, CONS PAP SUST REP; IIA, 2015, GLOB PERSP INS NUMB; IIRC, 2015, OV FEEDB CALL ACT; IIRC, 2014, ASS IR INTR DISC; IIRC, 2014, ASS IR EXPL ISS; IOSCO, 2020, SUST FIN ROL SEC REG; IRRCI, 2018, STAT SUST INT REP 20; KPMG, 2017, NONF ASS IMPR TRANSP; KPMG, 2019, NEXT STEPS NONF INF; KPMG, 2020, TIM HAS COM KPMG SUR; McKinsey & Company, 2019, MOR VAL VAL BAS SUST; PwC, 2019, FUT AUD PERSP AUD CO; Rao S., 2017, CPA J, V87; Robinson C., 2019, HEADS, V26; Simnett R, 2009, ACCOUNT REV, V84, P937, DOI 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937; Street D. L., 2020, UNCTAD ISAR ANN REV, P1; Venter E., 2021, J INT FINANCIAL MANA, V32, pthis issue; WBCSD, 2018, ENH CRED NONF INF IN; WBCSD, 2016, ASS GEN VAL EXT ASS; WBCSD & Accountancy Europe, 2018, RESP ASS NEEDS NONF; WBCSD & Baker & McKenzie, 2020, REP MATT MAINT AMB A; WBCSD & FSR - Danish Auditors, 2019, GUID IMPR QUAL ESG I; WBCSD & ICAEW, 2019, BUYERS GUID ASS NONF	72	12	12	3	8	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	0954-1314	1467-646X		J INT FIN MANAG ACC	J. Int. Financ. Manag. Account.	FEB	2021	32	1					104	142		10.1111/jifm.12127	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12127		JAN 2021	39	Business, Finance	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	PZ6FL		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000604749800001
J	Razali, F; Daud, D; Weng-Wai, C; Jiram, WRA				Razali, Fitriyah; Daud, Dzurllkanian; Weng-Wai, Choong; Jiram, Wilson Rangga Anthony			Waste separation at source behaviour among Malaysian households: The Theory of Planned Behaviour with moral norm	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Theory of planned behaviour; Moral norm; Behaviour; Households; Waste separation; Sustainability assessment	PREDICTING RECYCLING BEHAVIOR; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; FOOD WASTE; INTENTION; ATTITUDES; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; CONSERVATION; WILLINGNESS; CONTEXT	Background: Malaysia, as one of the countries that intend to achieve the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations (UN). Under the responsible consumption and production goals category, Malaysian households should take part by practising waste separation at home when the Separation at Source Initiative (SSI) under Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Act 2007 (Act 672) launched and effective in September 2015. However, many households in Malaysia is unwilling to participate. As the local authority has taken an extrinsic motivation thru SSI, this paper will study the impact of intrinsic motivation among the households. This paper purpose is to emphasise the part of intrinsic motivation thru extended Theory of Planned Behaviour in influencing households waste separation behaviour. A questionnaire survey was conducted towards high-rise residential units in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and obtained a total of 900 valid questionnaires. Data are analysed using the Smart PLS software. The results show that all the determinants from the model that consists of attitude towards behaviour, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control, and moral norm are significant. All the determinants positively influence the waste separation behaviour with the moral norm as the most influential determinant in improving households intrinsic motivation to engage with the waste separation at source behaviour. This paper result with the suggestions to foster waste separation behaviour among households based on the findings. Objectives: To identify the factors that could positively influence the waste separation at source behaviour among high-rise residents in Kuala Lumpur. This paper intends to discover the application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) extended with Moral Norm (MN) element in influencing the Waste Separation at Source Behaviour (WSB) among households. As this research focuses on intrinsic motivation, the MN element is included as it is one of the elements that represent a person intrinsic motivation. The result will support the application of moral norm together with TPB determinants. Furthermore, it shows the significance of the extended TPB. Originality/value: Most past papers studied the recycling intentions and behaviour among households. This paper is the first study that applying the extended TPB in investigating the WSB among high-rise residents in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The implication of the findings is useful for the local authority to encourage waste separation at source behaviour among households. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Razali, Fitriyah; Daud, Dzurllkanian; Weng-Wai, Choong; Jiram, Wilson Rangga Anthony] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Built Environm & Surveying, Dept Real Estate, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia		Daud, D (corresponding author), Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Built Environm & Surveying, Dept Real Estate, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia.	dzrull@utm.my	Jiram, Wilson Rangga Anthony/Z-4188-2019; wai, choong weng/K-6420-2012	Jiram, Wilson Rangga Anthony/0000-0002-2424-1402; wai, choong weng/0000-0002-5464-2370	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Cost Center) [R.J130000.7752.4J366]	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Cost Center)	The researchers acknowledge the help from a financial support by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under the Zamalah scholarship program and Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Cost Center No: R.J130000.7752.4J366).	AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T; Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL, P11; Alhassan H, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110055; Armitage CJ, 2001, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V40, P471, DOI 10.1348/014466601164939; Bagheri A, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109291; Bortoleto AP, 2012, WASTE MANAGE, V32, P2195, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.037; Botetzagias I, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V95, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004; Carrus G, 2008, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V28, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.003; Chan L, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V36, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.010; Cheung SF, 1999, ENVIRON BEHAV, V31, P587, DOI 10.1177/00139169921972254; Conner M, 1998, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V28, P1429, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x; DEYOUNG R, 1986, ENVIRON BEHAV, V18, P435, DOI 10.1177/0013916586184001; DEYOUNG R, 1985, J ENVIRON SYST, V15, P281, DOI 10.2190/3FWV-4WM0-R6MC-2URB; Dornyei Z., 2007, RES METHODS APPL LIN, DOI [10.1017/s0272263110000094, DOI 10.1017/S0272263110000094]; Fornara F, 2011, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V14, P623, DOI 10.1177/1368430211408149; FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312; Ghani WAWA, 2013, WASTE MANAGE, V33, P1276, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.019; Graham-Rowe E, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V101, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.020; Hair JF., 2010, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, V7; Hair JF, 2019, EUR BUS REV, V31, P2, DOI 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203; Henseler J, 2015, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V43, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8; Ioannou T, 2013, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V22, P2035; Johe MH, 2016, ECOL ECON, V128, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.019; Ketchen DJ, 2013, LONG RANGE PLANN, V46, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002; Klockner CA, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P574, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.001; Knussen C, 2004, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V24, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001; Lam T, 2003, ANN TOURISM RES, V30, P160, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00047-6; Largo-Wight E, 2012, AM J HEALTH EDUC, V43, P66, DOI 10.1080/19325037.2012.10599221; Lopez-Mosquera N, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V135, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.019; Martinho G, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V103, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.012; Maycox A., 2003, CHARTERED I WASTES M, V4, P10; Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2019, NAT REC RAT; Moh YC, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V82, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.004; Moh Y, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V116, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.012; Mondejar-Jimenez JA, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V138, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.018; Onwezen MC, 2013, J ECON PSYCHOL, V39, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005; Oteng-Peprah M, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109807; Oztekin C, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V62, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.036; Pakpour AH, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.028; Peters A, 2011, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V14, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.003; Quintal VA, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P797, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.006; Ramayah T, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V102, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.025; Rehman A, 2020, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V6, P238, DOI 10.28991/cej-2020-03091467; Saphores JDM, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V60, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003; Sarantakos S, 2013, SOC RES; Sinar Harian, 2016, MASIH RAMAI BELUM PE; Stern PC, 2000, J SOC ISSUES, V56, P407, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00175; Stoeva K, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V68, P732, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.005; Sumiani Y., 2009, J SAINS MALAYSIANA, P457; Terry D.J., 1993, THEORY REASONED ACTI, DOI [10.4324/9780203769621, DOI 10.4324/9780203769621]; Nguyen TTP, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013; Tonglet M, 2004, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V41, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001; Valle P.O., 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P364, DOI DOI 10.1177/0013916504272563; Wan C, 2017, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V50, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006; Wang SY, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V87, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038; Wang ZH, 2014, J RENEW SUSTAIN ENER, V6, DOI 10.1063/1.4898363; Weijters B, 2010, INT J RES MARK, V27, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004; Xu L, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V77, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048; Xu L, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040625; Xu L, 2017, HABITAT INT, V63, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.009; Yuan Y, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8101083; Zhang B, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V233, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059; Zhang DL, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P9475, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120809475; Zhang DQ, 2010, WASTE MANAGE, V30, P921, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.017	64	37	38	12	63	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 20	2020	271								122025	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122025	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122025			10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	NN4TS					2022-09-08	WOS:000568783300015
J	Papa, A; Mital, M; Pisano, P; Del Giudice, M				Papa, Armando; Mital, Monika; Pisano, Paola; Del Giudice, Manlio			E-health and wellbeing monitoring using smart healthcare devices: An empirical investigation	TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE			English	Article						Internet of things; Smart healthcare; Smart cities; RFID; Healthcare computing; Healthcare systems; Innovation management	KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; BIG DATA; INNOVATION; INTERNET; COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE	According to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal No. 3 (SDG - Goal 3), for sustainable development it is imperative to ensure health and well-being across all ages, and is achievable only through effective and continuous healthcare monitoring. But in India and other third world countries, healthcare monitoring is poor compared to other countries in the world, in spite of it being affordable. The global healthcare smart wearable healthcare (SWH) devices market is expected to rise up at a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 5.6% and by 2020 it is expected to reach 25 Billion (GVR Report, 2016). The growing incidences of lifestyle diseases, sedentary lifestyle, busy work schedules, technological advancements in healthcare monitoring devices, and increased usage of remote devices-seems to be some of the important factors fuelling this growth. Some of the major players in this segment are Abbott Laboratories, Philips Healthcare, Life Watch, GE Healthcare, Omron Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare and Honeywell International Inc. etc. But in spite of the healthcare monitoring devices are being predicted to be technologically innovative and providing advanced as well as basic health care monitoring features and available in various price ranges based on the features, we wanted to empirically study the attitude towards adoption of such devices in India. India has traditionally been having a very lackadaisical attitude towards healthcare monitoring. In such a context, what would be the factors influencing the adoption of SWH devices. Remote health monitoring can enhance the nature of wellbeing administration and to lessen the aggregate expense in human services by maintaining a strategic distance from pointless hospitalizations and guaranteeing that the individuals who need critical consideration get it sooner. This empirical investigation would provide a detailed insight as to how these wearable Internet Of Things devices would bring about a revolution in the healthcare industry. It would also provide the future prospect of IOT devices in this sector and how the probability of increase in its usage can be increased with time. The paper explores intrusiveness (INTR), Comfort (C), perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (EOU) of SWH devices. The study hypothesized the Impact of PU and EOU, INTR and C on attitude and intention to use towards adoption of SWH devices. Partial Least Square Structured Equation Modeling (PLS - SEM) methodology was applied to explore the relationships between the concepts and hypothesis. The data was collected from 273 respondents. The age group of the respondents was between 25 and 40 years. The results indicated that intrusiveness and comfort do not have a significant direct impact on Intention to use BI (Behavior Intention) BI SWH devices. At the same time Intrusiveness had a significant impact on PU of SWH devices and Comfort has a strong significant impact on PU and EOU of smart wearables. The research has strong implications in the current emerging context of smart wearables, their design and effectiveness. Also the research can have lasting implications on elderly health and well-being. There are very few empirical studies in the area of SWH devices. Most of the studies till now are conceptual studies or providing technology architectures and frameworks. The research in this area is still at a very nascent stage and very few studies have been done to explore the use and adoption of SWH devices.	[Papa, Armando; Pisano, Paola] Univ Turin, Dept Informat, Via Pessinetto 12, I-10149 Turin, Italy; [Mital, Monika] Great Lakes Inst Management, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; [Del Giudice, Manlio] Univ Rome, Link Campus,Via Casale S Pio V 44, I-00162 Rome, Italy; [Del Giudice, Manlio] Paris Sch Business, 59 Rue Natl, F-75013 Paris, France		Papa, A (corresponding author), Univ Turin, Dept Informat, Via Pessinetto 12, I-10149 Turin, Italy.	armando.papa@unito.it; monikaajit@gmail.com; paola.pisano@unito.it; m.delgiudice@unilink.it						ADAMS DA, 1992, MIS QUART, V16, P227, DOI 10.2307/249577; Ahn JM, 2016, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V28, P1009, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2016.1181737; AJZEN I, 1973, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V27, P41, DOI 10.1037/h0034440; Alavi M, 2001, MIS QUART, V25, P107, DOI 10.2307/3250961; [Anonymous], MARKET TRENDS APPL A; [Anonymous], PROPOSED SOCIAL NETW; [Anonymous], TRIGGERING OPEN SERV; [Anonymous], RES POLICY; [Anonymous], 2017, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA; [Anonymous], MANAGEMENT DECISION; [Anonymous], 9781680387247 GVR; [Anonymous], ACTIVITY MONITORING; [Anonymous], TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; Ashton K., 2009, RFID J; Axisa F, 2005, IEEE T INF TECHNOL B, V9, P325, DOI 10.1109/TITB.2005.854505; Brownsell SJ, 2000, J TELEMED TELECARE, V6, P199, DOI 10.1258/1357633001935356; Burns LR, 2012, BUSINESS OF HEALTHCARE INNOVATION, 2ND EDITION, P1; Carayannis EG, 2014, J KNOWL ECON, V5, P212, DOI 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8; Cetindamar D, 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.004; Chan M, 2012, ARTIF INTELL MED, V56, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.003; Chan M, 2009, MATURITAS, V64, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.014; Chang V, 2018, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V29, P1243, DOI 10.1007/s00521-017-3000-1; Chang V, 2017, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V127, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.003; Chau PYK, 2002, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V39, P297, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2; Chesbrough H., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW; Darroch J., 2005, Journal of Knowledge Management, V9, P101, DOI 10.1108/13673270510602809; DAVIS FD, 1989, MIS QUART, V13, P319, DOI 10.2307/249008; Del Giudice M, 2016, J KNOWL MANAG, V20, P484, DOI 10.1108/JKM-07-2015-0257; Del Giudice M, 2014, J KNOWL MANAG, V18, P841, DOI 10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0264; Del Giudice M, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, pIII; Doughty K, 2000, J TELEMED TELECARE, V6, P150, DOI 10.1258/1357633001934483; Elwyn G, 2007, IMPLEMENT SCI, V2, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-2-44; Farahani B, 2018, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V78, P659, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2017.04.036; Garcia-Muina FE, 2007, TECHNOVATION, V27, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.04.004; Gefen D, 2003, MIS QUART, V27, P51, DOI 10.2307/30036519; Gilbert M, 1996, TECHNOVATION, V16, P301, DOI 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00012-0; Gubbi J, 2013, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V29, P1645, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010; Hansen T, 2004, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V24, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.08.004; Henseler J, 2014, ORGAN RES METHODS, V17, P182, DOI 10.1177/1094428114526928; Hsu MH, 2004, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V38, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001; Hu LT, 1998, PSYCHOL METHODS, V3, P424, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424; Jackson CM, 1997, DECISION SCI, V28, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01315.x; James H, 2005, ACTA HORTIC, P399, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.694.65; Jirotka M., 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, V14, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10606-005-9001-0; Ketchen DJ, 2013, LONG RANGE PLANN, V46, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002; Laursen K, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P131, DOI 10.1002/smj.507; Lee J, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8050466; Li X, 2011, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V49, P68, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069711; Liao SY, 1999, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V19, P63, DOI 10.1016/S0268-4012(98)00047-4; Liker JK, 1997, J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE, V14, P147, DOI 10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00008-8; MADDEN TJ, 1992, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V18, P3, DOI 10.1177/0146167292181001; Marston S, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006; Mathieson K, 1991, INFORM SYST RES, V2, P173, DOI 10.1287/isre.2.3.173; McAfee A, 2012, HARVARD BUS REV, V90, P60; McAfee Andrew, 2014, 2 MACHINE AGE WORK P; Miorandi D, 2012, AD HOC NETW, V10, P1497, DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016; Mital M, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V136, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001; Murray A, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P341, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0077; Mykytyn P. P.  Jr., 1993, Information Resources Management Journal, V6, P15; Nahapiet J, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P242, DOI 10.2307/259373; Nishtar Sania, 2004, Health Res Policy Syst, V2, P5, DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-2-5; O'Connor GC, 2004, J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE, V21, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002; Papa A, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P589, DOI 10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0391; Pardo Theresa., 2011, P 12 ANN INT DIG GOV, P282, DOI DOI 10.1145/2037556.2037602; Pentland A, 2000, COMPUTER, V33, P50, DOI 10.1109/2.820039; Piwek L, 2016, PLOS MED, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953; Sandulli FD, 2017, R&D MANAGE, V47, P607, DOI 10.1111/radm.12250; Scuotto V, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P357, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0074; Shih YY, 2004, INTERNET RES, V14, P213, DOI 10.1108/10662240410542643; Sixsmith A, 2004, IEEE PERVAS COMPUT, V3, P42, DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2004.1316817; Tenenhaus M., 2004, P 42 SIS SCI M, P739; Van Beveren J., 2003, Journal of Knowledge Management, V7, P90, DOI 10.1108/13673270310463644; van de Vrande V, 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001; Venkatesh V, 2003, MIS QUART, V27, P425, DOI 10.2307/30036540; von Hippel E, 2001, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V42, P82; Vrontis D, 2017, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V42, P374, DOI 10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7; Westerman D, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001; Wixom BH, 2005, INFORM SYST RES, V16, P85, DOI 10.1287/isre.1050.0042; Zhou KL, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V56, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.050; Zhou KZ, 2005, J MARKETING, V69, P42, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.42.60756	80	101	101	44	220	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0040-1625	1873-5509		TECHNOL FORECAST SOC	Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.	APR	2020	153								119226	10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.018	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.018			10	Business; Regional & Urban Planning	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Public Administration	LF4CK			Y	N	2022-09-08	WOS:000527366500002
J	Tapsuwan, S; Marcos-Martinez, R; Schandl, H; Yu, ZF				Tapsuwan, Sorada; Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo; Schandl, Heinz; Yu, Zefan			Valuing ecosystem services of urban forests and open spaces: application of the SEEA framework in Australia	AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS			English	Article						sustainable cities; system of environmental and economic accounting; Urban green spaces; urban planning; urban SDGs		Around two-thirds of the global population will live in cities by 2050 requiring large urban infrastructure development. Decision-makers and planners usually rely on standard economic accounting methods for urban planning and investments on infrastructure assets. However, standard methods fail to account for the ecosystem services benefits that living infrastructure (e.g. urban forests, open spaces) provides to city dwellers. This could generate socially inefficient configurations of urban spaces and compromise the achievement of long-term urban sustainability targets. In this analysis, we applied a stochastic whole-of-life benefit-cost analysis following the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) framework to compare alternative long-term management strategies for living infrastructure in Canberra, Australia. Spatially explicit data, i-Tree Eco and benefit transfer methods were used to estimate the stocks and flows ecosystem services benefits of urban forests and irrigated open spaces from 2018 to 2070. Our analysis suggests that a '30 per cent canopy cover expansion' scenario has the highest benefit-cost ratio, while the business as usual scenario, where a net loss of 400 trees is expected per year, offers the lowest benefit-cost ratio. Scenarios of expanding versus not expanding irrigated open spaces in the future both result in a benefit-cost ratio of approximately two.	[Tapsuwan, Sorada; Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo; Schandl, Heinz] CSIRO Land & Water, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; [Yu, Zefan] ACT Govt, Sustainabil & Climate Change, Environm Planning & Sustainable Dev Directorate, GPO Box 158, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia		Tapsuwan, S (corresponding author), CSIRO Land & Water, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.	tap021@csiro.au	Schandl, Heinz/C-5055-2008; Tapsuwan, Sorada/G-5869-2010; Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo/Q-7051-2019	Schandl, Heinz/0000-0001-6399-4231; Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo/0000-0002-7925-7081; Yu, Zefan/0000-0002-6236-4892	Environment Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government; CSIRO Land Water	Environment Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government; CSIRO Land Water	This research is funded by the Environment Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government and the CSIRO Land & Water. The authors would like to thank the team from Transport Canberra and City Services (Daniel Goodwin, Carma Sweet and Rachel Dawes), the team from the Environment Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate (Catherine Kiernan, Peter Rowed, Stephanie Wilson), the team from Treasury and Economic Development Directorate, Cristopher Brack (ANU), the team from the CSIRO (Jacquie Meyers, Ann Seitzinger, David Fleming, Andrew Sullivan, Natthanij Soonsawad) and USDA (Lauren Marshall, David Nowak) for providing information, advice and data for this report. ACT Government; CSIRO Land & Water.	ABS, 2017, 2024 0 CENS POP HOUS; ACT Government, 2018, CANB LIV INFR INF PA, DOI 1170965/Canberra; ACT Revenue Office, 2017, LAND VAL; ActewAGL, 2017, OUR ACT NAT GAS SCHE; AusPlay, 2016, PART DAT SPORT SECT; Australian Capital Territory, 2019, CANB LIV INFR PLAN C; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2013, EM DEP CAR 2012 13 A, P8; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2019, HSE216 AUSTR I HLTH; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011, AUSTR GOV RESP SEN C, P10; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2016, EM DEP CAR 2015 16 A, P16; Berland A, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P734, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.06.004; Brack C.L., 2015, INITIAL ANAL CANBERR; British Cochlear Implant Group, 2020, BCIG ANN DAT COLL FI; Brouwer R., 2013, SYNTHESIS APPROACHES; Chief Minister, 2019, TREAS EC DEV DIR ACT; Curham, 2018, CANBERRA DESTINATION; Donovan GH, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V94, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.019; ENGLIN J, 1995, REV ECON STAT, V77, P104, DOI 10.2307/2109996; Environment Division Environment Planning and Sustainable Development, 2019, REN EN TARG LEG REP; Environment Division Environment Planning and Sustainable Development, 2018, AV INV COSTS W UNPUB; Garner, 1999, DETERMINING APPROPRI; Helliwell Rodney, 2008, Arboricultural Journal, V31, P161; Hondula DM, 2014, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V122, P831, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1307496; ICRC, 2018, RET EL PRIC 2017 202; Interagency Working Group Technical Support, 2016, DOC SOC COST CARB RE; Kiss M, 2015, MORAV GEOGR REP, V23, P36, DOI 10.1515/mgr-2015-0016; LOCKWOOD M, 1995, J LEISURE RES, V27, P155, DOI 10.1080/00222216.1995.11949740; Loughnan M., 2013, SPATIAL VULNERABILIT; MacDonald DH, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V95, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.003; McPherson E.G., 2000, TREE GUIDELINES COAS; Mexia T, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023; Meyers J., 2017, MAPPING SURFACE URBA; Mo'r Mortgage Option, 2017, CANB LAND UN VAL UV; Nowak David J., 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V5, P93, DOI [10.1016/j.ufug.2006.04.002, 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007]; Nowak DJ, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.004; Nowak David J., 2002, Journal of Arboriculture, V28, P194; Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019; Nowak David J., 2008, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V34, P347; NOWAK DJ, 2000, HDB URBAN COMMUNITY; Pandit R, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V110, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.001; Pandit R, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1324, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.009; Polyakov M, 2017, WATER RESOUR ECON, V17, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.wre.2016.03.002; Qian YL, 2010, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V74, P366, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2009.0075; Revesz R, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P655, DOI 10.1126/science.aao4322; Schandl H, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121770; Serna-Chavez HM, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V39, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024; Soares AL, 2011, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V10, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.001; Tapsuwan, 2018, UNDERSTANDING BENEFI; The Lawn Institute, 2018, LAWN TURFGR FACTS ST; Townsend-Small A, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2009GL041675; ULRICH RS, 1991, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V11, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7; United Nations Statistics Division, 2009, SYST NAT ACC 2008; USDA Forest Service, 2018, I TREE 2018 SUIT VER; Villamagna AM, 2013, ECOL COMPLEX, V15, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004; Wang ZH, 2016, APPL ENERG, V161, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.047; Xu C, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.058; Yaghoobian N, 2010, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V49, P332, DOI 10.1175/2009JAMC2198.1; Zhang BA, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V100, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.015	58	1	1	3	21	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1364-985X	1467-8489		AUST J AGR RESOUR EC	Aust. J. Agr. Resour. Econ.	JAN	2021	65	1					37	65		10.1111/1467-8489.12416	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12416		FEB 2021	29	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Economics	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Agriculture; Business & Economics	QG6KN					2022-09-08	WOS:000613410300001
J	Endres, M; Bican, PM; Wollner, T				Endres, Miro; Bican, Peter M.; Woellner, Theresa			Sustainability meets agile: Using Scrum to develop frugal innovations	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Frugal innovation; Scrum; Agile frameworks; Sustainability; Constrained-based innovation	OF-THE-ART; SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEW; EXPERIENCE; FRAMEWORK; PROJECTS; DESIGN	With the climate crisis looming, innovations are no longer judged by their technical prowess alone but also on their sustainability. Frugal innovations have attracted significant attention in this regard. These user-friendly, cost-effective, and resource-efficient solutions of appropriate quality provide significant value to users and end customers and present attractive solutions to meet the current demands. Nevertheless, knowledge about the development of frugal solutions is scarce. Scrum is one of the most popular agile frameworks and is increasingly implemented in diverse companies' product development processes, although the relationship between Scrum and frugal innovation has not yet been investigated. Based on semi-structured expert interviews with Scrum practitioners, this paper provides the first insights into developing frugal innovations with Scrum. Interviewees generally considered Scrum's impact to be positive, and they named developing a user-friendly solution of appropriate quality as the frugal-innovation characteristic most benefited by applying Scrum. However, Scrum's impact was not explicit on the developed product's price-performance ratio, one of the variables to measure customer value. Therefore, this paper proposes integrating the user perspective into the Scrum process by identifying the actual users of the developed solution and by formally and regularly inviting them to sprint review meetings. To keep the development process efficient while addressing the identified stakeholder needs, organizations should work with fully dedicated, generalist Scrum teams that are knowledgeable on user experience. Additionally, Scrum team members should regularly share their insights gained with marketing departments to improve the effectiveness and appropriateness of pricing decisions. Companies can also address cost-effectiveness and sustainable resource efficiency by developing resource-efficient increments and by reusing existing components. Our study indicates that sustainability efforts, like reaching the UN Sustainable Development Goals, can profit from including agile frameworks in innovation activities.	[Endres, Miro; Bican, Peter M.; Woellner, Theresa] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany		Bican, PM (corresponding author), Nuremberg Campus Technol NCT, Chair Technol Management, Dr Mack Str 81, D-90762 Furth, Germany.	peter.bican@fau.de		Bican, Peter M./0000-0003-4937-5818; Endres, Miro Yanik/0000-0002-7099-9505				Agarwal N., 2017, J ENTREPRENEURSHIP I, V3, P115; Agarwal N., 2012, ENG TECHN INN ICE 20, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICE.2012.6297683; Agarwal N, 2017, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V64, P3, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2016.2620562; Agnihotri A, 2015, J STRATEG MARK, V23, P399, DOI 10.1080/0965254X.2014.970215; Albert M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747; Anderson SW, 2011, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V28, P1349, DOI 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01107.x; Apostolopoulos N, 2016, INT J ENERGY SECT MA, V10, P19, DOI 10.1108/IJESM-11-2014-0009; Barclay C, 2014, INFORM TECHNOL DEV, V20, P165, DOI 10.1080/02681102.2013.841630; BARRIBALL KL, 1994, J ADV NURS, V19, P328; Barua S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126755; Basu R.R., 2013, J MANAG GLOB SUSTAIN, V1, P63, DOI DOI 10.13185/JM2013.01204; Batra D, 2020, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V37, P361, DOI 10.1080/10580530.2020.1821843; Bican PM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135239; Bican PM, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P1384, DOI 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0509; Blustein DL, 2020, J VOCAT BEHAV, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103436; Brammer S, 2020, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V34, P493, DOI 10.5465/amp.2019.0053; Braun A., 2016, CONCEPTUAL ANAL FDN; Brem Alexander, 2017, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V45, P37, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2017.2734320; Brem A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122232; Bruun A, 2018, NORDICHI'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH NORDIC CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, P352, DOI 10.1145/3240167.3240213; Cajander A, 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8119, P762; Campbell JL, 2013, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V42, P294, DOI 10.1177/0049124113500475; Campbell MC, 2020, J CONSUM RES, V47, P311, DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucaa036; Caselli F.G., 2020, MOBILITY COVID 19 PA, V2020; Cooper RG, 2016, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V33, P513, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12314; Cordes A, 2021, INT J INNOV TECHNOL, V18, DOI 10.1142/S0219877021500267; Corsini L, 2021, R&D MANAGE, V51, P195, DOI 10.1111/radm.12446; Da Silva T.S., 2013, DESIGN USER EXPERIEN, P599, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_64, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_64]; Davidson Alistair, 2016, Strategy & Leadership, V44, P36, DOI 10.1108/SL-11-2015-0086; Diebold P, 2015, LECT NOTES BUS INF P, V212, P40, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_4; Dingsoyr T, 2012, J SYST SOFTWARE, V85, P1213, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033; Eisenhardt KM, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1113, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.4004; Ferraresi M, 2020, ECON LETT, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109628; Foss NJ, 2020, J MANAGE, V46, P1322, DOI 10.1177/0149206320945015; Fraunhofer I.S.I., 2017, STOBER GMBH DRUCK VE; Glaser J., 2009, EXPERTENINTERVIEWS Q; Guderian CC, 2021, R&D MANAGE, V51, P223, DOI 10.1111/radm.12447; Gupta A., 2013, STANFORD SOCIAL IN S, V11, P18; Hallgrimsson B., 2012, PROTOTYPING MODELMAK; Hassenzahl M., 2008, P 20 C LINTERACTION, P11; Herstatt C, 2020, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V83, P15; Hobbs B, 2017, PROJ MANAG J, V48, P3, DOI 10.1177/875697281704800301; Hoegl M, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P1382, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.018; Hohl L, 2021, J ENTREP, V30, P134, DOI 10.1177/0971355720974821; Hommel K, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12198035; Hossain M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124782; Hossain M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.091; Immelt JR, 2009, HARVARD BUS REV, V87, P56; Inoue H, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0255031; Jiang QQ, 2019, MIS QUART, V43, P1303, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2019/14043; Kallio H, 2016, J ADV NURS, V72, P2954, DOI 10.1111/jan.13031; Kaufmann C, 2020, INT J PROJ MANAG, V38, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.002; Keidel J, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116184; Khorram-Manesh A, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18115888; Klemes JJ, 2020, ENERGY, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118701; Knapp O., 2015, FRUGAL SIMPLY BEST F; Lastovicka JL, 1999, J CONSUM RES, V26, P85, DOI 10.1086/209552; Law ELC, 2015, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V31, P584, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2015.1065693; Lee TW, 1999, J VOCAT BEHAV, V55, P161, DOI 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1707; Lehner A., 2016, THESIS U PADERBORN; Lichtenthaler U, 2020, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V63, P42, DOI 10.1080/08956308.2020.1790240; Lim C, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1016, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.014; Lous P, 2017, INT CONF GLOBAL SOFT, P1, DOI 10.1109/ICGSE.2017.13; MacQueen KM., 1998, FIELD METHOD, V10, P31, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1525822X980100020301, 10.1177/1525822X980100020301]; Mayring P., 2014, QUALITATIVE CONTENT; Miesler T, 2020, ACS BIOMATER SCI ENG, V6, P2709, DOI 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01712; Morgan G., 1980, ACAD MANAGEMENT REV, V5, P491, DOI [10.2307/257453, DOI 10.2307/257453]; Narayan PK, 2021, FINANC RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101732; Ojha AK, 2014, J INDIAN BUS RES, V6, P4, DOI 10.1108/JIBR-12-2012-0123; Penttinen M., 2012, 2012 7th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2012), P195, DOI 10.1109/ICGSE.2012.16; Pisoni A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.248; Prahalad CK, 2010, HARVARD BUS REV, V88, P132; Prahalad C.K., 2005, FORTUNE BOTTOM PYRAM; Rao Balkrishna C., 2017, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V45, P32, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2017.2667219; Rao BC, 2013, TECHNOL SOC, V35, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003; Riar F.J., 2021, FAMILY BUSINESS WORL; Riar FJ, 2021, INT J ENTREP VENTUR, V13, P113, DOI 10.1504/IJEV.2021.114385; Riar FJ, 2022, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V46, P44, DOI 10.1177/10422587211006427; Rigby DK, 2016, HARVARD BUS REV, V94, P41; Roper S, 2020, INT SMALL BUS J, V38, P504, DOI 10.1177/0266242620947946; Roulston K., 2018, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781526416070; Salda?a J., 2016, CODING MANUAL QUALIT; Saunders M., 2019, RES METHODS BUSINESS, Veighth, P434; Schmidt TS, 2017, INT ICE CONF ENG, P521, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2017.8279930; Schwaber K., 1997, BUSINESS OBJECT DESI, P117, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11.; Schwaber K, 2020, SCRUM GUIDE DEFINITI; Severo EA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V286, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947; Sibona C, 2020, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V46, P537, DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.04622; Simula H, 2015, CURR SCI INDIA, V109, P1567, DOI 10.18520/v109/i9/1567-1572; Sommer AF, 2015, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V58, P36, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5801236; Soni P, 2014, J INDIAN BUS RES, V6, P29, DOI 10.1108/JIBR-03-2013-0025; Stormi KT, 2019, J ACCOUNT ORGAN CHAN, V15, P231, DOI 10.1108/JAOC-09-2017-0076; Vermeeren APOS, 2016, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V35, P21, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1081292; Walker M., 2002, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, P661; Weyrauch Timo, 2016, Journal of Frugal Innovation, V2, DOI 10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y; Weyrauch T, 2021, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V68, P699, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2020.3000924; Wimschneider C, 2020, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V83, P134; Xing YJ, 2020, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100696; Yang D, 2017, IEEE WORK CONF MIN S, P280, DOI 10.1109/MSR.2017.13; Yeung H.W., 1995, INT BUS REV, V4, P313, DOI [10.1016/0969-5931(95)00012-O, https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(95)00012-O, DOI 10.1016/0969-5931(95)00012-O]; Yuan JH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148091; Zeschky M, 2011, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V54, P38, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5404007	102	0	0	9	9	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 1	2022	347								130871	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130871	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130871			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	0X1YT					2022-09-08	WOS:000789511000007
J	Jagger, P; Cheek, JZ; Miller, D; Ryan, C; Shyamsundar, P; Sills, E				Jagger, Pamela; Cheek, Jennifer Zavaleta; Miller, Daniel; Ryan, Casey; Shyamsundar, Priya; Sills, Erin			The Role of Forests and Trees in Poverty Dynamics	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Forest policy; Livelihoods; Poverty reduction; Sustainable Development Goals; Risk mitigation; Safety nets	RURAL LIVELIHOODS; NATURAL INSURANCE; TROPICAL FORESTS; PROTECTED AREAS; ENVIRONMENTAL INCOMES; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; PERSISTENT POVERTY; COPING STRATEGIES; RAIN-FOREST; REDD PLUS	Understanding the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation and human well-being has never been more important. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are erasing gains in poverty reduction achieved over the past several decades. At the same time, climate change is increasing the frequency of extreme weather events and natural disasters, especially in poor rural communities. In this paper, we review approaches to measuring poverty and well-being finding that standard approaches to measuring poverty and poverty dynamics typically do not adequately consider environmental goods and services, leading to an incompelete understanding of poverty dynamics among policy makers and practitioners. We identify four archetypal poverty trajectories and discuss how subsistence and cash income, assets, and non-material benefits from forests and tree-based systems influence each of them. We draw on the broad literature on forests and livelihoods, acknowledging that the majority of the literature on the topic of forests and poverty relies on static, micro-level, and highly contextualized analyses. Our review suggest that forests and tree-based systems provide a pathway out of poverty only under very specific conditions, when high value goods are accessible and marketed, or when ecosystem services can be monetized for the benefit of people living in or near forests. However, the role that forests play in supporting and main-taining current consumption, diversifying incomes, and meeting basic needs may be extremely important, particularly for those experiencing transient poverty. We discuss negative externalities associated with living proximate to forests, including the special case of geographic poverty traps, which can occur in remote forested areas. To build a strong evidence base for policy makers we recommend that research on forest-poverty dynamics address longer time-frames (up to decades), larger and/or nested spatial scales, and are contextualized within the landscape, region, or national setting where it is conducted. Advancing our understanding of forest-poverty dynamics is critical, particularly in low and middle-income countries where large numbers of people live in or near forests or in landscapes with forest-agriculture mosaics. Policy makers should strive to understand the potential role for forest-based livelihood strategies among their suite of social protection and poverty reduction policies and programs, particularly for addressing transient poverty.	[Jagger, Pamela] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; [Cheek, Jennifer Zavaleta] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, McFadden Biostress Lab 138,Univ Stn, Brookings, SD 57007 USA; [Miller, Daniel] Univ Notre Dame Illinois, Keough Sch Global Affairs, 1010 Jenkins Nanov Halls, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA; [Ryan, Casey] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Crew Bldg, Edinburgh EH92JN, Scotland; [Shyamsundar, Priya] Nature Conservancy, 4245 N Fairfax Dr, Arlington, VA 22203 USA; [Sills, Erin] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA		Jagger, P (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.	pjagger@umich.edu; Jennifer.ZavaletaCheek@sdstate.edu; dmille33@nd.edu; casey.ryan@ed.ac.uk; priya.shyamsundar@tnc.org; sills@ncsu.edu		Sills, Erin/0000-0001-8289-0489	International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO)	International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO)	We thank the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) for their logistical and financial support in hosting workshops where ideas for this article were developed. We would also like to thank Stephanie Mansourian and Christoph Wildburger for their editorial contributions and three anonymous reviewers whose comments allowed us to strengthen this work. We are grateful to Stephanie Scott for research support and Eugenie Hadinoto for help designing the figures.	Addison T., 2008, POVERTY DYNAMICS MEA, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1246882, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1246882]; Alkire S, 2013, SOC INDIC RES, V112, P239, DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0257-3; Alkire S, 2007, OXF DEV STUD, V35, P347, DOI 10.1080/13600810701701863; Amartya Sen., 1999, DEV FREEDOM; Andam KS, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P9996, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0914177107; Angelsen A., 2003, EXPLORING FOREST POV, DOI [10.17528/cifor/001211, DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/001211]; Angelsen A, 2018, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V23, P257, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X18000013; Angelsen A, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006; Asselin H, 2015, ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF FOREST ECOLOGY, P586; Aung T, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102432; Azariadis C, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P295; Bakkegaard RK, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V84, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.005; Baland J.M., 1996, INEQUALITY COLLECTIV; Bank Public, 2018, WORLD BANK ANN REPOR, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1296-5, 10.1596/978-1-4648-1296-5]; Barbier E.B, 2019, EC POVERTY TRAPS, P315; Barbier EB, 2019, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V74, P1239, DOI 10.1007/s10640-019-00366-3; Barrett CB, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.008; Barrett CB, 2016, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V8, P303, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095235; Bathiany S, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5809; Baulch B, 2000, J DEV STUD, V36, P1, DOI 10.1080/00220380008422652; Baylis K, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P58, DOI 10.1111/conl.12180; Beal T, 2018, MATERN CHILD NUTR, V14, DOI 10.1111/mcn.12617; Belcher B, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1435, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.007; Belcher B., 2004, FOREST PRODUCTS LIVE, V1, P1; Bhattacharya H, 2013, AM J AGR ECON, V95, P42, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aas121; Bonjour S, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V121, P784, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1205987; Brockington D, 2021, J PEASANT STUD, V48, P201, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2019.1658081; Brockington D, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0271; Byron N, 1999, WORLD DEV, V27, P789, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00025-X; Campbell BM., 2002, UNCOVERING HIDDEN HA, P262; Caplow S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.003; Carter MR, 2006, J DEV STUD, V42, P178, DOI 10.1080/00220380500405261; Carter MR, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P1987, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00089-4; Cavendish W, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P1979, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8; Chambers R., 1992, 296 IDS U SUSS; Chen XD, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P732, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0; Cheng SH, 2019, ENVIRON EVID, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0148-4; Clement MT, 2015, SOCIOL INQ, V85, P628, DOI 10.1111/soin.12097; Clements T, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P78, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12423; Coomes OT, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P13925, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1012973108; Cumming GS, 2014, NATURE, V515, P50, DOI 10.1038/nature13945; Daniel K. S., 2016, AFRICAN J SUSTAINABL, V6, P251; Debela B, 2012, LAND ECON, V88, P139, DOI 10.3368/le.88.1.139; den Braber B, 2018, CONSERV LETT, V11, DOI 10.1111/conl.12576; Dercon S, 2003, INSURANCE POVERTY; Fairhead J, 2012, J PEASANT STUD, V39, P237, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770; Fedele G, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102368; Ferraro PJ, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P4332, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1307712111; Ferraro PJ, 2006, PLOS BIOL, V4, P482, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105; Fisher M, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1115, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.008; Fisher M, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P1241, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.03.005; Gamfeldt L, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2328; Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC), 2007, FORESTRY COMMISSION; Godoy R, 1998, ETHNOLOGY, V37, P55, DOI 10.2307/3773848; Golden CD, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P19653, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1112586108; Goodhand J, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P629, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00009-3; GROOTAERT C, 1995, J DEV STUD, V31, P603, DOI 10.1080/00220389508422380; Hajjar R, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102554; Hallegatte S, 2015, SHOCK WAVES MANAGING, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5; Hallegatte S, 2018, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V23, P217, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X18000141; Hill CM, 2018, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V47, P377, DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050022; Humphries S, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.005; Ickowitz A, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154139; Ickowitz A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.001; IUCN, 2012, LIVELIHOODS LANDSCAP; Jagger P, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V76, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.006; Jagger P, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125004; Jagger P, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS43, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.004; Jalan J, 2002, J APPL ECONOM, V17, P329, DOI 10.1002/jae.645; Jones D, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V32, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2016.02.009; Kilpatrick AM, 2012, LANCET, V380, P1946, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61151-9; Klasen S, 2015, WORLD DEV, V71, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.007; Kraay A, 2014, J ECON PERSPECT, V28, P127, DOI 10.1257/jep.28.3.127; Krauss JE, 2022, WORLD DEV, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105757; Krishna A, 2004, WORLD DEV, V32, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.002; Krishna A, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.003; Krishna A, 2011, WORLD DEV, V39, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.011; Krishna Anirudh, 2010, ONE ILLNESS AWAY WHY; Kusters K, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11; Lawlor K., 2019, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL; Lopez-Feldman A, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS91, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.012; Macqueen D, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.004; Mbiba M, 2019, J RURAL STUD, V65, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.012; McKinnon MC, 2016, ENVIRON EVID, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7; McSweeney K, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1453, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.008; McSweeney K, 2004, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V17, P39, DOI 10.1080/08941920490247245; MEA,, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL; Miller D.C., 2020, FORESTS TREES ERADIC, V39; Miller Daniel C., 2020, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, V3, P101, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00101; Miller DC, 2020, CAMPBELL SYST REV, V16, DOI 10.1002/cl2.1066; Miller DC, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104647; Moran R, 2003, ESCAPING POVERTY TRA, DOI [10.1007/s11111-017-0285-z, DOI 10.1007/S11111-017-0285-Z]; Mugido W, 2017, POPUL ENVIRON, V39, P107, DOI 10.1007/s11111-017-0285-z; Munyi P., 2007, PROTECTION COMMUNITY; Narain U, 2008, ECOL ECON, V66, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.021; Narlochand U, 2018, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V23, P298, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X18000128; Naughton-Treves L, 1998, J APPL ECOL, V35, P596, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540596.x; Nerfa L, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104689; NEUMANN RP, 2000, COMMERCIALISATION NO; Newton P, 2020, ONE EARTH, V3, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.016; Ngoufo R., 2014, CHANGE ADAPT SOCIO E, P26, DOI [10.2478/cass-2014-0003, DOI 10.2478/CASS-2014-0003]; Nielsen MR, 2012, ECOL ECON, V78, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.009; Noack F, 2019, J ASSOC ENVIRON RESO, V6, P823, DOI 10.1086/703487; Nussbaum M., 2000, WOMEN HUMAN DEV CAPA, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511841286.003, 10.1017/CBO9780511841286]; OPHI, 2018, GLOB MULT POV IND 20; Ostrom E., 1990, GOVERNING COMMONS EV; Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15181, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0702288104; Oteng-Yeboah A, 2012, WORLD FORESTS, V12, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2144-9_2; Padoch Christine, 2014, SOCIAL LIVES FORESTS; Paige SB, 2014, ECOHEALTH, V11, P534, DOI 10.1007/s10393-014-0942-y; Parrotta J., 2012, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE; Pattanayak SK, 2001, LAND ECON, V77, P595, DOI 10.2307/3146943; Paumgarten F, 2018, HUM ECOL, V46, P183, DOI 10.1007/s10745-018-9984-z; Poteete AR, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.012; Power CC, 2022, BIOTROPICA, V54, P18, DOI 10.1111/btp.13023; Pritchard R, 2020, WORLD DEV, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104741; Pritchard R, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.008; Rasmussen LV, 2020, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100331; Raymond CM, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P1301, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006; Razafindratsima OH, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102576; Robinson EJZ, 2016, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V8, P281, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095521; Rodrigues RR, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P1242, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.008; Rutte C, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2387, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.017; Ryan CM, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0312; Salafsky N, 2002, CONSERV BIOL, V16, P1469, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01232.x; Salzman J, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P136, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0; Sanderson EW, 2018, BIOSCIENCE, V68, P412, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy039; Santika T, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104073; Schlesinger J, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V56, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.013; Schreckenberg K, 2009, INT FOREST REV, V11, P221, DOI 10.1505/ifor.11.2.221; Scoones I., 1998, Working Paper - Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex; SEN A, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P169, DOI 10.2307/2026184; Senge P. M, 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA; Shackleton C, 2011, NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT, P255, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_12; Shackleton CM, 2007, FOREST POLICY ECON, V9, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.004; Shackleton S, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.004; Shyamsundar P, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102607; Shyamsundar P, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104622; Sills E, 2011, NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_2; Sills EO, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V43, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.002; Sims KRE, 2010, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V60, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.003; Smith HE, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101976; Smith HE, 2019, WORLD DEV, V113, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.024; Sumner A., 2020, WIDER WORKING PAPER, P800; Sunderland T, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V84, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.013; Sunderland T, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS56, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003; Sunderlin WD, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1383, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004; Sunderlin WD, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13; Sundstrom A, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V181, P779, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.020; Takasaki Y, 2004, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V9, P203, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X03001232; Takasaki Y, 2010, REV DEV ECON, V14, P48, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00538.x; Tata CY, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215281; Tincani L.S., 2012, THESIS U LONDON LOND; Tiominar B., 2011, PLANTATIONS POVERTY; Toth R, 2015, AM J AGR ECON, V97, P315, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aau064; United Nations, 2014, WORLD FOR INV 1963; Vedeld P, 2007, FOREST POLICY ECON, V9, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.05.008; Vira B, 2015, FORESTS AND FOOD: ADDRESSING HUNGER AND NUTRITION ACROSS SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPES, P9; Vollmer Frank, 2017, World Development Perspectives, V7-8, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.wdp.2017.11.005; Walelign SZ, 2021, J DEV STUD, V57, P1613, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2021.1873282; Wells G.J., 2020, EARTHARXIV ELSEVIER, DOI [10.31223/osf.io/n9keh, DOI 10.31223/OSF.IO/N9KEH]; Wollenberg E, 2007, INT FOREST REV, V9, P670, DOI 10.1505/ifor.9.2.670; World Bank, 2018, PIEC TOG POV PUZL, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1330-6; Wu Y, 2021, ECOL ECON, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106965; Wunder S, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P1817, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00070-5; Wunder S, 2018, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V23, P279, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X18000116; Wunder S, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS29, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.005; Wunder S, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.007; Yaqab S, 2000, DEV BIBLIO, V16; Zulu LC, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P3717, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.050	170	0	0	5	5	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	JUL	2022	140								102750	10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102750	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102750			12	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	1U9PD					2022-09-08	WOS:000805734300003
J	Andradottir, HO; Thorsteinsson, T				Andradottir, Hrund O.; Thorsteinsson, Throstur			Repeated extreme particulate matter episodes due to fireworks in Iceland and stakeholders' response	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Consumer fireworks; Particulate matter; Extreme pollution; Environmental management; Stakeholders	AIR-POLLUTION; EMISSIONS; MORTALITY	Extreme pollution associated with residential firework celebrations is recognized as an important health and environmental issue. Despite this knowledge, consumer fireworks continue to be allowed in many countries around the world. This paper explores the physical and societal factors contributing to extreme recreational firework pollution, as well as stakeholders' perspectives on the resultant pollution and possible mitigation. Metropolitan Reykjavik (217 000 inhabitants) is taken as an example of an affluent, well informed community with a relatively recent history of fireworks displays. Largely non-regulated public access to fireworks has resulted in exceedance of the European air quality standard of PM10 (50 mu g/m(3)), and hazardous hourly concentration (>500 mu g/m 3 ) every other year. In the second hour of New Year's Day (NYD) 2018, hourly particulate matter records, 4042 mu g/m(3) PM10 and 3014 mu g/m(3) PM2.5, were set in a residential, suburban area. Concentrations of potential toxic metals increased by a factor of 104 (Cu), 96 (Sr), 27 (Ba) during the celebrations compared to the preceding days. The reasons why these high pollution episodes continue to occur, based on stakeholders' interviews, are traced back to a series of societal and regulatory hurdles: (1) Conflicting interests at governmental, municipal and entrepreneurial levels because fireworks are an entertaining spectacle for locals and tourists and a major fundraiser for not-forprofit organizations (NPOs), and yet pose an unacceptable public burden in terms of air pollution. (2) The lawful public access to fireworks severely limits stakeholder involvement and air quality mitigation actions. (3) Implementation of fireworks policy is dispersed among multiple stakeholders. These factors promote stakeholder passiveness towards pollution mitigation: Continuing public awareness campaigns with the goal of slowly weaning the public off fireworks were favored over restricting public use to fireworks. Future opportunities lie in holistic policy making, using the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as a roadmap; and in clarifying the risk of extreme particulate matter episodes in the relevant regulations, e.g. by accounting for the level of exceedances (concentration value divided by ambient air quality standard), and the nature of the particles (size, morphology, chemical composition). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Andradottir, Hrund O.] Univ Iceland, Sch Engn & Nat Sci, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Hjardarhagi 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland; [Thorsteinsson, Throstur] Univ Iceland, Sch Engn & Nat Sci, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Sturlugata 7, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland		Andradottir, HO (corresponding author), Univ Iceland, Sch Engn & Nat Sci, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Hjardarhagi 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland.	hrund@hi.is; ThrosturTh@hi.is	Thorsteinsson, Throstur/A-8960-2008	Thorsteinsson, Throstur/0000-0001-5964-866X; Andradottir, Hrund/0000-0002-4832-1503				Anderson L. G., 2017, PARTICULATE MATTER I, V46; Burnett R, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P9592, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803222115; Calderon-Garciduenas L, 2004, TOXICOL PATHOL, V32, P650, DOI 10.1080/01926230490520232; Clarke J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1175, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.108; de Nazelle A, 2017, ENVIRON INT, V99, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.023; Di Q, 2017, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V318, P2446, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.17923; Donaldson K, 2001, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V58, P211, DOI 10.1136/oem.58.3.211; EEA, 2017, 132017 EEA, DOI [10.2800/850018, DOI 10.2800/850018]; Environment Agency of Iceland, 2018, UST201802 ENV AG IC; Environment Agency of Iceland, 2017, IC HREINT LOFT FRAMT; Gifford R, 2011, AM PSYCHOL, V66, P290, DOI 10.1037/a0023566; Ginsberg GL, 2005, J TOXICOL ENV HEAL A, V68, P573, DOI 10.1080/15287390590921793; Gudmundsson G., 2018, LAEKNABLADID, V104, P576; Hamad S, 2016, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V9, P735, DOI 10.1007/s11869-015-0384-x; Hersveinn G., 1995, ICELANDIC FLUGELDAR; Ji DS, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V628-629, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.304; Jung J, 2018, ATMOS ENVIRON, V178, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.013; Kelly FJ, 2012, ATMOS ENVIRON, V60, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.039; Knibbs LD, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P2611, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.065; Kopavogur Municipality, 2016, KOP MUN PUBL HLTH PO; Kumar M, 2016, ATMOS RES, V180, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.05.014; Laden F, 2006, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V173, P667, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC; Lai YH, 2017, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V189, DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-6167-0; Lin CC, 2016, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V16, P2227, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2016.08.0346; Ministry of Industry and Innovation, 2015, ROAD MAP TOUR SERV; Moreno T, 2007, ATMOS ENVIRON, V41, P913, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.019; Moreno T, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V183, P945, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.082; Mossman Brooke T, 2007, Part Fibre Toxicol, V4, P4, DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-4-4; Peshin SK, 2017, MAUSAM, V68, P111; Gonzalez IVR, 2017, REV BIO CIENC, V4, DOI 10.15741/revbio.04.05.01; Scheytt TJ, 2011, GRUNDWASSER, V16, P37, DOI 10.1007/s00767-010-0159-0; Thordarson H., 2018, 6EM18001 INN CTR IR; Thorsteinsson T, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JB008756; Thorsteinsson T, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P5924, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.023; WHO, 2018, WORLD HLTH STAT 2018; Wick P, 2010, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V118, P432, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0901200; Ye C, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P1740, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.113; Zeka A, 2005, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V62, P718, DOI 10.1136/oem.2004.017012; Zhang YQ, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V223, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.008	39	6	6	5	28	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	NOV 1	2019	236								117511	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.342	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.342			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IU2MH					2022-09-08	WOS:000483414000078
J	Ishikawa, Y; Murata, M; Kawaguchi, T				Ishikawa, Yuriko; Murata, Michihiro; Kawaguchi, Tomoya			Globally applicable water quality simulation model for river basin chemical risk assessment	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						River water and sediment concentration; Chemical substances; Spatial and temporal estimation; Unsteady analysis model; Water risk assessment; Carbon disclosure project (CDP) water program	THE-DRAIN CHEMICALS; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FATE; LAS	Many companies around the world need to assess water environmental risks in accordance with sustainable development goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) water program, and also their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Although companies have been requested to voluntarily evaluate their water risks and provide information thereon, the water quality risk in river basins is difficult to assess owing to insufficient monitoring information. This paper proposes the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology - Standardized Hydrology-based AssessmeNt tool for chemical Exposure Load (AIST-SHANEL) model as a river water quality simulation model that can be employed for chemical risk assessment and evaluation of the effects of use of a company's consumer products on river basins. AIST-SHANEL is the only unsteady analysis model that estimates spatial and temporal chemical concentrations and assesses water quality within river basins by point/non-point emission of chemical substances. To evaluate the efficacy of AIST-SHANEL, a case study focused on the surfactant linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), found in the detergents of widely used health care products, was conducted. The water risk assessment was performed in three Japanese river basins with different watershed characteristics: Tama River in urban Tokyo with high sewerage penetration rate, Nikko River in urban Nagoya with a low sewerage penetration rate, and the nonurban None River with no sewerage. In Tama River, the LAS river water concentrations were found to be strongly influenced by seasonal variations as well as the flow rate associated with dilution and temperature-induced biodegradation. Their concentrations in Nikko River were strongly affected by flooding, indicating that the influence on their transport through the drainage channel was due more to low sewage levels than temperature-induced biodegradation. In None River, the LAS river water concentrations were only slightly affected by dilution. The river sediment concentrations of LAS in the three river basins showed mild seasonal variations. The 95th percentile of river water concentrations, predicted environmental concentration (PEC), at the most downstream and maximum concentration grids in the three river basins were 4.5 and 51.2 mg/m(3) for Tama River, 30 and 58.6 mg/m(3) for Nikko River, and 0.15 mg/m(3) for None River. Neither of the PECs nor maximum values at these grids exceeded the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) of LAS (270 mg/m(3)), suggesting minimal ecological risk in these river basins over the year for all target river basins due to LAS. Furthermore, we analyzed a scenario in which LAS was substituted with the highly biodegradable alcohol ethoxylates (AE) for corporate self-management measures in Nikko River with only a few sewers, and therefore only a low risk. The AIST-SHANEL model has useful and widespread application with no need for monitoring by companies; as long as the relevant watershed characteristics can be obtained, water risk assessments of chemical substances can be performed for any river basin in the world. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Ishikawa, Yuriko] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058569, Japan; [Murata, Michihiro; Kawaguchi, Tomoya] Nihon Suido Consultants Co Ltd NSC, Shinjuku Ku, 22-1 Nishi Shinjuku 6 Chome, Tokyo 1631122, Japan		Ishikawa, Y (corresponding author), Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058569, Japan.	y-ishikawa@aist.go.jp	Ishikawa, Yuriko/L-8085-2018	Ishikawa, Yuriko/0000-0002-0550-8458				Bureau of Environment Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2015, WAT QUAL MEAS RES FY; Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), 2017, CDP JAP 500 WAT REP; CDP, 2016, THIRST BUS WHY WAT I; CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project), 2017, TURN TID TRACK CORP; CEO Water Mandate, 2017, EXPL CAS CORP CONT B; Cowan-Ellsberry C, 2014, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V44, P1893, DOI 10.1080/10739149.2013.803777; Grill G, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V541, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.100; Hampel M, 2012, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V184, P6013, DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2399-6; Ishikawa Y., 2017, Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment, V40, P199, DOI 10.2965/jswe.40.199; Ishikawa Yuriko, 2012, Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment, V35, P65, DOI 10.2965/jswe.35.65; Ishikawa Y., 2006, JSWE, V29, P797, DOI [10.2965/jswe.29.797, DOI 10.2965/JSWE.29.797]; Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), 2011, MET DAT SEARCH; Japan Surfactant Industry Association (JSIA), SAF ENV IMP SURF; Kawaguchi T., 2007, P 3 INT S INT WAT RE, V317, P41; Kehrein N, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.018; Kilgallon J, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V230, P954, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.041; Koormann F, 2006, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V21, P925, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.009; Masutomi Y, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P572, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7186; McDonough K, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V572, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.084; Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism of Japan (MLIT), 2015, WAT INF SYST; Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan (MOE), 2013, PRTR INF PLAZ JAP; National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 2007, GLOB DRAIN BAS DAT G; National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 2008, GRID CATCHM INT ENV; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2015, AIST SHANEL VER 3 0; Nishioka T., 2018, Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment, V41, P129, DOI 10.2965/jswe.41.129; Nishioka T, 2019, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V15, P750, DOI 10.1002/ieam.4167; Price OR, 2009, ENVIRON POLLUT, V157, P2610, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.010; Sakai N, 2017, CHEMOSPHERE, V172, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.139; Suzuki N, 2004, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V38, P5682, DOI 10.1021/es049261p; United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2015, BETT ASS SCI INT POI; United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2017, WAT QUAL AN SIM PROG; World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2018, GLOB WAT TOOL GWT; Zhang L, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V22, P18531, DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-5352-3	33	6	6	10	99	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	DEC 1	2019	239								118027	10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118027	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118027			15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IZ7AO					2022-09-08	WOS:000487237100079
J	Strotmann, C; Baur, V; Bornert, N; Gerwin, P				Strotmann, Christina; Baur, Vanessa; Boernert, Nora; Gerwin, Paula			Generation and prevention of food waste in the German food service sector in the COVID-19 pandemic - Digital approaches to encounter the pandemic related crisis	SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES			English	Article						Food waste; Food service sector; COVID-19; Digital technologies; Digital transformation; Sustainability	MANAGEMENT	The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the food service processes and operations in many ways, such as the use of contactless payment methods or ordering systems has increased. Despite the pandemic-related obstacles the sector faces, SDG12.3, halving food waste at the retail and consumer levels by 2030, needs to be achieved. This study therefore examines the two questions: How far has the pandemic affected the generation of food waste and the implementation of prevention measures? How does the use of digital technology, which has been increasingly accessed since the beginning of the pandemic, offer opportunities to further reduce food waste in the sector? Two online surveys were conducted. In the first survey, 84% of the 170 respondents indicated not to implement further food waste reduction measures since the start of the pandemic, while 11% do. They engaged in more targeted purchasing activities based on more conscious planning of the production volume, the reduction of menus offered, and the standardisation of menu components. In total, 91 food service companies provided data on the food wasted (in %) before and since the pandemic. Of the 179 entries made for the different waste categories, 47% indicated waste had not changed, while 42% and 11% indicated an increase/decrease, respectively. In the context of the ongoing digitalisation of the sector, possible fields of action for digital applications were identified, which are helpful in combating food waste in general and specifically during the pandemic. In this study, a classification scheme for digital food waste reduction approaches was developed. These approaches are systemised into four categories: forecasting, waste analysis, redistribution, and measures catalogue. Further, the process steps in which the applications are applied are indicated and direct and indirect effects on the generation of food waste are provided.	[Strotmann, Christina; Baur, Vanessa; Boernert, Nora; Gerwin, Paula] Munster Univ Appl Sci, Inst Sustainable Nutr iSuN, Corrensstr 25, D-48149 Munster, Germany		Strotmann, C (corresponding author), Munster Univ Appl Sci, Inst Sustainable Nutr iSuN, Corrensstr 25, D-48149 Munster, Germany.	Christina.Strotmann@fh-muenster.de; vanessa.baur@fh-muenster.de; nora.boernert@fh-muenster.de; paula.gerwin@fh-muenster.de			H2020 ERA-net Cofund on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption (SUSFOOD2) by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) [2818ERA07B]	H2020 ERA-net Cofund on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption (SUSFOOD2) by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE)	This research was funded through the H2020 ERA-net Cofund on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption (SUSFOOD2) by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant number 2818ERA07B.	Abay K.A., 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SECURI; Aldaco R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140524; [Anonymous], 2021, TOO GOOD GO; Blay-Palmer A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031325; Borsellino V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208366; Boyaci-Gunduz CP, 2021, FOODS, V10, DOI 10.3390/foods10030497; Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft, 2020, NAT STRAT RED LEB; Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft, 2021, DEUTSCHL WIE ES ISST; Burlea-Schiopoiu A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126333; Clowes A, 2021, BUSINESS CASE REDUCI; Dannenberg P, 2020, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V111, P543, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12453; Delicious data, 2021, DELICIOUS DATA; Derqui B, 2018, APPETITE, V129, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.022; Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Ernahrung, 2021, WEG MEHR NACHH BETR; Diaz-Ruiz R, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V149, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.031; Ellison B., 2020, FOOD WASTE COVID 19; Eriksson M, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V61, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035; FAO, 2020, COVID 19 RISK FOOD S, DOI DOI 10.4060/CA8388-N; FAO IFAD UNICEF WFP and WHO, 2020, STAT FOOD SEC NUTR W, DOI 10.4060/ca9692-n; Filimonau V, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105272; Filimonau V, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V71, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.009; Fischer M, 2020, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2019.103262; Fletcher G, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185; Galanakis CM, 2021, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V110, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002; Galanakis CM, 2020, FOODS, V9, DOI 10.3390/foods9040523; Giordano C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119617; Gobel C., 2017, DISSERTATION; Gursoy D, 2020, J HOSP MARKET MANAG, V29, P527, DOI 10.1080/19368623.2020.1788231; Gust G, 2017, MIS Q EXEC, V16, P215; Heikkila L, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V56, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.019; Henriette E, 2016, MEDITERRANEAN C INFO, P1; Hong J, 2021, ROLE CONSUMPTION BAS; Huang J, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P301, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.16; ifo.de, 2020, IFO I BRANCHENATLAS; Ivanov D, 2019, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V276, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_1; Kitro, 2021, KITRO; Kornmeier M., 2007, WISSENSCHAFTSTHEORIE; Kuckartz U., 2009, EVALUATION ONLINE IN; Kunst A., 2021, WHICH THESE PRODUCTS; LAV platform, 2021, US; Leanpath, 2021, LEANPATH; Malefors C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133541; Martins ML, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P1362, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.020; Matomatic Sweden, 2021, MATOMATIC SWEDEN; Mitakus, 2021, MITAKUS; O'Connor C., 2014, THE FULL REPORT; Pagani M, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P617, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.13; Papargyropoulou E, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V76, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020; Principato L, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100953; Prognolite, 2021, PROGNOLITE; Regusto, 2021, REGUSTO; ResQ Club, 2021, RESQ; Rizou M, 2020, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V102, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.008; Schmidt T, 2015, LEBENSMITTELABFALLE; Schomerus T, 2016, ENDBERICHT UMWELTBUN; Strotmann C, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9081409; Strotmann C, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040512; Strotmann C, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010066; Svahn F, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P239, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12; techconsult, 2021, DIG MITT 2020 2021 D; Technologie-Transfer-Initiative GmbH an der Universitat Stuttgart, 2021, VERBR NRW KUCH; The NPD Group, 2021, KONS DEUTSCHL EINFL; Transgourmet Digital Magazin, 2021, UMFR REST UMFR TRANS; United Against Waste, 2021, WAST AN TOOL; United Against Waste, 2021, WAST TRACK APP; United Against Waste, 2021, FOOD SAV APP; United Nations, 2021, REST CAT FOOD LOSS W; Verhoef PC, 2021, J BUS RES, V122, P889, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022; Vial G, 2019, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V28, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003; Welte B, 2020, FOOD WASTE 4 0 ZWISC; Wilkesmann M, 2020, SPITZENGASTRONOMIE C, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-30545-1_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-30545-1_6]; Winnow, 2021, WINN VIS AI UK; Winnow, 2021, WAST MON UK; Wrap Icaro Consulting, 2020, CIT RESP COV 19 LOCK; Yaffe-Bellany D, 2021, NEW YORK TIMES	75	8	8	1	1	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0038-0121	1873-6041		SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI	Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci.	AUG	2022	82		A						101104	10.1016/j.seps.2021.101104	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101104			13	Economics; Management; Operations Research & Management Science	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science	3J7BB	35721382	Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000833547800010
J	Ward, EJ; Dimitriou, HT; Dean, M				Ward, E. John; Dimitriou, Harry T.; Dean, Marco			Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal	RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS			English	Article						Multi-criteria analysis; Policy-led multi-criteria analysis; Project appraisal; Multiple stakeholders; Mega projects; Sustainable development	DECISION-MAKING; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; ANALYSIS MAMCA; POWER; STRATEGY; SCIENCE; RISK	The aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, to present a review and critical analysis of the varying forms and functions of Multi-Criteria Analysis presented in the literature, and secondly, drawing from this, to introduce methods and processes by which policy leadership can be introduced into such processes for the appraisal of large-scale transport infrastructure projects to form a policy-led multi-criteria analysis. Following the discussion in the first paper of this Special Issue, 'Presenting the Case for the Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis to Mega Transport Project Infrastructure Appraisal', this contribution commences by outlining further the generic features and challenges of multi-criteria analysis approaches to project appraisal whilst emphasizing the difference among various frameworks and attendant processes for such approaches. It also highlights the important role/value of the multi-criteria mapping of stakeholder policies and agendas affecting project decision-making as a means of defining and scoping the boundaries of the project exercise under study and the trade-off decision-spaces for stakeholder dialogues and negotiations in their search to arrive at mutually agreed actions and outcomes. The paper discusses how multi-criteria analysis frameworks can be tailor-designed for particular agencies and stakeholders developed around problems, challenges and issues. This is done in the acknowledgement that such exercises, especially when applied to mega infrastructure project appraisal, typically attract a multiple-institutional response and where ultimately an institutional leader (or partnership of stakeholders) exists/emerges that impose its/their priorities on others. Alternatively, the approach can be tailor-made for specific institutions with its imbedded hierarchy of policies and priorities that frame the stakeholder decision space within which other parties can participate and trade off interests. The first part of the paper highlights the important role of scenarios of policy-making contexts and policy leadership indicating the new risks, uncertainties and opportunities these may offer in multi criteria analysis exercises, indicating that some/many past processes have been conducted outside of any real reference to such matters. In so doing, such applications have them silently and implicitly adopt scenarios and policy assumptions that are not transparent frequently reflecting, it is alleged, 'business as usual' circumstances in contexts when the signs are very much that these trends will not/cannot prevail. The authors contend that without explicit policy leadership there is a danger that certain institutional stakeholder priorities will be imposed over others by the most powerful without adequate dialogue. Understanding that this matters a great deal in contexts when project stakeholder powers shifts occur is very significant Examples of such circumstances are when national governments become, less or more powerful and economically affluent, when relative legislative and regulation powers become less or more binding and powerful, and when a major private sector investor upon which a project depends goes bankrupt. The second half of the paper builds on these observations to offer a generic multi-criteria analysis framework and attendant processes that imbed policy leadership firmly within multi-stakeholder decision-making (termed Policy-led Multi-criteria Analysis). The framework developed is to be applied to mega transport projects via the use of suitable appraisal criteria in the pursuit of sustainable development goals, which seek to address both quantitative and qualitative dimensions and concerns of multiple stakeholders, with particular emphasis on the processes required to identify and incorporate suitable policy leadership, including feedback between appraisal and policy. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Ward, E. John; Dimitriou, Harry T.; Dean, Marco] UCL, Bartlett Sch Planning, OMEGA Ctr, 14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England		Ward, EJ (corresponding author), UCL, Bartlett Sch Planning, OMEGA Ctr, 14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England.	eric.ward@ucl.ac.uk; h.dimitrou@ucl.ac.uk; marco.dean.11@ucl.ac.uk	Dean, Marco/AAR-9260-2021	Dean, Marco/0000-0002-2418-8170	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1299083] Funding Source: researchfish	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC))		Allport R. J., 2011, PLANNING MAJOR PROJE; Altshuller A., 2003, MEGA PROJECTS CHANGI; [Anonymous], IND NETWORKS NEW VIE; [Anonymous], 2002, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE; [Anonymous], 2008, DEL SUST TRANSP SYST; [Anonymous], 2004, MANAGING UNCERTAINTI; [Anonymous], 1997, MULTICRITERIA ANAL; Antunes P, 2006, LAND USE POLICY, V23, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014; Banville C, 1998, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V15, P15, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::AID-SRES179>3.0.CO;2-B; BEESLEY ME, 1973, URBAN TRANSPORT STUD; Bickerstaff K., 2002, J TRANSP GEOGR, V10, P61, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8; Boardman A.E., 2006, COST BENEFIT ANAL CO; Boiteux M., 1996, TRANSPORTS POUR MEIL; Bragge J, 2010, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V634, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_22; Bryson G. M., 2004, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT RE, V6, P21; BTE, 1999, 100 BTE; Burgess J, 2007, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V16, P299, DOI 10.1177/0963662507077510; Chapman C.B., 2011, MANAGE PROJECT OPPOR; Chung SS, 1996, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V17, P189, DOI 10.1016/0921-3449(96)01107-X; Considine M, 2005, MAKING PUBLIC POLICY; DCLG, 2009, MULT AN MAN; De Brucker K., 1998, SOCIAAL EC EVALUATE; DEste G, 2009, P 32 AUSTR TRANSP RE; DfT, 2009, NATA REFR APPR SUST; DfT (Department for Transport), 2007, SUST TRANSP SYST SUP; Dimitriou H., 2001, PLANNING SUSTAINABLE, P61; Dimitriou H. T., 2013, NLE OMEGA WORKSH OME; Dimitriou H. T., 2008, 4 U COLL LOND BARTL; Dimitriou H.T., 2010, INC PRINC SUST DEV D; Dimitriou H.T., 2015, THESIS; Dobes L, 2009, AGENDA-J POLICY ANAL, V16, P7; *DTLR, 2001, MULT AN MAN; FINEBERG HV, 1996, UNDERSTANDING RISK I; FIORINO DJ, 1990, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V15, P226, DOI 10.1177/016224399001500204; FISCHER F, 1993, POLICY SCI, V26, P165, DOI 10.1007/BF00999715; Flyvbjerg B., 2003, MEGAPROJECTS RISK AN, P86; Friend JK, 1969, LOCAL GOVT STRATEGIC; Goodwin P, 2001, J MANAGE STUD, V38, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00225; Hall P., 1980, GREAT PLANNING DISAS; Henrichson C., 2014, USING COST BENEFIT A; HM Treasury, 2003, GREEN BOOK APPR EV C; HOGWOOD B, 1984, POLICY ANAL REAL WOR; Holtzman, 1989, INT DEC SYST; Institution of Civil Engineers and The Actuaries Profession, 2014, RISK AN MAN PROJ RAM; KLAUER B, 2002, MULTICRITERIA ANAL U; Klinger R., 2015, PANTURA REPORT SUMMA; Kurtz CF, 2003, IBM SYST J, V42, P462, DOI 10.1147/sj.423.0462; Lambert JH, 2012, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V18, P155, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000078; Macharis C., 2013, INT HDB MEGA PROJECT; Macharis C., 2000, STRATEGISCHE MODELLE; Macharis C., 2005, Q J TRANSP LAW EC EN, V8, P114; Macharis C., 2011, POSSIBLE BIAS MULTIA; Macharis C, 2012, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V54, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008; Macharis C, 2007, TRANSPORT PROJECT EVALUATION: EXTENDING THE SOCIAL COST-BENEFIT APPROACH, P115; Macharis C, 2010, TRANSPORT POLICY, V17, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.02.004; Malczewski J., 1999, GIS MULTIPLE CRITERI; McDowall W, 2007, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V32, P4611, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.06.020; Miller R., 2008, DECISION MAKING MEGA; Mitchell RK, 1997, ACAD MANAGE REV, V22, P853, DOI 10.2307/259247; Montibeller G., 2007, 0792 LSEOR; Morgan M., 2004, REGULATING STEM CELL; Morgan M., 2010, THESIS; Munda G, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V158, P662, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2; Munda G., 1995, MULTICRITERIA EVALUA; Murray-Webster R., 2006, MAKING SENSE STAKEHO, VVIII; Norese M. F., 2002, DECISION MAKING URBA; OMEGA Centre, 2012, MAG PROJ EX SUMM LES; OMEGA Centre, 2014, MULT AN METH PROJ AP; OMEGA Centre, 2011, LESS DEC MAK COMP AN; Omman I, 2004, MULTICRITERIA DECISI; Papamichail KN, 2013, IMA J MANAG MATH, V24, P481, DOI 10.1093/imaman/dps028; Pearce O., 2008, J CORPORATE CITIZENS, P37; Pellizzoni L, 2003, ENVIRON VALUE, V12, P195, DOI 10.3197/096327103129341298; Pellizzoni L, 2001, BRIT J SOCIOL, V52, P59, DOI 10.1080/00071310122320; PHILLIPS LD, 1993, J OPER RES SOC, V44, P533, DOI 10.1038/sj/jors/0440601; Pouloudi A, 1997, EUR J INFORM SYST, V6, P1, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000252; Priemus H, 2013, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK ON MEGA-PROJECTS, P1, DOI 10.4337/9781781002308; Priemus H., 2008, DECISION MAKING MEGA; Rehfeld C., 1998, THESIS; RENN O, 1993, POLICY SCI, V26, P189, DOI 10.1007/BF00999716; Rutter Carol Chillington, 2005, ENCY MIDDLE GRADES E, DOI DOI 10.1007/B100605; Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE; Sayers T. M., 2003, TRANSPORT POLICY, V10, P95, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00049-5; Snell M., 1997, COST BENEFIT ANAL EN; Stagl S., 2007, SDRN RAPID RES EVIDE; Stakeholder Management Pty Ltd, 2006, STAK CIRCL; Stewart TJ, 2013, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V41, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003; Stirling A, 2006, LAND USE POLICY, V23, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010; Stirling A., 1999, INT J JUSTICE SUSTAI, V4, P111, DOI DOI 10.1080/13549839908725588; Stirling A., 1999, 21 SPRU U SUSS; Stirling A, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1128, P95, DOI 10.1196/annals.1399.011; Stirling A, 2008, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V33, P262, DOI 10.1177/0162243907311265; STOUGH R, 1997, J TRANSP GEOGR, V5, P207, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00016-1; Surowiecki D., 2004, WISDOM CROWDS; Thompson P. B., 2010, WHAT SUSTAINABILITY, P16; Triantaphyllou E., 1989, Decision Support Systems, V5, P303, DOI 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90037-7; Veron-Okamoto A., 2014, ADB SUSTAINABLE DEV, V31; VINCKE P, 1992, MULTICRITERIA DECISI; Wilkinson A., 2014, ESSENCE SCENARIOS LE; Wright, 2004, DECISION ANAL MANAGE	100	15	16	3	25	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0739-8859	1875-7979		RES TRANSP ECON	Res. Transp. Econ.	OCT	2016	58						21	45		10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.003	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.003			25	Economics; Transportation	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Transportation	EG5IN					2022-09-08	WOS:000391077600003
J	Wong, FWMH; Foley, A; Del Rio, DF; Rooney, D; Shariff, S; Dolfi, A; Srinivasan, G				Wong, Fadhli Wong Mohd Hasan; Foley, Aoife; Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer; Rooney, David; Shariff, Shahidah; Dolfi, Andrea; Srinivasan, Geetha			Public perception of transitioning to a low-carbon nation: a Malaysian scenario	CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY			English	Article; Early Access						Low-carbon nation; Nature-based solution; Climate change; National oil companies; Public perception; Comparative survey study	ENERGY; CCS	Efforts such as the Glasgow United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties 26, the Paris Agreement (Paris agreement, United Nations, Paris, 2015) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals are supporting the drive to protect the planet from global warming by ensuring sustainable development. The oil and gas industry, as key contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, must transition to more sustainable energy solutions and play their part in reducing these emissions. Currently, oil and gas companies are implementing technical solutions to achieve net zero carbon emissions. The energy transition from fossil fuel reliance has also happened by exploiting alternative renewable energy sources to meet global energy demand such as wind, solar, biogas and bioderived feedstocks. This net zero energy transition will require a fair and just transition for all in society, and to implement this, it is crucial for those working in the oil and gas industry to understand the technologies needed, the importance of carbon policies and their roles. This research presents a modified Delphi study of employees in Malaysia's national oil and gas company to understand their perceptions towards a net-zero carbon future. The paper briefly reviews Malaysia's low-carbon policy plans, its current carbon dioxide accounting balance, and identifies potential technologies for decarbonisation to set the scene for the modified Delphi study. The results indicated that the national oil and gas company has both the capabilities and the financial resources to significantly contribute towards Malaysia transitioning to a carbon neutral nation. This can be achieved by implementing advanced technologies complementing with nature-based solutions to realise net zero carbon emissions. This study also portrays the confidence that the portfolio of solutions should be executed through a coordinated effort to maximise the outcome and minimise the financial impact in terms of economical sustainability. Implementation of activities towards this energy transition will require significant social commitment, and hence, gauging their perception towards this journey is key objective of this paper. [GRAPHICS] .	[Wong, Fadhli Wong Mohd Hasan; Foley, Aoife; Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer; Rooney, David] Queens Univ, Bryden Ctr, David Keir Bldg, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland; [Wong, Fadhli Wong Mohd Hasan; Rooney, David; Srinivasan, Geetha] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland; [Wong, Fadhli Wong Mohd Hasan; Shariff, Shahidah; Dolfi, Andrea; Srinivasan, Geetha] Kawasan Inst Bangi, Grp Res & Technol, PETRONAS, Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia; [Foley, Aoife] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland; [Foley, Aoife] Univ Dublin, Dept Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; [Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer] Univ Sussex, Business Sch, Sci Policy Res Unit, Brighton, E Sussex, England		Wong, FWMH (corresponding author), Queens Univ, Bryden Ctr, David Keir Bldg, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland.; Wong, FWMH (corresponding author), Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland.	fmohdhasanwong01@qub.ac.uk		Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan/0000-0001-7860-8700	PETRONAS	PETRONAS	We would like to express our acknowledgment and great appreciation to Shamina A. Aleem, Adam Harith Zafrul Fazry and Ariffin Mohamad Annuar for assisting us in preparing, disseminating, collecting and presenting data of the survey. This study is funded by PETRONAS.	[Anonymous], 2018, FORBES; Araujo OQF, 2021, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V23, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s10098-021-02123-x; Bayulken B, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125569; Chen ZA, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.046; Chin H., 2015, ENABL ASIA STABLISE, P119; Chong CH, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109356; Cox E, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P744, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0823-z; Curry T., 2004, AWARE IS PUBLIC CARB; DALKEY N, 1963, MANAGE SCI, V9, P458, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458; de Best-Waldhober M, 2009, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V3, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.09.001; Del Rio DDF, 2021, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102105; Denton F., 2002, Gender and Development, V10, P10, DOI 10.1080/13552070215903; Dowd AM, 2014, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V28, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.009; Economic Planning Unit, 2010, 10 MAL PLAN 2011 201; Economic Planning Unit, 2015, 11 MAL PLAN 2016 202; Ghazali Z., 2016, INT J EC FINANC, V6, P179; Global Energy and CO2 Data, 2015, NAT GAS SUBS MAL CUR; Gupta M, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V45, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.001; Ha-Duong M, 2009, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V3, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.05.003; Hartmann J, 2021, J BUS STRAT; Husaini DH, 2019, ENERGY, V171, P1000, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.078; IEA, 2019, SE AS EN OUTL 2019 C; Kawgan-Kagan I., 2015, EUR TRANSP RES REV; Kellstedt PM, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x; Malaysia Energy Commission, 2017, PIGMEAT STAT; Mansor WNW, 2020, DATA BRIEF, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105440; MESTECC, 2018, 3 NAT COMM 2 BIENN U; Ministry of Environment and Water, 2020, MAL 3 BIENN UPD REP; National Climate Change Secretariat Singapore, 2019, NATL CLIMATE CHANGE; Navas-Anguita Z, 2020, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113498; Ostfeld R, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111332; Ozier W, DELPHI MODIFIED DELP; Pickl MJ, 2019, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100370; Prior A., 2019, PUBLIC ATTITUDES CLE; Qazi A, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P63837, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906402; Sabri MF., 2020, MALAYSIAN J CONSUMER; Seigo SL, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V38, P848, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.017; SHELL, 2018, NAT GAS MOR CLEAN EN; Silvana T, 2011, NATL OIL CO VALUE CR; Smith P, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P1, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15926; Sonny R., 2013, PERCEPTIONS CLIMATE; The Economic Planning Unit, 2017, MAL SUST DEV GOALS; The-White-House, 2021, BRIEF ROOM; United Nations Paris Agreement, 2015, THE PARIS AGREEMENT; Upham P, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V46, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.024; Viscusi WK, 2005, PERCEPTION VALUATION, DOI [10.3386/w11863, DOI 10.3386/W11863]; Wong KY, 2019, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V30, P91, DOI 10.1177/0958305X18787273; World Economic Forum, 2020, GLOB GAPREPORT 2019; World Resources Institute, 2016, WORLD GREENH GAS EM; Xibei Z., 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE; Zahari MAZ, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P2429, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1263-3	51	0	0	2	2	SPRINGER	NEW YORK	ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES	1618-954X	1618-9558		CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR	Clean Technol. Environ. Policy											s10098-022-02345-7	10.1007/s10098-022-02345-7	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02345-7		JUL 2022	16	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	3E4ZQ		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000829993100002
J	Bhavsar, A; Diallo, C; Ulku, MA				Bhavsar, Aniket; Diallo, Claver; Ulku, M. Ali			Towards sustainable development: Optimal pricing and sales strategies for retailing fair trade products	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Fair trade; Supply chain; Optimization; Pricing; Sustainability	WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUPPLY CHAIN; BOTTOM; MARKET; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; MODELS; GREEN; LABOR	In response to heightened pressure from customers who embrace sustainability, and in compliance with the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations, an increasing number of organizations have implemented, mostly within their supply chains, initiatives to reduce their environmental impacts while enhancing their social responsibilities and economic well-being. As such, offering Fair Trade (FT) alternatives on their shelves provides an opportunity for retailers to better connect with and support their suppliers in the developing world by guaranteeing higher purchase prices, and enhanced education and well-being. This could be achieved by transitioning to or integrating with a FT Supply Chain (FSC). To that end, this paper studies, from the perspective of a profit-maximizing and socially-aware retailer who wants to expand its conventional product (C-product) offering by adding an FT option (F-product), the conditions under which the two competing products (Fand C-products) can be optimally priced and allocated to the available storage capacity. Our demand model segments the market with respect to customers' willingness to pay a higher premium for the F-product relative to the C-product, and their derived utilities. We formulate the optimization model as a convex mathematical program. To showcase the use of the optimality model, various numerical experiments are conducted to investigate the sensitivity of key parameters. To further stimulate discussion and productivity in sustainable supply chain literature, and due to their salient operating structure of FSCs, such as licensing fees, we deliberately expand on the historical background of FT, and delineate FSC from its conventional counterpart CSC. Our results show that FSCs and CSCs can be well-aligned if demands for both Fand C-products are not cannibalized, and that the retailer is willing to invest in enhancing its social responsibility profile. Among others, our model informs managers about how to use pricing as a leverage, and when to sell only F-, or C-product, or a mix of both. The results confirm that it is possible to design sales strategies for the retailer such that its financial-bottom line is still not hurt while FT suppliers and workers in developing countries could benefit from high premiums from the sales of F-products, for a sustained income in disruptionprone working environments. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Bhavsar, Aniket; Diallo, Claver; Ulku, M. Ali] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 5269 Morris St,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada; [Ulku, M. Ali] Dalhousie Univ, Rowe Sch Business, 6100 Univ Ave,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada; [Diallo, Claver; Ulku, M. Ali] Dalhousie Univ, Rowe Sch Business, Ctr Res Sustainable Supply Chain Analyt CRSSCA, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada		Diallo, C (corresponding author), Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 5269 Morris St,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.	an374755@dal.ca; cd@dal.ca; ulku@dal.ca	Ülkü, M. Ali/AAT-6801-2021	Ülkü, M. Ali/0000-0002-8495-3364; Diallo, Claver/0000-0002-7381-2187	Canadian Natural Science and Engineering Research Council	Canadian Natural Science and Engineering Research Council(Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC))	This work was supported by a grant awarded by the Canadian Natural Science and Engineering Research Council to the second author through the Discovery Grant Program. Additional in-kind support for this research was provided by The Centre for Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Analytics (CRSSCA). We also thank the Editors and the anonymous reviewers.	Abedinia O, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P878, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.085; Agrawal V, 2019, PROD OPER MANAG, V28, P767, DOI 10.1111/poms.12943; Bacon C, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.002; Becchetti L., 2006, WORKING PAPER, P665; Beji-Becheur A, 2008, J MACROMARKETING, V28, P44, DOI 10.1177/0276146707311842; Bendul JC, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, pS107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.001; Bertsekas D. P, 1999, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN; Brown S, 2008, GEOJOURNAL, V73, P11, DOI 10.1007/s10708-008-9192-2; Brundtland G., 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE RE, V1, P59; Caliskan-Demirag O, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V207, P1321, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.017; Castaldo S, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V84, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9669-4; Chen J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117642; Cho S.-H., 2019, MANUFACTURING SERVIC; Cousin-Gossett N., 2010, SUSTAINABILITY N AM; Cretu AE, 2007, IND MARKET MANAG, V36, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.013; Crowson N, 2009, NGOS IN CONTEMPORARY BRITAIN: NON-STATE ACTORS IN SOCIETY AND POLITICS SINCE 1945, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230234079; Cui TH, 2007, MANAGE SCI, V53, P1303, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0697; De Pelsmacker P, 2005, J CONSUM AFF, V39, P363, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x; DeCarlo J, 2007, FAIR TRADE BEGINNERS; Didier T, 2008, INT J CONSUM STUD, V32, P479, DOI 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00714.x; Elkington J., 1997, CANNIBALS FORKS TRIP, P49; Fair Trade International, 2016, DRIV SAL DEEP IMP AN; Fair Trade International, 2018, WORK TOG FAIR SUST T; Fair Trade International, 2015, GLOB CHANG LOC LEAD; Fair Trade International, 2017, CREAT INN SCAL IMP A; Fawcett SE, 2015, J BUS LOGIST, V36, P233, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12096; Gendron C, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V86, P63, DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9758-4; Gold S, 2013, INT BUS REV, V22, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.12.006; Guo RX, 2016, MANAGE SCI, V62, P2722, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2256; Hainmueller J, 2015, REV ECON STAT, V97, P242, DOI 10.1162/REST_a_00467; Hartley-Urquhart W.R., 2000, US Patent, Patent No. [6 (167), 385, 6167385]; Heinberg R., 2010, POST CARBON READER, P11; Jin PJ, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P34, DOI 10.3141/2440-05; Jones ARW, 2012, J FASH MARK MANAG, V16, P246, DOI 10.1108/13612021211222851; Joo SJ, 2010, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V21, P490, DOI 10.1108/09574091011089826; Karnani A, 2007, CALIF MANAGE REV, V49, P90, DOI 10.2307/41166407; Katok E, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01388.x; Kurtulus M, 2011, PROD OPER MANAG, V20, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01141.x; Ladhari R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V87, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.068; Lappeman J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118012; Lebel L, 2008, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V33, P241, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022007.145734; Lee YM, 2018, EVOLUTION OF KOREAN INDUSTRIAL AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, P1, DOI 10.1080/14728214.2018.1543400; Lim MK, 2019, PROD OPER MANAG, V28, P3023, DOI 10.1111/poms.13011; Liu ZW, 2020, CLIN APPL THROMB-HEM, V26, DOI 10.1177/1076029620978809; Maseland R, 2002, ECONOMIST-NETHERLAND, V150, P251, DOI 10.1023/A:1016161727537; Min S., 2000, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V30, P765, DOI DOI 10.1108/09600030010351462; Moore G, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V53, P73, DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039400.57827.c3; Ozinci Y, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V191, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.05.005; Raynolds LT, 2007, FAIR TRADE CHALLENGE; Renard MC, 2003, J RURAL STUD, V19, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00051-7; Rios K, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V130, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2221-9; Sargent J, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.015; Sethi SP, 2016, BUS SOC REV, V121, P5, DOI 10.1111/basr.12079; Smith AM, 2013, SOC ENTERP J, V9, P53, DOI 10.1108/17508611311330000; Sodhi MS, 2016, DECISION, V43, P125, DOI 10.1007/s40622-015-0117-x; Sugata M., 2011, THESIS; Sweeney E., 2002, J NATL I TRANSPORT L, V5, P14; Ulku M.A., 2017, P 52 ANN C CAN TRANS, P300; Ulku MA, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V203, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.016; Ulku MA, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P4230, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.050; WANG Z, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJPE.2020.107935; WFTO, 2018, 10 PRINC FAIR TRAD; Wilson F, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P715, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0; Yenipazarli A, 2017, ANN OPER RES, V250, P537, DOI 10.1007/s10479-014-1781-5; Yoon Y, 2006, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V16, P377, DOI 10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9	65	7	7	1	16	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAR 1	2021	286								124990	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124990	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124990		JAN 2021	15	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	QA1FK					2022-09-08	WOS:000613195400012
J	Schandl, H; Fischer-Kowalski, M; West, J; Giljum, S; Dittrich, M; Eisenmenger, N; Geschke, A; Lieber, M; Wieland, H; Schaffartzik, A; Krausmann, F; Gierlinger, S; Hosking, K; Lenzen, M; Tanikawa, H; Miatto, A; Fishman, T				Schandl, Heinz; Fischer-Kowalski, Marina; West, James; Giljum, Stefan; Dittrich, Monika; Eisenmenger, Nina; Geschke, Arne; Lieber, Mirko; Wieland, Hanspeter; Schaffartzik, Anke; Krausmann, Fridolin; Gierlinger, Sylvia; Hosking, Karin; Lenzen, Manfred; Tanikawa, Hiroki; Miatto, Alessio; Fishman, Tomer			Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence	JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY			English	Article						environmental policy; global material flows; industrial ecology; material flow accounting (MFA); resource productivity; trade	INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; MATERIAL EFFICIENCY; INCOME INEQUALITY; CONSUMPTION; PATTERNS; POPULATION; EXTRACTION; EMISSIONS; FOOTPRINT; GROWTH	The international industrial ecology (IE) research community and United Nations (UN) Environment have, for the first time, agreed on an authoritative and comprehensive data set for global material extraction and trade covering 40 years of global economic activity and natural resource use. This new data set is becoming the standard information source for decision making at the UN in the context of the post-2015 development agenda, which acknowledges the strong links between sustainable natural resource management, economic prosperity, and human well-being. Only if economic growth and human development can become substantially decoupled from accelerating material use, waste, and emissions can the tensions inherent in the Sustainable Development Goals be resolved and inclusive human development be achieved. In this paper, we summarize the key findings of the assessment study to make the IE research community aware of this new global research resource. The global results show a massive increase in materials extraction from 22 billion tonnes (Bt) in 1970 to 70 Bt in 2010, and an acceleration in material extraction since 2000. This acceleration has occurred at a time when global population growth has slowed and global economic growth has stalled. The global surge in material extraction has been driven by growing wealth and consumption and accelerating trade. A material footprint perspective shows that demand for materials has grown even in the wealthiest parts of the world. Low-income countries have benefited least from growing global resource availability and have continued to deliver primary materials to high-income countries while experiencing few improvements in their domestic material living standards. Material efficiency, the amount of primary materials required per unit of economic activity, has declined since around 2000 because of a shift of global production from very material-efficient economies to less-efficient ones. This global trend of recoupling economic activity with material use, driven by industrialization and urbanization in the global South, most notably Asia, has negative impacts on a suite of environmental and social issues, including natural resource depletion, climate change, loss of biodiversity, and uneven economic development. This research is a good example of the IE research community providing information for evidence-based policy making on the global stage and testament to the growing importance of IE research in achieving global sustainable development.	[Schandl, Heinz; West, James; Hosking, Karin] CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia; [Schandl, Heinz] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia; [Fischer-Kowalski, Marina; Eisenmenger, Nina; Schaffartzik, Anke; Krausmann, Fridolin; Gierlinger, Sylvia] Alpen Adria Univ Klagenfurt, Inst Social Ecol, Vienna, Austria; [Giljum, Stefan; Lieber, Mirko; Wieland, Hanspeter] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Vienna, Austria; [Dittrich, Monika] Inst Energy & Environm Res IFEU, Heidelberg, Germany; [Geschke, Arne; Lenzen, Manfred] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; [Tanikawa, Hiroki; Miatto, Alessio; Fishman, Tomer] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan		Schandl, H (corresponding author), CSIRO, Black Mt Labs, Clunies Ross St, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.	heinz.schandl@csiro.au	Schandl, Heinz/C-5055-2008; Miatto, Alessio/R-9972-2019; Hosking, Karin F/G-5587-2010; Krausmann, Fridolin/N-1918-2015; Eisenmenger, Nina/AAB-7805-2020; Fischer-Kowalski, Marina/O-9646-2019; Giljum, Stefan/M-3162-2015; Geschke, Arne/AAM-7434-2020; West, James/B-5487-2011; Fishman, Tomer/C-9772-2015	Schandl, Heinz/0000-0001-6399-4231; Miatto, Alessio/0000-0001-7541-9330; Krausmann, Fridolin/0000-0002-9995-2372; Eisenmenger, Nina/0000-0002-8833-3883; Fischer-Kowalski, Marina/0000-0003-3345-4538; Giljum, Stefan/0000-0002-4719-5867; Geschke, Arne/0000-0001-9193-5829; Wieland, Hanspeter/0000-0001-5944-7155; West, James/0000-0002-1444-1080; Fishman, Tomer/0000-0003-4405-2382	United Nations Environment Program; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26281056] Funding Source: KAKEN	United Nations Environment Program; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT)Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceGrants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI))	This work has been funded by the United Nations Environment Program.	[Anonymous], 2011, DECOUPLING NATURAL R; [Anonymous], 2012, HUNG GEOGR B, DOI DOI 10.1787/1999155X; Bartelmus P, 2003, ECOL ECON, V46, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00078-8; Behrens A, 2007, ECOL ECON, V64, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.034; Bringezu S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080778; Bringezu S, 2015, RESOURCES-BASEL, V4, P25, DOI 10.3390/resources4010025; Bruckner M, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P568, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.011; Costantini V, 2008, ECOL ECON, V64, P867, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.011; Dittrich M, 2012, ECOL ECON, V79, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.014; Dittrich M, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1838, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.023; EHRLICH PR, 1971, SCIENCE, V171, P1212, DOI 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212; Ekins P, 2002, EC GROWTH ENV SUSTAI; Eurostat, 2001, EC WID MAT FLOW ACC, P2; Fang K, 2015, ECOL ECON, V114, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.008; Fischer-Kowalski M, 2011, J IND ECOL, V15, P855, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x; Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a; Harvey David, 2006, SPACES GLOBAL CAPITA; Hatfield-Dodds S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V144, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.170; Herendeen RobertA., 1998, ECOLOGICAL NUMERACY; Herrero M, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P20888, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308149110; Hertwich EG, 2005, J IND ECOL, V9, P1, DOI 10.1162/1088198054084536; Krausmann F, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2696, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007; Lenzen M, 2013, ECON SYST RES, V25, P20, DOI 10.1080/09535314.2013.769938; Martinez-Alier J, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1741, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017; Miatto A, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P924, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12471; Mudd GM, 2007, ORE GEOL REV, V32, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2006.05.005; Myers N, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P4963, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0438061100; OECD, 2008, MEAS MAT FLOWS RES P; Peters GP, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P2, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1332; Piketty T, 2003, Q J ECON, V118, P1, DOI 10.1162/00335530360535135; Reeson AF, 2012, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V56, P302, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00578.x; Rockstrom J, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14; Schaffartzik A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.013; Schandl H, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P352, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00420.x; Schandl H, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003; Schor JB, 2005, J IND ECOL, V9, P37, DOI 10.1162/1088198054084581; Spangenberg JH, 2002, ECOL ECON, V43, P127, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00212-4; Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855; Steinberger JK, 2010, ECOL ECON, V70, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.014; Tsang EYH, 2014, FRONT GLOB, P1; UNEP, 2012, GLOB ENV OUTL 5 ENV; UNEP, 2016, GLOBAL MAT FLOWS RES; UNEP, 2014, REPORT WORKING GROUP; West J, 2014, ECOL ECON, V105, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.013; West J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V94, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.015; Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110	46	133	133	6	114	WILEY	HOBOKEN	111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA	1088-1980	1530-9290		J IND ECOL	J. Ind. Ecol.	AUG	2018	22	4					827	838		10.1111/jiec.12626	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12626			12	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GQ3OI					2022-09-08	WOS:000441574100015
J	Zemaitis, P; Linkevicius, E; Aleinikovas, M; Tuomasjukka, D				Zemaitis, Povilas; Linkevicius, Edgaras; Aleinikovas, Marius; Tuomasjukka, Diana			Sustainability impact assessment of glue laminated timber and concrete-based building materials production chains - A Lithuanian case study	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Value chain; Wood building material; Concrete building material; Sustainability indicators	CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; LIFE-CYCLE; WOOD; EMISSIONS; BIOMASS	In recent years, wood has received increased interest in Europe as a multi-storey building material. The trend is driven by the recognition that wood, as an environment friendly material, can contribute bioeconomy development and the achievement of sustainable development goals. In Lithuania, multi-storey wood-based building is still at the level of policy and political discussions. Therefore, the presented research focuses on quantification and comparison of the sustainability impacts of both wood- and concrete-based building materials value chains and provides applied scientific knowledge relevant to decision makers and in this way contributes to mitigation of the climate change. In detail, study covers the production value chain - from raw material extraction to manufacturing using the same method, while documenting and assessing the material sourcing stages transparently and consistently. In our study glue laminated timber and sawn timber building materials represented renewable material value chains, while site-cast concrete and precast reinforced concrete building materials represented non-renewable materials value chains. In discussion with study partners in the BenchValue project and during a project stakeholder workshop, twelve environmental, social and economic indicators were selected to perform the sustainability impact assessment of selected building materials. Building materials were compared by using a decision support tool ToSIA. The relevant data was gathered from local, well-known companies in the national and international arena. Our results revealed that glue laminated timber and sawn timber value chains compared to site-cast concrete and precast reinforced concrete value chains have more positive sustainability impacts. This is especially true when analysing environmental indicators: GHG emissions, Energy use, Generation of wastes and Water use. Analyses also revealed more positive socio-economic impacts of wood-based building materials. The socio-economic advantage of wood could increase competitiveness of the regions and contributes to their sustainable development. Our paper is in line with the applied research. Since it is a case study, the presented results are country specific, because the estimation of indicators was done by applying local data. The presented research is relevant to policy experts and decision makers in the context of the reduction of CO2 emissions. Also, this paper is relevant to the companies and architects who want to build and compare various building materials. Partially, results of this paper could be applied in other countries with comparable to Lithuania economic development level, having in mind the possible shortcomings already highlighted.	[Zemaitis, Povilas; Aleinikovas, Marius] Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Inst Forestry, Liepu Str 1, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania; [Linkevicius, Edgaras] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Agr Acad, Fac Forest Sci & Ecol, Studentu 13,Akademija, LT-53362 Kaunas, Lithuania; [Tuomasjukka, Diana] European Forest Inst EFI, Yliopistokatu 6, Joensuu 80100, Finland		Zemaitis, P (corresponding author), Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Inst Forestry, Liepu Str 1, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania.	Povilas.Zemaitis@lammc.lt	; Zemaitis, Povilas/H-7114-2017	Linkevicius, Edgaras/0000-0001-7777-8353; Tuomasjukka, Diana/0000-0003-1469-5942; Zemaitis, Povilas/0000-0002-2438-4999	Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania	Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania(Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT))	The study was supported by the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania in the frame of EU program 7BP ERA-NET SUMFOREST project BenchValue (2017-2019). The authors would like to thank Dr. Ken Byrne (University of Limerick) for valuable comments and checking the language of this manuscript.	[Anonymous], 2019, LITHUANIAN STAT YB F, P184; [Anonymous], 2019, LIETUVOS STATISTIKOS; [Anonymous], 2018, LITHUANIAN STAT YB F, P184; [Anonymous], 2013, EPDBFS20130094IBG1EN; Bates J.S, 2016, J EXT, V54; Bionova Ltd, 2021, CARBON FOOTPRINT LIM; Borjesson P, 2000, ENERG POLICY, V28, P575, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00049-5; Bruno R, 2019, APPL ENERG, V238, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.035; Chum HL, 2001, FUEL PROCESS TECHNOL, V71, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00146-1; Climate change connection, 2019, CO2 EQUIVALENTS; D'Amico B, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123487; Deep Resource, 2019, EN REL CONV FACT; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Europe Forest, 2020, STATE EUROPES FOREST; Garcia-Alvarez A, 2013, J INTELL TRANSPORT S, V17, P233, DOI 10.1080/15472450.2012.719456; Hall DO, 1998, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V15, P357, DOI 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00030-0; Hildebrandt J, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013; Hurmekoski E., 2016, Dissertationes Forestales; Hurmekoski E, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V99, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.002; Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V. (IBU), 2014, KNAUF EPDDECLARATION; International Standards Worldwide, 2017, ASTMEPD070; Kylili A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V35, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013; Lazarevic D, 2020, FOREST POLICY ECON, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006; Lijewski P, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P153, DOI 10.1007/s10342-016-1015-2; Lindner M, 2012, EUR J FOREST RES, V131, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10342-011-0483-7; Lindner M, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2197, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.006; Linna, 2006, VTTWORK43, P94; LNECP, 2018, LITHUANIA NATL ENERG, P273; Lu HYR, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.065; Mahapatra Krushna, 2012, Construction Innovation, V12, P62, DOI 10.1108/14714171211197508; Mallo MFL, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V94, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.090; Markstrom E, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.216; McIntosh AJ, 2016, ANN TOURISM RES, V56, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.003; Miner R., 2010, 159 FAO; Official statistics portal of Lithuania, 2020, BUILDING CONSTRUCTIO; Paivinen R, 2012, EUR J FOREST RES, V131, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10342-010-0446-4; Paivinen R, 2008, MULTIFUNCTIONAL ROLE, P153; Petersen AK, 2003, CAN J FOREST RES, V33, P1061, DOI [10.1139/x03-020, 10.1139/X03-020]; Petersen AK, 2002, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V5, P169, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00044-2; Petruch M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126324; Sathre R, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005; Sherriff, 2009, IMPROVING SUSTAINABI; statistika Lietuvos, 2016, EKONOMIKA IRFINANSAI; Tanabe K, 2006, REPORT; TFEU, 2012, CHARACTERIZATION FAC; Toivonen R, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102480; Troxler, 2014, 2013 REVISED SUPPLEM, P268; Uthes S, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2136, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.010; Valimaki, 2011, TOOLS FORSUSTAINABIL; Vizlenskas D, 2015, LIETUVOS MISKU UKIO; Walter C, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P1288, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.017; Werhahn-Mees W, 2011, GCB BIOENERGY, V3, P91, DOI 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01068.x	52	1	1	5	10	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 25	2021	321								129005	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129005	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129005		SEP 2021	11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	WE7BW					2022-09-08	WOS:000705777200084
J	do Nascimento, RF; Canteri, MHG				do Nascimento, Revenli Fernanda; Canteri, Maria Helene Giovanetti			Use of sodium metabisulfite and ascorbic acid as anti-browning agents in processed potatoes	BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL			English	Article						Quality control; Browning reactions; Solanum tuberosum L	CITRIC-ACID; SHELF-LIFE; QUALITY; ANTIOXIDANT; WATER	Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the use of sodium metabisulfite (SMB) and ascorbic acid (AA) either alone or in combination as anti-browning agents in industrially processed potatoes. Design/methodology/approach The experiment was carried out in the production line of an agricultural industry located in the state of Parana, Brazil, testing the following chemical treatments in the immersion process of the potatoes: T1 (control, without additives), T2 (0.5 percent AA), T3 (0.5 percent SMB), T4 (0.5 percent SMB + 0.5 percent AA) and T5 (0.25 percent SMB + 0.25 percent AA). The statistical significance of the difference between chemical treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5) and storage periods (1, 5, 10 and 15 days) was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Additionally, multifactorial ANOVA was carried out in a 2(2) factorial experimental design with 3 central points to estimate the influence of independent variables on the results. The analyses performed on the samples of the different treatments were total soluble solids content, pH, total titratable acidity, instrumental color and browning index. Findings The tested antioxidants did not affect the content of total soluble solids and total titratable acidity but significantly influenced the pH, color and browning index. The treatment T3, containing only SMB (0.5 percent m/v), and the treatment T5, a combination of SMB (0.25 percent m/v) and AA (0.25 percent m/v), were the most effective in the controlling the browning reaction. In these treatments, the formation of brown color in potatoes after cooked was significantly reduced (p<0.05) using relatively lower concentration of antioxidants. Originality/value The novelty of the research is focused on reducing the use of chemical agents to control the browning of the processed potatoes (peeled, steamed, sterilized and vacuum packed) ready for consumption and widely marketed. During processing of this commercial potato, the tissue damage caused by mechanical processes, as well as the heat treatment employed during cooking, induces the development of enzymatic and non-enzymatic browning reactions. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the influence of industrially employed chemical agents in order to maintain the quality of this product, with stable color and the lowest possible concentration of additives. The reduction of chemical additives offers viable solutions to many of the problems the Sustainable Development Goals are meant to tackle, as they ensure healthy lives, availability and sustainable management of water and promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization.	[do Nascimento, Revenli Fernanda] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Postgrad Program Prod Engn, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil; [Canteri, Maria Helene Giovanetti] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Francisco Beltrao, Parana, Brazil		do Nascimento, RF (corresponding author), Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Postgrad Program Prod Engn, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil.	revenli_fernanda@hotmail.com; canteri.mhg@gmail.com	Canteri, Maria Helene Giovanetti/AAQ-6473-2020	Canteri, Maria Helene Giovanetti/0000-0003-2800-4006; do Nascimento Ostrowski, Revenli Fernanda/0000-0001-9994-9029	Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]	Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES)(Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES))	This study was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES)-Finance Code 001.	AOAC, 2005, OFF METH AN; Barcia MT, 2010, SEMIN-CIENC AGRAR, V31, P381, DOI 10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n2p381; Buckley RR, 2015, ENCY COLOR SCI TECHN, P1; Chaethong K, 2015, J FOOD PROCESS PRES, V39, P2161, DOI 10.1111/jfpp.12460; Damodaran S., 2017, FENNEMAS FOOD CHEM; Fernandes AM, 2010, HORTIC BRAS, V28, P299, DOI 10.1590/S0102-05362010000300010; Fernandes L. M. M., 2013, WORKING PAPER; Fonseca R.R., 2007, WORKING PAPER; Furlaneto K. A., 2014, Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologia Postcosecha, V15, P187; Goyeneche R, 2014, POSTHARVEST BIOL TEC, V93, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.02.011; Jiang GH, 2016, FOOD SCI BIOTECHNOL, V25, P153, DOI 10.1007/s10068-016-0023-9; Kim MJ, 2014, J FOOD BIOCHEM, V38, P542, DOI 10.1111/jfbc.12086; Lovatto MT, 2012, HORTIC BRAS, V30, P258, DOI 10.1590/S0102-05362012000200013; Marangoni A.G., 2017, KINETIC ANAL FOOD SY, P79; Nunes E. E., 2011, Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, V2, P43; Remorini D, 2015, J FOOD PROCESS PRES, V39, P2925, DOI 10.1111/jfpp.12544; Sgroppo SC, 2010, SPAN J AGRIC RES, V8, P686, DOI 10.5424/sjar/2010083-1266; Tan TC, 2015, INT FOOD RES J, V22, P631; Tan TC, 2012, FOOD CHEM, V134, P2430, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.049; Teo CRPA, 2010, REV BRAS ENG AGR AMB, V14, P993, DOI 10.1590/S1415-43662010000900012; Uluata S, 2015, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V63, P1819, DOI 10.1021/jf5053942; Vanier NL, 2015, J FOOD COMPOS ANAL, V41, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.02.008; Vasconcelos CM, 2015, FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH, V8, P1982, DOI 10.1007/s11947-015-1558-0; Virmond E. P., 2014, Ambiencia, V10, P31; Wu D, 2013, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V29, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.08.004; Zorzella C. A., 2003, BRAZ J FOOD TECHNOL, V6, P15	26	7	7	3	19	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0007-070X	1758-4108		BRIT FOOD J	Br. Food J.	NOV 5	2019	122	2					380	389		10.1108/BFJ-05-2019-0322	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2019-0322			10	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Food Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Agriculture; Food Science & Technology	KC0QR					2022-09-08	WOS:000506893100001
J	Tost, M; Hitch, M; Chandurkar, V; Moser, P; Feiel, S				Tost, Michael; Hitch, Michael; Chandurkar, Vighnesh; Moser, Peter; Feiel, Susanne			The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Mining; Weak and strong sustainability; Planetary boundaries; Natural capital; SDGs	ANTHROPOCENE	In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role in the transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry has since then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. But how far has the industry been considering environmental ("strong") sustainability in its approach? And how does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the United Nations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative? This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry has considered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largest mining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as the position of leading organizations. We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage, but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industries on natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreement in its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working with the Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of "strong sustainability" would mean for their business models. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Tost, Michael; Moser, Peter; Feiel, Susanne] Univ Leoben, Chair Min Engn & Mineral Econ, Leoben, Austria; [Hitch, Michael; Chandurkar, Vighnesh] UNSW, Australian Ctr Sustainable Min Practices, Sch Min Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia		Tost, M (corresponding author), Univ Leoben, Chair Min Engn & Mineral Econ, Leoben, Austria.	michael.tost@unileoben.ac.at	Hitch, Michael/AAH-8205-2020; Hitch, Michael/AAE-6734-2022	Hitch, Michael/0000-0002-0893-5973				Agricola G., 1556, ZWOLF BUCHER BERG UN; [Anonymous], 1972, LIMITS GROWTH; [Anonymous], 2002, BREAK NEW GROUND MIN; Ayres R., 1998, VIEWPOINT WEAK VS ST; Brundtland G.H., 1987, MED WAR; Buxton A., 2012, MMSD 10 REFLECTING D; Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 2017, HIST CONV; Dali H., 2011, ECOLOGICAL EC PRINCI; Franks DM, 2015, ROU ST EXTR IND SUST, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315884400; Global Footprint Network, 2017, EC FOOTPR; Global Reporting Initiative, 2016, CONSOLIDATED SET GRI; HARTWICK JM, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P972; ICMM (International Council on Mining & Metals), 2003, ICMM 10 PRINC; International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), 2017, POS STAT WAT STEW; IPCC, 2013, SEA LEVEL CHANGE, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324; IRMA (Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance), 2017, IRMA STAND IN PRESS; Krausmann F., 2009, ECOL EC; MAC (Mining Association of Canada), 2017, TSM 101 A PRIM; Maddison Angus., 2008, HIST STAT WORLD EC; MCA (Minerals Council of Australia), 2015, END VAL PRINC; Moran C., 2014, SUSTAINABILITY IT PE, P16; Moran CJ, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V84, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.016; Moser P, 2016, REINEU C BRAT; Neumayer E., 2003, WEAK VERSUS STRONG S; Philips, 2017, HLTH PEOPLE SUSTAINA; RobecoSam, 2016, IND GROUP LEAD 2016; Rockstrom J, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14; SDSN ( Sustainable Development Solutions Network), 2014, ACT AG SUST DEV; Secretariat of the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity), 2014, GLOB BIOD OUTL 4 SUM; SOLOW RM, 1986, SCAND J ECON, V88, P141, DOI 10.2307/3440280; Steffen W, 2007, AMBIO, V36, P614, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2; Steffen W, 2015, ANTHROPOCENE REV, V2, P81, DOI 10.1177/2053019614564785; Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855; Tost M., 2017, P 8 INT C SUST DEV M; UN FCCC, 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV UN; UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2012, GEO GLOB ENV OUTL 5; United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992, UNITED NATIONS C ENV; United Nations webpage, 2017, PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE; WBCSD, 2010, VIS 2050; WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development), 2014, ACT 2020	41	63	64	3	40	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	MAY 1	2018	182						969	977		10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051			9	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	GB1QW					2022-09-08	WOS:000428826300087
J	Kartikawangi, D				Kartikawangi, Dorien			Symbolic convergence of local wisdom in cross-cultural collaborative social responsibility: Indonesian case	PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW			English	Article						Communication accommodation; Cross cultural communication; CSR; SDG's; Symbolic convergence		Lately, the CSR policies of Multinational Corporations in Indonesia show certain improvements. It cannot be denied that at present the CSRs of Multinational Corporations in Indonesia indicate they are visibly supporting/involved in assisting the attainment of some of the Global Goals for Sustainable Development (SDGs). This study examines the CSR activities of several Multinational Corporations in Indonesia, in particular how they adjust/adapt to the local wisdom in their efforts to attain their CSR goals. The main theory applied in our study is the Symbolic Convergence Theory, supported by the Accommodation Communication Theory. Three Multinational Corporations in Indonesia were chosen as subjects of this research. Analysis is based on the Collaborative Social Responsibility Model (Kartikawangi, 2015) and Cross Cultural Communication Competence in Business Interaction models (Kartikawangi et al., 2016). At present "positive" actions are increasing by companies in efforts to better understand the society they are working in. Clearer understandings of local, regional and national societal factors are required to enhance the corporation's product development programs, marketing strategies, and CSR strategies. Local, regional and national societal groups are in positions to choose what should be provided by the companies in achieving shared and practical Symbolic Convergence meanings. The societal groups actively present their aspirations, but also the aspirations and local wisdom that must be absorbed by the company. Symbolic Convergence in the relationship is built by all interacting parties. These interactions include the companies, government and local society. Meanwhile, the media also assist in developing awareness through the dissemination of various balanced information in the form of social disclosures. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.	[Kartikawangi, Dorien] Atma Jaya Catholic Univ, Sch Commun, Jakarta, Indonesia		Kartikawangi, D (corresponding author), Atma Jaya Catholic Univ, Sch Commun, Jakarta, Indonesia.	dorien.kartika@atmajaya.ac.id	Kartikawangi, Dorien/ABB-8713-2022; Kartikawangi, Dorien/AAD-8324-2021	Kartikawangi, Dorien/0000-0002-1537-1360				Bales R.F, 1950, INTERACTION PROCESS; Barbaro G, 2006, J COMMUN MANAG, V10, P44, DOI 10.1108/13632540610646364; Bateman & Snell, 2009, MANAGEMENT LEADING C; Bateman T.S., 2004, MANAGEMENT NEW COMPE; Close AG, 2006, J ADVERTISING RES, V46, P420, DOI 10.2501/S0021849906060430; Coulter Mary, 2010, MANAJEMEN EDISI KESE; CRAGAN JF, 1998, UNDERSTANDING COMMUN; Daft R. L., 2010, NEW ERA MANAGEMENT; Daymon C, 2008, METODE METODE RISET; Gallois Cindy, 2005, COMMUNICATION ACCOMM; Gomez Balkin, 2008, MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PE; Griffin, 2008, MANAGEMENT HOUGHTONE; Gudykunst W. B., 2003, THEORIZING INTERCULT; Gudykunst WB, 1997, COMMUN RES, V24, P327, DOI 10.1177/009365097024004001; Gudykunst WB, 1984, COMMUNICATING STRANG; Jablin F.M., 1994, EMERGING PERSPECTIVE, P114; Jablin M., 2001, NEW HDB ORG COMMUNIC; Jenkins C, 2007, CORP REPUT REV, V10, P305, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550059; Kartikawangi D., 2013, INT J SOCIAL SCI HUM, V5; Kartikawangi D., 2016, CROSS CULT COMM C; Kartikawangi D., 2015, 2 INT C MED COMM CUL; Kartikawangi D., 2013, FANTASY THEME BUSINE; Kinicki A., 2009, MANAGEMENT PRACTICAL; Littlejohn Stephen W., 2005, THEORIES HUMAN COMMU; Martin J. N., 1997, READINGS CULTURAL CO; Milliken FJ, 1996, ACAD MANAGE REV, V21, P402, DOI 10.2307/258667; Molleda J. C., 2003, ANN M INT COMM ASS; Newman W. L., 2006, SOCIAL RES METHOD QU; Schermerhorn, 2010, INTRO MANAGEMENT; Shields D. C., 1995, SYMBOLIC THEORIES AP; SMITH A, 2003, J COMMUNICATION MANA, V7, P254	31	7	7	4	35	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA	0363-8111	1873-4537		PUBLIC RELAT REV	Public Relat. Rev.	MAR	2017	43	1					35	45		10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.012	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.012			11	Business; Communication	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Communication	EN4FD					2022-09-08	WOS:000395962500005
J	Schulhof, V; van Vuuren, D; Kirchherr, J				Schulhof, Vera; van Vuuren, Detlef; Kirchherr, Julian			The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What Will it Look Like in the Future?	TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE			English	Article						Future scenarios; Scenario analysis; Belt and Road Initiative; BRI; Chinese foreign direct investment/FDI; Energy; Foreign policy; Multilateralism; Globalisation; SDG; Sustainability	CLIMATE-CHANGE RESEARCH; SOUTH TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; CHINA BELT; SCENARIO FRAMEWORK; DOMESTIC POLITICS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; GLOBALIZATION; MULTILATERALISM; INVESTMENT; POLICY	China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), labelled as the world's largest infrastructure program, has so far directed investments mainly to energy and transportation networks in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Since its launch, the BRI has changed significantly in terms of scale, stakeholders, and investment sectors and continues to evolve, also in light of the COVID-19 crisis. However, so far, there is no systematic and comprehensive analysis of how it might look like in the medium-term future (2035), even though academic literature on the BRI is burgeoning. We address this research gap and apply a scenario method with a 2 x 2 matrix, building on insights from similar to 40 qualitative interviews with representatives from business, non-profit and public sectors from China and BRI countries, complemented by desk research of press and academic articles. We conceptualise the BRI alongside its degree of economic globalisation and multilateralism, which are both impacted by the global pandemic response. We arrive at the four scenarios Asian, Vibrant, Irrelevant, and International BRI. These scenarios show that different development are possible with the BRI' s geographical scope, the investment volumes and sectors, the funding structure, and also the orientation towards sustainability. These post-pandemic pathways of the BRI might help decision-makers in business and politics to prepare their responses and strategies. The scenarios can also inform the academic debate around conceptualising the BRI and provide a qualitative basis for future quantitative impact assessments.	[Schulhof, Vera; van Vuuren, Detlef; Kirchherr, Julian] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands; [van Vuuren, Detlef] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, The Hague, Netherlands		Schulhof, V (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies Grp, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.	v.k.schulhof@uu.nl; detlef.vanvuuren@pbl.nl; j.kirchherr@uu.nl						Akon M.S., 2020, RESHAPING GLOBAL ORD, V02, DOI [10.1142/S2630531320500067, DOI 10.1142/S2630531320500067]; Ali M, 2020, CONTEMP SOUTH ASIA, V28, P100, DOI 10.1080/09584935.2019.1667302; Allen-Ebrahimian E., 2020, CHINA ENVISIONS CENT; Altmann S. A., 2020, WILL COVID 19 HAVE L; Amer M, 2013, FUTURES, V46, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003; an H., 2018, CHINA IS MASSIVELY B; Andornino GB, 2017, CHINA WORLD ECON, V25, P4, DOI 10.1111/cwe.12211; [Anonymous], 2020, NATURE, V585, P481, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-02697-4; [Anonymous], 2000, EUR J INT LAW, V11, P339; [Anonymous], 2017, CHINAS INVOLVEMENT C; [Anonymous], INT ECON ECON POL, V17, P659, DOI [10.1007/s10368- 020-00470-6, DOI 10.1007/S10368-020-00470-6]; [Anonymous], 2018, GREENING BELT ROAD I; Ascensao F, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P206, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3; Asian Development Bank, 2017, M AS INFR NEEDS MAN, DOI DOI 10.22617/FLS168388-2; Babones S., 2020, CHINAS SUPERPOWER DR; Baldwin R., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC, P111; Ballard B., 2020, CAUGHT DEBT TRAP; Barbieri P, 2020, OPER MANAGE RES, V13, P131, DOI 10.1007/s12063-020-00160-1; Barua Jahnabi, 2020, UNDERTOW, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3566477; Bauwens T, 2020, ECOL ECON, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703; BBC, 2020, BBC NEWS 0922; Bitabarova A.G., 2018, J CONT E ASIA STUDIE, V7, P149, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1553226, DOI 10.1080/24761028.2018.1553226]; Boo B. C., 2020, WILL COVID 19 AFFECT; Brakman S, 2019, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V12, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsy037; Brands H., 2020, THE JAPAN TIMES; Brinza A., 2019, CHINA CAN REPLACE BE; Buckley PJ, 2020, J INT BUS POLICY, V3, P311, DOI 10.1057/s42214-020-00063-9; Buckley PJ, 2008, MANAGE INT REV, V48, P715, DOI 10.1007/s11575-008-0104-y; Cai X, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V198, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.291; Callahan WA, 2005, REV INT STUD, V31, P701, DOI 10.1017/S0260210505006716; Callahan WA, 2016, ASIAN J COMP POLITIC, V1, P226, DOI 10.1177/2057891116647806; Carey L., 2019, CHINESE MULTILATERAL; CCICED, 2016, S S COOP EC CIV; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; CGTN, 2020, FULL TEXT XI JINP SP; Chan E., 2019, CHINA GROWTH SLOW 2; Chazan, 2020, FINANC TIMES; Chen H., 2020, WILL CHINAS CARBON N; Chen Y., 2020, WILL CHINA LEAPFROG; Cheng S, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111960; Chin GT, 2019, GLOB POLICY, V10, P569, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12767; Chubarov IG, 2018, MIROVAYA EKON MEZHD, V62, P25, DOI 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-1-25-33; Coenen J, 2021, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V31, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.1901; Corbetta R, 2004, POLIT RES QUART, V57, P5, DOI 10.1177/106591290405700101; Cordell K., 2020, EVOLVING RELATIONSHI; Crawford N., 2020, CHINA CONFRONTS MAJO; Curry A, 2009, J FUTURES STUD, V13, P35; de Graaff N, 2020, REV INT POLIT ECON, V27, P191, DOI 10.1080/09692290.2019.1709880; De Jonge A, 2017, INT AFF, V93, P1061, DOI 10.1093/ia/iix156; Demongeot M., 2020, BIG PICTURE BELT ROA; Devonshire -Ellis C., 2020, CHINESE CO HUNTING L; Dreher A, 2006, APPL ECON, V38, P1091, DOI 10.1080/00036840500392078; Duan WJ, 2020, J CHIN ECON BUS STUD, V18, P355, DOI 10.1080/14765284.2020.1855395; Dunford M, 2019, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V12, P145, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsy032; Dupont A., 2020, US CHINA COLD WAR HA; EEFA, 2020, EXP SEE GROW STAND A; Eilstrup-Sangiovanni M, 2020, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V27, P1077, DOI 10.1080/13501763.2019.1678665; Enderwick Peter, 2021, Critical Perspectives on International Business, V17, P463, DOI 10.1108/cpoib-06-2020-0070; Feigenbaum E. A., 2020, ASIAS FUTURE US CHIN; Feng E., 2020, CHINAS EC BOUNCES BA; Ferdinand P, 2016, INT AFF, V92, P941, DOI 10.1111/1468-2346.12660; Fereday J., 2006, DEMONSTRATING RIGOR; Fjaertoft TE, 2020, GLOB POLICY, V11, P170, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12736; forza A., 2020, GLOBALIZATION TIME C; Frazier AE, 2019, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V34, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00772-4; Fukuyama F, 2020, FOREIGN AFF, V99, P26; Fusch PI, 2015, QUAL REP, V20, P1408; Gabusi G, 2020, INT SPECT, V55, P17, DOI 10.1080/03932729.2020.1782071; Gallagher KS, 2021, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101827; Garlick J, 2018, J CONTEMP CHINA, V27, P519, DOI 10.1080/10670564.2018.1433483; Gaspar JD, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V75, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.048; Gelb S., 2020, IMPORTANT MOMENT MUL; Gellers J.C., 2019, WISCONSIN INT LAW J, V36, P276; Gholizadeh A, 2020, MARIT BUS REV, V5, P335, DOI 10.1108/MABR-11-2019-0051; Gibson J, 2018, ASIA PAC POLICY STU, V5, P168, DOI 10.1002/app5.237; Glover D, 2016, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V47, P55, DOI 10.19088/1968-2016.155; Gonzalez A., 2020, COULD CORONAVIRUS PA; Goron C, 2018, CHINA PERSPECT, P38; Green BRI Center, BELT ROAD IN INT GRE; Green BRI Center, COUNTR BELT ROAD IN; Gu YF, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104654; Gurria A., 2019, WHAT WE NEED IS MOR; Gygli S, 2019, REV INT ORGAN, V14, P543, DOI 10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2; Habib A M., 2020, CORONAVIRUS THREATEN; Han A., 2021, COVID 19 PANDEMIC RA; Han DH, 2011, KOREAN J INT STUD, V9, P39, DOI 10.14731/kjis.2011.06.9.1.39; Hanson A., 2019, ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZAT, DOI [10.22617/WPS190604-2, DOI 10.22617/WPS190604-2]; Harvey F., 2020, CHINA PLEDGES BECOME; He BG, 2019, J CONTEMP CHINA, V28, P180, DOI 10.1080/10670564.2018.1511391; He CF, 2015, POST-COMMUNIST ECON, V27, P448, DOI 10.1080/14631377.2015.1084716; Hecking C., 2020, CORONA WIRTSCHAFT CH; Henderson J, 2013, DEV CHANGE, V44, P1221, DOI 10.1111/dech.12066; Hensengerth O., 2017, J CURRENT CHINESE AF, V46, P85, DOI 10.1177/186810261704600304; Hensengerth O, 2019, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V34, P121, DOI 10.1177/0952076717753279; Hensengerth O, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V114, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.039; Hensengerth O, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P911, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1088334; Hevia C., 2020, C19PDS UNDP; Hillmann J., 2018, BIG IS CHINAS BELT R; Hilton I., 2019, CHINAS BIG OVERSEAS; Huang YP, 2016, CHINA ECON REV, V40, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007; Huang Yuangfu, 2020, BELT ROAD INITIATIVE; Hubner W, 2020, ACTA OECON, V70, P47, DOI 10.1556/032.2020.00025; Hughes AC, 2019, CONSERV BIOL, V33, P883, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13317; Hurley J, 2019, J INFRASTRUCT POLICY, V3, P139, DOI 10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123; IMF WUI, 2020, WUI; IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000, EMISSIONS SCENARIOS; IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001, 3 ASS REP TAR; Janicke M, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V48, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045; Jakimow M, 2019, ASIA EUR J, V17, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10308-019-00561-3; James H, 2012, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V28, P411, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grs028; Jones L, 2020, FUDAN J HUM SOC SCI, V13, P113, DOI 10.1007/s40647-019-00252-8; Jones L, 2019, THIRD WORLD Q, V40, P1415, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046; Joshi P, 2021, INDIA REV, V20, P247, DOI 10.1080/14736489.2021.1875698; Junio TJ, 2013, INT STUD REV, V15, P374, DOI 10.1111/misr.12061; Kahn ME, 2011, CLIM CHANG ECON, V2, P257, DOI 10.1142/S2010007811000292; Kaltenecker E., 2020, GEOPOLITICAL FACTORS; KEOHANE RO, 1990, INT J, V45, P731, DOI 10.2307/40202705; Kirchherr J, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201710; Kirchherr J, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V102, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.058; Kirchherr J, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V41, P33, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.]; Koop F., 2020, CORONAVIRUS RESHAPES; Kriegler E, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P401, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5; Kurlantzik J., 2020, CHINAS DIGITAL SILK; Lancaster K., 2020, MAPPING CHINAS HLTH; Lancaster K, 2017, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V20, P93, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555; Leach M., 2019, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V1; Leitao NC., 2014, INT J ENERGY EC POLI, V3, P391; Lelyveld M., 2019, CHINAS BELT ROAD INI; Leverett F, 2017, CHINA J, V77, P110, DOI 10.1086/689684; Li MJ, 2020, INT AFF, V96, P169, DOI 10.1093/ia/iiz240; Li Y, 2018, J CHIN ECON BUS STUD, V16, P233, DOI 10.1080/14765284.2018.1491667; Li ZH, 2019, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V55, P3211, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1569512; Lin BQ, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112438; Lin WQ, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.001; Liu C., 2020, US EXITS WHO DESPITE; Liu LN, 2021, ASIAN J POLIT SCI, V29, P88, DOI 10.1080/02185377.2020.1837193; Liu WD, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P1199, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1520-y; Liu WD, 2016, AREA DEV POLICY, V1, P323, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2016.1232598; Losos E., 2019, REDUCING ENV RISKS B, DOI [10.1596/1813-9450-8718, DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-8718]; Lu J, 2021, GLOBALIZATIONS, V18, P422, DOI 10.1080/14747731.2020.1796159; Luo CY, 2019, WORLD ECON, V42, P3464, DOI 10.1111/twec.12895; Ma J, 2019, DECARBONIZING BELT R; Ma W. W., 2020, DIGITAL SILK ROAD CH; Marchang R, 2021, J ASIAN SECUR INT AF, V8, P249, DOI 10.1177/23477970211017732; Mardell J., 2020, CHINAS HLTH SILK ROA; Marshall MN, 1996, FAM PRACT, V13, P522, DOI 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522; McKibbin W, 2021, ASIAN ECON PAP, V20, P1, DOI 10.1162/asep_a_00796; Meissner P, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.011; Menton M, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1621, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8; Miller MC, 2016, CHIN J INT POLIT, V9, P211, DOI 10.1093/cjip/pow006; Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the PRC, 2017, GUID PROM GREEN BELT; Mohan G, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P1368, DOI 10.1177/0042098018794351; Mouritz F., 2020, CONNECTIONS, V19, P115; Nanwani S, 2019, GLOB POLICY, V10, P284, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12666; NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission), 2021, 13 5 YEAR PLAN EC SO; Nedopil C., 2020, CHINAS INVESTMENTS B; Nedopil Wang C., 2020, PUBLIC; Neumann I., 2004, INT STUDIES PERSPECT, V5, P258, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1528-3577.2004.00173.X; Di Lan N, 2019, E ASIA-NETHERLANDS, V36, P229, DOI 10.1007/s12140-019-09318-6; O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2; OECD, 2020, OECD EC OUTLOOK, DOI [10.1787/34ffc900-en, DOI 10.1787/34FFC900-EN]; OECD, 2019, CHIN NEEDS FURTH REF; oon Y., 2020, ASIAS NEW COLD WAR; oong J. -J., 2020, PERSPECTIVES STATE S, V54, P1, DOI [10.1080/ 10971475.2020.1809813, DOI 10.1080/10971475.2020.1809813]; Oxford Analytica, 2019, CHIN SAT WILL BUILD; Ozturk I., 2019, WORKING PAPERS E ASI, V125; Palit A., 2020, RESILIENT SUPPLY CHA; Pandey A., 2020, CORONAVIRUS COULD FO; Paradise JF, 2019, J CHIN POLIT SCI, V24, P471, DOI 10.1007/s11366-019-09610-5; Parpart U., 2020, GERMANY BATTLES HUAW; Pearl H., 2020, CHINA SLOW CURB COAL; Pettinotti L., 2020, CHINAS PLEDGE CLIMAT; Pfeiffer A, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabc5f; Pfeiffer A, 2016, APPL ENERG, V179, P1395, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.093; Pike L., 2019, BELT ROAD COUNTRIES; Plant M., 2019, CHINAS NEW DEBT SUST; Potrafke N, 2015, WORLD ECON, V38, P509, DOI 10.1111/twec.12174; Pyzhikov NS, 2021, MIROVAYA EKON MEZHD, V65, P42, DOI 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-3-42-51; Ramirez R, 2014, FORESIGHT, V16, P54, DOI 10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061; Ramirez R, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V86, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.020; Rees W.E., 2002, B SCI TECHNOL SOC, V22, P249, DOI [10.1177/, DOI 10.1177/0270467602022004001]; Reuters, 2020, CHINA CALLS GLOB GRE; Rolland N., 2019, CONCISE GUIDE BELT R; Romann A., 2020, BELT ROAD BEST HOPE; Rowland NJ, 2015, FORESIGHT, V17, P557, DOI 10.1108/FS-02-2015-0014; Ruan X, 2019, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V46, P905, DOI 10.1080/03088839.2019.1594425; RUGGIE JG, 1993, MULTILATERALISM MATT; Runde D. F., 2020, RECOVERY RESILIENCE; Sachdeva G., 2018, INT STUDIES, V55, P285, DOI 10.1177/0020881718807359; Sachs J., 2020, CONSILIENCE, P1, DOI [10.7916/consilience.vi22.6729, DOI 10.7916/CONSILIENCE.VI22.6729]; Saidi K, 2015, ENERGY REP, V1, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2015.01.003; Saldinger A., 2019, GLOBAL PUBLIC GOOD; Samimi P, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087824; Sandalow D., 2020, CHINAS RESPONSE CLIM; Sarker M.N.I., 2018, OPEN J SOCIAL SCI, V06, DOI 10.4236/jss.2018.64011; Sarsenbayev M, 2020, CHINA WORLD ECON, V28, P84, DOI 10.1111/cwe.12322; Saunders B, 2018, QUAL QUANT, V52, P1893, DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8; Sautmann H., 2019, TRUTH SRI LANKAS HAM; Schindler S., 2020, RES GLOBALIZATION, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100020, DOI 10.1016/J.RESGLO.2020.100020]; Schirrmeister E., 2020, FUTURES FORESIGHT SC, V2, pe31, DOI [10.1002/ ffo2.31, DOI 10.1002/FFO2.31, 10.1002/ffo2.31]; Scruggs L, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002; Seitz S, 2016, QUAL RES, V16, P229, DOI 10.1177/1468794115577011; Shen S, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0077-9; Shepherd C., 2020, CHINAS BELT ROAD URG; Spaniol Matthew J., 2019, Futures & Foresight Science, V1, DOI 10.1002/ffo2.3; Stanway D., 2021, REUTER ENERGY; State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2015, FULL TEXT ACT PLAN B; State Council of the People's Republic of China (PRC), 2015, CHRONOLOGY CHINAS BE; Statista, 2020, LEAD COUNTR WORLDW 2; Sus M, 2020, CONTEMP SECUR POL, V41, P432, DOI 10.1080/13523260.2020.1730055; Svarstad H., 2011, POLICYMIX ASSESSING, P1; Swain J., 2018, HYBRID APPROACH THEM, DOI [10.4135/9781526435477, DOI 10.4135/9781526435477]; Tan-Mullins M., 2017, J CURRENT CHINESE AF, V46, P3, DOI [10.1177/186810261704600301, DOI 10.1177/186810261704600301]; Tang F., 2020, CORONAVIRUS US CHINA; Tao M., 2021, CHINA EC, V16, DOI [10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2021.07.05, DOI 10.19602/J.CHINAECONOMIST.2021.07.05]; Teo HC, 2019, ENVIRONMENTS, V6, DOI 10.3390/environments6060072; Tjia YNL, 2020, CHINA J, V83, P58, DOI 10.1086/706743; Tonchev P., 2020, POSSIBLE POSTPANDEMI; Trevelyan L., 2020, IS WORLD ENTERING NE; UN Statistical Office, 1962, ANN I NOT SOURC METH; UNCTAD, 2020, GLOB TRAD IMP COR CO; UNEP-UN Environment Programme, 2019, BELT ROAD IN IN GREE; Urban F, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V113, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.007; Urban Frauke, 2013, Environment Development and Sustainability, V15, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10668-012-9415-z; Urban Frauke, 2013, Environment Development and Sustainability, V15, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10668-012-9411-3; van Vuuren DP, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.009; van Vuuren DP, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P373, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1; van Vuuren DP, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P415, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0974-2; Vanham P., 2019, BRIEF HIST GLOBALIZA; Vervoort JM, 2015, FUTURES, V74, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.009; Vogl S, 2013, SOCIOL METHODOL, V43, P133, DOI 10.1177/0081175012465967; Voros J., 2003, Foresight, V5, P10, DOI 10.1108/14636680310698379; Wang H, 2019, J INT ECON LAW, V22, P29, DOI 10.1093/jiel/jgy048; Wang Y, 2016, PAC REV, V29, P455, DOI 10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690; Ward JD, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733; Watts J., 2020, COULD COVID LOCKDOWN; Wedgwood R., 2002, MULTILATERALISM US F, P167; Weinhardt C, 2020, REV INT POLIT ECON, V27, P258, DOI 10.1080/09692290.2019.1699145; Welfens PJJ, 2020, INT ECON ECON POL, V17, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10368-020-00479-x; Weller S, 2017, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V20, P613, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505; Wiig A, 2019, REG STUD, V53, P912, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566703; Wilkinson A, 2009, J FUTURES STUD, V13, P107; Williams J, 2020, GEOGR J, V186, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12332; Winter T, 2021, GEOPOLITICS, V26, P1376, DOI 10.1080/14650045.2020.1718656; Wintour P., 2020, GUARDIAN; Wood J., 2020, RESUMING FIELD RES P; World Bank, 2017, BELT ROAD CHINESE WO; Wu SH, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P483, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1611-4; Wuttke J, 2017, GLOB POLICY, V8, P62, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12439; Xiao A., 2020, CHINAS BELT ROAD INI; Xinhua, 2020, MULTILATERALISM MATT; Xinhua, 2017, BELT ROADINCORPORATE; Ye M, 2021, ASIA POLICY, V16, P65; Ye M, 2019, J CONTEMP CHINA, V28, P696, DOI 10.1080/10670564.2019.1580428; Yeoh E.K.-K., 2020, CONT CHINESE POLITIC, V6, P373; Zeng JH, 2019, GLOB POLICY, V10, P207, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12662; Zeng JH, 2017, JCMS-J COMMON MARK S, V55, P1162, DOI 10.1111/jcms.12535; Zhai F, 2018, J ASIAN ECON, V55, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006; Zhang ZL, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8030222; Zhao YJ, 2021, BRIT J POLIT INT REL, V23, P280, DOI 10.1177/1369148120987464; Zhou JY, 2020, CHIN J COMP LAW, V8, P384, DOI 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa022; Zhou L, 2018, MOVING GREEN BELT RO; Zhu V., 2020, WHAT EXPECT CHINAS N; Zoi Environment Network, 2019, GREEN BELT ROAD PROJ; Zou YZ, 2020, J CONTEMP CHINA, V29, P92, DOI 10.1080/10670564.2019.1621532	265	2	2	12	12	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0040-1625	1873-5509		TECHNOL FORECAST SOC	Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.	FEB	2022	175								121306	10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121306	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121306			17	Business; Regional & Urban Planning	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Public Administration	0D4DC		hybrid, Green Published			2022-09-08	WOS:000775946700003
J	Chhabra, S; Sindhi, S; Nandy, M				Chhabra, Sakhhi; Sindhi, Sumita; Nandy, Merlin			Factors Affecting the Adoption of Slow Fashion - An Exploratory Study of Multiple Stakeholders	JOURNAL OF MACROMARKETING			English	Article; Early Access						Handloom; slow fashion; sustainable fashion; thematic analysis; matrix analysis; weavers; barriers; support mechanism	SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TEXTILE; IMPLEMENTATION; ENTERPRISE; BARRIERS	The growing consumer consciousness is accelerating the interest in sustainable products that offer better value and longevity. Slow fashion is one such philosophy that aims to provide meaningful and sustainable products advocating the needs of stakeholders. In this exploratory study, we find the barriers and support mechanisms affecting the adoption of slow fashion, specifically Indian handloom. The handloom industry is gradually depleting, posing challenges for stakeholders in the value chain. Though the extant literature delineates several factors, it does not explain the inter-factor interactions nor integrates these factors into themes. We conducted 36 in-depth multi-stakeholder interviews and found eight barriers preventing handloom adoption as a slow fashion alternative and five support mechanisms that counter these barriers. An extensive thematic analysis, led to seventeen sub-themes as barriers and eleven sub-themes as support mechanisms. We established a framework through matrix analysis to map support mechanisms addressing the corresponding barriers. The study's practical implications can be related to UN SDGs.	[Chhabra, Sakhhi] Xavier Sch Management Delhi NCR, Delhi, India; [Sindhi, Sumita] Indian Inst Management Sambalpur, Sambalpur, Odisha, India; [Nandy, Merlin] Indian Inst Management Sambalpur, Informat Syst, Sambalpur, Odisha, India		Chhabra, S (corresponding author), Xavier Sch Management Delhi NCR, Delhi, India.	sakhhichhabra@xlri.ac.in		Chhabra, Sakhhi/0000-0002-0705-0030				Aboagyewaa-Ntiri J., 2016, INT BUSINESS RES, V9, P127; Abraham V., 2010, LABOUR COST EXPORT B; Adhikari R., 2007, IND POLICY 21 CENTUR, P183; Ahmed M.U., 1999, ASIAN AFF, V21, P4; Akter S., 2005, BRAC U J, V2, P1; [Anonymous], 2020, HANDLOOM CENSUS; [Anonymous], 2021, MORDOR INTELLIGENCE; Balaji NC, 2014, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V13, P323, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2014.037; Bhagyashri Annaldewar, 2021, IMPACT COVID 19 SUST, DOI [10.1007/978-981-16-3860-2_4, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-3860-2_4]; Bhunia A., 2016, INDIA SPEND; Bortamuly AB, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V90, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.018; Boyatzis R., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA; Brandao A, 2021, EUR BUS REV, V33, P742, DOI 10.1108/EBR-11-2020-0306; Bryman A, 2012, SOCIAL RES METHODS, V4th; Chandra P, 2006, TEXTILE APPAREL IND, P525; Chatterjee A., 2015, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V50, P34; Chi T, 2011, J TEXT I, V102, P837, DOI 10.1080/00405000.2010.524361; Clark H, 2008, FASH THEORY, V12, P427, DOI 10.2752/175174108X346922; Creswell J., 2002, PLANNING CONDUCTING; Das Mohapatra A.K, 2020, TEST ENG MANAGEMENT, V83, P7055; Decker M., 2006, P INT C E BUSINESS I, P169; Deshpande N., 2018, WIRE 0807; Di Benedetto CA, 2017, J GLOB FASH MARK, V8, P251, DOI 10.1080/20932685.2017.1329023; Diabat A, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V83, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.081; Faisal MN, 2010, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V16, P508, DOI 10.1108/14637151011049476; Fiber2Fashion, 2012, CHANGING WORLD FASHI; Fletcher K., 2014, SUSTAINABLE FASHION; Fletcher Kate, 2010, FASHION PRACTICE, V2, DOI DOI 10.2752/175693810X12774625387594; Gale NK, 2013, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117; Groenl, 2018, INT J BUSINESS GLOBA, V21, P119, DOI [10.1504/ijbg.2018.10015276, DOI 10.1504/IJBG.2018.10015276]; Grose L, 2012, FASHION SUSTAINABILI; Handloom Export Promotion Council, 2019, US; Harvie C, 2004, 0416 U WOLL DEP EC; Hazarika B, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.009; Hethorn J, 2008, SUSTAINABLE FASHION; Hussain M., 2011, THESIS; Islam M.M., 2013, REJ ENG SCI, V2, P33; Jain M., 2016, 3 CHARTS SHOW INDIAN; Jain S., 2017, P 92 IASTEM INT C; Johnston A., 2012, 1 STEPS CONSIDERATE; Jujjuvarapu SeshuKumar., 2018, J ADV RES DYNAMICAL, V10, P391; Jung SJ, 2014, INT J CONSUM STUD, V38, P510, DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12127; Kar SK, 2012, SOC BUS REV, V7, P114, DOI 10.1108/17465681211237592; Kemp R., 2008, SYSTEM INNOVATION SU, P369; Khan A.A., 2010, RES J INT STUDIES, V14, P21; Khare A, 2020, J INT CONSUM MARK, V32, P228, DOI 10.1080/08961530.2019.1695239; Kong HM, 2016, J GLOB FASH MARK, V7, P103, DOI 10.1080/20932685.2015.1131435; Kongmanila Xayphone., 2009, INT J EC MANAGEMENT, V3 (2), P225; Lang CM, 2013, INT J CONSUM STUD, V37, P706, DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12060; Lee YJ, 2012, J GLOB FASH MARK, V3, P42, DOI 10.1080/20932685.2012.10593106; Markkula A, 2012, J CONSUM POLICY, V35, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10603-011-9184-3; Mathiyazhagan K, 2014, INT J PROD RES, V52, P188, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.831190; McKeown C, 2019, J CONSUM BEHAV, V18, P406, DOI 10.1002/cb.1780; Trivedi PM, 2020, GLOB BUS REV, DOI 10.1177/0972150920907251; Mondal C, 2018, ADV INTELL SYST, V588, P821, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_83; Moon KKL, 2015, J TEXT I, V106, P939, DOI 10.1080/00405000.2014.955293; Niinimaki K, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P1876, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020; Pandya A, 2011, INDIAN TEXTILE IND P; Panigrahi SS, 2018, RES J TEXT APPAR, V22, P59, DOI 10.1108/RJTA-07-2017-0036; Perry P, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V130, P737, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2252-2; Pookulangara S, 2013, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V20, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.002; Prathap Sangeetha., 2020, J HUMANITIES APPL SO, P2632, DOI [10.1108/JHASS-04-2020-0055, DOI 10.1108/JHASS-04-2020-0055]; Raichurkar Pramod., 2015, INT J TEXTILE ENG PR, V1, P47; Raut R, 2019, BENCHMARKING, V26, P371, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0340; Ritchie J., 2013, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC; Shah S. S. H., 2012, ASIAN J BUSINESS MAN, V4, P105; Shen B, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P6236, DOI 10.3390/su6096236; Sivasakthi R., 2018, INT J CIVIL ENG TECH, V9, P103; Slow Fashion Award, 2010, CAST YOUR ART; Sundari B. Syama, 2017, WIRE; SunderA Shetty, 2001, STAFF RES STUDY OFFI; Tarai S, 2020, J TEXTILE ENG FASHIO, V6, P133; Tewari M., 2001, CHALLENGE REFORM TAM; Trehan D, 2020, J PUBLIC AFF, V20, DOI 10.1002/pa.2415; Umarji V., 2015, BUSINESS STANDARD; Verma Servjaeta, 2018, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, V23, P101; Wanniarachchi T, 2020, RES J TEXT APPAR, V24, P111, DOI 10.1108/RJTA-09-2019-0041; Warren C.A., 2002, HDB INTERVIEW RES CO; WBCSD, 2008, SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPT; Yoganandan G., 2013, LIFE SCI J, V10, P1145; You S., 2009, INT J FASHION DESIGN, V2, P33, DOI DOI 10.1080/17543260903055141	81	0	0	1	1	SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC	THOUSAND OAKS	2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA	0276-1467	1552-6534		J MACROMARKETING	J. Macromarketing												10.1177/02761467221116294	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02761467221116294		AUG 2022	18	Business	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	3L1UX					2022-09-08	WOS:000834554500001
J	Benson, NU; Fred-Ahmadu, OH; Bassey, DE; Atayero, AA				Benson, Nsikak U.; Fred-Ahmadu, Omowunmi H.; Bassey, David E.; Atayero, Aderemi A.			COVID-19 pandemic and emerging plastic-based personal protective equipment waste pollution and management in Africa	JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING			English	Article						SARS-CoV-2; Single-use plastics; COVID plastic wastes; Plastic pollution; SDG 3; SDG 11; SDG 14		The threat of plastic waste pollution in African countries is increasing exponentially since the World Health Organisation declared the coronavirus infection as a pandemic. Fundamental to this growing threat are multiple factors, including the increased public consumption for single-use plastics, limited or non-existence of adequate plastic waste management infrastructures, and urbanisation. Plastics-based personal protective equipment including millions of surgical masks, medical gowns, face shields, safety glasses, protective aprons, sanitiser containers, plastics shoes, and gloves have been widely used for the reduction of exposure risk to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This paper estimates and elucidates the growing plethora of plastic wastes in African countries in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectral fingerprint indicates that face masks were characterised by natural and artificial fibres including polyester fibres, polypropylene, natural latex resin. Our estimate suggests that over 12 billion medical and fabric face masks are discarded monthly, giving the likelihood that an equivalent of about 105,000 tonnes of face masks per month could be disposed into the environment by Africans. In general, 15 out of 57 African countries are significant plastic waste contributors with Nigeria (15%), Ethiopia (8.6%), Egypt (7.6%), DR Congo (6.7%), Tanzania (4.5%), and South Africa (4.4%) topping the list. Therefore, this expert insight is an attempt to draw the attention of governments, healthcare agencies, and the public to the potential risks of SARS-CoV-2-generated plastics (COVID plastic wastes), and the environmental impacts that could exacerbate the existing plastic pollution epidemic after the COVID-19 pandemic.	[Benson, Nsikak U.; Fred-Ahmadu, Omowunmi H.] Covenant Univ, Dept Chem, Analyt & Environm Chem Unit, Ota, Nigeria; [Bassey, David E.] DR Energy Serv Inc, Calgary, AB, Canada; [Atayero, Aderemi A.] Covenant Univ, Dept Elect & Informat Engn, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria		Benson, NU (corresponding author), Covenant Univ, Dept Chem, Analyt & Environm Chem Unit, Ota, Nigeria.	nbenson@covenantuniversity.edu.ng	Atayero, Aderemi A./O-1355-2013; Benson, Nsikak/F-6522-2011	Atayero, Aderemi A./0000-0002-4427-2679; Benson, Nsikak/0000-0002-1285-579X				Adam I, 2020, MAR POLICY, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103928; Africa CDC, 2020, GUID ENV DEC CONT CO; Ahmed SA, 2004, HABITAT INT, V28, P467, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00044-4; Amereh F, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114158; [Anonymous], 2020, ALJAZEERA NEWS; Asim M, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V58, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.013; Aydin O., 2020, PERFORMANCE FABRICS, DOI [10.1101/2020.0419.20071779, DOI 10.1101/2020.0419.20071779]; Baskaran S, 2020, VIB SPECTROSC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.vibspec.2020.103105; Benson NU, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V730, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139013; Bhadra S, 2019, POLYM TEST, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106066; Bogoch II, 2020, J TRAVEL MED, V27, DOI 10.1093/jtm/taaa008; Boyle l, 2020, DISCARDED CORONAVIRU; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, HIV SURV REP; Chae Y, 2017, MAR POLLUT BULL, V124, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.070; Chaudhuri S, 2020, WAR PLASTIC TAKES BA; Chin AWH, 2020, LANCET MICROBE, V1, pE10, DOI [10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30003-3, 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30095-1]; Delloitte, 2014, DELL CONS REV AFR 21; EU European Union, 2020, WAST MAN CONT COR CR; Folorunsho-Francis F, 2020, SCAVENGERS PICK FACE; Fred-Ahmadu OH, 2020, REG STUD MAR SCI, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101365; Fred-Ahmadu OH, 2020, DATA BRIEF, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105755; Furukawa Nathan W, 2020, Emerg Infect Dis, V26, DOI 10.3201/eid2607.201595; Guo YR, 2020, MILITARY MED RES, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0; Imam A, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P468, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.006; Jambeck J, 2018, MAR POLICY, V96, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.041; Jambeck JR, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, P768, DOI 10.1126/science.1260352; Jiang XF, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113896; Jones SL, 2020, FOOD ENVIRON VIROL, V12, P158, DOI 10.1007/s12560-020-09421-5; Kabatanya M, 2020, WEARING FACE MASKS N; Kale RD, 2018, J POLYM ENVIRON, V26, P355, DOI 10.1007/s10924-017-0936-2; Kampf G, 2020, J HOSP INFECT, V104, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022; Kostov KG, 2013, SURF COAT TECH, V234, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.09.041; Mackenzie JS, 2020, MICROBIOL AUST, V41, P45, DOI 10.1071/MA20013; Maclntyre CR, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V350, DOI 10.1136/bmj.h694; Mahase E, 2020, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V369, DOI 10.1136/bmj.m1422; Markovic D, 2020, APPL SURF SCI, V527, DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146829; Miezah K, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V46, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.009; Moss E, 2017, SEA OPPORTUNITY SUPP; Nghiem L.D., 2020, CASE STUDIES CHEM EN, V1, DOI [10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100006, 10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100006.]; Nzediegwu C, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104947; Oguntoyinbo OO, 2012, PUBLIC HEALTH, V126, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.01.030; Park GW, 2015, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V81, P5987, DOI 10.1128/AEM.01657-15; PDA Pharmacists' Defence Association, 2020, WEAR FAC MASKS PUBL; Peets P, 2017, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V173, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.007; Prata JC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V702, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455; Rothe C, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P970, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc2001468; Sembiring E, 2010, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V54, P802, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.010; Sharma K, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V107, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.011; SWAC Sahel and West Africa Club Secretariat, 2020, W AFR MAK FAC MASK U; Syam N., 2020, IS PANDEMIC TRIGGERI; Tasamba J., 2020, COVID 19 RWANDA DR C; Todd ECD, 2009, J FOOD PROTECT, V72, P202, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X-72.1.202; Tremblay C, 2010, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V54, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.09.006; Trifuoggi M, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108815; van Doremalen N, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1564, DOI [10.1101/2020.03.09.20033217, 10.1056/NEJMc2004973]; Vasickova P, 2010, FOOD ENVIRON VIROL, V2, P24, DOI 10.1007/s12560-010-9025-6; World Health Organization, 2020, CLEAN DIS ENV SURF C; World Health Organization, 2020, COR; Worldometer, 2021, COVID 19 CORONAVIRUS; WWF (World Wildlife Fund), 2020, DISP MASKS GLOV RESP	60	44	44	10	57	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	2213-2929	2213-3437		J ENVIRON CHEM ENG	J. Environ. Chem. Eng.	JUN	2021	9	3							105222	10.1016/j.jece.2021.105222	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105222		FEB 2021	11	Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Chemical	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Engineering	RC2HG	33614408	Green Published, Bronze	Y	N	2022-09-08	WOS:000632624300004
J	Haid, M; Albrecht, JN; Finkler, W				Haid, Marco; Albrecht, Julia N.; Finkler, Wiebke			Sustainability implementation in destination management	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Tourism development; Destination development; Implementation theory; Nature-based tourism; Destination management organization	RESPONSIBLE TOURISM; POLICY; ISSUE	This empirically-based paper examines how sustainability is implemented in tourism destination management organizations. By positing a conceptual model for sustainability implementation that is grounded in the academic literature and assessed in light of the empirical findings of the study presented here, this paper combines two strands of academic inquiry. Works on sustainability and its implementation offer the theoretical and practical context; implementation theory from the political sciences provides the conceptual context. Twenty interviews with 22 destination managers in nature-based tourism destinations in the Tyrolean Oberland and the South Island of New Zealand form the empirical basis of our study. Implementation processes are found to be non-linear and non-synchronous. Discretion of individuals and communication between destination stakeholders are decisive factors that influence implementation processes. Destination managers associate a wide range of projects with sustainability, and they prioritize implementing projects for economic sustainability. Sustainability successes as measured against SDGs 8 and 12 lack in concrete and holistic measures.	[Haid, Marco] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Div Management Hlth & Sport Tourism, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria; [Albrecht, Julia N.] Univ Otago, Dept Tourism, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [Finkler, Wiebke] Univ Otago, Dept Mkt, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand		Haid, M (corresponding author), UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Div Management Hlth & Sport Tourism, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria.	marco.haid@umit.at		Finkler, Wiebke/0000-0003-2470-5307				Albrecht J. N., 2010, International Journal of Tourism Policy, V3, P181, DOI 10.1504/IJTP.2010.037991; Albrecht JN, 2022, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V30, P32, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1868483; Alfaro Navarro JL, 2020, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V23, P423, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2019.1579174; Salas-Zapata WA, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV, V27, P153, DOI 10.1002/sd.1885; Salas-Zapata WA, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9801-z; Allen C., 2001, POLICY STUD-UK, V22, P149; [Anonymous], 2019, TIROLER WIRTSCHAFTS; Arkema KK, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052427; Arkema KK, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P7390, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1406483112; Armitage D, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002; Bardach E., 1977, IMPLEMENTATION GAME; Silva FBE, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V68, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.020; Boom S, 2021, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V24, P520, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2020.1722076; Bridgman P, 2003, AUST J PUBL ADMIN, V62, P98, DOI 10.1046/j.1467-8500.2003.00342.x; Buhalis D, 2015, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V4, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.04.001; Burke J.P., 1990, IMPLEMENTATION POLIC, P133; Chettiparamb A, 2012, J POLICY RES TOUR LE, V4, P302, DOI 10.1080/19407963.2012.711088; Ciegis R, 2009, INZ EKON, P28; Colebatch H, 2006, POLICY CYCLE POLICY; Cristina B, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V116, P2257, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.555; Dodds R., 2007, Current Issues in Tourism, V10, P296, DOI 10.2167/cit278.0; Ellig J, 1995, EC APPROACHES ORG I, P267; Frey B.S, 1985, UMWELTOKONOMIE; Fyall A, 2020, TOUR REV, V75, P165, DOI 10.1108/TR-07-2019-0311; Galuppo L, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577612; Gu XP, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P199, DOI 10.3390/su13010199; Hall C.M., 1995, TOURISM PUBLIC POLIC; Hesse-Biber S. N., 2006, PRACTICE QUALITATIVE; Higgins-Desbiolles F, 2010, TOUR HOSP RES, V10, P116, DOI 10.1057/thr.2009.31; Horisch J, 2015, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V24, P765, DOI 10.1002/bse.1844; Howlett M., 2009, STUDYING PUBLIC POLI; Howlett M, 2019, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V34, P405, DOI 10.1177/0952076718775791; Hupe PL, 2016, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V31, P103, DOI 10.1177/0952076715598828; Jenkins C.L., 2006, TOURISM RES POLICY P, P21; Kebete Y, 2019, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V13, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.03.006; Jorge ML, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.035; Lew AA, 2016, TOURISM GEOGR, V18, P18, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2015.1122664; Lin A.C, 2000, REFORM MAKING THE IM; McDonagh P, 2014, J MARKET MANAG-UK, V30, P1186, DOI 10.1080/0267257X.2014.943263; MIHALIC T, 1996, UMWELTOKONOMIE TOURI; Mihalic T, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.062; Murphy P., 2004, STRATEG MANAG; Nordea, 2020, EC CONT NZ; O'Toole LJ, 2004, PUBLIC ADMIN, V82, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00396.x; Patton M., 2015, QUALITATIVE EVALUATI, V4th; Pearce D. G., 1992, TOURISM ORG; PEARCE PL, 1996, TOURISM COMMUNITY RE; Pforr C., 2001, Current Issues in Tourism, V4, P275, DOI 10.1080/13683500108667890; Pike S, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V41, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.009; Pressman J.L., 1973, IMPLEMENTATION GREAT; Rothstein B., 1998, JUST I MATTER MORAL, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511598449; SABATIER P, 1979, POLICY ANAL, V5, P481; Sabatier P. A., 1986, J PUBLIC POLICY, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00003846; Sharmin F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13042308; SIMMONS RH, 1974, WESTERN POLIT QUART, V27, P457, DOI 10.2307/448030; StatsNZ, 2020, TOURISM; Streimikiene D, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P259, DOI 10.1002/sd.2133; Sugrue C., FUTURE ED CHANGE INT, P175; Thomann E, 2018, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V28, P583, DOI 10.1093/jopart/muy024; United Nations General Assembly, 1987, GEN ASS RES 42 187; Visbeck M, 2014, MAR POLICY, V48, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.005; Vogt CA, 2020, ANN TOURISM RES, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102963; Wood SA, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70829-x; World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2017, TOURISM SUSTAINABLE; Wray M, 2009, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V17, P673, DOI 10.1080/09669580903071979; Zhu L, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P66, DOI 10.1002/sd.2131	66	2	2	2	9	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2021	312								127718	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127718	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127718		JUN 2021	10	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	TI2BF					2022-09-08	WOS:000672590600002
J	Tokazhanov, G; Galiyev, O; Lukyanenko, A; Nauyryzbay, A; Ismagulov, R; Durdyev, S; Turkyilmaz, A; Karaca, F				Tokazhanov, Galym; Galiyev, Olzhas; Lukyanenko, Artyom; Nauyryzbay, Aslan; Ismagulov, Rassul; Durdyev, Serdar; Turkyilmaz, Ali; Karaca, Ferhat			Circularity assessment tool development for construction projects in emerging economies	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Circular economy; Circularity; Construction industry; Circularity assessment tool; SDG9; SDG11; Central Asia		Intending to close the loop of product life cycles and substitute for the linear economy, a new concept of circular economy (CE) has emerged. Although relatively novel, the concept of CE has gained significant momentum worldwide. CE can potentially help to solve the problem of resource depletion and environmental degradation. However, measuring circularity remains a question and a challenge for various stakeholders. This work aimed to propose an assessment tool to measure the circularity of construction projects. Through a systematic literature review, existing circularity measurement methods, tools, and actions associated with circularity in the construction industry were reviewed. A list of critical circularity actions was identified. Kazakhstan was selected as an emerging economy country to validate the tool. A survey was conducted among professionals in the construction industry to determine the importance of every action and the legislative readiness of local laws to support those actions. The proposed tool (CAT2022) was tailored to measure the circularity degree of construction projects in the selected emerging economy country. As part of the proposed circularity measurement tool, the study also provided several assessments to demonstrate the criteria in the evaluation and their fulfillment of the actions concerning circularity. The results show that projects perform notably differently in terms of circularity depending on methods of construction, technologies implemented, company business model, energy and material efficiency practices. In line with the common assumption that projects certified by green building rating systems are more "circular" than others, our findings indicated that LEED-certified buildings and buildings implementing modular construction methods tend to receive high circularity scores.	[Tokazhanov, Galym; Galiyev, Olzhas; Lukyanenko, Artyom; Nauyryzbay, Aslan; Ismagulov, Rassul; Turkyilmaz, Ali; Karaca, Ferhat] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Engn & Digital Sci, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Environm & Resource Efficiency Cluster EREC, Kabanbay Batyr Ave 53, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; [Durdyev, Serdar] Ara Inst Canterbury, Dept Architectural & Engn Studies, Christchurch, New Zealand; [Turkyilmaz, Ali] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Engn & Digital Sci, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Master Engn Management Program, Kabanbay Batyr Ave 53, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; [Karaca, Ferhat] Kabanbay Batyr ave 58,Bldg 3e536, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan		Karaca, F (corresponding author), Kabanbay Batyr ave 58,Bldg 3e536, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.	ferhat.karaca@nu.edu.kz	Durdyev, Serdar/T-7347-2019	Durdyev, Serdar/0000-0003-1781-1830; Tokazhanov, Galym/0000-0003-1017-6264	Nazarbayev University Faculty Development Competitive Research Grant Program (FDCRGP) [280720FD1904]	Nazarbayev University Faculty Development Competitive Research Grant Program (FDCRGP)	Funding The authors acknowledge the financial support from Nazarbayev University Faculty Development Competitive Research Grant Program (FDCRGP; Funder Project Reference: 280720FD1904) .	Abadi M., 2020, P 36 ANN ARCOM C GLA, P516; Abbott BP, 2016, PHYS REV LETT, V116, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102; Adams KT, 2017, PROC INST CIV ENG-WA, V170, P15, DOI 10.1680/jwarm.16.00011; Ajayabi Atta, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V225, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012015; Akanbi LA, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V129, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026; Akhanova G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11174754; Akinade O, 2020, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V31, P829, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2019.1695006; Antwi-Afari P, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126870; Bao ZK, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V724, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138264; Bicket M., 2014, SCOPING STUDY IDENTI, DOI [10.2779/29525, DOI 10.2779/29525]; Business in the Community, 2020, ADV CIRC CONSTR CAS; Buyle M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V218, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.306; Ce100, 2016, CIRCULARITY BUILT EN; CIRCit Norden, CIRC ASS TOOL; Corona B, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498; De Pascale A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942; Durach CF, 2017, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V53, P67, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12145; European Commission, 2022, REPOWEREU JOINT EUR; Benachio GLF, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046; Gao HH, 2015, CHINESE J CHEM ENG, V23, P1987, DOI 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.009; Giorgi S., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V296, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012027; Gonzalez Arnau, 2021, Resour Conserv Recycl Adv, V12, pNone, DOI 10.1016/j.rcradv.2021.200051; Gravagnuolo A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133512; Guerra BC, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V324, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129125; He LL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120928; Hevner AR, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P75, DOI 10.2307/25148625; Honic M., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V225, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012073; Hossain MU, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948; Huang BJ, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V129, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029; Jansen BW, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104857; Jones P., 2018, INT J MANAG CASES IJ, V20, P4; Kamali M, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V138, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.019; Kanters J, 2018, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/buildings8110150; Karimi H, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104548; Kendal S., 2000, RESIDENTIAL OPEN BUI; Lei HR, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103374; Ruiz LAL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238; Butkovic LL, 2021, INT J CONSTR MANAG, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2021.1942770; Mangialardo A, 2018, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P333, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_23; Marzouk M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147856; Mettler Tobias, 2011, International Journal of Society Systems Science, V3, P81, DOI 10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934; Morseletto P, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553; Munaro MR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121134; Nasir MHA, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008; Norouzi M, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704; Nunez-Cacho P., 2018, J EU RESOUR BUS, V2018, P909360, DOI [10.5171/2018.909360, DOI 10.5171/2018.909360]; Nussholz JLK, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036; O'Grady TM, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14134065; Patwa N, 2021, J BUS RES, V122, P725, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.015; Pigosso DCA, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V28, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.011; Pomponi F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055; Roychand R, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102199; Sassanelli C, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019; Shen KW, 2020, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V26, P21, DOI 10.3846/tede.2019.11249; Smol M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V95, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051; Superti V, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105711; Tennakoon GA, 2022, WASTE MANAGE RES, V40, P274, DOI 10.1177/0734242X211021478; Tomaszewska J, 2020, MATERIALS, V13, DOI 10.3390/ma13225228; Torgautov B, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, P501, DOI 10.3390/buildings11110501; Ullah Z, 2020, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V29, P7, DOI 10.1177/1420326X19853324; Unal E., 2021, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V510, P13775; Unal E, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V146, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.034; UNOOSA, 2021, SPAC EC IN 2020 OUTC; USEPA, 2008, US REC IND MAT BUILD; Van Den Berg M., 2017, 3 GREEN C, P1; Yu YF, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126083; Zhang Q., 2021, ADV APPL EMERGING 2D, P247; Zulfiqar U, 2017, MATER LETT, V192, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.070	68	1	1	6	6	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 15	2022	362								132293	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132293	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132293			11	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	1X9TE					2022-09-08	WOS:000807790200008
J	Valdivia, S; Backes, JG; Traverso, M; Sonnemann, G; Cucurachi, S; Guinee, JB; Schaubroeck, T; Finkbeiner, M; Leroy-Parmentier, N; Ugaya, C; Pena, C; Zamagni, A; Inaba, A; Amaral, M; Berger, M; Dvarioniene, J; Vakhitova, T; Benoit-Norris, C; Prox, M; Foolmaun, R; Goedkoop, M				Valdivia, Sonia; Backes, Jana Gerta; Traverso, Marzia; Sonnemann, Guido; Cucurachi, Stefano; Guinee, Jeroen B.; Schaubroeck, Thomas; Finkbeiner, Matthias; Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie; Ugaya, Cassia; Pena, Claudia; Zamagni, Alessandra; Inaba, Atsushi; Amaral, Milena; Berger, Markus; Dvarioniene, Jolanta; Vakhitova, Tatiana; Benoit-Norris, Catherine; Prox, Martina; Foolmaun, Rajendra; Goedkoop, Mark			Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment	INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT			English	Article						Sustainability; Life cycle assessment; LCSA; Principles; Life cycle initiative	IMPLEMENTATION; LCA	Purpose and context This paper aims to establish principles for the increased application and use of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). Sustainable development (SD) encompassing resilient economies and social stability of the global system is growingly important for decision-makers from business and governments. The "17 SDGs" emerge as a high-level shared blueprint for peace, abundance, and prosperity for people and the planet, and "sustainability" for supporting improvements of products and organizations. A "sustainability" interpretation-successful in aligning stakeholders' understanding-subdivides the impacts according to a triple bottom line or three pillars: economic, social, and environmental impacts. These context and urgent needs inspired the LCSA framework. This entails a sustainability assessment of products and organizations in accordance with the three pillars, while adopting a life cycle perspective. Methods The Life Cycle Initiative promotes since 2011 a pragmatic LCSA framework based on the three techniques: LCSA = environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) + life cycle costing (LCC) + social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). This is the focus of the paper, while acknowledging previous developments. Identified and reviewed literature shows challenges of addressing the three pillars in the LCSA framework implementation like considering only two pillars; not being fully aligned with ISO 14040; lacking interconnectedness among the three pillars; not having clear criteria for results' weighting nor clear results' interpretation; and not following cause-effect chains and mechanisms leading to an endpoint. Agreement building among LCSA experts and reviewing processes strengthened the consensus on this paper. Broad support and outreach are ensured by publishing this as position paper. Results For harmonizing practical LCSA applications, easing interpretation, and increasing usefulness, consensed ten LCSA principles (10P) are established: understanding the areas of protection, alignment with ISO 14040, completeness, stakeholders' and product utility considerations, materiality of system boundaries, transparency, consistency, explicit trade-offs' communication, and caution when compensating impacts. Examples were provided based on a fictional plastic water bottle Conclusions In spite of increasing needs for and interest in SD and sustainability supporting tools, LCSA is at an early application stage of application. The 10P aim to promote more and better LCSA applications by ensuring alignment with ISO 14040, completeness and clear interpretation of integrated results, among others. For consolidating its use, however, more consensus-building is needed (e.g., on value-laden ethical aspects of LCSA, interdependencies and interconnectedness among the three dimensions, and harmonization and integration of the three techniques) and technical and policy recommendations for application.	[Valdivia, Sonia] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, World Resources Forum Assoc, Luneburg, Germany; [Backes, Jana Gerta; Traverso, Marzia] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Aachen, Germany; [Sonnemann, Guido; Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie] Univ Bordeaux, Inst Mol Sci, CyVi Grp, Bordeaux, France; [Cucurachi, Stefano; Guinee, Jeroen B.] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci, Leiden, Netherlands; [Schaubroeck, Thomas] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Environm Res & Innovat, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg; [Finkbeiner, Matthias; Berger, Markus] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Environm Technol, Berlin, Germany; [Ugaya, Cassia] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil; [Pena, Claudia] ADDERE Res & Technol, Santiago, Chile; [Zamagni, Alessandra] Ecoinnovazione Spin Off, ENEA, Bologna, Italy; [Inaba, Atsushi] Japan Life Cycle Assessment Facilitat Ctr, Tokyo, Japan; [Amaral, Milena] ESCP Business Sch, Berlin, Germany; [Dvarioniene, Jolanta] Kaunas Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Kaunas, Lithuania; [Vakhitova, Tatiana] Ansys Ltd, Cambridge, England; [Benoit-Norris, Catherine] NewEarth B, York, NY USA; [Prox, Martina] IPoint Syst GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany; [Foolmaun, Rajendra] Minist Environm & Sustainable Dev, Port Louis, Mauritius; [Goedkoop, Mark] PRe Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands		Valdivia, S (corresponding author), Leuphana Univ Luneburg, World Resources Forum Assoc, Luneburg, Germany.	sonia.valdivia@wrforum.org	Backes, Jana Gerta/ABF-1004-2021; Guinee, Jeroen/K-7931-2013	Backes, Jana Gerta/0000-0002-6578-5764; Guinee, Jeroen/0000-0003-2558-6493; Cucurachi, Stefano/0000-0003-2748-655X; Schaubroeck, Thomas/0000-0002-1933-0697; Dvarioniene, Jolanta/0000-0003-4162-4349	Projekt DEAL	Projekt DEAL	Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.	[Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO; Arroyo P, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V128, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.079; Bruntland, 1987, A42427 UN GEN ASS; Capitals Coalition (CC), 2016, NAT CAP PROT; Cf OJUNNY NY USA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Chen WH, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1169, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.264; Elkington J., 2018, HARVARD BUS REV; Elkington J., 1997, CANNIBALS FORKS TRIP, P49; Finkbeiner Matthias, 2010, Sustainability, V2, P3309, DOI 10.3390/su2103309; Guinee J., 2016, TAKING STOCK IND ECO, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_3; Guinee JB, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P90, DOI 10.1021/es101316v; Heijungs R, 2010, POLYM DEGRAD STABIL, V95, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.11.010; Hoekstra R, 2019, REPLACING GDP BY 2030: TOWARDS A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR THE WELL-BEING AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMUNITY, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108608558; Kloepffer W, 2008, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V13, P89, DOI 10.1065/lca2008.02.376; Neugebauer S, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V102, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.053; Purvis B, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P681, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5; Schaubroeck T, 2017, J IND ECOL, V21, P1464, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12653; Swarr TE, 2011, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V16, P389, DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0287-5; Traverso, 2021, ALIGNMENT CASE UNPUB; Traverso M, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P680, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00497.x; Traverso M, 2012, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V17, P1068, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0433-8; UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015, SUST DEV 17 GOALS; UN (United Nations), 1992, AG 21 RIO DECL FOR P; UNEP, 2009, GUID SOC LIF CYCL AS; UNEP, 2011, DTI1412PA UNEP; UNEP, MANAGEMENT, V15, P104; Valdivia S, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P1673, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1; Weidema B., 2020, LCA BASED ASSESSMENT; Zamagni A, 2013, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V18, P1637, DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0648-3; Zamagni A, 2012, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V17, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11367-012-0389-8; Zanghelini GM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.230	31	12	12	27	63	SPRINGER HEIDELBERG	HEIDELBERG	TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY	0948-3349	1614-7502		INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS	Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.	SEP	2021	26	9					1900	1905		10.1007/s11367-021-01958-2	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01958-2		AUG 2021	6	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	UU3EK		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000686093500001
J	Fioramonti, L; Coscieme, L; Costanza, R; Kubiszewski, I; Trebeck, K; Wallis, S; Roberts, D; Mortensen, LF; Pickett, KE; Wilkinson, R; Ragnarsdottir, KV; McGlade, J; Lovins, H; De Vogli, R				Fioramonti, Lorenzo; Coscieme, Luca; Costanza, Robert; Kubiszewski, Ida; Trebeck, Katherine; Wallis, Stewart; Roberts, Debra; Mortensen, Lars F.; Pickett, Kate E.; Wilkinson, Richard; Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala; McGlade, Jacqueline; Lovins, Hunter; De Vogli, Roberto			Wellbeing economy: An effective paradigm to mainstream post-growth policies?	ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS			English	Article						Post-Growth; Degrowth; Wellbeing; Sustainability; SDGs	ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HEALTH; WORK; OPPORTUNITIES; CONTEXT; TIME; LIFE	The concept of 'wellbeing economy' (WE), that is, an economy that pursues human and ecological wellbeing instead of material growth, is gaining support amongst policymakers, business, and civil society. Over the past couple of years, several national governments have adopted the WE as their guiding framework to design development policies and assess social and economic progress. While it shares a number of basic principles with various post-growth conceptualisations, the WE' s language and concepts tend to be more adaptable to different social and economic contexts, thus penetrating into policy processes and connecting to a variety of cultural traits, not only in advanced economies but also in less industrialised nations. In this paper, we describe the key features of the WE, including its approach to key concepts like work, productivity and technology and several examples of its policy impact. We conclude by positing that the WE framework may be one of the most effective bases to mainstream post-growth policies at the national and global level.	[Fioramonti, Lorenzo] Univ Pretoria, Dept Polit Sci, Pretoria, South Africa; [Coscieme, Luca] Hot Cool Inst, Berlin, Germany; [Costanza, Robert; Kubiszewski, Ida] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia; [Trebeck, Katherine; Wallis, Stewart] Wellbeing Econ Alliance, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland; [Roberts, Debra] eThekwini Municipal, Environm Planning & Climate Protect Dept, Durban, South Africa; [Mortensen, Lars F.] European Environm Agcy, Copenhagen, Denmark; [Pickett, Kate E.] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England; [Wilkinson, Richard] Univ Nottingham, Div Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Nottingham, England; [Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala] Univ Iceland, Inst Earth Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland; [Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala] Univ Iceland, Inst Sustainable Dev Studies, Reykjavik, Iceland; [McGlade, Jacqueline] UCL, London, England; [Lovins, Hunter] Nat Capitalism Solut, Longmont, CO USA; [De Vogli, Roberto] Univ Padua, Dept Social Psychol & Dev, Padua, Italy		Coscieme, L (corresponding author), Hot Cool Inst, Berlin, Germany.	l.coscieme@hotorcool.org		McGlade, Jacqueline/0000-0002-8657-6734; Pickett, Kate/0000-0002-8066-8507				Akenji L., 2021, 15 DEGREE LIFESTYLES; Alvaredo F., 2018, WORLD INEQUALITY REP; [Anonymous], 2018, INNER LEVEL; [Anonymous], 2017, WORLD GDP EC POLITIC; Atkinson S, 2012, WELLBEING AND PLACE, P1; Bakker G., 2017, EC HIST WORKING PAPE, V269; Bastianoni S, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V100, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.024; Bathiany S, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5809; BBC, 2019, ICEL PUTS WELL BEING; Bowler DE, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/147-2458-10-456; Boyce C., 2020, UNDERSTANDING WELLBE; Brunori G, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8050449; Buhr K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061899; Carrero GC, 2020, ENVIRON MANAGE, V66, P966, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01354-w; CDC-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, EC TRENDS TOB; Chaves LSM, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14954-1; Chiengkul P, 2018, ALTERNATIVES, V43, P81, DOI 10.1177/0304375418811763; Clark J., 2020, ECOLOGICAL CITIZEN, V3, P9; Coady D., 2019, GLOB FOSS FUEL SUBS; Coscieme L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126502; Coscieme L, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119232; Coscieme L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11164374; Coscieme L, 2014, ECOSYST SERV, V7, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.003; Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0; Costanza R., 2020, SOLUTIONS, V11, P112; Costanza R., 2020, SUSTAINABLE WELLBEIN; Costanza R, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023; Costanza R, 2020, ECOL ECON, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106484; Costanza R, 2017, ECOL ECON, V131, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.023; Costanza R, 2016, ECOL ECON, V130, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009; Costanza R, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P59, DOI 10.1002/fee.1231; Costanza R, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002; Costanza R, 2014, NATURE, V505, P283, DOI 10.1038/505283a; Dasgupta P., 2021, EC BIODIVERSITY DASG; Dasgupta P, 2020, UK TREASURY INTERIM; Daszak P, 2020, IPBES SECRETARIAT, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.4147317, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4147317]; EASTERLIN RA, 1995, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V27, P35, DOI 10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B; European Environment Agency, 2018, UN EXP UN IMP SOC VU; Fioramonti L, 2020, UNECONOMIA STARE BEN; Fioramonti L., 2016, WELL BEING EC SCENAR; Fioramonti L., 2017, WELLBEING EC SUCCESS; Fioramonti L, 2019, ANTHROPOCENE REV, V6, P207, DOI 10.1177/2053019619869947; Gamfeldt L, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2328; Gennari P., 2020, ACHIEVING SDGS STATI; Griep Y, 2015, J OCCUP HEALTH PSYCH, V20, P190, DOI 10.1037/a0038342; Griggs, 2011, ENERGY LAW J, V32, P57; Helliwell J.F., 2021, WORLD HAPPINESS REPO; Helliwell JF, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1435, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522; Hickel J, 2021, GLOBALIZATIONS, V18, P1105, DOI 10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222; Hickel J, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV, V27, P873, DOI 10.1002/sd.1947; Hickel J, 2019, THIRD WORLD Q, V40, P18, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2018.1535895; Hough-Stewart L., 2019, WEALL IDEAS LITTLE S; Inglehart R, 2008, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V3, P264, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x; International Energy Agency, 2017, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PE; Jackson T, 2021, POSTGROWTH LIFE CAPI; Kahneman D, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P3, DOI 10.1257/089533006776526030; Kallis G, 2018, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V43, P291, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941; Kallis G, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P873, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007; Kari P., 2019, GUARDIAN 1105; Kasser T., 2002, HIGH PRICE MAT; Keniger LE, 2013, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V10, P913, DOI 10.3390/ijerph10030913; King MF, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V116, P681, DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0; Kossek EE., 2014, WORK AND WELLBEING, P295, DOI 10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell030; Le Blanc D, 2015, SUSTAIN DEV, V23, P176, DOI 10.1002/sd.1582; Lowy M., 2015, ECOSOCIALISM RADICAL; Lu YL, 2015, NATURE, V520, P432, DOI 10.1038/520432a; Lunau T, 2014, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V24, P422, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/cku010; MADDOW RACHEL, 2019, BLOWOUT CORRUPTED DE; Malik VS, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, P2113, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037401; Manshoven S, 2019, TEXT ENV CIRC EC; Mao CX, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119914; Martin S., 2016, RISE THE URBAN ENERG; Max-Neef M., 2010, DEV ETHICS, P197; Millward-Hopkins J, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168; Mortensen L.F, 2017, SOLUTIONS, V8; Moyer JD, 2020, WORLD DEV, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104749; Myers DG, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P56, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56; NEON WEAll PIRC and PositiveMoney, 2020, MESSAGING GUIDE WELL; New Zealand Government, 2019, WELLBEING BUDGET; Nuccitelli D, 2019, YALE CLIMATE CONNECT, V18; OECD, 2019, 102 SDD; OSullivan A., 2019, BRIDGE EXPERT COMMEN; Parrique T., 2019, THESIS U CLERMONT AU; Petschow U., 2018, 892018 TEXTE; Pham-Truffert M, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1236, DOI 10.1002/sd.2073; Piketty T., 2014, CAPITAL 21 CENTURY, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674369542; Radcliffe SA, 2012, GEOFORUM, V43, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003; Raworth K., 2017, DOUGHNUT EC 7 WAYS T; Rockstrom J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a; Sandifer PA, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007; Schor J.B, 2012, WORKING PAPER SERIES; Schwab K., 2018, SHAPING 4 IND REVOLU; Sommer C, 2019, WHAT WE TALK WE TALK; Stiglitz J.E, 2019, GDP; Stiglitz J.E., 2012, PRICE INEQUALITY TOD; Tannen D, 1998, THE ARGUMENT CULTURE; TEEB, 2013, NAT CAP RISK TOP 100; Thoits PA, 2001, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V42, P115, DOI 10.2307/3090173; Tomaselli MF, 2021, ECOL ECON, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106952; Trebeck K., 2019, EC ARRIVAL IDEAS GRO; Trebeck K., SCOTLAND VIRUS; Trebeck K, 2020, SUPPORTING NOT SYNON; ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402; UNDP, 2021, PEOPL CLIM VOT; van den Bergh JCJM, 2012, J ECON ISSUES, V46, P909, DOI 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404; Wallace R., 2016, BIG FARMS MAKE BIG F; Ward J, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, P6160, DOI 10.3390/en13236160; Ward JD, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733; Wiedenhofer D, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429; Wiedenhofer D, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V30, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.007; Wilkinson R., 2009, DESIGUALDAD ANALISIS; Williford B, 2018, J WORLD SYST RES, V24, P96, DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2081.629; Woolfson C., 2018, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES; Ziffer Daniel, 2020, ABC NEWS	114	2	2	24	38	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-8009	1873-6106		ECOL ECON	Ecol. Econ.	FEB	2022	192								107261	10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107261	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107261		OCT 2021	8	Ecology; Economics; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Business & Economics	WR8CV					2022-09-08	WOS:000714724100005
J	Shah, SAA; Cheng, LS; Solangi, YA; Ahmad, M; Ali, S				Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali; Cheng Longsheng; Solangi, Yasir Ahmed; Ahmad, Munir; Ali, Sharafat			Energy trilemma based prioritization of waste-to-energy technologies: Implications for post-COVID-19 green economic recovery in Pakistan	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						COVID-19; Green economic recovery; Waste-to-Energy; Renewable energy; SDG 7; MCDM	MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; FUZZY AHP; VIKOR; RESOURCES	As lockdown eases, economic activities resume in Pakistan. If the country continues to follow business as-usual (BAU) then it is anticipated that carbon output could surge past pre-COVID-19 levels that means more disasters in future. Thus, it is an unprecedented opportunity to shift from BAU and achieve carbon-neutral and nature-positive economic recovery green economic recovery (GER). To fuel the GER, access to modern, equitable, affordable and sustainable energy is paramount. This study explores waste-to-energy (WtE) as an alternative green fuel for GER. Seven WtE technologies are prioritized based on the concept of energy trilemma energy security, energy equity, and environmental sustainability. For the evaluation, an energy trilemma based decision support framework is developed using most prominent multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The fuzzy set theory is integrated with MCDM methods to minimize uncertainty in results. Sixteen experts are engaged to score each WtE technology with respect to every energy trilemma dimension and sub-dimension. Gasification technology is found to be the most feasible option for WtE generation in Pakistan whereas Torrefaction technology is least favorable. It is concluded that the need to shift towards sustainable energy is more than ever to limit the carbon emission and prevent future crisis. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali; Cheng Longsheng; Solangi, Yasir Ahmed] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China; [Ahmad, Munir] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China; [Ali, Sharafat] Govt Postgrad Coll Kot Sultan, Dept Econ, Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan		Shah, SAA; Cheng, LS (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China.	ahsan.shah1@hotmail.com; cheng_longsheng@njust.edu.cn; yasir.solangi86@hotmail.com; munirahmad@zju.edu.cn; sharafat.ali.rana@gmail.com	Ali, Sharafat/G-3381-2014; Ahmad, Munir/W-6429-2019	Ali, Sharafat/0000-0001-7893-4055; Ahmad, Munir/0000-0002-4376-8410; Solangi, Yasir Ahmed/0000-0003-2576-1730; Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali/0000-0001-8488-3047	National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271114]	National Natural Science Foundation of China(National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC))	The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in Grant 71271114.	Agar D, 2012, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V44, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.004; [Anonymous], 2014, INT J SCI TECHNOLOGY; Batidzirai B, 2013, ENERGY, V62, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.035; Feng CL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120002; Foong SY, 2020, CHEM ENG J, V389, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124401; HASSAN MH, 2013, PROCEDIA ENG, V56, P53; Ikram M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V226, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.265; Khan I, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V150, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132; Korai MS, 2016, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V124, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.032; Kutlu AC, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044; Li J, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V58, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.011; Lopes EJ, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V116, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.018; Lukajtis R, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V91, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.043; Medic D, 2010, EFFECT TORREFACTION, P1; Mohsin M, 2018, ENERGY, V155, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.116; Muhammad N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114744; Mulebeke JA, 2005, SAHP 2005; Musaad OAS, 2020, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/sym12010116; Musaad AS, 2020, PROCESSES, V8, DOI 10.3390/pr8040418; Onut S, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P3887, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.045; Opricovic S, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V156, P445, DOI 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1; Opricovic S, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P12983, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097; Opricovic S, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V178, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020; Panepinto D, 2016, IND CROP PROD, V83, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.044; Panepinto D, 2012, WASTE BIOMASS VALORI, V3, P249, DOI 10.1007/s12649-012-9120-z; Parmar PS, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121802; Rozenberg, 2013, THEMAT FOCUS ECOSYST; Saaty T.L., 1996, DECISION MAKING DEPE; Sailer G, 2020, WASTE MANAGE, V109, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.047; Shah SAA, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105507; Shah SAA, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V235, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.020; Shah S.A.A., 2019, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG; Shah SAA, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P41787, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10145-z; Shah SAA, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P29687, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06102-0; Shah SAA, 2018, ENERGIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/en11071777; Siddiqi MM, 2019, PROCESSES, V7, DOI 10.3390/pr7110848; Solangi YA, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P30286, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06172-0; Song LL, 2017, ENERG ECON, V66, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.07.004; Suganthi L, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V43, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.022; Pham TPT, 2015, WASTE MANAGE, V38, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.004; Vardopoulos I, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684; Wang B, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V142, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.011; Wang Q, 2018, MITOCHONDRIAL DNA B, V3, P149, DOI 10.1080/23802359.2018.1431074; Wu WW, 2007, EXPERT SYST APPL, V32, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005; Wu YN, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.024; Xie YM, 2019, J AM STAT ASSOC, V114, P1466, DOI 10.1080/01621459.2018.1564670; Xu CB, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111495; Xu L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P33202, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06431-0; Yan W, 2010, ENERG FUEL, V24, P4738, DOI 10.1021/ef901273n; Zadeh L. A., 1978, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V1, P3, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5; Zhang XY, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121863	51	61	61	13	48	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	FEB 15	2021	284								124729	10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124729	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124729		JAN 2021	13	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	PS7PU	33100603	Bronze, Green Published	Y	Y	2022-09-08	WOS:000608119000007
J	Naqvi, B; Rizvi, SKA; Hasnaoui, A; Shao, XF				Naqvi, Bushra; Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas; Hasnaoui, Amir; Shao, Xuefeng			Going beyond sustainability: The diversification benefits of green energy financial products	ENERGY ECONOMICS			English	Article						Markowitz efficient frontiers; Green energy funds; Diversification; Sustainable investment	MEAN-VARIANCE; INVESTORS DIVERSIFY; COMMODITY; STOCK; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; UTILITY; FUNDS; RISK	After the inclusion of Green energy financing in the list of United Nations Sustainability Goals (SDGs) as SDG 7, the role, importance, and visibility of green financial products; all have escalated enormously. This paper assesses the utility of green exchange-traded funds (ETFs), in the investors' portfolios for their dual potential of sustainability and diversification. ETFs provide a unique opportunity to construct practically investible portfolios and have long been used as conduits to facilitate project financing. In this paper, we use distinct ETFs based on dirty (conventional) and clean (green) energy products and companies, bonds, equity, ex-energy commodity, and real estate markets to examine the diversification benefits of green energy for a US-based investor. We construct efficient frontiers under different asset allocations and diversification strategies using the Markowitz MVO framework. Our results show that green energy ETFs provide significant diversification benefits and move the efficient frontier upward. In contrast, the portfolio performance deteriorates with dirty energy funds under different asset allocation and diversification strategies. Overall, we find that owing to their risk-return profile, green energy ETFs can be a rewarding alternative to dirty energy for investors in the global energy market.	[Naqvi, Bushra; Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas] Lahore Univ Management Sci, Suleman Dawood Sch Business, Lahore, Pakistan; [Hasnaoui, Amir] Excelia Business Sch, La Rochelle, France; [Shao, Xuefeng] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia		Naqvi, B (corresponding author), Lahore Univ Management Sci, Suleman Dawood Sch Business, Lahore, Pakistan.	bushra.naqvi@lums.edu.pk; kumail.rizvi@lums.edu.pk; hasnaouia@excelia-group.com; david.shao@newcastle.edu.au						Abanomey W.S., 1999, J ALTERNATIVE INVEST, V2, P51, DOI [10.3905/jai.1999.318904, DOI 10.3905/JAI.1999.318904]; Ahmad W, 2018, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V54, P1838, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1467314; Balcilar M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101799; Bessler W, 2015, J BANK FINANC, V60, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.021; Bourcet C, 2020, ENERG ECON, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104563; Cai XJ, 2020, EMPIR ECON, V58, P393, DOI 10.1007/s00181-018-1551-3; Cheung CS, 2010, J INT FINANC MARK I, V20, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.intfin.2010.06.003; Clarkson PM, 2011, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V30, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013; DeMiguel V, 2009, REV FINANC STUD, V22, P1915, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhm075; Demiralay S, 2019, EMPIR ECON, V56, P1823, DOI 10.1007/s00181-018-1450-7; El Ghoul S, 2017, J BANK FINANC, V77, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.10.009; Elsayed AH, 2020, ENERG ECON, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104847; Erb CB, 2006, FINANC ANAL J, V62, P69, DOI 10.2469/faj.v62.n2.4084; FORTENBERY TR, 1990, AM J AGR ECON, V72, P721, DOI 10.2307/1243042; Fousekis P, 2019, STUD ECON FINANC, V36, P183, DOI 10.1108/SEF-05-2018-0138; Gagnon MH, 2020, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101515; Georgiev Georgi, 2001, J ALTERN INVEST, V4, P40, DOI DOI 10.3905/JAI.2001.318997; Gorton G, 2006, FINANC ANAL J, V62, P47, DOI 10.2469/faj.v62.n2.4083; GREEN RC, 1992, J FINANC, V47, P1785, DOI 10.2307/2328996; Han YW, 2022, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101998; Henriksen TES, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V282, P155, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2996-7; Huang BN, 2021, EMPIR ECON, V61, P719, DOI 10.1007/s00181-020-01874-8; Huang MY, 2011, RES INT BUS FINANC, V25, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2011.03.003; IEA, 2020, WORLD EN INV 2020; Israeli D, 2017, REV ACCOUNT STUD, V22, P1048, DOI 10.1007/s11142-017-9400-8; Jackson M, 1999, J OPER RES SOC, V50, P1256; Jacobs H, 2014, J FINANC MARK, V19, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.finmar.2013.07.004; Jensen G.R, 2011, COMMODITIES INVESTME; Kritzman M, 2010, FINANC ANAL J, V66, P31, DOI 10.2469/faj.v66.n2.6; KROLL Y, 1984, J FINANC, V39, P47, DOI 10.2307/2327667; Kuang W, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V302, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127006; Lee CC, 2022, ENERG ECON, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863; Lee CC, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P64830, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15615-6; Lee CC, 2021, RES INT BUS FINANC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101386; LEVY H, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P308; Li JP, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120383; Miralles-Quiros JL, 2019, ENERG ECON, V78, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.008; Miralles-Quiros JL, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P244, DOI 10.1002/bse.2253; Markowitz H, 1952, J FINANC, V7, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x; Naqvi B, 2021, GLOB FINANC J, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100656; Naqvi B, 2018, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V52, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.02.003; Naqvi B, 2017, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V30, P1594, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1340182; Ng A., 2021, PALGRAVE HDB GLOBAL, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_104-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_104-1]; Oztek MF, 2017, INT REV ECON FINANC, V48, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2016.11.008; Reboredo JC, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V73, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.158; Reddy K, 2017, ECON MODEL, V66, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.007; Rehman MU, 2020, N AM J ECON FINANC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.najef.2020.101271; Rehman MU, 2019, RESOUR POLICY, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101456; Rezec M, 2017, INT J GREEN ENERGY, V14, P368, DOI 10.1080/15435075.2016.1261704; Rizvi SKA, 2022, ANN OPER RES, V313, P495, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04367-8; Rubinstein M., 1989, FINANC ANAL J, V45, P20, DOI [10.2469/FAJ.V45.N5.20, DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V45.N5.20]; Saeed T, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13123141; Satyanarayan S., 1996, J INVEST, V5, P69, DOI [10.3905/joi.5.1.69, DOI 10.3905/JOI.5.1.69]; Schmidt AB, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V282, P315, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2896-x; Shahzad SJH, 2020, PHYSICA A, V550, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124519; SHARPE WF, 1966, J BUS, V39, P119, DOI 10.1086/294846; Su CW, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110774; Tang DY, 2020, J CORP FINANC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001; Tsai PJ, 2009, J ECON BUS, V61, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2009.06.003; Umar M, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113156; Wang EZ, 2022, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V58, P692, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1837106; Wang L, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829; Wei H, 2020, RESOUR POLICY, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101663; Yan L, 2017, J COMMOD MARK, V8, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomm.2017.10.002; Zhang YJ, 2019, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101395	65	1	1	5	5	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0140-9883	1873-6181		ENERG ECON	Energy Econ.	JUL	2022	111								106111	10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106111	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106111			14	Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics	2N6KX					2022-09-08	WOS:000818486300006
J	Zhunusova, E; Ahimbisibwe, V; Sen, LTH; Sadeghi, A; Toledo-Aceves, T; Kabwe, G; Gunter, S				Zhunusova, Eliza; Ahimbisibwe, Vianny; Le Thi Hoa Sen; Sadeghi, Azin; Toledo-Aceves, Tarin; Kabwe, Gillian; Guenter, Sven			Potential impacts of the proposed EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains on smallholders, indigenous peoples, and local communities in producer countries outside the EU	FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS			English	Article						Deforestation-free products; EU regulation; Smallholders; Indigenous people; Local communities; Producing countries	LAND RIGHTS; PALM OIL; CERTIFICATION; CONSERVATION; AGRICULTURE; MARKETS	According to the new European Commission proposal for a regulation on deforestation-free products, six com-modities -cattle, wood, palm oil, soy, cocoa, and coffee and their derivate products - grown or raised on land that was subject to deforestation or forest degradation will be banned from entering the EU market. In this commentary paper, we discuss the possible unintended effects of the regulation and elaborate on potential ways to reduce the negative impacts, on vulnerable groups in producer countries, such as smallholders, Indigenous peoples, and local communities (IPLCs). Such impacts could comprise exclusion of smallholders and IPLCs from high-value supply chains of commodities covered by the regulation, inadequate price premiums to cover the costs of complying with this regulation, increase the risk of land conflicts between large-scale and small-scale agriculture, push smallholders and IPLCs to marginal lands, and even exacerbate human rights risks already associated with large-scale commodity production. In order to avoid or minimize such impacts, we propose: 1) to make provisions for companies, smallholders, and producing regions to receive sufficient support in their transition to deforestation-free supply chains and to provide incentives so that this transition can be inclusive; 2) to further promote and strengthen holistic approaches, such as jurisdictional or other integrated landscape management approaches to address the many issues that can arise from conflicting interests and unequal power distribution in affected landscapes; 3) to make clear provisions for protection of human rights and to promote land rights for smallholders and IPLCs related to tenure security; and 4) to ensure that regular and robust impact assessments inform policy about both direct and indirect impacts of the regulation on smallholders and IPLCs so that timely and adequate action can be taken to minimize the unintended effects of this regulation. Addressing potential negative impacts on smallholders and IPLCs would also ensure that the progress achieved so far in terms of other UN SDGs related to poverty, inequality, hunger, and land restoration is not compromised.	[Zhunusova, Eliza; Ahimbisibwe, Vianny; Sadeghi, Azin; Toledo-Aceves, Tarin; Guenter, Sven] Thunen Inst Forestry, Hamburg, Germany; [Ahimbisibwe, Vianny] Tech Univ Munich, Ecosyst Dynam & Forest Management, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany; [Le Thi Hoa Sen] Hue Univ Agr & Forestry, Hue Univ, Hue, Vietnam; [Sadeghi, Azin] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Grad Sch Forest & Agr Sci GFA, Gottingen, Germany; [Toledo-Aceves, Tarin] Inst Ecol AC, Red Ecol Func, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico; [Kabwe, Gillian] Copperbelt Univ, Sch Nat Resources, Lusaka, Zambia		Zhunusova, E (corresponding author), Leuschnerstr 91, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany.	eliza.zhunusova@thuenen.de			Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute; Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; Strong Research Group Program of Hue University	Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute; Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation(Alexander von Humboldt Foundation); Strong Research Group Program of Hue University	We are very grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the editorial team for their constructive comments on the previous version of this manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries (THG fund) for Azin Sadeghi within the framework of the LaForeT-R 2 project and for Vianny Ahimbisibwe within the framework of the FLESRA project, as well as the financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Georg Forster fellowship) for Tarin Toledo-Aceves. Sen Le Thi Hoa would like to thank the Strong Research Group Program of Hue University for supporting this research. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of their respective institutions.	Akinnifesi F. K., 2008, Agricultural Journal, V3, P58; Alix-Garcia J, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V47, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.009; Anderson T, 2006, OIL PALM SMALL FARME; Ansah EO, 2020, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V44, P54, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2019.1579776; Apriani E, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105112; Bakhtary H., 2020, CLIMATE FOCUS, P61; Balana B., 2020, ARE SMALLHOLDER FARM, DOI [10.2499/p15738coll2.134152, DOI 10.2499/P15738COLL2.134152]; Balana B., WORLD DEV SUSTAIN, V1, DOI [10.1016/j.wds.2022.100012, DOI 10.1016/J.WDS.2022.100012]; Benjaminsen TA, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.003; Brack D, 2019, SUSTAINABLE COCOA SU; Brandi C, 2015, J ENVIRON DEV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/1070496515593775; Buchanan J., 2019, CONSERV INT TROP FIE; Bulkan J., 2020, REV GOUVERN, V17, P7, DOI [10.7202/1073109ar, DOI 10.7202/1073109AR]; ClientEarth, 2021, PROP EU LAW DEF FREE, P17; ClientEarth, 2021, END END AM CRIT WEAK; Coffee Board of India, 2020, STAT COFF; Davis B., 2022, FOOD SECUR, DOI [10.1007/s12571-021-01214-3, DOI 10.1007/S12571-021-01214-3]; De Sy V, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3dc6; Dou Y, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041596; Duguma L.A., 2021, TREE COMMODITIES RES; Elahi K., 2017, OIL PALM PLANTATION, V26, P15; Erbaugh JT, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1472, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-01282-2; European Commission, 2021, PROP REG DEF FREE PR; European Commission, 2021, ANN PROP REG DEF FRE; European Commission, 2021, FOR PARTN; European Commission, 2021, QUEST ANSW NEW RUL D; Fair Trade Advocacy Office Fern IUCN NL Solidaridad Tropenbos International, 2021, INCL SMALL EU ACT PR, P12; FAO, 2020, GLOBAL FOREST RESOUR, V2020, P4, DOI [10.4060/ca8753en, DOI 10.4060/CA8753EN]; FERN, 2021, EU REG DEF FREE PROD; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2020, GLOBAL FOREST RESOUR, DOI DOI 10.4060/CA9825-N; Garcia M., 2021, JURISDICTIONAL APPRO; Garnett ST, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P369, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6; Grabs J, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102357; Guerena A., 2013, OXFAM AM RES BACKGRO; Hoang HTN, 2019, J FOREST RES-JPN, V24, P137, DOI 10.1080/13416979.2019.1610993; Herliana Sri, 2018, MATEC Web of Conferences, V215, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/201821502008; Hosonuma N, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009; IDH, 2019, COFF PROD FAC CLIM C; Ingram V., 2020, OUTCOMES DEFORESTATI, P88; IPCC, 2019, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT; ITTO FAO, 2020, FOR GOV CLIM CHANG M; Jena PR, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10668-015-9732-0; Jong H.N, 2020, MONGABAY SERIES INDO; Lowder S.K., 2014, WHAT WE REALLY KNOW; Lowder SK, 2016, WORLD DEV, V87, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041; Maertens M., 2009, LICOS DISCUSSION PAP; Marx A., 2021, DEFORESTATION FRONTS; Marzano K., DEFORESTATION FREE C; Meyfroidt P, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1187, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.005; Neilson J, 2008, WORLD DEV, V36, P1607, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.005; Nguyen T.Q, 2018, FOREST TRENDS REPORT; Okello J. J., 2011, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V3, P188, DOI 10.5539/jas.v3n4p188; Pacheco P., 2018, PRIVATE SECTOR CAN Z; Pacheco P, 2012, CONSERV SOC, V10, P114, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.97484; Pham T.T., 2020, CTR INT FORESTRY RES, DOI [10.17528/cifor/007573, DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/007573]; Ponte S, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P1099, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00032-3; Potter L, 2020, J RURAL STUD, V78, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.035; Proforest, 2016, PROF CO SMALLH WORK; Reed J, 2015, ENVIRON EVID, V4, DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-4-2; Roman-Danobeytia FJ, 2014, FORESTS, V5, P978, DOI 10.3390/f5050978; Sayer J, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8349, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1210595110; Schulte I., 2020, SUPPORTING SMALLHOLD, P59; Schurmann AT, 2009, J HEALTH POPUL NUTR, V27, P518; Scurrah N., 2015, POLITICAL EC LAND GO; Seymour FJ, 2020, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V3, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.503326; SNV, REDD DEF FREE AGR VI; Tovar LG, 2005, J RURAL STUD, V21, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.002; Tura HA, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V70, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.024; United Nations (General Assembly), 1948, UN DECL HUM RIGHTS, DOI 10.5195/rt.2019.591; van der Ven H, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.002; VECO, 2011, INCR INC IND COC FAR, P21; von Essen M, 2021, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V19, P159, DOI 10.1002/fee.2299; Wessel M, 2015, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V74-75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2015.09.001; WWF, 2014, GROWTH SOY IMP SOL, P96; WWF, 2021, STEPP CONT IMP EU CO, P33	75	0	0	0	0	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	1389-9341	1872-7050		FOREST POLICY ECON	Forest Policy Econ.	OCT	2022	143								102817	10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102817	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102817			9	Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry	4A1KJ					2022-09-08	WOS:000844869200001
J	Drago, C; Gatto, A				Drago, Carlo; Gatto, Andrea			Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator	ENERGY POLICY			English	Article						Business ethics; Accountability; Regulation &amp; policy; Sustainable energy; Renewable energy; Interval-based composite indicators	RENEWABLE ENERGY; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY; JUSTICE; TRANSPARENCY; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; POLITICS; MARKETS	Energy policy and regulation are critical to implementing renewable energy and the governance of natural resources. Institutions prioritize the support to reliable and sustainable energy access for any world community. As a result, establishing policies, legislation, and institutional structures is crucial to sustain renewable energy. The nations seeking to stimulate investments and boost their energy sectors to accomplish SDG7 must first develop a suitable environment. Policies and regulations help them achieve their goals. In this framework, sustainability represents a watershed moment in the worldwide development agenda. Domestic regulations should encourage responsibility and compliance from businesses to accelerate the renewable energy transition. This paper develops a brand-new interval-based composite indicator that measures the extent of institutional transparency comparing 110 world states, ultimately aiming to quantify national institutional arrangements governing energy policy. The findings reveal a set of nations that stand out among their peers in institutional traits - the UK, the UAE, Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, and the US. In general, African countries perform poorly compared to other states. Also, no African country made it to the top 25. The obtained worldwide standards may be used as policy objectives for any country wishing to enhance its energy regulatory performance.	[Drago, Carlo] Univ Rome N Cusano, Via Don Carlo Gnocchi 3, I-00166 Rome, Italy; [Gatto, Andrea] Wenzhou Kean Univ, Wenzhou 325060, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; [Gatto, Andrea] Greenwich Univ, Nat Resources Inst, Cent Ave, Chatham ME4 4TB, England; [Gatto, Andrea] Azerbaijan State Univ Econ UNEC, Ctr Studies Europe, Baku, Azerbaijan		Gatto, A (corresponding author), Wenzhou Kean Univ, Wenzhou 325060, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.	carlo.drago@unicusano.it; a.gatto@greenwich.ac.uk		Gatto, Andrea/0000-0003-1005-3571				Adams S., 2019, INNOVATION GLOBAL GR; Al-Ajlan SA, 2006, ENERG POLICY, V34, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.013; Aldieri L, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112505; Aldieri L, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118051; Aldieri L, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103541; Alexander K, 2015, AMIC CURIAE, V104, P2; Aseeva A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10114022; Asgary N, 2002, J BUS ETHICS, V36, P239, DOI 10.1023/A:1014057122480; Ashford NA, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P270, DOI 10.3390/su3010270; Banerjee S.G., 2017, 26099 WORLD BANK; Beerepoot M, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P4812, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.015; Betsill M, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P381, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614668; Bickerstaff K., 2013, ENERGY JUSTICE CHANG; Bose A, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V47, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.038; Brauch HG, 2016, HEXAG SER HUM ENVIRO, V10, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_1; Busato F., 2019, MONETA CREDITO, V72, P29, DOI DOI 10.13133/2037-3651_72.285_3; Busch T, 2019, NATURE, V571, P36, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-02029-1; Busch T, 2016, BUS SOC, V55, P303, DOI 10.1177/0007650315570701; Cattivelli V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114444; Cigu E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218778; Cisco G, 2021, ECONOMIES, V9, DOI 10.3390/economies9020047; Climent F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072152; Commission JRC-E, 2008, HDB CONSTRUCTING COM, P24; Cook J, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002; Crnalic M, 2015, ACCOUNTING SUSTAINAB; Davies H., 2001, BUSINESS ETHICS EURO, V10, P280; Derrick J., 2021, GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHT; Drago C., 2017, FEEM WORKING PAPER S, V42; Drago C, 2020, C CLADAG 2019 12 SCI; Drago C, 2022, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V31, P2107, DOI 10.1002/bse.3010; Drago C, 2021, ECONOMIES, V9, DOI 10.3390/economies9040145; Eccles RG, 2019, HARVARD BUS REV, V97, P106; Emem O., 2015, ENERGY CRISIS NIGERI; Energy Sector Management Assistance Program, 2020, REG IND SUST EN 2020; ESMAP, 2018, REG IND SUST EN; European Commission, 2020, OV SUST FIN WHAT IS; Farrukh A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12198247; Fischer-Kowalski M, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14; Galaz V, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.015; Gangi F., 2021, EVOLUTION SUSTAINABL; Gangi F, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071899; Gardiner Stephen M., 2010, CLIMATE ETHICS ESSEN; Gatto A., 2021, EC GROWTH FINANCIAL, P23; Gatto A, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18396-0; Gatto A, 2021, J PUBLIC AFF, DOI 10.1002/pa.2769; Gatto A, 2021, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101977; Gatto A, 2020, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V27, P1525, DOI 10.1002/csr.1912; Gatto A, 2020, ECOL ECON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106527; Gatto A, 2018, J INT DEV, V30, P911, DOI 10.1002/jid.3386; Gielen D, 2019, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006; Gioia F, 2005, STAT APPL, V17, P75; Gioia F, 2006, COMPUTATION STAT, V21, P343, DOI 10.1007/s00180-006-0267-6; Gnansounou E, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3734, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.004; Greenland SJ, 2018, APPROACH GLOB SUST M, P111, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5047-3_7; Gupta A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V10, P1, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_e_00011; Gupta E, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P1195, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.011; Hatcher R. L., 1999, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V1, P96; Heffron RJ, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V87, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.033; Heiman M.K, 1997, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V40, P631; Hudrlikova L, 2013, PRAGUE ECON PAP, V22, P459, DOI 10.18267/j.pep.462; Ines C, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111212; Introcaso D., 2018, CLIMATE CHANGE IS GR, DOI [10.1377/hblog20181218.278288/full/, DOI 10.1377/HBLOG20181218.278288/FULL, 10.1377/hblog20181218.278288/full]; Ionascu E., 2019, MORE TRANSPARENCY RE; IRENA IEA and REN21., 2020, RENEWABLE ENERGY POL; Iwaro J, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P7744, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.027; Jalilian H, 2007, WORLD DEV, V35, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.005; Khanna M, 2002, LAND ECON, V78, P539, DOI 10.2307/3146852; Knutti R, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P361, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3; Krishnan R, 2016, ENERG SOURCE PART B, V11, P32, DOI 10.1080/15567249.2011.563260; Kuc-Czarnecka M., 2020, SOC INDICAT RES, P1; Kutscher C.F., 2019, MECH AEROSPACE ENG S, Vthird; Kuzemko C, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685; La Porta R, 1998, J POLIT ECON, V106, P1113, DOI 10.1086/250042; Laureti T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3367, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.086; Liu SY, 2012, EUR LAW J, V18, P108, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00588.x; Martin C., 2012, J KNOWL MANAG EC INF, V2, P1; McCormack F, 2015, ANTHROPOL FORUM, V25, P384, DOI 10.1080/00664677.2015.1044941; McKinnon C, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P375, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1382-6; Meadowcroft J, 2009, POLICY SCI, V42, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z; Michelon G, 2018, ENV DISCLOSURE COST; Mol APJ, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V10, P132, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00018; Munda G, 2009, INT J ENVIRON TECHNO, V11, P7, DOI 10.1504/IJETM.2009.027185; Murphy L, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V45, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.056; Myers T.A, 2013, J INT BUS ETHICS, V6, P72; Nathwani J., 2010, PATHS SUSTAINABLE EN; Nohrstedt D, 2010, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V1, P1, DOI 10.2202/1944-4079.1035; ODwyer B., 2003, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V16, P523, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570310492290; OECD, 2015, BETT POL DEV 2015 PO; OECD, 2010, REG POL ROAD SUST GR; OECD, 2020, BUILD BACK BETT SUST; Oh TH, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V37, P809, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.070; Owen G, 2004, WORKING PAPER SUSTAI; Panarello D, 2020, EC INSECURITY CONSER; Parovic M.M., 2021, THERM SCI, V00, P262; Pearce D. W., 2000, BLUEPRINT SUSTAINABL; Pearson P., 2012, UK ENERGY POLICY 198; Percebois J, 2007, INT J ENERGY SECT MA, V1, P51, DOI 10.1108/17506220710738597; Perez-Carmona A., 2013, TRANSGOVERNANCE ADV, P83, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28009-2; Puaschunder J.M, 2017, ARCH BUS RES, V5, P151; Punzo G, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.006; Rosenow J, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V121, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.033; Roser D, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P349, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1556-2; Sadik-Zada E.R., 2022, SUSTAINABLE POLICIES, P547; Saisana M, 2005, J ROY STAT SOC A STA, V168, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x; Saltelli A., 2005, STAT KNOWLEDGE POLIC, P359; Santillan OS, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13071608; Schoenmaker D., 2018, ROYAL PHILIPS SUSTAI; Schoenmaker D, 2019, FRAMEWORK SUSTAINABL; Scholtens B, 2017, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V32, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.013; Sikor T, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P524, DOI 10.1111/conl.12142; Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102756; Smith A, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P6266, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.023; Soppe A, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V53, P213, DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039410.18373.12; Soppe A., 2006, THESIS ERASMUS SCH L; Sovacool BK, 2014, GLOBAL ENERGY JUSTICE: PROBLEMS, PRINCIPLES, AND PRACTICES, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107323605; Stefes CH, 2020, REV POLICY RES, V37, P286, DOI 10.1111/ropr.12390; Stern N, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P203, DOI 10.1126/science.1142920; Strielkowski W, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13179860; Unesco, 2014, ETH PRINC CLIM CHANG, DOI [10.1111/issj.12068, DOI 10.1111/ISSJ.12068]; Walawalkar R, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P2558, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.005; Wegrich K., 2015, ROLE TRANSPARENCY RE; Wessels J, 2017, INT J ENVIRON STUD, V74, P355; Wood S., 2006, ENV LAW SUSTAINABILI; Yatim P, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P1685, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1151-x; Yost N. C, ENV REGULATION ARE T; Zafar MW, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122149	126	1	1	7	7	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0301-4215	1873-6777		ENERG POLICY	Energy Policy	AUG	2022	167								112889	10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112889	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112889			13	Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	2I0GW		hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000814664300013
J	Mason-D'Croz, D; Sulser, TB; Wiebe, K; Rosegrant, MW; Lowder, SK; Nin-Pratt, A; Willenbockel, D; Robinson, S; Zhu, TJ; Cenacchi, N; Dunston, S; Robertson, RD				Mason-D'Croz, Daniel; Sulser, Timothy B.; Wiebe, Keith; Rosegrant, Mark W.; Lowder, Sarah K.; Nin-Pratt, Alejandro; Willenbockel, Dirk; Robinson, Sherman; Zhu, Tingju; Cenacchi, Nicola; Dunston, Shahnila; Robertson, Richard D.			Agricultural investments and hunger in Africa modeling potential contributions to SDG2-Zero Hunger	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Agriculture; Agricultural investments; Hunger; Africa; SDGs; Food security	RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; GREEN-REVOLUTION; FOOD; SCENARIOS; RETURNS; FUTURES; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY	We use IFPRI's IMPACT framework of linked biophysical and structural economic models to examine developments in global agricultural production systems, climate change, and food security. Building on related work on how increased investment in agricultural research, resource management, and infrastructure can address the challenges of meeting future food demand, we explore the costs and implications of these investments for reducing hunger in Africa by 2030. This analysis is coupled with a new investment estimation model, based on the perpetual inventory methodology (PIM), which allows for a better assessment of the costs of achieving projected agricultural improvements. We find that climate change will continue to slow projected reductions in hunger in the coming decades-increasing the number of people at risk of hunger in 2030 by 16 million in Africa compared to a scenario without climate change. Investments to increase agricultural productivity can offset the adverse impacts of climate change and help reduce the share of people at risk of hunger in 2030 to five percent or less in Northern, Western, and Southern Africa, but the share is projected to remain at ten percent or more in Eastern and Central Africa. Investments in Africa to achieve these results are estimated to cost about 15 billion USD per year between 2015 and 2030, as part of a larger package of investments costing around 52 billion USD in developing countries. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Mason-D'Croz, Daniel; Sulser, Timothy B.; Wiebe, Keith; Rosegrant, Mark W.; Nin-Pratt, Alejandro; Robinson, Sherman; Zhu, Tingju; Cenacchi, Nicola; Dunston, Shahnila; Robertson, Richard D.] IFPRI, Washington, DC USA; [Mason-D'Croz, Daniel] CSIRO, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia; [Willenbockel, Dirk] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton, E Sussex, England		Mason-D'Croz, D (corresponding author), CSIRO, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.	daniel.masondcroz@csiro.au; t.sulser@cgiar.org; k.wiebe@cgiar.org; m.rosegrant@cgiar.org; a.ninpratt@cgiar.org; d.willenbockel@ids.ac.uk; s.robinson@cgiar.org; tingjuzhu@intl.zju.edu.cn; n.cenacchi@cgiar.org; s.dunston@cgiar.org; r.robertson@cgiar.org	Willenbockel, Dirk/AAC-2191-2021; Mason-D'Croz, Daniel/M-4254-2016; Sulser, Timothy B./AAJ-1776-2020	Willenbockel, Dirk/0000-0002-6840-0954; Mason-D'Croz, Daniel/0000-0003-0673-2301; Sulser, Timothy B./0000-0001-7128-5283; Zhu, Tingju/0000-0002-6882-3551; Wiebe, Keith/0000-0001-6035-620X	CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) [CRP23-001-2017]; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) [CRP-072-15, CRP-137-11]; United States Agency for International Development [AID-BFS-G-11-00002-11]; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP2234339, OPP1009468]	CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM)(CGIAR); CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)(CGIAR); United States Agency for International Development(United States Agency for International Development (USAID)); Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation(Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)	The authors would like to acknowledge funding for this research, which was provided by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) (CRP23-001-2017), the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) (CRP-072-15 (Amendment No. 4 to Program Participant Agreement CRP-137-11)), the United States Agency for International Development (AID-BFS-G-11-00002-11 Deepening Multilateral Research to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals). the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Projects: OPP2234339, Supporting Evidence-Based Interventions to Achieve Agricultural Development Goals (SEBI) LiveGaps 2; OPP1009468, BMGF-Global Futures and CGIAR strategic foresight Program Phase 2 (GF/SF P2)).	Aghion P, 2015, ECON J, V125, P533, DOI 10.1111/ecoj.12199; Alston JM, 2001, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V25, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00195.x; Alston JM, 2018, AM J AGR ECON, V100, P392, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aax094; Alston JM, 2011, AM J AGR ECON, V93, P1257, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aar044; Alston JM, 2009, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V1, P537, DOI 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144137; [Anonymous], 2015, 1483 IFPRI; [Anonymous], 2015, GLOBAL LANDSCAPE CLI; Baker E, 2008, ENERG ECON, V30, P2817, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.001; Ball E, 2013, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V35, P435, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppt014; Beintema N., 2012, ASTI GLOBAL ASSESSME, DOI [10.2499/9780896298026, DOI 10.2499/9780896298026]; Bitzer J, 2007, APPL ECON, V39, P179, DOI 10.1080/00036840500427973; Bodirsky BL, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139201; Chandy L, 2015, LAST MILE ENDING EXT; Clarke L.E., 2007, SCENARIOS GREENHOUSE, P154; Delgado C, 2001, OUTLOOK AGR, V30, P27, DOI 10.5367/000000001101293427; Dellink R, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004; Dercon S, 2014, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V6, P471, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012706; Dufresne JL, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2123, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1; Esposti R, 2003, J PROD ANAL, V19, P33, DOI 10.1023/A:1021818019626; Evenson R. E., 2003, P473, DOI 10.1079/9780851995496.0473; Evenson RE, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P758, DOI 10.1126/science.1078710; FAO, 2015, ACH ZER HUNG CRIT RO; FAO, 2016, AQUASTAT; FAO, 2015, REG OV FOOD INS AFR; FAO I. F. A. D., 2017, AGR FOOD SEC NUTR P; Fischer G, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, V360, P2067, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1744; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001, STATE FOOD INSECURIT; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012, STAT FOOD AGR INV AG; FSIN, 2018, GLOB REP FOOD CRIS 2; Fuglie K. O, 2012, PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, DOI [10.1079/9781845939212.0335, DOI 10.1079/9781845939212.0335]; Fuglie K, 2018, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V40, P421, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppx045; Fujino J, 2006, ENERGY J; GRILICHES Z, 1979, BELL J ECON, V10, P92, DOI 10.2307/3003321; GRILICHES Z, 1958, J POLIT ECON, V66, P419, DOI 10.1086/258077; GRILICHES Z, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1; GYGWPA, 2017, GLOB YIELD GAP WAT P; Hall BH, 2010, HBK ECON, V2, P1033, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02008-3; Hasegawa T, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P699, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x; Hijioka Y., 2008, J GLOB ENV ENG, V13, P97; Hoogenboom G., 2012, DECISION SUPPORT SYS; Huffman W. E, 2018, AGRISCIENCE AGRIBUSI, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_22, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_22]; IFPRI, 2015, STAT PUBL EXP EC DEV, DOI [10.7910/DVN/INZ3QK, DOI 10.7910/DVN/INZ3QK]; Ignaciuk A., 2014, MODELLING ADAPTATION; Ignaciuk A, 2015, EUROCHOICES, V14, P26, DOI 10.1111/1746-692X.12088; IIASA, 2015, RCP DAT VERS 2 0 5; IIASA 2013, 2013, SSP DAT VERS 1 0; Inocencio A, 2007, COST PERFORMANCE IRR, DOI [10.3910/2009.109, DOI 10.3910/2009.109]; IPCC, 2013, SEA LEVEL CHANGE, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324; Islam S, 2016, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V10, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.003; Jiang LW, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008; Jones CD, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P543, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-543-2011; Jones JW, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P235, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7; Laborde D, 2016, ENDING HUNGER WHAT W; Lowder SK, 2015, EUR J DEV RES, V27, P371, DOI 10.1057/ejdr.2015.39; Markowitz H, 1952, J FINANC, V7, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x; MARKOWITZ HM, 1991, J FINANC, V46, P469, DOI 10.2307/2328831; Mason-D'Croz D, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V83, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.008; McArthur J. W, 2015, LAST MILE ENDING EXT; McDonald S, 2007, 14 USNA; Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823; Narayanan BG, 2012, GLOBAL TRADE ASSISTA; Nelson G., 2010, IFPRI RES MONOGRAPH, DOI [10.2499/9780896291867, DOI 10.2499/9780896291867]; Nelson GC, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3274, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222465110; Nin-Pratt A., 2015, IDB WORKING PAPER SE, V608; Nin-Pratt A., 2016, PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIE; Nordmann A, 2014, J RESPONSIBLE INNOV, V1, P87, DOI 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064; O'Neill BC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004; O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2; OECD, 2016, CLIM CHANG OECD DAC; Palazzo A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V45, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.002; Pingali P, 2007, FOOD POLICY, V32, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.08.001; Pingali PL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P12302, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0912953109; Reardon T, 2019, AGR SYST, V172, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.022; Renkow M, 2010, FOOD POLICY, V35, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.006; Riahi K., 2007, GREENHOUSE GASES INT, V74, P234; Robinson S, 2014, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V45, P21, DOI 10.1111/agec.12087; Rockstrom J, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14; Rosegrant M., 2017, QUANTITATIVE FORESIG; Rosegrant MarkW., 2002, WORLD WATER FOOD 202; ROSEGRANT MW, 2014, FOOD SECURITY WORLD; Rosegrant MW, 1999, P NUTR SOC, V58, P219, DOI 10.1017/S0029665199000312; ROSEGRANT MW, 2001, 2020 GLOBAL FOOD OUT; Rosegrant MW, 2018, PRIORITIZING DEV COS, P322, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781108233767.020, 10.1073/pnas.1721436115, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1721436115]; Rosenzweig C, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3268, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222463110; Ruane AC, 2018, CLIM RES, V76, P17, DOI 10.3354/cr01520; Samir KC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004; Schumpeter J.A., 1942, CAPITALISM SOCIALISM; Smith LC, 2000, EXPLAINING CHILD MAL; Smith SJ, 2006, ENERG J, P373; Springmann M, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1937, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3; Sulser T. B, 2015, RESAKSS ANNUAL TREND, DOI [10.2499/9780896298927, DOI 10.2499/9780896298927]; Sulser TB, 2011, FOOD SECUR, V3, pS23, DOI 10.1007/s12571-010-0100-5; Tassey G., 2005, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE, V30, P89; Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1; Tilman D, 2014, NATURE, V515, P518, DOI 10.1038/nature13959; Timmer CP, 2002, HANDB ECON, V18, P1487; UN, 2015, MILL DEV GOALS REP 2; UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2016, AD FIN GAP REP 2016; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; USDA, 2015, USDA FOOD PATT EST C; van Ittersum MK, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P14964, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1610359113; van Vuuren DP, 2006, ENERG J, P201; van Vuuren DP, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9; Vervoort J, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.004; Vervoort JM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.001; von Lampe M, 2014, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V45, P3, DOI 10.1111/agec.12086; Warszawski L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312330110; Wiebe K, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085010; Willenbockel D, 2018, IFPRI DISCUSSION PAP; Wise M, 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P1183, DOI 10.1126/science.1168475	110	46	47	1	19	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X			WORLD DEV	World Dev.	APR	2019	116						38	53		10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.006	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.006			16	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	HJ9FR	30944503	Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000457504700004
J	Abbasi, KR; Hussain, K; Haddad, AM; Salman, A; Ozturk, I				Abbasi, Kashif Raza; Hussain, Khadim; Haddad, Akram Masoud; Salman, Asma; Ozturk, Ilhan			The role role of Financial Development and Technological Innovation towards Sustainable Development in Pakistan: Fresh insights from consumption and territory-based emissions	TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE			English	Article						Financial development; Energy use; Economic globalization; Technological innovation	LONG-RUN CAUSALITY; CO2 EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSION; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; AIR-POLLUTION; COUNTRIES	In the contemporary world, environmental problems are a major human concern. The status of the environment and its management are prerequisites for every country's sustainable development. Following the Paris Climate Summit (COP21), Pakistan has amplified its efforts to address environmental issues. In this pursuit, this study aims to provide a new perspective by examining the impact of economic globalization, financial development, energy use, economic development and technological innovation with consumption and territory-based emissions from 1990Q1 to 2019Q4 in Pakistan. The study used Dynamic Autoregressive-Distributed Lag (ARDL) simulations and Frequency Domain Causality (FDC) methods. The empirical evidence reveals that financial and economic development stimulate both consumption and territory-based emissions in the short and long run. However, energy use intensifies consumption and territory-based emissions only in the long run. Also, in the short-run economic globalization adversely affects consumption and territory-based emissions while in the long run rises just consumption-based emissions. However, technological innovations decrease both emissions substantially in the long term. Finally, FDC outcomes endorsed the hypothesis. The study suggests that policymakers discourage non-renewables and increase renewable energy use to decrease consumption and territory-based emissions. The results would help Pakistan reach more eco-friendly energy technologies and a more sustainable energy environment to accomplish SDG 7 and 13 goals.	[Abbasi, Kashif Raza] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, 99 Shangda Rd,Baoshan Campus, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [Abbasi, Kashif Raza] ILMA Univ, Fac Management Sci, Dept Business Adm, Karachi, Pakistan; [Hussain, Khadim] Mirpur Univ Sci & Technol MUST, Dept Econ, Mirpur 10250, AJK, Pakistan; [Haddad, Akram Masoud] Amity Univ Dubai AUD, United Arab Emirates, Humanities Arts & Appl Sci, Dubai, U Arab Emirates; [Salman, Asma] Amer Univ Emirates AUE, Coll Business Adm, Dubai, U Arab Emirates; [Ozturk, Ilhan] Cag Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Mersin, Turkey; [Ozturk, Ilhan] China Med Nivers, Dept Med Res, China Med Univ Hosp, Taichung, Taiwan; [Ozturk, Ilhan] Asia Univ, Dept Finance, 50 Lioufeng Rd, Taichung 41354, Taiwan		Ozturk, I (corresponding author), Cag Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Mersin, Turkey.; Ozturk, I (corresponding author), China Med Nivers, Dept Med Res, China Med Univ Hosp, Taichung, Taiwan.; Ozturk, I (corresponding author), Asia Univ, Dept Finance, 50 Lioufeng Rd, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.	kashifabbasi@shu.edu.cn; hussain.eco@must.edu.pk; ahaddad@amityuniversity.ae; asma.salman@aue.ae; ilhanozturk@cag.edu.tr	Abbasi, Kashif Raza/AAD-6632-2021; Salman, Asma/C-9619-2018; Hussain, Khadim/ABC-4797-2021	Salman, Asma/0000-0002-5623-3087; Hussain, Khadim/0000-0002-1415-4647; Abbasi, Kashif/0000-0002-6775-7468				Abbasi KR, 2021, RENEW ENERG, V180, P1439, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.078; Abbasi KR, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102341; Abbasi KR, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P8639, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01803-4; Abbasi KR, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P68717, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15312-4; Abbasi KR, 2021, ENERGY, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119793; Abbasi KR, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112087; Abbasi KR, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P23323, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-12217-6; Adedoyin FF, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V713, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136726; Ahad M., 2016, B ENERGY EC, V4, P258; Ahmad M, 2022, GONDWANA RES, V105, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012; Ahmad M, 2018, CARBON MANAG, V9, P631, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2018.1529998; Ahmed Z, 2020, RESOUR POLICY, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677; Ali SA, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120573; Alola AA, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V685, P702, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139; Anser MK, 2020, PROCESSES, V8, DOI 10.3390/pr8091033; Anwar A, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P6556, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01716-2; Asongu SA, 2020, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V43, P949, DOI 10.1080/01900692.2019.1663530; Awan U., 2020, HDB ENV MAT MANAGEME, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_177-1; Awan U., 2021, IND INNOVATION INFRA, P1026; Awan U., 2020, RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPT; Awan U, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P463, DOI 10.1002/bse.2631; Bakhsh K, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V196, P627, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.029; Baloch MA, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P26030, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2654-2; Balsalobre-Lorente D, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V113, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050; Bano S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P1082, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.008; Bekhet HA, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089; Bhandari P., 2019, IMPACTS ENV ON HUMAN, P349; Bhattacharya M, 2020, ENERG ECON, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104632; Bildirici M, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106340; Breitung J, 2006, J ECONOMETRICS, V132, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004; CEIC, 2021, PAKISTAN IND PRODUCT; Chen MZ, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120521; Chen YL, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V131, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047; Cheng C, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V158, P3506, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.919; Cheng Y, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398; Danis, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996; Dogan E, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006; Donbesuur F, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120252; ENGLE RF, 1987, ECONOMETRICA, V55, P251, DOI 10.2307/1913236; Etokakpan MU, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P26125, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08714-3; Fang JC, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P12181, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04513-7; Fei Q, 2014, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V25, P1323, DOI 10.1260/0958-305X.25.8.1323; Friedlingstein P, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P3269, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020; Gozgor G, 2019, ENERGY, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115995; Hasanov FJ, 2018, ENERG ECON, V74, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004; Haug AA, 2002, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V64, P399, DOI 10.1111/1468-0084.00025; Iqbal N, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648; Jiang C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195241; JOHANSEN S, 1988, J ECON DYN CONTROL, V12, P231, DOI 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3; Jordan S, 2018, R J, V10, P469; Jordan S, 2018, STATA J, V18, P902, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1801800409; Kahouli B, 2017, ENERG ECON, V68, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013; Khan MI, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P39560, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-09304-z; Khan MK, 2020, FINANC INNOV, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40854-019-0162-0; Khan MK, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P23480, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05640-x; Khan MM, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P1375, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.094; Khan MTI, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V161, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.129; Khan Z, 2020, ENERG ECON, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806; Khan Z, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1317, DOI 10.1002/sd.2086; Khan Z, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V730, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945; Khan Z, 2019, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V41, P137, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2018.1504145; Ko YC, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120633; Koondhar MA, 2021, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101099; KRAFT J, 1978, J ENERGY DEV, V3, P401; Kwakwa PA, 2020, INT J ENERGY SECT MA, V14, P20, DOI 10.1108/IJESM-09-2018-0003; Lacheheb M., 2015, INT J ENERGY EC POLI, V5, P1125; Leadership C. Group, 2018, CONSUMPTION BASED GH, P17; Lee K.-H., 2014, J ASIA PACIFIC BUS, V15, P105; Liu YY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V645, P674, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062; Lv ZK, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V137, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004; Mikayilov JI, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1558, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269; NASA, 2020, CLIMATE CHANGEHOW WE; NEPRA, 2020, REGULATIONS, V53, P1689; Ozcan B, 2020, ECON MODEL, V84, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.010; Pata UK, 2021, RENEW ENERG, V173, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125; Pata UK, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P770, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236; Pesaran MH, 2001, J APPL ECONOMET, V16, P289, DOI 10.1002/jae.616; Pesaran MH, 1999, J AM STAT ASSOC, V94, P621, DOI 10.2307/2670182; Qureshi MI, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P367, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2423-9; Rafindadi AA, 2018, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V25, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2017.12.008; Rasool Y, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P22907, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05504-4; Riti JS, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V148, P882, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.037; Safi A, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V27, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.034; Salahuddin M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2002, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009; Salik Ahmad Naeem, 2017, COP21 PARIS PAKISTAN; Sarkodie SA, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V668, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.432; Saud S, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518; Shah M.M.A., 2019, IMPACTS GLOBALISATIO; Shahbaz M, 2020, ENERG ECON, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664; Shahbaz M, 2016, ENERG ECON, V55, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.013; Shahzad SJH, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042; Shen YJ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538; Shoaib HM, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P12461, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z; Sinha A, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110602; Statista, 2019, PAKISTAN FOSSIL FUEL; The_Global_Economy, 2020, GLOBAL EC; Twerefou DK, 2017, RES INT BUS FINANC, V42, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.028; Umar M, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111026; UNFCCC, 2015, UN PARIS AGR; Unwin J., 2019, WHAT DOES PAKISTANS; Wang L, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829; WDI, 2019, DEV FIN ASS GUID TOO; WITS, 2021, PAK TRAD STAT; Wurlod JD, 2018, ENERG ECON, V71, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.012; Xu F, 2015, LETT SPAT RESOUR SCI, V8, P15, DOI 10.1007/s12076-014-0120-4; Yameogo C.E.W., 2021, RES GLOBAL, V3; Yang L, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V101, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.020; Yao Y, 2019, ENERG ECON, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104534; You WH, 2018, ENERG ECON, V73, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016; Youmatter.world, 2020, WHAT IS GLOBALIZATIO; Zameer H, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120326; Zeb R, 2014, RENEW ENERG, V71, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.012; Zhao J, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121384; Zhao L, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121198	114	32	32	4	4	ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC	NEW YORK	STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA	0040-1625	1873-5509		TECHNOL FORECAST SOC	Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.	MAR	2022	176								121444	10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121444	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121444			16	Business; Regional & Urban Planning	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Public Administration	1K0SQ					2022-09-08	WOS:000798321700011
J	Esfandabadi, HS; Asl, MG; Esfandabadi, ZS; Gautam, S; Ranjbari, M				Esfandabadi, Hadi Shams; Asl, Mohsen Ghamary; Esfandabadi, Zahra Shams; Gautam, Sneha; Ranjbari, Meisam			Drought assessment in paddy rice fields using remote sensing technology towards achieving food security and SDG2	BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL			English	Article; Early Access						Agro-food industry; Food security; Drought prediction; Rice yield; Sustainable agriculture; Risk assessment	AGRICULTURE; SATELLITE	Purpose This research aims to monitor vegetation indices to assess drought in paddy rice fields in Mazandaran, Iran, and propose the best index to predict rice yield. Design/methodology/approach A three-step methodology is applied. First, the paddy rice fields are mapped by using three satellite-based datasets, namely SRTM DEM, Landsat8 TOA and MYD11A2. Second, the maps of indices are extracted using MODIS. And finally, the trend of indices over rice-growing seasons is extracted and compared with the rice yield data. Findings Rice paddies maps and vegetation indices maps are provided. Vegetation Health Index (VHI) combining average Temperature Condition Index (TCI) and minimum Vegetation Condition Index (VCI), and also VHI combining TCImin and VCImin are found to be the most proper indices to predict rice yield. Practical implications The results serve as a guideline for policy-makers and practitioners in the agro-food industry to (1) support sustainable agriculture and food safety in terms of rice production; (2) help balance the supply and demand sides of the rice market and move towards SDG2; (3) use yield prediction in the rice supply chain management, pricing and trade flows management; and (4) assess drought risk in index-based insurances. Originality/value This study, as one of the first research assessing and mapping vegetation indices for rice paddies in northern Iran, particularly contributes to (1) extracting the map of paddy rice fields in Mazandaran Province by using satellite-based data on cloud-computing technology in the Google Earth Engine platform; (2) providing the map of VCI and TCI for the period 2010-2019 based on MODIS data and (3) specifying the best index to describe rice yield through proposing different calculation methods for VHI.	[Esfandabadi, Hadi Shams; Asl, Mohsen Ghamary] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran; [Esfandabadi, Zahra Shams] Politecn Torino, Dept Environm Land & Infrastruct Engn DIATI, Turin, Italy; [Esfandabadi, Zahra Shams] Politecn Torino, Energy Ctr Lab, Turin, Italy; [Gautam, Sneha] Karunya Inst Technol & Sci, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; [Ranjbari, Meisam] Univ Turin, Dept Econ & Stat Cognetti Martiis, Turin, Italy; [Ranjbari, Meisam] ESSCA Sch Management, Lyon, France		Asl, MG (corresponding author), Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.	m_ghamaryasl@azad.ac.ir	Ranjbari, Meisam/AAW-9409-2020; Shams Esfandabadi, Zahra/AAW-9671-2020	Ranjbari, Meisam/0000-0002-2666-9154; Shams Esfandabadi, Zahra/0000-0001-9320-4712				Amir NA, 2021, AGR RES, V10, P483, DOI 10.1007/s40003-020-00512-0; Amini S., 2020, Information Processing in Agriculture, V7, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.inpa.2019.10.001; Amini S, 2020, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100744; Ataei P, 2021, RURAL SOC, V30, P15, DOI 10.1080/10371656.2021.1895471; Bhuiyan C., 2008, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V37, P907; Bi JG, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V315, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127992; Bisheh AV, 2017, ENERGY ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P214, DOI 10.1007/s40974-017-0054-y; Bridhikitti A, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V146, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.016; CGIAR-CSI, 2018, SRTM 90M DIG EL DAT; Danodia A, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P15432, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01305-3; Dar MH, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062214; Desa U.N., 2016, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203; Dong JW, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V185, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.016; FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2015, IMP NAT HAZ DIS AGR; Fawole WO, 2016, BRIT FOOD J, V118, P1554, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-11-2015-0425; Ferreira J, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P535, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02145.x; [Галиев Р.Р. Galiev R.R.], 2021, [Проблемы прогнозирования, Problemy prognozirovaniya, Problemy prognozirovaniya], P41, DOI 10.47711/0868-6351-186-41-53; Gautam S, 2020, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100650; Gautam S, 2020, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100546; Guilherme L. R. G., 2018, Acta Horticulturae, P1; Gutaker RM, 2020, NAT PLANTS, V6, P492, DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-0659-6; Hochrainer-Stigler S, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V6, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2014.09.002; Huang CL, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75845-5; Iazzi A, 2022, BRIT FOOD J, V124, P1081, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-02-2021-0197; Ibrahim M, 2020, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V79, DOI 10.1007/s12665-020-09075-3; Inoue S, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, P1622, DOI 10.3390/rs12101622; Kalantari H, 2020, JUNDISHAPUR J NAT PH, V15, DOI 10.5812/jjnpp.94663; Karimi V, 2018, J INTEGR AGR, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61794-5; Khan MIR, 2021, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V172, P645, DOI 10.1111/ppl.13223; Khoshkdaman M, 2021, J PLANT PATHOL, V103, P87, DOI 10.1007/s42161-020-00653-9; Kogan F, 2004, INT J REMOTE SENS, V25, P2889, DOI 10.1080/01431160410001697619; Kogan FN, 1997, B AM METEOROL SOC, V78, P621, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0621:GDWFS>2.0.CO;2; Kukunuri ANJ, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P2871, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2020.1837256; Kumar V, 2011, ADV AGRON, V111, P297, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1; Liu ZR, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166497; Mirzapour S., 2018, J GEOGRAPHY NATURAL, V8, DOI [10.4172/2167-0587.1000215, DOI 10.4172/2167-0587.1000215]; Musa SFPD, 2021, BRIT FOOD J, V123, P3085, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0325; Panda D, 2021, RICE SCI, V28, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.rsci.2021.01.002; Raksapatcharawong M, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12132099; Ranjbari M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660; Ranjbari M, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P16646, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01372-6; Ranjbari M, 2019, DIR ORGAN, V68, P33; Raoufi RS, 2018, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V31, DOI 10.1111/nrm.12162; Regmi P.P., 2000, INT J SOC ECON, V27, P788; Rehber E, 2012, BRIT FOOD J, V114, P353, DOI 10.1108/00070701211213465; Rezaei M, 2021, ENERG SOURCE PART A, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2020.1864066; Rezaei S., 2013, LIVESTOCK AGRO IND, V174, P32; Roy DP, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V185, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024; Sabouri A, 2020, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V158, P561, DOI 10.1007/s10658-020-02102-w; Sabouri A, 2018, MOL BIOL REP, V45, P1037, DOI 10.1007/s11033-018-4253-1; Shams SB, 2014, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V40, P79, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W3-79-2014; Silwal S, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, P1831, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10111831; Statistical Center of Iran, 2020, STAT CTR IR; Suwannaporn P, 2008, BRIT FOOD J, V110, P595, DOI 10.1108/00070700810877906; Taherparvar M, 2018, RICE SCI, V25, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.02.003; Tanksale A, 2015, BRIT FOOD J, V117, P1315, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2014-0239; Tey YS, 2019, BRIT FOOD J, V122, P852, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-08-2019-0632; Tiraieyai N., 2014, ASIAN SOC SCI, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.5539/ASS.V10N4P1; Wu WB, 2019, FRONT EARTH SCI-PRC, V13, P682, DOI 10.1007/s11707-019-0803-7; Xiao XM, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V100, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.004; Zolin MB, 2021, BRIT FOOD J, V123, P59, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0577	61	2	2	12	22	EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD	BINGLEY	HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND	0007-070X	1758-4108		BRIT FOOD J	Br. Food J.												10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0872	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0872		JAN 2022	15	Agricultural Economics & Policy; Food Science & Technology	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Agriculture; Food Science & Technology	YC7FL					2022-09-08	WOS:000739853500001
J	Larson, AM; Solis, D; Duchene, AE; Atmadja, S; Resosudarmo, IAP; Dokken, T; Komalasari, M				Larson, Anne M.; Solis, David; Duchene, Amy E.; Atmadja, Stibniati; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja; Dokken, Therese; Komalasari, Mella			Gender lessons for climate initiatives: A comparative study of REDD plus impacts on subjective wellbeing	WORLD DEVELOPMENT			English	Article						Climate change; Mitigation; Tropical forests; Livelihoods; Community forest management	WOMENS PARTICIPATION; FOREST; INTERVENTIONS; PERCEPTIONS	Although REDD+ is primarily a mechanism for reducing carbon emissions from forests, concerns regarding social benefits, wellbeing and gender are increasingly part of its mandate. This is consistent with the Paris Declaration as well as SDG 5 on gender equality and women's empowerment. Critics have argued, however, that REDD+ design, both in policy and projects, does not take gender into account effectively, rather marginalizing women from decision making processes and exacerbating inequalities. Most of that research has been site specific or on single countries. This article uses data from a longitudinal study of subnational REDD+ initiatives in six countries to analyze their gendered impact on perceived wellbeing. Comparative research on subjective wellbeing was conducted at 62 villages participating in 16 REDD+ initiatives and 61 control villages at two periods in time, using a before-after-control-intervention (BACI) design. Focus groups with villagers (68% male) and women (100% female) permit a gendered comparison of definitions of wellbeing and outcomes of initiatives. The results highlight that while definitions of wellbeing overlapped between the two groups, almost half of the women's focus groups thought that having their own source of income was important. Outcomes regarding wellbeing change suggest that perceived wellbeing decreased in REDD+ villages both for villagers as a whole and for women, relative to control villages, but the decrease was much worse for women - a decrease that is significantly associated with living in a REDD+ village. These declines may be due to unrealized expectations for REDD+, combined with little attention to gender in REDD+ initiatives, in spite of an important portion (46%) of specific interventions that women view positively. These interventions provide insights into potential ways forward. Overall, however, REDD+ initiatives appear to be repeating past mistakes, with insufficient attention to gender equality and safeguarding women's rights. More effort needs to be paid to ensuring that gender is an integral part of future initiatives to combat climate change in rural communities. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.	[Larson, Anne M.; Solis, David] CIP, Ctr Int Forestry Res, Ave Molina 1895, Lima 12, Peru; [Solis, David] Univ Antonio Ruiz de Montoya, Lima, Peru; [Duchene, Amy E.; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja; Komalasari, Mella] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Jl Cifor, Bogor Barat 16115, Jawa Barat, Indonesia; [Atmadja, Stibniati] Ctr Int Forestry Res, ILRI Addis Ababa Campus,POB 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; [Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; [Dokken, Therese] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Sch Econ & Business, Univ Stunet 3, N-1430 As, Norway		Larson, AM (corresponding author), CIP, Ctr Int Forestry Res, Ave Molina 1895, Lima 12, Peru.	a.larson@cgiar.org; dsolis04@gmail.com; a.duchelle@cgiar.org; s.atmadja@cgiar.org; daju.resosudarmo@anu.edu.au; theresedokken@gmail.com; M.Komalasari@cgiar.org	Atmadja, Stibniati S./AGY-3388-2022	Duchelle, Amy Eleanor/0000-0002-8810-1054; Resosudarmo, Daju/0000-0002-9951-548X	Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT); European Union (EU); International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB); Department for International Development (UKAID); CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FTA)	Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad)(CGIAR); Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)(Australian Government); European Union (EU)(CGIAREuropean Commission); International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB); Department for International Development (UKAID)(CGIAR); CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FTA)(CGIAR)	We thank the members of our field teams for their contribution in carrying out this research, our in-country partners for their collaboration, and the men and women of participating communities for sharing their time and insights. The funding partners that supported this research include the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), the European Union (EU), the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB), the Department for International Development (UKAID), and the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FTA), with financial support from the donors contributing to the CGIAR Fund. We would like to thank Abdon Awono for his contributions on the Cameroon sites. We also thank Bimbika Sijapati Basnett and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of the article.	Aguilar L, 2016, GENDER FORESTS CLIMA; Anandi C. A. M., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; Angelsen A, 2017, CONSERV BIOL, V31, P718, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12933; Atmadja S. S., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; Bee BA, 2017, THIRD WORLD Q, V38, P787, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2016.1191342; Brown HCP, 2011, INT FOREST REV, V13, P163, DOI 10.1505/146554811797406651; Chant S., 2012, GENDER DEV, V20, P517, DOI DOI 10.1080/13552074.2012.731812; Duchelle AE, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI [10.5751/ES-09334-220302, 10.5751/es-09334-220302]; Esquivel V., 2016, GENDER DEV, V24, P9, DOI [10.1080/13552074.2016.1147872, DOI 10.1080/13552074.2016.1147872]; Indriatmoko Y., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; Intarini D. Y., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; IUCN, 2012, MAINSTR GEND CONS RE; Kabeer N, 2010, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V41, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00188.x; Kariuki J, 2016, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V29, P432, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2015.1086461; Khadka M, 2014, MT RES DEV, V34, P197, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00081.1; Kijazi M., 2017, 226 CIFOR; Larson AM, 2015, INT FOREST REV, V17, P43, DOI 10.1505/146554815814725031; Larson A. M., GENDERED OUTCOMES RE; Meinzen-Dick R., 2011, 99 CAPRI INT FOOD PO, DOI [10.2499/CAPRiVVP99, DOI 10.2499/CAPRIVVP99]; Myers R, 2015, CONSERV SOC, V13, P370, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.179886; Pham TT, 2016, INT FOREST REV, V18, P334, DOI 10.1505/146554816819501691; Putri A. A. D., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; Ravnborg H. M., 2017, 20076 DIIS, P6; Rodriguez-Ward D., 2014, REDD ON THE GROUND; Sills EO, 2014, REDD GROUND CASEBOOK, P505; Sills EO, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V43, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.002; Stiem L, 2016, INT FOREST REV, V18, P110, DOI 10.1505/146554816818206113; Sunderland T, 2014, WORLD DEV, V64, pS56, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003; Sunderlin W. D., 2016, TECHNICAL GUIDELINES; UN General Assembly, 2015, ARES701 UN GEN ASS; UNFCCC (United Nations Framework on Climate Change), 2016, FCCCCP201510ADD1; Westholm L, 2016, INT FOREST REV, V18, P511, DOI 10.1505/146554816820127578; Westholm L, 2015, CONSERV SOC, V13, P189, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.164203	33	29	29	4	31	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND	0305-750X			WORLD DEV	World Dev.	AUG	2018	108						86	102		10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.027	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.027			17	Development Studies; Economics	Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Development Studies; Business & Economics	GH3AH		Green Published, Green Submitted, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000433272600007
J	Yin, S; Yu, YY				Yin, Shi; Yu, Yuanyuan			An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for industry 5.0	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Digital green innovation; Manufacturing industry; Cognitive evaluation; Enterprise performance	TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; IMPACT; COGNITION; SEARCH; EXPLORATION; EMOTION; PRODUCT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; COMPETITIVENESS	Despite the current slowdown in global economic growth due to the impact of COVID-19, the digital economy is still performing well. Under the background of double carbon, green innovation and intelligent production of manufacturing enterprises have become the general trend of sustainable development. It is particularly important to study the integration of digital technology into green innovation and production processes to improve the performance of digital green innovation and the competitiveness of enterprises. However, the integration of digital technology and green innovation from the perspective of knowledge management has not been fully introduced into current literatures. In this study, hierarchical regression and fsQCA approaches were used to empirically verify the adoption process of digital green innovation activities and the impact of digital green knowledge creation on digital green innovation performance (DGIP), and explores the moderating effects of digital green risk perception (DGRP) and digital green complexity perception (DGCC) through 429 questionnaires from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. In addition, knowledge search is divided into three dimensions: scientific digital green knowledge search (SDGKS), market digital green knowledge search (MDGKS) and supply chain digital green knowledge search (SCDGKS). The results show that: i) SDGKS promotes exploitative digital green knowledge creation (EDGKC). MDGKS has a positive impact on both utilizing digital green knowledge creation (ADGKC) and EDGKC. SCDGKS promotes EDGKC. ii) The relationship between SDGKS and EDGKC is only moderated by DGCC (positive). The relationship between MDGKS and EDGKC is only moderated by DGCC (negative). The relationship between SCDGKS and EDGKC is moderated by DGRP (negative) and DGCC (negative). iii) There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between ADGKC and DGIP. There is a U-shaped relationship between EDGKC and DGIP. The essence of this study is to help manufacturing enterprises find external partners to improve their digital green innovation performance through external knowledge search partner selection. The conclusion of this study has certain theoretical contribution to the clarification of the complex process of digital green innovation. This study provides a theoretical basis for enterprises to select knowledge search partners according to their own environment to carry out digital green innovation activities smoothly. This study has practical value for enterprises to improve competitiveness, better survival and development process under the current environment.	[Yin, Shi; Yu, Yuanyuan] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China; [Yin, Shi] Harbin Engn Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China		Yin, S; Yu, YY (corresponding author), Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China.	shyshi0314@163.com; acadch@hrbeu.edu.cn	Yin, Shi/AEA-6712-2022	Yin, Shi/0000-0001-6885-7412	Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of the Ministry of Education [21YJCZH203]; Soft Science Special Project of Hebei Innovation Capability Enhancement Program [21557635D]; Social Science Fund project of Hebei Province [HB21YJ003]; Top Young Talents Scientific Research Project of Higher Education in Hebei Province [BJ2021084]; Baoding Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [2020047]; Scientific Research Foundation for the Talents of Hebei Agricultural University [YJ2020017]; Hebei Agricultural Industry System Project [HBCT2021230301]; Henan Key Research and Development and Promotion Special (Soft Science Research) [222400410126]	Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of the Ministry of Education; Soft Science Special Project of Hebei Innovation Capability Enhancement Program; Social Science Fund project of Hebei Province; Top Young Talents Scientific Research Project of Higher Education in Hebei Province; Baoding Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project; Scientific Research Foundation for the Talents of Hebei Agricultural University; Hebei Agricultural Industry System Project; Henan Key Research and Development and Promotion Special (Soft Science Research)	This research was funded by Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of the Ministry of Education grant number [21YJCZH203] , Soft Science Special Project of Hebei Innovation Capability Enhancement Program grant number [21557635D] , Social Science Fund project of Hebei Province grant number [HB21YJ003] , Top Young Talents Scientific Research Project of Higher Education in Hebei Province grant number [BJ2021084] , Baoding Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project grant number [2020047] , and Scientific Research Foundation for the Talents of Hebei Agricultural University grant number [YJ2020017] , Hebei Agricultural Industry System Project [HBCT2021230301] , and Henan Key Research and Development and Promotion Special (Soft Science Research) grant number [222400410126] .	Abbas J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024; Acquah ISK, 2021, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V32, P1399, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0404; Agarwal Naresh Kumar, 2014, International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, V4, P67, DOI 10.5865/IJKCT.2014.4.2.067; ANDERSON JC, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P411, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411; Anser MK, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12051937; Anthony B, 2021, ENTERP INF SYST-UK, V15, P299, DOI 10.1080/17517575.2020.1812006; Ardito L, 2020, J BUS RES, V119, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043; Awan, 2021, 4 IND REVOLUTION IMP, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-62796-6_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-62796-6_1]; Awan Usama, 2019, International Journal of Applied Management Science, V11, P21; Awan U., 2022, INF SOFTW TECHNOL, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106896; Awan U., 2020, RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPT; Awan U, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P2038, DOI 10.1002/bse.2731; Awan U, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P1283, DOI 10.1002/bse.2684; Awan U, 2021, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V30, P463, DOI 10.1002/bse.2631; Awan U, 2018, J IND ENG MANAG-JIEM, V11, P349, DOI 10.3926/jiem.2558; Bagla RK, 2018, J MANAG DEV, V37, P442, DOI 10.1108/JMD-04-2017-0144; Bagozzi R.P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327]; Balduzzi S, 2019, EVID-BASED MENT HEAL, V22, P153, DOI 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117; Basle N, 2018, EUR J INT MANAG, V12, P334, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2018.10011275; Batista L, 2018, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V29, P438, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502; Berg-Schlosser D., 2009, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP, P1, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452226569; Birkinshaw J, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P825; Brettel M., 2017, FORMAMENTE, V12; Buchbinder H., 2021, HIGHER ED INFORM AGE, P21; Byrne F. P., 2016, SUSTAINABLE CHEM PRO, V4, P7, DOI [10.1186/s40508-016-0051-z, DOI 10.1186/S40508-016-0051-Z]; Carmeli A, 2009, STRATEG ENTREP J, V3, P85, DOI 10.1002/sej.63; Carrel A, 2018, GA ST U LAW REV, P35; Ceptureanu SI, 2018, ENERGIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/en11081977; Chang CH, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V104, P361, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x; Chen MP, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1780948; Cheng Y, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398; Chevalier M, 2021, INT DATABASE ENG APP, P184, DOI 10.1145/3472163.3472276; Choi JN, 2011, J ORGAN BEHAV, V32, P107, DOI 10.1002/job.684; Choo AS, 2007, J OPER MANAG, V25, P918, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.002; CHURCHILL GA, 1979, J MARKETING RES, V16, P64, DOI 10.2307/3150876; Clausen J, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.003; Clohessy T.., 2019, INVESTIGATING INFLUE; Colombo MG, 2021, RES POLICY, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104134; Daellenbach US, 1999, R&D MANAGE, V29, P199, DOI 10.1111/1467-9310.00130; David A, 2019, EUR MANAG REV, V16, P383, DOI 10.1111/emre.12299; Del Giudice M, 2021, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V38, P68, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12560; Demircioglu MA, 2017, RES POLICY, V46, P1681, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004; Dong X.Y., 2019, LIB INFORM SERVICE, P1; Du Y.Z., 2017, MANAGE WORLD WASTE, V6, P155, DOI DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2017.06.012; Ehls D, 2020, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V37, P405, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12549; Fabiae M.G., 2016, ADM MANAG PUBL, P7; Fang Z, 2022, TECHNOL SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101844; Feng L.J., 2022, SCI TECHNOLOGICAL PR; Fernando Y, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031; Ferraris A, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119750; Gandhi R, 2007, 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND DEVELOPMENT (ICTD), P20; Gao S.X.., 2018, SCI SCI MANAG SCI TE, P24; Garcia-Herrero A.., 2018, BRUEGEL WORKING PAPE; Ge DL, 2009, NATURE, V461, P399, DOI 10.1038/nature08309; Ghobakhloo M, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P2384, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1630775; Gibbs RA, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P222, DOI 10.1126/science.1139247; Gremmels H, 2021, ECLINICALMEDICINE, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100677; Gunasekeran DV, 2021, NPJ DIGIT MED, V4, DOI 10.1038/s41746-021-00412-9; Guo B.N., 2021, LANZHOU J, P1; Guo L.., 2022, IMPACT ENERGY ENTERP; Guo YY, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10040940; Gurevitch J, 2018, NATURE, V555, P175, DOI 10.1038/nature25753; Harlan T, 2021, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V62, P202, DOI 10.1080/15387216.2020.1795700; Hayes BD, 2009, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V20, P69, DOI 10.1353/hpu.0.0159; He Y.B.., 2017, SCI SCI MANAG SCI TE, P12; Heidenreich S, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P2440, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.014; Henfridsson O, 2018, INFORM ORGAN-UK, V28, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001; Hernandez-Espallardo M, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007; Hiser J, 2018, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V83, P638, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.030; Horbach J, 2012, ECOL ECON, V78, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005; Horvath AO, 2018, PSYCHOTHER RES, V28, P499, DOI 10.1080/10503307.2017.1373204; Huang HY, 2021, TECHNOL SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101593; Huang S.F., 2016, THESIS ZHEJIANG U; Huang Y, 2021, CHEM ENG J, V403, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126295; Jafari-Sadeghi V, 2021, J BUS RES, V124, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.020; Ji C.Z., 2022, EC MANAGEMENT; Jiang JS, 2022, J APPL PHYCOL, V34, P1411, DOI 10.1007/s10811-022-02700-7; Jiang WB, 2020, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V29, P1899, DOI 10.1002/bse.2478; Jiskani IM, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102007; July Singh S.K., 2019, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V1, P19246; Kalinowska K, 2021, CURR OPIN GREEN SUST, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100498; KAMOCHE KN, 2006, ASIA PACIFIC J HUMAN, V44, P25, DOI DOI 10.1177/1038411106061506; Karahanna E, 2013, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V30, P15, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300101; Katila R, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P1183, DOI 10.2307/3069433; Kazadi K, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.009; Khattak SI, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P13866, DOI [10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4, 10.1007/s10668-020-00674-5]; Kibbeling M, 2013, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V30, P500, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12007; Kim C, 2013, R&D MANAGE, V43, P394, DOI 10.1111/radm.12026; Kimuli SNL, 2021, WORLD J SCI TECHNOL, V18, P93, DOI 10.1108/WJSTSD-02-2021-0017; Kiss AN, 2020, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V41, P2200, DOI 10.1002/smj.3192; Kline R.B., 1998, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE; Kline S.J., 2010, STUDIES SCI INNOVATI, P173, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789814273596_0009; Kobrinskii B.A.., 2021, INT C INTELLIGENT IN, P307; Kraus S, 2018, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V14, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8; Kumar S, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599; Laursen K, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P131, DOI 10.1002/smj.507; Lazarus R. S., 1987, EUR J PERSONALITY, V1, P141, DOI [10.1002/per.2410010304, DOI 10.1002/PER.2410010304]; Lewrick Michael, 2011, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, V6, P48, DOI 10.4067/S0718-27242011000300004; Li B.Z., RES SCI; Li B.Z.., 2022, RES SCI; Li C.F., 2021, STUD SCI SCI, V1, P180; Li H.X., 2021, IMPACT MANUFACTURING, P41; Li K, 2020, ELECTRON COMMER R A, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004; Li Y.J.., 2021, SCI TECHNOL PROGR CO, P86; Lii P, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V174, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.018; Liu C.J., 2022, TECHNOL EC, P6; Liu X., 2022, SCI TECHNOLOGY CHINA, P62; Liu Y.., 2020, DIGITAL INNOVATION M, P198; Loonam J, 2018, STRATEG CHANG, V27, P101, DOI 10.1002/jsc.2185; Ma X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031755; Machnik-Slomka J., 2017, EC ENV STUDIES, V17, P221, DOI [10.25167/ees.2017.42.5, DOI 10.25167/EES.2017.42.5]; Magnier-Watanabe R, 2017, KNOWL MAN RES PRACT, V15, P325, DOI 10.1057/s41275-017-0058-6; Mandal P, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123373; March JG, 1991, ORGAN SCI, V2, P71, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71; Tang MR, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P4184, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10760-w; Miao W.., 2011, MODERN MANAG SCI, P19; Mohsin AKM, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07811; Nair B.V., 2020, J RES INNOVAT TEACH, V13, P174; Nambisan S, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P1029, DOI 10.1111/etap.12254; Nambisan S, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P223, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03; Neutzling DM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.091; Nieto MJ, 2007, TECHNOVATION, V27, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001; Ode E, 2020, J INNOV KNOWL, V5, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002; Orben A, 2019, NAT HUM BEHAV, V3, P173, DOI 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1; Osiyevskyy O, 2015, STRATEG ENTREP J, V9, P58, DOI 10.1002/sej.1192; Papa A, 2018, BALT J MANAG, V13, P329, DOI 10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0125; Pappas IO, 2021, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310; Paritala PK, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V174, P982, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.250; Pasupuleti M.B., 2018, AM J TRADE POLICY, V5, P139; Patel Amit R., 2021, Data Science and Intelligent Applications. Proceedings of ICDSIA 2020. Lectures Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (LNDECT 52), P267, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-4474-3_31; Peng X.X.., 2017, MED J, P381; Qin D., MANAG REV, P126; Ragin CC, 2014, COMPARATIVE METHOD: MOVING BEYOND QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES, P1; Ragin C. C., 2008, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP, V51, P87; Raisch S, 2008, J MANAGE, V34, P375, DOI 10.1177/0149206308316058; Rapanta C., 2020, POSTDIGITAL SCI EDUC, V2, P923, DOI [10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y, DOI 10.1007/S42438-020-00155-Y]; Rihoux B.., 2008, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP, P679; Riswanto A., 2021, RES HORIZ, V1, P7; Riswanto A., 2020, MANAG SCI LETT, V10, P1947; Roehrich JK, 2019, IND MARKET MANAG, V79, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.10.006; Rui Z.Y., 2016, STUD SCI SCI, P771; Saunila M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.211; Savchenkov A.V.., 2017, REV ESPACIOS, V38; Schilling M, 2020, STRATEG MANAG; Schneider CQ, 2012, STRAT SOC INQ, P1; Schwarz N, 2000, COGNITION EMOTION, V14, P433, DOI 10.1080/026999300402745; Shahzad M, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P2079, DOI 10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624; She M., 2022, SCI TECHNOL PROGR CO, P121; Shen HY, 2020, ECON MODEL, V89, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.007; Shin Seungki, 2020, [JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 정보교육학회논문지], V24, P59, DOI 10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.1.59; SHRIVASTAVA P, 1987, J MANAGE STUD, V24, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00445.x; Singh SK, 2021, J BUS RES, V128, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040; Sireci S.G.., 2020, CHINENGLISH J ED MEA, V1, P3; SMITH ML, 1977, AM PSYCHOL, V32, P752, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.32.9.752; Sofka W, 2010, R&D MANAGE, V40, P310, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00592.x; Sofka Wolfgang., 2010, SPEC SEARCH INNOVAT, V40, P310; Song ML, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V144, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.055; Stachova K, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020345; Stahl B. C., 2021, ARTIF INTELL, P124; [苏敬勤 SU Jingqin], 2010, [科学学与科学技术管理, Science of Science and Management of S.& T.], V31, P34; Sun Y, 2020, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V37, P734, DOI 10.1002/sres.2714; Huynh TLD, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120188; Udall M, 2018, DIAGN PATHOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13000-018-0689-9; Vargo D, 2021, HUM BEHAV EMERG TECH, V3, P13, DOI 10.1002/hbe2.242; Vis B, 2012, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V41, P168, DOI 10.1177/0049124112442142; von Krogh G, 1998, CALIF MANAGE REV, V40, P133, DOI 10.2307/41165947; von Krogh G, 2018, ACAD MANAG DISCOV, V4, P404, DOI 10.5465/amd.2018.0084; Wan H., 2021, INCLUSIVE INNOVATION, P169; Wang BC, 2021, ENGINEERING-PRC, V7, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.017; Wang CH, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P301, DOI 10.1108/JKM-04-2019-0198; Wang R, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111027; Wei S.W., 2022, CAN DIGITAL EC PROMO; WHO, 2012, WORLD MALARIA REPORT 2012, P1; Wicki S, 2019, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V28, P970, DOI 10.1002/bse.2295; Wilms R, 2019, EUR MANAG J, V37, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2019.03.006; Wisniewski B, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087; Wu C.H., 2017, MODERN SHOP MALLS, P83; Xia HS, 2022, INT J INOV SCI, V14, P62, DOI 10.1108/IJIS-08-2020-0122; Xiao D.D.., 2016, STUD SCI SCI, P1076; Xiao J.H., 2015, MANAGE WORLD, P137; Xu L., 2017, JIANGSU BUS THEOR, P74; Xu X., 2020, REF, V2020, P19; Xu XL, 2020, ENERGY REP, V6, P2667, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.011; Yamao S, 2009, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V48, P531, DOI 10.1002/hrm.20297; Yang H.J., 2016, RES RELATIONSHIP LEA, P152; Yang JW, 2021, STRESS, V24, P1016, DOI 10.1080/10253890.2021.1992380; Yao X., 2022, CARBON TRADING MECH; Ye J.F., 2020, J EC MANAG, P17; Ye Y.P., 2017, LIB INFORM SERVICE, P102; Yin S, 2020, J IND INF INTEGR, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.jii.2020.100157; Yin S, 2020, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V23, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.003; Yoo YJ, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P724, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322; You D.M., 2020, REFORMATION, P122; Yu C.P., 2020, MANAGE WORLD WASTE, P146; Yu C.P., 2020, PROFESSIONAL KNOWLED, P146; Yu F., 2021, SCI TECHNOL MANAG, P203; Yu F.F., 2022, RES TECHNOLOGICAL IN, P11; Yu H.J., 2017, J NINGBO VOCAT TECH, P105; Yuan Y.J.., 2019, STUD SCI SCI, V10, P1902; Zhang C, 2018, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P320, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2018.8500622; Zhang J., 2019, CHINA POPUL RES ENV, P168; Zhang SL, 2021, ENERG ECON, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105412; Zhang X., 2017, NANKAI MANAG REV, P144; Zhao X.Y.., 2021, HUM RES DEV, V21, P18; Zhong X., 2021, IOP C SERIES EARTH E, V647; Zhou H.H., 2021, RES IMPACT DIGITAL T, P33; Zhou J., ADV ENG INFORM, V52; Zhou J, 2018, ENGINEERING-PRC, V4, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002; Zhou W.Q., SOFT SCI, P55; Zhou Y., 2022, TECH EC, P61; Zhu H.C., 2022, RES CARBON EMISSION, P59; Zhu JW, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V331, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129890; Zhu Z.., 2011, NANKAI; Zouari G., 2021, J INNOVAT ENTREPRENE, V10, P1	214	5	5	14	14	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	AUG 20	2022	363								132608	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132608	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132608			24	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	2T8HP					2022-09-08	WOS:000822709400003
J	Sezer, AA; Fredriksson, A				Sezer, Ahmet Anil; Fredriksson, Anna			Environmental impact of construction transport and the effects of building certification schemes	RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING			English	Article						Certification schemes; CLS; Construction logistics; Construction transport; Emissions; SDGs	LOGISTICS; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM	The construction industry is associated with low productivity growth rates and environmental harm and, has a crucial role to play to reach the SDGs adopted by the UN in 2015. Construction logistics offer useful solutions to improve both the productivity and sustainability of the industry. The purpose of this paper is to investigate, in detail, the environmental impact of construction transport and whether the building certification scheme for a construction project has any influence on its transport arrangements. The analysis in this paper is based on a multiple case study of 40 Swedish projects. The results show that construction projects with better environmental ratings generated less emissions from construction transport. However, among the ten projects with highest transport/m(2), five were certified. Construction logistics solutions (CLSs) such as terminals and checkpoints are useful in reducing the number of transports, and thereby reducing emissions. But the usefulness of a CLS is influenced by gross floor area and type of project, as well as the phase which the solution is implemented in. This study contributes to a better understanding of construction transport patterns and reducing environmental harm of these transports. The results of this paper are beneficial for construction site managers, logistics consultants and transport companies, helping them to implement CLSs in a more useful way, depending on the phase and type of project.	[Sezer, Ahmet Anil; Fredriksson, Anna] Linkoping Univ, Dept Sci & Technol, SE-60174 Norrkoping, Sweden		Sezer, AA (corresponding author), Linkoping Univ, Dept Sci & Technol, SE-60174 Norrkoping, Sweden.	ahmet.sezer@liu.se; anna.fredriksson@liu.se	Sezer, Ahmet Anıl/V-1204-2017	Sezer, Ahmet Anıl/0000-0003-4615-709X; Fredriksson, Anna/0000-0001-7494-8134				Ade R, 2020, BUILD RES INF, V48, P1, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2019.1627179; Backstrand J., 2020, P ECOC, P1; Behera P, 2015, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V26, P1332, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1045953; Bergman F, 2016, BYGGLOGISTIKCENTER N; BRE Global, 2016, BREEAM NEW CONSTR TE; Bughin J., 2017, REINVENTING CONSTRUC; Eras JJC, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V47, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.026; Chang B, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.04.004; Cheng JCP, 2010, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V19, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.003; Dalenstam M, 2015, REPORT WSP SVERIGE; Dubois A., 2000, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V6, P207, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00016-2; Eisenhardt KM, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P25, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888; Ekeskar A, 2016, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V34, P174, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2016.1186809; Fredriksson A., 2018, CIVIC PROJECT SMART; Fufa S.M., 2019, IOP C SERIES EARTH E; Ghanem M., 2018, P 26 ANN C INT GROUP, P992, DOI 10.24928/2018/0540; Goshu YY, 2017, INT J BUS PERFORM MA, V18, P381, DOI 10.1504/IJBPM.2017.087103; Guerlain C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11216118; Hamzeh F.R., 2007, 15 ANN C INT GROUP L; Janne M., 2020, THESIS THESIS; Janne M, 2019, 31 ANN NOFOMA C 12 1 31 ANN NOFOMA C 12 1; Janne M, 2018, 30 NOFOMA C U SO DEN 30 NOFOMA C U SO DEN, P13; Janne M, 2019, CONSTR INNOV-ENGL, V19, P89, DOI 10.1108/CI-03-2018-0024; Josephson Per-Erik, 2007, WASTE CONSTRUCTION P; Karrbom T, 2012, J INF TECHNOL CONSTR, V17, P520; Ko HS, 2016, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V63, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.011; Kooragamage R, 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM, P205; Kurdve M, 2019, EUROMA SUST FOR GOTH EUROMA SUST FOR GOTH; L?fgren, 2010, EFFEKTIVA BYGGTRANSP; Lacoste S, 2015, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V21, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.006; Linden S, 2013, J ENG DES TECHNOL, V11, P90, DOI 10.1108/17260531311309152; Lundesjo Greger, 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG; Martinsuo M, 2018, INT J PROJ MANAG, V36, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.018; McKinnon A., 2018, DECARBONIZING LOGIST; Pearce A.R., 2017, SUSTAINABLE BUILDING, DOI [10.1080/01446193.2013.770893, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2013.770893]; Pipino Leo L, 2002, COMMUN ACM, V45, P211, DOI DOI 10.1145/505248.506010; Sandanayake M, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V95, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.002; Scholman H.S.A., 1997, SUBCONTRACTING MAIN; Segerstedt A, 2010, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V15, P347, DOI 10.1108/13598541011068260; Seo MS, 2016, ENERGIES, V9, DOI 10.3390/en9080599; Sezer A.A, 2020, IOP C SERIES EARTH E; SGBC, 2020, MILJ MILJ; Sundquist V, 2018, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V36, P49, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2017.1356931; Sveriges Byggindustrier, 2019, BOSTADER; Thunberg M, 2016, THESIS THESIS; Thunberg M, 2018, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V36, P425, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2017.1394579; Tischer A, 2014, PROC INST CIV ENG-WA, V167, P82, DOI 10.1680/warm.13.00025; Transport for London, 2013, CONSTR LOG PLAN GUID CONSTR LOG PLAN GUID; USGBC, 2020, LEED BUILD DES CONST LEED BUILD DES CONST; Voordijk H, 2000, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V20, P823, DOI 10.1108/01443570010330793; Vrijhoef Ruben., 2000, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V6, P169; Wang R. Y., 1996, Journal of Management Information Systems, V12, P5; Wells P, 2017, BRIT J MANAGE, V28, P45, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12201; Westlund P., 2014, KLIMATPAVERKAN FRAN; Woodcock M., 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM, P35; Yin R.K.., 2011, CASE STUDY RES APPL; Ying F, 2014, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V21, P261, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-06-2013-0058	57	4	4	1	2	ELSEVIER	AMSTERDAM	RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS	0921-3449	1879-0658		RESOUR CONSERV RECY	Resour. Conserv. Recycl.	SEP	2021	172								105688	10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105688	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105688		JUN 2021	9	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	TF4PL		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000670700700026
J	Rampasso, IS; Anholon, R; Silva, D; Ordonez, REC; Santa-Eulalia, LA; Quelhas, OLG; Filho, WL; Aguirre, LFG				Rampasso, I. S.; Anholon, R.; Silva, D.; Cooper Ordonez, R. E.; Santa-Eulalia, L. A.; Quelhas, O. L. G.; Filho, W. Leal; Granada Aguirre, L. F.			Analysis of the perception of engineering students regarding sustainability	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Engineering education; Sustainability; SDG; PLS-SEM	CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; HIGHER-EDUCATION; GREEN; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT	This research aims to evaluate the engineering students' perception regarding sustainability. For this, a survey was developed based on sustainability parameters from a detailed analysis of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (BICG). The parameters were initially divided into seven groups: Financial and Productivity Aspects (FPA); Concern With Employees (CWE); Support for Local Communities (SLC); Ethical and Corporate Governance Issues (ECI); Environmental Aspects (ENA); Sustainable Aspects in the Operations Network (SON); Customers, Development of New Products and Services (CPS). The survey was conducted with engineering undergraduate students from two Brazilian universities. The data were analyzed through structural equation modeling technique, namely the PLS-SEM algorithm. The collected 162 answers enabled the validation of the model tested, and showed that the students, in general, do not consider SLC and CWE when they are analyzing sustainability. Additionally, the most important construct was the CPS. This is an exploratory study and we believe that these findings may contribute to expand the debate about the sustainability insertion in engineering courses, helping educators in their didactic activities. There were not found similar studies in the literature, which highlight the originality of the research. The statistical validation of the results and the contribution to expand the debate regarding sustainability in engineering education justify the value of this study. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Rampasso, I. S.; Anholon, R.; Silva, D.; Cooper Ordonez, R. E.] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Mech Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil; [Santa-Eulalia, L. A.] Univ Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; [Quelhas, O. L. G.] Fed Fluminense Univ, Lab Technol Business & Environm Management, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil; [Filho, W. Leal] Hamburg Univ Appl Sci, Fac Life Sci, Hamburg, Germany; [Granada Aguirre, L. F.] Univ Libre, Posgrad Salud Publ, Cali, Colombia		Rampasso, IS (corresponding author), Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Mech Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil.	izarampasso@gmail.com; rosley@fem.unicamp.br; dirceuds@gmail.com; cooper@fem.unicamp.br; l.santa-eulalia@usherbrooke.ca; osvaldoquelhas@id.uff.br; walter.leal2@haw-hamburg.de; luisf.granadaa@unilibre.edu.co	Leal, Walter/ACX-9082-2022; Leal, Walter/AAU-6997-2021; Rampasso, Izabela Simon/H-1755-2018; Anholon, Rosley/C-3650-2018	Leal, Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225; Leal, Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225; Rampasso, Izabela Simon/0000-0003-1633-6628; Anholon, Rosley/0000-0003-3163-6119	Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [307536/2018-1, 305442/2018-0, 311530/2018-4]	Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ))	Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) Grants: 307536/2018-1; 305442/2018-0; 311530/2018-4.	Ashford N. A., 2004, INT J SUSTAINABILITY, V5, P239, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14676370410546394, 10.1108/14676370410546394]; Balsiger J, 2015, FUTURES, V65, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.005; BICG, 2007, SER CORP GOV PAP; Bjornberg KE, 2015, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V16, P639, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2014-0010; Campos R.T.O., 2010, ESTUDOS PESQUISAS PS, V10, P221, DOI [10.12957/epp.2010.9029, DOI 10.12957/EPP.2010.9029]; Chekima B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1438, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.086; Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL SOCI, V2nd Edn; Dagiliute R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.213; Diaz-Ruiz R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1140, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.148; Filho WL, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017; Fiorini M, 2018, WORLD DEV, V112, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.015; Gallardo-Vazquez D, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V72, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.051; Gray D.E., 2017, DOING RES BUSINESS W; GRI, 2018, CONS SET GRI SUST RE; Guerra A, 2017, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V18, P436, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0022; Hair J.F., 2014, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; Hanning A, 2012, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V13, P305, DOI 10.1108/14676371211242607; Harring JR, 2015, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V75, P721, DOI 10.1177/0013164414565007; Holgaard JE, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P3479, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.063; Hollos D, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P2968, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.582184; Hwang GH, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.023; Iyer-Raniga U, 2016, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V17, P105, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-09-2014-0121; Kuei CH, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V95, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.030; Kumar V, 2005, J MANUF SYST, V24, P215, DOI 10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80011-7; Laguir I, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V107, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.059; Lamb EG, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P2434, DOI 10.1890/13-1997.1; Marques VD, 2018, BRAZ J OPER PROD MAN, V15, P595, DOI 10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n4.a13; McCormick M, 2015, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V16, P136, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0054; Nejati M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.213; Opoku A, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V141, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011; Pinheiro JQ, 2013, PSICO PORTO ALEGRE, V44, P184; Ramanujan D, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.191; Rampasso IS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V193, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.079; Rampasso IS, 2019, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V20, P229, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2018-0048; Rehman MA, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V137, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.106; Ringle CM, 2014, REV BRASIL MARK, V13, P54, DOI 10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717; Rosati F, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107; Moreira ACS, 2018, BRAZ J OPER PROD MAN, V15, P137, DOI 10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n1.a12; Saunila M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.211; Segalas J, 2012, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V13, P293, DOI 10.1108/14676371211242599; Sharma B, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P4032, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.046; Srivastava A, 2018, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V69, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.001; Tejedor G, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085; Thurer M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V181, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.130; United Nations, 2018, GLOB IND FRAM SUST D; von Blottnitz H, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.063; WCED, 1987, REPORT; Yuan XL, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V48, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.041	48	15	15	4	35	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	OCT 1	2019	233						461	467		10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.105	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.105			7	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	IN9VC		Green Accepted			2022-09-08	WOS:000479025500036
J	Abad-Segura, E; Gonzalez-Zamar, MD				Abad-Segura, Emilio; Gonzalez-Zamar, Mariana-Daniela			Sustainable economic development in higher education institutions: A global analysis within the SDGs framework	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Sustainable development; Economic sustainability; Economic growth; Higher education institution; SDGs	RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; INDICATORS; SCIENCE; WEB; UNIVERSITIES; ENGAGEMENT; CURRICULUM; PEDAGOGY; QUALITY	Universities must focus their efforts on being economically competitive without harming the chances of being sustainable. The study of sustainable economic development (SED) of higher education institutions (HEIs) has experienced growth in last years. The objective of this study is to explore the global evolution of scientific production and research trends related to SED in HEIs in 1990e2018 period. For this purpose, a theoretical and conceptual framework was carried out, together with a bibliometric analysis of a sample of 1689 articles. Results of the scientific productivity of the journals, authors, research in-stitutions, and countries that contribute to this topic have been obtained. Most of the articles have been divulged by Journal of Industrial Ecology and Journal of Cleaner Production, whereas the countries with the most articles produced are the United States, China, and the United Kingdom. The main lines of research developed during this period have been detected: sustainable development, environmental impact, economy, education and recycling. The future lines of research are in establishing indicators that allow managers of academic institutions a protocol to assess the economic dimension of sustainability. This study offers different analysis and evaluation perspectives for HEIs according to the SED, so that the actions are applied and valued positively in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions in the context of the SDGs. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.	[Abad-Segura, Emilio] Univ Almeria, Dept Econ & Business, Almeria 04120, Spain; [Gonzalez-Zamar, Mariana-Daniela] Univ Almeria, Dept Educ, Almeria 04120, Spain		Abad-Segura, E (corresponding author), Univ Almeria, Dept Econ & Business, Almeria 04120, Spain.	eas297@ual.es; mgz857@ual.es	ABAD-SEGURA, EMILIO/I-6129-2018; González-Zamar, Mariana-Daniela/AAV-8119-2020	ABAD-SEGURA, EMILIO/0000-0001-8624-103X; González-Zamar, Mariana-Daniela/0000-0003-1187-8970				Abad-Segura E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12052107; Abad-Segura E, 2019, EDUC SCI, V9, DOI 10.3390/educsci9030238; Adriaanse LS, 2013, ELECTRON LIBR, V31, P727, DOI 10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174; Ahmad J, 2012, SOC RESPONSIB J, V8, P77, DOI 10.1108/17471111211196584; Aktas CB, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.037; Albareda-Tiana S, 2018, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V19, P473, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-05-2017-0069; Albarillo F., 2014, BEHAV SOCIAL SCI LIB, DOI [10.1080/ 01639269.2014.904693, DOI 10.1080/01639269.2014.904693]; Aleixo AM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P1664, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.010; Alghamdi N, 2017, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V18, P84, DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2015-0071; Annan-Diab F, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006; [Anonymous], 2019, EDIE; [Anonymous], 2020, WASH POST; [Anonymous], 2015, TRANSFORMING OUR WOR; [Anonymous], 2020, CNN; [Anonymous], 2017, UWF UMW WIRTSCH FORU, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00550-017-0449-4; [Anonymous], 2019, MAGAZINE HARVARD; [Anonymous], 2020, INEWS; [Anonymous], 2020, STUD PUSH U STOP INV; [Anonymous], 2008, HIGH ED EUR, DOI DOI 10.1080/03797720802253686; Arora NK, 2018, ENV SUSTAINABILITY, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S42398-018-0013-3; Arruda ND, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.010; Austria, 2018, OECD Q INT TRADE STA, P24, DOI [10.1787/int_trade-v2018-1-4-en, DOI 10.1787/INT_TRADE-V2018-1-4-EN]; Axelsson R., 2011, SUSTAINABLE DEV SUST, V4, P5, DOI 10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1; Azzali S, 2018, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V6, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.010; Bamberger M., 1990, EDI SEMINAR SERIES, P107, DOI [10.1596/0-8213-1614-1, DOI 10.1596/0-8213-1614-1]; BARBIER EB, 1987, ENVIRON CONSERV, V14, P101, DOI 10.1017/S0376892900011449; Barth M., 2007, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V8, P416, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14676370710823582, 10.1108/1467637071082358]; Beddewela E, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.013; Bringezu S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080778; BRINKERHOFF DW, 1992, WORLD DEV, V20, P369, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90030-Y; Brueckner M, 2018, J ECON GROWTH, V23, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10887-018-9156-4; Caniglia G, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.207; Cebrian G, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.010; Chadegani A.A., 2013, ASIAN SOCIAL SCI, V9, P18, DOI [10.5539/ass.v9n5p18, DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N5P18]; Charfeddine L, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V76, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031; Chen CM, 2010, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V61, P1386, DOI 10.1002/asi.21309; Cicmil S, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.002; Clauset A, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111; Cobbinah PB, 2015, ENVIRON DEV, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.001; Cole R, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V210, P1622, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.135; Cottafava D, 2019, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V10, P521, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0152; COURTIAL JP, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS, V31, P173, DOI 10.1007/BF02018559; Cronin B, 2001, J INF SCI, V27, P1, DOI 10.1177/016555150102700101; Cronin B, 2006, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V57, P1275, DOI 10.1002/asi.20354; Cullen JG, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V145, P429, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2838-3; Currie G, 2010, BRIT J MANAGE, V21, ps1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00677.x; DISINGER JF, 1990, J ENVIRON EDUC, V21, P3, DOI DOI 10.1080/00958964.1990.9941931; Dlouha J, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.096; Elken M, 2018, QUAL HIGH EDUC, V24, P189, DOI 10.1080/13538322.2018.1554782; Emas R, 2015, BRIEF GSDR 2015, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.34980.22404; European Commission, 1992, 5 EUR COMM ENV PROGR; Faham E, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V123, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.023; Feldman M, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P5, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614653; Fien J., 1995, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V1, DOI [10.1080/1350462950010102, DOI 10.1080/1350462950010102]; Figueiro PS, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118; Filho WL, 2018, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V25, P713, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2018.1461707; Fischer-Kowalski M, 2011, J IND ECOL, V15, P855, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x; Franceschini S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V127, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.142; Franco I, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P1621, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0628-4; Giddings B, 2002, SUSTAIN DEV, V10, P187, DOI 10.1002/sd.199; Glavic P, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1875, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006; Gong Y, 2018, ASIA-PAC EDUC RES, V27, P277, DOI 10.1007/s40299-018-0385-2; Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a; GROSSMAN GM, 1995, Q J ECON, V110, P353, DOI 10.2307/2118443; Gupta J, 2016, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V16, P433, DOI 10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z; Gylfason T, 2001, EUR ECON REV, V45, P847, DOI 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00127-1; Hacking T, 2008, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V28, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002; Haglund L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11123255; Hanushek EA, 2016, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V32, P538, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grw025; Hassan SU, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V99, P549, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1193-3; Hausmann R, 2003, J DEV ECON, V72, P603, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X; Hoveskog M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P4383, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.112; Imran S, 2014, SUSTAIN DEV, V22, P134, DOI 10.1002/sd.537; Jain P, 2013, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V20, P116, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2013.766910; Kalsoom Q, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P1301, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.047; Kantola J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, pS1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.091; Keane J, 1999, REG STUD, V33, P896; Klavans R, 2017, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V68, P984, DOI 10.1002/asi.23734; Konur O, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V47, P1363, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.827; Kouatli I, 2019, SOC RESPONSIB J, V15, P888, DOI 10.1108/SRJ-10-2017-0210; Krausmann F, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P647, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726; Le Blanc D, 2015, SUSTAIN DEV, V23, P176, DOI 10.1002/sd.1582; Leal W, 2018, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V25, P131, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103; LELE SM, 1991, WORLD DEV, V19, P607, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P; Li Q, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9030384; Li ZL, 2020, J GEOVIS SPAT ANAL, V4, DOI 10.1007/s41651-019-0046-x; Lozano R, 2018, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V27, P1159, DOI 10.1002/bse.2059; Lozano R, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.031; Lu CH, 2018, ECON MODEL, V68, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.08.013; Luque-Martinez T, 2020, STUD HIGH EDUC, V45, P819, DOI 10.1080/03075079.2018.1564260; MACNEILL J, 1989, SCI AM, V261, P154, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-154; Marginson S, 2016, J HIGH EDUC-UK, V87, P243, DOI 10.1353/jhe.2016.0007; Moldan B., 2004, OECD STAT KNOWLEDGE, V1, P1; Mongeon P, 2016, SCIENTOMETRICS, V106, P213, DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5; Murray A, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V140, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2; Newman MEJ, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI [10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131, 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113]; Nowotny J, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2541, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.060; OECD, 2018, OECD J BUDGETING, V18, DOI [10.1787/budget-18-5j8l804wg0kf., DOI 10.1787/BUDGET-18-5J8L804WG0KF]; Ojala M, 2017, FUTURES, V94, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2016.10.004; Orr D.W., 1995, CHANGE MAGAZINE, V27, P43, DOI [10.1080/00091383.1995.10544663, DOI 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544663]; Panayotou T., 2016, EC GROWTH ENV, P140; Paskin N, 2010, ENCY LIB INFORM SCI, V3, P1586; Pinar M, 2019, EDUC ECON, V27, P75, DOI 10.1080/09645292.2018.1512560; Qasim M, 2017, J ECON SURV, V31, P1035, DOI 10.1111/joes.12183; Ramos TB, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V106, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.088; RANIS G, 1961, AM ECON REV, V51, P533; Redclift M, 1996, AGROECOLOGIA DESARRO, V10, P48; Rieckmann M, 2012, FUTURES, V44, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005; Robert K.H., 2000, J CLEAN PROD, V8, P243, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00011-1; Rosen M.A., 2019, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RE, V4, DOI [10.29333/ejosdr/6429, DOI 10.29333/EJOSDR/6429]; Sachs JD, 2017, SCIENCE, V356, P32, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9380; Sahlberg P, 2010, EUR J EDUC, V45, P280, DOI 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01429.x; Schandl H, 2018, J IND ECOL, V22, P827, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12626; SCHANK C, 2019, J ED SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P67, DOI DOI 10.1177/0973408219844849; Silvestre BS, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V208, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244; Sonetti G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010254; Sonetti G, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8010083; Stafford-Smith Mark, 2017, Sustain Sci, V12, P911, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3; Staniskis JK, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V120, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.086; Storey M, 2017, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V15, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.009; Strachan G., 2018, DISCOURSE COMMUN, V9, P36, DOI [10.2478/dcse-2018-0003, DOI 10.2478/DCSE-2018-0003]; Strezov V, 2017, SUSTAIN DEV, V25, P242, DOI 10.1002/sd.1649; Svanstrom M., 2008, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V9, P339, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14676370810885925, 10.1108/14676370810885925]; Tanaka Y., 2012, J ED SUSTAIN DEV, V6, P63, DOI [10.1177/097340821100600113, DOI 10.1177/097340821100600113]; The Guardian, 2022, GUARDIAN 0417; van Eck NJ, 2017, SCIENTOMETRICS, V111, P1053, DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7; van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3; Van Raan AFJ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V62, P133, DOI 10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6; Veer D.K., 2017, INT J SCI RES COMPUT, V2, P779; Waltman L, 2012, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V63, P2378, DOI 10.1002/asi.22748; Waltman L, 2010, J INFORMETR, V4, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002; WCED, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE; Whalley WB, 2019, QUAL HIGH EDUC, V25, P340, DOI 10.1080/13538322.2019.1684041; Wiek A, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6; Yan EJ, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P499, DOI 10.1007/s11192-011-0531-6; Zaman K, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V74, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072; Zancanaro A, 2015, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V16, P1; Zhang N, 2018, SCIENTOMETRICS, V116, P1039, DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2786-7; Zyoud SH, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-667	139	28	28	8	44	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	APR 20	2021	294								126133	10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126133	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126133		FEB 2021	20	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	RH3QH					2022-09-08	WOS:000636137100004
J	Khan, MTI; Anwar, S; Sarkodie, SA; Yaseen, MR; Nadeem, AM; Ali, Q				Khan, Muhammad Tariq Iqbal; Anwar, Sofia; Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu; Yaseen, Muhammad Rizwan; Nadeem, Abdul Majeed; Ali, Qamar			Comprehensive disaster resilience index: Pathway towards risk-informed sustainable development	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION			English	Article						Climatechange; Foodsecurity; Naturaldisasters; Principalcomponentanalysis; Resilience; Sustainabledevelopment	CLIMATE-CHANGE VULNERABILITY; NATURAL DISASTERS; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; MANAGEMENT; HAZARDS; INSTITUTIONS; SANITATION; WATER; NEXUS	The occurrence of natural hazards on the earth is as universal as this universe. Though difficult to avoid or control, however, increasing resilience remains a crucial coping mechanism for disasters. This study focuses on the first target (SDG-13.1) of "Climate Action" which entails strengthening country-specific resilience and adaptive capacity towards natural disasters. Thus, we develop a novel comprehensive disaster resilience index that captures economic stability, emergency workforce, agricultural development, human capital, digitalization, infrastructure, governance, social capital, and women empowerment. We apply IMF index-making methodology using panel data of 62 indicators from 1995 to 2019 across 24 developed and 67 developing countries. Resilience index was higher in high-income countries (0.674) followed by upper-middle (0.463), lower-middle (0.372), and low (0.314) income economies. The top 5 countries with high resilience scores include Switzerland (0.789), Germany (0.777), France (0.751), New Zealand (0.749), and Australia (0.733). Disaster resilience score in 2019 was (a) greater than 0.7 for 9 countries, (b) between 0.5 and 0.7 for 31 countries, (c) between 0.3 and 0.5 for 44 countries, and (d) less than 0.3 for 7 countries. Our study recommends improvement in disaster resilience through risk-informed strategies (i.e., rescue and medical care services, early warning systems, training, and the latest technologies). It is recommended for low resilience countries to (a) increase the health budget and upgrade hospitals, (b) ensure economic stability and food security through agricultural growth and financial development, (c) enhance social and human capital, (d) introduce institutional reforms, and (e) empower women. Thus, improving resilience for preparedness, restoration, and loss minimization underpin the pathway towards riskinformed sustainable development.	[Khan, Muhammad Tariq Iqbal; Anwar, Sofia; Yaseen, Muhammad Rizwan; Nadeem, Abdul Majeed] Govt Coll Univ, Dept Econ, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; [Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu] Nord Univ Business Sch HHN, Post Box 1490, N-8049 Bodo, Norway; [Ali, Qamar] Virtual Univ Pakistan, Dept Econ, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan		Khan, MTI (corresponding author), Govt Coll Univ, Dept Econ, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.	tariqiqbal88@yahoo.com; sofia_eco@gcuf.edu.pk; asumadusarkodiesamuel@yahoo.com; rizwany2001@yahoo.com; majeednadeem@gcuf.edu.pk; qamarali2402@gmail.com	Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu/I-3854-2015; Khan, Muhammad Tariq Iqbal/L-1473-2018	Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu/0000-0001-5035-5983; Khan, Muhammad Tariq Iqbal/0000-0001-8557-3390				Aghapour AH, 2019, J BUILD ENG, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100853; Al Rifat SA, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9080469; Al-Maruf, 2017, THESIS U COLOGNE GER; Alam K., 2017, HDB DISASTER RISK RE, P697, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789813207950_0029; Albuquerque PH, 2019, RES INT BUS FINANC, V50, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.001; Ali Q, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102365; Ameli Mariam, 2022, Gondwana Res, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.014; [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9; [Anonymous], NOTR DAM GLOB AD IN; Anuradha JMPN, 2021, GLOB SOC WELFARE, V8, P81, DOI 10.1007/s40609-018-00137-w; Ashmawy IKIM, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P7996, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00894-9; Balaei B, 2021, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100961; Becerra O, 2014, REV DEV ECON, V18, P445, DOI 10.1111/rode.12095; Benali N, 2019, J KNOWL ECON, V10, P695, DOI 10.1007/s13132-017-0484-y; Boon HJ, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P381, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0021-4; Briguglio L., 2008, 200855 UN U WORLD I; Bronfenbrenner U., 1992, 6 THEORIES CHILD DEV, P187; Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV EX; Bronfenbrenner U, 2004, MAKING HUMAN BEINGS; Chen C., 2015, U NOTRE DAME GLOBAL; Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514; Coban S, 2013, ENERG ECON, V39, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.04.001; Cui P, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.09.001; Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7; de Haen H, 2008, EUROCHOICES, V7, P26, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00108.x; de Haen H, 2007, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V37, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00233.x; Dogru T, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V72, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.010; Doni F., 2020, SDG13 CLIMATE ACTION, P21, DOI [10.1108/978-1-78756-915-720201006, DOI 10.1108/978-1-78756-915-720201006]; European Commission (EC), 2013, STUD CARR OUT COMM F; Fagbemi F., 2021, RES GLOB, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100047, DOI 10.1016/J.RESGLO.2021.100047]; Fallah-Aliabadi S, 2020, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-4915-2; Fang JC, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P1455, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3634-2; Feitelson E, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102913; Feldmeyer D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145734; Firdhous MFM, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P707, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.091; French EL, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001; Global State of Democracy (GSD), WORLD BANK; Goniewicz K, 2020, J CLIN MED, V9, DOI 10.3390/jcm9103328; Guo XS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102239; Gyawali S, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P626, DOI 10.1002/sd.2013; Hamidi AR, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101496; Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245; International Monetary Fund (IMF), INT MONETARY FUND; Ji TT, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102726; Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058; Johannessen A, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.002; Kim YK, 2018, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4789-3; Kinn MC, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P238, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00936-8; Kohlitz JP, 2017, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V7, P181, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.134; Kusumastuti RD, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007; Li XL, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P257, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0091-8; Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8; Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674; Swathi JM, 2017, INT J MED EDUC, V8, P414, DOI 10.5116/ijme.5a07.1e1b; Malik MB., 2017, QUAL MANAG J, V24, P37, DOI [10.1080/10686967.2017.11918499, DOI 10.1080/10686967.2017.11918499]; Mao WY, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.658528; Marasco S, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102778; Marin G, 2021, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101032; Marzi S, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0221585; Mavhura E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102152; Moghim S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.090; Moreno J, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V92, P205, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3204-4; Mulyasari F, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P2137, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0798-4; Munene MB, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.021; Naderpajouh Nader, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P306, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9704-7; OCHA, 2021, NO ETH HUM UPD SIT R; Oktari RS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101974; Opitz-Stapleton S., 2019, RISK INFORM DEV CRIS; Parsons M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102422; Parsons M, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005; Perera S, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P292, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2015-0046; PETAK WJ, 1985, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V45, P3, DOI 10.2307/3134992; Pingali P, 2005, DISASTERS, V29, pS5, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00282.x; Qadeer A, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103962; Ranjbari M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660; Ruszczyk HA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101763; Sarker MNI, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101769; Sarkodie SA, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V831, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945; Sarkodie SA, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P7951, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00956-y; Sarkodie SA, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P5005, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00801-2; Sawada Y, 2017, WORLD DEV, V94, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.035; Shah AA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.014; Sharma E, 2021, J INT DEV, V33, P594, DOI 10.1002/jid.3539; Shaw R, 2016, SUSTAINABLE DEV DISA, DOI [10.1007/978-4-431-55078-5_1, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55078-5_1]; Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9; Shim JH, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14153, DOI 10.3390/su71014153; Smith G., 2018, HDB DISASTER RES HDB, P595, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28, 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28]; Song YS, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030868; Story WT, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.027; Svirydzenka K., 2016, WP165 IMF STRAT POL; Tammar A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114668; Tanesab J.P., 2020, INT J DISASTER MANAG, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.24815/IJDM.V3I2.17621; Tarhan C, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V216, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.059; Tariq H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102358; The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), 2013, 1202 UNISDR CH; Tiernan A, 2019, POLICY DES PRACT, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240; Trinh TA, 2021, EC EFFECTS NATURAL D, P261, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-817465-4.00017-0, 10.1016/B978-0-12-817465-4.00017-0]; UNDP, 2020, HUM DEV DAT; UNDRR, 2019, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS; Wang L, 2022, BIG EARTH DATA, V6, P3, DOI 10.1080/20964471.2021.1901359; Wang Q, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V202, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111637; World Bank, 2021, WORLD BANK; World Development Indicators (WDI), WORLD BANK; Wu Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106088; Yoon DK, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P436, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142; Zaw TN, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.023; Zhang DY, 2020, ECON ANAL POLICY, V66, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2020.04.003	107	1	1	6	6	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0959-6526	1879-1786		J CLEAN PROD	J. Clean Prod.	SEP 15	2022	366								132937	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132937	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132937			14	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	3A4MK					2022-09-08	WOS:000827235700005
J	Islar, M; Brogaard, S; Lemberg-Pedersen, M				Islar, Mine; Brogaard, Sara; Lemberg-Pedersen, Martin			Feasibility of energy justice: Exploring national and local efforts for energy development in Nepal	ENERGY POLICY			English	Article						Nepal; Renewable energy; Community, grid; Energy justice: SDG	CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; ADAPTATION; INSIGHTS; ELECTRIFICATION; BARRIERS; RIGHTS	The energy justice framework serves as an important decision-making tool in order to understand how different principles of justice can inform energy systems and policies. The realization of the urgency of providing modern energy technology and services particularly to rural areas has prompted both the Nepalese government and development institutions to focus on community-run renewable energy facilities. It is argued that off-grid and micro-scale energy development offers an alternative path to fossil-fuel use and top-down resource management as they democratize the grid and increase marginalized communities' access to renewable energy, education and health care. However, Nepal's energy development is also heavily influenced by demands from the fast-growing economies of neighboring countries such as China and India. As a result, this article evaluates the Nepalese national energy policies by applying the key aspects of the energy justice framework and showing the feasibility constraints due to geopolitical and biophysical factors to the implementation of energy just policies in this developing country context. The empirical evidence is derived from interviews during a one-month fieldwork in the Lalitpur and Katmandu districts of Nepal, site-visits, discourse analysis of expert statements, government policies and newspaper articles as well literature review on peer-review articles.	[Islar, Mine; Brogaard, Sara] Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, POB 170, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden; [Lemberg-Pedersen, Martin] Aalborg Univ, Dept Culture & Global Studies, Frederikskaj 10,Bldg B,303A, DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark		Islar, M (corresponding author), Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, POB 170, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden.	mine.islar@lucsus.lu.se; sara.brogaard@lucsus.lu.se; lemberg@cgs.aau.dk			Swedish Research Council; FORMAS [211-2014-1600]	Swedish Research Council(Swedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission); FORMAS(Swedish Research Council Formas)	The authors would like to acknowledge Dipak Gyawali as well as our informants for their contributions. This research was supported by the Swedish Research Council, FORMAS [grant number 211-2014-1600] on Sustainable Energy: Exploring the sustainability of the community run hydropower development in Nepal.	AEPC, 2011, MAK REN EN MAINSTR S; [Anonymous], 2016, RUR EN POL; [Anonymous], 2016, KATHMANDU POST; [Anonymous], 2016, ASIAN TIMES     0324; [Anonymous], 2004, URBAN HOUSEHOLD ENER; Bhattacharyya SC, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.028; Cheng SK, 2014, APPL ENERG, V113, P1372, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.052; Chetri A. B., 2007, P UNF FUT NEP EC SOC; CISDL, 2002, WORLD SUMM SUST DEV; CREP, 2011, COMM RUR EL PROGR CR; Dowd AM, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.005; Eriksson M., 2009, IMPACT CLIMATE CHANG; Flyvbjerg Bent., 2011, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, P301; George A.L., 2005, CASE STUDIES THEORY; Gippner O, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P407, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9367-5; Government of Nepal, 2016, NAT DET CONTR; Gurung A, 2011, RENEW ENERG, V36, P3203, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.012; Hajer M.A., 2005, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V7, P175, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15239080500339646, 10.1080/15239080500339646]; Harnesk D., 2016, J ENV DEV; Herington MJ, 2016, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V21, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.025; Holdren JP, 2000, WORLD ENERGY ASSESSM, P61; Holtug N., 2006, EGALITARIANISM NEW A; Huseby R, 2010, J POLIT PHILOS, V18, P178, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00338.x; Islar M., 2016, INNOV EUR J SOC SCI, V29; Islar M, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P317, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.665858; Jamasb T., 2006, Utilities Policy, V14, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2004.11.001; Jenkins K, 2016, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V11, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004; Jones L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1262, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.002; Khanal S. K., 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P1407; Kollmuss A., 2002, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V8, P239, DOI [10.1080/13504620220145401, DOI 10.1080/13504620220145401]; KUKATHAS C, 2004, ETHICAL THEORY MORAL, V7, P215; Kumar P., 2015, NEPAL SCALING ELECT, V2; Laegaard S., 2008, ETHICAL THEORY MORAL, V9, P399; Manandhar S, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0137-1; McCauley D., 2013, INT ENERGY LAW REV, V32, P107; Miller CA, 2013, SCI CULT-UK, V22, P135, DOI 10.1080/09505431.2013.786989; Mitigation C. C., 2011, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT; MoF, 2011, EC SURV FISC YEAR 20; NCVST, 2009, VULN EYES VULN CLIM; NEA (Nepal Energy Authority), 2016, ANN EN REP; NEA (Nepal Energy Authority), 2014, LOAD FOR; Nepal R., 2011, CAMBRIDGE WORKING PA, V1124; Nepal R, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V40, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.062; Nightingale A, 2003, GEOFORUM, V34, P525, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(03)00026-5; Nightingale AJ, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004; OEC, 2015, OBS EC COMPL EXP IMP; Pandey R. C., 2009, Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment, V4, P36; Pearson PJG, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V50, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.061; Rana T., 2012, DEMOCRATIZING ELECT; Rawls J., 1999, LAW PEOPLES IDEA PUB; Reuters, 2015, NEP SEEKS CHIN SUPP; Ribot JC, 2003, RURAL SOCIOL, V68, P153, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x; Sapkota A, 2014, RENEW ENERG, V68, P793, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.003; Satre A., 2010, VILLAGES PLUG RURAL; SEN A, 1982, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V11, P3; Shrestha S, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V14, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.08.002; Sovacool B., 2013, JUSTICE GLOBAL ENERG; Sovacool BK, 2015, APPL ENERG, V142, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002; Sovacool BK, 2014, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003; Sovacool BK, 2014, NATURE, V511, P529, DOI 10.1038/511529a; Sovacool BK, 2012, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V16, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.006; Sovacool BK, 2011, ENERGY, V36, P3468, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.051; SOVACOOL BK, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1; Stirling A, 2014, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V1, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001; UNDESA, 2014, EL ED BEN BARR REC A; UNDP, 2007, EN POV NEP CHALL WAY; UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2016, SUST DEV GOALS; UNFCC, 2015, PAR AGR; United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), 2010, NEW EM TECHN REN EN; United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2013, REV DEV TRANSP AS PA; Walker G., 2012, ENV JUSTICE CONCEPTS; Wiens D, 2014, PHILOS QUART, V64, P301, DOI 10.1093/pq/pqt057; World Bank, 2015, COUNTR OV	73	51	51	1	17	ELSEVIER SCI LTD	OXFORD	THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND	0301-4215	1873-6777		ENERG POLICY	Energy Policy	JUN	2017	105						668	676		10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.004	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.004			9	Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)	Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology	ET8EY		Green Published, hybrid			2022-09-08	WOS:000400532900065
J	Shah, AH; Shahid, M; Tahir, M; Natasha, N; Bibi, I; Tariq, TZ; Khalid, S; Nadeem, M; Abbas, G; Saeed, MF; Ansar, S; Dumat, C				Shah, Ali Haider; Shahid, Muhammad; Tahir, Maria; Natasha, Natasha; Bibi, Irshad; Tariq, Tasveer Zahra; Khalid, Sana; Nadeem, Muhammad; Abbas, Ghulam; Saeed, Muhammad Farhan; Ansar, Sabah; Dumat, Camille			Risk assessment of trace element accumulation in soil and Brassica oleracea after wastewater irrigation	ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH			English	Article; Early Access						Ecological risk; Sustainable developmental goals; Toxic elements; Untreated wastewater; Bioaccumulation; B; oleracea; Human health risk		The risk assessment of trace elements has received substantial attention for the achievement of UN Sustainable Developmental Goals (UN-SDGs). The present study aimed to evaluate health and ecological risks associated with trace element accumulation in Brassica oleracea under wastewater irrigations from three different areas. This study, for the first time, compared the pros and cons of mixed water crop irrigation (wastewater with fresh/groundwater). A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the buildup of eight trace elements (As, Cu, Cd, Mn, Fe, Pb, Ni and Zn) in soil and B. oleracea plants irrigated with wastewater alone and mixed with fresh/groundwater. Specific ecological [degree of contamination (C-d), potential ecological risk index (PERI), pollution load index (PLI), geo-accumulation index (I-geo)], phytoaccumulation [bioconcentration factor (BCF) and transfer factor (TF)] and health risk models [chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), cancer risk (CR)] were applied to assess the overall contamination of trace elements in the soil-plant-human system. Moreover, these indices were compared with the literature data. The concentration of Cd, Fe and Mn exceeded the threshold limits of 10, 500 and 200 mg kg(-1), respectively, for agricultural soil. Overall, all the irrigation waters caused significant pollution load in soil indicating high ecological risk (C-d > 24, PERI > 380, Igeo > 5, PLI > 2). Not all the mixing treatments caused a reduction in trace element buildup in soil. The mixing of wastewater-1 with either groundwater or freshwater increased trace element levels in the soil as well as risk indices compared to wastewater alone. The BCF and TF values were > 1, respectively, for 66% and 7% treatments. Trace element concentration in plants and associated health risk were minimized in mixed wastewater treatments. There were 22% and 32% reduction in HQ and CR when wastewater was mixed with freshwater and 29% and 8% when mixed with groundwater. Despite total reduction, a great variation in % change in risk indices was observed with respect to the area of wastewater collection. Therefore, mixed water irrigation may be a good management strategy, but its recommendation depends on soil properties and composition of waters used for mixing. Moreover, it is recommended that the freshwater and wastewater of the particular area may be continuously monitored to avoid potential associated health hazards.	[Shah, Ali Haider; Shahid, Muhammad; Natasha, Natasha; Khalid, Sana; Nadeem, Muhammad; Abbas, Ghulam; Saeed, Muhammad Farhan] COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Environm Sci, Vehari Campus, Vehari 61100, Pakistan; [Tahir, Maria] Sahiwal Med Coll, Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan; [Bibi, Irshad] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan; [Tariq, Tasveer Zahra] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Dept Bot, Subcampus, Vehari, Pakistan; [Ansar, Sabah] King Saud Univ, Dept Clin Lab Sci, Coll Appl Med Sci, POB 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia; [Dumat, Camille] Univ Toulouse Jean Jaure S, Ctr Etud & Rech Travail Org Pouvoir CERTOP, 5 Alle & Antonio Machado, F-31058 Toulouse, France; [Dumat, Camille] Univ Toulouse, INP ENSAT, Ave Agrobiopole, F-31326 Auzeville Tolosane, France		Shahid, M (corresponding author), COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Environm Sci, Vehari Campus, Vehari 61100, Pakistan.	muhammadshahid@ciitvehari.edu.pk			King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [20-4423/RD/HEC/14/980, RSP-2021/169]	King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia(King Saud University)	Dr. M Shahid thanks HEC-Pakistan for financing a project (20-4423/R&D/HEC/14/980). Authors thank the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/169), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for the financial support.	Al-Dhabi NA, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112115; Anwar H, 2021, CHEMOSPHERE, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129124; Ashraf I, 2021, SN APPL SCI, V3, DOI 10.1007/s42452-021-04547-y; Cosgrove WJ, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4823, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016869; Dumat C, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P20015, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04588-2; Graefe S, 2019, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V115, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10705-019-10018-z; Gul I, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117667; HAKANSON L, 1980, WATER RES, V14, P975, DOI 10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8; Iqbal Z, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P29567, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-09256-4; Kabata-Pendias A., 1992, Trace elements in soils and plants.; Khalid S, 2017, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V182, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021; Li QG, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V808, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152091; MDGs, 2015, MILLENNIUM DEV GOALS; Minhas PS, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V808, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152001; Natasha, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V772, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145266; Natasha, 2022, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V44, P487, DOI 10.1007/s10653-021-00818-0; Natasha, 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, DOI 10.1007/s10653-020-00702-3; Natasha, 2021, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH; Natasha N., SCI TOTAL ENVIRON; Natasha N, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V808, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152024; Natasha Shahid M., 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, P1; Parvanak K, 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V42, P4269, DOI 10.1007/s10653-020-00697-x; Parvez S, 2020, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V187, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109814; Sarwar T, 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V42, P4281, DOI 10.1007/s10653-019-00358-8; Shabbir Zunaira, 2020, Environ Geochem Health, DOI 10.1007/s10653-020-00782-1; Shabbir Z, 2020, CHEMOSPHERE, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127436; Shah AH, 2020, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V42, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10653-019-00306-6; Shahid M, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V407, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124881; Shahid M, 2020, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V50, P1984, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2019.1689061; Shahid M, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V242, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.083; Shahid M, 2014, REV ENVIRON CONTAM T, V232, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06746-9_1; Shahsavari AA, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V65, P231, DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1086-9; Tang B, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112174; United Nations, 2016, SUST DEV GOALS REP; Zhang X, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V828, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154552	35	0	0	0	0	SPRINGER	DORDRECHT	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS	0269-4042	1573-2983		ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH	Environ. Geochem. Health												10.1007/s10653-022-01351-4	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01351-4		AUG 2022	14	Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Water Resources	Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)	Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Water Resources	3Q8JZ	35948700				2022-09-08	WOS:000838471800003